Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure: Slides
|
|
- Derick Pierce
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure: Slides Alexander Tarasov University of Munich Summer 2010 Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
2 Motivation For the United States, about one-third of exports and over 40% of imports consist of intrarm trade between a U.S. or foreign rm and their afliates. In a cross-section of industries, the share of intrarm imports in total U.S. imports is larger the higher the capital intensity of the exporting industry. PICTURE 1. In a cross-section of countries, the share of intrarm imports in total U.S. imports is larger the higher the capital-labor ratio of the exporting country. PICTURE 2. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
3 Motivation These observations raise the following questions: Why are capital-intensive goods transacted within rm boundaries while labor-intensive goods are traded mostly at arm's length? Why is the share of intrarm imports higher for capital-abundant countries? Are these facts related? Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
4 What This Paper Does A property-rights model of the boundaries of the rm in which the endogenous benets of integration outweigh its endogenous costs only in capital-intensive industries! close to PICTURE 1 A general-equilibrium, factor-proportions model of international trade, with imperfect competition and product differentiation: in the general equilibrium, capital-abundant countries capture larger shares of a country's imports of capital-intensive goods PICTURE 2 follows from the interaction of transaction-cost minimization (PICTURE 1) and comparative advantage Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
5 The Sketch of the Model A nal-good producer needs to obtain a special and distinct intermediate input from a supplier. Production of the input requires certain noncontractible and relationship-specic investments in capital and labor. The nal-good producer contributes to some of these investments but cost-sharing is relatively more important in capital investments. The lack of ex-ante contracts implies that the bargaining over the terms of trade takes place after intermediate input has been produced and manufacturing costs are bygones. A two-sided holdup problem which results in underinvestment in both capital and labor. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
6 The Sketch of the Model There are two possible organizational forms: vertical integration or outsourcing. Ownership is dened as the entitlement of some residual rights of control. Inefciency in labor investments is shown to be relatively higher under integration than under outsourcing; and conversely for capital. This implies that rms will choose outsourcing only when the investment in labor is relatively important in production! close to PICTURE 1. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
7 The Sketch of the Model This partial equilibrium is embedded in a general equilibrium setup with imperfect competition and product differentiation. Countries specialize in certain intermediate input varieties and export them worldwide. Capital-abundant countries tend to produce a larger share of capital-intensive varieties than labor-abundant countries. The share of capital-intensive (and thus intrarm) imports in total imports is then shown to be an increasing function of the capital-labor ratio of the exporting country! close to PICTURE 2. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
8 Consider a two-factor (K, L), two-sector (Y, Z ) closed economy. K and L are inelastically supplied and freely mobile across sectors. In each sector, rms use K and L to produce a continuum of differentiated varieties. Preferences of the representative consumer are of the form: where µ, α 2 (0, 1). Z ny µ Z U = y(i) α α nz di 0 0 z(i) α di 1 µ α, Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
9 Demand for nal-good varieties is thus y(i) = z(i) = A Y, p Y (i) 1 1 α A Z, p Z (i) 1 1 α where A Y = µep α 1 α Y, A Z = (1 µ) EP α 1 α Z. E is the total expenditure and P Y and P Z are the industry price indexes. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
10 Sales revenues are given by R Y (i) = p Y (i)y(i) = A 1 α Y y(i) α R Z (i) = p Z (i)z(i) = A 1 α Z z(i) α. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
11 Technology: Each variety y(i) requires a special and distinct intermediate input x Y (i) (z(i) requires x Z (i)). The input must be of high quality, otherwise output is zero. If the input is of high quality, production of the nal good requires no further costs and y(i) = x Y (i), z(i) = x Z (i). Production of a high-quality intermediate input requires a combination of capital K x and L x : Kx (i) βk Lx (i) x k (i) = β k 1 β k 1 βk for k 2 fy, Z g. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
12 Technology: Let 1 > β Y > β Z > 0. Low-quality intermediate inputs can be produced at a negligible cost. There are also xed costs of production: fr β k w 1 β k, k 2 fy, Z g. The costs are split between the producer and the supplier (f S and f F ). Firm structure: The nal-good producer (F ) decides whether it wants to enter a given market, and if so, whether to obtain the input from a vertically-integrated supplier (S) or from a stand-alone S. F chooses the mode of organization so as to maximize its ex-ante prots. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
13 Firm structure: It is assumed that, upon entry, S makes a lump-sum transfer T k (i) to F (it is to simplify the description of equilibrium). The labor investment L x is undertaken by S. The capital investment K x is undertaken by F. These investments are incurred upon entry and are useless outside the relationship. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
