arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 13 Nov 2017
|
|
- Beverley Garrett
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BPS Cho Maison monopole arxiv:7.484v [hep-th] Nov 7 Filip Blaschke,, and Petr Beneš, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo náměstí 5/, 746 Opava, Czech Republic Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Horská a/, 8 Praha, Czech Republic We present exact solutions to Cho Maison magnetic monopole in a family of effective electroweak models, which havea BPS limit. We findthat the lower boundtothemass of the magnetic monopole is M πv/g.7 TeV. We argue that this bound holds universally, not just in theories with a BPS limit. Keywords: Magnetic monopole; electroweak model; exact solutions I. INTRODUCTION The Dirac s monopole [], later generalized to dyon by Swinger [], remains the most fruitful theoretical idea which is yet to be experimentally verified to date. The famous Dirac s quantization condition linking together magnitude of the electric charge e and the magnetic charge q = πn/e is but a first of its many interesting consequences. Originally, Dirac imagined his monopole as an optional component of quantum) electrodynamics. However, the idea of magnetic monopole quickly pollinated all major disciplines of theoretical physics. It has been introduced to non-abelian SU) gauge theory by Wu and Yang []. Later, t Hooft[4] and Polyakov[5] independently showed that a non-singular SU) monopole configuration can be achieved with adjoint scalar fields. Subsequently, Bogomol nyi [6] and, independently, Prasad and Sommerfield [7] discovered that in the limit of vanishing potential the monopole can be found in the analytic form. This limit, henceforth known as Bogomol nyi Prasad Sommerfield BPS) limit, became an important tool in both finding and studying classical solutions in gauge theories coupled with the scalar matter. Among other things, in the BPS limit, one can directly calculate the mass without the need for integration. Furthermore, BPS limit allows constructing multi-particle solutions as static configurations since, in this limit, the repulsive force mediated by gauge fields is precisely balanced by the attractive force mediated by scalars. This also enables an approximate analysis of scattering without the need of solving underlying partial differential equations [8]. In short, the BPS limit provides us with a useful analytical window for studying its non-bps and more realistic) counterparts. The electroweak model of Weinberg [9] and Salam [] was long thought to be void of monopoles. The standard argument was that the underlying quotient space SU) L U) Y /U) em has only trivial second homotopy group and, hence, cannot support a monopole. filip.blaschke@fpf.slu.cz petr.benes@utef.cvut.cz While this is true, Cho and Maison [] showed that the desired topology can be found elsewhere, namely in the normalized) Higgs doublet, which can be regarded as CP coordinate. This gives us a second homotopy π ) CP = Z. In addition, Cho Maisonmonopole similarly to Dirac s monopole has a point singularity in the magnetic field and a line singularity in U) Y gauge fields. As such, Cho Maison monopole represent as a peculiar mixture of t Hooft Polyakov and Dirac s ideas. With the experiments such as MoEDAL [] currently searching for magnetic monopoles, the problem of estimating the mass of the Cho Maison monopoles is especially urgent. The issue is that Cho Maison monopole has a divergent energy and one needs a sufficiently robust regularization method to obtain a valid estimate. In their paper [], Cho, Kim and Yoon CKY) showed that by modifying the hypercharge coupling constant to depend on the magnitude of the Higgs doublet, i.e., L 4 ǫ H v ) B µν B µν, ) where ǫ) = becomes a unity in the Higgs vacuum H v, it is possible to have finite Cho Maison monopoles within the range 4 to TeV. For concreteness, they showed that for ǫ H 8 the monopole mass is 4π/e )M W 7. TeV. This was picked up by Ellis et al. [4] who pointed out that such a choice leads to an unrealistically high Hγγ vertex and proposed a whole series of alternative forms for ǫ. Using the principle of maximum entropy to determine unconstrained parameters in ǫ, they showed that some choices can get as low as 5.5 TeV opening a possibility for pair-production of Cho Maison monopoles at LHC. In this paper, we continue this story by providing a definitive lower bound on the mass of the Cho Maison monopole, which is M πv/g.7 TeV. We achieve this by constructing a family of effective electroweak models which has a BPS limit. In this limit, the mass of the Cho Maison monopole can be found analytically and it is determined purely by asymptotic behavior of fields. We then show that CKY theory can be reformulated as a BPS theory with additional positive contributions. This demonstrates that monopoles in CKY model cannot be lighter and in fact must be heavier) than the
2 BPS monopoles presented in this paper. A further advantage of considering a BPS extension of the CKY model lies also in the fact that it motivates non-canonical modifications of the theory. While in CKY model the introduction of the ǫ term is rather ad hoc, in this work, it would not be possible to achieve BPS limit without it. As it turns out, we actually need modifications to the SU) L kinetic term as well. The idea to make gauge couplings of the theory into functions of gauge invariants is rather natural from the point of view of the effective Lagrangian approach. These terms can be understood as a finite or infinite sum of loop corrections to the electroweak theory or some other theory beyond the SM. Even though the top-down justification for their precise structure would be difficult and beyond the scope of this paper, in general, there could be many different dynamics which cause them. Moreover, the idea of field-dependent gauge coupling of the type ) arises quite naturally within the context of supersymmetric theories but its utility reaches far beyond. For instance, this concept has been successfully used in localizing zero modes of non-abelian gauge fields on the domain wall [5]. The physical reasoning is that such a term classically mimics the effects of confining vacuum outside of the domain wall, which acts as a dual superconductor forcing the field lines to be squeezed inside the domain wall. Recently, a similar idea was used in constructing a 5- dimensional SU5) GUT scenario in the background of five domain walls [6]. There, the gauge-kinetic scalar term was responsible for dynamical symmetry breaking of SU5) to the SM gauge group [7] via non-coincident configuration of walls, similarly to the D-branes. In this sense, we view the modifications of the form ) as yet another application of the position dependent gauge coupling idea. The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we introduce our model and derive BPS equations. In Sec. III, we solve the BPS equations in the spherically symmetric case and present a general formula for monopole mass and charge. We also discuss the properties of monopoles in various special cases. Sec. IV is devoted to the general BPS theory, which is used in Sec. V to demonstrate the universality of the lower bound on the monopole mass. Lastly, we discuss our results in Sec. VI. II. MODEL AND THE BPS EQUATIONS Let us consider the following modification of the bosonic part of the electroweak model: L eff = v 4g H Tr[ F µν F µν] + v g H 6 Tr[ F µν HH ] Tr [ F µν HH ] ) H 4g f B µν B µν v + D µ H λ ) H H v, ) where v = 46GeV is the electroweak scale. The field strength tensors of the SU) L and U) Y gauge groups are F µν = µ A a ν νa a µ εabc A b µ Ac ν) τ a, ) B µν = µ B ν ν B µ, 4) and the covariant derivative of the Higgs doublet H is D µ H = µ ½ +ia aµτ a +i ) B µ½ H. 5) The SU) L generators τ a satisfy [τ a,τ b ] = iε abc τ c and are normalized as Tr[τ a τ b ] = δab. In the model ), we introduced a function f, whose derivativesquared modifies the kinetic term ofthe U) Y gauge field in the same manner as in Refs. [, 4]. As shown in [], the purpose of this function is to modify permittivity of the U) Y gauge field and, consequently, make the energy of the monopole solution finite. Requiring that in the vacuum H = v/ ) the kinetic term is unmodified, we adopt the normalization f ) =. 6) Notice that this condition does not impact the generality of our discussion, since any f ) can be absorbed into the definition of g. In contrast to [4] or [], however, we also modify the SU) L gauge structure of the theory, as is shown in the first two lines ofeq. ). The motivation for these two effective termsis to makethe theorypossessthe BPSlimit. Interestingly, while we have virtually absolute freedom in modifying effective permittivity of U) Y embodied in the function f, we find that modifications of SU) L gauge terms are completely fixed by the requirement that the mixed term B µν Tr [ F µν HH ], 7) The function f /g corresponds to the function ǫ in the notation of [4]; compare Eq. ).
