arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 1 Jun 2018
|
|
- Griselda Norris
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA ASSOCIATED WITH NORMS arxiv: v [math.ap] Jun 208 CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND HENOK MAWI Abstract. We show existence of interfaces between two anisotropic materials so that light is refracted in accordance with a given pattern of energy. To do this we formulate a vector Snell law for anisotropic media when the wave fronts are given by norms for which the corresponding unit spheres are strictly convex. Contents. Introduction 2 2. Preliminaries on Norms and Convexity 4 3. A vector Snell s law for anisotropic media Physical constraints for refraction 8 4. Uniformly refracting surfaces 0 5. The refractor problem when κ <, κ in (4.2) 6. Propagation of light in anisotropic materials Case considered for the application of our results Connection with optimal mass transport 25 References 25 June 4, 208. The first author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS , and the third author partially supported by NSF grant HRD
2 2 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI. Introduction Anisotropic materials are those whose optical properties vary according to the direction of propagation of light. Typical examples are crystals, where the refractive index depends on the direction of the incident light, see [BW59, Chapter XV], [LL84, Chapter XI] and [Som54, Chapter IV]. Important research was done on this subject because of it multiple applications, see the fundamental work [KK65], and [YY84], [Sch07] for more recent applications and references. Mathematically, in these materials wave fronts satisfy the Fresnel partial differential equation which in the particular case of isotropic materials is the eikonal equation. A difficulty with anisotropic materials in the geometrical optics regime is that incident rays may be refracted into two rays: an ordinary ray and an extraordinary ray. This is the phenomenon of bi-refringence, observed experimentally in crystals, and is a consequence from the fact that the Fresnel equation splits in general as the product of two surfaces, see (6.8). The main purpose of this paper is to show existence of interfaces between two homogenous and anisotropic materials so that light is refracted in accordance with a given pattern of energy. As a main step to achieve this, we give a formulation of a vector Snell s law in anisotropic materials when the wave fronts are given by norms in R n which has independent interest. More precisely, suppose N i (x), i =, 2, are norms in R n, Σ i = {x : N i (x) = }, Ω i Σ i are domains, f > 0 is an integrable function on Ω, and µ is a Radon measure in Ω 2 with f (x) dx = µ(ω Ω 2 ). We have two anisotropic media I and II such that the wave fronts in I are given by N and the wave fronts in II given by N 2. Light rays emanate from the origin, located in medium I, with intensity f (x) for each x Ω. We seek a surface S separating media I and II so that all rays emanating from the origin and with directions in Ω are refracted into rays with directions in Ω 2 and the conservation There is no mathematical objection to look at this problem in n dimensions but the physical problem is three dimensional.
3 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 3 of energy condition τ(e) f (x) dx = µ(e) holds for each Borel set E Ω 2 where τ(e) = {x Ω : x is refracted into E}. This is called the refractor problem, and when media I and II are homogeneous and isotropic it is solved in [GH09] using optimal mass transport and in [Gut4] with a different method. A main difficulty to solve this problem is to lay down the mathematical formulation of the physical laws and constraints in anisotropic media to our setting with norms. To place our results in perspective we mention the following. A similar problem for norms but for reflection was studied in [CH09]. Once the Snell law and physical constraints for anisotropic media are formulated and proved in Section 3, our existence results use the abstract method developed in [GH4], where existence results for the near field refractor problem in homogenous and isotropic media are obtained. Further results on geometric optics problems for refraction in homogeneous and isotropic media have been studied in [GM3], [LGM7], and [Kar6]. On the other hand, the mathematical literature for these problems in anisotropic media is lacking. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 recalls a few results on norms and convexity that will be used later. The Snell law in anisotropic media is proved in Section 3 as a consequence of Fermat s principle of least time. The discussion on the physical constraints for refraction in anisotropic media is in Section 3.. Section 4 introduces and analyzes the surfaces refracting all rays into a fixed direction which are used in Section 5 to show the existence Theorems 5.6 and 5.7. Section 6 introduces and analyzes the Fresnel pde for the wave fronts in general materials non homogenous and anisotropic. In Section 6. we apply the results from the previous sections to materials having permittivity and permeability coefficients ɛ and µ that are constant matrices with one a constant multiple of the other. Finally, in Section 7 we relate our problem with optimal mass transport.
4 4 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI 2. Preliminaries on Norms and Convexity Consider a norm N(x) = x in R n, and let Σ = {x R n : N(x) = } be the unit sphere in the norm such that Σ is a strictly convex surface. Given a vector ν S n, the support function of Σ is defined by ϕ(ν) = sup x ν. x Σ Clearly ϕ is strictly positive (ϕ(ν) / ν ). Since Σ is compact, there is x 0 Σ such that ϕ(ν) = x 0 ν, and since Σ is strictly convex x 0 is unique. The hyperplane Π ν with equation {x : l(x) = x ν ϕ(ν) = 0} is a supporting hyperplane to Σ at x 0. That is, l(x) 0 for all x Σ and l(x 0 ) = 0. We then have a map ν S n x 0 Σ Φ : S n Σ, Φ(ν) = x 0. This map assigns to each vector ν S n a unique point Φ(ν) Σ (uniqueness follows from the strict convexity of Σ) so that Π ν is a supporting hyperplane to Σ at Φ(ν). In addition, also from the strict convexity of Σ, and consequently the uniqueness of maximizer of ϕ, we have Φ( ν) = Φ(ν). Φ is called the support map. The dual norm of N, denoted by N (x) = x is defined as follows. Since R n is finite dimensional, each linear functional l : R n R can be represented as l(x) = y x for a unique y R n. Given y R n, the dual norm of N is then N (y) = sup x Σ x y, and writing y = λ ν with ν S n, we get that N (y) = λ ϕ(ν). Hence the dual norm sphere of Σ is Σ = {y R n : N (y) = } = {ν/ϕ(ν) : ν S n }. We recall the following. Lemma 2.. [CH09, Lemma 2.3] For each x Σ and ν = ν/ϕ(ν) with ν S n we have (a) x ν ; and (b) x ν = if and only if x Φ(ν). Since Σ is a convex surface, for each x Σ, there is a supporting hyperplane to Σ at x and let ν(x) be the outer unit normal to such a supporting hyperplane. If Σ
5 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 5 is such that at each x one can pick a supporting hyperplane with normal ν(x) in such a way that ν(x) is continuous for all x Σ, that is, Σ has a continuous normal field, then from the proof of [CGH08, Theorem 6.2], Σ has a unique tangent plane at each point; that is, Σ is differentiable. With the notation from [CH09], the Minkowski functional of Σ defined by M Σ (x) = inf{r > 0 : x r B} satisfies M Σ (x) = N(x), where B = {x R n : N(x) }. It is proved in [CH09, Lemma 2.4] that Σ has a continuous normal field ν(x) if and only if N C (R n \ {0}); and p(x) := N(x) = ν(x)/ϕ(ν(x)). We also recall [CH09, Lemma 2.5] saying that if Σ is C, then Σ is strictly convex. Also, if Σ is strictly convex, then Σ C, [CH09, Lemma 2.7]. Therefore, if Σ is strictly convex and C, then p : Σ Σ is an homeomorphism and p p = Id; p = N. 3. A vector Snell s law for anisotropic media We have two homogenous 2 and anisotropic media I and II so that the surfaces for the wave fronts are given by a norm N in I, and given by a norm N 2 in II. 3 We are assuming that the norms N i C (R n \ {0}) and the corresponding unit spheres Σ i are strictly convex, i =, 2. Suppose I and II are separated by a plane having normal ν from medium I to medium II as in Figure. We formulate the Snell law in anisotropic media as follows: Each incident ray traveling in medium I with direction x Σ with x ν 0 and striking the plane Π at some point P 0 is refracted in medium II into a direction m Σ 2 if (3.) p 2 (m) p (x) ν, with p i = N i, i =, 2; see Figure. For each x Σ with x ν 0, there is at most one m Σ 2 satisfying (3.) with m ν 0. In fact, from (3.) there is λ R with 2 In homogenous media light travels in straight lines. This follows from [KK65, Equation (3.97)] because the function H there is independent of x, y, z. 3 A wave front is a surface in 3d space described by ψ(x) = c t where ψ is a function, c is the speed of light in vacuum and t is time. This means the points x on the wave front that are travelling for a time t are located on the surface ψ(x) = c t; see [KK65, Chapter II, Sec. 2].
