arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 30 Aug 2018

Transcription

1 Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. article c ESO 218 August 31, 218 Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta T. Vaillant, J. Laskar, N. Rambaux, and M. Gastineau ASD/IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Université, Sorbonne Université, 77 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 7514 Paris, France Received ; accepted arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 3 Aug 218 ABSTRACT Context. The dwarf planet Ceres and the asteroid Vesta have been studied by the Dawn space mission. They are the two heaviest bodies of the main asteroid belt and have different characteristics. Notably, Vesta appears to be dry and inactive with two large basins at its south pole. Ceres is an ice-rich body with signs of cryovolcanic activity. Aims. The aim of this paper is to determine the obliquity variations of Ceres and Vesta and to study their rotational stability. Methods. The orbital and rotational motions have been integrated by symplectic integration. The rotational stability has been studied by integrating secular equations and by computing the diffusion of the precession frequency. Results. The obliquity variations of Ceres over [ 2 : ] Myr are between 2 and 2 and the obliquity variations of Vesta are between 21 and 45. The two giant impacts suffered by Vesta modified the precession constant and could have put Vesta closer to the resonance with the orbital frequency 2s 6 s V. Given the uncertainty on the polar moment of inertia, the present Vesta could be in this resonance, where the obliquity variations can vary between 17 and 48. Conclusions. Although Ceres and Vesta have precession frequencies close to the secular orbital frequencies of the inner planets, their long-term rotations are relatively stable. The perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn dominate the secular orbital dynamics of Ceres and Vesta and the perturbations of the inner planets are much weaker. The secular resonances with the inner planets also have smaller widths and do not overlap contrary to the case of the inner planets. Key words. celestial mechanics - planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability - minor planets, asteroids: individual: Ceres - minor planets, asteroids: individual: Vesta 1. Introduction Ceres and Vesta are the two heaviest bodies of the main asteroid belt. They have been studied by the Dawn space mission, which has allowed to determine notably their shape, gravity field, surface composition, spin rate and orientation (Russell et al. 212; Russell et al. 216). However the precession frequency of their spin axes has not be determined and there are still uncertainties about their internal structures (e.g. Park et al. 214; Ermakov et al. 214; Park et al. 216; Ermakov et al. 217b; Konopliv et al. 218). No satellites have been detected from observations with the Hubble Space Telescope and the Dawn space mission around these bodies (McFadden et al. 212; McFadden et al. 215; DeMario et al. 216). The long-term rotation of the bodies of the solar system can be studied with secular equations (Kinoshita 1977; Laskar 1986; Laskar & Robutel 1993) or with a symplectic integration of the orbital and rotational motions (Touma & Wisdom 1994). Secular equations are averaged over the mean longitude and over the proper rotation, which is generally fast for the bodies of the solar system, and their integration is much faster. They were used by Laskar et al. (1993 and Laskar & Robutel (1993) to study the stability of the planets of the solar system. The method of Laskar & Robutel (1993) has been applied by Skoglöv et al. (1996) to study the stability of the rotation and the variations of the obliquity for Ceres and nine asteroids including Vesta. However at this time, the initial conditions for the spin axes were not determined precisely and knowledge on the internal structure lacked to constrain the precession frequencies. Skoglöv et al. (1996) assumed that the bodies are homogeneous and concluded that their long-term rotations are relatively stable. By using secular equations and a secular model for the orbital motion, Bills & Scott (217) determined the obliquity variations of Ceres. Ermakov et al. (217 obtained the obliquity variations of Ceres for different polar moments of inertia by realizing the symplectic integration of the rotational and orbital motions. Asteroid impacts and close encounters can influence the long-term rotation of bodies in the main asteroid belt. Vesta has suffered two giants impacts (Marchi et al. 212; Schenk et al. 212), which have significantly modified its shape and its spin rate (Fu et al. 214; Ermakov et al. 214). Laskar et al. (211 obtained an orbital solution of Ceres and Vesta, called La21, which takes into account mutual interactions between bodies of the main asteroid belt and Laskar et al. (211 showed that close encounters in the solution La21 are the cause of the chaotic nature of the orbits of Ceres and Vesta. These close encounters can affect their long-term rotation. For Ceres, the obliquity drives the ice distribution on and under the surface. Ceres possesses cold trap regions, which do not receive sunlight during a full orbit. This prevents the sublimation of the ice, which can accumulate (Platz et al. 216). The surface area of these cold traps depends on the value of the obliquity. Ermakov et al. (217 determined that the obliquity of Ceres varies between 2 and 2 and that the cold trap areas for an obliquity of 2 correspond to bright crater floor deposits that are likely water ice deposits. Platz et al. (216) determined that one bright deposit near a shadowed crater is water ice. In addition, the Dawn mission gave evidence of the presence of ice under the surface of Ceres from the nuclear spectroscopy instrument (Prettyman et al. 217) and from the morphology of the terrains (Schmidt et al. 217). The ice distribution and the burial depth with respect to the latitude depends on the history Article number, page 1 of 23

2 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article of the obliquity (Schorghofer 28, 216). For Vesta, studies of the long-term evolution of the obliquity were not performed with the initial conditions of the spin axis and the physical characteristics determined by the Dawn space mission. The main purpose of this article is to investigate the longterm evolution of the rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta. First, we explore the obliquity variations of these bodies for a range of possible precession constants obtained from the data of the Dawn mission. Then, the stability of their spin axes is studied. In this paper, we consider for the orbital motion the solutions La211 and La21 (Laskar et al. 211, which do not include the rotation of Ceres and Vesta. To compute the obliquity variations, we follow the symplectic method of Farago et al. (29) by averaging the fast proper rotation. This method avoids to integrate the fast rotation and allows to use a large step to reduce the computation time. We call Ceres217 the long-term rotational solution obtained. The orbital and rotational equations are integrated simultaneously in a symplectic way and the effects of the rotation on the orbital motions are considered. We consider the close encounters of Ceres and Vesta with the bodies of the main asteroid belt used in Laskar et al. (211 and estimate with a statistical approach their effects on the long-term rotation of Ceres and Vesta. In order to determine the secular frequencies and identify the possible secular resonances on the orbital and rotational motions, the solutions are studied by the method of the frequency map analysis (Laskar 1988, 199; Laskar et al. 1992; Laskar 1993, 23). Moreover to study the effects of the close secular orbital resonances, we compute a secular Hamiltonian from the method of Laskar & Robutel (1995). We obtain a secular model, which reproduces the secular evolution of the solution La211 and allows to investigate the effects of the secular resonances. The stability of the spin axes is studied by using secular equations with a secular orbital solution obtained from the frequency analysis of the solution La211. We verify beforehand that they allow to reproduce the obliquity variations computed by the symplectic method and have the same stability properties. We study the stability of the rotation in the vicinity of the range of possible precession constants to identify the secular resonances between the orbital and rotational motions. Vesta has suffered two giant impacts which have changed its shape and its spin rate (Fu et al. 214; Ermakov et al. 214) and also its precession constant. We investigate if this possible evolution of precession constant changed the stability properties. Following the method of Laskar & Robutel (1993), we finally realize a stability map of the spin axes of Ceres and Vesta. In section 2, we present the methods used in this paper to obtain the long-term rotation. In section 3, we estimate the precession constants deduced from Dawn space mission and their possible variations during the history of Ceres and Vesta. In section 4, we analyse the long-term solutions obtained for the orbital and rotational motions. In section 5, we study the effects of the orbital secular resonances with a secular Hamiltonian model. In section 6, we study the stability of the rotation axes from the secular equations of the rotation. 2. Methods for the integration of the rotation The spin rates of Ceres and Vesta are relatively fast (see section 3). We thus average the fast rotation using the method of Farago et al. (29) in order to integrate in a symplectic way the angular momentum of a rigid body, When we need many integrations with different initial conditions or parameters, we use the secular equations from Boué & Laskar (26) in order to speed up the computation Symplectic integration of the angular momentum We consider a planetary system of n + 1 bodies with a central body and n planetary bodies, where the body of index 1 is a rigid body and the other planetary bodies point masses. We note the vectors in bold. The Hamiltonian H of the system is (Boué & Laskar 26) H = H N + H I, + n H I,k + H E, (1) k=2 with H N the Hamiltonian of n+1 point masses. The Hamiltonian H E of the free rigid body is H E = (G.I)2 2A + (G.J)2 2B + (G.K)2 2C. (2) (I,J,K) is the basis associated to the principal axes of moments of inertia respectively A, B, C, where A B C, and G the angular momentum of the rigid body. The Hamiltonians H I, and H I,k are respectively the interactions without the point mass interactions of the central body and of the planetary body k with the rigid body 1 and are obtained with a development in Legendre polynomials (Boué & Laskar 26) H I, = Gm 2r 3 1 ( ) 2 ( (B + C 2A) r1.i r1.j + (A + C 2B) r 1 ( ) 2 r1.k + (A + B 2C), r 1 H I,k = Gm ( ) k 2r 3 (B + C 2A) r1,k.i 2 ( r1,k.j + (A + C 2B) r 1,k 1,k r 1,k ( ) r1,k.k 2 + (A + B 2C), r 1,k with (r k, r k ) the heliocentric position and the conjugate momemtum of the body k, m k the mass of the body k, r 1,k = r 1 r k and G the gravitational constant. By averaging over the fast Andoyer angles g, the angle of proper rotation, and l, the angle of precession of the polar axis K around the angular momentum G (Boué & Laskar 26), H E becomes constant and the averaged total Hamiltonian H is n H = H g,l = H N + H I, + H I,k, (5) where H I, = H I, g,l = C 1m r 3 1 k=2 1 3 ( r1.w r 1 r 1 ) 2 (3) ) 2 (4) ) 2, (6) H I,k = ( ) H I,k g,l = C 1m k r r1,k.w 2 r, (7) 1,k 1,k Article number, page 2 of 23

