arxiv: v1 [physics.data-an] 31 Oct 2014
|
|
- Katrina Henry
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Autocorrelation analysis for the unbiased arxiv: v1 [physics.data-an] 31 Oct 2014 determination of power-law exponents in single-quantum-dot blinking J. Houel,, Q. T. Doan, T. Cajgfinger, G. Ledoux, D. Amans, A. Aubret, A. Dominjon, S. Ferriol, R. Barbier, M. Nasilowski, E. Lhuillier, B. Dubertret, C. Dujardin, and F. Kulzer, Institut Lumière-Matière, CNRS UMR5306, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne CEDEX, France, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, CNRS UMR5822, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, 4 rue Enrico Fermi, Villeurbanne CEDEX, France, and Laboratoire de Physique et d Étude des Matériaux, CNRS UMR8213, École Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris, 10 Rue Vauquelin, Paris CEDEX 05, France julien.houel@univ-lyon1.fr; florian.kulzer@univ-lyon1.fr KEYWORDS: Colloidal Quantum Dots, Photoluminescence, Power-Law Blinking, Intensity Autocorrelation, Non-Ergodicity To whom correspondence should be addressed Institut Lumière-Matière, CNRS UMR5306, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne CEDEX, France Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, CNRS UMR5822, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, 4 rue Enrico Fermi, Villeurbanne CEDEX, France Laboratoire de Physique et d Étude des Matériaux, CNRS UMR8213, École Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris, 10 Rue Vauquelin, Paris CEDEX 05, France 1
2 Abstract We present an unbiased and robust analysis method for power-law blinking statistics in the photoluminescence of single nano-emitters, allowing us to extract both the bright- and darkstate power-law exponents from the emitters intensity autocorrelation functions. As opposed to the widely-used threshold method, our technique therefore does not require discriminating the emission levels of bright and dark states in the experimental intensity timetraces. We rely on the simultaneous recording of 450 emission timetraces of single CdSe/CdS core/shell quantum dots at a frame rate of 250 Hz with single photon sensitivity. Under these conditions, our approach can determine ON and OFF power-law exponents with a precision of 3 % from a comparison to numerical simulations, even for shot-noise-dominated emission signals with an average intensity below 1 photon per frame and per quantum dot. These capabilities pave the way for the unbiased, threshold-free determination of blinking power-law exponents at the micro-second timescale. Blinking, that is to say intermittent fluorescence, 1 4 is a ubiquitous feature of the emission of nanoparticles 5 and can have dramatic consequences for many potential applications. For colloidal quantum dots (QDs), blinking affects the performance of lasers, 6 light emitting diodes 7 and single photon sources, 8,9 to name but a few examples. Photoluminescence (PL) intermittence manifests itself as intensity fluctuations in the fluorescence timetrace of nano-emitters, where highly-emitting states (ON states) are repeatedly interrupted by poorly-emitting states (OFF states). The durations of these alternating ON and OFF periods are found to be distributed according to power laws for many kinds of quantum emitters, 5 including CdSe/CdS QDs. Under these distributions, the probability P ON (t)dt of observing an ON state duration between t and t+ dt is governed by the probability density P ON (t)=(m ON 1) θ m ON 1 t m ON, (1) where m ON is the power-law exponent associated with the ON state and θ is the cut-on time of the blinking process. The expression for the OFF-state probability density P OFF (t) can be obtained from Eq. (1) by replacing m ON with m OFF, the corresponding exponent for the OFF state. For colloidal 2
3 QDs, power law exponents 2 have been found, which implies non-ergodicity of the ON- and OFF-state dynamics. 10,11 Theoretical efforts to explain power-law-like emission characteristics started with Randall and Wilkins, who showed that the existence of electron traps with exponentially-distributed depths explains power-law decay of phosphorescence. 12 As far as QDs are concerned, their OFF states are linked to charge separation and electron trapping, 13 meaning that similar considerations can be applied. Power-law distributed ON times, on the other hand, are less straightforward to account for. More elaborate models have therefore been developed, based on spectral diffusion, 4,14 fluctuating barriers, 15,16 the existence of charged ON states, 17 spatial diffusion, 18 and variations of non-radiative rates. 19 However, while each of these models reproduces a large part of the available experimental evidence, there is still no unified approach that explains all observed properties of QD fluorescence intermittency; as a further complication, the existing models predict different power-law exponents. Recent experimental results have furthermore hinted at the possibility of subtle variations of the exponents when changing parameters like the excitation wavelength 20 or the excitation power. 21,22 As a consequence, an accurate and reliable method to determine powerlaw exponents from experimental data appears to be crucial for all further efforts toward a unified understanding of the underlying physical phenomena. Several sophisticated methods exist for the analysis of single-nano-emitter blinking. 23 Studies of power-law blinking usually proceed by first identifying the ON and OFF periods in singleparticle fluorescence timetraces and then adjusting Eq. (1) to the probability densities of the observed ON and OFF times. 3,4,15,24 The standard procedure of least-squares fitting is known to have problems with long-tailed distributions. 25 Thus, more suitable methods to extract m ON(OFF) have been developed, based on maximum-likelihood criteria and other statistical tests Nevertheless, all these approaches still crucially depend on a reliable distinction between ON and OFF in the emission intensity traces, which involves establishing an acceptable intensity threshold for a binned timetrace. The nano-emitter is thus considered to be in the ON-state if the intensity of a time bin surpasses this threshold and to be in the OFF-state otherwise, which is straightforward in both 3
4 concept and implementation. However, it has been shown recently 29 that the extracted m ON and m OFF can differ by up to 30%, depending on the experimental resolution (bin time) and the chosen threshold value. Furthermore, this method obviously depends on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thus breaks down when the signals are dominated by shot noise, which blurs the distinction between ON and OFF levels and thus limits the temporal resolution that can be achieved. The change-point detection approach of Watkins et al. 30 is an alternative to the threshold method: Here, the arrival time of every photon is recorded with high temporal resolution ( 100 ns); a subsequent maximum-likelihood analysis can then identify the most probable times at which ON OFF transitions occurred. The bin-time bias is thus eliminated as the technique makes the best possible use of the temporal resolution of the data-acquisition electronics. However, a trade-off still exists between efficiency (detecting all state changes, avoiding false negatives) and purity (detecting only real" state changes, avoiding false positives). This constraint reintroduces a user-biased choice for the acceptable level of false positives, with a concomitant trade-off for false negatives, in the maximum-likelihood analysis. Two approaches have been explored for extracting m ON and m OFF power-law blinking exponents without trying to differentiate ON and OFF states explicitly in the timetrace. 31,32 These methods successfully recover the power-law exponent if only one power-law process is at work, but become ambiguous as soon as two such distributions are involved, as is the case for QD blinking. Pelton et al. 32 have analyzed the power spectrum of an ensemble of QDs to show that the Fourier transform of their emission timetrace behaves as 1/ f β, where β contains the information on both ON and OFF time periods; so far it has not been possible to disentangle the individual contributions of m ON and m OFF. Verberk et al. 31 present an analysis based on the fluorescence intensity autocorrelation function, which makes use of the full information contained in the delays between all pairs of detected photons. As such, it is less sensitive to noise, can be applied to the data at full temporal resolution, and does not require any ON/OFF intensity threshold to be defined. However, the autocorrelation function contains an intermixed information on m ON and m OFF ; so far no general analytical 4
