Dynamical evolution of asteroid 2009 HE60, a quasi-satellite of Earth.
|
|
- Beverley Charleen Palmer
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dynamical evolution of asteroid 2009 HE60, a quasi-satellite of Earth. P. Caspari ª ª Swinburne Astronomy Online, Student Not yet received Not yet available online Abstract This paper announces that recently discovered asteroid 2009 HE60 is currently in a quasi orbit of the Earth. From an Earth bound perspective it appears to be in a retrograde orbit with a period of approximately 1 year. Computations suggest this quasi satellite dynamic will continue until 2036 when it will transition into a horseshoe orbit. Its chaotic orbital dynamics, largely resulting from frequent approaches to Venus, suggest a transient object. This study also uncovered a dynamic previously unknown in both nature and theory which also relates to its interactions with Venus. This dynamic produces a quasi stable cyclic change in the semi-major axis resulting in a quasi satellite type dynamic except unrelated to a major body. This analysis will study the three-body orbital interactions and perturbations of asteroid 2009 HE60 to understand its current and future dynamics and stability as a companion to our Earth. Its will also explore this bodies unique interactions with Venus. Keywords: Co-orbital; Asteroid; Dynamics; Earth; Venus; 1. Introduction Three-body motion can explain stable companions moving in remarkably similar orbits to a parent planet while still orbiting the Sun. Until relatively recently the only known interactions of these types of objects was that of Jupiter s Trojans. A Trojan or tadpole orbit (TP) is a type of co-orbital threebody interaction that occurs around one of two Lagrange points of stability, L4 and L5, which are 60 ahead and behind the primary body. Prior to 1991 only Jupiter was known to have Trojans which is where the name originated. However in 1991 the first Trojan of Mars was discovered (Innanen, 1991) called asteroid 5261 Eureka. A Trojan asteroid of Neptune has also been found (Brasser et al., 2004). More recently two other complex co-orbital dynamics have been found to exist in the form of the quasi satellite (QS) orbit and the horseshoe (HS) orbit. The first asteroid to be determined to exhibit co-orbital dynamics beyond the TP was 3753 Cruithne in 1997 (Wiegert et al, 1998). Since then other examples have been 1 discovered and studied including 2002 AA29, 2003 YN107, 2000 PH5 and 2001 GO2. Of this population of co-orbitals only 3 are known to currently be in a QS phase and they are 1998 UP1, 2008 KT and 2009 BD. Asteroid 2009 HE60 is part of a small but increasing population of Earth co-orbital asteroids. This paper will demonstrate how, in addition to its current QS status 2009 HE60, within current uncertainties, is also likely to exhibit HS dynamics. 2. Background This paper will use the standard notation a.e.i,ω,ω and M for the semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, argument of perihelion, longitude of the ascending node and mean anomaly. Due to this body having an e its orbit does not resemble that of the Earth. Wiegert et al. (1998) suggested that the term co-orbital only applied to bodies that share the same orbit however the term co-orbital is often used for bodies a with very similar a. For the purposes of this paper the term co-orbital will be used for 2009 HE60 as no clear alternative term for this type of object exists.
2 Asteroid 2009 HE60 was discovered on the 24 th of April 2009 by the Mt. Lemmon Survey (MPECweb) at an approximate magnitude of 21. Based on an absolute magnitude of 25.6 the diameter of the object is estimated to be 22 meters assuming an S type asteroid with an albedo of 0.2. A more comprehensive integration using multiple test particles was performed using the Solar System Dynamics simulator which is a modified version of the SWIFT code (Levison & Duncan 1994). Simulations will be performed on the Swinburne University supercomputer. The SWIFT code simulates 3 distinct types of bodies, a central dominant gravitational body with up to 20 bodies orbiting the central body and up to 50 non random massless test particles per simulation run. The main central and orbiting bodies affect each other and the test particles. The test particles do not affect each other or the main central and orbiting bodies. Figure HE60 at discovery (JPL Horiznons) The basic orbital parameters for 2009 HE60 are similar to the Earth with the notable exception of e. The perihelion distance is just outside that of Venus resulting in close approaches to Venus and these interactions will be considered in this study. For the Earth, co-orbital dynamics are possible for objects within a distance E, based on the Hill s theory radius and a practically massless object. Ε =(m/3m) ⅓ Where m and M are the masses of the Earth and the Sun respectively. This results in an annulus a-a < 0.01 AU where subscript denotes the Earth (Connors at el 2004). A study of the MPCORB data file from the Minor Planet Center (MPCweb) for this range of a revealed a number of recently discovered asteroids HE60 was selected for this study as it currently exhibits QS dynamics and is likely to transition to a HS phase. A search of the literature has not found any reference to this asteroid exhibiting these unusual dynamics. 3. Numerical Experimentation Initial studies were conducted using the JPL Horizons online system (Giorgini, J.D. 1996). This system offers an ephemeris, vectors and Kelparian elements for a period of integration of 600 years from approximately 1600 to Test particles are removed from the simulation if they exceed preset limitations relating to the proximity of the main bodies or distance from the central body. The simulation stops if all the test particles have exceeded these limits The simulation continues until the preset integration time is reached and it can be continued from a previous run. The option to continue a run allows for more data outputs to be generated as there is a data output limitation to a single run (SWIFTCodePageweb). The subset of the SWIFT code used for solar system dynamics employs a Regularized Mixed Variable Symplectic (RMVS) method. This method addresses close approaches between test particles and orbiting bodies (Levison & Duncan 1994). A time step of years was used for all presented simulation results. A time step of was also tested producing qualitatively equivalent results. The SWIFT code automatically reduces the time step in a 2 stage process when a test particle is in the proximity of the orbiting body (Levison & Duncan 1994). All the major planets have been used as part of this analysis however the SWIFT code does not support the Earth s Moon, instead the Earth Moon Barycenter was applied. The data from any test particles subsequent to a close approach within the Hill sphere for the combined Earth Moon system was ignored. No close approaches to Venus were within its Hill sphere. The SWIFT code has a limit of 50 non random test particles thus each integration runs of >50 test particles are broken into subsets. The orbital parameters, uncertainties and initial state vectors for the major planets and 2009 HE60 were obtained from the JPL Horizons system for an Epoch of which is approximately mid point in the data arc span (see Table 1). A measure of how long a dynamical system, such as 3 body orbital interactions, takes to become chaotic is called the Lyapunov time (Wieggert et al. 1998). Once this time frame has been exceeded the dynamics move outside the bounds of precise predictability and enters a chaotic phase.
