arxiv: v2 [q-fin.tr] 11 Apr 2013

Transcription

1 Estimating the efficient price from the order flow: a Brownian Cox process approach arxiv: v2 [q-fin.r] 11 Apr 213 Sylvain Delattre LPMA, Université Paris Diderot Paris 7) delattre@math.univ-paris-diderot.fr Christian Y. Robert SAF, Université Lyon 1 christian.robert@univ-lyon1.fr Mathieu Rosenbaum LPMA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6) mathieu.rosenbaum@upmc.fr April 15, 213 Abstract At the ultra high frequency level, the notion of price of an asset is very ambiguous. Indeed, many different prices can be defined last traded price, best bid price, mid price,... ). hus, in practice, market participants face the problem of choosing a price when implementing their strategies. In this work, we propose a notion of efficient price which seems relevant in practice. Furthermore, we provide a statistical methodology enabling to estimate this price form the order flow. Key words: Efficient price, order flow, response function, market microstructure, Cox processes, fractional part of Brownian motion, non parametric estimation, functional limit theorems. 1 Introduction 1.1 What is the high frequency price? he classical approach of mathematical finance is to consider that the prices of basic products future, stock,... ) are observed on the market. In particular, their values are used in order to price complex derivatives. Since options traders typically rebalance their portfolio once or a few times a day, such derivatives pricing problems typically occur at the daily scale. When working at the ultra high frequency scale, even pricing a basic product, that is assigning a price to it, becomes a challenging issue. Indeed, one has access to trades 1

2 and quotes in the order book so that at a given time, many different notions of price can be defined for the same asset: last traded price, best bid price, best ask price, mid price, volume weighted average price,... his multiplicity of prices is problematic for many market participants. For example, market making strategies or brokers optimal execution algorithms often require single prices of plain assets as inputs. Choosing one definition or another for the price can sometimes lead to very significantly different outcomes for the strategies. his is for example the case when the tick value the minimum price increment allowed on the market) is rather large. Indeed, this implies that the prices mentioned above differ in a non negligible way. In practice, high frequency market participants are not looking for the fair economic value of the asset. What they need is rather a price whose value at some given time summarizes in a suitable way the opinions of market participants at this time. his price is called efficient price. Hence, this paper aims at providing a statistical procedure in order to estimate this efficient price. 1.2 Ideas for the estimation strategy In this paper, we focus on the case of large tick assets. We define them as assets for which the bid-ask spread is almost always equal to one tick. Our goal is then to infer an efficient price for this type of asset. Naturally, it is reasonable to assume that the efficient price essentially lies inside the bid-ask spread but we wish to say more. In order to retrieve the efficient price, the classical approach is to consider the imbalance of the order book, that is the difference between the available volumes at the best bid and best ask levels, see for example [4]. Indeed, it is often said by market participants that the price is where the volume is not. Here we consider a dynamic version of this idea through the information available in the order flow. More precisely, we assume that the intensity of arrival of the limit order flow at the best bid or the best ask level depends on the distance between the efficient price and the considered level: if this distance is large, the intensity should be high and conversely. hus, we assume the intensity can be written as an increasing deterministic function of this distance. his function is called the order flow response function. In our approach, a crucial step is to estimate the response function in a non parametric way. hen, this functional estimator is used in order to retrieve the efficient price. Note that it is also possible to use the buy or sell market order flow. In that case, the intensity of the flow should be high when the distance is small. Indeed, in this situation, market takers are not loosing too much money with respect to the efficient price) when crossing the spread. 1.3 Organization of the paper he paper is organized as follows. he model and the assumptions are described in Section 2. Particular properties of the efficient price are given in Section 3 and the main statistical procedure is explained in Section 4. he theorems about the response function can be found in Section 5 and the limiting behavior of the estimator of the efficient price is given 2

