Persuasion Under Costly Lying
|
|
- Cory Briggs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Persuasion Under Costly Lying Teck Yong Tan Columbia University 1 / 43
2 Introduction Consider situations where agent designs learning environment (i.e. what additional information to generate) to persuade another agent : advertising and marketing communications in organizations medical testing and research media control/ lobbying Kamenica and Gentzkow (2011), hereafter KG: Model these situations as a strategic communication (or cheap talk) game with Sender commitment. Sender designs the information generating structure and can commit to truthfully reporting all his information to Receiver. 2 / 43
3 Leading Example of KG A prosecutor (S) wants to convince a judge (R) that a defendant is guilty: State ω {Guilty, I nnocent}, unknown to both. Judge chooses action a {Acquit, Convict}. Gets utility 1 when chosen the right action (acquit when ω = I, convict when ω = G); Gets utility 0 otherwise. = R chooses convict when believes Pr(ω = G) 1. 2 Prosecutor only wants to convict the defendant: Gets utility 0 if Judge chooses acquit. Gets utility U > 0 if Judge chooses convict. Common prior β 0 = 0.3. Judge chooses acquit. 3 / 43
4 Leading Example of KG (continued) Suppose Prosecutor can conduct an investigation and can design the informational content of his investigation costlessly. No bribery (i.e. no transfers or monetary incentives allowed). Full commitment assumption: Outcome of investigation is publicly observed. Formally, let signal space be S = {g, i} and Prosecutor chooses a family of distribution π( ω) on S. 4 / 43
5 Leading Example of KG (continued) No investigation π(s = i ω = I ) = 1 2 π(s = i ω = G) = 1 2 π(s = g ω = I ) = 1 2 π(s = g ω = G) = 1 2 Judge chooses acquit (since prior β = 0.3). 5 / 43
6 Leading Example of KG (continued) Full investigation π(s = i ω = I ) = 1 π(s = i ω = G) = 0 π(s = g ω = I ) = 0 π(s = g ω = G) = 1 Bayes rule: Pr(ω = G s = g) = 1, Pr(ω = I s = i) = 1. Judge chooses convict when observed s = g, acquit when observed s = i. = Judges chooses convict with probability Pr(s = g) = 0.3. Prosecutor's ex-ante expected utility is 0.3U. 6 / 43
7 Leading Example of KG (continued) Prosecutor can do better by being vague sometimes. Optimal investigation: π(s = i ω = I ) = 4 7 π(s = i ω = G) = 0 π(s = g ω = I ) = 3 7 π(s = g ω = G) = 1 Bayes rule: Pr(ω = G s = g) = 1, Pr(ω = I s = i) = 1. 2 Judge still chooses convict when observed s = g, acquit when observed s = i. But now, Pr(s = g) = 0.6. Prosecutor's expected utility is 0.6U. Judge convicts with ex-ante probability 0.6, even though Judge knows defendant is guilty with only 30% chance. This is the optimal signal structure (investigation). 7 / 43
8 The Full Commitment Assumption What if Judge cannot fully observe the investigation and relies on Prosecutor to report the ndings? What happens during the communication stage? If lying is costless: similar to cheap talk (Crawford and Sobel (1982)). Information will only be transmitted when preferences are suciently aligned. If Prosecutor must tell the truth but not necessarily the whole truth: similar to cheap talk under veriable information (Grossman (1981), Milgrom (1981)) There will be unravelling through skepticism. If Prosecutor can lie with a cost: similar to cheap talk under costly lying, or costly signaling (Kartik et al. (2007), Kartik (2009), Spence (1973)) Costly cheap-talk: There is language ination (exaggeration). 8 / 43
9 Example Allowing For Costly Lying Many reasons why Judge might need to rely on Prosecutor to report the ndings, and why Prosecutor can lie at a cost: Costly interpretation Tampering with ndings at a cost Suppose now that Prosecutor privately observes the signal realization s and then sends a message m {g, i} to the Judge. The structure of the investigation π( ω) is still public knowledge. Cost of lying: Incurs no cost for truthful reporting, but incurs a cost k > 0 for lying. k is common knowledge. 9 / 43
10 Large Lying Cost (k > U) k > U implies any possible gain from lying is outweighed by lying cost. Prosecutor will never lie. Lying cost has no bite. 10 / 43
11 Small Lying Cost (k < U) Suppose k < U. Consider the KG optimal investigation structure: π(s = i ω = I ) = 4 7 π(s = i ω = G) = 0 π(s = g ω = I ) = 3 7 π(s = g ω = G) = 1 Bayes rule: Pr(ω = G s = g) = 1, Pr(ω = I s = i) = 1. 2 Pr(s = g) = 0.6. If Judge always chooses convict when Prosecutor reports m = g, Prosecutor will always report m = g regardless of the signal. 11 / 43
12 Small Lying Cost (k < U) continued Can establish 3 three things: 1 Judge cannot disregard message and always choose convict (since prior µ 0 = 0.3). 2 Judge cannot disregard message and always choose acquit (since Prosecutor will want to tell the truth and avoid lying cost). 3 Judge cannot always choose convict after hearing a particular message (from previous argument). 12 / 43