3 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta with w = G G, (8) C 1 = G 2 ( C A + B 2 ) ( 1 3 ) 2 sin2 J and J the Andoyer angle between w and K. G is the norm of the angular momentum G. The Hamiltonian H = H N + H I, + n k=2 H I,k can be split in several parts. The Hamiltonian H N of n point masses can be integrated with the existing symplectic integrators (e.g. Wisdom & Holman 1991; Laskar & Robutel 21; Farrés et al. 213). For a planetary system where a planet is located much closer to the central star than the other planets, Farago et al. (29) averaged its fast orbital motion to obtain a Hamiltonian of interaction between the orbital angular momentum of the closest planet and the other more distant planets. Because the Hamiltonians H I, and H I,k are analogous to this Hamiltonian, we can use the symplectic method developped by Farago et al. (29) for this case. We detail explicitly how this method can be applied here. The Hamiltonian H I, gives the equations of the motion (Boué & Laskar 26) ṙ 1 = r 1 = r1 H I, = 3C ( ) 2 1m r r1.w r r (r 1.w) w, 1 1 ẇ = 1 G wh I, w = 6C 1m Gr 5 1 (r 1.w) r 1 w. (9) (1) r 1 is conserved and because of r 1.ẇ =, r 1.w is also constant. With the angular frequency Ω = 6C 1 m (r 1.w) /(Gr 4 1 ) as in Farago et al. (29), the solution for w is w (t) = R r1 (Ω t) w (), (11) where R x (θ) is the rotation matrix of angle θ around the vector x. The solution for r 1 is (Farago et al. 29) r 1 (t) = r 1 () 3C ( ) 2 1m r r1.w r tr r ) 1.w (w (t) w ()) r 1. (12) Ω r 1 We have then an exact solution for the Hamiltonian H I,. The equations of motion for the Hamiltonian H I,k are similar. However, this Hamiltonian modifies the variables of the body k. The equations are then ṙ 1 =, r 1 = 3C ( 1m k r r1,k.w r, 1,k 1,k ṙ k =, r k = 3C ( ) 1m k r r1,k.w 2 r r 1,k + 2 ( r ) 1,k.w w, 1,k 1,k ẇ = 6C 1m k Gr 5 1,k ( r1,k.w ) r 1,k w, ) 2 r 1,k + 2 ( r 1,k.w ) w (13) which have the solution r 1 (t) = r 1 () 3C 1m k r 5 1,k w (t) = R r1,k (Ω k t) w (), ( ) 1 3 r1,k.w 2 tr 1,k r 1,k + 2r ) 1,k.w (w (t) w ()) r 1,k, Ω k r 1,k r k (t) = r k () + 3C ( ) 1m k r r1,k.w 2 r tr 1,k 1,k 1,k + 2r 1,k.w Ω k r 1,k (w (t) w ()) r 1,k ), (14) with the angular frequency Ω k = 6C 1 m k ( r1,k.w ) /(Gr 4 1,k ). The symplectic scheme for the total Hamiltonian is (Farago et al. 29) S (t) = e t 2 L H I, e t 2 L H I,2... e t 2 L H I,n e tl HN e t 2 L H I,n... e t 2 L H I,2 e t 2 L H I,, (15) where L X represents the Lie derivative of a Hamiltonian X. This scheme gives a symplectic solution for the long-term evolution of the angular momentum of the rigid body. It is possible to neglect the effects of the rotation on the orbital motion by keeping r 1 = and r k = in Eqs. (1) and (13). This allows to obtain multiple solutions for the long-term rotation with different initial conditions for the angular momentum by computing only one orbital evolution. In this case, the total energy is still conserved, but it is not the case for the total angular momentum. By averaging over the fast rotation of Ceres and Vesta, this method is used in section 4 to obtain the long-term evolution of the angular momenta of Ceres and Vesta where the torques are exerted by the Sun and the planets Secular equations for the angular momentum In order to speed up the computation, we average the Hamiltonian (Eq. (5)) over the mean longitude of the rigid body. By considering only the torque exerted by the Sun, we obtain the secular Hamiltonian for the rotation axis (Boué & Laskar 26) Gα H = 2 ( 1 e 2) 3/2 (w.n)2, (16) with G = Cω for the spin rate ω. The motion of the angular momentum is forced by a secular orbital solution, from which the normal to the orbit n and the eccentricity e are computed. The precession constant α can be written α = 3 GM ( C A + B ) ( 1 3 ) 2 Cωa sin2 J (17) with a the semi-major axis and M the mass of the Sun. The moments of inertia can be normalized by A = A mr 2, B = B mr 2, C = C mr 2, I = I mr 2, (18) with I = (A+B+C)/3 the mean moment of inertia, m the mass of the solid body and R the reference radius used for the determination of the gravity field. The gravitationnal flatenning J 2 depends on the normalized moments of inertia with J 2 = C A + B. (19) 2 Article number, page 3 of 23

4 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article The precession constant can then be written α = 3 ( GM J ) 2 Cωa 3 2 sin2 J. (2) The secular equation for the angular momentum w is then (e.g. Colombo 1966; Boué & Laskar 26) α ẇ = ( 1 e 2 ) (w.n) w n. (21) 3/2 The angle between the normal to the orbit, n, and the angular momentum, w, is the obliquity ɛ. The Eq. (21) will be used in section 6 to study the stability of the spin axes of Ceres and Vesta. 3. Precession constants and initial conditions To determine the quantity C 1 (Eq. (9)) and the precession constant α (Eq. (2)), the polar moment of inertia C, the spin rate ω, the gravitationnal flattening J 2 and the Andoyer angle J are necessary Estimation of the Andoyer angle J The Andoyer angle J is the angle between the angular momentum G and the polar axis K. The Dawn space mission determined the principal axes of Ceres and Vesta and measured the gravitational field in these frames. To obtain the precision of the determination of the principal axes, we estimate the angle γ between the polar axis and its determination by Dawn with the expression γ C S 21 2 /C. (22) The spherical harmonic gravity coefficients of second degree and first order C 21 and S 21 were determined with their uncertainties by Dawn for Ceres (Park et al. 216) and Vesta (Konopliv et al. 214). Because C 21 and S 21 are smaller than their uncertainties and than the other coefficients of second degree for both bodies, Park et al. (216) and Konopliv et al. (214) deduce that this angle is negligible. By replacing C 21 and S 21 by their uncertainites in Eq. (22) and C by the values of the sections and 3.3.2, the angle γ is about and for respectively Ceres and Vesta. In the basis (I,J,K) associated to the principal axes of moments of inertia, the rotational vector Ω can be expressed as m 1 Ω = ω m 2, (23) 1 + m 3 where m 1, m 2 described the polar motion and m 3 the length of day variations, which were estimated by Rambaux et al. (211) and Rambaux (213) for respectively Ceres and Vesta. The amplitude of the polar motion is about.4 mas for Ceres and.8 mas for Vesta. Rambaux et al. (211) assumed that Ceres is axisymmetric and obtained an amplitude of about mas for m 3. Rambaux (213) considered a triaxial shape for Vesta and obtained an amplitude for m 3 of about.1 mas. The angle between the rotational vector Ω and the polar axis is about for Ceres and for Vesta and the polar motion is then negligible. The rotational vector can also be approximated by Ω = ωk and G verifies G = CωK. Therefore we can neglect sin 2 J in Eq. (2) and the precession constant becomes α = 3 GM J 2 2 Cωa. (24) 3 Article number, page 4 of 23 Mantle density (kg/m 3 ) Mantle radius (km) Fig. 1: Normalized mean moment of inertia I by assuming a spherical shape with respect to the density and radius of the mantle. The purple line represents the numerical solutions of the Clairaut s equations which reproduce the observed gravitationnal flatenning J 2 (Park et al. 216) Precession constant of Ceres Physical parameters From the Dawn data, Park et al. (216) determined J 2 J 2 = ± (25) for the reference radius R = 47 km. (26) Park et al. (216) also refined the spin rate to ω = ±.1 /day. (27) Polar moment of inertia The polar moment of inertia can be estimated from a model of internal structure. Park et al. (216) proposed a set of internal models with two layers by numerically integrating the Clairaut s equations of hydrostatic equilibrium. The mantle of density kg m 3 has a composition similar to the ones of different types of chondrites and the outer shell of density kg m 3 is a blend of volatiles, silicates and salts. Ermakov et al. (217 used the gravity field and the shape obtained by the Dawn space mission and took into account the effect of the isostasy to constrain the internal structure of Ceres. Their favoured model has a crust of density of thickness and of radius kg m 3 and km and a mantle of density kg m km. In figure 1, the purple curve represents the numerical solutions of the Clairaut s equations, which allow to reproduce the observed gravitationnal flatenning J 2 (Park et al. 216). In figure 1, the normalized mean moment of inertia I is computed by assuming a spherical shape as in Eq. (1) of Rambaux et al. (211). For a mantle density of kg m 3, we have I =.375. The normalized polar moment of inertia C can be deduced by C = 2J I. (28) With Eq. (25) and I =.375, we found C = If we take into account the non-spherical shape of Ceres to compute the normalized mean moment of inertia, the normalized polar moment of inertia becomes C = I