3 in Section 6. One numerical illustration can be found in Section 7 and a conclusion is given in Section 8. Finally the proofs are relegated to Section 9. 2 he model 2.1 Description of the model We assume the tick size is equal to one, meaning that the asset can only take integer values. Moreover, the efficient price is given by P t = P + σw t, t [, ], where W t ) t is a Brownian motion on some filtered probability space Ω, F, F t ) t, P) and P is a F -measurable random variable, independent of W t ) t and uniformly distributed on [p, p + 1), with p N. Note that such a simple dynamics for the efficient price is probably still reasonable at our high frequency scale. Let Y t be the fractional part of P t, denoted by {P t }, that is: Y t = {P t } = P t P t. o fix ideas and without loss of generality, we focus in the rest of the paper on the limit order flow at the best bid level. We assume that when a limit order is posted at time t at the best bid level, its price B t is given by P t. herefore at time t, the efficient price is P t = B t + Y t. We denote by N t the total number of limit orders posted over [, t]. In order to translate the fact that the intensity of N t should be an increasing function of Y t, we assume that N t ) t is a Cox process also known as doubly stochastic Poisson process) with arrival intensity at time t given by µhy t ), where µ is a positive constant and where the response function h : [, 1) R + satisfies the following assumption: Assumption H1: Response function he function h is C 1 on [, 1), with derivative h for which there exist some positive constants c 1 and c 2 such that for any x in [, 1), c 1 h x) c 2. Moreover, we have the following identifiability condition: 1 hx)dx = 1. Remark that H1 implies in particular that h is bounded on [, 1). he response function expresses the influence of the efficient price on the order flow. In particular, the limiting case 3

4 where h is constant corresponds to orders arriving according to a standard Poisson process. his simple arrival mechanism is often assumed in practice for technical convenience, see for example [4], [5]. However, it is not very realistic. Nevertheless, it is clear that our model is still probably too simple, Y t being the only source of fluctuation of the intensity. For example, a more reasonable version should probably allows for seasonalities in the flow and the possible influence of exogenous variables. We assume that we observe the point process N t ) on [, ]. o get asymptotic properties, we let tend to infinity. It will be also necessary to assume that µ = µ depends on. More precisely, we have the following assumption: Assumption H2: Asymptotic setting For some ε >, as tends to infinity, 5/2+ε /µ. Note that up to scaling modifications, we could also consider a setting where is fixed and the tick size is not constant equal to 1 but tends to zero. 3 Properties of the process Y t he intensity of the order flow is µ hy t ). his process Y t ) t has several nice properties. 3.1 Markov property First, recall that if U is uniformly distributed on [, 1] and X is a real-valued random variable, which is independent of U then {U + X} is also uniformly distributed on [, 1]. hus, since P is uniformly distributed on [, 1], we obtain that Y t ) is a stationary Markov process. hen, from the properties of the sample paths of the Brownian motion, it is clear that Y t ) is Harris recurrent and therefore, for f a bounded positive measurable function, almost surely, 1 1 lim fy s )ds = fs)ds, + see for example heorem 3.12 in [7]. 3.2 Regenerative property Beyond the Markov property, the process Y t ) also enjoys a regenerative property. We define the sequence of stopping time ν n ) n N the following way: ν =, ν 1 = inf {t > : P t N} and for n 2: ν n = inf{t > ν n 1 : P t = P νn 1 ± 1} = inf{t > ν n 1 : W t = W νn 1 ± 1/σ}. 1) he cycles Y t+νn ) t<νn+1 ν n are independent and identically distributed for n 1. hus Y t ) is a regenerative process. Note that ν 2 ν 1 has the same law as τ 1 = inf{t, W t = 1/σ}. 4

