A COMPARISON OF VERY SHORT-TERM QPF S FOR SUMMER CONVECTION OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN AREAS, WITH THE NCAR/ATEC WRF AND MM5-BASED RTFDDA SYSTEMS
|
|
- Edwin Kelly
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A COMPARISON OF VERY SHORT-TERM QPF S FOR SUMMER CONVECTION OVER COMPLEX TERRAIN AREAS, WITH THE NCAR/ATEC WRF AND MM5-BASED RTFDDA SYSTEMS Wei Yu, Yubao Liu, Tom Warner, Randy Bullock, Barbara Brown and Ming Ge (National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado) 1. INTRODUCTION During the last few years, NCAR and the Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) developed a real-time rapid-cycling FDDA and forecast (RTFDDA) system. This MM5-based system was deployed and is running operationally at five Army test ranges. A collaborative effort was made to transition the ATEC-system core from MM5 to WRF during the past 18 months (Liu et al., 2005 and 2006; WRF-MM5 workshops). With the completion of the WRF- RTFDDA system last summer, two parallel WRF- RTFDDA and MM5-RTFDDA systems were set up and run in real-time, for systematic evaluations, at selected ATEC ranges. In this paper we describe the models verification of the precipitation analyses and a 7 hour forecast of summer convection over the complex terrain of New Mexico and Arizona. The precipitation output from the two models is verified against the NCEP STAGE IV analyses. An object-based precipitation verification method is employed to quantify the statistical performance of the two modeling systems. 2. MODELING SYSTEMS AND PARALLEL RUNS As part of the effort transitioning the ATEC RTFDDA systems from MM5 to WRF, the newly developed WRF-based RTFDDA system was set up to run in real-time, for systematic evaluation, in parallel to the MM5-based operational RTFDDA system at selected ATEC ranges. Meanwhile, the WRF-RTFDDA systems were also set up to run for retrospective cases/periods to compare WRF-RTFDDA performances for different weather regimes of special interest. Here we focus on the summer orographically forced convection events over the White Sand Missile Range (WSMR). August 2005 was chosen for the retrospective model runs. The WRF-RTFDDA system was configured to have the same domains and cycling controls as the real-time MM5- RTFDDA system running at the range. The models have three nested grids with 30, 10 and 3.33 km grid increment (Fig.1). As shown in Fig.1, the 10 km domain (D2) covers most of the southern Rocky Mountains over New Mexico and Arizona, and the finest mesh (D3) includes the main WSMR test region and two major mountains to the west and east. Both systems cycled every 3 hours. D1 D2 D3 Fig. 1 WSMR test range of MM5-RTFFDDA domain configuration Similarly, the WRF-RTFDDA model physics and vertical levels were set to be close to those of the real-time MM5-RTFDDA system. Readers can refer to Liu et al. (2005) for the model physics schemes used in the two modeling systems. Two WRF-RTFDDA runs were conducted throughout August One used the Kain-Fritch scheme on Domain 1 and 2 and the other used the Grell ensemble cumulus parameterization scheme. The model outputs were analyzed and compared to the archive of the real-time MM5-RTFDDA operated at WSMR during August In this study, 3-hr rain accumulations, ending at 00, 03, 06, 21Z were collected from the
2 analyses and 7-hr forecasts were collected from the WRF- and MM5-RTFDDA runs for August The rain data were then analyzed to study the day-to-day precipitation evolution. The month-long statistics were evaluated to study the overall performance of the two systems in simulating the summer convection intensity and life-cycle. Statistics of precipitation objects, defined by using the Brown, et al. (2004) approach, are computed using the NECP Stage IV analyses in order to compare the abilities of the modeling systems in simulating the observed precipitation features. 3. RESULTS During August 2005, there was frequent afternoon convection over New Mexico and Arizona in response to the diurnal solar-heating cycle. The complex terrain, particularly the numerous mountain ranges of varying sizes and orientations, were influential in triggering the convective development and subsequently controlling the convective life cycle. Convective events initiate around noon, continue to develop and reach maximum in the later afternoon, and dissipate after sunset. Fig. 2 shows the diurnal cycle of the monthly domain-average precipitation on Domains 2 and 3. The forecasts from both models nicely replicated the convection diurnal cycle observed in the Stage IV rain analyses. The precipitation begins at around 18Z, and then intensifies to a maximum at around 00Z, and decreases after that. On Domain 2, the two models have similar domain-averaged precipitation from 18Z to 03Z. However, on Domain 3, the two models are very different: MM5 overestimates the precipitation and WRF underestimates it. The daily evolution of the domain-mean precipitation shows a similar result (not shown). Fig. 2 Monthly domain averaged precipitation forecast for domain 3 and domain 2. (Left: domain 3, Right: domain 2) Fig. 3 shows the monthly-mean of 3-hr precipitation accumulations of MM5 and WRF forecasts at 00Z on Domain 2. It can be seen that both MM5 and WRF precipitation agree with the STAGE IV analysis. Two significant precipitation features are worth discussing: one is in the western domain, a precipitation belt from northwest to southeast with several isolated maxima; another is to the east of the WSMR. The MM5 forecasted stronger and smaller precipitation centers than did WRF, where MM5 is more consistent with the STAGE IV analysis. The major precipitation cores and bands in the models and observations appear to align well with the terrain distribution. Thus, both MM5 and WRF are able to simulate the terrain-forced convection. ST IV MM5 FCST Fig. 3 Monthly domain averaged precipitation forecast for domain 2 at 00Z. (top-left: STAGE IV, topright: MM5, bottom: WRF) In spite of the overall consistency, one can observe many fine-scale differences between the WRF and MM5 rain in Fig. 3. One thing worth noting is that, in the WSMR area, WRF shows a white square window with much less precipitation in the area of Domain 3. This discontinuity is an artifact. On Domain 2, the KF parameterization and Reisner s mixed-phase microphysical parameterization are used to model the moist process, while on Domain 3, only the explicit scheme is used. Thus, the window indicates that the WRF precipitation process on the coarse and fine grids (Domain 2 and Domain 3) does not match. To find out if the mismatch is due to the KF scheme, we conducted another identical WRF-RTFDDA run for the month, but
