arxiv:hep-ph/ v3 8 Nov 2002

Transcription

1 CERN-TH/ hep ph/ October 2002 arxiv:hep-ph/ v3 8 Nov 2002 B Physics an CP Violation Robert Fleischer Theory Division, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerlan Abstract After an introuction to the Stanar-Moel escription of CP violation, we turn to the main focus of these lectures, the B-meson system. Since non-leptonic B ecays play the key rôle for the exploration of CP violation, we have to iscuss the tools to escribe these transitions theoretically before classifying the main strategies to stuy CP violation. We will then have a closer look at the B-factory benchmark moes B J/ψK S, B φk S an B π + π, an shall emphasize the importance of stuies of B s ecays at haron colliers. Finally, we focus on more recent evelopments relate to B πk moes an the B π + π, B s K + K system. Invite lecture at the International School Heavy Quark Physics, Dubna, Russia, 27 May 5 June 2002 To appear in the Proceeings (Lecture Notes in Physics)

2

3 B Physics an CP Violation Robert Fleischer Theory Division, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerlan Abstract. After an introuction to the Stanar-Moel escription of CP violation, we turn to the main focus of these lectures, the B-meson system. Since non-leptonic B ecays play the key rôle for the exploration of CP violation, we have to iscuss the tools to escribe these transitions theoretically before classifying the main strategies to stuy CP violation. We will then have a closer look at the B-factory benchmark moes B J/ψK S, B φk S an B π + π, an shall emphasize the importance of stuies of B s ecays at haron colliers. Finally, we focus on more recent evelopments relate to B πk moes an the B π + π, B s K + K system. 1 Introuction The non-conservation of the CP symmetry, where C an P enote the chargeconjugation an parity transformation operators, respectively, is one of the most exciting phenomena in particle physics since its unexpecte iscovery through K L π + π ecays in 1964 [1]. At that time it was believe that although weak interactions are neither invariant uner P, nor invariant uner C the prouct CP was preserve. Consier, for instance, the process π + e + ν e C π e ν C e P π e ν e. (1) Here the left-hane νe C state is not observein nature; only after performing an aitional P transformation o we obtain the right-hane electron antineutrino. Before the start of the B factories, CP-violating effects coul only be stuie in the kaon system, where we istinguish between inirect CP violation, which isuetothefactthatthe masseigenstatesk S ank L oftheneutralkaonsystem are not eigenstates of the CP operator, an irect CP violation, arising irectly at the ecay amplitue level of the neutral kaon system. The former kin of CP violation was alreay iscovere in 1964 an is escribe by a complex parameter ε,whereasthelatterone,escribebythefamousparameterre(ε /ε),coulonly be establishe in 1999 after tremenous efforts by the NA48 (CERN) [2] an KTeV (Fermilab) [3] collaborations, reporting the following results in 2002: { Re(ε (14.7±2.2) 10 /ε) = 4 (NA48 [4]) (20.7±2.8) 10 4 (2) (KTeV [5]). Unfortunately, the theoretical interpretation of Re(ε /ε) is still affecte by large haronic uncertainties an oes not provie a stringent test of the Stanar- Moel escription of CP violation, unless significant theoretical progress concerning the relevant haronic matrix elements can be mae [6,7,8].

4 2 Robert Fleischer In 2001, CP violation coul also be establishe in B-meson ecays by the BaBar (SLAC) [9] an Belle (KEK) [10] collaborations, representing the start of a new era in the exploration of CP violation. As we will iscuss in these lecture notes, ecays of neutral an charge B-mesons provie valuable insights into this phenomenon, offering in particular powerful tests of the Kobayashi Maskawa (KM) mechanism [11], which allows us to accommoate CP violation in the Stanar Moel of electroweak interactions. In Section 2, we shall have a closer look at the Stanar-Moel escription of CP violation, an shall introuce the Wolfenstein parametrization an the unitarity triangles of the Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa(CKM) matrix. Since non-leptonic ecays of B mesons play thekeyrôleintheexplorationofcpviolation,wehavetoiscussthetoolstoeal with these transitions an the corresponing theoretical problems in Section 3. The main strategies to stuy CP violation are then classifie in Section 4, before we focus on benchmark moes for the B factories in Section 5. The great physics potential of B s -meson ecays for experiments at haron colliers is emphasize in Section 6, an will also be employe in Section 7, where we iscuss interesting recent evelopments. Finally, we make a few comments on the usual rare B ecays in Section 8, before we summarize our conclusions an give a brief outlook in Section 9. A consierably more etaile presentation of CP violation in the B system can be foun in [12], as well as in the textbooks liste in [13]. Another lecture on relate topics was given by Neubert at this school [14]. 2 CP Violation in the Stanar Moel 2.1 Charge-Current Interactions of Quarks The CP-violating effects iscusse in these lectures originate from the chargecurrent interactions of the quarks, escribe by the Lagrangian L CC int = g 2 ) (ūl, c L, t L γ µ ˆVCKM L s L W µ + h.c., (3) 2 where the gauge coupling g 2 is relate to the gauge group SU(2) L, the W ( ) µ fiel correspons to the charge W bosons, an ˆV CKM enotes the CKM matrix, connecting the electroweak eigenstates of the own, strange an bottom quarks with their mass eigenstates through a unitary transformation. Since the CKM matrix elements V UD an V UD enter in D UW an the CP-conjugate process D UW +, respectively, where D {,s,b} an U {u,c,t}, we observe that the phase structure of the CKM matrix is closely relate to CP violation. It was pointe out by Kobayashi an Maskawa in 1973 that actually one complex phase is require in aition to three generalize Euler angles to parametrize the quark-mixing matrix in the case of three fermion generations, thereby allowing us to accommoate CP violation in the Stanar Moel [11]. b L

5 B Physics an CP Violation 3 More etaile investigations show that aitional conitions have to be satisfie for CP violation. They can be summarize as follows: (m 2 t m2 c )(m2 t m2 u )(m2 c m2 u ) (m 2 b m 2 s)(m 2 b m 2 )(m 2 s m 2 ) J CP 0, (4) where the Jarlskog parameter J CP = ±Im ( V iα V jβ Viβ V jα ) (i j, α β) (5) represents a measure of the strength of CP violation within the Stanar Moel [15]. As ata imply J CP = O(10 5 ), CP violation is a small effect in the Stanar Moel. In scenarios for physics beyon the Stanar Moel, typically also new sources of CP violation arise [16]. 2.2 Wolfenstein Parametrization The quark transitions cause by charge-current interactions exhibit an interesting hierarchy, which is mae explicit in the Wolfenstein parametrization of the CKM matrix [17]: ˆV CKM = λ2 λ Aλ 3 (ρ iη) λ λ2 Aλ 2 +O(λ 4 ). (6) Aλ 3 (1 ρ iη) Aλ 2 1 This parametrization correspons to an expansion in powers of the small quantity λ = 0.22, which can be fixe through semileptonic kaon ecays. The other parameters are of orer 1, where η leas to an imaginary part of the CKM matrix. The Wolfenstein parametrization is very useful for phenomenological applications, as we will see below. A etaile iscussion of the next-to-leaing orer terms in λ can be foun in [18]. 2.3 Unitarity Triangles The central targets for tests of the KM mechanism of CP violation are the unitarity triangles of the CKM matrix. As we have alreay note, the CKM matrix is unitary. Consequently, it satisfies ˆV CKM ˆV CKM = ˆ1 = ˆV CKM ˆV CKM, (7) implying a set of 12 equations, which consist of 6 normalization relations an 6 orthogonality relations. The latter can be represente as 6 triangles in the complex plane [19], all having the same area, 2A = J CP [20]. However, in only two of them, all three sies are of comparable magnitue O(λ 3 ), while in the remaining ones, one sie is suppresse with respect to the others by O(λ 2 )

6 4 Robert Fleischer Im (ρ,η) (a) Im (ρ,η) (b) R b α R t γ 0 1 β Re γ δγ 0 1 Re Fig.1. The two non-squashe unitarity triangles of the CKM matrix: (a) an (b) correspon to the orthogonality relations (8) an (9), respectively. or O(λ 4 ). The orthogonality relations escribing the non-squashe triangles are given by V u Vub +V cvcb tvtb = 0 [1st an 3r column] (8) Vub V tb +Vus V ts +Vu V t = 0 [1st an 3r row]. (9) At leaing orer in λ, these relations agree with each other, an yiel (ρ+iη)aλ 3 +( Aλ 3 )+(1 ρ iη)aλ 3 = 0. (10) Consequently, they escribe the same triangle, which is usually referre to as the unitarity triangle of the CKM matrix [20,21]. It is convenient to ivie (10) by the overall normalization Aλ 3. Then we obtain a triangle in the complex plane with a basis normalize to 1, an an apex given by (ρ,η). In the future, the experimental accuracy will reach such an impressive level that we will have to istinguish between the unitarity triangles escribe by (8) an (9), which iffer through O(λ 2 ) corrections. They are illustrate in Fig. 1, where ρ an η are relate to ρ an η through [18] an ρ ( 1 λ 2 /2 ) ρ, η ( 1 λ 2 /2 ) η, (11) δγ γ γ = λ 2 η. (12) The sies R b an R t of the unitarity triangle shown in Fig. 1 (a) are given by ) R b = (1 λ2 1 V ub 2 λ V cb ρ = 2 +η 2 = 0.38±0.08 (13) R t = 1 V t λ (1 ρ) = 2 +η 2 = O(1), (14) V cb an will show up at several places throughout these lectures. Whenever we refer to a unitarity triangle, we mean the one illustrate in Fig. 1 (a).

