1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics"

Transcription

1 Chapter Second Quantization. Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics We will begin with a quick review of creation and annihilation operators in the non-relativistic linear harmonic oscillator. Let a and a be two operators acting on an abstract Hilbert space of states, and satisfying the commutation relation [ a, a ] = (.) where by we mean the identity operator of this Hilbert space. The operators a and a are not self-adjoint but are the adjoint of each other. Let α be a state which we will take to be an eigenvector of the Hermitian operators a a with eigenvalue α which is a real number, a a α = α α (.2) Hence, α = α a a α = a α 2 0 (.3) where we used the fundamental axiom of Quantum Mechanics that the norm of all states in the physical Hilbert space is positive. As a result, the eigenvalues α of the eigenstates of a a must be non-negative real numbers. Furthermore, since for all operators A, B and C we get [AB, C] = A[B, C] + [A, C] B (.4) [ a a, a ] = a (.5) [ a a, a ] = a (.6)

2 2 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION i.e., a and a are eigen-operators of a a. Hence, ( a a ) a = a ( a a ) (.7) ( a a ) a = a ( a a + ) (.8) Consequently we find ( a a ) a α = a ( a a ) α = (α )a α (.9) Hence the state a α is an eigenstate of a a with eigenvalue α, provided a α 0. Similarly, a α is an eigenstate of a a with eigenvalue α+, provided a α 0. This also implies that α = α + = α a α (.0) α + a α (.) Let us assume that a n α 0, n Z + (.2) Hence, a n α is an eigenstate of a a with eigenvalue α n. However, α n < 0 if α < n, which contradicts our earlier result that all these eigenvalues must be non-negative real numbers. Hence, for a given α there must exist an integer n such that a n α 0 but a n+ α = 0, where n Z +. Let where But α n = a n α an α a a α n = (α n) α n (.3) a n α n = α n (.4) a α n = a n α an+ α = 0 α = n (.5) In other words the allowed eigenvalues of a a are the non-negative integers. Let us now define the ground state 0, as the state annihilated by a, Then, an arbitrary state n is a 0 = 0 (.6) n = n! (a ) n 0 (.7) which has the inner product n m = δ n,m n! (.8)

3 .. CREATION AND ANNIHILATION OPERATORS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS3 In summary, we found that creation and annihilation operators obey and thus their matrix elements are a n = n + n + (.9) a n = n n (.20) a a n = n n (.2) (.22) m a n = n + δ m,n+ m a n = n δ m,n (.23).. The Linear harmonic Oscillator The Hamiltonian of the Linear Harmonic Oscillator is H = P 2 2m + 2 mω2 X 2 (.24) where X and P, the coordinate and momentum Hermitian operators satisfy canonical commutation relations, [X, P] = i (.25) We now define the creation and annihilation operators a and a as a = [ ] mω 2 X + i P mω a = [ ] mω 2 X i P mω (.26) (.27) which satisfy [ a, a ] = (.28) Since X = P = the Hamiltonian takes the simple form ( H = ω a a + ) 2 ( a + a ) (.29) 2mω ( ) mω a a (.30) 2 i (.3) The eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are constructed easily using our results since all eigenstates of a a are eigenstates of H. Thus, the eigenstates of H are the eigenstates of a a, ( H n = ω n + ) n (.32) 2

4 4 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION with eigenvalues ( E n = ω n + ) 2 (.33) where n = 0,,.... The ground state 0 is the state annihilated by a, Since a 0 [ ] mω 2 X + i P 0 = 0 (.34) mω x P φ = i d x φ (.35) dx we find that ψ 0 (x) = x 0 satisfies ( x + ) d ψ 0 (x) = 0 (.36) mω dx whose (normalized) solution is ψ 0 (x) = The wave functions ψ n (x) of the excited states n are ψ n (x) = x n = n! x (a ) n 0 = ( mω n! 2 ( mω ) /4 mω e 2 x2 (.37) π ) n/2 ( x mω ) n d ψ 0 (x) (.38) dx Creation and annihilation operators are very useful. Let us consider for instance the anharmonic oscillator whose Hamiltonian is H = P 2 2m + 2 mω2 X 2 + λx 4 (.39) Let us compute the eigenvalues E n to lowest order in perturbation theory in powers of λ. The first order shift E n is E n = λ n X 4 n + O(λ 2 ) ( ) 2 = λ n (a + a ) 4 n mω ( ) 2 { = λ n a a aa n + other terms with two a s and two a s } mω ( ) 2 ( = λ 6n 2 + 6n + 3 ) +... (.40) 2mω

5 .. CREATION AND ANNIHILATION OPERATORS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS5..2 Many Harmonic Oscillators It is trivial to extend these ideas to the case of many harmonic oscillators, which is a crude model of an elastic solid. Consider a system of N identical linear harmonic oscillators of mass M and frequency ω, with coordinates {Q i } and momenta {P i }, where i =,...,N. These operators satisfy the commutation relations [Q j, Q k ] = [P j, P k ] = 0, [Q j, P k ] = i δ jk (.4) where j, k =,..., N. The Hamiltonian is H = N i= P 2 i 2M i + 2 N V ij Q i Q j (.42) i,j= where V ij is a symmetric positive definite matrix, V ij = V ji. We will find the spectrum (and eigenstates) of this system by changing variables to normal modes and using creation and annihilation operators for the normal modes. To this end we will first rescale coordinates and momenta so as to absorb the particle mass M: x i = M i Q i (.43) p i = U ij = P i Mi (.44) Mi M j V ij (.45) which also satisfy and H = [x j, p j ] = i δ jk (.46) N i= p 2 i N U ij x i x j (.47) i,j= We now got to normal mode variables by means of an orthogonal transformation C jk, i.e. [C ] jk = C kj, N N x k = C kj x j, p k = C kj p j j= N C ki C ji = δ kj, i= j= N C ik C ij = δ kj (.48) Sine the matrix U ij is real symmetric and positive definite, its eigenvalues, which we will denote by ωk 2 (with k =,...,N), are all non-negative, ω2 k 0. The eigenvalue equation is i= N C ki C lj U ij = ωk 2 δ kl, (no sum over k) (.49) i,j=

6 6 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION Since the transformation is orthogonal, it preserves the commutation relations and the Hamiltonian is now diagonal [ x j, x k ] = [ p j, p k ] = 0, [ x j, p k ] = i δ jk (.50) H = 2 N 2 ( p j + ωj 2 j) x2 i= (.5) We now define creation and annihilation operators for the normal modes ( a j = ωj x j + i ) p j 2 ωj a j = x j = p j = i ( ωj x j i ) p j 2 ωj ( ) a j + a j 2ω j ωj 2 ( ) a j a j (.52) where, once again, [ ] [a j, a k ] a j, a k = 0, [ ] a j, a k = δjk (.53) and the normal mode Hamiltonian takes the standard form H = N j= ( ω j a j a j + ) 2 (.54) The eigenstates of the Hamiltonian are labelled by the eigenvalues of a j a j for each normal mode j, n,...,n N {n j }. Hence, H n,...,n N = N j= ( ω j n j + ) n,...,n N (.55) 2 where N n,...,n N = j= (a j )nj nj! 0,...,0 (.56) The ground state of the system, which we will denote by 0, is the state in which all normal modes are in their ground state, 0 0,..., 0 (.57)

7 .. CREATION AND ANNIHILATION OPERATORS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS7 Thus, the ground state 0 is annihilated by the annihilation operators of all normal modes, and the ground state energy of the system E gnd is The energy of the excited states is a j 0 = 0, j (.58) E gnd = E(n,...,n N ) = N j= 2 ω j (.59) N ω j n j + E gnd (.60) We can now regard the state 0 as the vacuum state and the excited states n,...,n N as a state with n j excitations (or particles) of type j. In this context, the excitations are called phonons. A single-phonon state of type j will be denoted by j, is This state is an eigenstate of H, j= j = a j 0 = 0,...,0, j, 0,...,0 (.6) H j = Ha j 0 = ( ω j + E gnd )a j 0 = ( ω j + E gnd ) j (.62) with excitation energy ω j. Hence, an arbitrary state n,..., n N can also be regarded as a collection of non-interacting particles (or excitations), each carrying an energy equal to the excitation energy (relative to the ground state energy). The total number of phonons in a given state is measured by the number operator N ˆN = a j a j (.63) j= Notice that although the number of oscillators is fixed (and equal to N) the number of excitations may differ greatly from one state to another. We now note that the state n,..., n N can also be represented as n,...,n k,... n n 2 n!n 2!... {}}{{}}{..., (.64) We will see below that this form appears naturally in the quantization of systems of identical particles. Eq.(.64) is symmetric under the exchange of labels of the phonons. Thus, phonons are bosons.

