arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 15 Jan 2018

Transcription

1 Finding the chira gravitationa wave background of an axion-su( infationary mode using CMB observations and aser interferometers arxiv: v [astro-ph.co] 5 Jan 08 Ben Thorne,, Tomohiro Fujita, 3, 4 Masashi Hazumi,, 5, 6, 7 Nobuhiko Katayama, Eiichiro Komatsu,, 8 and Maresuke Shiraishi, 9 Kavi Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (Kavi IPMU, WPI, UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, , Japan Oxford Astrophysics, Denys Wikinson Buiding, Kebe Road, Oxford, OX 3RH, United Kingdom 3 Stanford Institute for Theoretica Physics and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94306, USA 4 Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, , Japan 5 Institute of Partice and Nucear Studies, KEK, - Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki , Japan 6 SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Miura District, Kanagawa 40-05, Japan 7 Institute of Space and Astronautica Studies (ISAS, Japan Aerospace Exporation Agency (JAXA, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 5-50, Japan 8 Max Panck Institute for Astrophysics, Kar-Schwarzschid-Str., Garching 9 Department of Genera Education, Nationa Institute of Technoogy, Kagawa Coege, 355 Chokushi-cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa , Japan (Dated: January 6, 08 A detection of B-mode poarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB anisotropies woud confirm the presence of a primordia gravitationa wave background (GWB. In the infation paradigm this woud be an unprecedented probe of the energy scae of infation as it is directy proportiona to the power spectrum of the GWB. However, simiar tensor perturbations can be produced by the matter fieds present during infation, breaking the simpe reationship between energy scae and the tensor-to-scaar ratio r. It is therefore important to find ways of distinguishing between the generation mechanisms of the GWB. Without doing a fu mode seection, we anayse the detectabiity of a new axion-su( gauge fied mode by cacuating the signa-to-noise of future CMB and interferometer observations sensitive to the chiraity of the tensor spectrum. We forecast the detectabiity of the resuting CMB temperature and B-mode (TB or E-mode and B-mode (EB cross-correation by the LiteBIRD sateite, considering the effects of residua foregrounds, gravitationa ensing, and assess the abiity of such an experiment to jointy detect primordia TB and EB spectra and sef-caibrate its poarimeter. We find that LiteBIRD wi be abe to detect the chira signa for r > 0.03 with r denoting the tensor-to-scaar ratio at the peak scae, and that the maximum signa-to-noise for r < 0.07 is. We go on to consider an advanced stage of a LISA-ike mission, which is designed to be sensitive to the intensity and poarization of the GWB. We find that such experiments woud compement CMB observations as they woud be abe to detect the chiraity of the GWB with high significance on scaes inaccessibe to the CMB. We concude that CMB two-point statistics are imited in their abiity to distinguish this mode from a conventiona vacuum fuctuation mode of GWB generation, due to the fundamenta imits on their sensitivity to parity-vioation. In order to test the predictions of such a mode as compared to vacuum fuctuations it wi be necessary to test deviations from the sef-consistency reation, or use higher order statistics to everage the non-gaussianity of the mode. On the other hand, in the case of a spectrum peaked at very sma scaes inaccessibe to the CMB, a highy significant detection coud be made using space-based aser interferometers. I. INTRODUCTION Over the past two decades the temperature and poarization anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB have been measured with increasing sensitivity, ushering in the era of precision cosmoogy. It is the aim of the next generation of CMB experiments to better measure the poarization of the CMB in order to detect its primordia B-mode poarization, parametrized by r, the ratio between tensor and scaar perturbations, which woud provide strong evidence for the presence of a primordia gravitationa wave background (GWB (see e.g. [ 3] for review. Normay, the GWB is produced ony by quantum fuctuations of the vacuum during infation, and is consequenty simpy reated to the energy density of infation : ρ /4 inf ( r 0.0 / GeV. A measurement of the power spectrum of tensor perturbations to the metric woud therefore be an extremey powerfu probe of physics at GUT scaes 0 6 GeV. Given the importance of this measurement, many experiments are currenty making observations of the poarized CMB, such as POLARBEAR [4], SPTPo [5], ACTPo [6], BICEP / Keck Array [7], and Panck [8]. The best current

