Mapping Reducibility. Human-aware Robotics. 2017/11/16 Chapter 5.3 in Sipser Ø Announcement:
|
|
- Eugene McCormick
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Mapping Reducibility 2017/11/16 Chapter 5.3 in Sipser Ø Announcement: q Slides for this lecture are here: 1
2 Last time Reducibility q q Reducibility Using reducibility Ø Goals: o o Learn about the use of reducibility Learn to use reducibility to prove that a problem is unsolvable 2
3 Outline for today Reducibility q Selecting problem S q LBA Mapping reducibility q Formal definition of reducibility q Use mapping reducibility Ø Goals: o Learn a formal definition of reducibility o Learn to use mapping reducibility 3
4 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! S S s solver R s solver convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 4
5 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! <M, w> accept S s solver R s solver <M1, M2> reject? M accept w or not convert S to R 5
6 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! M accept w or not <M, w> S s solver <x> M1: accept R s solver <M1, M2> <x> M2: 1) if x!= w accept 2) otherwise M w convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 6
7 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! M accept w or not <M, w> S s solver <x> M1: accept R s solver <M1, M2> <x> M2: 1) if x!= w accept 2) otherwise M w convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 7
8 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! We can change S to be any unsolvable problem! S S s solver R s solver convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 8
9 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = E TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! M accept the empty language or not S s solver R s solver S convert S to R? Map the solution of R to a solution to S 9
10 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = E TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! M accept the empty language or not <M> S s solver <x> M1 <M, M1> R s solver M convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 10
11 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = E TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! M accept the empty language or not <M> S s solver <x> M1 <M, M1> reject R s solver M convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 11
12 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = E TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! A simpler solution! M accept the empty language or not <M> S s solver <x> M1 <M, M1> reject R s solver M convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 12
13 The EQ TM problem Let us use S = E TM q Assume that M R solves R = EQ TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! 13
14 Steps to use reducibility Using reducibility (S reduces to R) to prove unsolvability q q q q q q Select an unsolvable (undecidable problem) S (key) Assume R is solvable, solve S to derive a contradiction Check the input for R and S Think about how to use outputs for R to reason about outputs for S (key) Convert S input to R s input Convert R s output to S s output 14
15 Summary Decidable languages learned: A DFA, A NFA, G RE, E RE, EQ DFA, A CFG, E CFG Undecidable languages learned so far: A TM, HALT TM, E TM, REGULAR TM, EQ TM, ALL CFG (on the book) 15
16 Rice s theorem Consider A TM 16
17 Rice s theorem Consider A TM Proof in text book (5.28). You cannot use Rice s theorem in exams for proofs unless told to L 17
18 Outline for today Reducibility q Selecting problem S q LBA Mapping reducibility q Formal definition of reducibility q Use mapping reducibility Ø Goals: o Learn a formal definition of reducibility o Learn to use mapping reducibility 18
19 LBA Equivalent to a FA? 19
20 LBA Equivalent to a FA? NO! The tape size is dependent on the input 20
21 A LBA A LBA is decidable! 21
22 A LBA A LBA is decidable! Finite distinct configurations so we know when it loops! 22
23 A LBA A LBA is decidable! Finite distinct configurations so we know when it loops! q states, n is the tape size, g is tape alphabet size 23
24 The E LBA problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E LBA q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! S S s solver R s solver convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 24
25 The E LBA problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E LBA q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! <M, w> S s solver <B> R s solver convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 25
26 The E LBA problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E LBA q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! Why can t we do this? <M, w> S s solver <x> M1 1) x!= w reject 2) x == w M convert S to R <B> R s solver Map the solution of R to a solution to S 26
27 The E LBA problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E LBA q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! <x> <M, w> S s solver <x> B (LBA) accept only if x is a computation history of M accepting w convert S to R <B> R s solver Map the solution of R to a solution to S 27