8 8 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION.2 The Quantized Elastic Solid We will now consider the problem of an elastic solid in the approximation of continuum elasticity, i.e. we will be interested in vibrations on wavelengths long compared to the inter-atomic spacing. At the classical level, the physical state of this system is determined by specifying the local three-component vector displacement field u( r, t), which describes the local displacement of the atoms away from their equilibrium positions, and by the velocities of the atoms, u t ( r, t). The classical Lagrangian L for an isotropic solid is L = d 3 r ρ 2 ( ) 2 u t 2 d 3 r [K i u j i u j + Γ i u i j u j ] (.65) where ρ is the mass density, K and Γ are two elastic moduli. The classical equations of motion are δl = ( ) δl δu i t δ u i (.66) which have the explicit form of a wave equation ρ 2 u i t 2 K 2 u i Γ i u = 0 (.67) We now define the canonical momentum Π i ( r, t) Π i ( r, t) = δl δ u i = ρ u i (.68) which in this case coincides with the linear momentum density of the particles. The classical Hamiltonian H is H = d 3 rπ i ( r, t) u [ ] Π ( r, t) L = d 3 2 r t 2ρ + K 2 ( i u) 2 + Γ ( ) 2 u 2 (.69) In the quantum theory, the displacement field u( r) and the canonical momentum Π( r) become operators acting on a Hilbert space, obeying the equal-time commutation relations [ u i ( r), u j ( R) ] [ = Π i ( r), Π j ( R) ] [ = 0, u i ( r), Π j ( R) ] = i δ 3 ( r R)δ ij (.70) Due to the translational invariance of the continuum solid, the canonical transformation to normal modes is a Fourier transform. Thus we write ũ i ( p) = d 3 r e i p r u i ( r) (.7) Π i ( p) = d 3 r e i p r Π i ( r) (.72)

9 .2. THE QUANTIZED ELASTIC SOLID 9 Using the representations of the Dirac δ-function δ 3 ( r R) d 3 p = ei p ( r R) (2π) 3 (.73) (2π) 3 δ 3 ( p q) = d 3 r e i( p q) r (.74) we can write u i ( r) = ρ Π i ( r) = ρ d 3 p (2π) 3 ei p r ũ i ( p) (.75) d 3 p (2π) 3 ei p r Πi ( p) (.76) where we have scaled out the density ρ or future convenience. On the other hand, since u i ( r) and Π i ( r) are real (and Hermitian) u i ( r) = u i ( r), Π i( r) = Π i ( r) (.77) their Fourier transformed fields ũ i ( p) and Π i ( p) obey ũ i ( p) = ũ i( p), with equal-time commutation relations [ũ j ( p), ũ k ( q)] = [ Πj ( p), Π k ( q)] = 0, where Π i ( p) = Π i ( p) (.78) [ ũ j ( p), Π ] k ( q) = i (2π) 3 δ 3 ( p + q)δ jk (.79) In terms of the Fourier transformed fields the Hamiltonian has the form H = d 3 p (2π) 3 The 3 3 matrix ωij 2 has two eigenvalues:. 2. ( 2 Π i ( p) Π i ( p) + 2 ω2 ij ( p)ũ i( p)ũ j ( p) ) (.80) ω 2 ij ( p) = K ρ p 2 δ ij + Γ ρ p ip j (.8) with eigenvector parallel to the unit vector p/ p ( ) K + Γ ωl( p) 2 = p 2 (.82) ρ ω 2 T( p) = ( ) K p 2 (.83) ρ with a two-dimensional degenerate space spanned by the mutually orthogonal unit vectors e ( p) and e 2 ( p), both orthogonal to p: e α ( p) p = 0, (α =, 2), e ( p) e 2 ( p) = 0 (.84)

10 0 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION We can now expand the displacement field ũ( p) into a longitudinal component and two transverse components ũ L i ( p) = ũ L ( p) p i p ũ T i ( p) = α=,2 (.85) ũ T α( p)e α i ( p) (.86) The canonical momenta Π i ( p) can also be expanded into one longitudinal component Π L ( p) and two transverse components Π T α( p). As a result the Hamiltonian can be decomposed into a sum of two terms, H = H L + H T (.87) H L involves only the longitudinal component of the field and momenta H L = d 3 p } { ΠL 2 (2π) 3 ( p) Π L ( p) + ωl 2 ( p) ũ L( p)ũ L ( p) (.88) H T involves only the transverse components of the field and momenta H T = d 3 p } { ΠT 2 (2π) 3 α ( p) Π T α ( p) + ω2 T ( p) ũt α ( p)ũt α ( p) (.89) α=,2 We can now define creation and annihilation operators for both longitudinal and transverse components ( ) ωl i a L ( p) = ( p) ũ L ( p) + Π L ( p) 2 ωl ( p) a L ( p) = a α T( p) = a α T ( p) = ( ωl i ( p) ũ L ( p) 2 ωl ( p) ( ωt ( p) ũ α i T( p) + 2 ωt ( p) ( ωt ( p) ũ α T ( p) i 2 ωt ( p) Π L ( p) Π α T( p) ) ) Π α T ( p) ) which obey standard commutation relations: [a L ( p), a L ( q)] = [ a L ( p), a L ( q) ) ] = 0 [ al ( p), a L ( q) ] = (2π) 3 δ 3 ( p q) ] [a α T ( p), aβt ( q) = [ a α T ( p), aβ T ( q) ] = [ ] a α T ( p), a β T ( q) ) = 0 (2π) 3 δ 3 ( p q)δ αβ [a L ( p), a α T( q)] = [ a L ( p), a α T( q) ) ] = 0 (.90) (.9)

11 .2. THE QUANTIZED ELASTIC SOLID where α, β =, 2. Conversely we also have ũ L ( p) = 2ω L ( p) ( al ( p) + a L ( p) ) Π L ( p) = ũ α T( p) = Π α T ( p) = ωl ( p) ( i al ( p) a L ( p) ) 2 ( a α 2ω T ( p) T ( p) + a α T( p) ) i ωt ( p) 2 ( a α T ( p) a α T ( p) ) (.92) The Hamiltonian now reads H = d 3 p 2 (2π) 3 ω L( p) ( a L ( p) a L ( p) + a L ( p)a L ( p) ) + d 3 p 2 (2π) 3 ω T( p) ( a α T ( p) a α T( p) + a α T( p)a α T( p) ) α=,2 ( d 3 p = E gnd + (2π) 3 ω L ( p) a L ( p) a L ( p) + ) ω T ( p) a α T( p) a α T( p) The ground state 0 has energy E gnd, where we have used that E gnd = V α=,2 (.93) d 3 p (2π) 3 2 ( ω L( p) + 2 ω T ( p)) (.94) lim p 0 δ3 ( p) = V (2π) 3 (.95) As before the ground state is annihilated by all annihilation operators a L ( p) 0 = 0, a α T ( p) 0 = 0 (.96) and it will be regarded as the state without phonons. There are three one-phonon states with wave vector p: One longitudinal phonon state L, p = a L ( p) 0 (.97) with energy E L ( p) E L ( p) = ω L ( p) = v L p (.98)

12 2 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION where v L = K + Γ ρ (.99) is the speed of the longitudinal phonon, Two transverse phonon states T, α, p = a α T( p) 0 (.00) one for each polarization, with energy E T ( p) E T ( p) = ω T ( p) = v T p (.0) where v T = K ρ (.02) is the speed of the transverse phonons. The energies of the longitudinal and transverse phonon we found vanish as p 0. These are acoustic phonons and the speeds v L and v T are speeds of sound. Notice that if the elastic modulus Γ = 0 all three states become degenerate. If in addition we were to have considered the effects of lattice anisotropies, the two transverse branches may no longer be degenerate as in this case. Similarly we can define multi-phonon states, with either polarization. For instance a state with two longitudinal phonons with momenta p and q is L, p, q = a L ( p) a L ( q) 0 (.03) This state has energy ω L ( p) + ω L ( q) above the ground state. Finally, let us define the linear momentum operator P, for phonons of either longitudinal or transverse polarization, P = d 3 p (2π) 3 p ( a L ( p) a L ( p) + α=,2 This operator obeys the commutation relations [ P, al ( k) ] = ka L ( k) a α T( p) a α T( p) ) (.04) [ P, a α T ( k) ] = ka α T ( k) [ P, al ( k)] = ka L ( k) [ P, a α T ( k)] = ka α T( k) (.05)

13 .2. THE QUANTIZED ELASTIC SOLID 3 and commutes with the Hamiltonian [ P, H ] = 0 (.06) Hence P is a conserved quantity. Moreover, using the commutation relations and the expressions for the displacement fields it is easy to show that [ P, ui ( x)] = i u i ( x) (.07) which implies that P is the generator of infinitesimal displacements. Hence, it is the linear momentum operator. It is easy to see that P annihilates the ground state P 0 = 0 (.08) which means that the ground state has zero momentum. In other terms, the ground state is translationally invariant (as it should). Using the commutation relations it is easy to show that P L, k = k L, k, P T, α, k = k T, α, k (.09) which allows us to identify the momentum carried by a phonon with k where k is the label of the Fourier transform. Finally, we notice that we can easily write down an expression for the displacement field u i ( r) and the canonical momentum Π i ( r) in terms of creation and annihilation operators for longitudinal and transverse phonons: u i ( r) = ρ + ρ d 3 p (2π) 3 d 3 p (2π) 3 2ω L (p) 2ω T (p) p i ( al ( p)e i p r a L ( p) e i p r) p α=,2 e α i ( p) ( a α T( p)e i p r a α T( p) e i p r) (.0) which is known as a mode expansion. There is a similar expression for the canonical momentum Π i ( r). In summary, after quantizing the elastic solid we found that the quantum states of this system can be classified in terms if a set of excitations, the longitudinal and transverse phonons. These states carry energy and momentum (as well as polarization) and hence behave as particles. For these reason we will regard these excitations as the quasi-particles of this system. We will see that quasi-particles arise generically in interacting many-body system. One problem we will be interested in is in understanding the relation between the properties of the ground state and the quantum numbers of the quasiparticles.