3 disappear. The main benefit of not having such a term is that the BPS equations are simplest and easiest to solve. The price we pay, however, is the apparent pole at H =. Let us stress that, despite the appearances, the model ) is well defined around the Higgs vacuum if not identical to the electroweak model), as we will see later in this section. In fact, it is best not to perceive ) as a model for phenomenological inquiry; rather, it is a theoretical laboratory, where Cho Maison monopoles are in their analytically simplest form. In Sec. IV, we drop this anti-mixterm policy and explore the Ivory Tower of all possible BPS theories to its full heights. We find a much richer family of BPS theories, where one can completely avoid the above mentioned singular appearance. Surprisingly, we find that the BPS mass of the Cho Maison monopole has the same form in any BPS theory. With this in mind, we consider the results presented in this section to be representative and generic. Let us now show that for the model ) the BPS limit exists. It proves convenient to decompose the Higgs doublet H as H = vρξ, 8) wherethecp fieldξ adoublet)isnormalizedasξ ξ = and the radial field ρ a singlet) is real. First, let us write the energy density for static configurations that is, = A a = B = ): E = ) g ρ M i ξ M i ξ ξ + g f ρ ) G i + D i H + λv4 8 ρ ), 9) where we introduced the SU) L and U) Y magnetic fields M i = ε ijkf jk = ε ijk j A a k ) εabc A b ja c k τ a, ) G i = ε ijkb jk = ε ijk j B k ) and where we used the identity Tr [ Mi ] ξ M i ξ ) = Mi ξ M i ξ ) ξ, ) so that the positive definiteness of E is manifest. In the limit λ we can complete the energy density into a perfect square plus a total derivative: ) M i ξ M i ξ ξ η gρ E = D ih η +η v ) g i ξ M i ξ + η v g i g f ρ)g i ξ ) fρ)g i, ) where η = ± and η = ± are some signs and where we used the Bianchi identities i M a i ε abc A b i Mc i = and i G i =. Thus, we obtain the Bogomol nyi bound E η v ) g i ξ M i ξ + η v ) g i fρ)g i, 4) which is saturated if the BPS equations ) D i H = η M i ξ M i ξ ξ + η gρ g f ρ)g i ξ 5) are satisfied. Field configurations which solve BPS equations are generically called BPS solitons and are necessarily solutions of the equations of motion. Let us now multiply the BPS equations 5) from left by ξ to obtain where ) vρ ξ D i ξ +v i ρ+ i ) B iρ = η g f ρ)g i, 6) D i ξ = i ½ +ia a iτ a) ξ. 7) If we now subtract from Eq. 6) its Hermitian conjugate we obtain, after trivial rearranging of the terms, B i = iξ D i ξ, 8) i.e., we obtain expression of the U) Y gauge field B i in terms of ξ and A a i. On the other hand, summing Eq. 6) with its Hermitian conjugate yields i ρ f ρ) = η vg G i. 9) Lastly, using the expressions for B i and i ρ, we can rewrite the BPS equations 5) into the reduced form ½ ξξ ) D i ξ η ) gvρ M iξ =. ) III. BPS CHO MAISON MONOPOLE A. Spherically symmetric Ansatz Let us now solve the BPS equation 5) for a spherically symmetric monopole. We employ the hedgehog Ansatz for SU) L gauge fields: A a i τa = Kr) ) ε ijk x k τ j r, ) However, for a configuration of monopoles i G i and in that case, strictly speaking, we should introduce into the Lagrangian ) a source term for the monopoles j µb µ. Alternatively, we can say that our model is not based on R but rather on the space with the origin removed R /} for a single monopole), where i G i =. In this paper, we will adopt this somewhat sloppy but convenient attitude as it does not change the results, as far as static configurations are concerned.
4 4 where Kr) is some function of the radial coordinate. Furthermore we set ) sinθ/)e iϕ ξ = i, ) cosθ/) where ϕ, θ are respectively the azimuthal and polar angles. The hedgehog Ansatz ) leads to M i = r [ xi x a r K ) Furthermore, it holds that δ ia x ix a r )rk ] τ a. ) ξ τ a ξ = xa r, 4) which together with ) implies A a i ξ τ a ξ =. Using the formula 8) for B i we obtain B i = iξ i ξ = cosθ) i ϕ = ε ij j logr+z) 5) and correspondingly G i = x i r = i r. 6) Consequently, under the spherically symmetric Ansatz ) and ) the bps equations 9) and ) reduce to ρ f ρ) = η vg r, 7a) K K = ηgv ρ, 7b) which are easily solved as [ ρr) = F F ρ ) ) η g vr where Kr) = K)exp η gv r ], 8a) } dr ρ r ), 8b) ρ dρ Fρ) f ρ ). 9) The boundary condition is ρ ) = so that the Higgs field acquires a proper vacuum expectation value at spatial infinity. For Kr), we set K) = in order for the SU) L gaugefields ) to be regularat the origin. Similarly, regularity of the Higgs field at the origin requires ρ) =. From the second expression for the connection B i is particularly easy to see that it is singular along the negative z-axis. It can be shown that the direction and even the shape of this Dirac string can be arbitrarily changed by gauge transformations and hence represents an unphysical object. The energy density given by the Bogomol nyi bound 4)) can be, using Eqs. 7), rewritten as E = v ρ K r + g f ρ) r 4. ) To make the total energy mass) integral M = 4π drr E to converge, we need to have K ) =, which implies η =, ) while the convergence at the lower limit requires that f ρ)) = f ) =. To summarize, we have the following initial and boundary conditions on ρr) and Kr) and on the function f ρ): K) =, ρ) =, f ) =, a) K ) =, ρ ) =, f ) =. b) B. The mass and its lower bound Recallthat in the BPSlimit the energydensity is given as a total derivative: E = η v g i ξ M i ξ ) + η v g i fρ)gi ). ) Thus, we can calculate the mass of the monopole using the Gauss Ostrogradsky theorem. Taking into account the spherically symmetric Ansatz, we have [ η M = v d x i R g ξ M i ξ + η ] g fρ)g i 4a) [ η = v lim ds i r S g ξ M i ξ + η ] g fρ)g i 4b) ] = v lim r [ η dω S g rx iξ M i ξ }} + η g fρ)rx ig i }} 4c) = 4πv [ ηg + ηg ] f). 