arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Sep 1997

Transcription

1 IFT-UW/97-15 Texure dynamics for neurinos arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Sep 1997 Wojciech Królikowski Insiue of Theoreical Physics, Warsaw Universiy Hoża 69, PL Warszawa, Poland Absrac An ansaz for mass marix was recenly proposed for charged lepons, predicing (in is diagonal approximaion) m τ MeV from he experimenal values of m e and m µ, in agreemen wih m exp τ = MeV. Now i is applied o neurinos. If he ampliude of neurino oscillaions ν µ ν τ is 1/ and m ν τ m ν µ ( o 0.01) ev, as seems o follow from amospheric neurino experimens, his ansaz predics m νe m νµ (0. o 1) 10 ev and m ντ (0. o 1) 10 1 ev, and also he ampliude of neurino oscillaions ν e ν µ (in he vacuum). Such a very small ampliude for ν e ν µ is implied by he value of m exp τ MeV used o deermine he deviaion of he diagonalizing marix Û(e) from 1 in he lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V = Û(ν) Û(e). Here, Û(ν) by iself gives pracically no oscillaions ν e ν µ, while i provides he large oscillaions ν µ ν τ. PACS numbers: 1.15.Ff, b Work suppored in par by he Polish KBN Gran B

2 Augus 1997

3 1. Inroducion Firs, le us say a few inroducory words abou wo familiar noions of neurino weak ineracion saes and neurino mass saes. Since, apparenly, neurinos display no elecromagneic nor srong ineracions, experimenal deecors selec heir weak ineracion saes, wha is in conras o mass saes seleced by deecors in he case of charged lepons and hadrons (buil up from quarks). Thus, if he neurino mass marix M (ν) and/or charged lepon mass marix M (e) are originally nondiagonal in he bases and ν (0) = ν (0) e ν (0) µ ν (0) τ (1) e (0) = e (0) µ (0) τ (0) respecively, he neurino weak ineracion saes ν = ν e ν µ ν τ, () (3) are, muais muandis, analogues of he Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa ransforms of down quark mass saes d = d (m) d = d s b (4) d s b. (5) I is so, hough ν are experimenally observed saes, in conras o d d, where d (m) d describe experimenally observed saes. 1

4 In fac, neurino weak ineracion saes are defined as where ν = V 1 ν (m), V = Û(ν) 1Û(e), (6) ν (m) = Û(ν) 1 ν (0), Û(ν) 1 M (ν)û(ν) = diag ( m νe, m νµ, m ντ ) (7) are neurino mass saes while ν (m) = ν (m) e ν (m) µ ν (m) τ, (8) e (m) = Û(e) 1 e (0), Û(e) 1 M (e)û(e) = diag (m e, m µ, m τ ) (9) represen charged lepon mass saes e (m) e = e µ τ. (10) Here, e (m) e describe experimenally observed saes, in conras o ν (m) ν. I can be readily seen ha he saes ν (m) (), as given in Eq. (7), are eigensaes of he neurino mass operaor d 3 r i j ν (0) i (x)m (ν) i j ν (0) j (x) = d 3 r i m νi ν (m) i (x)ν (m) i (x), (11) where M (ν) = ( M (ν) ) i j. Similarly, he saes e (m) (), as defined in Eq. (9), represen eigensaes of he charged lepon mass operaor. The uniary marix V, inroduced in Eq. (6), is obviously a lepon analogue of he Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix, because he lepon charge changing weak curren has he form

5 ν (0) (x)βγ µ (1 γ 5 ) e (0) (x)= ν (m) (x) V βγ µ (1 γ 5 ) e (m) (x) = ν (x)βγ µ (1 γ 5 ) e (x), (1) where Eqs. (7), (9) and (6) are used. Noe ha he formula ν = Û(e) 1 ν (0) (13) follows generally from Eqs. (6) and (7). This implies in he case when M (e) is diagonal (i.e., Û(e) = 1 and so, e = e (0) ) ha ν = ν (0). In his case, V = Û(ν) 1 and hus ν = Û(ν) ν (m), wha means ha ν ν (m) if Û(ν) 1. When, alernaively, M (ν) is diagonal (i.e., Û(ν) = 1 and so, ν (m) = ν (0) ), hen Eq. (13) shows ha ν = Û(e) 1 ν (m) giving ν ν (m) if Û(e) 1. As is well known, neurino mixing i.e., he mixing of neurino mass saes ν (m) i neurino weak ineracion saes ν i, expressed by he formula (6), wihin ν i = j ( V 1) i j ν(m) j, (14) implies neurino oscillaions (in ime) beween saes ν i. They occur if masses m νi are no all degenerae and, of course, he mass marices M (ν) and/or M (e) are nondiagonal. In fac, since ime dependen weak ineracion neurino saes are ν i () = e ih ν i = j ( V 1) ij ν(m) j e ie j, (15) he probabiliy of oscillaions ν i ν j (in he vacuum) is given by he formula P(ν i ν j, ) = ν j ν i () = k l where he ulrarelaivisic relaion V j lv i l V j k V ik exp ( i m ν l m ν k p ), (16) E l E k = m ν l m ν k p is used for neurino mass saes. In Eq. (16), usually / p = L/E, wha is replaced by L/E if m ν l m ν k, L and E are measured in ev, km and GeV, respecively. Here, L is he source deecor disance. 3 (17)

