arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 10 Oct 2017
|
|
- Berenice Wiggins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A direct test of the integral Yang-Mills equations through SU) monopoles C. P. Constantinidis, L. A. Ferreira and G. Luchini arxiv: v1 hep-th] 1 Oct 17 Departamento de Física Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo UFES), CEP 975-9, Vitória-ES, Brazil Instituto de Física de São Carlos; IFSC/USP; Universidade de São Paulo Caixa Postal 369, CEP , São Carlos-SP, Brazil Abstract We use the SU) t Hooft-Polyakov monopole configuration, and its BPS version, to test the integral equations of the Yang-Mills theory. Those integral equations involve two complex) parameters which do not appear in the differential Yang-Mills equations, and if they are considered to be arbitrary it then implies that non-abelian gauge theories but not abelian ones) possess an infinity of integral equations. For static monopole configurations only one of those parameters is relevant. We expand the integral Yang-Mills equation in a power series of that parameter and show that the t Hooft-Polyakov monopole and its BPS version satisfy the integral equations obtained in first and second order of that expansion. Our results points to the importance of exploring the physical consequences of such an infinity of integral equations on the global properties of the Yang-Mills theory.
2 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to perform a test of the integral equations of Yang-Mills theories, recently proposed in 1, ], using the SU) t Hooft-Polyakov monopole solution 3, 4] as well as its exact analytical BPS version 5, 6]. The main motivation for such a test is that these integral equations involve two complex parameters that are not present in the Yang-Mills partial differential equations. If those parameters are arbitrary, it means that contrary to abelian electromagnetism, Yang-Mills theories possess in fact an infinity of integral equations. Indeed, by expanding the Yang-Mills integral equations in power series of those parameters, we check that the SU) t Hooft-Polyakov monopole, and its BPS version, do satisfy the integral equations appearing in that expansion, up to second order in one of the parameters. The cancelations involved in such a check are highly non-trivial and give strong evidence on the arbitrariness of those parameters. As shown in 1, ] the integral Yang-Mills equations lead in a quite natural way to gauge invariant conserved charges. Such charges involve those two parameters in a way that if they are indeed arbitrary it would imply that in principle, the number of charges is infinite. However, due to some special properties of BPS multi-dyon solutions 7, 8], shown in 9], the higher charges are not really independent for such solutions, being in fact powers of the first ones the electric and magnetic charges). The same is true for the SU) t Hooft-Polyakov monopole. There remains to be investigated if other non-bps solutions also present such special properties or not, and so possess or not an infinity of charges. In order to discuss the role of such parameters in a more concrete way let us start by the theory of electromagnetism described by the Maxwell equations µ f µν = j ν µ f µν = 1.1) where f µν = µ a ν ν a µ, f µν = 1 ε µνρλf ρλ, j µ being the external four current, and a µ the electromagnetic four vector potential. The integral version of those equations is obtained through the abelian Stokes theorem for a rank-two antisymmetric tensor b µν on a space-time 3-volume Ω, as Ω b = Ω d b, where Ω is the border of Ω. Taking b µν as a linear combination of f µν and its Hodge dual, and using 1.1), one gets ˆ α f µν + β f ] ˆ µν dσ µν = β j µνρ dv µνρ 1.) Ω where j µνρ = ε µνρλ j λ is the Hodge dual of the external current and α and β are arbitrary parameters used in the liner combination. By considering α and β to be arbitrary, the integral equations 1.) correspond to the four usual integral equations of electromagnetic theory, which in fact preceded Maxwell differential equations. Indeed, taking α = and Ω to be a purely spatial 3-volume one gets the Gauss law. On the hand, taking β = and Ω to be a solid cylinder with its height in the time direction, and its base on a spatial plane, one gets the Faraday law, and so on. The role of the parameters α and β are not really important here because 1.) is linear in them. The situation becomes more complex in a non-abelian gauge theory. 1 Ω
3 The Yang-Mills theories were formulated à la Maxwell in terms of partial differential equations, the so-called Yang-Mills equations1] D µ F µν = J ν D µ F µν = 1.3) where F µν = µ A ν ν A µ +i e A µ, A ν ], with e being the gauge coupling constant, F µν = 1 ε µνρλf ρλ, J µ being the external matter current, and D µ = µ +i e A µ, ], and A µ being the non-abelian gauge field taking value on the Lie algebra of the gauge group G. In order to construct the integral form of Yang-Mills equations 1.3) one needs the non-abelian version of the Stokes theorem for a non-abelian) rank-two antisymmetric tensor B µν on a space-time 3-volume Ω. Even though the non-abelian Stokes theorem for a one-form connection on a -surface was known for some time, the same theorem for a two-form connection was constructed only more recently in 11, 1] using concepts on generalized loop spaces. Conceptually everything becomes more clear if one uses the two-form B µν, defined on space-time, to construct a one-form connection on the generalized loop space. Using such generalized non-abelian Stokes theorem, the integral form of Yang-Mills equations were constructed in 1, ]. The formulas involve path, surface and volume ordered integrals as follows. Consider a space-time 3-volume Ω, and choose a reference point x R on its border Ω. Scan Ω with closed -surfaces based on x R, labelled by a variable ζ, such that ζ = corresponds to the infinitesimal surface around x R, and ζ = ζ to the border Ω. Then scan each closed -surface with loops, starting and ending at x R, labelled by a variable τ. Each loop is parameterized by a variable σ. The integral form of Yang-Mills equations 1.3) is given by 1, ] V Ω) P e ie Ω dσw αf µν+β F µν)w xµ x ν σ τ = P 3 e Ω dζv J V U Ω), 1.4) where P and P 3 mean surface and volume ordered integration respectively, as explained above, and J = ˆ σf + e ˆ σ { deβ J µνλ W dx µ dx ν dσ dσ d xκ d x µ d σ d σ dx λ dζ α 1) F W κρ + β F W κρ ) σ ), d x ρ σ ) d τ d x ν σ) d ζ d xρ σ ) d ζ αfµν W + β F ) ] µν W σ) d x ν )} σ) d τ with J µνλ = ε µνλρ J ρ, being the Hodge dual of the external matter current. In order to simplify the formulas we have used the notation 1.5) X W W X W 1.6) with X standing for the field tensor, its Hodge dual, or the dual of the matter currents. The quantity W appearing above stands for the Wilson line, defined on a path parameterized by σ through the equation dw dσ + iea dx µ µ dσ W = 1.7)
4 and so W = 1 i e ˆ σ dσ A µ σ ) dx µ dσ + i e) ˆ σ dσ A µ σ ) dx µ dσ ˆ σ dσ A ν σ ) dx ν ) dσ The quantity V, called the Wilson surface, is defined on a surface parameterized by σ and τ, through the equation with dv V T τ) =, 1.9) ˆ σf T τ) = ie dσ W αf µν + β F ) µν W xµ x ν σ τ. 1.1) and the integration being on the closed loops used in the scanning of Ω, as explained above. The initial and final values of σ, denoted and σ f respectively, correspond to the initial and final points of the loop, which in fact are the same point since the loop is always closed. Therefore the solution of 1.9) is the surface-ordered series ˆ τ ˆ τ V τ) = 1 + T τ ) + ˆ τ T τ )T τ ) ) The l.h.s. of 1.4) is obtained by integrating 1.9) on the -surface Ω, i.e. the border of Ω. On the other hand the r.h.s. of 1.4) is obtained by integrating the equation on the 3-volume Ω, and where du dζ K U = 1.1) ˆ K = Σ V J V 1.13) with Σ being the closed -surfaces scanning Ω, labelled by ζ, and J given by 1.5). The solution of 1.1) is given by the volume-ordered series ˆ ζ ˆ ζ ˆ ζ Uζ) = 1 + dζ Kζ ) + dζ dζ Kζ ) Kζ ) ) Note that 1.4) does reduce to 1.) in the case that the gauge group G is U1). However, for non-abelian gauge groups the dependence of both sides of 1.4) on the parameters α and β are highly non-linear. Indeed, if such parameters are arbitrary one can expand both sides of 1.4) in a power series on them. The coefficient of each term of such series on the l.h.s. of 1.4) will have to equal the corresponding coefficient of the series on the r.h.s., leading to an infinity of integral equations. Consequently any solution of the Yang-Mills equations 1.3) will have to satisfy such an infinity of integral equations. It is this test that we want to perform with the t Hooft-Polyakov monopole, and its exact analytical BPS version 8]. We shall consider the 3-volume Ω to be purely spatial, and consequently only the spatial components of the field tensor and its dual, i.e. F ij and F ij, i, j = 1,, 3, will be present on both sides of 1.4). However, F ij is proportional to the electric field and so it vanishes for those static monopole solutions. In addition, only the component J 13 J 3