5 expression to extract m ON and m OFF from the autocorrelation function has been put forward. In this letter, we present the unbiased determination of m ON and m OFF power-law blinking exponents of CdSe/CdS QDs using the autocorrelation function. Our approach is robust with respect to experimental noise and temporal resolution, allowing the extraction of power-law exponents from fast (2 ms integration time), low-signal (< 1 photon per frame for each QD on average) blinking data. The method, which we here apply to the PL of single CdSe/CdS quantum dots, does not require setting an intensity threshold for distinguishing ON and OFF states in the experimental emission timetrace, thus removing the potential bias 29 inherent in making such a choice. Furthermore, our technique can easily be extended to photophysical schemes that involve more than two states and we therefore expect it to be applicable to many different types of nano-emitters. The fact that power-law blinking lacks a typical timescale has dramatic consequences: To obtain complete information on the fluorescence dynamics of single nano-emitters, the total experimental time needs to be infinite. As a consequence, experimental autocorrelation functions, even of one and the same nano-emitter, recorded at different times can deviate from each other significantly. This is not necessarily due to any change in the blinking behavior (the underlying power-law exponents themselves), but rather an intrinsic signature of the non-ergodicity (statistical aging) of luminescence that is governed by power-laws. 10,11 We therefore record a large number of single QD fluorescence timetraces simultaneously so that we can perform a statistical analysis of the corresponding autocorrelation functions; a subsequent comparison to numerical simulations identifies the best-fit power-law exponents with high specificity. The experimental setup used to record the timetraces is a home-built wide-field microscope coupled to a high-frame-rate ebcmos camera with high fidelity single photon counting capabilities, see Fig. 1 a. The CdSe/CdS core (3 nm)/shell(8 nm) QDs have an emission maximum centered at 597 nm and spin-coated onto a glass slide from a 90/10 hexane/octane solution. QD luminescence is excited by a 561 nm solid state laser with an intensity of 200 W/cm 2 in the center of the laser spot. The emission of individual QDs is collected by a 60, NA=1.35 oil-immersion objective and is redirected onto the ebcmos camera with a plano-convex lens of 1 m focal length, 5
6 (a) Ebcmos Filters (b) 561 nm QDs (c) photons/2 ms g (2) -1 frame # (x10 3 ) time (s) (d) counts (e) time (s) Figure 1: (a) Scheme of the experimental setup. Single QDs are excited at 561 nm with a continuous-wave laser. Photoluminescence is collected through the excitation objective and directed onto the ebcmos camera. Scattered laser light is suppressed by long-pass filters. (b) Position-dependent integrated photon counts per pixel on a false-color scale; the total acquisition time was 660 s. (The black square in the top left is due to one of the 4 camera quadrants having been turned off during the measurement.) (c) An example of a single QD timetrace extracted from (b). (d) Distribution of the counts of the QD timetrace: no global threshold can be established to discriminate between the ON and OFF states at full temporal resolution (2 ms). (e) Autocorrelation function of the data in (c) (blue dots) and the corresponding fit of Eq. (3) (red line) with parameters A=0.37, B=0.047 and C=
7 resulting in 333 magnification. The overall detection efficiency of the apparatus is around 3%. (Further details on the setup and the QD samples are available in the Supporting Information, Sections 1 and 2.) We have recorded the fluorescence of 450 single QDs simultaneously at a frame rate of 250 Hz with a total integration time of 660 seconds. It is worth mentioning that this frame rate is achieved on the full ebcmos camera chip of pixels. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such a large number of single QD timetraces recorded simultaneously at such a high frame rate and with the single photon sensitivity. To validate our method beyond standard conditions (slow acquisition and relatively high SNR), we deliberately kept the excitation power to a minimum, resulting in single-qd timetraces with average count rates of 1 photon per frame. Such lowlevel signals can be recorded with the ebcmos sensor thanks to its ultra-small dark noise of less than 0.02 photons/qd/frame on average (see Supporting Information, Fig. S9). Fig. 1 b shows the integrated image of the emission of 450 individual QDs, to which a pattern recognition algorithm was applied to locate the positions of the QDs (see Supporting Information, Section 3). The signal of each QD is then extracted from the sequence of images as a frame timetrace, an example of which is shown in Fig. 1 c. As can be seen in Fig. 1 d, the distribution of photon counts as commonly used in threshold-based methods does not allow for the discrimination between ON and OFF states. To analyze the single-qd timetraces, their fluorescence intensity autocorrelation functions g (2) (τ) are calculated according to: I(t)I(t+ τ) g (2) (τ)= 2, (2) I(t) where I(t) is the intensity (counts per timebin) at time t and represents time averages; Fig. 1 e shows an example of a single-qd autocorrelation function. Power-law blinking with exponents m < 2 lead to timetraces that are dominated by long events whose duration is of the same order of magnitude as the total measurement time. 36 As a consequence, the normalization factor I(t) 2 7
8 in Eq. (2) does not tend toward a well-defined long-time limit. The experimental autocorrelation functions therefore show significant variation from one QD to the next, and even if one and the same QD is probed several times under identical experimental conditions. Nonetheless, the autocorrelation functions exhibit a well-defined general shape for almost all (more than 95%) of the 450 QDs we studied: a power-law decay modulated by an exponential cut-off, in accordance with earlier reports. 31 The red line in Fig. 1 e shows a fit of the autocorrelation with the following equation: f(t)=at C exp ( Bt ), (3) where A represents the autocorrelation contrast, B the cut-off time and C is the power-law exponent of the autocorrelation function; C is equal to 2 m if only one of the two states has lifetimes governed by a power law with exponent m. 31,36 Generally speaking, the decay of an autocorrelation function represents a loss of information about the state of the emitter: As time progresses, it becomes increasingly likely that transitions occur, and at long times one can only make general statistical predictions that are independent of the emitter s state at time t = 0. We can therefore surmise that the fit parameter C will be linked to the combined contributions of the m ON and m OFF distributions, given that both types of transitions are stochastic in nature and hence lead to information loss. The autocorrelation contrast A is influenced by the relative duration of the ON/OFF periods; 23 traces dominated by long OFF periods have higher correlation contrasts than those of an emitter that is mostly in the ON state. The exponential cut-off rate given by parameter B, a phenomenological addition to the fit function, 31 may be attributable, at least partially, to the finite measurement time. Based on the above heuristic arguments, we conclude that the combination of parameters C and A may contain sufficient information to unravel the contributions of m ON and m OFF, even in the absence of a general analytical formula relating the fit parameters to the power-law exponents. (The cut-off parameter B serves as a consistency check, see Supporting Information, Section 8.) Due to the non-ergodicity of power-law blinking, we expect to find a broad distribution of the two parameters in (A,C) space; Fig. 2 a shows that this is indeed the case for the 450 experimental 8
9 C-parameter (a) (b) photons/2ms A-parameter (c) frame # (x10 3 ) time (s) (d) counts g (2) (e) time (s) Figure 2: (a) 2D distribution of the(a,c) couples resulting from fitting Eq. (3) to the experimental autocorrelation functions. Our analysis relies on reproducing this 2D distribution with simulated power-law blinking timetraces that are subjected to the same autocorrelation analysis. (b) Three different(a,c) distributions obtained after fitting the autocorrelation functions of simulated traces for three different sets of (m ON,m OFF ) exponents. Green triangles corresponds to (1.5,1.7), violet squares to (1.7,1.7) and red dots to (1.7,1.5). Every pair of exponents generates its own 2D distribution in the (A,C) space. (c) Example of a simulated timetrace with (m ON = 1.80,m OFF = 1.95) power-law exponents. (d) Distribution of the photon counts of the timetrace in (c). As for the experimental data, no global threshold can be established for discriminating ON and OFF states. (e) The corresponding autocorrelation, fitted (red line) by Eq. (3) with adjusted parameters A=0.13, B=0.056 and C=
