arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 31 Oct 2001

Transcription

1 KA TP hep-ph/98848 Octoer 21 (rev.) Dipole Form Factors and Loop induced CP violation in Supersymmetry W. Hollik, J.I. Illana, C. Schappacher, D. Stöckinger, 1 arxiv:hep-ph/98848v2 31 Oct 21 Astract Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Karlsruhe, D Karlsruhe, Germany S. Rigolin 2 Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantolanco, E 2849 Madrid, Spain The one loop Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) contriutions to the weak and electromagnetic dipole form factors of heavy fermions are reviewed. For the Z oson on shell, the weak magnetic and weak electric dipole moments of the τ lepton and the quark can e defined and directly connected to oservales. But far from the Z peak, the weak and electromagnetic dipole form factors are not enough to account for all the new physics effects. In the context of the calculation of the process e + e t t to one loop in the MSSM, we compare the impact on the phenomenology of the CP violating dipole form factors of the top quark with the contriution from CP violating ox graphs. Some exemplificative oservales are analyzed and the relevance of oth the contriutions is pointed out. The set of tensor integrals employed, the one loop expressions for the electromagnetic and weak dipole form factors in a general renormalizale theory and the SM and MSSM couplings and conventions are also given. 1 Introduction The investigation of the electric and magnetic dipole moments of fermions provides deep insight in particle theory. The measurement of the intrinsic magnetic dipole moment (MDM) of the electron proved the correctness of the hypothesis of half integer spin particles [1] and is one of the most spectacular achievements of quantum field theory predictions. More precise studies of 1 addresses: {hollik,jillana,cs,ds}@particle.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de 2 address: rigolin@delta.ft.uam.es Preprint sumitted to Elsevier Preprint 9 April 218

2 electron and muon showed afterwards the presence of an anomalous contriution to the MDM (AMDM) and imply very accurate tests of the quantum structure of the Standard Model (SM). The measurements of the (g e 2) and (g µ 2) availale [2] are in perfect agreement with the SM predictions to several orders in the perturative expansion of the theory (cf. [3] and references therein). Furthermore, with the expected precision at the E821 Brookhaven experiment [4] it will e possile to improve the previous measurement of (g µ 2) y a factor 2. Therefore the MDMs can e used, together with the precision tests at the Z resonance from LEP and SLC and the new results of LEP2 and TEVATRON, to set ounds on possile New Physics effects eyond the SM [5]. The importance of the analysis of the electric dipole moment(edm) of elementary and composite particles is intimately related to the CP violating character of the theory. In the electroweak SM there is only one possile source of CP violation, theδ CKM phase ofthecaio Koayashi Maskawa (CKM) mixing matrix for quarks [6]. Currently the only place where CP violation has een measured, theneutral K system, fixesthevalueofthisphaseut doesnotconstitute itself a test for the origin of CP violation [7]. On the other hand, if the aryon asymmetry of the universe has een dynamically generated, CP must e violated. The SM cannot account for the size of the oserved asymmetry [8]. In extended models (eyond the SM) many other possile explanations of CP violation can e given. In particular, in supersymmetric (SUSY) models [9,1] CP violation can appear assuming complex soft SUSY reaking terms. Two physical phases remain in the GUT constrained MSSM [1 12], enough to provide the correct size of aryon asymmetry in some range of parameters [13]. But the most significant effect of the CP violating phases in the phenomenology is their contriution to the EDMs [14]. Unlike the SM, where the contriution to the EDM of fermions arises eyond two loops [15], the MSSM can give a contriution already at the one loop level [9]. The measurements of the neutron, electron and muon EDMs [16,17] constrain the phases and the supersymmetric spectrum in a way that may demand fine tuning (supersymmetric CP prolem): SUSY particles very heavy (several TeV [18]) or phases of O(1 2 ) [9]. Very large soft SUSY reaking masses are unappealing as it seems natural to demand the SUSY spectrum to e at the electroweak scale. 1 On the other side, general universal soft SUSY reaking terms can e taken only if the genuine SUSY CP phases are vanishing. In this case the CP violation is originated via the usual SM CKM mechanism and the supersymmetric spectrum affects the oservales only through renormalization group equations and/or one loop radiative contriutions. Of course in this scenario one has to construct models in which the SUSY phases nat- 1 Moreover if the SUSY spectrum is in the TeV region this could also give rise to relic densities unacceptaly large. 2

3 urally vanish [19] and at the same time provide some other non standard mechanism for explaining electroweak aryogenesis. There exist also ways of naturally otaining small non zero soft phases which leave sufficient CP violation for aryogenesis [12]. But, in general, to get oservale effects in most electroweak processes one has to relax the assumption of soft term universality. Several attempts have een made, following this direction, to use CP violation from top squark mixing: a complex parameter A t would yield large CP violating effects in collider processes involving top quarks [2]. 2 Besides, due to renormalization group induced effects on the other low energy phases, the phase of A t is constrained y the EDM of the neutron [22]. One can also make the hypothesis that, due to cancellation among the different components of the neutron EDM (constituent quarks and gluons), the SUSY phases can still e kept of O(1) and the SUSY spectrum at the electroweak scale satisfying the experimental ounds [23]. Finally, in [24] it is shown that, in the constrained MSSM, large CP violating phases are compatile with the ounds on the electron and neutron EDMs as well as with the cosmological relic densities. In view of all these arguments we keep our analysis completely general and consider the SUSY CP phases as free parameters. Some attention has also een payed to the study of possile CP violating effects in the context of R parity violating models [25]. In this class of models new interactions appear providing extra sources of CP violation (still preventing fast proton decay). They can explain the CP violation in the K system (with no need of the CKM phase) without introducing anomalous Flavor Changing Neutral Current (FCNC) contriutions [26]. In any case we assume in the following R parity conservation for simplicity. Recently a numer of works have een devoted to the analysis of weak dipole moments (WDM). The WDMs are defined, in analogy to the usual DMs, taking the corresponding on shell chirality flipping form factors of the Zf f effective vertex. The SM one loop contriution to the anomalous weak magnetic dipole moment (AWMDM) has een calculated for the τ lepton and the quark in [27,28]. The CP violating weak electric dipole moment (WEDM) is in the SM a tiny three loop effect. The WDMs are gauge invariant and can directly connected to physical oservales. While for the τ case, using appropriate oservales [27,29,3], an experimental analysis is feasile, for the case the situation is complicated y hadronization effects [31]. The SM predictions are far elow the sensitivity reachale at LEP [27] ut non standard interactions can enhance these expectations (2HDM [32], MSSM [33]) especially for the (CP violating) WEDMs (2HDM, leptoquark models [34], MSSM [35]). The experimental detection of non zero AWMDM or WEDM of heavy fermions, at the current sensitivity, would e a clear evidence of new physics 2 Large non SM CP violating top quark couplings could e proed at high energies colliders like the NLC [21]. 3