6 Concluding his inroducory Secion, we can see ha he masses m νe, m νµ, m ντ of neurino mass saes ν (m) e, ν µ (m), ν τ (m) as well as heir mixing parameers [involved in he lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V (V ij )] can be deermined, if neurino and charged lepon mass marices M (ν) ( M (ν) ) ij and M (e) ( M (e) ) ij are given explicily. Once he mixing of ν (m) e, ν µ (m), ν τ (m) (in weak ineracions) and he masses m νe, m νµ, m ντ are known, he oscillaions (in ime) beween he neurino weak ineracion saes ν e, ν µ, ν τ can be evaluaed. The noaion ν (m) e, ν (m) µ, ν (m) τ for neurino mass saes and m νe, m νµ, m ντ for heir masses, hough consequen, may be someimes confusing abou is difference wih ν e, ν µ, ν τ being he neurino weak ineracion saes o which masses canno be ascribed. Thus, in he case of mass saes, he noaion ν 0, ν 1, ν and m ν0, m ν1, m ν is, perhaps, more adequae. We hope, however, ha he Reader will no be seriously confused by he former noaion used consequenly hroughou his paper (noice ha in he Paricle Tables of Ref. [] he neurino masses are also denoed by m νe, m νµ, m ντ ). In he nex Secion, an ansaz for he mass marices M (e) and M (ν) will be described and is cosequences derived. This ansaz inroduces a kind of exure dynamics for lepons.. A model for M (e) and M (ν) Le us consider he following ansaz [1] for charged lepon and neurino mass marices: wih M (e,ν) = ρ ĥ(e,ν) ρ (18) where ĥ (e,ν) = µ (e,ν) [ N (1 ε (e,ν) ) N ] + ( α (e,ν) 1 + β (e,ν) n ) âe iϕ(e,ν) + â ( α (e,ν) 1 + β (e,ν) n ) e iϕ(e,ν), (19) ρ = , N = 1 + n = (0)

7 and n = â â = , â = (1) For charged lepons we will assume abou he coupling consans α (e) /µ (e) and β (e) /µ (e) ha he second erm in he marix ĥ(e) can be reaed as a small perurbaion of he firs erm. For neurinos we will conjecure wo alernaive opions: eiher (i) he coupling consans α (ν) /µ (ν) and β (ν) /µ (ν) enable us o apply he perurbaive reamen (similarly as for charged lepons) and, in addiion, ε (ν) 0, or (ii) α (ν) /µ (ν) only is a perurbaive parameer and, addiionally, ε (ν) 0. Noe from Eqs. (1) ha he runcaed annihilaion and creaion marices in he family space, â and â, saisfy he familiar commuaion relaions wih n [â, n] = â, [ â, n ] = â () and, addiionally, he runcaion ideniies â 3 = 0, â 3 = 0. (3) Thus, n n = n n as well as â n = n n 1 and â n = n + 1 n+1 (n = 0, 1, ), bu â = 0 i.e., 3 = 0 (in addiion o â 0 = 0 i.e., 1 = 0). Evidenly, n = 0, 1, plays he role of an index i in our hree dimensional marix calculaions. For boh labels e and ν he mass marix (18) can be wrien explicily in he form M = 1 9 (wih obvious suppression of labels e and ν). µε αe iϕ 0 αe iϕ 4µ(80 + ε )/9 8(α + β) 3e iϕ 0 8(α + β) 3e iϕ 4µ(64 + ε )/5 (4) The uniary marix Û (U i j), diagonalizing he mass marix M (M i j ) according o he equaion Û 1 MÛ = diag(m 0, m 1, m ), has he form where Û = A 0 A 1 M 01 M 00 m 1 A M m M 1 M 01 M 00 m A 0 M 00 m 0 M 01 A 1 A M m M 1 A 0 M 00 m 0 M 01 M 1 M m 0 A 1 M 1 M m 1 A, (5) 5

8 A 0 = A 1 = A = { [ { 1 + (M 00 m 0 ) M M 01 (M 00 m 1 ) + M (M m ) M 1 [ M 1 ]} 1/ 1 +, (M m 0 ) ] 1/, [ (M m 1 ) 1 + M 01 ]} 1/. (6) (M 00 m ) The elemens of lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V (V i j ) = can be calculaed from he formulae V i j = k U (ν) k i U (e) k j secular equaions de( M 1 m i ) = 0 (i = 0, 1, ) give Û(ν) Û(e) (i, j = 0, 1, ). Here, he (M 00 m i )(M 11 m i )(M m i ) = M 01 (M m i ) + M 1 (M 00 m i ) (7) due o M 0 = 0 = M 0. In paricular, Eq. (7) implies ha M 00 m 0 = 0 and (M 11 m i )(M m i ) = M 1 (i = 1, ) if M 01 = 0 = M 10. Also, (M 00 m 0 )(M m 0 ) 1 M 01 M 1 if µ Charged lepon masses Applying o he marix M given in Eq. (4) he firs order perurbaive calculaion wih respec o is off diagonal elemens, we obain m 0 = µ ε ε m 1 = µ 4 ( ) 80 + ε m = µ ( 64 + ε ) + ( ) α, µ ε ( ) α µ ε These formulae imply he following mass sum rule: ( ) α + β, ε µ ( ) α + β. (8) µ m = 6 15 (351m 1 136m 0 ) + 16 ( ) α + β ε µ ε ( ) α µ. (9) µ

