Jets: where from, where to?
|
|
- Martin Barber
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Jets: where from, where to? Gavin P. Salam LPTHE, UPMC Paris 6 & CNRS London workshop on standard-model discoveries with early LHC data UCL, London, 31 March 29 Based on work with M. Cacciari, M. Dasgupta, L. Magnea, J. Rojo & G. Soyez
2
3 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 3) Introduction Jets as projections p π π φ K LO partons NLO partons parton shower hadron level Jet Def n Jet Def n Jet Def n Jet Def n jet 1 jet 2 jet 1 jet 2 jet 1 jet 2 jet 1 jet 2 Projection to jets provides universal view of event
4 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 4) Introduction QCD jets flowchart Jet (definitions) provide central link between expt., theory and theory And jets are an input to almost all analyses
5 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 4) Introduction QCD jets flowchart Jet (definitions) provide central link between expt., theory and theory And jets are an input to almost all analyses
6 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 5) Where from? What tools do we have?
7 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 6) Where from? The cone algorithm CDF JetClu CDF MidPoint CDF MidPoint with searchcones D/ Run II Cone (midpoint) ATLAS Iterative Cone CMS Iterative Cone PxCone PyCell/CellJet/GetJet
8 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 6) Where from? The cone algorithm Each cone involves CDF JetClu different code CDF MidPoint different physics CDF MidPoint with searchcones D/ Run II Cone (midpoint) ATLAS Iterative Cone CMS Iterative Cone PxCone PyCell/CellJet/GetJet
9 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 6) Where from? The cone algorithm Each cone involves CDF JetClu different code CDF MidPoint different physics CDF MidPoint with searchcones Each cone is essentially D/ Run II Cone (midpoint) infrared unsafe ATLAS Iterative Cone collinear unsafe CMS Iterative Cone or some detector-influenced mixture of the PxCone two PyCell/CellJet/GetJet
10 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 6) Where from? The cone algorithm Each cone involves CDF JetClu different code CDF MidPoint different physics CDF MidPoint with searchcones Each cone is essentially D/ Run II Cone (midpoint) infrared unsafe ATLAS Iterative Cone collinear unsafe CMS Iterative Cone or some detector-influenced mixture of the PxCone two PyCell/CellJet/GetJet Maybe half the cones are incompletely documented
11 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 7) Where from? This is complex It s theoretically unsatisfactory (IR unsafety is inconsistent with perturbative calculations, even at LO) [and NLO calculations have seen $5 million investment] Last meaningful order JetClu, ATLAS MidPoint CMS it. cone Known at cone [IC-SM] [IC mp-sm] [IC-PR] Inclusive jets LO NLO NLO NLO W/Z + 1 jet LO NLO NLO NLO 3 jets none LO LO NLO [nlojet++] W/Z + 2 jets none LO LO NLO [MCFM] m jet in 2j + X none none none LO NLO
12 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 7) Where from? This is complex It s theoretically unsatisfactory (IR unsafety is inconsistent with perturbative calculations, even at LO) [and NLO calculations have seen $5 million investment] But change has tended to be slow and hard-going E.g.: midpoint cone was proposed for Tevatron Run II: it was (only) a patch for earlier algorithm s IR safety issues its adoption was only partial at Tevatron Most of LHC s physics studies ignored it
13 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 8) Where from? xc-sm CDF JetClu CDF MidPoint D/ Run II Cone (midpoint) ATLAS Iterative Cone Cones: what to use? SISCone find all stable cones run split merge on overlaps [GPS & Soyez 7] xc-pr CMS Iterative Cone PyCell/CellJet/GetJet anti-k t cluster min d ij = min(k 2 ti, k 2 tj ) R 2 ij if d ib = k 2 smallest, i jet ti [Cacciari, GPS & Soyez 8]
14 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 8) Where from? xc-sm CDF JetClu CDF MidPoint D/ Run II Cone (midpoint) ATLAS Iterative Cone Cones: what to use? SISCone find all stable cones run split merge on overlaps [GPS & Soyez 7] xc-pr CMS Iterative Cone PyCell/CellJet/GetJet anti-k t cluster min d ij = min(k 2 ti, k 2 tj ) R 2 ij if d ib = k 2 smallest, i jet ti [Cacciari, GPS & Soyez 8]
15 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 9) Where from? Build up of jets with anti-k t ( ) 1 d ij = min, 1 k 2 ti k 2 tj Recombine smallest R 2 ij
16 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 9) Where from? Build up of jets with anti-k t ( ) 1 d ij = min, 1 k 2 ti k 2 tj Recombine smallest R 2 ij
17 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 9) Where from? Build up of jets with anti-k t ( ) 1 d ij = min, 1 k 2 ti k 2 tj Recombine smallest R 2 ij
18 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 9) Where from? Build up of jets with anti-k t ( ) 1 d ij = min, 1 k 2 ti k 2 tj Recombine smallest R 2 ij
19 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 9) Where from? Build up of jets with anti-k t ( ) 1 d ij = min, 1 k 2 ti k 2 tj Recombine smallest R 2 ij
20 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 9) Where from? Build up of jets with anti-k t ( ) 1 d ij = min, 1 k 2 ti k 2 tj Recombine smallest R 2 ij
21 ICPR has circular jets But collinear unsafe So does anti-k t safe from theory point of view Cones with split-merge (SISCone) shrink to remove soft junk
22 ICPR has circular jets But collinear unsafe So does anti-k t safe from theory point of view Cones with split-merge (SISCone) shrink to remove soft junk
23 ICPR has circular jets But collinear unsafe So does anti-k t safe from theory point of view Cones with split-merge (SISCone) shrink to remove soft junk
24
25 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 11) Where from? Sequential recombination algs The k t algorithm Find smallest d ij = min(k 2 ti, k2 tj ) R2 ij /R2 and recombine; If d ib = k 2 ti is smallest, call i a jet. The Cambridge/Aachen algorithm Repeatedly recombine objects with smallest R 2 ij, until all R ij > R Both involve a tradeoff: useful information from clustering hierarchy irregularity of the jets My favourite: Cam/Aachen (it s more easily twisted to fit your needs)
26 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 11) Where from? Sequential recombination algs The k t algorithm Find smallest d ij = min(k 2 ti, k2 tj ) R2 ij /R2 and recombine; If d ib = k 2 ti is smallest, call i a jet. The Cambridge/Aachen algorithm Repeatedly recombine objects with smallest R 2 ij, until all R ij > R Both involve a tradeoff: useful information from clustering hierarchy irregularity of the jets My favourite: Cam/Aachen (it s more easily twisted to fit your needs)
27 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 12) Where from? A full set of IRC-safe jet algorithms Generalise inclusive-type sequential recombination with d ij = min(k 2p ti,k 2p tj ) R 2 ij/r 2 d ib = k 2p ti Alg. name Comment time p = 1 k t Hierarchical in rel. k t CDOSTW 91-93; ES 93 N ln N exp. p = Cambridge/Aachen Hierarchical in angle Dok, Leder, Moretti, Webber 97 Scan multiple R at once N ln N Wengler, Wobisch 98 QCD angular ordering p = 1 anti-k t Cacciari, GPS, Soyez 8 Hierarchy meaningless, jets reverse-k t Delsart like CMS cone (IC-PR) N 3/2 SC-SM SISCone Replaces JetClu, ATLAS GPS Soyez 7 + Tevatron run II MidPoint (xc-sm) cones N 2 ln N exp. All these algorithms coded in (efficient) C++ at (Cacciari, GPS & Soyez 5-8)
28 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 13) Where from? FastJet 2.3.x also contains CDF JetClu (legacy) CDF MidPoint cone (legacy) PxCone (legacy) FastJet 2.4 will add (in next few weeks) D/ Run II cone (legacy) ATLAS Iterative cone (legacy) CMS Iterative cone (legacy) Trackjet (legacy) A whole range of e + e algorithms Tools to help you build your own seq. rec. algorithms [NB: many algs available also in SpartyJet]
29 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 13) Where from? FastJet 2.3.x also contains CDF JetClu (legacy) CDF MidPoint cone (legacy) PxCone (legacy) FastJet s FastJet inclusion 2.4 will of add many (inlegacy next few cones weeks) is not an endorsement of them. D/ Run II cone (legacy) They are toatlas be deprecated Iterative cone for any (legacy) new physics CMS Iterative analysis. cone (legacy) Trackjet (legacy) A whole range of e + e algorithms Tools to help you build your own seq. rec. algorithms [NB: many algs available also in SpartyJet]
30 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 14) Understanding Can we understand our tools?