6 6 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI p (x) I x Π ν II p 2 (m) m Figure. Snell s law p 2 (m) = p (x) + λ ν. That is, if l is the line passing through p (x) with direction ν, then p 2 (m) l Σ 2. So if there were m m 2 satisfying (3.), then p 2 (m i ) l Σ 2, i =, 2. The outer normal to Σ 2 at p ( 2(m i ) equals to N 2 p2 (m i ) ) ( = p 2 p2 (m i ) ) = m i because p 2 : Σ 2 Σ 2 is a homeomorphism since Σ 2 is C and strictly convex. And also p 2 (m ) p 2 (m 2 ). On the other hand, since the points p 2 (m i ) are also on the line l and Σ 2 is strictly convex, the normals at p 2(m i ) must satisfy that its dot products with ν must have different signs. Therefore, it cannot both happen m ν 0 and m 2 ν 0. Therefore, only one of the two m i can satisfy m i ν 0. Physically, the norm N(x) = represents the location of the points x after traveling for a time t, with c t =, from the origin into the given medium. For example, if we are in an homogenous and isotropic medium with refractive index n, then the wave propagates from the origin with velocity v = c/n. So if x satisfies N(x) =, then the Euclidean distance from O to x must satisfy x /t = v. Since t = /c, we obtain x = v /c = /n so N(x) = n x. Therefore, if medium I
7 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 7 has refractive index n and medium II has refractive index n 2, then N (x) = n x x and N 2 (x) = n 2 x. We then have p i (x) = N i (x) = n i, i =, 2, x 0, and so from x (3.) we recover the standard Snell law: the unit incident direction x is refracted into the unit direction m when n x n 2 m ν, see [GH09, Formula (2.)]. We shall prove that (3.) is equivalent to Fermat s principle of least time with respect to the norms N, N 2 where Σ and Σ 2 strictly convex. Suppose two anisotropic media I, II with norms N in I and N 2 in II, are separated by a plane Π as in Figure. Given X I and Y II, then Fermat s principle states that the (minimal) optical path from X to Y through the plane Π is the path XP 0 Y where P 0 Π is the unique point such that (3.2) min{n (P X) + N 2 (Y P) : P Π} = N (P 0 X) + N 2 (Y P 0 ). Equation (3.2) implies that (3.3) p 2 (Y P 0 ) p (P 0 X) ν where ν is the normal to Π. In fact, for P Π we can write P = P 0 + n i= t i e i where e,, e n is a basis for Π. From (3.2) n n t j N P 0 X + t i e i + N 2 P 0 Y + t i e i i= n n = p P 0 X + t i e i e j + p 2 P 0 Y + t i e i e j = 0 i= when t j = 0, for j =,, n. Since p i ( X) = p i (X), (3.3) follows. Also since p i are homogenous of degree zero, from (3.3) we then obtain (3.) with m = Y P 0 N 2 (Y P 0 ) and x = P 0 X N (P 0 X). Vice versa, from (3.) we deduce (3.2). In fact, let us fix X I and Y II, and consider a path XP 0 Y with P 0 Π. The ray from X to P 0 has direction x = P 0 X N (P 0 x), and the ray from P Y P 0 0 to Y has direction m =. If x is ( ) ( N) 2 (Y P 0 ) Y P 0 P 0 X refracted into m, then from (3.), p 2 p ν, and since p i N 2 (Y P 0 ) N (P 0 x) i= i=
8 8 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI are homogeneous of degree zero (3.4) p 2 (Y P 0 ) p (P 0 X) ν. Consider the functional F(P) = N (P X) + N 2 (Y P) for P Π. Write P Π as P = P 0 + n i= t i e i where e,, e n is a basis for Π. We can write F(P) = F(t,, t n ). As before and from (3.4) n n F(t,, t n ) = p t j P 0 X + t i e i e j + p 2 P 0 Y + t i e i e j = 0 i= for j =,, n and t = = t n = 0. On the other hand, since the functional F on Π is strictly convex, there are unique t 0,, t0 such that the minimum of n F is attained at t 0,, t0 n. Therefore, t0 = = t0 n = 0 and the point P 0 is the unique point in Π minimizing F, obtaining Fermat s principle. 3.. Physical constraints for refraction. Since the incident ray x is in media I we must have x ν 0, where ν is the normal to the hyperplane separating I and II, ν having direction from media I to media II. Similarly, since the refracted ray m is in media II, we also have m ν 0; Figure. We analyze here the meaning of these two physical constraints x ν 0 and m ν 0 in the following two cases. Case : Let us assume first that Σ is contained inside Σ 2, i.e., N 2 (x) for all N (x) =. If x Σ, then p (x) Σ and from Lemma 2.(b) x p (x) =. Hence, if x Σ and m Σ 2, then x (p (x) p 2 (m) ) = x p 2 (m) = N 2 (x) x N 2 (x) p 2(m) N 2 (x) i= from Lemma 2.(a) 0 from the assumption Σ contained inside Σ 2. Thus, if x ν 0 and x is refracted into m, then from (3.) p (x) p 2 (m) = λ ν and so λ > 0. Hence, m ν 0 and Lemma 2.(b) imply that m p (x) = m (p (x) p 2 (m) ) = λ m ν 0.
9 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 9 Therefore, when Σ is contained in the interior of Σ 2, we obtain the physical constraint (3.5) m p (x), for refraction of x Σ into m Σ 2. Case 2: Let us assume now that Σ 2 is contained inside Σ, i.e., N (x) for all N 2 (x) =. Reasoning as in the first case, we have for x Σ and m Σ 2, that m (p 2 (m) p (x) ) = m p (x) = N (m) m N (m) p (x) N (m) from Lemma 2.(a) 0 from the assumption Σ 2 contained inside Σ. Thus, if m ν 0 and x is refracted into m, then from (3.) p 2 (m) p (x) = λ ν and so λ > 0. Hence, x ν 0 and Lemma 2.(b) imply that x p 2 (m) = x (p 2 (m) p (x) ) = λ x ν 0. Therefore, when Σ 2 is contained in the interior of Σ, we obtain the physical constraint (3.6) x p 2 (m), for refraction of x Σ into m Σ 2. Notice that, as explained before, if medium I has refractive index n and medium x II has refractive index n 2, then N (x) = n x and N 2 (x) = n 2 x ; and p i (x) = n i x, i =, 2. Hence, if n > n 2 we are in Case above, and so (3.5) reads x m n 2 /n for x, m unit vectors. If n < n 2 then we are then in Case 2, and so (3.6) reads x m n /n 2 for x, m unit vectors. Therefore, when the media I and II are homogenous and isotropic we recover the physical constraints showed in [GH09, Lemma 2.].
10 0 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI 4. Uniformly refracting surfaces In this section, we shall describe the surfaces separating two anisotropic materials I and II, like in Section 3, so that rays emanating from a point source, the origin, located in medium I are refracted in medium II into a fixed direction m Σ 2. These surfaces will have the form (4.) { X R n : N (X) = p 2 (m) X + b }, where b R. If we write X = ρ(x) x for N (x) =, then the polar radius ρ(x) = b x p 2 (m) for x Σ. To show that these surfaces do the desired refraction job, as in Section 3. we distinguish two cases. Case I: Σ is strictly contained in the interior of Σ 2, that is, (4.2) κ = sup N 2 (x) <. N (x)= In this case, given m Σ 2, the desired surface is { } b (4.3) S I (m, b) = ρ(x)x : ρ(x) = x p 2 (m), x Σ with m p (x) with b > 0. In fact, to verify that each ray with direction x Σ such that m p (x) is refracted by S I (m, b) into m, we need to verify that (3.) holds, and the physical constraints x ν 0 and m ν 0 are met with ν the normal from medium I to II. From (4.), the outward normal at a point X is ν = p (x) p 2 (m) with x = X/N (X) and so (3.) holds. From Lemma 2. x ν = x (p (x) p 2 (m) ) = x p 2 (m) (4.4) = N 2 (x) x N 2 (x) p 2(m) N 2 (x) > κ > 0 from (4.2). Also m ν = m (p (x) p 2 (m) ) = m p (x) m p 2 (m) = m p (x) 0 by the definition of S I.