7 B Physics an CP Violation 5 η 2 ε 1 α R t -1 R b γ 0 β 1 2 ρ Fig. 2. Contours to etermine the unitarity triangle in the ρ η plane. 2.4 Stanar Analysis of the Unitarity Triangle There is a stanar analysis to constrain the apex of the unitarity triangle in the ρ η plane, employing the following ingreients: Using heavy-quark arguments, exclusive an inclusive b u,clν l ecays provie V ub an V cb [22], allowing us to fix the sie R b of the unitarity triangle, i.e. a circle in the ρ η plane aroun (0,0) with raius R b. Using the top-quark mass m t as an input, an taking into account certain QCD corrections an non-perturbative parameters, we may extract V t from B 0 B0 mixing (see below). The combination of V t with V cb allows us then to fix the sie R t of the unitarity triangle, i.e. a circle in the ρ η plane aroun (1,0) with raius R t. Comparing B 0 B0 with B0 s B0 s mixing, an SU(3)-breaking parameter ξ suffices to etermine R t. Using m t an V cb as an input, an taking into account certain QCD corrections an non-perturbative parameters, the observable ε escribing inirect CP violationin the kaonsystem allowsus to fix ahyperbolain the ρ η plane. These contours are sketche in Fig. 2; their intersection gives the apex of the unitarity triangle shown in Fig. 1 (a). Because of strong correlations between theoretical an experimental uncertainties, it is rather involve to convert the experimental information into an allowe range in the ρ η plane, an various analyses can be foun in the literature: a simple scanning approach [7], a Gaussian approach[23], the BaBar 95% scanning metho [24], a Bayesian approach [25], an a non-bayesian statistical approach [26]. Other recent analyses can be foun in [27,28]. A reasonable range for α, β an γ that is consistent with these approaches is given by 70 < α < 130, 20 < β < 30, 50 < γ < 70. (15) The question of how to combine the theoretical an experimental errors in an optimal way will certainly continue to be a hot topic in the future. This is also reflecte by the Bayesian [25] vs. non-bayesian [26] ebate going on at present.

8 6 Robert Fleischer 2.5 Quantitative Stuies of CP Violation As we have seen above, the neutral kaon system provies two ifferent CPviolating parameters, ε an Re(ε /ε). The former is one of the ingreients of the stanar analysis of the unitarity triangle, implying in particular η > 0 if very plausible assumptions about a certain non-perturbative bag parameter are mae. On the other han, Re(ε /ε) oes not (yet) provie further stringent constraints on the unitarity triangle because of large haronic uncertainties, although the experimental values are of the same orer of magnitue as the range of theoretical estimates [6,7]. Consierably more promising in view of testing the Stanar-Moel escription of CP violation are the rare kaon ecays K + π + νν an K L π 0 νν, which originate in the Stanar Moel from loop effects an are theoretically very clean since the relevant haronic matrix elements can be fixe through semileptonic kaon ecays [7,29]. In particular, they also allow an interesting etermination of the unitarity triangle [30], an show interesting correlations with CP violation in the B sector [12,31]. Unfortunately, the K πνν branching ratios are at the level in the Stanar Moel; two events of K + π + νν have alreay been observe by the E787 Experiment at Brookhaven, yieling a branching ratio of ( ) [32]. It is very important to measure K + π + νν an K L π 0 νν with reasonable statistics, an there are efforts uner way to accomplish this challenging goal [33]. In the case of the B-meson system, consisting of charge mesons B u + ub, B c + cb, as well as neutral ones B 0 b, B0 s sb, we have a simplifie haron ynamics, since the b quark is heavy with respect to the QCD scale parameter Λ QCD. Moreover, haronic uncertainties can be eliminate or cancel in appropriate CP-violating observables, thereby proviing various tests of the KM mechanism of CP violation an irect eterminations of the angles of the unitarity triangle. As we will see below, the Stanar Moel preicts large CPviolating asymmetries in certain ecays, an large effects were actually observe recently in B J/ψK S [9,10]. The goal is now to overconstrain the unitarity triangle as much as possible an to test several Stanar-Moel preictions, with the hope to encounter iscrepancies that coul she light on the physics lying beyon the Stanar Moel. In this ecae, the asymmetric e + e B factories operating at the Υ(4S) resonance with their etectors BaBar an Belle provie access to several benchmark ecay moes of B u ± an B 0 mesons [34]. Moreover, experiments at haron colliers allow us to stuy, in aition, large ata samples of ecays of B s mesons, which are another very important element in the testing of the Stanar-Moel escription of CP violation. Important first steps in this irection are alreay expecte at run II of the Tevatron [35], whereas several strategies can only be fully exploite in the LHC era [36], in particular at LHCb (CERN) an BTeV (Fermilab). Inthese lecturesweshallfocus onthe B-mesonsystem. Forthe explorationof CP violation, non-leptonic B ecays play the central rôle, as CP-violating effects areuetocertaininterferenceeffectsthatmayshowupinthisecayclass.before turning to these moes, let us note that there are also other promising systems

9 b q 1 B Physics an CP Violation 7 W q 2 (s) Fig.3. Tree iagrams (q 1,q 2 {u,c}). to obtain insights into CP violation, for example D mesons, where the Stanar Moel preicts very small CP violation, electric ipole moments or hyperon ecays. These topics are, however, beyon the scope of this presentation. 3 Non-Leptonic B Decays 3.1 Classification Non-leptonic B ecays are meiate by b q 1 q 2 (s) quark-level transitions, with q 1,q 2 {u,,c,s}. There are two kins of topologies contributing to nonleptonic B ecays: tree-iagram-like an penguin topologies. The latter consist of gluonic (QCD) an electroweak (EW) penguins. In Figs. 3 5, the corresponing leaing-orer Feynman iagrams are shown. Depening on the flavour content of their final states, we may classify b q 1 q 2 (s) ecays as follows: q 1 q 2 {u,c}: only tree iagrams contribute. q 1 = q 2 {u,c}: tree an penguin iagrams contribute. q 1 = q 2 {,s}: only penguin iagrams contribute. 3.2 Low-Energy Effective Hamiltonians In orer to analyse non-leptonic B ecays theoretically, one uses low-energy effective Hamiltonians, which are calculate by making use of the operator prouct expansion, yieling transition matrix elements of the following structure: f H eff i = G F λ CKM C k (µ) f Q k (µ) i. (16) 2 k W b u,c,t (s) G q 2 = q 1 q 1 Fig.4. QCD penguin iagrams (q 1 = q 2 {u,,c,s}).