3 used a GF scheme for cumulus parameterization. The results from these runs show a similar phenomenon. This grid-jump of the precipitation is also shown in the daily runs, both in the WRF- RTFDDA forecasts and analyses. ST IV MM5 FCST On the finest domain (Domain 3), on which moist processes are simulated with explicit schemes (Reisner for MM5 and Lin for WRF) only, WRF-RTFDDA and MM5-RTFDDA differ greatly in terms of both the amount and distribution of the precipitation predictions. MM5 forecasts a larger area with more intense precipitation, which is consistent with the Stage IV analysis, although MM5 appears to overestimate the rain amount. Like the MM5- RTFDDA forecasts, WRF-RTFDDA also nicely reproduces the observed rain amount in the mideastern domain where steep mountains are located. Nevertheless, the system obviously underestimates the rain on the rest of the domain. This result is consistent with the results shown in Fig. 1, where we clearly see that WRF underestimates the total precipitation in the domain. When comparing the WRF-RTFDDA analysis with the forecast (Fig. 4), it can be seen that the analysis precipitation is stronger than in the forecasts, and the overall distribution and amount of the analysis rain compares better to the STAGE IV observation. Because the differences between the model analyses and forecasts are mostly due to the nudging toward available temperature, wind and moisture observation from about 20 surface stations in the domain in the analysis, the significant differences of the precipitation between the analyses and forecasts should be caused by the PBL variation due to the surface data nudging effect. WRF ANALYSIS Fig. 4 Average precipitation of August 2005 on domain 3 at 00Z. (top left: STAGE IV, top right: MM5 forecast, bottom left: WRF forecast, bottom right: WRF analysis) Because summer convection in the region is mainly caused by solar radiation heating, the 2-m surface temperature of the WRF analysis and forecast and the MM5 forecast are compared. Fig. 5 shows the monthly-averaged 2-meter temperature of the models at 18Z, when convection begins to develop. It is obvious that the WRF-RTFDDA forecast of the low-level atmosphere is cooler than its analysis. This explains why the WRF forecast has less precipitation than its forecast. In the forecast, the low level of the model is cooler, the atmosphere is stable, the convection is less active, and thus less precipitation appeared in the 7-hr forecast. Incorporating the extra surface data, in the WRF analysis, warms up the low-level atmosphere and thus intensifies the convective development. It should be noted that the low-level temperature of the WRF analysis is still lower than in the MM5 analysis, and the MM5 analysis agrees more with the observations (not shown).
4 MM5 ANA WRF ANA values and then defining the attributes of the objects, including sizes, median intensities, axis orientations and others. The quality of the forecasted precipitation is evaluated based on how the forecasted objects match the observed objects. Fig. 5 Average 2 meter temperature of August 2005 on domain 3 at 18 Z. (top left: MM5 forecast, top right: WRF analysis, bottom: WRF forecast) A lower temperature forecast in the lower atmosphere also exists in Domain 2. But there, the affection on the precipitation is not as obvious as in Domain 3. This could be related to the different precipitation parameterizations in Domains 2 and 3. Domain 2 makes use of a cumulus parameterization and an explicit scheme. It is interesting to see that the cumulus parameterization scheme is less sensitive to the near surface cold bias. Apparently, to improve the WRF-RTFDDA performances on the summer convection simulation, it is critical to understand and correct the WRF cold bias in the region. Fig. 6 gives an example of the object-based statistics, where the total number of precipitation objects from WRF- and MM5-RTFDDA analyses and 7-hr forecasts, MM5-RTFDDA analyses and forecasts and STAGE IV observations, for a set of varying thresholds, are compared. It can be seen that the WRF model analysis and MM5 model analysis and forecasts produced similar amounts of precipitation objects to those in the Stage IV observations, while the WRF forecast underestimated the amount by half. It is interesting to point out that, although the WRF analysis has a similar number of precipitation objects as the observation, which indicates that the WRF model picks up the terrain triggering effects on convective development, the convection is not able to develop completely due to the cooler low-level atmosphere, and thus the precipitation area is small and the rain intensity is weaker.. Number of objects MM5_ANA WRF_ANA WRF_FCST MM5_FCST Stage IV 15 Thresholds 4. VERIFICATION WITH AN OBJECT-BASED APPROACH It is well known that conventional grid-based statistical verifications are handicapped for the evaluation of precipitation forecasts from high resolution models, such as the ones used in this study. In this study we used a tool developed by NCAR/RAL (Brown et al. 2004), to compare the MM5 and WRF systems with the STAGE IV for August It is recommended that readers refer to Brown et al. (2004) for more information on this approach. Essentially, the scheme identifies precipitation objects by setting intensity threshold Fig. 6 Comparison of number of forecasted precipitation objects with those of STAGE IV observations on domain 3. As shown in Fig. 2, the difference between the domain-averaged precipitation forecast of MM5 and WRF is not big. The statistical results also show that WRF and MM5 are very similar in the overall verification of the precipitation forecast for Domain 2. This is also confirmed in Fig. 2.