5 appears on the r.h.s. of 1.4), and that vanishes because the solution is static and we shall work in the gauge where A =. Remember that the only contribution for the matter current for such a solution comes from the triplet Higgs field φ, and that is of the form J µ φ, D µ φ ]. Therefore, all terms involving the parameter β are not present on both sides of 1.4), for static monopoles when Ω is purely spatial, and so it reduces to with J ˆ = e ˆ σf P e i e α Ω dσw F ij W xi x j σ τ = P 3 e αα) Ω dζv J ˆ V, 1.15) dσ F W k,l σ ), ˆ σf ] x dσfij W k x i ) x l σ) σ σ τ σ ) xj xl σ) ζ ζ σ ) xj τ σ) 1.16) where i, j, k, l = 1,, 3, repeated indices are summed, and where we have denoted Fij W W F ij W. Note that we have explored the symmetry of J ˆ in σ and σ to replace σ f dσ σ dσ 1 σf dσ σ f dσ. Equation 1.15) is what we call generalized integral Bianchi identity. Note that one would expect the integral Bianchi identity to be 1.15) for α = 1, i.e. P e i e Ω dσw F ij W xi x j σ τ = 1l 1.17) Indeed, that is what leads to the quantization of the magnetic charge. From a physical point of view it is intriguing that by rescaling the field tensor magnetic field) as F ij α F ij, leads to the appearance of a term like the r.h.s of 1.15), making the magnetic flux through Ω to change drastically. However, the validity of 1.4), and so of 1.15), is guaranteed by the generalized nonabelian Stokes theorem for a two-form B µν and the partial differential Yang-Mills equations 1.3) as proved in 11, 1, 1, ]. The intriguing non-linear phenomenon that we want to directly check in this paper, is if one can expand both sides of 1.15) in powers of α, and if the SU) t Hoot-Polyakov monopole and its exact analytical BPS version, satisfy each one of the integral equations obtained through such an expansion. The paper is organized as follows. In section we perform the expansion of the generalized integral Bianchi identity 1.15) in powers of the parameter α, and we show that each term of the expansion can be expressed solely in terms of the Wilson line operator. In section 3 we calculate explicitly the Wilson line operator for the SU) t Hooft-Polyakov and BPS monopoles using a suitable scanning of surfaces and volumes. The result is quite simple and it is given in 3.14). In section 4 we check the validity of the integral equation in first order of the α-expansion, and in section 5 we do the same for the integral equation in second order of that same expansion. We present our conclusions in section 6 and in the appendix A we give the results of the numerical calculations of the integrals needed to perform the check of the integral equations. The expansion of the Yang-Mills integral equations Assuming that α and β are indeed arbitrary we expand both sides of 1.4) in power series in those parameters. As we have said the l.h.s. of 1.4) is obtained by integrating 1.9), and its r.h.s. 4
6 by integrating 1.1). By writing the expressions on the l.h.s and on the r.h.s of the integral equation 1.4) in terms of 1.11) and 1.14), and collecting the coefficients at first order in α and zeroth order in β, we get the integral equation at first order in α ˆ σf dσ F W µν x µ σ x ν ˆ ζ τ ζ=ζ = ie dζ d xκ d x µ d σ d σ ˆ σf d x ρ σ ) d τ ˆ σ dσ dσ F W κρ σ ), Fµν W σ) ] d x ν σ) d ζ d xρ σ ) d ζ d x ν ) σ) d τ where ζ is the value of ζ corresponding to the closed surface Ω, in the scanning of the 3-volume Ω, which is the border of Ω see explanation of the scanning in the paragraph above 1.4)). On the other hand, the integral equation appearing in order β and zeroth order in α, in the expansion of 1.4) is given by ˆ σf dσ F W µν x µ σ x ν τ ζ=ζ = ˆ ζ + i e dζ ˆ σ dσ d xκ d x µ d σ d σ ˆ σf { dσ J W dx µ dx ν dx λ µνλ dσ dζ Fκρ W σ ), F ] µν W σ) d x ρ σ ) d τ d x ν σ) d ζ d xρ σ ) d ζ d x ν )} σ) d τ Note that in the case where the gauge group G is the abelian group U1), the equation.1) corresponds to 1.) for α = 1 and β =. Equation.) corresponds to 1.) for α = and β = 1. Note in addition that in the case where the 3-volume Ω is purely spatial, the commutator term in.1) involving the field tensors can be interpreted as a density of non-abelian magnetic charge associated to the gauge field configuration inside Ω. The commutator term in.) involving the field tensor and its Hodge dual can be interpreted as a density of non-abelian electric charge associated to the gauge field configuration inside Ω. In the case where Ω has time components, those commutators will be associated to flows of non-abelian electric and magnetic charges. We have explored further those facts to obtain the integral form of the non-abelian Gauss, Faraday, etc., laws, and the physical implications of these new terms the commutator terms) should be further explored in some other opportunity. As one goes higher in the expansion, the integral equations become more and more complex. However, for the case we are considering in this paper, namely the static t Hooft-Polyakov monopole and its BPS version, and where the 3-volume Ω is purely spatial, there is an important simplification. As we have argued in the paragraph above 1.15), only the spatial components of the field tensor magnetic field) appear in the formulas, since the spatial components of its Hodge dual electric field) vanish. As explained in section of 11], or in the appendix of ], if one performs an infinitesimal variation, x µ σ) x µ σ) + δx µ σ), of the curve where the Wilson line W 1.7) is calculated, but keeping its end points fixed, the infinitesimal variation of the Wilson line operator is given by.1).) W σ f ) δw σ f ) = ie ˆ σf dσ W F µν W d xµ d σ δxν.3) 5
7 The Wilson line operators W appearing in the Yang-Mills integral equations 1.4) are evaluated on the paths that scan the closed surfaces which in their turn scan the 3-volume Ω. Thefore, as we vary the parameter τ which labels the loops, we vary the loop along a given surface, and so δx µ = dxµ δτ. When we vary the parameter ζ which labels the surfaces, the loops vary perpendicular to that surface and so δx µ = dxµ dζ δζ. Consequently, from.3) we get the following two useful formulas ˆ σf ie ie ˆ σf dσ W F µν W dxµ dσ dσ W F µν W dxµ dσ dx ν dx ν dζ = W dw = W dw dζ..4) As we have shown, for the static t Hooft-Polyakov monopole and its BPS version, and a purely spatial 3-volume Ω, the integral Yang-Mills equation 1.4) becomes the generalized integral Bianchi identity 1.15). Therefore, from 1.11), 1.1) and.4), one gets that the l.h.s. of 1.15) is given by V Ω) P e i e α Ω dσw F ij W xi x j σ τ = 1 + α + α W dw τ) ζ=ζ.5) ˆ τ = 1 + α V 1) + α V ) +... dw W τ )W dw τ) ζ=ζ +... From.4) one gets that 1.16) becomes J ˆ = W dw, W dw dζ ]..6) Therefore, from 1.14) and.6), the r.h.s. of 1.15) becomes U Ω) P 3 e αα) ˆ Ω dζv J ˆ ζ V = 1 α α 1) dζ ˆ ζ ˆ ζ + α α 1)] dζ dζ V V dw dw W, W dζ = 1 + α U 1) + α U ) +... V W dw, W dw dζ W dw, W dw dζ ] V ] ) V τ, ζ) ] ) τ V, ζ ) ) where V in.7) is evaluated with the same expansion as in 1.11) with β =, and so an expansion similar to.5). Therefore, by equating.5) to.7) one gets that the term in first order in α leads to the integral equation V 1) = W dw ζ=ζ = ˆ ζ dζ W dw, W dw dζ ] = U 1)..8) 6