5 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta The gravitationnal flatenning possesses a non-hydrostatic component J2 nh, which causes an uncertainty on C. Park et al. (216) estimated J2 nh with J2 nh C S 2 22 = (29) J 2 J 2 for the normalized spherical harmonic gravity coefficients of second degree and second order C 22 and S 22 and J 2 the normalized value of J 2. By derivating the Radau-Darwin relation (e.g. Rambaux et al. 215; Ermakov et al. 217, we obtain the uncertainty I on I 2k I = 3 Jnh 2. (3) (4 k) (1 + k) 3 J 2 The fluid Love number k verifies k = 3J 2 /q (Ermakov et al. 217 with q = ω 2 R 3 vol /(Gm), R vol the volume-equivalent radius and m the mass. For R vol = km (Ermakov et al. 217, Eq. (3) gives the uncertainty I =.47. With Eq. (28), we have C = I+2J2 nh /3 =.53. We keep C =.5 as in Ermakov et al. (217. For the integration of the obliquity, we choose C =.393 and.5 for its uncertainty. The interval of uncertainty on C is then [.388 :.398]. Ermakov et al. (217 obtained the value C =.392 for a radius of R = km, which corresponds to C.3915 for R = 47 km. The value C =.393 is then consistent with the one of Ermakov et al. (217 given the uncertainties Precession constant We take a constant semi-major axis to compute the precession constant. We use the average of the semi-major axis of the solution La211 on [ 25 : 5] Myr, which is about a AU. On this interval, the semi-major axis can move away to a =.5 AU from this value. From Eq. (24) and previous values and uncertainties, we deduce the precession constant α = 6.4 ±.12 /yr. (31) Early Ceres Mao & McKinnon (218) estimated that Ceres should spin about 7 ± 4% faster to be in hydrostatic equilibrium with the observed present shape. They supposed that Ceres was in hydrostatic equilibrium in the past and has then slowed down due to some phenomena like significant asteroid impacts. They obtained for this higher spin rate an internal structure of normalized mean moment of inertia I =.353 ±.9 for a reference radius R = 47 km. With Eq. (28), it corresponds to a normalized polar moment of inertia C =.371 ±.9. The corresponding precession constant is α = 6.34 ±.43 /yr (32) with the value of the semi-major axis of the section With the present spin rate and considering a normalized polar moment of inertia of C =.371 ±.9, the precession constant of the present Ceres would be α = 6.78 ±.2 /yr. (33) ρ (kg m 3 ) semi-principal axes (km) Crust ( 29 a = b = 28.9 c = Mantle 32 a = b = c = Core 78 a = b = c = 12.3 Crust ( 297 a = b = c = Mantle 316 a = b = 257 c = 27 Core 74 a = b = 117 c = 15 Crust (c) 297 a = b = c = Mantle 397 a = b = 213 c = 192 Table 1: Densities and semi-principal axes for different models of internal structure of Vesta. ( corresponds to the reference ellipsoids of table 3 of Ermakov et al. (214), ( and (c) respectively to the three-layer and two-layer models of Park et al. (214). For ( and (c), the dimensions of the crust are given by the best-fit ellipoid of Konopliv et al. (214) Precession constant of Vesta Physical parameters From the Dawn data, Konopliv et al. (214) gived the normalized value for J 2 J 2 = ± (34) for the reference radius R = 265 km. (35) It corresponds to about J 2 = 5 J 2 = The rotation rate has been refined by Konopliv et al. (214) with ω = ±.5 /day. (36) Polar moment of inertia The observation of the precession and nutation of the pole of Vesta by Dawn has not allowed to obtain the polar moment of inertia C (Konopliv et al. 214). Following Rambaux (213), we determine C from an internal model composed of ellipsoidal layers of semi-axes a i, b i, c i and uniform densities ρ i. a i, b i and c i are respectively the major, intermediate and minor semi-axes. For a three-layer model constituted of a crust (1), a mantle (2) and a core (3), C is C = 4π ( ( ) ( ) a1 b 1 c 1 a b 2 1 ρ1 + a 2 b 2 c 2 a b 2 2 (ρ2 ρ 1 ) ( +a 3 b 3 c 3 a b3) 2 (ρ3 ρ 2 ) ). (37) Ermakov et al. (214) and Park et al. (214) proposed internal models from the gravity field and the shape model of Gaskell (212). Ermakov et al. (214) determined the interface between the crust and the mantle. The densities and the reference ellipsoids used by Ermakov et al. (214) to compare their model are in table 1. For these parameters, Eq. (37) gives C =.461. If we use instead of the biaxial crust of the table 1, the triaxial bestfit ellipsoid of Ermakov et al. (214) determined from the shape model of Gaskell (212) with a = km, b = km, c = km, we obtain C =.486. Park et al. (214) proposed three-layer and two-layer models (table 1). For the form of the crust, we use the best-fit ellipsoid of Konopliv et al. (214) instead of the shape of Gaskell (212). Eq. (37) gives the approximate values C =.489 for the three-layer model and C =.4218 for the two-layer model. Article number, page 5 of 23

6 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article Ceres Vesta R.A. ( ) ± ±.3 D ( ) ± ±.2 Table 2: Right ascension (R.A.) and declination (D) of Ceres (Park et al. 216) and Vesta (Konopliv et al. 214) at the epoch J2 in the ICRF frame. We keep C =.49 obtained for the three-layer model of Park et al. (214) with the uncertainty.13, given from the uncertainty interval [.46 :.422] Precession constant Like for Ceres, we consider a mean value for the semi-major axis. With a AU and a =.2 AU, Eq. (24) gives α = 15.6 ±.6 /yr. (38) Early Vesta The southern hemisphere of Vesta has a large depression with two basins Veneneia and Rheasilvia created by two giant impacts (Marchi et al. 212; Schenk et al. 212). Fu et al. (214) fitted the regions of the northern hemisphere not affected by the giant impacts with an ellipsoid of principal axes of dimensions a = 28.6 km, b = km and c = km. By extrapoling this shape to the two hemispheres of the early Vesta supposed hydrostatic, Fu et al. (214) obtained a paleorotation period of 5.2 h and Ermakov et al. (214) a paleorotation period between 4.83 h and 4.93 h for respectively the most and least differentiated internal structures. By replacing the shape of the previous models by the supposed shape of the early Vesta determined by Fu et al. (214), Eq. (37) gives C =.455 for the three layer model of Ermakov et al. (214), C =.481 and C =.421 for respectively the three-layer and two-layer models of Park et al. (214). We choose C =.48 with an uncertainty of.13. The corresponding gravitationnal flatenning is J 2 =.559 ±.3, where the uncertainty is given from the gravitationnal flatennings of the three different models of internal structure. We choose the paleorotation period of 5.2 h of Fu et al. (214). We use the value of the semi-major axis of section and Eq. (24) gives the precession constant for the early Vesta α = 11.6 ±.9 /yr. (39) 3.4. Initial conditions The Dawn space mission refined the orientation of the rotation axes of Ceres and Vesta. We use the coordinates given under the form right ascension/declination in the ICRF frame for the epoch J2 by Park et al. (216) for Ceres and by Konopliv et al. (214) for Vesta reminded in table 2. From these coordinates and their uncertainties, we obtain the obliquities ɛ C and ɛ V of respectively Ceres and Vesta at the epoch J2 ɛ C = ±.3, (4) ɛ V = ±.3. (41) 4. Orbital and rotational solutions obtained with the symplectic integration This section is dedicated to the long-term solutions La211 for the orbital motion and Ceres217 for the rotational motion, which is obtained with the symplectic integration of the angular momentum described in section 2.1. The time origin of the solutions is the epoch J2. We analyse the solutions with the method of the frequency map analysis (Laskar 1988, 199; Laskar et al. 1992; Laskar 1993, 23), which decomposes a discrete temporal function in a quasi-periodic approximation. The precision of the obtained frequencies is estimated by performing a frequency analysis of the solution rebuilt from the frequency decomposition with a temporal offset (Laskar 199). The differences between the frequencies of the two decompositions allow to estimate the accuracy on the determination of the frequencies Perturbations on the rotation axis We investigate and estimate some effects which can affect the long-term rotation in addition to the torques exerted by the Sun and the planets Tidal dissipation The torque exerted on a celestial body for the solar tides is (Mignard 1979) Γ = 3 k 2GM 2 R 5 Cr 8 t [ (r.g) r r 2 G + Cr v ] (42) with t the time delay between the stress exerted by the Sun and the response of the body, k 2 the Love number, R the radius of the body, r and v the heliocentric position and velocity of the body and r the norm of r. For a circular and equatorial orbit, Mignard (1979) writes Γ = 3 k 2GM 2 R 5 2r 6 sin (2δ) (43) with δ = (ω n) t the phase lag and n the mean motion. The phase lag δ is related to the effective specific tidal dissipation function Q by 1/Q = tan(2δ) (MacDonald 1964). Because of the dependance in r 6, the torque decreases strongly with the distance to the Sun. Laskar et al. (24 concluded that the tidal dissipation in the long-term rotation of Mars has an effect on the obliquity inferior to.2 in 1 Myr. We estimate this torque for Ceres and Vesta and compare with the one for Mars in table 3. The values of k 2 and Q used for the estimation of the torque are the ones used by Rambaux et al. (211) for Ceres and by Bills & Nimmo (211) for Vesta. The ratio of the torque on the rotation angular momentum is respectively about 1 and 1 times weaker for Ceres and Vesta than for Mars, for which the effect can be already considered as weak (Laskar et al. 24. Therefore, the solar tidal dissipation for Ceres and Vesta was not considered Close encounters In the long-term solution La21 (Laskar et al. 211, the five bodies of the asteroid belt (1) Ceres, (2) Pallas, (4) Vesta, (7) Iris and (324) Bamberga are considered as planets and there are mutual gravitationnal interactions between them. Laskar et al. (211 considered these bodies because Ceres, Vesta and Pallas Article number, page 6 of 23

