arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 12 Jul 2017
|
|
- Claribel Willis
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Frobenius splitting of thick flag manifolds of Kac-Moody algebras Syu Kato arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 12 Jul 2017 July 13, 2017 Abstract We explain that the Plücker relations provide the defining equations of the thick flag manifold associated to a Kac-Moody algebra. This naturally transplant the result of Kumar-Mathieu-Schwede about the Frobenius splitting of thin flag manifolds to the thick case. As a consequence, we provide a description of the global sections of line bundles of a thick Schubert variety as conjectured in Kashiwara-Shimozono [Duke Math. J. 148 (2009)]. This also yields the existence of a compatible basis of thick Demazure modules, and the projective normality of the thick Schubert varieties. Introduction The geometry of flag manifolds of a Lie algbera g are ubiquitous in representation theory. In case g is a Kac-Moody algebra, we have two versions of flag varieties X and X, that we call the thin and thick flag manifolds, respectively (see e.g. [12]). They coincide when g is of finite type, and in this case we have X = X = Proj λ L(λ), (0.1) where λ runs over all dominant integral weights and L(λ) denotes the corresponding integrable highest weight representation of g. The isomorphism (0.1) islessobviouswhengisnotfinite typesince L(λ)is nolongerfinite-dimensional. In fact, the both of X and X are quotients of certain Kac-Moody groups G associated to g, and we can ask whether we have G = Speck[G] (0.2) as an enhancement of (0.1), where k[g] is the coordinate ring of G (cf. Kac- Peterson [7]). However, Kashiwara [8, 6] explains that none of the choice of G can satisfy (0.2) for any version of a reasonably natural commutative ring k[g]. The goal of this paper is to explain that despite the above situation, we can still understand the geometry of Kac-Moody flag varieties as infinite type schemes so that we can deduce subtle consequences in representation theory. Department of Mathematics, Kyoto University, Oiwake Kita-Shirakawa Sakyo Kyoto JAPAN syuchan@math.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1
2 To explain what we mean by this, we introduce some more notation: The scheme X admits a natural action of the subgroup B of G that corresponds to the non-negative part of g, and the set of B-orbits of X is in natural bijection with the Weyl group W of g. Hence, we can represent a B-orbit closure of X by X w for some w W. For each integral weight λ of g, we have an associated line bundle O X (λ) and its restriction O X w(λ) to X w. The main result in this paper is: Theorem A (. =Theorem1.11andTheorem2.15). For an arbitrary Kac-Moody algebra, the thick flag manifold X admits the presentation (0.1) as schemes. Similar result holds for each B-orbit closure of X. As Kashiwara s embedding of X into the Grassmanian[8, 4] factors through a highest weight integrable module, Theorem A asserts that it is a closed embedding. This affirmatively answers the question in [8, ]. The thin flag variety X forms a dense subset of X (see e.g. Kashiwara- Tanisaki [12, 1.3]). This implies that the projective coordinate ring of X (as an ind-scheme) is the completion of that of X (as a honest scheme). Therefore, we can transplant the Frobenius splitting of X (or its ind-pieces) to that of X provided in Kumar-Schwede [14]: Corollary B (. = Corollary 2.9). For an arbitrary Kac-Moody algebra over a field k of positive characteristic, the thick flag manifold X admits a Frobenius splitting that is compatible with the B-orbits. As X is an infinite type scheme, we do not have the Serre vanishing theorem. This means that we cannot obtain the higher cohomology vanishing of X w for ample line bundles by using Corollary B through standard arguments. Nevertheless, we can deduce some conclusions on the level of global sections as: Theorem C (. = Theorem 2.13, 2.15, and Corollary 2.18, 2.19). For each w W, we have: 1. the natural restriction map is surjective; 2. the image of the inclusion Γ(X,O X (λ)) Γ(X w,o X w(λ)) (0.3) Γ(X w,o X w(λ)) Γ(X,O X (λ)) = L(λ) obtained as the dual of (0.3) is cyclic as a LieB-module; 3. the scheme X w is projectively normal; 4. the LieB-submodules {Γ(X w,o X w(λ)) } w W forms a distributive lattice. We remark that Theorem C 4) should be also obtained as a combination of Kashiwara s crystal basis theory [10] and Littelmann s path model theory [15] when g is symmetrizable. However, the only reference the author is aware beyond the finite case is the affine case presented in Ariki-Kreimann-Tsuchioka [1, 6] (as stated there, the proofsof this part aredue to Kashiwaraand Sagaki). We also note that Theorem C 1) and 2) are (parts of a) conjecture in Kashiwara-Shimozono [11, 9] when g in affine. The remaining part is precisely the vanishing of higher cohomology of an ample line bundle. The author hopes to study this in his future research. 2
3 1 Defining equations of thick flag manifolds We work over a field k unless stated otherwise. Let I be a finite set and let C = (c ij ) i,j I be a GCM ([6, 1.1]). Let g be the Kac-Moody algebra associated to C. In particular, we have its Cartan subalgebra h of dimension 2 I rankc. Let {E i,f i } i I be the Kac-Moody generators of g so that [E i,f j ] = δ ij α i h for i,j I. Let us consider a lattice X that contains the root lattice of g so that X Z k = h. Let Q be the coroot lattice of g. Let n,n g be the Lie subalgebras generated by {E i } i I and {F i } i I, respectively. Set r := I. We assume that there exists a natural pairing, : Q X Z so that α i,α j = c ij and we can choose 1,..., r X so that α i, j = δ ij and α i,x = Z. We set H := Speck[e λ λ X ]. We have LieH = h. For each α X, we define We set g α := {X g Ad(h)X = α(h)x, h H}, multα := dim g α. + := {α X \{0} g α n}, := +. We have reflections {s i } i I on Aut(X ) that generates a Coxeter group W. We denote its length function by l, and the Bruhat order by < (cf. Kumar [13, Definition ]). We have a subset + re := + W{α i } i I +. Each α + re gives a reflection s α W defined through the conjugation of a simple reflection. We have multα = 1 for α + re, and we have sl(2) = g α kα g α as Lie algebras in this case. We define the pro-unipotent groups as N + := exp g α, N := exp g α. α + α They are accompanied by dense subgroups N + N + and N N obtained by replacing with. We set B + := H N + and B := H N. Let N(H) denote the group generated by H and the normalizers of H inside SL(2) or PGL(2) arising from each simple root, whose quotient by H is W. We have a translation of elements of B ± under the action of N(H), defined partially (see [13, 6.1]). The positive Kac-Moody group G + is defined as the amalgam of B + and N(H), while the negative Kac-Moody group G is defined as the amalgam of B and N(H). For each J I, we have a partial amalgam B ± B ± J G ±, that we call the parabolic subgroup corresponding to J. For each α + re, we have a one-parameter unipotent subgroup ρ α : G a B + so that hρ α (z)h 1 = ρ α (α(h)z) for every z G a and h H. Similarly, we have a one-parameter unipotent subgroup ρ α : G a B. For each i I, we define SL(2,i) as the connected and simply connected algebraic group with an identification Lie SL(2,i) = ke i kα i kf i. We 3