3 The Lyapunov time for any Earth crossing object is estimated to be in the order of 100 years (Wieggert et al. 1998). Due to the short observing arc, the relatively short Lyapunov time and frequent close approaches to Venus, simulations over longer time frames become speculative. The true evolution of this object cannot be predicted reliably therefore a statistical approach to the analysis is appropriate. The integration period was also kept to a relatively low 1200 years which will cover 4 HS libration cycles of approximately 200 years. The HS libration period was approximated from plots such as Figure 5. A total of 65 test particles were calculated for integration, 1 for the current best fit solution and 64 based on 1 σ uncertainty (Sim 1). For each of the six primary orbital parameters 2 test particles will explore both extremes of the 1 σ distribution and all combination therein (2^6 combinations). These test particles were cross referenced with a basic binary methodology where 0 = -1 σ and 1 = +1 σ allows efficient analysis of the data. This non random approach provides the opportunity for a more detailed statistical analysis. Element Value Uncertainty ( 1 σ ) a (AU) e i ( ) ω( ) Ω( ) M( ) Table 1. The orbital parameters for 2009 HE60 with 1 σ uncertainty. The Yarkovsky effect is a change in the orbit of a body as a result of the re-emission of solar radiation (Bottke et al 2006). This re-emission can cause the object to accelerate or decelerate by the momentum lost due to radiating photons. This effect is depending on the spin direction and is most significant in low mass objects such as small asteroids. It primarily results in changes to the a. The effect of the Yarkovsky mechanism on 2009 HE60 is difficult to determine due to limited observational information. The effect of this mechanism is dependent on many factors including shape, orientation, and albedo. However considering the uncertainty in a that is covered by the test particles the Yarkovsky effect can be considered irrelevant to this study following a similar logic to Connors et al. (2002) All the resulting data from the both the JPL Horizons system and the Swinburne University supercomputer were imported into a purpose built MS Access database application for further analysis (CoOrb). A visualization tool to produce plots of co-rotating reference frames was developed as part of this database. Approximately 10^7 records of state vectors and orbital elements were collected as part of this study. This database can also automatically produce a series of state vectors from a set of Keplarian elements and covering a range of uncertainties as per Sim 1. This series of state vectors can automatically be entered as Planets or test particles into the SWIFT interface on the Swinburne University supercomputer using a web automation tool. 4. Results Table 2 details the orbital elements and results summary for each dynamical class. For each orbital element the binary test particle methodology discussed above was applied. A count of test particles at +1 σ / -1 σ for each orbital element and dynamical class is displayed. A total of test particles that demonstrated each dynamical class is listed in the far right column. The BN dynamic will be discussed below. The final row labeled Exit applies the same methodology as above for test particles that exited the annulus a-a < 0.01 by the end of the 1200 year integration (subscript denotes the Earth). a E i ω Ω M HS 25/20 21/24 23/22 22/23 21/24 24/21 45 QS ¾ 5/2 1/6 4/3 2/5 5/2 7 BN 1/0 0/1 0/1 0/1 1/0 1/0 1 Exit 6/5 8/3 6/5 6/5 3/8 7/4 11 Table 2. Test Particle results summary from CoOrb for Sim Quasi Satellite Dynamics 2009 HE60 is currently in a QS phase however, as Table 2 indicates, only 7 out of the 65 test particles exhibited another QS phase over the next 1200 years. While a QS of the Earth appears to be in a retrograde orbit of the Earth with a period of 1 year it is actually orbiting the Sun. A QS has a very similar a to the Earth however with a different e which is usually greater. A permanently stable QS orbit can be approximated by i < e - e (S. Mikkola et al 2006) where subscript denotes the Earth. For larger inclinations, i > e - e, a temporary capture into the QS phase is possible depending on relative differences in a and orbit orientation. This is further supported by the bias towards test particles with lower i values entering a QS phase. See table 2. A clear trend amongst the test particles indicates i will increase over the period of Sim 1. This is the probable explanation for relatively few test particles exhibiting future 3
4 QS dynamics. The cause of the increase in i will be discussed below. The QS phase can be identified in a plot of a versus time as a sinusoidal wave style cyclic change in a apparent between 2300 and 2600 in Figure Horseshoe Dynamics A HS orbit liberates around a planet repeatedly reversing its direction as a result of changes in a resulting from close approaches. One libration cycle can also be defined as two opposing circulation transitions. A circulation transition (Connors et al 2005) has been defined as a transition between a < a to a > a or visa versa where subscript denotes the Earth. From a co-rotating reference frame this results in a horseshoe shape with the Earth in a gap between the ends of the horseshoe. Since 1997 a number of asteroids with HS dynamics have been studied such as 3753 Cruithne, 2002 AA29 and 2003 YN107. Figure 2. a vs time for a typical QS Phase between 2300 and 2600 Co-orbital dynamics are often visualized from a reference frame that co-rotates with the selected body in this case, the Earth. Figure 3 is a plot of the co-rotating reference frame for the QS phase from 1946 to The vector data for this plot was obtained from JPL Horizons. Fig. 4. The HS phase from 2036 to Vector data sourced from JPL Horizons. Integrations on both the JPL Horizons and SWIFT systems indicate that 2009 HE60 will transition from QS phase to HS phase around Prior to the work of (Wiegert et al, 1998) relating to Asteroid 3753 Cruthnia co-orbital nature the transfer between QS and HS dynamics had not been realized in theory or in nature. Fig. 3. An Earth (0,-1) based co-rotating reference frame for the QS phase from 1946 to Based on JPL Horizons data the current QS phase commenced in 1946 and will continue until 2036 after which it is likely to transition to a HS phase. Figure 5 represents a typical HS phase amongst the test particles. This phase can clearly be identified by the square wave style cyclical change in a. Also an increasing i is apparent and typical amongst the test particles for Sim 1. 4
