arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 27 Mar 2008

Transcription

1 Noncanonicaly Embedded Rational Map Soliton in Quantum SU3 Skyrme Model D. Jurčiukonis and E.Norvaišas Vilnius University, Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Goštauto, Vilnius 008, Lithuania arxiv: v [hep-th] 7 Mar 008 Abstract The quantum Skyrme model is considered in non canonical bases SU3 SO3 for the state vectors. A rational map ansatz is used to describe the soliton with the topological number bigger than one. The canonical quantization of the Lagrangian generates in Hamiltonian five different moments of inertia and negative quantum mass corrections, which can stabilize the quantum soliton solution. Explicit expressions of the quantum Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian are derived for this model soliton. Electronic address: darius@itpa.lt Electronic address: norvaisas@itpa.lt

2 . INTRODUCTION The Skyrme model was introduced as an effective theory of baryons []. Recently the topological soliton solutions namely the skyrmions, are applied in studies of the quantum Hall effect, Bose-Einstein condensate and black hole physics. General analitical solutions of the model are unknown even in the classical case, and approximate solitonic solutions are under intensive consideration. For instance, the rational map ansatz [] is used to describe light nuclei as quantized skyrmions [3, 4]. The original Skyrme model was defined for a unitary field Ux,t that belongs to a fundamental representation of the SU group. A semiclassical quantization suggests that the skyrmion rotates as a rigid body [5]. The collective coordinates approach separates variables which depend on the time and spatial coordinates. The structure of the ansatz which depends on spatial coordinates determines the solitonic solutions. A constructive realization of the canonical quantization adds a term in the Hamiltonian which may be interpreted as an effective pion mass term [6]. An extension of the model to the SUN group [7] represents a common structure of the Skyrme Lagrangian and explains its wide application. The aim of this work is to discuss the group-theoretical aspects of the canonical quantization of the SU3 Skyrme model in the rational map antsatz approximation with baryon number B. The ansatz is defined in noncanonical SU3 SO3 bases as an SO3 solitonic solution. The canonical quantization generates five different moments of inertia. The proposed ansatz can be used to describe light nuclei as special skyrmions. The paper is organized as follows. Some preliminary definitions are presented in Sec.. The quantum Skyrme model is constructed ab initio in the collective coordinates framework for the rational map soliton in Sec. 3. Section 4 contains a summarizing discussion. A few relevant mathematical details and long expressions of the Hamiltonian terms are given in the Appendix.. NONCANONICAL EMBEDDING OF THE RATIONAL MAP SOLITON The Skyrme model is a Lagrangian density for a unitary field Ux,t that belongs to the general representation of the SU3 group [8]. We consider the unitary field in the fundamental representation,0 of the SU3 group. The chiraly symmetric

3 Lagrangian density has the form: L = f π 4 Tr R µ R µ 3e Tr [R µ,r ν ][R µ,r ν ],. where the right and left chiral currents are defined as R µ = µ U U = µ α i C B i α J B,. L µ = U µ U = µ α i C B i α JB,.3 and have the values on the SU3 algebra. The f π and e in. are phenomenological parameters of themodel. Explicit expressions of functions C B i α and C B i α depend on the group parametrization α i. The noncanonical SU3 generators may be expressed in terms of the canonical generators J, defined in [9]: Z,I,M J, = J, = J, = J, = J, J,,, J,, J,,,0 = J, 0,,0,,, J,,,, J, = J, 0,,, J,,, J,, J,,,0 = J, 0,0,0, J,,, J,, J,,, = J, 0,,..4 The canonical generators satisfy these commutation relations [ ][ [ ],,, a L L L JL,M,J L,M = 3 L L L M M M ] J L,M..5 The bracketed coefficients on the rhs of.5 are the SU3 noncanonical isofactor and the SO3 Clebsch-Gordan coefficient. The state vectors for the canonical bases SU3 SU and the non canonical bases SU3 SO3 are equivalent in fundamental representation. We suggest to use the rational map antsatz in the SO3 case as a matrix U R M,M = DM,M κ = expiˆn a J,a Fr M,M = sin F Mˆn Mˆn M i [ ] sinf M u M ˆn u cosfδ M,M,.6 where the unit vector ˆn is defined [] in terms of a rational complex function Rz as ˆn = R ReR,ImR, R }..7 3

