Lecture 11/12. Roy Model, MTE, Structural Estimation
|
|
- Bruno Lamb
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lecture 11/12. Roy Model, MTE, Structural Estimation Economics 2123 George Washington University Instructor: Prof. Ben Williams
2 Roy model The Roy model is a model of comparative advantage: Potential earnings in sectors 0 and 1: Y 0, Y 1 Individuals choose sector 1 if and only if Y 1 Y 0 c where c is a nonrandom cost. Heckman and Honore (1990) studied the empirical implications and identification of this model.
3 Roy model The extended and generalized Roy model: the extended model allows for an observable cost component, D = 1(Y 1 Y 0 c(w )) where W is a vector of covariates and c is a possibly unknown function. the generalized model allows for an unobservable cost component, D = 1(Y 1 Y 0 c(w, V )) where V is unobservable
4 Roy model Two parts of this lecture: estimation of treatment effects estimation of structural models
5 Roy model In the Roy model, Y d = µ d + U d for d = 0, 1. Suppose we observe a vector of covariates X so that µ d = β d X. Then E(Y D = 1, X = x) = β 1 x + E(U 1 U 1 U 0 z, X = x) E(Y D = 0, X = x) = β 0 x + E(U 0 U 1 U 0 < z, X = x) where z = (β 1 β 0 ) x c.
6 Roy model Assumption: (U 1, U 0 ) X = x N(0, Σ) where ( ) σ 2 Σ = 1 σ 10 σ 10 σ0 2 Let V = U 1 U 0 and σ 2 V = Var(V )
7 Roy model Assumption: (U 1, U 0 ) X = x N(0, Σ) Let z = z /σ V. Then under this assumption, E(Y D = 1, X = x) = β 1 x + σ2 1 σ 10 λ( z) σ V E(Y D = 0, X = x) = β 0 x + σ2 0 σ 10 λ( z) σ V and Pr(D = 1 X = x) = Φ( z)
8 Roy model Estimation with only sector one observed. If we only observe Y for those with D = 1 (for example, a wage-lfp model) then we can (1) estimate the probit: Pr(D = 1 X = x) = Φ(γ 0 + γ 1 x) = Φ( z) (2) compute the predicted values from (1), ˆ Z = ˆγ0 + ˆγ 1 X and plug into λ to get λ( ˆ Z ) (3) estimate a regression of Y on X, λ( ˆ Z ) for those with D = 1 This enables us to estimate β 1 but not β 0, σ 1, σ 10, σ 0.
9 Roy model Estimation with both sectors observed. If we only observe Y, D, X for everyone. (1) estimate the probit: Pr(D = 1 X = x) = Φ(γ 0 + γ 1 x) = Φ( z) (2) compute the predicted values from (1), ˆ Z = ˆγ0 + ˆγ 1 X and plug into λ to get λ( ˆ Z ) (3) estimate a regression of Y on X, λ( ˆ Z ) for those with D = 1 (4) estimate a regression of Y on X, λ(ˆ Z ) for those with D = 0 This enables us to estimate β 1, β 0, β 1 β 0 and σ V, σ2 0 σ 10 σ V σ1 2 σ 10 σ V. Thus we get σ V too From the variance of the residuals from the two regressions we can also identify σ1 2, σ2 0 and σ 10.
10 Roy model Concerns: If λ( z) is approximately linear then we will have a serious collinearity problem. If U 1, U 0 is not normal then the model is misspecified and identification is not transparent. If there are variable costs the model is misspecified.
11 Roy model In the extended Roy model, Y d = µ d + U d for d = 0, 1 but D = 1(Y 1 Y 0 γ 1 X + γ 2 Z ) Cost of participation varies with X and also with other variables Z. Then E(Y D = 1, X = x, Z = z) = β 1 x E(Y D = 0, X = x, Z = z) = β 0 x where z = (β 1 β 0 ) x γ 1 x γ 2 z. + E(U 1 U 1 U 0 z, X = x) + E(U 0 U 1 U 0 < z, X = x)
12 Roy model Assumption: (U 1, U 0 ) X = x, Z = z N(0, Σ) Under this assumption, if z = z /σ V, E(Y D = 1, X = x) = β 1 x + σ2 1 σ 10 λ( z) σ V E(Y D = 0, X = x) = β 0 x + σ2 0 σ 10 λ( z) σ V and Pr(D = 1 X = x, Z = z) = Φ( z) β 1 and β 0 are still identified Σ only identified if there is an exclusion: a component of X that does not affect costs
13 Roy model What do we need/want to identify? The ATE is E(Y 1 Y 0 ) = (β 1 β 0 )E(X)
14 Roy model What do we need/want to identify? The ATE is E(Y 1 Y 0 ) = (β 1 β 0 )E(X) The distribution of gains: Y 1 Y 0 X = x N((β 1 β 0 ) x, σv 2 ) various other counterfactuals need Σ to go beyond mean treatment effects
15 Roy model In the generalized Roy model, Y d = µ d + U d for d = 0, 1 but D = 1(γ 1 X + γ 2 Z V ) V includes an unobservable component of cost Then E(Y D = 1, X = x, Z = z) = β 1 x E(Y D = 0, X = x, Z = z) = β 0 x where z = γ 1 x + γ 2 z. + E(U 1 V z, X = x) + E(U 0 V > z, X = x)
16 Roy model Assumption: (U 1, U 0, V ) X = x, Z = z N(0, Σ) Under this assumption, β 1 and β 0 are identified σ V is identified under the exclusion restriction but Var(U 1 U 0 ) σv 2 (key ingredient needed for distribution of Y 1 Y 0 ) is not identified
17 Roy model without normality Assumption: (U 1, U 0, V ) X = x, Z = z and lim z Pr(D = 1 X = x, Z = z) = 1 The first assumption is essentially the same one used by Imbens and Angrist (1994) The second assumption is called identification at infinity
18 Roy model without normality Under these assumptions Let P(x, z) = Pr(D = 1 X = x, Z = z) E(Y D = 1, X = x, Z = z) = β 1 x + K 1(P(x, z)) and lim z E(Y D = 1, X = x, Z = z) = β 1 x selection on unobservables goes away in the limit Using the same argument for D = 0, we can identify ATE(x) = (β 1 β 0 ) x We ve traded normality for identification at infinity.