28 The E LBA problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E LBA q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! That is the maximum tape size we need! <x> <M, w> S s solver <x> B (LBA) accept only if x is a computation history of M accepting w convert S to R <B> R s solver Map the solution of R to a solution to S The construction of this LBA is on the book 28
29 The E LBA problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E LBA q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! A similar proof shows that ALL CFG is undecidable (Theorem 5.13) 29
30 Outline for today Reducibility q Selecting problem S q LBA Mapping reducibility q Formal definition of reducibility q Use mapping reducibility Ø Goals: o Learn a formal definition of reducibility o Learn to use mapping reducibility 30
31 Mapping Reducibility M w f(w) 31
32 Mapping Reducibility The challenge of design f(s) lies in the bi-direction mapping 32
33 Mapping Reducibility Reduction we talked about: The challenge of design f(s) lies in the bi-direction mapping S S s solver R s solver convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S f(s): everything inside the red block (both steps) except for the switching between accept and reject in the end 33
34 Mapping Reducibility S is reduced to R (R is more difficult than S) q q If R is decidable, S is also decidable! If S is undecidable, R is also undecidable! 34
35 Outline for today Reducibility q Example for selecting your unsolvabe problem S q LBA Mapping reducibility q Formal definition of reducibility q Use mapping reducibility Ø Goals: o Learn about a formal definition of reducibility o Learn to use mapping reducibility 35
36 The halting problem is undecidable! Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = HALT TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! How do we combine the two parts? M accept w or not <M, w> S s solver <M, w> R s solver accept w M accept reject convert S to R reject Map the solution of R to a solution to S What is f(s)? 36
37 The halting problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = HALT TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! M accept w or not <M, w> S s solver <x> M <x> M <M, w> R s solver f(<m, w>) convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S What is M in the input <M, w> is not a proper TM? 37
38 The halting problem Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = HALT TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! M accept w or not <M, w> S s solver <x> M <x> M <M, w> R s solver f(<m, w>) convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S What is M in the input <M, w> is not a proper TM? Ø In general, when we describe a Turing machine that computes a reduction from A to B, improperly formed inputs are assumed to map to strings outside of B. 38
39 E TM Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! reduction from! M accept w or not <M, w> S s solver <x> M1 <M1> R s solver 1) x!= w reject 2) x == w M convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S 39
40 E TM Let us use S = A TM q Assume that M R solves R = E TM q Solve S using M R by constructing M S using M R q A contradiction since S is not solvable! reduction from! M accept w or not <M, w> S s solver <x> M1 <M1> R s solver 1) x!= w reject 2) x == w M convert S to R Map the solution of R to a solution to S reduction from A TM to E TM, in fact, does not exist (exercise 5.5)! 40
41 Mapping reducibility Interpreting the notation based on the problems difficulty levels ; easy to remember! To prove some problem B is not TM recognizable, we only need to show that 41
42 Mapping reducibility A TM apple m EG TM A TM apple m EG TM 42
43 Outline for today Reducibility q Example for selecting your unsolvabe problem S q LBA Mapping reducibility q Formal definition of reducibility q Use mapping reducibility Ø Goals: o Learn about a formal definition of reducibility o Learn to use mapping reducibility 43
Computability and Complexity
Computability and Complexity Lecture 5 Reductions Undecidable problems from language theory Linear bounded automata given by Jiri Srba Lecture 5 Computability and Complexity 1/14 Reduction Informal Definition
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION "Winter" 2018 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi18/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 4.2 Trace high-level descriptions of algorithms for computational problems. Use
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Spring 2018 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/sp18/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 5.1, 5.3 Define and explain core examples of computational problems, including
More informationReducability. Sipser, pages
Reducability Sipser, pages 187-214 Reduction Reduction encodes (transforms) one problem as a second problem. A solution to the second, can be transformed into a solution to the first. We expect both transformations
More informationDecidability. Human-aware Robotics. 2017/10/31 Chapter 4.1 in Sipser Ø Announcement:
Decidability 2017/10/31 Chapter 4.1 in Sipser Ø Announcement: q q q Slides for this lecture are here: http://www.public.asu.edu/~yzhan442/teaching/cse355/lectures/decidability.pdf Happy Hollaween! Delayed
More informationWhat languages are Turing-decidable? What languages are not Turing-decidable? Is there a language that isn t even Turingrecognizable?
