II - REAL ANALYSIS. This property gives us a way to extend the notion of content to finite unions of rectangles: we define
|
|
- Della Barrett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 Measures 1.1 Jordan content in R N II - REAL ANALYSIS Let I be an interval in R. Then its 1-content is defined as c 1 (I) := b a if I is bounded with endpoints a, b. If I is unbounded, we define c 1 (I) = +. More generally, Definition Let R = I 1... I N R N be a N-rectangle, where I k R is an interval, k = 1,..., N. Then the N-content of R is defined as c N (R) = c 1 (I 1 )... c 1 (I N ). We always assume that if c 1 (I k ) = 0 for some k, then c N (R) = 0 (so the 2-content of a straightline in R 2 is 0) and if c 1 (I k ) = for some k, with c 1 (I j ) > 0, j k then c N (R) =. One important feature of the N-content (and as we shall see of measures of sets) is its additivity: if R 1, R 2 are disjoint rectangles then c N (R 1 R 2 ) = c N (R 1 ) + c N (R 2 ). This property gives us a way to extend the notion of content to finite unions of rectangles: we define Definition U(R N ) is the class of sets given by finite unions of n-rectangles, E(R N ) is the class of sets given by finite unions of bounded n-rectangles, that is, bounded sets in U(R N ). Elements of E(R N ) are called elementary or simple sets. Note that since R \ S is a rectangle whenever R, S are rectangles, any finite union can assumed to be disjoint: if U = p i=1 R i, then U = p i=1 R i, R 1 = R 1, R k+1 = R k+1 \ k i=1 R i where the rectangles R are mutually disjoint. (This process of turning an arbitrary union k into an union of disjoint sets will be used often.) Definition Let U E(R N ) be such that U = p i=1 R i, where R i are disjoint rectangles. We define the N-content of U by c N (U) := p c N (R i ). i=1 1
2 Of course, one needs to show - see [NotesMR] - that the definition above does not depend on the partition of U into disjoint rectangles. The class of simple sets is quite restrictive: e.g., balls and triangles are not simple sets. The point now is to consider sets that can be approximated, outer and inner, by simple sets. One can see that if J R N is bounded then there exist simple sets U, K such that K J U. Hence the following definition makes sense: Definition Let J R N be bounded. The outer Jordan content of J is defined as The inner Jordan content of J is defined as c N (J) := inf{c N (U) : U J, U E(R N )}. c N (J) := sup{c N (K) : K J, K E(R N )}. The bounded set J is said to be Jordan measurable, J J(R N ), if c N (J) = c(j). In that case we define the Jordan content of J as c N (J) := c N (J) = c(j). Examples Finite sets are simple, hence Jordan measurable, and have content 2. D = Q [0, 1] not Jordan measurable, c(d) = 1 and c(d) = 0. Useful criteria to show Jordan measurability, that relies mainly on the definition of sup and inf: Proposition (i) J J(R N ) if and only if for all ɛ > 0, there exist simple sets U, K E(R N ) such that K J U, c N (U \ K) < ɛ and in this case c N (J) ]c N (U) ɛ, c N (K) + ɛ[. (ii) J J(R N ) if and only if there exist simple sets U n, K n E(R N ) such that K n J U n, c N (U n \ K n ) 0 and in this case c N (J) = lim c N (K n ) = lim c N (U n ). (iii) J J(R N ) with c N (J) = 0 if and only if there is U E(R N ) such that J U, c N (U) < ɛ 2
3 A set with c N (J) = 0 is said to be a null set. Note that since c N (J) c N (J), any set with c N (J) = 0 is Jordan measurable (see also (iii)), in particular, if N J(R N ) is a null-set and J N then J is Jordan measurable and c N (J) = 0. In (i), we can assume that U and K are open or closed without loss of generality (mainly because if U is simple, then also intu and U are simple, and have the same content as U). In particular, taking K and open U closed in (i), we see that U \ K covers the boundary J of J and that J J(R N ) with c N ( J) = 0. The converse is also true: Proposition Let J R N be bounded. Then J J(R N ) J J(R N ) and c N ( J) = 0. In that case, c N (J) = c N (intj) = c N (J) and (i) c N (J) = 0 intj =, (ii) if J E(R N ) then c N (J) = 0 J is finite. Note that a set with non-empty interior cannot be a null set, since in that case it contains a rectangle with positive content. Properties of J(R N ): Proposition The class of J(R N ) is a semi-algebra: 1 (and also A B J(R N )). A, B J(R N ) A B, A \ B J(R N ) 2. Let A, B J(R N ). The Jordan content c N : J(R N ) [0, + ] is: (i) Additive: if A B =, then c N (A B) = c N (A) + c N (B). (ii) Monotonic: if A B, then c N (A) c N (B). (iii) Subadditive: c N (A B) c N (A) + c N (B). (iv) Invariant under translations and reflexions. 3. Products: A J(R N ), B J(R M ) then A B J(R N+M ) and c N+M (A B) = c N (A)c M (B). By induction, any union in the proposition above can be replaced by a finite union: J(R N ) is closed for finite unions and intersections, and is finitely additive and subadditive. We can show that (for any additive, non-negative set function) for A, B J(R N ) (not necessarily disjoint): c N (A) + c N (B) = c N (A B) + c N (B A). (1) Moreover, always have c N (A) = c N (A B) + c N (A \ B). 1 it is not an algebra, since R N J(R N ). 3
4 Remark (Riemann Integral). Let f : R R be a non-negative, bounded function and let Ω f (E) := {(x, y) : 0 y f (x), x E}. If I = [a, b] is an interval, then c N (Ω f (I)) = b f (x)dx = inf S D ( f ), c N (Ω f (I)) = a b a f (x)dx = sup s D ( f ), where S D ( f ), s D ( f ) are the upper and lowers Darboux sums relative to a decomposition D of I. Hence f is Riemann integrable, f R(I) Ω f (I) J(R N ). Conversely, for E R, let χ E be the characteristic, or indicator, function of E: χ E (x) = 1, x E, and χ E (x) = 0, x E. Asume E is bounded, then E J(R N ) χ E R(I), c N (E) = χ E. R The fact that there are countable sets that are not Jordan measurable yields an example of a sequence of Riemann integrable functions whose pointwise limit is not Riemann integrable: just take E = {p k : k N} J(R N ) and E n = {p k : k n} J(R N ) (finite sets). Then χ E = lim χ En but χ E not Riemann integrable on any interval. We have that finite unions of Jordan measurable sets are always Jordan measurable, but this does not hold even if we take a countable union of points, as Q [0, 1] shows. We would like to extend the definition of Jordan content to countable unions of Jordan measurable sets. This is made possible by the following fundamental result. Theorem Let A n J(R N ), n N, be disjoint. If A = A n J(R N ) then c N (A) = c N (A n ). Proof. Let A n J(R N ), n N, be disjoint and A = A n J(R N ). Given ɛ > 0, let K, K n be closed and U, U n be open such that K A U, c N (U \ K) < ɛ, K n A n U n, c N (U \ K) < ɛ 2 n. We have then that c N (U) ɛ < c N (A) < c N (K) + ɛ and c N (U n ) ɛ 2 c N(A n n ) c N (K n ) + ɛ 2, n so that c N (U n ) ɛ c N (A n ) c N (K n ) + ɛ. 4