10 8 Robert Fleischer b u,c,t Z,γ W (s) q 2 = q 1 b W u,c,t Z,γ (s) q 2 = q 1 q 1 q 1 Fig.5. Electroweak penguin iagrams (q 1 = q 2 {u,,c,s}). The operator prouct expansion allows us to separate the short-istance contributions to this transition amplitue from the long-istance ones, which are escribe by perturbative Wilson coefficient functions C k (µ) an non-perturbative haronic matrix elements f Q k (µ) i, respectively. As usual, G F is the Fermi constant, λ CKM is a CKM factor, an µ enotes an appropriate renormalization scale. The Q k are local operators, which are generate by electroweak interactions an QCD, an govern effectively the ecay in question. The Wilson coefficients C k (µ) can be consiere as scale-epenent couplings relate to the vertices escribe by the Q k. Let us consier B 0 D+ K, which is a pure tree ecay, to iscuss the evaluation of the corresponing low-energy effective Hamiltonian in more etail. At leaing orer, this ecay originates from a b cus quark-level transition, where the bc an us quark currents are connecte through the exchange of a W boson. Evaluating the corresponing Feynman iagram yiels [ g2 2 8 V usv cb [sγ ν g νµ (1 γ 5 )u] k 2 MW 2 Because of k 2 m 2 b M2 W, we have ] [cγ µ (1 γ 5 )b]. (17) g νµ k 2 M 2 W g νµ M 2 W ( 8GF )g 2g 2 νµ, (18) 2 i.e. we may integrate out the W boson in (17), an arrive at H eff = G F 2 V us V cb[s α γ µ (1 γ 5 )u α ][c β γ µ (1 γ 5 )b β ] = G F VusV cb (s α u α ) V A (c β b β ) V A G F VusV cb O 2, (19) 2 2 where α an β enote SU(3) C colour inices. Effectively, our ecay process b cus is now escribe by the current current operator O 2. If we take into account QCD corrections, operator mixing leas to a secon current current operator, which is given by O 1 [s α γ µ (1 γ 5 )u β ][c β γ µ (1 γ 5 )b α ]. (20)

11 B Physics an CP Violation 9 Consequently, we obtain a low-energy effective Hamiltonian of the following structure: H eff = G F 2 V usv cb [C 1 (µ)o 1 +C 2 (µ)o 2 ], (21) wherec 1 (µ) 0anC 2 (µ) 1areue toqcdrenormalizationeffects. Inorer to evaluate these coefficients, we have first to calculate QCD corrections to the ecay processesboth in the full theory, i.e. with W exchange, an in the effective theory, an have then to express the QCD-correcte transition amplitue in terms of QCD-correcte matrix elements an Wilson coefficients as in (16). This proceure is calle matching. The results for the C k (µ) thus obtaine contain terms of log(µ/m W ), which become large for µ = O(m b ), the scale governingthe haronic matrix elements of the O k. Making use of the renormalization group, which exploits the fact that the transition amplitue (16) cannot epen on the chosen renormalization scale µ, we may sum up the following terms of the Wilson coefficients: α n s [ ( µ log M W )] n [ ( )] n 1 µ (LO), α n s log (NLO),... (22) M W A very etaile iscussion of these techniques can be foun in [37]. In the case of ecays receiving contributions both from tree an from penguin topologies, basically the only ifference to (21) is that we encounter more operators: H eff = G F 2 j=u,c V jr V jb { 2 10 C k (µ)q jr k + C k (µ)qk} r. (23) k=1 Here the current current operators Q jr 1 an Q jr 2, the QCD penguin operators Q r 3 Qr 6, an the EW penguin operators Qr 7 Qr 10 are relate to the tree, QCD an EW penguin processes shown in Figs. 3 5 (explicit expressions for these operators can be foun in [12,37]). At a renormalization scale µ = O(m b ), the Wilson coefficients of the current current operators satisfy C 1 (µ) = O(10 1 ) an C 2 (µ) = O(1), whereas those of the penguin operators are O(10 2 ). Note that penguin topologies with internal charm- an up-quark exchanges are escribe in this framework by penguin-like matrix elements of the corresponing current current operators [38], an may also have important phenomenological consequences [39,40]. Since the ratio α/α s = O(10 2 ) of the QED an QCD couplings is very small, we woul expect naïvely that EW penguins shoul play a minor rôle in comparisonwith QCDpenguins. Thiswoul actuallybe the caseifthe top quark wasnot heavy.however,sincethewilsoncoefficientc 9 increasesstronglywith m t, we obtain interesting EW penguin effects in several B ecays: B K φ is affecte significantly by EW penguins, whereas B πφ an B s π 0 φ are even ominate by such topologies [41,42]. EW penguins also have an important impact on B πk moes [43], as we will see in Section 7. k=3

12 10 Robert Fleischer The low-energy effective Hamiltonians iscusse in this section apply to all B ecays that are cause by the same corresponing quark-level transition, i.e. they are universal. Within this formalism, ifferences between various exclusive moes are only ue to the haronic matrix elements of the relevant fourquark operators. Unfortunately, the evaluation of such matrix elements is associate with large uncertainties an is a very challenging task. In this context, factorization is a wiely use concept, which is our next topic. 3.3 Factorization of Haronic Matrix Elements In orer to iscuss factorization, let us consier once more B 0 D+ K. Evaluating the corresponing transition amplitue, we encounter the haronic matrix elements of the O 1,2 operatorsbetween the K D + final an B 0 initial states. If we use the well-known SU(N C ) colour-algebra relation TαβT a γδ a = 1 ( δ αδ δ βγ 1 ) δ αβ δ γδ (24) 2 N C to rewrite the operator O 1, we obtain with K D + H eff B 0 = G F 2 V usv cb [a 1 K D + (s α u α ) V A (c β b β ) V A B 0 +2C 1 K D + (s α T a αβu β ) V A (c γ T a γδb δ ) V A B 0 ], (25) a 1 = C 1 N C +C 2. (26) It is now straightforwar to factorize the haronic matrix elements: K D + (s α u α ) V A (c β b β ) V A B 0 fact = K [s α γ µ (1 γ 5 )u α ] 0 D + [c β γ µ (1 γ 5 )b β ] B 0 f K ( ecay constant ) F BD ( form factor ), (27) K D + (s α T a αβ u β) V A (c γ T a γδ b δ) V A B 0 fact = 0. (28) The quantity introuce in(26) is a phenomenological colour factor, governing colour-allowe ecays. In the case of colour-suppresse moes, for instance B 0 π0 D 0, we have to eal with the combination a 2 = C 1 + C 2 N C. (29) The concept of the factorization of haronic matrix elements has a long history[44],ancanbejustifie, forexample,inthelargen C limit[45].recently, the QCD factorization approach was evelope [46,47,48], which may provie an important step towars a rigorous basis for factorization for a large class of

13 B Physics an CP Violation 11 non-leptonic two-boy B-meson ecays in the heavy-quark limit. The resulting formula for the transition amplitues incorporates elements both of the naïve factorization approach sketche above an of the har-scattering picture. Let us consier a ecay B M 1 M 2, where M 1 picks up the spectator quark. If M 1 is either a heavy (D) or a light (π, K) meson, an M 2 a light (π, K) meson, QCD factorization gives a transition amplitue of the following structure: A(B M 1 M 2 ) = [ naïve factorization ] [1+O(α s )+O(Λ QCD /m b )]. (30) While the O(α s ) terms, i.e. the raiative non-factorizable corrections to naïve factorization, can be calculate in a systematic way, the main limitation of the theoreticalaccuracyis ue tothe O(Λ QCD /m b ) terms. Theseissues areiscusse in etail in [14]. Further interesting recent papers are liste in [49]. Another QCD approach to eal with non-leptonic B ecays into charmless final states the perturbative har-scattering (or PQCD ) approach was evelope inepenently in [50], an iffers from the QCD factorization formalism in some technical aspects. An interesting avenue to eal with non-leptonic B ecays is also provie by QCD light-cone sum-rule approaches [51]. 4 Towars Stuies of CP Violation in the B System 4.1 Amplitue Structure an Direct CP Violation If we use the unitarity of the CKM matrix, it is an easy exercise to show that the amplitue for any given non-leptonic B ecay can always be written is such a way that at most two weak CKM amplitues contribute: A(B f) = e +iϕ1 A 1 e iδ1 +e +iϕ2 A 2 e iδ2 (31) A(B f) = e iϕ1 A 1 e iδ1 +e iϕ2 A 2 e iδ2. (32) Here ϕ 1,2 enote CP-violating weak phases, which are ue to the CKM matrix, an the A 1,2 e iδ1,2 are CP-conserving strong amplitues, containing the whole haron ynamics of the ecay at han: A e iδ k C k (µ) }{{} f Q k (µ) B. }{{} (33) pert. QCD non-pert. Employing (31) an (32), we obtain the following CP-violating rate asymmetry: A CP = Γ(B f) Γ(B f) Γ(B f)+γ(b f) = A(B f) 2 A(B f) 2 A(B f) 2 + A(B f) 2 2 A 1 A 2 sin(δ 1 δ 2 )sin(ϕ 1 ϕ 2 ) A A 1 A 2 cos(δ 1 δ 2 )cos(ϕ 1 ϕ 2 )+ A 2 2. (34) Consequently, a non-vanishing CP asymmetry A CP arises from interference effects between the two weak amplitues, an requires both a non-trivial weak