4 understand that a representation of an algebraic group is always algebraic. Note that the complete reducibility of representations always hold for split torus (and we never deal with non-split torus in this paper). Definition 1.1 (integrable highest weight modules). A (U(h), H)-module M is said to be a weight module if M admits a semi-simple h-action that integrates to the algebraic H-action. In this case, we denote by M µ M the H-weight space of weight µ X. We call M restricted if we have dim M λ < for every λ X. A (U(g),H)-module M is said to be a highest weight module if M is a weight module as a (U(h),H)-module and M carries a U(g)-module generator that is a (U(b), H)-eigenvector. A (U(g),H)-module M is said to be an integrable module if it is a restricted weight module, we have Span k {E (n) i F (m) i v} < for each v M and i I, and it integrates to an algebraic SL(2, i)-action that is compatible with the H-action. Let U Z (g) (resp. U Z (b) or U Z (n)) be the Chevalley-Kostant Z-form of the enveloping algebra of g generated by E (n) i,f (n) i (i I,n Z 0 ) and h (resp. and h, or F (n) i ), and let U(g) (resp. U(b) or U(n )) be its specialization E (n) i to k (see e.g. Tits [19] or Mathieu [17, Chapter I]). We have a non-dengenerate k-linear pairing (, ) : U(n ) k[ N ] k. Lemma 1.2. Let M be an integrable U(g)-module. Then, every U(g)-submodule of M is again integrable. We define P := i I Z i and P + := i I Z 0 i. For each λ P +, we have a Verma module M(λ) defined as: M(λ) = U(g) U(b) C λ. The Verma modules are restricted weight modules and are generated by a unique vector v λ with H-weight λ. We define L(λ) := M(λ)/ i I U(g)F ( α i,λ +1) i v λ. Lemma 1.3. For each λ P +, the module L(λ) is the maximal integrable quotient of M(λ). Proof. The assertionis [13, Lemma 2.1.7]when chark = 0. Its proofalsoasserts that every integrable module is a quotient of L(λ) for chark > 0 (as an effect of our definition of integrality). For each i I, the module M(λ)/U(g)F ( α i,λ +1) i v λ is SL(2,i)-integrable (recall that the pro-unipotent radical of the parabolic subgroup corresponding to i I is SL(2, i)-stable by the GCM condition α i,α j 0 when i j [6, 1.1]). Hence, we deduce that L(λ) is integrable. This proves the assertion. 4
5 Corollary 1.4. For each λ P +, the H-character of L(λ) obeys the Weyl-Kac character formula. Proof. This is [13, Theorem 8.3.1] when char k = 0. When char k > 0, the arguments in [17] asserts that some integrable submodule of L(λ) obtained as a successive application of Demazure-Joseph functors obeys the Weyl-Kac character formula. As such a submodule contains v λ, it must be the whole L(λ). For each w W and λ P +, we have a unique non-zero vector v wλ L(λ) of weight wλ. We define the thin Demazure module and thick Demazure module as: L w (λ) := U(n)v wλ, L w (λ) := U(n)v wλ L(λ). These admit H-eigenspace decompositions. We define the tensor product of two restricted weight modules M,N as: M N := λ,µ X M λ N µ. We define the dual of a restricted weight module M as: M := λ X M λ, for which the natural inclusion M M defines a H-submodule. The completion of a restricted weight module M is defined as: M := λ X M λ. It is straight-forwardtosee that if M admits a Liealgebraaction that containsh that prolongs to the H-action, then so are M and M. Note that the H-action on M is H-finite. The canonical non-degenerate pairing (, ) identifies M(λ) with a rank one k[ N ]-module. This also induces an inclusion L(λ) M(λ) = k[ N ] k k λ λ P +. Note that M(λ) naturally admits an action of U(g), with unique H-eigen cocyclic vector of weight λ. This induces an inclusion L(λ) M(λ) = k[ N ] k λ k[ B ], (1.1) λ P + λ P + λ P + where the RHS is a commutative ring. Lemma 1.5. For each λ,µ P +, we have a unique U(g)-module morphism m λ,µ : L(λ) L(µ) L(λ+µ) that makes λ P + L(λ) into an integral commutative ring. Moreover, this ring is generated by i I L( i). 5
6 Proof. By the comparison of the defining equation, we have a unique U(g)- module map (up to scalar) m λ,µ : L(λ+µ) L(λ) L(µ) that respects the H-weight decomposition. By taking the dual, we obtain the desired map. Each L(λ) is a quotient of M(λ), and we have an isomorphism M(λ) = k[ N ] k k λ as U(n )-modules. The B -equivariant multiplication of k[ B ] is uniquely determined by that of the N -fixed elements, that is k[x ]. It follows that the inclusion (1.1) respects the product structure. Hence, λ P + L(λ) is a commutative ring. It is integral as k[ N ] is so. The last assertion follows by Mathieu [18, Corollaire 2]. We denote the ring λ P + L(λ) by R. We define where our Proj is the P + -graded proj. X := ProjR, Corollary 1.6. For each w W and λ,µ P +, the multiplication map m λ,µ of R induces a U(n)-module map and a U(n )-modules map m λ,µ : L w (λ) L w (µ) L w (λ+µ), m λ,µ : L w (λ) L w (µ) L w (λ+µ) that are surjective and satisfy the associativity condition. Proof. By the dual of Lemma 1.5, we have L(λ+µ) L(λ) L(µ). By m λ,µ (v w(λ+µ)) = v wλ v wµ, we deduce that the inclusion L(λ + µ) L(λ) L(µ) yields inclusions L w (λ + µ) L w (λ) L w (µ) and L w (λ + µ) L w (λ) L w (µ). Hence, the multiplication map m λ,µ induce well-defined surjective maps m λ,µ : L w (λ) L w (µ) L w (λ+µ), m λ,µ : L w (λ) L w (µ) L w (λ+µ) that define quotient rings of R (and hence they satisfy the associativity conditions). For each w W, we have two commutative algebras: R w := L w (λ), and R w := L w (λ), λ P + λ P + whose multiplications are given in Corollary 1.6. The thin flag manifolds and its Schubert varieties dealt in the following results are these found in [13, Theorem and Theorem ]. In particular, we have natural line bundles O Xw (λ) for each w W and λ P. Theorem 1.7 (Kumar [13] and Mathieu [18, 14]). The ring R w is the multigraded projective coordinate ring of the thin Schubert variety X w. For each λ P +, we have { H i (X w,o Xw (λ)) L w (λ) (i = 0) = {0} (i > 0). 6