14 Contract Incompleteness: No outside party can distinguish between a high-quality and a low-quality intermediate input x k. This implies that F and S cannot sign enforceable quality-contingent contracts specifying the purchase of a certain type of intermediate input for a certain price. Similarly, it is assumed that K x (i), L x (i) are not veriable and the parties cannot write contracts on R Y (i) and R Z (i). The only contractibles ex-ante are the allocation of residual rights and the ex ante transfer T k (i). Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
15 Contract Incompleteness: If the supplier incurs all variable costs, the contract incompleteness gives rise to a standard holdup problem: the nal-good producer will want to renegotiate the price after x k (i) has been produced. Foreseeing this renegotiation, the supplier will undertake investments in capital and labor. If the nal-producer shares capital expenditures with the supplier, the holdup problem becomes two-sided. Therefore, its investment in capital are also suboptimal. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
16 Contract Incompleteness: Because no enforceable contract is signed ex-ante, F and S will bargain over the surplus of the relationship ex-post, when manufacturing costs are bygones. The extent of the underinvestment by each party will be inversely related to the share of surplus the obtain in the bargaining. Assume that Generalized Nash Bargaining leaves the nal-good producer with a fraction φ 2 (0, 1) of the ex-post gains from trade. Bargaining will occur even when the parties are integrated. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
17 When the supplier is a stand-alone rm, then if the parties fail to agree on a division of surplus, the nal-good producer is left with nothing. Under integration, the nal-good producer can re the manager of the supplying division and seize some amount of input produced. In particular, the nal-good producer obtains the residual rights over only a fraction of δ 2 (0, 1) of the input. If δ = 1, then integration would never be chosen (the nal-good producer just takes the whole amount of input implying zero investment in labor). PICTURE! Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
18 Integrated pairs: The potential revenues are given by R Y (i) = A 1 Y α y(i) α If there is no agreement, then the revenues are δ α R Y (i). Therefore, the quasi-rent is R Y (i) δ α R Y (i) = (1 δ α )R Y (i). Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
19 Integrated pairs: The nal-good producer receives δ α R Y (i) + φ(1 δ α )R Y (i) = φr Y (i) The supplier receives 0 + (1 φ)(1 δ α )R Y (i) Note that φ > φ. That is, under integration, the nal-good producer receives a higher fraction of sale revenues. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
20 Integrated pairs: Given the choice of labor, the nal-good producer solves max f φr Y (i) rk Y (i)g. K Y (i) Given the choice of capital, the supplier solves max f(1 φ) R Y (i) wl Y (i)g. L Y (i) We can solve for the interception of these two best response functions. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
21 Integrated pairs: The solution implies that p Y,V = β Y r β Y w 1 α φ β. Y (1 φ) 1 β Y The distortionary effect of incomplete contracting takes the form of a markup that is 1 φ β Y (1 φ) 1 β Y times higher than the "traditional" markup. The lump-sum transfer T Y,V is equal to the supplier prots. While the nal-good producer prots are given by π F,V,Y = const V A Y (p Y,V ) 1 α fr β Y w 1 β Y α Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
22 Non-Integrated pairs: The potential revenues are given by R Y (i) = A 1 Y α y(i) α If there is no agreement, then the revenues are equal to zero. Therefore, the quasi-rent is R Y (i). The nal-good producer gets φr Y (i) and the supplier (1 φ)r Y (i). Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
23 Non-Integrated pairs: Given the choice of labor, the nal-good producer solves max fφr Y (i) rk Y (i)g. K Y (i) Given the choice of capital, the supplier solves max f(1 φ) R Y (i) wl Y (i)g. L Y (i) We can solve for the interception of these two best response functions. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
24 Non-Integrated pairs: We have now that r p Y,O = β Y w 1 β Y αφ β Y (1 φ) 1 β. Y The nal-good producer's prots are π F,O,Y = const O A Y (p Y,O ) 1 α fr β Y w 1 β Y. α Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
25 Complete contractibility: In the case of complete contracts, when the quality-contigent contracts could be enforced (the quality of the input is veriable), the investments in capital and labor would be set to maximize the total surplus given by: R Y (i) rk Y (i) wl Y (i) fr β Y w 1 β Y. It can be shown that the impossibility of writing contracts lead to underinvestment in capital and labor. PICTURE! Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
26 Ownership Structure: Let Θ(β k ) be operating prots under integration relative to outsourcing. That is, Then, Θ(β k ) = Θ(β k ) = π F,V,k + fr β k w 1 π F,O,k + fr β k w 1 α(1 φ)δ α (1 2β 1 + k ) 1 α(1 β k ) + αφ(1 2β k ) δ α αβ k 1 α 1 + φ(1 δ α (1 δ α ) α 1 α. ) β k β k Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
27 Ownership Structure: It can be shown that Θ(β k ) is increasing in β k, Θ(0) < 1, and Θ(1) > 1. Theorem Therefore, there exists a unique threshold capital intensity ˆβ, such that all rms with β k < ˆβ choose to outsource production of the intermediate output, while all rms with β k > ˆβ choose to integrate their suppliers. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