14 4 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION.3 Indistinguishable Particles Let us consider now the problem of a system of N identical non-relativistic particles. For the sake of simplicity I will assume that the physical state of each particle j is described by its position x j relative to some reference frame. This case is easy to generalize. The wave function for this system is Ψ(x,...,x N ). If the particles are identical then the probability density, Ψ(x,..., x N ) 2, must be invariant (i.e., unchanged) under arbitrary exchanges of the labels that we use to identify (or designate) the particles. In quantum mechanics, particles do not have well defined trajectories. Only the states of a physical system are well defined. Thus, even though at some initial time t 0 the N particles may be localized at a set of well defined positions x,..., x N, they will become delocalized as the system evolves. Furthermore the Hamiltonian itself is invariant under a permutation of the particle labels. Hence, permutations constitute a symmetry of a manyparticle quantum mechanical system. In other terms, identical particles are indistinguishable in quantum mechanics. In particular, the probability density of any eigenstate must remain invariant if the labels of any pair of particles are exchanged. If we denote by P jk the operator that exchanges the labels of particles j and k, the wave functions must change under the action of this operator at most by a phase factor. Hence, we must require that P jk Ψ(x,..., x j,..., x k,..., x N ) = e iφ Ψ(x,...,x j,...,x k,..., x N ) (.) Under a further exchange operation, the particles return to their initial labels and we recover the original state. This sample argument then requires that φ = 0, π since 2φ must not be an observable phase. We then conclude that there are two possibilities: either Ψ is even under permutation and PΨ = Ψ, or Ψ is odd under permutation and PΨ = Ψ. Systems of identical particles which have wave functions which are even under a pairwise permutation of the particle labels are called bosons. In the other case, Ψ odd under pairwise permutation, they are Fermions. It must be stressed that these arguments only show that the requirement that the state Ψ be either even or odd is only a sufficient condition. It turns out that under special circumstances (e.g in one and twodimensional systems) other options become available and the phase factor φ may take values different from 0 or π. These particles are called anyons. For the moment the only cases in which they may exist appears to be in situations in which the particles are restricted to move on a line or on a plane. In the case of relativistic quantum field theories, the requirement that the states have well defined statistics (or symmetry) is demanded by a very deep and fundamental theorem which links the statistics of the states of the spin of the field. This is known as the spin-statistics theorem and it is actually an axiom of relativistic quantum mechanics (and field theory).

15 .4. FOCK SPACE 5.4 Fock Space We will now discuss a procedure, known as Second Quantization, which will enable us to keep track of the symmetry of the states of systems of many identical particles in a simple way. Let us consider a system of N identical non-relativistic particles. The wave functions in the coordinate representation are Ψ(x,...,x N ) where the labels x,..., x N denote both the coordinates and the spin states of the particles in the state Ψ. For the sake of definiteness we will discuss physical systems describable by Hamiltonians Ĥ of the form Ĥ = 2 2m N N 2 j + j= j= V (x j ) + j,k U(x j x k ) +... (.2) Let {φ n (x)} be the wave functions for a complete set of one-particle states. Then an arbitrary N-particle state can be expanded in a basis which is the tensor product of the one-particle states, namely Ψ(x,..., x N ) = {nj} C(n,... n N )φ n (x )...φ nn (x N ) (.3) Thus, if Ψ is symmetric (antisymmetric) under an arbitrary exchange x j x k, the coefficients C(n,..., n N ) must be symmetric (antisymmetric) under the exchange n j n k. A set of N-particle basis states with well defined permutation symmetry is the properly symmetrized or antisymmetrized tensor product Ψ,... Ψ N Ψ Ψ 2 Ψ N = ξ P Ψ P() Ψ P(N) N! (.4) where the sum runs over the set of all possible permutations P. The weight factor ξ is + for bosons and for fermions. Notice that, for fermions, the N-particle state vanishes if two particles are in the same one-particle state. This is the Pauli Exclusion Principle. The inner product of two N-particle states is χ,... χ N ψ,..., ψ N = ξ P+Q χ Q() ψ P() χ Q(N) ψ P() = N! P,Q = P ξ P χ ψ P() χ N ψ P(N) P (.5) where P = P + Q denotes the permutation resulting from the composition of the permutations P and Q. Since P and Q are arbitrary permutations, P spans the set of all possible permutations as well.

16 6 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION It is easy to see that Eq.(.5) is nothing but the permanent (determinant) of the matrix χ j ψ k for symmetric (antisymmetric) states, i.e., χ ψ... χ ψ N χ,... χ N ψ,... ψ N =.. (.6) χ N ψ... χ N ψ N ξ In the case of antisymmetric states, the inner product is the familiar Slater determinant. Let us denote by { α } a complete set of orthonormal one-particle states. They satisfy α β = δ αβ α α = (.7) The N-particle states are { α,... α N }. Because of the symmetry requirements, the labels α j can be arranged in the form of a monotonic sequence α α 2 α N for bosons, or in the form of a strict monotonic sequence α < α 2 < < α N for fermions. Let n j be an integer which counts how many particles are in the j-th one-particle state. The boson states α,...α N must be normalized by a factor of the form α n!... n N! α,..., α N (α α 2 α N ) (.8) and n j are non-negative integers. For fermions the states are α,..., α N (α < α 2 < < α N ) (.9) and n j = 0 >. These N-particle states are complete and orthonormal N! α,...,α N α,...,α N α,..., α N = Î (.20) where the sum over the α s is unrestricted and the operator Î is the identity operator in the space of N-particle states. We will now consider the more general problem in which the number of particles N is not fixed a-priori. Rather, we will consider an enlarged space of states in which the number of particles is allowed to fluctuate. In the language of Statistical Physics what we are doing is to go from the Canonical Ensemble to the Grand Canonical Ensemble. Thus, let us denote by H 0 the Hilbert space with no particles, H the Hilbert space with only one particle and, in general, H N the Hilbert space for N-particles. The direct sum of these spaces H H = H 0 H H N (.2) is usually called Fock space. An arbitrary state ψ in Fock space is the sum over the subspaces H N, ψ = ψ (0) + ψ () + + ψ (N) + (.22)

17 .5. CREATION AND ANNIHILATION OPERATORS 7 The subspace with no particles is a one-dimensional space spanned by the vector 0 which we will call the vacuum. The subspaces with well defined number of particles are defined to be orthogonal to each other in the sense that the inner product in Fock space χ ψ χ (j) ψ (j) (.23) j=0 vanishes if χ and ψ belong to different subspaces..5 Creation and Annihilation Operators Let φ be an arbitrary one-particle state, i.e. φ H. Let us define the creation operator â (φ) by its action on an arbitrary state in Fock space â (φ) ψ,...,ψ N φ, ψ,...,ψ N (.24) Clearly, â (φ) maps the N-particle state with proper symmetry ψ,..., ψ N to the N + -particle state φ, ψ,..., ψ N, also with proper symmetry. The destruction or annihilation operator â(φ) is then defined as the adjoint of â (φ), χ,...,χ N â(φ) ψ,..., ψ N ψ,..., ψ N â (φ) χ,...,χ N (.25) Hence χ,...,χ N â(φ) ψ,..., ψ N = ψ,..., ψ N φ, χ,..., χ N = ψ φ ψ χ ψ χ N = ψ N φ ψ N χ ψ N χ N ξ (.26) We can now expand the permanent (or determinant) along the first column to get χ,...,χ N â(φ) ψ,..., ψ N = = = N ξ k ψ k φ k= ψ χ... ψ χ N..... (no ψ k )... ψ N χ... ψ N χ N N ξ k ψ k φ χ,...,χ N ψ,... ˆψ k..., ψ N k= where ˆψ k indicates that ψ k is absent. ξ (.27)

18 8 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION Thus, the destruction operator is given by â(φ) ψ,..., ψ N = N ξ k φ ψ k ψ,..., ˆψ k,...,ψ N (.28) k= With these definitions, we can easily see that the operators â (φ) and â(φ) obey the commutation relations â (φ )â (φ 2 ) = ξ â (φ 2 )â (φ ) (.29) Let us introduce the notation [Â, ˆB] ξ  ˆB ξ ˆB (.30) where  and ˆB are two arbitrary operators. For ξ = + (bosons) we have the commutator [â (φ ), â (φ 2 ) ] + [ â (φ ), â (φ 2 ) ] = 0 (.3) while for ξ = it is the anticommutator [â (φ ), â (φ 2 ) ] { â (φ ), â (φ 2 ) } = 0 (.32) Similarly for any pair of arbitrary one-particle states φ and φ 2 we get [â(φ ), â(φ 2 )] ξ = 0 (.33) It is also easy to check that the following identity generally holds [â(φ ), â (φ 2 ) ] ξ = φ φ 2 (.34) So far we have not picked any particular representation. Let us consider the occupation number representation in which the states are labelled by the number of particles n k in the single-particle state k. In this case, we have n,..., n k,... n n2 n!n 2!... {}}{{}}{..., (.35) In the case of bosons, the n j s can be any non-negative integer, while for fermions they can only be equal to zero or one. In general we have that if α is the αth single-particle state, then â α n,..., n α,... = n α + n,..., n α +,... â α n,...,n α,... = nα n,..., n α,... (.36) Thus for both fermions and bosons, â α annihilates all states with n α = 0, while for fermions â α annihilates all states with n α =.