9 In he case of charged lepons, he mass formulae (8) wih m e = m 0, m µ = m 1, m τ = m lead o m τ = MeV + O [ (α (e) /µ (e)) ] µ (e) + O { [(α (e) + β (e)) /µ (e)] } µ (e), ε (e) = O [ (α (e) /µ (e)) ], µ (e) = MeV + O [ (α (e) /µ (e)) ] µ (e) + O { [(α (e) + β (e) )/µ (e)] } µ (e), (30) if he experimenal values of m e and m µ [] are used as an inpu. Thus, he sum rule (9) gives ( ) α (e) m τ = MeV, (31) µ (e) if we pu for he sake of simpliciy β (e) = 0. Wih he experimenal value m τ = MeV, Eq. (31) shows ha ( α (e) µ (e) ) = (3) So, as ye, he value of α (e) is consisen wih zero (of course, from he viewpoin of our model, he accepable lower error in Eq. (3) is 0.0). We can see ha our model for M (e), even in he zero order perurbaive calculaion, predics excellenly he mass m τ [1]. 4. Neurino masses (he firs opion) In he case of neurinos consisen wih our firs opion (α (ν) /µ (ν) and β (ν) /µ (ν) are perurbaive parameers and ε (ν) 0), he mass formulae (8) ake he form m νe = µ(ν) 9 ε(ν) 9 ( ) α (ν) µ (ν) 0, 30 µ (ν) m νµ µ(ν), m ντ µ(ν), (33) if ( α (ν) /µ (ν)) < 1 and ( β (ν) /µ (ν)) < 1. Here, he possible minus sign a mνe can be changed (if considered from he phenomenological poin of view) ino he plus sign since only m ν e is relevan relaivisically (cf. he Dirac equaion). Noe from Eqs. (33) ha 7

10 hus his raio is pracically equal o ha m ντ 106 = , (34) m νµ 15 m τ = (35) m µ The recen Super Kamiokande experimens for amospheric neurinos [3] seem o show m ν τ m ν µ ( o 0.01) ev, (36) wih he value ev being preferable (if mixing of ν µ (m) and ν τ (m) case, Eqs.(33) give ( m ντ m ν µ ) 1/ is maximal). In his µ (ν) Then, from Eqs. (33) we predic ( o 0.005) ev. (37) ( ) α m νe (0.3 o ) ε (ν) (ν) ev 0, m νµ (1 o 6) 10 3 ev, m ντ (0. o 1) 10 1 ev. (38) µ (ν) Hence, m ν µ m ν e m ν µ (0.1 o 4) 10 5 ev. (39) Here, he sign means approximae equaliy deduced wih he use of bounds (36). If we pu enaively ( ) α (ν) ( ) α (e), (40) µ (ν) µ (e) where he rhs is esimaed as in Eq. (3), hen from he firs of Eqs. (38) we obain m νe ( o ) 10 7 ev (41) 8

11 if ε (ν) = 0 for he sake of simpliciy (of course, from he viewpoin of our model, he realisic lower errors in Eq. (41) are 0.7 and 4, rerspecively). In such a case, from Eqs. (33) hus his raio is much smaller han m νe m νµ , (4) (obviously, he realisic lower error in Eq. (4) is 7). m e m µ = = (43) We can see from Eqs. (38) ha m νe + m νµ + m ντ m ντ (0.0 o 0.1) ev, so (if our model for M (ν) works) neurinos canno be candidaes for ho dark maer, because such a possibiliy requires several ev for he neurino mass sum [4]. 5. Neurino oscillaions (he firs opion) In order o calculae elemens of he lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V (V i j ) = Û(ν) Û(e) we use he formulae V ij = k U (ν) k i U (e) k j (i, j = 0, 1, ), where he uniary marices Û(ν, e) are given by Eq. (5) in cooperaion wih Eq. (4) (here, he labels ν and e are made explici). In M (ν) we pu ε (ν) = 0, while in M (e) we have approximaely ε (e) 0. Then, in he lowes (linear) order in α (ν) /µ (ν), β (ν) /µ (ν) and α (e) /µ (e), β (e) /µ (e) we obain ( 4 α (ν) V 01 = e iϕ(ν) 9 m νµ ( 19 α (ν) + β (ν) V 1 = 9 m ντ V 0 = 0 = V 0, ) α(e) e iϕ(e) = V10, m µ e iϕ(ν) α(e) + β (e) ) e iϕ(e) = V1, m τ V 00 = V 11 = V = 1. (44) Insering he marix elemens (44) ino Eq. (16), we ge in he lowes (quadraic) order in α (ν) /µ (ν), β (ν) /µ (ν) and α (e) /µ (e), β (e) /µ (e) he following neurino oscillaion probabiliies (in he vacuum): 9

