SAM GEEN (ITA, HEIDELBERG)

Transcription

1 Episode IV: THE RETURN TO SAM GEEN (ITA, HEIDELBERG) WITH PATRICK HENNEBELLE PASCAL TREMBLIN AND JOAKIM ROSDAHL

2 UV FEEDBACK IN CLOUDS HII HII regions, regions, supernovae, supernovae, Molecular Molecular clouds clouds Outline Outline of of talk: talk: How does photoionisation drive outflows in star-forming clouds? How does photoionisation drive outflows in star-forming clouds? How do supernovae interact with HII regions and clouds? How do supernovae interact with HII regions and clouds? Can we explain self-regulation of star formation? Can we explain self-regulation of star formation? Interaction between observational techniques and simulations Interaction between observational techniques and simulations

3 Photoionisation 1) UV photons stream out of the star, ionising hydrogen until all the photons are used to keep the gas ionised (called the Strömgren radius ) How to make an HII region 2) The photoionised gas is at ~ 10,000 K so a shock begins to expand at ~ 10 km/s (still in photoionisation equilibrium) 3) The expansion can stall or even collapse via turbulence or accretion Example: Initial Strömgren radius is ~0.3 pc for a source of 1048 UV photons/s in a cloud of density 1000 cm-3 See Geen et al, 2015 a, b, 2016 for more detailed models of this

4 Simulations Use AMR code RAMSES-RT + MHD (Teyssier 2002, Fromang et al 2006, Rosdahl et al 2013, 2015) Take an isothermal gas sphere (can vary mass, density, etc) Include Kolmogorov turbulence, self-gravity, B-field (20 μg peak in Fiducial run) Use a 2563 coarse grid with 2 levels of AMR on Jeans unstable cells (effective resolution 10243) In the Fiducial run, the box is 25 pc max resolution pc Evolve the cloud for 1 freefall time, then put in a source of photons (Vacca et al, 1996, Sternberg et al, 2003) Trace ionising photons with M1 method treats photons as a fluid on the AMR grid See Geen, Hennebelle, Tremblin & Rosdahl, 2015 or 2016

5 Varying Photon Emission Rate 105 Msun cloud Edge of HII region No UV source 1049/s (0.1% SFE) 1050/s (1% SFE) 1051/s (10% SFE)

6 HII Regions and SUPERNOVAE What What happens happens when when you you put put a a supernova supernova in in a a very very turbulent turbulent cloud? cloud? g cm / s in turbulent flows Our cloud has ~~ 10 Our M Msun cloud has 10 g cm / s in turbulent flows sun 8-3 Embedded Embedded dense dense clumps clumps up up to to cm cm-3,, despite despite HII HII radiation radiation beforehand beforehand (See (See Iffrig Iffrig & & Hennebelle, Hennebelle, for for less less massive massive cloud cloud with with a a similar similar setup setup Also Also Martizzi Martizzi et et al, al, 2014, 2014, Kim Kim & & Ostriker Ostriker 2015, 2015, Li Li et et al al 2015, 2015, Walch Walch & & Naab Naab 2015) 2015) Credit: Steven Sugar

7 HII regions and supernovae Edge of ionised gas 4 Cooling time ~ 10 Cooling time ~ 104 years years Very Very little little hot hot gas gas remaining remaining

8 MOMENTUM FROM SNe (Supernova momentum subtracted from total cloud momentum) (Iffrig & Hennebelle 2015)

9 MOMENTUM FROM SNe g cm/s per 1051 We get ~ 10 We get ~ 10 g cm/s per 1051 ergs ergs of of SN SN energy energy This This is is perhaps perhaps times times lower lower than than other other authors authors (Review (Review by by Thorsten Thorsten Naab, Naab, in in prep) prep) Why? Why? Iffrig Iffrig & & Hennebelle Hennebelle use use similar similar code code and and initial initial conditions conditions and and get get better better agreement agreement with with others others Some Some hypotheses hypotheses (see (see Geen Geen et et al, al, 2016) 2016) 4-3 Explodes Explodes in/next in/next to to gas gas > > cm cm-3 Shock Shock cools cools within within pc, pc, inside inside cloud cloud High High ram ram pressure pressure inside inside cloud cloud Out-of-equilibrium Out-of-equilibrium ionised ionised gas gas cooling cooling Difficulty Difficulty resolving resolving cooling cooling scales scales in in very very dense dense gas gas Signal Signal from from supernova supernova is is too too weak weak compared compared to to total total cloud cloud momentum momentum Still Still lots lots of of open open questions questions Supernovae Supernovae very very sensitive sensitive to to conditions conditions Be Be careful careful with with your your sub-grid sub-grid models! models!