13 Small Lying Cost (k < U) continued Suppose Judge becomes wary of the Prosecutor's message. Chooses convict k (0, 1) of the time when Prosecutor sends m = g. U This is still optimal for Judge since she is indierent at s = g (Pr(ω = G s = g) = 1 ). 2 Prosecutor is now indierent between lying and truth-telling for s = i. Willing to always report truthfully now. Ex-ante expected utility is Pr(s = g) k U = 0.6k < 0.6U. U Can the Prosecutor do better with a dierent investigation and possibly lie sometimes? No! The above investigation is still the optimal one (we will see why later). 13 / 43
14 Outline Consider strategic communication games where: Sender designs information acquisition structure (as in KG). Limited commitment in revealing his information truthfully in the form of costly lying. Main results for this talk: Limited commitment hurts the Sender. For general lying cost structure, Sender will design an information acquisition structure that gives him no incentive to lie. Social welfare is lower because learning must be vague. When Sender has state-independent preference, the optimal information acquisition structure resembles that of KG. 14 / 43
15 Setup Two players: Receiver (she) and Sender (he). True state of world ω Ω. Ω is nite. Both players uncertain about ω; shares common prior β0 (Ω). Stage one: Sender chooses signal structure π from a family of distribution Π = {π( ω)} ω Ω over a nite signal realization (or signal) space S. Choice of π is observed by Receiver. Stage two: Sender privately observes signal realization s S. Reports a message m S to Receiver. Can have richer form of message space. Key is every message carries a meaning of I observed signal s for a s S. Receiver then takes an action a A; A is compact. 15 / 43
16 Setup (continued) Receiver's expected utility is u(a, ω): can depend on both her action and true state. Sender's expected utility is v(a, ω) C(m, s): v(a, ω) is the payo; dependent on Receiver's action and true state C(m, s) is lying cost; Assume C(s, s) = 0 and C(s, s ) > 0 s s. Call it KG environment when C(s, s ) = s s Call it lying environment otherwise. 16 / 43
17 Setup (Strategies) Sender's strategy is σ = (π, µ): Choice of signal structure: π Π. Messaging strategy: µ : Π S (S). Let µ be the truthful reporting strategy (i.e. µ(s) = s s). Receiver's strategy is α : (Ω) (A): Dene a belief update operator ϕπ,µ : S (Ω): π is the chosen signal structure. µ is Receiver's conjecture of Sender's messaging strategy. 17 / 43
18 Posterior distribution A signal structure generates a distribution of posterior beliefs τ ( (Ω)) Supp(τ) = {βs} s S. Each posterior is derived via Bayes' rule: s β s(ω) = :µ(s )=s π(s ω)β 0(ω) ω Ω s :µ(s )=s π(s ω )β 0(ω ) τ(β) = π(s ω)β 0(ω) s:β s =β ω Ω A distribution of posteriors τ is Bayes plausible if: τ(β s ) β s = β 0 β s Supp(τ) Note: Not all Bayes plausible distribution can be generated when µ µ Eg. if µ(s) = s0 s. The only distribution of posterior generated is degenerate at the prior 18 / 43
19 Utility In Terms Of Posteriors Let a (β) := arg max a A E β u(a, ω). Assume that: A has at least two elements. a A, there exists a belief β (Ω) such that a a (β). Let â(β) := arg max a { Eβ v(a, ω) a a (β) }. â(β) is the action that generates the highest expected payo for Sender among Receiver's optimal actions under belief β. 19 / 43
20 Utility In Terms Of Posteriors Let Sender's expected payo when both players hold belief β and Receiver takes â(β) be ˆv(β) := E β v(â(β), ω). This allows us to dene Sender's utility in terms of posteriors generated: In KG, the Sender preferred eq restricts α( ) = â( ). This is not the case here. Let V be the concave closure of ˆv: V (β) := sup{z (β, z) co(ˆv)} where co(ˆv) is the convex hull of graph ˆv. 20 / 43
21 Persuasion In KG Environment In the KG environment (i.e. no possibility of lying), Sender's problem can be reduced to s.t. max τ E τ ˆv(β) Supp(τ) βτ(β) = β 0 21 / 43
22 Persuasion In KG Environment ˆv(β) ˆv(β) β 0 22 / 43
23 Persuasion In KG Environment ˆv(β) V (β) co(ˆv) ˆv(β) β 0 23 / 43
24 Persuasion In KG Environment ˆv(β h ) V (β) ˆv(β l ) co(ˆv) ˆv(β) β l β 0 β h 24 / 43
25 Persuasion In KG Environment Choose the set of posteriors {β s } to induce. Bayes plausibility is assured by: τ s = ω β s(ω) β 0 (ω). Signal structure is backed out by: π(s ω) = βs (ω) τs β 0(ω). 25 / 43
26 Persuasion In Lying Environment Suppose Receiver does not observe the signal and Sender reports the signal under costly lying now... Sender's expected utility is weakly lower in the lying environment than in the KG environment Proof: The distribution of posterior in the lying environment must be Bayes plausible and hence, can be generated in the KG environment as well. 26 / 43
27 Communication Subgame Restrict attention to principal-optimal equilibrium (PBE) An equilibrium here refers to equilibrium of the whole game, not just the communication subgame. Note that in an equilibrium, Receiver's conjecture of Sender's message strategy is correct. 27 / 43
28 Communication Subgame Lemma At equilibrium, there cannot be a full-separation with lying involved in the communication subgame. Full-separation with lying means Receiver knows exactly what Sender observed Proof: If not, Sender can just relabel the signals and save on lying costs. 28 / 43