5 Fig 6: X,Y for all Major Planets excluding Venus, 32 Test Particles from Sim1 Figure 5 i,a and e versus time for a sample test particle from Sim1 5. The effects of Venus on 2009 HE60 The perihelion distance of the asteroid is very close to the a for Venus. The resulting close approaches have a dramatic effect on the orbit of 2009 HE60. This can be clearly recognized in Figure 6 and 7 which are X versus Y plots for 32 of the 65 test particles in Sim1. Figure 7 shows a much broader spread of these test particles than Figure 6 as a result of these approaches. The chaotic effects can further be appreciated by the effect on a in Figures 8 and 9 for 32 of the 65 test particles in Sim1. Figure 8 indicates a relatively stable combination of HS and QS dynamics, however when Venus is introduced the dynamics become dramatically more chaotic. Clearly the effects of Venus insure that this body is destined to be transient. Fig 7: X,Y for all Major Planets including Venus, 32 Test Particles from Sim1 5
6 6. Co-orbital stability and evolution We have discussed how changes in a clearly reflect coorbital dynamics. Changes in e are relatively small (<3% for all test particles in Sim 1). However results already indicate that i is increasing over the duration of the integration. A further analysis of 32 of the 65 test particles in Sim1 (Figure 10) confirms that a clear trend for an increasing i exists. Fig 8: a versus time for all Major Planets excluding Venus, 32 Test Particles from Sim1 Fig 10: i versus time for all Major Planets, 32 Test Particles from Sim1 As discussed the increasing i reduces the likelihood of future QS and HS phases. To confirm this another integration was run with the best fit orbital parameters with the exception of i which ranged from 1 to 3.8 with increments of 0.2 (Sim 2). As expected the likelihood of HS or QS dynamics clearly reduced with increasing i Fig 9: a versus time for all Major Planets including Venus, 32 Test Particles from Sim1 The CoOrb database containing the results of Sim 1 was queried to study the relationship between approaches to both Earth and Venus and their effects on i. For the 65 test particles in Sim 1 any period of 36 days where the i changed by more than was cross referenced with all approaches of <0.2 AU to both Earth and Venus. For Venus the mean change to i during these approaches was where as for the Earth the mean change was Clearly it is the interactions with Earth that is increasing i. To understand exactly when the interactions with Earth increase i a plot was produced for i versus time with a versus time superimposed (Figure 11). From this plot it is clear that i is increasing during circulation transitions. 6
7 To confirm the precession and recession of ω and Ω a plot was produced for 32 of the 65 test particles in Sim1 (Figure 14). Figure 11: i versus time with a versus time superimposed for sample test particle. Another observation was that Ω is recessing and ω is precessing at approximately 4.6 per century. In 2043 ω = Ω = 227. A further integration of 36 test particles based on the best fit solution except with 0 Ω 360 at 10 intervals (Sim 3) was conducted. This study indicates that dependant on Ω, 1 < i < 4. Cleary the recession of Ω alters the rate of change in i. Figure 13: ω and Ω in radians versus time for 32 test particles from Sim 1 A possible explanation for the change in i is that the precession and recession of ω and Ω respectively alter the position of nodes in relation to approaches. If a circulation transition occurs as the asteroid approaches the ascent node it appears to kick up the i with an opposite effect at the descent node. 7. The banana orbit A study of the a from the test particles in Sim 1 uncovered an unexpected type of dynamic. Figure 14 indicates 2 HS librations followed by a sinusoidal wave style cyclic change in a. This sinusoidal phase appears similar to the QS dynamic except with a lower amplitude and is not based around the Earth. For the purposes of this paper this dynamic will be referred to as a Banana orbit (BN) due to its appearance on a corotating reference frame plot. Figure 12: The i versus time of 36 Test Particles with 0 Ω 360 at 10 intervals over 1200 years (Sim 3) 7
8 Figure 14: a vs time with the BN phase starting from approximately 2650 It appears that the right set of orbital parameters can produce a low amplitude oscillation in a which in turn results in a quasi-satellite type of dynamic around a non existent object. A search of Minor Planet Center s website found no reference to any asteroids which exhibits this type of dynamic. Fig 16 1 Librations of BN phase, 1 test particle from Sim 1 For the 3 full liberation cycles the points of circulation transition do not overlap. The BN dynamic appears to precess and this can also be seen in Figure 14 by the fact that the center amplitude is offset. Figures 15,16 and 17 demonstrate this precession from a co-orbital reference frame. Fig 17 2 Librations of BN phase, 1 test particle from Sim 1 Fig Librations of BN phase, 1 test particle from Sim 1 8 To further investigate this phenomenon an integration (Sim4) was run for 64 test particles based on orbital elements from the original test particle from Sim 1 that exhibited BN dynamic. The basic methodology is similar to Sim 1 except uncertainty is fixed to 0.01%. This integration produced a further 4 test particles exhibiting BN dynamics. Integrations without Venus produced no such dynamics.
9 a e i ω Ω M BN 2/2 1/3 2/2 4/0 1/3 3/1 4 Table 3. Test Particle results summary from CoOrb for Sim 4. Figure 18 and 19 are examples of the BN phase which covers the period of time approximately from 2730 to Another integration (Sim5) extended the time frame for Sim 4 to 2000 years indicating the BN phase can be quasi-stable for a period of 800 years covering 8 librations. This period of quasi-stability is comparable to the periods of stability of HS and QS phases (Figure 20). Figure 20: BN phase for 1 test particle from Sim 5 over 2000 years Figure 18: BN phase near L3 for 1 test particle from Sim 4. An 8:13 resonance exists between asteroid 2009 HE60 and Venus respectively however this is not a classical mean motion orbital resonance due to the close approaches involved. These close approaches occurring at an interval of approximately 8 years. By studying these approaches with a dynamic orbital plot an explanation for the cyclic nature of a becomes apparent. When the asteroids lags behind Venus during one of these approaches the gravitation attraction of Venus increases the angular velocity near Periapsis which in turn increases the a of the asteroid. As a result subsequent approaches become closer to and abeam Venus eventually causing the asteroid to take over and lead Venus. When the asteroid leads Venus the reciprocal effect decreases the asteroids angular velocity and the a from which a cyclic dynamic results. The Periapsis distance of 2009 HE60 is just outside the orbit of Venus ensuring that these close approaches do not result in an impact. The interactions that occur during these approaches are similar to the QS and HS dynamics described above. Figure 19: BN phase near L5 for 1 test particle from Sim 4. To further understand this dynamic and its range of stability further simulations need to be conducted employing the binary test particle methodology discussed above. Numerous integrations similar to Sim 4 explored a range of uncertainties and other examples were uncovered however all examples of the BN dynamic occur in approximately 700 9
