6 Non-Relativistic Field Theory
|
|
- Lydia Booth
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 6 Non-Relativistic Field Theory In this Chapter we will discuss the field theory description of non-relativistic systems. The material that we will be presented here is, for the most part, introductory as this topic is covered in depth in many specialized textbooks, such as Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics by A. Abrikosov, L. Gorkov and I. Dzyaloshinskii (Prentice-Hall, 1963), Statistical Mechanics, A Set of lectures by R. Feynman (Benjamin, 1973) and many others. The discussion of second quantization is very standardand is presented her for pedagogical reasons but can be skipped. 6.1 Non-Relativistic Field Theories, Second Quantization and the Many-Body Problem Let us consider now the problem of a system of N identical non-relativistic particles. For the sake of simplicity I will assume that the physical state of each particle j is described by its position x j relative to some reference frame. This case is easy to generalize. The wave function for this system is Ψ(x 1,...,x N ). If the particles are identical then the probability density, Ψ(x 1,...,x N ) 2,mustbeinvariant (i.e., unchanged) under arbitrary exchanges of the labels that we use to identify (or designate) the particles. In quantum mechanics, the particles do not have well defined trajectories. Only the states of a physical system are well defined. Thus, even though at some initial time t 0 the N particles may be localized at a set of well defined positions x 1,...,x N,theywillbecome delocalized as the system evolves. Furthermore the Hamiltonian itself is invariant under a permutation of the particle labels. Hence, permutations constitute a symmetry of a many-particle quantum mechanical system. In other terms, identical particles are indistinguishable in quantum mechanics. In particular, the probability density of any eigenstate must remain invariant
2 176 Non-Relativistic Field Theory if the labels of any pair of particles are exchanged. If we denote by P jk the operator which exchanges the labels of particles j and k, the wave functions must satisfy P jk Ψ(x 1,...,x j,...,x k,...,x N )=e iφ Ψ(x 1,...,x j,...,x k,...,x N ) (6.1) Under a further exchange operation, the particles return to their initial labels and we recover the original state. This sample argument then requires that φ =0,π since 2φ must not be an observable phase. We then conclude that there are two possibilities: either Ψ is even under permutation and P Ψ=Ψ,or Ψisodd under permutation and P Ψ= Ψ. Systems of identical particles which have wave functions which are even under a pairwise permutation of the particle labels are called bosons. Intheothercase,Ψodd under pairwise permutation, they are Fermions. Itmustbestressedthat these arguments only show that the requirement that the state prioriψbe either even or odd is only a sufficient condition. It turns out that under special circumstances other options become available and the phase factor φ may take values different from 0 or π. Theseparticlesarecalledanyons. For the moment the only cases in which they may exist appears tobeinsituations in which the particles are restricted to move on a line oronaplane. In the case of relativistic quantum field theories, the requirement that the states have well defined statistics (or symmetry) is demanded by a very deep and fundamental theorem which links the statistics of the states of the spin of the field. This is the spin-statistics theorem which we will discuss later on Fock Space We will now discuss a procedure, known as Second Quantization, whichwill enable us to keep track of the symmetry of the states in a simpleway. Let us consider now a system of N particles. The wave functions in the coordinate representation are Ψ(x 1,...,x N )wherethelabelsx 1,...,x N denote both the coordinates and the spin states of the particles in the state Ψ. Forthesakeofdefinitenesswewilldiscussphysicalsystemsdescribable by Hamiltonians Ĥ of the form Ĥ = 2 2m N N 2 j + j=1 j=1 V (x j )+g j,k U(x j x k )+... (6.2) Let {φ n (x)} be the wave functions for a complete set of one-particle states. Then an arbitrary N-particle state can be expanded in a basis which is the
3 6.1 Non-Relativistic Field Theories, Second Quantization and the Many-Body Problem 177 tensor product of the one-particle states, namely Ψ(x 1,...,x N )= {nj} C(n 1,...n N )φ n1 (x 1 )...φ nn (x N ) (6.3) Thus, if Ψ is symmetric (antisymmetric) under an arbitrary exchange x j x k,thecoefficientsc(n 1,...,n N )mustbesymmetric(antisymmetric)under the exchange n j n k. AsetofN-particle basis states with well defined permutation symmetry is the properly symmetrized or antisymmetrized tensor product Ψ 1,...Ψ N Ψ 1 Ψ 2 Ψ N = 1 ξ P Ψ P (1) Ψ P (N) N! (6.4) where the sum runs over the set of all possible permutation P.Theweight factor ξ is +1 for bosons and 1 forfermions.noticethat,forfermions,the N-particle state vanishes if two particles are in the same one-particle state. This is the exclusion principle. The inner product of two N-particle states is χ 1,...χ N ψ 1,...,ψ N = 1 ξ P +Q χ N! Q(1) ψ P (1) χ Q(N) ψ P (1) = P,Q = P ξ P χ 1 ψ P (1) χ N ψ P (N) P (6.5) which is nothing but the permanent (determinant) of the matrix χ j ψ k for symmetric (antisymmetric) states, i.e., χ 1 ψ 1... χ 1 ψ N χ 1,...χ N ψ 1,...ψ N =.. (6.6) χ N ψ 1... χ N ψ N ξ In the case of antisymmetric states, the inner product is the familiar Slater determinant. Letusdenoteby{ α } the complete set of one-particle states which satisfy α β = δ αβ α α =1 (6.7) The N-particle states are { α 1,...α N }. Becauseofthesymmetryrequirements, the labels α j can be arranged in the form of a monotonic sequence α 1 α 2 α N for bosons, orintheformofastrict monotonic sequence α 1 <α 2 < <α N for fermions. Letn j be an integer which counts how α
4 178 Non-Relativistic Field Theory many particles are in the j-th one-particle state. The boson states α 1,...α N must be normalized by a factor of the form 1 n1!...n N! α 1,...,α N (α 1 α 2 α N ) (6.8) and n j are non-negative integers. For fermions the states are α 1,...,α N (α 1 <α 2 < <α N ) (6.9) and n j =0> 1. These N-particle states are complete and orthonormal 1 N! α 1,...,α N α 1,...,α N α 1,...,α N = Î (6.10) where the sum over the α s is unrestricted and the operator Î is the identity operator in the space of N-particle states. We will now consider the more general problem in which the number of particles N is not fixed a-priori. Rather, we will consider an enlarged space of states in which the number of particles is allowed to fluctuate. In the language of Statistical Physics what we are doing is to go fromthecanonical Ensemble to the Grand Canonical Ensemble. Thus,letusdenotebyH 0 the Hilbert space with no particles, H 1 the Hilbert space with only one particle and, in general, H N the Hilbert space for N-particles. The direct sum of these spaces H H = H 0 H 1 H N (6.11) is usually called the Fock space.anarbitrarystate ψ in Fock space is the sum over the subspaces H N, ψ = ψ (0) + ψ (1) + + ψ (N) + (6.12) The subspace with no particles is a one-dimensional space spanned by the vector 0 which we will call the vacuum. Thesubspaceswithwelldefined number of particles are defined to be orthogonal to each other in the sense that the inner product in the Fock space χ ψ χ (j) ψ (j) (6.13) j=0 vanishes if χ and ψ belong to different subspaces.