14 12 Robert Fleischer A(B + c D + s D 0 ) 2A(B c D s D 0 +) 2A(B + c D + s D 0 +) A(B c D s D 0 ) 2γ A(B + c D + s D 0 ) = A(B c D s D 0 ) Fig.6. The extraction of γ from B ± c D ± s {D 0,D 0,D 0 +} ecays. phase ifference ϕ 1 ϕ 2 an a non-trivial strong phase ifference δ 1 δ 2. This kin of CP violation is referre to as irect CP violation, as it originates irectly at the amplitue level of the consiere ecay. It is the B-meson counterpart of the effects probe through Re(ε /ε) in the neutral kaon system. Since ϕ 1 ϕ 2 is in general given by one of the angles of the unitarity triangle usually γ the goal is to etermine this quantity from the measure value of A CP. Unfortunately, the extraction of ϕ 1 ϕ 2 from A CP is affecte by haronic uncertainties, which are ue to the strong amplitues A 1,2 e iδ1,2 (see (34)). 4.2 Classification of the Main Strategies Themostobvious butalsomostchallenging strategywemayfollowistotryto calculate the relevant haronic matrix elements f Q k (µ) B. As we have note above, interesting progress has recently been mae in this irection through the evelopment of the QCD factorization [46,47,48,49], the PQCD [50], an the QCD light-cone sum-rule approaches [51]. Another avenue we may follow is to search for fortunate cases, where relations between ecay amplitues allow us to eliminate the haronic uncertainties. This approach was pioneere by Gronau an Wyler [52], who propose the extraction of γ from triangle relations between B u ± K ± {D 0,D 0,D+} 0 amplitues, where D+ 0 is the CP-even eigenstate of the neutral D-meson system. These moes receive only contributions from tree-iagram-like topologies. Unfortunately, this strategy, which is theoretically clean, is very ifficult from an experimental point of view, since the corresponing triangles are very squashe ones (for other experimental problems an strategies to solve them, see [53]). As an alternative B K 0 {D 0,D 0,D+ 0 } moes were propose [54], where the triangles are more equilateral. Interestingly, from a theoretical point of view, the ieal realization of this triangle approach arises in the B c -meson system. Here the B c ± D s ± {D0,D 0,D+ 0 } ecays allow us to construct the amplitue triangles sketche

15 B Physics an CP Violation 13 q W b q u,c,t b u,c,t u,c,t W W b W q b u,c,t q Fig.7. Box iagrams contributing to Bq B 0 q 0 mixing (q {,s}). in Fig. 6, where all sies are expecte to be of the same orer of magnitue [55]. The practical implementation of this strategy appears also to be challenging, but elaborate feasibility stuies for experiments of the LHC era are strongly encourage. Amplitue relations can also be erive with the help of the flavour symmetries of strong interactions, i.e. SU(2) an SU(3). Here we have to eal with B (s) ππ,πk,kk ecays, proviing interesting eterminations of weak phases an insights into haronic physics. We shall have a closer look at these moes in Section 7. The thir avenue we may follow to eal with the problems arising from haronic matrix elements is to employ ecays of neutral B or B s mesons. Here we encounter a new kin of CP violation, which is ue to interference effects betweenbq 0 B0 q mixingan ecayprocesses,an is referreto as mixing-inuce CP violation. Within the Stanar Moel, Bq B 0 q 0 mixing arises from the box iagrams shown in Fig. 7. Because of this phenomenon, an initially, i.e. at time t = 0, present Bq-meson 0 state evolves into a time-epenent linear combination of Bq 0 an Bq 0 states: B q (t) = a(t) B 0 q +b(t) B 0 q, (35) where a(t) an b(t) are governe by an appropriate Schröinger equation. In orer to solve it, mass eigenstates with mass an with ifferences M q M (q) H M(q) L > 0 an Γ q Γ (q) H Γ(q) L, (36) ( ) respectively, are introuce. The ecay rates Γ( Bq 0 (t) ( ) f ) then contain terms proportional to cos( M q t) an sin( M q t), escribing the Bq B 0 q 0 oscillations. To be specific, let us consier the very important special case where the Bq 0 meson ecays into a final CP eigenstate f, satisfying (CP) f = ± f. (37) The corresponing time-epenent CP asymmetry then takes the following form: a CP (t) Γ(B0 q (t) f) Γ(B0 q (t) f) Γ(Bq 0(t) f)+γ(b0 q (t) f) (38) [ A ir CP = (B q f) cos( M q t)+a mix CP (B ] q f) sin( M q t). cosh( Γ q t/2) A Γ (B q f) sinh( Γ q t/2)

16 14 Robert Fleischer In orer to calculate the CP-violating observables, it is convenient to introuce A(B f = ±e iθ(q) q 0 f) M A(Bq 0 (39) f), ξ (q) where ± refers to the CP eigenvalue of the final state f specifie in (37), an Θ (q) M π = 2arg(Vtq V tb) φ q = { +2β = O(50 ) for q =, 2δγ = O( 2 ) for q = s (40) is the CP-violating weak Bq B 0 q 0 mixing phase. It shoul be note that ξ (q) f oes not epen on the chosen CP or CKM phase conventions an is actually a physical observable (for a etaile iscussion, see [12]). We then obtain A ir CP (B q f) = 1 ξ (q) 2 f 1+ ξ (q) 2 = A(B f) 2 A(B f) 2 A(B f) 2 + A(B f) 2, (41) f an conclue that this observable measures irect CP violation, which we have alreay encountere in (34). The interesting new aspect is mixing-inuce CP violation, which is escribe by CP (B q f) = 2Imξ(q) f 1+ ξ (q) 2, (42) f A mix an arises from interference effects between B 0 q B 0 q mixing an ecay processes. The with ifference Γ q, which may be sizeable in the B s system, as we will see in Subsection 6.1, provies another observable, A Γ (B q f) 2Reξ(q) f 1+ (q) ξ 2, (43) f which is, however, not inepenent from A ir CP (B q f) an A mix CP (B q f): [ ] 2 [ ] 2 [ 2 A ir CP(B q f) + A mix CP(B q f) + A Γ (B q f)] = 1. (44) Let us now have a closer look at ξ (q) f. Using (31) an (32), we obtain ξ (q) f = e iφq [ e +iϕ 1 A 1 e iδ1 +e +iϕ2 A 2 e iδ2 e iϕ1 A 1 e iδ1 +e iϕ2 A 2 e iδ2 ], (45) an observe that the calculation of ξ (q) f is in general affecte by haronic uncertainties. However, if one CKM amplitue plays the ominant rôle, the corresponing haronic matrix element cancels: [ ξ (q) e +iφ f /2 M f = e iφq f e iδ ] f = e i(φq φf). (46) e iφf/2 M f e iδ f

17 B b W c c s 01 ψ K S B B Physics an CP Violation 15 b 01 W u,c,t c ψ c Fig.8. Feynman iagrams contributing to B 0 J/ψK S. The ashe lines in the penguin topology represent a colour-singlet exchange. s 01 K S In this special case, irect CP violation vanishes, i.e. A ir CP (B q f) = 0. However, we still have mixing-inuce CP violation, measuring the CP-violating weak phase ifference φ φ q φ f without haronic uncertainties: A mix CP (B q f) = ±sinφ. (47) The corresponing time-epenent CP asymmetry now takes the following simple form: Γ(Bq(t) 0 f) Γ(Bq(t) 0 f) = ±sinφ sin( M q t), (48) Γ(Bq(t) 0 f)+γ(bq(t) 0 f) Γq=0 an allows an elegant etermination of sinφ. Let us apply this formalism, in the next section, to important benchmark moes for the B factories. 5 Benchmark Moes for the B Factories 5.1 The Gol-Plate Moe B J/ψK S The ecay B 0 J/ψK S is a transition into a CP eigenstate with eigenvalue 1, an originates from b ccs quark-level ecays. As can be seen in Fig. 8, we have to eal both with tree-iagram-like an with penguin topologies. The corresponing amplitue can be written as [56] A(B 0 J/ψK S) = λ (s) c (A c CC +Ac pen ) +λ (s) u Au pen +λ(s) t A t pen, (49) where A c CC enotes the current currentcontributions, i.e. the tree processesin Fig. 8, an the strong amplitues A q pen escribe the contributions from penguin topologies with internal q quarks (q {u, c, t}). These penguin amplitues take into account both QCD an EW penguin contributions. The primes in (49) remin us that we are ealing with a b s transition, an the λ (s) q V qs V qb (50)