10 years. To exclude the effect of 700 years of perturbations, a valid analysis of the orbital parameters requires the integration to enter the BN phase almost immediately. To this end an Epoch of (1 st of March 2065) was selected as this is 6 months prior to a close approach with Venus while significantly separated from Earth. Unfortunately only 1 integration from this epoch was conducted before access to the Solar System Dynamics Module was discontinued. This integration did not reproduced the BN dynamic however a much broader search is required. Without access to the Solar System Dynamics Module the study has moved to the data available with the JPL Horizons system. This study will look for asteroids with aphelion or perihelion distances within the Hills sphere of the major planets and also with resonance ratios of two small integers. These orbital elements, particularly the a, will be analyzed looking for further examples of the BN dynamic. This work is on going. Clearly the study of the BN orbit is in its infancy. The following are just some of the aspects of BN dynamics that needs to be explored Confirm that the BN dynamic is not an artifact of the integration software or a type of numerical or statistical anomaly. Reproduce the dynamic by using different integration software Study if the BN dynamic can occur at aphelion as well as perihelion Study if the BN dynamic can occur as a result of the interaction with bodies other than Venus. Venus has a very low eccentricity as compared to the other major planets which may play a role. Are there any examples in nature (This study has already commenced using JPL Horizons data). Consider if this dynamic is a just a scientific curiosity or whether it may offer useful trajectories for future space probes. Develop a mathematical understanding of the dynamic Unless this is a known phenomenon further studies of this unique phenomenon are warranted. The Swinburne University supercomputer running the SWIFT code in conjunction with the CoOrb database developed as part of this study provide the necessary computing resources for such an investigation. 8. Conclusion Asteroid 2009 HE60 is a QS of the Earth and numerical studies indicate a high probability this object will then transition into a horse shoe orbit with a libration period of approximately 200 years. The object s short Lyaponvic time and frequent close approaches to Venus imply this objects current orbit is not primordial. An integration of 65 test particles indicated that 11 of the test particles will exit the region of likely co-orbital behavior over the next 1200 years. This is largely due to the effects of Venus This study determined that the asteroid s i is likely to increase due to the precession and recession of ω and Ω respectively and the resulting interactions at the position of the nodes. This increase in i will reduce the likelihood of future quasi-stable co-orbital dynamics. The BN dynamic uncovered by this study has been determined to be the result of interactions with Venus. This unique dynamic is due to a cyclic leading and lagging interaction with Venus. As more of these types of co-orbital asteroids are discovered and studied, statistically trends may develop allowing us to develop our understanding of the dynamics of these intrinsically interesting objects. Asteroid 2009 HE60 s unique dynamics and transfer mechanisms in relation to known co-orbital behavior warrants closer study especially when further astrometrics become available. However the unique BN co-orbital dynamic uncovered as part of this study cries out for further investigation. Acknowledgements This paper was developed as part of my studies with Swinbourne Astronomy Online. I d like to thank Jarrod Hurley and Swinburne University for their invaluable assistance with this effort. References Bottke, W., Vokrouhlický, D., Rubincam, D., Nesvorný, D., The Yarkovsky and Yorp Effects: Implications for Asteroid Dynamics, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, vol. 34, p Brasser, R., Innanen, K., Connors, M., Veillet, C., Wiegert, P.,Mikkola, S., Chodas, P.W., 2004b. Transient co-orbital asteroids. Icarus 171,
11 SWIFTCodePageweb: Module 5: Solar System Dynamics - Code Explanation Page, (2007) Connors, M., Chodas, P., Mikkola, S., Wiegert, P., Veillet, C.,Innanen, K., Discovery of an asteroid and quasisatellite in an Earth-like horseshoe orbit. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 37, Connors, M., Veillet, C., Brasser, R., Wiegert, P., Chodas, P.W., Mikkola, S., Innanen, K., Discovery of Earth s quasisatellite. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 39, Connors,M., Stacey,G. Brasser,R., Wiegert,P A survey of orbits of co-orbitals of Mars, Planetary and Space Science 53 (2005) Giorgini, J.D., Yeomans, D.K., Chamberlin, A.B., Chodas, P.W., Jacobson, R.A., Keesey, M.S., Lieske, J.H., Ostro, S.J., Standish, E.M., Wimberly, R.N., "JPL's On-Line Solar System Data Service", Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 28(3), 1158, Gladman, B, Duncan, M, Candy, J Symplectic integrators for long-term integrations in celestial mechanics. Gray (2008). Guide software v8. Project Pluto, Bowdoinham, Maine Levison, H., & Duncan, M. 1994,:The Long-Term Dynamical Behavior of Short-Period Comets, Icarus, 108, 18. S. Mikkola,K. Innanen, P. Wiegert, M. Connors and R. Brasser, Stability limits for the quasi-satellite orbit, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, (2006) MPCweb: Minor Planet Center, (2009) MPECweb:Minor Planet Electron Circular, M.P.E.C H61: (2009) SWIFTweb:SWIFT A solar system integration software package, (Accessed 20 October 2009) Wiegert, P., Innanen, K., Mikkola, S., The orbital evolution of near-earth Asteroid Astron. J. 115, Wisdom, J, Holman, M, Symplectic maps for the n- body problem. 11
A Kozai-resonating Earth quasi-satellite
MNRASL 437, L85 L89 (2014) Advance Access publication 2013 November 13 doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt147 A Kozai-resonating Earth quasi-satellite M. Connors Athabasca University Observatories, Athabasca AB T9S
More informationDiscovery of Earth s quasi-satellite
Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 8, 1251 1255 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Discovery of Earth s quasi-satellite Martin CONNORS, 1* Christian VEILLET, 2 Ramon BRASSER,
More informationThe Mars 1:2 Resonant Population. Tabaré Gallardo.