11 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA Case II: Σ 2 is strictly contained in the interior of Σ, that is, (4.5) κ = inf N (x)= N 2(x) >. In this case, given m Σ 2, the desired surface is { } b (4.6) S II (m, b) = ρ(x)x : ρ(x) = x p 2 (m), x Σ with x p 2 (m) > with b > 0. In fact and once again, to verify that each ray with direction x Σ such that x p 2 (m) > is refracted by S II (m, b) into m, we need to verify that (3.) holds, and the physical constraints x ν 0 and m ν 0 are met with ν the normal towards medium II. From the definition of S II, the outward normal at a point X is ν = p 2 (m) p (x) with x = X/N (X) and so (3.) holds. From Lemma 2. m ν = m (p 2 (m) p (x) ) = m p (x) = N (m) m N (m) p (x) N (m) κ N 2(m) = κ > 0 from (4.5). Also x ν = x (p 2 (m) p (x) ) = x p 2 (m) > 0 by the definition of S II. Remark 4.. If medium I is homogeneous and isotropic with refractive index n, then N (x) = n x. Also, if II is also similar with refractive index n 2, then N 2 (x) = n 2 x. In this case, condition (4.2) is equivalent to n > n 2, and the surface S I (m, b) is a half ellipsoid of revolution with axis m, recovering the surfaces from [GH09, Formula (2.8)]. Similarly, condition (4.5) is equivalent to n < n 2, and S II (m, b) is one of the branches of a hyperboloid of two sheets as in [GH09, Formula (2.9)]. 5. The refractor problem when κ <, κ in (4.2) Using the uniformly refracting surfaces introduced in Section 4, we state and solve here the refraction problem we are interested in. We are given two closed domains Ω Σ, Ω 2 Σ 2, a non negative function f L (Ω ), and a Radon measure µ in Ω 2 satisfying the following conditions: (a) the surface measure of the boundary of Ω is zero;
12 2 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI (b) inf x Ω,m Ω 2 m p (x) ; (c) Σ and Σ 2 are C and strictly convex. Refractors are then defined as follows. Definition 5.. The surface S = {ρ(x) x : x Ω }, with ρ C(Ω ), ρ > 0, is a refractor from Ω to Ω 2, if for each x 0 Ω there exist m Ω 2 and b > 0 such that the surface S I (m, b) supports S at x 0, that is, ρ(x) b x p 2 (m) for all x Ω with equality at x = x 0. The refractor mapping associated with the refractor S is the set valued function (5.) R S (x 0 ) = {m Ω 2 : there exists S I (m, b) supporting S at x 0 }. We have the following lemma. Lemma 5.2. If a refractor S is parametrized by ρ(x) x, then ρ is Lipschitz continuous in Ω. Proof. Let x 0, x Ω and S I (m, b) supporting S at x 0. Then ρ(x) ρ(x 0 ) b x p 2 (m) b x 0 p 2 (m) = b (x x 0 ) p 2 (m) ( x p2 (m) ) ( x 0 p 2 (m) ) = ρ(x 0 ) (x x 0) p 2 (m) x p 2 (m) C x x 0 max ρ x x 0 p 2 (m) Ω κ from (4.4) since N i and are all equivalent norms, i =, 2. Reversing the roles of x and x 0 we obtain the lemma. Following the notation from [GH4, Section 2], we denote by C S (Ω, Ω 2 ) the class of set-valued maps Φ : Ω Ω 2 that are single valued for a.e. x Ω, with respect to f dx, that are continuous in Ω, and Φ(Ω ) = Ω 2. Continuity of Φ at x 0 Ω means that if x k x 0 and y k Φ(x k ), then there is a subsequence y kj and y 0 Φ(x 0 ) such that y kj y 0. Lemma 5.3. If S is a refractor from Ω to Ω 2, then the refractor map R S C S (Ω, Ω 2 ).
13 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 3 Proof. Let m Ω 2 and define b = max x Ω ( ρ(x) ( x p2 (m) ). From (4.4), b max x Ω ( ρ(x) ( κ) ) > 0. Also, there is x0 Ω with b = ρ(x 0 ) ( x 0 p 2 (m) ) and so m R S (x 0 ), showing that R S (Ω ) = Ω 2. Next, let us show that R S (x) is single valued for a.e. x Ω. In fact, if at x 0 Ω there exist m m 2 Ω 2 with m i R S (x 0 ), i =, 2, then x 0 is a singular point to the surface S. Otherwise, since S I (m i, b i ), i =, 2 support S at x 0, they would have the same tangent plane at x 0 ρ(x 0 ). Therefore, by the Snell law and since there is at most one m satisfying (3.), we obtain m = m 2. From Lemma 5.2, S is Lipschitz, and since Ω = 0, we obtain that R S (x) is single valued a.e. in Ω. It remains to show that R S is continuous. Let x i x 0 Ω and let m i R S (x i ). Hence ρ(x) b i x p 2 (m i ) for all x Ω with equality at x = x i. As before, b i = ( ) ρ(x i ) ( x i p 2 (m i ) ) ( κ) min Ω ρ, and b i = ρ(x i ) N 2 (x i ) N 2 (x i ) p 2(m i ) max Ω ρ (+κ) from Lemma 2.(a) and (4.2). We have m i Ω 2 Σ 2 and p 2 C (Σ 2 ). By compactness there are subsequences m ik m 0 Ω 2 and b ik b 0 > 0 so that b 0 ρ(x) x p 2 (m 0 ) for all x Ω with equality at x = x 0. This completes the proof to the lemma. Using [GH4, Lemma 2.], we obtain from Lemma 5.3 that if S is a refractor from Ω to Ω 2, then the set function (5.2) M S, f (E) = f (x) dx R S (E) is a Borel measure in Ω 2, that is called the refractor measure. Continuing using the set up from [GH4, Section 2], we recall [GH4, Definition 2.2]: given F C(Ω ) and a map T : F C S (Ω, Ω 2 ), we say T is continuous at φ F if whenever φ j F, φ j φ uniformly in Ω, x 0 Ω and y j T (φ j )(x 0 ), then there exists a subsequence y jl y 0 with y 0 T (φ)(x 0 ). If we let (5.3) F = {ρ C(Ω ) : S ρ is a refractor from Ω to Ω 2 parametrized by ρ(x)x} then we have the following lemma. x i
14 4 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI Lemma 5.4. The mapping T : F C S (Ω, Ω 2 ) defined by T (ρ) = R Sρ at each ρ F. is continuous Proof. Let ρ j, ρ F with ρ j ρ uniformly in Ω, x 0 Ω and m j R Sρj (x 0 ). Hence b j ρ j (x) x p 2 (m j ) for all x Ω with equality at x = x 0. As in the last part of the proof of Lemma 5.3, b j are bounded away from 0 and. Therefore there exist b subsequences b jl b and m jl m with ρ(x) x p 2 (m) for all x Ω with equality at x = x 0. Thus m R Sρ (x 0 ) and we are done. As a consequence of Lemma 5.4 we obtain from [GH4, Lemma 2.3] that if ρ j ρ uniformly in Ω, then M Sρj, f M Sρ, f weakly. In addition, properties (A)-(A3) from [GH4, Section 2.] translate to the present case as follows: (A) if S ρ and S ρ2 are refractors from Ω to Ω 2, then S ρ ρ 2 is a refractor from Ω to Ω 2 with ρ ρ 2 = min{ρ, ρ 2 }; (A2) if ρ (x 0 ) ρ 2 (x 0 ), then R Sρ (x 0 ) R Sρ ρ 2 (x 0 ); b (A3) we let h b,m (x) =, and we have x p 2 (m) {h b,m (x) : m Ω 2, 0 < b < } F, with F defined by (5.3). In addition we have the following (a) m R Shb,m (x) for all x Ω, from Section 4, Case I; (b) h b,m h b2,m for b b 2 ; (c) h b,m 0 uniformly in Ω as b 0; (d) h b,m h b0,m uniformly in Ω as b b 0. We then introduce the following definition. Definition 5.5. Let f L (Ω ) and let µ be a Radon measure in Ω 2 with Ω f dx = µ(ω 2 ). The refractor S from Ω to Ω 2 is a weak solution of the refractor problem if M S, f (E) = µ(e)
15 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 5 for each Borel set E Ω 2, where M S, f is the refractor measure defined by (5.2). Using the above set up and the existence results from [GH4, Section 2] we obtain the following theorems showing solvability of the refractor problem for anisotropic media when κ <. We first show solvability when the measure µ is discrete. Theorem 5.6. Let f L (Ω ) with f > 0 a.e., m,, m N Ω 2 be distinct points, and g,, g N positive numbers satisfying f dx = N Ω i= g i. Then for each 0 < b < there exist unique positive b 2,, b N such that S = {ρ(x)x : x Ω } with ρ(x) = min i N h b i,m i (x), is a weak solution to the refractor problem. In addition, M S, f ({m i }) = g i for i N. Proof. To prove this theorem, we use [GH4, Theorem 2.5] with the set up from above, for which we need to verify that the assumptions of that theorem are met. In fact, we need to show that we can choose positive numbers b 0,, 2 b0 such that N ρ 0 (x) = min i N h b 0 i,m i (x) such that M S ρ0, f (m i ) g i for 2 i N, where b 0 = b. We have h b 0,m (x) = b 0 x p 2 (m ) b κ from (4.4). Also h b 0 i,m (x) = b 0 i i x p 2 (m i ) b 0 i + κ for 2 i N from Lemma 2.(b) and (4.2). Therefore choosing b0,, 2 b0 N suitable so that ρ 0 (x) = h b 0,m (x), the assumptions of [GH4, Theorem 2.5] are met and the existence follows. The uniqueness follows from [GH4, Theorem 2.7] since f > 0 a.e. We are now ready to prove the following existence theorem for a general Radon measure µ. Theorem 5.7. Let f L (Ω ) with f > 0 a.e, and let µ be a Radon measure in Ω 2 such that f (x) dx = µ (Ω Ω 2 ). Then for each x 0 Ω and R 0 > 0, there exists S weak solution to the refractor problem passing through the point X 0 = R 0 x 0. Proof. Let µ l = N i= g i δ mi be a sequence of discrete measures with µ l µ weakly and µ l (Ω 2 ) = µ (Ω 2 ) for l =, 2,. From Theorem 5.6 and for the measure µ l,