5 6.1 Non-Relativistic Field Theories, Second Quantization and the Many-Body Problem Creation and Annihilation Operators Let φ be an arbitrary one-particle state. Letusdefinethecreation operator â (φ) byitsactiononanarbitrarystateinfockspace â (φ) ψ 1,...,ψ N = φ, ψ 1,...,ψ N (6.14) Clearly, â (φ) mapsthen-particle state with proper symmetry ψ 1,...,ψ N onto the N +1-particle state φ, ψ,..., ψ N,alsowithpropersymmetry. The destruction or annihilation operator â(φ) is defined to be the adjoint of â (φ), χ 1,...,χ N 1 â(φ) ψ 1,...,ψ N = ψ 1,...,ψ N â (φ) χ 1,...,χ N 1 (6.15) Hence χ 1,...,χ N 1 â(φ) ψ 1,...,ψ N ψ = 1,...,ψ N φ, χ 1,...,χ N 1 = ψ 1 φ ψ 1 χ 1 ψ 1 χ N 1 =... ψ N φ ψ N χ 1 ψ N χ N 1 ξ (6.16) We can now expand the permanent (or determinant) to get χ 1,...,χ N 1 â(φ) ψ 1,...,ψ N = N = ξ k 1 ψ k φ k=1 = ψ 1 χ 1... ψ 1 χ N (noψ k )... ψ N χ 1... ψ N χ N 1 N ξ k 1 ψ k φ χ 1,...,χ N 1 ψ 1,... ˆψ k...,ψ N k=1 ξ (6.17) where ˆψ k indicates that ψ k is absent. Thus,thedestructionoperatoris given by â(φ) ψ 1,...,ψ N = N ξ k 1 φ ψ k ψ 1,..., ˆψ k,...,ψ N (6.18) k=1 With these definitions, we can easily see that the operators â (φ) andâ(φ)
6 180 Non-Relativistic Field Theory obey the commutation relations â (φ 1 )â (φ 2 )=ξ â (φ 2 )â (φ 1 ) (6.19) Let us introduce the notation Â, ˆB] ξ  ˆB ξ ˆB (6.20) where  and ˆB are two arbitrary operators. For ξ =+1(bosons) wehave the commutator ] â (φ 1 ), â (φ 2 ) ]+1 â (φ 1 ), â (φ 2 ) =0 (6.21) while for ξ = 1 itistheanticommutator { } â (φ 1 ), â (φ 2 ) ] 1 â (φ 1 ), â (φ 2 ) =0 (6.22) Similarly for any pair of arbitrary one-particle states φ 1 and φ 2 we get â(φ 1 ), â(φ 2 )] ξ =0 (6.23) It is also easy to check that the following identity holds ] â(φ 1 ), â (φ 2 ) = φ 1 φ 2 (6.24) ξ So far we have not picked any particular representation. Let us consider the occupation number representation in which the states are labelled by the number of particles n k in the single-particle state k. Inthiscase,wehave n 1,...,n k,... n1 n2 1 n1!n 2!... {}}{{}}{ 1...1, (6.25) In the case of bosons, then j s can be any non-negative integer, while for fermions they can only be equal to zero or one. In general we have that if α is the αth single-particle state, then â α n 1,...,n α,... = n α +1 n 1,...,n α +1,... â α n 1,...,n α,... = n α n 1,...,n α 1,... (6.26) Thus for both fermions and bosons, â α annihilates all states with n α =0, while for fermions â α annihilates all states with n α =1. The commutation relations are â α, â β ]= â α, â β ] =0 ] â α, â β = δ αβ (6.27)
7 6.1 Non-Relativistic Field Theories, Second Quantization and the Many-Body Problem 181 for bosons, and {â α â β } = { } â β, â β =0 { } â α â β = δ αβ (6.28) } for fermions. Here, {Â, ˆB is the anticommutator of the operators  and ˆB {Â, ˆB}  ˆB + ˆB (6.29) If a unitary transformation is performed in the space of one-particle state vectors, then a unitary transformation is induced in the space of the operators themselves, i.e., if χ = α ψ + β φ, then â(χ) =α â(ψ)+β â(φ) â (χ) =αâ (ψ)+βâ (φ) (6.30) and we say that â (χ) transformsliketheket χ while â(χ) transformslike the bra χ. For example, we can pick as the complete set of one-particle states the momentum states { p }. Thisis momentumspace.withthischoicethe commutation relations are ] â (p), â (q) =â(p), â(q)] ξ =0 ξ ] â(p), â (q) ξ =(2π)d δ d (p q) (6.31) where d is the dimensionality of space. In this representation, an N-particle state is p 1,...,p N =â (p 1 )...â (p N ) 0 (6.32) On the other hand, we can also pick the one-particle states to be eigenstates of the position operators, i.e., x 1,...x N =â (x 1 )...â (x N ) 0 (6.33) In position space, the operators satisfy ] â (x 1 ), â (x 2 ) =â(x 1), â(x 2 )] ξ =0 ξ ] â(x 1 ), â (x 2 ) = ξ δd (x 1 x 2 ) (6.34)
8 182 Non-Relativistic Field Theory This is the position space or coordinate representation. A transformation from position space to momentum space is the Fourier transform p = d d x x x p = d d x x e ip x (6.35) and, conversely x = d d p (2π) d p e ip x (6.36) Then, the operators themselves obey â (p) = d d x â (x)e ip x â d d p (x) = (2π) d â (p)e ip x (6.37) General Operators in Fock Space Let A (1) be an operator acting on one-particle states. We can always define an extension of A acting on any arbitrary state ψ of the N-particle Hilbert space as follows:  ψ N ψ 1... A (1) ψ j... ψ N (6.38) j=1 For instance, if the one-particle basis states { ψ j } are eigenstates of A with eigenvalues {a j } we get N  ψ = ψ (6.39) j=1 We wish to find an expression for an arbitrary operator A in terms of creation and annihilation operators. Let us first consider the operator A (1) αβ = α β which acts on one-particle states. The operators A (1) αβ form a basis of the space of operators acting on one-particle states. Then, the N-particle extension of A αβ is  αβ ψ = a j N ψ 1 α ψ N β ψ j (6.40) j=1
9 6.1 Non-Relativistic Field Theories, Second Quantization and the Many-Body Problem 183 Thus  αβ ψ = j N {}}{ ψ 1,..., α,...,ψ N β ψ j (6.41) j=1 In other words, we can replace the one-particle state ψ j from the basis with the state α at the price of a weight factor, the overlap β ψ j.this operator has a very simple expression in terms of creation and annihilation operators. Indeed, â (α)â(β) ψ = N ξ k 1 β ψ k α, ψ 1,...,ψ k 1,ψ k+1,...,ψ N (6.42) k=1 We can now use the symmetry of the state to write ξ k 1 {}}{ α, ψ 1,...,ψ k 1,ψ k+1,...,ψ N = ψ 1,..., α,...,ψ N (6.43) Thus the operator A αβ,theextensionof α β to the N-particle space, coincides with â (α)â(β)  αβ â (α)â(β) (6.44) We can use this result to find the extension for an arbitrary operator A (1) of the form A (1) = α,β k α α A (1) β β (6.45) we find  = α,β â (α)â(β) α A (1) β (6.46) Hence the coefficients of the expansion are the matrix elements ofa (1) between arbitrary one-particle states. We now discuss a few operators of interest. The Identity Operator The Identity Operator ˆ1 oftheone-particlehilbertspace ˆ1 = α α α (6.47) becomes the number operator N N = α â (α)â(α) (6.48)