28 The theorem provides an explanation for the rst picture: vertical integration of suppliers occurs mostly in capital-intensive industries. Hence, one would expect the share of intrarm trade to be relatively higher in those industries. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
29 Some Important points: Θ(β k ) is independent of factor prices because of the Cobb-Douglas assumption in production. In general, the decision would depend on factor prices. Why is F providing K x? It can be shown that if φ > 1/2 then nal-good producers will always decide to provide capital required for production the supplier is never given full control Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
30 Industry Equilibrium: Free entry implies that no rm makes positive expected prots. There are two types of equilibria (depends on β k ): integrated and non-integrated. In the integrated equilibrium: the ex-ante transfer T Y,V is equal to the supplier's prots. All prices are the same and given by Then, β Y r p Y,V = β Y w 1 α φ β. Y (1 φ) 1 β Y A Y,V = µe (p Y,V ) α 1 α n Y,V Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
31 Industry Equilibrium: The free entry implies that In the case of outsourcing, n Y,V = 1 α(1 β Y ) + α φ (1 2β Y ) fr β Y w 1 β µe Y p Y,O = β Y r β Y w 1 αφ β Y (1 φ) 1 β. Y This implies that n Y,O = 1 α(1 β Y ) + αφ (1 2β Y ) fr β Y w 1 β µe Y Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
32 General Equilibrium We assume that β Y > ˆβ > β Z. That is, in one industry we have the integrated equilibrium, while in the other non-integrated. First, E = rk + wl Equilibrium conditions are such that the capital and labor markets clear. By Walras' law we can focus on the equilibrium in the labor market. The labor market clearing condition is given by: L = n Y L Y + n Z L Z where L Y and L Z are labor demand by each pair in the industries. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
33 General Equilibrium Therefore, L Y = L x,y,v + L f,f,y + L f,s,y L Z = L x,z,o + L f,f,z + L f,s,z where L x,k,j is labor used by the supplier for production, L f,k,j + L f,k,j is labor used to cover xed costs (k 2 fy, Z g and j 2 fv, Og). It is possible to derive that where σ L is some constant. w r = σ L 1 σ L K L Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
34 Open Economy Now suppose the world is divided in J 2 countries, with country j receiving an endowment (K j, L j ). Assume that preferences are identical in all J countries. Factors of production are internationally immobile. Factor price equalization is attained (the endowments are not too different) and we can use the general equilibrium above to characterize the aggregate allocations in the world economy. Final goods are not tradable. Trade is in intermediate inputs only. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
35 Open Economy: Conclusion Capital-abundant countries tend to produce a larger share of capital-intensive varieties than labor-abundant countries. The share of capital-intensive (and thus intrarm) imports in total imports is then shown to be an increasing function of the capital-labor ratio of the exporting country! close to PICTURE 2. Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) and Antras and Helpman (2004) Summer / 35
Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure: Slides
Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure: Slides Alexander Tarasov University of Munich Summer 2012 Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Antràs (2003) Summer 2012 1 / 34 Motivation For the United States,
More informationIncomplete Contracts and the Product Cycle. Pol Antràs. Harvard University, NBER and CEPR
Incomplete Contracts and the Product Cycle Pol Antràs Harvard University, NBER and CEPR 1 Broad Research Agenda Try to understand how firms organize production in a global economy and study its implications
More informationTopics in Trade: Slides
Topics in Trade: Slides Alexander Tarasov University of Munich Summer 20 Alexander Tarasov (University of Munich) Topics in Trade Summer 20 / 2 : Rybczynski Theorem (955) How factor endowments affect product
More informationMotivation A Figure 1 Figure 2 Table 1 Table 2
Future Work Motivation A Figure 1 Figure 2 Table 1 Table 2 Motivation B Markup Di erences: SOEs vs. POEs Markup Di erences Across Sectors Sectoral Di erences Motivation Key Novelty Model Trade Liberalization,
More informationWhy Do Firms Conduct Bi-Sourcing? 1
Why Do Firms Conduct Bi-Sourcing? 1 Julan Du Chinese University of Hong Kong Yi Lu University of Hong Kong Zhigang Tao University of Hong Kong Abstract In acquiring the same intermediate inputs, a firm
More informationLecture 8: Incomplete Contracts
Lecture 8: Incomplete Contracts Cheng Chen School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong (Cheng Chen (HKU)) Econ 6006 / 23 Introduction Motivation Development of microeconomics theory: General
More informationLecture 1: Incomplete Contracts and International Trade
Lecture 1: Incomplete Contracts and International Trade Economics 552 Esteban Rossi-Hansberg Princeton University ERH (Princeton University ) Lecture 1: Incomplete Contracts and Trade 1 / 32 The Property-Rights
More informationComparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms
Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms Andrew Bernard, Tuck and NBER Stephen e Redding, LSE and CEPR Peter Schott, Yale and NBER 1 Introduction How do economies respond when opening to trade? Classical
More informationLabor Market Structure and Oshoring
Labor Market Structure and Oshoring Sangwha Shin August 8, 2013 Abstract In this paper, I propose a two-country, two-sector model where a rm's decision on oshoring depends on labor market rigidities, due
More informationAddendum to: New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?