4 The triplet κ of Euler angles is defined by ˆn and Fr. By differentiation of ˆn we get an expression which gives the advantage of the following calculations s s rˆn m s rˆn m = ˆn mˆn m I m δ m,m ˆn mˆn m.8 where the symbol I denotes the function that solely depends on the angles θ and ϕ. z Iθ,ϕ = dr R dz,.9 The baryon charge density for the rational map skyrmion is expressed as Br,θ,ϕ = ε 0klm TrR k R l R m = Iθ,ϕ π F rsin F r..0 Since this expression contains the I function, there is no need to modify the usual boundary conditions F0 = π and F = 0 to account for the chiral angle. The normalized baryon charge density and the Lagrangian density for SO3 by a factor 4. The integral by the spatial angles of I can be regarded as the Morse function and is proportional to the baryon number [0] π 0 π dϕ dθ Isinθ = 4πB.. 0 With the ansatz.6 the Lagrangian density. reduces to the classical Skyrme Lagrangian for any baryon number B: L cl r,θ,ϕ = M cl = f π 4 e Isin F r which describes the skyrmion mass density. F r Isin F r F r Isin F r,. 3. CANONICAL QUANTIZATION OF THE SOLITON The quantization of the model can be carried out by means of collective coordinates that separate the variables, depending on the time and spatial coordinates Ur,qt = AU R A = AqtUR r Aqt. 3.3 Here eight SU3 group parameters q i t, i =,..8 are quantum variables. Thus the Skyrme Lagrangian is considered quantum mechanically ab initio in contrast to the 4

5 conventional semiclassical quantization of the soliton as a rigid body. The generalized coordinates q i t and the corresponding velocities q i t satisfy the following commutation relations [ q α,q β] = if αβ q, 3.4 where f αβ q are functions of q only. They are determined having the quantization condition imposed. The commutation relation between the velocity component q α and an arbitrary function Gq is given by [ q α,gq] = i r f αβ q qβgq. 3.5 We adopt the usual Weyl ordering for the time derivative: 0 Gq = } q α, q αgq. 3.6 The curly brackets denote an anticommutator. Due to the Weyl operator ordering no further ordering ambiguity appears in the Lagrangian or the Hamiltonian. The differentiation of the q-dependent unitary matrix can be expressed in terms of functions C L,M α and the matrix elements of the group generator J L,M : q αgλ,µ ABq = C L,M α qg λ,µ λ,µ AA q A J λ,µ L,M B The relations are neglected in semiclassical calculations. 3.7 For the purpose of defining the metric tensor in the Lagrangian we use an approximate expression: AȦ q α,c α q} L,M JL,M which will be specified later. After substitution of the ansatz 3.3 into the model Lagrangian density. and integration over spatial coordinates the Lagrangian has this form: L = qα g αβ q,f q β a 0 where the metric tensor is } [ ] q α,c α,0 q q 0 order terms, 3.9 g αβ q,f = C L,M α qe L,ML,M FC L,M β q, 3.0 with the intermediate function E L,ML,M defined as E L,ML,M F = M a L,M Fδ L,L δ M, M. 3. 5

6 Note that the exact expression of the coefficient a 0 is not important for the calculation of g αβ. There are five different quantum moments of inertia in 3.9: a,0 F = e 3 d 3 r r sin F n 0 [ F I ] f π r sin F ; 3.a a, F = a, F = e 3 d 3 r r sin F n 0 [ F I ] f π r sin F ; 3.b a,0 F = e 3 d 3 r r sin F n 0 f cos F n 0 sin F π n 0 4cos F n 0cosF F I r sin F cos F n 0 4 cosf ; 3.c a, F = a, F = e 3 d 3 r r sin F 3cosF 3n 0 4n 4 f 0sin F π 98cosF 3n 0 4n 4 0cosF F I r sin F 94cosF 5n 0 4n 4 04 cosf ; 3.d a, F = a, F = 4e 3 d 3 r r sin F 3 cosf n 0 f cos F n 4 0 sin F π 3cosF 4n 0 cos F n 4 0 cosf F I r sin F 6cosF n 0 cos F n cosf ; 3.e where the dimensionless variable r = ef π r and d 3 r = sinθdθdϕd r. These quantum moments depend on the chiral angle function Fr, one component of the rational map vector n 0 and the function Iθ,ϕ. The canonical momenta are defined as p β = L q β = qα,g αβ }a 0 C,0 β q. 3.3 Note that the momenta do not commute and have terms which do not contains velocity. The parametrization q α of the group manifold is significant for the definition of the canonical momenta. For the time being we do not require [p α,p β ] = 0. The momenta and the conjugate coordinates satisfy the commutation relations [p β,q α ] = iδ αβ. This commutation relations determine the explicit expressions of the functions f αβ q in 3.4: where f αβ q = g αβ = C L,M α,m qel,ml FC β L,M q, 3.4 E L,ML,M F = M a L,M F δ L,L δ M, M