5 Now note that by Heine-Borel s theorem, K is compact, as it is closed and bounded. Since {U n } is an open cover, it has a finite subcover: It follows that hence c N (A) c N (A n ). K U n K p U n. c N (A) ɛ < c N (K) c N (A) < p c N (U n ) c N (A n ) + ɛ c N (A n ) + 2ɛ, for all ɛ > 0 Conversely, let again A n J(R N ), n N, be disjoint and A = A n J(R N ). Since, for all n N, we have A n k=1 A k, by monotonicity and finite additivity: ( c N (A) c N n k=1 A ) n k = c N (A k ), n N hence c N (A) k=1 c N (A k ). A function satisfying the condition in the above theorem is said to be a pre-measure, a terminology that will be made clear in the following sections. We now have a way of extending the Jordan content to countable unions of Jordan measurable, need to check that if A = A n = B n for collections of measurable, disjoint, sets (A n ), (B n ) then since A n is Jordan measurable and A n = m=1 A n B m, we get from the previous result that k=1 c N (A n ) = c N (A n B m ) = c N (B m ), m=1 m=1 where we apply to same reasoning to B m to get the last equality. Definition We let J σ (R N ) denote the class of countable unions of Jordan measurable sets. Define the extended Jordan content c N : J σ (R N ) [0, + ] such that if A = A n, with A n J(R N ) disjoint, then c N (A) := c N (A n ). The previous theorem shows that the function defined above is indeed an extension of the Jordan content on J(R N ), and we write in general c N as c N. We let E σ (R N ) denote the class of countable unions of simple sets, that is, the class of countable unions of rectangles. 5
6 A set function λ is said to be σ-additive if λ ( A n ) := λ(a n ), A n disjoint and σ-subadditive if λ ( A n ) λ(a n ). Proposition The classes J σ (R N ) and E σ (R N ) are closed for countable unions and c N is σ-additive and σ-subadditive on J σ (R N ) and E σ (R N ). Examples Any countable set is in J σ (R N ) and if Q = {q n } then ( c N (Q) = c N {q n } ) = c N ({q n }) = Let D = [0, 1] Q. Then D J σ (R N ), since it is countable, and c N (D) = 0. By additivity, if D c := [0, 1] R \ Q J σ (R N ), then c N (D c ) = 1. But int(d c ) =, hence if D c = A n, with A n J(R N ), then int(a n ) =, hence c N (A n ) = 0 and also c N (D c ) = 0. We conclude that D c = [0, 1] \ D = [0, 1] R \ Q J σ (R N ). In particular, J σ (R N ) is not closed for difference of sets, hence not an algebra. NOTE: In general, for A J σ (R N ), c N (A) = 0 int(a) =. In particular, A E σ (R N ), c N (A) = 0 A is countable. 3. Any open set is given by a countable union of rectangles, hence is σ-simple. Therefore J σ (R N ) contains all the open sets. 4. An open set U J(R): let {q n } = [0, 1] Q and ɛ > 0 be given. Define U n :=]q n ɛ 2 n, q n + ɛ 2 n [, U := U n. Then U is open, U E σ (R) J σ (R). By subadditivity, c(u) c(u n ) = ɛ = 2ɛ. 2n 1 On the other hand, since [0, 1] Q U, the upper Jordan content c(u) c([0, 1] Q) = 1. If U J(R), we would have c(u) = c(u) < 2ɛ, c(u) = c(u) 1. For ɛ < 1/2 this is a contradiction. Hence U J(R) for ɛ < 1/2. 6
7 The following two examples will be used and often used as reference during the course. Example (Cantor set). Let I = [a, b]. Define T(I) := I \ ] a+b c(i), [ a+b + c(i) and T( p I k=1 k) := p T(I k=1 k). Let F 0 = [a, b] and F n = T(F n 1 ), n N. Then F n is given by finite unions of closed sets, hence it is a closed, simple set and c(f n ) 0. Define C(I) = F n. Since F n E(R N ) and C(I) F n, with c(f n ) 0, it follows from Proposition (iii) that C(I) J(R) with c(c(i)) = 0. It is an uncountable set with int(c(i)) =. Topological properties: closed, hence compact nowhere dense int(c(i))) = int(c(i))) = perfect set: all points in C(I) are limit points (no isolated points) totally disconnected. Also have that I \ C(I) is a countable union of open intervals, hence is in E σ (R). But C(I) E σ (R) being an uncountable null set. Hence, E σ (R N ) is not closed for difference of sets, hence it is not an algebra. Example (Smith-Volterra-Cantor set). Borel Problem: Find a collection of sets M P(R N ) and m N : M [0, + ] such that (1) M is an algebra closed for countable unions and for A n M, m N A n = m N (A n ). (2) M E(R N ) and m N (E) = c N (E), for E E(R N ). Note that M E σ (R N ), in particular M contains all opens sets, as well as all closed sets in R N. Note also that, since c N is translation invariant, m N is translation invariant on E σ (R N ). If we require that m N is translation invariant on M, we see now that such a collection M is necessarily proper, even though the existence on sets that cannot be measured by m N relies on the axiom of Choice. Example (Vitali s set). Define an equivalence relation on [0, 1[ by x y x y Q. Let V [0, 1[ be such that the intersection of V with [x] contains precisely one element (need Axiom of Choice). We claim that if (M, m N ) is a translation invariant solution for Borel s problem, then V M. It follows from Vitali s example that: If (M, m N ) is a translation invariant solution for Borel s problem then M P(R N ). 7
8 1.2 σ-algebras and measure spaces We now consider an arbitrary base space X. Definition Let M P(X). Then (i) M is an algebra if X M and A, B M A B, A \ B M (ii) M is a σ-algebra if it is an algebra and is closed with respect to countable unions: A n M, n N A n M. We have always, X are in M and that M is closed for countable intersections as well: A n M, n N A n = X \ X \ A n M. Examples P(X) is the largest σ-algebra, {, X} is the smallest. 2. J(R N ), E(R N ) semi-algebra, not closed for countable unions, hence not σ-algebras. 3. J σ (R N ), E σ (R N ): closed for countable unions but not algebras: not closed for difference of set. Hence, are not σ-algebras. 4. Let (X, τ) be a topological space. Then the collection τ of open sets in X is closed for countable unions, but fails to be an algebra, as it is not closed for complements. Even if a given class A is not s σ-algebra, we can always consider the smallest σ- algebra that contains it. It is easy to see that the intersection of σ-algebras is still a σ-algebra, and P(X) is a σ-algebra containing any collection of sets A. We define the σ-algebra generated by A by M(A) := M, M σ-algebra, A M. Definition Let X be a topological space. The Borel σ-algebra B(X) is the σ-algebra generated by the class of opens sets. Sets in B(X) are called Borel sets, include all open sets, all closed sets, all countable unions of closed sets - such a set is called a Fσ-set - and all countable intersections of open sets - such a set is called a G δ -set. When X = R N, it is easily seen that B(R N ) is generated by open/closed/half- open rectangles. Definition Let M be a σ-algebra. A set function µ : M [0, + ] is a measure on M if 8
9 (i) µ( ) = 0, (ii) µ is σ-additive: for A n M, n N, disjoint, µ A n = µ(a n ). A measure space is a triple (X, M, µ) where µ is a measure on M. Sets in M are said to be µ-measurable. The measure is finite if µ(x) < and σ-finite if there exist X n with µ(x n ) < and X = X n. Note that µ( ) = 0 µ(a) <, for some A M. Moreover, for A, B M, not necessarily disjoint, we always have µ(a) + µ(b) = µ(a B) + µ(b A), µ(a) = µ(a B) + µ(a \ B). (2) Examples Counting measure: # : P(X) [0, + ] #(E) = the number of elements of E, if E is finite, and #(E) = +, if E is infinite. # is finite measure X is finite, and a σ-finite measure X is countable. In particular, it is an example of non σ-finite measure on R. 2. Dirac measure given x 0 X, define δ x0 : P(X) [0, ] by 1, if x 0 E, δ x0 (E) = 0, if x 0 E 3. Dirac comb: µ : P(X) [0, + ] such that is a σ-finite measure. µ(e) = #(E Z) = δ n (E). (NOTE: the sum of measures is always a measure -Exercise.) 4. Probability measure: p : M [0, 1] such that p(x) = 1, M is the space of events and (X, M, p) is called a probability space. For instance, take p(e) = #(E) #(X), X finite. 9 n Z