19 .5. CREATION AND ANNIHILATION OPERATORS 9 We conclude that for bosons the following commutation relations hold [ ] [ ] [â α, â β ] = â α, â β = 0 â α, â β = δ αβ (.37) whereas for fermions we obtain instead anticommutation relations { } { } {â α â β } = â β, â β = 0 â α â β = δ αβ (.38) If a unitary transformation is performed in the space of one-particle state vectors, then a unitary transformation is induced in the space of the operators themselves, i.e., χ = α ψ + β φ â(χ) = α â(ψ) + β â(φ) â (χ) = αâ (ψ) + βâ (φ) (.39) and we say that â (χ) transforms like the ket χ while â(χ) transforms like the bra χ. For example, we can pick as the complete set of one-particle states the momentum states { p }. This is momentum space. With this choice the commutation relations are [â ( p), â ( q) ] ξ = [â( p), â( q)] ξ = 0 [â( p), â ( q) ] ξ = (2π) d δ d ( p q) (.40) where d is the dimensionality of space. In this representation, an N-particle state is p,..., p N = â ( p )...â ( p N ) 0 (.4) On the other hand, we can also pick the one-particle states to be eigenstates of the position operators, i.e., In position space, the operators satisfy x,... x N = â ( x )...â ( x N ) 0 (.42) [â ( x ), â ( x 2 ) ] ξ = [â( x ), â( x 2 )] ξ = 0 [â( x ), â ( x 2 ) ] ξ = δ d ( x x 2 ) (.43) This is the position space or coordinate representation. A transformation from position space to momentum space is the Fourier transform p = d d x x x p = d d x x e i p x (.44) and, conversely x = d d p (2π) d p e i p x (.45)

20 20 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION Then, the operators themselves obey â ( p) = d d x â ( x)e i p x â ( x) = d d p (2π) d â ( p)e i p x (.46).6 General Operators in Fock Space Let A () be an operator acting on one-particle states. We can always define an extension  of A() acting on any arbitrary state ψ of the N-particle Hilbert space H N as follows:  ψ N ψ... A () ψ j... ψ N (.47) j= For instance, if the one-particle basis states { ψ j } are eigenstates of  with eigenvalues {a j } we get N  ψ = ψ (.48) j= We wish to find an expression for an arbitrary operator  in terms of creation and annihilation operators. Let us first consider the operator A () αβ = α β which acts on one-particle states. The operators A () αβ form a basis of the space of operators acting on one-particle states. Then, the N-particle extension of A () αβ is N Âαβ ψ = ψ α ψ N β ψ j (.49) Thus j=  αβ ψ = j= a j j N {}}{ ψ,..., α,..., ψ N β ψ j (.50) In other words, we can replace the one-particle state ψ j from the basis with the state α at the price of a weight factor, the overlap β ψ j. This operator has a very simple expression in terms of creation and annihilation operators. Indeed, â (α)â(β) ψ = N ξ k β ψ k α, ψ,..., ψ k, ψ k+,..., ψ N (.5) k=

21 .6. GENERAL OPERATORS IN FOCK SPACE 2 We can now use the symmetry of the state to write ξ k α, ψ,...,ψ k, ψ k+,..., ψ N = ψ,..., k {}}{ α,...,ψ N (.52) Thus the operator Âαβ, the extension of α β to the N-particle space, coincides with â (α)â(β)  αβ â (α)â(β) (.53) We can use this result to find the extension for an arbitrary operator A () of the form A () = α α A () β β (.54) α,β we find  = α,β â (α)â(β) α A () β (.55) Hence the coefficients of the expansion are the matrix elements of A () between arbitrary one-particle states. We now discuss a few operators of interest.. The Identity Operator: The Identity Operator ˆ of the one-particle Hilbert space ˆ = α α α (.56) in Fock space becomes the number operator ˆN ˆN = α â (α)â(α) (.57) In momentum and in position space it takes the form d ˆN d p = (2π) d â ( p)â( p) = d d x â ( x)â( x) = d d x ˆρ( x) (.58) where ˆρ(x) = â ( x)â( x) is the particle density operator. 2. The Linear Momentum Operator: In the space H, the linear momentum operator is ˆp () j = d d p (2π) d p j p p = d d x x i j x (.59) Thus, we get that the total linear momentum operator ˆP j is ˆP j = d d p (2π) d p jâ ( p)â( p) = d d x â ( x) i jâ( x) (.60)

22 22 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION â ( p + q) p + q q Ṽ ( q) â( p) p Figure.: One-body scattering. 3. Hamiltonian: The one-particle Hamiltonian H () has the matrix elements H () = p 2 + V ( x) (.6) 2m x H () y = 2 2m 2 δ d ( x y) + V ( x)δ d ( x y) (.62) Thus, in Fock space we get ( ) Ĥ = d d x â ( x) 2 2m 2 +V ( x) â( x) (.63) in position space. In momentum space we can define Ṽ ( q) = d d x V ( x)e i q x (.64) the Fourier transform of the potential V (x), and get Ĥ = d d p p 2 2mâ (2π) d ( p)â( p) + d d p (2π) d d d q (2π) d Ṽ ( q)â ( p + q)â( p) (.65) The last term has a very simple physical interpretation. When acting on a one-particle state with well-defined momentum, say p, the potential term yields another one-particle state with momentum p + q, where q is the momentum transfer, with amplitude Ṽ ( q). This process is usually depicted by the diagram of Fig... Two-Body Interactions: A two-particle interaction is an operator ˆV (2) which acts on the space of

23 .6. GENERAL OPERATORS IN FOCK SPACE 23 two-particle states H 2, which has the form V (2) = α, β V (2) (α, β) α, β (.66) 2 α,β The methods developed above yield an extension of V (2) to Fock space of the form ˆV = â (α)â (β)â(β)â(α) V (2) (α, β) (.67) 2 α,β In position space, ignoring spin, we get ˆV = d d x d d y â ( x) â ( y) â( y) â( x) V (2) ( x, y) 2 d d x d d y ˆρ( x)v (2) ( x, y)ˆρ( y) + d d x V (2) ( x, x) ˆρ( x) 2 2 (.68) where we have used the commutation relations. In momentum space we find instead ˆV = d d p d d q d d k 2 (2π) d (2π) d (2π) d Ṽ ( k) â ( p + k)â ( q k)â( q)â( p) (.69) where Ṽ ( k) is only a function of the momentum transfer k. This is a consequence of translation invariance. In particular for a Coulomb interaction, for which V (2) ( x, y) = Ṽ ( k) = 4πe2 k 2 e2 x y (.70) (.7) â ( p + k) p + k q k â ( q k) kṽ ( k) â( p) 4. p q â( q) Figure.2: Two-body interaction.

24 24 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION.7 Non-Relativistic Field Theory and Second Quantization We can now reformulate the problem of an N-particle system as a non-relativistic field theory. The procedure described in the previous section is commonly known as Second Quantization. If the (identical) particles are bosons, the operators â(φ) obey canonical commutation relations. If the (identical) particles are Fermions, the operators â(φ) obey canonical anticommutation relations. In position space, it is customary to represent â (φ) by the operator ˆψ( x) which obeys the equal-time algebra [ ˆψ( x), ( y)] ˆψ = δ d ( x y) ξ [ ] [ ˆψ( x), ˆψ( y) = ˆψ ( x), ˆψ ( y)] = 0 ξ ξ (.72) In this framework, the one-particle Schrödinger equation becomes the classical field equation [ i ] t + 2 2m 2 V ( x) ψ = 0 (.73) Can we find a Lagrangian density L from which the one-particle Schrödinger equation follows as its classical equation of motion? The answer is yes and L is given by L = i ψ 2 tψ ψ 2m ψ V ( x)ψ ψ (.74) Its Euler-Lagrange equations are t δl δ t ψ = δl δ ψ + δl δψ (.75) which are equivalent to the field Equation Eq..73. The canonical momenta Π(x) and Π (y) are Π ψ = δl = i ψ (.76) δ t ψ and Π ψ = δl δ t ψ = i ψ (.77) Thus, the (equal-time) canonical commutation relations are [ ] ˆψ( x), ˆΠ( y) = i δ( x y) (.78) which require that [ ˆψ( x), ˆψ ( y)] ξ ξ = δd ( x y) (.79)

25 .8. NON-RELATIVISTIC FERMIONS AT ZERO TEMPERATURE 25.8 Non-Relativistic Fermions at Zero Temperature The results of the previous sections tell us that the action for non-relativistic fermions (with two-body interactions) is (in D = d + space-time dimensions) S = 2 [ d D x ˆψ i t ˆψ 2 ] 2m ˆψ ˆψ V ( x) ˆψ (x) ˆψ(x) d D x d D x ˆψ (x) ˆψ (x )U(x x ) ˆψ (x) ˆψ(x)] where U(x x ) represents instantaneous (two-body) interactions, The Hamiltonian Ĥ for this system is (.80) U(x x ) U( x x )δ(x 0 x 0 ) (.8) Ĥ = d d x [ 2 2m ˆψ ˆψ + V ( x) ˆψ ( x)ψ( x)] + d d x d d x 2 ˆψ (x) ˆψ (x )U(x x ) ˆψ(x ) ˆψ(x) (.82) For Fermions the fields ˆψ(x) and ˆψ (x) satisfy equal-time canonical anticommutation relations { ˆψ( x), ˆψ ( x)} = δ D ( x x ) (.83) while for Bosons they satisfy [ ˆψ( x), ˆψ ( x )] = δ D ( x x ) (.84) In both cases, the Hamiltonian Ĥ commutes with the total number operator ˆN = d d x ˆψ (x) ˆψ(x) since Ĥ conserves the total number of particles. The Fock space picture of the many-body problem is equivalent to the Grand Canonical Ensemble of Statistical Mechanics. Thus, instead of fixing the number of particles we will introduce a Lagrange multiplier µ, the chemical potential, to weigh contributions from different parts of the Fock space. Thus, we define the operator H, H Ĥ µ N (.85) In a Hilbert space with fixed N this amounts to a shift of the energy by µn. We will now allow the system to choose the sector of the Fock space but with the requirement that the average number of particles N is fixed to be some number N. In the thermodynamic limit (N ), µ represents the difference