7 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta k 2 Q ω ( /day) R (km) C r (AU) Γ/(Cω) (yr 1 ) Mars Ceres Vesta Table 3: Estimation of the solar tidal torque Γ/(Cω) on Mars (Laskar et al. 24a; Konopliv et al. 26), Ceres (Rambaux et al. 211; Park et al. 216) and Vesta (Bills & Nimmo 211; Konopliv et al. 214). perturbed body perturbing body R (km) N c (1 3 Gyr 1 ) A (1 8 AU 2.Gyr 1 ) B (1 1 AU 3/2 ) V (Gyr 1 ) (1) (4) R 1 = 476 km (2) (7) (324) (4) (1) R 4 = 256 km (2) (7) (324) Table 4: Radii R used by Laskar et al. (211 to compute the collision probabilities N c between Ceres and Vesta and some bodies. The values of R for Ceres, Vesta and the other bodies and the ones of N c are extracted from the table 3 of Laskar et al. (211. The coefficients A computed from these values, B and the variance V are also indicated. are the three main bodies of the main asteroid belt and because Iris and Bamberga influence significantly the orbital motion of Mars. Laskar et al. (211 studied the close encounters between these bodies and showed that these close encounters are responsible of their chaotic behaviour. If a body comes close to Ceres or Vesta, it can exert a significant torque during the encounter. The effects of close encounters on the rotation axes of the giant planets have been studied by Lee et al. (27). For a body of mass m with no satellites, the maximal difference w between the angular momentum before an encounter with a perturbing body of mass m pert and the one after is (Lee et al. 27) w = π 2 αm pert M a 3 r 2 pv p (44) with α the precession constant (Eq. (24)), a the semi-major axis, r p and v p = 2G(m + m pert )/r p respectively the distance and the relative speed between the two bodies at the closest distance. We can write this formula as w = Br 3/2 p (45) with B = 3π 4 m G pert 2 ( ) J 2 m + m pert Cω. (46) The values of the coefficient B have been computed in table 4 for close encounters considered in Laskar et al. (211. Therefore a close encounter changes the orientation of the rotation axis at the most of the angle θ = arccos 1 B2. (47) 2r 3 p Laskar et al. (211 studied the probability of close encounters between the five bodies of the asteroid belt considered in the solution La21 (Laskar et al. 211 and determined that the probability density ρ(r p ) per unit of time of an encounter with a distance r p at the closest approach can be fitted by a linear function of r p for r p AU ρ ( r p ) = Arp, (48) with A = 2N c (R 1 + R 2 ) 2. (49) N c is the collision probability per unit of time between two bodies of radii R 1 and R 2. Table 4 gives the radii, the collision probability N c extracted from table 3 of Laskar et al. (211 and the deduced coefficient A between each considered pair on 1 Gyr for the five bodies considered in Laskar et al. (211. We suppose that each close encounter moves the angular momentum in a random direction. The motion of the rotation axis is described by a random walk on a sphere of distribution (Perrin 1928; Roberts & Ursell 196) ρ S (θ) = k= 2k + 1 k(k+1) 4π e 4 V P k (cos θ) (5) with the variance V, 2π π ρ S (θ) sin θdθdφ = 1 and P k the Legendre polynomial of order k. For a random walk of N steps with a large value of N, where each step causes a small change β of the orientation, the variance V is (Roberts & Ursell 196) V = N k=1 π β 2 dp k (β) (51) with dp k (β) the probability to have a change of angle β for the step k. For Ceres, we consider the close encounters with the bodies considered in Laskar et al. (211 for which we have the probability of close encounters and we can write V 1 = k {2,4,7,324} N k βkmax β kmin β 2 dp k (β) (52) with k the number of the body for which we consider the close encounter with Ceres, β kmin the minimal change of orientation at the distance AU, β kmax the maximal change of orientation for a grazing encounter at the distance R 1 + R k, N k the Article number, page 7 of 23

8 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article g i ( /yr) s i ( /yr) g s g s g s g s g g s g s g s g s Table 5: Principal secular frequencies of the solution La211 g i, s i determined on [ 2 : ] Myr for the four inner planets and on [ 5 : ] Myr for the four giant planets and Pluto. number of close encounters and dp k (β) the probability distribution to have the change β for a close encounter with the body k. As dp k (β) = A 1k r p dr p /N k, the variance V 1 verifies 1 3 AU V 1 = A 1k arccos 2 1 B2 1k r p dr p. (53) R 1 +R k k {2,4,7,324} We compute the standard deviation of the distribution of the rotation axis of Ceres on 1 Gyr under the effects of the close encounters with the bodies (2) Pallas, (4) Vesta, (7) Iris and (324) Bamberga with the formula θ 1sd = k= 2k + 1 4π 2π π k(k+1) e 4 V 1 2r 3 p θ 2 P k (cos θ) sin θdθdφ. We obtain with the intermediary quantities in table 4 about (54) θ 1sd =.24. (55) We realize a similar computation for Vesta in table 4 to obtain θ 4sd = 1.3. (56) The time interval [ 1 : ] Myr is smaller than 1 Gyr and the effects of close encounters are then weaker on this interval. Moreover these standard deviations are computed for close encounters, which cause a maximal effect on the rotation axis Although their effects are weak, we consider for the longterm integration of the rotation the torques exerted on the angular momenta of Ceres and Vesta by the five bodies of the main asteroid belt considered in Laskar et al. ( Orbital motion La211 The orbital solution La211 is computed on [ 25 : 25] Myr in a frame associated to the invariable plane (Laskar et al Two successive rotations allow to pass from this frame to the ICRF as explained in the appendix A. The variables z = e exp(iϖ) and ζ = sin (i/2) exp(iω) are computed from the non canonical elliptical elements (a, λ, e, ϖ, i, Ω), where a is the semi-major axis, λ the mean longitude, e the eccentricity,ϖ the longitude of the perihelion, i the inclination with respect to the invariable plane and Ω the longitude of the ascending node. These elements are computed from the heliocentric positions and velocities. As made for the solution La24 of Laskar et al. (24, we perform a frequency analysis of the quantities z i and ζ i on e i ( ) Fig. 2: Eccentricity ( and inclination ( of Ceres for the solution La211. e i ( ) Fig. 3: Eccentricity ( and inclination ( of Vesta for the solution La211. [ 2 : ] Myr for the four inner planets and on [ 5 : ] Myr for the four giant planets and Pluto to obtain the proper perihelion precession frequencies g i and ascending node precession frequencies s i in table 5. The evolutions of the eccentricity and the inclination are represented for Ceres and Vesta on [ 1 : ] Myr respectively in figures 2 and 3. For Ceres, the eccentricity oscillates between.629 et.169 and the inclination between 8.77 and 1.6 on [ 2 : ] Myr. For Vesta, the eccentricity varies between.392 et.16 and the inclination between 5.21 and 7.56 on [ 2 : ] Myr. The amplitudes of the variations have the same order of magnitude for Ceres and Vesta on [ 25 : 25] Myr. For Ceres and Vesta, we perform a frequency analysis of z and ζ on the time interval [ 25 : 5] Myr. We consider the fifty secular terms with the highest amplitudes which have a frequency in the interval [ 3 : 3] /yr in tables 6 and 7. The frequency decompositions of tables 6 and 7 allow to obtain a secular solution, which reproduces the secular evolution of the solution La211 on [ 2 : ] Myr in figures 4 and 5, where the differences with the solution La211 correspond to the short period terms excluded from the secular solution. It is not the case for the ones obtained with a frequency analysis on the time interval [ 2 : ] Myr. Article number, page 8 of 23