10 5. Borel measures: if X is a topological space, a Borel measure is a measure defined on σ-algebra of the Borel sets B(X), generated by the opens sets. In R N, the most important Borel measure is the Lebesgue measure, which is translation invariant and yields a solution to Borel s problem. 6. Let f : R R be increasing, define µ f (]a, b[) := f (b) f (a). Then µ is σ-additive on the σ-algebra generated by the open intervals, that is in B(R), so (R, B(R), µ f ) is a measure space. The Lebesgue measure corresponds to the case f (x) = x. (The Dirac measure is a particular case, with H(x) = 1, x x 0, H(x) = 0, x < x 0.) 7. Haar measures: invariant measures on locally compact topological groups, defined on Borel sets. An additive, non-negative, function is always monotonic, as µ(b) = µ(b A)+µ(B\A). Using monotonicity, we can see that σ-additivity implies σ-subadditivity. Moreover, a measure is always continuous with respect to monotonic sequences, in a sense made clear by the next result. Proposition Let (X, M, µ) be a measure space. 1. µ is σ-subadditive; 2. Let E n M, n N such that µ(e 1 ) <, 2 E n+1 E n and E = E n (write E n E). Then µ(e) = lim µ(e n ). 3. Let E n M, n N such that E n E n+1 and E = E n (write E n E). Then µ(e) = lim µ(e n ). Properties 2. and 3. are sometimes called continuity from above and continuity from below, respectively. (In [NotesR], Property 3. is called Lebesgue s monotone convergence theorem.) Proof. To see σ-subadditivity, let A = A n and write A = A n with A n = A n \ n 1 k=1 A k, then by σ-additivity and monotonicity µ(a) = µ(a n) µ(a n ). To prove 2., let E n M, n N such that µ(e 1 ) <, E n+1 E n and E = E n then E 1 can be written as a disjoint union E 1 = E ( k=1 E k \ E k+1 ) 2 (N, P(N), #), with E n = {k n} then E n =, µ(e n ) =. 10
11 hence Since µ(e 1 ) = µ(e) + µ(e k \ E k+1 ) = lim k=1 µ(e k \ E k+1 ) <. k=1 n µ(e k ) µ(e k+1 ) = µ(e 1 ) lim µ(e n+1 ), k=1 and µ(e 1 ) <, it follows that µ(e) = lim µ(e n ). To prove 3., let now E n M, n N such that E n E n+1 and E = E n. Then E can be written as a disjoint union and in the same way E = k=0 E k+1 \ E k, E 0 = µ(e) = n µ(e k+1 \ E k ) = lim µ(e k+1 \ E k ) = lim µ(e n+1 ). k=0 k=0 Let (X, M, µ) be a measure space. Sets in M with µ(e) = 0 are usually called null sets and play an important role in measure theory, as null sets are used as a means of approximation: a property that holds except on a null-set is said to hold µ-almost everywhere, µ-a.e. (and we often look for characterizations of measurable sets minus a null-set). Note that a countable union of null-sets is also a null-set, by σ-subadditivity. Let N be a null set and E N. If E M, then µ(e) µ(n) = 0, hence E is also a null set. There is however no reason in general for E M. Definition A measure space (X, M, µ) is said to be complete if E N M, µ(n) = 0 E M, µ(e) = 0. Even if a given measure space is not complete, we can always form its completion, extending µ to a larger σ-algebra. Let N M be the collection of all null sets. Define M := {E F : E M, F N, N N}, µ : M [0, + ], µ(e F) := µ(e). First check that µ is well-defined: if E 1 F 1 = E 2 F 2 then E 1 \ E 2 F 2 N 2 for some null set N 2, hence is also a null set (since E 1 \ E 2 M) and µ(e 1 ) = µ(e 1 \ E 2 ) + µ(e 1 E 2 ) = µ(e 1 E 2 ) = µ(e 2 ), by the same reasoning with E 2. Moreover, if A E F M with µ(e F) = 0, then E is a µ-null set, so A is a subset of a µ-null set and hence A M. An alternative definition of M is the following: 11
12 A M there exist U, K M with K A U and µ(u \ K) = 0, which illustrates that sets in M are precisely the ones that can be approximated by sets in M, modulo a µ-null set. (Exercise.) Theorem (X, M, µ) is a complete measure space and is the smallest complete extension of (X, M, µ). 1.3 Outer measures Now we turn to the issue of defining measure spaces. One way of achieving this is to consider first outer approximations, which should be defined for any set, and then define measurability from there. Definition An outer measure is a set function µ : P(X) [0, + ] such that (i) µ ( ) = 0, (ii) µ is monotonic, (iii) µ is σ-subadditive: for any A n X, n N, µ A n µ (A n ). So, we drop σ-additivity, requiring only the weaker σ-subadditivity ( approximation from the outside ) but require on the other hand that µ is defined on the whole of P(X). Any measure defined on P(X) is also an outer measure, so the counting measure and the Dirac measures are outer measures. Example Outer Jordan content is subadditive but not σ-subadditive: take D = Q [0, 1], then c N (D) = 1, but D = {q n }, and c N ({q n }) = 0. Hence it is not an outer measure. The following proposition gives a common way of obtaining outer measures: Proposition Let E P(X) be such that, X E and λ : E [0, ] such that λ( ) = 0. For A X, let λ : P(X) [0, ] given by Then λ is an outer measure. λ (E) = inf λ(e n ) : E j E, A E n. 12
13 Now we want to associate a measure space to a given outer measure µ, that is, a σ- algebra M µ of measurable sets and a measure µ = µ on M µ, so µ is σ-additive on M µ. Noting that a finitely additive function is σ-additive if and only if it is σ-subadditive, we want to find a σ-algebra M µ where µ is additive. Definition Let µ be an outer measure on X. A set A X is said to be µ -measurable if µ (E) = µ (E A) + µ (E A c ), for all E P(X). We denote by M µ the class of all µ -measurable sets. Note that we have always, by subadditivity, µ (E) µ (E A) + µ (E A c ). The next lemma shows that we get finite additivity of µ restricted to M µ (note that B can be any set). Lemma Let A M µ, B P(X). Then µ (A B) = µ (A) + µ (B \ A). If A B = then µ (A B) = µ (A) + µ (B). Proof. Taking E = A B in the definition of µ -measurability, we get µ (A B) = µ ((A B) A) + µ ((A B) A c ) = µ (A) + µ (B A c ). In fact, more is true, as we can prove in the same way that if A M µ, B, C X, with A, B disjoint, then µ (C (A B)) = µ (C A) + µ (C B). We have then, by induction, that µ is (finitely) additive on any algebra contained in M µ, hence σ-additive on any σ-algebra contained in M µ. Lemma M µ is a σ-algebra. Proof. It is closed for complements, by definition, and, X M µ. Let now A, B M µ. We show that A B M µ, want to see that µ (E) µ (E (A B)) + µ (E (A B) c ) for any E X. Now E (A B) c = (E A c ) (E A B c ) (disjoint union), hence µ (E (A B) c ) + µ (E (A B)) µ (E A c ) + µ (E A B c ) + µ (E A B) = µ (E A c ) + µ (E A) = µ (E) where we used µ -mensurability of B and A in the last equalities. Hence M µ is an algebra, in particular, closed for finite unions. 13
14 We show it is closed for countable unions. Let A = A n, with A n M µ, n N, assume disjoint. Let E X. For finite unions, we know that for any n N, µ (E) = µ (E ( n k=1 A k)) + µ (E ( n k=1 A k) c ) µ (E ( n k=1 A k)) + µ (E A c ) (since ( n A k=1 k) c A c ). Moreover, by measurability of each A n, using induction, one can see (Exercise) that n µ (E ( n k=1 A n)) = µ (E A k ). Letting n, it follows µ (E) k=1 µ (E A k ) + µ (E A c ) µ (E A) + µ (E A c ), k=1 by σ-subadditivity 3. Since we always have, µ (E) µ (E A) + µ (E A c ), the measurability of A follows, and that finishes the proof. Given an outer measure µ, we have constructed a σ-algebra M µ where µ is σ- additive (in fact, we only needed additive), that is, so that the restriction of µ to M µ is a true measure. Moreover, this measure is always complete. In fact any set with µ (A) = 0 is always measurable : if E X, then µ (E A) µ (A) = 0, so that µ (E) µ (A E) + µ (A c E) = µ (A c E) µ (E). Hence µ (E) = µ (A E) + µ (A c E) and A M µ. In particular, if A N where N M µ such that µ(n) = µ (N) = 0, then µ (A) µ (N) = 0, so A is measurable and the space is complete. We have proved: Theorem (Caratheodory). Let µ be an outer measure on X. Then there exists a complete measure space (X, M µ, µ) such that where M µ is as in µ(e) = µ (E), for E M µ. The first application of Caratheodory s construction is to extend additive functions on algebras to measures on σ-algebras. Definition Let A P(X) be an algebra, or a semi-algebra such that X is a countable union of elements of A. A premeasure on A is a function µ 0 : A [0, ] such that µ ( ) = 0, and for A n A disjoint, n N, then A = A n A µ 0 (A) = µ 0 (A n ). 3 In fact, in this case we have σ-additivity: prove that µ (E A) = k=1 µ (E A k ) 14