31 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 15) Understanding Jet def n differences Jet definitions differ mainly in: 1. How close two particles must be to end up in same jet [discussed in the 9s, e.g. Ellis & Soper] 2. How much perturbative radiation is lost from a jet [indirectly discussed in the 9s (analytic NLO for inclusive jets)] 3. How much non-perturbative contamination (hadronisation, UE, pileup) a jet receives [partially discussed in 9s Korchemsky & Sterman 95, Seymour 97]
32 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 16) Understanding Reach the reach of jet algorithms p t2 / p t1 p t1 R p t2 p t1 R p t2 1 jet? 2 jets? R 12 / R SISCone (xc-sm) reaches further for hard radiation than other algs
33 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 16) Understanding Reach the reach of jet algorithms p t2 / p t1 p t1 R p t2 p t1 R p t2 1 jet? 2 jets? x = p t,2 /p t,1 1.5 T Cam/Aachen R CA = 1; R T =.4 Cam/ Aachen parton level R 12 / R R / R T SISCone (xc-sm) reaches further for hard radiation than other algs
34 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 16) Understanding Reach the reach of jet algorithms p t2 / p t1 x = p t,2 /p t,1 1.5 p t1 R 1 jet? p t2 T Cam/Aachen R CA = 1; R T =.4 Cam/ Aachen parton level p t1 R 12 / R R 2 jets? p t R / R T x = p t,2 /p t,1 1.5 T anti-k t R CA = 1; R T =.4 anti-k t xcpr parton level R / R T SISCone (xc-sm) reaches further for hard radiation than other algs
35 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 16) Understanding Reach the reach of jet algorithms p t2 / p t1 x = p t,2 /p t,1 1.5 p t1 R 1 jet? p t2 T Cam/Aachen R CA = 1; R T =.4 Cam/ Aachen parton level p t1 R 12 / R R 2 jets? p t R / R T x = p t,2 /p t,1 x = p t,2 /p t, T anti-k t R CA = 1; R T =.4 anti-k t xcpr parton level R / R T T SISCone (f=.75) R CA = 1; R T =.4 SISCone parton level R / R T SISCone (xc-sm) reaches further for hard radiation than other algs
36 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 16) Understanding Reach the reach of jet algorithms p t2 / p t1 x = p t,2 /p t,1 1.5 p t1 R 1 jet? p t2 T Cam/Aachen R CA = 1; R T =.4 Cam/ Aachen parton level p t1 R 12 / R R 2 jets? p t R / R T x = p t,2 /p t,1 x = p t,2 /p t, T anti-k t R CA = 1; R T =.4 anti-k t xcpr parton level R / R T T SISCone (f=.75) R CA = 1; R T =.4 SISCone parton level R / R T SISCone (xc-sm) reaches further for hard radiation than other algs
37 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 17) Understanding Perturbative p t Jet p t v. parton p t : perturbatively? The question s dangerous: a parton is an ambiguous concept Three limits can help you: Threshold limit e.g. de Florian & Vogelsang 7 Parton from color-neutral object decay (Z ) Small-R (radius) limit for jet One simple result p t,jet p t,parton p t = α { s π lnr 1.1CF quarks.94c A +.7n f gluons + O (α s ) only O (α s ) depends on algorithm & process cf. Dasgupta, Magnea & GPS 7
38 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 18) Understanding Non-perturbative p t Jet p t v. parton p t : hadronisation? Hadronisation: the parton-shower hadrons transition Method: infrared finite α s à la Dokshitzer & Webber 95 prediction based on e + e event shape data could have been deduced from old work Korchemsky & Sterman 95 Seymour 97 Main result.4 GeV p t,jet p t,parton shower R { CF quarks gluons C A cf. Dasgupta, Magnea & GPS 7 coefficient holds for anti-k t ; see Mrinal s talk for k t alg.
39 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 19) Understanding Non-perturbative p t Underlying Event (UE) Naive prediction (UE colour dipole between pp): { p t.4 GeV R2 2 CF q q dipole gluon dipole C A DWT Pythia tune or ATLAS Jimmy tune tell you: p t 1 15 GeV R2 2 This big coefficient motivates special effort to understand interplay between jet algorithm and UE: jet areas How does coefficient depend on algorithm? How does it depend on jet p t? How does it fluctuate? cf. Cacciari, GPS & Soyez 8
40 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 2) Understanding Non-perturbative p t E.g. SISCone jet area 1. One hard particle, many soft Jet area = Measure of jet s susceptibility to uniform soft radiation Depends on details of an algorithm s clustering dynamics. SISCone, any R, f.391
41 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 2) Understanding Non-perturbative p t E.g. SISCone jet area 2. One hard stable cone Jet area = Measure of jet s susceptibility to uniform soft radiation Depends on details of an algorithm s clustering dynamics. SISCone, any R, f.391
42 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 2) Understanding Non-perturbative p t E.g. SISCone jet area 3. Overlapping soft stable cones Jet area = Measure of jet s susceptibility to uniform soft radiation Depends on details of an algorithm s clustering dynamics. SISCone, any R, f.391
43 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 2) Understanding Non-perturbative p t E.g. SISCone jet area 4. Split the overlapping parts Jet area = Measure of jet s susceptibility to uniform soft radiation Depends on details of an algorithm s clustering dynamics. SISCone, any R, f.391
44 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 2) Understanding Non-perturbative p t E.g. SISCone jet area 5. Final hard jet (reduced area) Jet area = Measure of jet s susceptibility to uniform soft radiation Depends on details of an algorithm s clustering dynamics. SISCone s area (1 hard particle) = 1 4 πr2 SISCone, any R, f.391
45 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 21) Understanding Summary Jet algorithm properties: summary k t Cam/Aachen anti-k t SISCone reach R R R (1 + p t2 p t2 )R p t,pt αsc i π lnr lnr lnr ln1.35r p t,hadr.4 GeVC i R.7? 1? area = πr 2.81 ± ± πr 2 C i πb ln αs(q ) α s(rp t).52 ±.41.8 ± ±.7 In words: k t : area fluctuates a lot, depends on p t (bad for UE) Cam/Aachen: area fluctuates somewhat, depends less on p t anti-k t : area is constant (circular jets) SISCone: reaches far for hard radiation (good for resolution, bad for multijets), area is smaller (good for UE)
46 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 22) Where to? Using our understanding (concentrate on R-dependence)
47 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 23) Where to? Small v. large jet radius (R) HSBC Small jet radius Large jet radius single LO: jet radius irrelevant
48 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 23) Where to? Small v. large jet radius (R) HSBC Small jet radius Large jet radius θ θ perturbative fragmentation: large jet radius better (it captures more)
49 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 23) Where to? Small v. large jet radius (R) HSBC Small jet radius Large jet radius π + K L π K + π π + K L π K + π non perturbative hadronisation non perturbative hadronisation θ θ non-perturbative fragmentation: large jet radius better (it captures more)
50 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 23) Where to? Small v. large jet radius (R) HSBC Small jet radius Large jet radius π + K L π K + π π + K L π K + π non perturbative hadronisation non perturbative hadronisation θ θ UE UE underlying ev. & pileup noise : small jet radius better (it captures less)