9 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta ν k ( /yr) 1 6 A k φ k ( ) ν k ( /yr) 1 6 A k φ k ( ) g C s C g s C (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) g s C + (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) g 6 g s C + (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) s C g C s C (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) s g 6 g g s C + (g 5 g 7 ) s C (2g C (2g 6 g 5 )) g C s C g C (2g 6 g 5 ) s C (2g 6 g 5 ) g C (s C s 6 ) g C + (s C s 6 ) s C 2 (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) g C g g C (g 5 g 7 ) s C (2g C + g 5 4g 6 + g 7 ) s C (g C g 6 ) g C + (g 5 g 7 ) s C + 2 (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) s C + (g C g 5 2g 6 + 2g 7 ) g C (2g 6 g 7 ) s C + (2g C + g 5 4g 6 + g 7 ) s C (2g C (2g 6 g 7 )) s C + (g C g 6 ) s C (2g 6 g 7 ) s C g s C (g C g 5 2g 6 + 2g 7 ) s C g s g C g s s C + s 6 g C g 6 + (g 5 g 7 ) s C +(s 6 s 7 g C 2g 5 + 3g 6 ) g (g 6 g 7 ) s C (s 6 s 7 g C 2g 5 + 3g 6 ) g C + g 5 s C g 6 (g 5 g 7 ) s C 2 (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) g C + g 6 s C s C (g C (g 5 g 7 )) g C g 6 + s C s s C + 2 (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) s C + (g C g 5 ) s C + (g C + 2g 5 2g 6 g 7 ) s C + (g 5 g 6 ) ( z = e exp(iϖ) ( ζ = sin (i/2) exp(iω) Table 6: 5 first terms of the frequency decomposition 5 k=1 A ke i(ν kt+φ k ) of z ( and ζ ( for Ceres on [ 25 : 5] Myr. These frequency decompositions are used in section 6 to compute the orbital quantities in Eq. (21) needed for the secular integration of the rotation. The terms of weak amplitude can play a role in the long-term rotation in the case of secular resonances. For instance, the passage through the resonance with the frequency s 6 + g 5 g 6 is responsible for a decrease of the obliquity of about.4 for the Earth (Laskar et al. 1993b; Laskar et al. 24. Therefore, we add to the frequency decompositions of the variable ζ for Ceres the 1 following terms in the interval [ 45 : 6] /yr and for Vesta the 1 following terms in the interval [ 34 : 6] /yr. These boundaries have been chosen such that it selects the frequencies, which can play a role in the long-term rotation without all the terms close to the principal frequencies s. Article number, page 9 of 23

10 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article ν k ( /yr) 1 6 A k φ k ( ) g V g g g V (s V s 6 ) g V + (s V s 6 ) s V g V g g 6 g g V + (g 5 g 7 ) g V (g 5 g 7 ) g V g g 6 (s V s 6 ) g 6 + (g 5 g 7 ) g V g g V g 6 + s V s g 6 (g 5 g 7 ) ( z = e exp(iϖ) ν k ( /yr) 1 6 A k φ k ( ) s V s s V (g V g 6 ) s V + (g V g 6 ) s g V s V s s 6 (g V g 6 ) g V + g 6 s V s V (g 5 g 7 ) s V s s V + (g 5 g 7 ) s V + (g V g 5 ) g V + g 5 s V ( ζ = sin (i/2) exp(iω) Table 7: 5 first terms of the frequency decomposition 5 k=1 A ke i(ν kt+φ k ) of z ( and ζ ( for Vesta on [ 25 : 5] Myr. For Ceres, the proper secular frequencies are g C = ±.6 /yr and s C = ±.2 /yr with the respectively associated periods kyr and kyr. The first fifty secular terms of the frequency decompositions do not include proper frequencies of the inner planets. Their perturbations on the orbital motions are then much weaker than the ones of the giant planets. We observe the proximity of the frequencies 2g 6 g /yr and 2g 6 g /yr with g C. Resonances with these two frequencies could affect the orbital motion of Ceres. For Vesta, the proper secular frequencies are g V = ±.3 /yr and s V = ±.3 /yr with respectively associated periods kyr and kyr. The proper frequencies of the inner planets are not present except maybe for the Article number, page 1 of 23

11 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta δe δi ( ) Fig. 4: Difference for Ceres in eccentricity ( and inclination ( between the solution La211 and the secular solution. δe δi ( ) Fig. 5: Difference for Vesta in eccentricity ( and inclination ( between the solution La211 and the secular solution. frequency /yr, which could correspond to the node frequency of Mars s 4. Vesta has a shorter semi-major axis and the planetary perturbations of Mars are then more important than for Ceres, which could explain the presence of this frequency with a higher amplitude. As in Laskar (199), we estimate the size of the chaotic zones and perform a frequency analysis of the solution La211 on sliding intervals of 3 Myr over [ 25 : 25] Myr with a 5 Myr step size. The evolutions of the proper frequencies of Ceres and Vesta are respectively in figures 6 and 7. g C and s C vary respectively on about [ : ] /yr and [ : 59.29] /yr and g V and s V respectively on about [36.89 : ] /yr and [ 4.11 : ] /yr. The secular frequencies vary because of the chaotic diffusion, which is then higher for Vesta than for Ceres. The frequency s V has the highest diffusion with a decrease of about.5 /yr on [115 : 22] Myr Rotational motion Ceres217 The solution La211 does not include the integration of the rotation axes of Ceres and Vesta. We compute then the solution gc ( /yr) sc ( /yr) Fig. 6: Secular frequencies g C ( and s C ( of Ceres on [ 25 : 25] Myr computed with a step of 5 Myr with the frequency map analysis on an interval of 3 Myr. The error bars are given by the precision of the frequency map analysis. gv ( /yr) sv ( /yr) Fig. 7: Secular frequencies g V ( and s V ( of Vesta on [ 25 : 25] Myr, computed with a step of 5 Myr with the frequency map analysis on an interval of 3 Myr. The error bars are given by the precision of the frequency map analysis. Ceres Vesta J R (km) ω (rad.s 1 ) C Table 8: Physical characteristics of Ceres and Vesta used for the computation of the long-term rotation. Ceres217 where the spin axes of Ceres and Vesta are integrated with the symplectic method of the section 2.1. We consider the interactions between the orbital and rotational motions and the torques exerted by the Sun and the planets on Ceres and Vesta. Like in La211, Ceres, Vesta, Pallas, Iris and Bamberga are considered as planets and exert a torque on Ceres and Vesta. We use the same initial condition for the orbital motion than La211. To integrate the long-term rotation, we use the parameters of the table 8 and the initial conditions for the rotation axis of the table Article number, page 11 of 23