5 he Laplace transform of τ 1 is given by E[e γτ 1 ] = 1/ cosh 2γ)/σ ), γ. From this expression, we get E[τ 1 ] = 1/σ 2 and E[τ1 2] = 5/3σ4 ). hus for f a bounded positive measurable function, by heorem VI.3.1 in [1], we get that almost surely 1 1 ν2 lim fy s )ds = + E[ν 2 ν 1 ] E[ fy t )dt ] = σ 2 E τ1 f{σw t })dt ). ν 1 In particular, this implies that σ 2 E [ τ 1 f{σw t })dt ] = 1 fs)ds. Furthermore, by heorem VI.3.2, we get the following convergence in distribution as : 1 with Z f a centered random variable defined by Z f = fy t )dt σ 2 E [ τ 1 f{σw t })dt ]) d N, σ 2 Var[Z f ]), 2) τ1 f{σw t })dt τ 1 σ 2 E [ τ 1 f{σw t })dt ]. We end this section with two particular cases for the function f which will be useful in the following. First, if f = h, using the identifiability condition in Assumption H1, we get that almost surely: herefore, lim + 1 hy t )dt = σ 2 E [ τ 1 h{σw t })dt ] = 1. Z h = = τ1 1/σ 1/σ I{Wt<}h1 + σw t ) 1) + I {Wt>}hσW t ) 1) ) dt I{u<} h1 + σu) 1) + I {u>} hσu) 1))L 1/σ,1/σ u)du, where L 1/σ,1/σ is the local time of W t ) t stopped at τ 1. In the same way, for fx) = I {hx) t}, t [, h1 )), we have So we define Z e t) = Z f by 1 I {hs) t} ds = h 1 t). Z e t) = = τ1 1/σ 1/σ I{Ws<,h1+σW s) t} + I {Ws>,hσW s) t} h 1 t) ) ds I{u<,h1+σu) t} + I {u>,hσu) t} h 1 t) ) L 1/σ,1/σ u)du. 5

6 In fact, it will be useful to see Z e t)) t [,h1 )) as a process indexed by t. hus, we introduce the covariance function ρt 1, t 2 ) = Cov[Z e t 1 ), Z e t 2 )] = E[Z e t 1 )Z e t 2 )]. 3) Note that this function and Var[Z h ] can be computed as multiple integrals on [ 1/σ, 1/σ] 2. Indeed, for u, v) [ 1/σ, 1/σ] 2 an explicit expression for the bivariate Laplace transform of L 1/σ,1/σ u), L 1/σ,1/σ v) ) is available, see Formula I ) in [3]. Using differentiation, from this expression, one can easily derive 1 E[L 1/σ,1/σ u)l 1/σ,1/σ v)] which enables to deduce ρt 1, t 2 ) and Var[Z h ]. 4 Estimating the flow response function and its inverse We want to estimate the flow response function. Before estimating h, we need to estimate µ. Since E [ N ] [ 1 = E hy t )dt ] = 1 E[hY t )]dt = 1, µ it is natural to propose ˆµ = N 4) as an estimator for µ. We have the following proposition, whose proof is given in Section 9.1. Proposition 1 If µ as, we have ˆµ µ 1 ) d N, σ 2 Var[Z h ]). We now explain how the estimator of the flow response function is built. Let k be a known deterministic sequence of positive integers. hen define for j = 1,..., k ˆθ j = k N j/k N j 1)/k ˆµ = k N N j/k N j 1)/k ). Now remark that ˆθ j is approximately equal to 1 µ /k µ /k i=1 Nj 1)/k +i/µ N j 1)/k +i 1)/µ ). Conditional on the path of Y t ), the variables in the sum are independent and if /k is small enough, they approximately follow a Poisson law with parameter µ hy j 1)/k )/k. herefore, if moreover µ /k is sufficiently large, one can expect that ˆθ j is close to hy j 1)/k ). 1 We skip the explicit writing of E[L 1/σ,1/σ u)l 1/σ,1/σ v)], the expression being quite heavy. 6

7 In fact, throughout the paper, we assume that k is chosen so that for some p >, as tends to infinity, p+1/2 k 1/2,. µ k p/2 Note that since 5/2+ε /µ such a sequence k exists. he ˆθ j introduced above are k estimators of quantities of the form hu j ), u j [, 1]. However, we do not have access to the values of the u i. Nevertheless, we know that they are uniformly distributed on [, 1]. We therefore rank the ˆθ j : ˆθ 1) ˆθ 2)... ˆθ k ). For u [, 1), we define the estimator of hu) the following way: ĥu) = ˆθ uk +1). Note that the identifiability condition holds since 1 ĥu)du = 1 k k hen, the estimator of h 1 is naturally defined by: ĥ 1 t) = 1 k k ˆθ j = 1. Indeed, ĥ is the right continuous generalized inverse of ĥ 1. I {ˆθj t}. 5) 5 Limit theorems for the response function We now give the theorems associated to ĥ 1 and ĥ. For b >, we write D[, b) resp. D[, b]), for the space of càdlàg functions from [, b) resp. [, b]) into R. We define the convergence in law in D[, b) as the convergence in law of the restrictions of the stochastic processes to any compact [, a], < a < b, for the Skorohod topology J 1. We have the following result for ĥ 1 : heorem 1 Under H1 and H2, as tends to infinity, we have ĥ 1 ) h 1 ) ) d σg ) ) h h 1 ) ) h1 ) σgv)dv, in D[, h1 )), where G ) is a continuous centered Gaussian process with covariance function ρ defined by 3). Note that although there are k terms in the sum defining h 1 in 5), the rate of convergence in heorem 1 is which is slower than k. his is due to the strong dependence between the ˆθ j within each cycle and the fact that the number of cycles is of order. he same type of result holds also for ĥ: 7