4 eyond the SM. In the perspective of the next generation of linear e + e colliders, we extend the previous analyses on the WDMs to consider the t quark dipole form factors (DFF) and, in particular, the CP violating ones. In [36] an independent analysis of the t quark EDFF and WEDFF can e found. Since the t quark is very heavy one expects this fermion to e the est candidate to have larger DFFs. Beyond the Z peak (s > 4m 2 t ) other effects are expected to give contriutions to the physical oservales. In fact the DFFs in a general model are not guaranteed to e gauge independent. An exception is the one loop MSSM contriution to the CP violating electromagnetic and weak DFFs (EDFF and WEDFF) which do not involve any gauge oson in internal lines. Anyway, although this contriution is indeed gauge invariant any CP odd oservale will e sensitive to not only the DFFs ut to the complete set of one loop CP violating diagrams involved. In this work we present the full calculation of the expectation value of a set of these oservales in the context of the MSSM and compare the size of the different contriutions. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we present the general effective vertex descriing the interaction of on shell fermions with a neutral vector oson. The definitions and the generic expressions of the DFFs for all the contriuting topologies at the one loop level are also given. In Section 3 we evaluate these expressions for on shell Z and the case of the τ lepton and the quark (their AWMDM and WEDM) in the context of the SM and the MSSM. A discussion of the supersymmetric limit is also given. The evaluation of the t quark EDFFs and WEDFFs at s = 5 GeV is presented in Section 4. In Section 5 we review oservales sensitive to the τ AWMDM at the Z peak as well as other CP odd oservales valid in general. In Section 6 we evaluate specific CP odd oservales for the t quark pair production in e + e colliders to one loop in the MSSM and compare the influence of the t EDFF and WEDFF with that of the CP violating ox diagrams. Our conclusions are presented in Section 7. In the Appendices one can find the definition of the one loop tensor integrals and the SM and MSSM couplings and conventions that have een used. 2 The dipole form factors 2.1 The Vff effective vertex The most general effective Lagrangian descriing the interaction of a neutral vector oson V with two fermions can e written, using at most dimension five operators, as a function of ten independent terms: 4

5 Tale 1 C, P, T properties of the operators in the effective Lagrangian of Eq. (1). Their chirality flipping ehavior is also displayed. Operator Coefficient P CP T Chirality Flip V µ Ψγµ Ψ g V NO V µ Ψγµ γ 5 Ψ g A + + NO V µ Ψi µ Ψ g M YES V µ Ψ µ γ 5 Ψ g E YES V µ Ψi ν σ µν Ψ g TS + YES V µ Ψ ν σ µν γ 5 Ψ g TP + + YES ( V) ΨΨ g S + YES (i V) Ψγ 5 Ψ g P + + YES ( µ V ν ) Ψσ µν Ψ g TM YES (i µ V ν ) Ψσ µν γ 5 Ψ g TE YES [ L Vff =V µ (x) Ψ(x) γ µ (g V g A γ 5 ) + i µ (g M +ig E γ 5 ) ] +i ν σ µν (g TS +ig TP γ 5 ) Ψ(x) [ ] +(i µ V ν (x)) Ψ(x) g µν (ig S +g P γ 5 ) + σ µν (ig TM +g TE γ 5 ) Ψ(x). (1) The first two coefficients, i.e. g V and g A, are the usual vector and axial vector couplings. They are connected to chirality conserving dimension four operators. All the other coefficients in Eq. (1) multiply chirality flipping dimension five operators and can receive a contriution only through radiative corrections in a renormalizale theory. The operators associated to g V, g A, g M, g P, g TM and g TP are even under a CP transformation. The presence of non vanishing g E, g S, g TE and g TS yields a contriution to CP violating oservales. In Tale 1 we summarize the C, P, T and chirality properties of each operator introduced in the effective Lagrangian. By Fourier transform of Eq. (1) one otains the most general Lorentz structure for the vertex Vff in the momentum space: Γ Vff µ =i [ γ µ (f V f A γ 5 ) + (q q) µ (f M +if E γ 5 )+ p µ (if S +f P γ 5 ) 5

6 +(q q) ν σ µν (f TS +if TP γ 5 ) + p ν σ µν (if TM +f TE γ 5 ) ], (2) where q and q are the outgoing momenta of the fermions and p = (q + q) is the total incoming momentum of the neutral oson V. The form factors f i are functions of the kinematical invariants. Actually they are more general than the coefficients g i. In fact any operator of dimension higher than five added to the Lagrangian of Eq. (1) is related to a new coefficient g i. But every new coefficient can contriute only to the ten independent form factors f i introduced in Eq. (2). The parameters g i and the form factors f i can e complex in general. Their real parts account for dispersive effects (CPT even) whereas their imaginary parts are related to asorptive contriutions. It is possile to lower the numer of independent form factors in Eq. (2) y imposing on shell conditions on the fermionic and/or osonic fields. For instance, in the case of on shell fermions, making use of the Gordon identities: 2m f ū γ µ v= { ū (q q) µ v +ū i (q + q) ν σ µν v }, 2m f ū γ µ γ 5 v= { ū (q+ q) µ γ 5 v +ū i (q q) ν σ µν γ 5 v }, = { ū (q+ q) µ v +ū i (q q) ν σ µν v }, = { ū (q q) µ γ 5 v+ū i (q + q) ν σ µν γ 5 v }, (3) one can eliminate f TM, f TE, f TS and f TP from the effective Lagrangian. The numer of relevant form factors can e further reduced taking also the oson V on its mass shell. In this case the condition p µ ǫ µ = automatically cancels allthecontriutions coming fromf S andf P. Thesamesituationoccursforoff shell vector oson V when, in the process e + e V f f, theelectron mass isneglected.thereforef S andf P willeignoredinthefollowing.withallthese assumptions the V f f effective vertex for on shell fermions is conventionally written as: Γ Vff µ (s) = ie { γ µ [ V V f (s) A V f (s)γ 5 ] +σµν (q + q) ν [i av f (s) dv f (s) 2m f e γ 5 ]}, (4) where e and m f are respectively the electric unit charge and the mass of the external fermion. The form factors in Eq. (4) depend only on s. As mentioned aove Vf V (s) and A V f (s) parameterize the vector and axial vector current. They are connected to the chirality conserving CP even sector. The form factors a V f (s) and dv f (s) are known respectively as anomalous magnetic dipole form factor (AMDFF) and electric dipole form factor (EDFF). They are oth connected to chirality flipping operators. In a renormalizale theory they can receive contriution exclusively y quantum corrections. The EDFFs contriute to the CP odd sector and constitute a source of CP violation. 6