18 16 Robert Fleischer are CKM factors. If we employ the unitarity of the CKM matrix to eliminate λ (s) t through λ (s) t = λ (s) u λ (s) c, an the Wolfenstein parametrization, we may write A(B 0 J/ψK S ) [ 1+λ 2 ae iθ e iγ], (51) where the haronic parameter ae iθ measures, sloppily speaking, the ratio of penguin- to tree-iagram-like contributions to B 0 J/ψK S. Since this parameter enters in a oubly Cabibbo-suppresse way, the formalism iscusse in Section 4.2 gives, to a very goo approximation [57]: A ir CP (B J/ψK S ) = 0, A mix CP (B J/ψK S ) = sinφ. (52) After important first steps by the OPAL, CDF an ALEPH collaborations, the B J/ψK S moe (an similar ecays) le eventually, in 2001, to the observation of CP violation in the B system [9,10]. The present status of sin2β is given as follows: { 0.741±0.067±0.033 (BaBar [58]) sin2β = (53) 0.719±0.074±0.035 (Belle [59]), yieling the worl average [60] sin2β = 0.734±0.054, (54) which agrees well with the results of the stanar analysis of the unitarity triangle (15), implying 0.6 < sin2β < 0.9. In the LHC era, the experimental accuracy of the measurement of sin2β may be increase by one orer of magnitue [36]. In view of such a tremenous accuracy, it will then be important to obtain eeper insights into the theoretical uncertainties affecting(52), which are ue to penguin contributions. A possibility to control them is provie by the B s J/ψK S channel [56]. Moreover, also irect CP violation in B J/ψK moes allows us to probe such penguin effects [42,61]. So far, there are no experimental inications for non-vanishing CP asymmetries of this kin. Although the agreement between (54) an the results of the CKM fits is striking, it shoul not be forgotten that new physics may nevertheless hie in A mix CP (B J/ψK S ). The point is that the key quantity is actually φ, which is fixe through sinφ = 0.734±0.054 up to a twofol ambiguity, φ = ( ) ( ) (55) Here the former solution woul be in perfect agreement with the range implie by the CKM fits, 40 < φ < 60, whereas the latter woul correspon to new physics. The two solutions can be istinguishe through a measurement of the sign of cosφ : in the case of cosφ = +0.7 > 0, we woul conclue φ = 47, whereas cosφ = 0.7 < 0 woul point towars φ = 133, i.e. new physics. There are several strategies on the market to resolve the twofol ambiguity in the extraction of φ [62]. Unfortunately, they are rather challenging from a practical point of view. In the B J/ψK system, cosφ can be extracte from

19 B Physics an CP Violation 17 B + b u W s u, c, t G u s s φ K + Fig.9. QCD penguin contributions to B + φk +. the time-epenent angular istribution of the ecay proucts of B J/ψ[ l + l ]K [ π 0 K S ], if the sign of a haronic parameter cosδ involving a strong phase δ is fixe through factorization [63,64]. Let us note that analyses of this kin are alreay in progress at the B factories [65]. The preferre mechanism for new physics to manifest itself in CP-violating effects in B J/ψK S is through B 0 B0 mixing, which arises in the Stanar Moel from the box iagrams shown in Fig. 7. However, new physics may also enter at the B J/ψK amplitue level. Employing estimates borrowe from effective fiel theory suggests that the effects are at most O(10%) for a generic new-physics scale Λ NP in the TeV regime. In orer to obtain the whole picture, a set of appropriate observables can be introuce, using B J/ψK S an its charge counterpart B ± J/ψK ± [61]. So far, these observables o not yet inicate any eviation from the Stanar Moel. In the context of new-physics effects in the B J/ψK system, it is interesting to note that an upper boun on φ is implie by an upper boun on R b V ub /V cb, as can be seen in Fig. 2. To be specific, we have sinβ max = R max b, (56) yieling (φ ) SM max 55 for Rb max As the etermination of R b from semileptonic tree-level ecays is very robust concerning the impact of new physics, φ 133 woul require new-physics contributions to B 0 B0 mixing. As we will see in Subsection 7.2, an interesting connection between the two solutions for φ an constraints on γ is provie by CP violation in B π + π [66]. 5.2 The B φk System An important testing groun for the Stanar-Moel escription of CP violation is also provie by B φk ecays. As can be seen in Fig. 9, these moes are governe by QCD penguin processes [67], but also EW penguins are sizeable [41,68]. Consequently, B φk moes represent a sensitive probe for new physics. In the Stanar Moel, we have the following relations [42,69,70,71]: A ir CP (B φk S ) = 0+O(λ 2 ) (57)

20 18 Robert Fleischer A mix CP (B φk S ) = A mix CP (B J/ψK S )+O(λ 2 ). (58) As in the case of the B J/ψK system, a combine analysis of B φk S, B ± φk ± moesshoulbeperformeinorertoobtainthewholepicture[71]. There is also the possibility of an unfortunate case, where new physics cannot be istinguishe from the Stanar Moel, as iscusse in etail in [12,71]. In the summer of 2002, the experimental status can be summarize as follows: A ir CP(B φk S ) = { n.a. (BaBar [72]) 0.56±0.41±0.12 (Belle [73]) (59) { A mix CP (B φk S ) = 0.52 ±0.09 (BaBar [72]) 0.73±0.64±0.18 (Belle [73]). (60) Unfortunately, the experimental uncertainties are still very large. Because of A mix CP (B J/ψK S ) = 0.734± (see (52) an (54)), there were alreay speculations about new-physics effects in B φk S [74]. In this context, it is interesting to note that there are more ata available from Belle: A ir CP(B η K S ) = 0.26±0.22±0.03 (61) A mix CP (B η K S ) = 0.76± (62) A ir CP(B K + K K S ) = 0.42±0.36± (63) A mix CP (B K + K K S ) = 0.52±0.46± (64) The corresponing moes are governe by the same quark-level transitions as B φk S. Consequently, it is probably too early to be excite too much by the possibilityofsignalsofnewphysicsinb φk S [60].However,theexperimental situation shoul improve significantly in the future. 5.3 The Decay B π + π Another benchmark moe for the B factories is B 0 π+ π, which is a ecay into a CP eigenstate with eigenvalue +1, an originates from b uu quarklevel transitions, as can be seen in Fig. 10. In analogy to (49), the corresponing ecay amplitue can be written in the following form [75]: A(B 0 π + π ) = λ u () ( A u CC +A u pen) +λ () c A c pen +λ () t A t pen. (65) If we use again the unitarity of the CKM matrix, yieling λ () t as well as the Wolfenstein parametrization, we obtain = λ () u λ () c, A(B 0 π+ π ) [ e iγ e iθ], (66) where e iθ 1 R b ( A c pen A t ) pen A u CC +Au pen A t pen (67)

21 B Physics an CP Violation 19 B b W u u π π + - B b W u, c, t G + π u u - π Fig.10. Feynman iagrams contributing to B 0 π + π. measures, sloppily speaking, the ratio of penguin to tree contributions in B π + π. In contrast to the B 0 J/ψK S amplitue (51), this parameter oes not enter in (66) in a oubly Cabibbo-suppresse way, thereby leaing to the well-known penguin problem in B π + π. If we ha negligible penguin contributions, i.e. = 0, the corresponing CP-violating observables were given as follows: A ir CP(B π + π ) = 0, A mix CP (B π + π ) = sin(2β +2γ) = sin2α, (68) wherewehavealsousethe unitarityrelation2β+2γ = 2π 2α.We observethat actually the phases 2β = φ an γ enter irectly in the B π + π observables, an not α. Consequently, since φ can be fixe straightforwarly through B J/ψK S, we may use B π + π to probe γ. This is avantageous to eal with penguins an possible new-physics effects, as we will see in Subsection 7.2. Measurements of the B π + π CP asymmetries are alreay available: A ir CP(B π + π ) = { 0.30±0.25±0.04 (BaBar [76]) ±0.09 (Belle [77]) (69) { 0.02±0.34±0.05 (BaBar [76]) A mix CP (B π + π ) = (Belle [77]). (70) Unfortunately, the BaBar an Belle results are not fully consistent with each other; the experimental picture will hopefully be clarifie soon. Forming nevertheless the weighte averages of (69) an (70), using the rules of the Particle Data Group (PDG), yiels A ir CP(B π + π ) = 0.57±0.19 (0.32) (71) A mix CP (B π + π ) = 0.57±0.25 (0.61), (72) where the errors in brackets are the ones increase by the PDG scaling-factor proceure [78]. Direct CP violation at this level woul require large penguin contributions with large CP-conserving strong phases. A significant impact of penguinsonb π + π isalsoinicatebyataonb πk,ππ ecays,aswell