16 6 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI there exists a refractor S ρ parametrized by ρ. Notice that S l l C l ρ is also a solution l to the same refractor problem since R Cl ρ = R ρ for each positive constant C l. Then l l pick C l so that C l ρ l (x 0) = R 0. Now we use the existence result [GH4, Theorem 2.8], and in order to do that we need to verify that the hypotheses (i) and (ii) of that theorem hold in the present case. To verify (i) we show that if R Range ( h b,m ), then κ R + κ h + κ b,m R κ. b In fact, there exists x Ω with R = h b,m (x ) = x p 2 (m), so h b,m(x) = b x p 2 (m) = R x p 2 (m), and the desired inequalities follow from Lemma x p 2 (m) 2.(b) and (4.2). The verification of (ii), that is, the family {ρ F : C 0 ρ C } is compact in C(Ω ), follows from Lemma 5.2 and the proof of Lemma 5.4. Remark 5.8. In the same way we can state and solve the refractor problem when κ >, i.e., (4.5) holds, using instead the uniformly refracting surfaces S II (m, b) b defined by (4.6). Now the functions h b,m are defined by h b,m (x) = x p 2 (m) and the properties (A)-(A3) defined after Lemma 5.4 must be changed in accordance with properties (A )-(A3 ) in [GH4, Section 2.2]. All lemmas in this section then hold true with obvious changes. For the existence of solutions we now need to use [GH4, Theorems 2.9 and 2.]. In Theorem 5.7 uniqueness follows from optimal mass transport, Section Propagation of light in anisotropic materials We begin this section with some background on the propagation of light in anisotropic materials. Let us assume we have a material whose permittivity and permeability are given by positive definite and symmetric matrices ɛ(x, y, z) and µ(x, y, z), respectively. Assuming we are in the geometric optics regime, i.e., the wave length of the radiation is very small compared with the objects considered, it is known [KK65, Chap. III, Sect. 4] that the function ψ = ψ(x, y, z) defining the wave fronts ψ(x, y, z)=constant, satisfies the following first order pde, the Fresnel
17 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 7 differential equation: ɛ R (6.) det R µ = 0, where R is the 3 3 skew-symmetric matrix 0 ψ z ψ y R = ψ z 0 ψ x. ψ y ψ x 0 We can re write Fresnel s equation in a simpler form using the following Schur s determinant identity: if A is an n n invertible matrix, B is n m, C is m n and D is m m, then A B det C D = det A det ( D C A B ) = det D det ( A B D C ), of course for the last identity D is invertible. We then get ɛ R det R µ = det ɛ det ( µ + R ɛ R ) = det µ det ( ɛ + R µ R ) and since ɛ, µ are positive definite, (6.) is equivalent to either (6.2) det ( µ + R ɛ R ) = 0, or (6.3) det ( ɛ + R µ R ) = 0. Letting (6.4) τ = µ /2 ɛµ /2, τ is symmetric and positive definite, so there is an orthogonal matrix O and a diagonal matrix D such that τ = ODO t.
18 8 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI For a column vector v = v v 2 v 3 define 0 v 3 v 2 Skew(v) = v 3 0 v. v 2 v 0 Given a 3 3 matrix B we have the formula B t Skew(B v) B = det B Skew(v). We then re write (6.3) as follows: det ( ɛ + R µ R ) = det µ det ( µ /2 ɛµ /2 + ( µ /2 Rµ /2) ( µ /2 Rµ /2)). Also since µ /2 is symmetric, we have µ /2 Rµ /2 = µ /2 Skew( ψ)µ /2 = µ /2 Skew ( µ /2 µ /2 ψ ) µ /2 = det ( µ /2) Skew ( µ /2 ψ ). Also µ /2 ɛµ /2 + ( µ /2 Rµ /2) ( µ /2 Rµ /2) = ODO t + OO ( t µ /2 Rµ /2) OO ( t µ /2 Rµ /2) OO t = O ( D + O ( t µ /2 Rµ /2) OO ( t µ /2 Rµ /2) O ) O t. We have R := O t ( µ /2 Rµ /2) O = det ( µ /2) O t Skew ( µ /2 ψ ) O = det ( µ /2) O t Skew ( O O t µ /2 ψ ) O = det ( µ /2) det O Skew ( O t µ /2 ψ ),
19 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 9 so D + R R = D + ( det ( µ /2)) 2 (det O) 2 Skew ( O t µ /2 ψ ) Skew ( O t µ /2 ψ ) = D + ( det ( µ /2)) 2 ( Skew O t µ /2 ψ ) Skew ( O t µ /2 ψ ) ) ) µ = D + Skew (O /2 t det ( µ µ /2) ψ Skew (O /2 t det ( µ /2) ψ. Therefore det ( ɛ + R µ R ) ( ) )) µ = det µ det D + Skew (O /2 t det ( µ µ /2) S Skew (O /2 t det ( µ /2) S (6.5) = det µ det ( D + Skew(p) Skew(p) ) = 0, where p = p p 2 p 3 := O t µ /2 det ( µ /2) S. Notice that this calculation is done at a fixed point (x, y, z) since the matrices ɛ and µ depend on the point (x, y, z); therefore the matrices D and O depend also on (x, y, z). Next we have Skew(p) Skew(p) = p p t p t p Id = p p (p p) Id, so by (6.5) the Fresnel equation for the wave fronts (6.3) is then 0 = det ( D + Skew(p) Skew(p) ) = det ( D + p p (p p) Id ). To write this equation in a more convenient form, set τ 0 0 D = 0 τ 2 0, 0 0 τ 3
20 20 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI (a matrix depending on (x, y, z)), so 0 = det ( D + p p (p p) Id ) τ + p 2 p 2 p p 2 p p 3 = det p 2 p τ 2 + p 2 2 p 2 p 2 p 3 p 3 p p 3 p 2 τ 3 + p 2 3 p 2 τ p 2 2 p2 p 3 p 2 p p 3 = det p 2 p τ 2 p 2 p2 3 p 2 p 3 p 3 p p 3 p 2 τ 3 p 2 p2 2 Let us now define for an arbitrary vector (p, p 2, p 3 ) the following functions, which depend on the point (x, y, z) since τ i depend on (x, y, z) Φ(p, p 2, p 3 ) = ( + ) p 2 2 τ2 τ + ( + ) p τ τ + ( + ) p τ τ, 2 and ( Ψ(p, p 2, p 3 ) = (p 2 + p2 2 + p2 3 ) p 2 τ 2 τ + p τ τ + ) p τ τ 2 It is easy to check that (6.6) τ p 2 2 p2 p 3 p 2 p p 3 det p τ τ 2 τ 2 p τ 2 p 2 p2 p 3 2 p 3 = 2Φ(p, p 2, p 3 ) + Ψ(p, p 2, p 3 ). 3 p 3 p p 3 p 2 τ 3 p 2 p2 2 Now write Next notice that 2Φ + Ψ = 2Φ + Φ 2 Φ 2 + Ψ = ( Φ) 2 (Φ 2 Ψ). (6.7) Φ 2 Ψ, which follows using Legrange multipliers since Φ 2 Ψ is homogenous of degree four. So we can write 2Φ + Ψ = ( Φ Φ 2 Ψ ) ( Φ + Φ 2 Ψ )..
21 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 2 We then obtain that the Fresnel equation of wave fronts (6.3) can be split as the following two equations (6.8) Φ Φ 2 Ψ = 0 or Φ + Φ 2 Ψ = 0. Each of these equations describes a three dimensional surface that depends of the point (x, y, z) chosen at the beginning; see Figure 2. That is, in this way each point (x, y, z) in the space has associated a pair of surfaces, one enclosing the other. The inner surface is convex and the outer surface is neither convex nor concave. We have shown that the vector (6.9) p = p p 2 p 3 := O t µ /2 det ( µ /2) ψ, belongs to one of the surfaces, with all quantities calculated at (x, y, z), and the matrix O is orthogonal and diagonalizes the matrix τ. In other words, we have shown that the gradient ψ(x, y, z) of the wave front ψ=constant, when multiplied µ /2 by the matrix det ( µ /2) and conveniently rotated by Ot, belongs to one of the surfaces described by the equations (6.8). Notice that when the permittivity matrix is ɛ Id and the permeability matrix is µ Id, where ɛ and µ are scalar functions depending only on position, then we recover the eikonal equation ψ 2 = ɛ µ. In fact, in this case the matrix τ = (ɛ/µ) Id, so τ i = ɛ/µ for i =, 2, 3, O = Id, Φ(p, p 2, p 3 ) = µ ɛ (p2 + p2 2 + p2 3 ), and ( µ Ψ(p, p 2, p 3 ) = ɛ ) 2 (p 2 + p2 2 + p2 3 )2. So Φ 2 = Ψ and both surfaces in (6.8) are identically equal to Φ(p, p 2, p 3 ) = µ ɛ (p2 + p2 2 + p2 3 ) = 0.