10 SELF REGULATION OF STAR FORMATION Credit: NASA/Hubble

11 Cloud Self Destruction with UV (for other work with feedback on sinks, see review by Dale, 2015) 104 Msun cloud 1 freefall time Sink particles accrete gas above Jeans limit Particles emit radiation (S* = 9x1046 /s / Msun) 1 freefall time Sinks form in dense peaks More radiation from stars as gas is accreted Cloud is dispersed, accretion cut off How does this compare to Star formation ends observational estimates of SFE? Take column density maps Use 6 lines of sight Finds stars inside A = 0.1 k

12 Apparent Apparent SFE SFE IN IN SIMULATIONS SIMULATIONS To reproduce observed relations, we need BOTH: HII radiation The right density Fit from Lada et al, 2010 Cloud evolves over time from here, ends at circle marker

13 Analytic modelling With Antoine Verliat (masters student this summer with Patrick Hennebelle) Some success explaining expansion of HII regions with constant photon sources (Geen et al 2015a,b, 2016) Can we extend this to explaining the regulation of star formation inside molecular clouds? Fairly easy to get ~1 to 10% SFE (star formation efficiency), but accurate predictions are harder... Open questions: How best to compare to simulations? What does the analytic model mean? Can we be sure of our results? i.e. are they degenerate with another way of getting the same SFE? More work to be done Feedback cycles in astrophysics are complex spatial, multivariate problems to describe precisely (quantitatively and qualitatively)

14 Syththetic Observations Observations Simulations Credit: Lost Valley Observatory

15 Syththetic Observations New New project project at at ITA, ITA, Heidelberg Heidelberg Couple Couple OPIATE OPIATE by by Eric Eric Pellegrini Pellegrini to to RAMSES RAMSES (Optimized (Optimized Post-processing Post-processing Iterative Iterative Approach Approach To To Emissivities) Emissivities) Multi-variate Multi-variate calculations calculations of of emission/extinction emission/extinction Allow Allow synthetic synthetic observations observations of of simulations simulations Improve Improve cooling cooling of of photoionised photoionised gas gas Anticipated Anticipated projects: projects: Explore geometry & evolution of observed HII regions Explore geometry & evolution of observed HII regions Model wider spectrum of UV photons in RAMSES Model wider spectrum of UV photons in RAMSES Insights into star formation laws (e.g. Lada+ 2010) Insights into star formation laws (e.g. Lada+ 2010) 3D 3D tools tools for for RAMSES RAMSES outputs: outputs: Use programmable shaders on graphics cards Use programmable shaders on graphics cards Compute emission/extinction maps in real time Compute emission/extinction maps in real time Cyan: Ionised, Orange: Neutral

16 Thoughts We use RAMSES to model UV photoionisation and supernovae in star-forming regions The The combination combination of of simulations simulations and and analytic analytic theory theory is is vital vital to to understanding understanding feedback feedback Exciting Exciting new new possibilities possibilities for for coupling coupling simulations simulations and and observations observations Still Still a a lot lot to to understand understand on on the the small small scale scale before before itit can can be be applied applied to to galaxies galaxies

17 ANY QUESTIONS? References: References: GEEN, GEEN, HENNEBELLE, HENNEBELLE, TREMBLIN, TREMBLIN, ROSDAHL ROSDAHL (2015) (2015) GEEN, GEEN, HENNEBELLE, HENNEBELLE, TREMBLIN, TREMBLIN, ROSDAHL ROSDAHL (2016) (2016)