26 26 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION of the ground state energies between two sectors with N + and N particles respectively. The modified Hamiltonian H is (for spinless fermions) H = d d x ˆψ ( x)[ 2 2m 2 +V ( x) µ] ˆψ( x) + d d x d d y 2 ˆψ ( x) ˆψ ( y)u( x y) ˆψ( y) ˆψ( x) (.86).9 The Ground State of a System of Free Fermions E single particle energy E F Fermi Energy occupied states Fermi Sea empty states single particle states Figure.3: The Fermi Sea. Let us discuss now the very simple problem of finding the ground state for a system of N spinless free fermions. In this case, the interaction potential vanishes and, if the system is isolated, so does the one-body potential V ( x). In general there will be a complete set of one-particle states { α } and, in this basis, Ĥ is Ĥ = α E α â αa α (.87) where the index α labels the one-particle states by increasing order of their single-particle energies E E 2 E n (.88)

27 .0. EXCITED STATES 27 Since were are dealing with fermions, we cannot put more than one particle in each state. Thus the state the lowest energy is obtained by filling up all the first N single particle states. Let gnd denote this ground state gnd = N N â α 0 â â N 0 = {}}{..., (.89) α= The energy of this state is E gnd with E gnd = E + + E N (.90) The energy of the top-most occupied single particle state, E N, is called the Fermi energy of the system and the set of occupied states is called the filled Fermi sea..0 Excited States A state like ψ N {}}{ ψ = (.9) is an excited state. It is obtained by removing one particle from the single particle state N (thus leaving a hole behind) and putting the particle in the unoccupied single particle state N +. This is a state with one particle-hole Ground N N + single particle states â N+âN Ψ single particle states Figure.4: An excited (particle-hole) state. pair, and it has the form = â N+âN gnd (.92) The energy of this state is E ψ = E + + E N + E N+ (.93)

28 28 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION Hence E ψ = E gnd + E N+ E N (.94) and, since E N+ E N, E ψ E gnd. The excitation energy ǫ ψ = E ψ E gnd is ǫ ψ = E N+ E N 0 (.95). Construction of the Physical Hilbert Space It is apparent that, instead of using the empty state 0 for reference state, it is physically more reasonable to use instead the filled Fermi sea gnd as the physical reference state or vacuum state. Thus this state is a vacuum in the sense of absence of excitations. These arguments motivate the introduction of the particle-hole transformation. Let us introduce the fermion operators b α such that ˆbα = â α for α N (.96) Since â α gnd = 0 (for α N) the operators ˆb α annihilate the ground state gnd, i.e., ˆbα gnd = 0 (.97) The following anticommutation relations hold } {â α, â α} = {â α,ˆb β = {ˆbβ,ˆb β} = } {â α, â α = δ αα {ˆbβ,ˆb β } = δ ββ { } â α,ˆb β = 0 (.98) where α, α > N and β, β N. Thus, relative to the state gnd, â α and ˆb β behave like creation operators. An arbitrary excited state has the form α...α m, β... β n ; gnd â α... â α mˆb β...ˆb β n gnd (.99) This state has m particles (in the single-particle states α,...,α m ) and n holes (in the single-particle states β,..., β n ). The ground state is annihilated by the operators â α and ˆb β â α gnd = ˆb β gnd = 0 (α > N β N) (.200) The Hamiltonian Ĥ is normal ordered relative to the empty state 0, i.e. Ĥ 0 = 0, (.20) but it is not normal ordered relative to the physical ground state gnd. The particle-hole transformation enables us to normal order Ĥ relative to gnd. Ĥ = α E α â αâ α = α N E α + α>n E α â αâ α β N E βˆb βˆb β (.202)

29 .. CONSTRUCTION OF THE PHYSICAL HILBERT SPACE 29 Thus where Ĥ = E gnd + :Ĥ : (.203) E gnd = N E α (.204) α= is the ground state energy, and the normal ordered Hamiltonian is :Ĥ := α>n E α â aâ α β N ˆb βˆb β E β (.205) The number operator ˆN is not normal-ordered relative to gnd either. Thus, we write ˆN = â αâα = N + â α a α ˆb βˆb β (.206) α α>n β N We see that particles raise the energy while holes reduce it. However, if we deal with Hamiltonians that conserve the particle number ˆN (i.e., [ ˆN, Ĥ] = 0) for every particle that is removed a hole must be created. Hence particles and holes can only be created in pairs. A particle-hole state α, β; gnd is It is an eigenstate with an energy Ĥ α, β; gnd = This state has exactly N particles since α, β; gnd â αˆb β gnd (.207) (E gnd + :Ĥ : ) â αˆb β gnd = (E gnd + E α E β ) α, β; gnd (.208) ˆN α, β; gnd = (N + ) α, β; gnd = N α, β; gnd (.209) Let us finally notice that the field operator ˆψ (x) in position space is ˆψ ( x) = α x α â α = α>n φ α ( x)â α + β N φ β ( x)ˆb β (.20) where {φ α ( x)} are the single particle wave functions. The procedure of normal ordering allows us to define the physical Hilbert space. The physical meaning of this approach becomes more transparent in the thermodynamic limit N and V at constant density ρ. In this limit, the space of Hilbert space is the set of states which is obtained by acting with creation and annihilation operators finitely on the ground state. The spectrum of states that results from this approach consists on the set of states with finite excitation energy. Hilbert spaces which are built on reference states with macroscopically different number of particles are effectively disconnected from each other. Thus, the normal ordering of a Hamiltonian of a system with an infinite number of degrees of freedom amounts to a choice of the Hilbert space. This restriction becomes of fundamental importance when interactions are taken into account.

30 30 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION.2 The Free Fermi Gas Let us consider the case of free spin one-half electrons moving in free space. The Hamiltonian for this system is H = d d x ( ) ˆψ σ( x) 2 2m 2 µ ˆψσ ( x) (.2) σ=, where the label σ =, indicates the z-projection of the spin of the electron. The value of the chemical potential µ will be determined once we satisfy that the electron density is equal to some fixed value ρ. In momentum space, we get ˆψ σ ( x) = d d p (2π ) ˆψ d σ ( p) e i p x (.22) where the operators ˆψ σ ( p) and ˆψ σ ( p) satisfy { ˆψσ ( p), ˆψ } σ ( p) = (2π ) d δ σσ δ d ( p p ) { ˆψ σ ( p), ˆψ } σ ( p) = { ˆψ( p), ˆψ σ ( p )} = 0 (.23) The Hamiltonian has the very simple form d H d p ( = (2π ) d ǫ( p) µ) ˆψ σ ( p) ˆψ σ ( p) (.24) where ε( p) is given by σ=î, ε( p) = p2 (.25) 2m For this simple case, ε( p) is independent of the spin state. It is convenient to define the energy of the one-particle states measured relative to the chemical potential (or Fermi energy) µ = E F, E( p) as E( p) = ε( p) µ (.26) Hence, E( p) is the excitation energy measured from the Fermi energy E F = µ. The energy E( p) does not have a definite sign since there are states with ε( p) > µ as well as states with ε( p) < µ. Let us define by p F the value of p for which E(p F ) = ε(p F ) µ = 0 (.27) This is the Fermi momentum. Thus, for p < p F, E( p) is negative while for p > p F, E( p) is positive. We can construct the ground state of the system by finding the state with lowest energy at fixed µ. Since E( p) is negative for p p F, we see that by

31 .2. THE FREE FERMI GAS 3 filling up all of those states we get the lowest possible energy. It is then natural to normal order the system relative to a state in which all one-particle states with p p F are occupied. Hence we make the particle- hole transformation ˆbσ ( p) = ˆψ σ( p) for p p F â σ ( p) = ˆψ (.28) σ ( p) for p > p F In terms of the operators â σ and ˆb σ, the Hamiltonian is H = d d p [ ] (2π ) d E( p)θ( p p F )â σ( p)â σ ( p) + θ(p F p )E( p)ˆb σ ( p)ˆb σ( p) σ=, where θ(x) is the step function (.29) θ(x) = { x > 0 0 x 0 (.220) Using the anticommutation relations in the last term we get H = d d p [ ] (2π ) d E( p) θ( p p F )â σ ( p)â σ( p) θ(p F p )ˆb σ ( p)ˆb σ ( p) +Ẽgnd σ=, (.22) where Ẽgnd, the ground state energy measured from the chemical potential µ, is given by Ẽ gnd = σ=, d d p (2π ) d θ(p F p )E( p)(2π) d δ d (0) = E gnd µn (.222) Recall that (2π ) d δ(0) is equal to (2π ) d δ d (0) = lim(2π ) d δ (d) ( p) = lim p 0 p 0 d d x e i p x/ = V (.223) where V is the volume of the system. Thus, Ẽ gnd is extensive and the ground state energy density ε gnd is ε gnd = 2 p p F Ẽ gnd = V ε gnd (.224) d d p (2π ) d E( p) = ε gnd µ ρ (.225) where the factor of 2 comes from the two spin orientations. Putting everything together we get d d ( ) p p 2 pf ( ) ε gnd = 2 p p F (2π ) d 2m µ = 2 dp p d S d p 2 0 (2π ) d 2m µ (.226)