29 Communication Subgame Lemma At equilibrium, there cannot be any pooling of messages in the communication subgame. Implies Sender will not play mixed reporting strategy as well. Proof: Suppose µ pools s 1 and s 2 and always report s 1. Hence, Sender incurs lying cost at realization s 2. Receiver's posterior will be β 1 Sender can choose a dierent π such that π(s 1 ω) = π(s 2 ω) ω, and β 1 = β 2 = β 1. This is Bayes plausible and expected payo is unchanged. 29 / 43
30 Communication Subgame Proposition At equilibrium, there is no lying at the communication subgame. Proof: Follows from the previous two lemmas Intuitively, any form of lying will be anticipated by Receiver (i.e. Receiver will not be manipulated by lying). Hence, lying will not improve Sender's payo. 30 / 43
31 Persuasion In Lying Environment In the lying environment, Sender's problem can be reduced to max τ E τ ˆv(β) s.t. (Bayes plausibility) Supp(τ) βτ(β) = β 0 (No incentive to lie)???????? What does the additional no incentive to lie constraint bring? Sender cannot choose too sharp an information structure. 31 / 43
32 What is the lying cost Ordering If lying from s1 to s 3 is higher than lying from s 1 to s 2, Sender can just relabel the signal (or not use it at all) Magnitude Should lying cost be proportional to the expected gain from lying? But expected gain is endogenous to the strategies. Shall assume C(s, s ) = k > 0 s s 32 / 43
33 State-independent preference for Sender Assumes v(a, ω) = v(a, ω ) for all ω, ω Ω If Sender's preference depends on states, the payo of lying towards s depends on the true realization s. Eg. lying from s to s yields payo E βs v(α(β s ), ω) and not ˆv(β s ) Instead, state-independent preference implies payo of reporting any message m is just ˆv(β m ) Relevant applications: Prosecution example Lobbying Advertising 33 / 43
34 Optimal Signal Structure Sender's problem is reduced to max τ E τ ˆv(β) s.t. (Bayes plausibility) Supp(τ) βτ(β) = β 0 (No incentive to lie) v(β s ) min β Supp(τ) ˆv(β) k β s Supp(τ) 34 / 43
35 Optimal Signal Structure (Some Notation) For E {KG, L}, (L for Lying) Let τ E be the optimal signal structure Supp(τ E ) = {β E,..., 1 βe n }, with ˆv(β E ) 1 ˆv(βE ) 2 ˆv(βE n ) State independence preference allows us to rank beliefs Say there is gain from persuasion in the E environment if E τ E ˆv(β E s ) > ˆv(β 0 ) Corollary If there is gain from persuasion in the KG environment and ˆv(β KG n then there is gain from from persuasion in the lying environment. ) ˆv(β KG 1 ) k, 35 / 43
36 Optimal Signal Structure In Lying Environment When is there gain from persuasion? What does the optimal signal structure look like? Proposition There is gain from persuasion in the lying environment if and only if (i) there is gain from persuasion in the KG and environment and (ii) ˆv(β 0 ) < ˆv(β KG 1 ) + k. Proposition Let β be such that ˆv(β) = ˆv(β KG 1 ) + k. If there is gain from persuasion in the lying environment, the optimal signal structure τ L with Supp(τ L ) = {β L 1,..., βl n} can be achieved by: β L s = { βs KG β if ˆv(β s KG ) ˆv(β 1 ) + k if ˆv(β s KG ) > ˆv(β 1 ) + k 36 / 43
37 Persuasion In KG Environment ˆv(β h ) V (β) ˆv(β l ) co(ˆv) ˆv(β) β l β 0 β h 37 / 43
38 Optimal Signal Structure In Lying Environment ˆv(β h ) > k ˆv(β l ) ˆv(β) β l β 0 β h 38 / 43
39 Optimal Signal Structure In Lying Environment ˆv(β h ) > k ˆv(β l ) = k ˆv(β) β l β 0 β β h 39 / 43
40 Prosecutor Example U ˆv(β) β 0 = / 43
41 Prosecutor Example U ˆv(β) V (β) β 0 = / 43
42 Prosecutor Example U ˆv(β) V (β) = k β 0 = / 43
43 Conclusion Inducing an agent to do something through persuasion is done through belief manipulation. This paper studies the extent of belief manipulation possible when Sender cannot commit to revealing all new information found. Showed that under costly lying, Sender will not lie in the communication stage. Would instead choose to induce a vague information acquisition process (any gain from sharper information is eroded away by Receiver's wariness of Sender lying). Under state-independent Sender preference and constant lying cost, optimal signal structure resembles that of KG. 43 / 43
Introduction. Introduction
Bayesian Persuasion Emir Kamenica and Matthew Gentzkow (2010) presented by Johann Caro Burnett and Sabyasachi Das March 4, 2011 Emir Kamenica and Matthew Gentzkow (2010) (presentedbayesian by Johann Persuasion
More informationBayesian Persuasion Online Appendix
Bayesian Persuasion Online Appendix Emir Kamenica and Matthew Gentzkow University of Chicago June 2010 1 Persuasion mechanisms In this paper we study a particular game where Sender chooses a signal π whose
More informationBayesian Persuasion. Emir Kamenica and Matthew Gentzkow University of Chicago. September 2009
Bayesian Persuasion Emir Kamenica and Matthew Gentzkow University of Chicago September 2009 Abstract When is it possible for one person to persuade another to change her action? We take a mechanism design
More informationHierarchical Bayesian Persuasion
Hierarchical Bayesian Persuasion Weijie Zhong May 12, 2015 1 Introduction Information transmission between an informed sender and an uninformed decision maker has been extensively studied and applied in
More informationECO421: Communication