7 The functions C L,M α q are defined in A.a. It is possible to choose the parametrization on the SU3 group manifold so that the eight operators ˆR LM = i p β,c β L,M q } 3.6 are defined as the group generators satisfying the commutation relations.5. It is easy to check that because of the choice 3.6 the requirement [p α,p β ] = 0 is satisfied for certain. The proof for the SU group can be found in []. The generators 3.6 act on the Wigner matrix of the SU3 irreducible representation as right transformation generators: ] [ˆRLM,D λ,µ α L M α L M q = D λ,µ λ,µ α L M α L M q α L M J λ,µ LM. α L M 3.7 The indices α and α label the multiplets of L,M. For instance, the left transformation generators are defined as ˆL LM = i p β,c βl,m q }. 3.8 Determination offunctionsf αβ q allows ustoobtain an explicitexpression of3.8: AȦ = A q α,a} = = q α,c LM α q α,c α LM q } q J LM i } J LM i EL M L M J L M J L M a 0 i a J 0, 3.9 where a 0 and a are constructed from the quantum moments of inertia: = a 0 3 a,0 a, a,0 a, a, = a 3 a,0 a, a,0 a, a, ; 3.30a. 3.30b The field 3.3 is substituted in the Lagrangian density. in order to obtain the explicit expression in terms of the collective coordinates and the space coordinates. After long calculation by using 3.9 and the commutation relation 3.5 which is very important, we get a complete explicit expression of the Skyrme model Lagrangian density Lq, q,κ = q α,c L,M α i } q q α,c L,M α q } q β,c L,M β q V κ } V κv 3 κ M cl

8 The function V in first term results from the trace of two group generators see A.3 below. The function V results from the trace containing three group generators see A.4. The function V 3 results from the trace containing four group generators A.5. Expressions of V i functions are presented in Appendix, see A.6 A.8. The terms with functions V and V 3 are absent in the semiclassical quantization. Integration 3.3 over the space variables gives the Lagrangian L = } } } q α,c L,M α q E 8 L M L M q β,c L,M β q i q α,c α,0 q V V 3 M cl, 3.3 where V i = d 3 xv i κ. R. Sugano and collaborators [] developed the q-number variational method to formulate a theory that has the consistency between the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian formalisms on the curved space of generalized coordinates. From 3.3 we specify the coefficient a 0 = iv that was undetermined in 3.3 and derive the Hamiltonian in a form H = } } q α,c L,M α q E 8 L M L M q β,c L,M β q V 3 M cl = ˆR L M E L M L M ˆRL M V V ˆR,0 V 3 M cl. a,0 a, We define the state vectors as the complex conjugate Wigner matrix elements of the Λ,Θ representation depending on eight quantum variables q α : Λ,Θ α,s,n;β,s,n = dimλ,θd Λ,Θ α,s,nβ,s,n q 0, 3.34 The indices α and β label the multiplets of the SO3 group. 0 denotes the vacuum state. Because of five different moments of inertia the vectors 3.34 are not the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian The action of the Hamiltonian on vectors 3.34 following 3.7 can be expressed in terms of the moments of inertia a L,M and the SU3 group Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. We take into account the chiral symmetry breaking effects by introducing a term which takes an explicit form like in B = case [9]. M sb = 6 f πm 0TrU U, 3.35 M sb = f πm 0sin F,