19 Roy model Next: The marginal treatment effect. Structural estimation of the Roy model More on structural estimation
20 Some preliminaries Recall that D = 1(γ 1 X + γ 2 Z V ) Let U D = F V (V ) where V has distribution function F V ( ). Then D = 1(P(X, Z ) U D ) And note that U D Uniform(0, 1).
21 Definition of the MTE Then MTE(x, u) = E(Y 1 Y 0 X = x, U D = u) This demonstrates (observable and unobservable) heterogeneity in Y 1 Y 0. MTE(x, u) can be interpreted as the effect of participation for those individuals who would be indifferent if we assigned them a new value of P = P(x, z) equal to u. Someone with a large value of u (close to 1) will participate only if P is quite large; this person will be indifferent if P is equal to u. These are the high unobservable cost individuals. Someone with a small value of u (close to 0) will participate even if P is quite small; this person will be indifferent if P is equal to u. These are the low unobservable cost individuals.
22 Identification of the MTE The identifying equation: E(Y X = x, P(X, Z ) = p) p = MTE(x, p) This only works if Z is continuous. The effect for the high unobserved cost individuals is identified by the effect of a marginal increase in participation probability on Y at a high participation rate.
23 Other treatment parameters and methods ATE(x) = 1 0 MTE(x, u)du
24 Other treatment parameters and methods ATE(x) = 1 0 MTE(x, u)du TT (x) = 1 0 MTE(x, u)ω TT (x, u)du where ω TT (x, u) disproportionately weights smaller values of u OLS and IV can also be written as weighted averages of MTE(x, u).
25 Other treatment parameters and methods Consider the IV estimand IV (x) = The weight here is Cov(J(Z ),Y X=x) Cov(J(Z ),D X=x) ω IV (x, u) = E(J E(J) X = x, P u)pr(p u X = x) Cov(J, P X = x) This and many interesting implications are discussed in Heckman, Vytlacil, and Urzua (2006).
26 An example Carneiro, Heckman, Vytlacil (2011) use data from the NLSY Y is log wage in 1991 (ages 28-34), D represents college attendance, X a vector of controls vector Z : (i) distance to college, (ii) local wage, (iii) local unemployment, (iv) average local public tuition
27 VOL. 101 NO carneiro et al.: estimating marginal returns to education An example MTE U S
28 Estimating the MTE - normal model Option 1. Estimate using MLE. Option 2. Two stage estimation: Probit to estimate P(Z i ) (to simplify, define Z i to include X i and instrument(s)) Regress Y on X i and ˆλ 1i = φ(φ 1 (ˆP(Z i ))) for D ˆP(Z i ) i = 1 Regress Y on X i and ˆλ 0i = φ(φ 1 (ˆP(Z i ))) 1 ˆP(Z i ) Then for D i = 0 MTE(x, u) = x ( ˆβ 1 ˆβ 0 ) + (ˆρ 1 ˆρ 0 )Φ 1 (u)
29 Estimating the MTE semiparametric model The outcome equation can be written 1 as E(Y X = x, P(Z ) = p) = x δ 0 + px (δ 1 δ 0 ) + K (p) There are several ways to estimate this perhaps the simplest is a series/spline/sieve estimator. Estimate P(Z i ) (logit). Choose a set of basis functions (polynomials) and an order, K. Run the regression: Y i = X i δ 0 + ˆP(Z i )X i (δ 1 δ 0 ) + γ 1 ˆP(Zi ) γ K ˆP(Zi ) K + η i An important sacrifice here is that MTE(x, u) is only identified for u in the support of P. (Recall identification at )
30 Consider policies that affect P(Z ) but not Y 1, Y 0, V. Propensity score P under new policy. It can be shown that the effect of shifting to this new policy is given by 1 0 [ MTE(x, u) F P X=x(u) F P X=x (u) E(P X = x) E(P X = x) This will still require large support for P(Z ). define a continuum of policies consider marginal change from baseline ] du
31 MPRTE Consider increasing tuition (a component of Z ) by an amount α: tuition = tuition + α. Corresponding propensity score, P α. Define the MPRTE as 1 lim α 0 0 [ MTE(x, u) F Pα X=x(u) F P0 X=x(u) E(P α X = x) E(P 0 X = x) ] du This is also equal to lim e 0 E(Y 1 Y 0 µ D (X, Z ) V < e). And it can be written as 1 MTE(x, u)ω(x, u) where 0 ω(x, u) = f P X (u)f V X (F 1 V X (u)) E(f V X (µ D (X, Z )) X)
32 Maximum likelihood You ve seen theoretical conditions for maximum likelihood estimation before. See Cameron and Trivedi for a review. Here I want to practice constructing the likelihood for different models. Suppose we observe a vector of outcomes Y i and covariates X i. With iid data, the likelihood function is L(β) = n f Y X (Y i X i ; β) i=1 Let L(β) = log(l(β)) = n i=1 log(f Y X (Y i X i ; β)). Then ˆβ MLE = arg max L(β) β
33 Censoring and Truncation Censoring and truncation occur when when only observe the value of a variable below or above some threshold. Censoring occurs when we observe y if y > L but we still observe the individuals with y < L, just not their value of y. Truncation occurs when we observe y if y > L and we don t observe the individuals with y < L at all.