5 5. CONCLUSIONS To evaluate WRF-RTFDDA s ability in forecasting summer convection over the WSMR region, where complex terrain dominates, monthlong WRF-RTFDDA runs were performed in August The WRF-RTFDDA rain analyses and forecasts were compared with those of the real-time operational MM5-RTFDDA. It was found that both MM5-RTFDDA and WRF- RTFDDA were capable of forecasting the convective rain forced by the complex topography with a model grid size of 10 km. WRF presented an obvious discontinuity in the surface precipitation between the finest grid and the coarse grid, indicating incompatible moist processes between the cumulus scheme on the coarse mesh and the explicit scheme in the fine mesh. Meteorology, 4-8 Oct, Hyannis, MA, American Meteorological Society (Boston), available at Liu, Y., A. Bourgeois, T. Warner, S. Swerdlin and J. Hacker, 2005: Implementation of Observationnudging Based FDDA into WRF for Supporting ATEC Test Operation. WRF/MM5 Users' Workshop June 27-30, Boulder, CO. The statistical analysis of the model forecasts with a monthly mean and object-based approach shows that both the WRF and MM5 forecasts captured the main features of the summer orographic convection quite well. On the fine grid, WRF appears to significantly underestimate convection, and MM5 significantly overestimates it. It is found that the less active convection in the WRF model on the fine grid is due to its obvious cool bias at the surface in the region. We are in the process of investigating the generation of a cold-bias. Acknowledgements. For this study, we received help from other NCAR/RAL colleagues. We would like to express our appreciation to Carol Park, Francois Vandenberghe, Julie Schramm, and Andrea Hahmann. 6. REFERENCES Davis, C. A., B. G. Brown, R. Bullock, M. Chapman, K. Manning, R. Morss, and A. Takacs, 2004: Verification techniques appropriate for cloud-resolving NWP models. Preprints, 16th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, USA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Brown, B.G., R.R. Bullock, C.A. Davis, J. Halley Gotway, M.B. Chapman, A. Takacs, E. Gilleland, and K. Manning, 2004: New verification approaches for convective weather forecasts. Preprints, 11th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace
VERIFICATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION WRF-RTFDDA SURFACE FORECASTS OVER MOUNTAINS AND PLAINS
VERIFICATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION WRF-RTFDDA SURFACE FORECASTS OVER MOUNTAINS AND PLAINS Gregory Roux, Yubao Liu, Luca Delle Monache, Rong-Shyang Sheu and Thomas T. Warner NCAR/Research Application Laboratory,
More information1.5 HIGH-RESOLUTION LAND DATA ASSIMILATION IN THE NCAR/ATEC 1.5 REAL-TIME FDDA AND FORECASTING SYSTEM
1.5 HIGH-RESOLUTION LAND DATA ASSIMILATION IN THE NCAR/ATEC 1.5 REAL-TIME FDDA AND FORECASTING SYSTEM Andrea N. Hahmann, Yubao Liu, Fei Chen, Kevin W. Manning, Thomas T. Warner, and Laurie Carlson Research
More informationA WRF-based rapid updating cycling forecast system of. BMB and its performance during the summer and Olympic. Games 2008
A WRF-based rapid updating cycling forecast system of BMB and its performance during the summer and Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen 1, Shui-yong Fan 1, Jiqin Zhong 1, Xiang-yu Huang 2, Yong-Run Guo 2, Wei
More informationSimulating orographic precipitation: Sensitivity to physics parameterizations and model numerics
Simulating orographic precipitation: Sensitivity to physics parameterizations and model numerics 2nd COPS-Meeting, 27 June 2005 Günther Zängl Overview A highly idealized test of numerical model errors
More informationPERFORMANCE OF THE WRF-ARW IN THE COMPLEX TERRAIN OF SALT LAKE CITY
P2.17 PERFORMANCE OF THE WRF-ARW IN THE COMPLEX TERRAIN OF SALT LAKE CITY Jeffrey E. Passner U.S. Army Research Laboratory White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico 1. INTRODUCTION The Army Research Laboratory
More informationModeling rainfall diurnal variation of the North American monsoon core using different spatial resolutions
Modeling rainfall diurnal variation of the North American monsoon core using different spatial resolutions Jialun Li, X. Gao, K.-L. Hsu, B. Imam, and S. Sorooshian Department of Civil and Environmental
More informationT Bias ( C) T Bias ( C)
P.7 A QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF A REAL-TIME MESOSCALE FDDA AND FORECASTING SYSTEM UNDER DIFFERENT SYNOPTIC SITUATIONS RONG-SHYANG SHEU*, JENNIFER CRAM, YUBAO LIU, AND SIMON LOW-NAM
More informationWater Balance in the Murray-Darling Basin and the recent drought as modelled with WRF
18 th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13-17 July 2009 http://mssanz.org.au/modsim09 Water Balance in the Murray-Darling Basin and the recent drought as modelled with WRF Evans, J.P. Climate
More informationABSTRACT 3 RADIAL VELOCITY ASSIMILATION IN BJRUC 3.1 ASSIMILATION STRATEGY OF RADIAL
REAL-TIME RADAR RADIAL VELOCITY ASSIMILATION EXPERIMENTS IN A PRE-OPERATIONAL FRAMEWORK IN NORTH CHINA Min Chen 1 Ming-xuan Chen 1 Shui-yong Fan 1 Hong-li Wang 2 Jenny Sun 2 1 Institute of Urban Meteorology,
More informationSensitivity of precipitation forecasts to cumulus parameterizations in Catalonia (NE Spain)
Sensitivity of precipitation forecasts to cumulus parameterizations in Catalonia (NE Spain) Jordi Mercader (1), Bernat Codina (1), Abdelmalik Sairouni (2), Jordi Cunillera (2) (1) Dept. of Astronomy and
More informationPrecipitation Structure and Processes of Typhoon Nari (2001): A Modeling Propsective
Precipitation Structure and Processes of Typhoon Nari (2001): A Modeling Propsective Ming-Jen Yang Institute of Hydrological Sciences, National Central University 1. Introduction Typhoon Nari (2001) struck