ECO421: Communication Marcin P ski February 9, 2018 Plan Introduction Asymmetric information means some players know more than the others. In real life, information can be transmitted A simple model of
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES BAYESIAN PERSUASION. Emir Kamenica Matthew Gentzkow. Working Paper
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES BAYESIAN PERSUASION Emir Kamenica Matthew Gentzkow Working Paper 15540 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15540 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,
More informationCompetition in Persuasion
Competition in Persuasion Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica University of Chicago September 2011 Abstract Does competition among persuaders increase the extent of information revealed? We study ex ante
More informationEndogenous Persuasion with Rational Verification
Endogenous Persuasion with Rational Verification Mike FELGENHAUER July 16, 2017 Abstract This paper studies a situation in which a sender tries to persuade a receiver with evidence that is generated via
More informationDisclosure of Endogenous Information
Disclosure of Endogenous Information Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica Stanford University and University of Chicago March 2016 Abstract We study the effect of disclosure requirements in environments
More informationCostly Persuasion. Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica University of Chicago. December 2013
Costly Persuasion Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica University of Chicago December 2013 Abstract We study the design of informational environments in settings where generating information is costly. We
More informationGames and Economic Behavior
Games and Economic Behavior 104 (2017) 411 429 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Games and Economic Behavior www.elsevier.com/locate/geb Bayesian persuasion with multiple senders and rich signal
More informationPersuading Skeptics and Reaffirming Believers
Persuading Skeptics and Reaffirming Believers May, 31 st, 2014 Becker-Friedman Institute Ricardo Alonso and Odilon Camara Marshall School of Business - USC Introduction Sender wants to influence decisions
More informationGraduate Microeconomics II Lecture 5: Cheap Talk. Patrick Legros
Graduate Microeconomics II Lecture 5: Cheap Talk Patrick Legros 1 / 35 Outline Cheap talk 2 / 35 Outline Cheap talk Crawford-Sobel Welfare 3 / 35 Outline Cheap talk Crawford-Sobel Welfare Partially Verifiable
More informationOrganizational Barriers to Technology Adoption: Evidence from Soccer-Ball Producers in Pakistan
Organizational Barriers to Technology Adoption: Evidence from Soccer-Ball Producers in Pakistan David Atkin, Azam Chaudhry, Shamyla Chaudry Amit K. Khandelwal and Eric Verhoogen Sept. 016 Appendix B: Theory
More informationCMS-EMS Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics And Management Science. Discussion Paper #1583. Monotone Persuasion
CMS-EMS Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics And Management Science Discussion Paper #1583 Monotone Persuasion Jeffrey Mensch Northwestern University May 24 th, 2016 Monotone Persuasion Jeffrey
More informationCompetition in Persuasion
Competition in Persuasion Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica University of Chicago September 2012 Abstract Does competition among persuaders increase the extent of information revealed? We study ex ante
More informationIntroduction Persuasion Attribute Puffery Results Conclusion. Persuasive Puffery. Archishman Chakraborty and Rick Harbaugh
Persuasive Puffery Archishman Chakraborty and Rick Harbaugh 2012 Marketing Science Meetings Puffery Sellers tend to exaggerate World s best hotdogs! That suit looks perfect on you! Our service can t be
More informationCostly Expertise. Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz. Current Version: December, 2007
Costly Expertise Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz Current Version: December, 007 In many environments expertise is costly. Costs can manifest themselves in numerous ways, ranging from the time that is required
More informationDefinitions and Proofs
Giving Advice vs. Making Decisions: Transparency, Information, and Delegation Online Appendix A Definitions and Proofs A. The Informational Environment The set of states of nature is denoted by = [, ],
More informationOptimal Signals in Bayesian Persuasion Mechanisms with Ranking
Optimal Signals in Bayesian Persuasion Mechanisms with Ranking Maxim Ivanov y McMaster University August 2015 (First version: October 2013) Abstract This paper develops a novel approach based on the majorization
More informationjoint with Jonathan Pogach (Penn) 2009 FESAMES at Tokyo Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Honesty vs. White Lies Kim & Pogach Overview
vs. White vs. joint with Jonathan Pogach (Penn) Kyungmin (Teddy) Kim Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 2009 FESAMES at Tokyo vs. White vs. Question Models Main Results Contributions 1 Honest
More informationEx Post Cheap Talk : Value of Information and Value of Signals