15 In particular, µ 0 is additive on A. Now to each premeasure, we can associate an outer measure, according to µ (E) = inf µ 0 (A n ) : A j A, E A n. (3) Proposition Let µ 0 be a premeasure on an algebra / semi-algebra 4 A and µ be defined as above, M µ the σ-algebra of µ -measurable sets. Then (i) µ A = µ 0 (ii) A M µ if and only if µ 0 (B) = µ (B A) + µ (B A c ), for all B A, (iii) A M µ. Proof. (i). Let A A. It is clear from the definition that µ (A) µ 0 (A). Let A A n, A n A. Then A = A A n A hence, by the premeasure property, µ 0 (A) = µ 0 (A A n ) µ 0 (A n ). Hence µ 0 (A) µ (A), so equality follows. (ii) Let A X such that µ 0 (B) = µ (B A) + µ (B A c ), for all B A,. For E X such that E B n, B n A we have E A (B n A), E A c (B n A c ) hence µ (E A) + µ (E A c ) µ (B n A) + µ (B n A c ) = µ 0 (B n ) It follows µ (E) µ (E A) + µ (E A c ) µ (E), so A is measurable. (iii) is an easy consequence of (i) and (ii). Theorem (Hahn s extension theorem). Let µ 0 be a premeasure on an algebra / semialgebra A and M be the σ-algebra generated by A. Then (i) µ 0 extends to a σ-additive function µ on M and (X, M, µ) is a measure space. (ii) If ν is also an extension of µ 0 to M, then µ(e) = ν(e), if µ(e) <, E M. In particular, the extension is unique if µ 0 is σ-finite. 4 In this case, we assume that X = A n for some collection A n A. 15
16 Proof. (i) is Caratheodory s extension restricted to M, noting that if A M µ, then also M M µ (as M µ is a σ-algebra). As for (ii), if ν is another extension, then ν(e) µ (E) = µ(e) as if E A i, with A i disjoint, then ν(e) ν( A i ) = ν(a i ) = µ 0 (A i ). If µ(e) <, then for any ɛ > 0, can take E A = A i, A i A disjoint such that µ(a \ E) < ɛ. Have µ(a) = ν(a) by σ-additivity of µ, ν, as the measures coincide on A. Hence µ(e) µ(a) = ν(a) = ν(e) + ν(a \ E) ν(e) + µ(a \ E) ν(e) + ɛ, ɛ > 0 so µ(e) ν(e). If the space is σ-finite, any set can be written as a countable union of sets with finite measure, hence the two measures coincide. Note that in fact we always have a complete extension of µ 0 and A considering µ on the class M µ of µ -measurable sets. Remark (Inner measures). If µ is an outer measure obtained by extending a premeasure on an algebra, then we can define an inner measure by µ (E) = µ 0 (X) µ (E c ). Then E is µ -measurable iff µ (E) = µ (E). (Exercise [Fol] uses regularity) 1.4 Lebesgue measure We are now back in R N and will use the results in the previous section to provide a solution (in fact, two) to Borel s problem: we want to define a measure space (R N, M N, m N ) such that M N E(R N ), that is, simple sets, and m N extends the Jordan content: m N (E) = c N (E), if E E(R N ). The outer Jordan content is subadditive but not σ-subadditive (just take D = Q [0, 1] = {q n }), hence Caratheodory s construction cannot be applied directly. Nevertheless, it follows from Theorem that c N is a premeasure on the semi-algebra E(R N ): we saw in partcular that, if A = A n E(R N ), with A n disjoint, then c N (A) = c N (A n ). From the results in the previous section, it induces an outer measure m N and a σ-algebra where it becomes a measure. Definition The Lebesgue outer measure m N : P(RN ) [0, + ] is defined as m N (A) = inf{ c N (R n ) : R n bounded rectangle, A R n}. 16
17 The Lebesgue measurable sets L(R N ) are those sets A such that for any E R N, m N (E) = m N (E A) + m N (E Ac ). The Lebesgue measure m N : L(R N ) [0, ] as m N (A) = m N (A), if A L(RN ). It is easy to see that m N is indeed the outer measure induced by c N as in (3). Note that the σ-algebra generated by E(R N ) coincides with the σ-algebra generated by the collection of bounded rectangles, which coincides with the σ-algebra generated by the open sets, that is, with the Borel algebra B(R N ). It follows Proposition that A L(R N ) iff c N (R) = m N (R A) + m N (R Ac ), R bounded rectangle. We summarize the results from the previous section: (i) L(R N ), B(R N ) are σ-algebras and m N is a measure such that for any E E(R N ), m N (E) = c N (E). (ii) m N is the unique extension of c N to B(R N ) (as R N is σ-finite). (iii) L(R N ) is a complete extension of B(R N ) (will see that it is the completion). Recalling Borel s problem of extending c N we now have: Theorem (R N, B(R N ), m N ) and (R N, L(R N ), m N ) are solutions to Borel s problem. (R N, B(R N ), m N ) is the smallest solution, and (R N, L(R N ), m N ) is a complete solution. 5 Note that completeness of L(R N ) follows from the stronger crucial property, that we use often: m N (A) = 0 A L(RN ). Examples Countable sets 2. All open sets and all the closed sets are in B(R N ) L(R N ), as are all sets of the form G δ = U n, U n open, F σ = K n, K n closed. Sets that are countable unions of closed sets are called F-sigma sets, and countable intersections of open sets are called G-delta sets. Also, the closure and the interior of any set are always measurable. 5 it will follow from B(R N ) = L(R N ) that it is also the smallest complete solution. 17
18 3. The set U = ]q n ɛ, q 2 n n + ɛ [, where q 2 n n are the rationals in [0, 1]: open (not in J(R N )) 4. Cantor and Volterra ( fat Cantor): closed. Volterra s set shows that in L(R N ), a set with positive measure can have empty interior, in fact be nowhere dense. 5. Cardinality: the Cantor set C(I) and all subsets of Cantor are Lebesgue measurable (in fact, also Jordan measurable), as they are null sets. Since C(I) is uncountable, it follows that #J(R N ) = #L(R N ) = #P(R). On the other hand, the Borel sets are generated by a countable basis of open sets, and it can be proved that #B(R N ) = #P(N) = #(R) So there are many more Lebesgue (and Jordan) measurable sets than Borel sets. It is not easy however to give an explicit description of a set in L(R N ) \ B(R N ). We have, as we see below, J(R N ) L(R N ). We give now two equivalent definitions of m N (we take the extension of c N to E σ (R N ) given by σ-additivity). Proposition Let E σ (R N ) be the collection of countable unions of simple sets m N (A) = inf{c N(E) : E E σ (R N ), A E} = inf{c N (U) : U is open, A U}. Proof. We have m N (A) = inf{ c N (E n ) : E n E(R N ), A E n}. The first equality follows noting that we can assume without loss of generality that E n are disjoint and in this case if E = E n E σ (R N ), then c N (E) = c N (E n ). As for the second, any open set U E σ (R N ), as it can be written as a countable union of (disjoint) rectangles, so inf{c N (E) : E E σ (R N ), A E} inf{c N (U) : U is open, A U}. Moreover, given E E σ (R N ) and ɛ > 0, can always find open U E such that c N (U) c N (E) + ɛ: if c N (E) < and E = R n, take open rectangles R n R n such that c N (R n \ R n ) < ɛ/2 n and U = R n. If c N (E) = then any open U E also has infinite content. Hence, the reverse inequality holds, and equality follows. The first definition given above is quite similar in form to that of Jordan outer content: just replace E(R N ) by E σ (R N ). In particular, we can see that c N (A) m N (A) c N(A) for any A hence if A J(R N ) then m N (A) = c N(A). Moreover, 18
