Mixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies
|
|
- Archibald Charles
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AAS Mixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies C. Eugene Skelton II and Christopher D. Hall Department of Aerospace & Ocean Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Blacksburg, Virginia This paper develops control strategies that use single-gimbal control moment gyros for coarse large angle slew maneuvering and momentum wheels for precise control and error reduction due to initial conditions. Lyapunov and feedback linearization control laws are developed. Numerical simulations of the derived mixed control moment gyro and momentum wheel control laws are evaluated. INTRODUCTION A spacecraft can use either internal or external actuators to control its attitude. Generally external actuators such as thrusters are used for large fast slewing maneuvers. However thrusters are not ideal for precision attitude control due to their discontinuous nature. Internal actuators can be momentum exchange devices, such as momentum wheels and control moment gyros, or non-moving devices like magnetic torquers. A momentum wheel is a high inertia flywheel mounted on a motor that can provide one axis control by changing the relative momentum of the vehicle. Momentum wheels can perform precise maneuvers and maintain attitude; however the varying wheel speeds tend to excite structural dynamics. Momentum wheels require torques proportionate to the desired output torque which makes them non-ideal for rapid slewing. A control moment gyro has a flywheel mounted on a motor that spins at a constant relative speed. The flywheel and motor are mounted to a gimbal motor that can rotate about an axis perpendicular to the spin axis of the flywheel. Control moment gyros (CMGs) can be double-gimballed or single-gimballed [1]. For the purpose of this paper a CMG refers to a single gimballed CMG. A control moment gyro can create high torques for slewing, that are dependant on the flywheel speed, inertia, and the gimbal angle rate, based on momentum exchange. Many control laws have been developed for control moment gyro applications such as the International Space Station [2, 3]. The disadvantage of CMGs is that certain sets of the gimbal angles can cause singularities where the CMG cluster is unable to provide torque about a given axis. Many papers have explored control laws that have various methods of avoiding CMG singularities including use of gimballed momentum wheels [4] or implementing optimization techniques to steer away from singularity configurations. Oh and Vadali [5] presented a Lyapunov control law for attitude and velocity control with CMGs. They argued that commanding gimbal velocities were ideal for attitude control of the body in order to take advantage of the so called torque amplification factor, rather than commanding gimbal accelerations which lead to undesirable gimbal rates. In Ref [6] Ford presented an extension of Ref. [5] by including the possibility of gimballed momentum wheels in the notation that we use in this research. Schaubet.al [7] presented an extension of the control law of Ref. [5] by changing the attitude representation from Euler Parameters to Modified Rodrigues Parameters. Both changes Graduate Research Assistant, cskelton@vt.edu. Student Member ASME. Professor, cdhall@vt.edu. Associate Fellow AIAA, Member AAS. 1
2 were made for singularity avoidance. The advantage of Ford s equations are that the actual motor torques are explicit for ease of implementation. Control laws developed to use thrusters for coarse slew control and momentum wheels for precise control or to reduce errors due to initial conditions have been proven to be effective [8]. This paper develops control strategies that use single-gimbal control moment gyros for coarse large slew maneuvering and momentum wheels for precise control and error reduction due to initial conditions. Mixing control moment gyros and momentum wheels for attitude control is believed to be a novel approach. The governing equations for a rigid body with control moment gyros and momentum wheels are presented much like that of Ref. [6]. Lyapunov control laws are developed from the governing equations. Feedback linearization techniques are used to transform the state equations and then choose a control input to cancel out the nonlinearities of the system dynamics. Simulations of the derived mixed control moment gyro and momentum wheel control laws are evaluated. The goal of this paper is to develop control laws that use control moment gyros and momentum wheels for large slew maneuvers. EQUATIONS OF MOTION The governing equations of a rigid body with gimballed momentum wheels have been developed in Ref. [6]. These equations are easily used to represent a body with any combination of control moment gyros, momentum wheels, and gimballed momentum wheels (GMW). We modify the equations slightly to represent a rigid body with only