12 P (ν e ν µ, ) = ( ) α (ν) ( α (e) + m νµ m µ ) ) α(ν) m νµ α (e) cos ( ϕ (ν) ϕ (e)) m µ ( m sin νµ m ν e, P (ν µ ν τ, ) = 768 ( α (ν) +β (ν) ) ( α (e) +β (e) ) + α(ν) +β (ν) α (e) +β (e) cos ( ϕ (ν) ϕ (e)) 841 m ντ m τ m ντ m τ ) ( m sin ντ m ν µ P (ν e ν τ, ) = 0., If we make use of Eqs (8), neglecing here he erms O [ (α (e) /µ (e)) ] and also O { [(α (e) + β (e)) /µ (e)] } (wha leads o he relaions m µ (30/61)µ (e) and m τ (14976/75)µ (e) up o erms proporional o ε (e) 0 ), we can conclude from Eqs. (45) ha ( ) P (ν e ν µ, ) = α (ν) ( α (e) + µ (ν) µ (e) ) ) α(ν) µ (ν) α (e) ( m sin νµ m ν e, ( P (ν µ ν τ, ) = α (ν) + β (ν) ) ( α (e) + β (e) + µ (ν) µ (e) µ cos ( ϕ (ν) ϕ (e)) (e) ) α(ν) + β (ν) α (e) + β (e) cos ( ] ϕ (ν) ϕ (e)) µ (ν) µ (e) sin ( m ντ m ν µ ) (45). (46) Here, he facors [ ] < 1, so he order of ampliude of P (ν µ ν τ, ) is smaller han O(10 3 ). We can see ha his resul, valid in he case of our firs opion, appears o be inconsisen wih he experimens for amospheric neurinos [3,4,5] which seem o indicae ha he order of ampliude of P (ν µ ν τ, ) is O(1). 6. Neurino masses (he second opion) In he case of neurinos consisen wih he second opion (where α (ν) /µ (ν) only is a 10

13 perurbaive parameer and ε (ν) 0), he second erm in he marix ĥ(ν) given in Eq. (19) canno be reaed as a small perurbaion of he firs erm. When α (ν) /µ (ν) = 0, he neurino mass marix (4) akes he unperurbed form µ (ν) ε (ν) 0 0 M (ν) = 1 0 4µ (ν) (80 + ε (ν) )/9 8β (ν) 3e iϕ 9 0 8β (ν) 3e iϕ 4µ (ν) (64 + ε (ν) )/5 Evidenly, is eigenvalues can be found exacly, reading. (47) m 0 m 1, = M (ν) 00 = µ(ν) 9 ε(ν), = M(ν) 11 + M (ν) = M(ν) ( β(ν) 1 + µ (ν) 11 M (ν) 0.3 µ(ν) β (ν) + M (ν) ) 1 1/ µ (ν), (48) if ε (ν) < 0.1. These eigenvalues give hree unperurbed neurino masses m νe = m 0, m νµ = m 1, m ντ = m (49) if, by convenion, we ascribe he minus sign in Eq. (48) o m νµ. Noe ha in he limi of µ (ν) 0 Eqs. (48) give m 0 0 and m 1, M (ν) 1 = 0.478β (ν). From Eqs. (48) we can evaluae he difference of mass squared : m m 1 = M (ν) 1 ( M (ν) 11 + M (ν) ) 1 + M(ν) 11 M (ν) 1/ M (ν) 1 ( ) = 0.9 β (ν) µ (ν) µ(ν), (50) β (ν) if ε (ν) < 0.1. Noe also from Eq. (48) ha M (ν) 11 m 1 M (ν) 1 = Xe iϕ, M (ν) m M (ν) 1 = Xe iϕ, (51) 11

14 where X = M(ν) 11 M (ν) M (ν) 1 = 0.3 µ(ν) β (ν) M(ν) 11 M (ν) 1/ M (ν) 1 ( ) 1/ 0.3 µ(ν), (5) β (ν) 1 + if ε (ν) < 0.1. Here, (M (ν) (ν) 1 m i )M 1 = M (ν) 1 (M (ν) 11 m i ) 1 (i = 1, ), as i follows from he secular equaions de( M (ν) 1m i ) = 0 wih M (ν) 0 = 0 = M (ν) 0 and M (ν) 01 = 0 = M (ν) 10. Also M (ν) 11 + M (ν) = m 1 + m and M (ν) 11 M (ν) M (ν) 1 = m 1 m. Noe ha Eqs. (48) and (5) give m 1, = M (ν) 11, M (ν) 1 X. Now, le us assume ha he neurino mass marix (47) is perurbed by he marix δ M (ν) = 0 δm (ν) 01 0 δm (ν) 10 0 δm (ν) 1 0 δm (ν) 1 0 = α(ν) 9 0 e iϕ(ν) 0 e iϕ(ν) 0 8 3e iϕ(ν) 0 8 3e iϕ(ν) 0. (53) Remember ha in he unperurbed mass marix (47) M (ν) 01 = 0 = M (ν) 10, while M (ν) 1 = (8β (ν) 3/9) exp(iϕ (ν) ) = M (ν) 1. Then, he secular equaions de[ M (ν) + δ M (ν) 1(m i + δm i )] = 0 give in he lowes (linear or quadraic) perurbaive order in α (ν) /µ (ν) he following neurino mass correcions: δm 0 δm 1, = δm(ν) 01 M (ν), m 1 m = δm(ν) 1 M (ν) 1, (54) m m 1 where δm (ν) 01 = α (ν), δm (ν) 1 = 0.478α (ν), M (ν) = 0.7µ (ν) and M (ν) 1 = 0.478β (ν). Here, we neglec all erms proporional o ε (ν) (his is correc for ε (ν) < 0.1). From Eqs. (54) i follows ha δm 0 +δm 1 +δm = 0, as i should be because of r δ M (ν) = 0. Noe ha in he limi of µ (ν) 0 Eqs. (54) give δm 0 0 and δm 1, δm (ν) 1 /. Thus, in his limi (m 1 + δm 1 ) = (m + δm ) as well as m 1 = m. 7. Neurino oscillaions (he second opion) The uniary marix (5), diagonalizing he unperurbed neurino mass marix (47) according o he equaion Û(ν) 1 M (ν)û(ν) = diag(m 0, m 1, m ), can be wrien as 1