19 Proposition J σ (R N ) L(R N ) and m N = c N on J σ (R N ) Proof. We show that J(R N ) L(R N ), and so m N = c N on J ( R N ). Given A J(R N ) then for any bounded rectangle R, R A, R A C J(R N ), by additivity c N (R) = c N (R A) + c N (R A c ) = m N (R A) + m N (R Ac ). Then J σ (R N ) L(R N ), as L(R N ) is a σ-algebra. Exercise: show m N extends c N. Not all Borel sets are Jordan measurable: saw in Example an open non Jordan measurable set and we have seen that not all Jordan measurable are Borel measurable. It follows from the second definition that if A L(R N ) then m N (A) = inf{c N (U) : U is open, A U} = inf{m N (U) : U is open, A U}. A Borel measure with the above property is said to be (outer) regular. Regularity means that the measure is completely determined by its values on open sets, by approximation. This property, together with the fact that sets with 0 outer measure are measurable (completeness), give a number of useful characterizations of Lebesgue measurable sets. Proposition E L(R N ) (i) given ɛ > 0, there is U open, with E U and m N (U \ E) < ɛ (ii) given ɛ > 0, there is K closed, with E K and m N (E \ K) < ɛ (iii) given ɛ > 0, there are U open, K closed, with K E U and m N (U \ K) < ɛ. Proof. (iii) is equivalent to (i) + (ii), while (ii) is equivalent to (i) taking complements. So we prove equivalence (i). Let E L(R N ) and ɛ > 0 be given. If m N (E) <, then since m N (E) = inf{m N(U) : U is open, E U}, we can take open U E such that m N (E) m N (U) < m N (E) + ɛ. Since m N (U) = m N (E) + m N (E \ U), by measurability of E, and m N (E) <, m N (U) <, it follows that m N (U \ E) < ɛ. If m N (E) =, write E = E n, where E n = E R n, with R n bounded rectangles, disjoint such that X = R n. Then m N (E n) <, and by the above there is open U n E n such that m N (U n \ E n ) < ɛ. Let U = U 2 n n, open. Then m N (U \ E) < ɛ. Conversely, if there is U n E such that m N (U n \ E) < 1 n, then letting U = U n, have m N (U \ E) m N (U n \ E) < 1 n m N (U \ E) = 0 U \ E L(RN ). Hence E = U \ (U \ E) L(R N ). 19
20 The following consequence is very useful: Corollary E L(R N ) if there exist U n open, with U n E such that m N (U n \ E) 0 and in that case m N (U n ) m N (E). Recall that a F σ set is a countable union of closed sets and a G δ set is a countable intersection of open sets; F σ and G δ sets are in the Borel algebra. Proposition E L(R N ) there are a F σ set B and a G δ set A such that A E B and m N (B \ A) = 0. In this case, m N (A) = m N (B) = m N (E). Proof. For each n N, let K n be closed, U n be open, such that K n E U n and m N (U n \ K n ) < 1. Let B = K n n and A = U n, then B \ A U n \ K n for each n, and the result follows. Conversely, if there are such A, B, then E \ A B \ A B(R N ) L(R N ), hence by completeness, E \ A L(R N ) and also E = A E \ A L(R N ). It follows straightaway from the definition of completion that: Corollary L(R N ) is the completion of the Borel algebra B(R N ). Proposition (R N, L(R N ), m N ) is the unique complete and regular (it is the largest regular and the smallest complete) solution to Borel s problem. Proof. Any complete solution contains B(R N ), hence contains B(R N ) = L(R N ). Let now (X, M, µ) be a regular solution to Borel s problem and A M. By regularity, µ(a) = m N (A) as µ = m N = c N on open sets. Let R be a bounded rectangle, then c N (R) = µ(r) = µ(a R) + µ(a c R) = m N (A R) + m N (Ac R) hence A L(R N ) and in this case µ(a) = µ (A) = m N (A). To finish this section, we now investigate some properties, of geometrical nature, of the Lebesgue measure that were known for the Jordan content: invariance, and behavior with respect to products. Proposition Let A L(R N ) and x R N. Then A + x = {a + x : a A} L(R N ) and m N (A) = m N (A + x). 2. Let A B(R N ) and x R N. Then A + x = {a + x : a A} B(R N ) and m N (A) = m N (A + x). 20
21 Proof. It follows from regularity and the fact that c N is translation invariant that m N (A + x) = m N (A). Now for E X, x R N, E (A + x) = ((E + ( x)) A) + x hence m N (E (A + x)) + m N (E (Ac + x)) = m N ((E + ( x)) A) + m N ((E + ( x)) Ac ) = m N ((E + ( x)) = m N (E), by measurability of A. As for the Borel case: let A = {A R N : A + x B(R N ), x R N }. Then A contains the open sets and A is a σ-algebra, hence A B(R N ). Moreover, the Lebesgue measure is also invariant with respect to unitary transformations [Foll Thm 2.44] We have seen, when introducing Borel s problem, that no tranlsation invariant solution could be defined on the whole P(R N ): the classical example is Vitali s set, which provides an example of a non- Lebesgue measurable set. Examples Vitali s construction can be adapted so as to show that any A with m N (A) > 0 contains a non-measurable subset. 2. Lebesgue measurable, not Borel measurable. follows form existence of nonmeasurable. Let f : [0, 1] [0, 1] be Cantor function, that is f ( x i 3 i ) := x i 2 i if x i 1, and f constant on subintervals with x j = 1 for some (the smallest) j, f (x) = j xi 2 i. Then f increasing, continuous, and f (C) = [0, 1], where C is the Cantor set in [0, 1]. (Also known as devil s staircase ). Such a function maps Borel sets to Borel sets. Let V [0, 1] be Vitail s set and take E C such that E = f 1 (V). Then E is Lebesgue measurable (even Jordan measurable), as a subset of the Cantor set, but not Borel measurable, as in this case f (E) = V would be as well. Behavior with respect to products: see first Lemma Let A R N and B R M, then m N+M (A B) m N (A)m M (B). In particular, it follows that if m N (A) = 0 (or m M (B) = 0) then m N+M (A B) = 0, hence A B L(R N+M ). Proposition Let A L(R N ) and B L(R M ). Then A B L(R N+M ) and m N+M (A B) = m N (A)m M (B). 2. Let A B(R N ) and B B(R M ). Then A B B(R N+M ) and m N+M (A B) = m N (A)m M (B). 21
Measures and Measure Spaces
Chapter 2 Measures and Measure Spaces In summarizing the flaws of the Riemann integral we can focus on two main points: 1) Many nice functions are not Riemann integrable. 2) The Riemann integral does not
More informationMeasures. Chapter Some prerequisites. 1.2 Introduction
Lecture notes Course Analysis for PhD students Uppsala University, Spring 2018 Rostyslav Kozhan Chapter 1 Measures 1.1 Some prerequisites I will follow closely the textbook Real analysis: Modern Techniques
More informationLebesgue Measure on R n
CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets
More informationMeasure Theory. John K. Hunter. Department of Mathematics, University of California at Davis
Measure Theory John K. Hunter Department of Mathematics, University of California at Davis Abstract. These are some brief notes on measure theory, concentrating on Lebesgue measure on R n. Some missing
More informationChapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries
Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.