7 Class I: k l f Class II: k l f Class III: k l f j f j f j f Class IV: k l f Class V: k l f Class VI: j l f j f j f k f Fig. 1. The one-loop Vff diagrams with general couplings. The dipole moments (DM) are defined taking the corresponding vector osons on shell, s = M 2 V. For V = γ one gets the usual definitions of the photon anomalous magnetic dipole moment (AMDM) and electric dipole moment (EDM). The definitions of electric charge, magnetic and electric dipole moments [37] consistent with our convention for the covariant derivative (B.1) are respectively: charge e V γ f () = e Q f, (5) MDM e (V γ f 2m f ()), f (6) EDM d γ f (). (7) Thus the AMDM of a fermion is a γ f () = Q f(g f 2)/2 with g f eing the gyromagneticratio.theaxial-vector coupling A γ f vanishes. ForV = Z,thequantities a w f a Z f(mz) 2 and d w f d Z f(mz) 2 define the anomalous weak magnetic dipole moment (AWMDM) and the weak electric dipole moment (WEDM) One loop generic expressions of the dipole form factors All the possile one loop contriutions to the a V f (s) and d V f (s) form factors can e classified in terms of the six classes of triangle diagrams depicted in Fig. 1. The vertices involved are laelled y generic couplings for vector osons V µ (k) = A µ, Z µ, W µ, W µ, fermions Ψ k and scalar osons Φ k, according to the following interaction Lagrangian: L=ieJ(W µνw µ V ν W µν W µv ν +V µν W µw ν )+ieg jk V µ Φ j µ Φ k 3 Massless and neutral fermions may have magnetic moments. The usual parametrization in (4) must e generalized y the replacement e a V f (s)/2m f µ V (s). The dipole moments of neutrinos are then given y µ V (M 2 V ). 7

8 + { e Ψ f (S jk P jk γ 5 )Ψ k Φ j +ek jk V µ V µ (k) Φ j +h.c. } +ev µ (k) Ψ j γ µ (V (k) jl A (k) jl γ 5 )Ψ l. (8) Every class of diagrams is calculated analytically and expressed in terms of the couplings introduced in (8) and the one loop three point integrals C i (see App. A). The result is given in the t Hooft-Feynman gauge. [Class I]: vector oson exchange: a V f (s) 2m f (I)= α 4π d V f (s) (I)= α e 4π { 4mf +4 jkl jkl { 4mf 4 jkl jkl Re [ V (V) (l) jk (V fj V (l) fk +A (l) fj A(l) fk ) +A (V) (l) jk (V fj A(l) fk +A(l) fj V (l) fk )][ 2C 2 + 3C 1 + +C ]kjl m k Re [ V (V ) (l) jk (V fj V (l) fk A (l) fj A(l) fk ) A (V ) (l) jk (V fj A(l) fk A(l) fj V (l) fk )][ 2C 1 + C ] } kjl Im [ V (V) (l) jk (V fj A(l) fk +A(l) fj V (l) fk ) +A (V) (l) jk (V fj V (l) fk +A (l) fj A(l) fk )][ 2C 2 + C1 m k Im [ V (V ) (l) jk (V fj A(l) fk A(l) fj V (l) fk ) ] kjl (9) A (V ) (l) jk (V fj V (l) fk A (l) ]kjl} fj A(l) fk )][ 2C 1 + C (1) In the case of gluon exchange one has to sustitute α for α s and V (l) fi for T l (the SU(3) generators) and take A (l) fj =. The sum over the index l yields a color factor C F = 4/3. The gluon contriution to the CP violating form factor d V f (I) vanishes in general. [Class II]: fermion exchange and two internal vector osons: a V f (s) 2m f (II)= α 4π d V f (s) (II)= α e 4π { 2mf jkl 6 jkl { 2mf +6 jkl Re [ J(V (j) fl V (k) fl +A (j) fl A(k) fl ) ][ ] 4C 2 + +C+ 1 kjl m l Re [ J(V (j) fl V (k) fl A (j) fl A(k) fl ) ][ ] } C 1 + (11) kjl Im [ J(V (j) fl A (k) fl +A (j) fl V (k) fl ) ][ ] 4C 2 + C1 kjl m l Im [ J(V (j) fl A (k) fl A (j) fl V (k) fl ) ][ ] } C 1 + (12) jkl kjl [Class III]: scalar exchange: 8

9 a V f (s) 2m f (III)= α 4π d V f (s) (III)= α e 4π { 2mf 2 jkl jkl { 2mf +2 jkl Re [ V (V) jk (S ljs lk +P lj P lk) +A (V) jk (S ljp lk +P ljs lk )][ 2C + 2 C+ 1 m k Re [ V (V) jk (S ljs lk P ljp lk ) ] kjl A (V ) jk (S ljplk P lj Slk) ][ ] } C 1 + +C1 kjl jkl Im [ V (V) jk (P ljs lk +S ljp lk ) +A (V) jk (S ljs lk +P ljp lk )][ 2C + 2 C 1 m k Im [ V (V) jk (P ljs lk S lj P lk) +A (V) jk (S ljslk P ] } ljplk )][ C 1 + +C 1 kjl ] kjl (13) (14) [Class IV]: fermion exchange and two internal scalars: a V f (s) (IV)= α { 2mf Re [ G jk (S jl Skl +P jl P 2m f 4π kl) ][ ] 2C 2 + C 1 + kjl jkl + m l Re [ G jk (S jl Skl P jlpkl )][ 2C 1 + C ] } (15) jkl d V f (s) (IV)= α { 2mf Im [ G jk (S jl Pkl +P jl S e 4π kl) ][ ] 2C 2 + C1 kjl jkl m l Im [ G jk (S jl Pkl P jlskl )][ 2C 1 + C ] } (16) jkl [Class V+VI]: fermion exchange, one vector and one scalar internal oson: a V f (s) (V+VI)= α 2m f 4π 2 Re [ K jk (V (k) fl Sjl +A (k) fl P jl) ][ ] C 1 + +C1 (17) kjl jkl d V f (s) (V+VI)= α e 4π 2 Im [ K jk (V (k) ] fl Pjl +A(k) fl S jl )][ C 1 + +C 1 (18) kjl jkl In Eqs. (9 18) the shorthand notation [ C] kjl stands for the three point tensor integrals C( q,q,m k,m j,m l ). The integrals appearing in the previous Eqs. are UV and IR finite. All the expressions are proportional to some positive power of a fermion mass, either internal or external, consistently with the chirality flipping character of the dipole moments. 4 For class V and VI diagrams the mass dependence is hidden in the product of the Yukawa couplings 4 This is as expected when applying the mass insertion method: to induce a flip in the fermion chirality one introduces a mass in either one of the internal fermion lines, picking a mass term from the propagator, or in the external fermion lines, kjl kjl 9