Ex Post Cheap Talk : Value of Information and Value of Signals Liping Tang Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA 15213, USA Abstract. Crawford and Sobel s Cheap Talk model [1] describes an information
More informationWhere does the sender s information come from? Communication with Endogenous Information Acquisition
Where does the sender s information come from? Communication with Endogenous Information Acquisition Harry Di Pei January 24, 2013 Abstract This paper revisits the Crawford-Sobel game by allowing the sender
More informationEquilibrium Refinements
Equilibrium Refinements Mihai Manea MIT Sequential Equilibrium In many games information is imperfect and the only subgame is the original game... subgame perfect equilibrium = Nash equilibrium Play starting
More informationDeceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers
Deceptive Advertising with Rational Buyers September 6, 016 ONLINE APPENDIX In this Appendix we present in full additional results and extensions which are only mentioned in the paper. In the exposition
More informationReputational Concern with Endogenous Information Acquisition. Haibo Xu Washington University in Saint Louis. December 28, 2011
Reputational Concern with Endogenous Information Acquisition Haibo Xu Washington University in Saint Louis December 28, 2011 Abstract We develop a reputational cheap talk model to characterize the essential
More informationSome Notes on Costless Signaling Games
Some Notes on Costless Signaling Games John Morgan University of California at Berkeley Preliminaries Our running example is that of a decision maker (DM) consulting a knowledgeable expert for advice about
More informationCommunication with Self-Interested Experts Part II: Models of Cheap Talk
Communication with Self-Interested Experts Part II: Models of Cheap Talk Margaret Meyer Nuffield College, Oxford 2013 Cheap Talk Models 1 / 27 Setting: Decision-maker (P) receives advice from an advisor
More informationWhen to Ask for an Update: Timing in Strategic Communication. National University of Singapore June 5, 2018
When to Ask for an Update: Timing in Strategic Communication Ying Chen Johns Hopkins University Atara Oliver Rice University National University of Singapore June 5, 2018 Main idea In many communication
More informationBayesian Persuasion with Private Information
Bayesian Persuasion with Private Information Andrew Kosenko September 1, 2017 Abstract We study a model of communication and Bayesian persuasion between a sender who is privately informed and has state
More informationStrategic Information Transmission under Reputation Concerns
Strategic Information Transmission under Reputation Concerns Emilia Oljemark October 7, 03 Abstract This paper analyzes strategic information transmission in a repeated model of communication. The sender
More informationPre-Communication in a Coordination Game with Incomplete Information
Pre-Communication in a Coordination Game with Incomplete Information Zhuozheng Li, Huanxing Yang, and Lan Zhang y JEL Classi cation: D3, D74, D8 Keywords: Cheap talk, Coordination game, Centralization,
More informationNoisy persuasion. Working Paper Elias Tsakas and Nikolas Tsakas
Working Paper 11-2018 Noisy persuasion Elias Tsakas and Nikolas Tsakas Department of Economics, University of Cyprus, P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus Tel.: +357-22893700, Fax: +357-22895028, Web site:
More informationGovernment 2005: Formal Political Theory I
Government 2005: Formal Political Theory I Lecture 11 Instructor: Tommaso Nannicini Teaching Fellow: Jeremy Bowles Harvard University November 9, 2017 Overview * Today s lecture Dynamic games of incomplete
More informationCoordinated Sequential Bayesian Persuasion
Coordinated Sequential Bayesian Persuasion Wenhao Wu December 3, 017 Abstract his paper studies an extended Bayesian Persuasion model in which multiple senders persuade one Receiver sequentially and the
More informationHonesty vs. White Lies
Honesty vs. White Lies KyungMin Kim and Jonathan Pogach May 29 Abstract We study and compare the behavioral consequences of honesty and white lie in communication. An honest agent always recommends the
More informationMediated Persuasion: Some Examples
Mediated Persuasion: Some Examples Andrew Kosenko Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh June, 208 Abstract We study a game of strategic information design between a sender, who chooses state-dependent
More informationBelief Meddling in Social Networks: an Information-Design Approach. October 2018
Belief Meddling in Social Networks: an Information-Design Approach Simone Galperti UC San Diego Jacopo Perego Columbia University October 2018 Motivation introduction 2012 Presidential race, Romney at
More informationAn Example of Conflicts of Interest as Pandering Disincentives
An Example of Conflicts of Interest as Pandering Disincentives Saori Chiba and Kaiwen Leong Current draft: January 205 Abstract Consider an uninformed decision maker (DM) who communicates with a partially
More informationA Rothschild-Stiglitz approach to Bayesian persuasion