control moment gyros and momentum wheels. The governing equations represent the absolute angular momentum of the body about its center of mass, the absolute angular momenta of the actuators about their control axes, the gimbal angles, and the Modified Rodrigues Parameters from the body fixed frame to the inertial frame. These are the equations that are used to derive the mixed control laws. In this section we briefly review the equations derived by Ford [6] and the notation. Refs. [4, 6] contain complete derivations of these equations. We then use Ford s notation to present the governing equations for a rigid body with CMGs and MWs. GMW Equations of Motion The equations that describe the motion of a rigid body with N GMWs are where ḣ = ω h + g e (1) ḣ swa = g w (2) ḣ ga = diag((i t (I sg + I sw ))A T s ω I sw Ω)(A T t ω) + g g (3) δ = I 1 g h ga A T g ω (4) h = (I B + A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s )ω + A s h swa + A g h ga (5) h swa = I sw A T s ω + A s Ω (6) h ga = I g A T g ω + I g δ (7) The absolute angular momentum of the system is h. The skew symmetric matrix is defined as ω = 0 ω 3 ω 2 ω 3 0 ω 1 (9) ω 2 ω 1 0 The external torques on the system are g e. The absolute axial angular momentum of the GMW flywheel is h swa and the torque on the flywheel about the same axis is g w. Equation 3 describes (8) 2
3 the change in absolute angular momentum of the GMW about its gimbal axis. The matrices I s, I t, and I g are diagonal matrices that represent the inertias of the GMWs about their spin, transverse, and gimbal axes, respectively. The spin axis inertia matrix is split into I sw and I sg to represent the inertia of the flywheel and GMW frame, respectively. The angular velocity of between the body-fixed reference frame and the inertial reference frame is ω. The relative speeds of the momentum wheels are Ω, and the gimbal angle rates are δ, where both are N 1. A matrix containing all of the gimbal angles is δ. The torques that the gimbal motors exert on the GMWs are g g. The matrices A s, A t, and A g contain the orientation of the GMWs spin, transverse, and gimbal axes, respectively. Note that A s and A t change with gimbal angle, while A g remains constant regardless of gimbal angle. The inertia of the body including transverse inertias of the momentum wheels are I B. CMG and Momentum Wheel Equations of Motion We wish to use this notation to define the equations of motion for a rigid body with N control moment gyros, and M momentum wheels. The momentum wheels are defined in a similar manner to the GMWs. Each momentum wheel has a reference frame F Wk (k = 1...M) that is fixed in the body. The vector components of the unit axes ( c sk, c tk, c gk ) are assumed to be given in F b. We define a matrix C s = [ c s1, c s2,..., c sk ] (10) to describe the orientation of the spin axis in the body. We form an additional inertia like matrix for the momentum wheels formed from the flywheels spin inertia as, I swmw = diag(i swmw 1, I swmw 2,..., I swmw M ) (11) The spin axis angular momentum of the k-th MW is not contained in the body angular momentum terms, so we form an M 1 matrix h swmw a = I swmw C T s ω + I swmw Ω MW (12) where Ω MW is an M 1 matrix formed with the relative angular velocities of the flywheels about their spin axis. We define the momentum wheel s change in absolute angular momentum about its spin axes as ḣ swmw a = g MW (13) The equations that describe the motion of each CMG are similar to the equations for a GMW. We exclude the time rate of change of absolute angular momentum of the CMG spin axis because an independent controller ensures that the angular velocity of the flywheel about its spin axis is constant relative to the CMG frame. Kinematics For this research we choose to use Modified Rodrigues Parameters (MRPs) because singularities can be avoided with use of the shadow set [9]. Euler s Theorem states that any rotation about a single fixed point can be described by a single rotation about a fixed axis through that point. The axis and angle are called Euler axis and Euler angle, respectively. It is common to define ê as the Euler axis and Φ as the Euler angle. The three element set of MRPs is defined as As presented in Ref. [9] we use a shadow set of MRPs σ = ê tan(φ/4) (14) σ S = 1 σ T σ σ (15) to avoid singularities. The shadow set replaces the original MRPs when σ T σ > 1. The magnitude of the MRP that switches to the shadow set is user defined. The conversion from MRPs to a direction cosine matrix is R = 1 + 4(1 σt σ) (1 + σ T σ) 2 σ (1 + σ T σ) 2 (σ ) 2 (16)