8 Similarly, the term in order α gives the following integral equation V ) = + + ˆ ζ ˆ ζ dζ dζ ˆ τ ˆ ζ dw W ˆ τ dζ W dw ζ=ζ = dw W, ˆ ζ dζ W dw, W dw dζ W dw, W dw dζ ] ] W dw, W dw dζ ] dw dw W, W dζ ].9) ] = U ). We are going to verify if the SU) t Hooft-Polyakov monopole and its BPS version 3, 4, 5, 6, 8], satisfy the integral equations.8) and.9). Note that the only quantity appearing in.8) and.9) is the Wilson loop W. In the next section we evaluate it for those monopole solutions. 3 The Wilson loop for t Hooft-Polyakov and BPS monopoles reads The spherically symmetric t Hooft-Polyakov ansatz 3, 4] for a SU) static magnetic monopole φ = 1 H ζ) ˆr T e r A = 3.1) A i = 1 e ɛ x j ijk r 1 Kζ)) T k with r = x 1 + x + x 3, ˆr i = x i /r, ζ = ear, a being the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field in the triplet representation, and T i being the generators of the SU) Lie algebra T i, T j ] = i ε ijk T k 3.) The exact analytical BPS monopole solution corresponds to the functions 5, 6] Kζ) = ζ sinh ζ Hζ) = ζ coth ζ 1 3.3) For the t Hooft-Polyakov monopole the functions Kζ) and Hζ) are obtained numerically, but they have qualitatively the same behaviour as 3.3), i.e. we have that K) = 1, and then it decays monotonically exponentially) to zero as r, and H) =, and then it grows monotonically with r and for r, such grow is linear in r. The function Hζ) will not be important in our calculations because the Higgs field does not appear in our integral equations for the case of static solutions and for Ω being purely spatial see.8) and.9)). The important simplification we obtain in our calculations is due to the fact that Kζ) is a monotonic function of ζ, and so it admits an inverse function. We will then trade the parameter ζ by the function K, and our calculations will not depend upon the explicit form of the function Kζ). 7
9 We have chosen to evaluate both sides of the integral equations.8) and.9) on a purely spatial 3-volume Ω which is a ball centered at the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system x i, i = 1,, 3, used in the ansatz 3.1). We then scan that volume Ω with closed surfaces which are spheres also centered at the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system, with radii varying from zero to the radius of Ω. However, since the reference point x R have to lie on the border Ω of Ω, and since the surfaces scanning it have to be based at x R, we shall attach to the ball Ω a infinitesimally thin cylinder lying on the negative x 1 -axis, and locate the reference point x R at x 1, x, x 3 ) =,, ). The cylinder has a radius ε, which will be taken to zero at the end of the calculations. The surfaces scanning Ω will have the form depicted in Figure, i.e. an infinitesimally thin cylinder on the negative x 1 -axis and a sphere centered at the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system. With the attachment of the thin cylinder we can keep the surfaces based at x R, and centered at the origin. In addition, x R being at infinity allows us to have the volume Ω with any radius. We shall label the surfaces scanning Ω with the parameter ζ, which is the same as the one appearing in the ansatz 3.1). Then ζ = corresponds to the surface made of the thin cylinder and a sphere of radius zero attached to it, and ζ = ζ corresponds to the border Ω, made of the thin cylinder attached to a sphere of radius ζ, the same as the radius of Ω, centered at the origin. The loops will be labelled by a parameter τ, they start and end at the reference point x R, and there will be three types of loops, as follows: 1. Loops of type I), scanning the thin cylinder, as depicted in Figure 1. For such loops the parameter τ varies from to π, with τ = corresponding to the infinitesimal loop around x R, and τ = π corresponding to a straight line from x R to the border of the sphere, then encircling the joint of the cylinder with the sphere, and coming back to x R through the same straight line. The three parts of such loops will be denoted I.1), the first straight line, I.), the circle and I.3) the second straight line. We parameterize the loops with σ, such that the points on the loops have the following coordinates: I.1) x 1 = τ + σ ζ + π x = x 3 = ε σ ) I.) x 1 = τ ζ + π x = ε sin σ x 3 = ε cos σ σ π) I.3) x 1 = τ + π σ ζ + π x = x 3 = ε π σ ) with fixed ζ and τ π. x R " x 1 Figure 1: Scanning of type I). The gap between the straight lines is only a visual resource.. Loops of type II), scanning the thin sphere, as depicted in Figure. For such loops the parameter τ varies from π to π. A loop of this type is made of a straight line from x R to 8
10 the border of the sphere, then making a circle on the surface of the sphere, starting and ending at the junction of the cylinder with the sphere, and lying on a plane perpendicular to the plane x 1 x 3, that makes an angle τ with the plane x 1 x. Finally, it returns to x R through the same straight line. Again, the three parts of such loops will be denoted as II.1) for the first straight line, II.) for the circle and II.3) labels the second straight line. We parameterize the loops with σ, such that the points on the loops have the following coordinates: II.1) x 1 = σ ζ x = x 3 = ε σ ) II.) x 1 = ζ cos τ1 cos σ) 1 ) x = ζ cos τ sin σ σ π) x 3 = ζ cos τ sin τ1 cos σ) II.3) x 1 = σ + π ζ x = x 3 = ε π σ ). with fixed ζ and where in II.) the parameter τ varies from π to π. x x R... x 1 x 3 Figure : Scanning of type II). 3. Loops of type III), scanning the thin cylinder backwards, as depicted in Figure 3. For such loops the parameter τ varies from π to, and they are made of two straight lines. The first one starting at x R and ending on some point on the side of the cylinder with coordinates x 1, x, x 3 ) = x 1,, ε). The second part of the loop is the same straight line reversed) going back to x R. We shall denote the first straight line III.1) and the second III.). We parameterize the loops with σ, such that the points on the loops have the following coordinates: III.1) x 1 = π τ ζ + σ x = x 3 = ε σ ) III.) x 1 = π τ ζ σ x = x 3 = ε σ ) with fixed ζ, and where π τ. An important simplification is made by observing that the Wilson line is constant along loops scanning the thin cylinder. Indeed, we observe that on the segments I.1), I.3), II.1), II.3), III.1) and III.), the coordinate x 1 is linear in σ, and x and x 3 are independent of it. Therefore, using 9
11 x R " x1 Figure 3: Scanning of type III). 3.1), we have that A i dx i dσ straight lines= ±A 1 = 1 e ε r 1 K) T as ε 3.4) with the upper signs valid for the segments I.1), II.1) and III.1), and the lower signs valid for I.3), II.3) and III.). On the segment I.), on the other hand, we get that dx i A i dσ I.) = ε cos σ A + sin σ A 3 ] 3.5) = ε 1 K) e r ε T 1 + τ ζ + π ) ] cos σ T 3 + sin σ T ) as ε The only non-vanishing contribution comes from the segment II.) which gives A i dx i dσ II.) = 1 e 1 K) cos τ cos τ sin τ1 cos σ)t 1 + sin τ sin σ T + sin τ1 cos σ) 1 ) T 3 ] = 1 e 1 K) cos τ ei τ T e i σ T 3 e i τ T T 3 e i τ T e i σ T 3 e i τ T 3.6) Therefore, integrating 1.7) one gets that the Wilson lines on the loops of type I and III are trivial, i.e. W I) = W III) = 1l. On the loops of type II one gets that W II) = W 3 W W 1, where W a are the Wilson lines obtained by integrating 1.7) on the segments II.a), a= 1,, 3. Due to 3.4) we have that W 1 = W 3 = 1l. Under a gauge transformation A i Āi = g A i g + i e ig g, with g = e i τ T e i σ T 3 e i τ T, one gets that W W = g f W g i = e i τ T e i π T 3 e i τ T W 3.7) where g i and g f are the values of g at the initial and final points of the loop II.), and so g i = 1l, and g f = e i τ T e i π T 3 e i τ T. Therefore, one gets that and the equation 1.7) for W becomes dx i A i dσ dx i II.) Āi dσ II.)= 1 e K cos τ T 3 sin τ T 1 ] 3.8) d W d σ + i K cos τ T 3 sin τ T 1 ] W =. 3.9) Since the connection term K ζ) cos τ T 3 sin τ T 1 ] is independent of t follows that the path ordering is unimportant and the integration on the loops II.) gives W = e i π K cos τ T 3 sin τ T 1 ] 3.1) 1
12 Using the fact that e i π T 3 = ±1l, depending if the representation used is of integer +) or half-integer ) spin, we get that g f = ± 1l, and so W = W II) = W = ± e i π Kζ) cos τ T 3 sin τ T 1 ] 3.11) where we have equated W to W II), because, as shown above W I) = W III) = 1l. Therefore, in 3.11) we have τ varying from π to π. The calculations concerning the Wilson line can be simplified defining γ as with Then 3.11) can be written as from which we get cos γ = K cos τ ; sin γ = sin τ F F 3.1) F ζ, τ) = K ζ) cos τ + sin τ. 3.13) W = ± e i γ T e i π F T 3 e i γ T, 3.14) W W = i e i γ T { π F T 3 + γ cos π F ) 1) T + sin π F ) T 1 ]} e i γ T = i { π F sin γ + γ sin π F ) cos γ] T 1 + γ cos π F ) 1] T + π F cos γ + γ sin π F ) sin γ] T 3 }. 3.15) We then have with W d W d τ = i cos τ N j K, τ) T j 3.16) N 1 K, τ) = 1 F π 1 K ) ] sin τ + K sin π F ) F N K, τ) = K F 1 cos π F )] 3.17) cos τ N 3 K, τ) = K sin τ F π 1 K ) ] cos sin π F ) τ +. cos τ F In addition W d W d τ, W d W d ζ ] d F = π i d τ d γ d ζ d γ ) d F d τ d ζ e i γ T 1 cos π F )) T 1 + sin π F ) T ] e i γ T = i π K cos τ M j K, τ) T j 3.18) with M 1 K, τ) = K cos τ F 1 cos π F )] M K, τ) = sin π F ) F M 3 K, τ) = sin τ F 1 cos π F )] )