51 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 23) Where to? Small v. large jet radius (R) HSBC Small jet radius Large jet radius multi-hard-parton events: small jet radius better (it resolves partons more effectively)
52 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 24) Where to? What R is best for an isolated jet? PT radiation: q : p t α sc F π p t lnr Hadronisation: q : p t C F R.4 GeV Underlying event: q,g : p t R GeV 2 Minimise fluctuations in p t Use crude approximation: p 2 t p t 2 in small-r limit (?!) cf. Dasgupta, Magnea & GPS 7
53 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 24) Where to? What R is best for an isolated jet? PT radiation: q : p t α sc F π p t lnr Hadronisation: q : p t C F R Underlying event:.4 GeV q,g : p t R GeV 2 Minimise fluctuations in p t Use crude approximation: p 2 t p t 2 δp t 2 pert + δp t 2 h + δp t 2 UE [GeV2 ] GeV quark jet LHC quark jets p t = 5 GeV δp t 2 h δp t 2 UE δp t 2 pert R in small-r limit (?!) cf. Dasgupta, Magnea & GPS 7
54 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 24) Where to? What R is best for an isolated jet? PT radiation: q : p t α sc F π p t lnr Hadronisation: q : p t C F R Underlying event:.4 GeV q,g : p t R GeV 2 Minimise fluctuations in p t Use crude approximation: p 2 t p t 2 δp t 2 pert + δp t 2 h + δp t 2 UE [GeV2 ] LHC quark jets p t = 1 TeV 1 TeV quark jet δp t 2 pert δp t 2 UE R in small-r limit (?!) cf. Dasgupta, Magnea & GPS 7
55 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 24) Where to? What R is best for an isolated jet? PT radiation: q : p t α sc F π p t lnr 4 At low p t, small R limits relative impact of UE Hadronisation: q : p t C 3 At high Fp t, perturbative effects dominate over.4 GeV R non-perturbative R best 1. Underlying event: q,g : p t R GeV 2 Minimise fluctuations in p t Use crude approximation: p 2 t p t 2 δp t 2 pert + δp t 2 h + δp t 2 UE [GeV2 ] LHC quark jets p t = 1 TeV 1 TeV quark jet δp t 2 pert δp t 2 UE R in small-r limit (?!) cf. Dasgupta, Magnea & GPS 7
56 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.3 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.3, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 24. GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] q
57 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.3 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.3, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 24. GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
58 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.4 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.4, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 22.5 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
59 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.5 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.5, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 22.6 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
60 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.6 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.6, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 23.8 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
61 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.7 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.7, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 25.1 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
62 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.8 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.8, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 26.8 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
63 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R =.9 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=.9, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 28.8 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
64 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R = 1. qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=1., f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 31.9 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
65 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R = 1.1 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=1.1, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 34.7 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
66 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R = 1.2 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=1.2, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 37.9 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
67 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R = 1.3 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=1.3, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 42.3 GeV arxiv: p Resonance X dijets jet q q X q p dijet mass [GeV] jet q
68 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 25) Where to? Dijet mass: scan over R [Pythia 6.4] 1/N dn/dbin / R = 1.3 qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, R=1.3, f=.75 Q w f=.24 = 42.3 GeV arxiv: ρ L from Q w f= qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: dijet mass [GeV] R After scanning, summarise quality v. R. Minimum BEST picture not so different from crude analytical estimate
69 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 1 GeV qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
70 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 15 GeV qq, M = 15 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
71 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 2 GeV qq, M = 2 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
72 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 3 GeV qq, M = 3 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
73 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 5 GeV qq, M = 5 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
74 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 7 GeV qq, M = 7 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
75 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 1 GeV qq, M = 1 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
76 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 2 GeV qq, M = 2 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
77 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 4 GeV qq, M = 4 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
78 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 4 GeV qq, M = 4 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
79 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 26) Where to? Scan through q q mass values ρ L from Q w f= m qq = 4 GeV qq, M = 4 GeV SISCone, f=.75 arxiv: Best R is at minimum of curve Best R depends strongly on mass of system Increases with mass, just like crude analytical prediction NB: current analytics too crude BUT: so far, LHC s plans involve running with fixed smallish R values e.g. CMS arxiv: R NB: 1, plots for various jet algorithms, narrow qq and gg resonances from Cacciari, Rojo, GPS & Soyez 8
80 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 27) Where to? quality: 5 algorithms, 3 processes
81 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 27) Where to? quality: 5 algorithms, 3 processes
82 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 27) Where to? quality: 5 algorithms, 3 processes
83 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 28) Where to?