More informationMeasure and Integration: Concepts, Examples and Exercises. INDER K. RANA Indian Institute of Technology Bombay India
Measure and Integration: Concepts, Examples and Exercises INDER K. RANA Indian Institute of Technology Bombay India Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076,
More informationLebesgue Measure on R n
8 CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets
More informationMATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, 2014 1 Introduction Definition. If A, B are sets and there exists a bijection A B, they have the same cardinality, which we write as A, #A. If there exists
More informationChapter 4. Measure Theory. 1. Measure Spaces
Chapter 4. Measure Theory 1. Measure Spaces Let X be a nonempty set. A collection S of subsets of X is said to be an algebra on X if S has the following properties: 1. X S; 2. if A S, then A c S; 3. if
More informationConstruction of a general measure structure
Chapter 4 Construction of a general measure structure We turn to the development of general measure theory. The ingredients are a set describing the universe of points, a class of measurable subsets along
More informationMATH41011/MATH61011: FOURIER SERIES AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION. Extra Reading Material for Level 4 and Level 6
MATH41011/MATH61011: FOURIER SERIES AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION Extra Reading Material for Level 4 and Level 6 Part A: Construction of Lebesgue Measure The first part the extra material consists of the construction
More information1.4 Outer measures 10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE
10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE 1.3.6. ( Almost everywhere and null sets If (X, A, µ is a measure space, then a set in A is called a null set (or µ-null if its measure is 0. Clearly a countable union of null sets
More informationThe Caratheodory Construction of Measures
Chapter 5 The Caratheodory Construction of Measures Recall how our construction of Lebesgue measure in Chapter 2 proceeded from an initial notion of the size of a very restricted class of subsets of R,
More informationDRAFT MAA6616 COURSE NOTES FALL 2015
Contents 1. σ-algebras 2 1.1. The Borel σ-algebra over R 5 1.2. Product σ-algebras 7 2. Measures 8 3. Outer measures and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem 11 4. Construction of Lebesgue measure 15 5.
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. II.1. Prelude. Recall that the Riemann integral of a real-valued function f on an interval [a, b] is defined as
FUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by Doğan Çömez II. MEASURES AND MEASURE SPACES II.1. Prelude Recall that the Riemann integral of a real-valued function f on an interval [a, b] is defined as b n f(xdx :=
More informationREAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE
REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1.4.1 Introduction We will expand on Section 1.4 of Folland s text, which covers abstract outer measures also called exterior measures).
More informationLebesgue Measure. Dung Le 1
Lebesgue Measure Dung Le 1 1 Introduction How do we measure the size of a set in IR? Let s start with the simplest ones: intervals. Obviously, the natural candidate for a measure of an interval is its
More information1.1. MEASURES AND INTEGRALS
CHAPTER 1: MEASURE THEORY In this chapter we define the notion of measure µ on a space, construct integrals on this space, and establish their basic properties under limits. The measure µ(e) will be defined
More informationLebesgue measure on R is just one of many important measures in mathematics. In these notes we introduce the general framework for measures.
Measures In General Lebesgue measure on R is just one of many important measures in mathematics. In these notes we introduce the general framework for measures. Definition: σ-algebra Let X be a set. A
More informationReal Analysis Chapter 1 Solutions Jonathan Conder
3. (a) Let M be an infinite σ-algebra of subsets of some set X. There exists a countably infinite subcollection C M, and we may choose C to be closed under taking complements (adding in missing complements
More informationIntegration on Measure Spaces
Chapter 3 Integration on Measure Spaces In this chapter we introduce the general notion of a measure on a space X, define the class of measurable functions, and define the integral, first on a class of
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More information18.175: Lecture 2 Extension theorems, random variables, distributions
18.175: Lecture 2 Extension theorems, random variables, distributions Scott Sheffield MIT Outline Extension theorems Characterizing measures on R d Random variables Outline Extension theorems Characterizing
More informationPart V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory
Part V 7 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets Lebesgue Integration Theory Definition 7. (Preliminary). A measure on a set is a function :2 [ ] such that. () = 2. If { } = is a finite
More informationMath 4121 Spring 2012 Weaver. Measure Theory. 1. σ-algebras
Math 4121 Spring 2012 Weaver Measure Theory 1. σ-algebras A measure is a function which gauges the size of subsets of a given set. In general we do not ask that a measure evaluate the size of every subset,
More informationThe Lebesgue Integral
The Lebesgue Integral Brent Nelson In these notes we give an introduction to the Lebesgue integral, assuming only a knowledge of metric spaces and the iemann integral. For more details see [1, Chapters
More informationIndeed, if we want m to be compatible with taking limits, it should be countably additive, meaning that ( )
Lebesgue Measure The idea of the Lebesgue integral is to first define a measure on subsets of R. That is, we wish to assign a number m(s to each subset S of R, representing the total length that S takes
More informationJORDAN CONTENT. J(P, A) = {m(i k ); I k an interval of P contained in int(a)} J(P, A) = {m(i k ); I k an interval of P intersecting cl(a)}.
JORDAN CONTENT Definition. Let A R n be a bounded set. Given a rectangle (cartesian product of compact intervals) R R n containing A, denote by P the set of finite partitions of R by sub-rectangles ( intervals
More informationCHAPTER 6. Differentiation
CHPTER 6 Differentiation The generalization from elementary calculus of differentiation in measure theory is less obvious than that of integration, and the methods of treating it are somewhat involved.
More informationn [ F (b j ) F (a j ) ], n j=1(a j, b j ] E (4.1)
1.4. CONSTRUCTION OF LEBESGUE-STIELTJES MEASURES In this section we shall put to use the Carathéodory-Hahn theory, in order to construct measures with certain desirable properties first on the real line
More informationReal Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller
Real Analysis Notes Thomas Goller September 4, 2011 Contents 1 Abstract Measure Spaces 2 1.1 Basic Definitions........................... 2 1.2 Measurable Functions........................ 2 1.3 Integration..............................
More informationMeasure Theoretic Probability. P.J.C. Spreij
Measure Theoretic Probability P.J.C. Spreij this version: September 16, 2009 Contents 1 σ-algebras and measures 1 1.1 σ-algebras............................... 1 1.2 Measures...............................
More informationTHEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515
THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515 Proposition 1 (=comment on page 17). If A is an algebra, then any finite union or finite intersection of sets in A is also in A. Proposition 2 (=Proposition 1.1). For every
More informationReminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces
Reminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces T. C. Dorlas Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies School of Theoretical Physics 10 Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Email: dorlas@stp.dias.ie
More informationMATH & MATH FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE EXERCISES FALL 2015 & SPRING Scientia Imperii Decus et Tutamen 1
MATH 5310.001 & MATH 5320.001 FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE EXERCISES FALL 2015 & SPRING 2016 Scientia Imperii Decus et Tutamen 1 Robert R. Kallman University of North Texas Department of Mathematics 1155
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.fa] 14 Jul 2018
Construction of Regular Non-Atomic arxiv:180705437v1 [mathfa] 14 Jul 2018 Strictly-Positive Measures in Second-Countable Locally Compact Non-Atomic Hausdorff Spaces Abstract Jason Bentley Department of
More informationMeasure Theory & Integration
Measure Theory & Integration Lecture Notes, Math 320/520 Fall, 2004 D.H. Sattinger Department of Mathematics Yale University Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 2 Measures 3 2.1 Area and Measure........................