22 22 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI Figure 2. Fresnel surfaces when τ =, τ 2 = 2, τ 3 = 3; µ = Id So the vector p in (6.9) satisfies the last equation and p = µ ψ, therefore ψ 2 = ɛ µ. 6.. Case considered for the application of our results. For the application of our results from Sections 3 5 we consider materials having permittivity and permeability tensors ɛ and µ that are positive definite symmetric constant matrices with µ = a ɛ, where a is a positive number. These are homogeneous materials that when ɛ is not the identity matrix are anisotropic. We will associate with such a material a norm as follows. From the calculations above, the Fresnel equation in this case is as follows. From (6.4) we get τ = Id, so a Φ(p) = a p 2, Ψ(p) = a 2 p 4. Obviously, Φ 2 = Ψ and so the Fresnel equation is Φ = 0, i.e., p 2 = /a and therefore it has only one sheet. Then from (6.9) the vector ψ satisfies the det µ /2 µ /2
23 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 23 equation a µ /2 det µ /2 ψ 2 =. The last expression induces the following dual norm N (p) = a µ /2 det µ p /2. The norm N is the dual to the norm given by N(x) = sup x p = N (p)= det µ/2 a µ /2 x, which is the norm we associate to the material. Notice that if µ is the identity matrix, then ɛ = Id, the material is isotropic and has index of refraction n = a ɛ µ = / a. The norm obtained this way is then N(x) = n x, in agreement with the physical explanation for isotropic media given after (3.). Now, if N(x) = A x with A a constant matrix, then N(x) = N(x) At Ax. Therefore, having two materials I and II so that the wave fronts are given by norms N (x) = A x and N 2 (x) = A 2 x, respectively, the Snell law (3.) takes the following form: Each incident ray traveling in medium I with direction x Σ, i.e., N (x) =, with x ν 0 and striking the plane Π at some point P 0 is refracted in medium II into a direction m Σ 2, i.e., N 2 (m) =, if A t 2 A 2m A t A x ν, where ν is the unit normal at P 0 from medium I to medium II. In our application we have materials I and II having constant tensors (ɛ, a ɛ ) and (ɛ 2, a 2 ɛ 2 ), respectively, and therefore the associated norms to I and II are N (x) = det µ/2 a µ /2 x, N2 (m) = det µ/2 2 a2 µ /2 2 m, respectively. If we let A = det µ/2 a µ /2, A 2 = det µ/2 2 a2 µ /2 2,
24 24 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI then N (x) = A x and N 2 (m) = A 2 m. To apply the results of the previous sections to this case, from the definition of κ in (4.2) we have κ = sup A 2 x = sup A 2 A z A2 = A A x = z = the norm of the matrix A 2 A induced by the standard Euclidean norm. Hence when A2 A < the results from Section 5 are applicable to this case. On the other hand, when κ is defined by (4.5), setting A = A 2 A we get minimum eigenvalue of A t A = inf A 2 A z >, and the results from Remark 5.8 are applicable in this case. We can also write A 2 A = det µ/2 2 a2 µ /2 2 a det µ /2 µ /2 = z = a det µ /2 2 µ /2 µ /2. a 2 det µ /2 2 Once again notice that if µ i is the identity matrix, then ɛ i = a i Id, the materials are isotropic and have index of refraction n i = ɛ i µ i = / a i. The norms are then N i (x) = n i x, i =, 2, and κ = a /a 2 = n 2 /n in agreement with the physical explanation for isotropic media given after (3.). Finally, we remark that for the materials considered light rays travel in straight lines and they do not exhibit bi refringence, that is, each incident ray is refracted into only one ray. one sheet. The last property is because the Fresnel equation has only That rays travel in straight lines follows from Fermat s principle of least time explained in Section 3. Indeed, let X, Y be two points in space, γ(θ) = ( θ) X + θ Y, 0 θ, and let φ(θ) be any curve from X to Y. Then the optical length T for each curve satisfies T(γ) = 0 γ (θ) dθ = X Y, and T(φ) = 0 φ (θ) dθ 0 φ (θ) dθ = X Y. For general anisotropic materials when ɛ is not a multiple of µ, the Fresnel equation has two sheets, see Figure 2, and as mentioned before bi-refringence. 4 That is, κ is the spectral norm of the matrix A := A 2 A, i.e., κ = maximum eigenvalue of (A t A) 4
25 REFRACTORS IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA 25 occurs. This is the case for crystals, that is, when ɛ is a diagonal constant matrix and µ = Id. 7. Connection with optimal mass transport The setting up, analysis, and results from the previous sections allow us to cast the refraction problem in optimal transport terms. However, the method used in Section 5 to prove existence of solutions relies more on a deeper insight of the physical and geometric features of the refractor problem. To apply the optimal mass transport approach, we use the abstract set up in [GH09, Section 3.2 and 3.3] and from Definition 5. introduce the cost function ( ) c(x, m) = log x p 2 (m) for x Ω Σ, m Ω 2 Σ 2 and κ < with κ in (4.2). With [GH09, Definition 3.9] of c-concavity, we have that S = {ρ(x)x : x Ω } is a refractor in the sense of Definition 5. above if and only if log ρ is c-concave. From the definition of c-normal mapping N c,φ given in [GH09, Definition 3.0], and the definition of refractor mapping R S given by (5.), we have that R S = N c,log ρ. One can easily check that S is a weak solution of the refractor problem if and only if log ρ is c- concave and N c,log ρ is a measure preserving map in the sense of [GH09, Equation (3.9)] from f (x) dx to µ. Hence existence and uniqueness up to dilations of the refractor problem follows as in [GH09, Theorem 3.5]. From Remark 5.8 and using the cost function c(x, m) = log(x p 2 (m) ) we obtain similar results for κ >, defined by (4.5). References [BW59] M. Born and E. Wolf. Principles of Optics, Electromagnetic theory, propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Cambridge University Press, seventh (expanded), 2006 edition, 959. [CGH08] L. A. Caffarelli, C. E. Gutiérrez, and Qingbo Huang. On the regularity of reflector antennas. Ann. of Math., 67: , 2008.