12 ν k ( /yr) 1 6 A k φ k ( ) f C s C s s C + (g C g 5 ) s C + (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) s C (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) s s C + (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) s C (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) s s C + 2(g C g 6 ) f C (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) f C + (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) s C + 2(g C g 6 ) + (g 5 g 7 ) s C 2(g 5 g 6 ) s C + (g 5 g 7 ) f C + (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) f C (g C (2g 6 g 7 )) s C + (3g C 4g 6 + g 7 ) s C + 2(g C g 6 ) (g 5 g 7 ) s C + (g C g 6 ) s C (g 5 2g 6 + g 7 ) s C + 2 (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) s C 2 (g C (2g 6 g 5 )) s C (2g C + g 5 4g 6 + g 7 ) s C + (2g C + g 5 4g 6 + g 7 ) f C s C s C + (g C g 5 2g 6 + 2g 7 ) s C (g C g 6 ) s C (g C g 5 2g 6 + 2g 7 ) s s C f C s C + (g C g 7 ) f C + (g C g 6 ) f C (g C g 6 ) s C (s 6 s 7 g C 2g 5 +3g 6 ) s C +(s 6 s 7 g C 2g 5 +3g 6 ) g C s C f C + (s C s 6 ) s C + (3g C + g 5 4g 6 ) Table 9: 5 first terms of the frequency decomposition 5 k=1 A ke i(ν kt+φ k ) of w x + iw y for Ceres on [ 2 : ] Myr. 2. The integration is realized on [ 1 : 1] Myr in extended precision with a time step of.5 yr. We use the integrator SABA C3 developped for perturbed Hamiltonians by Laskar & Robutel (21). A symmetric composition of this integrator with the method of Suzuki (199) allows to obtain a higher order integrator as indicated in Laskar & Robutel (21). The differences between La211 and Ceres217 for the eccentricity and inclination of Ceres and Vesta oscillate around Article number, page 12 of 23 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article time (kyr) Fig. 8: Obliquity of Ceres on [ 1 : ] kyr (, [ 1 : ] Myr ( and [ 2 : ] Myr (c). On (, the obliquity caused only by the change of orientation of the orbit is represented by the red curve. zero. The amplitudes on [ 2 : ] Myr are about.8 and.1 for the eccentricity and the inclination of Ceres and about.2 and.2 for Vesta. These differences have similar amplitudes to the ones observed for a small change (1 1 1 rad) of the initial mean longitude λ of Ceres and Vesta. Therefore they come from the chaotic behaviour for the orbital motions of Ceres and Vesta (Laskar et al. 211 and are then not significant. The evolution of the obliquity is represented on the time intervals [ 1 : ] kyr, [ 1 : ] Myr and [ 2 : ] Myr in figures 8 and 9 for respectively Ceres and Vesta. For Ceres, we obtain similar results to Bills & Scott (217) and Ermakov et al. (217 with oscillations between about 2.6 and 19.6 on [ 2 : ] Myr. For Vesta, we observe oscillations between 21.4 and The amplitudes of the oscillations of the obliquities of Ceres and Vesta are similar on [ 1 : 1] Myr. We perform the frequency analysis of the solution Ceres217 on the time interval [ 2 : ] Myr. The frequency decompositions of the quantity w x + iw y, where w x and w y are the coordinates in the invariant frame of the component parallel to the invariable plane of the normalized angular momentum, are in tables 9 and 1 for respectively Ceres and Vesta. For Ceres, the precession frequency of the rotation axis is then f C = ±.2 /yr, which corresponds to a precession of a period of about kyr and is consistent with the precession period of 21 kyr determined by Ermakov et al. (217. For Vesta, the precession frequency of the rotation axis c)

13 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta ν k ( /yr) 1 6 A k φ k ( ) f V f V (2s 6 s V ) s 6 s V s V f V s V s f V s f V (s V s 6 ) f V (g V g 6 ) f V + (g V g 6 ) f V + (s V s 6 ) f V 2s f V 2(s V s 6 ) s V f V s V + (g V g 5 ) s V + (g V g 6 ) s s V + s 6 f V s V (g V g 6 ) s f V (g V g 5 ) f V + (g V g 5 ) f V + (g V g 6 + s V s 6 ) Table 1: 5 first terms of the frequency decomposition 5 k=1 A ke i(ν kt+φ k ) of w x + iw y for Vesta on [ 2 : ] Myr. is f V = ±.2 /yr, which corresponds to a period of precession of about 1.61 kyr. Skoglöv et al. (1996) noticed that bodies like Ceres and Vesta, which have a high inclination and a precession frequency of the ascending node higher than the precession frequency of the rotation axis, could have strong variations of the obliquity. Indeed, the obliquity is given by cos ɛ = n.w = cos i cos l + sin i sin l cos (Ω L) (57) time (kyr) c) Fig. 9: Obliquity of Vesta on [ 1 : ] kyr (, [ 1 : ] Myr ( and [ 2 : ] Myr (c). On (, the obliquity caused only by the change of orientation of the orbit is represented by the red curve. with (l, L) the inclination and the longitude of the ascending node of the equatorial plane and (i, Ω) the ones of the orbital plane in the frame of the invariable plane. Then the precession of the ascending node causes obliquity variations, if the inclination of the orbital plane is not null. The inclination of the orbit plane with respect to the initial equatorial plane is represented by a red curve in figures 8 and 9 for respectively Ceres and Vesta. For Ceres, a large part of the amplitude of the obliquity is caused by the precession of the ascending node, which creates oscillations between 2.1 and 17.1 on [ 1 : ] kyr. For Vesta, the contribution is less important. We have integrated for the time interval [ 1 : ] Myr the rotation of Ceres and Vesta for different normalized polar moments of inertia respectively in the intervals [.38 :.46] and [.39 :.43]. For Ceres, all the different normalized polar moments of inertia give solutions for the obliquity with oscillations of similar amplitude (Fig. 1), as noticed by Ermakov et al. (217. The mean differences come from the precession frequency, which depends on the normalized polar moment of inertia. A small difference on the precession frequency causes a phase difference, which grows when the time increases. For Vesta, the obliquity solutions of the different normalized polar moments of inertia have all oscillations of similar amplitude (Fig. 11) except for the solution obtained for C =.46. Because of a secular resonance with the orbital frequency 2s 6 s V (see section 6.2.2), the obliquity can decrease to 18.9 on [ 2 : ] Myr for C =.46. Article number, page 13 of 23

14 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article C Fig. 1: Maximal, mean and minimal obliquities respectively in red, black and blue for Ceres on [ 2 : ] Myr with respect to the normalized polar moment of inertia C Fig. 11: Maximal, mean and minimal obliquities respectively in red, black and blue for Vesta on [ 2 : ] Myr with respect to the normalized polar moment of inertia. 5. Secular models for the orbital motion In section 4.2, we have observed the proximity of Ceres with the resonances of the frequencies 2g 6 g /yr and 2g 6 g /yr. If Ceres is close to these two resonances and if these resonances overlap, it could affect its orbital motion and therefore the rotational motion. We have especially seen in section 4.3 that the values of the inclination have direct consequences on the variations of the obliquity. Moreover, as noted by Laskar & Robutel (1993), the chaotic behaviour of the orbital motion can widen by diffusion the possible chaotic zones of the rotation axis. A secular model can be obtained from the secular Hamiltonian of Ceres and Vesta to get secular equations, which are integrated much faster than full equations. From the development of the secular Hamiltonian of Laskar & Robutel (1995), we build a secular model of Ceres and Vesta perturbed only by Jupiter and Saturn, which allows to identify the important terms of the planetary perturbations and to study the close secular resonances Hamiltonian secular model Laskar & Robutel (1995) computed the development of the Hamiltonian of the planetary perturbations. We consider the case of a body only perturbed by Jupiter and Saturn. From Laskar & Robutel (1995), the Hamiltonian is H = 6 Γ N (Λ, Λ i ) X n Xi n X n X n i Y m Yi m Y m Y m i e i(kλ+k λ i ) i=5 k,k N δe δi ( ) Fig. 12: Difference in eccentricity ( and inclination ( for Ceres between the solution La211 and the Hamiltonian secular model with adjustment of the frequencies in black and without in red. δe δi ( ) Fig. 13: Difference in eccentricity ( and inclination ( for Vesta between the solution La211 and the Hamiltonian secular model with adjustment of the frequencies in black and without in red. (58) with N = (n, n, n, n, m, m, m, m ) and the coefficients Γ N (Λ, Λ i ), which depend only on the ratio of the semimajor axes. The Poincaré s rectangular canonical coordinates (Λ, λ, x, ix, y, iy) are defined by Λ = β µa, (59) x = y = Λ ( 1 1 e 2) e iϖ, (6) Λ 1 e 2 (1 cos i)e iω, (61) with β = mm /(m + M ), µ = G(m + M ) and m the mass of the perturbed body. The variables X and Y are given by X = x 2/Λ and Y = y/ 2Λ (Laskar & Robutel 1995). We select the Article number, page 14 of 23

15 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta e e i ( ) 1 i ( ) c) -56 c) gc ( /yr) sc ( /yr) A ( /yr) Fig. 14: Eccentricity (, inclination (, frequency g C (c) with respect to A for Ceres. For ( and (, the red, black and blue curves correspond respectively to the maximal, mean and minimal values. The vertical red line represents the value of A for the secular model B ( /yr) Fig. 15: Eccentricity (, inclination (, frequency s C (c) with respect to B for Ceres. For ( and (, the red, black and blue curves correspond respectively to the maximal, mean and minimal values. The vertical red line represents the value of B for the secular model. terms verifying the secular inequality (, ) for (k, k ) to obtain the secular part of the Hamiltonian (Eq. (58)) and we consider the case of a massless perturbed body. The secular interaction Hamiltonian has been computed for the order 1 in mass and the degree 4 in eccentricity and inclination. We perform a frequency analysis of the solution La211 on [ 2 : ] Myr and conserve only the main secular terms to create a secular solution of Jupiter and Saturn, which we inject in the Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian depends then only on time and on X, Y. The equations of the motion are dx dt dy dt = 2i H Λ X (62) = i H 2Λ Y. (63) 5.2. Adjustment of the secular model Eqs. (62, 63) are integrated with a step size of 1 years with a numerical integrator Runge-Kutta 8(7) on [ 2 : ] Myr. The obtained solution allows to reproduce the amplitudes of the oscillations of the eccentricity and the inclination of the solution La211. However there are differences in the proper frequencies g and s with the solution La211. These differences of frequency cause phase differences between the perihelion and ascending node longitudes, which grow approximately linearly with time. The secular model does not allow then to reproduce the solution La211 (Figs. 12 and 13). To increase the precision of the secular model, it is possible to increase the order of the secular Hamiltonian but this only allows to reduce partly the differences of frequencies. As was done by Laskar (199), we adjust the secular frequencies of the model. The differences in the perihelion and ascending node longitudes between the solution La211 and the secular model are fitted by the affine functions At + dϖ and Bt + dω. The frequencies of the secular model are adjusted by applying the following procedure to obtain the Hamiltonian H H = H AΛ XX 2BΛYY. (64) 2 The initial conditions for the perihelion longitudes and ascending node longitudes are also respectively corrected of the quantities dϖ and dω. The initial conditions for the eccentricity and the inclination are also slightly corrected. We iterate this procedure until we obtain a difference between the solution La211 and the secular model, which has a mean close to zero for the four quantities e, i, ϖ, Ω. The adjustement of the frequencies is then about A 4.1 /yr and B.2 /yr for Ceres and A.51 /yr and B.41 /yr for Vesta. The differences for Article number, page 15 of 23