8 heorem 2 Under H1 and H2, as tends to infinity, we have in D[, 1). ) d ĥ ) h ) h )σg h ) ) h1 ) + h ) σgv)dv, Note that both in heorem 1 and heorem 2, the covariance functions of the limiting processes can be computed explicitly, see Section Estimation of the efficient price Let t, ]. A nice corollary of heorem 1 is the possibility of estimating Y t, which is the fractional part of the efficient price at time t, and therefore the efficient price itself provided t is an order arrival time). Indeed, we have an estimator ĥ 1 of h 1 and we know how to estimate hy t ), namely we take 2 ĥy t ) = k N t N t /k ˆµ herefore, it is natural to define an estimator Y t ) of Y t by Ŷ t = ĥ 1 ĥy t ) ). he following corollary shows that this estimator is indeed a good estimator of the efficient price Y t. Corollary 1 For t >, under H1 and H2, as tends to infinity, we have Ŷt Y t ) d σg hyt ) ),. with G independent of Y t. hus, thanks to this approach it is possible to retrieve the efficient price from the order flow, with the usual parametric rate. Remark that the law of σg hy t ) ) can be explicitly computed. Indeed, conditional on Y t we have a centered Gaussian random variable with variance σ 2 ρ hy t ), hy t ) ). hen we can use the fact that Y t is independent of G and uniformly distributed. 7 One numerical illustration In order to give an idea of the way our procedure behaves, we give in this section one short numerical illustration. We take σ = 1, = 5, µ = 1 and k = 15. We consider 2 Of course we can take any other time interval of length /k containing t. Also, one could probably consider a smoothed version of ĥyt) using a kernel rather than a rectangle window. 8

9 two different cases 3 for the function h: hu) = 2u and hu) = 4u 3. We give in Figure 1 examples of estimator of the order flow response function h, over one sample path in each case. Averages of estimators together with 95% confidence intervals obtained from 1 Monte Carlo simulations are drawn in Figure u u Figure 1: One sample path for hu) = 2u left) and hu) = 4u 3 right). In red the function h and in black its estimation u u Figure 2: 1 Monte Carlo simulations for hu) = 2u left) and hu) = 4u 3 right). In red the function h, in black its estimation, and in green the 95 % confidence intervals. We see that in each case, the function h is indeed fairly well estimated. here is of course a positive bias around zero, especially in the first case. his is in particular due to the fact that our estimators cannot be negative, whereas in both cases h) =. 3 Note that strictly speaking, in the second case, the function h does not fully satisfy our assumptions since the derivative in zero is equal to zero. 9

10 8 Conclusion In this paper, we take advantage of the dynamic information from the order flow in order to estimate an efficient price, whereas the classical approach is to use the static information from the imbalance of the order book. his is done through a simple model which follows the principle that the price is where the volume is not. Indeed we assume that the intensity of the flow at the considered level of the order book best bid or best ask) is a deterministic function order flow response function) of the distance between this level and the efficient price. his function is estimated in a non parametric way and the estimation of the efficient price is derived from it. Remark that in our approach, the arrival of the orders at the best bid and best ask levels are connected through the influence of the efficient price. However, in the estimating procedures, the bid and ask sides are treated separately. An interesting extension of this work, left for further research, would be to find a suitable way to combine these estimators, or even to consider a more intricate dependence structure between the order flows at the best bid and best ask levels. 9 Proofs All the proofs are done under H1 and H2. In the following, c denotes a constant that may vary from line to line, and even in the same line. 9.1 Proof of Proposition 1 We give here an elementary proof of Proposition 1. However, note that this result can also be obtained as a by product of Corollary 2 shown in Section 9.3. he characteristic function of ˆµ /µ 1) satisfies E [ exp it ˆµ /µ 1) )] = exp it [ [ N )] ] )E E Y exp it, µ where E Y denotes the expectation conditional of the path of Y t ). Since conditional on the path of Y t ), N follows a Poisson random variable with parameter the characteristic function is equal to Now µ hy t )dt, exp it [ )E exp e itµ )] ) 1 1)µ hy t )dt. e itµ ) 1 1 itµ ) 1 t 2 µ ) 2. 1