1 The Mars 1:2 Resonant Population Tabaré Gallardo Departamento de Astronomía, Facultad de Ciencias, Iguá 4225, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay gallardo@fisica.edu.uy Icarus, in press May 2007 2 Abstract An
More informationA survey of orbits of co-orbitals of Mars
ARTICLE IN PRESS Planetary and Space Science 53 (2005) 617 624 www.elsevier.com/locate/pss A survey of orbits of co-orbitals of Mars Martin Connors a,, Greg Stacey a,b, Ramon Brasser c, Paul Wiegert d
More informationEarth s Trojan Asteroid
Earth s Trojan Asteroid Martin Connors 1,2, Paul Wiegert 3 & Christian Veillet 4 It was realized in 1772 that small bodies can stably share the orbit of a planet if they remain near triangular points 60
More informationLecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System
Lecture 13 Gravity in the Solar System Guiding Questions 1. How was the heliocentric model established? What are monumental steps in the history of the heliocentric model? 2. How do Kepler s three laws
More informationPaweł Kankiewicz, Ireneusz Włodarczyk
Meeting on Asteroids and Comets in Europe Vienna, Austria, 12-14.05.2006 The stability of orbits of effective Mars Crossers Paweł Kankiewicz, Ireneusz Włodarczyk Astrophysics Division, Institute of Physics,
More informationAST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements
AST111, Lecture 1b Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements Planetary properties (continued): Measuring Mass The orbital period of a moon about a planet depends
More informationPubl. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 90 (2010), DYNAMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HUNGARIA ASTEROIDS 1. INTRODUCTION
Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 9 (21), 11-18 Invited Lecture DYNAMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HUNGARIA ASTEROIDS Z. KNEŽEVIĆ1, B. NOVAKOVIĆ2, A. MILANI 3 1 Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 116 Belgrade,
More informationEVOLUTIONS OF SMALL BODIES IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM
EVOLUTIONS OF SMALL BODIES IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM Dynamics and collisional processes Dr. Patrick MICHEL Côte d'azur Observatory Cassiopée Laboratory, CNRS Nice, France 1 Plan Chapter I: A few concepts on
More informationInvestigation of evolution of orbits similar to that of (4179) Toutatis
Investigation of evolution of orbits similar to that of (4179) Toutatis Wm. Robert Johnston May 1994 Abstract This project compared the orbital evolution of asteroid (4179) Toutatis to that of several
More informationResonancias orbitales
www.fisica.edu.uy/ gallardo Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de la República Uruguay Curso Dinámica Orbital 2018 Orbital motion Oscillating planetary orbits Orbital Resonances Commensurability between
More information18. Kepler as a young man became the assistant to A) Nicolaus Copernicus. B) Ptolemy. C) Tycho Brahe. D) Sir Isaac Newton.
Name: Date: 1. The word planet is derived from a Greek term meaning A) bright nighttime object. B) astrological sign. C) wanderer. D) nontwinkling star. 2. The planets that were known before the telescope
More informationEarth's Pseudo-Moon 2016 HO 3
Discovered on 27 April 2016 by the Pan-STARRS 1 asteroid survey telescope on Haleakala (Maui, Hawaii), near-earth object (NEO) 2016 HO 3 is currently the best example of a natural interplanetary object
More informationPhysics 3/3/2013. Kepler s Three Laws of Planetary Motion. Distance, Velocity from the Sun at any given time: q=angle from perihelion
Physics Kepler s Three Laws of Planetary Motion a=semi-major axis b=semi-minor axis e=eccentricity Focus, Foci Distance, Velocity from the Sun at any given time: a(1 e ) r 1 ecosq v 1 GM ro a q=angle from
More informationObservational Astronomy - Lecture 4 Orbits, Motions, Kepler s and Newton s Laws
Observational Astronomy - Lecture 4 Orbits, Motions, Kepler s and Newton s Laws Craig Lage New York University - Department of Physics craig.lage@nyu.edu February 24, 2014 1 / 21 Tycho Brahe s Equatorial
More informationStability limits for the quasi-satellite orbit
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, 5 4 (6) doi:./j.365-966.6.36.x Stability limits for the quasi-satellite orbit S. Mikkola, K. Innanen, P. Wiegert, 3 M. Connors 4 and R. Brasser 5,6 Tuorla Observatory, University
More informationPlanetary Perturbations on the 2 : 3 Mean Motion Resonance with Neptune
PASJ: Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 54, 493 499, 2002 June 25 c 2002. Astronomical Society of Japan. Planetary Perturbations on the 2 : 3 Mean Motion Resonance with Neptune Tetsuharu FUSE Subaru Telescope,
More informationA STUDY OF CLOSE ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN MARS AND ASTEROIDS FROM THE 3:1 RESONANCE. Érica C. Nogueira, Othon C. Winter
A STUDY OF CLOSE ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN MARS AND ASTEROIDS FROM THE 3: RESONANCE Érica C. Nogueira, Othon C. Winter Grupo de Dinâmica Orbital e Planetologia UNESP -- Guaratinguetá -- Brazil Antonio F.B. de
More informationorbits Moon, Planets Spacecrafts Calculating the and by Dr. Shiu-Sing TONG
A Science Enrichment Programme for Secondary 3-4 Students : Teaching and Learning Resources the and Spacecrafts orbits Moon, Planets Calculating the 171 of by Dr. Shiu-Sing TONG 172 Calculating the orbits
More informationInner solar system dynamical analogs of plutinos
Inner solar system dynamical analogs of plutinos Martin Connors a,*, R. Greg Stacey a,b, Ramon Brasser c, and Paul Wiegert d a Centre for Science, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca AB,
More informationCelestial Mechanics III. Time and reference frames Orbital elements Calculation of ephemerides Orbit determination
Celestial Mechanics III Time and reference frames Orbital elements Calculation of ephemerides Orbit determination Orbital position versus time: The choice of units Gravitational constant: SI units ([m],[kg],[s])
More informationThe orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100 million year
A&A 368, 700 705 (2001) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010056 c ESO 2001 Astronomy & Astrophysics The orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100 million year X.-S. Wan 1 and T.-Y. Huang 1,2 1 Astronomy Department,
More informationDynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly
First Kepler s Law The secondary body moves in an elliptical orbit, with the primary body at the focus Valid for bound orbits with E < 0 The conservation of the total energy E yields a constant semi-major
More informationThe stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system
The stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system Paul A. Wiegert 1, Matt Holman 2 1 Department of Astronomy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics,
More informationarxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 29 Mar 2013
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 000 (2013) Printed 1 April 2013 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Three new stable L 5 Mars Trojans arxiv:1303.0124v2 [astro-ph.ep] 29 Mar 2013 C. de la Fuente Marcos and R.
More informationA REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES AROUND JUPITER
The Astronomical Journal, 136:909 918, 2008 September c 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/909 A REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES
More informationis a revolution relative to a fixed celestial position. is the instant of transit of mean equinox relative to a fixed meridian position.