} We ll now take a look at Turing Machines at a high level and consider what types of problems can be solved algorithmically and what types can t: What languages are Turing-decidable? What languages are
More informationNon-emptiness Testing for TMs
180 5. Reducibility The proof of unsolvability of the halting problem is an example of a reduction: a way of converting problem A to problem B in such a way that a solution to problem B can be used to
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Spring 2016 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/sp16/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 4.1, 5.1 Define reductions from one problem to another. Use reductions to prove
More informationLecture 12: Mapping Reductions
Lecture 12: Mapping Reductions October 18, 2016 CS 1010 Theory of Computation Topics Covered 1. The Language EQ T M 2. Mapping Reducibility 3. The Post Correspondence Problem 1 The Language EQ T M The
More informationComputation Histories
208 Computation Histories The computation history for a Turing machine on an input is simply the sequence of configurations that the machine goes through as it processes the input. An accepting computation
More informationCSCE 551: Chin-Tser Huang. University of South Carolina
CSCE 551: Theory of Computation Chin-Tser Huang huangct@cse.sc.edu University of South Carolina Computation History A computation history of a TM M is a sequence of its configurations C 1, C 2,, C l such
More informationLecture 23: Rice Theorem and Turing machine behavior properties 21 April 2009
CS 373: Theory of Computation Sariel Har-Peled and Madhusudan Parthasarathy Lecture 23: Rice Theorem and Turing machine behavior properties 21 April 2009 This lecture covers Rice s theorem, as well as
More informationFORMAL LANGUAGES, AUTOMATA AND COMPUTATION
FORMAL LANGUAGES, AUTOMATA AND COMPUTATION DECIDABILITY ( LECTURE 15) SLIDES FOR 15-453 SPRING 2011 1 / 34 TURING MACHINES-SYNOPSIS The most general model of computation Computations of a TM are described
More informationComputability Theory
CS:4330 Theory of Computation Spring 2018 Computability Theory Decidable Languages Haniel Barbosa Readings for this lecture Chapter 4 of [Sipser 1996], 3rd edition. Section 4.1. Decidable Languages We
More informationIntro to Theory of Computation
Intro to Theory of Computation LECTURE 14 Last time Turing Machine Variants Church-Turing Thesis Today Universal TM Decidable languages Designing deciders Sofya Raskhodnikova 3/1/2016 Sofya Raskhodnikova;
More informationDecidable Languages - relationship with other classes.
CSE2001, Fall 2006 1 Last time we saw some examples of decidable languages (or, solvable problems). Today we will start by looking at the relationship between the decidable languages, and the regular and
More informationproblem X reduces to Problem Y solving X would be easy, if we knew how to solve Y
CPS220 Reducibility A reduction is a procedure to convert one problem to another problem, in such a way that a solution to the second problem can be used to solve the first problem. The conversion itself
More informationCS5371 Theory of Computation. Lecture 14: Computability V (Prove by Reduction)
CS5371 Theory of Computation Lecture 14: Computability V (Prove by Reduction) Objectives This lecture shows more undecidable languages Our proof is not based on diagonalization Instead, we reduce the problem
More informationChap. 4,5 Review. Algorithms created in proofs from prior chapters
Chap. 4,5 Review Algorithms created in proofs from prior chapters (p. 55) Theorem 1.39: NFA to DFA (p. 67) Lemma 1.55: Regex to NFA (p. 69) Lemma 1.60: DFA to regex (through GNFA) (p. 112) Lemma 2.21:
More informationComputability and Complexity
Computability and Complexity Decidability, Undecidability and Reducibility; Codes, Algorithms and Languages CAS 705 Ryszard Janicki Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario,
More informationIntro to Theory of Computation
Intro to Theory of Computation LECTURE 15 Last time Decidable languages Designing deciders Today Designing deciders Undecidable languages Diagonalization Sofya Raskhodnikova 3/1/2016 Sofya Raskhodnikova;