10 autocorrelation functions. The assumption at the heart of our subsequent analysis is that this 2D distribution of the (A,C) parameters corresponds to one and only one (m ON,m OFF ) pair of blinking exponents. To validate this assumption, we have simulated 450 single QD timetraces with ON and OFF periods distributed according to power laws with exponents (m ON,m OFF ) (further details of the simulations and the fitting procedure are given in the Supporting Information, Sections 4 to 7). Fig. 2 c shows an example of a simulated timetrace for (m ON,m OFF ) = (1.8,1.95) and Fig. 2 e presents the corresponding autocorrelation. For every(m ON,m OFF ) couple, the 450 simulated autocorrelation functions are fitted with Eq. (3), yielding the 2D distribution of A and C in each case. Three examples of such simulated distributions are plotted in Fig. 2 b for(m ON,m OFF )=(1.5,1.7), (1.7,1.7) and (1.7,1.5). As expected, the distributions for each (m ON,m OFF ) pair are spread over a large area in (A,C) space, meaning that correctly identifying the underlying power-law exponents requires studying a statistically significant number of single QDs (see Supporting Information, Section 13). Given a large-enough data set, we can test whether a single (m ON,m OFF ) couple can be identified as the best fit for describing the experimental data of Fig. 2 a. To this end, we use a 2D Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) statistical test, 37,38 which compares the 2D (A,C) distributions of two different data sets, yielding a parameter D that quantifies the mismatch between the two distributions: D [0,1], where D=0 would correspond to prefect overlap. In total, we have tested 1444 different(m ON,m OFF ) combinations ranging from(1.05,1.05) to(2.9,2.9), covering more than the spread of values reported in the literature. 5,20,26,28,39,40 That is to say, we have simulated 450 single-qd timetraces for each(m ON,m OFF ) couple, determined the corresponding 2D distribution in (A,C) space and calculated the K-S parameter D with respect to the experimental data of Fig. 2 a. The 2D contour plot in Fig. 3 a shows the resulting values of D on a color scale as a function of m ON and m OFF ; the high contrast of D spans variations of one order of magnitude, from D 0.1 to 1. There is an isolated, well-defined minimum of D 0.1 at (1.8,1.95), indicating that a singular, narrowly-delimited combination of exponents optimizes the overlap between the experimental data and simulations based on the power-law model of Eq. (1). A high-resolution contour plot 10
11 m OFF D < (a) (b) 2.00 (c) m ON D < m ON C-parameter (d) A-parameter counts (e) D Figure 3: (a) Low-resolution comparison of simulations to experimental data with a 2D Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test. The K-S parameter D (color scale) is represented as a function of the m ON and m OFF exponents used in the simulations. There is a single (m ON,m OFF ) couple, (1.80, 1.95), that minimizes the D-parameter, corresponding to the best agreement between experimental and simulated(a,c) distributions. (b) Same comparison as in (a), now with a simulated set for (m ON = 1.80,m OFF = 1.95) replacing the experimental data; all features of the original contour plot (a) are reproduced. (c) High-resolution exploration of the area of minimal D from (a), yielding more accurate optimum values of(m ON = 1.805,m OFF = 1.955)±3%. (d) 2D distributions of A and C for the data (blue dots, same as in Fig. 2 a) and the best-fit simulation(m ON = 1.805,m OFF = 1.955) (red triangles). (e) Reproducibility and distinctiveness of D: The red histogram shows the distribution found for D when comparing the experimental (A,C) distribution to 215 different analysis runs for the previously-determined optimum couple (m ON = 1.805,m OFF = 1.955), while the black bars represent the analogous distribution for (m ON = 1.85,m OFF = 2.00), the second-lowest pixel in the contour plot in (a). The green histogram corresponds to a null-hypothesis calibration, for which one simulation run for (m ON = 1.805,m OFF = 1.955) is compared to 215 additional runs for the very same pair of parameters. 11
12 of the parameter space around the minimum of D can be seen in Fig. 3 c. For this particular ensemble of CdSe/CdS QDs, we thus find best-fit blinking exponents of(m ON = 1.805,m OFF = 1.955) for the pixel with minimum D; the corresponding simulated (A,C) distribution is compared to the experimental data in Fig. 3 d. After having shown that our approach can identify the optimal (m ON,m OFF ) couple with high specificity, we now discuss to what extent the autocorrelation analysis allows us to judge whether the underlying hypothesis itself QD blinking is governed by power-law distributed probabilities, Eq. (1) is justified. To explore this issue, we took a simulated data set for (m ON = 1.805,m OFF = 1.955), i. e., an ensemble of timetraces for which we know the null hypothesis to be true, and we subjected this set to the same analysis as the experimental data. We can thus identify the behavior of D that corresponds to genuine power-law blinking and quantify the degree of variation in D that is inherent in repeatedly probing the same power-law distributions with limited sample sizes and measurement times. As can be seen in Fig. 3 b, the resulting ideal contour plot agrees very well with the experimental one of Fig. 3 a, down to the shape of the faint offshoots observed for the main and secondary minima. However, the values of D are slightly lower in the minimum regions of Fig. 3 b, although this is barely noticeable given the color scale. We further investigated this feature by subjecting both the real and the idealized (simulated) data to 215 different analysis runs for the previously identified optimum parameters (m ON = 1.805,m OFF = 1.955). Each analysis run is based on a new seed of the random number generator and therefore produces its own simulated (A,C) distribution, to which both data sets (real and idealized) are then compared with the K- S test. The simulation-simulation analyses thus yield the distribution of D values that can be expected for idealized power-law blinking, which, as is shown in Fig. 3 e (green histogram), has its mean value at D sim = with a standard deviation of σ sim = The experiment-simulation analysis runs, on the other hand, produce a roughly Gaussian-shaped histogram (red) with mean value D exp = and standard deviation σ exp = There is about 20% overlap between the experiment-simulation and the simulation-simulation distributions, with the D values for the experimental data being larger in general. This means that the data, on average, tends to agree 12
13 slightly less well with simulations than can be expected from the variations between equivalent simulation-simulation analysis runs. Nevertheless, the large overlap means that there is no reason to reject the null hypothesis at the base of our analysis, which supposed that the blinking behavior of all the investigated QDs can be modeled by a power law with a single(m ON,m OFF ) combination. The remaining small offset between D exp and D sim might be due to an aspect of the particles photophysics that is not incorporated in our model. For example, small inhomogeneities may be present in the investigated sample of 450 QDs as far as power-law exponents, the exciton emission rates and/or the ratios between bright and dark state emission efficiencies are concerned. The black histogram in Fig. 3 e is the result of the experiment-simulation comparison for (m ON = 1.85,m OFF = 2.00), which corresponds to the pixel with the second-lowest D in the contour plot of Fig. 3 a. There is strictly no overlap with the D distribution for the optimum fit parameters (red histogram), illustrating once more the specificity of the autocorrelation analysis. In fact, as is detailed in the Supporting Information (Sections 9 and 11), we find that all 8 nearest-neighbor pixels in Fig. 3 a exhibit distributions whose maxima differ by at least 6σ from the mean value of D=0.107 of the optimum-solution histogram (red); where σ stands for the largest standard deviation of the compared histograms (worst case scenario). We therefore conclude that we are able to extract the power-law exponents with an absolute precision of ±0.05 (±3%) at 6σ specificity. The combination of m ON = with an almost 10% larger m OFF = indicates that these QDs spend most of the time in the ON state under continuous illumination, a typical feature of such large-shell CdSe/CdS QDs. 39,41 It is particularly noteworthy that m OFF approaches the critical threshold of 2, above which the average duration of the OFF periods becomes finite. The power-law exponent of the ON periods, on the other hand, is associated with an infinite average length; overall, this leads to a favorable interplay of ON versus OFF periods in the photoluminescence of this type of QD. To complete the discussion of our technique, we now address its robustness with respect to two critical factors. First, we consider the influence of the ON/OFF intensity contrast. OFF states can still be moderately emissive ( dim instead of completely dark), which makes it harder to distinguish them from the ON states. In fact, residual OFF state emission manifests itself in the 13
