Maximal Functions in Analysis
|
|
- Kristopher Daniels
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Maximal Functions in Analysis Robert Fefferman June, 5 The University of Chicago REU Scribe: Philip Ascher Abstract This will be a self-contained introduction to the theory of maximal functions, which are some of the most important objects in modern harmonic analysis and partial differential equations. We shall consider various generalizations of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and wind up with an elementary introduction to Calderon-Zygmund Theory. One of the basic ingredients of the study of maximal functions is a deep understanding of the geometry of collections of simple sets such as balls or rectangles in Euclidean spaces. We shall investigate this geometry in some detail. Contents The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Lebesgue Measure 3 The Generalized FTC 4 4 The Hardy-Littlewood Maximal Theorem 4 5 The Vitali Covering Lemma 5 6 Proof of The Hardy-Littlewood Theorem 5 7 The Generalized FTC Revisited 6 8 Proof of Hardy-Littlewood when p > 8 9 Some Closing Questions
2 The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Theorem. (The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus). If f is continuous then ( x f a dx) = f and b F dx = F (b) F (a). a Proof. lim h x+h a f dx x a f dx h x+h f dx x = lim h } h } small average of f Later, we ll generalize the FTC to (n > ), and to the Lebesgue Integral. Definition.. The Dirichlet Funtion is defined as: x Q D(x) = x / Q = f Since it is measurable, the Dirichlet funtion has the property that where µ is Lebesgue Measure. D dx = µ(d = }) + µ(d = }) Lebesgue Measure Let s recall some basic facts about Lebesgue Measure on R. If we have I k S then µ(s) length(i k ) Definition.. The Lebesgue Measure of a set S is defined as: Remark.. µ(s) = µ (Q [, ]) < inf all covers length(i k ) ε k = ε ε >
3 Remark.3. ( ) µ Q [, ] = Remark.4. For disjoint measurable sets ( ) µ E k = µ(e k ) Definition.5. A Lebesgue Simple Function S is a measurable function with finitely many values v,..., v N. Remark.6. For a simple function S S dx = N v k µ(s = v k }) Definition.7 (Lebesgue Integral). Let f(x) be a measurable function on [,], then f(x) dx def = sup S simple S f Definition.8 (L p spaces). for p < define: L ([, ]) def = L p ([, ]) def = Recall the Dirichlet Function f measurable f measurable D(x) = x Q x / Q S dx } f dx < } f p dx < We have that ( x D dx) = D almost everywhere (that is, except on a set of measure ). We can verify this: if x / Q then ( x D(x) dx) = = D(x) =, so it s false only when x Q (which has measure ). 3
4 3 The Generalized FTC Theorem 3. (The Generalized FTC for the Lebesgue Integral). Let f L ([, ]). Then ( x ) f dx = f almost everywhere sup h> Definition 3.. If f L ([, ] [, ]) then x+h f dx = sup h x I I x h I f dx = Mf(x) Definition 3.3. If f L ( ) then the Maximal Function of f is M(f)(x) def = sup f dx x B µ(b) 4 The Hardy-Littlewood Maximal Theorem Theorem 4. (Hardy-Littlewood Maximal Theorem). If f L p ( ) a) p = µm(f)(x) > α} C α f (a weak-type on L ) b) p > M(f) p C p,n f p (bounded on L p ) The first part of this theorem is related to Chebychev s Inequality. Theorem 4. (Chebychev s Inequality). If Q then µ(q > α}) Q dx α Proof. Starting out with a trivial inequality, α (x) Q(x) χq>α} α χ dx Q dx Q>α} R n α µ(q > α}) Q dx µ(q > α}) Q dx α 4 B
5 5 The Vitali Covering Lemma Question: can you get a subset of an arbitrary collection of finitely many balls in that is disjoint and counts a fixed fraction of their total area? Lemma 5. (The Vitali Covering Lemma). Let B, B,..., B N be balls in. Then a sub-collection of balls, B, B,..., B M, such that: a) The B k are pairwise disjoint ( M ) ( b) µ B k N ) 3 µ B n k Proof. First, arrange the balls by decreasing radius. Choose B, so that B = B, for B choose B = B if and only if it is disjoint from B = B. Continue this - so given a ball B k, choose it for the sub-collection if and only if it is disjoint from all previously chosen balls. Claim: Bk ( ) Bj Where the notation ( B j ) 3 means a concentric enlargement of the ball by a factor of 3. Pf of Claim: Take one B k and ask: why is B k ( ) Bj? This is easy to see by drawing a picture, and keeping in mind the way we chose the B j } above. So: ( ) ( ( ) ) µ Bk µ Bj (( ) ) µ Bj 3 3 = ( ) ( ) 3 n µ Bj = 3 n µ Bj 3 3 since the B j } were chosen to be disjoint. 6 Proof of The Hardy-Littlewood Theorem Theorem 6. (Restating Thm 4.). If f L p ( ) a) p = µm(f)(x) > α} C α f (a weak-type on L ) b) p > M(f) p C p,n f p (bounded on L p ) 5