2 observationa constraints come from a combination of BICEP/Keck and Panck (BKP data to give r < 0.07 (95% C.L [7], but the next round of CMB experiments, such as the LiteBIRD sateite [9], the CORE sateite [0] and the ground-based Stage-4 [] effort, seek to push constraints on r to 0 3. Interestingy, this search for B-modes may aso be sensitive to the dynamics of subdominant fieds other than the infaton, considering the possibiity of aternative gravitationa wave generation scenarios. Some particuar matter fieds present during infation can produce primordia tensor perturbations simiar to those sourced by vacuum fuctuations. Therefore, in the event of a detection of r, we must first understand its source. Recent efforts to provide aternative modes for the generation of gravitationa waves, which are aso consistent with existing observations, have introduced the couped system of the axion and gauge fieds as the spectator sector in addition to the infaton sector [ 7]. Such a setup is quite natura from the point of view of partice physics, since many high energy theories contain axion fieds and its couping to some gauge fieds, namey the Chern-Simons term: (χ/ff µν Fµν. In particuar, string theory typicay predicts the existence of numerous axion fieds. From the view point of ow energy effective fied theory, at the same time, such dimension five interaction term is expected to exist, because it respects the shift symmetry of the axion fied, χ χ + constant. Therefore it is strongy motivated to investigate the observationa consequence of their dynamics during infation in ight of the roe of infation as a unique probe of high energy physics. Interestingy enough, the GWB produced by the additiona axion-gauge sector has severa characteristic features, incuding non-gaussianity, scae-dependence, and chiraity. A mode invoving a U( gauge fied was studied first, and it was confirmed that the resuting GWB is ampified to the same eve as the scaar perturbation [, 8] and hence visibe in CMB B-mode observations [9] and interferometer experiments [0]. Recenty, a more intriguing mode due to a SU( gauge fied was aso examined, achieving a surpassing GWB production against the scaar sector [3]. This yieds more rich phenomenoogy, and thus motivates us toward the assessment of its detectabiity. Gravitationa waves may be decomposed into modes with eft (L and right (R handed poarization. A GWB produced by conventiona vacuum fuctuations woud have equa ampitudes of L and R, but the effect of the Chern- Simons term in the theory is to aow their ampitudes to differ [, 3, ]. Such a chira GWB woud have signatures observabe both in CMB poarization and by aser interferometers. CMB poarization may be decomposed into modes of opposing parity: E and B [, 3]. A detection of a correation between E and B modes (EB, or between temperature and B modes (TB, woud therefore be strong evidence of a parity-vioating GWB [9,, 4 6]. Todate observationa constraints using the CMB are consistent with no parity-vioation and are dominated by systematic uncertainty [6 9]. An aternative to using the CMB is to directy probe the circuar poarization of the GWB, denoted with the circuar poarization Stokes parameter V (f, using gravitationa interferometers. Interferometers are sensitive to the strain induced in their arms by passing gravitationa waves, and for certain detector geometries are sensitive to the poarization of the passing wave [30 33]. In this paper we seek to provide a reaistic forecast of the abiity of LiteBIRD to distinguish this SU( mode proposed in Ref. [3] from the conventiona GWB generation by vacuum fuctuations. LiteBIRD is a proposed CMB sateite mission with the primary science goa of detecting the GWB with r < 0 3 [9, 34, 35]. Therefore its sensitivity wi be focused in the owest two hundred mutipoes where the B-mode signa is both strong and reativey uncontaminated by gravitationa ensing. We excude Stage 4 from the anaysis as we found that the chiraity signa is contained in the mutipoe range 30. Since Stage 4 experiments wi have B-mode surveys over the range 30 [], they wi be i-suited to constrain chiraity, and we do not consider them further. Ref. [36] consider a simpe mode for detecting primordia chiraity using the CMB, and concude that ground-based sma-scae experiments are not we-suited for pursuing this signa. We aso considered a COrE-type experiment, the resuts of which we do not incude in our anaysis, as they are simiar to LiteBIRD due to the dominant impact of arge scae foreground residuas for both instruments. In our anaysis we incude four contributions to the uncertainty in a measurement of the chira GWB: instrumenta noise, foreground residuas from the imperfect ceaning of muti-channe data, gravitationa ensing, and the joint sef-caibration of the instrument s poarimeter. This provides a robust assessment of LiteBIRD s capabiity to detect primordia chiraity. On the other hand, aser interferometer gravitationa wave observatories are sensitive to the GWB today, and provide probes of much smaer scaes: k CMB 0 4 Mpc vs. k interf 0 3 Mpc [0]. In the case of singe-fied sow-ro infation the tensor spectrum is expected to have a sma red-tit (n T = r/8, where n T is the tit of the tensor spectrum P h k n T, in which case modern interferometers woud not be sensitive enough to make a detection. However, given the scae-dependence of the mode of Ref. [3] for part of the parameter space the sma scae tensor spectrum is comparativey arge. For symmetry reasons the nomina designs of space-based gravitationa interferometers are insensitive to the circuar poarization of gravitationa waves. Since we are interested in constraining chiraity we therefore consider advanced stages of the nomina design of LISA [37, 38], foowing the proposed designs of Ref. [33] which provide equa sensitivity to both intensity and poarization of the GWB. In this paper we show that interferometers and CMB observations provide compementary probes at different scaes of the axion-su( s primordia tensor spectrum. We then consider the sensitivities of two designs of

3 3 an advanced stage LISA mission, and compare to constraints achieved using the CMB. In II we review the mode proposed by Ref. [3] and its prediction for the GWB. In III we forecast the abiity of a LiteBIRD-ike CMB sateite mission to detect the TB and EB correations expected due to the chira tensor spectrum, in the presence of foreground contamination, gravitationa ensing, instrument noise, and simutaneous sef-caibration of the teescope s poarimeter. In IV we anayse the sensitivity of space-based gravitationa interferometers to the chira gravitationa background expected by this mode. Finay, in V we summarize our findings and discuss our concusions. II. THEORY In this section we wi briefy review the axion-su( mode proposed in Ref. [3]. The mode is described by the foowing Lagrangian: L = L infaton + ( ] χ ( µχ µ [ 4 + cos f 4 F µνf a aµν + λ 4f χf F µν aµν, ( where L infaton denotes the unspecified infaton sector which reaizes infation and the generation of the curvature perturbation compatibe with the CMB observation, χ is a pseudo-scaar fied (axion with a cosine type potentia, µ and f are dimensionfu parameters and λ is a dimensioness couping constant between the axion and the gauge fied. Fµν a µ A a ν ν A a µ gɛ abc A b µa c ν is the fied strength of SU( gauge fied and F aµν ɛ µνρσ Fρσ/( a g is its dua. Here, g is the sef-couping constant of the gauge fied and ɛ abc and ɛ µνρσ are the competey asymmetric tensors, ɛ 3 = ɛ 03 =. In the axion-su( mode in the FLRW universe g µν = diag(, a (t, a (t, a (t, the SU( gauge fieds naturay take an isotropic background configuration, A a 0 = 0, A a i = a(tq(tδa i by virtue of the couping to the axion χ, and the transverse and traceess part of its perturbation, t ij = δa i j (not to be confused with the time variabe, t, sources gravitationa waves at the inear order. Interestingy, either of the two circuar poarization modes of t ij, namey t R or t L, undergo a transient instabiity around the horizon crossing and gets substantiay ampified. Subsequenty, ony the corresponding poarization mode of the gravitationa wave, h R or h L, is significanty sourced by t ij and fuy chira gravitationa waves are generated. Note that the parity (R L symmetry is spontaneousy broken by the background evoution of the axion (i.e. the sign of t χ(t. In this paper we assume the eft hand modes are produced for definiteness. In Appendix. A, we derive the foowing expression for the sourced GW power spectrum: [ L, Sourced Ph (k = r P ζ exp ( ] k σ n k p ( R, Sourced Ph (k 0, where the ampitude is parameterized by the tensor-to-scaar ratio r at the peak scae k = k p, σ is the width of the Gaussian-shaped spectrum, and P ζ is the power spectrum of curvature perturbations. We treat r and σ as free parameters in our anaysis, whie they can be rewritten in terms of more fundamenta parameters m, ɛ B and N, as discussed in Appendix A. Note that, there is no theoretica bound on r, whie the possibe vaues of σ are restricted by k p as Eq. (A. Figure gives an exampe of how the ampitude r is degenerate in m and ɛ B, and we show an exampe pot of Ph Sourced (k for three sets of these parameters in Figure. Here we define the power spectrum of primordia tensor perturbations to be: h A k h A π k = (π3 k 3 PA h (kδ (3 (k + k δ AA, (3 where A refers to the circuar poarization of the gravitationa wave with the momentum vector k : A = L, R. For the rest of this paper we mode the primordia tensor spectrum as being the sum of two contributions: a competey poarized sourced contribution to the tensor spectrum Ph Sourced : and a contribution from the vacuum fuctuations, which we take to be unpoarized and which we do not vary: P vac h P vac ζ = A T ( k k nt = A S ( k k ns, (4