10 γ, Z t W g W t t W Fig. 2. SM diagrams for the Z vertex (Higgs sector excluded). S ij (P ij ) and the dimensionful parameter K ij. Hence, the heaviest fermions are the most promising candidates to have larger DFFs. Eqs.(9 18) also show that, in general, the DFFs for massless fermions are not vanishing ut proportional to masses of fermions running in the loop. The SM cancellation of the massless neutrino DFFs is only due to the asence of right handed neutrinos. Finally, notice that all the contriutions to the EDFFs are proportional to the imaginary part of certain cominations of couplings. A theory with real couplings has manifestly vanishing EDFFs. 3 SM and MSSM predictions for the τ and WDMs In the previous Section we derived the DFFs for the generic interaction Lagrangianof Eq. (8). In this Section we focus in the calculation of the WDMs in two specific models: the SM and the MSSM. These quantities, defined at the Z peak, are gauge invariant and can e directly related to oservales. The τ lepton and the quark are the heaviest fermions to which a Z oson can decay and hence the optimal candidates to have larger weak dipole moments. 3.1 The τ and magnetic and electric WDMs in the SM In the electroweak sector of the SM, adopting the t Hooft-Feynman gauge, there are 14 diagrams contriuting at one loop to the Zff oson interaction. One more diagram has to e considered (the gluon exchange) if also QCD is included. All the possile SM diagrams for the Z vertex are given in Figs. 2 and 3. The calculation in Ref. [33] is in perfect agreement with the results of Refs. [27,28] for oth the τ lepton and the quark. Taking as input parametersm τ = 1.777GeV,m = 4.5GeV,m t = 175GeV,M Z = 91.19GeV, s 2 W =.232, α = 1/128 and α s =.118, the pure electroweak contriutions are: a w τ [EW]=( i) 1 6, (19) a w [EW]=[(1.1; 2.; 2.4).2 i] 1 6, (2) using the equations of motion for the free fermion. 1

11 t χ φ - H,χ φ - + perm t t H φ - Z W H φ - t t H φ - Z W Fig. 3. SM Higgs diagrams for the Z vertex. for three different values of the Higgs mass (respectively M H = M Z, 2M Z and 3M Z ). Note that for the τ case the Higgs oson contriution has a very small impact, changing the final result y less than 1% in the range of the Higgs oson masses considered. A much stronger dependence is oserved for the case. The CKM matrix element V t is taken equal to one and all the offdiagonal entries vanishing. The whole SM contriution (EW+QCD) for the quark is dominated y the gluon exchange: a w [SM] = ( i) 1 4. (21) This large enhancement is as expected y the replacement α α s. The only phase present in the SM, the δ CKM, is not sufficient for generating one-loop contriutions to the (W)EDM. 5 One needs to go eyond the two loop level [15]. A very crude estimate of the tiny three loop SM contriution to the (W)EDM can e done using simple power counting arguments. For a general fermion with mass m f d w f[sm] is of the order of eg F m f α 2 α s J/(4π) 5 with J = c 1 c 2 c 3 s 2 1 s 2s 3 s δ eing an invariant under reparameterizations of the CKM matrix [14]. For the τ lepton and the quark we have: d w τ [SM] < µ τ and d w [SM] < µ. (22) We use the scale unit µ f e/2m f ( magneton ) with µ τ (µ ) = 5.55 (2.19) 1 15 ecm, respectively. 3.2 The τ and AWMDMs in the MSSM The particle content of the MSSM includes the SM spectrum, the SUSY partners and an extended Higgs sector consisting of two doulets. We assume 5 We implicitly assume here a vanishing θ QCD phase. 11

12 t A,G H -,G - h,h,a,g H -,G - + perm t t h,h H -,G - Z W h,h G - t t h,h G - Z W Fig. 4. MSSM Higgs diagrams for Z. χ - k t k t l χ - l χ - j t j k g χ k l k χ l j χ j j Fig. 5. MSSM diagrams for Z. implicitly R parity conservation. The new non SM diagrams are depicted in Figs. 4 and 5. They will e grouped into sets of diagrams including Higgs osons, neutralinos, charginos and gluinos, as in Ref. [33]. All of them elong to the topologies of classes III, IV, V and VI. The MSSM involves a large set of new parameters currently unknown ut constrained y present experimental data. For sake of simplicity we assume the usual GUT relations for the soft reaking gaugino mass terms, M 1 = 5 3 tan2 θ W M 2, M 3 = α s α s2 W M 2 (23) and a common scalar fermion mass parameter. Moreover we restrict ourselves to two typical scenarios, low and high tanβ, set respectively to tanβ = 1.6 and tanβ = 5. 6 We also assume generation diagonal, not universal, trilinear soft reaking terms in order to prevent large FCNC. 7 We are left, for given values of tan β, with the following free parameters: the gaugino mass parameter forthe SU(2)sector M 2, thehiggs higgsino mass parameter µ, themass ofthe pseudoscalar Higgs oson M A, the common scalar lepton soft reaking mass 6 Currently our adopted value for the low tanβ scenario is close to e excluded y Higgs oson searches [41] ut we keep it for reference. 7 For a review aout FCNC effects see for instance [26]. 12

13 parameter m l, the common scalar quark soft-reaking mass parameter m q and the trilinear soft reaking terms A f (for f =,t or τ). The conventions for couplings and mixing are extensively explained in the Appendices. In this Section all the supersymmetric parameters are taken real MSSM Higgs contriution to the AWMDMs The MSSM Z diagrams involving Higgs osons are shown in Fig. 4. There G and G ± are the would e Goldstone osons and h, H, H ± and A are the physical scalar and pseudoscalar MSSM Higgs osons. Actually not all these diagrams contriute to the AWMDM: the class IV diagrams with neutral Higgs osons (necessarily of opposite parity) identically vanish, also in the SM, due to the way their couplings to fermions(b.78 B.83,B.85) comine in(15). There are only three independent parameters involved in the Higgs sector: tan β, the mass of the pseudoscalar M A, and the common scalar fermion mass parameter m f. The Higgs contriution decreases with growing M A and m f, consistently with the decoupling theorem [38,39]. The Higgs contriution to the Re(a w τ ) coming from the diagrams of classes III and IV are proportional to (m τ /M Z ) 4 tan 2 β and those from the diagrams of classes V and VI are proportional to (m τ /M Z ) 2. Due to the fourth power suppression the sum is not very sensitive to tanβ. We otain Re(a w τ [Higgs]) =.3 (.4) 1 6 for tanβ = 1.6 (5), (24) m q = 25 GeV and M A = 1 GeV. Assuming the present lower ounds for the masses of the Higgs osons [4,41] the only contriution to the Im(a w τ ) can arise from class III diagrams and it is in general smaller than the SM one. The same considerations apply for the Higgs contriution to the AWMDM. The only relevant difference is the presence of a dominant term proportional to (m m t /M 2 Z) 2. The Re(a w ) is: Re(a w [Higgs]) = 3.8 (+.8) 1 6 for tanβ = 1.6 (5), (25) m q = 25 GeV and M A = 1 GeV. Again the contriution to the Im(a w ) is negligile Chargino contriution to the AWMDMs There are two diagrams with charginos and scalar fermions (Fig. 5). In the region of MSSM parameters not ruled out y present experiments [41] charginos and scalar fermions cannot e pair produced in Z decays. Therefore they can 13