A Rothschild-Stiglitz approach to Bayesian persuasion Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica Stanford University and University of Chicago December 2015 Abstract Rothschild and Stiglitz (1970) represent random
More informationInformation and Legislative Organization
Information and Legislative Organization Felix Munoz-Garcia Advanced Microeconomics II - Washington State University A paper by Gilligan and Krehbiel (1987) models the role of parliamentary committees
More informationPerfect Bayesian Equilibrium
Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium For an important class of extensive games, a solution concept is available that is simpler than sequential equilibrium, but with similar properties. In a Bayesian extensive
More information1 Web Appendix: Equilibrium outcome under collusion (multiple types-multiple contracts)
1 Web Appendix: Equilibrium outcome under collusion (multiple types-multiple contracts) We extend our setup by allowing more than two types of agent. The agent s type is now β {β 1, β 2,..., β N }, where
More informationMarkets with Asymetric Information
Microeconomics 2 Presentation: Francis Bloch, Slides: Bernard Caillaud Master APE - Paris School of Economics March 6, 2017 (Lecture 9) I. Asymmetric information I.1. Introduction The economy is fundamentally
More informationA Rothschild-Stiglitz approach to Bayesian persuasion
A Rothschild-Stiglitz approach to Bayesian persuasion Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica Stanford University and University of Chicago January 2016 Consider a situation where one person, call him Sender,
More informationMisinformation. March Abstract
Misinformation Li, Hao University of British Columbia & University of Toronto Wei Li University of British Columbia & University of California, Riverside March 2010 Abstract We model political campaigns
More informationSequential Games with Incomplete Information
Sequential Games with Incomplete Information Debraj Ray, November 6 For the remaining lectures we return to extensive-form games, but this time we focus on imperfect information, reputation, and signalling
More informationGood Lies. May Abstract. Decision makers often face uncertainty about the ability and the integrity of their
Good Lies Filippo Pavesi y, Massimo Scotti z May 2017 Abstract Decision makers often face uncertainty about the ability and the integrity of their advisors. If an expert is sufficiently concerned about
More informationGame Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium
Game Theory Wolfgang Frimmel Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium / 22 Bayesian Nash equilibrium and dynamic games L M R 3 2 L R L R 2 2 L R L 2,, M,2, R,3,3 2 NE and 2 SPNE (only subgame!) 2 / 22 Non-credible
More informationRenegotiation proof mechanism design with imperfect type veri cation
Renegotiation proof mechanism design with imperfect type veri cation Francisco Silva y December 7, 2017 Abstract I consider the interaction between an agent and a principal who is unable to commit not
More informationSelecting Cheap-Talk Equilibria
Selecting Cheap-Talk Equilibria Ying Chen, Navin Kartik, and Joel Sobel September 30, 2007 Abstract There are typically multiple equilibrium outcomes in the Crawford-Sobel (CS) model of strategic information
More informationSender s Small Concern for Credibility and Receiver s Dilemma
April 2012 Sender s Small Concern for Credibility and Receiver s Dilemma Hanjoon Michael Jung The Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica Abstract We model a dilemma that receivers face when a sender has
More information9 A Class of Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information:
A Class of Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information: Signalling Games In general, a dynamic game of incomplete information is any extensive form game in which at least one player is uninformed about some
More informationCommunication with Detectable Deceit
Communication with Detectable Deceit Preliminary Wioletta Dziuda 1 Kellogg School of Management Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences wdziuda@kellogg.northwestern.edu February 2012 ( rst draft: January
More informationPersuading a Pessimist
Persuading a Pessimist Afshin Nikzad PRELIMINARY DRAFT Abstract While in practice most persuasion mechanisms have a simple structure, optimal signals in the Bayesian persuasion framework may not be so.
More informationStatic Information Design
Static Information Design Dirk Bergemann and Stephen Morris Frontiers of Economic Theory & Computer Science, Becker-Friedman Institute, August 2016 Mechanism Design and Information Design Basic Mechanism
More informationA Rothschild-Stiglitz approach to Bayesian persuasion
A Rothschild-Stiglitz approach to Bayesian persuasion Matthew Gentzkow and Emir Kamenica Stanford University and University of Chicago September 2015 Abstract Rothschild and Stiglitz (1970) introduce a
More informationCommunication in Cournot Oligopoly
Communication in Cournot Oligopoly PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE Maria Goltsman Gregory Pavlov June 5, 20 Abstract We study communication in a static oligopoly model with unverifiable private information.