More informationSpring 2014 Advanced Probability Overview. Lecture Notes Set 1: Course Overview, σ-fields, and Measures
36-752 Spring 2014 Advanced Probability Overview Lecture Notes Set 1: Course Overview, σ-fields, and Measures Instructor: Jing Lei Associated reading: Sec 1.1-1.4 of Ash and Doléans-Dade; Sec 1.1 and A.1
More informationMeasure and integration
Chapter 5 Measure and integration In calculus you have learned how to calculate the size of different kinds of sets: the length of a curve, the area of a region or a surface, the volume or mass of a solid.
More informationµ (X) := inf l(i k ) where X k=1 I k, I k an open interval Notice that is a map from subsets of R to non-negative number together with infinity
A crash course in Lebesgue measure theory, Math 317, Intro to Analysis II These lecture notes are inspired by the third edition of Royden s Real analysis. The Jordan content is an attempt to extend the
More informationMoreover, µ is monotone, that is for any A B which are both elements of A we have
FRACTALS Contents. Algebras, sigma algebras, and measures 2.. Carathéodory s outer measures 5.2. Completeness 6.3. Homework: Measure theory basics 7 2. Completion of a measure, creating a measure from
More informationMA359 Measure Theory
A359 easure Theory Thomas Reddington Usman Qureshi April 8, 204 Contents Real Line 3. Cantor set.................................................. 5 2 General easures 2 2. Product spaces...............................................
More informationLebesgue Integration: A non-rigorous introduction. What is wrong with Riemann integration?
Lebesgue Integration: A non-rigorous introduction What is wrong with Riemann integration? xample. Let f(x) = { 0 for x Q 1 for x / Q. The upper integral is 1, while the lower integral is 0. Yet, the function
More informationINTRODUCTION TO MEASURE THEORY AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION
1 INTRODUCTION TO MEASURE THEORY AND LEBESGUE INTEGRATION Eduard EMELYANOV Ankara TURKEY 2007 2 FOREWORD This book grew out of a one-semester course for graduate students that the author have taught at
More informationFinal. due May 8, 2012
Final due May 8, 2012 Write your solutions clearly in complete sentences. All notation used must be properly introduced. Your arguments besides being correct should be also complete. Pay close attention
More informationMeasure Theory on Topological Spaces. Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond
Measure Theory on Topological Spaces Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond May 22, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 The Riemann Integral........................................ 2 1.2 Measurable..............................................
More informationChapter 8. General Countably Additive Set Functions. 8.1 Hahn Decomposition Theorem
Chapter 8 General Countably dditive Set Functions In Theorem 5.2.2 the reader saw that if f : X R is integrable on the measure space (X,, µ) then we can define a countably additive set function ν on by
More informationMeasures. 1 Introduction. These preliminary lecture notes are partly based on textbooks by Athreya and Lahiri, Capinski and Kopp, and Folland.
Measures These preliminary lecture notes are partly based on textbooks by Athreya and Lahiri, Capinski and Kopp, and Folland. 1 Introduction Our motivation for studying measure theory is to lay a foundation
More information(2) E M = E C = X\E M
10 RICHARD B. MELROSE 2. Measures and σ-algebras An outer measure such as µ is a rather crude object since, even if the A i are disjoint, there is generally strict inequality in (1.14). It turns out to
More informationMTH 404: Measure and Integration
MTH 404: Measure and Integration Semester 2, 2012-2013 Dr. Prahlad Vaidyanathan Contents I. Introduction....................................... 3 1. Motivation................................... 3 2. The
More informationProbability and Measure. November 27, 2017
Probability and Measure November 27, 2017 1 CONTENTS 2 Contents 1 Measure Theory 4 1.1 History................................ 4 1.2 Lebesgue Measure.......................... 5 1.3 Measurable Functions........................
More informationREVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS
REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS 1. AXIOMATIC STRUCTURE OF R Doğan Çömez The real number system is a complete ordered field, i.e., it is a set R which is endowed with addition and multiplication operations
More informationAnnalee Gomm Math 714: Assignment #2
Annalee Gomm Math 714: Assignment #2 3.32. Verify that if A M, λ(a = 0, and B A, then B M and λ(b = 0. Suppose that A M with λ(a = 0, and let B be any subset of A. By the nonnegativity and monotonicity
More information02. Measure and integral. 1. Borel-measurable functions and pointwise limits
(October 3, 2017) 02. Measure and integral Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2017-18/02 measure and integral.pdf]
More informationRecall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm
Chapter 13 Radon Measures Recall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm (13.1) f = sup x X f(x). We want to identify
More informationLebesgue measure and integration
Chapter 4 Lebesgue measure and integration If you look back at what you have learned in your earlier mathematics courses, you will definitely recall a lot about area and volume from the simple formulas
More informationProblem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 2015.
Problem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 015. (1) Let f n : D R be a sequence of functions with domain D R n. Recall that f n f uniformly if and only if for all ɛ > 0, there is an N = N(ɛ) so that if n
More informationLebesgue Measure. Chapter Lebesgue Outer Measure
Chapter 2 Lebesgue Measure This chapter develops the basic notions of measure theory. They are what is needed to introduce the concepts of measure-preserving transformations, recurrence and ergodicity
More informationMeasure on the Real Line
Chapter 2 Measure on the Real Line 2.1 Introduction There are many examples of functions that associate a nonnegative real number or + with a set. There is, for example, the number of members forming the
More informationProblem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016
Problem Set 2: s Math 201A: Fall 2016 Problem 1. (a) Prove that a closed subset of a complete metric space is complete. (b) Prove that a closed subset of a compact metric space is compact. (c) Prove that
More information+ 2x sin x. f(b i ) f(a i ) < ɛ. i=1. i=1
Appendix To understand weak derivatives and distributional derivatives in the simplest context of functions of a single variable, we describe without proof some results from real analysis (see [7] and
More information+ = x. ± if x > 0. if x < 0, x
2 Set Functions Notation Let R R {, + } and R + {x R : x 0} {+ }. Here + and are symbols satisfying obvious conditions: for any real number x R : < x < +, (± + (± x + (± (± + x ±, (± (± + and (± (, ± if
More informationMAT1000 ASSIGNMENT 1. a k 3 k. x =
MAT1000 ASSIGNMENT 1 VITALY KUZNETSOV Question 1 (Exercise 2 on page 37). Tne Cantor set C can also be described in terms of ternary expansions. (a) Every number in [0, 1] has a ternary expansion x = a
More informationSigned Measures. Chapter Basic Properties of Signed Measures. 4.2 Jordan and Hahn Decompositions
Chapter 4 Signed Measures Up until now our measures have always assumed values that were greater than or equal to 0. In this chapter we will extend our definition to allow for both positive negative values.
More informationReview of measure theory
209: Honors nalysis in R n Review of measure theory 1 Outer measure, measure, measurable sets Definition 1 Let X be a set. nonempty family R of subsets of X is a ring if, B R B R and, B R B R hold. bove,
More informationMATH 202B - Problem Set 5
MATH 202B - Problem Set 5 Walid Krichene (23265217) March 6, 2013 (5.1) Show that there exists a continuous function F : [0, 1] R which is monotonic on no interval of positive length. proof We know there
More informationSection 2: Classes of Sets
Section 2: Classes of Sets Notation: If A, B are subsets of X, then A \ B denotes the set difference, A \ B = {x A : x B}. A B denotes the symmetric difference. A B = (A \ B) (B \ A) = (A B) \ (A B). Remarks
More information1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),
Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 April 26, 2005 1 Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski 1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer
More informationAnalysis of Probabilistic Systems
Analysis of Probabilistic Systems Bootcamp Lecture 2: Measure and Integration Prakash Panangaden 1 1 School of Computer Science McGill University Fall 2016, Simons Institute Panangaden (McGill) Analysis
More informationCarathéodory s extension of a measure on a semi-ring
Carathéodory s extension of a measure on a semi-ring Reinhardt Messerschmidt www.rmesserschmidt.me.uk 7 October 2018 1 Introduction This article presents Carathéodory s extension of a measure on a semi-ring,
More information4 Countability axioms
4 COUNTABILITY AXIOMS 4 Countability axioms Definition 4.1. Let X be a topological space X is said to be first countable if for any x X, there is a countable basis for the neighborhoods of x. X is said
More informationDifferentiation of Measures and Functions
Chapter 6 Differentiation of Measures and Functions This chapter is concerned with the differentiation theory of Radon measures. In the first two sections we introduce the Radon measures and discuss two
More informationPartial Solutions to Folland s Real Analysis: Part I
Partial Solutions to Folland s Real Analysis: Part I (Assigned Problems from MAT1000: Real Analysis I) Jonathan Mostovoy - 1002142665 University of Toronto January 20, 2018 Contents 1 Chapter 1 3 1.1 Folland
More informationMeasure Theoretic Probability. P.J.C. Spreij. (minor revisions by S.G. Cox)
Measure Theoretic Probability P.J.C. Spreij (minor revisions by S.G. Cox) this version: October 23, 2016 Preface In these notes we explain the measure theoretic foundations of modern probability. The
More informationg 2 (x) (1/3)M 1 = (1/3)(2/3)M.