13 where K stands for dk dζ, and where we have used the formulas d F d τ = sin τ cos τ F 1 K ), d F d ζ = K cos τ K, F d γ d τ = K F, d γ d ζ = sin τ cos τ F K. 3.) With these expressions we are ready to perform the calculations of section for the SU) monopoles. 4 Check of first order integral equations for SU) monopoles The integral equation for a purely spatial volume Ω, in first order in α, for the SU) monopoles t Hooft-Polyakov or BPS) is given by expression.8). However, since the Wilson line is unit for the loops of type I and III see section 3) we get that.8) is only non-trivial for loops of type II, where τ varies from π to π, and so.8) becomes V 1) = W dw ˆ ζ = dζ ζ=ζ π π W dw, W dw dζ ] = U 1) 4.1) where the l.h.s is an integration on a closed surface of radius ζ and the r.h.s is an integration in the volume contained inside that surface. Our goal is to evaluate both sides of this equation using the results obtained in the expressions 3.16) and 3.18). In order to perform the integration of the l.h.s term, a better choice of variables is the following: y = sin τ ; y 1 ; z = Kζ) cos τ ; z 1 4.) with ζ, Kζ) 1, and π τ π. Note that we are using the fact that Kζ) is monotonically decreasing function of ζ for both, the t Hooft-Polyakov and BPS monopole solutions. The explicit form of the function Kζ) is not important here. In these variables we get F = y + z = K + 1 K )y 4.3) and so using 3.16) and 3.17) we get that the l.h.s. of 4.1) becomes with K Kζ ), and V 1) = i dy N j K, y) T j 4.4) N 1 K, y) = π { } F y 1 K ) + K sinπf ) πf N K, y) = K {1 cos πf } 1 y F 4.5) N 3 K, y) = { } K y π F sin πf ) y F πf Note that N 3 is an odd function of y and so integrating we get V 1) K ) = i J 1 K )T 1 + i J K )T, 4.6) 1
14 with J 1 K ) = π dy J K ) = dy 1 K K + 1 K )y 1 K )y sin π ) K + 1 K )y + π K + 1 K )y )} K {1 1 y K + 1 K )y) cos π K + 1 K )y. Note that as ζ varies from to ζ, one has that K varies from 1 to K K ζ ) < 1. Therefore, the integration domain on the r.h.s. of 4.1) is a truncated semi-disc shown in Figure 4. The absolute value of the Jacobian of the variable transformation ζ, τ) y, z), given in 4.), is K cos τ = K cos τ, since K is strictly negative. In addition, it is more appropriate to perform a further change of variables to evaluate the integration on the r.h.s. of 4.1). We define the polar type coordinates s, θ) as y = s cos θ ; z = s sin θ ; S K, θ) s 1 ; θ π 4.7) with K SK, θ) p 1 cos θ1 K ) 4.8) Therefore one has that ˆ ζ ˆˆ dζ K cos τ = truncated semi-disc dzdy = π ˆ dθ ds s 4.9) SK,θ) z = p 1 y z.4. z = K p 1 y y Figure 4: The integration domain in the new polar coordinates. Each value of K fixes a new domain by shortening the area of the disk from below. 13
15 We then have that the M i s, defined in 3.19), become M 1 = z sin θ 1 cos π F )] = F s M = sin π F ) F = sin π s) s M 3 = y cos θ 1 cos π F )] = F s 1 cos π s)] 1 cos π s)] Using 3.18) we get that in these coordinates the r.h.s. of 4.1), denoted by U 1), reads 4.1) U 1) = iπ dθ SK,θ) ds {sin θ1 cosπs))t 1 + sinπs)t + cos θ1 cosπs))t 3 } 4.11) from where we can easily perform the integration in s, obtaining where I 1 K ) = I K ) = dθ U 1) K ) = ii 1 K )T 1 + ii K )T 4.1) { )} πk dθ sin θ π 1 cos θ1 K ) + sin πk 1 cos θ1 K ) { )} πk 1 cos 1 cos θ1 K ) 4.13) The integral along the T 3 -direction in 4.11) vanishes since the integrand is odd, under reflection around θ = π, in the interval θ π note that S θ) is even in that interval). Therefore, in order to check the validity of the integral equation at first order in α, given in 4.1), we have to verify the equalities of the coefficients of T i in 4.6) and in 4.1). We have performed the numerical integration of the quantities I i K ) and J i K ) for several values of K, covering the range 1 K, corresponding to ζ. Note that the actual value of K for a given value of ζ is different for the t Hooft-Polyakov and BPS monopoles. However, the fact that K ζ) is a monotonically decreasing function of ζ, for both solutions, allowed us to trade the coordinate ζ by K, and perform one check that is valid for the two monopole solutions. In section A.1 we give the results of the numerical integrations of the quantities I i K ) and J i K ), i = 1,. As one observes in those tables the values of I i K ) and J i K ) are remarkably identical, differing in the worst case around the eighth decimal place, due to the numerical approximation. This indicates that the t Hooft-Polyakov and BPS SU) monopoles are indeed solutions of the first order integral equation.1), or equivalently 4.1), appearing in the expansion in α of the integral non-abelian Gauss law in.5) and.7). 5 Check of second order integral equations for SU) monopoles The integral equation for a purely spatial volume Ω, in second order in α, for the SU) monopoles t Hooft-Polyakov or BPS) is given by expression.9). However, since the Wilson line is unit for 14
16 the loops of type I and III see section 3) we get that.9) is only non-trivial for loops of type II, where τ varies from π to π, and so.9) becomes V ) = + + π ˆ ζ ˆ ζ dζ dζ ˆ τ π π ˆ ζ dw W W dw ˆ τ π dζ π = ζ=ζ ˆ ζ dζ dw W, W dw, W dw dζ U 1) + G + G 3 = U ) π W dw, W dw dζ π ]] W dw, W dw dζ ] ] dw dw W, W dζ where we have denoted G and G 3 the terms appearing on the second and third lines respectively of 5.1). In addition, we have used the fact that the first term on r.h.s. of the first line of 5.1) is the same up to a minus sign) as U 1) given on the r.h.s. of 4.1). We start by evaluating the l.h.s. of 5.1), using 3.16), and 4.5) to get ˆ τ dw W W dw ˆ y 3 = dy dy N i K, y ) N j K, y) T i T j ζ=ζ π π i,j=1 ] 5.1) = 1 3 ] dy N i K, y) T i=1 i dy ˆ y dy 3 i j=1 N i K, y ) N j K, y) T i T j 5.) where in the first term on the r.h.s. of 5.) we have used the symmetry of the integrand in y and y to transform the integral on the triangle y 1 and y y, to the integral on the square y, y 1. We now use the fact that N i K, y) = ε i N i K, y), with ε i = 1 for i = 1, and ε 3 = see 4.5)). Then we can write dy ˆ y dy N i K, y ) N j K, y) = 1 + ε i ε j dy ˆ y dy dy N i K, y ) N j K, y) y dy N i K, y ) N j K, y) 5.3) Therefore for the case where ε i ε j = 1, one can write further that dy ˆ y dy N i K, y ) N j K, y) = 1 dy dy N i K, y ) N j K, y) ; ε i ε j = 1 For the case ε i ε j =, we do not use 5.3), but instead write T i T j = 1 {T i, T j } + 1 T i, T j ] = 1 {T i, T j } + i ε ijk T k 5.4) Note that we are dealing here with products, and not only commutators, of the SU) Lie algebra generators. We have therefore to work with a basis in the enveloping algebra of SU), which in the 15
17 case of quadratic terms we shall take to be the 9 quantities T i, and the anti-commutators {T i, T j }, i, j = 1,, 3. If one works with the spinor representation given by the Pauli matrices, i = 1,, 3, then one has σ j = i ε ijk σ k + δ ij 1l, and non-diagonal terms vanish, i.e. {, σ j } =, for i j. However, if one works with the triplet or higher representations one has {T i, T j } = even for i j. So, we have to consider the coefficients of all the 9 elements of the basis of the enveloping algebra to be independent. Therefore, using 5.4) one gets that ˆ τ V ) = dw W W dw = N 1 K )T1 + N K )T + N 1 K ) {T 1, T } ζ=ζ where π π + N + 13 K ) {T 1, T 3 } + N + 3 K ) {T, T 3 } i N 13 K ) T + i N 3 K ) T 1 ] N i K ) = 1 N 1 K ) = 1 N 13 ± K ) = 1 N 3 ± K ) = 1 dy N i K, y)) i = 1, ) dy N 1 K, y) dy dy ˆ y ˆ y dy N K, y ) ) ˆ y ) N 1 K, y )N 3 K, y) ± dy dy N 3 K, y )N 1 K, y) ˆ y dy N K, y )N 3 K, y) ± dy dy N 3 K, y )N K, y) with the N i s defined in 4.5), and where we have dropped the term proportional to T 3 because N 3 is an odd function of y, and so its integral on the interval y 1, vanishes. Using 3.16), 3.18) and 4.), the term on the second line of 5.1), denoted G, becomes ˆ K G = i π ε ijk T k dk 1 dy 1 y M j K, y) ˆ y dy N i K, y ) 5.5) 5.6) i 4 π R k K ) T k 5.7) Using 3.18) and 4.1) the term on the third line of 5.1), denoted G 3, becomes ) G 3 = 4 π dθ SK,θ) ds s dθ SK,θ ) ds s 3 M i s, θ) M j s, θ ) T i T j 5.8) i,j=1 with K K, and so ζ ζ. Note that in the θ, s )-integration, K has to be taken as a function of θ and s. From 4.) and 4.7) one gets that K =. Note that the 1 s cos θ θ, s )-integration is the same as the one performed in 4.11), with K replaced by K. Therefore, similar to what happened, there will be no terms in the direction of T j for j = 3, since M 3 s, θ ) is odd under reflection of θ around θ = π see 4.1)). Since K and S K, θ) are even under the reflection of θ around θ = π, there will be no terms in the direction of T i for i = 3, since M 3 s, θ) is odd under that reflection. Using 5.4) one gets that G 3 = 4π S 1 K )T1 + S K )T ] + S 1 {T 1, T } + is 3 K )T 3 16 s sin θ