14 contour plot of Fig. 3 a, which shows, besides the global minimum of D=0.1, as a second domain (green) of relatively low D values around 0.4. This secondary minimum arises due to the relatively high quantum yield of the dark state for this type of QD, reaching 10% of the bright state emission. We show in the Supporting Information (Section 15) that this region shifts as a function of the dark state emissivity and tends to vanish if this emissivity drops below 0.1% of the efficiency of the bright state. With regard to more emissive dark states, we verified (see Supporting Information, Section 15) that our technique maintains a precision of ±0.05 (under the experimental conditions discussed in this work) as long as dark state efficiencies stay below 50% of the bright states. As a consequence, the approach is also suitable for analyzing recently developed types of giantshell or alloyed QDs, 44 both of which having a high dark-state-emission efficiency. The second important benchmark is the interplay between count rate, temporal resolution and residual uncertainty for the power-law exponents, which is linked to the sensitivity of the D parameter. As discussed above, we are able to extract the power-law exponents with an absolute precision of ±0.05 (±3%) at 6σ specificity. It is worth noting that this precision is achieved with shot-noisedominated timetraces, well below saturation of the QD emission. Such minimally-invasive conditions are preferable to approaches that require high count rates to discriminate between ON and OFF states, and hence high excitation intensities that may influence the blinking parameters 21,22 and can furthermore lead to photobleaching. As far as the temporal resolution is concerned, our method can extract blinking power-law exponents for timetraces with only 0.1 photons/qd/frame on average, with a reasonable acquisition time T max = 66 s with 3% precision (±0.05) at 6σ specificity (see Supporting Information, Section 14). This robustness of our method against noise may allow blinking studies at up to 100 khz (10 µs resolution), one order of magnitude faster than what has been demonstrated with change-point detection. 30 Verifying power-law behavior at the fastest possible timescale will be useful to elucidate the role of the cut-on time, θ in Eq. (1). Taking a pragmatic point of view, this cut-on time can be equated with the experimental temporal resolution; nevertheless, a more fundamental approach can be expected to improve our understanding of QD photophysics, for example if a timescale can be identified at which the power-law behavior breaks 14
15 down. In conclusion, we have presented a technique to determine unbiased power-law exponents of blinking CdSe/CdS core/shell QDs with a precision of 3 % at 6σ specificity. To our knowledge, this constitutes the first approach for extracting the full set of blinking parameters from experimental autocorrelation functions, bypassing the need of introducing a possibly-biased ON/OFF threshold. Our autocorrelation analysis is robust in the presence of noise and intrinsically free from timebindependent thresholding artifacts. As such, the method is capable of determining m ON and m OFF from timetraces dominated by shot noise, which are untreatable by other methods. We thus can extract the power-law exponents from ultra-low signal data ( 0.1 photon/frame/qd) with a precision of 3%, which offers the perspective of threshold-free blinking analysis at the micro-second timescale. Acknowledgment. We acknowledge technical support by J. Margueritat, J.-F. Sivignon, Y. Guillin, and the Lyon center for nano-opto technologies (NanOpTec). This research was supported by the Programme Avenir Lyon Saint-Étienne (ANR-11-IDEX-0007) of Université de Lyon, within the program Investissements d Avenir operated by the French National Research Agency (ANR). J. Houel thanks the Fédération de Recherche André Marie Ampère (FRAMA) for financial support. This work was performed in the context of the European COST Action MP1302 NanoSpectroscopy. Supporting Information Available. Extensive supporting information on experimental techniques, numerical simulations, and further capability benchmarks of our approach is available free of charge via the Internet at References (1) Nirmal, M.; Dabbousi, B. O.; Bawendi, M. G.; Macklin, J. J.; Trautman, J. K.; Harris, T. D.; Brus, L. E. Nature 1996, 383,
16 (2) Banin, U.; Bruchez, M.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Ha, T.; Weiss, S.; Chemla, D. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, (3) Kuno, M.; Fromm, D. P.; Hamann, H. F.; Gallagher, A.; Nesbitt, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, (4) Shimizu, K. T.; Neuhauser, R. G.; Leatherdale, C. A.; Empedocles, S. A.; Woo, W. K.; Bawendi, M. G. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, (5) Frantsuzov, P.; Kuno, M.; Janko, B.; Marcus, R. A. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, (6) Klimov, V. I.; Mikhailovsky, A. A.; Xu, S.; Malko, A.; Hollingsworth, J. A.; Leatherdale, C. A.; Eisler, H. J.; Bawendi, M. G. Science 2000, 290, (7) Anikeeva, P. O.; Halpert, J. E.; Bawendi, M. G.; Bulovic, V. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, (8) Lounis, B.; Bechtel, H. A.; Gerion, D.; Alivisatos, P.; Moerner, W. E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 329, (9) Michler, P.; Imamoğlu, A.; Mason, M. D.; Carson, P. J.; Strouse, G. F.; Buratto, S. K. Nature 2000, 406, (10) Brokmann, X.; Hermier, J. P.; Messin, G.; Desbiolles, P.; Bouchaud, J. P.; Dahan, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, (11) Lutz, E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, (12) Randall, J. T.; Wilkins, M. H. F. Proc. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1945, 184, (13) Efros, A. L.; Rosen, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, (14) Tang, J.; Marcus, R. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, (15) Kuno, M.; Fromm, D. P.; Hamann, H. F.; Gallagher, A.; Nesbitt, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115,
17 (16) Kuno, M.; Fromm, D. P.; Johnson, S. T.; Gallagher, A.; Nesbitt, D. J. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, (17) Verberk, R.; van Oijen, A. M.; Orrit, M. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, (18) Margolin, G.; Protasenko, V.; Kuno, M.; Barkai, E. adv chem phys 2006, 133, (19) Frantsuzov, P. A.; Marcus, R. A. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, (20) Knappenberger, K. L.; Wong, D. B.; Romanyuk, Y. E.; Leone, S. R. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, (21) Goushi, K.; Yamada, T.; Otomo, A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, (22) Malko, A. V.; Park, Y. S.; Sampat, S.; Galland, C.; Vela, J.; Chen, Y. F.; Hollingsworth, J. A.; Klimov, V. I.; Htoon, H. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, (23) Lippitz, M.; Kulzer, F.; Orrit, M. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, (24) Sher, P. H.; Smith, J. M.; Dalgarno, P. A.; Warburton, R. J.; Chen, X.; Dobson, P. J.; Daniels, S. M.; Pickett, N. L.; O Brien, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, (25) Goldstein, M. L.; Morris, S. A.; Yen, G. G. Eur. Phys. J. B 2004, 41, (26) Hoogenboom, J. P.; den Otter, W. K.; Offerhaus, H. L. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, (27) Clauset, A.; Shalizi, C. R.; Newman, M. E. J. SIAM Rev. 2009, 51, (28) Riley, E. A.; Hess, C. M.; Whitham, P. J.; Reid, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, (29) Crouch, C. H.; Sauter, O.; Wu, X. H.; Purcell, R.; Querner, C.; Drndic, M.; Pelton, M. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, (30) Watkins, L. P.; Yang, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, (31) Verberk, R.; Orrit, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119,
