Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I
|
|
- Blaze Phelps
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I Set-up. Let K be an algebraically closed field. By convention all our algebraic groups will be linear algebraic groups over K. For such a group G let K[G] denote the algebra of regular functions on G. For the background on algebraic groups I refer to the books Linear Algebraic Groups by J. E. Humphreys, T. A. Springer, and A. Borel. Modules. Let G be an algebraic group. A G module is by definition a module V over the group algebra KG of G as an abstract group such that V satisfies two additional conditions: V is locally finite: each element is contained in a finite dimensional KG submodule. For each v V and ϕ V the matrix coefficient c ϕ,v given by c ϕ,v (g) = ϕ(g v) for all g G is a regular function: c ϕ,v K[G]. For example, any finite dmensional vector space V is a module under the natural action for the general linear group GL(V ) as well as for any closed subgroup of GL(V ). For any algebraic group G the algebra of regular functions K[G] is a G module under the (left) regular representation given by (gf) (g ) = f(g 1 g ). It is the easy to chech that the category of all G modules is closed under: submodules factor modules direct sums tensor products symmetric and exterior powers. If a G module V is finite dimensional, then also its dual space V is a G module. Frobenius twist. Assume char(k) = p > 0. In this case we have another method to construct new G modules from known ones. If V is a vector space over K we denote by V (1) the vector space over K that coincides with V as an additive group and where the scalar multiplication is given by a v = p a v for all a K, v V where the left hand side is the new multiplication and the right hand side the old one. (Since K is algebraically closed, the Frobenius morphism a a p is a bijection K K, so any element in K has a unique p th root.) 1
2 If V is a G module, then V (1) is a G module using the given action of any g G on the additive group V (1) = V. The action is again K linear. A finite dimensional G stable subspace of V is also a finite dimensional G stable subspace of V (1) (of the same dimension); so also V (1) is locally finite. For any ϕ V the map ϕ (1) : V (1) K, v ϕ(v) p is K linear. One checks that (V (1) ) = { ϕ (1) ϕ V } and gets finally for all g G hence c ϕ (1),v = c p ϕ,v K[G]. c ϕ (1),v(g) = ϕ (1) (gv) = ϕ(gv) p = c ϕ,v (g) p One defines higher Frobenius twists inductively: Set V (r+1) = (V (r) ) (1). Exercise: Consider K[G] as a G module under the (left) regular representation. Show that f f p is a homomorphism K[G] (1) K[G] of G modules. Induction. Let H be a closed subgroup of an algebraic group G. Any G module V is by restriction an H module since the restriction to H of any function in K[G] belongs to K[H]. This restriction of modules is clearly a functor from G modules to H modules. We can define an induction functor ind G H in the opposite direction, from H modules to G modules. For any H module M set ind G H M = { f: G M regular f(gh) = h 1 f(g) for all g G, h H }. Here a function f: G M is called regular if there exists m 1, m 2,..., m r M and f 1, f 2,..., f r K[G] such that f(g) = r i=1 f i(g) m i for all g G. All regular functions G M form a vector space over K and ind G H M is then a subspace. We get a G action on this subspace by setting (gf)(g ) = f(g 1 g ). In order to show that this KG module is a G module one uses the fact that K[G] is a G module. A trivial example for an induced module is ind G {1} = K[G]. We ll soon see more interesting examples for G = SL 2 (K). The functor ind G H is right adjoint to the restriction functor from G modules to H modules. This means that we have functorial isomorphisms Hom G (V, ind G H M) Hom H (V, M) Here any G homomorphism ϕ: V ind G H M is sent to ϕ: V M with ϕ(v) = ϕ(v) (1). Conversely any H homomorphism ψ: V M goes to ψ: V ind G H M such that ψ(v) (g) = ψ(g 1 v). Example: SL 2 (K). Consider G = SL 2 (K) acting on its natural module V = K 2 with its standard basis e 1, e 2. Then G acts also on V and on the symmetric algebra S(V ) that we can identify with the algebra K[X 1, X 2 ] of polynomial functions on V. Here X 1, X 2 is the basis of V dual to e 1, e 2. 2
