Production of (anti)(hyper)nuclei in Pb-Pb collisions measured with ALICE at the LHC

Transcription

1 Production of (anti)(hyper)nuclei in Pb-Pb collisions measured with ALICE at the LHC Dipartimento Di Fisica, Università di Trieste e INFN, Sezione Trieste For the ALICE collaboration Achievements and Perspectives in Low-Energy QCD with Strangeness 27 1 October 2014

2 Introduction Heavy ion collisions provide experimental access to the properties of nuclear matter under extreme conditions of temperature and density Collective and thermal properties of the Quark Gluon Plasma can be inferred from transverse momentum (pt) distributions and integrated yields of identified particles Time Initial state Hydrodynamic Evolution Hadron Freeze-out 1

3 Introduction Heavy ion collisions provide experimental access to the properties of nuclear matter under extreme conditions of temperature and density Collective and thermal properties of the Quark Gluon Plasma can be inferred from transverse momentum (pt) distributions and integrated yields of identified particles Time Initial state Hydrodynamic Evolution Hadron Freeze-out At LHC energies uu, dd, ss pairs can be easily excited from the quantum vacuum abundant production of strangeness and antimatter Light (anti-)nuclei: very sensitive to fireball characteristics sensitive to late stage of fireball evolution 1

4 (Anti-)(Hyper)nuclei production Statistical thermal model Coalescence 2

5 (Anti-)(Hyper)nuclei production Statistical thermal model Thermodynamic approach to particle production in heavy-ion collisions Abundances fixed at chemical freeze-out (Tchem) : (hyper)nuclei are very sensitive to Tchem because of their large mass (M) Exponential dependence of the yield: dn/dy e(- m/tchem) Yield per 106 most central event LHC A= A=4 A=5 A. Andronic et al., Phys. Lett. B 697, 20 (2011) 2

6 (Anti-)(Hyper)nuclei production Statistical thermal model Coalescence Thermodynamic approach to particle production in heavy-ion collisions Abundances fixed at chemical freeze-out (Tchem) : (hyper)nuclei are very sensitive to Tchem because of their large mass (M) Exponential dependence of the yield: dn/dy e(- m/tchem) If baryons at freeze-out are close enough in phase space an (anti-)(hyper)nucleus can be formed (Hyper)nuclei are formed by protons and neutrons (Λ) which have similar velocities after the kinetic freeze-out Yield per 106 most central event LHC A= A=4 A=5 G. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, (201) A. Andronic et al., Phys. Lett. B 697, 20 (2011) 2

7 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade).

8 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). ITS ITS Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material

9 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material

10 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material Time Projection Chamber (TPC): particle identification via de/dx (allows also separation of charges) TPC

11 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material Time Projection Chamber (TPC): particle identification via de/dx (allows also separation of charges)

12 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material Time Projection Chamber (TPC): particle identification via de/dx (allows also separation of charges). Time Of Flight (TOF): particle identification via time-of-flight TOF

13 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material Time Projection Chamber (TPC): particle identification via de/dx (allows also separation of charges). Time Of Flight (TOF): particle identification via time-of-flight

14 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material HMPID Time Projection Chamber (TPC): particle identification via de/dx (allows also separation of charges). Time Of Flight (TOF): particle identification via time-of-flight. High Momentum PID (HMPID): particle identification via ring imaging Cherenkov

15 A Large Ion Collider Experiment ALICE particle identification capabilities are unique. Almost all known techniques are exploited: de/dx, Time Of Flight, Transition Radiation, Cherenkov Radiation, calorimetry and topological decay (V0, cascade). Inner Tracking System(ITS) : precise separation of primary particles and those from weak decay or knock-out from material Time Projection Chamber (TPC): particle identification via de/dx (allows also separation of charges). Time Of Flight (TOF): particle identification via time-of-flight. High Momentum PID (HMPID): particle identification via ring imaging Cherenkov

16 Collision Geometry Centrality = degree of overlap of the 2 colliding nuclei Centrality connected to observables via Glauber model Central collisions: small impact parameter b high number of participant nucleons high multiplicity Peripheral collisions: large impact parameter b low number of participant nucleons low multiplicity K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 0201 (2011)

17 Nuclei Identification and Results 4

18 Nuclei Identification Low momenta Higher Momenta Nuclei identification via de/dx measurement in the TPC: de/dx resolution in central Pb-Pb collisions: 7% Excellent separation of (anti-)nuclei from other particles over a wide range of momentum ALI-PERF