32 32 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION where S d is the area of the d-dimensional hypersphere. Our definitions tell us that the chemical potential is µ = p2 F 2m E F where E F, is the Fermi energy. Thus the ground state energy density ε gnd ( measured from the empty state) is equal to S d E gnd = m (2π ) d pf 0 pd+2 F S d dp p d+ = m(d + 2) (2π ) d = 2E F p d F S d (d + 2)(2π ) d (.227) How many particles does this state have? To find that out we need to look at the number operator. The number operator can also be normal-ordered with respect to this state ˆN = = d d p (2π ) d d d p (2π ) d σ=, σ=, ˆψ σ ( p) ˆψ σ ( p) = Hence, ˆN can also be written in the form { } θ( p p F )â σ( p)â σ ( p) + θ(p F p )ˆb σ ( p)ˆb σ( p) (.228) ˆN =: ˆN : +N (.229) where the normal-ordered number operator : ˆN : is : ˆN d d p [ ] := (2π ) d θ( p p F )â σ ( p)â σ( p) θ(p F p )ˆb σ ( p)ˆb σ ( p) σ=, and N, the number of particles in the reference state gnd, is N = d d p (2π ) d σ=, Therefore, the particle density ρ = N V is θ(p F p )(2π ) d δ d (0) = 2 d pd F S d (.230) S d (2π ) d V (.23) ρ = 2 d (2π ) d pd F (.232) This equation determines the Fermi momentum p F in terms of the density ρ. Similarly we find that the ground state energy per particle is E gnd N = d d+2 E F. The excited states can be constructed in a similar fashion. The state +, σ, p +, σ, p = â α ( p) gnd (.233) is a state which represents an electron with spin σ and momentum p while the state, σ, p, σ, p = ˆb σ ( p) gnd (.234)

33 .3. FREE BOSE AND FERMI GASES AT T > 0 33 represents a hole with spin σ and momentum p. From our previous discussion we see that electrons have momentum p with p > p F while holes have momentum p with p < p F. The excitation energy of a one-electron state is E( p) 0(for p > p F ), while the excitation energy of a one-hole state is E( p) 0 (for p < p F ). Similarly, an electron-hole pair is a state of the form σ p, σ p = â σ ( p)ˆb σ ( p ) gnd (.235) with p > p F and p < p F. This state has excitation energy E( p) E( p ), which is positive. Hence, states which are obtained from the ground state without changing the density, can only increase the energy. This proves that gnd is indeed the ground state. However, if the density is allowed to change, we can always construct states with energy less than E gnd by creating a number of holes without creating an equal number of particles..3 Free Bose and Fermi Gases at T > 0 We will now quickly review the properties of free Fermi and Bose gases and Bose condensation, and their thermodynamic properties. We ll work in the Grand Canonical Ensemble in which particle number is not exactly conserved, i.e. we couple the system to a bath at temperature T and fixed chemical potential µ. The Grand Partition Function at fixed T and µ is Z G = e βω β(ĥ µ ˆN) = tr e (.236) where Ĥ is the Hamiltonian, ˆN is the total particle number operator, β = (kt), where T is the temperature and k is the Boltzmann constant, and Ω is the thermodynamic potential Ω = Ω(T, V, µ). For a free particle system the total Hamiltonian H is a sum of one-particle Hamiltonians, H = ε l â lâl (.237) l where l = 0,,... labels the states of the complete set of single-particle states { l }, and {ε l } are the eigenvalues of the single-particle Hamiltonian. The Grand Partition Function Z G can be computed easily in the occupation number representation of the eigenstates of H: Z G = n...n k... n... n k... e β l (µ ε l)n l n...n k... (.238) where n l is the occupation number of the l-th single particle state. The allowed values of the occupation numbers n l for fermions and bosons is n l = 0, n l = 0,,... fermions bosons (.239)

34 34 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION Thus, the Grand Partition Function is Z G = l=0 n l n l e β(µ εl)nl n l (.240) For fermions we get Z F G = e βωf G = l=0 n l =0, e β(µ ε l) = l=0 [ + e β(µ ε l) ] (.24) or, what is the same, the thermodynamic potential for a system of free fermions Ω F G at fixed T and µ is given by an expression of the form Ω F G = kt For bosons we find instead, l=0 [ ] ln + e β(µ ε l) Fermions (.242) Z B G = e βωb G = l=0 n l =0 e β(µ ε l) = l=0 e β(µ ε l) (.243) Hence, the thermodynamic potential Ω B G for a system of free bosons at fixed T and µ is [ ] Ω B G = kt ln e β(µ ε l) Bosons (.244) l=0 The average number of particles N is N = tr ˆNe β(ĥ µ ˆN) tre β(ĥ µ ˆN) = β Z G Z G µ = β µ lnz G (.245) N = ρv = β µ [ βω G] = Ω G µ where ρ is the particle density and V is the volume. For bosons N is (.246) N = β l=0 e β(µ ε l) ( ) eβ(µ ε l) β (.247) Hence, N = l=0 e β(ε l µ) Bosons (.248)

35 .3. FREE BOSE AND FERMI GASES AT T > 0 35 Whereas for fermions we find, N = l=0 e β(ε l µ) + Fermions (.249) In general the average number of particles N is N = n l = e β(ε l µ) ± l=0 l=0 where + holds for fermions and holds for bosons. The internal energy U of the system is (.250) where Hence, H µn = Z G U = H = H µn + µ N (.25) Z G β = lnz G β = β (βω G) (.252) U = β (βω G) + µ N (.253) As usual, we will need to find the value of the chemical potential µ in terms of the average number of particles N (or in terms of the average density ρ) at fixed temperature T and volume V. Once this is done we can compute the thermodynamic variables of the systems, such as the pressure P and the entropy S by using standard thermodynamic relations, e.g. Pressure: P = ΩG V µ,t Entropy: S = ΩG T µ,v The following integrals will be helpful below and I(a, b) = + e a 2 x2 bx n! a (n+)/2 for n even I n (a) = (n/2)! 2n/2 0 for n odd dx = e b2 2a (.254) 2π a (.255).3. Bose Case Let ε 0 = 0, ε l 0, and µ 0. The thermodynamic potential for bosons Ω B G is Ω B G = kt l=0 ln [ e β(µ ε l) ] (.256)

36 36 CHAPTER. SECOND QUANTIZATION The number of modes in the box of volume V with momenta in the infinitesimal region d 3 p is sv d3 k (2π ), and for bosons of spin S we have set s = 2S +. Thus 3 for spin- bosons there are 3 states. (However, in the case of photons S = but have only 2 polarization states and hence s = 2.) The single-particle energies ε( p) are ε( p) = p2 2m (.257) where we have approximated the discrete levels by a continuum. In these terms, Ω B G becomes Ω B G = ktsv d 3 [ ] p p2 β(µ (2π ) 3 ln e 2m ) (.258) and ρ = N /V is given by ρ = N V = V Ω µ = s e βp2 2m e βµ e βp2 2m +βµ It is convenient to introduce the fugacity z and the variable x d 3 p (2π ) 3 (.259) z = e βµ x 2 = βp2 2m in terms of which the volume element of momentum space becomes (.260) d 3 p (2π ) 3 4πp2 (2π ) 3 dp = x2 2π 2 3 ( 2m β ) 3/2 dx (.26) where we have carried out the angular integration. The density ρ is [ ze x2 x 2 ( ) ] 3/2 2m ρ = s o ze x2 2π 2 3 dx β ( ) 3/2 s 2m + = 4π 2 3 dx z n+ e (n+)x2 x 2 β n=0 ( ) 3/2 s 2m + = 4π 2 3 dx z n x 2 e nx2 = β = = s 4π 2 3 s 4π 2 3 n= ( ) 3/2 2m β ( 2m β n= ) 3/2 n= z n n 3/2 z n n 3/2 + π 2 dy y 2 e y2 We now introduce the (generalized) Riemann ζ-function, ζ r (z) ζ r (z) = n= (.262) z n n r (.263)

6 Non-Relativistic Field Theory

6 Non-Relativistic Field Theory 6 Non-Relativistic Field Theory In this Chapter we will discuss the field theory description of non-relativistic systems. The material that we will be presented here is, for the most part, introductory

More information

Problem Set No. 1: Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 14, Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid

Problem Set No. 1: Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 14, Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid Physics 56, Fall Semester 5 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. : Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 4, 5 Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid Consider a three-dimensional

More information

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of

More information

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Earlier in class we saw how harmonic-oscillator-like bosonic commutation relations [â α,â β ] = 0, [ ] â α,â β = 0, [ ] â α,â β = δ α,β (1) give rise to the bosonic Fock

More information

Attempts at relativistic QM

Attempts at relativistic QM Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and

More information

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section

More information

Second Quantization: Quantum Fields

Second Quantization: Quantum Fields Second Quantization: Quantum Fields Bosons and Fermions Let X j stand for the coordinate and spin subscript (if any) of the j-th particle, so that the vector of state Ψ of N particles has the form Ψ Ψ(X

More information

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of

More information

Identical Particles. Bosons and Fermions

Identical Particles. Bosons and Fermions Identical Particles Bosons and Fermions In Quantum Mechanics there is no difference between particles and fields. The objects which we refer to as fields in classical physics (electromagnetic field, field

More information

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space

Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Earlier in class we saw how the harmonic-oscillator-like bosonic commutation relations [â α,â β ] = 0, [ ] â α,â β = 0, [ ] â α,â β = δ α,β (1) give rise to the bosonic

More information

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory SECOND QUANTIZATION Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory Dr. P.J.H. Denteneer Fall 2008 2 SECOND QUANTIZATION 1. Introduction and history 3 2. The N-boson system 4 3. The many-boson system 5 4. Identical

More information

Second quantization (the occupation-number representation)

Second quantization (the occupation-number representation) Second quantization (the occupation-number representation) February 14, 2013 1 Systems of identical particles 1.1 Particle statistics In physics we are often interested in systems consisting of many identical

More information

1 Mathematical preliminaries

1 Mathematical preliminaries 1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical

More information

SECOND QUANTIZATION. notes by Luca G. Molinari. (oct revised oct 2016)

SECOND QUANTIZATION. notes by Luca G. Molinari. (oct revised oct 2016) SECOND QUANTIZATION notes by Luca G. Molinari (oct 2001- revised oct 2016) The appropriate formalism for the quantum description of identical particles is second quantisation. There are various equivalent

More information

LECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS

LECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS LECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS February 18, 2011 2 Contents 1 Need for Statistical Mechanical Description 9 2 Classical Statistical Mechanics 13 2.1 Phase Space..............................