15 where Û (ν) = 0 A (ν) 1 A (ν) Xe iϕ(ν), (55) 0 A (ν) 1 Xe iϕ(ν) A (ν) A (ν) 1 = ( 1 + X ) 1/ = A (ν). (56) Here, X is given as in Eq. (51). Noe ha in he limi of µ (ν) 0 Eqs. (5) and (56) give X 1 and A (ν) 1 = A (ν) 1/. Assuming enaively ha α (e) and β (e), which are experimenally consisen wih zero [cf. Eq. (3)], are really zero i.e., Û(e) = 1, we have V = Û(ν) = ( U (ν) ) j i (57) wih Û(ν) = ( U (ν) ) i j. Then, Eqs. (16) and (55) give he following unperurbed neurino oscillaion probabiliies (in he vacuum): P (ν e ν µ, ) = 0 = P (ν e ν τ, ), X ( m ντ m ) P (ν µ ν τ, ) = 4 (1 + X ) sin ν µ. (58) Noe from Eq. (5) ha he oscillaion ampliude 4X (1 + X ) 1 in he limi of µ (ν) /β (ν) 0 as hen X 1. The amospheric neurino experimens seem o indicae ha his oscillaion ampliude is of he order O(1), perhaps 1/ [4]. So, aking 4X (1+ X ) 1/ as an inpu, we esimae X (3 ) 1/ = 1, wha hrough Eq. (5) implies ha or β (ν) /µ (ν) 0.3 and µ (ν) /β (ν) µ(ν) 1 (59) β (ν) Now, assuming as anoher inpu he Super Kamiokande bound (36), we obain from Eqs. (50) and (59) 9.6µ (ν) β (ν) ( o 0.01)eV. (60) Of course, his relaion excludes µ (ν) = 0, wha would give m 1 = m as well as (m 1 + δm 1 ) = (m + δm ). Making use of Eqs. (59) and (60), we esimae 13

16 µ (ν) (0.71 o 4.1) 10 3 ev (61) and β (ν) (1.4 o 8.3) 10 ev. (6) Finally, using he esimaes (59) and (61), we can calculae from Eqs. (48) he unperurbed neurino masses m 0 = µ(ν) 9 ε(ν) (0.4 o 1.4) 10 4 ε (ν) ev m 1, m 1.8µ (ν) (0.0 o 1.) 10 ev, m 4.6µ (ν) (0.17 o 1.0) 10 1 ev, (63) if ε (ν) < 0.1. The minus sign a m 1 is irrelevan (cf. he Dirac equaion) and so, can be changed (if considered from he phenomenological poin of wiew) ino he plus sign. Similarly, from Eqs. (54) we can evaluae he neurino mass correcions in erms of α (ν) /µ (ν) : ( ) α (ν) ( ) α δm µ (ν) (1.0 o 5.9) 10 6 (ν) ev, µ (ν) µ (ν) δm 1, 0.17 α(ν) µ (ν)µ(ν) (1. o 6.9) 10 4 α(ν) ev, (64) µ (ν) if ε (ν) < 0.1. Thus, δm 0 /m ( 1/ε (ν)) ( α (ν) /µ (ν)), δm1 /m α (ν) /µ (ν) and δm /m α (ν) /µ (ν), wha implies ha on our accuracy level we ge m i + δm i m i for i = 1,. We can see ha he unperurbed resul (58) for P (ν µ ν τ, ), valid in he case of our second opion, is consisen wih he experimens for amospheric neurinos [3,4,5], which sugges a large neurino oscillaion ampliude of he order O(1). However, in he case of our second opion, he vanishing P (ν e ν µ, ) and P (ν e ν τ, ) raise a problem for solar neurinos. Of course, he perurbed neurino mass marix M (ν) + δ M (ν), as described by Eqs. (47) and (53), induces a perurbaion δû(ν) for he diagonalizing 14