PERIODICITY FORMULAS: Sidereal Orbit Tropical Year Eclipse Year Anomalistic Year Sidereal Lunar Orbit Lunar Mean Daily Sidereal Motion Lunar Synodical Period Centenial General Precession Longitude (365.25636042
More informationImportance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets
Importance of the study of extrasolar planets Exoplanets Introduction Planets and Astrobiology (2017-2018) G. Vladilo Technological and scientific spin-offs Exoplanet observations are driving huge technological
More informationA study upon Eris. I. Describing and characterizing the orbit of Eris around the Sun. I. Breda 1
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. Eris c ESO 2013 March 27, 2013 A study upon Eris I. Describing and characterizing the orbit of Eris around the Sun I. Breda 1 Faculty of Sciences (FCUP), University
More informationLinking NEAs to their main-belt source regions
Near-Earth (NEAs) Department of Astronomy, University of Belgrade Stardust ITN: Opening Training School 21st November 2013, Glasgow, Scotland Near-Earth (NEAs) Table of contents 1 Main phases during the
More informationTides and Lagrange Points
Ast111, Lecture 3a Tides and Lagrange Points Arial view of Tidal surge in Alaska (S. Sharnoff) Tides Tidal disruption Lagrange Points Tadpole Orbits and Trojans Tidal Bulges Tides Tidal Force The force
More informationA Study of Six Near-Earth Asteroids Summary Introduction
A Study of Six Near-Earth Asteroids John Junkins 1, Puneet Singla 1, Daniele Mortari 1, William Bottke 2, Daniel Durda 2 Summary We consider here 6 Earth-orbit-crossing asteroids (ECAs) as possible targets
More informationANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS
ANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS A1.1. Kepler s laws Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) discovered the laws of orbital motion, now called Kepler's laws.
More informationCelestial mechanics and dynamics. Topics to be covered. The Two-Body problem. Solar System and Planetary Astronomy Astro 9601
Celestial mechanics and dynamics Solar System and Planetary Astronomy Astro 9601 1 Topics to be covered The two-body problem (.1) The three-body problem (.) Perturbations and resonances (.3) Long-term
More informationState Vector Reference Body Transformations Throughout The Solar System
Introduction One of the more mind-boggling programming challenges encountered during interplanetary trajectory design software development is how to transform a specified inertial position and velocity
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 19 Sep 2014
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 000 (2014) Printed 13 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Asteroid 2014 OL 339 : yet another Earth quasi-satellite arxiv:1409.5588v1 [astro-ph.ep] 19 Sep 2014 C.
More informationGravitation and the Waltz of the Planets
Gravitation and the Waltz of the Planets Chapter Four Guiding Questions 1. How did ancient astronomers explain the motions of the planets? 2. Why did Copernicus think that the Earth and the other planets
More informationGravitation and the Waltz of the Planets. Chapter Four
Gravitation and the Waltz of the Planets Chapter Four Guiding Questions 1. How did ancient astronomers explain the motions of the planets? 2. Why did Copernicus think that the Earth and the other planets
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ORBITAL MECHANICS - MODEL & SIMULATION SOFTWARE (OM-MSS) Earth, Sun, Moon & Satellites Motion in Orbit - Model & Simulation Software
Return to Website INTRODUCTION TO ORBITAL MECHANICS - MODEL & SIMULATION SOFTWARE (OM-MSS) Earth, Sun, Moon & Satellites Motion in Orbit - Model & Simulation Software RC Chakraborty (Retd), Former Director,
More informationAsteroid 2014 YX 49 : a large transient Trojan of Uranus
Preprint 6 February 2017 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Asteroid 2014 YX 49 : a large transient Trojan of Uranus C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos Universidad Complutense de
More informationGravitation and the Motion of the Planets
Gravitation and the Motion of the Planets 1 Guiding Questions 1. How did ancient astronomers explain the motions of the planets? 2. Why did Copernicus think that the Earth and the other planets go around
More informationarxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 5 Aug 2016
MNRAS, 1 6 (2) Preprint 19 June 21 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3. The analemma criterion: accidental quasi-satellites are indeed true quasi-satellites C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente
More informationCelestial mechanics and dynamics. Topics to be covered
Celestial mechanics and dynamics Solar System and Planetary Astronomy Astro 9601 1 Topics to be covered The two-body problem (2.1) The three-body problem (2.2) Perturbations and resonances (2.3) Long-term
More informationCelestial mechanics and dynamics. Solar System and Planetary Astronomy Astro 9601
Celestial mechanics and dynamics Solar System and Planetary Astronomy Astro 9601 1 Topics to be covered The two-body problem (2.1) The three-body problem (2.2) Perturbations ti and resonances (2.3) Long-term
More informationPossible Sources of Toroidal Region in Sporadic Meteoroid Complex
WDS'11 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part III, 13 18, 2011. ISBN 978-80-7378-186-6 MATFYZPRESS Possible Sources of Toroidal Region in Sporadic Meteoroid Complex P. Pokorný Institute of Astronomy,
More informationResonance In the Solar System
Resonance In the Solar System Steve Bache UNC Wilmington Dept. of Physics and Physical Oceanography Advisor : Dr. Russ Herman Spring 2012 Goal numerically investigate the dynamics of the asteroid belt
More informationOrbital Stability Regions for Hypothetical Natural Satellites
Orbital Stability Regions for Hypothetical Natural Satellites By Samantha RIEGER, 1) Daniel SCHEERES, 1) 1) Ann and H.J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder,
More informationDynamical evolution of asteroid fragments originating near the ν 6 resonance
Dynamical evolution of asteroid fragments originating near the ν 6 resonance Takashi Ito and Renu Malhotra Lunar & Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 0092, USA Correspondence
More informationA SYMPLECTIC MAPPING MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF 2:3 RESONANT TRANS-NEPTUNIAN MOTION
3 A SYMPLECTIC MAPPING MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF 2:3 RESONANT TRANS-NEPTUNIAN MOTION K.G. HADJIFOTINOU and JOHN D. HADJIDEMETRIOU Department of Physics, University of Thessaloniki, 540 06 Thessaloniki, Greece
More informationAstronomy 111 Review Problems Solutions
Astronomy 111 Review Problems Solutions Problem 1: Venus has an equatorial radius of 6052 km. Its semi-major axis is 0.72 AU. The Sun has a radius of cm. a) During a Venus transit (such as occurred June
More informationPossibility of collision between co-orbital asteroids and the Earth
Volume 24, N. 1, pp. 99 107, 2005 Copyright 2005 SBMAC ISSN 0101-8205 www.scielo.br/cam Possibility of collision between co-orbital asteroids and the Earth R.C. DOMINGOS 1 and O.C. WINTER 2,1 1 Instituto
More informationJoseph Castro Mentor: Nader Haghighipour
ON THE POSSIBILITY OF ADDITIONAL PLANETS IN THE γ CEPHEI BINARY-PLANETARY SYSTEM Joseph Castro Mentor: Nader Haghighipour ABSTRACT Results of the simulations of the dynamical stability of additional hypothetical
More informationNewton s Legacy. 1- accelerate to break free of Earth. Rocket Science: How to send a spacecraft to Mars
Reading: today: web-based reading on satellite orbits; Chap. 3 Sec. 5 Chap. 7, Sect. 1, 2 (for next week) Exam 1: Tuesday, September 26, 6:45-8:00. Room assignments on course website ESSAY QUESTION Homework
More informationA Centenary Survey of Orbits of Co-orbitals of Jupiter
1 A Centenary Survey of Orbits of Co-orbitals of Jupiter 2 3 4 5 6 7 by R. Greg Stacey Athabasca University and University of Alberta and Martin Connors Athabasca University 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
More information1 Determination of the Orbit of a Minor Planet Using 3 Observations
1 Determination of the Orbit of a Minor Planet Using 3 Observations If the ecliptic latitudes of the three observations being used are greater than 2 it is possible to use the method of three observations
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 3 Jul 2018
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. _main c ESO 2018 July 5, 2018 Centaurs potentially in retrograde co-orbit resonance with Saturn Miao Li 1, Yukun Huang 1, and Shengping Gong 1, School of Aerospace
More informationGravity: Motivation An initial theory describing the nature of the gravitational force by Newton is a product of the resolution of the
Gravity: Motivation An initial theory describing the nature of the gravitational force by Newton is a product of the resolution of the Geocentric-Heliocentric debate (Brahe s data and Kepler s analysis)
More informationSOLAR SYSTEM 2019 SAMPLE EXAM
SOLAR SYSTEM 2019 SAMPLE EXAM Team Name: Team #: No calculators are allowed. All questions are of equal weight unless otherwise noted. Turn in all materials when you have completed the test! Make sure
More informationJohannes Kepler ( ) German Mathematician and Astronomer Passionately convinced of the rightness of the Copernican view. Set out to prove it!