14 (a) () Fig. 6. Re(a w [char]) for low (a) and high () tanβ in units of 1 6 in the plane M 2 µ. The contour solid-lines correspond to the lightest chargino masses m χ ± = 9 and 2 GeV and the contour dashed-lines correspond to the lightest neutralino masses m χ = 15 and 1 GeV. The common scalar quark mass parameter is fixed to m q = 25 GeV and m t LR =. From [33]. contriute only to the real part of the AWMDM. The free parameters involved aretanβ,m 2, µ,m f (anda t inthecase, sincethereisnomixing inthescalar neutrino sector). Increasing the scalar fermion common mass only produces decoupling of the scalar fermion from the spectrum. In the large M 2 and µ region also the charginos decouple. The chargino contriution to the real part of the τ AWMDM is: Re(a w τ [char]) = ±.2 (±7.) 1 6 for tanβ = 1.6 (5), (26) with m q = 25 GeV and M 2 = µ = 2 GeV. The enhancement for higher tanβ is due to the dependence of the chargino and neutralino couplings on the Higgs vacuum expectation values. For the real part of the AWMDM one gets: Re(a w [char]) = ±1.1 (±33) 1 6 for tanβ = 1.6 (5), (27) with m q = 25 GeV, M 2 = µ = 2 GeV and A t = µcotβ. The ± stands for sign(µ). Varying the value of A t in the range ±µcotβ there is only a small effect in the AWMDM. We thus choose the value of A t that makes the off diagonal entry of the t scalar quarks mixing mass matrix vanish. In such a way the scalar fermion mass eigenstates are always physical. Fig. 6 shows the contourplotofthere(a w [char])inthem 2 µplane.thecontourlinesforfixed 14

15 masses of the lightest chargino (9 and 2 GeV) and lightest neutralino (15 and 1 GeV) are also given for illustration. The contriutions are enhanced y increasing tanβ. In the low tanβ scenario the contriution is of order 1 6 (Fig. 6a), while in the high tanβ scenario it ecomes of order 1 5 (Fig. 6). The contour plots for the τ AWMDM are similar to the quark ones ut suppressed y factors etween m τ /m and (m τ /m ) 2 [see Eqs. (13) and (15)] Neutralino contriution to the AWMDMs The two diagrams involving neutralinos and scalar fermions are shown in Fig. 5. The scalar fermion masses are ounded y present experiments to e heavy ut the neutralino masses can e lighter than half the mass of the Z [41]. This allows for the possiility of a contriution to the imaginary part of the AWMDM through class III diagrams. A non negligile effect can arise only extremely near to the neutralino production threshold. The neutralino contriution to the AWMDM depends on tanβ, M 2, µ, m f, as well as the trilinear soft reaking mass term A f. No sizeale deviations due to changes in A f in the range ±µtanβ are oserved. To avoid an unphysical mass for the fermion we take m f LR =. The usual decoupling properties for scalar and fermions have een successfully checked. For the real parts of the τ and AWMDM one gets: Re(a w τ [neut])=.2 (.4) 1 6, (28) Re(a w [neut])=.2 ( 1.5) 1 6 for tanβ = 1.6 (5). (29) and M 2 = µ = 2 GeV. Like in the chargino contriutions the result is enhanced with increasing tan β Gluino contriution to the AWMDM In the case of the AWMDM one more diagram must e considered: the one with a gluino and two scalar quarks running in the loop. Due to the α α s replacement, we expect from the gluino sector a large contriution to the AWMDM. The present ounds on scalar quark masses [41] only allow a real contriution to the AWMDM. The free parameters are tanβ, m q, m g, A and µ. The last two affect the result only through the off diagonal term of the scalar quark mass matrix m LR = A µtanβ. This parameter is responsile for the mixing in the sector and intervenes in association with the chirality flipping in the gluino internal line. Thus the contriution to the AWMDM is almost proportional to m LR. We assume µtanβ as typical scale for m LR. InFig.7thegluinocontriutiontotheAWMDMisdisplayedinthem LR m g 15

16 (a) () Fig. 7.Re(a w [glu]) low (a) and high () tanβ in units of 1 6 in the plane m LR m g. The common scalar quark mass parameter is fixed to m q = 25 GeV. The region aove the upper horizontal line is unphysical (m 2 1 < ). From [33]. plane. In the low tanβ region (Fig. 7a) the value of m LR does not affect significantly the mass of the lightest scalar quark (always aove 2 GeV). For zero gluino mass, only the term proportional to the mass of the quark provides a contriution. As we increase the gluino mass, the term proportional to m g dominates, especially for large m LR, ecoming again suppressed at high m g due to the gluino decoupling. For high tanβ the ehavior is analogous ut larger values for the AWMDM can e otained as shown in Fig. 7 (extremely high values of m LR are excluded due to unphysical < ). Typical values m2 1 are: Re(a w [glu])= for tanβ = 1.6, m LR = 2 GeV, (3) Re(a w [glu])= for tanβ = 5, m LR = 7 TeV, (31) with the gluino mass fixed to m g = 2 GeV. Using the GUT constraint (23) higher values for the gluino mass (m g M 3 ) seem more likely and in this case the results in Eqs. (3, 31) are approximately reduced linearly with m g MSSM total contriution to the AWMDMs The imaginary parts of the τ lepton and quark AWMDM are provided only y the diagrams with Higgs osons and neutralinos. The total contriution in a reasonale region of the MSSM parameter can reach at maximum 1 6 and is typically lower than the corresponding SM contriution. The real part is dominated y the chargino and the gluino sectors, when 16