Addendum to: New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? Costas Arkolakis Yale and NBER Arnaud Costinot MIT and NBER September 5, 200 Andrés Rodríguez-Clare Penn State and NBER Abstract This addendum provides generalizations
More informationInternation1al Trade
4.58 International Trade Class notes on 4/8/203 The Armington Model. Equilibrium Labor endowments L i for i = ; :::n CES utility ) CES price index P = i= (w i ij ) P j n Bilateral trade ows follow gravity
More informationproblem. max Both k (0) and h (0) are given at time 0. (a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming
1. Endogenous Growth with Human Capital Consider the following endogenous growth model with both physical capital (k (t)) and human capital (h (t)) in continuous time. The representative household solves
More informationLecture 1: Ricardian Theory of Trade
Lecture 1: Ricardian Theory of Trade Alfonso A. Irarrazabal University of Oslo September 25, 2007 Contents 1 Simple Ricardian Model 3 1.1 Preferences................................. 3 1.2 Technologies.................................
More informationInternationa1 l Trade
14.581 Internationa1 l Trade Class notes on /19/013 1 Overview Assignment Models in the Trade Literature Small but rapidly growing literature using assignment models in an international context: Trade:
More informationGeneral Equilibrium and Welfare
and Welfare Lectures 2 and 3, ECON 4240 Spring 2017 University of Oslo 24.01.2017 and 31.01.2017 1/37 Outline General equilibrium: look at many markets at the same time. Here all prices determined in the
More informationTrading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring
Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring Gene M. Grossman and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg Princeton University June 26, 2014 Grossman and Rossi-Hansberg (Princeton University) A Simple Theory of Offshoring
More informationChapter 5. The Engine of Growth. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko
Chapter 5. The Engine of Growth Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko Endogenous growth theory. The Romer model Where does the technological progress come from? Is there limit to economic growth and technological
More informationInternational Trade Lecture 16: Gravity Models (Theory)
14.581 International Trade Lecture 16: Gravity Models (Theory) 14.581 Week 9 Spring 2013 14.581 (Week 9) Gravity Models (Theory) Spring 2013 1 / 44 Today s Plan 1 The Simplest Gravity Model: Armington
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 4 Technology and the Labor Market
14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 4 Technology and the Labor Market Daron Acemoglu MIT September 20, 2016. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Technology and the Labor Market September 20, 2016. 1 / 51 Technology
More informationMIT PhD International Trade Lecture 15: Gravity Models (Theory)
14.581 MIT PhD International Trade Lecture 15: Gravity Models (Theory) Dave Donaldson Spring 2011 Introduction to Gravity Models Recall that in this course we have so far seen a wide range of trade models:
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics Leonardo Felli EC441: Room D.106, Z.332, D.109 Lecture 8 bis: 24 November 2004 Monopoly Consider now the pricing behavior of a profit maximizing monopolist: a firm that is the only
More informationAddendum to: International Trade, Technology, and the Skill Premium
Addendum to: International Trade, Technology, and the Skill remium Ariel Burstein UCLA and NBER Jonathan Vogel Columbia and NBER April 22 Abstract In this Addendum we set up a perfectly competitive version
More informationKnowledge licensing in a Model of R&D-driven Endogenous Growth
Knowledge licensing in a Model of R&D-driven Endogenous Growth Vahagn Jerbashian Universitat de Barcelona June 2016 Early growth theory One of the seminal papers, Solow (1957) discusses how physical capital
More informationInternation1al Trade
14.581 Internation1al Trade Class notes on 3/4/2013 1 Factor Proportion Theory The law of comparative advantage establishes the relationship between relative autarky prices and trade ows But where do relative
More informationCEMMAP Masterclass: Empirical Models of Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade 1 Lecture 3: Gravity Models
CEMMAP Masterclass: Empirical Models of Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade 1 Lecture 3: Gravity Models Dave Donaldson (MIT) CEMMAP MC July 2018 1 All material based on earlier courses taught
More informationCapital Structure and Investment Dynamics with Fire Sales
Capital Structure and Investment Dynamics with Fire Sales Douglas Gale Piero Gottardi NYU April 23, 2013 Douglas Gale, Piero Gottardi (NYU) Capital Structure April 23, 2013 1 / 55 Introduction Corporate
More informationWHY ARE THERE RICH AND POOR COUNTRIES? SYMMETRY BREAKING IN THE WORLD ECONOMY: A Note
WHY ARE THERE RICH AND POOR COUNTRIES? SYMMETRY BREAKING IN THE WORLD ECONOMY: A Note Yannis M. Ioannides Department of Economics Tufts University Medford, MA 02155, USA (O): 1 617 627 3294 (F): 1 617
More informationEconS Cost Structures
EconS 425 - Cost Structures Eric Dunaway Washington State University eric.dunaway@wsu.edu Industrial Organization Eric Dunaway (WSU) EconS 425 Industrial Organization 1 / 34 Introduction Today, we ll review
More informationDesign Patent Damages under Sequential Innovation
Design Patent Damages under Sequential Innovation Yongmin Chen and David Sappington University of Colorado and University of Florida February 2016 1 / 32 1. Introduction Patent policy: patent protection
More informationThe TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?