18 with S a K ) = π S 1 K ) = π S 3 K ) = π dθ dθ SK,θ) SK,θ) ds s ds s dθ dθ SK,θ ) SK,θ ) ds s M a s, θ) M a s, θ ) ; a = 1, ds s M 1 s, θ) M s, θ ) + M s, θ) M 1 s, θ )] 5.9) dθ SK,θ) ds s dθ SK,θ ) ds s M 1 s, θ) M s, θ ) M s, θ) M 1 s, θ )] The s -integration can be performed analytically and so, using 4.1) and the fact that K = s sin θ 1 s, we get cos θ and SK,θ ) SK,θ ) ds s M 1 s, θ ) = sin θ 1 s sin θ s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ )] 1 π sin π s sin θ s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ )] ds s M s, θ ) = 1 π s sin θ + cos π s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ 5.1) 5.11) Note that the above integrals are symmetric under the reflection of θ and θ around π. The quantities M 1 s, θ), M s, θ), S K, θ) and K s, θ) are also symmetric under the reflection of θ around π. Therefore, the integration in θ and θ can be performed in the interval from zero to π, by multiplying 17
19 the result by two. So, we then get that S 1 K ) = P 1 K ) = dθ ds SK,θ) dθ 1 cos πs)) sin θ sin θ )] πs sin θ π s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ + sin πs sin θ s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ P 1 K ) = dθ + cos π SK,θ) ds dθ 1 cos πs)) sin θ sin θ )] πs sin θ s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ dθ ds dθ sin πs) S θ) πs sin θ s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ + sin )] πs sin θ s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ 5.1) 5.13) 5.14) S K ) = where we have introduced ˆ π dθ ds dθ sin πs) + cos SK,θ) )] πs sin θ s sin θ + 1 s ) sin θ S 1 = 1 P 1K ) + P 1 K )) S 3 = 1 P 1K ) P 1 K )), 5.15) Summarizing, we have obtained both sides of the integral equation in second order in α for a given K, given in 5.1). From 5.5) we have that V ) = in3 T 1 + in13 T N 1 T1 N T N 1 {T 1, T } N 13 + {T 1, T 3 } N 3 + {T, T 3 } 5.16) and, from 5.1), 4.1), 5.7) and 5.9) we have that U ) = ii 1 +4π R 1 )T 1 + ii +4π R )T i4π R 3 +4πS 3 )T 3 4πS 1 T1 4πS T 4πS 1 {T 1, T }. 5.17) We have to check the equality between the coefficients of each element of the basis of the SU) enveloping algebra on the expansion of V ) and U ). Those coefficients involve integrals which are calculated numerically for a set of values of K. The results are presented in the tables of section A. in the Appendix. The consistency is remarkable and with that check we can state clearly that the the t Hooft-Polyakov monopole and its BPS version satisfy the integral Yang-Mills equations up to second order in α. 18
20 6 Conclusions The integral Yang-Mills equations appeared from an attempt to understand integrability in higher dimensional space-times 1, ]. Through a loop space formulation 11, 1] one can construct a suitable generalization of the non-abelian Stokes theorem for two-form fields that can be used naturally to define conservation laws, thus mimicking the so-called zero curvature representation of integrable field theories in 1 + 1)-dimensions. That has led us to consider the applications of such non-abelian Stokes theorem to construct the integral equations for non-abelian gauge theories, generalizing the well known abelian version of such integral equations used to describe the laws of electrodynamics. That was indeed possible, as we have shown in 1, ], and the usual differential Yang-Mills equations are obtained from these integral equations when the appropriate limit is taken. The present paper shows that there is more to be explored. The integral Yang-Mills equations allow the introduction of two c-numbers as parameters which arise naturally in the construction of the equations, and as being non-linear, produce a quite non-trivial dependence on those parameters of the surface and volume ordered integrals appearing on both sides of the equation. We have tested the assumption that the integral Yang-Mills equations are in fact a collection of an infinite number of equations, each one corresponding to the coefficients of the above mentioned expansion in powers of those parameters. This was done by considering the fact that, by construction, a solution of the differential Yang-Mills equation is also a solution of the integral Yang-Mills equation. Thus, using the t Hooft-Polyakov and BPS monopoles as such configurations, we tested the validity of the equations arising at first and second order in the parameter expansion of the integral Yang- Mills equation. Despite the quite different structures of the terms resulting from the surface and volume ordered integrals, we have checked their equalities with a high numerical precision of at least one part in 1 7. In addition, much of the check has been done analytically, and we have obtained an exact expression for the Wilson line operator, on each loop scanning the surfaces and volumes, for the SU) t Hooft-Polyakov monopole solution and its BPS version see 3.14)). That result can certainly be useful in many other applications. The fact that those configurations are solutions of both of the highly non-trivial equations at each order of the expansion, indicates that the parameters could indeed be arbitrary. The arbitrariness of the parameters leads to a variety of important consequences which can now be considered, such as their role in the conserved charges that arise dynamically from the integral equations and the significance of having an infinite number of integral equations. Aknowkedgments: The authors are grateful to partial financial support by FAPES under contract number 447/15. LAF is partially supported by CNPq-Brazil. 19
21 A Numerical Results In this section we show the results of the numerical integrations related to the terms on the l.h.s and r.h.s of the expansion of the integral equation performed at first and second order in α. The coefficients of the generators of the algebra eventually, up to a common factor of i ) are compared for different values of K. For each integral estimative there is an associated upper bound on the error, which we represent by using the following notation: 1.37 ± ± 8). A.1 Equation V 1) = U 1) Coefficients of T 1 K I 1 K ) J 1 K ) ± ) ± 6) ± ) ± 8) ± 4) ± 6) ± 1) ± 9) ± 3) ± 1) Coefficients of T K I K ) J K ) ± 3) ± 1) ± 9) ± ) ± 1) ± 4) ± 6) ± 8) ± ) ± ) ± ) ± ) ± 6) ± 1) ± 6) ± 8) ± 3) ± 9) ± 4) ± 7) Table 1: Numerical verification of the validity of equation 4.1): the coefficients of T 1 and T in 4.6) and in 4.1) agree up to the eighth order.
22 A. Equation V ) = U ) The tables below show the values of the coefficients of the algebra elements of 5.16) and 5.17). The fact that they agree implies on the validity of the equation obtained after expanding the Yang- Mills integral equation to second order in α and therefore, on the validity of the integral equation itself for any value of α, at least up to that order. Coefficients of T 1 K I 1 K ) + 4π R 1 K ) N 3 K ) ± ) ± 3) ± 6) ± 4) ± ) ± 1) ± 8) ± 6) ± 4) ± 1) ± 5) ± 9) ± 6) ± 4) ± 1) ± 9).8719± 9) ± 3) ± 3) ± 1) Coefficients of T K I K ) + 4π R K )) N 13 K ) ± 3) ± 1) ± 9) ± 1) ± 1) ± 1) ± 1) ± 8) ± 6) ± 9) ± ) ± ) ± 7) ± 6) ± 7) ± 6) ± 4) ± 3).17786± 1) ± 4).3349± 8) Table : Comparison between the coefficients of T 1 and T of equations 5.16) and 5.17). 1
23 Coefficients of T1 K 4πS 1 K ) N 1 K ) ± ) ± 8) ± ) ± 3) ± ) ± 3) ± 1) ± ) ± 1) ± ) 1 Coefficients of T K 4πS K ) N K ) ± ) ± 1) ± 1) ± ) ± 4) ± 7) ± 1) ± 1) ± 4) ± 5) ± 4) ± 4) ± 3) ± ) ± 1) ± 5) ± 1) ± 1) e-6.798± 8)e-6 Table 3: Comparison between the coefficients of T 1 and T of equations 5.16) and 5.17).