11 Using the boundedness of h and the fact that µ goes to infinity, we get that the limit as tends to infinity of the characteristic function is given by [ lim E exp it ) 1 hy t )dt 1 ))]. + From Equation 2), this is equal to 9.2 An auxiliary result exp σ2 t 2 2 Var[Zh ] ). We now give an auxiliary result from which heorem 1 and heorem 2 will be easily deduced. For j = 1,..., k, we set θ j = and define the function ĥe by for u [, 1). Note that We also define which satisfies k µ N j/k N j 1)/k ) = ˆµ µ ˆθj, ĥ e u) = θ uk +1) = ĥu) ˆµ µ, ˆµ µ = N µ = 1 k We have the following proposition: k ĥ 1 e t) = 1 k θ j = 1 k I {θj t}, ĥ 1 ˆµ ) t) = ĥ 1 e t. µ ĥ e u)du. Proposition 2 As tends to infinity, we have ĥ 1 e ) h 1 ) ) d σg ), in D[, h1 )). By heorem 15.1 in [2], it is enough to prove that the finite dimensional distributions converge and that a tightness criterion holds. he proof is splitted into two Lemmas: Lemma 1 for the convergence of the finite dimensional distributions and Lemma 2 for the C-tightness. Lemma 1 For any n N, for any t 1,..., t n ) [, h1 )) n, as, ĥ 1 e t i ) h 1 t i ) ) d N, σ 2 ν) i=1,...,n where ν i,j = ρ t i, t j ), with ρ the covariance function defined in 3). 11

12 Proof. We give the proof for n = 1. he other cases are obtained the same way by linear combinations of the components of ĥ 1 e t i ) h 1 t i ) ) i=1,...,n. We write ĥ 1 e t) h 1 t) = , with 1 = 1 k 2 = 1 3 = 1 k k I k k { I {θj t} 1 k k I k { j /k j 1) /k hy u)du t} 1 I {hyu) t}du h 1 t). We study each component separately. We have 1 = 1 k j /k j 1) /k hy u)du t}, k j/k k v j,k, j 1)/k I {hyu) t}du, with v j,k, = or - v j,k, = 1 if θ j t < k j/k j 1)/k hy t )dt, - v j,k, = 1 if k j/k j 1)/k hy t )dt t < θ j. For ε >, we have E[ v j,k, ] A 1 + A 2, with A 1 = P [ k j/k A 2 = E [ I {vj,k, =±1}I { t k j 1)/k hy u )du t ε ], j /k j 1) /k hy t)dt >ε } ]. We have k j/k hy t )dt hy j 1)/k ) c k j 1)/k j/k j 1)/k Y t Y j 1)/k dt. Now remark that from Markov inequality and the fact that Y s is uniformly distributed, we easily get that for any p >, δ >, λ > : P [ sup Y t Y s λ ] c p δ p/2 λ p + δ 1/2 ). herefore, for p >, t [s,s+δ] P [ k j/k j 1)/k hy t )dt hy j 1)/k ) ε ] c /k ) p/2 12 ε p + c/k ) 1/2.