19 Nuclei Identification Low momenta Higher Momenta Nuclei identification via de/dx measurement in the TPC: de/dx resolution in central Pb-Pb collisions: 7% Excellent separation of (anti-)nuclei from other particles over a wide range of momentum ALI-PERF Velocity measurement with the Time Of Flight detector is used to evaluate the m2 distribution. Excellent TOF performance: σtof 85 ps in PbPb collisions. ±σ-cut around expected TPC de/dx for deuterons reduces drastically the background from TPC and TOF mismatch ALI-PERF

20 Nuclei Identification Low momenta Higher Momenta Nuclei identification via de/dx measurement in the TPC: de/dx resolution in central Pb-Pb collisions: 7% HMPID At higher momenta nuclei in central Pb-Pb collisions are identified based on Cherenkov radiation with HMPID cos θ Cherenkov = Excellent separation of (anti-)nuclei from other particles over a wide range of momentum nβ m = p (n cos θ Cherenkov 1) ALI-PERF

21 Nuclei Identification : Secondaries The measurement of nuclei is strongly affected by background from knock-out from material Rejection is possible by applying a cut on DCA Z and fitting the DCAXY distributions 6

22 Nuclei Identification : Secondaries The measurement of nuclei is strongly affected by background from knock-out from material Rejection is possible by applying a cut on DCA Z and fitting the DCAXY distributions Not relevant for anti-nuclei. However, their measurement suffers from large systematics related to unknown hadronic interaction cross-sections of anti-nuclei in material 6

23 Deuterons and He in Pb Pb Spectra are extracted in different centrality bins and fitted with a Blast-Wave function (simplified hydro model) for the extraction of yields (extrapolation to unmeasured region at low and high pt) A hardening of the spectrum with increasing centrality is observed as expected in a hydrodynamic description of the fireball as a radially expanding source Blast-Wave model: E. Schnedermann et al., Phys. Rev. C 48, 2462 (199) 7

24 Deuteron to proton ratio 8

25 Deuteron to proton ratio Rise with multiplicity in p-pb No significant centrality dependence in Pb-Pb Ratio in pp collisions is a factor 2.5 lower than in Pb-Pb collisions 8

26 Deuteron to proton ratio Rise with multiplicity in p-pb No significant centrality dependence in Pb-Pb Ratio in pp collisions is a factor 2.5 lower than in Pb-Pb collisions 8

27 Deuteron to proton ratio Rise with multiplicity in p-pb No significant centrality dependence in Pb-Pb Ratio in pp collisions is a factor 2.5 lower than in Pb-Pb collisions 8

28 Deuterons B2 Within a coalescence approach, the formation probability of deuterons can be quantified through the parameter B2 Ed B 2= ( Ep d Nd dp d d N p dp p ) 2 ALI-DER

29 Deuterons B2 Within a coalescence approach, the formation probability of deuterons can be quantified through the parameter B2 Ed B 2= ( Ep d Nd dp d d N p dp p ) 2 ALI-DER Simple coalescence model: Flat B vs p and no dependence on 2 T multiplicity/centrality 9

30 Deuterons B2 Within a coalescence approach, the formation probability of deuterons can be quantified through the parameter B2 Ed B 2= ( Ep d Nd dp d d N p dp p ) 2 ALI-DER Simple coalescence model: Flat B vs p and no dependence on 2 T multiplicity/centrality Observed peripheral Pb-Pb 9

31 Deuterons B2 Within a coalescence approach, the formation probability of deuterons can be quantified through the parameter B2 Ed B 2= ( Ep d Nd dp d d N p dp p ) 2 ALI-DER Simple coalescence model: Flat B vs p and no dependence on 2 T multiplicity/centrality Observed peripheral Pb-Pb More elaborated coalescence model: B scales like HBT radii 2 decrease with centrality in Pb-Pb is explained as an increase in the source volume increasing with pt in central Pb-Pb reflects the kt-dependence of the homogeneity volume in HBT 9

32 Deuterons B2 Within a coalescence approach, the formation probability of deuterons can be quantified through the parameter B2 Ed B 2= ( Ep d Nd dp d d N p dp p ) 2 ALI-DER Simple coalescence model: Flat B vs p and no dependence on 2 T multiplicity/centrality Observed peripheral Pb-Pb More elaborated coalescence model: B scales like HBT radii 2 decrease with centrality in Pb-Pb is explained as an increase in the source volume increasing with pt in central Pb-Pb reflects the kt-dependence of the homogeneity volume in HBT Observed in central Pb-Pb collisions 9