26 26 C. E. GUTIÉRREZ, QINGBO HUANG AND H. MAWI [CH09] L. A. Caffarelli and Qingbo Huang. Reflector problem in R n endowed with non- Euclidean norm. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 93(2): , [GH09] C. E. Gutiérrez and Qingbo Huang. The refractor problem in reshaping light beams. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 93(2): , [GH4] C. E. Gutiérrez and Qingbo Huang. The near field refractor. Annales de l Institut Henri Poincaré (C) Analyse Non Linéaire, 3(4): , July-August temple.edu/ gutierre/papers/nearfield.final.version.pdf. [GM3] C. E. Gutiérrez and H. Mawi. The far field refractor with loss of energy. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 82:2 46, 203. [Gut4] C. E. Gutiérrez. Refraction problems in geometric optics. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2087, pages Springer-Verlag, 204. [Kar6] A. Karakhanyan. An inverse problem for the refractive surfaces with parallel lighting. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 48(): , 206. [KK65] M. Kline and I. W. Kay. Electromagnetic theory and geometrical optics, volume XII of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley, 965. [LGM7] R. De Leo, C. E. Gutiérrez, and H. Mawi. On the numerical solution of the far field refractor problem. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 57:23 45, 207. [LL84] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz. Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, volume 8 of Course of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, 2nd revised and enlarged edition, 984. [Sch07] Toralf Scharf. Polarized light in liquid crystals and polymers. Wiley, [Som54] Arnold Sommerfeld. Optics, volume IV of Lectures on theoretical physics. Academic Press, 954. [YY84] A. Yariv and P. Yeh. Optical waves in crystals. John Wiley & Sons, 984. Department of Mathematics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 922 address: gutierre@temple.edu Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Wright State University, Dayton, OH address: qingbo.huang@wright.edu Department of Mathematics, Howard University, Washington, D.C address: henok.mawi@howard.edu
REFRACTION PROBLEMS IN GEOMETRIC OPTICS March 13, 2015
REFRACTION PROBLEMS IN GEOMETRIC OPTICS March 13, 2015 CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Snell s law of refraction 2 2.1. In vector form 2 2.2. erivation of the Snell law 5 2.3. Surfaces
More informationON THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE FAR FIELD REFRACTOR PROBLEM
ON THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE FAR FIELD REFRACTOR PROBLEM ROBERTO DE LEO, CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ AND HENOK MAWI Abstract. The far field refractor problem with a discrete target is solved with a numerical
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 22 Jan 2018
ON THE EXISTENCE OF DICHROMATIC SINGLE ELEMENT LENSES arxiv:80.07223v [math.ap] 22 Jan 208 CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ AND AHMAD SABRA Abstract. Due to dispersion, light with different wavelengths, or colors,
More informationA LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION
A LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN. Introduction In this paper we study the geometry of the sections for solutions to the Monge- Ampere equation det D 2 u = f, u
More informationESTIMATES FOR THE MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION
GLOBAL W 2,p ESTIMATES FOR THE MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN Abstract. We use a localization property of boundary sections for solutions to the Monge-Ampere equation obtain global W 2,p estimates under
More informationLECTURE 5 APPLICATIONS OF BDIE METHOD: ACOUSTIC SCATTERING BY INHOMOGENEOUS ANISOTROPIC OBSTACLES DAVID NATROSHVILI
LECTURE 5 APPLICATIONS OF BDIE METHOD: ACOUSTIC SCATTERING BY INHOMOGENEOUS ANISOTROPIC OBSTACLES DAVID NATROSHVILI Georgian Technical University Tbilisi, GEORGIA 0-0 1. Formulation of the corresponding
More informationWave Propagation in Uniaxial Media. Reflection and Transmission at Interfaces
Lecture 5: Crystal Optics Outline 1 Homogeneous, Anisotropic Media 2 Crystals 3 Plane Waves in Anisotropic Media 4 Wave Propagation in Uniaxial Media 5 Reflection and Transmission at Interfaces Christoph
More informationRecent developments in elliptic partial differential equations of Monge Ampère type
Recent developments in elliptic partial differential equations of Monge Ampère type Neil S. Trudinger Abstract. In conjunction with applications to optimal transportation and conformal geometry, there
More informationREGULARITY OF POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS IN OPTIMAL TRANSPORTATION. Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications The Australian National University
ON STRICT CONVEXITY AND C 1 REGULARITY OF POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS IN OPTIMAL TRANSPORTATION Neil Trudinger Xu-Jia Wang Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications The Australian National University Abstract.
More informationEE/ACM Applications of Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications Lecture 17
EE/ACM 150 - Applications of Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications Lecture 17 Andre Tkacenko Signal Processing Research Group Jet Propulsion Laboratory May 29, 2012 Andre Tkacenko
More information2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due 9/5). Prove that every countable set A is measurable and µ(a) = 0. 2 (Bonus). Let A consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is
More informationPARTIAL REGULARITY OF BRENIER SOLUTIONS OF THE MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATION
PARTIAL REGULARITY OF BRENIER SOLUTIONS OF THE MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATION ALESSIO FIGALLI AND YOUNG-HEON KIM Abstract. Given Ω, Λ R n two bounded open sets, and f and g two probability densities concentrated
More informationOptics and Optical Design. Chapter 6: Polarization Optics. Lectures 11-13
Optics and Optical Design Chapter 6: Polarization Optics Lectures 11-13 Cord Arnold / Anne L Huillier Polarization of Light Arbitrary wave vs. paraxial wave One component in x-direction y x z Components
More informationLARGE DEVIATIONS OF TYPICAL LINEAR FUNCTIONALS ON A CONVEX BODY WITH UNCONDITIONAL BASIS. S. G. Bobkov and F. L. Nazarov. September 25, 2011
LARGE DEVIATIONS OF TYPICAL LINEAR FUNCTIONALS ON A CONVEX BODY WITH UNCONDITIONAL BASIS S. G. Bobkov and F. L. Nazarov September 25, 20 Abstract We study large deviations of linear functionals on an isotropic
More informationALEKSANDROV-TYPE ESTIMATES FOR A PARABOLIC MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATION
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2005(2005), No. 11, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) ALEKSANDROV-TYPE
More informationOn John type ellipsoids
On John type ellipsoids B. Klartag Tel Aviv University Abstract Given an arbitrary convex symmetric body K R n, we construct a natural and non-trivial continuous map u K which associates ellipsoids to
More informationLinear Ordinary Differential Equations
MTH.B402; Sect. 1 20180703) 2 Linear Ordinary Differential Equations Preliminaries: Matrix Norms. Denote by M n R) the set of n n matrix with real components, which can be identified the vector space R
More informationSpectral theory for magnetic Schrödinger operators and applicatio. (after Bauman-Calderer-Liu-Phillips, Pan, Helffer-Pan)
Spectral theory for magnetic Schrödinger operators and applications to liquid crystals (after Bauman-Calderer-Liu-Phillips, Pan, Helffer-Pan) Ryukoku (June 2008) In [P2], based on the de Gennes analogy
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More informationOptimal Transportation. Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Optimal Transportation and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations Neil S. Trudinger Centre of Mathematics and its Applications Australian National University 26th Brazilian Mathematical Colloquium 2007
More informationDiscreteness of Transmission Eigenvalues via Upper Triangular Compact Operators
Discreteness of Transmission Eigenvalues via Upper Triangular Compact Operators John Sylvester Department of Mathematics University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. June 3, 2011 This research
More informationElectromagnetic fields and waves
Electromagnetic fields and waves Maxwell s rainbow Outline Maxwell s equations Plane waves Pulses and group velocity Polarization of light Transmission and reflection at an interface Macroscopic Maxwell
More information1. Introduction Boundary estimates for the second derivatives of the solution to the Dirichlet problem for the Monge-Ampere equation
POINTWISE C 2,α ESTIMATES AT THE BOUNDARY FOR THE MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN Abstract. We prove a localization property of boundary sections for solutions to the Monge-Ampere equation. As a consequence
More informationModern Optics Prof. Partha Roy Chaudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Modern Optics Prof. Partha Roy Chaudhuri Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture 08 Wave propagation in anisotropic media Now, we will discuss the propagation of electromagnetic
More informationC 1 regularity of solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation for optimal transport in dimension two
C 1 regularity of solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation for optimal transport in dimension two Alessio Figalli, Grégoire Loeper Abstract We prove C 1 regularity of c-convex weak Alexandrov solutions of
More informationREGULAR LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS FOR CONTROL PROBLEMS WITH MIXED POINTWISE CONTROL-STATE CONSTRAINTS
REGULAR LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS FOR CONTROL PROBLEMS WITH MIXED POINTWISE CONTROL-STATE CONSTRAINTS fredi tröltzsch 1 Abstract. A class of quadratic optimization problems in Hilbert spaces is considered,
More informationSome recent results on controllability of coupled parabolic systems: Towards a Kalman condition
Some recent results on controllability of coupled parabolic systems: Towards a Kalman condition F. Ammar Khodja Clermont-Ferrand, June 2011 GOAL: 1 Show the important differences between scalar and non
More informationOptics and Optical Design. Chapter 6: Polarization Optics. Lectures 11 13
Optics and Optical Design Chapter 6: Polarization Optics Lectures 11 13 Cord Arnold / Anne L Huillier Polarization of Light Arbitrary wave vs. paraxial wave One component in x direction y x z Components
More informationMath 164-1: Optimization Instructor: Alpár R. Mészáros
Math 164-1: Optimization Instructor: Alpár R. Mészáros First Midterm, April 20, 2016 Name (use a pen): Student ID (use a pen): Signature (use a pen): Rules: Duration of the exam: 50 minutes. By writing
More information(a) Show that the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted waves, corrrect to first order
Problem 1. A conducting slab A plane polarized electromagnetic wave E = E I e ikz ωt is incident normally on a flat uniform sheet of an excellent conductor (σ ω) having thickness D. Assume that in space
More informationNEW RESULTS ON TRANSMISSION EIGENVALUES. Fioralba Cakoni. Drossos Gintides
Inverse Problems and Imaging Volume 0, No. 0, 0, 0 Web site: http://www.aimsciences.org NEW RESULTS ON TRANSMISSION EIGENVALUES Fioralba Cakoni epartment of Mathematical Sciences University of elaware
More informationOn the regularity of solutions of optimal transportation problems
On the regularity of solutions of optimal transportation problems Grégoire Loeper April 25, 2008 Abstract We give a necessary and sufficient condition on the cost function so that the map solution of Monge
More informationDeviation Measures and Normals of Convex Bodies
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra Geometry Volume 45 (2004), No. 1, 155-167. Deviation Measures Normals of Convex Bodies Dedicated to Professor August Florian on the occasion
More informationThe oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains
M. MITREA The oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains Let M be a smooth, oriented, connected, compact, boundaryless manifold of real dimension m, and let T M and T
More informationRecovery of anisotropic metrics from travel times
Purdue University The Lens Rigidity and the Boundary Rigidity Problems Let M be a bounded domain with boundary. Let g be a Riemannian metric on M. Define the scattering relation σ and the length (travel
More informationThe Imaging of Anisotropic Media in Inverse Electromagnetic Scattering
The Imaging of Anisotropic Media in Inverse Electromagnetic Scattering Fioralba Cakoni Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716, USA email: cakoni@math.udel.edu Research
More informationApplied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.