4d) where we used in the last line ρ ) =. As written, however, this result is ambiguous, for it is not a priori clear what constant of integration has to be chosen in the primitive function f. The answer comes from the condition of applicability of the Gauss Ostrogradsky theorem: The function, whose divergence is in the integrand, has to be regular everywhere. In our case, however, G i diverges at origin, therefore we must set fρ)) = f) = in order to make the integrand in 4a) regular in the origin. We can thus write f) = dρf ρ). 5) Furthermore, since we have η =, the first term in the parenthesis in 4d) is already positive. To make
5 5 positive also the second term, we must determine η in terms of f) as η = sgnf). 6) To conclude, we can write the final formula for the magnetic monopole mass as [ M = 4πv g + ] g dρf ρ). 7) From this result it immediately follows that the lower bound on the mass of the monopole is M πv g.7 TeV. 8) The mass formula 7) was derived under the assumption of spherical symmetry, but actually, it holds generally. In fact, for a configuration of n monopoles or n antimonopoles) the formula7) would be just multiplied by n. C. The magnetic charge In order to identify the unbroken U) em, it is most convenient to switch to the gauge where ) ξ =. 9) This is achieved by the gauge transformation ξ U ξ with U = ξ,ξ), 4) where the charge conjugated field ξ iσ ξ is also normalized as ξ ξ = and, crucially, satisfies ξ ξ = ξ ξ =. In this gauge, the Lagrangian ) reads switching to physically normalized gauge fields A µ ga µ and B µ g B µ ) L eff [ F ) ) ] 4ρ µν + F µν + v g ρ [ A ) ) ] 8 µ + A µ 4 f ρ) ) v ρ B µν + ga 8 µ g ) B µ + v µρ) µ ρ) λv4 ρ ). 4) 8 Notice that A µ is not dynamical in our model and should be integrated out. At the leading order, this would give us A µ = g B µ /g. This means that the standard massmatrix eigenstate gauge fields are given as A em ) µ = g A g +g µ +gb µ = g e B µ, 4a) Z µ = ) ga g +g µ g B µ =, 4b) where e = gg / g +g is the electric charge. Taking now into account our spherically symmetrical Ansatz, we obtain the magnetic field simply as Bi em = g e G i = x i e r. 4) The magnetic charge is thus easily calculated as q = lim ds i B r i em = 4π S e, 44) i.e., twice as big as the Dirac magnetic charge, in accordance with []. The antimonopole q = 4π/e) is obtained simply by taking instead of ξ its charge conjugation, i.e., instead of ) by considering the Ansatz ) cosθ/) ξ = i sinθ/)e iϕ. 45) The reason is that if B i = iξ D i ξ, then i ξ D i ξ = Bi. * Let us, in the following, investigate explicit solutions for some particular choices of f ρ) all of them normalized such that f ) = and f ) = ). D. Power function f ρ) = ρ n First, let us consider a class of functions f ρ) = ρ n. In order to maintain f ) = we must take n >. Thus, since f) = dρf ρ) = /n+) >, we have η =. The radial function ρ and the form factor K then come out as ρr) = Kr) = exp + n ) n, + n ) n g g [ n+ F,, 46a) 46b) n ) ]} ;, n n where F a,b,c,z) is the hypergeometric function and where we defined for convenience the scale µ vg 86. GeV. 47) Notice that in order to satisfy ρ) =, we must actually take n. 48) The mass of the monopole comes out as ) M = 4πv g + n+)g. 49)
6 6 It is worth considering explicitly several special values of n. Let us first look at the simplest case of linear function. The general solutions 46) reduce for n = to ρr) = exp Kr) = exp where }, 5a) ) +Ei )]}, 5b) g g [ exp Eix) = P e t x t dt 5) P stands for the principal value) is the exponential integral with asymptotic behavior Eix ) = log x +γ E + Ox). Despite the presence of the hypergeometric function in 46b), the form factor Kr) can be in some cases expressed in terms of elementary functions. To illustrate that, let us present solutions for n = : ρr) = +, 5a) Kr) = exp g [ + g + log + ) ]}, 5b) and for n = : ρr) = +, 5a) Kr) = exp g [ g log + )]}. 5b) Finally, in the limit n the solutions converge to ρr) n, Kr) n exp the energy density goes to Er) n µ g r exp 54a) g } g, 54b) gg } and the mass saturates the lower bound 8): M n 55) πv g. 56) We plot the resulting ρ and K and the corresponding energy densities E in Figs. and, respectively. K, ρ r [µ ] Figure. Profiles of ρr) solid lines) and of Kr) dotted lines) in the case f ρ) = ρ n see Eq. 46)) plotted for various values of n. E [µ 4 ] r [µ ] Figure. Energy densities Er) of the monopole corresponding to the case f ρ) = ρ n for various values of n. E. Exponential function f ρ) = e λρ )/e λ ) As an example of transcendental function let us consider the exponential function f ρ) = eλρ e λ, 57) where λ is arbitrary parameter. Notice that f ρ) is already normalized to satisfy f ) = and f ) =. For f) = dρf ρ) we have f) = λ e λ, 58) which is positive for all λ it interpolates between for λ and for λ ), so we set η =.