7 The analogous assertion holds for the thin-schubert varieties of the generalized flag manifold for every J I by setting R w,j := L w (λ). λ P +, α j,λ =0,j J Proof. The case chark = 0 is in [13]. The case chark > 0 follows by [14, Proposition 5.3] that yields a variant of [2, Theorem 3.1.1] and the fact that H 0 (X w,o Xw (λ)) is a cyclic U(n)-module generated by a H-eigenvector of weight wλ. Corollary 1.8. We have an action of B + on X w. Proof. We have a natural action of B+ on each of L w (λ) (λ P + ). Since dim L w (λ) <, this induces an action of B+ on L w (λ), and hence on the multi-graded projective coordinate ring of X w. Lemma 1.9. The set of H-fixed points of X is in bijection with W. Proof. A H-fixed point x of X gives a collection of non-zero H-eigenvectors {v λ } λ P + λ P + L(λ) so that m λ,µ (v λ+µ ) = v λ v µ for λ,µ P + by Lemma 1.5. By Theorem 1.7, there exists w W so that x X w. It follows that Xw H = X H. w W The set of H-fixed points of Xw H is in common among all characteristic and is a subset of the translation of {[v λ ]} λ P+ by N G +(H) that descends to W (see [13]). Therefore, we conclude that X H is in bijection with W. By examining the stabilizer, we deduce that B x w = N x w = A for each w W. We denote N x w X by O w and denote N + x w = N + x w X by O w. We set X w := O w X and call it the thick Schubert variety corresponding to w W. Proposition The subset O e X is obtained by inverting finitely many rational functions on X e. In other words, O e is a standard open set of X in the terminology of [3]. Proof. By (1.1), inverting the unique H-weight λ vector v λ L(λ) (up to scalar) yields λ P + (v λ) 1 L(λ) = U(n ) = k[ N ] as algebras, where the second isomorphism is through the Hopf algebra structure of U(n ). We can rearrange {v λ } λ P + so that it is closed under the multiplication. It follows that O e = X\{v i = 0} i I as required. Theorem The set of closed points of X is naturally in bijection with the thick flag manifold defined in [8, 5.8]. 7
8 Proof. We borrow some notation from the proof of Proposition We set X := w W Ow X and E := X\X. Note that X is the thick affine flag manifolds in the sense of [8, Corollary 4.5.5, 5.8]. Thanks to Proposition 1.10, the set E is contained in the locus that vλ = 0 for some λ P +. Note that E admits natural SL(2,i)-action for each i I as R does. It follows that E {vλ = 0}. w W By considering the condition to be global sections, we deduce that H 0 (X,O X (λ)) L(λ) M(λ) as H 0 (X,O X (λ)) is a cyclic U(n )-module generated by v λ so that we have F ( α i,λ +1) i v λ = 0 for each i I by a SL(2,i)-calculation (it is actually an equality by the definition of X). For each λ P +, we have natural (rational) maps ψ λ : X P(H 0 (X,O X (λ)) ) P(L(λ) ). Claim A. The map ψ λ sends E to P(M ), where M H 0 (X,O X (λ)) is a U(g)-stable H-submodule that does not contain H-weight {wλ} w W -part for each λ P +. Proof. Assume to the contrary to deduce contradiction. Then, we have some x E so that ψ λ (x) P(M ) for every U(g)-stable H-submodule that does not contain H-weight {wλ} w W -part. Then, applying SL(2,i)-action repeatedly, we obtain a point y E so that ψ λ (y) {vλ 0}. This is a contradiction and we conclude the result. We return to the proof of Theorem By taking the G m -action that shrinks N, we deduce that E H X H =. This forces E = (our G m -action always send a point to a limit point as the set of H-weight of L(λ) in contained in λ Z 0 + ), and we conclude the assertion. Corollary 1.12 (of the proof of Theorem 1.11). We have X = w W Ow. Corollary We have X w = O w, and the thin flag manifold X of g is obtained as w W X w. Proof. The assertion is a consequence of the embedding X X as seen in Kashiwara-Tanisaki [12, 1.3 and Appendix A]. Theorem 1.14 (Kashiwara [8] 4 and Kashiwara-Tanisaki [12] 1.3). For each w,v W, we have: 1. O w X v if and only if w v; 2. O w X v if and only if w v. 8
9 2 Frobenius splitting of thick flag manifolds We retain the setting of the previous section. Let B := N + H B +. For each i I, we have an overgroup B B i B + i so that LieP i = kfi LieB. Let i = (i 1,i 2,...,i l ) I l be a sequence. We have a Bott-Samuelson-Demazure- Hansen variety Z(i) := B i1 B B i2 B B B il /B. In case w = s i1 s i2 s il satisfies l(w) = l (i.e. i is a reduced expression of w), we have the BSDH resolution (see e.g. [13, Chapter VIII]) π i : Z(i) (g 1,g 2,...,g l ) g 1 g 2 g l B/B X w. The variety Z(i) admits a left B-action, that makes π i into a B-equivariant morphism. For each 1 k l, we define a B-stable divisor H k Z(i) by requiring g k B for (g 1,g 2,...,g l ) Z(i). Note that H k is naturally isomophic to Z(i k ), where i k I l 1 is obtained from i by omitting the k-th entry. In addition, every subword i = (i j1,...,i j l ) I l of i (so that 1 j 1 < j 2 < < j l < l) gives us a B-equivariant embedding described as j 1 1 j 2 j 1 1 {}}{{}}{ Z(i ) (g 1,...,g l ) ( 1,...,1,g j1, 1...,1,g j2,...) Z(i). Definition 2.1 (Frobenius splitting). Let X be a variety defined over a field k with positive characteristic. Let Fr be the (relative) Frobenius endomorphism of X(thatinducesak-linearendomorphism). Wehaveanaturalinclusionı : O X Fr O X. A Frobenius splitting of X is a O X -linear morphism φ : Fr O X O X so that the composition φ ı is the identity. Definition 2.2 (Compatible splitting). Let Y X be an inclusion of varieties defined over k. A Frobenious splitting φ of X is said to be compatible with Y if φ(fr I Y ) I Y. Remark 2.3. A Frobenius splitting of X compatible with Y induces a Frobenius splitting of Y (see e.g. [2, Remark (ii)]). Definition 2.4 (B-canonical splitting). Let X be a variety equipped with an B-action. A Frobenius splitting φ is said to be B-canonical if it is H-fixed, and each i I yields ρ αi (z)φ(ρ αi ( z p )f) = where φ i,j Hom OX (Fr O X,O X ). p 1 j=0 1 j! zj φ i,j (f), (2.1) Theorem 2.5 ([2] Exercise 4.1.E.2). For each i I l, there exists a unique B- canonical splitting of Z(i) that is compatible with the subvarieties Z(i ) obtained by subwords i of i. Corollary 2.6. In the setting of Theorem 2.5, the restriction of the B-canonical splitting to Z(i ) is B-canonical. Proof. The condition of B-canonical splitting is preserved by the restriction to a B-stable compatibly split subset. 9
