Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies

Transcription

1 Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies Luis C. Ho ( 何子山 ) The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science

2 Ho 2008, ARA&A Nuclear Activity in Nearby Galaxies Kormendy & Ho 2013, ARA&A Coevolution of Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies Ho 2013a, ApJ A Recalibration of the Black Hole Mass Scale for AGNs Ho 2013b, ApJ Quasars and the Mass Assembly of Elliptical Galaxies

3

4 Gebhardt et al. (2000) Ferrarese & Merritt (2000) Gültekin et al. (2009) black hole bulge

5

6

7 Courtesy of S. Heinz

8

9

10

11

12 log SFR / M O yr -1 Mpc Redshift (z)

13 All galaxies Early-type galaxies 2.5 u-r color Indeterminate-type galaxies All AGN 1%AGN 3% AGN 5% AGN 8% AGN 10% AGN Late-type galaxies Stellar Mass log M (solar masses) * Figure Schawinski et al. (2010)

14

15

16

17 ?

18 ??

19 What is Mmin and Mmax?? What is scatter? What is slope? What is zeropoint? Active cf. inactive? Redshift evolution??

20 black hole demography

21

22

23

24 NGC 4889: M = 2 x 1010 M (McConnell et al. 2011)

25 7 New Megamasers! Kuo et al. (2011)

26 7 New Megamasers! Kuo et al. (2011)

27 Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion

28 Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion

29 Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs NGC 5548 FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Peterson et al. (2002)

30 Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs Radius-Luminosity NGC 5548 Relation FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Bentz et al. (2009) Peterson et al. (2002)

31 Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs Radius-Luminosity NGC 5548 Relation FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Bentz et al. (2009) Peterson et al. (2002) Woo et al. (2010)

32 Virial BH Masses for Type 1 AGNs Radius-Luminosity NGC 5548 Relation FWHM M virial = f RV 2 /G f geometric fudge factor R BLR radius V BLR velocity dispersion Bentz et al. (2009) Peterson et al. (2002) M can be estimated to an accuracy of dex for z 0 6 Woo et al. (2010)

33 -2-4 z = 0.40 z = 0.60 z = 0.80 z = log (M BH ) [Mpc -3 dex -1 ] z = 1.20 z = 1.40 z = 1.60 z = 1.80 z = 2.15 z = 2.65 z = 3.20 z = z = 4.25 z = Kelly & Shen (2012) log M BH / M O

34 Greene & Ho (2004, 2007a, 2007b) Dong, Ho et al. (2012)

35 200 new sources Greene & Ho (2004, 2007a, 2007b) Dong, Ho et al. (2012)

36 NGC 4395 Filippenko & Ho (2003)

37 Greene, Ho & Barth (2008) Jiang, Greene & Ho (2011a, 2011b) HST/ACS

38 M galaxy correlations

39 Kormendy & Ho (2013)

40

41 NGC 1277

42

43 Kormendy & Ho (2013)

44 M σ relation

45 M σ relation M 10 9 M = km s ±0.29 intrinsic scatter = 0.28.

46 M M bulge relation

47 M M bulge relation M 10 9 M = Mbulge M 1.19±0.08 ; intrinsic scatter = 0.28 dex

48 M M bulge relation M 10 9 M = Mbulge M 1.19±0.08 ; intrinsic scatter = 0.28 dex old value

49 extension to AGNs...

50 quasars in interacting host galaxies from our Cycle 12 amera makes it possible to detect tidal tails, interacting ve been missed with the ACS/HRC, WFPC2/PC, or Kim, Ho, et al. (2008a, 2008b) HST/ACS WFC G quasars, from our Cycle 12 ACS program. The AGN ff using GALFIT, leaving the host galaxy morphology

51 Kim, Ho, et al. (2013a, 2013b) Jiang, Greene & Ho (2011a, 2011b)

52 Gravitationally Lensed Quasars CASTLES Survey/NICMOS C. Y. Peng Ph.D. Thesis (2005)

53 Gravitationally Lensed Quasars CASTLES Survey/NICMOS C. Y. Peng Ph.D. Thesis (2005)

54 Gravitationally Lensed Quasars CASTLES Survey/NICMOS C. Y. Peng Ph.D. Thesis (2005)

55 CaT Mg Ib Fe Ca H+K Fe II emission A stars Greene & Ho (2006a, 2006b)

56 A new approach using H I (and other radio lines) Ho (2007a, ApJ, 668, 94) Bulge and Halo Kinematics Across the Hubble Sequence Ho (2007b, ApJ, 669, 821) The CO Tully-Fisher Relation and Implications for the Host Galaxies of High-Redshift Quasars Ho, Darling, & Greene (2008a, ApJS, 177, 103) A New H I Survey of Active Galaxies Ho, Darling, & Greene (2008b, ApJ, 681, 128) Properties of Active Galaxies Deduced from H I Observations

57

58

59 Tully-Fisher Relation

60 z = 6.42 Bertoldi et al. (2003)

61 [C II] 158 μm z = 6.42 Maiolino et al. (2012)

62 z = 7.1 Venemans et al. (2012)

63 evolution (?)

64 Woo et al. (2006, 2008) Treu et al. (2007)

65 Woo Bennert et al. et (2006, al. (2011) 2008) Treu et al. (2007)

66 Peng, Impey, Ho et al. (2006)

67 Δα = dex Peng, Impey, Ho et al. (2006)

68 z = z = 0 Ho (2007b) cf. Shields et al. (2006); Wu (2007); Wang et al. (2010) FWHM(CO)

69 Δα = dex z = z = 0 Ho (2007b) cf. Shields et al. (2006); Wu (2007); Wang et al. (2010) FWHM(CO)

70 evolution (?)... not so fast

71

72

73

74

75

76 Ho (2013a, 2013b)

77 AGN Feedback when, where, how?

78

79

80

81 Jahnke & Maccio (2010)

82 Jahnke & Maccio (2010) Kormendy & Ho (2013)

83 van Dokkum et al. (2010)

84

85

86 3C 303 MS NGC 5548 PG MS MS MS MS Kim, Ho, et al. (2013a, 2013b)

87 Home Registration Abstract Submission Accommodation Contact Us Login