17 present. It is roughly proportional to tan β. The total contriution can reach the values: Re(a w τ [MSSM]).5 (7) 1 6, (32) Re(a w [MSSM]) 2 (5) 1 6 (33) for tanβ = 1.6 (5) respectively. In the low tanβ scenario the MSSM contriution to the AWMDM is of the same order than in the SM (19,2). More interesting is the high tan β scenario where the MSSM contriution to the real part can reach values one order of magnitude higher than the pure electroweak SM contriution, especially in the quark case (2), ut still a factor five elow the standard QCD contriution (21). 3.3 The τ and WEDMs in the MSSM Eqs. (9 18) show that for having non vanishing contriution to the WEDMs one has to deal with complex couplings. Many of the parameters in the SUSY Lagrangian can e complex ut not all the phases originated are physical. SomeofthemcaneasoredyaredefinitionoftheMSSMfields(seeApp.B for a complete discussion of the procedure). Our choice of CP violating phases is: 8 ϕ µ arg(µ), ϕ f arg(m f LR ) (f = τ, t, ) with mt LR A t µ cotβ and m τ, LR A τ, µ tanβ. SincetheMSSMcontainsaCP conserving Higgssector 9 andthesmprovides contriutions to the (W)EDMs eyond two loops, the relevant diagrams are the genuine SUSY graphs of classes III and IV [35] Chargino contriution to the WEDM There is only one phase, ϕ µ, involved in the chargino contriution to the τ WEDM, as there is no mixing in the scalar neutrino sector. The result grows with tanβ. It also depends on the common scalar lepton mass (whose effect consists of diminishing the result through the tensor integrals) and the µ and M 2 mass parameters. Taking M 2 = µ = m l = 25 GeV one otains: Re(d w τ[char]) =.18 (5.52) 1 6 µ τ for tanβ = 1.6 (5) (34) 8 Such a choice leads to a dependence on ϕ µ of chargino and neutralino masses. Conversely the scalar fermion masses are independent of ϕ f. 9 A one loop non vanishing contriution to the WEDM is possile in a general 2HDM [42]. 17

18 2 2 ' ~t ' ~ :5 :5 2 (a) ' +6 ' 2 () Fig. 8. Re(d w [char]) for low tanβ (a) and Re(dw [neut]) for high tanβ () in the plane ϕ f ϕ µ, in units of 1 6 µ with M 2 = µ = m q = 25 GeV. The mixing m t LR = µ cotβ and m LR = µ tanβ, respectively. From [35]. in the limit ϕ µ = π/2, for which the WEDM takes the largest value. Two CP-violating phases are involved in the case: ϕ µ and ϕ t. In Fig. 8a the dependence on these phases is shown, for M 2 = µ = m q = 25 GeV, m t LR = µ cotβ and oth low and high tanβ scenarios. The maximum effect on the WEDM is otained for ϕ µ = π/2 and ϕ t = π. One gets up to Re(d w [char]) = 1.17 (27.1) 1 6 µ for tanβ = 1.6 (5). (35) In the high tanβ scenario our assumed m t LR takes a small value and the dependence on ϕ t tends to disappear. To have an idea of the maximum value achievale for the chargino contriution, we show in Fig. 9 the dependence on M 2 and µ for ϕ µ = ±π/2 and m t LR = with the previous value for the common scalar quark mass parameter. Assuming the present ounds on the chargino masses [41], there is no contriution to the imaginary part of the τ and WEDM Neutralino contriution to the WEDMs Now oth ϕ µ and ϕ τ contriute. Assuming that m τ LR is of the order of µ tanβ or elow, there is no large influence of ϕ τ on the neutralino contriution, for oth low and high tan β. This contriution is roughly proportional to sinϕ µ regardless of the value of ϕ τ. Taking ϕ µ = π/2, M 2 = µ = 25 GeV and m l = 25 GeV one finds: Re(d w τ[neut]) =.1 (.25) 1 6 µ τ for tanβ = 1.6 (5). (36) 18

19 5 5 4 :5 +: M 2 M :5 +1: (a) Im() () Im() Fig. 9. Re(d w [char]) for low (a) and high () tanβ in the plane M 2 Im(µ), in units of 1 6 µ with sinϕ µ = 1 and m q = 25 GeV. The mixing m t LR =. The contour solid-lines correspond to the lightest chargino masses ± m χ = 8 and 1 2 GeV and the contour dashed-lines correspond to the lightest neutralino masses m χ = 15 and 1 GeV. From [35]. 1 The two relevant CP-violating phases for the neutralino contriution to the WEDM are: ϕ µ and ϕ. As efore, the most important effect from ϕ arises when the off diagonal term is larger, which in this case corresponds to high tanβ, as the trilinear soft reaking parameter is taken to e of the order of µ tan β. The maximum value for the neutralino contriution occurs for ϕ µ = ϕ = π/2 (Fig. 8). The total contriution increases with tanβ. Thus taking M 2 = µ = m q = 25 GeV and m LR = µ tanβ one gets: Re(d w [neut]) =.29 ( 12.6) 1 6 µ for tanβ = 1.6 (5). (37) For presently non excluded masses of the neutralinos [41] there can e a contriution to the imaginary part of the order of 1 6 µ f Gluino contriution to the WEDM The gluino contriution is affected only y m LR, m q and the gaugino mass m g. Therefore the maximum value occurs for ϕ = π/2. The mixing in the sector is determined y m LR and intervenes in the contriution due to chirality flipping in the gluino internal line (the contriution proportional to m g ). The contriution to the WEDM is enhanced y the largest values of m LR compatile with an experimentally not excluded mass for the lightest scalar quark. For zero gluino mass, only the term proportional to the mass of the 19

20 quark provides a contriution. Thus for ϕ = π/2 one gets: Re(d w [gluinos]) =.26 (9.31) 1 6 µ for tanβ = 1.6 (5), (38) m LR = µ tanβ, M 2 = µ = m q = 25 GeV and m g M 3 fulfilling the GUT relation (23). There exists the possiility for a gluino contriution to the imaginary part of the WEDM if the hypothesis of light gluino is not discarded MSSM total contriution to the WEDMs The Higgs sector does not contriute and chargino diagrams are more important than neutralino ones. Gluinos are also involved in the case and compete in importance with charginos. In the most favorale configuration of CP-violating phases and for values of the rest of the parameters still not excluded y experiments, these WEDMs can e as much as twelve orders of magnitude larger than the SM estimates (22): Re(d w τ ) <.2 (6) 1 6 µ τ (39) Re(d w ) < 2 (35) 1 6 µ (4) There may e a contriution to the imaginary part if the neutralinos are light ut this contriution is at least one order of magnitude smaller than the real part of the τ or WEDM. 3.4 Cancellation of the dipole moments in the supersymmetric limit A general Vff interaction is restricted to the form (2) y Lorentz invariance. Since the Lorentz algera is a sualgera of the supersymmetry algera, this interaction is even more constrained in a theory with unroken supersymmetry. In fact, supersymmetric sum rules are derived that relate the electric and magnetic multipole moments of any irreducile N = 1 supermultiplet [43]. Applied to the Vff interaction etween a vector oson coupling to a conserved current and the fermionic component of a chiral multiplet, these sum rules force the gyromagnetic ratio to e g f = 2 and forid an electric dipole moment: a V f = dv f =. (41) The Lagrangian of the MSSM is supersymmetric when the soft reaking terms are removed. For non zero value of the µ parameter the Higgs potential has 2