10 184 Non-Relativistic Field Theory In position and in momentum space we find d N d p = (2π) d â (p)â(p) = d d x â (x)â(x) = where ˆρ(x) =â (x)â(x) istheparticle density operator. The Linear Momentum Operator d d x ˆρ(x) (6.49) In the space H 1,thelinearmomentumoperatoris ˆp (1) d d p j = (2π) d p j p p = d d x x i j x (6.50) Thus, we get that the total momentum operator P j is d P d p j = (2π) d p jâ (p)â(p) = d d x â (x) i jâ(x) (6.51) The one-particle Hamiltonian H (1) has the matrix elements Hamiltonian H (1) = p 2 + V (x) (6.52) 2m x H (1) y = 2 2m 2 δ d (x y)+v (x)δ d (x y) (6.53) Thus, in Fock space we get ) Ĥ = d d x â (x) ( 2 2m 2 +V (x) â(x) (6.54) in position space. In momentum space we can define Ṽ (q) = d d xv(x)e iq x (6.55) the Fourier transform of the potential V (x), and get d d p p 2 Ĥ = 2mâ d d p d d q (2π) d (p)â(p)+ (2π) d (2π) d Ṽ (q)â (p + q)â(p) (6.56) The last term has a very simple physical interpretation. When actingona one-particle state with well-defined momentum, say p, thepotentialterm yields another one-particle state with momentum p + q, whereq is the momentum transfer, withamplitudeṽ (q). This process is usually depicted by the diagram of the following figure.
11 6.1 Non-Relativistic Field Theories, Second Quantization and the Many-Body Problem 185 â (p + q) p + q q Ṽ (q) â(p ) p Figure 6.1 One-body scattering. Two-Body Interactions Atwo-particleinteractionisaoperator ˆV (2) which acts on the space of two-particle states H 2,hastheform V (2) = 1 α, β V (2) (α, β) α, β (6.57) 2 α,β The methods developed above yield an extension of V (2) to Fock space of the form V = 1 2 α,β In position space, ignoring spin, we get V = â (α)â (β)â(β)â(α) V (2) (α, β) (6.58) d d x d d y â (x) â (y) â(y) â(x) V (2) (x, y) d d x d d y ˆρ(x)V (2) (x, y)ˆρ(y)+ 1 d d xv (2) (x, x) ˆρ(x) 2 (6.59) while in momentum space we find V = 1 2 d d p (2π) d d d q (2π) d d d k (2π) d Ṽ (k) â (p + k)â (q k)â(q)â(p) (6.60)
12 186 Non-Relativistic Field Theory where Ṽ (k) isonlyafunctionofthemomentumtransfer k.thisisaconsequence of translation invariance. In particular for a Coulomb interaction, for which we have V (2) (x, y) = e2 x y (6.61) Ṽ (k) = 4πe2 k 2 (6.62) â (p + k) p + k q k â (q k) k Ṽ (k) â(p) p q â(q) Figure 6.2 Two-body interaction. 6.2 Non-Relativistic Field Theory and Second Quantization We can now reformulate the problem of an N-particle system as a nonrelativistic field theory. The procedure described in the previous section is commonly known as Second Quantization. If the (identical) particles are bosons, the operators â(φ) obey canonical commutation relations. If the (identical) particles are Fermions, theoperatorsâ(φ) obeycanonical anticommutation relations. Inpositionspace,itiscustomarytorepresentâ (φ) by the operator ˆψ(x) whichobeystheequal-timealgebra ˆψ(x), (y)] ˆψ = ξ δd (x y) ] ˆψ(x), ˆψ(y) = ˆψ (x), ˆψ ] (y) =0 ξ ξ (6.63) In this framework, the one-particle Schrödinger equation becomes the clas-
13 sical field equation 6.3 Non-Relativistic Fermions at Zero Temperature 187 i ] 2 + t 2m 2 V (x) ˆψ =0 (6.64) Can we find a Lagrangian density L from which the one-particle Schrödinger equation follows as its classical equation of motion? The answer is yes and L is given by Its Euler-Lagrange equations are L = i ψ t ψ 2 2m ψ ψ V (x)ψ ψ (6.65) t δl δ t ψ = δl δ ψ + δl δψ (6.66) which are equivalent to the field Equation Eq The canonical momenta Π ψ and Π ψ are and Π ψ = Π ψ = δl = i ψ (6.67) δ t ψ δl δ t ψ = i ψ (6.68) Thus, the (equal-time) canonical commutation relations are ˆψ(x), ˆΠψ (y)] = i δ(x y) (6.69) which require that ˆψ(x), ˆψ (y)] ξ ξ = δd (x y) (6.70) 6.3 Non-Relativistic Fermions at Zero Temperature The results of the previous sections tell us that the action for non-relativistic fermions (with two-body interactions) is (in D = d +1space-time dimensions) S = 1 2 d D x ˆψ i t ˆψ 2 d D x ] 2m ˆψ ˆψ V (x) ˆψ (x) ˆψ(x) d D x ˆψ (x) ˆψ (x )U(x x ) ˆψ(x ) ˆψ (x) ˆψ(x) (6.71)
14 188 Non-Relativistic Field Theory where U(x x )representsinstantaneouspair-interactions, U(x x ) U(x x )δ(x 0 x 0) (6.72) The Hamiltonian Ĥ for this system is Ĥ = d d x 2 2m ˆψ ˆψ + V (x) ˆψ (x)ψ(x)] + 1 d d x d d x 2 ˆψ (x) ˆψ (x )U(x x ) ˆψ(x ) ˆψ(x) (6.73) For Fermions the fields ˆψ and ˆψ satisfy equal-time canonical anticommutation relations while for Bosons they satisfy { ˆψ(x), ˆψ (x)} = δ(x x ) (6.74) ˆψ(x), ˆψ (x )] = δ(x x ) (6.75) In both cases, the Hamiltonian Ĥ commutes with the total number operator ˆN = d d x ˆψ (x) ˆψ(x) sinceĥ conserves the total number of particles. The Fock space picture of the many-body problem is equivalent to the Grand Canonical Ensemble of Statistical Mechanics. Thus, instead offixingthe number of particles we can introduce a Lagrange multiplier µ, thechemical potential, to weigh contributions from different parts of the Fock space. Thus, we define the operator H. H Ĥ µ N (6.76) In a Hilbert space with fixed ˆN this amounts to a shift of the energy by µn. WewillnowallowthesystemtochoosethesectoroftheFockspace but with the requirement that the average number of particles ˆN is fixed to be some number N. Inthethermodynamiclimit(N ), µ represents the difference of the ground state energies between two sectors withn + 1 and N particles respectively. The modified Hamiltonian H is H = d d x σ + 1 d d x 2 ˆψ σ (x) ( 2 2m 2 +V (x) µ d d y σ,σ ) ˆψ σ (x) ˆψ σ (x) ˆψ σ (y)u(x y) ˆψ σ (y) ˆψ σ (x) (6.77)