7 7 K, ρ r [µ ] Figure. Profiles of ρr) solid lines) and of Kr) dotted lines) for the exponential function 57) plotted for various values of λ. The radial function ρ is ρr) = λ log [+ e λ ) exp λ e λ )], 59) where we again employed the scale µ, Eq. 47). The form factor K, however, cannot be this time calculated analytically for general λ. The mass of the monopole is given as [ M = 4πv g + g λ )] e λ 6) andconvergestothelowerboundm = πv/g forλ. It is interesting to consider several special limits of λ, for which K can be computed analytically. Let us first take the limit λ, in which case the solutions converge to ρr) λ Kr) θ ) λ θ ) ), 6a) +θ )exp g g 6b) )} log, where θ is the Heaviside step function. In the limit λ we obtain linear function f ρ) = ρ, so the solutions ρr), Kr) are the same as 5) of power function with n =. Finally, the limit λ corresponds to the limit n of the power function, so the solutions are in this limit given by 54). We plot the resulting ρ and K for various λ in Fig.. IV. GENERALIZATION The Ansatz for the most general BPS equation reads D i H = ρ f M i ξ +f ξ M i ξ ) ξ +f G i ξ, 6) where f, f, f are some functions of H /v = ρ. The factor /ρ in the first term is just for convenience.) Notice that no additional gauge-covariant terms, linear in M i and G i and independent of those already included, can be constructed. Being a BPS equation operationally means that the energy density has in the limit λ ) a form E = D ih ρ f M i ξ f ξ M i ξ ) ξ f G i ξ + i X i 6) for some X i. In order for this structure to appear, it turns out that f and f must be related to each other as and the X i is given by f = f ρ f 64) X i = v f ξ M i ξ ) + vf G i, 65) where F is a primitive function of f, and E can be written in a manifestly positive form E = ) ρ f M i ξ M i ξ ξ + f ξ M i ξ ) ξ +f G i ξ + D i H. 66) In order to make contact with previous sections, we rescale the function f ρ), f ρ) as f = η g h, f = η g f, 67) where f ρ) is the function introduced already in Sec. II and hρ) is a new function. Using these definitions, we see that if the BPS equations ) D i H = η gρ hρ) M i ξ M i ξ ξ +η ) h ρ) ξ M i ξ ξ g + η g f ρ)g i ξ 68) are satisfied, then the Bogomol nyi bound E η v ) g i hρ)ξ M i ξ + η v ) g i fρ)g i 69)
8 8 is saturated. The corresponding Lagrangian 4 possessing a BPS limit and reducing to the original Lagrangian ) of Sec. II for the special case hρ) = ) reads L eff = v 4g H h Tr [ F µν ) ] H 4 Tr[ F µν HH ] } η h ) 4 g H Tr[ F µν HH ] + η f g B µν + D µ H λ ) H H v. 7) Similarly as with the function f cf. Eq. 6)), we require the normalization h ) =. 7) If the above condition is not met, we can always absorb h ) into the definition of g. In other words, we can demand 7) without the loss of generality. Analyzing the generalized BPS equations 68) in the same way, we find that B i is given again by 8), while the equation 9) for ρ and the reduced BPS equations ) modify to i ρ = η ) ξ M i ξ h + η gv g v G if 7) and ½ ξξ ) D i ξ η ) gvρ hm iξ =, 7) respectively. These equations reduce for the spherically symmetric Ansatz to ρ = η K gv r h + η g v r f, K K = ηgv ρ h, 74a) 74b) cf. Eq. 7). From the second equation is it thus evident that in order to meet the boundary condition K ) = we must set η = sgnh). 75) On the other hand, requirement that the integral of the energy density, rewritten using the equation of motion as E = v ρ K η K r + g r h + η ) g r f, 76) 4 In principle, it is possible to modify also the kinetic term of the Higgs fields, giving the most general BPS model. Such modifications were considered, for example, in [8] and in references therein). We do not consider such modification here, however, preserving the physical argument that only gauge couplings are to depend on H. Let us stress, however, that such modifications would not give us more general BPS equations then discussed here. converges at the lower limit, does not give us any constraint on the value of h at r = due to K) =. Using the Gauss Ostrogradsky theorem we can calculate the mass of the monopole as M = 4πv [ ηg h)+ ηg ] f), 77) which, curiously, yields upon taking into account 7) and 75) the same expression as in Eq. 7). In particular, the lower bound 8) is unaltered! Finally, let us consider the Higgs vacuum ρ and the gauge ξ = ). Let us also switch to physically normalized gauge fields, i.e. A µ ga µ and B µ g B µ. The above Lagrangian becomes L eff [ F ) ) µν + F 4 µν ]+ g v [ ] A ) ) µ + A 8 µ ) η 4 h )Fµν ηf )B µν + v ga 8 µ g ). B µ 78) As was the case in Sec. II only a particular combination of A µ and B µ remains dynamical. In the generalized model, however, this is true only in the limit ρ and for ρ, all fields are dynamical. Nevertheless, to identify the electromagnetic field the limit ρ is sufficient. If we eliminate the nondynamical degrees of freedom from the above Lagrangian, we obtain at the leading order A µ = g B µ /g and the mass-matrix eigenstates would be given exactly the same as in Eqs. 4). Consequently, the magnetic charge will be the same as in 44). V. UNIVERSALITY OF THE LOWER BOUND As we saw in the previous section, the mass of the monopole cannot be lower than πv/g in all BPS theories which are classified via functions h and f. We claim that this bound also applies to any non-bps model that supports Cho Maison monopole. Heuristically, the argument goes as follows. The BPS mass depends only on the asymptotic behavior of fields at the spatial infinity. This behavior should be the same across all theories since it is fixed, among other things, by the underlying topology. Of course, we assume that the field content, as well as the gauge group, is the same for all models under consideration.) In non-bps theories, however, the mass also depends on the precise behavior of fields throughout the volume. Intuitively, this contribution should be positive. If so, we obtain a plausibly sounding statement that the mass of a topological soliton in non-bps theories is larger than the BPS mass. However, a possible subtlety lies in the fact that it is not clear whether one can separate the topological contributions form non-topological ones and maintain positivedefinitiveness of the later. It seems, however, very unlikely that the total non-topological energy can come out
9 9 negative for an apriori positive energy functional. Nevertheless, it seems hard to prove this assertion without the knowledge about the precise structure of the theory at hand. Let us, therefore, concentrate on a concrete model where we can articulate our claim precisely. As an example, let us look at the non-bps theory of [] and [4], whose energy density we write in our notation as E[ǫ] = g Tr[ Mi ] + g ǫg i + D i H + λ ) HH v, 79) where ǫ is a positive function of ρ. In particular, ǫ = gives us the bosonic part of the electroweak model. To prove our claim, we have to compare this energy density withtheenergydensityofthe generalbpstheorye[h,f ] given in 66). Concretely, we have to show that for a given ǫ there exist h and f such that E[ǫ] E[h,f ]. 8) Indeed, we have E[ǫ] E[h,f ] = g Tr[ Mi ] ) h ρ + g G i ǫ f ) + g ξ M i ξ ) 4h ρ h η η gg h f G i ξ M i ξ ). 8) If we now express the functions f and h in terms of a new function σ as f = ǫ ǫ ) ρσσ 4 +σ, 8a) ρ h =, 8b) +σ where σ satisfies σ) = so that h) = ) and +σ ρσσ for all ρ) 8) so that f ), the right-hand side of the above equation takes on a manifestly positive form: E[ǫ] E[h,f ] = g Tr[ Mi ] σ +σ + X i, 84) where X i = η ) ρσσ ξ g +σ 4 +σ M i ξ ) η ) ǫ ρσσ g +σ G i. 85) In other words, we see that E[ǫ] E[h,f ] is true for h, f given by the Ansatz 8), provided σ satisfies the above ) requirements. The simplest possibility is to take σ =, corresponding to f = ǫ/4 and h = ρ, in which case we obtain E[ǫ] E[ρ, ǫ/] = η ξ M i ξ ) η ) ǫgi g g. 86) This shows that the monopoles in the ǫ model cannot be lighter than our universal bound. VI. DISCUSSION In this paper, we presented a family of effective modifications to the electroweak model which contains BPS magnetic monopoles as classical solutions. These solutions are the BPS extensions of Cho Maison monopoles presented in [] and further studied in [4]. We have also studied several explicit examples, where we found monopole solutions in analytic form. Critically, we obtained a universal lower bound on the mass of the monopole as M πv/g.7 TeV. In Sec. V we argued that this bound applies also to non- BPS models, in particular to the model presented in [] and [4]. The modifications of the electroweak theory which are novel in our model are the first two terms in Eq. ). Interestingly, the structure of these modifications turns out to be completely fixed by the requirement that the coupling between SU) L and U) Y gauge fields disappear. In Sec. IV, we relax this requirement and showcase a general family of BPS theories. Nevertheless, we find that the formula for the BPS mass 7) is exactly the same as in the model ). Our work opens up the possibility of studying multiparticle configurations of Cho Maison monopoles, which are sometimes characterized as conceptually being something between Dirac s monopole and t Hooft Polyakov monopole. To construct a multi-monopole configuration of Dirac s monopoles is not particularly challenging. On the other hand, to obtain a t Hooft Polyakov multimonopole configuration requires to use a highly sophisticated tools, such as the Nahm construction[9]. It would make an interesting future study to elaborate how difficult is to write down a multi-monopole configuration of Cho Maison monopoles in the BPS limit and whether one can adopt the Nahm approach or other techniques. Furthermore, our model can be a useful tool to explore non-topological solutions of the electroweak model, such asthespharelon[]. Indeed, thebpslimitlendsitselfto the possibility that we can find unstable static solutions in the analytic form. We plan to investigate this in the future work.