18 (32) Pelton, M.; Grier, D. G.; Guyot-Sionnest, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, (33) Barbier, R. et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc.Equip. 2011, 648, (34) Doan, Q.; Barbier, R.; Dominjon, A.; Cajgfinger, T.; Guérin, C. Proc. SPIE 2012, 8436, 84360J. (35) Guérin, C.; Mahroug, J.; Tromeur, W.; Houles, J.; Calabria, P.; Barbier, R. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A-Accel. Spectrom. Dect. Assoc.Equip. 2012, 695, (36) Bardou, F.; Bouchaud, J.-P.; Aspect, A.; Cohen-Tannoudji, C. Lévy Statistics and Laser Cooling: How Rare Events Bring Atoms to Rest; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, (37) Peacock, J. A. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1983, 202, (38) Fasano, G.; Franceschini, A. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1987, 225, (39) Mahler, B.; Spinicelli, P.; Buil, S.; Quélin, X.; Hermier, J. P.; Dubertret, B. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, (40) Orrit, M. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2010, 9, (41) Canneson, D.; Biadala, L.; Buil, S.; Quélin, X.; Javaux, C.; Dubertret, B.; Hermier, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, (42) Galland, C.; Brovelli, S.; Bae, W. K.; Padilha, L. A.; Meinardi, F.; Klimov, V. I. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, (43) Javaux, C.; Mahler, B.; Dubertret, B.; Shabaev, A.; Rodina, A. V.; Efros, A. L.; Yakovlev, D. R.; Liu, F.; Bayer, M.; Camps, G.; Biadala, L.; Buil, S.; Quélin, X.; Hermier, J. P. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, (44) Wang, X. Y.; Ren, X. F.; Kahen, K.; Hahn, M. A.; Rajeswaran, M.; Maccagnano-Zacher, S.; Silcox, J.; Cragg, G. E.; Efros, A. L.; Krauss, T. D. Nature 2009, 459,
Continuous Distribution of Emission States from Single CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots
Continuous Distribution of Emission States from Single CdSe/ZnS Quantum Dots NANO LETTERS 2006 Vol. 6, No. 4 843-847 Kai Zhang, Hauyee Chang,, Aihua Fu, A. Paul Alivisatos,, and Haw Yang*,, Department
More informationSize-Dependent Biexciton Quantum Yields and Carrier Dynamics of Quasi-
Supporting Information Size-Dependent Biexciton Quantum Yields and Carrier Dynamics of Quasi- Two-Dimensional Core/Shell Nanoplatelets Xuedan Ma, Benjamin T. Diroll, Wooje Cho, Igor Fedin, Richard D. Schaller,
More informationHigh-quality, monodisperse semiconductor nanocrystals can
Evidence for a diffusion-controlled mechanism for fluorescence blinking of colloidal quantum dots Matthew Pelton, Glenna Smith, Norbert F. Scherer, and Rudolph A. Marcus ** Center for Nanoscale Materials,
More informationSeung Jae Lee, ac Younggyu Kim, b Jongjin Jung, a Mi Ae Kim, a Namdoo Kim, b Sung Jin Lee, a Seong Keun Kim, b Yong-Rok Kim, c and Joung Kyu Park* a
Rapid and Facile Synthesis of (Zn x Ag y In z )S 2 Nanocrystal Library via Sono- Combichem Method and Its Characterization including Single Nanocrystal Analysis Seung Jae Lee, ac Younggyu Kim, b Jongjin
More informationDebjit Roy, Saptarshi Mandal, Chayan K. De, Kaushalendra Kumar and Prasun K. Mandal*
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. This journal is the Owner Societies 2018 Nearly Suppressed Photoluminescence Blinking of Small Sized, Blue-Green-Orange-Red
More informationBiexciton Quantum Yield of Single Semiconductor Nanocrystals from Photon Statistics
Biexciton Quantum Yield of Single Semiconductor Nanocrystals from Photon Statistics The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.
More informationNew Journal of Physics
New Journal of Physics The open access journal for physics Memory in quantum-dot photoluminescence blinking Fernando D Stefani 1, Xinhua Zhong 2, Wolfgang Knoll 1, Mingyong Han 2 and Maximilian Kreiter
More informationPhoton antibunching in single CdSe/ZnS quantum dot uorescence
27 October 2000 Chemical Physics Letters 329 (2000) 399±404 www.elsevier.nl/locate/cplett Photon antibunching in single CdSe/ZnS quantum dot uorescence B. Lounis a,b, *, H.A. Bechtel a, D. Gerion c, P.
More informationEli Barkai. Wrocklaw (2015)
1/f Noise and the Low-Frequency Cutoff Paradox Eli Barkai Bar-Ilan University Niemann, Kantz, EB PRL (213) Theory Sadegh, EB, Krapf NJP (214) Experiment Stefani, Hoogenboom, EB Physics Today (29) Wrocklaw
More informationAnti-Bunching from a Quantum Dot
Anti-Bunching from a Quantum Dot Gerardo I. Viza 1, 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 We study the nature of non-classical single emitter light experimentally
More informationAccurate and unbiased estimation of power-law exponents from single-emitter blinking data
THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 125, 204713 2006 Accurate and unbiased estimation of power-law exponents from single-emitter blinking data Jacob P. Hoogenboom a Optical Techniques, Faculty of Science and
More informationSupplementary Figures
Supplementary Figures Supplementary Figure. X-ray diffraction pattern of CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 film. Strong reflections of the () family of planes is characteristics of the preferred orientation of the perovskite
More informationSingle Emitter Detection with Fluorescence and Extinction Spectroscopy
Single Emitter Detection with Fluorescence and Extinction Spectroscopy Michael Krall Elements of Nanophotonics Associated Seminar Recent Progress in Nanooptics & Photonics May 07, 2009 Outline Single molecule
More informationAuger Processes in Nanosize Semiconductor Crystals
Auger Process by Alexander Efros 04//02 Auger Processes in Nanosize Semiconductor Crystals Alexander Efros Nanostructure Optics Section Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C. Introduction In this chapter
More informationWeak Ergodicity Breaking WCHAOS 2011
Weak Ergodicity Breaking Eli Barkai Bar-Ilan University Bel, Burov, Korabel, Margolin, Rebenshtok WCHAOS 211 Outline Single molecule experiments exhibit weak ergodicity breaking. Blinking quantum dots,
More informationConfocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss Photon Antibunching Setup
1 Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss Photon Antibunching Setup Abstract Jacob Begis The purpose of this lab was to prove that a source of light can be
More information1/f noise for intermittent quantum dots exhibits nonstationarity
1/f noise for intermittent quantum dots exhibits nonstationarity and critical exponents Sanaz Sadegh 1, Eli Barkai 2 and Diego Krapf 1,3 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State
More informationFluorescence photon measurements from single quantum dots on an optical nanofiber
Fluorescence photon measurements from single quantum dots on an optical nanofiber Ramachandrarao Yalla, K. P. Nayak *, and K. Hakuta Center for Photonic Innovations, University of Electro-Communications,
More informationLAB 3: Confocal Microscope Imaging of single-emitter fluorescence. LAB 4: Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup. Photon antibunching. Roshita Ramkhalawon
LAB 3: Confocal Microscope Imaging of single-emitter fluorescence LAB 4: Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup. Photon antibunching Roshita Ramkhalawon PHY 434 Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Rochester
More informationLaboratory 3: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown, and Twiss Setup for Photon Antibunching
Laboratory 3: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown, and Twiss Setup for Photon Antibunching Jonathan Papa 1, * 1 Institute of Optics University of Rochester, Rochester,
More informationConfocal Microscope Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Photon Antibunching
Confocal Microscope Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Photon Antibunching By Dilyana Mihaylova Abstract The purpose of this lab is to study different types of single emitters including quantum
More informationChapter 1: Overview of Nanometer-sized Materials
Chapter 1: Overview of Nanometer-sized Materials 1.1 General introduction Properties of bulk materials with micrometer sizes or larger have been investigated widely and are well understood. Recently, nanometer-sized
More informationUltrafast Dynamics and Single Particle Spectroscopy of Au-CdSe Nanorods
Supporting Information Ultrafast Dynamics and Single Particle Spectroscopy of Au-CdSe Nanorods G. Sagarzazu a, K. Inoue b, M. Saruyama b, M. Sakamoto b, T. Teranishi b, S. Masuo a and N. Tamai a a Department
More informationLaboratory 3&4: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup for Photon Antibunching
Laboratory 3&4: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup for Photon Antibunching Jose Alejandro Graniel Institute of Optics University of Rochester,
More informationSuppressed Blinking and Auger Recombination in Near-Infrared Type-II InP/CdS Nanocrystal Quantum Dots
pubs.acs.org/nanolett Suppressed Blinking and Auger Recombination in Near-Infrared Type-II InP/CdS Nanocrystal Quantum Dots Allison M. Dennis, Benjamin D. Mangum, Andrei Piryatinski, Young-Shin Park, Daniel
More informationAuger recombination in self-assembled quantum. dots: Quenching and broadening of the charged
Auger recombination in self-assembled quantum dots: Quenching and broadening of the charged exciton transition Annika Kurzmann 1*, Arne Ludwig 2, Andreas D.Wieck 2, Axel Lorke 1, and Martin Geller 1 1.