3 The action of G on S(V ) is given by (gf) (v) = f(g 1 v). Each symmetric power S n (V ) is a submodule. We choose as basis all v i = ( 1) i X1X i 2 n i, 0 i n, and get (e.g.) for all a K 1 a v 0 1 i = i j=0 i a i j v j j and 1 0 v a 1 i = n j=i n i a j i v j (1) n j and for all t K t 0 0 t 1 v i = t n 2i v i. (2) Consider the closed subgroups in G U = { 1 0 t 0 a K } and B = { a 1 a t 1 a K, t K }. Let us first observe that we have an isomorphism of G modules S(V ) where K is the trivial U module such that ind G U K ind G U K = { f K[G] f(gu) = f(g) for all g G, u U }. Well, any ψ S(V ) defines ψ: G K setting ψ(g) = ψ(ge 2 ). One checks that ψ ind G U K and that ψ ψ is a morphism of G modules. On the other hand, any f ind G U K defines f: V \ {0} K: For any v V, v 0 there exists g G with v = ge 2 ; we then set f(v) = f(g). This is well defined as ge 2 = g e 2 implies g gu, hence f(g) = f(g ) since f ind G U K. One checks that f is a regular function on V \ {0}. Algebraic geometry tells you that f has a (unique) extension to a regular function on V. So there exists ψ S(V ) with f(v) = ψ(v) for all v 0, hence with f(g) = ψ(ge 2 ) for all g G, i.e., with f = ψ. For each n Z let K n denote K considered as a B module such that t 0 a t 1 v = t n v for all a, t, v K, t 0. Since any u U acts trivially on any K n, it is clear that ind G B K n ind G U K. The inverse image of ind G B K n under the isomorphism S(V ) ind G U K from above consists of all ψ S(V ) with ψ(tv) = t n ψ(v) for all t K and v V. This shows that we get isomorphisms { ind G B K n S n (V ) if n 0, 0 if n < 0. Simple modules for SL 2 (K). Consider again G = SL 2 (K). If char K = 0, then one can show that all S n (V ) with n N are simple G modules. [Using (2) above one checks that 3
4 each non-zero submodule contains some v i. Then (1) shows that the submodule contains all v j. Here one uses that all binomial coefficients are non-zero in K.] Furthermore, each simple G module is isomorphic to S n (V ) for a unique n. If char K = p > 0, then the same argument shows that all S n (V ) with 0 n < p are simple G modules. But one can quickly see that S p (V ) is not simple: The map ϕ: V S p (V ), f f p is semi-linear (i.e., satisfies ϕ(f + f ) = ϕ(f) + ϕ(f ) and ϕ(af) = a p ϕ(f) for all a K) and G equivariant. So its image is a G submodule of S p (V ) that is non-zero and not the whole module. Going back to the definition of a Frobenius twist one checks that ϕ is an isomorphism of G modules (V ) (1) KG X p 2 onto the submodule of S p (V ) generated by X p 2. For general n the characteristic 0 argument shows first that each non-zero submodule of S n (V ) contains some v i. Then the first formula in (1) implies that the submodule contains v 0 = X n 2. This shows that the submodule L(n) := KG v 0 = KG X n 2 of S n (V ) generated by X n 2 is simple, in fact, it is the only simple submodule of S n (V ). It then turns out that each simple G module is isomorphic to L(n) for exactly one n. One can describe L(n) alternatively as follows. Write n in p adic expansion: Then the map n = n 0 + n 1 p + n 2 p n r p r with 0 n i < p for all i. is an isomorphism of G modules f 0 f 1 f 2 f r f 0 f p 1 f p fr pr S n 0 (V ) S n 1 (V ) (1) S n 2 (V ) (2) S n r (V ) (r) L(n). Notations. Let G be a connected reductive group over K. Choose a maximal torus T in G. We want to generalise the SL 2 example. This involves some notation: X = Hom alg.gr (T, K ), the character group of T X = Hom alg.gr (K, T ), the cocharacter group of T,, the pairing X X Z such that λ(ϕ(t)) = t λ,ϕ for all t K Φ X, the root system of G with respect to T Φ = {α α Φ} X the corresponding dual roots Φ + a chosen system of positive roots 4
5 B and B + the Borel subgroups of G containing T that correspond to Φ + and Φ + respectively U and U + the unipotent radicals of these Borel subgroups. So we have semi-direct decompositions B = T U and B + = T U + as algebraic groups. Each λ X can be extended to a character λ: B K such that λ(tu) = λ(t) for all t T and u U. Denote by K λ the corresponding one dimensional B module. The general theory of connected soluble algebraic groups yields: Proposition: Each simple B module is isomorphic to K λ for a unique λ X. A corresponding statement holds for B + instead of B. Simple G modules. Any G module is by definition locally finite, i.e., a union of finite dimensional submodules. Therefore any simple G module V is finite dimensional. Considered as a B module it then has a composition series. This implies in particular that there is a surjective homomorphism of B modules from V onto a simple B module, hence by the proposition above onto some K λ with λ X. The basic property of induction implies then Hom G (V, ind G B K λ ) Hom B (V, K λ ) 0. Using the simplicity of V we get now: Claim 1: Each simple G module is isomorphic to a simple submodule of some ind G B K λ with λ X. In the case of SL 2 (K) this implies that any simple module is (as claimed above) isomorphic to some L(n). The next step towards a classification of the simple modules requires more subtle arguments that I cannot discuss here. They yield: Claim 2: ind G B K λ 0 λ dominant where the set X + of dominant characters is defined by X + = { λ X λ, α 0 for all α Φ + }. As a third step we want to see that each ind G B K λ with λ dominant contains a unique simple submodule. This is done by looking at fixed points for the subgroup U +. For any non-zero U + module M the space of fixed points M U + = { x M u x = x for all u U + } is non-zero as U + is connected and unipotent. The definition of ind G B K λ and of the G action on this space shows for any f (ind G B K λ ) U + that f(u 1 tu 2 ) = λ(t) 1 f(1) for all u 1 U +, t T, u 2 U. 5
