arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 2 Nov 2015

Transcription

1 PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN PARTIAL DYNAMIC INTEGRODIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS rxiv: v1 [mth.ds] 2 Nov 2015 DEEPAK B. PACHPATTE Abstrct. The im of the present pper is to study the existence, uniqueness nd some other properties of solutions of certin prtil dynmic integrodifferentil equtions.the Bnch fixed point theorem nd certin fundmentl inequlity with explicit estimtes re used to estblish our results. 1. Introduction The study of time scle clculus ws initited by Stefn Hilger in his Ph.D disserttion which unifies the continuous nd discrete clculus[4]. Since then mny uthors hve worked on vrious spects dynmic equtions on timescle clculus[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Bsic informtion on time scle clculus cn be found in [1, 2, 3, 4]. Mny uthors hve studied vrious types of prtil dynmic equtions on time scles[7, 8, 10, 11, 14].In [12, 13, 15] hve studied the integrodifferentil equtions nd its properties. Motivted by the results in the bove ppers in this pper we study properties of certin prtil dynmic integrodifferentil equtions. In wht follows R denotes the set of rel numbers nd T denotes the rbitrry time scles. Now we give some bsic definitions of time scle clculus. The function f : T R is sid to be rd-continuous if f is continuous t ech right dense point of T nd is denoted by C rd. Let two time scles with t lest two point be denoted by T 1 nd T 2 nd Ω = T 1 T 2. The delt prtil derivtive of rel vlued function f on T 1 T 2 hs prtil derivtive f t 1,t 2 ) with respect to t 1 if for ech ǫ > 0 there exists neighbourhood U t1 of t 1 such tht. f σ 1 t 1 ),t 2 ) f s,t 2 ) f t 1,t 2 )σ 1 t 1 ) s) ε σ 1 t 1 ) s for ll s U t2. The delt prtil derivtive of rel vlued function f on T 1 T 2 hs 2 prtil derivtive f t 1,t 2 ) with respect to t 2 if for ech η > 0 there exists neighbourhood U t2 of t 2 such tht f t1,σ 2 t 2 )) f t 1,l) f 2 t 1,t 2 )σ 2 t 2 ) l) η σ2 t 2 ) l 2010 Mthemtics Subject Clssifiction. 26E70, 34N05, 26D10. Key words nd phrses. Bnch fixed point theorem, Existence nd Uniqueness, integrl inequlity,integrodifferentil equtions, time scles. 1

2 2 D. B. PACHPATTE for ll u U t1. The prtil derivtive of wx, y) for x, y) Ω with respect to x,y nd xy is denoted by w x,y),w 2 x,y) nd w 2 x,y) = w 2 x,y). Suppose I = [,b] with < b nd Ω = Ω I. The prtil derivtive of ux,y,z) for x,y,z) C rd Ω,R) with respect to x,y nd xy is defined by w x,y,z),w 2 x,y,z) nd w 2 x,y,z) = w 2 x,y,z) In this pper we study the prtil dynmic integrodifferentil eqution of the form u 2 x,y,z) = F x,y,z,ux,y,z),u x,y,z),u 2 x,y,z),hu)x,y,z) ), 1.1) with the conditions for x,y) Ω where Hu)x,y,z) = ux,,z) = αx,z), u,y,z) = βy,z) 1.2) G x,y,z,q,ux,y,q),u x,y,q),u 2 x,y,q) ) q, 1.3) whereg C rd Ω R 3,R ),F C rd Ω R 4,R ) ndα,β C rd R I,R). We hve u,,z) = α,z) = β,z). Now for u,u,u 2 C rd Ω,R ), we denote. ux,y,z) W = ux,y,z) u x,y,z) u 2 x,y,z). 1.4) Let S be the spce function stisfying the condition ux,y,z) W = Oe λ x,y, z )), 1.5) where λ > 0 is positive constnt. In spce S we define norm u by u s = sup [ ux,y,z) w e Θλ x,y, z )]. 1.6) x,y,z) Ω I The norm defined 1.6) is clerly Bnch Spce. Then 1.5) implies tht there is constnt N 0 such tht ux,y,z) w N e λ x,y, z )), 1.7) nd we hve u s N. 1.8) The solution of 1.1) nd 1.2) is function ux,y,z) C ) rd Ω,R n stisfying 1.1) nd 1.2). It is esy to see tht ux,y,z) with 1.1) nd