4 where A T = r vac A S, A S =. 0 9, n S = 0.96, k = 0.05 Mpc are taken from the best-fit Panck cosmoogy [39]. We fix r vac = 0 5 which corresponds to the infationary Hubbe scae H inf = 8 0 GeV and the tensor tit is given by the consistency reation n T = r vac /8. Note that r vac is not required to be so sma compared to the sourced contribution; for arger vaues of r vac the chira contribution woud be more difficut to detect on the CMB due to the vacuum contribution to the BB spectrum. Therefore, we make the simpifying assumption of a sma r vac. In summary: P ζ (k = P vac ζ P h (k, k p, r, σ = Ph vac (k + Ph Sourced (k, k p, r, σ Ph L (k Ph R (k = Ph Sourced (k, k p, r, σ. It is found that contrary to the tensor perturbation, the scaar perturbations in the axion-su( sector do not have any instabiity for m Q and they are even suppressed compared to the vacuum fuctuation of a massess scaar fied due to their kinetic and mass mixing [3, 40, 4]. Since the axion-su( sector is decouped from the infaton and its energy density is subdominant, its contribution to the curvature perturbation is negigibe. It is possibe that the energy fraction of the axion Ω χ ρ χ /ρ tota grows after infation and χ becomes a curvaton if σ is very arge and the decay of the axion is suppressed more than that of the infaton [4 44]. In that case, the contribution from the scaar perturbations in the axion-su( sector to the curvature perturbation may be significant and hence it woud be interesting to investigate such cases. However, it is beyond the scope of this paper. Therefore, we can simpy consider that the curvature perturbation produced by the infaton is not affected by the axion and the SU( gauge fieds in this mode. We may then take the TT, EE, and TE spectra to be given by constrained cosmoogica parameters (which we take to be: h = 0.675, Ω b = 0.0, Ω c = 0., n s = 0.96, τ = 0.09, A s =. 0 9, and investigate ony the B-mode spectra: TB, EB, and BB. 4 III. CMB In this section, we study the CMB phenomenoogy of the mode introduced in II. The interesting CMB features of this are the non-zero TB and EB spectra produced by the chira tensor spectrum. We wi cacuate the expected TB and EB spectra and make forecasts of their detectabiity by the LiteBIRD sateite in the presence of cosmic-variance, residua foregrounds, instrumenta noise, gravitationa ensing, and poarimeter sef-caibration. The anisotropies on the CMB are cacuated by the integration of the primordia perturbation spectra over the transfer functions describing the evoution of perturbations with time. The tensor contribution to the anguar power spectra of the anisotropies are [, 4 6] C t,xx C t,yy = 4π d(n k [ Ph L (k + Ph R (k ] t X,(k t X,(k, = 4π d(n k [ Ph L (k Ph R (k ] t Y,(k t Y,(k. where X X = {T T, T E, EE, BB} and Y Y = {T B, EB}, and t X, (k indicates the tensor transfer function [45]. To cacuate these spectra we use the CLASS code [46], making the necessary modifications for it to cacuate TB and EB spectra. In Figure we pot exampes of the BB and TB spectra cacuated in this way for a few different combinations of the mode parameters, and compare them to the noise contributions from ensing, instrument noise and foreground residuas that we wi consider ater. In this paper we assess the detectabiity of the chiraity of the primordia GWB over the parameter space spanned by (r, k p, σ. Therefore, we cacuate the expected signa-to-noise of the combined TB and EB spectra [9]: ( S max = N TB+EB = C XX X X,X 3X 4 (5 [ξ ] XXX3X4 C X3X4, (6 where X X, X 3 X 4 = {T T, EE, BB, T E, T B, EB}, and ξ is the covariance of our estimate of the power spectra given a certain theoretica and experimenta setup: ξ XXX3X4 = (ĈXX C XX (ĈX3X4 C X3X4 = XX3 (+f sky ( C C XX4 XX4 + C C XX3, where tides indicate the observed spectrum: CXX = C XX + N XX, with N XX denoting the noise spectrum, and the cacuation of ξ is detaied in Appendix B. max denotes the highest mutipoe we consider, which in this case is 500.

5 5 (, (, (σ, k p [Mpc ] (, (4, (4, (4, P(k k [Mpc ] FIG. : The predicted tensor spectrum, P L,Sourced h, for three sets of parameters: (bue: σ =, r = 0.07, k p = Mpc, (orange: σ =, r = 0.07, k p = Mpc, (green: σ =, r = 0.07, k p = Mpc. Simiary, we can cacuate the detectabiity of the primordia GWB, as opposed to its chiraity, by cacuating the signa-to-noise of its contribution to the BB spectrum. In the case of no ensing, this is simpy: ( [ ] S max ( + C BB = f sky, (7 N BB C BB = However, one of the major sources of uncertainty in a measurement of the BB spectrum is due to gravitationa ensing. As the CMB propagates to us from the surface of ast scattering it is gravitationay ensed by the intervening matter density, converting primary E-mode anisotropies to secondary B-mode anisotropies, which then need to be accounted for in measurements of BB [47]. We can separate the contributions to BB into C BB BB, Prim = C + C BB, Lens, where Prim, Lens refer to the BB, Prim BB, Lens primordia and ensed contributions respectivey. We are interested in measuring C, and in effect C acts as an extra source of noise, with an unknown ampitude. The modification required to cacuate the signa-to-noise of the primordia BB signa is to consider the matrix: such that: F ij = max = ( + f sky C BB, i ( C BB, j C BB, (8 ( S = N BB,i (F (9 ii