24 Coefficients of {T 1, T } K 4πS 1 K ) N 1 K ) ± ) ± 5) ± 7) ± 1) ± 6) ± 4) ± 4) ± 1) ± 3) ± 7) 1 8 Table 4: Comparison between the coefficients of {T 1, T } of equations 5.16) and 5.17). 3
25 Coefficients of T 3, {T, T 3 } and {T 1, T 3 } K 4π R 3 K ) + 4πS 3 K ) N 3 + K ) N 13 + K ).1 ± 1 8 ± ± ± ± 1 9 ± ± ± ± ± 1 1 ± ± ± ± ± ± 7 1 ± ± ± ± ± ± ) 1 1 ± ± ± ± 9 1 ± ± 7) 1 3 ± 3 1 ± ± 4) ± ) 1 1 ± Table 5: The coefficients above are the ones that should vanish in the equation obtained at second order in α; indeed, within a numerical precision, they are zero. 4
26 References 1] L. A. Ferreira and G. Luchini, Integral form of Yang-Mills equations and its gauge invariant conserved charges, Phys. Rev. D 86, ); arxiv:15.88 hep-th]]. ] L. A. Ferreira and G. Luchini, Gauge and Integrable Theories in Loop Spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 858, 336 1); arxiv: hep-th]]. 3] G. t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 79, ). doi:1.116/ ) ] A. M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in the Quantum Field Theory, JETP Lett., ); Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., )]. 5] M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, An Exact Classical Solution for the t Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Dyon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, ). 6] E. B. Bogomolny, Stability of Classical Solutions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4, ) Yad. Fiz. 4, )]. 7] N. S. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, 4, Cambridge University Press 8] E. J. Weinberg, Classical Solutions in Quantum Field Theory : Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, 1, Cambridge University Press 9] C. P. Constantinidis, L. A. Ferreira and G. Luchini, A remark on the asymptotic form of BPS multi-dyon solutions and their conserved charges, Journal of High Energy Physics, JHEP 151, ); doi:1.17/jhep115)137; arxiv: hep-th]]. 1] C. N. Yang and R. L. Mills, Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance, Phys. Rev ) 191. doi:1.113/physrev ] O. Alvarez, L. A. Ferreira and J. Sanchez Guillen, A New approach to integrable theories in any dimension, Nucl. Phys. B 59, ); doi:1.116/s )4-3; hepth/971147]. 1] O. Alvarez, L. A. Ferreira and J. Sanchez-Guillen, Integrable theories and loop spaces: Fundamentals, applications and new developments, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4, 185 9); doi:1.114/s17751x943419; arxiv: hep-th]]. 5
arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 11 Nov 2018
A mild source for the Wu-Yang magnetic monopole arxiv:1611.741v3 [hep-th] 11 Nov 218 C. P. Constantinidis, L. A. Ferreira and G. Luchini Departamento de Física Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES),
More informationThe integral equations of Yang-Mills and its gauge invariant conserved charges
The integral equations of Yang-Mills and its gauge invariant conserved charges L. A. Ferreira 1 and G. Luchini 2 arxiv:1205.2088v2 [hep-th] 10 Oct 2012 Instituto de Física de São Carlos; IFSC/USP; Universidade
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 28 Nov 2018
Self-dual sectors for scalar field theories in ( + ) dimensions L. A. Ferreira, P. Klimas and Wojtek J. Zakrzewski arxiv:88.5v [hep-th] 8 Nov 8 ( ) Instituto de Física de São Carlos; IFSC/USP; Universidade
More informationLecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson
2009 05 07 Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson From the previous lecture: Example 3 Figure 1. Some x µ s will have ND or DN boundary condition half integer mode expansions! Recall also: Half integer mode expansions
More informationContact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED
Contact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED James Edwards QFT Seminar November 2014 Based on arxiv:1409.4948 [hep-th] and arxiv:1410.3288 [hep-th] Outline Introduction Worldline formalism
More informationChern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee
Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee Maxwell Theory Maxwell Theory: Gauge Transformation and Invariance Gauss Law Charge Degrees of
More informationIntroduction and Vectors Lecture 1
1 Introduction Introduction and Vectors Lecture 1 This is a course on classical Electromagnetism. It is the foundation for more advanced courses in modern physics. All physics of the modern era, from quantum
More informationUNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA EXACT SOLUTIONS OF THE SU(2) YANG-MILLS-HIGGS THEORY
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA arxiv:hep-th/0006182v2 17 Jul 2000 EXACT SOLUTIONS OF THE SU(2) YANG-MILLS-HIGGS THEORY Rosy Teh PENANG-MALAYSIA July 2000 1 EXACT SOLUTIONS OF THE SU(2) YANG-MILLS-HIGGS THEORY
More informationKink Chains from Instantons on a Torus
DAMTP 94-77 arxiv:hep-th/9409181v1 9 Sep 1994 Kink Chains from Instantons on a Torus Paul M. Sutcliffe Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics University of Cambridge Cambridge CB3 9EW,
More informationLecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson
9 3 19 Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson Last time: Relativistic physics in any dimension. Light-cone coordinates, light-cone stuff. Extra dimensions compact extra dimensions (here we talked about fundamental
More informationSingular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds
Singular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds Sergey Cherkis (Berkeley, Stanford, TCD) C k U(n) U(n) U(n) Odense 2 November 2010 Outline: Classical Solutions & their Charges Relations between
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 28 Aug 2014
Constraining Monopoles by Topology: an Autonomous System arxiv:1407.0609v [hep-th] 8 Aug 014 Fabrizio Canfora 1,, Gianni Tallarita 1 1 Centro de Estudios Científicos (CECS), Casilla 1469, Valdivia, Chile.
More informationLecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes
Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela STRING THEORY Santiago de Compostela, March 6, 2013 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes 6-mar-2013
More information8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 2010 Lecture 3
Lecture 3 8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II Fall 200 8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 200 Lecture 3 We begin with some comments concerning
More informationSpinning strings and QED
Spinning strings and QED James Edwards Oxford Particles and Fields Seminar January 2015 Based on arxiv:1409.4948 [hep-th] and arxiv:1410.3288 [hep-th] Outline Introduction Various relationships between
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 21 Aug 2009
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION arxiv:0906.4961v2 [hep-th] 21 Aug 2009 Monopoles and flux strings from SU(2) adjoint scalars Chandrasekhar Chatterjee, Amitabha Lahiri chandra@bose.res.in,
More informationMaxwell s equations for electrostatics
Maxwell s equations for electrostatics October 6, 5 The differential form of Gauss s law Starting from the integral form of Gauss s law, we treat the charge as a continuous distribution, ρ x. Then, letting
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 14 Oct 1997
T-duality and HKT manifolds arxiv:hep-th/9709048v2 14 Oct 1997 A. Opfermann Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EW, UK February
More informationInteracting non-bps black holes
Interacting non-bps black holes Guillaume Bossard CPhT, Ecole Polytechnique Istanbul, August 2011 Outline Time-like Kaluza Klein reduction From solvable algebras to solvable systems Two-centre interacting
More informationQuantum Nambu Geometry in String Theory
in String Theory Centre for Particle Theory and Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK E-mail: chong-sun.chu@durham.ac.uk Proceedings of the Corfu Summer Institute
More informationCoordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates
Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates Amir H. Fatollahi Department of Physics, Alzahra University, P. O. Box 19938, Tehran 91167, Iran fath@alzahra.ac.ir Abstract
More informationMonopoles and Skyrmions. Ya. Shnir. Quarks-2010
Monopoles and Skyrmions Ya. Shnir Quarks-2010 Коломна, Россия, 8 Июня 2010 Outline Abelian and non-abelian magnetic monopoles BPS monopoles Rational maps and construction of multimonopoles SU(2) axially
More informationBPS Solitons and Killing Spinors in Three Dimensional N =2Supergravity
La Plata-Th 97/18 BPS Solitons and Killing Spinors in Three Dimensional N =2Supergravity José D. Edelstein Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de La Plata C.C. 67, (1900) La Plata, Argentina Short
More informationElectric Dipole Moment of Magnetic Monopole
479 Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 117, No. 3, March 27 Electric Dipole Moment of Magnetic Monopole Makoto Kobayashi High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK, Tsukuba 35-81, Japan and
More informationSome Quantum Aspects of D=3 Space-Time Massive Gravity.
Some Quantum Aspects of D=3 Space-Time Massive Gravity. arxiv:gr-qc/96049v 0 Nov 996 Carlos Pinheiro, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Departamento de Física, Vitória-ES, Brazil, Gentil O. Pires,
More informationPhysics 557 Lecture 5
Physics 557 Lecture 5 Group heory: Since symmetries and the use of group theory is so much a part of recent progress in particle physics we will take a small detour to introduce the basic structure (as
More informationA Brief Introduction to AdS/CFT Correspondence
Department of Physics Universidad de los Andes Bogota, Colombia 2011 Outline of the Talk Outline of the Talk Introduction Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation
More informationInstantons and Monopoles in Maximal Abelian Projection of SU(2) Gluodynamics
ITEP-95-34 hep-th/9506026 arxiv:hep-th/9506026v2 11 Jun 1995 Instantons and Monopoles in Maximal Abelian Projection of SU(2) Gluodynamics M.N. Chernodub and F.V. Gubarev ITEP, Moscow, 117259, Russia and
More informationFourth Aegean Summer School: Black Holes Mytilene, Island of Lesvos September 18, 2007
Fourth Aegean Summer School: Black Holes Mytilene, Island of Lesvos September 18, 2007 Central extensions in flat spacetimes Duality & Thermodynamics of BH dyons New classical central extension in asymptotically
More informationLecture 24 Seiberg Witten Theory III
Lecture 24 Seiberg Witten Theory III Outline This is the third of three lectures on the exact Seiberg-Witten solution of N = 2 SUSY theory. The third lecture: The Seiberg-Witten Curve: the elliptic curve
More informationCurved spacetime and general covariance
Chapter 7 Curved spacetime and general covariance In this chapter we generalize the discussion of preceding chapters to extend covariance to more general curved spacetimes. 219 220 CHAPTER 7. CURVED SPACETIME
More informationNote 1: Some Fundamental Mathematical Properties of the Tetrad.