33 H Identification and Results 10

34 ( H) H Identification H is the lightest known hypernucleus and is formed by (p,n,λ). Λ Mass = GeV/c2 BΛ = 0.1 ± 0.05 MeV Lifetime ~ 26 ps Decay Channels H He + π - Λ H H + π0 Λ Λ Λ H d + p + πλ H d + n + π Λ Λ H He+ π 2 < pt < 10 GeV/c + H H+ π0 H d + p+ π+ + H d + n+ π Λ H and H search via two-body decays into charged Λ Λ particles: Two body decay: lower combinatorial background Charged particles: ALICE acceptance for charged particles higher than for neutrals Signal Extraction: Identify He and π Evaluate (He,π) invariant mass Apply topological cuts in order to: identify secondary decay vertex reduce combinatorial background Extract signal 11

35 ( H) H Identification H is the lightest known hypernucleus and is formed by (p,n,λ). Λ Mass = GeV/c2 BΛ = 0.1 ± 0.05 MeV Lifetime ~ 26 ps (He,π-)+ (He,π+) Invariant Mass spectrum Decay Channels H He + π - Λ H H + π0 Λ Λ Λ H d + p + πλ H d + n + π Λ Λ H He+ π 2 < pt < 10 GeV/c + H H+ π0 H d + p+ π+ + H d + n+ π Λ H and H search via two-body decays into charged Λ Λ particles: Two body decay: lower combinatorial background Charged particles: ALICE acceptance for charged particles higher than for neutrals μ = ± GeV/c2 σ = (2.08 ± 0.50)x10- GeV/c2 11

36 ( H ) H dn/dy dn/dy x B.R. (ΛH He + π-) extracted in two centrality bins for central (0-10%) and semi-central (10-50%) events and for ΛH and ΛH separately 12

37 ( H ) H dn/dy dn/dy x B.R. (ΛH He + π-) extracted in two centrality bins for central (0-10%) and semi-central (10-50%) events and for ΛH and ΛH separately Assuming particle production scales with centrality, yields were renormalized by <dnch/dη>: Central and semi-central yields consistent after scaling K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 0201 (2011) 12

38 ( H ) H dn/dy Yield extracted in two centrality bins dn/dy in good agreement with thermal model prediction from Andronic et al. for Tchem = 156 MeV M. Petráň et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, (201) A. Andronic et al., Phys. Lett. B 697, 20 (2011) 12

39 H Lifetime determination c = (5.5 ±1.4 ±0.68) cm Direct decay time measurement is difficult (~ps), but the excellent determination of primary and decay vertex allows measurement of lifetime via: ( N (t )=N (0) exp L βγc τ ) cτ = (5.5 ±1.4 ±0.68) cm Where c = ml/p (cm) With m the hypertriton mass, L the decay length and p the total momentum = 185 ± 48 ± 29 ps 1

40 Thermal Model 14

41 Thermal model fit to ALICE data The pt-integrated yields and ratios can be interpreted in terms of statistical (thermal) models Particle yields of light flavor hadrons (including nuclei) are described with a common chemical freeze-out temperature (Tchem= 156 ± 2 MeV) GSI-Heidelberg K* not include in the fit 15

42 Nuclei in Pb Pb p d Thermal model prediction: dn m exp( ) dy T chem He 4 He Nuclei follow nicely the exponential fall predicted by the model Each added baryon gives a factor of ~00 less production yield 16

43 Searches for weakly decaying exotic bound states 17

44 H-Dibaryon H-Dibaryon : Hypothetical bound state of uuddss (ΛΛ) first predicted by Jaffe in a bag model calculation. Recent lattice calculations suggest a bound state (20-50 MeV/c2 or 1 MeV/c2) R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 195 (1977), erratum ibid 8, 617 (1977) Inoue et al., PRL 106, (2011) Beane et al., PRL 106, (2011) If : mh< ΛΛ threshold weakly bound: measurable channel H Λpπ 2.2 GeV/c2 < mh < 2.21 GeV/c2 A. Andronic, private communication Jürgen Schaffner-Bielich et al., PRL 84, 405 (2000) 18

45 H-Dibaryon Expected strongly bound and lightly bound H-Dibaryon signal (thermal model prediction) N = x 2 x x x 0.64 = 2110 dn/dy y events lightly bound: 2110 x 0.64 = 150 Eff. BR(Λ) strongly bound: 2110 x 0.1 = 211 No signal visible upper limits For a lightly bound H: dn/dy 2x10-4 (99% CL) For a strongly bound H: dn/dy 8.4x10-4 (99% CL) 19