17 uniary marix Û(ν) given in Eq. (55), and so, a perurbaion δ V for he lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V = Û(ν). Obviously, when V V + δ V in consequence of M (ν) M (ν) + δ M (ν), hen P (ν e ν µ, ) = 0 δp (ν e ν µ, ), P (ν e ν τ, ) = 0 δp (ν e ν τ, ), P (ν µ ν τ, ) P (ν µ ν τ, ) + δp (ν µ ν τ, ). (65) If he realisic α (e) and/or β (e) are no zero i.e., Û(e) 1, hen Eqs. (58) ge also oher correcions which will be discussed in deail in he nex Secion. The perurbed V + δ V, srenghened by he mechanism of neurino oscillaions in he Sun maer [6,4,5], migh help wih he problem of solar neurinos, pracically no perurbing he oscillaions (in he vacuum) of amospheric neurinos. The perurbaion δ V = ( δû(ν)) of he lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V = Û(ν) (in he case of Û(e) = 1) can be calculaed from Eq. (5) applied o he whole mass marix M (ν) + δ M (ν) given by Eqs. (47) and (53). Then, in his equaion, M (ν) 01 δm (ν) 01 and M (ν) 1 M (ν) 1 + δm (ν) 1, and so, A (ν) i m i + δm i (i = 0, 1, ). Here, δa (ν) i negligible. Bu, due o Eq. (54), he elemens A (ν) i + δa (ν) i as well as m i are of he second order in α (ν) /µ (ν), while δm i are U (ν) 10 δu (ν) 10 = A (ν) 0 = A (ν) 0 M (ν) 00 m 0 δm 0 δm (ν) 01 = A (ν) 0 δm 0 δm (ν) 01 δm (ν) 01 M (ν) m 1 m (66) and U (ν) 0 δu (ν) 0 are of he firs order in α (ν) /µ (ν). Remember ha A (ν) 0 = 1 and A (ν) 1 = A (ν) = (1 + X ) 1/. In his way, afer some calculaions, we obain in he lowes (linear) perurbaive order in α (ν) /µ (ν) δû(ν) = 0 A (ν) 1 δm(ν) 10 M(ν) δm (ν) 01 m 1 A (ν) m 1 m 0 A (ν) δm (ν) 10 M(ν) 1 m 1 m A (ν) 1 δm (ν) 1 M (ν) m 1 δm (ν) 01 M(ν) 1 m (M (ν) m 1) δm (ν) 1 M (ν) m 1 0, (67) 15

18 where δm (ν) 01 = (α (ν) /9) exp(iϕ (ν) ) = δm (ν) 10 and δm (ν) 1 = (8α (ν) 3/9) exp(iϕ (ν) ) = δm (ν) 1, while Û(ν) is given as in Eq. (55) wih X exp(iϕ (ν) ) = ( M (ν) m ) /M (ν) 1. Here, all erms proporional o ε (ν) 0 are negleced (i is correc already for ε (ν) < 0.1). The correcions δp (ν e ν µ, ), δp (ν e ν τ, ) and δp (ν µ ν τ, ) o he neurino oscillaion probabiliies (in he vacuum) can be evaluaed from Eqs. (16) applied o he whole Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V + δ V = Û(ν) + ( δû(ν)) (in he case of Û (e) = 1) given by Eqs. (55) and (67). Then, afer some calculaions, we ge in he lowes (linear or quadraic) perurbaive order in α (ν) /µ (ν) he following formulae: ( δp (ν e ν µ, ) = 4 δv 10 M(ν) m sin νµ m ) ν e m ( + M(ν) 1 m X sin ντ m ν e ) M(ν) 1 M (ν) ( m X sin ντ m ) ν µ (68) m m for he oscillaions ν e ν µ, δp (ν e ν τ, ) = 4 δv 10 M(ν) 1 for he oscillaions ν e ν τ, and m X m 1 M (ν) m M (ν) + m ( 1 m sin ντ m ν e )+ M(ν) sin m m ( m 1 X νµ m ) sin ν e ( m ντ m ) ν µ (69) ( X m ντ m ) ν δp (ν µ ν τ, ) = 8 δv 1 µ (1 + X sin ) 3/ + 4 δv 10 m 1 X [ ( m sin νµ m ) ( ν e m sin ντ m ν e m 1 + X )] (70) for he oscillaions ν µ ν τ. These correcions are o be added o he unperurbed values (58). Here, he following numbers are involved: δv 10 = δv 1 = δm (ν) 10 ( ) m 1(1 + X ) = 4 α (ν) ( ) α (ν), 841(1 + X ) m 1 µ (ν) δm (ν) 1 (M (ν) m 1 ) 1 + X = α (ν) α(ν) (71) 1 + X M (ν) m 1 µ (ν) 16