6 So the restriction of f to the subset U + T U of G is determined by f(1). As U + T U is dense in G, it follows that f itself is determined by f(1). This implies that (ind G B K λ ) U + = K f λ where f λ K[G] is the unique regular function on G with f λ (u 1 tu 2 ) = λ(t) 1 for all u 1 U +, t T, u 2 U. Now every non-zero G submodule M of ind G B K λ satisfies M U + 0, hence f λ M and KG f λ M. It follows that L(λ) := KG f λ is the unique simple submodule of ind G B K λ. Theorem: Each simple G module is isomorphic to L(λ) for a unique λ X +. In order to get uniqueness one notes that L(λ) U + = Kf λ and that T acts on this subspace via λ. In case char K = 0 one can show that L(λ) = ind G B K λ for all λ X +. The examples above show that this fails in prime characteristic already for G = SL 2 (K). Steinberg s tensor product theorem. In order to simplify notation assume now that G is semi-simple and simply connected. Our choice of positive roots Φ + determines a system of simple roots. The corresponding dual roots form under our assumption a basis for the free abelian group X and X has then a dual basis consisting of fundamental weight. For any integer m > 0 the set X m = { λ X 0 λ, α < m for all simple roots α } X + consists of those characters whose coefficients with repect to the basis of fundamental weights belong to the interval from 0 to m 1. Suppose now that char K = p > 0. Any λ X + has a p adic expansion λ = λ 0 + pλ 1 + p 2 λ p r λ r with all λ i X p. Now Steinberg s tensor product theorem says (generalising the result for SL 2 ) that we have an isomorphism L(λ 0 ) L(λ 1 ) (1) L(λ 2 ) (2) L(λ r ) (r) L(λ). Note that each L(λ i ) ind G B K λi K[G] is a submodule of K[G]; similarly for L(λ). The isomorphism is then simply given by f 0 f 1 f 2 f r f 0 f p 1 f p fr pr Application to finite groups of Lie type. Assume again that G is semi-simple and simply connected. Suppose that char K = p > 0 and that G is defined over a finite subfield F q of K. (So q = p n for some n > 0.) The group G(F q ) of points of G over F q is then a finite group of Lie type. We can describe G(F q ) as the fixed points of a suitable Frobenius map on G. 6
7 In this situation a theorem due to Curtis for q = p and to Steinberg in general says: Theorem: Each L(λ) with λ X q is still simple when considered as a KG(F q ) module. Any simple KG(F q ) module is isomorphic to L(λ) for a unique λ X q. Note that the Ree and Suzuki groups are finite groups of Lie type, which are not of the form G(F q ). However, a modification of this theorem yields also a classification of their irreducible representations over an algebraically closed field of their defining characteristic. References. For a more detailed survey of the material in Lectures I and II see my article Modular representations of reductive groups in the proceedings of a conference in Beijing published under the title Group Theory, Beijing 1984 as volume 1185 of the Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 7
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationRepresentation Theory
Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim
More informationTHREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5
THREE CASES REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE LECTURE II: DELIGNE-LUSZTIG THEORY AND SOME APPLICATIONS Gerhard Hiss Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik RWTH Aachen University Summer School Finite Simple
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER Let k be an algebraically closed field. varieties unless otherwise stated. 1. Definitions and Examples For simplicity we will work strictly with affine Definition 1.1. An algebraic
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009
FACTORING TILTING MODULES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS arxiv:0909.2239v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009 S.R. DOTY Abstract. Let G be a semisimple, simply-connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of
More informationCHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES
CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationLECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)
LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is