The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam? Jean Louis Brillet, France For presentation at the LINK 2014 Conference New York, 22nd 24th October, 2014 Advertisement!!! The model uses EViews The
More information(a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming
1. Government Purchases and Endogenous Growth Consider the following endogenous growth model with government purchases (G) in continuous time. Government purchases enhance production, and the production
More informationThe challenge of globalization for Finland and its regions: The new economic geography perspective
The challenge of globalization for Finland and its regions: The new economic geography perspective Prepared within the framework of study Finland in the Global Economy, Prime Minister s Office, Helsinki
More informationThe economy is populated by a unit mass of infinitely lived households with preferences given by. β t u(c Mt, c Ht ) t=0
Review Questions: Two Sector Models Econ720. Fall 207. Prof. Lutz Hendricks A Planning Problem The economy is populated by a unit mass of infinitely lived households with preferences given by β t uc Mt,
More informationEconomic Growth: Lectures 10 and 11, Endogenous Technological Change
14.452 Economic Growth: Lectures 10 and 11, Endogenous Technological Change Daron Acemoglu MIT December 1 and 6, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 10 end 11 December 1 and 6, 2011. 1
More informationCompetitive Equilibrium and the Welfare Theorems
Competitive Equilibrium and the Welfare Theorems Craig Burnside Duke University September 2010 Craig Burnside (Duke University) Competitive Equilibrium September 2010 1 / 32 Competitive Equilibrium and
More informationBusiness Cycles: The Classical Approach
San Francisco State University ECON 302 Business Cycles: The Classical Approach Introduction Michael Bar Recall from the introduction that the output per capita in the U.S. is groing steady, but there
More informationProblem Set Suggested Answers
Problem Set 3 --- Suggested Answers 1. In chapters 15 18 the treatment is generalized to unbounded production technologies, resulting in the observation that when general equilibrium prices are announced,
More informationIntroduction to General Equilibrium: Framework.
Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework. Economy: I consumers, i = 1,...I. J firms, j = 1,...J. L goods, l = 1,...L Initial Endowment of good l in the economy: ω l 0, l = 1,...L. Consumer i : preferences
More informationMelitz, M. J. & G. I. P. Ottaviano. Peter Eppinger. July 22, 2011
Melitz, M. J. & G. I. P. Ottaviano University of Munich July 22, 2011 & 1 / 20 & & 2 / 20 My Bachelor Thesis: Ottaviano et al. (2009) apply the model to study gains from the euro & 3 / 20 Melitz and Ottaviano
More informationModeling firms locational choice
Modeling firms locational choice Giulio Bottazzi DIMETIC School Pécs, 05 July 2010 Agglomeration derive from some form of externality. Drivers of agglomeration can be of two types: pecuniary and non-pecuniary.