19 as well as M (ν) 11 = µ(ν) = 1.3µ (ν), M (ν) = µ(ν) = 0.7µ (ν), M (ν) 1 = β(ν) 9.70µ (ν) (7) and m 1.78µ (ν), m 4.7µ (ν), X 1 = (73) The perurbaive parameer α (ν) /µ (ν) is free. In Eqs. (71) (73), he sign denoes he esimae valid in he case of our inpu 4X (1 + X ) 1/ leading o he relaion (59) for β (ν) /µ (ν) i.e., β (ν) /µ (ν) 0.3. Anoher inpu is Eq. (60) giving for µ (ν) he value (61), µ (ν) (0.71 o 4.1) 10 3 ev. We can see from Eqs. (68) (70) and (71) (73) ha he correcions o he neurino oscillaion probabiliies (58) (in he vacuum) are very small (for α (ν) /µ (ν) < 1). The larges of hem is δp (ν µ ν τ, ). 8. Conclusions and a proposal In his paper, saring wih he generic form (4) of lepon mass marix, following from our exure dynamics expressed by Eqs. (18) (1), we concenraed mainly on neurinos. For he parameers involved in his form we considered wo opions: eiher (i) among he neurinos ν e, ν µ, ν τ pracically only he neighbours mix and do i weakly, or (ii) pracically only ν µ and ν τ mix and do i srongly. In boh cases, we evaluaed he neurino masses, he lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix and he neurino oscillaion probabiliies (in he vacuum), expressing all hese quaniies in erms of few parameers deermined essenially from he experimenal daa. In he second case, we calculaed also he lowes order perurbaive correcions o hese quaniies, caused by possible weak mixing of ν e wih ν µ and ν τ. The second opion urned ou o be consisen wih he experimens for amospheric neurinos [3,4,5] which seem o indicae a large ν µ ν τ oscillaion ampliude of he order O(1). Then, very small ν e ν µ and ν e ν τ oscillaion ampliudes were implied and so, 17

20 apparenly, mus be much srenghened in he Sun maer [6,4,5] in order o avoid he problem for solar neurinos. In hese calculaions, i was enaively assumed ha he nondiagonal par of he charged lepon mass marix, which is experimenally consisen wih zero, is really zero. Le us add a remark bearing on he las quesion and concerning he values of parameers involved in our generic form of mass marix, when i is applied also o he quarks u, c, and d, s, b. Such an applicaion, as i was made in he second Ref. [1], led o he values α (u) 1740 MeV, α (d) + β (d) 405 MeV, (74) when hey were fied o he experimenal daa for V cb and V ub /V cb. If α (u) : α (d) = Q (u) : Q (d) =, as was conjecured here, hen α (d) 870 MeV, β (d) 465 MeV, (75) wha leaves β (u) unknown, unless also β (u) : β (d) = giving β (u) 930 MeV (a presen, β (u) canno be deermined from he daa direcly). In he spiri of he relaion α (u) : α (d) = Q (u) : Q (e) for quarks, he analogical conjecure α (ν) : α (e) = Q (ν) : Q (e) = 0 would be naural for lepons, leaving now α (e) as well as β (ν) and β (e) free (o be deermined from he neurino and charged lepon experimens). In Secions 6 and 7 we allowed for α (ν) o be differen from zero, bu small (α (ν) /µ (ν) < 1). Now, using parly he suggesion ha α (ν) : α (e) = 0, we migh expec raher he inequaliy 0 α (ν) : α (e) 1. If so, a new perurbaion δ V (e) of he unperurbed V = Û(ν) Û(e) wih he rivial Û(e) = 1 would arise, when Û(e) 1 + δû(e) wih a δû(e) proporional o α (e) or α (e) + β (e). Such a new δ V (e) should be more significan han our previous perurbaion δ V (ν) = ( δû(ν)) proporional o α (ν) (and discussed in deail in Secion 7). As our las iem in his paper, le us evaluae he perurbaion δ V (e) = Û(ν) δû(e), (76) and also he relaed correcions o he neurino oscillaion probabiliies (in he vacuum). Then, 18

21 V V + δ V (e) + δ V (ν) = V + δ V (e) (77) under he conjecure of comparaively negligible or even vanishing δ V (ν). Since α (e) /µ (e) and β (e) /µ (e) can be reaed as perurbaive parameers, we obain from Eqs. (5), (4) and (8) in he lowes (linear) order in α (e) /µ (e) and (α (e) + β (e) )/µ (e) he uniary marix 1 + δû(e) diagonalizing he mass marix M (e) + δ M (e), where δû(e) = 1 9 α(e) 0 α(e) m µ e iϕ(e) 0 m µ e iϕ(e) (α(e) +β (e) ) m τ (α(e) +β (e) ) m τ e iϕ(e) 0 e iϕ(e) (wha is consisen wih Eqs. (44) if here α (ν) = 0 = β (ν) formally). Here, M (e) = diag(m e, m µ, m τ ) conains he unperurbed charged lepon masses (78) m e = µ(e) 9 ε(e), m µ = µ(e) 4 ( ) 80 + ε (e), m τ = µ(e) 4 ( ) 64 + ε (e) (79) [undisiguished, as ye, from heir experimenal values, as seen from Eqs. (31) and (3)], whereas δ M (e) = α (e) e iϕ(e) 0 α (e) e iϕ(e) 0 8 3(α (e) + β (e) )e iϕ(e) 0 8 3(α (e) + β (e) )e iϕ(e) 0 (80) is he perurbaion. Noe ha in he lowes (quadraic) perurbaive order he perurbed masses m e + δm e, m µ + δm µ, m τ + δm τ are given as in Eqs. (8). In he nex sep we make use of Eqs. (55) and (78) o calculae δ V (e) (δv (e) ij ) = Û (ν) δû(e). The resul is δv (e) 01 = α (e) e iϕ(e), δv (e) 10 = 9 m µ 9 α (e) e iϕ(e), 1 + X m µ δv (e) = 9 α (e) + β (e) e iϕ(e) = δv (e) 1 + X 1, m τ δv (e) 0 = 0, δv (e) X 0 = 9 α (e) e i(ϕ(ν) +ϕ(e)), 1 + X m µ δv (e) 00 = 0, δv (e) 11 = 8 3X m τ X α (e) + β (e) 19 e i(ϕ(ν) ϕ(e)) = δv (e). (81)