More informationMath 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups
Math 249B. Nilpotence of connected solvable groups 1. Motivation and examples In abstract group theory, the descending central series {C i (G)} of a group G is defined recursively by C 0 (G) = G and C
More information0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r
CHAPTER 4 Representations of finite groups of Lie type Let F q be a finite field of order q and characteristic p. Let G be a finite group of Lie type, that is, G is the F q -rational points of a connected
More informationAHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations.
AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations. Nate Harman September 16, 2014 1 Introduction and motivation Let k be a locally compact non-discrete field with non-archimedean valuation
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS
REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite
More informationIVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =
LECTURE 7: CATEGORY O AND REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS IVAN LOSEV Introduction We continue our study of the representation theory of a finite dimensional semisimple Lie algebra g by introducing
More informationis an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent
Lecture 4. G-Modules PCMI Summer 2015 Undergraduate Lectures on Flag Varieties Lecture 4. The categories of G-modules, mostly for finite groups, and a recipe for finding every irreducible G-module of a
More informationDirect Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013
Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! 1. Some algebraic geometry The subject of algebraic groups depends on the interaction between algebraic geometry and group theory.
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More informationLECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)
LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups
More informationInduced Representations and Frobenius Reciprocity. 1 Generalities about Induced Representations
Induced Representations Frobenius Reciprocity Math G4344, Spring 2012 1 Generalities about Induced Representations For any group G subgroup H, we get a restriction functor Res G H : Rep(G) Rep(H) that
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset
More informationFILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.
FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationMATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA
MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA These are notes for our first unit on the algebraic side of homological algebra. While this is the last topic (Chap XX) in the book, it makes sense to
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007
arxiv:0711.2128v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 SUPPORT VARIETIES OF NON-RESTRICTED MODULES OVER LIE ALGEBRAS OF REDUCTIVE GROUPS: CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA ALEXANDER PREMET J. C. Jantzen informed me that the proof
More informationSupplementary Notes October 13, On the definition of induced representations
On the definition of induced representations 18.758 Supplementary Notes October 13, 2011 1. Introduction. Darij Grinberg asked in class Wednesday about why the definition of induced representation took
More informationGeometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture
Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture Paul Baum Penn State Representations of Reductive Groups University of Utah, Salt Lake City July 9, 2013 Paul Baum (Penn State) Geometric Structure
More informationMAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY
MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations
More informationModular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview
Modular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview Bhama Srinivasan University of Illinois at Chicago Regina, May 2012 Bhama Srinivasan (University of Illinois at Chicago) Modular Representations
More informationMargulis Superrigidity I & II
Margulis Superrigidity I & II Alastair Litterick 1,2 and Yuri Santos Rego 1 Universität Bielefeld 1 and Ruhr-Universität Bochum 2 Block seminar on arithmetic groups and rigidity Universität Bielefeld 22nd
More informationHodge Structures. October 8, A few examples of symmetric spaces
Hodge Structures October 8, 2013 1 A few examples of symmetric spaces The upper half-plane H is the quotient of SL 2 (R) by its maximal compact subgroup SO(2). More generally, Siegel upper-half space H
More information12. Projective modules The blanket assumptions about the base ring k, the k-algebra A, and A-modules enumerated at the start of 11 continue to hold.