More informationOn the dynamics of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory
On the dynamics of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory Lorenzo Caliendo The University of Chicago 2010 Introduction "...free commodity trade will, under certain speci ed conditions, inevitably lead to complete
More informationAdvanced Economic Growth: Lecture 2, Review of Endogenous Growth: Expanding Variety Models
Advanced Economic Growth: Lecture 2, Review of Endogenous Growth: Expanding Variety Models Daron Acemoglu MIT September 10, 2007 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Advanced Growth Lecture 2 September 10, 2007 1 / 56
More informationMelitz, M. J. & G. I. P. Ottaviano. Peter Eppinger. July 22, 2011
Melitz, M. J. & G. I. P. Ottaviano University of Munich July 22, 2011 & 1 / 20 & & 2 / 20 My Bachelor Thesis: Ottaviano et al. (2009) apply the model to study gains from the euro & 3 / 20 Melitz and Ottaviano
More informationExpanding Variety Models
Expanding Variety Models Yin-Chi Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong November, 2012 References: Acemoglu (2009) ch13 Introduction R&D and technology adoption are purposeful activities The simplest
More informationAdvanced Economic Growth: Lecture 3, Review of Endogenous Growth: Schumpeterian Models
Advanced Economic Growth: Lecture 3, Review of Endogenous Growth: Schumpeterian Models Daron Acemoglu MIT September 12, 2007 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Advanced Growth Lecture 3 September 12, 2007 1 / 40 Introduction
More informationAnswers to Spring 2014 Microeconomics Prelim
Answers to Spring 204 Microeconomics Prelim. To model the problem of deciding whether or not to attend college, suppose an individual, Ann, consumes in each of two periods. She is endowed with income w
More informationAdvanced Macroeconomics
Advanced Macroeconomics The Ramsey Model Marcin Kolasa Warsaw School of Economics Marcin Kolasa (WSE) Ad. Macro - Ramsey model 1 / 30 Introduction Authors: Frank Ramsey (1928), David Cass (1965) and Tjalling
More informationECONOMICS 001 Microeconomic Theory Summer Mid-semester Exam 2. There are two questions. Answer both. Marks are given in parentheses.
Microeconomic Theory Summer 206-7 Mid-semester Exam 2 There are two questions. Answer both. Marks are given in parentheses.. Consider the following 2 2 economy. The utility functions are: u (.) = x x 2
More informationBargaining, Contracts, and Theories of the Firm. Dr. Margaret Meyer Nuffield College
Bargaining, Contracts, and Theories of the Firm Dr. Margaret Meyer Nuffield College 2015 Course Overview 1. Bargaining 2. Hidden information and self-selection Optimal contracting with hidden information
More informationEC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 5
EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 5 Leonardo Felli 32L.LG.04 27 October, 207 Pareto Efficient Allocation Recall the following result: Result An allocation x is Pareto-efficient if and only
More informationDepartment of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009
Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination May 009 Instructions: The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,
More informationOrganizing the Global Value Chain: Online Appendix
Organizing the Global Value Chain: Online Appendix Pol Antràs Harvard University Davin Chor Singapore Management University March 8, 23 Abstract This Online Appendix documents several detailed proofs from
More informationThe Role of Pre-trial Settlement in International Trade Disputes (1)
183 The Role of Pre-trial Settlement in International Trade Disputes (1) Jee-Hyeong Park To analyze the role of pre-trial settlement in international trade dispute resolutions, this paper develops a simple
More informationOn the Distributive Effects of Terms of Trade Shocks: The Role of Non-tradable Goods
WP/10/241 On the Distributive Effects of Terms of Trade Shocks: The Role of Non-tradable Goods Sebastian Galiani, Daniel Heymann and Nicolas Magud 2010 International Monetary Fund WP/10/241 IMF Working
More informationProductivity Improvements and Falling Trade Costs: Boon or Bane?
Productivity Improvements and Falling Trade Costs: Boon or Bane? Svetlana Demidova y The Pennsylvania State University This version: February 24, 2006. Abstract This paper looks at two features of globalization,
More informationGranular Comparative Advantage
Granular Comparative Advantage Cecile Gaubert cecile.gaubert@berkeley.edu Oleg Itskhoki itskhoki@princeton.edu RASA IX International Conference Washington DC November 218 1 / 28 Exports are Granular Freund
More informationCross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection
Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection Eric Bartelsman, John Haltiwanger & Stefano Scarpetta American Economic Review (2013) Presented by Beatriz González January
More informationEquilibrium in Factors Market: Properties
Equilibrium in Factors Market: Properties Ram Singh Microeconomic Theory Lecture 12 Ram Singh: (DSE) Factor Prices Lecture 12 1 / 17 Questions What is the relationship between output prices and the wage
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CONTRACTUAL FRICTIONS AND GLOBAL SOURCING. Pol Antràs Elhanan Helpman. Working Paper
BER WRKIG PAPER ERIE CTRACTUAL FRICTI AD GLBAL URCIG Pol Antràs Elhanan Helpman Working Paper 12747 http://www.nber.org/papers/w12747 ATIAL BUREAU F ECMIC REEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA
More informationTechnological Spillovers and Dynamics of Comparative Advantage
Technological Spillovers and Dynamics of Comparative Advantage Yury Yatsynovich University of California, Berkeley January 21, 2015 MOTIVATION Comparative advantage is dynamic: Korea from rice to microchips.