COMPACTNESS If C R n is closed and bounded, then by B-W it is sequentially compact: any sequence of points in C has a subsequence converging to a point in C Conversely, any sequentially compact C R n is
More informationLebesgue Integration on R n
Lebesgue Integration on R n The treatment here is based loosely on that of Jones, Lebesgue Integration on Euclidean Space We give an overview from the perspective of a user of the theory Riemann integration
More informationSection Signed Measures: The Hahn and Jordan Decompositions
17.2. Signed Measures 1 Section 17.2. Signed Measures: The Hahn and Jordan Decompositions Note. If measure space (X, M) admits measures µ 1 and µ 2, then for any α,β R where α 0,β 0, µ 3 = αµ 1 + βµ 2
More informationLecture 3: Probability Measures - 2
Lecture 3: Probability Measures - 2 1. Continuation of measures 1.1 Problem of continuation of a probability measure 1.2 Outer measure 1.3 Lebesgue outer measure 1.4 Lebesgue continuation of an elementary
More information(U) =, if 0 U, 1 U, (U) = X, if 0 U, and 1 U. (U) = E, if 0 U, but 1 U. (U) = X \ E if 0 U, but 1 U. n=1 A n, then A M.
1. Abstract Integration The main reference for this section is Rudin s Real and Complex Analysis. The purpose of developing an abstract theory of integration is to emphasize the difference between the
More informationx 0 + f(x), exist as extended real numbers. Show that f is upper semicontinuous This shows ( ɛ, ɛ) B α. Thus
Homework 3 Solutions, Real Analysis I, Fall, 2010. (9) Let f : (, ) [, ] be a function whose restriction to (, 0) (0, ) is continuous. Assume the one-sided limits p = lim x 0 f(x), q = lim x 0 + f(x) exist
More informationRS Chapter 1 Random Variables 6/5/2017. Chapter 1. Probability Theory: Introduction
Chapter 1 Probability Theory: Introduction Basic Probability General In a probability space (Ω, Σ, P), the set Ω is the set of all possible outcomes of a probability experiment. Mathematically, Ω is just
More informationMATH5011 Real Analysis I. Exercise 1 Suggested Solution
MATH5011 Real Analysis I Exercise 1 Suggested Solution Notations in the notes are used. (1) Show that every open set in R can be written as a countable union of mutually disjoint open intervals. Hint:
More information2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due 9/5). Prove that every countable set A is measurable and µ(a) = 0. 2 (Bonus). Let A consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is
More informationAbstract Measure Theory
2 Abstract Measure Theory Lebesgue measure is one of the premier examples of a measure on R d, but it is not the only measure and certainly not the only important measure on R d. Further, R d is not the
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More information6.2 Fubini s Theorem. (µ ν)(c) = f C (x) dµ(x). (6.2) Proof. Note that (X Y, A B, µ ν) must be σ-finite as well, so that.
6.2 Fubini s Theorem Theorem 6.2.1. (Fubini s theorem - first form) Let (, A, µ) and (, B, ν) be complete σ-finite measure spaces. Let C = A B. Then for each µ ν- measurable set C C the section x C is
More informationABSTRACT INTEGRATION CHAPTER ONE
CHAPTER ONE ABSTRACT INTEGRATION Version 1.1 No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means. Suggestions and errors are invited and can be mailed
More informationconsists of two disjoint copies of X n, each scaled down by 1,
Homework 4 Solutions, Real Analysis I, Fall, 200. (4) Let be a topological space and M be a σ-algebra on which contains all Borel sets. Let m, µ be two positive measures on M. Assume there is a constant
More informationCompendium and Solutions to exercises TMA4225 Foundation of analysis
Compendium and Solutions to exercises TMA4225 Foundation of analysis Ruben Spaans December 6, 2010 1 Introduction This compendium contains a lexicon over definitions and exercises with solutions. Throughout
More informationHomework 1 Real Analysis
Homework 1 Real Analysis Joshua Ruiter March 23, 2018 Note on notation: When I use the symbol, it does not imply that the subset is proper. In writing A X, I mean only that a A = a X, leaving open the
More informationReal Variables: Solutions to Homework 3
Real Variables: Solutions to Homework 3 September 3, 011 Exercise 0.1. Chapter 3, # : Show that the cantor set C consists of all x such that x has some triadic expansion for which every is either 0 or.
More informationClass Notes for Math 921/922: Real Analysis, Instructor Mikil Foss
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Math Department: Class Notes and Learning Materials Mathematics, Department of 200 Class Notes for Math 92/922: Real Analysis,
More informationMAT 571 REAL ANALYSIS II LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 2. Product measures Iterated integrals Complete products Differentiation 17
MAT 57 REAL ANALSIS II LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: SPRING 205 Contents. Convergence in measure 2. Product measures 3 3. Iterated integrals 4 4. Complete products 9 5. Signed measures
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRIC MEASURE THEORY AND AN APPLICATION TO MINIMAL SURFACES ( DRAFT DOCUMENT) Academic Year 2016/17 Francesco Serra Cassano
AN INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRIC MEASURE THEORY AND AN APPLICATION TO MINIMAL SURFACES ( DRAFT DOCUMENT) Academic Year 2016/17 Francesco Serra Cassano Contents I. Recalls and complements of measure theory.
More information3. (a) What is a simple function? What is an integrable function? How is f dµ defined? Define it first
Math 632/6321: Theory of Functions of a Real Variable Sample Preinary Exam Questions 1. Let (, M, µ) be a measure space. (a) Prove that if µ() < and if 1 p < q
More informationPart III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces
Part III 10 Topological Space Basics Topological Spaces Using the metric space results above as motivation we will axiomatize the notion of being an open set to more general settings. Definition 10.1.
More informationAnalysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set
Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets Definition. An initial segment is {n N n n 0 }. Definition. A finite set can be put into one-to-one correspondence with an initial segment. The empty set is also considered
More informationU e = E (U\E) e E e + U\E e. (1.6)
12 1 Lebesgue Measure 1.2 Lebesgue Measure In Section 1.1 we defined the exterior Lebesgue measure of every subset of R d. Unfortunately, a major disadvantage of exterior measure is that it does not satisfy
More informationProduct measures, Tonelli s and Fubini s theorems For use in MAT4410, autumn 2017 Nadia S. Larsen. 17 November 2017.
Product measures, Tonelli s and Fubini s theorems For use in MAT4410, autumn 017 Nadia S. Larsen 17 November 017. 1. Construction of the product measure The purpose of these notes is to prove the main
More informationReal Analysis II, Winter 2018
Real Analysis II, Winter 2018 From the Finnish original Moderni reaalianalyysi 1 by Ilkka Holopainen adapted by Tuomas Hytönen January 18, 2018 1 Version dated September 14, 2011 Contents 1 General theory
More information