13 hus A 1 P [ hy j 1)/k ) t ] /k ) p/2 2ε + c + c/k ) 1/2. Using the stationary distribution of Y j 1)/k we obtain that for ε small enough, A 1 h 1 t+2ε ) h 1 t 2ε )+c /k ) p/2 +c/k ) 1/2 cε +c /k ) p/2 +c/k ) 1/2. We now turn to A 2. Remarking that v j,k, = 1 implies ε p ε p ε p we get θ j k j/k hy t )dt t k j 1)/k A 2 P [ θj k j/k j/k j 1)/k hy t )dt, j 1)/k hy t )dt > ε ]. d Recall that conditional on the path of Y t ), θ j = Zk /µ ), where Z is a Poisson random variable with parameter j/k µ hy t )dt. j 1)/k hus we obtain Using that we finally get k A 2 c µ ε 2. E[ 1 ] 1 k k E[ v j,k, ], E[ p+1)/2 k 1 ] cε + c + c + c. µ ε 2 k ε p kp/2 We take ε = ζ /, with ζ tending to zero. hen E[ 1 ] cζ + c p+1/2 ζ p kp/2 + c k µ ζ 2 + c k. hanks to the assumptions on k, we can find a sequence ζ tending to such that E[ 1 ] goes to. We now turn to 2. We have 2 = 1 = 1 k j/k I{ k j 1)/k k j/k j 1)/k w j,k,s, ds I ) j /k hy {hy j 1) /k u)du t} s) t} ds 13

14 with w j,k,s, = or - w j,k,s, = 1 if k j/k j 1)/k hy u )du t < hy s ) - w j,k,t, = 1 if hy s ) t < k j/k j 1)/k hy u )du. Now remark that w j,k,s, = 1 implies hys ) k j/k hy u )du t k j 1)/k j/k j 1)/k hy u )du. Using the same kind of computations as for 1, for ε positive and small enough and p >, this leads to P [ w j,k,s, = 1 ] cε + c /k ) p/2 ε + c/k ) 1/2. )p hen, in the same way as for 1, we easily obtain that E[ 2 ] goes to. Eventually, from 2), we get that 3 converges in law towards a centered Gaussian random variable with variance σ 2 Var[Z e t)]. We now give the second Lemma needed to prove Proposition 2. Lemma 2 Let α t) = 1 he sequence α t) ) t<h1 ) is tight in D[, h1 )). I {hys) t}ds h 1 t) ). Proof. Recall first the following classical C-tightness criterion, see heorem 15.6 in [2]: If for p >, p 1 > 1 and all t 1, t 2 < h1 ) E [ α t 1 ) α t 2 ) p] c t 1 t 2 p ) 1, then α t) ) t h1) is tight in D[, h1 )). We now use the sequence of stopping time ν n ) n N defined by 1). Let n = inf{i : ν i }. From heorem II.5.1 and heorem II.5.2 in [6], we have E[ν n ] c 6) 14

15 and and We now define Y i t 1, t 2 ) = 1 ν i E[ n σ 2 )2 ] c. 7) ν i 1 I {t1 <hy t) t 2 }dt 1 σ 2 h 1 t 2 ) h 1 t 1 ) )) Ỹ n +1t 1, t 2 ) = 1 νn I {t1 <hy t) t 2 }dt. Remark that for i 2, the Y i t 1, t 2 ) are centered see Section 3.2) and iid. Moreover, using the occupation formula together with a aylor expansion, we get with E [ Y 2 t 1, t 2 ) ) [ 2] νi 1 E I {t1 <hy t) t 2 }dt ) ] 2 c 1 t 2 t 1 2 E[L ) 2 ], ν i 1 L = sup L 1/σ,1/σ u) ). u [ 1/σ,1/σ] From the Ray-Knight version of Burkhölder-Davis-Gundy inequality, see [7], we know that all polynomial moments of L are finite and thus We show in the same way that E [ Y 2 t 1, t 2 ) ) 2] c 1 t 2 t 1 2. E [ Y 1 t 1, t 2 ) ) 2] + E [Ỹn +1t 1, t 2 ) ) 2] c 1 t 2 t 1 2. We now use the preceding inequalities in order to show that the tightness criterion holds. We have α t 1 ) α t 2 ) = B 1 + B 2 B 3 + B 4, with hus By heorem I.5.1 in [6], B 1 = Y 1 t 1, t 2 ), B 2 = n i=2 Y i t 1, t 2 ), B 3 = Ỹn +1t 1, t 2 ), B 4 = n 1 σ 2 1) h 1 t 2 ) h 1 t 1 ) ). E [ E [ α t 1 ) α t 2 ) 2] c n i=2 4 E[ B i 2 ]. i=1 Y i t 1, t 2 ) 2 ] ce[n ]E [ Y 2 t 1, t 2 ) ) 2]. 15