3 INTEGRODIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 3 1.2) stisfy the following dynmic integrodifferentil eqution. ux,y,z) = αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) F s,t,z,us,t,z),u s,t,z),u 2 s,t,z),hu)s,t,z) ) t s, for x,y,z) C rd Ω,R) u x,y,z) = α x,z) F u 2 x,y,z) = β 2 y,z) x F x,t,z,ux,t,z),u x,t,z),u 2 x,t,z),hu)x,t,z) ) t, 1.9) 1.10) s,y,z,ux,t,z),u s,y,z),u 2 s,y,z),hu)s,y,z) ) s. We need following Lemm given in [3]. Lemm [[3], Theorem 2.6] Let u C rd T,R ), R for ll t T k, then for ll t T k. u t) t)ut), ut) ut 0 )e t,t 0 ), 2. Min Results 1.11) Now we give our min results Theorem 1.1 Suppose tht the functions F,G in 1.1) stisfy the condition F x,y,z,u 1,u 2,u 3,u 4 ) F x,y,z,u 1,u 2,u 3,u 4 ) M x,y,z)[ u 1 u 1 u 2 u 2 u 3 u 3 u 4 u 4 ], 2.1) Gx,y,z,q,u 1,u 2,u 3 ) Gx,y,z,q,u 1,u 2,u 3 )

4 4 D. B. PACHPATTE Kx,y,z,q)[ u 1 u 1 u 2 u 2 u 3 u 3 ], 2.2) where M C rd Ω,R ) nd K Crd Ω I,R ). For λ s in 1.5), there exists nonnegtive γ i i = 1,2,3) such tht M s,t,z)[e λ s,t, z ) ks,t,z,q)e λ s,t, q ) q t s γ 1 e λ x,y, z ), 2.3) M x,t,z)[e λ x,t, q ) x kx,t,z,q)e λ x,t, q ) q t γ 2 e λ x,y, z ), 2.4) M s,y,z)[e λ x,t, z ) ks,y,z,q)e λ s,y, q ) q s γ 3 e λ x,y, z ), 2.5) for x,y Ω, z I. There exist nonnegtive constnts η i i = 1,2,3) such tht αx,z) βy,z) α0,z) f s,t,z,0,0,h0)s,t,z)) t s η 1 e λ x,y, z ), 2.6) α x,z) β y,z) y F x,t,z,0,0,0,h0)x,t,z)) t η 2 e λ x,y, z ), 2.7) F s,y,z,0,0,0,h0)s,y,z)) s η 3 e λ x,y, z ), 2.8)

5 INTEGRODIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 5 where α,β re s in 1.2). If γ = γ 1 γ 2 γ 3 < 1 then problem 1.1) 1.2) hs unique solution ux,y,z) on 1.1) 1.2) in S. Proof. Let ux,y,z) S nd define the opertor T by Tu)x,y,z) = αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) F s,t,z,us,t,z),u s,t,z),u 2 s,t,z),hu)s,t,z) ) t s. 2.9) Now we show tht P mps S into itself. Tu is rd-continuous on Ω I nd Tu R. From 2.9) nd given hypotheses we hve Pu)x,y,z) αx,z) βy,z) α0,z) F s,t,z,us,t,z),u s,t,z),u 2 s,t,z),hu)s,t,z) ) F s,t,z,0,0,0,h0)s,t,z)) t s F s,t,z,0,0,0,h0)s,t,z)) t s η 1 e λ x,y, z ) M s,t,z)[e λ s,t, z ) us,t,z) e Θλ s,t, z ) kx,y,z,q)e λ s,t, q ) ux,y, q ) W e Θλ s,t, q ) q t s η 1 e λ x,y, z ) u s M s,t,z)[e λ s,t, z ) kx,y,z,q)e λ s,t, q ) q t s [η 1 Nγ 1 ]e λ x,y, z ). 2.10)

6 6 D. B. PACHPATTE Delt differentiting on both sides of 2.9) with respect to x nd 1.8) we hve Pu) x,y,z) α x,z) F x,t,z,ux,t,z),u x,t,z),u 2 x,t,z),hu)x,t,z) ) F x,t,z,0,0,0,h0)x,t,z)) t F x,t,z,0,0,0,h0)x,t,z)) t η 2 e λ x,y, z ) u s M x,t,z)[e λ x,t, z ) kx,t,z,q)e λ x,t, q ) q t [η 2 Nγ 2 ]e λ x,y, z ). 2.11) Similrly we hve Pu) 2 x,y,z) [η 3 Nγ 3 ]e λ x,y, z ). 2.12) From 2.10) 2.12) we hve Pu s [η 1 η 2 η 3 )Nγ]. Thus proving tht P mps S into itself. NowweshowthtopertorP iscontrctionmp. Letux,y,z),ux,y,z) S. From 2.9) we hve Pu)x,y,z) Pu)x,y,z) F s,t,z,us,t,z),u s,t,z),u 2 s,t,z),hu)s,t,z) ) F s,t,z,us,t,z),u s,t,z),u 2 s,t,z),hu)s,t,z) ) t s u u s M x,t,z)[e λ s,t, z )