6 Proof. For p =, it s easy to check that M(f) f. Now, we ll use the Vitali Covering Lemma: x E α = Mf > α}, choose B x such that f dx > α µ(b x ) B x and B x } x Eα covers E α. Without loss of generality, B, B,..., B k, a sequence of disjoint open balls from the B x s such that B k B x E α x E α k So we re going to show ( N ) µ (M(f)(x) > α}) µ B k C α f N (C independent of N) The proof is now fairly straightforward: ( N ) N µ B k = µ (B k ) < N f dx = f dx α B k α S Bk α f The second step in this string of inequalities comes from the following observation: look where f dx > α µ(b k ) < f dx µ(b) B α B k α f This completes the proof of the Hardy-Littlewood Theorem for p = (see section 8 for the other part). 7 The Generalized FTC Revisited Theorem 7. (Generalized FTC in ). If f L ( ) then lim f dx = f outside a set of measure r µ(b r (x)) B r(x) 6
7 Proof. Given any f L ( ), a beautiful function C L ( ) such that f C dx is as small as you wish. Define: We want to prove that A r (f)(x) = µ(b r (x)) B r(x) f dx lim A r(f)(x) f(x) outside a set of measure r Note that A r is additive: A r (f + f )(x) = A r (f )(x) + A r (f )(x) We have f L ( ). Let f = C + η (C is the beautiful function above) where η = error = f C and η dx < ε. Since A r is additive: Subtracting equations we get: A r (f)(x) = A r (C)(x) + A r (η)(x) A r (f)(x) f(x) = [A r (C)(x) C(x)] + [A }} r (η)(x) η(x)] this x Now we play some tricks with limsups: lim sup A r (f)(x) f(x) r A r (f)(x) f(x) = lim k sup <r<k lim sup A r (C)(x) C(x) r }} this by usual FTC sup A r (η)(x) + η(x) r> M(η)(x) + η(x) Remember that we want to prove that + lim sup A r (η)(x) η(x) r lim A r(f)(x) f(x) outside a set of measure r 7
8 so lets look at the following set: } µ lim sup A r (f)(x) f(x) > ε r µ M(η) > ε } + µ η(x) > ε } ( C ε + µ η(x) > ) η ε } C ε η + ε η (by H-L) (by Chebychev) 8 Proof of Hardy-Littlewood when p > Theorem 8. (Restating Thm 4.). If f L p ( ) a) p = µm(f)(x) > α} C α f (a weak-type on L ) b) p > M(f) p C p,n f p (bounded on L p ) Proof. We proved part a) in section 6, so now we re going to prove part b), and we re going to show that a) implies b), that is: µm(f)(x) > α} C f α implies that M(f) p C p,n f p for p >. Define for α > the distribution function of f: λ f (α) = µ f(x) > α} Now we re going to play with some integrals and use Fubini s Theorem: f(x) p dx = ( f p ) p = p = p = p = = α p λ f (α) dα α p µ f > α} dα α R p dx dα χ f(x) >α} n f(x) f(x) p dx 8 p α p dα dx
9 Now f L p ( ), and define f = f α + f α where f α f(x) where f(x α (x) = where f(x < α and f α (x) = where f(x α f(x) where f(x < α Since the maximum operator is a supremum of averages of values over balls, it is sub-additive: M(f) = M(f α + f α ) M(f α ) + M(f α ) Now note that f α L ( ) and f α L ( ). We re going to make some observations about the sets, and then look at their measures: M(f) > α} M(f α ) > α } M(f α ) > α } µ M(f) > α} µ M(f α ) > α } + µ M(f α ) > α } ( C α ) f α (by part a) of H-L) Now we re going to use the distribution function of Mf: λ (α) C f α (x) dx = C f(x) dx Mf α R α n f(x) > α } 9
10 Using the same logic as before (and Fubini again): Mf(x) p dx = ( Mf p ) p = p α p λ (α) dα Mf C p f(x) dx α p dα α f(x) > α } f(x) = pc α p dα f(x) dx Rn ( f(x) ) p = pc f(x) dx p = p pc f(x) p dx p = C p ( f p ) p 9 Some Closing Questions Do you think the generalized FTC is still true if we replace B r (x) with rectangles, and state the theorem the same way? If not, when is it true (by placing restrictions on f)? When is it true in R? In?