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 RHMS of Serbia 1 Summary of major highlights ECMWF forecast products became the backbone in operational work during last several years. Starting from
More informationRAL Advances in Land Surface Modeling Part I. Andrea Hahmann
RAL Advances in Land Surface Modeling Part I Andrea Hahmann Outline The ATEC real-time high-resolution land data assimilation (HRLDAS) system - Fei Chen, Kevin Manning, and Yubao Liu (RAL) The fine-mesh
More informationPolar Weather Prediction
Polar Weather Prediction David H. Bromwich Session V YOPP Modelling Component Tuesday 14 July 2015 A special thanks to the following contributors: Kevin W. Manning, Jordan G. Powers, Keith M. Hines, Dan
More informationJordan G. Powers Kevin W. Manning. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, USA
Jordan G. Powers Kevin W. Manning Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, USA Background : Model for Prediction Across Scales = Global
More informationSensitivity of CWRF simulations of the China 1998 summer flood to cumulus parameterizations
Sensitivity of CWRF simulations of the China 1998 summer flood to cumulus parameterizations Shuyan Liu a,b,c, Wei Gao *b,d, Xin-Zhong Liang e, Hua Zhang c, and James Slusser d a State Key Laboratory of
More informationINVESTIGATION FOR A POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF IOANNINA AND METSOVO LAKES (EPIRUS, NW GREECE), ON PRECIPITATION, DURING THE WARM PERIOD OF THE YEAR
Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference of Environmental Science and Technology Athens, Greece, 5-7 September 2013 INVESTIGATION FOR A POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF IOANNINA AND METSOVO LAKES (EPIRUS,
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2016
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016 Icelandic Meteorological Office (www.vedur.is) Bolli Pálmason and Guðrún Nína Petersen 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts
More informationDiagnosing the Climatology and Interannual Variability of North American Summer Climate with the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS)
Diagnosing the Climatology and Interannual Variability of North American Summer Climate with the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) Christopher L. Castro and Roger A. Pielke, Sr. Department of
More informationU.S. Army Research Laboratory SUMMER RESEARCH TECHNICAL REPORT
U.S. Army Research Laboratory SUMMER RESEARCH TECHNICAL REPORT Optimizing Strategies for an Observation-nudging-based Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation Forecast Approach with WRF-ARW ANDRE PATTANTYUS
More informationCanadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society and American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction 31 May 2012
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society and American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction 31 May 2012 The High Resolution Rapid Refresh (): An hourly updating
More informationCOMPOSITE-BASED VERIFICATION OF PRECIPITATION FORECASTS FROM A MESOSCALE MODEL
J13.5 COMPOSITE-BASED VERIFICATION OF PRECIPITATION FORECASTS FROM A MESOSCALE MODEL Jason E. Nachamkin, Sue Chen, and Jerome M. Schmidt Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA 1. INTRODUCTION Mesoscale
More informationSIMULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC STATES FOR THE CASE OF YEONG-GWANG STORM SURGE ON 31 MARCH 2007 : MODEL COMPARISON BETWEEN MM5, WRF AND COAMPS
SIMULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC STATES FOR THE CASE OF YEONG-GWANG STORM SURGE ON 31 MARCH 2007 : MODEL COMPARISON BETWEEN MM5, WRF AND COAMPS JEONG-WOOK LEE 1 ; KYUNG-JA HA 1* ; KI-YOUNG HEO 1 ; KWANG-SOON
More informationThe Fifth-Generation NCAR / Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5) Mark Decker Feiqin Xie ATMO 595E November 23, 2004 Department of Atmospheric Science
The Fifth-Generation NCAR / Penn State Mesoscale Model (MM5) Mark Decker Feiqin Xie ATMO 595E November 23, 2004 Department of Atmospheric Science Outline Basic Dynamical Equations Numerical Methods Initialization
More informationMesoscale predictability under various synoptic regimes
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics (2001) 8: 429 438 Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics c European Geophysical Society 2001 Mesoscale predictability under various synoptic regimes W. A. Nuss and D. K. Miller
More informationQUANTITATIVE VERIFICATION STATISTICS OF WRF PREDICTIONS OVER THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION
QUANTITATIVE VERIFICATION STATISTICS OF WRF PREDICTIONS OVER THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION Katsafados P. 1, Papadopoulos A. 2, Mavromatidis E. 1 and Gikas N. 1 1 Department of Geography, Harokopio University
More informationCHAPTER 8 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE ITCZ OVER THE INDIAN OCEAN AND INDONESIA DURING A NORMAL YEAR AND DURING AN ENSO YEAR
CHAPTER 8 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE ITCZ OVER THE INDIAN OCEAN AND INDONESIA DURING A NORMAL YEAR AND DURING AN ENSO YEAR In this chapter, comparisons between the model-produced and analyzed streamlines,
More informationRapid Prototyping of Cutting-Edge Meteorological Technology: The ATEC 4DWX System
Rapid Prototyping of Cutting-Edge Meteorological Technology: The ATEC 4DWX System James F. Bowers U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground Dugway, Utah 84022-5000 Scott P. Swerdlin and Thomas T. Warner National
More informationWRF-RTFDDA Optimization and Wind Farm Data Assimilation
2009, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. All rights reserved. WRF-RTFDDA Optimization and Wind Farm Data Assimilation William Y.Y. Cheng, Yubao Liu, Yuewei Liu, and Gregory Roux NCAR/Research