34 Censoring Suppose the conditional density is given by f (yi X i ). Then the likelihood is given by ( L n i=1 1(y i > L) ln(f (y i X i ))+1(y i < L) ln f (y X i )dy )
35 Truncation Suppose again that the conditional density is given by f (yi X i ). Then the density conditional on being observed is given by f (yi f (y X i)dy. Plug this into the likelihood to get X i )/ L n i=1 ln(f (y i ( ) X i )) ln f (y X i )dy L
36 Tobit In the Tobit model, yi = β X i + ε i where ε i is normally distributed. This can be implemented quite easily in Stata using the tobit command. As in the probit and logit models, consistency requires correct specification of the distribution of ε i a strong assumption (excludes heteroskedasticity, for example)!
37 Tobit Note that in this model, E(y i X i, y i > 0) = β X i + E(ε i β X i < ε i ) This second term is equal to σ ε φ( β X i /σ ε )/(1 Φ( β X i /σ ε )) if ε i N(0, σε 2 ) This is called the inverse Mills ratio.
38 Tobit An alternative is what Cameron and Trivedi call a two-part estimator. This models censoring as a different function of X i. d i = 1 if the observation is censored and Pr(d i = 0 X i ) is not given by Pr(β X i + ε i > 0 X i ). This can be interpreted as a participation decision and a separate choice/determination of y i conditional on participation (COP). See Angrist and Pischke for the reduced form approach to this.
39 Sample selection models The sample selection model generalizes this by allowing different components of X i to enter the participation/selection equation and the outcome equation. y i1 = β 1 X i1 + ε i1 y i2 = β 2 X i2 + ε i2 Then y i2 is observed if and only if y i1 > 0. Sometimes called a type 2 Tobit model.
40 Sample selection models This is easy to estimate via MLE if the distribution of (ε i1, ε i2 ) is known. The likelihood is L = n (1 y 1i )log (Pr(y1i 0))+y 1i log (f (y 2i y1i > 0)Pr(y1i > 0 i=1
41 Sample selection models The sample selection model can also be estimated using the two-step estimator of Heckman (1979). (heckit in Stata) The Roy model is a version of the sample selection model if yi1 < 0 then we observe a different outcome, yi3 and yi1 = y i2 y i3 or = y i2 y i3 + γ Z i We ll see an example of heckit briefly next class.
42 Example Another example (due to Petra Todd) Consider the following model of consumption (c i ), wages (w i ), and labor force participation (d i ). U i = c i + α i (1 d i ) with α i = κ i β + ε i c i = y i + w i d i πn i d i w i = z i γ + η i d i = 1(z i γ πn i κ i β + η i ε i 0) where ε i, η i are jointly normal. Is it possible to identify the effect of a child care subsidy?
43 Example Another example (due to Petra Todd) If we have sufficient independent variation so that we can identify Pr(d i = 1 z i, n i, κ i ) the estimated coefficients correspond to γ/σ ξ, β/σ ξ, and (β n + π)/σ ξ where σ 2 ξ = Var(η i ε i ) enough to identify the effect on LFP of the birth of a child, for example. not enough to identify the effect of a child care subsidy of a given amount τ because we don t observe variation in τ under the new policy, the participation probability becomes ( ) zi γ κ i β (β n + π τ)n i Pr(d i = 1 z i, n i, κ i, τ) = Φ σ ξ
44 Example Another example (due to Petra Todd) We can estimate a sample selection model where y 2i = w i and y 1i = d i We can generally identify (β n + π)/σ ξ If there is a variable in the wage equation that is not in κ i then we can identify σ ξ. This is what we need to identify the counterfactual!