18 Extra slides HIDDEN SECRETS

19 Modelling HII regions In the most extreme case, if vesc ~ 10 km/s (sound speed in ionised gas) front cannot expand beyond the initial Strömgren radius (Dale, 2012) But in order for the ionisation front to escape the cloud, we need the stall radius to be larger than the cloud. vesc can be lower and still create an ultracompact HII region. Assuming a uniform, virialised cloud, we need at least this many photons: Photon emission rate Surface density of cloud Mass of cloud See Geen, Hennebelle, Tremblin & Rosdahl (2015) for details If we assume a population of stars, this corresponds to a mass in stars of: So what does this mean in practice? Let's look at an example from simulations:

20 Varying Photon Emission Rate rstall at 1.6 rcloud Escapes Analytic density model: - Flat core - Power law outside (See Franco et al, 1990) Edge of cloud core rstall at 1.1 rcloud Escapes eventually rstall at 0.82 rcloud Trapped Collapse due to accretion (see Larson 1969 / Appendix D of upcoming paper) Simulation Analytic Model

21 Apparent SFE IN SIMULATIONS Projected SFE (c.f. Lada et al, 2010) Total Sink mass Initial cloud mass Without UV With UV Take column density maps Use 6 lines of sight Finds stars inside Ak = 0.1 Cloud dispersed, stars no longer associated with dense gas

22 After 0.5 Myr Just before supernova Supernovae in CLOUDS 5 Following Following the the first first supernova supernova from from a a massive massive star star in in a a solar solar mass mass cloud cloud Evolve Evolve cloud cloud for for Myr, Myr, then then add add UV UV radiation radiation for for 3 3 Myr, Myr, then then inject inject a a supernova supernova

23 Varying Cloud Density 104 solar mass cloud Simulation HII region escapes the cloud Analytic Model Stopped by ram pressure from turbulence Source flickers as dense clumps pass through it (see papers by Peters, Galván-Madrid, Klassen) Model assumes constant power law density, gas at freefall (i.e. virialised)

24 Why Radiation? Radiation? Ionising Photons (is 1051 ergs ok?) (maybe not?) Complications: - Rotating stars? - Protostellar jets? - Other radiative processes? - Interaction between processes (see Geen, Rosdahl, Blaizot, Devriendt & Slyz 2015) Credit: Robert Gendler

25 Collapsing Fronts? MORE MODELS 1 freefall time From Larson (1969), Ntormousi & Hennebelle (2015) Flickering due to clump motion

26 Momentum Added to ISM Model for momentum: dri/dt * mass inside ri (Assuming power Simulation law density field, no Model infall velocity) 0 /s 1047 /s 1048 /s 1048 /s (B=0) 1049 /s Ignoring turbulence works OK for stronger sources but not for weaker ones.

27 Feedback Amplifier OUT IN Filter (e.g. attenuator) Can be positive (feedback increases signal strength) or negative (feedback decreases signal strength)

28 Feedback Star Formation IN (gas) OUT (stars) Energetic stellar processes (superonvae, winds, radiation, jets) Can be positive (shock compression, metals from SNe efficient cooling, source of turbulence) or negative (cloud destruction, galactic winds)

29 Magnets? See also papers by How do Patrick Hennebelle they work? and collaborators

30 varying Cloud Density Our standard cloud Most compact cloud (1/8 freefall time)

31 Varying Source STrengtH (ignoring turbulence) 1047 /s 1048 /s 1048 /s (B=0) 1049 /s Simulation Model (Assuming power law density field, no infall velocity)

32 Positive Feedback? Our ionisation front causes mass to pile up around it as it expands Can we trigger star formation in this dense shell? Elmegreen (1994) says yes! If this is true... In our simulations this more or less means Which is just outside the time/size of our simulations So we don't see it, but it's possible!

33 Turbulence vs infall Here we turn off turbulence and let the cloud just collapse radially Need more photons to escape! Cloud collapses and crushes HII region Simulation Analytic model

34 NO MORE SLIDES WE ARE DONE