More informationDi Wu, Xiquan Dong, Baike Xi, Zhe Feng, Aaron Kennedy, and Gretchen Mullendore. University of North Dakota
Di Wu, Xiquan Dong, Baike Xi, Zhe Feng, Aaron Kennedy, and Gretchen Mullendore University of North Dakota Objectives 3 case studies to evaluate WRF and NAM performance in Oklahoma (OK) during summer 2007,
More information9.4. Jennifer L. Mahoney NOAA Research-Forecast Systems Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado
9.4 NEW VERIFICATION APPROACHES FOR CONVECTIVE WEATHER FORECASTS Barbara G. Brown*, Randy R. Bullock, Christopher A. Davis, John Halley Gotway, Michael B. Chapman, Agnes Takacs, Eric Gilleland, Kevin Manning
More informationThe model simulation of the architectural micro-physical outdoors environment
The model simulation of the architectural micro-physical outdoors environment sb08 Chiag Che-Ming, De-En Lin, Po-Cheng Chou and Yen-Yi Li Archilife research foundation, Taipei, Taiwa, archilif@ms35.hinet.net
More informationMeteorological Modeling using Penn State/NCAR 5 th Generation Mesoscale Model (MM5)
TSD-1a Meteorological Modeling using Penn State/NCAR 5 th Generation Mesoscale Model (MM5) Bureau of Air Quality Analysis and Research Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental
More informationLogistics. Goof up P? R? Can you log in? Requests for: Teragrid yes? NCSA no? Anders Colberg Syrowski Curtis Rastogi Yang Chiu
Logistics Goof up P? R? Can you log in? Teragrid yes? NCSA no? Requests for: Anders Colberg Syrowski Curtis Rastogi Yang Chiu Introduction to Numerical Weather Prediction Thanks: Tom Warner, NCAR A bit
More informationInfluences of PBL Parameterizations on Warm-Season Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Simulations
Influences of PBL Parameterizations on Warm-Season Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Simulations Stan Trier (NCAR/MMM) Andreas Prein (NCAR/ASP) and Changhai Liu (NCAR/RAL) GEWEX Convection-Permitting
More informationAddressing Diurnal Temperature Biases in the WRF Model
Addressing Diurnal Temperature Biases in the WRF Model Jeffrey Massey University of Utah Collaborators: Jim Steenburgh, Jason Knievel, Sebastian Hoch, Josh Hacker Long term 2-m temperature verification
More information608 SENSITIVITY OF TYPHOON PARMA TO VARIOUS WRF MODEL CONFIGURATIONS
608 SENSITIVITY OF TYPHOON PARMA TO VARIOUS WRF MODEL CONFIGURATIONS Phillip L. Spencer * and Brent L. Shaw Weather Decision Technologies, Norman, OK, USA Bonifacio G. Pajuelas Philippine Atmospheric,
More informationAdded Value of Convection Resolving Climate Simulations (CRCS)
Added Value of Convection Resolving Climate Simulations (CRCS) Prein Andreas, Gobiet Andreas, Katrin Lisa Kapper, Martin Suklitsch, Nauman Khurshid Awan, Heimo Truhetz Wegener Center for Climate and Global
More informationOn the Appropriateness of Spectral Nudging in Regional Climate Models
On the Appropriateness of Spectral Nudging in Regional Climate Models Christopher L. Castro Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona, USA Dynamically Downscaled IPCC model
More informationAir Quality Screening Modeling
Air Quality Screening Modeling 2007 Meteorology Simulation with WRF OTC Modeling Committee Meeting September 16, 2010 Baltimore, MD Presentation is based upon the following technical reports available
More informationAn Integrated Approach to the Prediction of Weather, Renewable Energy Generation and Energy Demand in Vermont
1 An Integrated Approach to the Prediction of Weather, Renewable Energy Generation and Energy Demand in Vermont James P. Cipriani IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY Other contributors
More informationOperational Forecasting With Very-High-Resolution Models. Tom Warner
Operational Forecasting With Very-High-Resolution Models Tom Warner Background Since 1997 NCAR Has Been Developing Operational Mesoscale Forecasting Systems for General Meteorological Support at Army Test
More informationErik Kabela and Greg Carbone, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina
Downscaling climate change information for water resources Erik Kabela and Greg Carbone, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina As decision makers evaluate future water resources, they often
More information4.4 EVALUATION OF AN IMPROVED CONVECTION TRIGGERING MECHANISM IN THE NCAR COMMUNITY ATMOSPHERE MODEL CAM2 UNDER CAPT FRAMEWORK
. EVALUATION OF AN IMPROVED CONVECTION TRIGGERING MECHANISM IN THE NCAR COMMUNITY ATMOSPHERE MODEL CAM UNDER CAPT FRAMEWORK Shaocheng Xie, James S. Boyle, Richard T. Cederwall, and Gerald L. Potter Atmospheric
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2011
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011 National Meteorological Administration 1. Summary of major highlights Medium range weather forecasts are primarily based on the results of ECMWF and
More informationANALYSIS OF THE MPAS CONVECTIVE-PERMITTING PHYSICS SUITE IN THE TROPICS WITH DIFFERENT PARAMETERIZATIONS OF CONVECTION REMARKS AND MOTIVATIONS
ANALYSIS OF THE MPAS CONVECTIVE-PERMITTING PHYSICS SUITE IN THE TROPICS WITH DIFFERENT PARAMETERIZATIONS OF CONVECTION Laura D. Fowler 1, Mary C. Barth 1, K. Alapaty 2, M. Branson 3, and D. Dazlich 3 1
More informationDevelopments at DWD: Integrated water vapour (IWV) from ground-based GPS
1 Working Group on Data Assimilation 2 Developments at DWD: Integrated water vapour (IWV) from ground-based Christoph Schraff, Maria Tomassini, and Klaus Stephan Deutscher Wetterdienst, Frankfurter Strasse
More informationThe Model Simulation of the Architectural Micro-Physical Outdoors Environment
The Model Simulation of the Architectural Micro-Physical Outdoors Environment Che-Ming Chiang 1, De-En Lin 2, Po-Cheng Chou 3, Yen-Yi Li 3 1 Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University,
More informationKelly Mahoney NOAA ESRL Physical Sciences Division