10 Lemma 2.7. For each w W, the ring R and R w admits a B-canonical splitting. Proof. The assertion for R w is a consequence of Theorem 2.5, together with [13, Theorem 8.2.2] (cf. [14]) and [2, Exercise 1.1.E.1]. Choose a series of sequences i k I k (k 1) so that 1. i k is obtained from i k+1 by omitting the first entry: 2. k 1 π i k (Z(i k )) = X. Let w k W be so that X wk = π ik (Z(i k )) (that exists as Z(i k ) is irreducible). Then, we have L(λ) = lim k L wk (λ). This induces a dense inclusion of algebras R lim k R wk, where the LHS is the H-finite part of the RHS. In view of [2, Exercise 1.1.E.1] and[13, Theorem ], Corollary 2.6 induces a Frobenius splitting of lim R wk. k Since our splitting preserves the H-weights, it descends to the H-finite part R as required. Corollary 2.8. The ring R admits a B -canonical splitting. Proof. We retain the setting of the proof of Lemma 2.7. Our ring R is a H- finite graded algebra that admits a B-canonical splitting. Note that R admits a rational action of SL(2,k) associated to each real root vector of n (through the sl(2)-triple) as each L(λ) is integrable. Hence, [2, Excercise 4.1 (1)] forces the B + -canonical splitting of R induces a B -canonical splitting as desired. Corollary 2.9. For each w W, the B -canonical splitting of X is compatible with O w. Proof. According to Kumar-Schwede [14], the essential part of this proof traces back to a result of Olivier Mathieu. As the author has no access to it, he cites it from[14]. There, they assume that g is symmetrizable. The author believes that there is no place where symmetrizability is essentially used throughout the proof ([13] together with [17, 18]; compare [13, Remark ] and [18, Corollaire 2]). By the same reasoning as in [14, Proof of Proposition 5.3 Assertion II], the H-fixed point of X splits compatibly with our B-canonical splitting (as the difference here and there are only the topology of k[ N ], that actually exists only when we modify the argument of [14] to form a projective system). Here a B -stable homogeneous ideal of R corresponds to a B -stable subspace of X as R is H-finite. Therefore, the ideal generated by B -orbits of O w = w v O v is preserved by our B -canonical splitting thanks to [2, Proposition 4.1.8] (as explained in [14, Proof of Proposition 5.3 Assertion III]). 10
11 Corollary For each w W, the scheme O w is integral. Proof. Apply [2, Proposition 1.2.1] to Corollary 2.9. Thanks to Theorem 1.11, the multi-homogeneous coordinate ring of X define line bundles O X (λ) indexed by P. Each of them restricts to a line bundle on X w. Let J I. We set P J + := {λ P + α i,λ = 0, i J}. Consider the subring R J := L(λ) R. λ P + J We set X J := ProjR J. We have natural map that is B -equivariant. π J : X X J, Lemma Let J I. The morphism π J is surjective. We have a B - canonical splitting of X J that is compatible with the B -orbits. Proof. The B -canonical splitting of X induces that of X J through the description of its projective coordinate ring. This must be compatible with the Zariski closure of the image of B -orbits. Hence, it remains to show that π J is surjective. Fix w W. By Theorem 1.7, the analogous map to π J defined for X w is surjective. The same proof as Corollary 1.9 (relying on [13]) implies X H J π J (X H ). Hence, the same argument as in Theorem 1.11 yields that every B - orbit of X J is the image of a B -orbit of X as required. Theorem 2.12(Kashiwara[9]Theorem5.2.1and[11] 8). Assumethat chark = 0. For each λ P +, we have { H i (X,O X (λ)) L(λ) (i = 0) = {0} (i > 0). Proof. The case g is symmetrizable is [9] Theorem The Kempf resolution presented in [11, (8.6)] is valid for arbitrary Kac-Moody algebras, and the comparison with the BGG resolution for arbitrary Kac-Moody algebras [5] imply the desired description of cohomology. Theorem 2.13 ([11] second part of Conjecture 8.10). For each λ P + and w,v W so that v < w, the natural restriction map is surjective. H 0 (X v,o X v(λ)) H 0 (X w,o X w(λ)) Proof. We set J := {i I α i,λ = 0}. The fiber of π J is the thick flag manifold of the Kac-Moody subalgebra corresponding to J, and we have (π J ) O X (λ) = O XJ (λ) by [8]. Hence, the assertion reduces to the surjectivity of H 0 (X v J,O X v J (λ)) H0 (X w J,O X w J (λ)), 11
12 where X w J := π J(X w ) for each w W. We omit the subscript in the below for simplicity. Note that O XJ (λ) = O X (λ) is ample. By the associativity of the restriction maps (and Theorem 1.14), we can assume v = e. For each v W and w W, we have a restriction map ϕ v w : H 0 (X v,o X v(λ)) H 0 (X v X w,o Xv X w (λ)). Recall that we have X = w X w X, that is a Zariski dense embedding. It follows that the subset X v X X v is again Zariski dense. Therefore, the inverse limit of {ϕ v w} w yields an inclusion ϕ v : H 0 (X v,o X v(λ)) H 0 (X v X,O Xv X(λ)). (2.2) Let Ψ + be a finite set. Let us consider a Z-linear functional h on + X (H) Z R so that 0 < h(α i ) for each i I and h(ψ) < 1. Then, the subset + (h) := {β + h(β) < 1} + is finite, and every Z 0 -linear combination of elements of + \ + (h) does not belong to + (h). For each w W, the set of H-weights of i I L w( i) is finite, and hence so is the set Ψ w of positive roots obtained by the difference of two H-weights of i I L w( i). Applying the above construction, we can find a division + = ( + 1 is + (h) obtained by setting Ψ = Ψ w ) so that every x N factors into x = x 1 x 2, where x 2 is the product of one-parameter subgroup corresponding to + 2, and This implies L w ( i) x 1 L w ( i) = {v L w ( i) x 1 v = v}. X v X w = B x v Bx w = B x v Bx w, where the most RHS is the definition of the Richardson variety in [14] (when J = ). Now [14, Proposition 5.3] (it is standard to deduce the the parabolic case in view of [2, ]) and [2, Theorem 1.2.8] yields that the map H 0 (X v X w,o Xv X w (λ)) H 0 (X v X w,o X v X w (λ)) is surjective for every w,v,v W so that v v when chark > 0. Since the both of (X v X w ) and (X v X w ) are finite type schemes, [2, Corollary 1.6.3] lifts this surjection to the case of chark = 0. Hence, we deduce a surjection H 0 (X v X,O Xv X(λ)) H 0 (X v X,O X v X (λ)) for every v,v W so that v v by taking the inverse limits with respect to surjective inverse systems (so that they satisfies the Mittag-Leffler condition), regardless of the characteristic. For arbitrary chark, the space H 0 (X v,o X v(λ)) is H-finite since H 0 (X v,o X v(λ)) H 0 (O v,o O v(λ)) = k[o v ] k k λ. 12