7 INTEGRODIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 7 ks,t,z,q)e λ s,t, q ) q t s u u s γ 1 e λ x,y, z ). 2.13) Similrly delt differentiting both sides of 2.12) with respect to x nd y we hve Pu) x,y,z) Pu) x,y,z) u u s γ 2 e λ x,y, z ), 2.14) nd Pu) 2 x,y,z) Pu) 2 x,y,z) u u s γ 3 e λ x,y, z ). 2.15) From 2.13) 2.15) we obtin Pu Pu s γ u u s. Since γ < 1, P hs unique fixed point in S by Bnch fixed point theorem. The fixed point of P is solution of 1.1) 1.2). This completes the proof. 3. Properties of solutions Now we study the properties of solution of dynmic integrodifferentil eqution of the form u 2 x,y,z) = f x,y,z,ux,y,z),hu)x,y,z)), 3.1) with 1.2) for x,y,z) Ω where hu)x,y,z) = jx,y,z,q,ux,y,q))dq, 3.2) ) in which i C rd Ω R,R, f Crd Ω R 2,R). Now we prove the following dynmic inequlity which cn be used in studying some properties of solutions. ) ) Theorem 3.1 Let w,p C rd Ω,R, Crd Ω I,R nd c 0 constnt. If wx,y,z) c [ps,t,z)ws,t,z) rs,t,z,q)ws,t,q) q t s, 3.3)

8 8 D. B. PACHPATTE for x,y,z) Ω then wx,y,z) ce Qx,y,z) x, ), 3.4) where x,y,z) Ω nd Qx,y,z) = ps,t,z) Proof. For n rbitrry Z I from 3.3) we hve rs,t,z,q) q s. 3.5) Put wx,y,z) c ms,t) = ps,t,z)ws,t,z) The inequlity 3.6) becomes Now define then wx,y,z) c vx,y) = c [ps,t,z)ws,t,z) rs,t,z,q)ws,t,q) q t s. 3.6) rs,t,z,q)ws,t,q) q. 3.7) ms,t) t s. 3.8) ms,t) t s, 3.9) v0,y) = vx,0) = c,wx,y,z) vx,y). 3.10) Delt differentiting both sides of 3.9) with respect to x nd y using 3.7) nd 3.10) we hve v 2 x,y) = mx,y) = px,y,z)wx,y,z) rx,y,z,q)wx,y,q) q

9 INTEGRODIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 9 vx,y) px,y,z) rs,t,z,q) q. 3.11) By keeping x fixed in 3.11), nd tking y = t nd delt integrting with respect to second vrible from to y. Using the fct tht v x,y) px,t,z) vx,y) px,t,z) rx,t,z,q) q vx,t) t rx,t,z,q) q t vx,y)qx,y,z). 3.12) Now treting y fixed in 3.12) nd pplying Lemm we hve vx,y) ce Qx,y,Z) x, ). 3.13) Becuse Z is rbitrry nd using 3.10) we get 3.9). Theorem 3.2 Suppose the functions f, j in 3.1),3.2) stisfy the conditions f x,y,z,u,v) f x,y,z,u,v) p 1 x,y,z)[ u u v v ], 3.14) jx,y,z,q,u) jx,y,z,q,u) p 2 x,y,z,q) u u, 3.15) ) ) where p 1 C rd Ω,R, p2 C rd Ω I,R, c 0 nd p 1 s,t,z) p 1 s,t,z,q) q t s <, 3.16) then the problem 3.1) 1.1) hs t most one solution. Proof. Let u 1 x,y,z) nd u 2 x,y,z) be two solutions of problem 3.1) 1.1). u 1 x,y,z) u 2 x,y,z) f s,t,z,u 1 s,t,z),hu 1 )s,t,z)) f s,t,z,u 2 s,t,z),hu 2 )s,t,z)) t s [p 1 s,t,z) u 1 s,t,z) u 2 s,t,z)

10 10 D. B. PACHPATTE hu 1 )s,t,z) hu 2 )s,t,z) ] t s [p 1 s,t,z) u 1 s,t,z) u 2 s,t,z) p 1 s,t,z,q) u 1 s,t,q) u 2 s,t,q) q t s. 3.17) NowpplyingTheorem3.1to3.17)yields u 1 x,y,z) u 2 x,y,z) 0 which gives u 1 x,y,z) = u 2 x,y,z). This proves tht there is t most one solution to problem 3.1) 1.1). Now we prove the theorem which gives the boundedness of solution of 3.1) 1.1). Theorem 3.3. Suppose the function f,j,α,β in 3.1) 1.1) stisfy the conditions f x,y,z,u,v) p 1 x,y,z)[ u v ], 3.18) jx,y,z,u,v) p 2 x,y,z,q) u, 3.19) αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) c, 3.20) where p 1 C rd Ω,R ), p 2 C rd Ω I,R ), c 0 is constnt nd the condition 3.16) holds. Then solution ux, y, z) is bounded nd ux,y,z) ce Qx,y,z) x, ), 3.21) for x,y,z) Ω Proof. Since ux,y,z) is solution of 3.1) 1.1). We hve ux,y,z) αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) c f s,t,z,us,t,z),hu)s,t,z)) t s [p 1 s,t,z) us,t,z) p 2 s,t,z,q) us,t,q) q t s. 3.22) Now n ppliction of Theorem 3.1 to 3.22) yields 3.21) thus proving the boundedness of solution. Now we give the dependency of solution of eqution on given condition