Lebesgue s Differentiation Theorem via Maximal Functions
Lebesgue s Differentiation Theorem via Maximal Functions Parth Soneji LMU München Hütteseminar, December 2013 Parth Soneji Lebesgue s Differentiation Theorem via Maximal Functions 1/12 Philosophy behind
More informationCHAPTER 6. Differentiation
CHPTER 6 Differentiation The generalization from elementary calculus of differentiation in measure theory is less obvious than that of integration, and the methods of treating it are somewhat involved.
More informationHARMONIC ANALYSIS. Date:
HARMONIC ANALYSIS Contents. Introduction 2. Hardy-Littlewood maximal function 3. Approximation by convolution 4. Muckenhaupt weights 4.. Calderón-Zygmund decomposition 5. Fourier transform 6. BMO (bounded
More informationGeometric intuition: from Hölder spaces to the Calderón-Zygmund estimate
Geometric intuition: from Hölder spaces to the Calderón-Zygmund estimate A survey of Lihe Wang s paper Michael Snarski December 5, 22 Contents Hölder spaces. Control on functions......................................2
More informationFrom Calculus II: An infinite series is an expression of the form
MATH 3333 INTERMEDIATE ANALYSIS BLECHER NOTES 75 8. Infinite series of numbers From Calculus II: An infinite series is an expression of the form = a m + a m+ + a m+2 + ( ) Let us call this expression (*).
More informationSHARP INEQUALITIES FOR MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH GENERAL MEASURES
SHARP INEQUALITIES FOR MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH GENERAL MEASURES L. Grafakos Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65203, U.S.A. (e-mail: loukas@math.missouri.edu) and
More informationBoth these computations follow immediately (and trivially) from the definitions. Finally, observe that if f L (R n ) then we have that.
Lecture : One Parameter Maximal Functions and Covering Lemmas In this first lecture we start studying one of the basic and fundamental operators in harmonic analysis, the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function.
More informationOn pointwise estimates for maximal and singular integral operators by A.K. LERNER (Odessa)
On pointwise estimates for maximal and singular integral operators by A.K. LERNER (Odessa) Abstract. We prove two pointwise estimates relating some classical maximal and singular integral operators. In
More informationMeasures. Chapter Some prerequisites. 1.2 Introduction
Lecture notes Course Analysis for PhD students Uppsala University, Spring 2018 Rostyslav Kozhan Chapter 1 Measures 1.1 Some prerequisites I will follow closely the textbook Real analysis: Modern Techniques
More informationJUHA KINNUNEN. Harmonic Analysis
JUHA KINNUNEN Harmonic Analysis Department of Mathematics and Systems Analysis, Aalto University 27 Contents Calderón-Zygmund decomposition. Dyadic subcubes of a cube.........................2 Dyadic cubes
More informationWEIGHTED REVERSE WEAK TYPE INEQUALITY FOR GENERAL MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS
GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL: Vol. 2, No. 3, 995, 277-290 WEIGHTED REVERSE WEAK TYPE INEQUALITY FOR GENERAL MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS J. GENEBASHVILI Abstract. Necessary and sufficient conditions are found to
More informationExercise 1. Let f be a nonnegative measurable function. Show that. where ϕ is taken over all simple functions with ϕ f. k 1.
Real Variables, Fall 2014 Problem set 3 Solution suggestions xercise 1. Let f be a nonnegative measurable function. Show that f = sup ϕ, where ϕ is taken over all simple functions with ϕ f. For each n
More information2 Lebesgue integration
2 Lebesgue integration 1. Let (, A, µ) be a measure space. We will always assume that µ is complete, otherwise we first take its completion. The example to have in mind is the Lebesgue measure on R n,
More informationJUHA KINNUNEN. Real Analysis
JUH KINNUNEN Real nalysis Department of Mathematics and Systems nalysis, alto University Updated 3 pril 206 Contents L p spaces. L p functions..................................2 L p norm....................................