6 6 (σ, k p [Mpc ] BB (, (4, (4, (4, TB (, (, EB (+ π C [µk ] BB, LiteBIRD N + C BB,Lensing C BB,Vac (r 0.05 = FIG. : Left pane: C BB for the same three sets of parameters used in Figure : (bue: σ =, r = 0.07, k p = Mpc, (orange: σ =, r = 0.07, k p = Mpc, (green: σ =, r = 0.07, k p = Mpc compared to the LiteBIRD noise spectrum with % foregrounds (soid back, the ensing BB spectrum (dashed back, and the standard vacuum fuctuation (r = 0.07 consistent with the BKP r < 0.07 (95% C.L. (dash-dot back. The axion-su( spectra contain a contribution from vacuum fuctuations with r = 0 5, as is used in the text. Right pane: C T B (soid coour and C EB (dashed coour spectra for the same three sets of parameters. Shown in back C BB is an exampe of the spurious TB signa induced by poarimeter miscaibration for an ange of one arcminute, as discussed in III C. where the indices i, j run pver Prim, Lens. Note that we wi assume that the temperature spectrum is perfecty known over the range of scaes we are interested in, and that the sourced contribution to the scaar spectrum is negigibe [3]: CTT = C TT. A. Cosmic-variance imited case Here, we discuss the signa-to-noise of the TB, EB, and BB spectra in the case of cosmic variance-imited observations: CXX = C XX. In this scenario, in the absence of ensing, Equation 7 has the simpe anaytic form ( S N BB = f sky( max + 3( max /. The signa-to-noise of the TB and EB spectra cacuated using Equation 6 are shown in Figure 3 for the parameter space of the mode, assuming a ensed BB spectrum with f sky =. We consider ony r < 0.07, in ine with current observationa constraints on the scae-invariant tensor-to-scaar ratio r 0.05 < 0.07 (95%C.L., where the subscript indicates the pivot scae in Mpc [7]. Figure demonstrates that the shape of C BB is strongy dependent on the position of the peak in the GW spectrum, k p, and aso on the width of the peak, σ. Therefore, the BKP bound on r does not simpy impy the same bound on r ; a sma vaue of k p and σ coud aow a arge vaue of r without exceeding the BKP imit, due to the sma scae damping of C BB. However, excepting O( underestimation for sma k p, the BKP bound provides a usefu guide as to what is aowed by current observations.

7 k p = Mpc ( S N TB+EB k p = 7e 05 Mpc ( S N TB+EB σ σ FIG. 3: Signa-to-noise of TB + EB spectra assuming the perfect case of f sky =, with no foreground contamination, noiseess observations, and no deensing. The back dashed ine indicates the bounds paced by r < Left pane: k p = Mpc. Right pane: k p = Mpc. The vaues of k p = Mpc and k p = Mpc were chosen as they probe different scaes to which L, Sourced the CMB is sensitive. Ph (k is more sharpy peaked for smaer σ and so for a given r the signa-to-noise decreases with decreasing σ. As σ increases the tensor spectrum becomes amost scae-invariant over the range of scaes accessibe with the CMB and so the signa-to-noise does not depend on σ for arge vaues of σ. Figure 3 shows that the maximum achievabe signa-to-noise is 3 and that the chiraity is undetectabe with S N for r 0.0. B. Incuding instrument noise and foreground contamination We now consider instrument noise, contamination of the spectrum due to imperfect foreground separation, and assume that we are unabe to perform any deensing. The mode we use for the noise spectrum incudes the instrument noise in the CMB channes, the residua foregrounds in the fina CMB map (assumed to be at a eve of %, foowing Refs. [9, 34, 48, 49] and the instrumenta noise from channes used for foreground ceaning that is introduced into the CMB channes by the ceaning process. The detais of how we combine these factors to produce a fina noise contribution to the measured CMB spectrum, as we as the instrument specifications for LiteBIRD can be found in Appendix C. In the eft pane of Figure we show the contributions to the BB noise spectrum, N BB, from ensing, LiteBIRD instrumenta noise, and foreground residuas compared to the primordia C BB.. BB Signa-to-Noise We cacuate Equation 9 over the avaiabe parameter space and show the resut in Figure 4. In a simiar way to the TB and EB signa-to-noise we see that there is some dependence on σ, especiay in the case of smaer k p. This is expected since k p = Mpc is sighty smaer than those scaes to which we expect the CMB to be sensitive [0]. Therefore, we expect that reducing σ for this vaue of k p wi eventuay excude the tensor perturbations from contributing to CMB scaes, expaining the sharp decrease in S/N for ow σ and a given r. From Figure 4 it is cear that we can detect the primordia contribution to BB for r > 0 3, which is consistent with the aim of LiteBIRD to achieve an uncertainty on the nu case of r = 0 of ess than 0 3.

8 k p = Mpc 0.07 k p = 7e 05 Mpc σ 0 0 ( S N BB, Prim σ 0 0 ( S N BB, Prim FIG. 4: Signa-to-noise of BB spectrum assuming no deensing and % foreground contamination and LiteBIRD instrumenta noise added using method described in Appendix C. The dashed ine refers to the observationa constraint of r = The signa-to-noise achieved in BB is much arger than that in TB+EB as the cosmic variances of BB and TB are proportiona to, and C BB than in BB. Left pane: k p = Mpc. Right pane: k p = Mpc (C BB C T T, respectivey. The factor of C T T means cosmic variance in the TB spectrum is much more significant. TB+EB Signa-to-Noise Lensing affects the TB and EB signa-to-noise ony through, since the direct ensing contributions to TB and EB are negigibe [9, 4]. We cacuate Equation 6 over the avaiabe parameter space, now incuding instrument noise for a LiteBIRD-type experiment (with parameters shown in Tabe II, foreground residuas, and gravitationa ensing, and show the resut in Figure 5. Over the aowed parameter space, the maximum achievabe signa-to-noise is S N. Whist for r 0.03 LiteBIRD can not detect chiraity in this mode, compared to r 0.0 in the CV-imited case. The right pane of Figure demonstrates that the TB and EB signa peaks at 0, making the arge scae foreground residua contribution to the noise, shown in the eft pane of Figure, the dominant factor causing this reduction in sensitivity. Improvements in foreground ceaning agorithms coud reduce the eve of foreground contamination, and perhaps aow a arger sky fraction to be used in the anaysis. However, even with perfect contro of these factors, the cosmicvariance imit of Figure 3 can not be beaten. We concude from this study that the most important factor imiting the sensitivity of CMB observations to the chiraity of the GWB is the arge cosmic variance of the TB and EB spectra due to arge scaar T and E signas, respectivey. C BB C. Simutaneous detection and sef-caibration In order to achieve its baseine performance target, LiteBIRD wi require an uncertainty on the poarimeter caibration ange of ess than one arcminute [50, 5]. There are severa methods that have been used in the past to caibrate poarimeters such as poarized astrophysica sources ike the Crab Nebua (Tau A, or man-made sources such as a poarization seective mesh. There are many factors preventing such methods achieving caibrations better than one degree. For exampe, Tau A is the best candidate for a point-ike poarized source, but this provides a caibration uncertainty of 0.5 degrees [5], and with these it is hard to achieve a caibration uncertainty better than one degree [53]. The poarization of Tau A aso has a poory understood frequency dependence, and is utimatey an extended source, making it poory suited to a characterization of the poarized beam [54]. Man-made sources on the other hand must often be paced in the near fied and are unstabe over ong time frames. However, a recent proposa of a baoon-borne artificia poarization source in the far fied of ground-based experiments may ameiorate this probem for ground-based teescopes [54].