The role of gray zone convective model physics in highresolution simulations of the 2013 Colorado Front Range Flood WRF model simulated precipitation over terrain in CO Front Range Kelly Mahoney NOAA ESRL
More informationAROME Nowcasting - tool based on a convective scale operational system
AROME Nowcasting - tool based on a convective scale operational system RC - LACE stay report Supervisors (ZAMG): Yong Wang Florian Meier Christoph Wittmann Author: Mirela Pietrisi (NMA) 1. Introduction
More informationRegional Climate Simulations with WRF Model
WDS'3 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part III, 8 84, 23. ISBN 978-8-737852-8 MATFYZPRESS Regional Climate Simulations with WRF Model J. Karlický Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics
More informationClimate FDDA. Andrea Hahmann NCAR/RAL/NSAP February 26, 2008
Climate FDDA Andrea Hahmann NCAR/RAL/NSAP hahmann@ucar.edu February 26, 2008 Outline Climate downscaling - the basics Method (ATEC ranges) - Climo-FDDA Possible application of Climo-FDDA data at the ranges
More informationDeveloping Sub-Domain Verification Methods on GIS Tools
Developing Sub-Domain Verification Methods on GIS Tools By Jeffrey A. Smith, Theresa A. Foley, John W. Raby, Brian Reen U.S. Army Research Laboratory White Sands Missile Range, NM Abstract The meteorological
More informationDynamic Ensemble Model Evaluation of Elevated Thunderstorms sampled by PRECIP
Dynamic Ensemble Model Evaluation of Elevated Thunderstorms sampled by PRECIP Joshua S. Kastman, Patrick S. Market, and Neil Fox, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO Session 8B - Numerical Weather Prediction
More informationCOSMIC GPS Radio Occultation and
An Impact Study of FORMOSAT-3/ COSMIC GPS Radio Occultation and Dropsonde Data on WRF Simulations 27 Mei-yu season Fang-Ching g Chien Department of Earth Sciences Chien National and Taiwan Kuo (29), Normal
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2014
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2014 Israel Meteorological Service (IMS), 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF deterministic runs are used to issue most of the operational forecasts at IMS.
More informationClimatology of Surface Wind Speeds Using a Regional Climate Model
Climatology of Surface Wind Speeds Using a Regional Climate Model THERESA K. ANDERSEN Iowa State University Mentors: Eugene S. Takle 1 and Jimmy Correia, Jr. 1 1 Iowa State University ABSTRACT Long-term
More informationWeather Research and Forecasting Model. Melissa Goering Glen Sampson ATMO 595E November 18, 2004
Weather Research and Forecasting Model Melissa Goering Glen Sampson ATMO 595E November 18, 2004 Outline What does WRF model do? WRF Standard Initialization WRF Dynamics Conservation Equations Grid staggering
More informationTHE IMPACT OF GROUND-BASED GPS SLANT-PATH WET DELAY MEASUREMENTS ON SHORT-RANGE PREDICTION OF A PREFRONTAL SQUALL LINE
JP1.17 THE IMPACT OF GROUND-BASED GPS SLANT-PATH WET DELAY MEASUREMENTS ON SHORT-RANGE PREDICTION OF A PREFRONTAL SQUALL LINE So-Young Ha *1,, Ying-Hwa Kuo 1, Gyu-Ho Lim 1 National Center for Atmospheric
More informationDenver International Airport MDSS Demonstration Verification Report for the Season
Denver International Airport MDSS Demonstration Verification Report for the 2015-2016 Season Prepared by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Research Applications Division (RAL) Seth Linden
More information1. INTRODUCTION 3. VERIFYING ANALYSES
1.4 VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES John Horel 1 *, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute for Regional Prediction 2 National Weather Service,
More informationA global modeler looks at regional climate modeling. Zippy:Regional_Climate_01:Regional_Climate_01.frame
A global modeler looks at regional climate modeling I come in peace. Global climate models, 1 All global climate models must include representations of the ocean, sea ice, and the vegetated land surface,
More informationConvection-Resolving NWP with WRF. Section coordinator Ming Xue University of Oklahoma
Convection-Resolving NWP with WRF Section coordinator Ming Xue University of Oklahoma Convection-resolving NWP Is NWP that explicitly treats moist convective systems ranging from organized MCSs to individual
More informationSTORM SURGE SIMULATION IN NAGASAKI DURING THE PASSAGE OF 2012 TYPHOON SANBA
STORM SURGE SIMULATION IN NAGASAKI DURING THE PASSAGE OF 2012 TYPHOON SANBA D. P. C. Laknath 1, Kazunori Ito 1, Takahide Honda 1 and Tomoyuki Takabatake 1 As a result of global warming effect, storm surges
More informationVerification Methods for High Resolution Model Forecasts
Verification Methods for High Resolution Model Forecasts Barbara Brown (bgb@ucar.edu) NCAR, Boulder, Colorado Collaborators: Randy Bullock, John Halley Gotway, Chris Davis, David Ahijevych, Eric Gilleland,
More informationStudy of the impacts of grid spacing and physical parameterizations on WRF simulations of convective system rainfall and morphology
Study of the impacts of grid spacing and physical parameterizations on WRF simulations of convective system rainfall and morphology Introduction Report on WRF-DTC Visit of W. Gallus, I. Jankov and E. Aligo
More informationShort Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model
Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson, Jerry Olson, Rich Neale, Andrew Gettelman,
More informationImplementation and Evaluation of a Mesoscale Short-Range Ensemble Forecasting System Over the Pacific Northwest
Implementation and Evaluation of a Mesoscale Short-Range Ensemble Forecasting System Over the Pacific Northwest Eric P. Grimit and Clifford F. Mass Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington
More informationExtreme precipitation events in the. southeast U.S.