Applied Analysis APPM 44: Final exam 1:3pm 4:pm, Dec. 14, 29. Closed books. Problem 1: 2p Set I = [, 1]. Prove that there is a continuous function u on I such that 1 ux 1 x sin ut 2 dt = cosx, x I. Define
More informationMeasuring Ellipsoids 1
Measuring Ellipsoids 1 Igor Rivin Temple University 2 What is an ellipsoid? E = {x E n Ax = 1}, where A is a non-singular linear transformation of E n. Remark that Ax = Ax, Ax = x, A t Ax. The matrix Q
More informationOn a Class of Multidimensional Optimal Transportation Problems
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 10 (2003), No. 2, 517 529 On a Class of Multidimensional Optimal Transportation Problems G. Carlier Université Bordeaux 1, MAB, UMR CNRS 5466, France and Université Bordeaux
More informationLinear Algebra Massoud Malek
CSUEB Linear Algebra Massoud Malek Inner Product and Normed Space In all that follows, the n n identity matrix is denoted by I n, the n n zero matrix by Z n, and the zero vector by θ n An inner product
More informationBRUNN MINKOWSKI AND ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY IN THE HEISENBERG GROUP
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 28, 23, 99 19 BRUNN MINKOWSKI AND ISOPERIMETRIC INEQUALITY IN THE HEISENBERG GROUP Roberto Monti Universität Bern, Mathematisches Institut Sidlerstrasse
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationRegularity for the optimal transportation problem with Euclidean distance squared cost on the embedded sphere
Regularity for the optimal transportation problem with Euclidean distance squared cost on the embedded sphere Jun Kitagawa and Micah Warren January 6, 011 Abstract We give a sufficient condition on initial
More informationTopological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models
Topological properties of Z p and Q p and Euclidean models Samuel Trautwein, Esther Röder, Giorgio Barozzi November 3, 20 Topology of Q p vs Topology of R Both R and Q p are normed fields and complete
More informationLecture 3: Asymptotic Methods for the Reduced Wave Equation
Lecture 3: Asymptotic Methods for the Reduced Wave Equation Joseph B. Keller 1 The Reduced Wave Equation Let v (t,) satisfy the wave equation v 1 2 v c 2 = 0, (1) (X) t2 where c(x) is the propagation speed
More informationExercise Solutions to Functional Analysis
Exercise Solutions to Functional Analysis Note: References refer to M. Schechter, Principles of Functional Analysis Exersize that. Let φ,..., φ n be an orthonormal set in a Hilbert space H. Show n f n
More informationChapter 7. Extremal Problems. 7.1 Extrema and Local Extrema
Chapter 7 Extremal Problems No matter in theoretical context or in applications many problems can be formulated as problems of finding the maximum or minimum of a function. Whenever this is the case, advanced
More informationCharacterization of half-radial matrices
Characterization of half-radial matrices Iveta Hnětynková, Petr Tichý Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Sokolovská 83, Prague 8, Czech Republic Abstract Numerical radius r(a) is the
More informationLecture 5: Polarization. Polarized Light in the Universe. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Polarizers. Retarders. Outline
Lecture 5: Polarization Outline 1 Polarized Light in the Universe 2 Descriptions of Polarized Light 3 Polarizers 4 Retarders Christoph U. Keller, Leiden University, keller@strw.leidenuniv.nl ATI 2016,
More informationPROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space
1 Professor Carl Cowen Math 54600 Fall 09 PROBLEMS 1. (Geometry in Inner Product Spaces) (a) (Parallelogram Law) Show that in any inner product space x + y 2 + x y 2 = 2( x 2 + y 2 ). (b) (Polarization
More informationMATH 51H Section 4. October 16, Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous:
MATH 51H Section 4 October 16, 2015 1 Continuity Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous: Definition. Let (X, d X ), (Y, d Y ) be metric spaces. A function f : X Y is
More informationIntroduction to Condensed Matter Physics
Introduction to Condensed Matter Physics Diffraction I Basic Physics M.P. Vaughan Diffraction Electromagnetic waves Geometric wavefront The Principle of Linear Superposition Diffraction regimes Single
More informationBLASCHKE S ROLLING BALL THEOREM AND THE TRUDINGER-WANG MONOTONE BENDING. 1. Introduction
BLASCHKE S ROLLING BALL THEOREM AND THE TRUDINGER-WANG MONOTONE BENDING ARAM L. KARAKHANYAN arxiv:5.086v math.ap] 7 Dec 05 Abstract. We revisit the classical rolling ball theorem of Blaschke for convex
More informationThe X-ray transform for a non-abelian connection in two dimensions
The X-ray transform for a non-abelian connection in two dimensions David Finch Department of Mathematics Oregon State University Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA Gunther Uhlmann Department of Mathematics University
More informationConstrained Optimization and Lagrangian Duality
CIS 520: Machine Learning Oct 02, 2017 Constrained Optimization and Lagrangian Duality Lecturer: Shivani Agarwal Disclaimer: These notes are designed to be a supplement to the lecture. They may or may
More informationFidelity and trace norm
Fidelity and trace norm In this lecture we will see two simple examples of semidefinite programs for quantities that are interesting in the theory of quantum information: the first is the trace norm of
More informationPacking-Dimension Profiles and Fractional Brownian Motion
Under consideration for publication in Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 1 Packing-Dimension Profiles and Fractional Brownian Motion By DAVAR KHOSHNEVISAN Department of Mathematics, 155 S. 1400 E., JWB 233,
More information9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning
Tel Aviv University, 2015 Functions of real variables 93 9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning 9a Borel-Kolmogorov paradox............. 93 9b Radon-Nikodym theorem.............. 94 9c Conditioning.....................
More informationfor all subintervals I J. If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D J only, we will write ϕ BMO d (J). In fact, the following is true
3 ohn Nirenberg inequality, Part I A function ϕ L () belongs to the space BMO() if sup ϕ(s) ϕ I I I < for all subintervals I If the same is true for the dyadic subintervals I D only, we will write ϕ BMO
More informationRobustness for a Liouville type theorem in exterior domains
Robustness for a Liouville type theorem in exterior domains Juliette Bouhours 1 arxiv:1207.0329v3 [math.ap] 24 Oct 2014 1 UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7598, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, F-75005, Paris,
More informationDuality of multiparameter Hardy spaces H p on spaces of homogeneous type
Duality of multiparameter Hardy spaces H p on spaces of homogeneous type Yongsheng Han, Ji Li, and Guozhen Lu Department of Mathematics Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN Internet Analysis Seminar 2012
More informationLecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University
Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University February 7, 2007 2 Contents 1 Metric Spaces 1 1.1 Basic definitions...........................
More informationON A MEASURE THEORETIC AREA FORMULA
ON A MEASURE THEORETIC AREA FORMULA VALENTINO MAGNANI Abstract. We review some classical differentiation theorems for measures, showing how they can be turned into an integral representation of a Borel
More informationTHE MULTIPLICATIVE ERGODIC THEOREM OF OSELEDETS
THE MULTIPLICATIVE ERGODIC THEOREM OF OSELEDETS. STATEMENT Let (X, µ, A) be a probability space, and let T : X X be an ergodic measure-preserving transformation. Given a measurable map A : X GL(d, R),
More informationLECTURE # 0 BASIC NOTATIONS AND CONCEPTS IN THE THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (PDES)
LECTURE # 0 BASIC NOTATIONS AND CONCEPTS IN THE THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (PDES) RAYTCHO LAZAROV 1 Notations and Basic Functional Spaces Scalar function in R d, d 1 will be denoted by u,
More informationLocal semiconvexity of Kantorovich potentials on non-compact manifolds
Local semiconvexity of Kantorovich potentials on non-compact manifolds Alessio Figalli, Nicola Gigli Abstract We prove that any Kantorovich potential for the cost function c = d / on a Riemannian manifold
More informationON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES
ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES CLAUS GERHARDT Abstract. We prove that the mean curvature τ of the slices given by a constant mean curvature foliation can be used
More informationLecture 5. Theorems of Alternatives and Self-Dual Embedding
IE 8534 1 Lecture 5. Theorems of Alternatives and Self-Dual Embedding IE 8534 2 A system of linear equations may not have a solution. It is well known that either Ax = c has a solution, or A T y = 0, c
More informationSummary of Fourier Optics
Summary of Fourier Optics Diffraction of the paraxial wave is described by Fresnel diffraction integral, u(x, y, z) = j λz dx 0 dy 0 u 0 (x 0, y 0 )e j(k/2z)[(x x 0) 2 +(y y 0 ) 2 )], Fraunhofer diffraction
More informationMaxwell s equations in Carnot groups
Maxwell s equations in Carnot groups B. Franchi (U. Bologna) INDAM Meeting on Geometric Control and sub-riemannian Geometry Cortona, May 21-25, 2012 in honor of Andrey Agrachev s 60th birthday Researches
More informationIn English, this means that if we travel on a straight line between any two points in C, then we never leave C.