More informationCrowd Learning without Herding: A Mechanism Design Approach
Crowd Learning without Herding: A Mechanism Design Approach Jacob Glazer Department of Economics University of Warwick and Faculty of Management Tel Aviv University email: glazer@post.tau.ac.il Ilan Kremer
More informationMediated Persuasion. Andrew Kosenko Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh. This draft: October 31, 2018 First draft: October 2017
Mediated Persuasion Andrew Kosenko Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh This draft: October, 08 First draft: October 07 Abstract We study a game of strategic information design between a sender,
More informationWe set up the basic model of two-sided, one-to-one matching
Econ 805 Advanced Micro Theory I Dan Quint Fall 2009 Lecture 18 To recap Tuesday: We set up the basic model of two-sided, one-to-one matching Two finite populations, call them Men and Women, who want to
More informationReputation and Bounded Memory in Repeated Games with Incomplete Information
Reputation and Bounded Memory in Repeated Games with Incomplete Information A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
More informationStrategic Learning and Information Transmission
Strategic Learning and Information Transmission Alexander Frug November 5, 2014 Abstract This paper addresses the problem of information transmission between a biased expert and a decision maker in an
More informationCorrelated Equilibrium in Games with Incomplete Information
Correlated Equilibrium in Games with Incomplete Information Dirk Bergemann and Stephen Morris Econometric Society Summer Meeting June 2012 Robust Predictions Agenda game theoretic predictions are very
More informationBenefits from non-competing persuaders
Benefits from non-competing persuaders Jiemai Wu November 26, 2017 Abstract This paper shows that biased persuaders can provide better information to a decision maker due to cooperative, and not competitive,
More informationSubpoena Power and Information Transmission
School of Economics Working Papers ISSN 2203-6024 Subpoena Power and Information Transmission Arnaud Dellis Dept. of Economics Université du Québec à Montréal Mandar Oak School of Economics University
More informationAustralian School of Business Working Paper
Australian School of Business Working Paper Australian School of Business Research Paper No. 2013 ECON 17 Experimental Design to Persuade Anton Kolotilin This paper can be downloaded without charge from
More informationMechanism Design: Basic Concepts
Advanced Microeconomic Theory: Economics 521b Spring 2011 Juuso Välimäki Mechanism Design: Basic Concepts The setup is similar to that of a Bayesian game. The ingredients are: 1. Set of players, i {1,
More informationThe Intuitive and Divinity Criterion:
The Intuitive and Divinity Criterion: Interpretation and Step-by-Step Examples Ana Espínola-Arredondo School of Economic Sciences Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164 Félix Muñoz-García y School
More informationWars of Attrition with Budget Constraints
Wars of Attrition with Budget Constraints Gagan Ghosh Bingchao Huangfu Heng Liu October 19, 2017 (PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE: COMMENTS WELCOME) Abstract We study wars of attrition between two bidders who
More informationCommunication and Voting With Double-Sided Information
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Business Economics and Public Policy Papers Wharton Faculty Research 8-2003 Communication and Voting With Double-Sided Information Ulrich Doraszelski Dino Gerardi
More informationDelayed Persuasion. First version: December 2015 This version: August Abstract
Delayed Persuasion Jacopo Bizzotto, Jesper Rüdiger and Adrien Vigier First version: December 05 This version: August 06 Abstract We study the effect of the arrival of exogenous news in dynamic games of
More informationMULTISTAGE INFORMATION TRANSMISSION WITH VOLUNTARY MONETARY TRANSFER
Discussion Paper No. 1006 MULTISTAGE INFORMATION TRANSMISSION WITH VOLUNTARY MONETARY TRANSFER Hiroshi Sadakane June 017 The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki,
More informationDynamic Bayesian Persuasion with Public News
Dynamic Bayesian Persuasion with Public News Jacopo Bizzotto, Jesper Rüdiger and Adrien Vigier First version: December 015 This version: September 016 Abstract We introduce and examine a class of dynamic
More informationInformative Advertising with Discretionary Search
Informative Advertising with Discretionary Search Pedro M. Gardete and Liang Guo September 2015 Abstract We consider a model of strategic information transmission in which a firm can communicate its quality
More informationDeliberative Voting. Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz. Current Version: May 8, 2006
Deliberative Voting Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz Current Version: May 8, 2006 Abstract. We analyze a model of jury decision making in which jurors deliberate before casting their votes. We consider
More informationDeliberative Voting. Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz. Current Version: January 23, 2006
Deliberative Voting Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz Current Version: January 23, 2006 Abstract. We analyze a model of jury decision making in which jurors deliberate before casting their votes. We consider
More informationOn Bayesian Persuasion with Multiple Senders
On Bayesian Persuasion with Multiple Senders Fei Li Peter Norman January 8, 05 Abstract In a multi-sender Bayesian persuasion game, Gentzkow and Kamenica 0 show that increasing the number of senders cannot
More informationWhen to Ask for an Update: Timing in Strategic Communication
When to Ask for an Update: Timing in Strategic Communication Work in Progress Ying Chen Johns Hopkins University Atara Oliver Rice University March 19, 2018 Main idea In many communication situations,
More informationby burning money Sjaak Hurkens y CentER, Tilburg University P.O. Box November 1994 Abstract