22 20 Robert Fleischer as by theoretical consierations [40,48,79,80] (see Subsection 7.2). Consequently, it is alreay evient that the penguin contributions to B π + π cannot be neglecte. Many approaches to eal with the penguin problem in the extraction of weak phases from the CP-violating B π + π observables were evelope; the best known is an isospin analysis of the B ππ system [81], yieling α. Unfortunately, this approach is very ifficult in practice, as it requires a measurement of the B 0 π0 π 0 an B 0 π0 π 0 branching ratios. However, useful bouns may alreay be obtaine from experimental constraints on the CP-average B π 0 π 0 branching ratio [82,83]. Alternatively, we may employ the CKM unitarity to express A mix CP (B π + π ) in terms of α an haronic parameters. Using A ir CP (B π + π ), a strong phase can be eliminate, allowing us to etermine α as a function of a haronic parameter p/t, which is, however, problematic to be etermine reliably [40,46,48,83,84,85,86]. A ifferent parametrization of the B π + π observables, involving a haronic parameter P/T an φ = 2β, is employe in [87], where, moreover, α + β + γ = 180 is use to eliminate γ, an β is fixe through the Stanar-Moel solution 26 implie by A mix CP (B J/ψK S ). Provie P/T is known, α can be extracte. To this en, SU(3) flavour-symmetry arguments an plausible ynamical assumptions are use to fix P through the CP-average B ± π ± K branching ratio. On the other han, T is estimate with the help of factorization an ata on B πlν. Refinements of this approach were presente in [88]. Another strategy to eal with penguins in B π + π is offere by B s K + K. Using the U-spin flavour symmetry of strong interactions, φ an γ can be extracte from the corresponing CP-violating observables [75]. Before coming back to this approach in more etail in Subsection 7.2, let us first have a closer look at the B s -meson system. 6 The B s -Meson System 6.1 General Features At the e + e B factories operating at the Υ(4S) resonance, no B s mesons are accessible, since Υ(4S) states ecay only to B u, -mesons, but not to B s. On the other han, the physics potential of the B s system is very promising for haron machines, where plenty of B s mesons are prouce. Consequently, B s physics is in some sense the El Dorao for B experiments at haron colliers. There are important ifferences between the B an B s systems: Within the Stanar Moel, the B 0 s B 0 s mixing phase probes the tiny angle δγ in the unitarity triangle shown in Fig. 1 (b), an is hence negligibly small: whereas φ = 2β = O(50 ). φ s = 2δγ = 2λ 2 η = O( 2 ), (73)

23 B Physics an CP Violation η.bar ( M s ) min =15/ps ( M s ) min =20/ps ( M s ) min =25/ps ( M s ) min =30/ps ρ.bar Fig.11. The impact of the upper limit (R t) max on the allowe range in the ρ η plane for ξ = The shae region correspons to R b = 0.38±0.08. A large x s M s /Γ s = O(20), where Γ s (Γ (q) H +Γ(q) L )/2, is expecte in the Stanar Moel, whereas x = 0.775± The present lower boun on M s is given as follows [89]: M s > 14.4ps 1 (95% C.L.). (74) There may be a sizeable with ifference Γ s /Γ s = O( 10%) between the mass eigenstates of the B s system that is ue to CKM-favoure b ccs quark-level transitions into final states common to B 0 s an B 0 s, whereas Γ is negligibly small [90]. The present CDF an LEP results imply [89] Γ s /Γ s < 0.31 (95% C.L.). (75) Interesting applications of Γ s are extractions of weak phases from untagge B s ata samples, where we o not istinguish between initially present B 0 s or B 0 s mesons, as iscusse in [91]. Let us now iscuss the rôle of M s for the etermination of the unitarity triangle in more etail. As we have alreay note in Subsection 2.4, the comparison of M with M s allows an interesting etermination of the sie R t of the unitarity triangle. To this en, only a single SU(3)-breaking parameter ˆBBsf Bs ξ ˆBB f B = 1.15±0.06 (76) is require, which measures SU(3)-breaking effects in non-perturbative mixing an ecay parameters. It can be etermine through lattice or QCD sum-rule calculations. The mass ifference M s has not yet been measure. However, lower bouns on M s can be converte into upper bouns on R t through [92] (R t ) max = 0.83 ξ 15.0ps 1 ( M s ) min, (77)

24 22 Robert Fleischer excluing alreay a large part in the ρ η plane, as can be seen in Fig. 11. In particular, γ < 90 is implie. In a recent paper [93], it is argue that ξ may actually be significantly larger than the conventional range given in (76), ξ = 1.32±0.10 (see also [27]). In this case, the exclue range in the ρ η plane woul be reuce, shifting the upper limit for γ closer to 90. Hopefully, the status ofξ will be clarifie soon. In the near future, run II of the Tevatron shoul provie a measurement of M s, thereby constraining the unitarity triangle an γ in a much more stringent way. 6.2 Benchmark B s Decays An interesting class of B s ecays is ue to b(b) cus(s) quark-level transitions. Here we have to eal with pure tree ecays, where both B 0 s an B0 s mesons may ecay into the same final state f. The resulting interference effects between ecay an mixing processes allow a theoretically clean extraction of φ s +γ from ξ (s) f ξ (s) = e 2i(φs+γ). (78) f There are several well-known strategies on the market employing these features: we may consier the colour-allowe ecays B s D s ± K [94], or the coloursuppresse moes B s D 0 φ [95]. In the case of B s Ds ± K or B s D 0 φ, the observables of the corresponing angular istributions provie sufficient information to extract φ s +γ from untagge analyses [96], requiring a sizeable Γ s. A tagge strategy involving B s Ds ± K moes was propose in [97]. Recently, strategies making use of CP-tagge B s ecays were propose [98], which require a symmetric e + e collier operate at the Υ(5S) resonance. In this approach, initially present CP eigenstates Bs CP are employe, which can be tagge through the fact that the Bs 0/B0 s mixtures have anticorrelate CP eigenvalues at Υ(5S). Here B s D s ± K,D s ± K,Ds ± K moes may be use. Let us note that there is alsoan interestingcounterpartof (78) in the B system [99], which employs B D ( )± π ecays, an allows a etermination of φ +γ. The extraction of γ from the phase φ s + γ provie by the B s approaches sketche in the previous paragraph requires φ s as an aitional input, which is negligibly small in the Stanar Moel. Whereas it appears to be quite unlikely that the pure tree ecays liste above are affecte significantly by new physics, as they involve no flavour-changing neutral-current processes, this is not the case for the Bs B 0 s 0 mixing phase φ s. In orer to probe this quantity, B s J/ψφ offers interesting strategies [64,100]. Since this ecay is the B s counterpart of B J/ψK S, the corresponing Feynman iagrams are analogous to those shown in Fig. 8. However, in contrast to B J/ψK S, the final state of B s J/ψφ is an amixture of ifferent CP eigenstates. In orer to isentangle them, we have to use the angular istribution of the J/ψ l + l an φ K + K ecay proucts [101]. The corresponing observables are governe by [36] ξ (s) ψφ e iφs [ 1 2i sinγ O(10 3 ) ]. (79)