16 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article.2.2 e.1 e i ( ) 7 6 i ( ) c) -36 c) gv ( /yr) sv ( /yr) A ( /yr) Fig. 16: Eccentricity (, inclination (, frequency g V (c) with respect to A for Vesta. For ( and (, the red, black and blue curves correspond respectively to the maximal, mean and minimal values. The vertical red line represents the value of A for the secular model B ( /yr) Fig. 17: Eccentricity (, inclination (, frequency s V (c) with respect to B for Vesta. For ( and (, the red, black and blue curves correspond respectively to the maximal, mean and minimal values. The vertical red line represents the value of B for the secular model. the eccentricity and the inclination between the two solutions oscillate then around zero and correspond to short period terms, which are not reproduced by the secular Hamiltonian (Figs. 12 and 13). On [ 2 : ] Myr, the maximal differences in absolute value between the solution La211 and the adjusted secular model are then.82 and.23 for the eccentricity and the inclination of Ceres and.13 and.65 for the eccentricity and the inclination of Vesta. This Hamiltonian model with the adjustment of the frequencies g and s allows to reproduce the variations of the eccentricity and the inclination of Ceres and Vesta on [ 2 : ] Myr. Therefore, the long-term orbital dynamics of Ceres and Vesta is given for the most part by the planetary perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn as noticed by Skoglöv et al. (1996) for Ceres and Vesta and Ermakov et al. (217 for Ceres Study of the close resonances This model allows to study the resonances close to Ceres and Vesta. The integration of the secular Hamiltonian is about 1 4 faster that the complete integration and allows to proceed to many integrations with different parameters A and B near the values used for the models to see the effects of the close secular resonances. For each value of these parameters, Eqs. (62, 63) are integrated on [ 2 : ] Myr and the secular frequencies g and s are determined with the frequency analysis. For Ceres, the evolutions of the eccentricity, the inclination, the frequency g C are in figure 14 for A [ : 6] /yr. The resonance with the frequency 2g 6 g /yr, present in the secular motion of Jupiter and Saturn, acts for about g C [51.32 : 53.16] /yr. The maximal and minimal eccentricities vary respectively from.18 to.27 and from.4 to.2. The maximal inclination rises from 1.6 to 11.1, which would rise the variations of the obliquity as noticed in section 4.3. For about g C [53.21 : 53.6] /yr, there is a resonance with the frequency 2g 6 g /yr, present in the secular motion of Jupiter and Saturn, and the maximal eccentricity increases from.17 to.19. The resonance with the frequency 2g 6 g 7 has then a weaker chaotic nature than the one with 2g 6 g 5. In section 4.2, we have given the interval [ : ] /yr as estimation of the variation of the frequency g C because of the chaotic diffusion on [ 25 : 25] Myr. Therefore the chaotic diffusion of Ceres is too weak to put Ceres in resonance with the frequencies 2g 6 g 5 and 2g 6 g 7 on [ 25 : 25] Myr. The frequency g 7 + 2g 6 2g /yr in the motion of Jupiter and Saturn causes a resonance with weaker but observable effects on the eccentricity for g C [5.97 : 51.2] /yr. In the secular model of the motions of Jupiter and Saturn, we find the frequency 3g 6 2g 5 + s 6 s /yr with a smaller am- Article number, page 16 of 23

17 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta plitude and it is then difficult to distinguish its effects from the ones of the resonance with the frequency 2g 6 g 5. The evolutions of the eccentricity, the inclination, the frequency s C are in figure 15 for B [ 3, 3] /yr and have slight irregularities for s C [ : 59.73] /yr. This frequency interval does not correspond to a term used for the secular motion of Jupiter and Saturn. For Vesta, the evolutions of the eccentricity, the inclination, the frequency g V are in figure 16 for A [ 3, 3] /yr. For g V [34.56 : 35.25] /yr, there is a resonance with the frequency 2g 5 s /yr, where the maximal eccentricity increases from.17 to.19 and the maximal inclination from 7.5 to 8.. For g V [38.86 : 39.12] /yr, the maximal inclination increases from 7.6 to 7.7. This area does not correspond to terms used for the secular motion of Jupiter and Saturn. The evolutions of the eccentricity, the inclination, the frequency s V are in figure 17 for B [ 3, 3] /yr. For s V [ : 41.49] /yr, the inclination can increase from 7.3 to 7.4. This resonance does not match with a term used for the secular motion of Jupiter and Saturn. 6. Stability of the rotation axes In this part, we are interested in the study of the long-term stability of the rotation axis. Like in Laskar et al. (1993 and Laskar & Robutel (1993), the stability of the rotation axis can be estimated using frequency analysis. We determinate the precession frequency f 1 on the interval [ 2 : ] Myr and the precession frequency f 2 on the interval [ 4 : 2] Myr. The quantity σ = ( f 1 f 2 )/ f 1 allows to estimate the diffusion of the precession frequency (Laskar 1993; Dumas & Laskar 1993). For an integrable system, this quantity must stay null. For a weakly perturbed system, this quantity is small but increases if the system becomes chaotic Secular solution for the obliquity We integrate the secular equation (21) with an Adams integrator and a step size of 1 years. The normal to the orbit n and the eccentricity e are computed from the secular orbital solution obtained from the secular frequency decompositions in section 4.2. We use the initial conditions for the rotation axis of table 2. The secular solutions for the obliquities are compared to the non secular ones for Ceres and Vesta in figure 18 for the time interval [ 2 : ] Myr. The secular computation of the obliquity, which is about 1 million times faster, allows then to reproduce correctly the evolution of the obliquity. The secular orbital solution has initial conditions different from the ones of the solution La211 because we have removed the short period variations in figures 4 and 5. This modifies the initial obliquities of Ceres and Vesta of about.2 for Ceres and.5 for Vesta and could explain the differences observed in figure 18. We integrate on [ 4 : ] Myr the rotation axis with the symplectic method of the section 2.1 and the secular equation (21). For both integrations the initial obliquities vary from to 1 with a step of.5. The diffusion of the precession frequency is represented in figure 19 with respect to the initial obliquity. For Ceres, the diffusion is quite similar with close amplitude and evolution and the areas with strong increasing of σ allow to recognize resonances with the orbital frequencies for the two cases. For Vesta, the diffusion σ is higher for the secular solution. However the areas with high values of the diffusion σ δ δ Fig. 18: Difference between the solution Ceres217 and the secular solution for the obliquity of Ceres ( and of Vesta ( on [ 2 : ] Myr. log 1 (σ) log 1 (σ) Fig. 19: Diffusion of the precession frequency with respect to the initial obliquity for the complete solution in black and for the secular solution in red for Ceres ( and Vesta (. correspond. The secular and non secular solutions of the obliquity have then close stability properties. Article number, page 17 of 23