10 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the Albert Einstein Centre for Gravitation and Astrophysics financed by the Czech Science Agency Grant No G F. B.) and by the program of Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports INTEREXCELLENCE Grant number LTT78 F. B., P. B.). [] P. A. M. Dirac, Quantized Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 9) 6 7. [] J. S. Schwinger,, Science ) 757. [] T. T. Wu and C. N. YangNucl. Phys. B7 976) 65. [4] G. t Hooft, Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories, Nuclear Physics B 79 Sept., 974) [5] A. M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in the Quantum Field Theory, JETP Lett. 974) [6] E. Bogomolny, Stability of classical solutions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys ) 449. [7] M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, An Exact Classical Solution for the t Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Dyon, Phys. Rev. Lett ) [8] N. S. Manton, A Remark on the Scattering of BPS Monopoles, Phys. Lett. B 54 98). [9] S. Weinberg, A Model of Leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett ) [] A. Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions, Conf. Proc. C ) [] Y. M. Cho and D. Maison, Monopoles in Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Lett. B9 997) 6 65, [hep-th/968]. [] MoEDAL collaboration, B. Acharya et al., The Physics Programme Of The MoEDAL Experiment At The LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9 4) 45, [45.766]. [] Y. M. Cho, K. Kim and J. H. Yoon, Finite Energy Electroweak Dyon, Eur. Phys. J. C75 5) 67, [5.699]. [4] J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos and T. You, The Price of an Electroweak Monopole, Phys. Lett. B756 6) 9 5, [6.745]. [5] K. Ohta and N. Sakai, Non-Abelian Gauge Field Localized on Walls with Four-Dimensional World Volume, Prog. Theor. Phys. 4 ) 7 9, [4.478]. [6] M. Arai, F. Blaschke, M. Eto and N. Sakai, Grand Unified Brane World Scenario, 7.5. [7] M. Arai, F. Blaschke, M. Eto and N. Sakai, Non-Abelian Gauge Field Localization on Walls and Geometric Higgs Mechanism, PTEP 7 7) 5B, [7.47]. [8] H. S. Ramadhan, Some exact BPS solutions for exotic vortices and monopoles, Phys. Lett. B758 6) 4 45, [5.64]. [9] W. Nahm, ALL SELFDUAL MULTI - MONOPOLES FOR ARBITRARY GAUGE GROUPS, in th NATO Advanced Summer Institute on Theoretical Physics: Structural Elements in Particle Physics and Statistical Mechanics Freiburg, Germany, August -September, 98, p., 98. [] F. R. Klinkhamer and N. S. Manton, A Saddle Point Solution in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys. Rev. D 984).
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA EXACT SOLUTIONS OF THE SU(2) YANG-MILLS-HIGGS THEORY
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA arxiv:hep-th/0006182v2 17 Jul 2000 EXACT SOLUTIONS OF THE SU(2) YANG-MILLS-HIGGS THEORY Rosy Teh PENANG-MALAYSIA July 2000 1 EXACT SOLUTIONS OF THE SU(2) YANG-MILLS-HIGGS THEORY
More informationThe Role Of Magnetic Monopoles In Quark Confinement (Field Decomposition Approach)
The Role Of Magnetic Monopoles In Quark Confinement (Field Decomposition Approach) IPM school and workshop on recent developments in Particle Physics (IPP11) 2011, Tehran, Iran Sedigheh Deldar, University
More informationElectrically and Magnetically Charged Solitons in Gauge Field Th
Electrically and Magnetically Charged Solitons in Gauge Field Theory Polytechnic Institute of New York University Talk at the conference Differential and Topological Problems in Modern Theoretical Physics,
More informationTriplet Higgs Scenarios
Triplet Higgs Scenarios Jack Gunion U.C. Davis Grenoble Higgs Workshop, March 2, 203 Higgs-like LHC Signal Fits with MVA CMS suggest we are heading towards the SM, but it could simply be a decoupling limit
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 31 Jul 2013
Electroweak Monopole Production at the LHC - a Snowmass White Paper Y. M. Cho 1,2, and James Pinfold 3, 1 Administration Building 31-4, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-71, Korea arxiv:137.839v1 [hep-ph] 31
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16 Masses for Vectors: the Higgs mechanism April 6, 2012 The momentum-space propagator
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v1 21 Mar 1996
Yang-Mills Inspired Solutions for General Relativity D. Singleton Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284-2000 arxiv:gr-qc/9603031v1 21 Mar 1996 (February 7, 2008) Abstract
More informationAharonov-Bohm Effect and Unification of Elementary Particles. Yutaka Hosotani, Osaka University Warsaw, May 2006
Aharonov-Bohm Effect and Unification of Elementary Particles Yutaka Hosotani, Osaka University Warsaw, May 26 - Part 1 - Aharonov-Bohm effect Aharonov-Bohm Effect! B)! Fµν = (E, vs empty or vacuum!= Fµν
More informationMAP, MAC, and Vortex-rings Configurations in the Weinberg-Salam Model arxiv: v8 [hep-th] 20 Mar 2015
MAP, MAC, and Vortex-rings Configurations in the Weinberg-Salam Model arxiv:140.4v8 [hep-th] 0 Mar 015 Rosy Teh, Ban-Loong Ng and Khai-Ming Wong School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia 11800 USM Penang,
More informationSingular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds
Singular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds Sergey Cherkis (Berkeley, Stanford, TCD) C k U(n) U(n) U(n) Odense 2 November 2010 Outline: Classical Solutions & their Charges Relations between
More informationMonopoles and Skyrmions. Ya. Shnir. Quarks-2010
Monopoles and Skyrmions Ya. Shnir Quarks-2010 Коломна, Россия, 8 Июня 2010 Outline Abelian and non-abelian magnetic monopoles BPS monopoles Rational maps and construction of multimonopoles SU(2) axially
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables Some formulas can be found on p.2. 1. Concepts.