Multi-sided pre-play communication by burning money Sjaak Hurkens y CentER, Tilburg University P.O. Box 90153 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands November 1994 Abstract We investigate the consequences of
More informationThe Social Value of Credible Public Information
The Social Value of Credible Public Information Ercan Karadas NYU September, 2017 Introduction Model Analysis MOTIVATION This paper is motivated by the paper Social Value of Public Information, Morris
More informationTowards a General Theory of Non-Cooperative Computation
Towards a General Theory of Non-Cooperative Computation (Extended Abstract) Robert McGrew, Ryan Porter, and Yoav Shoham Stanford University {bmcgrew,rwporter,shoham}@cs.stanford.edu Abstract We generalize
More informationSupplementary appendix to the paper Hierarchical cheap talk Not for publication
Supplementary appendix to the paper Hierarchical cheap talk Not for publication Attila Ambrus, Eduardo M. Azevedo, and Yuichiro Kamada December 3, 011 1 Monotonicity of the set of pure-strategy equilibria
More informationVirtual Robust Implementation and Strategic Revealed Preference
and Strategic Revealed Preference Workshop of Mathematical Economics Celebrating the 60th birthday of Aloisio Araujo IMPA Rio de Janeiro December 2006 Denitions "implementation": requires ALL equilibria
More informationBayes Correlated Equilibrium and Comparing Information Structures
Bayes Correlated Equilibrium and Comparing Information Structures Dirk Bergemann and Stephen Morris Spring 2013: 521 B Introduction game theoretic predictions are very sensitive to "information structure"
More information6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 24: Decisions in Groups
6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 24: Decisions in Groups Daron Acemoglu and Asu Ozdaglar MIT December 9, 2009 1 Introduction Outline Group and collective choices Arrow s Impossibility Theorem Gibbard-Satterthwaite
More informationStatic Information Design
Static nformation Design Dirk Bergemann and Stephen Morris European Summer Symposium in Economic Theory, Gerzensee, July 2016 Mechanism Design and nformation Design Mechanism Design: Fix an economic environment
More informationOnline Appendix for Sourcing from Suppliers with Financial Constraints and Performance Risk
Online Appendix for Sourcing from Suppliers with Financial Constraints and Performance Ris Christopher S. Tang S. Alex Yang Jing Wu Appendix A: Proofs Proof of Lemma 1. In a centralized chain, the system
More informationA Dual Perspective on Information Design
A Dual Perspective on Information Design Simone Galperti UC San Diego Jacopo Perego Columbia University December 13, 2018 Preliminary and Incomplete Abstract The problem of optimally designing information
More informationRobust Persuasion of a Privately Informed Receiver
E018009 018 03 06 Robust Persuasion of a Privately Informed Receiver Ju Hu Xi Weng Abstract: This paper studies robust Bayesian persuasion of a privately informed receiver in which the sender only has
More informationFalse Advertising and Consumer Protection Policy
False Advertising and Consumer Protection Policy Andrew Rhodes and Chris M. Wilson March 12, 2015 Abstract There is widespread evidence that some rms use false advertising to overstate the value of their
More informationWorking Paper Series 614 (ISSN ) Bayesian Persuasion with Costly Information Acquisition. Ludmila Matysková
Working Paper Series 614 (ISSN 1211-3298) Bayesian Persuasion with Costly Information Acquisition Ludmila Matysková CERGE-EI Prague, March 2018 ISBN 978-80-7343-421-2 (Univerzita Karlova, Centrum pro ekonomický
More informationStrategic Information Transmission: Cheap Talk Games
Strategic Information Transmission: Cheap Talk Games Outline (November 12, 2008) 1/ Credible information under cheap talk: Examples Geometric characterization of Nash equilibrium outcomes Expertise with
More informationCheap Talk With Two-Sided Private Information
Cheap Talk With Two-Sided Private Information Inés Moreno de Barreda London School of Economics and STICERD November 2010 Abstract I investigate the strategic interaction between an informed expert and
More informationChanging One s Mind when the Facts Change: Incentives of Experts and the Design of Reporting Protocols
Review of Economic Studies (007) 74, 1175 1194 0034-657/07/00411175$0.00 Changing One s Mind when the Facts Change: Incentives of Experts and the Design of Reporting Protocols WEI LI University of California,
More informationSpence s labor market signaling model
Spence s labor market signaling model Felix Munoz-Garcia EconS 503 - Advanced Microeconomics II - Washington State University Readings MWG 13.C (You can also read 13.B) Macho-Stadler and Perez-Castrillo,
More informationOn the Unique D1 Equilibrium in the Stackelberg Model with Asymmetric Information Janssen, M.C.W.; Maasland, E.
Tilburg University On the Unique D1 Equilibrium in the Stackelberg Model with Asymmetric Information Janssen, M.C.W.; Maasland, E. Publication date: 1997 Link to publication General rights Copyright and
More informationA Model of Gossip. Wei Li. June, Abstract
A Model of Gossip Wei Li June, 2003 Abstract This paper analyzes how the gossip process can be manipulated by biased people and the impact of such manipulation on information transmission. In this model,
More informationCommunication and Voting with Double-Sided Information
Communication and Voting with Double-Sided Information Ulrich Doraszelski Hoover Institution Dino Gerardi Yale University Francesco Squintani University of Rochester March 2002 An earlier version of this
More informationLecture 4. 1 Examples of Mechanism Design Problems
CSCI699: Topics in Learning and Game Theory Lecture 4 Lecturer: Shaddin Dughmi Scribes: Haifeng Xu,Reem Alfayez 1 Examples of Mechanism Design Problems Example 1: Single Item Auctions. There is a single
More information