12. Projective modules The blanket assumptions about the base ring k, the k-algebra A, and A-modules enumerated at the start of 11 continue to hold. 12.1. Indecomposability of M and the localness of End
More informationIrreducible subgroups of algebraic groups
Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups Martin W. Liebeck Department of Mathematics Imperial College London SW7 2BZ England Donna M. Testerman Department of Mathematics University of Lausanne Switzerland
More information`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups
`-modular Representations of Finite Reductive Groups Bhama Srinivasan University of Illinois at Chicago AIM, June 2007 Bhama Srinivasan (University of Illinois at Chicago) Modular Representations AIM,
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More information1 Fields and vector spaces
1 Fields and vector spaces In this section we revise some algebraic preliminaries and establish notation. 1.1 Division rings and fields A division ring, or skew field, is a structure F with two binary
More informationMATH 205B NOTES 2010 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 53
MATH 205B NOTES 2010 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 53 10. Completion The real numbers are the completion of the rational numbers with respect to the usual absolute value norm. This means that any Cauchy sequence
More informationLECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS
LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS IVAN LOSEV 18. Category O for rational Cherednik algebra We begin to study the representation theory of Rational Chrednik algebras. Perhaps, the class of representations
More informationLemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.
Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group
More informationOn the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group
IMRN International Mathematics Research Notices 1999, No. 8 On the Self-dual Representations of a p-adic Group Dipendra Prasad In an earlier paper [P1], we studied self-dual complex representations of
More informationSubgroups of Linear Algebraic Groups
Subgroups of Linear Algebraic Groups Subgroups of Linear Algebraic Groups Contents Introduction 1 Acknowledgements 4 1. Basic definitions and examples 5 1.1. Introduction to Linear Algebraic Groups 5 1.2.
More informationDraft: July 15, 2007 ORDINARY PARTS OF ADMISSIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUPS I. DEFINITION AND FIRST PROPERTIES
Draft: July 15, 2007 ORDINARY PARTS OF ADISSIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE ROUPS I. DEFINITION AND FIRST PROPERTIES ATTHEW EERTON Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Representations of p-adic analytic
More informationVanishing Ranges for the Cohomology of Finite Groups of Lie Type
for the Cohomology of Finite Groups of Lie Type University of Wisconsin-Stout, University of Georgia, University of South Alabama The Problem k - algebraically closed field of characteristic p > 0 G -
More informationDECOMPOSITION OF TENSOR PRODUCTS OF MODULAR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS FOR SL 3 (WITH AN APPENDIX BY C.M. RINGEL)
DECOMPOSITION OF TENSOR PRODUCTS OF MODULAR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS FOR SL 3 (WITH AN APPENDIX BY CM RINGEL) C BOWMAN, SR DOTY, AND S MARTIN Abstract We give an algorithm for working out the indecomposable
More informationFrobenius Green functors
UC at Santa Cruz Algebra & Number Theory Seminar 30th April 2014 Topological Motivation: Morava K-theory and finite groups For each prime p and each natural number n there is a 2-periodic multiplicative
More informationNotes on p-divisible Groups
Notes on p-divisible Groups March 24, 2006 This is a note for the talk in STAGE in MIT. The content is basically following the paper [T]. 1 Preliminaries and Notations Notation 1.1. Let R be a complete
More informationNOTES ON LINEAR ALGEBRA OVER INTEGRAL DOMAINS. Contents. 1. Introduction 1 2. Rank and basis 1 3. The set of linear maps 4. 1.