More informationGeneralization of the Dick Model
Generalization of the Dick Model arxiv:hep-ph/0092v 7 Sep 200 M. Ślusarczyk and A. Wereszczyński Institute of Physics, Jagellonian University, Reymonta, Kraków, Poland July 5, 208 Abstract We discuss a
More informationDonoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6
1 Week 7: Non linear sigma models and pion lagrangians Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter 9.3 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6 Weinberg, Chap. 19 1 Goldstone boson lagrangians
More informationHiggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I
iggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I Laura Reina TASI 2011, CU-Boulder, June 2011 Outline of Lecture I Understanding the Electroweak Symmetry Breaking as a first step towards a more fundamental theory of
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 21 Aug 2009
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION arxiv:0906.4961v2 [hep-th] 21 Aug 2009 Monopoles and flux strings from SU(2) adjoint scalars Chandrasekhar Chatterjee, Amitabha Lahiri chandra@bose.res.in,
More informationSpontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra
PROCEEDINGS Spontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra CERN-TH, CH-111 Geneva 3 E-mail: ulrich.nierste@cern.ch Abstract: A general theorem relating Higgs spectra to spontaneous CP phases is presented.
More informationSolitons in the SU(3) Faddeev-Niemi Model
Solitons in the SU(3) Faddeev-Niemi Model Yuki Amari Tokyo University of Science amari.yuki.ph@gmail.com Based on arxiv:1805,10008 with PRD 97, 065012 (2018) In collaboration with Nobuyuki Sawado (TUS)
More informationDynamics of a two-step Electroweak Phase Transition
Dynamics of a two-step Electroweak Phase Transition May 2, 2014 ACFI Higgs Portal Workshop in Collaboration with Pavel Fileviez Pérez Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf Kai Wang hiren.patel@mpi-hd.mpg.de Electroweak
More informationLecture III: Higgs Mechanism
ecture III: Higgs Mechanism Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking The Higgs Mechanism Mass Generation for eptons Quark Masses & Mixing III.1 Symmetry Breaking One example is the infinite ferromagnet the nearest
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Nov 1998
SOGANG-HEP 249/98 Consistent Dirac Quantization of SU(2) Skyrmion equivalent to BFT Scheme arxiv:hep-th/9811066v1 7 Nov 1998 Soon-Tae Hong 1, Yong-Wan Kim 1,2 and Young-Jai Park 1 1 Department of Physics
More informationPoS(Confinement X)058
Confining gauge theories with adjoint scalars on R 3 S 1 University of Bielefeld E-mail: nishimura@physik.uni-bielefeld.de Michael Ogilvie Washington University, St. Louis E-mail: mco@physics.wustl.edu
More informationFor Review Only. General Structure of Democratic Mass Matrix of Lepton Sector in E 6 Model. Canadian Journal of Physics
General Structure of Democratic Mass Matrix of Lepton Sector in E 6 Model Journal: Canadian Journal of Physics Manuscript ID cjp-2017-0783.r1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 08-Jan-2018
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationDescendants of the Chiral Anomaly
Descendants of the Chiral Anomaly R. Jackiw Center for Theoretical Physics arxiv:hep-th/0011275v1 29 Nov 2000 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 Dirac Medalist Meeting, Trieste,
More informationOn the existence of magnetic monopoles
On the existence of magnetic monopoles Ali R. Hadjesfandiari Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, NY 146 USA ah@buffalo.edu September 4, 13
More informationIs there a Scalar Sector?
Is there a Scalar Sector? Roberto Peccei Cornwall Symposium UCLA November 2009 Is there a Scalar Sector? The Cornwall Norton Paper Technicolor and its Troubles Difficulties with CP Concluding Remarks The
More informationInstantons and Monopoles in Maximal Abelian Projection of SU(2) Gluodynamics
ITEP-95-34 hep-th/9506026 arxiv:hep-th/9506026v2 11 Jun 1995 Instantons and Monopoles in Maximal Abelian Projection of SU(2) Gluodynamics M.N. Chernodub and F.V. Gubarev ITEP, Moscow, 117259, Russia and
More informationHIGGS-GRAVITATIONAL INTERATIONS! IN PARTICLE PHYSICS & COSMOLOGY
HIGGS-GRAVITATIONAL INTERATIONS! IN PARTICLE PHYSICS & COSMOLOGY beyond standard model ZHONG-ZHI XIANYU Tsinghua University June 9, 015 Why Higgs? Why gravity? An argument from equivalence principle Higgs:
More informationInter-brane distance stabilization by bulk Higgs field in RS model
EPJ Web of Conferences 58, 0500 07 QFTHEP 07 DOI: 0.05/epjconf/07580500 Inter-brane distance stabilization by bulk Higgs field in RS model Vadim Egorov,, and Igor Volobuev, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear
More informationRegularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Regularization Physics 3A, Spring 7, Hitoshi Murayama Introduction In quantum field theories, we encounter many apparent divergences. Of course all physical quantities are finite, and therefore divergences
More informationThe Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle
The Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle Heavy-Ion Seminar... or the Anderson-Higgs-Brout-Englert-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble Mechanism Philip W. Anderson Peter W. Higgs Tom W. B. Gerald Carl R. François Robert
More informationA Multimonopole Solution in String Theory
CTP/TAMU-33/92 A Multimonopole Solution in String Theory arxiv:hep-th/9205051v2 15 May 1992 Ramzi R. Khuri Center for Theoretical Physics Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843 A multimonopole
More informationA Brief Introduction to AdS/CFT Correspondence
Department of Physics Universidad de los Andes Bogota, Colombia 2011 Outline of the Talk Outline of the Talk Introduction Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation
More informationSymmetries Then and Now
Symmetries Then and Now Nathan Seiberg, IAS 40 th Anniversary conference Laboratoire de Physique Théorique Global symmetries are useful If unbroken Multiplets Selection rules If broken Goldstone bosons
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 23 Mar 2015
Equivalence between two different field-dependent BRST formulations Sudhaker Upadhyay Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 08016, India Bhabani Prasad Mandal Department
More informationA model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:
I. THE STANDARD MODEL A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:. The symmetries of the Lagrangian; 2. The representations of fermions
More informationIn-medium properties of the nucleon within a pirho-omega model. Ju-Hyun Jung in collaboration with Hyun-Chul Kim and Ulugbek Yakhshiev
In-medium properties of the nucleon within a pirho-omega model Ju-Hyun Jung in collaboration with Hyun-Chul Kim and Ulugbek Yakhshiev Outline 1. In-medium modified π ρ ω mesonic Lagrangian 2. Structure
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 19 Feb 1995
Axially Symmetric Solutions for SU(2) Yang-Mills Theory D. Singleton Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22901 arxiv:hep-th/9502116v1 19 Feb 1995 (June 27, 2018) Abstract
More informationUniversity of Illinois at Champaign Urbana Department of Physics
University of Illinois at Champaign Urbana Department of Physics Electroweak Symmetry Breaking. Higgs Particle Discovery Potential within the ATLAS Experiment Hovhannes Khandanyan Abstract. One of the
More informationTHE STANDARD MODEL AND THE GENERALIZED COVARIANT DERIVATIVE
THE STANDAD MODEL AND THE GENEALIZED COVAIANT DEIVATIVE arxiv:hep-ph/9907480v Jul 999 M. Chaves and H. Morales Escuela de Física, Universidad de Costa ica San José, Costa ica E-mails: mchaves@cariari.ucr.ac.cr,
More informationNon Abelian Higgs Mechanism
Non Abelian Higgs Mechanism When a local rather than global symmetry is spontaneously broken, we do not get a massless Goldstone boson. Instead, the gauge field of the broken symmetry becomes massive,