15 6.3 Non-Relativistic Fermions at Zero Temperature The Ground State Let us discuss now the very simple problem of finding the ground statefora system of N spinless free fermions. In this case, the pair-potential vanishes and, if the system is isolated, so does the potential V (x). In general there will be a complete set of one-particle states { α } and, in this basis, Ĥ is Ĥ = α E α â αa α (6.78) where the index α labels the one-particle states by increasing order of their single-particle energies E 1 E 2 E n (6.79) Since were are dealing with fermions, we cannot put more than one particle in each state. Thus the state the lowest energy is obtained by filling up all the first N single particle states. Let gnd denote this ground state gnd = N N â α 0 â 1 â N 0 = {}}{ 1...1, (6.80) α=1 The energy of this state is E gnd with E gnd = E E N (6.81) The energy of the top-most occupied single particle state, E N,iscalledthe Fermi energy of the system and the set of occupied states is called the filled Fermi sea. Astatelike ψ Excited States N 1 {}}{ ψ = (6.82) is an excited state. It is obtained by removing one particle from the single particle state N (thus leaving a hole behind) and putting the particle in the unoccupied single particle state N +1. This is a state with one particle-hole pair, andithastheform The energy of this state is =â N+1âN gnd (6.83) E ψ = E E N 1 + E N+1 (6.84)
16 190 Non-Relativistic Field Theory E Single Particle Energy E F Fermi Energy Fermi Sea Single Particle States Occupied States Empty States Figure 6.3 The Fermi Sea. gnd N N +1 Single Particle States â N+1âN Ψ Single Particle States Figure 6.4 An excited (particle-hole) state. Hence E ψ = E gnd + E N+1 E N (6.85) and, since E N+1 E N,E ψ E gnd.theexcitation energy ε ψ = E ψ E gnd is ε ψ = E N+1 E N 0 (6.86) Normal Ordering and Particle-Hole transformation: Construction of the Physical Hilbert Space It is apparent that, instead of using the empty state 0 for reference state, it is physically more reasonable to use instead the filled Fermi sea gnd as the
17 6.3 Non-Relativistic Fermions at Zero Temperature 191 physical reference state or vacuum state. Thusthisstateisavacuuminthe sense of absence of excitations. Theseargumentsmotivatetheintroduction of the particle-hole transformation. Let us introduce the fermion operators b α such that ˆbα =â α for α N (6.87) Since â α gnd =0(forα N) theoperatorsˆb α annihilate the ground state gnd, i.e., ˆbα gnd =0 (6.88) The following anticommutation relations hold {âα, â α} = {â α, ˆb } β = {ˆbβ, ˆb } { β = â α, ˆb } β =0 } {â α, â α = δ αα, {ˆbβ, ˆb } β = δ ββ (6.89) where α, α >N and β,β N. Thus,relativetothestate gnd, â α and ˆb β behave like creation operators. An arbitrary excited state has the form α 1...α m,β 1...β n ;gnd â α 1...â α mˆb β 1...ˆb β n gnd (6.90) This state has m particles (in the single-particle states α 1,...,α m )andn holes (in the single-particle states β 1,...,β n ). The ground state is annihilated by the operators â α and ˆb β â α gnd = ˆb β gnd =0 (α>nβ N) (6.91) The Hamiltonian Ĥ is normal ordered relative to the empty state 0, i. e. Ĥ 0 =0,butisnotnormalorderedrelativetotheactualgroundstate gnd. The particle-hole transformation enables us to normal order Ĥ relative to gnd. Ĥ = α E α â αâ α = α N E α + α>n E α â αâ α β N E βˆb βˆb β (6.92) where the minus sign in the last term reflects the Femi statistics. Thus Ĥ = E gnd +: Ĥ : (6.93) where N E gnd = E α (6.94) α=1
18 192 Non-Relativistic Field Theory is the ground state energy, and the normal ordered Hamiltonian is : Ĥ := α>n E α â aâα β N ˆb βˆb β E β (6.95) The number operator N is not normal-ordered relative to gnd either. Thus, we write N = â αâ α = N + â αa α ˆb βˆb β (6.96) α α>n β N We see that particles raise the energy while holes reduce it. However, if we deal with Hamiltonians that conserve the particle number N (i.e., N,Ĥ] = 0) for every particle that is removed a hole must be created. Hence particles and holes can only be created in pairs. Aparticle-holestate α, β gnd is α, β gnd â αˆb β gnd (6.97) It is an eigenstate with an energy ( ) Ĥ α, β gnd = E gnd +: Ĥ : â αˆb β gnd =(E gnd + E α E β ) α, β gnd (6.98) and the excitation energy is E α E β 0. Hence the ground state is stable to the creation of particle-hole pairs. This state has exactly N particles since N α, β gnd =(N +1 1) α, β gnd = N α, β gnd (6.99) Let us finally notice that the field operator ˆψ (x) inpositionspaceis ˆψ (x) = α x α â α = α>n φ α (x)â α + β N φ β (x)ˆb β (6.100) where {φ α (x)} are the single particle wave functions. The procedure of normal ordering allows us to define the physical Hilbert space. The physical meaning of this approach becomes more transparent in the thermodynamic limit N and V at constant density ρ. In this limit, the space of Hilbert space is the set of states which is obtained by acting with creation and annihilation operators finitely on the ground state. The spectrum of states that results from this approach consists on the set of states with finite excitation energy. Hilbert spaces which are built on reference states with macroscopically different number of particles are effectively disconnected from each other. Thus, the normal ordering of a Hamiltonian of asystemwithaninfinitenumberofdegreesoffreedomamountsto a choice