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION "Winter" 2018 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi18/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Section 4.1 Explain what it means for a problem to be decidable. Justify the use
More informationACS2: Decidability Decidability
Decidability Bernhard Nebel and Christian Becker-Asano 1 Overview An investigation into the solvable/decidable Decidable languages The halting problem (undecidable) 2 Decidable problems? Acceptance problem
More informationCS154, Lecture 10: Rice s Theorem, Oracle Machines
CS154, Lecture 10: Rice s Theorem, Oracle Machines Moral: Analyzing Programs is Really, Really Hard But can we more easily tell when some program analysis problem is undecidable? Problem 1 Undecidable
More informationCS5371 Theory of Computation. Lecture 15: Computability VI (Post s Problem, Reducibility)
CS5371 Theory of Computation Lecture 15: Computability VI (Post s Problem, Reducibility) Objectives In this lecture, we introduce Post s correspondence problem (playing with a special type of domino) We
More informationCS5371 Theory of Computation. Lecture 12: Computability III (Decidable Languages relating to DFA, NFA, and CFG)
CS5371 Theory of Computation Lecture 12: Computability III (Decidable Languages relating to DFA, NFA, and CFG) Objectives Recall that decidable languages are languages that can be decided by TM (that means,
More informationComputational Models Lecture 9, Spring 2009
Slides modified by Benny Chor, based on original slides by Maurice Herlihy, Brown University. p. 1 Computational Models Lecture 9, Spring 2009 Reducibility among languages Mapping reductions More undecidable
More informationV Honors Theory of Computation
V22.0453-001 Honors Theory of Computation Problem Set 3 Solutions Problem 1 Solution: The class of languages recognized by these machines is the exactly the class of regular languages, thus this TM variant
More information1 Reducability. CSCC63 Worksheet Reducability. For your reference, A T M is defined to be the language { M, w M accepts w}. Theorem 5.
CSCC63 Worksheet Reducability For your reference, A T M is defined to be the language { M, w M accepts w}. 1 Reducability Theorem 5.1 HALT TM = { M, w M is a T M that halts on input w} is undecidable.
More informationCSCE 551: Chin-Tser Huang. University of South Carolina
CSCE 551: Theory of Computation Chin-Tser Huang huangct@cse.sc.edu University of South Carolina Church-Turing Thesis The definition of the algorithm came in the 1936 papers of Alonzo Church h and Alan
More informationCS 301. Lecture 18 Decidable languages. Stephen Checkoway. April 2, 2018
CS 301 Lecture 18 Decidable languages Stephen Checkoway April 2, 2018 1 / 26 Decidable language Recall, a language A is decidable if there is some TM M that 1 recognizes A (i.e., L(M) = A), and 2 halts
More informationCSCE 551 Final Exam, Spring 2004 Answer Key
CSCE 551 Final Exam, Spring 2004 Answer Key 1. (10 points) Using any method you like (including intuition), give the unique minimal DFA equivalent to the following NFA: 0 1 2 0 5 1 3 4 If your answer is
More informationDecidable and undecidable languages
The Chinese University of Hong Kong Fall 2011 CSCI 3130: Formal languages and automata theory Decidable and undecidable languages Andrej Bogdanov http://www.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/~andrejb/csc3130 Problems about
More informationComputational Models Lecture 8 1
Computational Models Lecture 8 1 Handout Mode Nachum Dershowitz & Yishay Mansour. Tel Aviv University. May 17 22, 2017 1 Based on frames by Benny Chor, Tel Aviv University, modifying frames by Maurice
More informationDecidability and Undecidability
Decidability and Undecidability Major Ideas from Last Time Every TM can be converted into a string representation of itself. The encoding of M is denoted M. The universal Turing machine U TM accepts an
More information} Some languages are Turing-decidable A Turing Machine will halt on all inputs (either accepting or rejecting). No infinite loops.