More informationInterfacial alloying in CdSe/CdS heteronanocrystals, a Raman spectroscopy analysis
Interfacial alloying in CdSe/CdS heteronanocrystals, a Raman spectroscopy analysis Norman Tschirner,, Holger Lange, Andrei Schliwa, Amelie Biermann, Christian Thomsen, Karel Lambert,, Raquel Gomes,, and
More informationThis document contains the following supporting information: 1. Wide field scanning electron microscope image
Supporting information for Self-assembled nanoparticle dimer antennas for plasmonic-enhanced single-molecule fluorescence detection at micromolar concentrations Deep Punj, Raju Regmi, Alexis Devilez, Robin
More informationLab 3 and 4: Single Photon Source
Lab 3 and 4: Single Photon Source By: Justin Deuro, December 10 th, 2009 Abstract We study methods of single photon emission by exciting single colloidal quantum dot (QD) samples. We prepare the single
More informationRandom switching, or blinking, between bright and dark
pubs.acs.org/nanolett Reduced Auger Recombination in Single CdSe/CdS Nanorods by One-Dimensional Electron Delocalization Freddy T. Rabouw, Per Lunnemann,, Relinde J. A. van Dijk-Moes, Martin Frimmer,,
More information12. Spectral diffusion
1. Spectral diffusion 1.1. Spectral diffusion, Two-Level Systems Until now, we have supposed that the optical transition frequency of each single molecule is a constant (except when we considered its variation
More informationUnravelling the Origin of Operational Instability of Quantum Dot based Light- Emitting Diodes
Supporting Information Unravelling the Origin of Operational Instability of Quantum Dot based Light- Emitting Diodes Jun Hyuk Chang, 1 Philip Park, 2 Heeyoung Jung, 3 Byeong Guk Jeong, 4 Donghyo Hahm,
More information1/f Noise: the Low Frequency Cutoff Paradox HIT (2018) Eli Barkai. Bar-Ilan University
1/f Noise: the Low Frequency Cutoff Paradox Eli Barkai Bar-Ilan University Niemann, Kantz, EB PRL (213) Sadegh, EB, Krapf NJP (214) Leibovich, EB PRL (215) Leibovich, Dechant, Lutz, EB PRE (216) Leibovich,
More information1/f Noise on the nano-scale Aeging Wiener-Khinchin approach. Pohang (2016)
1/f Noise on the nano-scale Aeging Wiener-Khinchin approach Eli Barkai Bar-Ilan University Niemann, Kantz, EB PRL (213) MMNP (216) Sadegh, EB, Krapf NJP (214) Leibovich, EB PRL (215) Leibovich, Dechant,
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 24 Sep 2015
Non-blinking single-photon emitters in silica Freddy T. Rabouw 1, Nicole M. B. Cogan 2, Anne C. Berends 1, Ward van der Stam 1, Daniel Vanmaekelbergh 1, A. Femius Koenderink 3, Todd D. Krauss 2, and Celso
More informationLifetime and polarization of the radiative decay of excitons, biexcitons, and trions in CdSe nanocrystal quantum dots
Lifetime and polarization of the radiative decay of excitons, biexcitons, and trions in CdSe nanocrystal quantum dots Marco Califano, 1,2 Alberto Franceschetti, 2 and Alex Zunger 2 1 Institute of Microwaves
More informationWeak Ergodicity Breaking
Weak Ergodicity Breaking Eli Barkai Bar-Ilan University 215 Ergodicity Ergodicity: time averages = ensemble averages. x = lim t t x(τ)dτ t. x = xp eq (x)dx. Ergodicity out of equilibrium δ 2 (, t) = t
More informationNature. Single-molecule spectral fluctuations at room temperature
Page 1 of 8 Main Search Page Display Knowledge Base He Full Text Save Article Text Email Article Text P Nature Single-molecule spectral fluctuations at room temperature Author(s): Lu, H. Peter; Xie, X.
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 92 (2016 ) 24 28
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 92 (2016 ) 24 28 6th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2016 Laplacian PL image evaluation implying correction
More informationIncreasing your confidence Proving that data is single molecule. Chem 184 Lecture David Altman 5/27/08
Increasing your confidence Proving that data is single molecule Chem 184 Lecture David Altman 5/27/08 Brief discussion/review of single molecule fluorescence Statistical analysis of your fluorescence data
More informationLaser Dissociation of Protonated PAHs
100 Chapter 5 Laser Dissociation of Protonated PAHs 5.1 Experiments The photodissociation experiments were performed with protonated PAHs using different laser sources. The calculations from Chapter 3
More informationChallenges and solutions for highefficiency quantum dot-based LEDs
Challenges and solutions for highefficiency quantum dot-based LEDs Deniz Bozyigit and Vanessa Wood Colloidal quantum dots (QDs) hold great promise as electrically excited emitters in light-emitting diodes
More informationTemporal analysis for implicit compensation of local variations of emission coefficient applied for laser induced crack checking
More Info at Open Access Database www.ndt.net/?id=17661 Abstract Temporal analysis for implicit compensation of local variations of emission coefficient applied for laser induced crack checking by G. Traxler*,
More informationAdministrative details:
Administrative details: Anything from your side? www.photonics.ethz.ch 1 Where do we stand? Optical imaging: Focusing by a lens Angular spectrum Paraxial approximation Gaussian beams Method of stationary
More informationP hotoluminescence (PL) blinking has long been observed in a variety of single optical emitters1,2 ranging from
OPEN SUBJECT AREAS: QUANTUM DOTS SINGLE PHOTONS AND QUANTUM EFFECTS Defect-Induced Photoluminescence Blinking of Single Epitaxial InGaAs Quantum Dots Fengrui Hu 1, Zengle Cao 1, Chunfeng Zhang 1, Xiaoyong
More informationPhotoluminescence Intermittency from Single Quantum Dots to Organic Molecules: Emerging Themes
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 12487-12518; doi:10.3390/ijms131012487 Review OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Photoluminescence Intermittency
More informationThe expansion coefficient of liquid helium 3 and the shape of its stability limit
The expansion coefficient of liquid helium 3 and the shape of its stability limit Frédéric Caupin, Sébastien Balibar and Humphrey J. Maris Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l Ecole Normale Supérieure
More informationPHOTOLUMINESCENCE SPECTRA AND QUANTUM YIELDS OF GOLD NANOSPHERE MONOMERS AND DIMERS IN AQUEOUS SUSPENSION
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. This journal is the Owner Societies 2016 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR PHOTOLUMINESCENCE SPECTRA AND QUANTUM
More informationSupplementary Materials
Supplementary Materials Sample characterization The presence of Si-QDs is established by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), by which the average QD diameter of d QD 2.2 ± 0.5 nm has been determined
More informationTheoretical modeling of single-molecule fluorescence with complicated photon statistics
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 86, 5382 (212) Theoretical modeling of single-molecule fluorescence with complicated photon statistics I. S. Osad ko, 1,2 A. V. Naumov, 1,2,3 I. Yu. Eremchev, 1 Yu. G. Vainer, 1,3 and