21 only a trivial minimum. Therefore to keep the particles massive and supersymmetry preserved at the same time the choice µ = is necessary. Then the Higgs potential is positive semi definite and it has degenerate minima corresponding to v v 1 = v 2 (tanβ = 1). The value of M A = follows from such a configuration. Finally the value of the common v is fixed y the phenomenology: the muon decay constant and the gauge oson masses. In this supersymmetric limit the aove mentioned sum rules are valid and the magnetic and electric dipole form factors have to cancel. To verify our expressions we checked this for the AWMDM of the quark [35]. Choosing the parameters A = A t = M 2 = M 3 =, µ =, tanβ = 1 and M A =, the SM gauge oson contriution to a w [28] is indeed cancelled y the MSSM correction including the two Higgs doulets: the gluon and gluino contriution cancel among themselves and the neutralinos and charginos cancel the gauge oson and Higgs contriutions. 4 SM and MSSM predictions for the top quark dipole form factors 4.1 SM The electroweak contriutions to the magnetic and weak magnetic dipole form factors for off shell gauge osons are gauge dependent. The pinch technique [44] could e used to construct gauge parameter independent magnetic dipoles in the class of R ξ gauges [45,32] ut the prescription is not unique [46] and these quantities cannot e oservale y themselves. The QCD contriutions (gluon exchange) to the t(w)mdff are gauge independent and comparale in size to the electroweak predictions at s = 5 GeV in the t Hooft Feynman gauge due to the large mass of the t quark [32]. There is no contriution to the electric and weak electric dipole form factors to one loop in the SM. 4.2 MSSM The triangle diagrams with SUSY particles are gauge independent y themselves (no gauge or Goldstone osons involved) ut the ones including Higgs scalars andgaugeosonsinthelooparenot sufficient to keep thegaugeinvariance in the case of the magnetic dipole form factor. The CP violating dipole form factors (electric and weak electric) for which the Higgs sector of the MSSM is irrelevant, on the other hand, can e regarded as gauge independent 21

22 quantities. These form factors have also een considered in [36]. 1 We investigate the SUSY contriutions to the t electric and weak electric dipole form factors performing a parameter scan for which a fixed value s = 5 GeV has een chosen. 11 It is important to point out that the region of the supersymmetric parameter space that provides the maximal contriutions varieswith sdue tothreshold effects. Wescan themass parametersm 2 and µ in a road range and the CP violating phases: ϕ µ, ϕ t and ϕ (see Figs. 1 and 11). The gluino mass is given y the GUT constraint (23). We adopt a fixed value for the common scalar quark mass m q = 2 GeV: this is a plausile intermediate value; larger values decrease the effects. Finally, the moduli of the off diagonal terms in the t and mass matrices are also chosen at fixed values m t LR = m LR = 2 GeV, to reduce the numer of free parameters. The results are expressed in t magnetons µ t e/2m t = ecm. The MSSM contriutions to the top quark EDFF and WEDFF include: Neutralinos and t scalar quarks They provide typically small contriutions ut quite sensitive to the value of oth the phases involved, ϕ µ and ϕ t (Fig. 1). The results are larger for low tanβ since the chirality flipping mass terms are dominated y the t quark, yielding a term proportional to m t cotβ. A term proportional to the neutralino masses is also present as well as a negligile one proportional to m tanβ. The contriuting diagrams elong to the classes III and IV for the Z case and only to class IV for the γ case, as the neutralinos do not couple to photons. As a reference we take the representative values M 2 = µ = 2 GeV and ϕ µ = ϕ t = π/2. For these inputs the results are d γ t[ χ ]=( i) 1 3 µ t (42) d Z t [ χ ]=( i) 1 3 µ t (43) Charginos and scalar quarks As in the case of the neutralinos, the influence of chargino diagrams is enhanced for low tanβ. 1 The results in [36] after revision are in agreement with the ones presented here [47]. 11 We use the running coupling constants evaluated at s = 5 GeV, α s =.92, α = 1/

23 Re{d γ t [ χ ]} Im{d γ t [ χ ]} 2 2 :1 '~ t '~ t +:1 :1 +:1 2 ' 2 ' Re{d Z t [ χ ]} Im{d Z t [ χ ]} 2 2 '~ t '~ t :2 +:2 +:2 :2 2 ' 2 ' Fig. 1. Neutralino contriution to the real and imaginary parts of the t EDFF and WEFF [in 1 3 µ t units] in the plane ϕ t ϕ µ for tanβ = 1.6 and the reference values M 2 = µ = m t LR = 2 GeV at s = 5 GeV. The results depend very little on ϕ and mainly on ϕ µ, the maxima eing close to ϕ µ = ±π/2. For increasing tanβ the dependence on ϕ grows, as it comes with a factor proportional to m tanβ. The chargino contriutions are the most important ones. In Fig. 11 the dependence on Im(µ) and M 2 is displayed for tanβ = 1.6. The only relevant CP violating phase here has een set to the most favorale case, ϕ µ = π/2 (the negative values of Im(µ) correspond to ϕ µ = π/2). The symmetry with respect to Im(µ) = in Fig. 11 reflects the approximate independence of ϕ, here set to π/2. 12 The same does not happen for the neutralino contriutions 12 All the contriutions flip sign when the set (ϕ µ,ϕ t,ϕ ) is rotated y π. They vanish accordingly when all the phases are zero. See Fig. 1 for illustration. 23

24 5 Re{d γ t [ χ± ]} Im{d γ t [ χ± ]} 5 M 2 M : : Im() Im() 5 Re{d Z t [ χ± ]} Im{d Z t [ χ± ]} 5 M 2 M Im() Im() Fig. 11. Chargino contriution to the real and imaginary parts of the t EDFF and WEFF [in 1 3 µ t units] in the plane M 2 Im(µ) for tanβ = 1.6, m LR = 2 GeV and ϕ = π/2 at s = 5 GeV. The lower (upper) solid isolines correspond to m χ ± 1 = 9 (2) GeV and the dashed isolines to m χ 1 = 25 (1) GeV. for a fixed value of ϕ t,π in the plane M 2 Im(µ). The plots of Fig. 11 exhiit a tendency to decoupling of the supersymmetric effects for increasing values of the mass parameters. The isolines for a couple of masses of the lightest charginos and neutralinos in the same plane are also given for orientation. The current LEP2 experimental lower limits are m χ 1 > 25 GeV and ± m χ > 9 1 GeV [41]. The chargino contriutions for the values M 2 = µ = 2 GeV and ϕ µ = π/2 are d γ t[ χ ± ]=( i) 1 3 µ t (44) 24