Convex sets In this section, we will be introduced to some of the mathematical fundamentals of convex sets. In order to motivate some of the definitions, we will look at the closest point problem from
More informationON STRICT CONVEXITY AND CONTINUOUS DIFFERENTIABILITY OF POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS IN OPTIMAL TRANSPORTATION
ON STRICT CONVEXITY AND CONTINUOUS DIFFERENTIABILITY OF POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS IN OPTIMAL TRANSPORTATION Neil Trudinger Xu-Jia Wang Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications The Australian National University
More information1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω)
0.1 Norms 0.1 Norms A norm on a linear space X is a function : X R with the properties: Positive Definite: x 0 x X (nonnegative) x = 0 x = 0 (strictly positive) λx = λ x x X, λ C(homogeneous) x + y x +
More informationBackward wave propagation in left-handed media with isotropic and anisotropic permittivity tensors
J. Woodley and M. Mojahedi Vol. 23, No. 11/November 2006/ J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2377 Backward wave propagation in left-handed media with isotropic and anisotropic permittivity tensors Jonathan Woodley and
More informationIntroduction to Polarization
Phone: Ext 659, E-mail: hcchui@mail.ncku.edu.tw Fall/007 Introduction to Polarization Text Book: A Yariv and P Yeh, Photonics, Oxford (007) 1.6 Polarization States and Representations (Stokes Parameters
More informationThe Factorization Method for Inverse Scattering Problems Part I
The Factorization Method for Inverse Scattering Problems Part I Andreas Kirsch Madrid 2011 Department of Mathematics KIT University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Large-scale Research Center
More informationA VARIATIONAL METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF A MONOTONE SCHEME FOR THE MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATION 1. INTRODUCTION
A VARIATIONAL METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF A MONOTONE SCHEME FOR THE MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATION GERARD AWANOU AND LEOPOLD MATAMBA MESSI ABSTRACT. We give a proof of existence of a solution to the discrete problem
More informationGeometric problems. Chapter Projection on a set. The distance of a point x 0 R n to a closed set C R n, in the norm, is defined as
Chapter 8 Geometric problems 8.1 Projection on a set The distance of a point x 0 R n to a closed set C R n, in the norm, is defined as dist(x 0,C) = inf{ x 0 x x C}. The infimum here is always achieved.
More informationINVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM and SURFACES IN R n
INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM and SURFACES IN R n Let f C k (U; R n ), with U R n open. Assume df(a) GL(R n ), where a U. The Inverse Function Theorem says there is an open neighborhood V U of a in R n so that
More informationMath The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution
Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external
More informationChap. 4. Electromagnetic Propagation in Anisotropic Media
Chap. 4. Electromagnetic Propagation in Anisotropic Media - Optical properties depend on the direction of propagation and the polarization of the light. - Crystals such as calcite, quartz, KDP, and liquid
More informationPrimal-dual relationship between Levenberg-Marquardt and central trajectories for linearly constrained convex optimization
Primal-dual relationship between Levenberg-Marquardt and central trajectories for linearly constrained convex optimization Roger Behling a, Clovis Gonzaga b and Gabriel Haeser c March 21, 2013 a Department
More informationPACKING-DIMENSION PROFILES AND FRACTIONAL BROWNIAN MOTION
PACKING-DIMENSION PROFILES AND FRACTIONAL BROWNIAN MOTION DAVAR KHOSHNEVISAN AND YIMIN XIAO Abstract. In order to compute the packing dimension of orthogonal projections Falconer and Howroyd 997) introduced
More informationMeasure and Integration: Solutions of CW2
Measure and Integration: s of CW2 Fall 206 [G. Holzegel] December 9, 206 Problem of Sheet 5 a) Left (f n ) and (g n ) be sequences of integrable functions with f n (x) f (x) and g n (x) g (x) for almost
More informationx 1 x 2. x 1, x 2,..., x n R. x n
WEEK In general terms, our aim in this first part of the course is to use vector space theory to study the geometry of Euclidean space A good knowledge of the subject matter of the Matrix Applications
More informationAW -Convergence and Well-Posedness of Non Convex Functions
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 10 (2003), No. 2, 351 364 AW -Convergence Well-Posedness of Non Convex Functions Silvia Villa DIMA, Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 35, 16146 Genova, Italy villa@dima.unige.it
More informationON GENERALIZED-CONVEX CONSTRAINED MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION
ON GENERALIZED-CONVEX CONSTRAINED MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION CHRISTIAN GÜNTHER AND CHRISTIANE TAMMER Abstract. In this paper, we consider multi-objective optimization problems involving not necessarily
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF STRICT LOCAL MINIMIZERS OF ORDER ONE FOR STATIC MINMAX PROBLEMS IN THE PARAMETRIC CONSTRAINT CASE
Journal of Applied Analysis Vol. 6, No. 1 (2000), pp. 139 148 A CHARACTERIZATION OF STRICT LOCAL MINIMIZERS OF ORDER ONE FOR STATIC MINMAX PROBLEMS IN THE PARAMETRIC CONSTRAINT CASE A. W. A. TAHA Received
More informationFast convergent finite difference solvers for the elliptic Monge-Ampère equation
Fast convergent finite difference solvers for the elliptic Monge-Ampère equation Adam Oberman Simon Fraser University BIRS February 17, 211 Joint work [O.] 28. Convergent scheme in two dim. Explicit solver.
More informationReflection of Plane Electromagnetic Wave from Conducting Plane
Reflection of Plane Electromagnetic Wave from Conducting Plane Zafar Turakulov August 19, 2014 Abstract The phenomenon of reflection from conducting surface is considered in terms of exact solutions of
More informationLocally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem
56 Chapter 7 Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem Recall that C(X) is not a normed linear space when X is not compact. On the other hand we could use semi
More informationA Simple Proof of the Generalized Cauchy s Theorem
A Simple Proof of the Generalized Cauchy s Theorem Mojtaba Mahzoon, Hamed Razavi Abstract The Cauchy s theorem for balance laws is proved in a general context using a simpler and more natural method in
More informationSobolev regularity for the Monge-Ampère equation, with application to the semigeostrophic equations
Sobolev regularity for the Monge-Ampère equation, with application to the semigeostrophic equations Alessio Figalli Abstract In this note we review some recent results on the Sobolev regularity of solutions
More informationGAUSSIAN MEASURE OF SECTIONS OF DILATES AND TRANSLATIONS OF CONVEX BODIES. 2π) n
GAUSSIAN MEASURE OF SECTIONS OF DILATES AND TRANSLATIONS OF CONVEX BODIES. A. ZVAVITCH Abstract. In this paper we give a solution for the Gaussian version of the Busemann-Petty problem with additional
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationSOLUTION OF THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH A VARIATIONAL METHOD. 1. Dirichlet integral
SOLUTION OF THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH A VARIATIONAL METHOD CRISTIAN E. GUTIÉRREZ FEBRUARY 3, 29. Dirichlet integral Let f C( ) with open and bounded. Let H = {u C ( ) : u = f on } and D(u) = Du(x) 2 dx.
More informationScattering of electromagnetic waves by thin high contrast dielectrics II: asymptotics of the electric field and a method for inversion.
Scattering of electromagnetic waves by thin high contrast dielectrics II: asymptotics of the electric field and a method for inversion. David M. Ambrose Jay Gopalakrishnan Shari Moskow Scott Rome June
More informationMET Workshop: Exercises
MET Workshop: Exercises Alex Blumenthal and Anthony Quas May 7, 206 Notation. R d is endowed with the standard inner product (, ) and Euclidean norm. M d d (R) denotes the space of n n real matrices. When
More informationAppendix B Convex analysis
This version: 28/02/2014 Appendix B Convex analysis In this appendix we review a few basic notions of convexity and related notions that will be important for us at various times. B.1 The Hausdorff distance
More informationChapter 4. Inverse Function Theorem. 4.1 The Inverse Function Theorem
Chapter 4 Inverse Function Theorem d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d dd d d d d This chapter
More information