More informationDifferentiation. Chapter 4. Consider the set E = [0, that E [0, b] = b 2
Chapter 4 Differentiation Consider the set E = [0, 8 1 ] [ 1 4, 3 8 ] [ 1 2, 5 8 ] [ 3 4, 8 7 ]. This set E has the property that E [0, b] = b 2 for b = 0, 1 4, 1 2, 3 4, 1. Does there exist a Lebesgue
More informationThe Lebesgue Integral
The Lebesgue Integral Brent Nelson In these notes we give an introduction to the Lebesgue integral, assuming only a knowledge of metric spaces and the iemann integral. For more details see [1, Chapters
More informationNECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES
NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES JUHA LEHRBÄCK Abstract. We establish necessary conditions for domains Ω R n which admit the pointwise (p, β)-hardy inequality u(x) Cd Ω(x)
More informationConstruction of a general measure structure
Chapter 4 Construction of a general measure structure We turn to the development of general measure theory. The ingredients are a set describing the universe of points, a class of measurable subsets along
More informationREAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 4
REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 4 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein and Shakarchi s text, Chapter 2.. Given a collection of sets E, E 2,..., E n, construct another collection E, E 2,..., E N, with N =
More informationHIGHER INTEGRABILITY WITH WEIGHTS
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Series A. I. Mathematica Volumen 19, 1994, 355 366 HIGHER INTEGRABILITY WITH WEIGHTS Juha Kinnunen University of Jyväskylä, Department of Mathematics P.O. Box 35, SF-4351
More informationh(x) lim H(x) = lim Since h is nondecreasing then h(x) 0 for all x, and if h is discontinuous at a point x then H(x) > 0. Denote
Real Variables, Fall 4 Problem set 4 Solution suggestions Exercise. Let f be of bounded variation on [a, b]. Show that for each c (a, b), lim x c f(x) and lim x c f(x) exist. Prove that a monotone function
More informationCourse 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces
Course 212: Academic Year 1991-2 Section 1: Metric Spaces D. R. Wilkins Contents 1 Metric Spaces 3 1.1 Distance Functions and Metric Spaces............. 3 1.2 Convergence and Continuity in Metric Spaces.........
More informationMeasure and Integration Summary
Measure and Integration Summary Jacob Shapiro September 4, 2013 Abstract This is a (very rough) translation of Prof. Michael Struwe s German lecture Notes into English, as preparation for the final test
More informationMATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, 2014 1 Introduction Definition. If A, B are sets and there exists a bijection A B, they have the same cardinality, which we write as A, #A. If there exists
More informationProblem set 4, Real Analysis I, Spring, 2015.
Problem set 4, Real Analysis I, Spring, 215. (18) Let f be a measurable finite-valued function on [, 1], and suppose f(x) f(y) is integrable on [, 1] [, 1]. Show that f is integrable on [, 1]. [Hint: Show
More informationSingular Integrals. 1 Calderon-Zygmund decomposition
Singular Integrals Analysis III Calderon-Zygmund decomposition Let f be an integrable function f dx 0, f = g + b with g Cα almost everywhere, with b
More informationWeighted norm inequalities for singular integral operators
Weighted norm inequalities for singular integral operators C. Pérez Journal of the London mathematical society 49 (994), 296 308. Departmento de Matemáticas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28049 Madrid,
More informationTHE HARDY LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTION OF A SOBOLEV FUNCTION. Juha Kinnunen. 1 f(y) dy, B(x, r) B(x,r)
Appeared in Israel J. Math. 00 (997), 7 24 THE HARDY LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTION OF A SOBOLEV FUNCTION Juha Kinnunen Abstract. We prove that the Hardy Littlewood maximal operator is bounded in the Sobolev
More informationAnalysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t
Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2. Let f L 2 (, ) be given. (a) Prove that ( x 2 f(t) dt) 2 x x t f(t) 2 dt. (b) Given part (a), prove that F L 2 (, ) 2 f L 2 (, ), where F(x) = x (a) Using
More informationMATH 51H Section 4. October 16, Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous:
MATH 51H Section 4 October 16, 2015 1 Continuity Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous: Definition. Let (X, d X ), (Y, d Y ) be metric spaces. A function f : X Y is
More informationINTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYSIS II MATH 4332 BLECHER NOTES
INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYSIS II MATH 4332 BLECHER NOTES You will be expected to reread and digest these typed notes after class, line by line, trying to follow why the line is true, for example how it
More informationThe Lebesgue Integral
The Lebesgue Integral Having completed our study of Lebesgue measure, we are now ready to consider the Lebesgue integral. Before diving into the details of its construction, though, we would like to give
More informationChapter 4. Measure Theory. 1. Measure Spaces
Chapter 4. Measure Theory 1. Measure Spaces Let X be a nonempty set. A collection S of subsets of X is said to be an algebra on X if S has the following properties: 1. X S; 2. if A S, then A c S; 3. if
More information(U) =, if 0 U, 1 U, (U) = X, if 0 U, and 1 U. (U) = E, if 0 U, but 1 U. (U) = X \ E if 0 U, but 1 U. n=1 A n, then A M.