19 6.3 Non-Relativistic Fermions at Zero Temperature 193 of the Hilbert space. This restriction becomes of fundamental importance when interactions are taken into account The Free Fermi Gas Let us consider the case of free spin one-half electrons moving in free space. The Hamiltonian for this system is H = d d x ˆψ σ(x) 2 2m 2 µ] ˆψ σ (x) (6.101) σ=, where the label σ =, indicates the z-projection of the spin of the electron. The value of the chemical potential µ will be determined once we satisfy that the electron density is equal to some fixed value ρ. In momentum space, we get ˆψ σ (x) = d d p (2π) d ˆψ p x i σ (p) e (6.102) where the operators ˆψ σ (p) and ˆψ σ(p) satisfy { ˆψσ (p), ˆψ σ (p)} =(2π) d δ σσ δ d (p p ) { ˆψ σ (p), ˆψ σ (p)} = { ˆψ(p), ˆψ σ (p )} =0 (6.103) The Hamiltonian has the very simple form d H d p = (2π) d (ε(p) µ) ˆψ σ (p) ˆψ σ (p) (6.104) where ɛ(p) isgivenby σ=î, ɛ(p) = p2 2m (6.105) For this simple case, ε(p) is independent of the spin orientation. It is convenient to measure the energy relative to the chemical potential (or Fermi energy) µ = E F.TherelativeenergyE(p) is E(p) =ε(p) µ (6.106) Hence, E(p) istheexcitationenergymeasuredfromthefermienergye F = µ. TheenergyE(p) doesnothaveadefinitesignsincetherearestateswith
20 194 Non-Relativistic Field Theory ε(p) >µas well as states with ε(p) <µ.letusdefinebyp F the value of p for which E(p F )=ε(p F ) µ =0 (6.107) This is the Fermi momentum.thus,for p <p F,E(p) isnegative while for p >p F,E(p) ispositive. We can construct the ground state of the system by finding the state with lowest energy at fixed µ. SinceE(p) isnegativefor p p F,wesee that by filling up all of those states we get the lowest possible energy. It is then natural to normal order the system relative to a state in which all one-particle states with p p F are occupied. Hence we make the particlehole transformation ˆbσ (p) = ˆψ σ(p) for p p F â σ (p) = ˆψ (6.108) σ (p) for p >p F In terms of the operators â σ and ˆb σ,thehamiltonianis H = d d p (2π) d E(p)θ( p p F )â σ(p)â σ (p)+θ(p F p )E(p)ˆb σ (p)ˆb σ(p)] σ=, where θ(x) isthestepfunction θ(x) = { 1 x>0 0 x 0 (6.109) (6.110) Using the anticommutation relations in the last term we get H = d d p (2π) d E(p)θ( p p F )â σ (p)â σ(p) θ(p F (p) )ˆb σ (p)ˆb σ (p)]+ẽ gnd σ=, (6.111) where Ẽ gnd,thegroundstateenergymeasuredfromthechemicalpotential µ, isgivenby Ẽ gnd = σ=, d d p (2π) d θ(p F p )E(p)(2π) d δ d (0) = E gnd µn (6.112) Recall that (2π) d δ(0) is equal to (2π) d δ d (0) = lim (2π) d δ d (p) = lim p 0 p 0 d d xe ip x = V (6.113) where V is the volume of the system. Thus, Ẽ gnd is extensive Ẽ gnd = V ε gnd (6.114)
21 6.3 Non-Relativistic Fermions at Zero Temperature 195 and the ground state energy density ε gnd is ε gnd =2 p p F d d p (2π) d E(p) =ε gnd µ ρ (6.115) where the factor of 2 comes from the two spin orientations. Putting everything together we get d d ( ) p p 2 pf ( ) ε gnd =2 p p F (2π) d 2m µ =2 dp p d 1 S d p 2 0 (2π) d 2m µ (6.116) where S d is the area of the d-dimensional hypersphere. Our definitions tell us that the chemical potential is µ = p2 F 2m E F where E F,istheFermienergy. Thus the ground state energy density ε gnd (measured from the empty state) is equal to S d E gnd = 1 m (2π) d pf 0 pd+2 F S d dp p d+1 = m(d +2) (2π) d =2E F p d F S d (d +2)(2π) d (6.117) How many particles does this state have? To find that out we need tolook at the number operator. The number operator can also be normal-ordered with respect to this state ˆN = = d d p (2π) d d d p (2π) d σ=, ˆψ σ(p) ˆψ σ (p) = {θ( p p F )â σ (p)â σ(p)+θ(p F p )ˆb σ (p)ˆb σ (p)} σ=, Hence, ˆN can also be written in the form (6.118) ˆN =: ˆN :+N (6.119) where the normal-ordered number operator : ˆN :is d : ˆN d p := (2π) d θ( p p F )â σ(p)â σ (p) θ(p F p )ˆb σ(p)ˆb σ (p)] (6.120) σ=, and N, thenumberofparticlesinthereferencestate gnd, is d d p N = (2π) d θ(p F p )(2π) d δ d (0) = 2 S d d pd F (2π) d V (6.121) σ=,
22 196 Non-Relativistic Field Theory Therefore, the particle density ρ = N V is S d ρ = 2 d (2π) d pd F (6.122) This equation determines the Fermi momentum p F in terms of the density ρ. Similarly we find that the ground state energy per particle is E gnd N = 2d d+2 E F. The excited states can be constructed in a similar fashion. The state +,σ,p +,σ,p =â α(p) gnd (6.123) is a state which represents an electron with spin σ and momentum p while the state,σ,p,σ,p = ˆb σ(p) gnd (6.124) representsa hole with spinσ and momentum p.fromourpreviousdiscussion we see that electrons have momentum p with p >p F while holes have momentum p with p <p F.Theexcitationenergyofaone-electronstate is E(p) 0(for p >p F ), while the excitation energy of a one-hole state is E(p) 0(for p <p F ). Similarly, an electron-hole pair is a state of the form σp,σ p =â σ(p)ˆb σ (p ) gnd (6.125) with p >p F and p <p F.ThisstatehasexcitationenergyE(p) E(p ), which is positive. Hence, states which are obtained from the ground state without changing the density, can only increase the energy. This proves that gnd is indeed the ground state. However, if the density is allowed to change, we can always construct states with energy less than E gnd by creating a number of holes without creating an equal number of particles.