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) German Mathematician and Astronomer Passionately convinced of the rightness of the Copernican view. Set out to prove it! Kepler s Life Work Kepler sought a unifying principle
More informationThe asteroids. Example for the usage of the Virtual Observatory
Example for the usage of the Virtual Observatory The asteroids Florian Freistetter, ZAH, Heidelberg florian@ari.uni-heidelberg.de Asteroids in the solar system There are not only planets in our solar system.
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 13 Feb 2018
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000 000 (0000) Printed 14 February 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) The random walk of cars and their collision probabilities with planets arxiv:1802.04718v1 [astro-ph.ep]
More informationAstronomy 111 Exam Review Problems (Real exam will be Tuesday Oct 25, 2016)
Astronomy 111 Exam Review Problems (Real exam will be Tuesday Oct 25, 2016) Actual Exam rules: you may consult only one page of formulas and constants and a calculator while taking this test. You may not
More informationThe dynamics of Plutinos
The dynamics of Plutinos Qingjuan Yu and Scott Tremaine Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1001, USA ABSTRACT Plutinos are Kuiper-belt objects that share the 3:2 Neptune
More informationarxiv:astro-ph/ v1 7 Feb 2007
Is the Outer Solar System Chaotic? Wayne B. Hayes arxiv:astro-ph/0702179v1 7 Feb 2007 February 4, 2008 Wayne Hayes Computer Science Department University of California, Irvine Irvine, California 92697-3435
More informationarxiv:astro-ph/ v1 16 Sep 1996
The stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system Paul A. Wiegert 1, Matt Holman 2 1 Department of Astronomy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics,
More informationUNIT 6 CELESTIAL SPHERE AND EQUINOCTIAL SYSTEM OF COORDINATES
UNIT 6 CELESTIAL SPHERE AND EQUINOCTIAL SYSTEM OF COORDINATES Structure 6.1 Introduction Objectives 6.2 References 6.3 Apparent Annual Motion of the Sun and the Concept of the Ecliptic and the Obliquity
More informationThe MATROS project: Stability of Uranus and Neptune Trojans. The case of 2001 QR322
A&A 41, 725 734 (23) DOI: 1.151/4-6361:231275 c ESO 23 Astronomy & Astrophysics The MATROS project: Stability of Uranus and Neptune Trojans. The case of 21 QR322 F. Marzari 1, P. Tricarico 1, and H. Scholl
More informationFundamentals of Satellite technology
Fundamentals of Satellite technology Prepared by A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai Orbital Plane All of the planets,
More informationORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS DUE TO THE THREE DIMENSIONAL SWING-BY IN THE SUN-JUPITER SYSTEM
ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS DUE TO THE THREE DIMENSIONAL SWING-BY IN THE SUN-JUPITER SYSTEM JORGE K. S. FORMIGA 1,2 and ANTONIO F B A PRADO 2 National Institute for Space Research -INPE 1 Technology Faculty-FATEC-SJC
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 4 Dec 2018
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. EarthTrojan c ESO 2018 December 5, 2018 Orbital Stability of Earth Trojans Lei Zhou 1, Yang-Bo Xu 1, Li-Yong Zhou 1, 2, Rudolf Dvorak 3, and Jian Li 1, 2 1 School
More informationAssignment 1. Due Jan. 31, 2017
Assignment 1 Due Jan. 31, 2017 Show all work and turn in answers on separate pages, not on these pages. Circle your final answers for clarity. Be sure to show/explain all of your reasoning and that your
More informationarxiv:astro-ph/ v3 2 Mar 2006
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1?? (2006) Printed 5 February 2008 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Pluto s moon system: survey of the phase space I. I. Nagy, Á. Süli and B. Érdi Department of Astronomy, Eötvös
More informationAstronomy 241: Review Questions #2 Distributed: November 7, 2013
Astronomy 241: Review Questions #2 Distributed: November 7, 2013 Review the questions below, and be prepared to discuss them in class. For each question, list (a) the general topic, and (b) the key laws
More informationEccentricity pumping of a planet on an inclined orbit by a disc
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 44, 49 414 21) doi:1.1111/j.1365-2966.21.16295.x Eccentricity pumping of a planet on an inclined orbit by a disc Caroline Terquem 1,2 and Aikel Ajmia 1 1 Institut d Astrophysique
More informationDynamics of two planets in co-orbital motion
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 47, 39 398 (1) doi:1.1111/j.136-966.1.1694.x Dynamics of two planets in co-orbital motion C. A. Giuppone, 1 C. Beaugé, 1 T. A. Michtchenko and S. Ferraz-Mello 1 Observatorio Astronómico,
More informationKirkwood Gaps. Phil Peterman Physics 527 Computational Physics Project 1
Introduction Kirkwood Gaps Phil Peterman Physics 527 Computational Physics Project 1 Resonance phenomena, or tendencies for systems to oscillate at particular frequencies, occur in many distinct branches
More informationThe Origin of Near Earth Asteroids
The Origin of Near Earth Asteroids Judit Györgyey Ries Priors, Quaternions and Residuals, Oh My! September 24, 2004 Austin, Texas Outline Why are we interested in Near Earth Asteroids? How does an asteroid
More informationKEPLER S LAWS OF PLANETARY MOTION
KEPLER S LAWS OF PLANETARY MOTION In the early 1600s, Johannes Kepler culminated his analysis of the extensive data taken by Tycho Brahe and published his three laws of planetary motion, which we know
More informationSatellite Communications
Satellite Communications Lecture (3) Chapter 2.1 1 Gravitational Force Newton s 2nd Law: r r F = m a Newton s Law Of Universal Gravitation (assuming point masses or spheres): Putting these together: r
More informationThe precession of the perihelion of Mercury explained by Celestial Mechanics of Laplace Valdir Monteiro dos Santos Godoi
The precession of the perihelion of Mercury explained by Celestial Mechanics of Laplace Valdir Monteiro dos Santos Godoi valdir.msgodoi@gmail.com ABSTRACT We calculate in this article an exact theoretical
More informationLong-Term Evolution of High Earth Orbits: Effects of Direct Solar Radiation Pressure and Comparison of Trajectory Propagators
Long-Term Evolution of High Earth Orbits: Effects of Direct Solar Radiation Pressure and Comparison of Trajectory Propagators by L. Anselmo and C. Pardini (Luciano.Anselmo@isti.cnr.it & Carmen.Pardini@isti.cnr.it)
More informationTheory of mean motion resonances.