and their languages } Some languages are Turing-decidable A Turing Machine will halt on all inputs (either accepting or rejecting). No infinite loops. } Some languages are Turing-recognizable, but not
More information1 Showing Recognizability
CSCC63 Worksheet Recognizability and Decidability 1 1 Showing Recognizability 1.1 An Example - take 1 Let Σ be an alphabet. L = { M M is a T M and L(M) }, i.e., that M accepts some string from Σ. Prove
More informationLecture Notes: The Halting Problem; Reductions
Lecture Notes: The Halting Problem; Reductions COMS W3261 Columbia University 20 Mar 2012 1 Review Key point. Turing machines can be encoded as strings, and other Turing machines can read those strings
More informationHomework Assignment 6 Answers
Homework Assignment 6 Answers CSCI 2670 Introduction to Theory of Computing, Fall 2016 December 2, 2016 This homework assignment is about Turing machines, decidable languages, Turing recognizable languages,
More information6.045: Automata, Computability, and Complexity Or, Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring, Class 8 Nancy Lynch
6.045: Automata, Computability, and Complexity Or, Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring, 2010 Class 8 Nancy Lynch Today More undecidable problems: About Turing machines: Emptiness, etc. About
More information2017/08/29 Chapter 1.2 in Sipser Ø Announcement:
Nondeterministic Human-aware Finite Robo.cs Automata 2017/08/29 Chapter 1.2 in Sipser Ø Announcement: q Piazza registration: http://piazza.com/asu/fall2017/cse355 q First poll will be posted on Piazza
More informationIntroduction to Languages and Computation
Introduction to Languages and Computation George Voutsadakis 1 1 Mathematics and Computer Science Lake Superior State University LSSU Math 400 George Voutsadakis (LSSU) Languages and Computation July 2014
More information4.2 The Halting Problem
172 4.2 The Halting Problem The technique of diagonalization was discovered in 1873 by Georg Cantor who was concerned with the problem of measuring the sizes of infinite sets For finite sets we can simply
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Spring 2016 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/sp16/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 3.3, 4.1 State and use the Church-Turing thesis. Give examples of decidable problems.
More informationComputational Models Lecture 8 1
Computational Models Lecture 8 1 Handout Mode Ronitt Rubinfeld and Iftach Haitner. Tel Aviv University. May 11/13, 2015 1 Based on frames by Benny Chor, Tel Aviv University, modifying frames by Maurice
More informationDecidability (intro.)
CHAPTER 4 Decidability Contents Decidable Languages decidable problems concerning regular languages decidable problems concerning context-free languages The Halting Problem The diagonalization method The
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Fall 2016 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/fa16/cse105-abc/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 3 Trace the computation of a Turing machine using its transition function and configurations.
More informationTuring Machines Part III
Turing Machines Part III Announcements Problem Set 6 due now. Problem Set 7 out, due Monday, March 4. Play around with Turing machines, their powers, and their limits. Some problems require Wednesday's
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION. Spring 2018 review class
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Spring 2018 review class Today's learning goals Summarize key concepts, ideas, themes from CSE 105. Approach your final exam studying with confidence. Identify areas to focus
More informationComputability Theory
CS:4330 Theory of Computation Spring 2018 Computability Theory Decidable Problems of CFLs and beyond Haniel Barbosa Readings for this lecture Chapter 4 of [Sipser 1996], 3rd edition. Section 4.1. Decidable
More informationCSE 105 Theory of Computation
CSE 105 Theory of Computation http://www.jflap.org/jflaptmp/ Professor Jeanne Ferrante 1 Undecidability Today s Agenda Review and More Problems A Non-TR Language Reminders and announcements: HW 7 (Last!!)
More informationCOMP/MATH 300 Topics for Spring 2017 June 5, Review and Regular Languages
COMP/MATH 300 Topics for Spring 2017 June 5, 2017 Review and Regular Languages Exam I I. Introductory and review information from Chapter 0 II. Problems and Languages A. Computable problems can be expressed
More informationCSE355 SUMMER 2018 LECTURES TURING MACHINES AND (UN)DECIDABILITY
CSE355 SUMMER 2018 LECTURES TURING MACHINES AND (UN)DECIDABILITY RYAN DOUGHERTY If we want to talk about a program running on a real computer, consider the following: when a program reads an instruction,
More informationMidterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2018, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama
Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2018, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama Print family (or last) name: Print given (or first) name: I have read and understand
More information6.045J/18.400J: Automata, Computability and Complexity. Quiz 2. March 30, Please write your name in the upper corner of each page.