Note 1: Some Fundamental Mathematical Properties of the Tetrad. As discussed by Carroll on page 88 of the 1997 notes to his book Spacetime and Geometry: an Introduction to General Relativity (Addison-Wesley,
More informationDynamics of Multiple Kaluza-Klein Monopoles in M- and String Theory
hep-th/9707042 MRI-PHY/P970716 Dynamics of Multiple Kaluza-Klein Monopoles in M- and String Theory Ashoke Sen 1 2 Mehta Research Institute of Mathematics and Mathematical Physics Chhatnag Road, Jhusi,
More informationLecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)
Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries
More informationPhysics 236a assignment, Week 2:
Physics 236a assignment, Week 2: (October 8, 2015. Due on October 15, 2015) 1. Equation of motion for a spin in a magnetic field. [10 points] We will obtain the relativistic generalization of the nonrelativistic
More informationMagnetostatics. Lecture 23: Electromagnetic Theory. Professor D. K. Ghosh, Physics Department, I.I.T., Bombay
Magnetostatics Lecture 23: Electromagnetic Theory Professor D. K. Ghosh, Physics Department, I.I.T., Bombay Magnetostatics Up until now, we have been discussing electrostatics, which deals with physics
More informationBaby Skyrmions in AdS 3 and Extensions to (3 + 1) Dimensions
Baby Skyrmions in AdS 3 and Extensions to (3 + 1) Dimensions Durham University Work in collaboration with Matthew Elliot-Ripley June 26, 2015 Introduction to baby Skyrmions in flat space and AdS 3 Discuss
More informationContinuity of the Deconfinement Transition in (Super) Yang Mills Theory
Continuity of the Deconfinement Transition in (Super) Yang Mills Theory Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.5
More informationIntroduction to Group Theory
Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)
More informationPhysics/Astronomy 226, Problem set 4, Due 2/10 Solutions. Solution: Our vectors consist of components and basis vectors:
Physics/Astronomy 226, Problem set 4, Due 2/10 Solutions Reading: Carroll, Ch. 3 1. Derive the explicit expression for the components of the commutator (a.k.a. Lie bracket): [X, Y ] u = X λ λ Y µ Y λ λ
More informationPoS(LAT2005)324. D-branes and Topological Charge in QCD. H. B. Thacker University of Virginia
D-branes and Topological Charge in QCD University of Virginia E-mail: hbt8r@virginia.edu The recently observed long-range coherent structure of topological charge fluctuations in QCD is compared with theoretical
More informationTwo-monopole systems and the formation of non-abelian clouds
Two-monopole systems and the formation of non-abelian clouds Changhai Lu* Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027 Received 14 July 1998; published 12 November 1998 We study
More informationHalf BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory
Half BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory Based on work done in collaboration with Eric D Hoker, John Estes, Darya Krym (UCLA) and Paul Sorba (Annecy) E.D'Hoker, J.Estes and M.G., Exact half-bps type
More informationInfrared Propagators and Confinement: a Perspective from Lattice Simulations
Infrared Propagators and Confinement: a Perspective from Lattice Simulations Tereza Mendes University of São Paulo & DESY-Zeuthen Work in collaboration with Attilio Cucchieri Summary Lattice studies of
More informationAbelian and non-abelian Hopfions in all odd dimensions
Abelian and non-abelian Hopfions in all odd dimensions Tigran Tchrakian Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies (DIAS) National University of Ireland Maynooth, Ireland 7 December, 2012 Table of contents
More informationA Multimonopole Solution in String Theory
CTP/TAMU-33/92 A Multimonopole Solution in String Theory arxiv:hep-th/9205051v2 15 May 1992 Ramzi R. Khuri Center for Theoretical Physics Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843 A multimonopole
More information8.821 F2008 Lecture 18: Wilson Loops
8.821 F2008 Lecture 18: Wilson Loops Lecturer: McGreevy Scribe: Koushik Balasubramanian Decemebr 28, 2008 1 Minimum Surfaces The expectation value of Wilson loop operators W [C] in the CFT can be computed
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 9 Feb 2012
Electric charge in the field of a magnetic event in three-dimensional spacetime Claudio Bunster and Cristián Martínez Centro de Estudios Científicos (CECs), Av. Arturo Prat 514, Valdivia, Chile and Universidad
More informationTopological Solitons from Geometry
Topological Solitons from Geometry Maciej Dunajski Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics University of Cambridge Atiyah, Manton, Schroers. Geometric models of matter. arxiv:1111.2934.
More informationAugust 2008 Solitons and AdS string solutions 2
* In collaboration with Kewang Jin, Chrysostomos Kalousios and AnastasiaVolovich. Outline Classical string solutions: spiky strings Spikes as sinh Gordon solitons AdS string as a σ model Inverse scattering
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Nov 1998
SOGANG-HEP 249/98 Consistent Dirac Quantization of SU(2) Skyrmion equivalent to BFT Scheme arxiv:hep-th/9811066v1 7 Nov 1998 Soon-Tae Hong 1, Yong-Wan Kim 1,2 and Young-Jai Park 1 1 Department of Physics
More informationContinuity of the Deconfinement Transition in (Super) Yang Mills Theory
Continuity of the Deconfinement Transition in (Super) Yang Mills Theory Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 with Mithat Ünsal and Erich Poppitz Confinement and the
More informationChapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance
Chapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance In this chapter we generalize the discussion of preceding chapters to extend covariance to more general curved spacetimes. 145 146 CHAPTER 7. CURVED SPACETIME
More informationElectrically and Magnetically Charged Solitons in Gauge Field Th
Electrically and Magnetically Charged Solitons in Gauge Field Theory Polytechnic Institute of New York University Talk at the conference Differential and Topological Problems in Modern Theoretical Physics,
More informationSolitons, Vortices, Instantons
Solitons, Vortices, Instantons Seminarvortrag von David Mroß Universität Bonn 1. Juni 2006 Seminar Theoretische Elementarteilchenphysik SS 06 Structure of the talk Solitons in a nutshell Recap: solitons
More informationfree space (vacuum) permittivity [ F/m]
Electrostatic Fields Electrostatic fields are static (time-invariant) electric fields produced by static (stationary) charge distributions. The mathematical definition of the electrostatic field is derived
More informationLecture 4-1 Physics 219 Question 1 Aug Where (if any) is the net electric field due to the following two charges equal to zero?