9 k p = Mpc.5 ( S N TB+EB k p = 7e 05 Mpc.5 ( S N TB+EB σ σ FIG. 5: Signa-to-noise of TB + EB spectra assuming no deensing and % foreground contamination and LiteBIRD instrumenta noise added using method described in Appendix C. The dashed ine refers to the observationa constraint of r = Left pane k p = Mpc. Right pane: k p = Mpc. LiteBIRD pans to sef-caibrate its poarimeter using the EB spectrum, which is assumed to have zero contribution from primordia perturbations [55]. Unfortunatey this makes assumptions about cosmoogy, and uses part of the constraining power to caibrate the instrument, instead of for science. Furthermore, residua foreground contributions to TB and EB may resut in a biasing of the caibration ange. Ref. [56] shows that a miscaibration ange of 0.5 degrees can resut in a bias in the recovered vaue of r of 0 3, which is significant for LiteBIRD s aim to push constraints on r to r 0 3. However, Ref. [56] aso finds that TB and EB are consistent with zero in a study of the ow-foreground BICEP region. Furthermore, in a study of the Panck data Ref. [57] finds that TB and EB are both consistent with zero for sky fractions up to f sky = 0.3, and that TB increases to significant eves ony for arger sky fractions, whist EB is ony marginay non-zero for f sky = 0.7. Therefore whist foregrounds must be considered, they do not necessariy imit the use of this approach to caibration. We want to study the detectabiity of primordia TB and EB correations when taking sef-caibration into account. The sef-caibration process is carried out by zeroing the miscaibration ψ by measuring its contribution to the TB and EB spectra. In this anaysis we wi assume that residua foreground contributions to TB and EB are negigibe. If the ange of the poarimeter is miscaibrated by some ange ψ the measured Q, U wi be rotated. We work with the spin- quantities (Q ± iu(ˆn which have the transformation properties under rotation: ( Q ± iũ(ˆn = e±i ψ (Q ± iu(ˆn. E and B can be computed to find: ãt m ã E m = cos( ψ sin( ψ 0 sin( ψ cos( ψ ã B m at m a E m a B m which give the resuting rotations of the anguar power spectra: C T E cos( ψ sin( ψ C T B sin( ψ cos( ψ C EE = 0 0 cos ( ψ sin ( ψ sin(4 ψ C BB 0 0 sin ( ψ cos ( ψ sin(4 ψ C EB sin(4 ψ 0 0 sin(4 ψ cos(4 ψ rot We then repace the primordia spectra in our expression for C with the rotated spectra: C XX = C XX rot + N XX. C T E C T B C EE C BB C EB. (0

10 We jointy estimate the uncertainty on the miscaibration ange and the recovered ampitude of the TB and EB spectra parametrized by r using the Fisher information: F ij = max X X,X 3X 4 = 0 C XX [ξ CX3X4 XXX3X4 ] ( a i a j where a i, a j = ψ, r. The uncertainty on the miscaibration ange is then given by (σ ψ = (F ψ ψ. We can easiy cacuate the derivatives with respect to ψ in Equation using Equation 0. In order to cacuate the derivatives with respect to r we write: C T B/EB = r C T B/EB (r =. In order to study the interaction of the miscaibration ange and primordia chiraity we cacuate the correation coefficient: α F ψ F ψ ψ F r. We now cacuate the -sigma uncertainty in a measurement of the miscaibration ange ψ and α over the aowed parameter space of the mode and show the resuting contour pots in Figure 6. We find that for LiteBIRD σ ψ < arcmin for a of the aowed space, making the simutaneous caibration of the poarimeter and detection of the parity-vioation possibe. The correation coefficient is ess than 0.03 for the aowed parameter space, indicating that the effects of primordia parity-vioation and miscaibration are easiy separabe. This can be understood from the right pane of Figure where it is cear that the primordia signa is a arge scae effect, with maximum signa at 0, whereas the contribution to TB from miscaibration is a sma scae effect which dominates at > 00. This is supported by the σ dependence of α in the eft pane of Figure 6. The two effects become more correated for arger vaues of σ which correspond to fatter spectra, and hence more power at sma scaes. Varying k p has itte effect on the resut that the effects are separabe, but does introduce some interesting dependence on σ. This indicates that a sufficienty high max is necessary for the separation of these effects. For smaer vaues of k p, σ ψ becomes more dependent on σ. For exampe, with k p = Mpc, for a given r, σ ψ increases with σ since the fatter spectra of arge σ become more important when k p is further away from the sma scaes at which the miscaibration effect occurs. On the other hand when k p = Mpc the dependence on σ is reversed. This is because the miscaibartion effect peaks at 00, which corresponds to contributions from modes around k 00/η 0 = Mpc, where η 0 is the comoving distance to the surface of ast scattering. Therefore an increase of σ for k p Mpc wi make the signas ess correated as the fatter spectra wi introduce more power at arger scaes. In concusion, any reduction in sensitivity to TB and EB due to the caibration requirements is negigibe, and is ignored in the resuts we quote for LiteBIRD. Our resuts are in agreement with Refs [5, 36], which aso find that the primordia and miscaibration contributions are readiy separabe. D. CMB Resuts Here, we summarize the findings of the CMB section and provide a prognosis of the usefuness of CMB observations in detecting gravitationa wave chiraity. In the case of cosmic variance-imited utimate observations we found that over the parameter space of the mode the maximum signa-to-noise achievabe was 3 for the argest vaues of r, and that the chiraity is undetectabe for r 0.0, in agreement with previous studies of simper modes of chira GWBs with neary scae-invariant spectra [4 6]. Moving on to the reaistic case of a LiteBIRD-ike experiment with no deensing capabiity, a % eve of foreground residuas, and a simutaneous sef-caibration, we find that for the argest aowabe vaues of r it may achieve a signa-to-noise of.0, making the chiraity detectabe. The chiraity is undetectabe by LiteBIRD for r Though a detection with a two sigma significance may be of interest, it is ony achievabe for a sma part of the parameter space, 0.03 r 0.07, and in any event we have demonstrated that we may not exceed a S N of 3 using CMB two-point statistics. We aso investigated a COrE+ design with the same eve of foreground residuas as LiteBIRD and found that is performed very simiary to LiteBIRD since both instruments woud be imited by foreground residuas on the arge scaes we are interested in. As stated in I we wi not gain anything extra from Stage 4 observations, as they are imited to 30. Therefore, in order to make stronger statistica detections of this mode using the CMB, higher order statistica techniques taking advantage of the mode s non-gaussianity may have