6.045J/18.400J: Automata, Computability and Complexity March 30, 2005 Quiz 2 Prof. Nancy Lynch Please write your name in the upper corner of each page. Problem Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Q2-1 Problem 1: True
More informationDecidability. Overview. Preliminaries to Halting Problem. Decidable Problems of Regular Languages. Decidable Problems of Context-Free Languages
CS533 Class 04a: 1 c P. Heeman, 2017 Introduction: Decidability Overview Decidable Problems of Regular Languages Decidable Problems of Context-Free Languages Preliminaries to Halting Problem CS533 Class
More informationExam Computability and Complexity
Total number of points:... Number of extra sheets of paper:... Exam Computability and Complexity by Jiri Srba, January 2009 Student s full name CPR number Study number Before you start, fill in the three
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Spring 2018 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/sp18/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 4.1 Explain what it means for a problem to be decidable. Justify the use of encoding.
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION "Winter" 2018 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi18/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 4.1 Explain what it means for a problem to be decidable. Justify the use of encoding.
More informationComputational Models Lecture 8 1
Computational Models Lecture 8 1 Handout Mode Ronitt Rubinfeld and Iftach Haitner. Tel Aviv University. April 18/ May 2, 2016 1 Based on frames by Benny Chor, Tel Aviv University, modifying frames by Maurice
More informationacs-07: Decidability Decidability Andreas Karwath und Malte Helmert Informatik Theorie II (A) WS2009/10
Decidability Andreas Karwath und Malte Helmert 1 Overview An investigation into the solvable/decidable Decidable languages The halting problem (undecidable) 2 Decidable problems? Acceptance problem : decide
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Spring 2017 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/sp17/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Summarize key concepts, ideas, themes from CSE 105. Approach your final exam studying with
More informationTheory of Computation
Theory of Computation Lecture #10 Sarmad Abbasi Virtual University Sarmad Abbasi (Virtual University) Theory of Computation 1 / 35 Lecture 10: Overview Undecidability of the Halting Problem Russell s Paradox
More informationCpSc 421 Homework 9 Solution
CpSc 421 Homework 9 Solution Attempt any three of the six problems below. The homework is graded on a scale of 100 points, even though you can attempt fewer or more points than that. Your recorded grade
More informationTheory of Computation (IX) Yijia Chen Fudan University
Theory of Computation (IX) Yijia Chen Fudan University Review The Definition of Algorithm Polynomials and their roots A polynomial is a sum of terms, where each term is a product of certain variables and
More informationUndecidable Problems and Reducibility
University of Georgia Fall 2014 Reducibility We show a problem decidable/undecidable by reducing it to another problem. One type of reduction: mapping reduction. Definition Let A, B be languages over Σ.
More informationDecidability (What, stuff is unsolvable?)
University of Georgia Fall 2014 Outline Decidability Decidable Problems for Regular Languages Decidable Problems for Context Free Languages The Halting Problem Countable and Uncountable Sets Diagonalization
More informationCSE 105 Theory of Computation
CSE 105 Theory of Computation http://www.jflap.org/jflaptmp/ Professor Jeanne Ferrante 1 Undecidability Today s Agenda Review: The TM Acceptance problem, A TM The Halting Problem for TM s Other problems
More informationTheory of Computation
Theory of Computation Lecture #10 Sarmad Abbasi Virtual University Sarmad Abbasi (Virtual University) Theory of Computation 1 / 43 Lecture 10: Overview Linear Bounded Automata Acceptance Problem for LBAs
More informationUNIT-VIII COMPUTABILITY THEORY
CONTEXT SENSITIVE LANGUAGE UNIT-VIII COMPUTABILITY THEORY A Context Sensitive Grammar is a 4-tuple, G = (N, Σ P, S) where: N Set of non terminal symbols Σ Set of terminal symbols S Start symbol of the
More informationDecidability. Linz 6 th, Chapter 12: Limits of Algorithmic Computation, page 309ff
Decidability Linz 6 th, Chapter 12: Limits of Algorithmic Computation, page 309ff 1 A property P of strings is said to be decidable if the set of all strings having property P is a recursive set; that
More informationCS481F01 Solutions 8
CS481F01 Solutions 8 A. Demers 7 Dec 2001 1. Prob. 111 from p. 344 of the text. One of the following sets is r.e. and the other is not. Which is which? (a) { i L(M i ) contains at least 481 elements }
More informationTuring Machines Part Two
Turing Machines Part Two Recap from Last Time Our First Turing Machine q acc a start q 0 q 1 a This This is is the the Turing Turing machine s machine s finiteisttiteiconntont. finiteisttiteiconntont.
More informationMidterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2016, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama
Midterm Exam 2 CS 341: Foundations of Computer Science II Fall 2016, face-to-face day section Prof. Marvin K. Nakayama Print family (or last) name: Print given (or first) name: I have read and understand
More informationThere are two main techniques for showing that problems are undecidable: diagonalization and reduction
Reducibility 1 There are two main techniques for showing that problems are undecidable: diagonalization and reduction 2 We say that a problem A is reduced to a problem B if the decidability of A follows
More information2017/08/31 Chapter 1.2 & 1.3 in Sipser Ø Announcement:
Regular Expressions Human-aware and Robo.cs Operations 2017/08/31 Chapter 1.2 & 1.3 in Sipser Ø Announcement: q q q q Many thanks to students who have responded so far! There is still time to respond to
More informationTHEORY OF COMPUTATION (AUBER) EXAM CRIB SHEET
THEORY OF COMPUTATION (AUBER) EXAM CRIB SHEET Regular Languages and FA A language is a set of strings over a finite alphabet Σ. All languages are finite or countably infinite. The set of all languages
More informationCS20a: Turing Machines (Oct 29, 2002)
CS20a: Turing Machines (Oct 29, 2002) So far: DFA = regular languages PDA = context-free languages Today: Computability 1 Church s thesis The computable functions are the same as the partial recursive
More informationCS21 Decidability and Tractability
CS21 Decidability and Tractability Lecture 8 January 24, 2018 Outline Turing Machines and variants multitape TMs nondeterministic TMs Church-Turing Thesis So far several models of computation finite automata
More informationjflap demo Regular expressions Pumping lemma Turing Machines Sections 12.4 and 12.5 in the text
On the menu today jflap demo Regular expressions Pumping lemma Turing Machines Sections 12.4 and 12.5 in the text 1 jflap Demo jflap: Useful tool for creating and testing abstract machines Finite automata,
More informationCSCC63 Worksheet Turing Machines
1 An Example CSCC63 Worksheet Turing Machines Goal. Design a turing machine, M that accepts only strings of the form {w#w w {0, 1} }. Idea. Describe in words how the machine would work. Read first symbol
More informationTURING MAHINES
15-453 TURING MAHINES TURING MACHINE FINITE STATE q 10 CONTROL AI N P U T INFINITE TAPE read write move 0 0, R, R q accept, R q reject 0 0, R 0 0, R, L read write move 0 0, R, R q accept, R 0 0, R 0 0,
More information6.045 Final Exam Solutions
6.045J/18.400J: Automata, Computability and Complexity Prof. Nancy Lynch, Nati Srebro 6.045 Final Exam Solutions May 18, 2004 Susan Hohenberger Name: Please write your name on each page. This exam is open
More informationUndecidability COMS Ashley Montanaro 4 April Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol Bristol, UK
COMS11700 Undecidability Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol Bristol, UK 4 April 2014 COMS11700: Undecidability Slide 1/29 Decidability We are particularly interested in Turing machines
More informationDecidability: Reduction Proofs
Decidability: Reduction Proofs Basic technique for proving a language is (semi)decidable is reduction Based on the following principle: Have problem A that needs to be solved If there exists a problem
More informationTuring Machines. Reading Assignment: Sipser Chapter 3.1, 4.2
Reading Assignment: Sipser Chapter 31, 42 Turing Machines 41 covers algorithms for decidable problems about DFA, NFA, RegExp, CFG, and PDAs, eg slides 17 & 18 below I ve talked about most of this in class
More informationReading Assignment: Sipser Chapter 3.1, 4.2
Turing Machines 1 Reading Assignment: Sipser Chapter 3.1, 4.2 4.1 covers algorithms for decidable problems about DFA, NFA, RegExp, CFG, and PDAs, e.g. slides 17 & 18 below. I ve talked about most of this
More informationChapter 3: The Church-Turing Thesis
Chapter 3: The Church-Turing Thesis 1 Turing Machine (TM) Control... Bi-direction Read/Write Turing machine is a much more powerful model, proposed by Alan Turing in 1936. 2 Church/Turing Thesis Anything
More informationMidterm II : Formal Languages, Automata, and Computability
Midterm II 15-453: Formal Languages, Automata, and Computability Lenore Blum, Asa Frank, Aashish Jindia, and Andrew Smith April 8, 2014 Instructions: 1. Once the exam begins, write your name on each sheet.