11 INTEGRODIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 11 Theorem 3.4. Suppose the function f,k in 3.1),3.2) stisfy the conditions 3.14),3.15) nd the condition 3.16) holds. Let ux, y, z) nd vx,y,z) be the solutions of eqution with condition 1.2) nd vx,0,z) = αx,z), v0,y,z) = βy,z), 3.23) respectively nd αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) [ αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) ], 3.24) where α,β,α,β C rd R I,R) nd 0 is constnt. Then ux,y,z) vx,y,z) e Qx,y,z) x, ). 3.25) Proof. Since ux,y,z) nd vx,y,z) re solutions of 3.1)-1.1) nd 3.1) 3.23) nd the given conditions we hve ux,y,z) ux,y,z) αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) [ αx,z)βy,z) α0,z) ] f s,t,z,us,t,z),hu)s,t,z)) f s,t,z,vs,t,z),hu)s,t,z)) t s [p 1 s,t,z) us,t,z) vs,t,z) p 2 s,t,z,q) us,t,z) vs,t,z) q t s. 3.26) Now n ppliction of Theorem 3.1 to3.26) gives the estimte3.25) which gives the dependency of solution of eqution 3.1) on given conditions. Acknowledgement. This reserch is supported by Science nd Engineering Reserch BordSERB), New Delhi, Indi, Snct. No. SB/S4/MS:861/13 References References [1] M. Bohner nd A. Peterson, Dynmic equtions on time scles, Birkhuser Boston/Berlin, 2001). [2] M. Bohner nd A. Peterson, Advnces in Dynmic equtions on time scles, Birkhuser Boston/Berlin, 2003).

12 12 D. B. PACHPATTE [3] E.A.Bohner, M. Bohner nd F. Akin, Pchptte inequlities on on time scles, J. Inequl. Pure Appl. Mth.,,61)2005), Art. 6. [4] S. Hilger, Anlysis on Mesure chin-a unified pproch to continuous nd discrete clculus, Results. Mth., 18:18-56, [5] D. B. Pchptte, Explicit estimtes on integrl inequlities with time scle, J. Inequl. Pure. Appl. Mth., Vol. 7, Issue 4, Artivle 143, [6] D. B. Pchptte, Integrl Inequlitys for prtil dynmic equtions on time scles, Electron. J. Differentil Equtions,Vol ), No. 50, 1-7. [7] D. B. Pchptte, Properties of solutions to nonliner dynmic integrl equtions on Time Scles, Electron. J. Differentil Equtions,Vol ). No pp.1-8. [8] D. B. Pchptte, Properties of some prtil dynmic equtions on time scles, Interntionl Journl of Prtil Differentil Equtions, Vol. 2013, Art. ID , 9 pges [9] D. B. Pchptte, Properties of some dynmic Integrl equtions on time scles, Ann. Funct. Anl., Vol.4, No2.,2013. [10] B. Jckson, Prtil dymic equtions on time scles, J. Comput. Appl. Mth.,Vol.186, Issue 2, Feb 2006, p [11] Y. Sun, T. Hssnb, Some nonliner dynmic integrl inequlities on time scles, Appl. Mth. Comput., Vol 220, 2013, P [12] G. Liu, X. Xing, Y. Peng Nonliner integrodifferentil equtions nd optiml control problems on time scles, Comput. Mth. Appl., Vol 61,Issue 2, Jn 2011, P [13] A. S. Nowk, Integrodifferentil equtions on time scles with Henstock- Kurzweil-pettis Delt Integrls, Abstr. Appl. Anl., Vol 2010,Art. ID , p. 17. [14] F. Meng, J. Sho, Some new Volterr Fredholm type dynmic integrl inequlities on time scles, Appl. Mth. Comput., Vol. 223, 2013, p [15] Y. Xing, M. Hn, G. Zheng Initil vlue problem for first order integrodifferentil eqution of Volter type on Time scles, Nonliner Anl., Vol. 60, Issue 3,Feb 2005, p Deepk B. Pchptte Deprtment of Mthemtics, Dr. Bbsheb Ambedkr Mrthwd University, Aurngbd, Mhrshtr , Indi E-mil ddress: pchptte@gmil.com