11 0.07 k p = Mpc k p = Mpc α σ ψ (arcmin σ σ FIG. 6: Correation coefficient α (eft and -σ uncertainty on the poarimeter caibration (right for LiteBIRD, cacuated over the aowed parameter space of the mode assuming % foreground residua and no deensing. The dashed ine shows the observationa constraint of r = more success as shown for the axion-u( mode [9]. Aternativey, we can investigate different physica probes atogether. In the next section, we consider compementary constraints on the axion-su( mode from space-based aser interferometer gravitationa wave observatories. IV. LASER INTERFEROMETERS Due to the strong scae-dependence of the tensor spectrum, it may be possibe to study the case of arge k p using aser interferometer gravitationa wave observatories. Previous studies have indicated that the scae-invariant spectrum of singe-fied sow-ro infation woud be too weak at interferometer scaes to be detected by current generation interferometers such as LIGO [58], VIRGO [59], and LISA [38]. However, the mode we consider has a arge feature at k p, therefore for k p Mpc, current generation interferometers may be sensitive to the GWB of the axion-su( mode. It shoud be noted that it is difficut to have a sourced gravitationa wave spectrum with a sharp peak on interferometer scaes. This is because of the attractor behaviour of the background axion fied couped to the SU( gauge fieds (see Appendix A. As a resut, we consider the rather fat spectra seen in Figure 7. For such fat spectra one may expect any signa detectabe with interferometers woud aso be detectabe on CMB scaes, making the use of interferometers redundant. We therefore first demonstrate the compementarity of our CMB and interferometer studies. We compare their sensitivities as a function of the frequency f of the gravitationa wave background. The quantity we use to compare sensitivities is the minimum detectabe fractiona energy density in primordia gravitationa waves today: Ω GW (f ρ c ρ GW n(f ( where ρ c is the critica density to cose the Universe evauated today, and ρ GW = c 3π G ḣijḣij, where h ij δgij T T /a. The cacuation for the CMB is detaied in Appendix D, and for interferometers in the remainder of this section. Figure 7 dispays the minimum detectabe fractiona energy density using the CMB and interferometers for Panck, LiteBIRD, an advanced LISA [38]and BBO [60]. We see that LiteBIRD has a much improved sensitivity to chiraity, compared to Panck, which is due to its much ower instrumenta noise. The two potted theoretica spectra are ceary detectabe by LISA or BBO, without being detectabe at CMB scaes, making interferometers an independent, compementary probe of the primordia spectrum of the axion-su( mode.

12 h Ω min GW k [Mpc ] BBO V BBO I LISA I LISA V LiteBIRD V Panck V f [Hz] FIG. 7: Comparison of the sensitivity curves for LiteBIRD, Panck, LISA, and BBO corresponding to a signa-to-noise of one at a given frequency in intensity (I or poarization (V. At the top horizonta axis we aso show the corresponding wavenumber k computed via = f. Aso potted are the primordia spectra for the parameters: Mpc Hz kp = 03 Mpc, σ = 9, r = 835 (back dotted and k p = 0 Mpc, σ = 8, r = 0.5 (back dash-dotted. Note that beow f = 0 7 Hz transfer function of the fractiona gravitationa wave background energy density changes due to the transition between matter and radiation dominated eras. We see that even for the arge vaues of σ required by the arge k p vaues of the axion-su( mode LISA and BBO can make a detection that woud sti be inaccessibe at CMB scaes. This motivates the evauation of signato-noise for the interferometers. Note that the CMB sensitivity curves have been smoothed with a Gaussian kerne due to the sharp osciations introduced by the transfer function (Equation D. A. Interferometer notation Laser interferometers consist of a set of test masses paced at nodes and inked by aser beams. Interferometry is used to measure the change in the optica path ength between test masses. A passing gravitationa wave induces a time-dependent osciation in the optica path ength, which can be isoated from noise by taking cross-correations between detectors. The metric perturbation at point x at time t, h ij (t, x, can be decomposed into a superposition of pane waves [6]: h ij (t, x = d 3 kc P (k sin(ckt k x + Φ(ke P ij(ˆω, P where we use the transverse traceess basis tensors with normaization e P ij (ˆΩe P ij (ˆΩ = δ P P, and P = +,. It is more convenient to dea with compex vaues, and so we rewrite this as: h ij (t, x = P df d ˆΩ hp (f, ˆΩ exp(πif(t x ˆΩ e P c ij(ˆω, where ck = πf, k x = πf ˆΩ x c, and ˆΩ is a unit vector in the direction of propagation of the gravitationa wave. Since