Theory of mean motion resonances. Mean motion resonances are ubiquitous in space. They can be found between planets and asteroids, planets and rings in gaseous disks or satellites and planetary rings.
More informationAy 1 Lecture 2. Starting the Exploration
Ay 1 Lecture 2 Starting the Exploration 2.1 Distances and Scales Some Commonly Used Units Distance: Astronomical unit: the distance from the Earth to the Sun, 1 au = 1.496 10 13 cm ~ 1.5 10 13 cm Light
More informationKozai-Lidov oscillations
Kozai-Lidov oscillations Kozai (1962 - asteroids); Lidov (1962 - artificial satellites) arise most simply in restricted three-body problem (two massive bodies on a Kepler orbit + a test particle) e.g.,
More informationExploring the orbital evolution of planetary systems
Exploring the orbital evolution of planetary systems Tabaré Gallardo Instituto de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Udelar. (Dated: January 22, 217) The aim of this paper is to encourage the use of orbital
More informationIntroduction To Modern Astronomy I
ASTR 111 003 Fall 2006 Lecture 03 Sep. 18, 2006 Introduction To Modern Astronomy I Introducing Astronomy (chap. 1-6) Planets and Moons (chap. 7-17) Ch1: Astronomy and the Universe Ch2: Knowing the Heavens
More informationIdentifying Safe Zones for Planetary Satellite Orbiters
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit 16-19 August 2004, Providence, Rhode Island AIAA 2004-4862 Identifying Safe Zones for Planetary Satellite Orbiters M.E. Paskowitz and D.J. Scheeres
More informationIn all cases assume the observer is located at the latitude of Charlottesville (38 degrees north).
1. Recalling that azimuth is measured around the sky from North (North is 0 degrees, East is 90 degrees, South is 180 degrees, and West is 270 degrees) estimate (do not calculate precisely) the azimuth
More informationChaotic diffusion of small bodies in the Solar System
Chaotic diffusion of small bodies in the Solar System Kleomenis Tsiganis (tsiganis@obs-nicefr) and Alessandro Morbidelli Observatoire de la Côte d Azur - Nice, CNRS, BP 4229, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France
More informationGravity and the Orbits of Planets
Gravity and the Orbits of Planets 1. Gravity Galileo Newton Earth s Gravity Mass v. Weight Einstein and General Relativity Round and irregular shaped objects 2. Orbits and Kepler s Laws ESO Galileo, Gravity,
More informationarxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 3 Apr 2018
Astronomy& Astrophysics manuscript no. zanardi_ c ESO 28 September 2, 28 The role of the general relativity on icy body reservoirs under the effects of an inner eccentric Jupiter M. Zanardi, 2, G. C. de
More informationTHE LUNAR LIBRATION: COMPARISONS BETWEEN VARIOUS MODELS- A MODEL FITTED TO LLR OBSERVATIONS
THE LUNAR LIBRATION: COMPARISONS BETWEEN VARIOUS MODELS- A MODEL FITTED TO LLR OBSERVATIONS J. CHAPRONT, G. FRANCOU SYRTE - Observatoire de Paris - UMR 8630/CNRS 61, avenue de l Observatoire 75014 Paris
More informationNGA GNSS Division Precise Ephemeris Parameters
NGA GNSS Division Precise Ephemeris Parameters Precise Ephemeris Units. Earth-centered, Earth-fixed Coordinate system Position Velocity GPS time Trajectory interval Standard Trajectory Optional Trajectory
More informationEquation of orbital velocity: v 2 =GM(2/r 1/a) where: G is the gravitational constant (G=6.67x10 11 N/m 3 kg), M is the mass of the sun (or central
Everything in Orbit Orbital Velocity Orbital velocity is the speed at which a planetary body moves in its orbit around another body. If orbits were circular, this velocity would be constant. However, from
More informationToday in Astronomy 111: rings, gaps and orbits
Today in Astronomy 111: rings, gaps and orbits Gap sizes: the Hill radius Perturbations and resonances The variety of structures in planetary rings Spiral density waves Titan Bending waves Horseshoe and
More informationConfirmation of the April Rho Cygnids (ARC, IAU#348)
WGN, the Journal of the IMO 39:5 (2011) 131 Confirmation of the April Rho Cygnids (ARC, IAU#348) M. Phillips, P. Jenniskens 1 and B. Grigsby 1 During routine low-light level video observations with CAMS
More informationTHE PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT
The Astronomical Journal, 127:2418 2423, 2004 April # 2004. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT Michael E. Brown Division of Geological
More informationUnit 2: Celestial Mechanics
Unit 2: Celestial Mechanics The position of the Earth Ptolemy (90 168 AD) Made tables that allowed a user to locate the position of a planet at any past, present, or future date. In order to maintain circular
More informationThree objects; 2+1 problem
Three objects; 2+1 problem Having conquered the two-body problem, we now set our sights on more objects. In principle, we can treat the gravitational interactions of any number of objects by simply adding
More information