NOTES ON LINEAR ALGEBRA OVER INTEGRAL DOMAINS Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Rank and basis 1 3. The set of linear maps 4 1. Introduction These notes establish some basic results about linear algebra over
More informationEssays on representations of p-adic groups. Smooth representations. π(d)v = ϕ(x)π(x) dx. π(d 1 )π(d 2 )v = ϕ 1 (x)π(x) dx ϕ 2 (y)π(y)v dy
10:29 a.m. September 23, 2006 Essays on representations of p-adic groups Smooth representations Bill Casselman University of British Columbia cass@math.ubc.ca In this chapter I ll define admissible representations
More informationNOTES IN COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PART 2
NOTES IN COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PART 2 KELLER VANDEBOGERT 1. Completion of a Ring/Module Here we shall consider two seemingly different constructions for the completion of a module and show that indeed they
More informationModular representation theory
Modular representation theory 1 Denitions for the study group Denition 1.1. Let A be a ring and let F A be the category of all left A-modules. The Grothendieck group of F A is the abelian group dened by
More informationFinite Fields. [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT]
Finite Fields [Parts from Chapter 16. Also applications of FTGT] Lemma [Ch 16, 4.6] Assume F is a finite field. Then the multiplicative group F := F \ {0} is cyclic. Proof Recall from basic group theory
More informationRATIONAL COHOMOLOGY AND SUPPORTS FOR LINEAR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Dedicated to David J. Benson
RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY AND SUPPORTS FOR LINEAR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS ERIC M. FRIEDLANDER Dedicated to David J. Benson 0. Introduction What follows are rough notes based upon four lectures given by the author at
More informationLecture 2 Sheaves and Functors
Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors In this lecture we will introduce the basic concept of sheaf and we also will recall some of category theory. 1 Sheaves and locally ringed spaces The definition of sheaf
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS Your Name: Conventions: all rings and algebras are assumed to be unital. Part I. True or false? If true provide a brief explanation, if false provide a counterexample
More informationWeeks 6 and 7. November 24, 2013
Weeks 6 and 7 November 4, 03 We start by calculating the irreducible representation of S 4 over C. S 4 has 5 congruency classes: {, (, ), (,, 3), (, )(3, 4), (,, 3, 4)}, so we have 5 irreducible representations.
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationExercises on chapter 4
Exercises on chapter 4 Always R-algebra means associative, unital R-algebra. (There are other sorts of R-algebra but we won t meet them in this course.) 1. Let A and B be algebras over a field F. (i) Explain
More informationHom M (J P (V ), U) Hom M (U(δ), J P (V )),
Draft: October 10, 2007 JACQUET MODULES OF LOCALLY ANALYTIC RERESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUS II. THE RELATION TO ARABOLIC INDUCTION Matthew Emerton Northwestern University To Nicholas Contents
More informationDETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS
DETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS EDWARD T. CLINE, BRIAN J. PARSHALL AND LEONARD L. SCOTT Let G be a connected, semisimple algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field k of
More informationDieudonné Modules and p-divisible Groups
Dieudonné Modules and p-divisible Groups Brian Lawrence September 26, 2014 The notion of l-adic Tate modules, for primes l away from the characteristic of the ground field, is incredibly useful. The analogous
More informationRepresentations of semisimple Lie algebras
Chapter 14 Representations of semisimple Lie algebras In this chapter we study a special type of representations of semisimple Lie algberas: the so called highest weight representations. In particular
More informationON THE CHIEF FACTORS OF PARABOLIC MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS OF NORMAL LIE TYPE
Siberian Mathematical Journal, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 622 638, 2014 Original Russian Text Copyright c 2014 Korableva V.V. ON THE CHIEF FACTORS OF PARABOLIC MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS IN FINITE SIMPLE GROUPS OF NORMAL
More information1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties
0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasi-projective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.