More informationTwo-monopole systems and the formation of non-abelian clouds
Two-monopole systems and the formation of non-abelian clouds Changhai Lu* Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027 Received 14 July 1998; published 12 November 1998 We study
More informationLecture 8. September 21, General plan for construction of Standard Model theory. Choice of gauge symmetries for the Standard Model
Lecture 8 September 21, 2017 Today General plan for construction of Standard Model theory Properties of SU(n) transformations (review) Choice of gauge symmetries for the Standard Model Use of Lagrangian
More informationThe Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local Gauge Transformations Dynamics of Field Ten
Lecture 4 QCD as a Gauge Theory Adnan Bashir, IFM, UMSNH, Mexico August 2013 Hermosillo Sonora The Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local
More informationA first trip to the world of particle physics
A first trip to the world of particle physics Itinerary Massimo Passera Padova - 13/03/2013 1 Massimo Passera Padova - 13/03/2013 2 The 4 fundamental interactions! Electromagnetic! Weak! Strong! Gravitational
More informationComment about Didactical formulation of the
Comment about Didactical formulation of the Ampère law Hendrik van Hees Institute for Theoretical Physics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Str. 1, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany Frankfurt Institute
More informationYANG-MILLS THEORY. This theory will be invariant under the following U(1) phase transformations
YANG-MILLS THEORY TOMAS HÄLLGREN Abstract. We give a short introduction to classical Yang-Mills theory. Starting from Abelian symmetries we motivate the transformation laws, the covariant derivative and
More informationGrand unification and heavy axion
Grand unification and heavy axion V. A. Rubakov arxiv:hep-ph/9703409v2 7 May 1997 Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 60th October Anniversary prospect 7a, Moscow 117312
More information8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.821 String Theory Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.821 F2008 Lecture 03: The decoupling
More informationarxiv: v2 [physics.pop-ph] 12 Jul 2012
Unveiling the Higgs mechanism to students arxiv:1207.2146v2 [physics.pop-ph] 12 Jul 2012 Giovanni Organtini Sapienza, Università di Roma & INFN-Sez. di Roma, Roma, P.le A. Moro 2 I-00185 E-mail: giovanni.organtini@roma1.infn.it
More informationSM predicts massless neutrinos
MASSIVE NEUTRINOS SM predicts massless neutrinos What is the motivation for considering neutrino masses? Is the question of the existence of neutrino masses an isolated one, or is connected to other outstanding
More informationThe stability of the wall is due to the potential and the gradient balancing each other (Derrick s Theorem). Simple argument: = E grad
The stability of the wall is due to the potential and the gradient balancing each other (Derrick s Theorem). Simple argument: E grad ~ ( "# ) ~ $ & E pot ~ V (") ~ #$ 4 % ( ) * ~ $ Derrick s Theorem says
More informationAn extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model
An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model Jochen Zahn Universität Wien based on arxiv:1401.2020 joint work with Harold Steinacker Bayrischzell, May 2014 Motivation The IKKT
More informationStandard Model & Beyond
XI SERC School on Experimental High-Energy Physics National Institute of Science Education and Research 13 th November 2017 Standard Model & Beyond Lecture III Sreerup Raychaudhuri TIFR, Mumbai 2 Fermions
More informationTop quark effects in composite vector pair production at the LHC
Top quark effects in composite vector pair production at the LHC Antonio Enrique Cárcamo Hernández. Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria. SILAFAE 01, 10th-14th of December of 01. Based on: A. E. Cárcamo
More information1 Running and matching of the QED coupling constant
Quantum Field Theory-II UZH and ETH, FS-6 Assistants: A. Greljo, D. Marzocca, J. Shapiro http://www.physik.uzh.ch/lectures/qft/ Problem Set n. 8 Prof. G. Isidori Due: -5-6 Running and matching of the QED
More informationMagnetic Charge as a Hidden Gauge Symmetry. Abstract
Magnetic Charge as a Hidden Gauge Symmetry D. Singleton Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 901 (January 14, 1997) Abstract A theory containing both electric and magnetic
More informationQuantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams
Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams III. Quantization of constrained systems and Maxwell s theory 1. The
More informationElementary particles and typical scales in high energy physics
Elementary particles and typical scales in high energy physics George Jorjadze Free University of Tbilisi Zielona Gora - 23.01.2017 GJ Elementary particles and typical scales in HEP Lecture 1 1/18 Contents
More informationSolitons, Vortices, Instantons
Solitons, Vortices, Instantons Seminarvortrag von David Mroß Universität Bonn 1. Juni 2006 Seminar Theoretische Elementarteilchenphysik SS 06 Structure of the talk Solitons in a nutshell Recap: solitons
More informationOverview. The quest of Particle Physics research is to understand the fundamental particles of nature and their interactions.
Overview The quest of Particle Physics research is to understand the fundamental particles of nature and their interactions. Our understanding is about to take a giant leap.. the Large Hadron Collider
More informationMay 7, Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Francesco Fucito. Introduction. Standard. Model- Boson Sector. Standard. Model- Fermion Sector
- Boson - May 7, 2017 - Boson - The standard model of particle physics is the state of the art in quantum field theory All the knowledge we have developed so far in this field enters in its definition:
More informationBPS Solitons and Killing Spinors in Three Dimensional N =2Supergravity
La Plata-Th 97/18 BPS Solitons and Killing Spinors in Three Dimensional N =2Supergravity José D. Edelstein Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de La Plata C.C. 67, (1900) La Plata, Argentina Short
More informationWeak interactions and vector bosons
Weak interactions and vector bosons What do we know now about weak interactions? Theory of weak interactions Fermi's theory of weak interactions V-A theory Current - current theory, current algebra W and
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationGauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov
Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov March 9, 2017 Work with Georgios Karananas, 1703.02964 Heidelberg, March 9, 2017 p. 1 Outline Motivation Gauge coupling unification without
More informationCoordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates
Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates Amir H. Fatollahi Department of Physics, Alzahra University, P. O. Box 19938, Tehran 91167, Iran fath@alzahra.ac.ir Abstract
More informationLecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes
Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela STRING THEORY Santiago de Compostela, March 6, 2013 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes 6-mar-2013
More informationElectric Dipole Moment of Magnetic Monopole
479 Progress of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 117, No. 3, March 27 Electric Dipole Moment of Magnetic Monopole Makoto Kobayashi High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK, Tsukuba 35-81, Japan and
More informationChern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee
Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee Maxwell Theory Maxwell Theory: Gauge Transformation and Invariance Gauss Law Charge Degrees of
More informationLecture 24 Seiberg Witten Theory III