84 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 29) Conclusions These studies show that: Choice of jet definition matters (it s worth a factor of in lumi) There is no single best jet definition LHC will span two orders of magnitude in p t (experiments should build in flexibility) There is logic to the pattern we see (it fits in with crude analytical calculations)
85 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 3) Conclusions Towards jetography These studies motivate a more systematic approach: More realistic analytical calculations e.g. using known differences between algorithms Consideration of backgrounds Consideration of multi-jet signals (relation to boosted W/Z/H/top (subjet) ID methods) Design of more optimal jet algorithms (R alone may not give enough freedom cf. filtering )
86 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 3) Conclusions Towards jetography These studies motivate a more systematic approach: More realistic analytical calculations e.g. using known differences between algorithms Consideration of backgrounds Consideration of multi-jet signals (relation to boosted W/Z/H/top (subjet) ID methods) Design of more optimal jet algorithms (R alone may not give enough freedom cf. filtering ) Jetography: auto-focus for jets
87 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 31) Conclusions To conclude Past experience (CDF/JetClu) suggests that if an IRC unsafe legacy algorithm remains available within an experiment, the majority of analyses will use it. Maybe not the pure QCD analyses But all the others There are no longer any good reasons to prefer IRC unsafe algorithms. As a community, let us try and make sure LHC does the right job. So we get full value form perturbative QCD And so that we can move on to more useful questions
88 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 32) Extras EXTRAS
89 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 33) Extras ICSM Cone basics I: IC-SM Many cone algs have two main steps: Find some/all stable cones cone pointing in same direction as the momentum of its contents Resolve cases of overlapping stable cones By running a split merge procedure [Blazey et al. (Run II jet physics)]
90 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 33) Extras ICSM Cone basics I: IC-SM Many cone algs have two main steps: Find some/all stable cones cone pointing in same direction as the momentum of its contents Resolve cases of overlapping stable cones By running a split merge procedure [Blazey et al. (Run II jet physics)]
91 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 33) Extras ICSM Cone basics I: IC-SM Many cone algs have two main steps: Find some/all stable cones cone pointing in same direction as the momentum of its contents Resolve cases of overlapping stable cones By running a split merge procedure [Blazey et al. (Run II jet physics)]
92 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 33) Extras ICSM Cone basics I: IC-SM Many cone algs have two main steps: Find some/all stable cones cone pointing in same direction as the momentum of its contents Resolve cases of overlapping stable cones By running a split merge procedure [Blazey et al. (Run II jet physics)]
93 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 33) Extras ICSM Cone basics I: IC-SM Many cone algs have two main steps: Find some/all stable cones cone pointing in same direction as the momentum of its contents Resolve cases of overlapping stable cones By running a split merge procedure [Blazey et al. (Run II jet physics)]
94 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 33) Extras ICSM Cone basics I: IC-SM Many cone algs have two main steps: Find some/all stable cones cone pointing in same direction as the momentum of its contents Resolve cases of overlapping stable cones By running a split merge procedure [Blazey et al. (Run II jet physics)] Qu: How do you find the stable cones? Until recently used iterative methods: use each particle as a starting direction for cone; use sum of contents as new starting direction; repeat. Iterative Cone with Split Merge (IC-SM) e.g. Tevatron cones (JetClu, midpoint) ATLAS cone
95 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 34) Extras ICSM Seeded IC-SM: infrared issue Use of seeds is dangerous p T (GeV/c) stable cones from seeds 1 1 Extra soft particle adds new seed changes final jet configuration. This is IR unsafe. Kilgore & Giele 97 Partial fix: add extra seeds at midpoints of all pairs, triplets,...of stable cones. Adopted for Tevatron Run II But only postpones the problem by one order... Analogy: if you rely on Minuit to find minima of a function, in complex cases, results depend crucially on starting points
96 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 34) Extras ICSM Seeded IC-SM: infrared issue Use of seeds is dangerous p T (GeV/c) add soft particle 1 1 Extra soft particle adds new seed changes final jet configuration. This is IR unsafe. Kilgore & Giele 97 Partial fix: add extra seeds at midpoints of all pairs, triplets,...of stable cones. Adopted for Tevatron Run II But only postpones the problem by one order... Analogy: if you rely on Minuit to find minima of a function, in complex cases, results depend crucially on starting points
97 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 34) Extras ICSM Seeded IC-SM: infrared issue Use of seeds is dangerous p T (GeV/c) resolve overlaps 1 1 Extra soft particle adds new seed changes final jet configuration. This is IR unsafe. Kilgore & Giele 97 Partial fix: add extra seeds at midpoints of all pairs, triplets,...of stable cones. Adopted for Tevatron Run II But only postpones the problem by one order... Analogy: if you rely on Minuit to find minima of a function, in complex cases, results depend crucially on starting points
98 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 34) Extras ICSM Seeded IC-SM: infrared issue Use of seeds is dangerous p T (GeV/c) resolve overlaps 1 1 Extra soft particle adds new seed changes final jet configuration. This is IR unsafe. Kilgore & Giele 97 Partial fix: add extra seeds at midpoints of all pairs, triplets,...of stable cones. Adopted for Tevatron Run II But only postpones the problem by one order... Analogy: if you rely on Minuit to find minima of a function, in complex cases, results depend crucially on starting points
99 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 35) Extras ICSM pt/gev pt/gev Midpoint IR problem GeV y Stable cones with midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2} & {2,3} & {3} Jets with midpoint (f =.5) {1,2} & {3} {1,2,3} 3 y Midpoint cone alg. misses some stable cones; extra soft particle extra starting point extra stable cone found MIDPOINT IS INFRARED UNSAFE Or collinear unsafe with seed threshold
100 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 35) Extras ICSM pt/gev pt/gev Midpoint IR problem GeV y Stable cones with midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2} & {2,3} & {3} Jets with midpoint (f =.5) {1,2} & {3} {1,2,3} 3 y Midpoint cone alg. misses some stable cones; extra soft particle extra starting point extra stable cone found MIDPOINT IS INFRARED UNSAFE Or collinear unsafe with seed threshold
101 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 35) Extras ICSM pt/gev pt/gev Midpoint IR problem GeV y Stable cones with midpoint: {1,2} & {3} {1,2} & {2,3} & {3} Jets with midpoint (f =.5) {1,2} & {3} {1,2,3} 3 y Midpoint cone alg. misses some stable cones; extra soft particle extra starting point extra stable cone found MIDPOINT IS INFRARED UNSAFE Or collinear unsafe with seed threshold
102 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
103 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
104 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
105 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
106 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
107 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
108 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
109 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
110 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
111 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
112 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
113 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat
114 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 36) Extras ICPR Iterative Cone [with progressive removal] Procedure: Find one stable cone By iterating from hardest seed particle Call it a jet; remove its particles from the event; repeat Iterative Cone with Progressive Removal (IC-PR) e.g. CMS it. cone, [Pythia Cone, GetJet],... NB: not same type of algorithm as Atlas Cone, MidPoint, SISCone
115 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
116 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
117 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
118 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
119 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
120 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
121 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
122 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
123 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
124 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
125 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
126 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
127 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
128 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
129 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
130 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
131 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity jet 2 Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
132 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity jet 2 Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
133 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 37) Extras ICPR ICPR iteration issue 5 cone iteration cone axis cone p T (GeV/c) jet 1 rapidity jet 2 Collinear splitting can modify the hard jets: ICPR algorithms are collinear unsafe = perturbative calculations give
134 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
135 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
136 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
137 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
138 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
139 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
140 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
141 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
142 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
143 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
144 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
145 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
146 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
147 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
148 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
149 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
150 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
151 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Next cone edge on particle Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
152 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
153 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 38) Extras SCSM Seedless [Infrared Safe] cones (SC-SM) p t /GeV Aim to identify all stable cones, independently of any seeds Procedure in 1 dimension (y): find all distinct enclosures of radius R by repeatedly sliding a cone sideways until edge touches a particle check each for stability then run usual split merge In 2 dimensions (y,φ) can design analogous procedure SISCone GPS & Soyez y This gives an IRC safe cone alg.