Lecture 8. Roy Model, IV with essential heterogeneity, MTE
Lecture 8. Roy Model, IV with essential heterogeneity, MTE Economics 2123 George Washington University Instructor: Prof. Ben Williams Heterogeneity When we talk about heterogeneity, usually we mean heterogeneity
More informationLecture 11 Roy model, MTE, PRTE
Lecture 11 Roy model, MTE, PRTE Economics 2123 George Washington University Instructor: Prof. Ben Williams Roy Model Motivation The standard textbook example of simultaneity is a supply and demand system
More informationEstimation of Treatment Effects under Essential Heterogeneity
Estimation of Treatment Effects under Essential Heterogeneity James Heckman University of Chicago and American Bar Foundation Sergio Urzua University of Chicago Edward Vytlacil Columbia University March
More informationEstimating Marginal and Average Returns to Education
Estimating Marginal and Average Returns to Education Pedro Carneiro, James Heckman and Edward Vytlacil Econ 345 This draft, February 11, 2007 1 / 167 Abstract This paper estimates marginal and average
More informationExploring Marginal Treatment Effects
Exploring Marginal Treatment Effects Flexible estimation using Stata Martin Eckhoff Andresen Statistics Norway Oslo, September 12th 2018 Martin Andresen (SSB) Exploring MTEs Oslo, 2018 1 / 25 Introduction
More informationInstrumental Variables: Then and Now
Instrumental Variables: Then and Now James Heckman University of Chicago and University College Dublin Econometric Policy Evaluation, Lecture II Koopmans Memorial Lectures Cowles Foundation Yale University
More informationPrinciples Underlying Evaluation Estimators
The Principles Underlying Evaluation Estimators James J. University of Chicago Econ 350, Winter 2019 The Basic Principles Underlying the Identification of the Main Econometric Evaluation Estimators Two
More informationAGEC 661 Note Fourteen
AGEC 661 Note Fourteen Ximing Wu 1 Selection bias 1.1 Heckman s two-step model Consider the model in Heckman (1979) Y i = X iβ + ε i, D i = I {Z iγ + η i > 0}. For a random sample from the population,
More informationThe Generalized Roy Model and Treatment Effects
The Generalized Roy Model and Treatment Effects Christopher Taber University of Wisconsin November 10, 2016 Introduction From Imbens and Angrist we showed that if one runs IV, we get estimates of the Local
More informationEstimating marginal returns to education
Estimating marginal returns to education Pedro Carneiro James J. Heckman Edward Vytlacil The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP29/10 Estimating Marginal
More informationEstimating Marginal Returns to Education
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 5275 Estimating Marginal Returns to Education Pedro Carneiro James J. Heckman Edward Vytlacil October 2010 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the
More informationComparative Advantage and Schooling
Comparative Advantage and Schooling Pedro Carneiro University College London, Institute for Fiscal Studies and IZA Sokbae Lee University College London and Institute for Fiscal Studies June 7, 2004 Abstract
More informationTruncation and Censoring
Truncation and Censoring Laura Magazzini laura.magazzini@univr.it Laura Magazzini (@univr.it) Truncation and Censoring 1 / 35 Truncation and censoring Truncation: sample data are drawn from a subset of
More informationEstimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective*
Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective* Xiang Zhou and Yu Xie Princeton University 05/15/2016 *Direct all correspondence to Xiang Zhou
More informationFour Parameters of Interest in the Evaluation. of Social Programs. James J. Heckman Justin L. Tobias Edward Vytlacil
Four Parameters of Interest in the Evaluation of Social Programs James J. Heckman Justin L. Tobias Edward Vytlacil Nueld College, Oxford, August, 2005 1 1 Introduction This paper uses a latent variable
More informationApplied Econometrics Lecture 1
Lecture 1 1 1 Università di Urbino Università di Urbino PhD Programme in Global Studies Spring 2018 Outline of this module Beyond OLS (very brief sketch) Regression and causality: sources of endogeneity
More informationEstimating Marginal and Average Returns to Education
Estimating Marginal and Average Returns to Education (Author list removed for review process) November 3, 2006 Abstract This paper estimates marginal and average returns to college when returns vary in
More informationGeneralized Roy Model and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs 1
Generalized Roy Model and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs 1 James J. Heckman The University of Chicago University College Dublin Philipp Eisenhauer University of Mannheim Edward Vytlacil Columbia
More informationThe relationship between treatment parameters within a latent variable framework
Economics Letters 66 (2000) 33 39 www.elsevier.com/ locate/ econbase The relationship between treatment parameters within a latent variable framework James J. Heckman *,1, Edward J. Vytlacil 2 Department
More informationIV estimators and forbidden regressions
Economics 8379 Spring 2016 Ben Williams IV estimators and forbidden regressions Preliminary results Consider the triangular model with first stage given by x i2 = γ 1X i1 + γ 2 Z i + ν i and second stage
More informationMatching. James J. Heckman Econ 312. This draft, May 15, Intro Match Further MTE Impl Comp Gen. Roy Req Info Info Add Proxies Disc Modal Summ
Matching James J. Heckman Econ 312 This draft, May 15, 2007 1 / 169 Introduction The assumption most commonly made to circumvent problems with randomization is that even though D is not random with respect
More informationChilean and High School Dropout Calculations to Testing the Correlated Random Coefficient Model
Chilean and High School Dropout Calculations to Testing the Correlated Random Coefficient Model James J. Heckman University of Chicago, University College Dublin Cowles Foundation, Yale University and
More informationHeterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of. Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective Xiang Zhou Harvard University Yu Xie Princeton University University of Michigan Population Studies Center,
More informationLecture 14 More on structural estimation
Lecture 14 More on structural estimation Economics 8379 George Washington University Instructor: Prof. Ben Williams traditional MLE and GMM MLE requires a full specification of a model for the distribution
More informationThe Econometric Evaluation of Policy Design: Part I: Heterogeneity in Program Impacts, Modeling Self-Selection, and Parameters of Interest
The Econometric Evaluation of Policy Design: Part I: Heterogeneity in Program Impacts, Modeling Self-Selection, and Parameters of Interest Edward Vytlacil, Yale University Renmin University, Department
More informationTreatment Effects with Normal Disturbances in sampleselection Package
Treatment Effects with Normal Disturbances in sampleselection Package Ott Toomet University of Washington December 7, 017 1 The Problem Recent decades have seen a surge in interest for evidence-based policy-making.