1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics
Chapter Second Quantization. Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quantum Mechanics We will begin with a quick review of creation and annihilation operators in the non-relativistic linear harmonic oscillator.
More informationLecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of
More informationFermionic Algebra and Fock Space
Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Earlier in class we saw how harmonic-oscillator-like bosonic commutation relations [â α,â β ] = 0, [ ] â α,â β = 0, [ ] â α,â β = δ α,β (1) give rise to the bosonic Fock
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationProblem Set No. 1: Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 14, Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid
Physics 56, Fall Semester 5 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. : Quantization of Non-Relativistic Fermi Systems Due Date: September 4, 5 Second Quantization of an Elastic Solid Consider a three-dimensional
More information7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields
7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section
More informationFermionic Algebra and Fock Space
Fermionic Algebra and Fock Space Earlier in class we saw how the harmonic-oscillator-like bosonic commutation relations [â α,â β ] = 0, [ ] â α,â β = 0, [ ] â α,â β = δ α,β (1) give rise to the bosonic
More informationSecond quantization. Emmanuel Fromager
Institut de Chimie, Strasbourg, France Page 1 Emmanuel Fromager Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg - Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique - Université de Strasbourg /CNRS M2 lecture, Strasbourg, France. Institut
More informationSecond quantization (the occupation-number representation)
Second quantization (the occupation-number representation) February 14, 2013 1 Systems of identical particles 1.1 Particle statistics In physics we are often interested in systems consisting of many identical
More informationPHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.
PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.. First, an exercise in bosonic commutation relations [â α, â β = 0, [â α, â β = 0, [â α, â β = δ αβ. ( (a Calculate the commutators [â αâ β, â γ, [â αâ β,
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationMP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS
MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationSecond Quantization: Quantum Fields
Second Quantization: Quantum Fields Bosons and Fermions Let X j stand for the coordinate and spin subscript (if any) of the j-th particle, so that the vector of state Ψ of N particles has the form Ψ Ψ(X
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationMany Body Quantum Mechanics
Many Body Quantum Mechanics In this section, we set up the many body formalism for quantum systems. This is useful in any problem involving identical particles. For example, it automatically takes care
More informationThe Klein-Gordon equation
Lecture 8 The Klein-Gordon equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The bosons in field theory Bosons with spin 0 scalar (or pseudo-scalar) meson fields canonical field quantization
More informationQuantum Mechanics II
Quantum Mechanics II Prof. Boris Altshuler March 8, 011 1 Lecture 19 1.1 Second Quantization Recall our results from simple harmonic oscillator. We know the Hamiltonian very well so no need to repeat here.
More informationSECOND QUANTIZATION. notes by Luca G. Molinari. (oct revised oct 2016)
SECOND QUANTIZATION notes by Luca G. Molinari (oct 2001- revised oct 2016) The appropriate formalism for the quantum description of identical particles is second quantisation. There are various equivalent
More informationWeek 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field
Notes for Phys. 610, 2011. These summaries are meant to be informal, and are subject to revision, elaboration and correction. They will be based on material covered in class, but may differ from it by
More informationLECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS
LECTURES ON STATISTICAL MECHANICS E. MANOUSAKIS February 18, 2011 2 Contents 1 Need for Statistical Mechanical Description 9 2 Classical Statistical Mechanics 13 2.1 Phase Space..............................
More information1 Quantum field theory and Green s function
1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory
More information2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics
Chapter 2 Green Functions and Observables 2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics We will be interested in studying the properties of the ground state of a quantum mechanical many particle system. We
More information1 The postulates of quantum mechanics
1 The postulates of quantum mechanics The postulates of quantum mechanics were derived after a long process of trial and error. These postulates provide a connection between the physical world and the
More informationSystems of Identical Particles
qmc161.tex Systems of Identical Particles Robert B. Griffiths Version of 21 March 2011 Contents 1 States 1 1.1 Introduction.............................................. 1 1.2 Orbitals................................................
More informationLecture notes for QFT I (662)
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION Lecture notes for QFT I (66) Martin Kruczenski Department of Physics, Purdue University, 55 Northwestern Avenue, W. Lafayette, IN 47907-036. E-mail: markru@purdue.edu
More informationWe can instead solve the problem algebraically by introducing up and down ladder operators b + and b
Physics 17c: Statistical Mechanics Second Quantization Ladder Operators in the SHO It is useful to first review the use of ladder operators in the simple harmonic oscillator. Here I present the bare bones
More informationQuantum field theory and Green s function
1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory
More informationThe quantum state as a vector
The quantum state as a vector February 6, 27 Wave mechanics In our review of the development of wave mechanics, we have established several basic properties of the quantum description of nature:. A particle
More informationwhere P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation
1 Content of the course Quantum Field Theory by M. Srednicki, Part 1. Combining QM and relativity We are going to keep all axioms of QM: 1. states are vectors (or rather rays) in Hilbert space.. observables
More informationManybody wave function and Second quantization
Chap 1 Manybody wave function and Second quantization Ming-Che Chang Department of Physics, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan (Dated: March 7, 2013) 1 I. MANYBODY WAVE FUNCTION A. One particle
More informationIntroduction to Electronic Structure Theory
Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2002 Last Revised: June 2003 1 Introduction The purpose of these
More informationThe Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13
The Dirac Equation Dirac s discovery of a relativistic wave equation for the electron was published in 1928 soon after the concept of intrisic spin angular momentum was proposed by Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck
More informationin-medium pair wave functions the Cooper pair wave function the superconducting order parameter anomalous averages of the field operators
(by A. A. Shanenko) in-medium wave functions in-medium pair-wave functions and spatial pair particle correlations momentum condensation and ODLRO (off-diagonal long range order) U(1) symmetry breaking
More informationProblem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet
Physics 58, Fall Semester 018 Professor Eduardo Fradkin Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 018, 5:00 pm 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet In this
More information3 Quantization of the Dirac equation
3 Quantization of the Dirac equation 3.1 Identical particles As is well known, quantum mechanics implies that no measurement can be performed to distinguish particles in the same quantum state. Elementary
More informationSECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory
SECOND QUANTIZATION Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory Dr. P.J.H. Denteneer Fall 2008 2 SECOND QUANTIZATION 1. Introduction and history 3 2. The N-boson system 4 3. The many-boson system 5 4. Identical
More informationSecond quantization: where quantization and particles come from?