25 W s b u, c, t B G 01 u u 01 K π - + B Physics an CP Violation 23 s 01 + K W u 01 b u B Fig.12. Feynman iagrams contributing to B 0 π K π Since we have φ s = O( 2 ) in the Stanar Moel, the extraction of φ s from the B s J/ψ[ l + l ]φ[ K + K ] angular istribution may well be affecte by haronic uncertainties at the 10% level. These haronic uncertainties, which may become an important issue in the LHC era [36], can be controlle through B J/ψρ 0, exhibiting some other interesting features [102]. Since B s J/ψφ shows small CP-violating effects in the Stanar Moel because of (79), this moe represents a sensitive probe to search for new-physics contributions to B 0 s B 0 s mixing [103]. Note that new-physics effects entering at the B s J/ψφ amplitue level are expecte to play a minor rôle an can alreay be probe in the B J/ψK system [61]. For a etaile iscussion of smoking-gun signals of a sizeable value of φ s, see [64]. There, also methos to etermine this phase unambiguously are propose. 7 Recent Developments 7.1 Status of B πk Decays If we employ flavour-symmetry arguments an make plausible ynamical assumptions, B πk ecays allow eterminations of γ an haronic parameters with a minimal theoretical input [104] [116]. Alternative strategies, relying on a more extensive use of theory, are provie by the QCD factorization [46,47,48] an PQCD [50,79] approaches, which furthermore allow a reuction of the theoretical uncertainties of the flavour-symmetry strategies. These topics are iscusse in etail in [14]. Let us here focus on the former kin of strategies. To get more familiar with B πk moes, let us consier B 0 π K +. As can be seen in Fig. 12, this channel receives contributions from penguin an colour-allowe tree-iagram-like topologies, where the latter bring γ into the game. Because of the small ratio V us Vub /(V tsvtb ) 0.02, the QCD penguin topologies ominate this ecay, espite their loop suppression. This interesting feature applies to all B πk moes. Because of the large top-quark mass, we also have to care about EW penguins. However, in the case of B 0 π K + an B + π + K 0, these topologiescontribute only in colour-suppresseform an are hence expecte to playaminorrôle.on the otherhan, EWpenguinscontribute

26 24 Robert Fleischer Observable CLEO [118] BaBar [76,119] Belle [120] Average R 1.00± ± ± ±0.12 R c 1.27± ± ± ±0.19 R n 0.59± ± ± ±0.13 Table 1. CP-conserving B πk observables as efine in (80) (82). For the evaluation of R, we have use τ B +/τ B 0 = 1.060± Observable CLEO [121] BaBar [76,119] Belle [120] Average A ± ± ± ±0.05 A c ± ± ± ±0.11 A n ± ± ± ±0.04 Table 2. CP-violating B πk observables as efine in (80) (82). For the evaluation of A 0, we have use τ B +/τ B 0 = 1.060± also in colour-alloweform to B + π 0 K + an B 0 π0 K 0, an may here even compete with tree-iagram-like topologies. Because of the ominance of penguin topologies, B πk moes are sensitive probes for new-physics effects [117]. Relations between the B πk amplitues that are implie by the SU(2) isospin flavour symmetry of strong interactions suggest the following combinations to probe γ: the mixe B ± π ± K, B π K ± system [105] [108], the charge B ± π ± K, B ± π 0 K ± system [109] [111], an the neutral B π 0 K, B π K ± system [111,112]. Corresponingly, we may introuce the following sets of observables [111]: { R A0} { Rc A c 0 { Rn A n 0 [ ] BR(B 0 π K + )±BR(B 0 π+ K ) BR(B + π + K 0 )+BR(B π K 0 ) τ B + τ B 0 ] (80) } [ BR(B + π 0 K + )±BR(B π 0 K ) 2 (81) BR(B + π + K 0 )+BR(B π K 0 ) } [ ] 1 BR(B 0 π K + )±BR(B 0 π+ K ) 2 BR(B 0 π0 K 0 )+BR(B 0. (82) π0 K 0 ) The experimental status of these observables is summarize in Tables 1 an 2. Moreover, there are stringent constraints on CP violation in B ± π ± K: A CP (B ± π ± K) = { 0.17±0.10±0.02 (BaBar [119]) 0.46±0.15±0.02 (Belle [120]). (83) Let us note that a very recent preliminary stuy of Belle inicates that the large asymmetry in (83) is ue to a 3σ fluctuation [122]. Within the Stanar Moel, a sizeable value of A CP (B ± π ± K) coul be inuce by large rescattering effects. Other important inicators for such processes are branching ratios for B KK ecays, which are alreay strongly constraine by the B factories, an woul allow us to take into account rescattering effects in the extraction of

27 B Physics an CP Violation 25 Fig.13. The allowe regions in the R c A c 0 plane: (a) correspons to 0.20 r c 0.28 for q = 0.68, an (b) to 0.51 q 0.85 for r c = 0.24; the elliptical regions arise if we restrict γ to the Stanar-Moel range specifie in (86). In (c) an (), we show also the contours for fixe values of γ an δ c, respectively (r c = 0.24, q = 0.68). γ from B πk moes [108,110,111,123]. Let us note that also the QCD factorization approach [14,46,47,48] is not in favour of large rescattering processes. For simplicity, we shall neglect such effects in the iscussion given below. Interestingly, alreay CP-average B πk branching ratios may lea to non-trivial constraints on γ [106,109,111], provie the corresponing R (c,n) observables are foun to be sufficiently ifferent from 1. The final goal is, however, to etermine γ. Let us first turn to the charge an neutral B πk systems in more etail. The starting point of our consierations are relations between the charge an neutral B πk amplitues that follow from the SU(2) isospin symmetry of strong interactions. Assuming moreover that the rescattering effects iscusse above are small, we arrive at a parametrization of the following structure [111] (for an alternative one, see [110]): R c,n = 1 2r c,n (cosγ q)cosδ c,n + ( 1 2qcosγ +q 2) rc,n 2 (84) A c,n 0 = 2r c,n sinδ c,n sinγ. (85) Here r c,n measures simply speaking the ratio of tree to penguin topologies. Using SU(3) flavour-symmetry arguments an ata on the CP-average B ± π ± π 0 branching ratio [104], we obtain r c,n 0.2. The parameter q escribes the ratio of EW penguin to tree contributions, an can be fixe through SU(3) flavour-symmetry arguments, yieling q 0.7 [109]. In orer to simplify (84) an (85), we have assume that q is a real parameter, as is the case in the strict SU(3) limit; for generalizations, see [111]. Finally, δ c,n is the CP-conserving strong phase between trees an penguins. Consequently, the observables R c,n

28 26 Robert Fleischer Fig.14. The allowe regions in the R n A n 0 plane for q = 0.68 an r n = In (a) an (b), we show also the contours for fixe values of γ an δ n, respectively. an A c,n 0 epen on the two unknowns δ c,n an γ. If we vary them within their allowe ranges, i.e. 180 δ c,n +180 an 0 γ 180, we obtain an allowe region in the R c,n A c,n 0 plane [66,113]. Shoul the measure values of R c,n an A c,n 0 lie outsie this region, we woul have an immeiate signal for new physics. On the other han, shoul the measurements fall into the allowe range, γ an δ c,n coul be extracte. In this case, γ coul be compare with the results of alternative strategies an with the values implie by the stanar analysis of the unitarity triangle iscusse in Subsection 2.4, whereas δ c,n provies valuable insights into haron ynamics, thereby allowing tests of theoretical preictions. In Fig. 13, we show the allowe regions in the R c A c 0 plane for various parameter sets [66]. The crosses represent the averages of the experimental results given in Tables 1 an 2. If γ is constraine to the range implie by the stanar analysis of the unitarity triangle, 50 < γ < 70, (86) amuchmorerestricteregionarisesinthe R c A c 0 plane. Thecontoursin Figs.13 (c) an () allow us to rea off easily the preferre values for γ an δ c, respectively, from the measure observables [66]. Interestingly, the present ata seem to favour γ > 90, which woul be in conflict with (86). Moreover, they point towars δ c < 90 ; factorization preicts δ c to be close to 0 [48]. The situation for the neutral B πk system is illustrate in Fig. 14. Interestingly, here the ata point to γ > 90 as well, but favour also δ n > 90 because of the average of R n being smaller than 1 [66,112]. However, as can be seen in Table 1, the present ata are unfortunately rather unsatisfactory in this respect. Iffuture, moreaccurateatareallyyiel avalueforγ in the seconquarant, the iscrepancy with (86) may be ue to new-physics contributions to B 0 q B0 q mixing (q {,s}), or to the B πk ecay amplitues. In the former case, the constraints implie by (77), which rely on the Stanar-Moel interpretation of B 0 q B 0 q mixing, woul no longer hol, so that γ may actually be larger than 90. In the latter case, the Stanar-Moel expressions (84) an (85) woul receive corrections ue to the presence of new physics, so that also the extracte value for γ woul not correspon to the Stanar-Moel result. In such a scenario an example woul be given by new-physics contributions to the EW penguin