Extreme precipitation events in the Southeast US A preliminary investigation of operational forecast challenges related to moisture sources and transport TN flooding May 2010 Asheville, NC 2004 State Climate
More informationAssessment of Ensemble Forecasts
Assessment of Ensemble Forecasts S. L. Mullen Univ. of Arizona HEPEX Workshop, 7 March 2004 Talk Overview Ensemble Performance for Precipitation Global EPS and Mesoscale 12 km RSM Biases, Event Discrimination
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2008
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008 RHMS of Serbia 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are operationally used in Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia from the beginning of 2003.
More informationUnified Cloud and Mixing Parameterizations of the Marine Boundary Layer: EDMF and PDF-based cloud approaches
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Unified Cloud and Mixing Parameterizations of the Marine Boundary Layer: EDMF and PDF-based cloud approaches Joao Teixeira
More informationFORECASTING MESOSCALE PRECIPITATION USING THE MM5 MODEL WITH THE FOUR-DIMENSIONAL DATA ASSIMILATION (FDDA) TECHNIQUE
Global NEST Journal, Vol 7, No 3, pp 258-263, 2005 Copyright 2005 Global NEST Printed in Greece. All rights reserved FORECASTING MESOSCALE PRECIPITATION USING THE MM5 MODEL WITH THE FOUR-DIMENSIONAL DATA
More informationCreating Meteorology for CMAQ
Creating Meteorology for CMAQ Tanya L. Otte* Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Research Triangle Park, NC * On assignment to the National Exposure Research Laboratory,
More informationEVALUATION OF THE WRF METEOROLOGICAL MODEL RESULTS FOR HIGH OZONE EPISODE IN SW POLAND THE ROLE OF MODEL INITIAL CONDITIONS Wrocław, Poland
EVALUATION OF THE WRF METEOROLOGICAL MODEL RESULTS FOR HIGH OZONE EPISODE IN SW POLAND THE ROLE OF MODEL INITIAL CONDITIONS Kinga Wałaszek 1, Maciej Kryza 1, Małgorzata Werner 1 1 Department of Climatology
More information1. INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Model Domain Configurations
18.6 CONVECTIVE FORECAST PERFORMANCE OF AN OPERATIONAL MESOSCALE MODELLING SYSTEM Anthony P. Praino* and Lloyd A. Treinish IBM Thomas J Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 1. INTRODUCTION In our
More informationInvestigation of the Arizona Severe Weather Event of August 8 th, 1997
Investigation of the Arizona Severe Weather Event of August 8 th, 1997 Tim Hollfelder May 10 th, 2006 Abstract Synoptic scale forcings were very weak for these thunderstorms on August 7-8, 1997 over the
More informationA Snow-Ratio Equation and Its Application to Numerical Snowfall Prediction
644 W E A T H E R A N D F O R E C A S T I N G VOLUME 23 A Snow-Ratio Equation and Its Application to Numerical Snowfall Prediction KUN-YOUNG BYUN, JUN YANG,* AND TAE-YOUNG LEE Laboratory for Atmospheric
More informationLateral Boundary Conditions
Lateral Boundary Conditions Introduction For any non-global numerical simulation, the simulation domain is finite. Consequently, some means of handling the outermost extent of the simulation domain its
More informationWeather report 28 November 2017 Campinas/SP
Weather report 28 November 2017 Campinas/SP Summary: 1) Synoptic analysis and pre-convective environment 2) Verification 1) Synoptic analysis and pre-convective environment: At 1200 UTC 28 November 2017
More informationFinal Report for Partners Project S Project Title: Application of High Resolution Mesoscale Models to Improve Weather Forecasting in Hawaii
Final Report for Partners Project S04-44687 Project Title: Application of High Resolution Mesoscale Models to Improve Weather Forecasting in Hawaii University: University of Hawaii Name of University Researcher
More informationMaximization of Historical Severe Precipitation Events over American, Yuba and Feather River Basins
Maximization of Historical Severe Precipitation Events over merican, Yuba and Feather River Basins M. L. Kavvas 1, K. Ishida 1, S. Jang 1, N. Ohara 2, Z.Q.Chen 3, and M. nderson 3 1 University Of California,
More informationAn Evaluation of Seeding Effectiveness in the Central Colorado Mountains River Basins Weather Modification Program
2016, UCAR. All rights reserved. An Evaluation of Seeding Effectiveness in the Central Colorado Mountains River Basins Weather Modification Program for Grand River Consulting Sponsors: Colorado Water Conservation
More information8.3 A STUDY OF AIR-SEA INTERACTIONS AND ASSOCIATED TROPICAL HURRICANE ACTIVITY OVER GULF OF MEXICO USING SATELLITE DATA AND NUMERICAL MODELING
8.3 A STUDY OF AIR-SEA INTERACTIONS AND ASSOCIATED TROPICAL HURRICANE ACTIVITY OVER GULF OF MEXICO USING SATELLITE DATA AND NUMERICAL MODELING R. Suseela Reddy*, Alexander Schwartz, Praveena Remata, Jamese