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 3 Competition, Policy and Technological Progress
14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 3 Competition, Policy and Technological Progress Daron Acemoglu MIT September 15, 2016. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Competition, Policy and Innovation September 15, 2016.
More informationFirms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale
Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale. Increasing returns to scale and monopoly pricing 2. Constant returns to scale 19 C. The CRS economy 25 D. pplication to trade 47 E. Decreasing
More informationToulouse School of Economics, M2 Macroeconomics 1 Professor Franck Portier. Exam Solution
Toulouse School of Economics, 2013-2014 M2 Macroeconomics 1 Professor Franck Portier Exam Solution This is a 3 hours exam. Class slides and any handwritten material are allowed. You must write legibly.
More informationModeling Technological Change
Modeling Technological Change Yin-Chi Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong November, 202 References: Acemoglu (2009) ch2 Concepts of Innovation Innovation by type. Process innovation: reduce cost,
More informationu(c t, x t+1 ) = c α t + x α t+1
Review Questions: Overlapping Generations Econ720. Fall 2017. Prof. Lutz Hendricks 1 A Savings Function Consider the standard two-period household problem. The household receives a wage w t when young
More informationIn the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Microeconomics 1. Graduate School of Management and Economics. Dr. S.
In the Name of God Sharif University of Technology Graduate School of Management and Economics Microeconomics 1 44715 (1396-97 1 st term) - Group 1 Dr. S. Farshad Fatemi Chapter 10: Competitive Markets
More informationLecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy
Lecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy Economics 522 Esteban Rossi-Hansberg Princeton University Spring 2014 ERH (Princeton University ) Lecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy Spring 2014 1 / 34 Restuccia and Rogerson
More informationDynamics of Firms and Trade in General Equilibrium. Robert Dekle, Hyeok Jeong and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki USC, Seoul National University and Princeton
Dynamics of Firms and Trade in General Equilibrium Robert Dekle, Hyeok Jeong and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki USC, Seoul National University and Princeton Figure a. Aggregate exchange rate disconnect (levels) 28.5
More informationTrade policy III: Export subsidies
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies - wiiw June 25, 2015 Overview Overview 1 1 Under perfect competition lead to welfare loss 2 Effects depending on market structures 1 Subsidies to
More informationThe Definition of Market Equilibrium The concept of market equilibrium, like the notion of equilibrium in just about every other context, is supposed to capture the idea of a state of the system in which
More informationMarket Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example. Chad Syverson
Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example. Chad Syverson 2004 Hotelling s Circular City Consumers are located uniformly with density D along a unit circumference circular city. Consumer buys
More informationMicroeconomic Theory -1- Introduction
Microeconomic Theory -- Introduction. Introduction. Profit maximizing firm with monopoly power 6 3. General results on maximizing with two variables 8 4. Model of a private ownership economy 5. Consumer
More informationFirms and returns to scale -1- John Riley
Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley Firms and returns to scale. Increasing returns to scale and monopoly pricing 2. Natural monopoly 1 C. Constant returns to scale 21 D. The CRS economy 26 E. pplication
More informationNeoclassical Growth Model: I
Neoclassical Growth Model: I Mark Huggett 2 2 Georgetown October, 2017 Growth Model: Introduction Neoclassical Growth Model is the workhorse model in macroeconomics. It comes in two main varieties: infinitely-lived
More informationThis process was named creative destruction by Joseph Schumpeter.
This process was named creative destruction by Joseph Schumpeter. Aghion and Howitt (1992) formalized Schumpeter s ideas in a growth model of the type we have been studying. A simple version of their model
More informationPolitical Economy of Institutions and Development. Lecture 4. Economic Institutions under Elite Domination
14.773 Political Economy of Institutions and Development. Lecture 4. Economic Institutions under Elite Domination Daron Acemoglu MIT February 16, 2017 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Political Economy Lecture 4 February
More informationThe Heckscher-Ohlin model: Mathematical treatment*
The Heckscher-Ohlin model: Mathematical treatment* Robert Stehrer Draft and unfinished version Version: April 23, 2013 Various approaches Primal approach approach which are partly interrelated Primal approach
More informationExternalities and PG. MWG- Chapter 11
Externalities and PG MWG- Chapter 11 Simple Bilateral Externality When external e ects are present, CE are not PO. Assume: 1 Two consumers i = 1, 2 2 The actions of these consumers do not a ect prices
More informationTrade, Neoclassical Growth and Heterogeneous Firms
Trade, Neoclassical Growth and eterogeneous Firms Julian Emami Namini Department of Economics, University of Duisburg Essen, Campus Essen, Germany Email: emami@vwl.uni essen.de 10th March 2006 Abstract
More informationMarket Power. Economics II: Microeconomics. December Aslanyan (VŠE) Oligopoly 12/09 1 / 39
Market Power Economics II: Microeconomics VŠE Praha December 2009 Aslanyan (VŠE) Oligopoly 12/09 1 / 39 Microeconomics Consumers: Firms: People. Households. Monopoly. Oligopoly Now Perfect Competition.