More information

1 Fluctuations of the number of particles in a Bose-Einstein condensate

1 Fluctuations of the number of particles in a Bose-Einstein condensate Exam of Quantum Fluids M1 ICFP 217-218 Alice Sinatra and Alexander Evrard The exam consists of two independant exercises. The duration is 3 hours. 1 Fluctuations of the number of particles in a Bose-Einstein

More information

Quantum Mechanics II

Quantum Mechanics II Quantum Mechanics II Prof. Boris Altshuler March 8, 011 1 Lecture 19 1.1 Second Quantization Recall our results from simple harmonic oscillator. We know the Hamiltonian very well so no need to repeat here.

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i. Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =

More information

Second quantization. Emmanuel Fromager

Second quantization. Emmanuel Fromager Institut de Chimie, Strasbourg, France Page 1 Emmanuel Fromager Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg - Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique - Université de Strasbourg /CNRS M2 lecture, Strasbourg, France. Institut

More information

First Problem Set for Physics 847 (Statistical Physics II)

First Problem Set for Physics 847 (Statistical Physics II) First Problem Set for Physics 847 (Statistical Physics II) Important dates: Feb 0 0:30am-:8pm midterm exam, Mar 6 9:30am-:8am final exam Due date: Tuesday, Jan 3. Review 0 points Let us start by reviewing

More information

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics

More information

The quantum state as a vector

The quantum state as a vector The quantum state as a vector February 6, 27 Wave mechanics In our review of the development of wave mechanics, we have established several basic properties of the quantum description of nature:. A particle

More information

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13 The Dirac Equation Dirac s discovery of a relativistic wave equation for the electron was published in 1928 soon after the concept of intrisic spin angular momentum was proposed by Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck

More information

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics Chapter 2 Green Functions and Observables 2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics We will be interested in studying the properties of the ground state of a quantum mechanical many particle system. We

More information

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS 1.1 PARTICLES AND FIELDS The two great structures of theoretical physics, the theory of special relativity and quantum mechanics, have been combined

More information

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

Isotropic harmonic oscillator Isotropic harmonic oscillator 1 Isotropic harmonic oscillator The hamiltonian of the isotropic harmonic oscillator is H = h m + 1 mω r (1) = [ h d m dρ + 1 ] m ω ρ, () ρ=x,y,z a sum of three one-dimensional

More information

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part 2. Solutions. Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part 2. Solutions. Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I QUALIFYING EXAMINATION, Part Solutions Problem 1: Quantum Mechanics I (a) We may decompose the Hamiltonian into two parts: H = H 1 + H, ( ) where H j = 1 m p j + 1 mω x j = ω a j a j + 1/ with eigenenergies

More information

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics

More information

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics

More information

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008. PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.. First, an exercise in bosonic commutation relations [â α, â β = 0, [â α, â β = 0, [â α, â β = δ αβ. ( (a Calculate the commutators [â αâ β, â γ, [â αâ β,

More information

221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems)

221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems) 1B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems) 1 Statistical Mechanics of Fermions 1.1 Partition Function In the case of fermions, we had learnt that the field operator satisfies the anticommutation

More information

16. GAUGE THEORY AND THE CREATION OF PHOTONS

16. GAUGE THEORY AND THE CREATION OF PHOTONS 6. GAUGE THEORY AD THE CREATIO OF PHOTOS In the previous chapter the existence of a gauge theory allowed the electromagnetic field to be described in an invariant manner. Although the existence of this

More information

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2002 Last Revised: June 2003 1 Introduction The purpose of these

More information

Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS

Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS Erik Koch Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich N (x) = p N! ' (x ) ' 2 (x ) ' N (x ) ' (x 2 ) ' 2 (x 2 ) ' N (x 2 )........ ' (x N ) ' 2 (x N ) ' N (x N ) Slater determinant

More information

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function 1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory

More information

Phonons and lattice dynamics

Phonons and lattice dynamics Chapter Phonons and lattice dynamics. Vibration modes of a cluster Consider a cluster or a molecule formed of an assembly of atoms bound due to a specific potential. First, the structure must be relaxed

More information

221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems)

221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems) 1B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems) 1 Statistical Mechanics of Fermions 1.1 Partition Function In the case of fermions, we had learnt that the field operator satisfies the anticommutation

More information

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field Notes for Phys. 610, 2011. These summaries are meant to be informal, and are subject to revision, elaboration and correction. They will be based on material covered in class, but may differ from it by

More information

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions 1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions Predictions for observables in quantum field theories are made by computing expectation values of products of field operators, which are called Green functions

More information

We can instead solve the problem algebraically by introducing up and down ladder operators b + and b

We can instead solve the problem algebraically by introducing up and down ladder operators b + and b Physics 17c: Statistical Mechanics Second Quantization Ladder Operators in the SHO It is useful to first review the use of ladder operators in the simple harmonic oscillator. Here I present the bare bones

More information

Quantum Grand Canonical Ensemble

Quantum Grand Canonical Ensemble Chapter 16 Quantum Grand Canonical Ensemble How do we proceed quantum mechanically? For fermions the wavefunction is antisymmetric. An N particle basis function can be constructed in terms of single-particle

More information

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation 1 Content of the course Quantum Field Theory by M. Srednicki, Part 1. Combining QM and relativity We are going to keep all axioms of QM: 1. states are vectors (or rather rays) in Hilbert space.. observables

More information

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet Physics 58, Fall Semester 018 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 018, 5:00 pm 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet In this

More information

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics 1 The postulates of quantum mechanics The postulates of quantum mechanics were derived after a long process of trial and error. These postulates provide a connection between the physical world and the

More information

N-particle states (fermions)

N-particle states (fermions) Product states ormalization -particle states (fermions) 1 2... ) 1 2... ( 1 2... 1 2... ) 1 1 2 2... 1, 1 2, 2..., Completeness 1 2... )( 1 2... 1 1 2... Identical particles: symmetric or antisymmetric

More information

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary

More information

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013 Lorentz Transformation Properties of the Dirac Field First, rotations. In ordinary quantum mechanics, ψ σ i ψ (1) is

More information

Many Body Quantum Mechanics

Many Body Quantum Mechanics Many Body Quantum Mechanics In this section, we set up the many body formalism for quantum systems. This is useful in any problem involving identical particles. For example, it automatically takes care

More information

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19 Page 404 Lecture : Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 008/11/19 Date Revised: 008/11/19 Coordinate Basis Section 6. The One-Dimensional Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Coordinate Basis Page

More information

2 Canonical quantization

2 Canonical quantization Phys540.nb 7 Canonical quantization.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system?.1.1.lagrangian Lagrangian mechanics is a reformulation of classical mechanics.

More information

I. BASICS OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

I. BASICS OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND QUANTUM MECHANICS I. BASICS OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND QUANTUM MECHANICS Marus Holzmann LPMMC, Maison de Magistère, Grenoble, and LPTMC, Jussieu, Paris marus@lptl.jussieu.fr http://www.lptl.jussieu.fr/users/marus (Dated:

More information

Statistical physics and light-front quantization. JR and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D70, (2004) and hep-th/

Statistical physics and light-front quantization. JR and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D70, (2004) and hep-th/ Statistical physics and light-front quantization Jörg Raufeisen (Heidelberg U.) JR and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D70, 085017 (2004) and hep-th/0409157 Introduction: Dirac s Forms of Hamiltonian Dynamics

More information

Systems of Identical Particles

Systems of Identical Particles qmc161.tex Systems of Identical Particles Robert B. Griffiths Version of 21 March 2011 Contents 1 States 1 1.1 Introduction.............................................. 1 1.2 Orbitals................................................

More information

Quantum field theory and Green s function

Quantum field theory and Green s function 1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory

More information

7.1 Creation and annihilation operators

7.1 Creation and annihilation operators Chapter 7 Second Quantization Creation and annihilation operators. Occupation number. Anticommutation relations. Normal product. Wick s theorem. One-body operator in second quantization. Hartree- Fock

More information

Introduction to string theory 2 - Quantization

Introduction to string theory 2 - Quantization Remigiusz Durka Institute of Theoretical Physics Wroclaw / 34 Table of content Introduction to Quantization Classical String Quantum String 2 / 34 Classical Theory In the classical mechanics one has dynamical

More information

Quantization of the Spins

Quantization of the Spins Chapter 5 Quantization of the Spins As pointed out already in chapter 3, the external degrees of freedom, position and momentum, of an ensemble of identical atoms is described by the Scödinger field operator.