13 Now we specialize our attention to the case k = Q. In case v = e, the LHS of (2.2) is given in Theorem 2.12, and the RHS is given in [13]. In particular, the LHS is the H-finite part of the RHS. Therefore, the commutative diagram H 0 (X,O X (λ)) H 0 (X X,O X X (λ)) H 0 (X v,o X v(λ)) H 0 (X v X,O Xv X(λ)) yields the surjectivity of the left vertical arrow, that is our assertion when chark = 0. We have the higher cohomology vanishing of an ample line bundle O(λ) on X v X w by [2, Thorem 1.2.8]. Taking account into the surjectivity of the transition maps, the same is true when we (negatively) twist line bundles by the divisor obtained as a reduced union of the boundary of X v X w (cf. [14]). They stratify H 0 (X w,o(λ)), whose character is independent of chark since it is given by the Demazure character formula (cf. [13, Chapter VIII]). Therefore, the semi-continuity argument (and the rigidity of the torus characters) implies that the character of the RHS of (2.2) is independent of chark. The construction of the inclusion of (2.2) is uniform on chark and its image is dense when char k = 0. Hence, the semi-continuity argument (applied to H-eigenspacewise) yields that the LHS of (2.2) is dense in the RHS for every chark. This transplant our conclusion to chark > 0 as required. Corollary Let Y,Y be reduced unions of thick Schubert varieties so that Y Y. Then, the natural restriction map is surjective for each λ P +. H 0 (Y,O Y (λ)) H 0 (Y,O Y (λ)) Proof. We can formally replace X v X w with reduced unions of them (that are compatibly split along the intersections by the canonical splitting) in the proof of Theorem 2.13 to deduce the assertion. The following is a consequence of Theorem 2.13 as described in [11, 8] after Conjecture 8.10 (when g is of affine type). Theorem For each λ P +, we have H 0 (X w,o X w(λ)) = L w (λ). Proof. We first deal with the case chark = 0. Combining Theorem 2.12 and Theorem 2.13, we have H 0 (X w,o X w(λ)) L(λ). In addition, the integrality of X w implies that H 0 (X w,o X w(λ)) is cyclic as it is a U(n )-module with H-eigen cyclic vector v wλ. These imply our result when chark = 0. The case of chark > 0 follows by the same argument as in the last paragraph in the proof of Theorem
14 Theorem 2.16 (Kashiwara-Shimozono[11] Proposition 3.2). For each w W, the scheme X w is normal. Proof. The argument in [11, Proposition 3.2] is stated for symmetrizable g and chark = 0, but it is actually valid for an arbitrary case. Corollary For each w W, we have an isomorphism X w = ProjR w. In particular, X w is projectively normal. Proof. The first assertion is the direct consequence of Theorem 2.15 since X w is a closed subscheme of X. We prove the second assertion. Corollary 1.6 and Lemma 1.5 asserts that the ring R w is generated by i I Lw ( i). This verifies a sufficient condition of projective normality(see e.g. Hartshorne[4, Chapter II, Exercise 5.14] for singly graded case) in the presence of the normality of X w. Therefore, we conclude the assertion. The following result implies that {L w (λ)} w W forms a filtration of L(λ) for each λ P +, that is previously recorded when g is of affine type (see [1, Theorem 6.23]). An analogous result is known for {L w (λ)} w W by the works of many people (cf. Littelmann [16, 8] and Kumar [13, VIII]). Corollary For each finite subset S W, there exist another subset S W so that L w (λ) = L v (λ). v S w S Proof. Let T W and set X(T) := w T Xw. We have a sequence of maps O X (λ) O X(T) (λ) w T O X w. Thanks to Corollary 2.14, we deduce Γ(X,O X w(λ)) Γ(X,O X(T) (λ)) Γ(X,O X (λ)) = L(λ). w T L w (λ) = w T Morover, the restriction of the composition maps to a direct summand L w (λ) yields the standard embedding. Thus, we conclude Γ(X,O X(T) (λ)) = w T L w (λ) L(λ). (2.3) Let us divide S = S 1 S 2, and we set Y i := w S i X w for i = 1,2, where the intersection is the scheme-theoretic intersection. By [2, Proposition 1.2.1], the scheme Y i (i = 1,2) and the scheme-theoretic intersection Y := Y 1 Y 2 are reduced. Since Y is B -stable, we have Y = X(S ) for some S W. We have a short exact sequence 0 O X(S )(λ) O Y1 (λ) O Y2 (λ) O Y1 Y 2 (λ) 0. 14
15 Thanks to (2.3) and Corollary 2.14, we conclude a short exact sequence 0 w SL ( ) ( ) w (λ) L w (λ) L w (λ) L w (λ) 0 w S 1 w S 2 w S of g-modules. This proves the assertion by induction on S (since the case S = 1 is apparent from S = S ). Acknowledgement: The author would like to thank Masaki Kashiwara and Shrawan Kumar for helpful correspondences, and Daisuke Sagaki for discussions. This research is supported in part by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) References [1] Susumu Ariki, Victor Kreiman, and Shunsuke Tsuchioka. On the tensor product of two basic representations of U v(ŝle). Adv. Math., 218(1):28 86, [2] Michel Brion and Shrawan Kumar. Frobenius splitting methods in geometry and representation theory, volume 231 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, [3] A. Grothendieck. Éléments de géométrie algébrique. I. Le langage des schémas. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., (4):228, [4] Robin Hartshorne. Algebraic geometry. Springer- Verlag, [5] I. Heckenberger and S. Kolb. On the Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolution for Kac- Moody algebras and quantized enveloping algebras. Transform. Groups, 12(4): , [6] Victor G. Kac. Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, third edition, [7] Victor G. Kac and Dale H. Peterson. Regular functions on certain infinite-dimensional groups. In Arithmetic and geometry, Vol. II, volume 36 of Progr. Math., pages Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, [8] Masaki Kashiwara. The flag manifold of Kac-Moody Lie algebra. In Proceedings of the JAMI Inaugural Conference, supplement to Amer. J. Math. the Johns Hopkins University Press, [9] Masaki Kashiwara. Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture for a symmetrizable Kac-Moody Lie algebra. In The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. II, volume 87 of Progr. Math., pages Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, [10] Masaki Kashiwara. Crystal bases of modified quantized enveloping algebra. Duke Math. J., 73(2): , [11] Masaki Kashiwara and Mark Shimozono. Equivariant K-theory of affine flag manifolds and affine Grothendieck polynomials. Duke Math. J., 148(3): , [12] Masaki Kashiwara and Toshiyuki Tanisaki. Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture for affine Lie algebras with negative level. Duke Math. J., 77(1):21 62, [13] Shrawan Kumar. Kac-Moody groups, their flag varieties and representation theory, volume 204 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, [14] Shrawan Kumar and Karl Schwede. Richardson varieties have Kawamata log terminal singularities. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (3): , [15] Peter Littelmann. Paths and root operators in representation theory. Ann. of Math. (2), 142(3): , [16] Peter Littelmann. Contracting modules and standard monomial theory for symmetrizable Kac-Moody algebras. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 11(3): , [17] Olivier Mathieu. Formules de caractères pour les algèbres de Kac-Moody générales. Astérisque, :1 267,