More informationMath 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups
Math 250: Higher Algebra Representations of finite groups 1 Basic definitions Representations. A representation of a group G over a field k is a k-vector space V together with an action of G on V by linear
More informationAlgebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra
Algebraic Varieties Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra Algebraic varieties represent solutions of a system of polynomial
More information38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials
38 Irreducibility criteria in rings of polynomials 38.1 Theorem. Let p(x), q(x) R[x] be polynomials such that p(x) = a 0 + a 1 x +... + a n x n, q(x) = b 0 + b 1 x +... + b m x m and a n, b m 0. If b m
More informationExploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry
Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry Victor I. Piercey University of Arizona Integration Workshop Project August 6-10, 2010 1 Introduction In this project, we will describe the basic topology
More informationPeter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.
and of and Strings JC, 11 June, 2013 and of 1 2 3 4 5 of and of and Idea of 1 Study locally compact Hausdorff topological spaces through their algebras of continuous functions. The product on this algebra
More informationTHE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17
THE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17 Abstract. In this paper the 2-modular decomposition matrices of the symmetric groups S 15, S 16, and S 17 are determined
More informationDraft: February 26, 2010 ORDINARY PARTS OF ADMISSIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUPS I. DEFINITION AND FIRST PROPERTIES
Draft: February 26, 2010 ORDINARY PARTS OF ADISSIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF p-adic REDUCTIVE ROUPS I. DEFINITION AND FIRST PROPERTIES ATTHEW EERTON Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Representations of p-adic analytic
More informationALGEBRA HW 10 CLAY SHONKWILER. Proof. Suppose that these three functions are not linearly independent. Then there exist a, b R such that
ALGEBRA HW 10 CLAY SHONKWILER 1 (a): If A is a square matrix satisfying A 3 A 2 + A I = 0, find A 1 in terms of A. Answer: If A 3 A 2 + A I = 0, then (A 2 A + I)A = A 3 A 2 + A = I = A 3 A 2 + A = A(A
More informationCharacter sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence
Character sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence Anthony Henderson (joint with Pramod Achar, Daniel Juteau, Simon Riche) University of Sydney
More information4. Symmetric and Alternating Products We want to introduce some variations on the theme of tensor products.
4. Symmetric and Alternating Products We want to introduce some variations on the theme of tensor products. The idea is that one can require a bilinear map to be either symmetric or alternating. Definition
More informationThe Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras
The Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras Klaus Pommerening July 1979 english version April 2012 The Morozov-Jacobson theorem says that every nilpotent element of a semisimple
More informationFinite Groups of Lie Type
CHAPTER 1 Finite Groups of Lie Type We begin with a brief review of the standard ways in which finite groups of Lie type are classified, constructed, and described. One complication is the multiplicity
More informationFINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR
FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS LECTURE IV Gerhard Hiss Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik RWTH Aachen University Groups St Andrews 2009 in Bath University of Bath, August 1 15, 2009 CONTENTS
More informationRECOLLECTION THE BRAUER CHARACTER TABLE
RECOLLECTION REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE LECTURE III: REPRESENTATIONS IN NON-DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS AIM Classify all irreducible representations of all finite simple groups and related
More informationMath 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition
Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ Φ, and let B be the unique
More informationYuriy Drozd. Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry. Kaiserslautern 1998/99
Yuriy Drozd Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry Kaiserslautern 1998/99 CHAPTER 1 Affine Varieties 1.1. Ideals and varieties. Hilbert s Basis Theorem Let K be an algebraically closed field. We denote by
More informationHalf the sum of positive roots, the Coxeter element, and a theorem of Kostant
DOI 10.1515/forum-2014-0052 Forum Math. 2014; aop Research Article Dipendra Prasad Half the sum of positive roots, the Coxeter element, and a theorem of Kostant Abstract: Interchanging the character and
More informationLECTURE 20: KAC-MOODY ALGEBRA ACTIONS ON CATEGORIES, II
LECTURE 20: KAC-MOODY ALGEBRA ACTIONS ON CATEGORIES, II IVAN LOSEV 1. Introduction 1.1. Recap. In the previous lecture we have considered the category C F := n 0 FS n -mod. We have equipped it with two
More informationwhich is a group homomorphism, such that if W V U, then
4. Sheaves Definition 4.1. Let X be a topological space. A presheaf of groups F on X is a a function which assigns to every open set U X a group F(U) and to every inclusion V U a restriction map, ρ UV
More informationCharacter sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence
Character sheaves and modular generalized Springer correspondence Part 2: The generalized Springer correspondence Anthony Henderson (joint with Pramod Achar, Daniel Juteau, Simon Riche) University of Sydney
More informationEquivariant Algebraic K-Theory
Equivariant Algebraic K-Theory Ryan Mickler E-mail: mickler.r@husky.neu.edu Abstract: Notes from lectures given during the MIT/NEU Graduate Seminar on Nakajima Quiver Varieties, Spring 2015 Contents 1
More informationReview of Linear Algebra
Review of Linear Algebra Throughout these notes, F denotes a field (often called the scalars in this context). 1 Definition of a vector space Definition 1.1. A F -vector space or simply a vector space
More informationReal and p-adic Picard-Vessiot fields
Spring Central Sectional Meeting Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas Special Session on Differential Algebra and Galois Theory April 11th 2014 Real and p-adic Picard-Vessiot fields Teresa Crespo, Universitat
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.
INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7. 7. Killing form. Nilpotent Lie algebras 7.1. Killing form. 7.1.1. Let L be a Lie algebra over a field k and let ρ : L gl(v ) be a finite dimensional L-module. Define
More informationNoetherian property of infinite EI categories
Noetherian property of infinite EI categories Wee Liang Gan and Liping Li Abstract. It is known that finitely generated FI-modules over a field of characteristic 0 are Noetherian. We generalize this result
More informationCharacter Sheaves and GGGRs
Character Sheaves and GGGRs Jay Taylor Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Algebra Seminar University of Georgia 24th March 2014 Jay Taylor (TU Kaiserslautern) Character Sheaves Georgia, March 2014 1
More informationPacific Journal of Mathematics
Pacific Journal of Mathematics SPHERICAL NILPOTENT ORBITS IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC RUSSELL FOWLER AND GERHARD RÖHRLE Volume 237 No. 2 October 2008 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 237, No. 2, 2008
More informationNOTES ON FINITE FIELDS
NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction to finite fields 2 2. Definition and constructions of fields 3 2.1. The definition of a field 3 2.2. Constructing field extensions by adjoining
More information294 Meinolf Geck In 1992, Lusztig [16] addressed this problem in the framework of his theory of character sheaves and its application to Kawanaka's th
Doc. Math. J. DMV 293 On the Average Values of the Irreducible Characters of Finite Groups of Lie Type on Geometric Unipotent Classes Meinolf Geck Received: August 16, 1996 Communicated by Wolfgang Soergel
More informationBLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)
BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that
More informationMultiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups
Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups D. Testerman (with M. Liebeck and G. Seitz) EPF Lausanne Edinburgh, April 2016 D. Testerman (with M. Liebeck and G. Seitz) (EPF Lausanne) Multiplicity
More information(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)
1 Langlands classification for L-parameters A talk dedicated to Sergei Vladimirovich Vostokov on the occasion of his 70th birthday St.Petersburg im Mai 2015 (E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger) In the representation
More informationSPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationModular Littlewood-Richardson Coefficients
Modular Littlewood-Richardson Coefficients Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev Introduction Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p 0. We are interested in polynomial representations
More informationMath 249B. Applications of Borel s theorem on Borel subgroups
Math 249B. Applications of Borel s theorem on Borel subgroups 1. Motivation In class we proved the important theorem of Borel that if G is a connected linear algebraic group over an algebraically closed
More informationLectures on Galois Theory. Some steps of generalizations
= Introduction Lectures on Galois Theory. Some steps of generalizations Journée Galois UNICAMP 2011bis, ter Ubatuba?=== Content: Introduction I want to present you Galois theory in the more general frame
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, WINTER SOLUTIONS
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, WINTER 2017. SOLUTIONS Your Name: Conventions: all rings and algebras are assumed to be unital. Part I. True or false? If true provide a brief explanation, if false provide a counterexample
More informationLecture 15: Duality. Next we spell out the answer to Exercise It is part of the definition of a TQFT.
Lecture 15: Duality We ended the last lecture by introducing one of the main characters in the remainder of the course, a topological quantum field theory (TQFT). At this point we should, of course, elaborate
More information