110 Phys460.nb 7 Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 7.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system? 7.1.1.Lagrangian Lagrangian
More informationL11.P1 Lecture 11. Quantum statistical mechanics: summary
Lecture 11 Page 1 L11.P1 Lecture 11 Quantum statistical mechanics: summary At absolute zero temperature, a physical system occupies the lowest possible energy configuration. When the temperature increases,
More informationΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω +<=>± ħ
CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION In Chapter 1, F&W explain the basic theory: Review of Section 1: H = ij c i < i T j > c j + ij kl c i c j < ij V kl > c l c k for fermions / for bosons [ c i, c j ] = [ c
More informationQuantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18)
Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18) Prof. Dr. G. M. Pastor Institut für Theoretische Physik Fachbereich Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften Universität Kassel January 29, 2018 Contents 1 Fundamental concepts
More informationLecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization
Lecture 1: Introduction to QFT and Second Quantization General remarks about quantum field theory. What is quantum field theory about? Why relativity plus QM imply an unfixed number of particles? Creation-annihilation
More information221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems)
1B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems) 1 Statistical Mechanics of Fermions 1.1 Partition Function In the case of fermions, we had learnt that the field operator satisfies the anticommutation
More information221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems)
1B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems) 1 Statistical Mechanics of Fermions 1.1 Partition Function In the case of fermions, we had learnt that the field operator satisfies the anticommutation
More information2 Canonical quantization
Phys540.nb 7 Canonical quantization.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system?.1.1.lagrangian Lagrangian mechanics is a reformulation of classical mechanics.
More informationN-particle states (fermions)
Product states ormalization -particle states (fermions) 1 2... ) 1 2... ( 1 2... 1 2... ) 1 1 2 2... 1, 1 2, 2..., Completeness 1 2... )( 1 2... 1 1 2... Identical particles: symmetric or antisymmetric
More informationMean-Field Theory: HF and BCS
Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS Erik Koch Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich N (x) = p N! ' (x ) ' 2 (x ) ' N (x ) ' (x 2 ) ' 2 (x 2 ) ' N (x 2 )........ ' (x N ) ' 2 (x N ) ' N (x N ) Slater determinant
More informationQuantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.
Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =
More informationSection 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions
Physics 143a: Quantum Mechanics I Section 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions Spring 015, Harvard Here is a summary of the most important points from this week (with a few of my own tidbits),
More informationIdentical Particles. Bosons and Fermions
Identical Particles Bosons and Fermions In Quantum Mechanics there is no difference between particles and fields. The objects which we refer to as fields in classical physics (electromagnetic field, field
More informationIdentical Particles in Quantum Mechanics
Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Chapter 20 P. J. Grandinetti Chem. 4300 Nov 17, 2017 P. J. Grandinetti (Chem. 4300) Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Nov 17, 2017 1 / 20 Wolfgang Pauli
More informationThe Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013 Lorentz Transformation Properties of the Dirac Field First, rotations. In ordinary quantum mechanics, ψ σ i ψ (1) is
More informationMAKING BOHMIAN MECHANICS COMPATIBLE WITH RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Hrvoje Nikolić Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia
MAKING BOHMIAN MECHANICS COMPATIBLE WITH RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY Hrvoje Nikolić Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia Vallico Sotto, Italy, 28th August - 4th September 2010 1 Outline:
More informationFunctionals and the Functional Derivative
Appendix A Functionals and the Functional Derivative In this Appendix we provide a minimal introduction to the concept of functionals and the functional derivative. No attempt is made to maintain mathematical
More informationQFT as pilot-wave theory of particle creation and destruction
QFT as pilot-wave theory of particle creation and destruction arxiv:0904.2287v5 [hep-th] 28 Sep 2009 Hrvoje Nikolić Theoretical Physics Division, Rudjer Bošković Institute, P.O.B. 180, HR-10002 Zagreb,
More informationQuantum Electrodynamics Test
MSc in Quantum Fields and Fundamental Forces Quantum Electrodynamics Test Monday, 11th January 2010 Please answer all three questions. All questions are worth 20 marks. Use a separate booklet for each
More informationG : Quantum Mechanics II
G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 5 I. REPRESENTING STATES IN THE FULL HILBERT SPACE Given a representation of the states that span the spin Hilbert space, we now need to consider the problem
More informationLecture 6. Fermion Pairing. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 6 Fermion Pairing WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Experimental indications for Cooper-Pairing Solid state physics: Pairing of electrons near the Fermi surface with antiparallel
More informationThe Hartree-Fock Method
1/41 18. December, 2015 Problem Statement First Quantization Second Quantization References Overview 1. Problem Statement 2. First Quantization 3. Second Quantization 4. 5. References 2/41 Problem Statement
More informationQuantization of the Spins
Chapter 5 Quantization of the Spins As pointed out already in chapter 3, the external degrees of freedom, position and momentum, of an ensemble of identical atoms is described by the Scödinger field operator.
More informationCHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS
CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS 1.1 PARTICLES AND FIELDS The two great structures of theoretical physics, the theory of special relativity and quantum mechanics, have been combined
More informationLecture 4: Hartree-Fock Theory
Lecture 4: Hartree-Fock Theory One determinant to rule them all, One determinant to find them, One determinant to bring them all and in the darkness bind them Second quantization rehearsal The formalism
More informationH =Π Φ L= Φ Φ L. [Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )] = 0 = Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )
2.2 THE SPIN ZERO SCALAR FIELD We now turn to applying our quantization procedure to various free fields. As we will see all goes smoothly for spin zero fields but we will require some change in the CCR
More informationThe second quantization. 1 Quantum mechanics for a single particle - review of notation
The second quantization In this section we discuss why working with wavefunctions is not a good idea in systems with N 10 3 particles, and introduce much more suitable notation for this purpose. 1 Quantum
More informationCanonical Quantization
Canonical Quantization March 6, 06 Canonical quantization of a particle. The Heisenberg picture One of the most direct ways to quantize a classical system is the method of canonical quantization introduced
More informationThe Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case
The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case Time Total energy = Hamiltonian To find out about the
More informationThe general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation
Lecture 17 Page 1 Lecture 17 L17.P1 Review Schrödinger equation The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) is where functions are solutions of time-independent
More informationElectrons in a periodic potential
Chapter 3 Electrons in a periodic potential 3.1 Bloch s theorem. We consider in this chapter electrons under the influence of a static, periodic potential V (x), i.e. such that it fulfills V (x) = V (x
More informationChapter 19 - Second Quantization. 1. Identical Particles Revisited
Chapter 19 - Second Quantization 1. Identical Particles Revisited When dealing with a system that contains only a few identical particles, we were easily able to explicitly construct appropriately symmetrized