16 [18] Olivier Mathieu. Construction d un groupe de Kac-Moody et applications. Compositio Math., 69(1989):37 60, [19] Jacques Tits. Algebrès de Kac-Moody et groupes associés. Annuaire du College de France ( ) et ( )
Characters of the Negative Level Highest-Weight Modules for Affine Lie Algebras
IMRN International Mathematics Research Notices 1994, No. 3 Characters of the Negative Level Highest-Weight Modules for Affine Lie Algebras Masaki Kashiwara and Toshiyuki Tanisaki 0 Introduction Our main
More informationMAT 5330 Algebraic Geometry: Quiver Varieties
MAT 5330 Algebraic Geometry: Quiver Varieties Joel Lemay 1 Abstract Lie algebras have become of central importance in modern mathematics and some of the most important types of Lie algebras are Kac-Moody
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationAnother proof of the global F -regularity of Schubert varieties
Another proof of the global F -regularity of Schubert varieties Mitsuyasu Hashimoto Abstract Recently, Lauritzen, Raben-Pedersen and Thomsen proved that Schubert varieties are globally F -regular. We give
More informationIVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =
LECTURE 7: CATEGORY O AND REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS IVAN LOSEV Introduction We continue our study of the representation theory of a finite dimensional semisimple Lie algebra g by introducing
More informationLECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we continue to study the category O 0 and explain some ideas towards the proof of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture. We start by introducing
More informationGeometry of Schubert varieties and Demazure character formula
Geometry of Schubert varieties and Demazure character formula lectures by Shrawan Kumar during April, 2011 Hausdorff Research Institute for Mathematics Bonn, Germany notes written by Brandyn Lee 1 Notation
More informationRepresentations of semisimple Lie algebras
Chapter 14 Representations of semisimple Lie algebras In this chapter we study a special type of representations of semisimple Lie algberas: the so called highest weight representations. In particular
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More informationLECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS
LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS IVAN LOSEV 18. Category O for rational Cherednik algebra We begin to study the representation theory of Rational Chrednik algebras. Perhaps, the class of representations
More informationA relative version of Kostant s theorem
A relative version of Kostant s theorem 1 University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Srni, January 2015 1 supported by project P27072 N25 of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) This talk reports on joint
More informationMath 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups
Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups 1. Motivation and examples In abstract group theory, the descending central series {C i (G)} of a group G is defined recursively by C 0 (G) = G and C
More informationHighest-weight Theory: Verma Modules
Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,
More informationH(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).
92 19. Perverse sheaves on the affine Grassmannian 19.1. Spherical Hecke algebra. The Hecke algebra H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) resp. H(G(F q ((T ))//G(F q [[T ]])) etc. of locally constant compactly supported
More informationNOTES ON POINCARÉ SERIES OF FINITE AND AFFINE COXETER GROUPS
NOTES ON POINCARÉ SERIES OF FINITE AND AFFINE COXETER GROUPS VICTOR REINER Abstract. There are two famous formulae relating the Poincaré series of a finite/affine Weyl group to the degrees of fundamental
More informationEquivariant K -theory and hook formula for skew shape on d-complete set
Equivariant K -theory and hook formula for skew shape on d-complete set Hiroshi Naruse Graduate School of Education University of Yamanashi Algebraic and Enumerative Combinatorics in Okayama 2018/02/20
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009
FACTORING TILTING MODULES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS arxiv:0909.2239v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009 S.R. DOTY Abstract. Let G be a semisimple, simply-connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of
More informationBirational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits
arxiv:math/0611129v1 [math.ag] 6 Nov 2006 Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits Yoshinori Namikawa In order to explain what we want to do in this paper, let us begin with an explicit
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I Set-up. Let K be an algebraically closed field. By convention all our algebraic groups will be linear algebraic
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationCritical level representations of affine Kac Moody algebras
Critical level representations of affine Kac Moody algebras Peter Fiebig Emmy Noether Zentrum Universität Erlangen Nürnberg Isle of Skye May 2010 Affine Kac Moody algebras Let g be a complex simple Lie
More informationGEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS
GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS ANA BALIBANU DISCUSSED WITH PROFESSOR VICTOR GINZBURG 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to explore the geometry of a Lie algebra g through the action
More informationOn compactifications of the Steinberg zero-fiber
Journal of Algebra 305 (2006) 957 973 www.elsevier.com/locate/jalgebra On compactifications of the Steinberg zero-fiber Thomas Haahr Lynderup, Jesper Funch Thomsen Institut for Matematiske Fag, Aarhus
More informationBLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that
More information1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties
0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasi-projective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.
More informationLECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O
LECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this and the next lecture we will describe an entirely different application of Hecke algebras, now to the category O. In the
More information16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N
74 16. Lecture 16: Springer Representations 16.1. The flag manifold. Let G = SL n (C). It acts transitively on the set F of complete flags 0 F 1 F n 1 C n and the stabilizer of the standard flag is the
More informationSymplectic varieties and Poisson deformations
Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations Yoshinori Namikawa A symplectic variety X is a normal algebraic variety (defined over C) which admits an everywhere non-degenerate d-closed 2-form ω on the
More informationWe can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )
MODULI PROBLEMS AND GEOMETRIC INVARIANT THEORY 43 5.3. Linearisations. An abstract projective scheme X does not come with a pre-specified embedding in a projective space. However, an ample line bundle
More informationCHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES
CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the
More informationEquivariant Algebraic K-Theory
Equivariant Algebraic K-Theory Ryan Mickler E-mail: mickler.r@husky.neu.edu Abstract: Notes from lectures given during the MIT/NEU Graduate Seminar on Nakajima Quiver Varieties, Spring 2015 Contents 1
More informationConstruction of M B, M Dol, M DR
Construction of M B, M Dol, M DR Hendrik Orem Talbot Workshop, Spring 2011 Contents 1 Some Moduli Space Theory 1 1.1 Moduli of Sheaves: Semistability and Boundedness.............. 1 1.2 Geometric Invariant
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004
arxiv:math/0401137v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004 DISCRETE MIURA OPERS AND SOLUTIONS OF THE BETHE ANSATZ EQUATIONS EVGENY MUKHIN,1 AND ALEXANDER VARCHENKO,2 Abstract. Solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations associated
More informationWAHL S CONJECTURE HOLDS IN ODD CHARACTERISTICS FOR SYMPLECTIC AND ORTHOGONAL GRASSMANNIANS
WAHL S CONJECTURE HOLDS IN ODD CHARACTERISTICS FOR SYMPLECTIC AND ORTHOGONAL GRASSMANNIANS V. LAKSHMIBAI, K. N. RAGHAVAN, AND P. SANKARAN Abstract. It is shown that the proof by Mehta and Parameswaran
More informationLECTURE 4.5: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 4.5: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES DMYTRO MATVIEIEVSKYI Abstract. These are notes for a talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Graduate Student Seminar on category O and Soergel bimodules,
More informationA GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR
A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR M. EMERTON, D. NADLER, AND K. VILONEN 1. Introduction In the paper [BB1], Beilinson and Bernstein used the method of localisation to give a new proof and generalisation of Casselman
More informationPART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS
PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS Contents 1. Regular elements in semisimple Lie algebras 1 2. The flag variety and the Bruhat decomposition 3 3. The Grothendieck-Springer resolution 6 4. The
More informationL(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS 61 5. Root systems and semisimple Lie algebras 5.1. Characteristic 0 theory. Assume in this subsection that chark = 0. Let me recall a couple of definitions made earlier: G is called reductive
More informationLECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES
LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES DMYTRO MATVIEIEVSKYI Abstract. These are notes for a talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Graduate Student Seminar on category O and Soergel bimodules,
More informationChow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups
Chow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups Shizuo Kaji joint with Masaki Nakagawa Workshop on Schubert calculus 2008 at Kansai Seminar House Mar. 20, 2008 Outline Introduction Our problem (algebraic geometory)
More informationA Note on Dormant Opers of Rank p 1 in Characteristic p
A Note on Dormant Opers of Rank p 1 in Characteristic p Yuichiro Hoshi May 2017 Abstract. In the present paper, we prove that the set of equivalence classes of dormant opers of rank p 1 over a projective
More informationVector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle
Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo Notes(* prepared for the First Summer School on Complex Geometry (Villarrica, Chile 7-9 December 2010 1 The notion of vector bundle In affine geometry,
More informationA NOTE ON TENSOR CATEGORIES OF LIE TYPE E 9
A NOTE ON TENSOR CATEGORIES OF LIE TYPE E 9 ERIC C. ROWELL Abstract. We consider the problem of decomposing tensor powers of the fundamental level 1 highest weight representation V of the affine Kac-Moody
More informationMath 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition
Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ Φ, and let B be the unique
More informationNoetherian property of infinite EI categories
Noetherian property of infinite EI categories Wee Liang Gan and Liping Li Abstract. It is known that finitely generated FI-modules over a field of characteristic 0 are Noetherian. We generalize this result
More informationA Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields
A Version of the Grothendieck Conjecture for p-adic Local Fields by Shinichi MOCHIZUKI* Section 0: Introduction The purpose of this paper is to prove an absolute version of the Grothendieck Conjecture
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS
A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS PAUL E. GUNNELLS AND ERIC SOMMERS ABSTRACT. We give a characterization of the Dynkin elements of a simple Lie algebra. Namely, we prove that one-half of a Dynkin element
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER Let k be an algebraically closed field. varieties unless otherwise stated. 1. Definitions and Examples For simplicity we will work strictly with affine Definition 1.1. An algebraic
More informationRichardson Varieties have Kawamata Log Terminal Singularities
International Mathematics Research Notices Advance Access published November 4, 2012 S. Kumar and K. Schwede (2012) Richardson Varieties have KLT Singularities, International Mathematics Research Notices,
More informationReducibility of generic unipotent standard modules
Journal of Lie Theory Volume?? (??)???? c?? Heldermann Verlag 1 Version of March 10, 011 Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules Dan Barbasch and Dan Ciubotaru Abstract. Using Lusztig s geometric
More informationEigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups
Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups Shrawan Kumar Talk given at AMS Sectional meeting held at Davidson College, March 2007 1 Hermitian eigenvalue
More informationMODULI SPACES OF CURVES
MODULI SPACES OF CURVES SCOTT NOLLET Abstract. My goal is to introduce vocabulary and present examples that will help graduate students to better follow lectures at TAGS 2018. Assuming some background
More informationTHE p-smooth LOCUS OF SCHUBERT VARIETIES. Let k be a ring and X be an n-dimensional variety over C equipped with the classical topology.
THE p-smooth LOCUS OF SCHUBERT VARIETIES GEORDIE WILLIAMSON ABSTRACT. These are notes from talks given at Jussieu (seminaire Chevalley), Newcastle and Aberdeen (ARTIN meeting). They are intended as a gentle
More informationDECOMPOSITION OF TENSOR PRODUCTS OF MODULAR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS FOR SL 3 (WITH AN APPENDIX BY C.M. RINGEL)
DECOMPOSITION OF TENSOR PRODUCTS OF MODULAR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS FOR SL 3 (WITH AN APPENDIX BY CM RINGEL) C BOWMAN, SR DOTY, AND S MARTIN Abstract We give an algorithm for working out the indecomposable
More informationON SOME PARTITIONS OF A FLAG MANIFOLD. G. Lusztig
ON SOME PARTITIONS OF A FLAG MANIFOLD G. Lusztig Introduction Let G be a connected reductive group over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p 0. Let W be the Weyl group of G. Let W be the
More informationLECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)
LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationON AN INFINITE LIMIT OF BGG CATEGORIES O
ON AN INFINITE LIMIT OF BGG CATEGORIES O KEVIN COULEMBIER AND IVAN PENKOV Abstract. We study a version of the BGG category O for Dynkin Borel subalgebras of rootreductive Lie algebras, such as g = gl(
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationLemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.
Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationCohomology theories on projective homogeneous varieties
Cohomology theories on projective homogeneous varieties Baptiste Calmès RAGE conference, Emory, May 2011 Goal: Schubert Calculus for all cohomology theories Schubert Calculus? Cohomology theory? (Very)
More informationLECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)
LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups
More informationThe Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties
The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties Benson Farb and Mark Kisin August 20, 2008 Abstract Using Margulis results on lattices in semi-simple Lie groups, we prove the Grothendieck-
More informationHARTSHORNE EXERCISES
HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing
More informationParameterizing orbits in flag varieties
Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties W. Ethan Duckworth April 2008 Abstract In this document we parameterize the orbits of certain groups acting on partial flag varieties with finitely many orbits.
More informationEKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications
EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications and recent results on Complete Quadrics. (Based on joint works with Soumya Banerjee and Michael Joyce) Mahir Bilen Can April 16, 2016 Mahir Bilen Can EKT of Some
More informationRings and groups. Ya. Sysak
Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak 1 Noetherian rings Let R be a ring. A (right) R -module M is called noetherian if it satisfies the maximum condition for its submodules. In other words, if M 1... M i M i+1...
More informationRepresentations Are Everywhere
Representations Are Everywhere Nanghua Xi Member of Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 What is Representation theory Representation is reappearance of some properties or structures of one object on another.