154 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 39) Extras IRC safety Magnitude of IR safety impact (midpoint) dσ midpoint(1) /dp t / dσ SISCone /dp t (a) Pythia 6.4 pp s = 1.96 TeV hadron-level (with UE) hadron-level (no UE) parton-level R=.7, f=.5, y < p t [GeV] Impact depends on context: from a few % (inclusive) to 5% (exclusive) rel. diff. for dσ/dm 2 rel. diff. for dσ/dm NLOJet R=.7, f=.5 Mass spectrum of jet 2 midpoint() -- SISCone SISCone M (GeV) NLOJet R=.7, f=.5 R 23 < 1.4 Mass spectrum of jet 2 midpoint() -- SISCone SISCone M (GeV)
155 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 4) Extras IRC safety Does lack of IRC safety matter? I do searches, not QCD. Why should I care about IRC safety? If you re looking for an invariant mass peak, it s not 1% crucial IRC unsafety R is ill-defined A huge mass peak will stick out regardless Well, actually my signal s a little more complex than that... If you re looking for an excess over background you need confidence in backgrounds E.g. some SUSY signals Check W+1 jet, W+2-jets data against NLO in control region Check W+n jets data against LO in control region Extrapolate into measured region IRC unsafety means NLO senseless for simple topologies, LO senseless for complex topologies Breaks consistency of whole Wastes 5,,$/ /CHF/e But I like my cone algorithm, it s fast, has good resolution, etc. Not an irrelevant point has motivated significant work
156 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 4) Extras IRC safety Does lack of IRC safety matter? I do searches, not QCD. Why should I care about IRC safety? If you re looking for an invariant mass peak, it s not 1% crucial IRC unsafety R is ill-defined A huge mass peak will stick out regardless Well, actually my signal s a little more complex than that... If you re looking for an excess over background you need confidence in backgrounds E.g. some SUSY signals Check W+1 jet, W+2-jets data against NLO in control region Check W+n jets data against LO in control region Extrapolate into measured region IRC unsafety means NLO senseless for simple topologies, LO senseless for complex topologies Breaks consistency of whole Wastes 5,,$/ /CHF/e But I like my cone algorithm, it s fast, has good resolution, etc. Not an irrelevant point has motivated significant work
157 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 4) Extras IRC safety Does lack of IRC safety matter? I do searches, not QCD. Why should I care about IRC safety? If you re looking for an invariant mass peak, it s not 1% crucial IRC unsafety R is ill-defined A huge mass peak will stick out regardless Well, actually my signal s a little more complex than that... If you re looking for an excess over background you need confidence in backgrounds E.g. some SUSY signals Check W+1 jet, W+2-jets data against NLO in control region Check W+n jets data against LO in control region Extrapolate into measured region IRC unsafety means NLO senseless for simple topologies, LO senseless for complex topologies Breaks consistency of whole Wastes 5,,$/ /CHF/e But I like my cone algorithm, it s fast, has good resolution, etc. Not an irrelevant point has motivated significant work
158 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 4) Extras IRC safety Does lack of IRC safety matter? I do searches, not QCD. Why should I care about IRC safety? If you re looking for an invariant mass peak, it s not 1% crucial IRC unsafety R is ill-defined A huge mass peak will stick out regardless Well, actually my signal s a little more complex than that... If you re looking for an excess over background you need confidence in backgrounds E.g. some SUSY signals Check W+1 jet, W+2-jets data against NLO in control region Check W+n jets data against LO in control region Extrapolate into measured region IRC unsafety means NLO senseless for simple topologies, LO senseless for complex topologies Breaks consistency of whole Wastes 5,,$/ /CHF/e But I like my cone algorithm, it s fast, has good resolution, etc. Not an irrelevant point has motivated significant work
159 Jets, G. Salam, LPTHE (p. 4) Extras IRC safety Does lack of IRC safety matter? I do searches, not QCD. Why should I care about IRC safety? If you re looking for an invariant mass peak, it s not 1% crucial IRC unsafety R is ill-defined A huge mass peak will stick out regardless Well, actually my signal s a little more complex than that... If you re looking for an excess over background you need confidence in backgrounds E.g. some SUSY signals Check W+1 jet, W+2-jets data against NLO in control region Check W+n jets data against LO in control region Extrapolate into measured region IRC unsafety means NLO senseless for simple topologies, LO senseless for complex topologies Breaks consistency of whole Wastes 5,,$/ /CHF/e But I like my cone algorithm, it s fast, has good resolution, etc. Not an irrelevant point has motivated significant work
Joint ICTP-INFN-SISSA Conference: Topical Issues in LHC Physics. 29 June - 2 July, Jet Physics at the LHC
2045-3 Joint ICTP-INFN-SISSA Conference: Topical Issues in LHC Physics 29 June - 2 July, 2009 Jet Physics at the LHC Gavin SALAM LPTHE, Universites Paris VI, France Towards Jetography Gavin Salam LPTHE,
More informationTowards Jetography. Gavin Salam. LPTHE, CNRS and UPMC (Univ. Paris 6)
Towards Jetography Gavin Salam LPTHE, CNRS and UPMC (Univ. Paris 6) Based on work with Jon Butterworth, Matteo Cacciari, Mrinal Dasgupta, Adam Davison, Lorenzo Magnea, Juan Rojo, Mathieu Rubin & Gregory
More informationJets in QCD, an introduction
Jets in QCD, an introduction Gavin P. Salam LPTHE, UPMC Paris 6 & CNRS Hard Probes 2008 Illa Da Toxa, Galicia, 8-14 June 2008 Drawing on work with M. Cacciari, J. Rojo & G. Soyez Jets, G. Salam (p. 2)
More informationJets at LHCb. Gavin Salam. LHCb, CERN, 21 January CERN, Princeton & LPTHE/CNRS (Paris)
Jets at LHCb Gavin Salam CERN, Princeton & LPTHE/CNRS (Paris) LHCb, CERN, 21 January 2011 Jets @ LHCb (G. Salam) CERN, 2011-01-21 2 / 16 Any process that involves final-state partons gives jets Examples
More informationStandard Model Handles and Candles WG (session 1)
Standard Model Handles and Candles WG (session 1) Conveners: Experiment: Craig Buttar, Jorgen d Hondt, Markus Wobisch Theory: Michael Kramer, Gavin Salam This talk: the jets sub-group 1. Background + motivation
More informationNews in jet algorithms:
News in jet algorithms: SISCone and anti-k t Grégory Soyez Brookhaven National Laboratory G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, JHEP 5 (7) 86 [arxiv:74.292] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, JHEP 4 (8) 63 [arxiv:82.1189]
More informationTheoretical aspects of jet-finding
Theoretical aspects of jet-finding Gavin P. Salam LPTHE, UPMC Paris 6 & CNRS 4th Atlas Hadronic Calibration Workshop Tucson, Arizona 14 16 March 2008 Based on work with Cacciari (LPTHE) & Soyez (BNL),
More informationJet reconstruction with FastJet
Jet reconstruction with FastJet Gavin P. Salam LPTHE, UPMC Paris 6 & CNRS Jets in Proton-Proton and Heavy-Ion Collisions Prague, 12 August 21 Based on work (some preliminary) with Matteo Cacciari, Juan
More informationJets. Gavin Salam. LPTHE, CNRS and UPMC (Univ. Paris 6)
Jets Gavin Salam LPTHE, CNRS and UPMC (Univ. Paris 6) Spring Course of the International Graduate School Bielefeld Paris Helsinki, GRK 881 & PACO Quantum Fields and Strongly Interacting Matter Orsay, France,
More informationDefining jets at the dawn of the LHC
Defining jets at the dawn of the LHC Grégory Soyez CERN In collaboration with Gavin Salam, Matteo Cacciari and Juan Rojo CERN October 9 2009 p. 1 Plan Jet algorithms and jet definitions basic ideas: why
More informationJets, and Reconstruction with FastJet
ALICE Italia Frascati, 13 Novembre 2007 Jets, and Reconstruction with FastJet Matteo Cacciari LPTHE - Paris 6,7 and CNRS In collaboration with Gavin Salam and Gregory Soyez Goals Consider real jet algorithms
More informationJets, underlying event and HIC
Jets, underlying event and HIC Gavin P. Salam LPTHE, UPMC Paris 6 & CNRS From Particles and Partons to Nuclei and Fields: An international workshop and symposium in honor of Al Mueller s 70th birthday
More informationJet-finding for LHC. Gavin Salam work with M. Cacciari and (in progress) G. Soyez. LPTHE, Universities of Paris VI and VII and CNRS
Jet-finding for LHC Gavin Salam work with M. Cacciari and (in progress) G. Soyez LPTHE, Universities of Paris VI and VII and CNRS Robi is 60, SPhT Saclay 24 November 2006 Jet clustering in the LHC era
More informationJets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010
Jets (and photons) at the LHC J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010 More references Understanding cross sections at the LHC we have to understand QCD (at the LHC) PDF s, PDF luminosities and PDF uncertainties LO,
More informationJet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC
Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC Ulrike Schnoor Michigan State University High Energy Physics Institutsseminar IKTP TU Dresden, Nov 4, 010 Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC
More informationVivian s Meeting April 17 th Jet Algorithms. Philipp Schieferdecker (KIT)