More informationImpact Evaluation Technical Workshop:
Impact Evaluation Technical Workshop: Asian Development Bank Sept 1 3, 2014 Manila, Philippines Session 19(b) Quantile Treatment Effects I. Quantile Treatment Effects Most of the evaluation literature
More informationLecture 12: Application of Maximum Likelihood Estimation:Truncation, Censoring, and Corner Solutions
Econ 513, USC, Department of Economics Lecture 12: Application of Maximum Likelihood Estimation:Truncation, Censoring, and Corner Solutions I Introduction Here we look at a set of complications with the
More informationRecent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data
Recent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data July 2012 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 Content a) Censoring and truncation b)
More informationHaavelmo, Marschak, and Structural Econometrics
Haavelmo, Marschak, and Structural Econometrics James J. Heckman University of Chicago Trygve Haavelmo Centennial Symposium December 13 14, 2011 University of Oslo This draft, October 13, 2011 James J.
More informationPolicy-Relevant Treatment Effects
Policy-Relevant Treatment Effects By JAMES J. HECKMAN AND EDWARD VYTLACIL* Accounting for individual-level heterogeneity in the response to treatment is a major development in the econometric literature
More informationEconomics 536 Lecture 21 Counts, Tobit, Sample Selection, and Truncation
University of Illinois Fall 2016 Department of Economics Roger Koenker Economics 536 Lecture 21 Counts, Tobit, Sample Selection, and Truncation The simplest of this general class of models is Tobin s (1958)
More informationInstrumental Variables in Models with Multiple Outcomes: The General Unordered Case
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 3565 Instrumental Variables in Models with Multiple Outcomes: The General Unordered Case James J. Heckman Sergio Urzua Edward Vytlacil June 2008 Forschungsinstitut zur
More informationTesting for Essential Heterogeneity
Testing for Essential Heterogeneity James J. Heckman University of Chicago, University College Dublin and the American Bar Foundation Daniel Schmierer University of Chicago Sergio Urzua University of Chicago
More informationPotential Outcomes Model (POM)
Potential Outcomes Model (POM) Relationship Between Counterfactual States Causality Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics, Angrist Krueger (1999): The most challenging empirical questions in economics
More informationMaximum Likelihood Estimation
Maximum Likelihood Estimation Additional Topics Raphael Cunha Program in Statistics and Methodology PRISM Department of Political Science The Ohio State University cunha.6@osu.edu March 28, 2014 Overview
More informationLecture 8 Panel Data
Lecture 8 Panel Data Economics 8379 George Washington University Instructor: Prof. Ben Williams Introduction This lecture will discuss some common panel data methods and problems. Random effects vs. fixed
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics. Lecture 5. Instrumental Variables with Treatment Effect. Heterogeneity: Local Average Treatment Effects.
A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 5 Outline. Introduction 2. Basics Instrumental Variables with Treatment Effect Heterogeneity: Local Average Treatment Effects 3. Local Average Treatment Effects
More informationMarginal Treatment Effects from a Propensity Score Perspective
Marginal Treatment Effects from a Propensity Score Perspective Xiang Zhou 1 and Yu Xie 2 1 Harvard University 2 Princeton University January 26, 2018 Abstract We offer a propensity score perspective to
More informationSUPPOSE a policy is proposed for adoption in a country.
The Review of Economics and Statistics VOL. LXXXVIII AUGUST 2006 NUMBER 3 UNDERSTANDING INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES IN MODELS WITH ESSENTIAL HETEROGENEITY James J. Heckman, Sergio Urzua, and Edward Vytlacil*
More informationModeling Binary Outcomes: Logit and Probit Models
Modeling Binary Outcomes: Logit and Probit Models Eric Zivot December 5, 2009 Motivating Example: Women s labor force participation y i = 1 if married woman is in labor force = 0 otherwise x i k 1 = observed
More informationGenerated Covariates in Nonparametric Estimation: A Short Review.
Generated Covariates in Nonparametric Estimation: A Short Review. Enno Mammen, Christoph Rothe, and Melanie Schienle Abstract In many applications, covariates are not observed but have to be estimated
More informationECO Class 6 Nonparametric Econometrics
ECO 523 - Class 6 Nonparametric Econometrics Carolina Caetano Contents 1 Nonparametric instrumental variable regression 1 2 Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects 3 2.1 Asymptotic results................................