18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article fc ( /yr) log 1 (σ) A B α ( /yr) Fig. 2: Obliquity (, precession frequency (, diffusion of the precession frequency (c) for Ceres on [ 4 : ] Myr with respect to the precession constant. On (, the maximal, mean and minimal obliquities are respectively in red, black and blue. On (c), the rectangle A represents the precession constants for C [.38 :.46] with a vertical red line for C =.393. B corresponds to the precession constants in [5.91 : 6.77] /yr with a vertical red line for α = 6.34 /yr computed in section for a spin rate 7% higher (Mao & McKinnon 218) Study of the close resonances We integrate the secular equation (21) on [ 4 : ] Myr for different precession constants in an interval with a step of.1 /yr to look the effects of the resonances Ceres The precession frequency, its diffusion and the variations of the obliquity are represented for Ceres in figure 2 with respect to the precession constant in the interval [.1 : 12] /yr. We observe areas with strong variations of the diffusion, specified in table 11, which correspond to resonances with orbital frequencies. Most of these frequencies are already present in the frequency decompositions of the variables z and ζ used for the construction of the secular solution. The quantities n and e, which appear in the secular equation (21) and which are used to obtain the angular momentum w, are computed from the secular solution of the variables z and ζ, and can include additional frequencies. To identify the remaining frequencies in table 11, we perform then a frequency analysis of the quantities n x + in y and c) fv ( /yr) log 1 (σ) B A α ( /yr) Fig. 21: Obliquity (, precession frequency (, diffusion of the precession frequency (c) for Vesta on [ 4 : ] Myr with respect to the precession constant. On (, the maximal, mean and minimal obliquities are respectively in red, black and blue. On (c), the rectangle A represents the precession constants for C [.39 :.43] with a vertical red line for C =.49 and B the same but before the two giant impacts. (n x + in y )/(1 e 2 ) 3/2. n x and n y are the coordinates in the invariant frame of the component parallel to the invariable plane of the normal to the orbit n. We find no trace of the remaining frequencies in the first 4 terms of the frequency analysis of n x + in y. In the first 4 terms of the frequency analysis of (n x +in y )/(1 e 2 ) 3/2, we find the missing frequencies of the areas identified in table 11. The variations of the eccentricity are then responsible for the apparition of additional secular resonances between the orbital and the rotational motions. We note in particular the appearance of the resonance with the frequency s C + 2(g C g 6 ) + (g 5 g 7 ) 6.7 /yr, which is included in the interval of uncertainty of the precession constant. Therefore, Ceres could be in resonance with this frequency. However this effect on the obliquity is very limited. In the vicinity of the interval of uncertainty, we observe a narrow area with a small decreasing to 1 of the minimal obliquity because of the resonance with the frequency s C +(3g C 4g 6 +g 7 ) 6.39 /yr. More distant resonances have stronger effects on the obliquity of Ceres. The resonance with the frequency s C + (g C g 5 ) 9.26 /yr causes variations of the obliquity in the interval between and almost 4 and the one with s /yr variations between and almost 3. Ceres is closer of a less important resonance with s + 2(g C g 6 ) 7.24 /yr, where there are c) Article number, page 18 of 23

19 T. Vaillant et al.: Long-term orbital and rotational motions of Ceres and Vesta variations of the obliquity between and 26. However Ceres should have a precession constant between about 7.15 /yr and 7.85 /yr to go inside this resonance. In figure 2, we see the diffusion for the precession constants computed with a rotation rate 7% higher (Mao & McKinnon 218), as discussed in section If the early Ceres was in hydrostatic equilibrium as supposed by Mao & McKinnon (218), it could be in resonances with the frequencies s /yr, s C + 2(g C g 6 ) + (g 5 g 7 ) 6.7 /yr and s C + (3g C 4g 6 + g 7 ) 6.39 /yr which have weak effects on the obliquity as seen in figure 2 and the amplitudes of the oscillations of the obliquity would be similar. The events or phenomena, which would have changed its rotation rate, would not have changed significantly the interval of variation of the obliquity. As discussed in section 3.2.4, if the early Ceres was in hydrosatic equilibrium and the shape and the internal structure have not changed as supposed by Mao & McKinnon (218), the present Ceres would have a precession constant in the interval [6.58 : 6.98] /yr for a normalized polar moment of inertia of C =.371. With these precession constants, Ceres could be in resonance with the frequency s C + (3g C 4g 6 + g 7 ) 6.39 /yr (table 11) with no significant changes of the obliquity Vesta The precession frequency, its diffusion and the variations of the obliquity are represented for Vesta in figure 21 with respect to the precession constant in the interval [1 : 22] /yr. The frequencies of the resonances are in table 12. We identify the frequencies 2s 6 s V 13.9 /yr, s V g 5 + g /yr and /yr, which are among the frequencies of the secular model. As for Ceres, we perform a frequency analysis of the quantities n x +in y and (n x +in y )/(1 e 2 ) 3/2 to identify the remaining frequencies. We do not find them in the frequency analysis of n x +in y but find in the one of (n x +in y )/(1 e 2 ) 3/2 the frequencies 9.9 /yr, s 7 (g V g 6 ) /yr, s V + (g 6 g 7 ) /yr, which can correspond to the areas identified in table 12. As for Ceres, the variations of the eccentricity are responsible for the appearance of some resonances. The interval of frequency [ : 1.93] /yr in table 12 does not correspond to any term of the frequency analysis. The resonance which has the most important effect in the vicinity of Vesta is the one with the frequency /yr. If the maximal obliquity increases by about 3, the minimal obliquity decreases by about 1. The domain of the resonance with the frequency 2s 6 s V 13.9 /yr is included in the uncertainty interval for the precession constant. We have observed in section 4.3 that for the value C =.46 of the normalized polar moment of inertia, the minimal obliquity decreases compared to the evolution of the obliquity for the other normalized polar moments of inertia. We can see here that it is an effect of the resonance with the frequency 2s 6 s V. In this resonance, the minimal obliquity can decrease to 17.6 and the maximal obliquity can increase to In figure 21, we observe the diffusion for the precession constants computed with the paleorotation rate of the early Vesta determined by Fu et al. (214) and the physical parameters discussed in section The two giant impacts could then have put Vesta closer to the resonance with the frequency 2s 6 s V, which involves the crossing of two small resonances and could also have slightly increased the interval of variation of the obliquity Global stability of the rotation axis Like in Laskar et al. (1993 and in Laskar & Robutel (1993), we look for the long-term stability of the rotation axis. We integrate the rotation axis on [ 4 : ] Myr with the secular equation (21) on a grid of 2412 points for initial obliquities from to 1 with a step of.5 and for precession constants from.5 to 6 /yr with a step of.5 /yr. The precession frequency corresponds in the frequency analysis to the frequency with the largest amplitude. However in the case of an important resonance, the frequency with the largest amplitude can correspond to the resonance frequency. We also consider as precession frequency the one with the largest amplitude, for which the difference with the frequencies s and s 6 is larger than /yr Ceres In figure 22, we see the value of the quantity log 1 (σ), the maximal amplitude of the obliquity on [ 4 : ] Myr, which corresponds to the difference between the minimal and maximal obliquities on [ 4 : ] Myr and the precession frequency of Ceres obtained by frequency analysis on [ 2 : ] Myr. The position of Ceres for the epoch J2 is indicated with a white circle. Ceres is in a quite stable zone and is far from the most chaotic zones, which correspond to the resonance with the frequencies s C, s 6 and s C +(g C g 6 ). The motion of its rotation axis is relatively stable although Ceres has a precession frequency f C = /yr (table 9) close to the node precession frequencies of the inner planets, Mercury s 1 = 5.61 /yr and Venus s 2 = 7.6 /yr (table 5). The secular orbital motion of Ceres is almost entirely determined by the planetary perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn (section 5.2) and the amplitudes of frequencies of the inner planets are small in the motion of the ascending node of Ceres. Therefore the width of these resonances is small and they do not overlap contrary to the case of the inner planets (Laskar & Robutel 1993). The resonances with the frequencies s 7 and s 8 have more important effects that the ones with the inner planets. These resonances can increase the amplitude of the obliquity of several degrees. With the present precession constant, we see that the resonance with s 7 can affect the rotation axis of Ceres only if Ceres has an initial obliquity of about 7 and the resonance with s 8 can affect Ceres if the initial obliquity is about 9. The resonance with the frequency s 6 has large amplitudes of the obliquity, but does not correspond to one of the most chaotic zone except when it overlaps with the resonance at the frequency s C +(g C g 6 ). As for the case of the planets as noted by Laskar & Robutel (1993), the resonance with the frequency s 6 is isolated. The most important nearby resonance is with the frequency s C + (g C g 5 ) 9.24 /yr, which has a significant effect on the amplitude of the obliquity. For an initial obliquity between and 1, the amplitude of the obliquity passes about from 2 to 4. However this resonance has a limited width of about 1 /yr and it has no influence on Ceres Vesta The diffusion log 1 (σ), the maximal amplitude of the obliquity and the precession frequency are represented for Vesta in figure 22. Vesta for the epoch J2 is indicated with a white circle. Vesta is at the boundary of a relatively stable region. Vesta is far from the chaotic zone created by the resonances with the Article number, page 19 of 23

20 A&A proofs: manuscript no. article -1 6 d) log 1 (σ) -3-4 α ( /yr) log 1 (σ) -3-4 α ( /yr) e) α ( /yr) α ( /yr) c) f) fc ( /yr) -2 α ( /yr) 3 2 fv ( /yr) -2-3 α ( /yr) ɛ ( ) ɛ ( ) Fig. 22: Stability of the rotation axis (a,d), amplitude of the obliquity on [ 4 : ] Myr (b,e), precession frequency on [ 2 : ] Myr (c,f) for respectively Ceres and Vesta with respect to the initial obliquity and the precession constant for a grid of 2412 points. The white circles represent Ceres and Vesta for the epoch J2. The color scale of the diffusion is represented on [ 6 : 1], although log 1 (σ) takes values outside this interval. For ( and (d), red points correspond to log 1 (σ) 1 and black points to log 1 (σ) 6. For (d,e,f), the white squares represent Vesta before the two giant impacts. Article number, page 2 of