th 2009 Jet Algorithms What are Jets? Collimated bunches of stable hadrons, originating from partons (quarks & gluons) after fragmentation and hadronization Jet Finding is the approximate attempt to reverse-engineer
More informationReview of jet reconstruction algorithms
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPE OPEN ACCESS eview of jet reconstruction algorithms To cite this article: yan Atkin 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 645 012008 View the article online for updates and
More informationNon-perturbative effects for QCD jets at hadron colliders
Non-perturbative effects for QCD jets at hadron colliders Lorenzo Magnea Università di Torino INFN, Sezione di Torino Work in collaboration with M. Dasgupta and G. Salam. Milano 03/04/08 Outline Jets at
More informationTowards Jetography. Gavin P. Salam. LPTHE, UPMC Univ. Paris 6, CNRS UMR 7589, Paris 05, France. Abstract
Towards Jetography Gavin P. Salam arxiv:96.1833v1 [hep-ph] 1 Jun 29 LPTHE, UPMC Univ. Paris 6, CNRS UMR 7589, 75252 Paris 5, France Abstract As the LHC prepares to start taking data, this review is intended
More informationPino and Power Corrections: from LEP to LHC
Pino and Power Corrections: from LEP to LHC Gavin Salam CERN, Princeton University & LPTHE/CNRS (Paris) Pino 2012 A special meeting in honour of Giuseppe Marchesini, on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
More informationJet Physics. Yazid Delenda. 1st Jijel Meeting on Theoretical Physics. Jijel, October 29-31, University Batna 1
Jet Physics Yazid Delenda University Batna 1 1st Jijel Meeting on Theoretical Physics Quantum Mechanics, Gravitation and Particle Physics Jijel, October 29-31, 2018 977 1 ⵜ ⴰ ⵙ ⴷⴰ ⵡⵉ ⵜ ⵏ ⵜ ⴱⴰ ⵜ ⴻ ⵏ ⵜ U
More informationJets, UE and early LHC data
Jets, UE and early LHC data Gavin P. Salam LPTHE, UPMC Paris 6 & CNRS LHC@BNL Joint Theory/Experiment Workshop on Early Physics at the LHC 8 February 2010 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, USA Based
More informationJet structures in New Physics and Higgs searches
Jet structures in New Physics and Higgs searches Gavin P. Salam LPTHE, UPMC Paris 6 & CNRS LHC New Physics Forum, IWH Heidelberg, Germany, 23 26 February 2009 Part based on work with Jon Butterworth, Adam
More informationJet reconstruction in heavy-ion collisions
Jet reconstruction in heavy-ion collisions Grégory Soyez IPhT, Saclay CERN In collaboration with Gavin Salam, Matteo Cacciari and Juan Rojo BNL March 12 21 p. 1 Plan Motivations Why jets in heavy-ion collisions
More informationPower corrections to jet distributions at hadron colliders
Power corrections to jet distributions at hadron colliders Lorenzo Magnea Università di Torino INFN, Sezione di Torino Work in collaboration with: M. Cacciari, M. Dasgupta, G. Salam. DIS 7 Munich 8//7
More informationJuly 8, 2015, Pittsburgh. Jets. Zoltan Nagy DESY
July 8, 2015, Pittsburgh Jets Zoltan Nagy DESY What are Jets? A di-jet ATLAS event A multi-jet (6-jet) event What are Jets? What are Jets? The pt is concentrated in a few narrow sprays of particles These
More informationNikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009
QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 0, 009 1 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern
More informationJets Lecture 1: jet algorithms Lecture 2: jet substructure
MadGraph School Shanghai - November 2015 Jets Lecture 1: jet algorithms Lecture 2: jet substructure Matteo Cacciari LPTHE Paris Why jets A jet is something that happens in high energy events: a collimated
More informationOn QCD jet mass distributions at LHC
On QCD jet mass distributions at LHC Kamel Khelifa-Kerfa (USTHB) with M. Dasgupta, S. Marzani & M. Spannowsky CIPSA 2013 30 th Sep - 2 nd Oct 2013 Constantine, Algeria Outline 1 Jet substructure 2 Jet
More informationLecture 5. QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University
Lecture 5 QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University Tevatron data Wealth of data from the Tevatron, both Run 1 and Run 2, that allows us to test/add to our pqcd formalism with analysis procedures/
More informationQCD at hadron colliders Lecture 2: Showers, Jets and fixed-order predictions
QCD at hadron colliders Lecture 2: Showers, Jets and fixed-order predictions Gavin Salam CERN, Princeton & LPTHE/CNRS (Paris) Maria Laach Herbtschule für Hochenenergiephysik September 20, Germany QCD lecture
More informationJets and jet definitions
Jets and jet definitions Davison E. Soper University of Oregon CTEQ, Madison, July 2011 Outline Jets are real. - Experimental evidence - Why does this happen? Jets are a convention. - Infrared safety -
More informationA practical Seedless Infrared-Safe Cone jet algorithm
arxiv:0704.0292 [hep-ph] April 2007 A practical Seedless Infrared-Safe Cone jet algorithm arxiv:0704.0292v2 [hep-ph] 4 Apr 2007 Gavin P. Salam and Grégory Soyez LPTHE, Université Pierre et Marie Curie
More informationEvent shapes in hadronic collisions
Event shapes in hadronic collisions Andrea Banfi ETH Zürich SM@LHC - Durham - April Event shapes at hadron colliders Event shapes are combinations of hadron momenta in a number related to the geometry
More informationJet reconstruction with first data in ATLAS
University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada E-mail: damir.lelas@cern.ch The algorithms used for jet reconstruction in ATLAS are presented. General performance aspects like jet signal linearity and the
More informationJet reconstruction. What are jets? How can we relate the measured jets to the underlying physics process? Calibration of jets Tagging of jets
Jet reconstruction What are jets? How can we relate the measured jets to the underlying physics process? Calibration of jets Tagging of jets 1 What are jets? Jets for non- particle physicists Jets for
More informationJet Substructure. Adam Davison. University College London
Jet Substructure Adam Davison University College London 1 Outline Jets at the LHC Machine and ATLAS detector What is a jet? Jet substructure What is it? What can it do for us? Some ATLAS/Higgs bias here
More informationZhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory
Introduction to pqcd and Jets: lecture 3 Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Jet Collaboration Summer School University of California, Davis July 19 21, 2014 Selected references on QCD QCD and
More informationQCD Jet Physics with CMS LHC
QCD Jet Physics with CMS Detector @ LHC Y.Chao for the CMS Collaboration (National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan) QCD10 (25th annivervary) 2010/06/28-07/03 The Large Hadron Collider Four major experiments
More informationMeasurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella
Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC Michele Cascella Graduate Course in Physics University of Pisa The School of Graduate Studies in Basic
More informationHard And Soft QCD Physics In ATLAS
Hard And Soft QCD Physics In ALAS Stefanie Adomeit on behalf of the ALAS collaboration International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - Crete, June -6, QCD Measurements in ALAS at LHC every kind
More informationPrecision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations
Precision QCD at the Tevatron Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab Tevatron - Run II Chicago Ecm: 1.8 1.96 TeV more Bunches 6 36 Bunch Crossing 3500 396ns CDF Booster Tevatron
More informationQCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration
QCD at CDF Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration Jet Inclusive Cross-Section Underlying event studies Jet Shapes Specific processes _ W+Jets, γ + γ, γ + b/c, b-jet / bb jet Diffraction
More informationIntroduction to Jets. Hsiang nan Li ( 李湘楠 ) Academia Sinica, Taipei. July. 11, 2014
Introduction to Jets Hsiang nan Li ( 李湘楠 ) Academia Sinica, Taipei at CTEQ School, Beijing July. 11, 2014 1 Outlines Introduction e+e annihilation and jets Jets in experiment Jets in theory Summary 2 Introduction
More informationJet Reconstruction Algorithms in Deep Inelastic Scattering
Jet Reconstruction Algorithms in Deep Inelastic Scattering Summer Student Report at H1 Collaboration at DESY submitted by Anton Tamtögl H1 Collaboration, DESY (Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron) Notkestraße
More informationQCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations
QCD Jets at the LHC Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Outline Physics at the LHC Jet Reconstruction and Performance Clustering Algorithms
More informationThe inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections. J. Huston Michigan State University
The inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections J. Huston Michigan State University Tevatron in Run II 36 bunches (396 ns crossing time) 2 CDF in Run II
More informationFactorization for Jet Substructure. Andrew Larkoski Reed College
Factorization for Jet Substructure Andrew Larkoski Reed College SCET 017, March 14, 017 Goal: Precision Calculations on Isolated Jets at the LHC 3 Perturbative Radiation Perturbative Radiation Underlying
More informationQCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve
QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve February 8, 2006 Bon appétit! February 8, 2006 Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU 1 Why this seminar?