9 4. CONCLUSION We considered a new rational map approximation ansatz for the Skyrme model which is the noncanonical embedded SU3 SO3 soliton with baryon number B. The SU rational map ansatz is not spherically symmetric. The canonical quantization leads to five different quantum moments of inertia in the Hamiltonian and the negative quantum mass corrections. The state vectors are defined as the SU3 group representation Λ,Θ matrix depending on eight quantum variables q i because the ansatz does not commute with any generator of the group. The vectors 3.34 are not eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian for higher representations. The mixing is small. To find eigenstate vectors, the Hamiltonian matrix must be diagonalized in every Λ, Θ representation. If the baryon number B = and ˆn = ˆx, we get a soliton with two different moments of inertia which was considered in [9]. APPENDIX A The functions C L,M α q satisfy the following orthogonality relations: LM α C LM α q C β LM q = δ αβ, A.a C LM α q C α L M; q = δ LML M. A.b The commutator of the canonical momenta and the functions C L,M α q equals to: } q α,c α L,M q = E LML M p β,c β L M } iv q E,0LM. A. The trace of two group generators:,0 Tr D J L,M J L,0,M = M δ L,L D δ M, M. A.3 The trace of three group generators:,0 Tr D J L M J L M J L3,0 M 3 D = M3 3,,, γ=,,, γ= L M L M L 3 M 3 L M L M L 3 M 3 5. A.4 3 9

10 The trace of four group generators:,0 Tr D J L M J L M J L3 M 3 J L4,0 M 4 = 4[L L L 3 ] D } }[ ][ ] [L 4 ] u L L k L 3 L 4 k L L k L 3 L 4 k. M M u M 3 M 4 u k A.5 The terms included in the Lagrangian density 3.3: V κ = f π 4 M D M L,M κ D M,M L κ δ M,M [ ][ ] 3 L L L L 5 L M m M M m M 6e M B m,m κ δ M,M DL M,M κ δ M,M δ M,M D L M,M κdl M,M κ ; A.6 V κ = f π 4 M M [ L L 3 a L,M D 0,M a κ D0,M κ M 3 4e M a L,M [ ] L L M M M δ MM L L M M M [ L L B m,m κ 5 L δ M M δ M M δ M M DL M,M κδ M M ] D L M,M κ D L M,M κ ][ M m M ] L L M m M DM L κ δ, M M M δ M M δ M M δ M M DM,M κ ; A.7 0

11 V 3 κ = f π 4L L 4 a L,M a L,M a D0,0κ 4 [ ] L L DM,Mκ L M M 0 a L,M } [ L L k L L k M M u a 0 D L M,Mκ M a ] D k u,uκ 3 a 0 L L 3 } } 3 L L e 5 L 5 L M M u L L k L L k B m,m κ [ ][ ][ ][ ] L L L L L L k L L k M m M M m M M M u M M u δ a M M L,M a DL M L,M,M κ k δ M M δ M M D L M,M κdl M,M κ a L,M a L,M δ M M DL M,M κ k. A.8 where B m,m κ are: B m,m κ = 8 mm ˆn mˆn m r Isin F F m 8 δ m, m r Isin F. A.9 [] T.H.R. Skyrme, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 60, [] C. Houghton, N. Manton and P. Sutcliff, Nucl. Phys. B 50, [3] A. Acus, J. Matuzas, E. Norvaisas, D.O. Riska, Phys. Scr. 69, [4] O.V. Manko, N.S. Manton, S.W. Wood, Phys. Rev. C 76, [5] G.S. Adkins, C.R. Nappi, E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 8, [6] A. Acus, E. Norvaišas, D.O. Riska, Phys. Rev. C 57, [7] H. Walliser, Nucl. Phys. A 548, [8] D. Jurčiukonis, E. Norvaišas, D.O. Riska, J. Math. Phys. 46, [9] D. Jurčiukonis, E. Norvaišas, J. Math. Phys. 48, [0] A. Acus, E. Norvaišas, D.O. Riska, Phys. Rev. C 74, [] K. Fujii, A. Kobushkin, K. Sato, N. Toyota, Phys. Rev. D 35, [] T. Ohtami, R. Sugano, Prog.Theor.Phys. 50,