More informationEconometrics Master in Business and Quantitative Methods
Econometrics Master in Business and Quantitative Methods Helena Veiga Universidad Carlos III de Madrid This chapter deals with truncation and censoring. Truncation occurs when the sample data are drawn
More informationSample Problems. Note: If you find the following statements true, you should briefly prove them. If you find them false, you should correct them.
Sample Problems 1. True or False Note: If you find the following statements true, you should briefly prove them. If you find them false, you should correct them. (a) The sample average of estimated residuals
More informationThe College Premium in the Eighties: Returns to College or Returns to Ability
The College Premium in the Eighties: Returns to College or Returns to Ability Christopher Taber March 4, 2008 The problem of Ability Bias were A i is ability Y i = X i β + αs i + A i + u i If A i is correlated
More informationThe Econometric Evaluation of Policy Design: Part III: Selection Models and the MTE
The Econometric Evaluation of Policy Design: Part III: Selection Models and the MTE Edward Vytlacil, Yale University Renmin University June 2017 1 / 96 Lectures primarily drawing upon: Heckman and Vytlacil
More informationThe problem of causality in microeconometrics.
The problem of causality in microeconometrics. Andrea Ichino European University Institute April 15, 2014 Contents 1 The Problem of Causality 1 1.1 A formal framework to think about causality....................................
More informationChapter 60 Evaluating Social Programs with Endogenous Program Placement and Selection of the Treated
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/222400893 Chapter 60 Evaluating Social Programs with Endogenous Program Placement and Selection
More informationMethods to Estimate Causal Effects Theory and Applications. Prof. Dr. Sascha O. Becker U Stirling, Ifo, CESifo and IZA
Methods to Estimate Causal Effects Theory and Applications Prof. Dr. Sascha O. Becker U Stirling, Ifo, CESifo and IZA last update: 21 August 2009 Preliminaries Address Prof. Dr. Sascha O. Becker Stirling
More informationLabor Supply and the Two-Step Estimator
Labor Supply and the Two-Step Estimator James J. Heckman University of Chicago Econ 312 This draft, April 7, 2006 In this lecture, we look at a labor supply model and discuss various approaches to identify
More informationAdding Uncertainty to a Roy Economy with Two Sectors
Adding Uncertainty to a Roy Economy with Two Sectors James J. Heckman The University of Chicago Nueld College, Oxford University This draft, August 7, 2005 1 denotes dierent sectors. =0denotes choice of
More informationIntroduction to Econometrics
Introduction to Econometrics Lecture 3 : Regression: CEF and Simple OLS Zhaopeng Qu Business School,Nanjing University Oct 9th, 2017 Zhaopeng Qu (Nanjing University) Introduction to Econometrics Oct 9th,
More informationUnderstanding What Instrumental Variables Estimate: Estimating Marginal and Average Returns to Education
Understanding What Instrumental Variables Estimate: Estimating Marginal and Average Returns to Education Pedro Carneiro University of Chicago JamesJ.Heckman University of Chicago and The American Bar Foundation
More informationTobit and Selection Models
Tobit and Selection Models Class Notes Manuel Arellano November 24, 2008 Censored Regression Illustration : Top-coding in wages Suppose Y log wages) are subject to top coding as is often the case with
More information1 Static (one period) model
1 Static (one period) model The problem: max U(C; L; X); s.t. C = Y + w(t L) and L T: The Lagrangian: L = U(C; L; X) (C + wl M) (L T ); where M = Y + wt The FOCs: U C (C; L; X) = and U L (C; L; X) w +
More informationThe Problem of Causality in the Analysis of Educational Choices and Labor Market Outcomes Slides for Lectures
The Problem of Causality in the Analysis of Educational Choices and Labor Market Outcomes Slides for Lectures Andrea Ichino (European University Institute and CEPR) February 28, 2006 Abstract This course
More informationUsing Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 768 Using Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models James J. Heckman Salvador Navarro-Lozano April 2003 Forschungsinstitut
More informationFlorian Hoffmann. September - December Vancouver School of Economics University of British Columbia
Lecture Notes on Graduate Labor Economics Section 1a: The Neoclassical Model of Labor Supply - Static Formulation Copyright: Florian Hoffmann Please do not Circulate Florian Hoffmann Vancouver School of
More informationUnderstanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 2320 Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity James J. Heckman Sergio Urzua Edward Vytlacil September 2006 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft
More informationEconomics 582 Random Effects Estimation
Economics 582 Random Effects Estimation Eric Zivot May 29, 2013 Random Effects Model Hence, the model can be re-written as = x 0 β + + [x ] = 0 (no endogeneity) [ x ] = = + x 0 β + + [x ] = 0 [ x ] = 0
More informationTables and Figures. This draft, July 2, 2007
and Figures This draft, July 2, 2007 1 / 16 Figures 2 / 16 Figure 1: Density of Estimated Propensity Score Pr(D=1) % 50 40 Treated Group Untreated Group 30 f (P) 20 10 0.01~.10.11~.20.21~.30.31~.40.41~.50.51~.60.61~.70.71~.80.81~.90.91~.99
More informationted: a Stata Command for Testing Stability of Regression Discontinuity Models
ted: a Stata Command for Testing Stability of Regression Discontinuity Models Giovanni Cerulli IRCrES, Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth National Research Council of Italy 2016 Stata Conference