More informationIdentification of Predictors for Nowcasting Heavy Rainfall In Taiwan --------------------- Part II: Storm Characteristics and Nowcasting Applications Challenges in Developing Nowcasting Applications for
More informationAiguo Dai * and Kevin E. Trenberth National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) $, Boulder, CO. Abstract
9.2 AMS 14 th Symposium on Global Change and Climate Variations, 9-13 Feb. 2003, Long Beach, CA. Diurnal Variations in the Community Climate System Model Aiguo Dai * and Kevin E. Trenberth National Center
More informationImportance of Numerical Weather Prediction in Variable Renewable Energy Forecast
Importance of Numerical Weather Prediction in Variable Renewable Energy Forecast Dr. Abhijit Basu (Integrated Research & Action for Development) Arideep Halder (Thinkthrough Consulting Pvt. Ltd.) September
More informationConvection Nowcasting Products Available at the Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Ranges
Convection Nowcasting Products Available at the Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Ranges Cathy Kessinger National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO with contributions from: Wiebke
More informationApplication and verification of ECMWF products 2013
Application and verification of EMWF products 2013 Hellenic National Meteorological Service (HNMS) Flora Gofa and Theodora Tzeferi 1. Summary of major highlights In order to determine the quality of the
More informationNear-surface weather prediction and surface data assimilation: challenges, development, and potential data needs
Near-surface weather prediction and surface data assimilation: challenges, development, and potential data needs Zhaoxia Pu Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah,
More informationHigh Resolution Ensemble Prediction of Typhoon Morakot (2009) May 11, 2011
High Resolution Ensemble Prediction of Typhoon Morakot (2009) Ying-Hwa Kuo 1,* and Xingqin Fang 1,2 1 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA 2 Department of Atmospheric Sciences,
More informationIMPROVING CLOUD PREDICTION IN WRF THROUGH THE USE OF GOES SATELLITE ASSIMILATION
IMPROVING CLOUD PREDICTION IN WRF THROUGH THE USE OF GOES SATELLITE ASSIMILATION Andrew T. White*, Arastoo P. Biazar, Richard T. McNider, Kevin Doty, Maudood Khan Earth System Science Center, The University
More informationTC/PR/RB Lecture 3 - Simulation of Random Model Errors
TC/PR/RB Lecture 3 - Simulation of Random Model Errors Roberto Buizza (buizza@ecmwf.int) European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts http://www.ecmwf.int Roberto Buizza (buizza@ecmwf.int) 1 ECMWF
More informationAMPS Update June 2017
AMPS Update June 2017 Kevin W. Manning Jordan G. Powers Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO 12th Workshop on Antarctic Meteorology and Climate
More informationA Study of Convective Initiation Failure on 22 Oct 2004
A Study of Convective Initiation Failure on 22 Oct 2004 Jennifer M. Laflin Philip N. Schumacher NWS Sioux Falls, SD August 6 th, 2011 Introduction Forecasting challenge: strong forcing for ascent and large
More informationWRF Model Simulated Proxy Datasets Used for GOES-R Research Activities
WRF Model Simulated Proxy Datasets Used for GOES-R Research Activities Jason Otkin Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin
More informationTHE INFLUENCE OF HIGHLY RESOLVED SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURES ON METEOROLOGICAL SIMULATIONS OFF THE SOUTHEAST US COAST
THE INFLUENCE OF HIGHLY RESOLVED SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURES ON METEOROLOGICAL SIMULATIONS OFF THE SOUTHEAST US COAST Peter Childs, Sethu Raman, and Ryan Boyles State Climate Office of North Carolina and
More informationChris Lennard. Downscaling seasonal forecasts over South Africa
Chris Lennard Downscaling seasonal forecasts over South Africa Seasonal forecasting at CSAG Implemented new forecast system on a new computational platform...lots of blood, still bleeding United Kingdom
More informationP1.89 COMPARISON OF IMPACTS OF WRF DYNAMIC CORE, PHYSICS PACKAGE, AND INITIAL CONDITIONS ON WARM SEASON RAINFALL FORECASTS
P1.89 COMPARISON OF IMPACTS OF WRF DYNAMIC CORE, PHYSICS PACKAGE, AND INITIAL CONDITIONS ON WARM SEASON RAINFALL FORECASTS William A. Gallus, Jr. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 1. INTRODUCTION A series
More informationTOVS and the MM5 analysis over Portugal
TOVS and the MM5 analysis over Portugal YOSHIHIRO YAMAZAKI University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal MARIA DE LOS DOLORS MANSO ORGAZ University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal ABSTRACT TOVS data retrieved from
More information