More informationInternational Trade 31E00500
International Trade 31E00500 Lecture 6: Intra-industry trade and Gravity modelling Saara Tamminen 1 1 VATT Institute of Economic Research, Finland Winter 2016 Tamminen (VATT) Lecture 6 21.1.2016 1 / 53
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6
Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO April 10, 017 Administrative Stuff Homework # is due at the end of class. I will post the solutions on the website later today. The midterm
More informationGlobal Production with Export Platforms
Discussion of Global Production with Export Platforms by Felix Tintelnot Oleg Itskhoki Princeton University NBER ITI Summer Institute Boston, July 2013 1 / 6 Introduction Question: Where should firms locate
More informationEndogenous information acquisition
Endogenous information acquisition ECON 101 Benhabib, Liu, Wang (2008) Endogenous information acquisition Benhabib, Liu, Wang 1 / 55 The Baseline Mode l The economy is populated by a large representative
More informationMicroeconomics, Block I Part 2
Microeconomics, Block I Part 2 Piero Gottardi EUI Sept. 20, 2015 Piero Gottardi (EUI) Microeconomics, Block I Part 2 Sept. 20, 2015 1 / 48 Pure Exchange Economy H consumers with: preferences described
More informationImported Intermediate Goods and Product Innovation: Evidence from India
Imported Intermediate Goods and Product Innovation: Evidence from India Murat Seker Daniel Rodriguez-Delgado and Mehmet Fatih Ulu August 25 Abstract In this study, we build a structural model of multi-product
More informationStatic and Dynamic Gains from Importing Intermediate Inputs: Theory and Evidence
Static and Dynamic Gains from Importing Intermediate Inputs: Theory and Evidence Hongsong Zhang Department of Economics, Penn State University Gains from Importing" Hongsong Zhang, Penn State University
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics Problem Set 1
dvanced Microeconomics Problem Set László Sándor Central European University Pareto optima With Cobb-Douglas utilities u x ; x 2 ; x 3 = 0:4 log x 2 + 0:6 log x 3 and u x ; x 2 ; x 3 = log x 2 + log x
More informationResearch and Development
Chapter 9. March 7, 2011 Firms spend substantial amounts on. For instance ( expenditure to output sales): aerospace (23%), o ce machines and computers (18%), electronics (10%) and drugs (9%). is classi
More informationTrade and Domestic Policy in Models with Monopolistic Competition
Trade and Domestic Policy in Models with Monopolistic Competition Alessia Campolmi Università di Verona Harald Fadinger University of Mannheim and CEPR Chiara Forlati University of Southampton February
More informationEconomic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations
14.452 Economic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations Daron Acemoglu MIT November 20, 2018 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lecture 8 November 20, 2018 1 / 46 Growth with Overlapping Generations
More informationEndogenous Transport Investment, Geography, and Growth Take-offs
Endogenous Transport Investment, Geography, and Growth Take-offs International Conference on Infrastructure Economics and Development Stefan Zeugner ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Toulouse,
More informationHomework 3 - Partial Answers
Homework 3 - Partial Answers Jonathan Heathcote Due in Class on Tuesday February 28th In class we outlined two versions of the stochastic growth model: a planner s problem, and an Arrow-Debreu competitive
More informationDiscussion Papers in Economics
Discussion Papers in Economics No. 10/11 A General Equilibrium Corporate Finance Theorem for Incomplete Markets: A Special Case By Pascal Stiefenhofer, University of York Department of Economics and Related
More informationSELECTION EFFECTS WITH HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS: ONLINE APPENDIX
SELECTION EFFECTS WITH HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS: ONLINE APPENDIX Monika Mrázová University of Geneva and CEPR J. Peter Neary University of Oxford, CEPR and CESifo Appendix K: Selection into Worker Screening
More informationSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 202 Answer Key to Section 2 Questions Section. (Suggested Time: 45 Minutes) For 3 of
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012 The time limit for this exam is 4 hours. It has four sections. Each section includes two questions. You are
More informationEconS Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces.
EconS 424 - Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces. Félix Muñoz-García Washington State University fmunoz@wsu.edu February 7, 2014 Félix Muñoz-García (WSU) EconS 424 - Recitation 3 February
More informationTwo-sided investments and matching with multi-dimensional cost types and attributes
Two-sided investments and matching with multi-dimensional cost types and attributes Deniz Dizdar 1 1 Department of Economics, University of Montréal September 15, 2014 1/33 Investments and matching 2/33
More information