1. Abstract Integration The main reference for this section is Rudin s Real and Complex Analysis. The purpose of developing an abstract theory of integration is to emphasize the difference between the
More information(b) If f L p (R), with 1 < p, then Mf L p (R) and. Mf L p (R) C(p) f L p (R) with C(p) depending only on p.
Lecture 3: Carleson Measures via Harmonic Analysis Much of the argument from this section is taken from the book by Garnett, []. The interested reader can also see variants of this argument in the book
More information1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),
Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 April 26, 2005 1 Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski 1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer
More informationl(y j ) = 0 for all y j (1)
Problem 1. The closed linear span of a subset {y j } of a normed vector space is defined as the intersection of all closed subspaces containing all y j and thus the smallest such subspace. 1 Show that
More informationIntroduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1
Christopher Heil Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces Last Updated: March 10, 2018 c 2018 by Christopher Heil Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces
More informationBorderline variants of the Muckenhoupt-Wheeden inequality
Borderline variants of the Muckenhoupt-Wheeden inequality Carlos Domingo-Salazar Universitat de Barcelona joint work with M Lacey and G Rey 3CJI Murcia, Spain September 10, 2015 The Hardy-Littlewood maximal
More informationChapter 6. Integration. 1. Integrals of Nonnegative Functions. a j µ(e j ) (ca j )µ(e j ) = c X. and ψ =
Chapter 6. Integration 1. Integrals of Nonnegative Functions Let (, S, µ) be a measure space. We denote by L + the set of all measurable functions from to [0, ]. Let φ be a simple function in L +. Suppose
More informationMeasure Theory. John K. Hunter. Department of Mathematics, University of California at Davis
Measure Theory John K. Hunter Department of Mathematics, University of California at Davis Abstract. These are some brief notes on measure theory, concentrating on Lebesgue measure on R n. Some missing
More informationMeasure and integration
Chapter 5 Measure and integration In calculus you have learned how to calculate the size of different kinds of sets: the length of a curve, the area of a region or a surface, the volume or mass of a solid.
More informationHOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 6
HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 6 DUE 15 MARCH, 2016 1) Suppose f, g : A R are uniformly continuous on A. Show that f + g is uniformly continuous on A. Solution First we note: In order to show that f + g is uniformly
More informationProblem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 2015.
Problem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 015. (1) Let f n : D R be a sequence of functions with domain D R n. Recall that f n f uniformly if and only if for all ɛ > 0, there is an N = N(ɛ) so that if n
More information4 Integration 4.1 Integration of non-negative simple functions
4 Integration 4.1 Integration of non-negative simple functions Throughout we are in a measure space (X, F, µ). Definition Let s be a non-negative F-measurable simple function so that s a i χ Ai, with disjoint
More informationGood Lambda Inequalities and Riesz Potentials for Non Doubling Measures in R n
Good Lambda Inequalities and Riesz Potentials for Non Doubling Measures in R n Mukta Bhandari mukta@math.ksu.edu Advisor Professor Charles Moore Department of Mathematics Kansas State University Prairie
More informationTools from Lebesgue integration
Tools from Lebesgue integration E.P. van den Ban Fall 2005 Introduction In these notes we describe some of the basic tools from the theory of Lebesgue integration. Definitions and results will be given
More informationANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2016: SOLUTIONS. = lim. F n
ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 206: SOLUTIONS Problem. Let m be Lebesgue measure on R. For a subset E R and r (0, ), define E r = { x R: dist(x, E) < r}. Let E R be compact. Prove that m(e) = lim m(e /n).
More informationANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2.
ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 27: SOLUTIONS Problem. Determine, with justification, the it cos(nx) n 2 x 2 dx. Solution. For an integer n >, define g n : (, ) R by Also define g : (, ) R by g(x) = g n
More informationLebesgue measure and integration
Chapter 4 Lebesgue measure and integration If you look back at what you have learned in your earlier mathematics courses, you will definitely recall a lot about area and volume from the simple formulas
More informationMEASURE AND INTEGRATION. Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich
MEASURE AND INTEGRATION Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich 9 September 2016 ii Preface This book is based on notes for the lecture course Measure and Integration held at ETH Zürich in the spring semester 2014.
More informationSOME MEASURABILITY AND CONTINUITY PROPERTIES OF ARBITRARY REAL FUNCTIONS
LE MATEMATICHE Vol. LVII (2002) Fasc. I, pp. 6382 SOME MEASURABILITY AND CONTINUITY PROPERTIES OF ARBITRARY REAL FUNCTIONS VITTORINO PATA - ALFONSO VILLANI Given an arbitrary real function f, the set D
More informationHerz (cf. [H], and also [BS]) proved that the reverse inequality is also true, that is,
REARRANGEMENT OF HARDY-LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS IN LORENTZ SPACES. Jesús Bastero*, Mario Milman and Francisco J. Ruiz** Abstract. For the classical Hardy-Littlewood maximal function M f, a well known
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More informationOne-sided operators in grand variable exponent Lebesgue spaces
One-sided operators in grand variable exponent Lebesgue spaces ALEXANDER MESKHI A. Razmadze Mathematical Institute of I. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Georgia Porto, June 10, 2015 One-sided operators
More informationChapter 8. General Countably Additive Set Functions. 8.1 Hahn Decomposition Theorem
Chapter 8 General Countably dditive Set Functions In Theorem 5.2.2 the reader saw that if f : X R is integrable on the measure space (X,, µ) then we can define a countably additive set function ν on by
More informationA NOTE ON WAVELET EXPANSIONS FOR DYADIC BMO FUNCTIONS IN SPACES OF HOMOGENEOUS TYPE
EVISTA DE LA UNIÓN MATEMÁTICA AGENTINA Vol. 59, No., 208, Pages 57 72 Published online: July 3, 207 A NOTE ON WAVELET EXPANSIONS FO DYADIC BMO FUNCTIONS IN SPACES OF HOMOGENEOUS TYPE AQUEL CESCIMBENI AND
More informationMAT137 - Term 2, Week 2
MAT137 - Term 2, Week 2 This lecture will assume you have watched all of the videos on the definition of the integral (but will remind you about some things). Today we re talking about: More on the definition
More informationMath 328 Course Notes
Math 328 Course Notes Ian Robertson March 3, 2006 3 Properties of C[0, 1]: Sup-norm and Completeness In this chapter we are going to examine the vector space of all continuous functions defined on the
More informationANALYSIS IN METRIC SPACES
ANALYSIS IN METRIC SPACES HELI TUOMINEN Contents 1. About these notes 2 2. Classical extension results 3 2.1. Tietze(-Urysohn) extension theorem 3 2.2. Extension of Lipschitz functions 5 2.3. Whitney covering,
More informationRegularity Theory. Lihe Wang
Regularity Theory Lihe Wang 2 Contents Schauder Estimates 5. The Maximum Principle Approach............... 7.2 Energy Method.......................... 3.3 Compactness Method...................... 7.4 Boundary
More informationNotes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich Septemmber, 2014
1 Introduction Notes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich Septemmber, 2014 In the definition of the Riemann integral of a function f(x), the x-axis is partitioned and the integral is defined
More informationMeasure Theory and Lebesgue Integration. Joshua H. Lifton
Measure Theory and Lebesgue Integration Joshua H. Lifton Originally published 31 March 1999 Revised 5 September 2004 bstract This paper originally came out of my 1999 Swarthmore College Mathematics Senior
More informationLebesgue Integration: A non-rigorous introduction. What is wrong with Riemann integration?