More informationRecent QCD results from ATLAS
Recent QCD results from ATLAS PASCOS 2013 Vojtech Pleskot Charles University in Prague 21.11.2013 Introduction / Outline Soft QCD: Underlying event in jet events @7TeV (2010 data) Hard double parton interactions
More informationLHC Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 5: Jets, W, Z, photons
LHC Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 5: Jets, W, Z, photons HUGS 2015 Bolek Wyslouch Techniques to study the plasma Radiation of hadrons Azimuthal asymmetry and radial expansion Energy loss by quarks, gluons
More informationJET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER
JET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER OUTLINE Physics introduction Introduction to jet physics Jets in heavy-ion-collisions Jet reconstruction Paper discussion The CMS experiment Data selection and track/jet
More informationDemystifying Multivariate Searches
Demystifying Multivariate Searches and the Matthew Schwartz Harvard University Work down with Jason Gallicchio, PRL, 105:022001,2010 and with Gallicchio, Tweedie, Huth, Kagan and Black in preparation Johns
More informationJets and jet substructure 4: substructure
Jets and jet substructure 4: substructure Gavin Salam (CERN) with extensive use of material by Matteo Cacciari and Gregory Soyez TASI June 213 1 Two things that make jets@lhc special The large hierarchy
More informationShapes at hadron colliders
Shape variables at hadron colliders ETH Zürich Work done in collaboration with Gavin Salam (LPTHE Jussieu), Giulia Zanderighi (Oxford) and Mrinal Dasgupta, Kamel Khelifa-Kerfa, Simone Marzani (Manchester)
More informationMaria Fiascaris (University of Oxford) ATLAS UK Meeting, Durham 10/01/08
Summary W/Z + Jets Analyses Maria Fiascaris (University of Oxford) Aim and Motivations Work of the W/Z + jets Csc Note Group Goal: Measure W/Z+jets cross section in function of Jet Multiplicity and Leading
More informationJets and Heavy Flavour Physics in the vacuum and in the medium
LHCP Shanghai, May 2017 Jets and Heavy Flavour Physics in the vacuum and in the medium Matteo Cacciari LPTHE Paris Université Paris Diderot Jets Jets can be a golden observable to study the properties
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 18 Jan 2016
Jet measurements in pp, p Pb and Pb Pb collisions with ALICE at the LHC arxiv:6.446v [hep-ex] 8 Jan 6 Centre for Astroparticle Physics and Space Science, Bose Institute, Kolkata, 79 (INDIA) E-mail: sprasad@cern.ch
More informationImplementing Jet Algorithms: A Practical Jet Primer
Implementing Jet Algorithms: A Practical Jet Primer Stephen D. Ellis University of Washington West Coast LHC Theory Network UC Davis Outline: Jet Jargon Big Picture Jet Goals for LHC Cone Details & Lessons
More informationRelativistic Heavy Ions III - Hard Probes and Jet Quenching
Relativistic Heavy Ions III - Hard Probes and Jet Quenching RHI Physics The US National Nuclear Physics Summer School & TRIUMF Summer Institute Vancouver, Canada Helen Caines - Yale University June 2010
More informationLarge R jets and boosted. object tagging in ATLAS. Freiburg, 15/06/2016. #BoostAndNeverLookBack. Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg
Large R jets and boosted object tagging in ATLAS Christoph Anders Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg #BoostAndNeverLookBack Freiburg, 15/06/2016 ??? Cambridge-Aachen 2 arxiv:1506.00962 Higgs
More informationStudies on hadronic top decays
Studies on hadronic top decays José M. Clavijo, Havana University, Cuba September 6, 208 Supervisors: Daniela Dominguez Damiani and Hannes Jung Abstract Top events in the boosted regime are studied using
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders Part II
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 The structure of an event One incoming parton from each of the protons enters the hard process, where then a number of outgoing particles
More informationJet substructure, top tagging & b-tagging at high pt Pierre-Antoine Delsart and Jeremy Andrea
Jet substructure, top tagging & b-tagging at high pt Pierre-Antoine Delsart and Jeremy Andrea Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et Corpusculaire CNRS/IN2P3 1 Motivations Now exploring very high pt regions
More informationMoriond QCD. Latest Jets Results from the LHC. Klaus Rabbertz, KIT. Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF) Klaus Rabbertz
Latest Jets Results from the LHC Proton Structure (PDF) Proton Structure (PDF), KIT 1 Flash Menu Motivation Accelerators and Detectors Jet Algorithms and Calibration Inclusive Jets Dijets and 3-Jets The
More informationResults on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron
Results on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova October 21 Padova Outline: Machine and detector description Latest results on QCD Heavy Flavor:
More informationAzimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD
Azimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD Andrea Banfi ETH Zurich q q p 1 p 1 Outline Azimuthal decorrelations in QCD hard processes Dijets in the back-to-back region Phenomenology of azimuthal decorrelations
More informationAtlas results on diffraction
Atlas results on diffraction Alessia Bruni INFN Bologna, Italy for the ATLAS collaboration Rencontres du Viet Nam 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Qui Nhon, 16/12/2011 EDS 2011 Alessia
More informationAN ANALYTIC UNDERSTANDING OF JET SUBSTRUCTURE
AN ANALYTIC UNDERSTANDING OF JET SUBSTRUCTURE Simone Marzani Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Durham University NIKHEF Amsterdam, 7 th November 213 Dasgupta, Fregoso, SM, Powling EPJ C Dasgupta,
More informationThe Heavy Quark Search at the LHC
The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC Backgrounds: estimating and suppressing tt, multijets,... jet mass technique NLO effects matrix elements for extra jets initial state
More informationHigh p T physics at the LHC Lecture III Standard Model Physics
High p T physics at the LHC Lecture III Standard Model Physics Miriam Watson, Juraj Bracinik (University of Birmingham) Warwick Week, April 2011 1. LHC machine 2. High PT experiments Atlas and CMS 3. Standard
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO QCD
AN INTRODUCTION TO QCD Frank Petriello Northwestern U. & ANL TASI 2013: The Higgs Boson and Beyond June 3-7, 2013 1 Outline We ll begin with motivation for the continued study of QCD, especially in the
More informationQCD dijet analyses at DØ
QCD dijet analyses at DØ Pavel Demine for the DØ collaboration DAPNIA-SPP, CEA Saclay, France Contents: DØ detector Jet reconstruction at DØ Dijet mass spectrum Dijet azimuthal angle decorrelation XII
More informationSome Midpoint jet algorithm studies/thoughts. Joey Huston Michigan State University
Some Midpoint jet algorithm studies/thoughts Joey Huston Michigan State University General remarks There are three issues that currently limit the sensitivity of QCD tests involving jet measurements 1.