16 Moreover, using 6), we obtain E[n ]E [ Y 2 t 1, t 2 ) 2] c t 1 t 2 2. Finally, we easily get from 7) that E[B 4 ) 2 ] c t 1 t 2 2. and therefore the tightness criterion is satisfied. 9.3 Proofs of heorem 1 and heorem 2 In order to prove heorem 1 and heorem 2, we start with the following corollary of Proposition 2: Corollary 2 As, ĥ 1 e ) h 1 ), ĥe ) h ), converges in law towards σg ), h )σg h ) ), 1 h1 ) in D[, h1 )) D[, 1) R for the product topology). ) ĥ e u)du 1 ) σgv)dv, Proof. he result follows directly from Proposition 2 together with heorem in [8] and the continuous mapping theorem. with We now give the proof of heorem 1. We write ĥ 1 ) h 1 ) ) = V 1 + V 2, V 1 = ĥ 1 e ˆµ /µ ) h 1 ˆµ /µ ) ), V 2 = h 1 ˆµ /µ ) h 1 ) ). From Proposition 2 together with the continuity of the composition map, see heorem in [8], we have d V1 σg ), in D[, h1 )). Now recall that 1 ĥ e u)du = ˆµ /µ. hus using Corollary 2 together with heorem in [8], we get V2 d ) h h 1 ) ) h1 ) σgv)dv, in D[, h1 )). he convergences of V 1 and V 2 taking place jointly, this ends the proof of heorem 1. From heorem 1, heorem 2 follows from heorem in [8]. 16

17 9.4 Proof of Corollary 1 Let ĥey t ) be the oracle estimate of hy t ) defined the same way as ĥy t) but with µ instead of ˆµ. Now we use that ĥ 1 µ ) = ĥ 1 e ) ˆµ and the fact that the cycles on which ĥey t ) is defined are negligible in the estimation of h 1 ) and µ. hen, from Proposition 2, we have ĥ 1 µ ) h 1 ) ) ) d, ˆµ ĥey t ) σg ), hyt ) ) in D[, h1 )) R +, with G independent of Y t. Using heorem in [8] and the fact that ĥy t ) = µ ˆµ ĥ e Y t ), we derive ĥ 1 ĥy t ) ) h 1 ĥ e Y t ) )) d σg hyt ) ). Now recall that h 1 ĥ e Y t ) ) h 1 hy t ) ) c ĥ e Y t ) hy t ). and that conditional on the path of Y t ), ĥey t ) d = Zk /µ ), where Z is a Poisson random variable with parameter µ t t /k hy u )du. herefore, using a aylor expansion and the fact that P [ sup Y u Y t 1 ] c/k ) 1/2, u [t /k,t] we get that [ ĥe E Y t ) hy t ) ] is smaller than ce [ sup Y u Y t ] + c k / µ ) ) 1/2 c/k ) 1/2 + c k / µ ) ) 1/2. u [t /k,t] Eventually, since / k and k /µ tend to zero, we get E [ ĥe Y t ) hy t ) ] c/ k + ck /µ ) 1/2, which concludes the proof. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Renaud Drappier and Sebouh akvorian from BNP Paribas for their very interesting comments. We also thank the referee for his helpful remarks. 17

18 References [1] Asmussen, S. 23). Applied probability and queues. 2nd ed. Springer. [2] Billingsley, P. 1968). Convergence of probability measures. Wiley, New York. [3] Borodin, A. and Salminen, P. 23). Handbook of Brownian motion: facts and formulae. Birkhauser. [4] Cont, R. and de Larrard, A. 213). Price dynamics in a Markovian limit order book market. SIAM J. Financial Math. 4, [5] Farmer, J.D., Patelli, P. and Zovko, I.I. 25). he predictive power of zero intelligence in financial markets. PNAS 12, [6] Gut, A. 1988). Stopped random walks. Limit theorems and applications. Springer- Verlag, New York. [7] Revuz, D. and Yor, M. 25). Continuous martingale and Brownian motion. Springer, third edition. [8] Whitt, W. 22). Stochastic-Process Limits. Springer, New York. 18