Lebesgue Integration: A non-rigorous introduction What is wrong with Riemann integration? xample. Let f(x) = { 0 for x Q 1 for x / Q. The upper integral is 1, while the lower integral is 0. Yet, the function
More informationMeasure and Integration: Solutions of CW2
Measure and Integration: s of CW2 Fall 206 [G. Holzegel] December 9, 206 Problem of Sheet 5 a) Left (f n ) and (g n ) be sequences of integrable functions with f n (x) f (x) and g n (x) g (x) for almost
More informationIntegration on Measure Spaces
Chapter 3 Integration on Measure Spaces In this chapter we introduce the general notion of a measure on a space X, define the class of measurable functions, and define the integral, first on a class of
More informationII - REAL ANALYSIS. This property gives us a way to extend the notion of content to finite unions of rectangles: we define
1 Measures 1.1 Jordan content in R N II - REAL ANALYSIS Let I be an interval in R. Then its 1-content is defined as c 1 (I) := b a if I is bounded with endpoints a, b. If I is unbounded, we define c 1
More informationA note on some approximation theorems in measure theory
A note on some approximation theorems in measure theory S. Kesavan and M. T. Nair Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai - 600 06 email: kesh@iitm.ac.in and mtnair@iitm.ac.in
More informationRegularizations of Singular Integral Operators (joint work with C. Liaw)
1 Outline Regularizations of Singular Integral Operators (joint work with C. Liaw) Sergei Treil Department of Mathematics Brown University April 4, 2014 2 Outline 1 Examples of Calderón Zygmund operators
More informationDuality of multiparameter Hardy spaces H p on spaces of homogeneous type
Duality of multiparameter Hardy spaces H p on spaces of homogeneous type Yongsheng Han, Ji Li, and Guozhen Lu Department of Mathematics Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN Internet Analysis Seminar 2012
More informationIndeed, if we want m to be compatible with taking limits, it should be countably additive, meaning that ( )
Lebesgue Measure The idea of the Lebesgue integral is to first define a measure on subsets of R. That is, we wish to assign a number m(s to each subset S of R, representing the total length that S takes
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More informationRS Chapter 1 Random Variables 6/5/2017. Chapter 1. Probability Theory: Introduction
Chapter 1 Probability Theory: Introduction Basic Probability General In a probability space (Ω, Σ, P), the set Ω is the set of all possible outcomes of a probability experiment. Mathematically, Ω is just
More informationM ath. Res. Lett. 16 (2009), no. 1, c International Press 2009
M ath. Res. Lett. 16 (2009), no. 1, 149 156 c International Press 2009 A 1 BOUNDS FOR CALDERÓN-ZYGMUND OPERATORS RELATED TO A PROBLEM OF MUCKENHOUPT AND WHEEDEN Andrei K. Lerner, Sheldy Ombrosi, and Carlos
More information2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due 9/5). Prove that every countable set A is measurable and µ(a) = 0. 2 (Bonus). Let A consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is
More informationA SHORT PROOF OF THE COIFMAN-MEYER MULTILINEAR THEOREM
A SHORT PROOF OF THE COIFMAN-MEYER MULTILINEAR THEOREM CAMIL MUSCALU, JILL PIPHER, TERENCE TAO, AND CHRISTOPH THIELE Abstract. We give a short proof of the well known Coifman-Meyer theorem on multilinear
More informationThe reference [Ho17] refers to the course lecture notes by Ilkka Holopainen.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics Real Analysis I, Fall 207 Solutions to Exercise 6 (6 pages) riikka.schroderus at helsinki.fi Note. The course can be passed by an exam. The first possible exam
More informationMAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9
MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended
More information6.2 Fubini s Theorem. (µ ν)(c) = f C (x) dµ(x). (6.2) Proof. Note that (X Y, A B, µ ν) must be σ-finite as well, so that.