29 B Physics an CP Violation 27 sector also the extracte values for δ c an δ n may actually no longer satisfy δ c δ n [112]. An analysis similar to the one iscusse above can also be performe for the mixe B πk system, consisting of B ± π ± K, B π K ± moes. To this en, only straightforwar replacements of variables have to be mae. The present ata fall well into the Stanar-Moel region in observable space, but o not yet allow us to raw further efinite conclusions [66]. At present, the situation in the charge an neutral B πk systems appears to be more exciting. There are also many other recent analyses of B πk moes. For example, a stuy complementary to the one in B πk observable space was performe in [115], where the allowe regions in the γ δ c,n planes implie by B πk ata wereexplore. Another recent B πk analysiscan be foun in [116], where the R (c) werecalculatefor givenvaluesofa (c) 0 as functions of γ, an were compare with the B-factory ata. Making more extensive use of theory than in the flavoursymmetry strategies iscusse above, several ifferent avenues to extract γ from B πk moes are provie by the QCD factorization approach [14,48], which allows also a reuction of the theoretical uncertainties of the flavour-symmetry approaches iscusse above, in particular a better control of SU(3)-breaking effects. In orer to analyse B πk ata, also sum rules relating CP-average branching ratios an CP asymmetries of B πk moes may be useful [114]. 7.2 The B π + π, B s K + K System As can be seen from Fig. 10, B π + π is relate to B s K + K through an interchange of all own an strange quarks. The corresponing ecay amplitues can be expresse as follows [75]: ( A(Bs 0 K+ K ) = A(B 0 π + π ) = C [ e iγ e iθ] (87) λ 1 λ 2 /2 )C [ e iγ + ( 1 λ 2 λ 2 ) e iθ ], (88) where e iθ wasalreayintrouce in (67), e iθ isits B s K + K counterpart, an C, C arecp-conservingstrongamplitues. Using these generalparametrizations, we obtain A ir CP(B π + π ) = fct(,θ,γ), A mix CP(B π + π ) = fct(,θ,γ,φ ) (89) A ir CP(B s K + K ) = fct(,θ,γ), A mix CP (B s K + K ) = fct(,θ,γ,φ s ), (90) where φ s is negligibly small in the Stanar Moel, or can be fixe through B s J/ψφ. We have hence four observables at our isposal, epening on six unknowns. However, since B π + π an B s K + K are relate to each other by interchanging all own an strange quarks, the U-spin flavour symmetry of strong interactions implies e iθ = e iθ. (91)

30 28 Robert Fleischer cos cos C H 4.0 H 7.5 H Fig.15. Depenence of C cosθcosγ on for values of H consistent with (95). The circle an square with error bars represent the preictions of QCD factorization [48] an PQCD [79], respectively, for the Stanar-Moel range (86) of γ. Using this relation, the four observables in (89) an (90) epen on the four quantities, θ, φ an γ, which can hence be etermine [75]. The theoretical accuracy is only limite by the U-spin symmetry, as no ynamical assumptions about rescattering processes have to be mae. Theoretical consierations give us confience in (91), since this relation oes not receive U-spin-breaking corrections within the factorization approach [75]. Moreover, we may also obtain experimental insights into U-spin breaking [75,124]. The U-spin arguments can be minimize, if the B 0 B0 mixing phase φ, which can be fixe through B J/ψK S, is use as an input. We may then etermine γ, as well as the haronic quantities, θ, θ, by using only the U-spin relation = ; for a etaile illustration, see [75]. This approach is very promising for run II of the Tevatron an the experiments of the LHC era, where experimental accuracies for γ of O(10 ) [35] an O(1 ) [36] may be achieve, respectively. For other recently evelope U-spin strategies, the reaer is referre to [56,102,125,126]. Since B s K + K is not accessible at the e + e B factories operating at Υ(4S), ata are not yet available. However, as can be seen by looking at the corresponing Feynman iagrams, B s K + K is relate to B π K ± through an interchange of spectator quarks. Consequently, we have A ir CP (B s K + K ) A ir CP (B π K ± ) (92) BR(B s K + K ) BR(B π K ± ) τ B s τ B. (93) For the following consierations, the quantity H 1 C 2[ BR(B π + π ] ) ǫ C BR(B s K + K ) (94) isparticularlyuseful [127], whereǫ λ 2 /(1 λ 2 ).Using(93),aswellasfactorization to estimate U-spin-breaking corrections to C = C, H can be etermine

31 B Physics an CP Violation 29 Fig.16. Allowe regions in the A mix CP (B π + π ) A ir CP(B π + π ) plane for (a) φ = 47 an various values of H, an (b) φ = 133 (H = 7.5). The SM regions arise if we restrict γ to (86). Contours representing fixe values of γ are also inclue. from the B-factory ata as follows: H 1 ǫ ( fk f π ) 2 [ BR(B π + π ] ) BR(B π K ± = ) 7.3±2.9 (CLEO [118]) 7.6±1.2 (BaBar [119]) 7.1±1.9 (Belle [120]). (95) If we employ the U-spin relation (91) an the amplitue parametrizations in (87) an (88), we obtain H = 1 2cosθcosγ +2 ǫ 2 +2ǫcosθcosγ +2. (96) Consequently, H allows us to etermine C cosθcosγ as a function of, as shown in Fig. 15. We observe that the ata imply the rather restricte range 0.2 < < 1, thereby inicating that penguins cannot be neglecte in B π + π analyses. Moreover, the experimental curves are not in favour of a Stanar-Moel interpretation of the theoretical preictions for e iθ obtaine within the QCD factorization [48] an PQCD [79] approaches. Interestingly, agreement coul easily be achieve for γ > 90, as the circle an square in Fig. 15, calculate for γ = 60, woul then move to positive values of C [66,127]. Let us now come back to the ecay B π + π an its CP-violating observables, as parametrize in (89). As we have alreay note, φ entering A mix CP (B π + π ) can be fixe through A mix CP (B J/ψK S ), yieling the twofol solution in (55). In orer to eal with the penguins, we may employ H as an aitional observable. Applying (91), we obtain H = fct(,θ,γ) (see (96)). We maythen eliminate in (89) throughh.if wevarythe remainingparameters θ an γ within their physical ranges,i.e. 180 θ +180 an 0 γ 180, we obtain an allowe region in the A ir CP (B π + π ) A mix CP (B π + π ) plane. In Fig. 16, we show the corresponing results for the two solutions of φ an for various values of H, as well as the contours arising for fixe values of γ [66]. We observe that the experimental averages, represente by the crosses, overlap nicely with the SM region for φ = 47, an point towars γ 55. In

32 30 Robert Fleischer Fig.17. A ir CP(B π + π ) as a function of γ in the case of H = 7.5 for various values of A mix CP (B π + π ). In (a) an (b), φ = 47 an φ = 133 were chosen, respectively. The shae hills arise from a variation of A mix CP (B π + π ) within [0,+1]. The corresponing plots for negative A mix CP (B π + π ) are shown in (c) an () for φ = 47 an φ = 133, respectively. The bans arising from the experimental averages given in (71) an (72) are also inclue. this case, not only γ woul be in accorance with the results of the CKM fits escribe in Section 1, but also the B 0 B0 mixing phase φ. On the other han, for φ = 133, the experimental values favour γ 125, an have essentially no overlap with the SM region. Since a value of φ = 133 woul require CPviolating new-physics contributions to B 0 B0 mixing, also the γ range in (86) mayno longerhol in this case,asit reliesonastanar-moelinterpretationof the experimental information on B,s 0 B0,s mixing. In particular, also values for γ largerthan 90 coul then in principle be accommoate. In orer to put these observations on a more quantitative basis, we show in Fig. 17 the epenence of A ir CP (B π + π ) on γ for given values of A mix CP (B π + π ) [66]. If we vary A mix CP (B π + π ) within its whole positive range [0,+1], the shae hills in Figs. 17 (a) an (b) arise. In the case of φ = 47, which is in agreementwith the CKM fits, we may conveniently accommoate the Stanar-Moel range (86). On the other han, we obtain a gap aroun γ 60 for φ = 133. Taking into account the experimental averages given in (71) an (72), we obtain 34 < γ < 75 (φ = 47 ), 105 < γ < 146 (φ = 133 ). (97) If we vary A mix CP (B π + π ) within its whole negative range, both solutions for φ coul accommoate (86), as can be seen in Figs. 17 (c) an (), so that the