More informationPhys 622 Problems Chapter 5
1 Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5 Problem 1 The correct basis set of perturbation theory Consider the relativistic correction to the electron-nucleus interaction H LS = α L S, also known as the spin-orbit
More information-state problems and an application to the free particle
-state problems and an application to the free particle Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Quantum Mechanics 1 2013 3 September, 2013 Outline 1 Outline 2 The Hilbert space 3 A free particle 4 Keywords
More informationPLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to
Teoretisk Fysik KTH Advanced QM (SI2380), Lecture 2 (Summary of concepts) 1 PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send email to langmann@kth.se) The laws of QM 1. I now discuss the laws of QM and their
More informationQuantum Physics 2006/07
Quantum Physics 6/7 Lecture 7: More on the Dirac Equation In the last lecture we showed that the Dirac equation for a free particle i h t ψr, t = i hc α + β mc ψr, t has plane wave solutions ψr, t = exp
More information16. GAUGE THEORY AND THE CREATION OF PHOTONS
6. GAUGE THEORY AD THE CREATIO OF PHOTOS In the previous chapter the existence of a gauge theory allowed the electromagnetic field to be described in an invariant manner. Although the existence of this
More information(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle
Chapter 1 Identical particles 1.1 Distinguishable particles The Hilbert space of N has to be a subspace H = N n=1h n. Observables Ân of the n-th particle are self-adjoint operators of the form 1 1 1 1
More informationG : Quantum Mechanics II
G5.666: Quantum Mechanics II Notes for Lecture 7 I. A SIMPLE EXAMPLE OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM ADDITION Given two spin-/ angular momenta, S and S, we define S S S The problem is to find the eigenstates of the
More informationIntroduction to string theory 2 - Quantization
Remigiusz Durka Institute of Theoretical Physics Wroclaw / 34 Table of content Introduction to Quantization Classical String Quantum String 2 / 34 Classical Theory In the classical mechanics one has dynamical
More informationIntroduction to Second-quantization I
Introduction to Second-quantization I Jeppe Olsen Lundbeck Foundation Center for Theoretical Chemistry Department of Chemistry, University of Aarhus September 19, 2011 Jeppe Olsen (Aarhus) Second quantization
More information221B Lecture Notes Many-Body Problems I (Quantum Statistics)
221B Lecture Notes Many-Body Problems I (Quantum Statistics) 1 Quantum Statistics of Identical Particles If two particles are identical, their exchange must not change physical quantities. Therefore, a
More informationBrief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)
Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM) Note: This is a collection of several formulae and facts that we will use throughout the course. It is by no means a complete discussion of QM, nor will I attempt
More information7.1 Creation and annihilation operators
Chapter 7 Second Quantization Creation and annihilation operators. Occupation number. Anticommutation relations. Normal product. Wick s theorem. One-body operator in second quantization. Hartree- Fock
More informationNext topic: Quantum Field Theories for Quantum Many-Particle Systems; or "Second Quantization"
Next topic: Quantum Field Theories for Quantum Many-Particle Systems; or "Second Quantization" Outline 1 Bosons and Fermions 2 N-particle wave functions ("first quantization" 3 The method of quantized
More informationQuantum Mechanics I Physics 5701
Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701 Z. E. Meziani 02/23//2017 Physics 5701 Lecture Outline 1 General Formulation of Quantum Mechanics 2 Measurement of physical quantities and observables 3 Representations
More information1.1 Quantum mechanics of one particle
1 Second quantization 1.1 Quantum mechanics of one particle In quantum mechanics the physical state of a particle is described in terms of a ket Ψ. This ket belongs to a Hilbert space which is nothing
More informationIsotropic harmonic oscillator
Isotropic harmonic oscillator 1 Isotropic harmonic oscillator The hamiltonian of the isotropic harmonic oscillator is H = h m + 1 mω r (1) = [ h d m dρ + 1 ] m ω ρ, () ρ=x,y,z a sum of three one-dimensional
More information8.04 Spring 2013 March 12, 2013 Problem 1. (10 points) The Probability Current
Prolem Set 5 Solutions 8.04 Spring 03 March, 03 Prolem. (0 points) The Proaility Current We wish to prove that dp a = J(a, t) J(, t). () dt Since P a (t) is the proaility of finding the particle in the
More informationFor example, in one dimension if we had two particles in a one-dimensional infinite potential well described by the following two wave functions.
Identical particles In classical physics one can label particles in such a way as to leave the dynamics unaltered or follow the trajectory of the particles say by making a movie with a fast camera. Thus
More information1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime
1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime The theory of quantum fields in curved spacetime is a generalization of the well-established theory of quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime. To a great extent,
More informationσ 2 + π = 0 while σ satisfies a cubic equation λf 2, σ 3 +f + β = 0 the second derivatives of the potential are = λ(σ 2 f 2 )δ ij, π i π j
PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #4. Problem 1a: The linear sigma model has scalar potential V σ, π = λ 8 σ + π f βσ. S.1 Any local minimum of this potential satisfies and V = λ π V σ = λ σ + π f =
More informationQFT. Unit 1: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
QFT Unit 1: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics What s QFT? Relativity deals with things that are fast Quantum mechanics deals with things that are small QFT deals with things that are both small and fast What
More informationRepresentation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom
Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition
More informationThe experiment consists of studying the deflection of a beam of neutral ground state paramagnetic atoms (silver) in inhomogeneous magnetic field:
SPIN 1/2 PARTICLE Stern-Gerlach experiment The experiment consists of studying the deflection of a beam of neutral ground state paramagnetic atoms (silver) in inhomogeneous magnetic field: A silver atom
More informationStatistical physics and light-front quantization. JR and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D70, (2004) and hep-th/
Statistical physics and light-front quantization Jörg Raufeisen (Heidelberg U.) JR and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D70, 085017 (2004) and hep-th/0409157 Introduction: Dirac s Forms of Hamiltonian Dynamics
More informationSymmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws
Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional
More informationElements of Statistical Mechanics
Elements of Statistical Mechanics Thermodynamics describes the properties of macroscopic bodies. Statistical mechanics allows us to obtain the laws of thermodynamics from the laws of mechanics, classical
More informationMaxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density
Maxwell s equations based on S-54 Our next task is to find a quantum field theory description of spin-1 particles, e.g. photons. Classical electrodynamics is governed by Maxwell s equations: electric field
More informationCanonical Quantization C6, HT 2016
Canonical Quantization C6, HT 016 Uli Haisch a a Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics University of Oxford OX1 3PN Oxford, United Kingdom Please send corrections to u.haisch1@physics.ox.ac.uk.
More informationLecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 10 The Dirac equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The Dirac equation The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation formulated by British physicist
More information1 Free real scalar field
1 Free real scalar field The Hamiltonian is H = d 3 xh = 1 d 3 x p(x) +( φ) + m φ Let us expand both φ and p in Fourier series: d 3 p φ(t, x) = ω(p) φ(t, x)e ip x, p(t, x) = ω(p) p(t, x)eip x. where ω(p)
More information