46 Λn bound state Bound state of Λn? HypHI experiment at GSI sees evidence of a new state: Λn d+ C. Rappold et al. (HypHI collaboration), Phys. Rev. C88, (R) (201) Expected Λn bound states yield at the LHC in (Λn dπ-) (Thermal model prediction): N = x 2 x x x 0.5 = 4000 dn/dy y events Eff. BR(Λn) Jürgen Schaffner-Bielich, Private communication No signal visible upper limit dn/dy 1.5x10- (99% CL) A. Andronic, private communication 20

47 Comparison to different models The upper limits for exotica are lower than the thermal model expectation by a factor 10 The thermal model with the same temperature describes precisely the production yield of deuterons, He and ΛH At least a factor 10 between models and estimated upper limit The existence of such states with the assumed B.R., mass and lifetime is questionable 21

48 Conclusions Excellent ALICE performance allows detection of light (anti-)nuclei, (anti-)hypernuclei and other exotic bound states A hardening of the deuteron and He spectra with increasing centrality is observed in Pb-Pb collisions The d/p ratio rises with multiplicity in p-pb collisions, while no significant centrality dependence is observed in Pb-Pb collisions Coalescence parameter B2 is independent from pt in peripheral Pb-Pb collisions, while it increases with pt in central Pb-Pb collisions. A decrease with centrality is also observed The measured ΛH lifetime (185 ± 48 ± 29 ps) is consistent with previous measurements Measured deuteron, He, hypertriton and anti-alpha yields are in agreement with the current best thermal fit from equilibrium thermal model (T chem = 156 MeV) H-Dibaryon and Λn search in Pb-Pb with ALICE: no visible signal Upper limits are at least an order of magnitude lower than predictions of several models 22

49 Outlook - ALICE Upgrade After the Upgrade (2018) ALICE will be able to collect data with better performances and higher luminosity. Expected integrated luminosity: ~10 nb-1 ( ~ 8x109 collisions in the 0-10% centrality class) Expected yields for three hypernuclear states (plus their antiparticles) for central Pb-Pb collisions (0-10 %) at snn = 5.5 TeV Expected invariant mass distribution for ΛH (plus antiparticle) reconstruction in Pb-Pb collisions (0-10 % centrality class), corresponding to Lint= 10 nb-1. Technical Design Report for the Upgrade of the ALICE Inner Tracking System B. Abelev et al. (The ALICE Collaboration) 2014 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys

50 BACKUP 24

51 Collision Geometry Centrality = degree of overlap of the 2 colliding nuclei Central collisions: small impact parameter b high number of participant nucleons high multiplicity Peripheral collisions: large impact parameter b low number of participant nucleons low multiplicity Geometrical picture of AA collisions with the Glauber model: Random relative position of nuclei in transverse plane Woods-Saxon distribution of nucleons inside nucleus Straight-line nucleon trajectories N-N cross-section (snn = 64 ± 5 mb) independent of the number of collisions the nucleons suffered before 25

52 Centrality in p Pb Multiplicity estimator: slices in VZERO-A (V0A) amplitude Central collision p Pb Peripheral collision p Pb Correlation between impact parameter and multiplicity is not as straight-forward as in Pb-Pb 26

53 Rapidity definition in p Pb Asymmetric energy/nucleon in the two beams CMS moves with rapidity ΔyCMS = A-side C-side p Pb ylab = 0 ycms = 0 27

54 Efficiency Correction 28

55 Absorption Correction For the anti-deuteron spectra an additional correction is necessary due to the absorption 29

56 H-Dibaryon Two cases: mh< ΛΛ threshold weakly bound: measurable channel H Λpπ 2.2 GeV/c2 < mh < 2.21 GeV/c2 p mh>λλ threshold resonant state: measurable channel H ΛΛ mh > 2.21 GeV/c2 H0 p 0

57 Coalescence Model and HBT The size of the emitting volume (Veff) has to be taken into account: the larger the distance between the protons and neutrons which are created in the collision, the less likely is that they coalesce (small fireball) (large fireball) In detail, it turns out [1] that the coalescence process is governed by the same length of homogeneity in the source which can be extracted from two particle Bose-Einstein correlation (HanburyBrown Twiss (HBT) interferometry [2]): B2 ~ 1/Veff B 2= π / 2 C d 2 mt ℜ2T (m t )ℜ2p (m t ) e 2(mt m) (T 1 p 1 T d ) The strong decrease of B2 with centrality in Pb-Pb collisions can be naturally explained as an increase in the emitting volume: particle densities are relevant and not absolute multiplicities [1]R. Scheibl and U. Heinz, Phys.Rev. C59, 1585 (1999) [2]A review can be found in : U. Heinz, Nucl. Phys. A 610, 264c (1996) 1