13 3 x 3 x x z [L] z [L] x x x 3 0 x x x x [L] 0 y [L] 0 x [L] 0 y [L] FIG. 8: Possibe designs for future space-based aser interferometers. The bue arrows show the aser inks used in the Micheson interferometer signas defined in Equation 8. Left pane: One consteation design of a space-based interferometer, this corresponds to the baseine LISA design. The points x i show the i th sateite. Right pane: An advanced stage design of LISA or BBO with two consteations. The points x ij show the j th sateite on the i th consteation. the coefficients satisfy h P (f, ˆΩ = h P ( f, ˆΩ, h ij (t, x is expicity rea. The theory we are deaing with produces a highy non-gaussian GWB [6]. We can summarize the two-point statistics using the foowing expectation vaues of the Fourier coefficients, but this wi not capture a the avaiabe information: ( h+ (f, ˆΩh +(f, ˆΩ h + (f, ˆΩh (f, ˆΩ h (f, ˆΩh +(f, ˆΩ h (f, ˆΩh (f, ˆΩ h P (f, ˆΩh P (f, ˆΩ = δ(f f δ( (ˆΩ ˆΩ S P P h (f 4π = δ(f f δ( (ˆΩ ˆΩ ( I(f iv (f 4π iv (f I(f, (3 where I(f and V (f are the Stokes parameters for intensity and circuar poarization respectivey. As shown beow, V (f quantifies the difference between the ampitudes of two circuar poarization states and hence is a cean observabe for the chira GWB [30 3]. B. Interferometer response In this section, we present the design of the interferometers for which we wi forecast the sensitivity to a poarized gravitationa wave background. This anaysis uses the designs proposed by Ref. [33]. We summarise some of the resuts of Ref. [33] here, however for further detais we refer readers to Ref. [33]. Let us consider a set of masses paced at positions x i, and the phase change, φ ij, of ight as it traves from mass i at time t i to mass j arriving at time t [63]: φ ij (t = df d ˆn h P (f, ˆne P ab(ˆne iπf(ti ˆn xi D ab (û ij ˆn, f, (4 P where D ab is the singe-arm transfer function which contains a the geometric information about the instrument and must be derived individuay for each interferometer set-up [64], and û ij is a unit vector pointing from detector i to detector j. We now define the Fourier transform of a signa g(t observed for a time T : g(f = T/ g(t exp( πift. T/

14 The Fourier transform of the phase change φ is then: T/ ( φ ij (f = dt df d ˆΩ h P (f, ˆΩ exp iπf (t x ˆΩ πift D ab (û ij ˆn, f T/ c P ( = df δ T (f f d ˆΩ h P (f, ˆΩ exp iπf x ˆΩ D ab (û ij ˆn, f, c P where δ T is a finite-time approximation to the deta function defined as δ T (f f T sinc (πt (f f, with the properties: δ T (0 = T, im T δ T (f δ(f. We may form a signa by constructing a inear combination of phase changes aong different paths around the instrument, and then cross-correating these signas. The signa we seek to measure is stochastic and so to distinguish it from noise we must cross-correate the detector output with the output from a detector with independent noise properties. The expectation of the cross correated signa wi be composed of terms ike: φ ij (f φ k (f = df df d ˆΩ d ˆΩ δ T (f f δ T (f f h P (f, ˆΩ h P (f, ˆΩ P P exp ( πif tˆω x i exp ( πif tˆω x k D ab (û ij ˆΩ, f D cd (û k ˆΩ, f e P ab (ˆΩ e P cd (ˆΩ. Using h P (f, ˆΩ h P (f, ˆΩ = h P (f, ˆΩ h P ( f, ˆΩ, and D ab (û ij ˆΩ, f = D ab (û ij ˆΩ, f we can write this as: R ijk P P φ ij (f φ k (f = R ijk P P (f = 4π df δ T (f f δ T (f f S PP h (f R ijk P P (f, d ˆΩ exp ( πif ˆΩ (x i x k D ab (û ij ˆΩ, fd cd (û k ˆΩ, fe P ab (ˆΩ e P cd (ˆΩ. is referred to as the response function of the detector. R depends on the reative position and orientation of the arms i j and k, as we as the transfer functions of the two arms. In the remainder of this section we consider two interferometer designs. In IV B we consider the baseine design for near-future space-based interferometers such as the European Space Agency-ed Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA [37], and in IV B we consider two futuristic advanced stage LISA-ike missions simiar to the proposed Big Bang Observatory (BBO [60]. 4 (5 (6 (7. One consteation In this section, we consider the design shown in the eft pane of Figure 8. This is the baseine design of the LISA mission, and consists of three sateites paced at the vertices x i of an equiatera triange of side L, and a tota of six aser inks between the sateites, aowing for measurement of the phase change φ ij where i, j = {,, 3}, i j. We define the foowing three signas: s α (t = ( φ (t L + φ (t L φ 3 (t L φ 3 (t L + n α (t, s γ (t = ( φ 3(t L + φ 3 (t L φ 3 (t L φ 3 (t L + n γ (t, (8 s β (t = s α (t + s γ (t. The equiatera design means that the aser phase noise, which is the dominant contribution to the noise terms n(t, cances [64]. Furthermore Ref. [33] shows that signas α and β have independent noise properties. We therefore consider their cross-correations: where X, X = {α, β}, and: R XX I (f = 4π R XX V (f = 4π s X (fs X (f = [ δ(f f R XX I ] (fi(f + R XX V (fv (f, (9 [ d ˆΩ F + + X (f, û ˆΩF X (f, û ˆΩ + F X (f, û ˆΩF X (f, û ˆΩ ], [ d ˆΩ F + X (f, û ˆΩF X (f, û ˆΩ F + X (f, û ˆΩF X (f, û ˆΩ ], (0