22 Finally, we apply Eqs. (16) o he whole lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V + δ V (e), where V = Û(ν) and δ V (e) are given by Eqs. (55) and (81), respecively (and δ V (ν) = ( δû(ν)) is negleced). Then, afer some calculaions, we obain in he lowes (linear or quadraic) perurbaive order in α (e) /µ (e) and (α (e) +β (e) )/µ (e) he following correcions o he neurino oscillaion probabiliies (in he vacuum): δp (ν e ν µ, ) = for he oscillaions ν e ν µ, δp (ν e ν τ, ) = for he oscillaions ν e ν τ, and (1 + X ) 16X 841(1 + X ) ( α (e) m µ ( α (e) m µ ) sin ( m νµ m ν e ) cos ( m νµ m ν e ) ) (8) (83) δp (ν µ ν τ, ) = X α (e) + β (e) cos ( ϕ (ν) ϕ (e)) sin 9(1 + X ) m τ ( ) α (e) [ ) 16X 841(1 + X ) m µ sin ( m νµ m ν e ( m ντ m ) ν µ sin ( m ντ m ν e )] (84) for he oscillaions ν µ ν τ. Noe ha he same ime argumen appears in Eqs. (8) and (83). Also noice he presence of unknown phase facor cos(ϕ (ν) ϕ (e) ) in Eq. (84) ha becomes 1 if ϕ (ν) = ϕ (e) as e.g. for ϕ (ν) = ϕ (e) = 0. (85) Of course, hese correcions are o be added o he unperurbed values (58). In Eqs. (8), (83) and (84) here appear he numerical coefficiens (1 + X ) ( ) α (e) , m µ 16X 841(1 + X ) ( ) α (e) , 64 3X α (e) + β (e) (86) 9(1 + X ) m τ To evaluae hese coefficiens we pu β (e) = 0 for he sake of simpliciy, and hen ook he cenral value (α (e) /µ (e) ) = 0.0 deduced in Eq. (3) from he experimenal value 0 m µ

23 of m τ. We used also our inpu 4X (1 + X ) 1/ implying X 1. When he experimenal errors in Eq. (3) are aken ino accoun, he firs coefficien (86) becomes We can conclude from Eq. (8) ha he prediced oscillaions ν e ν µ (in he vacuum) are very small, and similar in magniude o hose derived in he case of our firs opion [cf. Eqs. (45)].Thus, he effec of neurino oscillaions in he Sun maer sill appears o be needed. Evidenly, he oscillaions ν e ν µ caused by δ V (ν) = ( δû(ν)) are comparaively negligible or even vanish if 0 α (ν) α (e) [cf. Eq. (68)]. Furher, from Eq. (84) i follows ha he prediced correcion o he overwhelming unperurbed oscillaions ν µ ν τ [cf. Eq. (58)] is larger in magniude han he oscillaions ν e ν µ, and also larger han he oscillaions ν µ ν τ obained in he case of our firs opion [cf. Eq. (45)]. Again, he correcion caused by δ V (ν) = ( δû(ν)) is comparaively negligible or even vanishes [cf. Eq. (70)]. Thus, he amospheric neurino experimens, if inerpreed in erms of our exure dynamics, seem o ransmi an imporan message abou srong mixing of ν µ and ν τ neurinos and, on he oher hand, heir weak mixing wih ν e. However, such a srong mixing canno be really maximal as hen he degeneraion m ν µ = m ν τ appears, excluding he experimenally suggesed large oscillaions ν µ ν τ. A priori, some small oscillaions ν e ν µ (in he vacuum) may be caused by boh facor marices Û(ν) and Û(e) in he lepon Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa marix V. In his Secion of our paper we conjecured ha Û(e) is pracically responsible for such small oscillaions (in he vacuum). 1

24 References 1. W. Królikowski, Aca Phys. Pol., B 7, 11 (1996); B 8, 1643 (1997); and references herein.. Review of Paricle Properies, Phys.Rev. D 54, 1 (1996), Par I. 3. D. Kie lczewska, privae communicaion. 4. For a review cf. G. Gelmini, E. Roule, Neurino Masses, CERN TH 7541/94 (December 1994). 5. Y. Suzuki, Neurino Masses and Oscillaions Experimen, in Proc. of he 8h Iner. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Warsaw 1996, eds. Z. Ajduk and A.K. Wróblewski, World Scienific Pub. 1997; A.Y. Smirnow, Neurino Masses and Oscillaions Theory, in he same Proceedings. 6. S.P. Mikheyev and A.Y. Smirnow, Sov. Jour. Nucl. Phys., 4, 913 (1985); L. Wolfensein, Phys.Rev. D 17, 369 (1978).