More information

Lecture notes for QFT I (662)

Lecture notes for QFT I (662) Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION Lecture notes for QFT I (66) Martin Kruczenski Department of Physics, Purdue University, 55 Northwestern Avenue, W. Lafayette, IN 47907-036. E-mail: markru@purdue.edu

More information

International Physics Course Entrance Examination Questions

International Physics Course Entrance Examination Questions International Physics Course Entrance Examination Questions (May 2010) Please answer the four questions from Problem 1 to Problem 4. You can use as many answer sheets you need. Your name, question numbers

More information

The properties of an ideal Fermi gas are strongly determined by the Pauli principle. We shall consider the limit:

The properties of an ideal Fermi gas are strongly determined by the Pauli principle. We shall consider the limit: Chapter 13 Ideal Fermi gas The properties of an ideal Fermi gas are strongly determined by the Pauli principle. We shall consider the limit: k B T µ, βµ 1, which defines the degenerate Fermi gas. In this

More information

From Particles to Fields

From Particles to Fields From Particles to Fields Tien-Tsan Shieh Institute of Mathematics Academic Sinica July 25, 2011 Tien-Tsan Shieh (Institute of MathematicsAcademic Sinica) From Particles to Fields July 25, 2011 1 / 24 Hamiltonian

More information

MAKING BOHMIAN MECHANICS COMPATIBLE WITH RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Hrvoje Nikolić Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia

MAKING BOHMIAN MECHANICS COMPATIBLE WITH RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Hrvoje Nikolić Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia MAKING BOHMIAN MECHANICS COMPATIBLE WITH RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY Hrvoje Nikolić Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia Vallico Sotto, Italy, 28th August - 4th September 2010 1 Outline:

More information

I. Collective Behavior, From Particles to Fields

I. Collective Behavior, From Particles to Fields I. Collective Behavior, From Particles to Fields I.A Introduction The object of the first part of this course was to introduce the principles of statistical mechanics which provide a bridge between the

More information

Electrons in a periodic potential

Electrons in a periodic potential Chapter 3 Electrons in a periodic potential 3.1 Bloch s theorem. We consider in this chapter electrons under the influence of a static, periodic potential V (x), i.e. such that it fulfills V (x) = V (x

More information

Manybody wave function and Second quantization

Manybody wave function and Second quantization Chap 1 Manybody wave function and Second quantization Ming-Che Chang Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan (Dated: March 7, 2013) 1 I. MANYBODY WAVE FUNCTION A. One particle

More information

ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω +<=>± ħ

ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω +<=>± ħ CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION In Chapter 1, F&W explain the basic theory: Review of Section 1: H = ij c i < i T j > c j + ij kl c i c j < ij V kl > c l c k for fermions / for bosons [ c i, c j ] = [ c

More information

Phonons (Classical theory)

Phonons (Classical theory) Phonons (Classical theory) (Read Kittel ch. 4) Classical theory. Consider propagation of elastic waves in cubic crystal, along [00], [0], or [] directions. Entire plane vibrates in phase in these directions

More information

Quantum Physics 2006/07

Quantum Physics 2006/07 Quantum Physics 6/7 Lecture 7: More on the Dirac Equation In the last lecture we showed that the Dirac equation for a free particle i h t ψr, t = i hc α + β mc ψr, t has plane wave solutions ψr, t = exp

More information

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 110 Phys460.nb 7 Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 7.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system? 7.1.1.Lagrangian Lagrangian

More information

G : Quantum Mechanics II

G : Quantum Mechanics II G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 5 I. REPRESENTING STATES IN THE FULL HILBERT SPACE Given a representation of the states that span the spin Hilbert space, we now need to consider the problem

More information

-state problems and an application to the free particle

-state problems and an application to the free particle -state problems and an application to the free particle Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Quantum Mechanics 1 2013 3 September, 2013 Outline 1 Outline 2 The Hilbert space 3 A free particle 4 Keywords

More information

For example, in one dimension if we had two particles in a one-dimensional infinite potential well described by the following two wave functions.

For example, in one dimension if we had two particles in a one-dimensional infinite potential well described by the following two wave functions. Identical particles In classical physics one can label particles in such a way as to leave the dynamics unaltered or follow the trajectory of the particles say by making a movie with a fast camera. Thus

More information

Section 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Section 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions Physics 143a: Quantum Mechanics I Section 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions Spring 015, Harvard Here is a summary of the most important points from this week (with a few of my own tidbits),

More information

Chapter 19 - Second Quantization. 1. Identical Particles Revisited

Chapter 19 - Second Quantization. 1. Identical Particles Revisited Chapter 19 - Second Quantization 1. Identical Particles Revisited When dealing with a system that contains only a few identical particles, we were easily able to explicitly construct appropriately symmetrized

More information

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send  to Teoretisk Fysik KTH Advanced QM (SI2380), Lecture 2 (Summary of concepts) 1 PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send email to langmann@kth.se) The laws of QM 1. I now discuss the laws of QM and their

More information

The Klein-Gordon equation

The Klein-Gordon equation Lecture 8 The Klein-Gordon equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The bosons in field theory Bosons with spin 0 scalar (or pseudo-scalar) meson fields canonical field quantization

More information

Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18)

Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18) Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18) Prof. Dr. G. M. Pastor Institut für Theoretische Physik Fachbereich Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften Universität Kassel January 29, 2018 Contents 1 Fundamental concepts

More information

1.1 Quantum mechanics of one particle

1.1 Quantum mechanics of one particle 1 Second quantization 1.1 Quantum mechanics of one particle In quantum mechanics the physical state of a particle is described in terms of a ket Ψ. This ket belongs to a Hilbert space which is nothing

More information

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM) Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM) Note: This is a collection of several formulae and facts that we will use throughout the course. It is by no means a complete discussion of QM, nor will I attempt

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Quantum Mechanics Solutions Quantum Mechanics Solutions (a (i f A and B are Hermitian, since (AB = B A = BA, operator AB is Hermitian if and only if A and B commute So, we know that [A,B] = 0, which means that the Hilbert space H

More information

Concepts for Specific Heat

Concepts for Specific Heat Concepts for Specific Heat Andreas Wacker 1 Mathematical Physics, Lund University August 17, 018 1 Introduction These notes shall briefly explain general results for the internal energy and the specific

More information

221B Lecture Notes Many-Body Problems I (Quantum Statistics)

221B Lecture Notes Many-Body Problems I (Quantum Statistics) 221B Lecture Notes Many-Body Problems I (Quantum Statistics) 1 Quantum Statistics of Identical Particles If two particles are identical, their exchange must not change physical quantities. Therefore, a

More information

Grand Canonical Formalism

Grand Canonical Formalism Grand Canonical Formalism Grand Canonical Ensebmle For the gases of ideal Bosons and Fermions each single-particle mode behaves almost like an independent subsystem, with the only reservation that the

More information

On the Heisenberg and Schrödinger Pictures

On the Heisenberg and Schrödinger Pictures Journal of Modern Physics, 04, 5, 7-76 Published Online March 04 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/ournal/mp http://dx.doi.org/0.436/mp.04.5507 On the Heisenberg and Schrödinger Pictures Shigei Fuita, James

More information

Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory

Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory Philippe A. Martin Francois Rothen Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory An Introduction Translated by Steven Goldfarb, Andrew Jordan and Samuel Leach Second Edition With 102 Figures, 7 Tables and

More information

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017) Lecture 19 8.31 Quantum Theory I, Fall 017 8 Lecture 19 Nov. 15, 017) 19.1 Rotations Recall that rotations are transformations of the form x i R ij x j using Einstein summation notation), where R is an

More information

VII.B Canonical Formulation

VII.B Canonical Formulation VII.B Canonical Formulation Using the states constructed in the previous section, we can calculate the canonical density matrix for non-interacting identical particles. In the coordinate representation

More information

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2 One of the most important problems in quantum mechanics is the simple harmonic oscillator, in part because its properties are directly applicable to field theory. The treatment in Dirac notation is particularly

More information

PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3

PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3 PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3 Copyright by Claudio Rebbi, Boston University, October 2016. These notes cannot be duplicated and distributed without explicit permission of the author. Time dependence

More information

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle Chapter 1 Identical particles 1.1 Distinguishable particles The Hilbert space of N has to be a subspace H = N n=1h n. Observables Ân of the n-th particle are self-adjoint operators of the form 1 1 1 1

More information

Language of Quantum Mechanics

Language of Quantum Mechanics Language of Quantum Mechanics System s Hilbert space. Pure and mixed states A quantum-mechanical system 1 is characterized by a complete inner-product space that is, Hilbert space with either finite or

More information

Mathematical Introduction

Mathematical Introduction Chapter 1 Mathematical Introduction HW #1: 164, 165, 166, 181, 182, 183, 1811, 1812, 114 11 Linear Vector Spaces: Basics 111 Field A collection F of elements a,b etc (also called numbers or scalars) with

More information

Chapter 14. Ideal Bose gas Equation of state

Chapter 14. Ideal Bose gas Equation of state Chapter 14 Ideal Bose gas In this chapter, we shall study the thermodynamic properties of a gas of non-interacting bosons. We will show that the symmetrization of the wavefunction due to the indistinguishability

More information

We already came across a form of indistinguishably in the canonical partition function: V N Q =

We already came across a form of indistinguishably in the canonical partition function: V N Q = Bosons en fermions Indistinguishability We already came across a form of indistinguishably in the canonical partition function: for distinguishable particles Q = Λ 3N βe p r, r 2,..., r N ))dτ dτ 2...

More information

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017 Quantum Dynamics March 0, 07 As in classical mechanics, time is a parameter in quantum mechanics. It is distinct from space in the sense that, while we have Hermitian operators, X, for position and therefore

More information

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet Soon after Schrödinger discovered the wave equation of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg and Dirac developed the first successful quantum theory of ferromagnetism W. Heisenberg,

More information

Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization

Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization General remarks about quantum field theory. What is quantum field theory about? Why relativity plus QM imply an unfixed number of particles? Creation-annihilation

More information

L11.P1 Lecture 11. Quantum statistical mechanics: summary

L11.P1 Lecture 11. Quantum statistical mechanics: summary Lecture 11 Page 1 L11.P1 Lecture 11 Quantum statistical mechanics: summary At absolute zero temperature, a physical system occupies the lowest possible energy configuration. When the temperature increases,

More information

2 The Density Operator

2 The Density Operator In this chapter we introduce the density operator, which provides an alternative way to describe the state of a quantum mechanical system. So far we have only dealt with situations where the state of a

More information

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional

More information