15 5 and [33, 64, 65]: FX P (f, ˆΩ û = Dij X (f, û ˆΩe P ij(ˆω, D α (f, û ˆΩ = exp( πif ˆΩ [ x û û T MI (f, ˆn û ˆv ˆv T MI (f, ˆΩ ] ˆv, D β (f, û ˆΩ = D α (f, û ˆΩ [ + exp( πif ˆn x 3 û û T MI (f, ˆΩ û ŵ ŵ T MI (f, ˆΩ ] ŵ, [ ( T MI (f, ˆΩ û = f( û sinc ˆΩ ( exp i f ( (3 + û f f ˆΩ f( + û + sinc ˆΩ ( exp i f ] ( + û f f ˆΩ. Consider the instrument s response to a gravitationa wave traveing in the direction ˆΩ = (θ, φ, and another traveing in a direction with θ π θ, i.e. refected in the x y pane. Since the vectors û, ˆv, ŵ, x i are a in the x y pane it is easy to see that the products x ˆΩ, û ˆΩ etc. are invariant. Under this transformation ony the z part of the basis tensor e + ab (ˆΩ is atered. Since D ab (f, ˆΩ û is non-zero ony in the x y part, then the product D ab (f, ˆΩ ûe + ab (ˆΩ is invariant. On the other hand the x y part of the e ab (ˆΩ tensor changes sign, meaning that D ab (f, ˆΩ ûe ab (ˆΩ changes sign. Therefore, when performing the anguar integra in Equation 0 the terms with a singe power of F X (f, ˆΩ û go to zero, giving R XX V (f = 0. The concusion is that co-panar detectors are not sensitive to the circuar poarization of the gravitationa wave background. This is true of other types of detectors with panar geometries such as pusar timing arrays and individua ground-based detectors such as LIGO [58]. To gain sensitivity to circuar poarization we need to introduce non-co-panar detector arms. Others [3] have considered using cross-correations between ground-based detectors ike LIGO, VIRGO [59], and KAGRA [66], which have a suitabe geometry. In the next subsection we consider an extension to LISA in which we add a second consteation of three sateites to break the co-panar geometry.. Two-consteations The extended LISA set-up is shown in the right pane of Figure 8. It consists of two consteations of three equa-arm detectors. The two consteations are separated by a rotation of π radians and a transation of DLẑ. The j th detector on the i th consteation is at position x ij, and the unit vectors joining them are given by: u i = (x i x i /L, v i = (x i3 x i /L, w i = (x i3 x i /L. We base this anaysis on the designs proposed by Ref. [33] which optimize the parameters L and D to achieve equa sensitivity to intensity and poarization of the gravitationa wave background. Simiar designs have aso been considered by [60, 64, 67]. We use the signas defined in Equation 8, but α, β are now written α i, β i where i refers to the consteation on which we are measuring the signa. The detector transfer functions are the same as the singe-consteation, but with extra indices referring to the consteation we are considering [33, 64]: D αi (f, û i ˆn = exp( πif ˆn x i [û i û i T MI (f, ˆn û i ˆv i ˆv i T MI (f, ˆn ˆv i ], D βi (f, û i ˆn = D α (f, û i ˆn + exp( πif ˆn x i3 [û i û i T MI (f, ˆn û i ŵ i ŵ i T MI (f, ˆn ŵ i ]. ( Foowing [33] we then combine Equations 8 to form estimators sensitive to just intensity or circuar poarization: δ T (f f R I (fi(f [ s α (f + s β (f ] [ s α (f + s β (f ], δ T (f f R V (fv (f s α (fs β (f s β (fs α (f. ( We wi consider two experimenta configurations of the two-consteation, introduced in Ref. [33]: LISA with L = 0 9 m, D = 7, T = 0 years, and BBO with L = m, D =, T = 0 years. These designs are optimized to achieve roughy equa sensitivity to I and V. C. Interferometer signa-to-noise Under the assumption that the signas we are cross-correating have independent noise properties and are Gaussiandistributed, and that the noise spectrum dominates over the signa, then the signa-to-noise in the interferometer is

16 6 given by [33, 64, 65]: ( S N I,V = T 0 df ( 3H 0 RI,V (fω I,V GW (f 4π f 6 Sn I,V, (3 (f where Sn I,V (f is the power spectrum of the noise in the I, V signas, and Ω I,V GW is the fractiona energy density of gravitationa waves in intensity and circuar poarization today, defined in Equation. To find the background fractiona energy density today we mutipy the primordia spectrum by the appropriate transfer function [0, 68, 69]: Ω I,V GW (f = Ω R,0 4 (PL (f ± P R (f, where Ω R,0 is the fractiona energy density in radiation today. Up to this point we have not discussed the noise, since it vanishes in the cross-correations we consider. However it sti contributes to the variance of the estimators in Equations. There are three major sources of noise in measurements of a particuar optica path through an interferometer: shot noise S n,s (f, acceerometer noise S n,a (f, and the dominant aser phase noise, S n,φ (f. As pointed out in IV B the major motivation for using equa-arm Micheson interferometers, as given in the first two ines of Equations 8, is the canceation of the aser phase noise. The shot and acceeration noises can be approximated by taking the fiducia LISA [37] and BBO [60] vaues and scaing them to an instrument with arm ength L observing at frequency f [64]. The fina expressions for Sn I,V (f are derived by Ref. [33]: S I n(f = 4 S V n (f = 96 SI n(f, [ ( ( ] f S n,s (f + S n,a (f + cos, f where the vaues for S n,a (f and S s,a (f for LISA and BBO are given in Ref. [33]. As is the case for the CMB, our Gaaxy contains sources of gravitationa waves that may act as a confusion noise to a measurement of the GWB [70, 7]. It is expected that compact binary systems in our Gaaxy wi form a gravitationa wave foreground with an ampitude in intensity of Ω W D 0 in the mhz regime. The shape of this spectrum is quite compicated because different periods of a binary system s evoution dominate at different frequencies and have different frequency dependences [70]. For the design of LISA we consider we expect the impact of such a foreground to be sma compared to the acceeration noise [7]. The BBO design we consider peaks at 0.3 Hz, which is expected to be reativey free of such sources of noise [73, 74]. However, we are mainy interested in detecting chiraity of the GWB, and this is more easiy distinguished from astrophysica foregrounds, and accordingy previous studies have not considered poarised foregrounds [0, 33, 75]. Therefore, we do not consider a contribution to the noise from astrophysica foregrounds in intensity or in poarisation, but it shoud be noted that we expect a sma degradation in the achievabe intensity sensitivity of the fiducia LISA design compared to our resut, due to the confusion noise of astrophysica sources. (4 D. Interferometer resuts In Figure 9 we pot signa-to-noise contours for LISA assuming k p = 0 Mpc and in Figure 0 we pot the corresponding contours for BBO assuming k p = 0 3 Mpc. We see that both the LISA and BBO configurations may detect a poarized gravitationa wave background with signa-to-noise greater than one in a regime unavaiabe to the CMB. In the case of LISA the signa-to-noise for k p = 0 3 Mpc is of order one. However, we see that a BBOike design far exceeds the sensitivity of LISA, probing a much arger range of r for the arge k p vaues, inaccessibe to CMB experiments. A singe consteation design described in IV B woud achieve equivaent sensitivity in I to LISA and BBO, but with no V sensitivity. Therefore, the fiducia LISA design woud be sensitive to the infationary mode we consider here, since a positive detection of I at these scaes with no corresponding detection on CMB scaes woud require a strong scae dependence of the gravitationa wave spectrum. V. DISCUSSION In this paper we have considered for the first time the detectabiity of a new mode for the production of gravitationa waves proposed in Ref. [3]. Given the increasing effort to measure the B-mode spectrum of the CMB, this is an important step in estabishing the origins of any detected primordia tensor perturbations. This mode has a unique tensor spectrum characterized by its scae-dependence and chiraity, both of which we use in order to find observationa markers that aow it to be distinguished from the conventiona primordia gravitationa waves produced by vacuum