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationNotes on D 4 May 7, 2009
Notes on D 4 May 7, 2009 Consider the simple Lie algebra g of type D 4 over an algebraically closed field K of characteristic p > h = 6 (the Coxeter number). In particular, p is a good prime. We have dim
More informationFILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.
FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0
More informationRoot Systems Lie Algebras. Their Representations.
V Root Systems Lie Algebras and Their Representations. Kyoji Saito IPMU, the university of Tokyo August 4 and 5, 2009 Plan Lecture 1: Lecture 2: Lecture 3: Root Systems Lie algebras over a root system
More informationELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS
ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS J. WARNER SUMMARY OF A PAPER BY J. CARLSON, E. FRIEDLANDER, AND J. PEVTSOVA, AND FURTHER OBSERVATIONS 1. The Nullcone and Restricted Nullcone We will need
More informationD-MATH Algebraic Geometry FS 2018 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski. Solutions Sheet 1. Classical Varieties
D-MATH Algebraic Geometry FS 2018 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski Solutions Sheet 1 Classical Varieties Let K be an algebraically closed field. All algebraic sets below are defined over K, unless specified otherwise.
More informationDEFORMATIONS VIA DIMENSION THEORY
DEFORMATIONS VIA DIMENSION THEORY BRIAN OSSERMAN Abstract. We show that standard arguments for deformations based on dimension counts can also be applied over a (not necessarily Noetherian) valuation ring
More informationPOLYNOMIAL IDENTITY RINGS AS RINGS OF FUNCTIONS
POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY RINGS AS RINGS OF FUNCTIONS Z. REICHSTEIN AND N. VONESSEN Abstract. We generalize the usual relationship between irreducible Zariski closed subsets of the affine space, their defining
More informationCurves on P 1 P 1. Peter Bruin 16 November 2005
Curves on P 1 P 1 Peter Bruin 16 November 2005 1. Introduction One of the exercises in last semester s Algebraic Geometry course went as follows: Exercise. Let be a field and Z = P 1 P 1. Show that the
More informationCHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998
CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley 18 February 1998 This chapter gives some preliminary material on number theory and algebraic geometry. Section 1 gives basic
More informationColoured Kac-Moody algebras, Part I
Coloured Kac-Moody algebras, Part I Alexandre Bouayad Abstract We introduce a parametrization of formal deformations of Verma modules of sl 2. A point in the moduli space is called a colouring. We prove
More informationRESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RIMS A Note on an Anabelian Open Basis for a Smooth Variety. Yuichiro HOSHI.
RIMS-1898 A Note on an Anabelian Open Basis for a Smooth Variety By Yuichiro HOSHI January 2019 RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Kyoto, Japan A Note on an Anabelian Open Basis
More informationne varieties (continued)
Chapter 2 A ne varieties (continued) 2.1 Products For some problems its not very natural to restrict to irreducible varieties. So we broaden the previous story. Given an a ne algebraic set X A n k, we
More informationOn the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem
On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem Bertram Kostant, MIT Conference on Representations of Reductive Groups Salt Lake City, Utah July 10, 2013
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007
arxiv:0711.2128v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 SUPPORT VARIETIES OF NON-RESTRICTED MODULES OVER LIE ALGEBRAS OF REDUCTIVE GROUPS: CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA ALEXANDER PREMET J. C. Jantzen informed me that the proof
More informationOn Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1
On Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1 Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley and ICERM (work in progress) Abstract. In the previous ICERM workshop, Tom Scanlon raised the question
More information5 Quiver Representations
5 Quiver Representations 5. Problems Problem 5.. Field embeddings. Recall that k(y,..., y m ) denotes the field of rational functions of y,..., y m over a field k. Let f : k[x,..., x n ] k(y,..., y m )
More informationNotes on p-divisible Groups
Notes on p-divisible Groups March 24, 2006 This is a note for the talk in STAGE in MIT. The content is basically following the paper [T]. 1 Preliminaries and Notations Notation 1.1. Let R be a complete
More informationLECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL
LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL In this lecture we discuss a criterion for non-stable-rationality based on the decomposition of the diagonal in the Chow group. This criterion
More informationWeyl group representations on zero weight spaces
Weyl group representations on zero weight spaces November 30, 2014 Here we survey briefly (trying to provide reasonably complete references) the scattered work over four decades most relevant to the indicated
More informationMath 210B. Artin Rees and completions
Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions 1. Definitions and an example Let A be a ring, I an ideal, and M an A-module. In class we defined the I-adic completion of M to be M = lim M/I n M. We will soon show
More informationFock space representations of twisted affine Lie algebras
Fock space representations of twisted affine Lie algebras Gen KUROKI Mathematical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai JAPAN June 9, 2010 0. Introduction Fock space representations of Wakimoto type for
More informationSPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES IN COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES IN COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS ROYA BEHESHTI AND N. MOHAN KUMAR Abstract. We prove that the space of smooth rational curves of degree e in a general complete intersection of multidegree
More informationFactorization of birational maps on steroids
Factorization of birational maps on steroids IAS, April 14, 2015 Dan Abramovich Brown University April 14, 2015 This is work with Michael Temkin (Jerusalem) Abramovich (Brown) Factorization of birational
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More informationTHE S 1 -EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY RINGS OF (n k, k) SPRINGER VARIETIES
Horiguchi, T. Osaka J. Math. 52 (2015), 1051 1062 THE S 1 -EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY RINGS OF (n k, k) SPRINGER VARIETIES TATSUYA HORIGUCHI (Received January 6, 2014, revised July 14, 2014) Abstract The main
More informationExercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti
Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo Alex Massarenti SISSA, VIA BONOMEA 265, 34136 TRIESTE, ITALY E-mail address: alex.massarenti@sissa.it These notes collect a series of
More informationNotes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.
Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem. Version 0.00 with misprints, The are a few obvious, but important consequences of the theorem of Eli Cartan on the maximal tori. The first one is the observation
More informationTHE TOTAL COORDINATE RING OF A WONDERFUL VARIETY
THE TOTAL COORDINATE RING OF A WONDERFUL VARIETY MICHEL BRION Abstract. We study the cone of effective divisors and the total coordinate ring of wonderful varieties, with applications to their automorphism
More informationProblems on Minkowski sums of convex lattice polytopes
arxiv:08121418v1 [mathag] 8 Dec 2008 Problems on Minkowski sums of convex lattice polytopes Tadao Oda odatadao@mathtohokuacjp Abstract submitted at the Oberwolfach Conference Combinatorial Convexity and
More informationLittlewood Richardson coefficients for reflection groups
Littlewood Richardson coefficients for reflection groups Arkady Berenstein and Edward Richmond* University of British Columbia Joint Mathematical Meetings Boston January 7, 2012 Arkady Berenstein and Edward
More information