More informationRecent Results on Jet Physics and α s
Recent Results on Jet Physics and α s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 8, Presented by Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Outline Introduction and Experimental Considerations
More informationReconstructing low mass boosted A bb at LHCb
Summer student report - CERN 2014 Summer student: Petar Bokan Supervisor: Victor Coco Reconstructing low mass boosted A bb at LHCb ABSTRACT: LHCb has the ability to trigger low mass objects with high efficiency.
More informationColin Jessop. University of Notre Dame
Colin Jessop University of Notre Dame Test the evolution of QCD to higher energies ( and lower x) Search for new particles with Quarks, gluons and photons in Final state Jet production is dominant process
More informationPoS(Confinement X)171
in pp collisions at LHC energies Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Wigner RCP, HAS 2 Budapest, XII. Konkoly Thege Miklos ut 29-33 E-mail: sona.pochybova@cern.ch With increasing luminosities at
More informationComparing different Jet-Algorithms for photoproduction Monte Carlo data
DESY Summerschool 8 Student Report Comparing different Jet-Algorithms for photoproduction Monte Carlo data Clemens Mellein DESY Hamburg / RWTH Aachen Abstract. The following report shows the results of
More informationMeasurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS
Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS For the CMS Collaboration NPA Seminar Yale, USA 15 October, 2015 Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Trying to answer two important
More informationMeasurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ATLAS
Measurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ALAS Bilge M. Demirköz, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Institut de Fisica d Altes Energies, Barcelona, SPAIN also at Middle East echnical
More informationLHC searches: what role for QCD?
LHC searches: what role for QCD? Gavin Salam LPTHE, CNRS and UPMC (Univ. Paris 6) Aspen Center for Physics 25 May 2010 Including examples based on work with Butterworth, Cacciari, Davison, Plehn, Rojo,
More informationDon Lincoln. QCD Results from the Tevatron
Recent Don Lincoln Fermilab DØ Calorimeter Uranium-Liquid Argon Calorimeter stable, uniform response, radiation hard Compensating: e/π 1 Uniform hermetic coverage η 4.2, recall η ln[tan(θ/2)] Longitudinal
More informationFinding heavy particles in single jets
Finding heavy particles in single jets Christopher Vermilion with teve Ellis and Jon Walsh University of Washington eptember 16, 009 arxiv: 0903.5081, 0909.OON tinyurl.com/jetpruning 1 / 37 Why jet substructure?
More informationJet Results in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at ALICE
Jet Results in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at ALICE Oliver Busch for the ALICE Collaboration Motivation Jet reconstruction in ALICE Jets in pp Jets in Pb-Pb Hadron triggered recoil jets Motivation Jets originate
More informationTests of QCD Using Jets at CMS. Salim CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration IPM /10/2017
Tests of QCD Using Jets at CMS Salim CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration IPM-2017 24/10/2017 2/25 Outline Introduction QCD at LHC QCD measurements on the LHC data Jets The strong
More informationHadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18
) " % "" ' & % % " ) " % '% &* ' ) * ' + " ' ) ( $#! ' "") ( * " ) +% % )( (. ' + -, '+ % &* ' ) ( 021 % # / ( * *' 5 4* 3 %( '' ' " + +% Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18 The Run II DØ Detector
More informationJets at the LHC. New Possibilities. Jeppe R. Andersen in collaboration with Jennifer M. Smillie. Blois workshop, Dec
Jets at the LHC New Possibilities Jeppe R. Andersen in collaboration with Jennifer M. Smillie Blois workshop, Dec 17 2011 Jeppe R. Andersen (CP 3 -Origins) Jets at the LHC Blois Workshop, Dec. 17 2011
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part 2 Standard Model Physics Test of Quantum Chromodynamics - Jet production - W/Z production - Production of Top quarks Precision measurements -W mass - Top-quark mass QCD
More informationEarly physics with Atlas at LHC
Early physics with Atlas at LHC Bellisario Esposito (INFN-Frascati) On behalf of the Atlas Collaboration Outline Atlas Experiment Physics goals Next LHC run conditions Physics processes observable with
More informationSoft gluon resummation
Soft gluon resummation Simone Marzani University of Manchester Institute on Parton Shower and Resummation DESY Hamburg, Germany May 2009 In collaboration with Jeff Forshaw and James Keates arxiv:0905.1350
More informationQCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets
QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØD Collaborations APS 2009 Denver, Colorado
More informationJet fragmentation study in vacuum and in medium in the ALICE experiment at the LHC
Jet fragmentation study in vacuum and in medium in the ALICE experiment at the LHC Magali Estienne for the ALICE Collaboration WISH 2010 Catania, Italia, September 8-10 2010 Outline 2 Motivations for jet
More informationRecent progress from Les Houches WG. Photon isolation and fragmentation contribution
Recent progress from Les Houches WG Photon isolation and fragmentation contribution Workshop PPSHC - 30/03/2012 Nicolas Chanon - ETH Zürich In behalf of the Photon Les Houches WG N. Chanon, S. Gascon-Shotkin,
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 21 Aug 2011
arxiv:18.155v1 [hep-ex] 1 Aug 011 Early Searches with Jets with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute E-mail: georgios.choudalakis@cern.ch We summarize the analysis
More informationThoughts on QCD for Run 2
ATLAS Standard Model Workshop, Lessons from Run 1 and Preparation for Run 2 Annecy, February 2014 Thoughts on QCD for Run 2 Gavin Salam (CERN) 1 Why SM studies? Test and extend our understanding of QCD
More informationExperiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Experiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations Related content - Measurement of multi-jet cross-sections
More informationLecture 2. QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University
Lecture 2 QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University NLO calculations NLO calculation requires consideration of all diagrams that have an extra factor of α s real radiation, as we have just discussed
More informationLecture 3: jets in heavy ion collisions
Lecture 3: jets in heavy ion collisions Marco van Leeuwen, Nikhef and Utrecht University JET School, UC Davis, 9-2 June 204 Jets and parton energy loss Motivation: understand parton energy loss by tracking
More informationInclusive spectrum of charged jets in central Au+Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV by STAR
Inclusive spectrum of charged jets in central Au+Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV by SAR Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciencis of Czech Republic, Na ruhlarce 39/64, 180 86 Prague, Czech Republic
More information