25 d Z t [ χ ± ]=( i) 1 3 µ t (45) Gluinos and t scalar quarks Their effect is roughly proportional to m t LR sinϕ t times a chirality flipping fermionmass,eitherm t orm 3 (thegluinomass).itisdampedforheavygluinos circulating in the loop and also for large scalar quark masses (decoupling). Both terms have opposite sign to Im(m t LR ) and the one proportional to the gluino mass dominates. The result for M 2 = 2 GeV and ϕ t = π/2 is d γ t[ g]=( i) 1 3 µ t (46) d Z t [ g]=( i) 1 3 µ t (47) Total contriution In view of these results, we estalish a set of SUSY parameters and phases for which nearly all the contriutions sum up constructively at s = 5 GeV. Our choice is Reference Set #1 : tanβ = 1.6 M 2 = µ = m q = m t LR = m LR = 2 GeV ϕ µ = ϕ t = ϕ = π/2, (48) for which the t EDFF and WEFF reach the values: d γ t =( i) 1 3 µ t (49) d Z t =( i) 1 3 µ t, (5) at s = 5 GeV. To illustrate how the maximum effects appear we display in Fig. 12 the individual contriutions as a function of s. The masses of the supersymmetric partners in the loops are such that there are threshold enhancements in the vicinity of s = 5 GeV. 5 Oservales at the Z resonance: the τ lepton case We analyze elow a set of oservales sensitive to the weak dipole moments at the Z peak. In this environment the effects of electromagnetic dipole moments 25

26 3: Re[d t (s)] 3: Im[d t (s)] 2: all 2: all 1: ~g 1: ~g : : 1: 1: 2: 2: 3: 3: 3: Re[d Z t (s)] 3: Im[d Z t (s)] 2: all 2: all 1: ~g 1: ~g : : 1: 1: 2: 2: 3: p 7 8 s [GeV] 9 1 3: p 7 8 s [GeV] 9 1 Fig. 12. The different contriutions to the t (W)EDFF [in 1 3 µ t units] for the reference set of SUSY parameters of Eq. (48). to the process e + e f f are negligile, as the pair production proceeds through the Z resonance. The γ exchange and ox diagrams are suppressed. 5.1 The Z width The Z width is given in terms of generic vertex form factors y Γ(Z f f)= G FM 3 Z 6 2π 1 4m2 f MZ 2 [ v 2 f ( 1+ 2m2 f M 2 Z ) +a 2 f 6v f s W c W Re(a w f)+4s 2 Wc 2 W a w f 2 ( M 2 Z 8m 2 f ( ) 1 4m2 f +1 MZ 2 ) 26

27 +2s 2 W c2 W ˆd w f 2 ( M 2 Z 4m 2 f 1 )], (51) where we have introduced the dimensionless parameter ˆd w f 2m f d w f/e for simplicity. From the previous expression one oserves that the real part of the AWMDM contriutes linearly to the total width (although it is not necessarily the dominant term in the τ case for a w τ near the experimental upper limit, due to the small value of v τ and the MZ 2/m2 τ enhancement factor). The WEDM contriutes only quadratically to the total Z width. One might get some upper ounds on Re(a w f ) and dw f from the Z partial widths measurements at LEP and SLC using the previous expressions. Actually this is not the most appropriate way to put limits to the dipoles as much information is integrated out. Moreover the weak magnetic and weak electric contriutions cannot e disentangled and some other effects can interfere the measurements. In contrast, the differential cross section for the production of polarized fermion pairs contains all the ingredients needed and is the starting point for the construction of more specific oservales. 5.2 The differential cross section e e + Z f f The differential cross section for e e + f(s 1 ) f(s 2 ) with polarized final fermions can e written as a sum of spin independent, single spin dependent and spin spin correlation contriutions as dσ dω f (s 1,s 2 ) = dσ dω f + dσs dω f (s 1 s 2 )+ dσc dω f (s 1 s 2 ), (52) where s 1 (s 2 ) are the polarization vectors of the fermion (antifermion). We choose a reference frame in which the z axis points in the direction of the outgoing fermion and the x z plane contains oth the incoming electron and the outgoing fermion. The polar angle θ f is the angle etween e and the outgoing fermion. The azimuthal angle of the fermion can e integrated over, as the electron and positron are assumed unpolarized. The masses of the electron and positron will e neglected, as well as the quadratic terms in the anomalous couplings. The spin correlation terms do not contriute when the polarization of only one of the two fermions is analyzed. In terms of the final fermion velocity β, the dilatation factor γ = M Z /2m f = (1 β 2 ) 1/2 intheoverallc.m.s.andthepolarizationvectorss 1,2 offermionand 27

28 antifermion in their rest frames, the differential cross section e e + Z f f (exactly on the Z resonance) reads dσ dcosθ f = α2 βn f C (4s W c W ) 4 1 Γ 2 Z { (v 2 e +a2 e )[v2 f (2 β2 sin 2 θ f ) +a 2 fβ 2 (1+cos 2 θ f )]+8v e a e v f a f βcosθ f } 8s W c W Re(a w f ) [(v2 e +a2 e )v f +2v e a e a f βcosθ f ], (53) with and dσ S dcosθ f = α2 βn f C (4s W c W ) 4 2s W c W Γ 2 Z [ (s 1 +s 2 ) xx + +(s 1 +s 2 ) yy + +(s 1 +s 2 ) zz + +(s 1 s 2) x X +(s 1 s 2) y Y +(s 1 s 2) z Z ], (54) X + = { 1 γs W c W [2v e a e v 2 f +(v2 e +a2 e )v fa f βcosθ f ] +2γRe(a w f ) [2v ea e v f (2 β 2 )+(v 2 e +a2 e )a fβcosθ f ] } sinθ f, (55) Y + = 2γβIm(a w f ) [2v ea e a f +(v 2 e +a2 e )v fβcosθ f ]sinθ f, (56) Z + = 1 s W c W [(v 2 e +a2 e )v fa f β(1+cos 2 θ f )+2v e a e (v 2 f +a2 f β2 )cosθ f ] +2Re(a w f ) [4v ea e v f cosθ f +(v 2 e +a2 e )a fβ(1+cos 2 θ f )], (57) X =2γβIm(ˆd w f ) [(v2 e +a2 e )v f cosθ f +2v e a e a f β]sinθ f, (58) Y =2γβRe(ˆd w f ) [2v ea e v f +(v 2 e +a2 e )a fβcosθ f ]sinθ f, (59) Z = 2βIm(ˆd w f) (v 2 e +a 2 e)v f sin 2 θ f, (6) dσ C dcosθ f = α2 βn f C (4s W c W ) 4 1 Γ 2 Z [ s xx C xx +s yy C yy +s zz C zz +(s xy +s yx )C + xy +(s xz +s zx )C + xz +(s yz +s zy )C + yz +(s 1 s 2 ) xc yz +(s 1 s 2 ) yc xz +(s 1 s 2 ) zc xy ], (61) with C xx =(v 2 e +a2 e )[v2 f (2 β2 ) a 2 f β2 ]sin 2 θ f 28