Lecture 4-1 Physics 219 Question 1 Aug.31.2016. Where (if any) is the net electric field due to the following two charges equal to zero? y Q Q a x a) at (-a,0) b) at (2a,0) c) at (a/2,0) d) at (0,a) and
More informationMultiple Integrals and Vector Calculus (Oxford Physics) Synopsis and Problem Sets; Hilary 2015
Multiple Integrals and Vector Calculus (Oxford Physics) Ramin Golestanian Synopsis and Problem Sets; Hilary 215 The outline of the material, which will be covered in 14 lectures, is as follows: 1. Introduction
More informationIntroduction to Chern-Simons forms in Physics - I
Introduction to Chern-Simons forms in Physics - I Modeling Graphene-Like Systems Dublin April - 2014 Jorge Zanelli Centro de Estudios Científicos CECs - Valdivia z@cecs.cl Lecture I: 1. Topological invariants
More informationThe Role Of Magnetic Monopoles In Quark Confinement (Field Decomposition Approach)
The Role Of Magnetic Monopoles In Quark Confinement (Field Decomposition Approach) IPM school and workshop on recent developments in Particle Physics (IPP11) 2011, Tehran, Iran Sedigheh Deldar, University
More informationNon-Abelian Berry phase and topological spin-currents
Non-Abelian Berry phase and topological spin-currents Clara Mühlherr University of Constance January 0, 017 Reminder Non-degenerate levels Schrödinger equation Berry connection: ^H() j n ()i = E n j n
More informationLorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 30A, Spring 007, Hitoshi Murayama 1 Poincaré Symmetry In order to understand the number of degrees of freedom we need
More informationThe stability of the wall is due to the potential and the gradient balancing each other (Derrick s Theorem). Simple argument: = E grad
The stability of the wall is due to the potential and the gradient balancing each other (Derrick s Theorem). Simple argument: E grad ~ ( "# ) ~ $ & E pot ~ V (") ~ #$ 4 % ( ) * ~ $ Derrick s Theorem says
More informationHigher-Spin Black Holes and Generalised FZZ Duality
Higher-Spin Black Holes and Generalised FZZ Duality Batsheva de Rothschild Seminar on Innovative Aspects of String Theory, Ein Bokek, Israel, 28 February 2006 Based on: Anindya Mukherjee, SM and Ari Pakman,
More informationSUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories
SUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories Joshua Berger With the Witten index constraint on SUSY breaking having been introduced in last week s Journal club, we proceed to explicitly determine the constraints on
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 26 Jan 2018
First-order vortices in a gauged CP() model with a Chern-Simons term V. Almeida 1, R. Casana 1 and E. da Hora. 1 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, 65080-805, São Luís, Maranhão,
More informationInstantons in string theory via F-theory
Instantons in string theory via F-theory Andrés Collinucci ASC, LMU, Munich Padova, May 12, 2010 arxiv:1002.1894 in collaboration with R. Blumenhagen and B. Jurke Outline 1. Intro: From string theory to
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 19 Sep 2001
La Plata-Th 00/11 November 2000 An alternative formulation of classical electromagnetic duality arxiv:hep-th/0009116v2 19 Sep 2001 Kang Li a,b,1 and Carlos M. Naón b,2 a Department of Physics, Zhejiang
More informationSpectrum of Holographic Wilson Loops
Spectrum of Holographic Wilson Loops Leopoldo Pando Zayas University of Michigan Continuous Advances in QCD 2011 University of Minnesota Based on arxiv:1101.5145 Alberto Faraggi and LPZ Work in Progress,
More informationHIGHER SPIN CORRECTIONS TO ENTANGLEMENT ENTROPY
HIGHER SPIN CORRECTIONS TO ENTANGLEMENT ENTROPY JHEP 1406 (2014) 096, Phys.Rev. D90 (2014) 4, 041903 with Shouvik Datta ( IISc), Michael Ferlaino, S. Prem Kumar (Swansea U. ) JHEP 1504 (2015) 041 with
More informationTwo-loop Remainder Functions in N = 4 SYM
Two-loop Remainder Functions in N = 4 SYM Claude Duhr Institut für theoretische Physik, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Paulistr. 27, CH-8093, Switzerland E-mail: duhrc@itp.phys.ethz.ch 1 Introduction Over the last
More informationQuantum Fields in Curved Spacetime
Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime Lecture 3 Finn Larsen Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics Yerevan, August 22, 2016. Recap AdS 3 is an instructive application of quantum fields in curved space. The
More informationTachyon Condensation in String Theory and Field Theory
Tachyon Condensation in String Theory and Field Theory N.D. Lambert 1 and I. Sachs 2 1 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA nlambert@physics.rutgers.edu 2 School of
More informationAll symmetric AdS n>2 solutions of type II supergravity
All symmetric AdS n>2 solutions of type II supergravity arxiv:1706.02118v3 [hep-th] 28 Nov 2017 Linus Wulff Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Masaryk University, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic
More informationSymmetries and solutions of field equations of axion electrodynamics
Symmetries and solutions of field equations of axion electrodynamics Oksana Kuriksha Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University, 10, 68 Desantnukiv Street, 54003 Mukolaiv, UKRAINE Abstract The group classification
More informationt Hooft Loops and S-Duality
t Hooft Loops and S-Duality Jaume Gomis KITP, Dualities in Physics and Mathematics with T. Okuda and D. Trancanelli Motivation 1) Quantum Field Theory Provide the path integral definition of all operators
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables Some formulas can be found on p.2. 1. Concepts.
More informationRelativistic Mechanics
Physics 411 Lecture 9 Relativistic Mechanics Lecture 9 Physics 411 Classical Mechanics II September 17th, 2007 We have developed some tensor language to describe familiar physics we reviewed orbital motion
More informationChern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action,
Lecture A3 Chern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action, S CS = k tr (AdA+ 3 ) 4π A3, = k ( ǫ µνρ tr A µ ( ν A ρ ρ A ν )+ ) 8π 3 A µ[a ν,a ρ
More informationB r Solved Problems Magnetic Field of a Straight Wire
(4) Equate Iencwith d s to obtain I π r = NI NI = = ni = l π r 9. Solved Problems 9.. Magnetic Field of a Straight Wire Consider a straight wire of length L carrying a current I along the +x-direction,
More informationNewman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions
Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions V. Pravda various parts in collaboration with: A. Coley, R. Milson, M. Ortaggio and A. Pravdová Introduction - algebraic classification in four dimensions
More informationINSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD
INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD () Instanton (definition) (2) ADHM construction (3) Compactification. Instantons.. Notation. Throughout this talk, we will use the following notation:
More informationOverthrows a basic assumption of classical physics - that lengths and time intervals are absolute quantities, i.e., the same for all observes.
Relativistic Electrodynamics An inertial frame = coordinate system where Newton's 1st law of motion - the law of inertia - is true. An inertial frame moves with constant velocity with respect to any other
More informationDynamical compactification from higher dimensional de Sitter space
Dynamical compactification from higher dimensional de Sitter space Matthew C. Johnson Caltech In collaboration with: Sean Carroll Lisa Randall 0904.3115 Landscapes and extra dimensions Extra dimensions
More informationVectors. January 13, 2013
Vectors January 13, 2013 The simplest tensors are scalars, which are the measurable quantities of a theory, left invariant by symmetry transformations. By far the most common non-scalars are the vectors,
More informationElectromagnetic. G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Jefferson Lab Professor of Physics Old Dominion University TAADI Electromagnetic Theory
TAAD1 Electromagnetic Theory G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Jefferson Lab Professor of Physics Old Dominion University 8-31-12 Classical Electrodynamics A main physics discovery of the last half of the 2 th
More informationYANG-MILLS GAUGE INVARIANT THEORY FOR SPACE CURVED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD. Algirdas Antano Maknickas 1. September 3, 2014
YANG-MILLS GAUGE INVARIANT THEORY FOR SPACE CURVED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD Algirdas Antano Maknickas Institute of Mechanical Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University September 3, 04 Abstract. It
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 2 Apr 2015
SUN) BPS Monopoles in M S arxiv:15.957v hep-th] Apr 15 Fabrizio Canfora 1, Gianni Tallarita 1, 1 Centro de Estudios Científicos CECS), Casilla 1469, Valdivia, Chile. Departamento de Física, Universidad
More informationRegularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Regularization Physics 3A, Spring 7, Hitoshi Murayama Introduction In quantum field theories, we encounter many apparent divergences. Of course all physical quantities are finite, and therefore divergences
More informationCosmic Strings and Topological Defects
Cosmic Strings and Topological Defects Jiawen Liu December 9, 2012 Abstract In this review article, we point out spontaneous symmetry breaking is closely related to the emergence of the topological defects.
More informationDyon degeneracies from Mathieu moonshine
Prepared for submission to JHEP Dyon degeneracies from Mathieu moonshine arxiv:1704.00434v2 [hep-th] 15 Jun 2017 Aradhita Chattopadhyaya, Justin R. David Centre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute
More informationIntegrable Spin Systems From Four Dimensions
Integrable Spin Systems From Four Dimensions Edward Witten Monte Verita, July 2, 2017 A few years ago, Kevin Costello introduced a new approach to integrable spin systems in two dimensions starting from
More informationQM and Angular Momentum
Chapter 5 QM and Angular Momentum 5. Angular Momentum Operators In your Introductory Quantum Mechanics (QM) course you learned about the basic properties of low spin systems. Here we want to review that
More informationDonoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6
1 Week 7: Non linear sigma models and pion lagrangians Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter 9.3 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6 Weinberg, Chap. 19 1 Goldstone boson lagrangians
More informationPhysics 342 Lecture 30. Solids. Lecture 30. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I
Physics 342 Lecture 30 Solids Lecture 30 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, April 18th, 2008 We can consider simple models of solids these highlight some special techniques. 30.1 An Electron in a
More informationSimple Evaluation of the Chiral Jacobian with the Overlap Dirac Operator
IU-MSTP/31; hep-th/9812019 November 1998 Simple Evaluation of the Chiral Jacobian with the Overlap Dirac Operator Hiroshi Suzuki Department of Physics, Ibaraki University, Mito 310-0056, Japan ABSTRACT
More informationGauge Theory of Gravitation: Electro-Gravity Mixing
Gauge Theory of Gravitation: Electro-Gravity Mixing E. Sánchez-Sastre 1,2, V. Aldaya 1,3 1 Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucía, Granada, Spain 2 Email: sastre@iaa.es, es-sastre@hotmail.com 3 Email: valdaya@iaa.es
More informationShow, for infinitesimal variations of nonabelian Yang Mills gauge fields:
Problem. Palatini Identity Show, for infinitesimal variations of nonabelian Yang Mills gauge fields: δf i µν = D µ δa i ν D ν δa i µ..) Begin by considering the following form of the field strength tensor
More informationVacuum Polarization in the Presence of Magnetic Flux at Finite Temperature in the Cosmic String Background
Vacuum Polarization in the Presence of Magnetic Flux at Finite Temperature in the Cosmic String Background Univ. Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Brazil E-mail: jeanspinelly@ig.com.br E. R. Bezerra de Mello
More information