Lecture 24 Seiberg Witten Theory III Outline This is the third of three lectures on the exact Seiberg-Witten solution of N = 2 SUSY theory. The third lecture: The Seiberg-Witten Curve: the elliptic curve
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 4 Dec 2008
Multi-fermion interaction models in curved spacetime arxiv:0812.0900v1 [hep-ph] 4 Dec 2008 Masako Hayashi Department of Physics, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan E-mail: hayashi@theo.phys.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 5 Sep 2014
Proceedings of the Second Annual LHCP CMS CR-2014/199 September 8, 2014 Future prospects of Higgs Physics at CMS arxiv:1409.1711v1 [hep-ex] 5 Sep 2014 Miguel Vidal On behalf of the CMS Experiment, Centre
More informationPhysics 662. Particle Physics Phenomenology. February 21, Physics 662, lecture 13 1
Physics 662 Particle Physics Phenomenology February 21, 2002 Physics 662, lecture 13 1 Physics Beyond the Standard Model Supersymmetry Grand Unified Theories: the SU(5) GUT Unification energy and weak
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 25 Nov 2015
The Non-Linear Higgs Legacy of the LHC Run I Tyler Corbett, 1, Oscar J. P. Éboli,3 Dorival Gonçalves, 4 J. Gonzalez Fraile, 5 Tilman Plehn, 5 and Michael Rauch 6 1 C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics,
More informationNotes on EDMs. Matt Reece. October 20, 2013
Notes on EDMs Matt Reece October 20, 2013 EDMs and the mass scale of new physics The electron EDM in QED is the dimension 5 operator L = d e i 2 ψσ µν γ 5 ψf µν, (1) where ψ is the electron field and F
More informationR-Invariant Dilaton Fixing
UT-824 R-Invariant Dilaton Fixing Izawa K.-I. and T. Yanagida Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan September, 1998 Abstract We consider dilaton stabilization with R invariance,
More informationA Review of Solitons in Gauge Theories. David Tong
A Review of Solitons in Gauge Theories David Tong Introduction to Solitons Solitons are particle-like excitations in field theories Their existence often follows from general considerations of topology
More informationThe Yang and Yin of Neutrinos
The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos Ernest Ma Physics and Astronomy Department University of California Riverside, CA 92521, USA The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos (2018) back to start 1 Contents Introduction The
More informationGenesis of Electroweak. Unification
Unification Tom Kibble Imperial College London ICTP October 2014 1 Outline Development of the electroweak theory, which incorporates the idea of the Higgs boson as I saw it from my standpoint in Imperial
More informationEmergence of Yang Mills theory from the Non-Abelian Nambu Model
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PPER OPEN CCESS Emergence of Yang Mills theory from the Non-belian Nambu Model To cite this article: C.. Escobar and L. F. Urrutia 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 761 012058
More informationBirth of electroweak theory from an Imperial perspective
Birth of electroweak theory from an Imperial perspective Tom Kibble King s College London 2 Oct 2012 Electroweak theory Oct 2012 1 Outline Story of spontaneous symmetry breaking in gauge theories and electro-weak
More informationAnomaly. Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa. College de France, 14 February 2006
Anomaly Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa College de France, 14 February 2006 Abstract Symmetry and quantization U A (1) anomaly and π 0 decay Origin of anomalies Chiral and nonabelian anomaly Anomally
More informationReferences. S. Cacciatori and D. Klemm, :
References S. Cacciatori and D. Klemm, 0911.4926: Considered arbitrary static BPS spacetimes: very general, non spherical horizons, complicated BPS equations! G. Dall Agata and A. Gnecchi, 1012.3756 Considered
More informationE 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale
E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale Instituts-Seminar Kerne und Teilchen, TU Dresden Alexander Knochel Uni Freiburg 24.06.2010 Based on: F. Braam, AK, J. Reuter, arxiv:1001.4074 [hep-ph], JHEP06(2010)013 Outline
More informationWhere are we heading? Nathan Seiberg IAS 2016
Where are we heading? Nathan Seiberg IAS 2016 Two half-talks A brief, broad brush status report of particle physics and what the future could be like The role of symmetries in physics and how it is changing
More informationThink Globally, Act Locally
Think Globally, Act Locally Nathan Seiberg Institute for Advanced Study Quantum Fields beyond Perturbation Theory, KITP 2014 Ofer Aharony, NS, Yuji Tachikawa, arxiv:1305.0318 Anton Kapustin, Ryan Thorngren,
More information+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2
I. THE HIGGS POTENTIAL AND THE LIGHT HIGGS BOSON In the previous chapter, it was demonstrated that a negative mass squared in the Higgs potential is generated radiatively for a large range of boundary
More information1 Introduction. 1.1 The Standard Model of particle physics The fundamental particles
1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to provide a brief introduction to the Standard Model of particle physics. In particular, it gives an overview of the fundamental particles and the relationship
More informationQFT Dimensional Analysis
QFT Dimensional Analysis In the h = c = 1 units, all quantities are measured in units of energy to some power. For example m = p µ = E +1 while x µ = E 1 where m stands for the dimensionality of the mass
More informationg abφ b = g ab However, this is not true for a local, or space-time dependant, transformations + g ab
Yang-Mills theory Modern particle theories, such as the Standard model, are quantum Yang- Mills theories. In a quantum field theory, space-time fields with relativistic field equations are quantized and,
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 10 Oct 2017
A direct test of the integral Yang-Mills equations through SU) monopoles C. P. Constantinidis, L. A. Ferreira and G. Luchini arxiv:171.3359v1 hep-th] 1 Oct 17 Departamento de Física Universidade Federal
More informationVersatility of the Abelian Higgs Model
Versatility of the Abelian Higgs Model Ernest Ma Physics and Astronomy Department University of California Riverside, CA 92521, USA Versatility of the Abelian Higgs Model (2013) back to start 1 Contents
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II T. Nguyen PHY 391 Independent Study Term Paper Prof. S.G. Rajeev University of Rochester April 2, 218 1 Introduction The purpose of this independent study is to familiarize ourselves
More informationHelicity conservation in Born-Infeld theory
Helicity conservation in Born-Infeld theory A.A.Rosly and K.G.Selivanov ITEP, Moscow, 117218, B.Cheryomushkinskaya 25 Abstract We prove that the helicity is preserved in the scattering of photons in the
More informationMagnetic monopoles. Arjen Baarsma. January 14, 2009
Magnetic s Arjen Baarsma January 14, 2009 GUT s GUT s 2 GUT s GUT s 3 (very briefly) Thoroughly discussed in previous talks Spontaneous symmetry occurs when a system with some symmetry (described by a
More informationHiggs mechanism and Goldstone s bosons
Remigiusz Durka Instytut Fizyki Teoretycznej Wroclaw March 15, 2008 1 / 28 Spontaneous symmetry breaking In physics spontaneous symmetry breaking takes place when a system, that is symmetric with respect
More informationA note on the principle of least action and Dirac matrices
AEI-2012-051 arxiv:1209.0332v1 [math-ph] 3 Sep 2012 A note on the principle of least action and Dirac matrices Maciej Trzetrzelewski Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik, Albert-Einstein-Institut,
More informationElementary Particles II
Elementary Particles II S Higgs: A Very Short Introduction Higgs Field, Higgs Boson, Production, Decays First Observation 1 Reminder - I Extend Abelian Higgs model to non-abelian gauge symmetry: ( x) +
More information