More information6.045: Automata, Computability, and Complexity Or, Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring, Class 10 Nancy Lynch
6.045: Automata, Computability, and Complexity Or, Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring, 2010 Class 10 Nancy Lynch Today Final topic in computability theory: Self-Reference and the Recursion
More informationTAKE-HOME: OUT 02/21 NOON, DUE 02/25 NOON
CSE 555 MIDTERM EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS TAKE-HOME: OUT 02/21 NOON, DUE 02/25 NOON The completed test is to be submitted electronically to colbourn@asu.edu before the deadline, or time-stamped by the main
More informationMapping Reductions. Mapping Reductions. Introduction to Computability. Theory. Mapping Reductions. Lecture13: Mapping. Reductions
Introduction to Computability Theory Lecture13: apping Reductions Prof. Amos Israeli 1 apping Reductions apping reductionsconstitute the generalization we are looking for. They are always in a specified
More informationApproximation Algorithms
Approximation Algorithms Announcements Problem Set 9 due right now. Final exam this Monday, Hewlett 200 from 12:15PM- 3:15PM Please let us know immediately after lecture if you want to take the final at
More informationCSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION
CSE 105 THEORY OF COMPUTATION Spring 2016 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/sp16/cse105-ab/ Today's learning goals Sipser Ch 2 Design a PDA and a CFG for a given language Give informal description for a PDA,
More informationCpSc 421 Final Exam December 15, 2006
CpSc 421 Final Exam December 15, 2006 Do problem zero and six of problems 1 through 9. If you write down solutions for more that six problems, clearly indicate those that you want graded. Note that problems
More informationCS5371 Theory of Computation. Lecture 10: Computability Theory I (Turing Machine)
CS537 Theory of Computation Lecture : Computability Theory I (Turing Machine) Objectives Introduce the Turing Machine (TM) Proposed by Alan Turing in 936 finite-state control + infinitely long tape A stronger
More informationProblems, and How Computer Scientists Solve Them Manas Thakur
Problems, and How Computer Scientists Solve Them PACE Lab, IIT Madras Content Credits Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, 3rd edition. Hopcroft et al. Introduction to the Theory
More informationCSCE 551 Final Exam, April 28, 2016 Answer Key
CSCE 551 Final Exam, April 28, 2016 Answer Key 1. (15 points) Fix any alphabet Σ containing the symbol a. For any language L Σ, define the language a\l := {w Σ wa L}. Show that if L is regular, then a\l
More informationCSC236 Week 11. Larry Zhang
CSC236 Week 11 Larry Zhang 1 Announcements Next week s lecture: Final exam review This week s tutorial: Exercises with DFAs PS9 will be out later this week s. 2 Recap Last week we learned about Deterministic
More informationFORMAL LANGUAGES, AUTOMATA AND COMPUTABILITY
15-453 FORMAL LANGUAGES, AUTOMATA AND COMPUTABILITY REVIEW for MIDTERM 1 THURSDAY Feb 6 Midterm 1 will cover everything we have seen so far The PROBLEMS will be from Sipser, Chapters 1, 2, 3 It will be
More information