More informationCausal Inference Lecture Notes: Causal Inference with Repeated Measures in Observational Studies
Causal Inference Lecture Notes: Causal Inference with Repeated Measures in Observational Studies Kosuke Imai Department of Politics Princeton University November 13, 2013 So far, we have essentially assumed
More informationMichael Lechner Causal Analysis RDD 2014 page 1. Lecture 7. The Regression Discontinuity Design. RDD fuzzy and sharp
page 1 Lecture 7 The Regression Discontinuity Design fuzzy and sharp page 2 Regression Discontinuity Design () Introduction (1) The design is a quasi-experimental design with the defining characteristic
More informationNon-linear panel data modeling
Non-linear panel data modeling Laura Magazzini University of Verona laura.magazzini@univr.it http://dse.univr.it/magazzini May 2010 Laura Magazzini (@univr.it) Non-linear panel data modeling May 2010 1
More informationLecture 10: Alternatives to OLS with limited dependent variables. PEA vs APE Logit/Probit Poisson
Lecture 10: Alternatives to OLS with limited dependent variables PEA vs APE Logit/Probit Poisson PEA vs APE PEA: partial effect at the average The effect of some x on y for a hypothetical case with sample
More informationPropensity-Score-Based Methods versus MTE-Based Methods. in Causal Inference
Propensity-Score-Based Methods versus MTE-Based Methods in Causal Inference Xiang Zhou University of Michigan Yu Xie University of Michigan Population Studies Center Research Report 11-747 December 2011
More informationEconometric Causality
Econometric (2008) International Statistical Review, 76(1):1-27 James J. Heckman Spencer/INET Conference University of Chicago Econometric The econometric approach to causality develops explicit models
More informationUsing Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models
Using Matching, Instrumental Variables and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models James J. Heckman and Salvador Navarro The University of Chicago Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1)
More informationAn Alternative Assumption to Identify LATE in Regression Discontinuity Designs
An Alternative Assumption to Identify LATE in Regression Discontinuity Designs Yingying Dong University of California Irvine September 2014 Abstract One key assumption Imbens and Angrist (1994) use to
More informationEmpirical approaches in public economics
Empirical approaches in public economics ECON4624 Empirical Public Economics Fall 2016 Gaute Torsvik Outline for today The canonical problem Basic concepts of causal inference Randomized experiments Non-experimental
More informationRising Wage Inequality and the Effectiveness of Tuition Subsidy Policies:
Rising Wage Inequality and the Effectiveness of Tuition Subsidy Policies: Explorations with a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Labor Earnings based on Heckman, Lochner and Taber, Review of Economic
More informationRobustness to Parametric Assumptions in Missing Data Models
Robustness to Parametric Assumptions in Missing Data Models Bryan Graham NYU Keisuke Hirano University of Arizona April 2011 Motivation Motivation We consider the classic missing data problem. In practice
More informationEconometrics of causal inference. Throughout, we consider the simplest case of a linear outcome equation, and homogeneous
Econometrics of causal inference Throughout, we consider the simplest case of a linear outcome equation, and homogeneous effects: y = βx + ɛ (1) where y is some outcome, x is an explanatory variable, and
More informationIdentifying and Estimating the Distributions of Ex Post. and Ex Ante Returns to Schooling
Identifying and Estimating the Distributions of Ex Post and Ex Ante Returns to Schooling Flavio Cunha University of Chicago James J. Heckman University of Chicago and This draft, May 18, 2007 University
More informationSelection on Observables: Propensity Score Matching.
Selection on Observables: Propensity Score Matching. Department of Economics and Management Irene Brunetti ireneb@ec.unipi.it 24/10/2017 I. Brunetti Labour Economics in an European Perspective 24/10/2017
More informationIdentifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments
Identifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments Sokbae Lee Bernard Salanie The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP72/15 Identifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments
More informationThe Generalized Roy Model and the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs
Discussion Paper No. 14-082 The Generalized Roy Model and the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Programs Philipp Eisenhauer, James J. Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil Discussion Paper No. 14-082 The Generalized
More informationBinary Choice Models Probit & Logit. = 0 with Pr = 0 = 1. decision-making purchase of durable consumer products unemployment
BINARY CHOICE MODELS Y ( Y ) ( Y ) 1 with Pr = 1 = P = 0 with Pr = 0 = 1 P Examples: decision-making purchase of durable consumer products unemployment Estimation with OLS? Yi = Xiβ + εi Problems: nonsense
More informationMultiple Regression Analysis. Part III. Multiple Regression Analysis
Part III Multiple Regression Analysis As of Sep 26, 2017 1 Multiple Regression Analysis Estimation Matrix form Goodness-of-Fit R-square Adjusted R-square Expected values of the OLS estimators Irrelevant
More informationApplied Econometrics (MSc.) Lecture 3 Instrumental Variables
Applied Econometrics (MSc.) Lecture 3 Instrumental Variables Estimation - Theory Department of Economics University of Gothenburg December 4, 2014 1/28 Why IV estimation? So far, in OLS, we assumed independence.
More informationWhen Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?
When Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data? Kosuke Imai Department of Politics Center for Statistics and Machine Learning Princeton University
More informationImbens, Lecture Notes 2, Local Average Treatment Effects, IEN, Miami, Oct 10 1
Imbens, Lecture Notes 2, Local Average Treatment Effects, IEN, Miami, Oct 10 1 Lectures on Evaluation Methods Guido Imbens Impact Evaluation Network October 2010, Miami Methods for Estimating Treatment
More informationIdentification and Extrapolation with Instrumental Variables
Identification and Extrapolation with Instrumental Variables Magne Mogstad Alexander Torgovitsky September 19, 217 Abstract Instrumental variables (IV) are widely used in economics to address selection
More informationESTIMATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS VIA MATCHING
ESTIMATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS VIA MATCHING AAEC 56 INSTRUCTOR: KLAUS MOELTNER Textbooks: R scripts: Wooldridge (00), Ch.; Greene (0), Ch.9; Angrist and Pischke (00), Ch. 3 mod5s3 General Approach The
More informationQuantitative Economics for the Evaluation of the European Policy
Quantitative Economics for the Evaluation of the European Policy Dipartimento di Economia e Management Irene Brunetti Davide Fiaschi Angela Parenti 1 25th of September, 2017 1 ireneb@ec.unipi.it, davide.fiaschi@unipi.it,
More informationAverage and Marginal Returns to Upper Secondary Schooling in Indonesia
Average and Marginal Returns to Upper Secondary Schooling in Indonesia Pedro Carneiro Michael Lokshin Cristobal Ridao-Cano Nithin Umapathi November 27, 205 Abstract: This paper estimates average and marginal
More informationDynamic Models Part 1
Dynamic Models Part 1 Christopher Taber University of Wisconsin December 5, 2016 Survival analysis This is especially useful for variables of interest measured in lengths of time: Length of life after
More informationEconometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Jeffrey M. Wooldridge / The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Contents Preface Acknowledgments xvii xxiii I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
More informationDensity estimation Nonparametric conditional mean estimation Semiparametric conditional mean estimation. Nonparametrics. Gabriel Montes-Rojas
0 0 5 Motivation: Regression discontinuity (Angrist&Pischke) Outcome.5 1 1.5 A. Linear E[Y 0i X i] 0.2.4.6.8 1 X Outcome.5 1 1.5 B. Nonlinear E[Y 0i X i] i 0.2.4.6.8 1 X utcome.5 1 1.5 C. Nonlinearity
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 14: Control Functions and Related Methods. Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008
A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 14: Control Functions and Related Methods Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008 1. Linear-in-Parameters Models: IV versus Control Functions 2. Correlated
More informationEcon 2148, fall 2017 Instrumental variables I, origins and binary treatment case
Econ 2148, fall 2017 Instrumental variables I, origins and binary treatment case Maximilian Kasy Department of Economics, Harvard University 1 / 40 Agenda instrumental variables part I Origins of instrumental
More informationSTRUCTURAL EQUATIONS, TREATMENT EFFECTS AND ECONOMETRIC POLICY EVALUATION 1. By James J. Heckman and Edward Vytlacil
STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS, TREATMENT EFFECTS AND ECONOMETRIC POLICY EVALUATION 1 By James J. Heckman and Edward Vytlacil First Draft, August 2; Revised, June 21 Final Version, September 25, 23. 1 This paper
More informationWhen Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?
When Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data? Kosuke Imai Princeton University Asian Political Methodology Conference University of Sydney Joint
More informationDiscrete Dependent Variable Models
Discrete Dependent Variable Models James J. Heckman University of Chicago This draft, April 10, 2006 Here s the general approach of this lecture: Economic model Decision rule (e.g. utility maximization)
More informationEVALUATING EDUCATION POLICIES WHEN THE RATE OF RETURN VARIES ACROSS INDIVIDUALS PEDRO CARNEIRO * Take the standard model of potential outcomes:
516 Cuadernos de Economía, CUADERNO Año 40, Nº DE 121, ECONOMIA pp. 516-529 (Vol. (diciembre 40, Nº 121, 2003) diciembre 2003) EVALUATING EDUCATION POLICIE WHEN THE RATE OF RETURN VARIE ACRO INDIVIDUAL
More informationIntroduction to GSEM in Stata
Introduction to GSEM in Stata Christopher F Baum ECON 8823: Applied Econometrics Boston College, Spring 2016 Christopher F Baum (BC / DIW) Introduction to GSEM in Stata Boston College, Spring 2016 1 /
More informationTREATMENT HETEROGENEITY PAUL SCHRIMPF NOVEMBER 2, 2011 UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ECONOMICS 628: TOPICS IN ECONOMETRICS
PAUL SCHRIMPF NOVEMBER 2, 2 UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ECONOMICS 628: TOPICS IN ECONOMETRICS Consider some experimental treatment, such as taking a drug or attending a job training program. It is very
More informationGibbs Sampling in Latent Variable Models #1
Gibbs Sampling in Latent Variable Models #1 Econ 690 Purdue University Outline 1 Data augmentation 2 Probit Model Probit Application A Panel Probit Panel Probit 3 The Tobit Model Example: Female Labor
More information