More informationIn Situ Imaging of Cold Atomic Gases
In Situ Imaging of Cold Atomic Gases J. D. Crossno Abstract: In general, the complex atomic susceptibility, that dictates both the amplitude and phase modulation imparted by an atom on a probing monochromatic
More informationSupplementary Figure 1 Comparison of single quantum emitters on two type of substrates:
Supplementary Figure 1 Comparison of single quantum emitters on two type of substrates: a, Photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of localized excitons in a WSe 2 monolayer, exfoliated onto a SiO 2 /Si substrate
More informationSemiconductor quantum dots
Semiconductor quantum dots Quantum dots are spherical nanocrystals of semiconducting materials constituted from a few hundreds to a few thousands atoms, characterized by the quantum confinement of the
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2011
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 00 (2018) 1 5 Alogo.pdf Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A Scintillation decay time and pulse shape discrimination in oxygenated
More informationInfluence of Morphology on Blinking Mechanisms. and Excitonic Fine Structure of Single Colloidal
Influence of Morphology on Blinking Mechanisms and Excitonic Fine Structure of Single Colloidal Nanoplatelets Zhongjian Hu 1,, Ajay Singh 1,, Serguei V. Goupalov 2,3, Jennifer A. Hollingsworth 1 & Han
More informationQuantum Dots for Advanced Research and Devices
Quantum Dots for Advanced Research and Devices spectral region from 450 to 630 nm Zero-D Perovskite Emit light at 520 nm ABOUT QUANTUM SOLUTIONS QUANTUM SOLUTIONS company is an expert in the synthesis
More informationDistribution of Delay Times in Laser Excited CdSe-ZnS Core-Shell Quantum Dots
Distribution of Delay Times in Laser Excited CdSe-ZnS Core-Shell Quantum Dots Andrei Vajiac Indiana University South Bend Mathematics, Computer Science Advisor: Pavel Frantsuzov, Physics Abstract This
More information5. 3P PIV Measurements
Micro PIV Last Class: 1. Data Validation 2. Vector Field Operator (Differentials & Integrals) 3. Standard Differential Scheme 4. Implementation of Differential & Integral quantities with PIV data 5. 3P
More informationTianle Guo, 1 Siddharth Sampat, 1 Kehao Zhang, 2 Joshua A. Robinson, 2 Sara M. Rupich, 3 Yves J. Chabal, 3 Yuri N. Gartstein, 1 and Anton V.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for Order of magnitude enhancement of monolayer MoS photoluminescence due to near-field energy influx from nanocrystal films Tianle Guo, Siddharth Sampat, Kehao Zhang, Joshua
More informationSupplementary Figure 1. Potential energy, volume, and molecular distribution of the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Supplementary Figure 1. Potential energy, volume, and molecular distribution of the organic substrates prepared by MD simulation. (a) Change of the density and total potential energy of
More informationLuminescence. Photoluminescence (PL) is luminescence that results from optically exciting a sample.
Luminescence Topics Radiative transitions between electronic states Absorption and Light emission (spontaneous, stimulated) Excitons (singlets and triplets) Franck-Condon shift(stokes shift) and vibrational
More informationEnhancement of Exciton Transport in Porphyrin. Aggregate Nanostructures by Controlling. Hierarchical Self-Assembly
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Nanoscale. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 Supporting Information for Enhancement of Exciton Transport in Porphyrin Aggregate Nanostructures
More informationInteraction mechanism for energy transfer from Ce to Tb ions in silica
Interaction mechanism for energy transfer from Ce to Tb ions in silica HAA Seed Ahmed 1,2, W-S Chae 3, OM Ntwaeaborwa 1 and RE Kroon 1 1 Department of Physics, University of the Free State, South Africa
More informationLab 3-4 : Confocal Microscope Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury-Brown and Twiss Set Up, Photon Antibunching
Lab 3-4 : Confocal Microscope Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury-Brown and Twiss Set Up, Photon Antibunching Mongkol Moongweluwan 1 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
More informationTime resolved ultrafast ARPES for the study of topological insulators: The case of Bi 2 Te 3
Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 222, 1271 1275 (2013) EDP Sciences, Springer-Verlag 2013 DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2013-01921-1 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL SPECIAL TOPICS Regular Article Time resolved ultrafast
More informationConformation-dependent Photostability among and within Single Conjugated Polymers. Supporting Information
Conformation-dependent Photostability among and within Single Conjugated Polymers Heungman Park, Dat Tien Hoang, Keewook Paeng, Jaesung Yang, Laura J. Kaufman * Department of Chemistry, Columbia University,
More informationReal-time near-field evidence of optical blinking in the photoluminescence of InGaN by scanning near-field optical microscope
Real-time near-field evidence of optical blinking in the photoluminescence of InGaN by scanning near-field optical microscope Kotaro Oikawa, 1 Christian Feldmeier, 2 Ulrich Theodor Schwarz, 3 Yoichi Kawakami
More informationTitle: Ultrafast photocurrent measurement of the escape time of electrons and holes from
Title: Ultrafast photocurrent measurement of the escape time of electrons and holes from carbon nanotube PN junction photodiodes Authors: Nathaniel. M. Gabor 1,*, Zhaohui Zhong 2, Ken Bosnick 3, Paul L.
More informationCHAPTER 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CHAPTER 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 CHAPTER OUTLINE This chapter presents the data obtained from the investigation of each of the following possible explanations: (1) Experimental artifacts. (2) Direct
More informationLet us consider a typical Michelson interferometer, where a broadband source is used for illumination (Fig. 1a).
7.1. Low-Coherence Interferometry (LCI) Let us consider a typical Michelson interferometer, where a broadband source is used for illumination (Fig. 1a). The light is split by the beam splitter (BS) and
More informationCharge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device
Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device Andreas V. Kuhlmann, 1 Julien Houel, 1 Arne Ludwig, 1, 2 Lukas Greuter, 1 Dirk Reuter, 2, 3 Andreas D. Wieck, 2 Martino Poggio, 1 and Richard
More informationLight Amplification Using Inverted Core/Shell Nanocrystals: Towards Lasing in the Single-Exciton Regime
J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10625-10630 10625 Light Amplification Using Inverted Core/Shell Nanocrystals: Towards Lasing in the Single-Exciton Regime Sergei A. Ivanov, Jagjit Nanda, Andrei Piryatinski,
More informationSupplementary Figure 1 Level structure of a doubly charged QDM (a) PL bias map acquired under 90 nw non-resonant excitation at 860 nm.