6.2 Fubini s Theorem Theorem 6.2.1. (Fubini s theorem - first form) Let (, A, µ) and (, B, ν) be complete σ-finite measure spaces. Let C = A B. Then for each µ ν- measurable set C C the section x C is
More informationREARRANGEMENT OF HARDY-LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS IN LORENTZ SPACES
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 128, Number 1, Pages 65 74 S 0002-9939(99)05128-X Article electronically published on June 30, 1999 REARRANGEMENT OF HARDY-LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS
More informationIntroduction and Preliminaries
Chapter 1 Introduction and Preliminaries This chapter serves two purposes. The first purpose is to prepare the readers for the more systematic development in later chapters of methods of real analysis
More informationSupremum and Infimum
Supremum and Infimum UBC M0 Lecture Notes by Philip D. Loewen The Real Number System. Work hard to construct from the axioms a set R with special elements O and I, and a subset P R, and mappings A: R R
More informationHarmonic Analysis Homework 5
Harmonic Analysis Homework 5 Bruno Poggi Department of Mathematics, University of Minnesota November 4, 6 Notation Throughout, B, r is the ball of radius r with center in the understood metric space usually
More informationThe Banach Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 19: Reiter s Property and the Følner Condition. 6 October 2011
The Banach Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 19: Reiter s Property and the Følner Condition 6 October 211 Invariant means and amenability Definition Let G be a locally compact group. An invariant
More informationMTH 404: Measure and Integration
MTH 404: Measure and Integration Semester 2, 2012-2013 Dr. Prahlad Vaidyanathan Contents I. Introduction....................................... 3 1. Motivation................................... 3 2. The
More informationLebesgue Measure on R n
CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets
More informationREAL ANALYSIS I Spring 2016 Product Measures
REAL ANALSIS I Spring 216 Product Measures We assume that (, M, µ), (, N, ν) are σ- finite measure spaces. We want to provide the Cartesian product with a measure space structure in which all sets of the
More informationA characterization of the two weight norm inequality for the Hilbert transform
A characterization of the two weight norm inequality for the Hilbert transform Ignacio Uriarte-Tuero (joint works with Michael T. Lacey, Eric T. Sawyer, and Chun-Yen Shen) September 10, 2011 A p condition
More informationn [ F (b j ) F (a j ) ], n j=1(a j, b j ] E (4.1)
1.4. CONSTRUCTION OF LEBESGUE-STIELTJES MEASURES In this section we shall put to use the Carathéodory-Hahn theory, in order to construct measures with certain desirable properties first on the real line
More informationSpring 2014 Advanced Probability Overview. Lecture Notes Set 1: Course Overview, σ-fields, and Measures
36-752 Spring 2014 Advanced Probability Overview Lecture Notes Set 1: Course Overview, σ-fields, and Measures Instructor: Jing Lei Associated reading: Sec 1.1-1.4 of Ash and Doléans-Dade; Sec 1.1 and A.1
More informationChapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries
Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.
More informationMath 5051 Measure Theory and Functional Analysis I Homework Assignment 2
Math 551 Measure Theory and Functional nalysis I Homework ssignment 2 Prof. Wickerhauser Due Friday, September 25th, 215 Please do Exercises 1, 4*, 7, 9*, 11, 12, 13, 16, 21*, 26, 28, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37.
More informationNotes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich November, 2013
Notes on the Lebesgue Integral by Francis J. Narcowich November, 203 Introduction In the definition of the Riemann integral of a function f(x), the x-axis is partitioned and the integral is defined in
More informationMeasure Theoretic Probability. P.J.C. Spreij
Measure Theoretic Probability P.J.C. Spreij this version: September 16, 2009 Contents 1 σ-algebras and measures 1 1.1 σ-algebras............................... 1 1.2 Measures...............................
More informationTHE STONE-WEIERSTRASS THEOREM AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO L 2 SPACES
THE STONE-WEIERSTRASS THEOREM AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO L 2 SPACES PHILIP GADDY Abstract. Throughout the course of this paper, we will first prove the Stone- Weierstrass Theroem, after providing some initial
More informationMeasure Theory on Topological Spaces. Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond
Measure Theory on Topological Spaces Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond May 22, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 The Riemann Integral........................................ 2 1.2 Measurable..............................................
More informationChapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity
Chapter One The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity Our story begins with a classical situation: convolution with homogeneous, Calderón- Zygmund ( kernels on R n. Let S n 1 R n denote the unit sphere
More informationDifferentiation of Measures and Functions
Chapter 6 Differentiation of Measures and Functions This chapter is concerned with the differentiation theory of Radon measures. In the first two sections we introduce the Radon measures and discuss two
More informationANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONS (D COURSE - PART II MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS)
ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONS (D COURS - PART II MATHMATICAL TRIPOS) CLÉMNT MOUHOT - C.MOUHOT@DPMMS.CAM.AC.UK Contents. Integration of functions 2. Vector spaces of functions 9 3. Fourier decomposition of functions
More informationThe Hilbert Transform and Fine Continuity
Irish Math. Soc. Bulletin 58 (2006), 8 9 8 The Hilbert Transform and Fine Continuity J. B. TWOMEY Abstract. It is shown that the Hilbert transform of a function having bounded variation in a finite interval
More information