Supplementary Figure 1 Level structure of a doubly charged QDM (a) PL bias map acquired under 90 nw non-resonant excitation at 860 nm. Charging steps are labeled by the vertical dashed lines. Intensity
More informationCorrelations between density fluctuations and acoustic far field in free jets using Rayleigh scattering
53 rd 3AF International Conference on Applied Aerodynamics 26 28 March 218, Salon de Provence France FP7-AERO218-mercier Correlations between density fluctuations and acoustic far field in free jets using
More informationSupporting Information The Effect of Temperature and Gold Nanoparticle Interaction on the Lifetime and Luminescence of Upconverting Nanoparticles
Supporting Information Synthesis and Characterization Supporting Information The Effect of Temperature and Gold Nanoparticle Interaction on the Lifetime and Luminescence of Upconverting Nanoparticles Ali
More informationB.J.C.M. van Gils. Optical Techniques Group Applied Physics Department of Science and Technology University of Twente
Towards quantum dot luminescence enhancement An investigation of radiative properties of single quantum dots in close proximity to a nanosize metal object B.J.C.M. van Gils Optical Techniques Group Applied
More informationSupplementary Figures Supplementary Figure 1: Estimation of the error of the number and brightness of molecules in a single cluster; Simulation
Supplementary Figures Supplementary Figure 1: Estimation of the error of the number and brightness of molecules in a single cluster; Simulation (a,c) Relative estimated numbers of molecules ; (b,d) relative
More informationStatistics. on Single Molecule Photon. Diffusion. Influence of Spectral
Influence of Spectral Diffusion on Single Molecule Photon Statistics Eli Barkai Yong He Bar-Ilan Feb. 24 25 Single Molecule Photon Statistics Sub-Poissonian Statistics, Mandel s Q parameter (198). Spectral
More informationLevel Repulsion of Localised Excitons Observed in Near-Field Photoluminescence Spectra
phys. stat. sol. (a) 190, No. 3, 631 635 (2002) Level Repulsion of Localised Excitons Observed in Near-Field Photoluminescence Spectra A. Crottini (a), R. Idrissi Kaitouni (a), JL. Staehli 1 ) (a), B.
More informationPrediction of a Shape-Induced Enhancement in the Hole Relaxation in Nanocrystals
Prediction of a Shape-Induced Enhancement in the Hole Relaxation in Nanocrystals NANO LETTERS 2003 Vol. 3, No. 9 1197-1202 Marco Califano,* Gabriel Bester, and Alex Zunger National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
More informationAPPROXIMATE CENTRIFUGAL BARRIERS AND CRITICAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM
Dedicated to Academician Aureliu Sandulescu s 80 th Anniversary APPROXIMATE CENTRIFUGAL BARRIERS AND CRITICAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM A. DIAF 1,2, M. LASSAUT 3, R.J. LOMBARD 3,* 1 Laboratoire de Physique Théorique,
More informationThree-Dimensional Silicon-Germanium Nanostructures for Light Emitters and On-Chip Optical. Interconnects
Three-Dimensional Silicon-Germanium Nanostructures for Light Emitters and On-Chip Optical eptember 2011 Interconnects Leonid Tsybeskov Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering New Jersey Institute
More informationSupporting Information Optical extinction and scattering cross sections of plasmonic nanoparticle dimers in aqueous suspension
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Nanoscale. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 Supporting Information Optical extinction and scattering cross sections of plasmonic nanoparticle
More informationSupporting information. Unidirectional Doubly Enhanced MoS 2 Emission via
Supporting information Unidirectional Doubly Enhanced MoS 2 Emission via Photonic Fano Resonances Xingwang Zhang, Shinhyuk Choi, Dake Wang, Carl H. Naylor, A. T. Charlie Johnson, and Ertugrul Cubukcu,,*
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 6 Mar 2008
CD2dBS-v2 Convergence dynamics of 2-dimensional isotropic and anisotropic Bak-Sneppen models Burhan Bakar and Ugur Tirnakli Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
More informationLab Experimental observation of singleemitter fluorescence and photon anti-bunching
Lab. 3-4. Experimental observation of singleemitter fluorescence and photon anti-bunching Laboratory Report Group, Fall 6 Abstract: Fluorescence from single emitters, such as DiDye molecules and CdSe quantum
More informationHigh-Resolution Survey of the Visible Spectrum of NiF by Fourier Transform Spectroscopy
Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 214, 152 174 (2002) doi:10.1006/jmsp.2002.8567 High-Resolution Survey of the Visible Spectrum of NiF by Fourier Transform Spectroscopy Y. Krouti, T. Hirao,,1 C. Dufour,
More informationLight Amplification in the Single-Exciton Regime Using Exciton-Exciton Repulsion in Type-II Nanocrystal Quantum Dots
1538 J. Phys. Chem. C 007, 111, 1538-15390 Light Amplification in the Single-Exciton Regime Using Exciton-Exciton Repulsion in Type-II Nanocrystal Quantum Dots Jagjit Nanda, Sergei A. Ivanov, Marc Achermann,
More informationNovel Nanoparticles for Ultrasensitive Detection and Spectroscopy
Final Technical Report (DOE-FG02-98ER14873) Project Officer: Dr. Richard Gordon / Dr. John Miller Novel Nanoparticles for Ultrasensitive Detection and Spectroscopy Shuming Nie Indiana University P. 0.
More informationResonantly Excited Time-Resolved Photoluminescence Study of Self-Organized InGaAs/GaAs Quantum Dots
R. Heitz et al.: PL Study of Self-Organized InGaAs/GaAs Quantum Dots 65 phys. stat. sol. b) 221, 65 2000) Subject classification: 73.61.Ey; 78.47.+p; 78.55.Cr; 78.66.Fd; S7.12 Resonantly Excited Time-Resolved
More informationλmax = k d Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Figures a b HQ CCD Transmission Grating Beam splitting lens Color CCD Objective Sample Dark-field Condenser Raw data Gaussian fit c λmax = k d k = 1.733 nm/pixel 53 nm 307 pixels d Supplementary
More informationMeasuring Colocalization within Fluorescence Microscopy Images
from photonics.com: 03/01/2007 http://www.photonics.com/article.aspx?aid=39341 Measuring Colocalization within Fluorescence Microscopy Images Two-color fluorescence-based methods are uncovering molecular
More informationC. Watson, E. Churchwell, R. Indebetouw, M. Meade, B. Babler, B. Whitney
Reliability and Completeness for the GLIMPSE Survey C. Watson, E. Churchwell, R. Indebetouw, M. Meade, B. Babler, B. Whitney Abstract This document examines the GLIMPSE observing strategy and criteria
More informationLecture 9. PMTs and Laser Noise. Lecture 9. Photon Counting. Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs) Laser Phase Noise. Relative Intensity
s and Laser Phase Phase Density ECE 185 Lasers and Modulators Lab - Spring 2018 1 Detectors Continuous Output Internal Photoelectron Flux Thermal Filtered External Current w(t) Sensor i(t) External System
More informationΓ43 γ. Pump Γ31 Γ32 Γ42 Γ41
Supplementary Figure γ 4 Δ+δe Γ34 Γ43 γ 3 Δ Ω3,4 Pump Ω3,4, Ω3 Γ3 Γ3 Γ4 Γ4 Γ Γ Supplementary Figure Schematic picture of theoretical model: The picture shows a schematic representation of the theoretical
More informationCHEM Outline (Part 15) - Luminescence 2013
CHEM 524 -- Outline (Part 15) - Luminescence 2013 XI. Molecular Luminescence Spectra (Chapter 15) Kinetic process, competing pathways fluorescence, phosphorescence, non-radiative decay Jablonski diagram
More informationDetection of Single Photon Emission by Hanbury-Brown Twiss Interferometry
Detection of Single Photon Emission by Hanbury-Brown Twiss Interferometry Greg Howland and Steven Bloch May 11, 009 Abstract We prepare a solution of nano-diamond particles on a glass microscope slide
More informationMechanisms of Visible Photoluminescence from Size-Controlled Silicon Nanoparticles
Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 737 23 Materials Research Society F1.5.1 Mechanisms of Visible Photoluminescence from Size-Controlled Silicon Nanoparticles Toshiharu Makino *, Nobuyasu Suzuki, Yuka Yamada,
More informationSupplementary Information: Three-dimensional quantum photonic elements based on single nitrogen vacancy-centres in laser-written microstructures
Supplementary Information: Three-dimensional quantum photonic elements based on single nitrogen vacancy-centres in laser-written microstructures Andreas W. Schell, 1, a) Johannes Kaschke, 2 Joachim Fischer,
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2012.63 Bright infrared quantum-dot light-emitting diodes through inter-dot spacing control Liangfeng Sun, Joshua J. Choi, David Stachnik, Adam C. Bartnik,
More information