4 Knowing the angular velocity as a function of time we can determine the attitude by integrating σ = G(σ)ω (17) where ω is the angular velocity between the two frames and G(σ) = 1 ( 1 + σ + σσ T 1 + ) σt σ (18) Summary The equations that describe the motion of a rigid body with N CMGs and M momentum wheels are where ḣ = ω h + g e (19) ḣ ga = diag((i t (I sg + I sw ))A T s ω I sw Ω)(A T t ω) + g g (20) ḣ swmw a = g MW (21) δ = I 1 g h ga A T g ω (22) σ = G(σ)ω (23) h = (I B + A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s )ω + A s h swa + A g h ga + C s h swmw a (24) h swa = I sw A T s ω + A s Ω (25) h ga = I g A T g ω + I g δ (26) h swmw a = I swmw C T s ω + I swmw Ω MW (27) CONTROL LAWS We wish to define control laws that use the torque amplification of CMGs for large rapid slew and the fine tuning abilities of momentum wheels. In this section we present the reference body dynamics and develop the state equations for this problem. We present a CMG feedback control law developed by Oh and Vadali [5]. This control law allows us to find the open loop CMG commands for the tracking maneuver. Derivation of Lyapunov and feedback linearization control laws conclude this section. Reference Body The use of a reference body for tracking follows that of Ref. [8]. We start by defining a reference trajectory. Consider a rigid reference body that has a body-fixed reference frame F R. The center of mass of the reference body is coincident with the origin of F R and is fixed in inertial space. The orientation of F R with respect to the inertial reference frame F I is expressed by the direction cosines matrix R RI. The MRPs that describe R RI are R RI = 1 + 4(1 σt R σ R) (1 + σ T R σ R) 2 σ R + 8 (1 + σ T R σ R) 2 (σ R )2 (28) The equations that describe the motion of the reference body are ḣ R = ω R I Bω R + g R (29) σ R = G(σ R )ω R (30) Note that the reference body has the same inertia of the controlled body without the actuator inertias. 4
5 State Equations With the reference body and the actual body fully defined we can form the terms δω and δσ which are the difference between the body and reference angular velocity and attitude, respectively: From these equations we define δσ = (1 σt R σ R)σ (1 σ T σ)σ R + 2σ σ R 1 + (σ T R σ R)(σ T σ) + 2σ R σ (31) δω = ω R BR ω R (32) δh = h I B R BR ω R (33) the difference between the angular momentum of the bodies, where R BR = R(δσ). Substituting equation 24 into δh and simplifying gives δh = I B ω + (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s )ω + A s h swa + A g h ga (34) + C s h swmw a I B R BR ω R = I B δω + (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s )ω + A s h swa + A g h ga (35) + C s h swmw a Taking the time derivative of equation 33 yields Hall et.al. [8] showed that δḣ = ḣ I B dr BR dt ω R I B R BR ω R (36) dr BR I B ω R = I B ω δω (37) dt Taking the time derivative of Equation 35 gives δḣ = I Bδ ω + Ȧsh swa + A s ḣ swa + A g ḣ ga + C s ḣ swmw a (38) +(ȦtI t A T t + A t I t Ȧ T t + ȦsI sg A T s + A s I sg Ȧ T s )ω + (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s ) ω The state equations are the attitude and angular velocity error rates. Equation 17 to express the states as We use Equation 38 and δ σ = G(δσ)δω (39) δ ω = I 1 B [δḣ Ȧsh swa A s ḣ swa A g ḣ ga (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s ) ω (40) (ȦtI t A T t + A t I t Ȧ T t + ȦsI sg A T s + A s I sg Ȧ T s )ω C s g MW ] Open Loop CMG Control We use a gimbal velocity law first presented by Oh and Vadali [5] to find the CMG control maneuver for a large rapid slew. Presented in this notation the gimbal torques are where g g = I g δ + I g A T g ω diag((i t I s )A T s ω I sw Ω)A T t ω (41) δ = k δ ( δ des δ) (42) δ des = D (k 3 δω + k 4 δσ JR BR ω R J 1 ω (Jω + A s h swa + A g h ga )) (43) D = A t diag(i sw Ω) (44) +1/2[(a s1 a T t1 + a t1 a T s1)(ω + R BR ω R ) (a s2 a T t2 + a t2 a T s2)(ω + R BR ω R )......(a sn a T tn + a tn a T sn )(ω + R BR ω R )](I t I s ) The coefficients k δ, k 3, and k 4 are positive constant scalars. 5
6 Lyapunov Controller We have developed the equations that we need to derive the control law. candidate function Consider a Lyapunov where K 1 = K T 1 > 0 and k 2 > 0. The derivative of V is where Equation 47 can be expanded to V = 1 2 δωt K 1 δω + 2k 2 ln(1 + δσ T δσ) (45) V = ḢT I 1 B K 1δω + k 2 δσ T δω (46) Ḣ = δḣ Ȧsh swa A s ḣ swa C s ḣ swmw a A g ḣ ga (47) (ȦtI t A T t + A t I t Ȧ T t + ȦsI sg A T s + A s I sg Ȧ T s )ω (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s ) ω Ḣ = ω ((I B + A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s )ω + A s h swa + A g h ga (48) +C s h swmw a ) + g e I B ω δω I B R BR I 1 B [ ω R Iω R + g R ] Ȧsh swa A s g w C s g MW A g (diag((i t I s )A T s ω I sw Ω)(A T t ω) + g g ) (ȦtI t A T t + A t I t Ȧ T t + ȦsI sg A T s + A s I sg Ȧ T s )ω (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s ) ω With Ḣ in expanded form we identify the control torques for the body g e, g w, g g, and g MW. For any CMG to maintain a constant velocity of the flywheel about its spin axis relative to the body the spin torque is g w = I sw (ȦT s ω + A T s ω) (49) For this problem we consider g e, g w, and g g as known parameters. With the g MW insure that V < 0 when δω 0 and δσ 0. By choosing K 1 = I B equation 46 becomes input we can We choose the control torque g MW to be which yields V = δω T (Ḣ + k 2δσ) (50) C s g MW = δḣ Ȧsh swa A s g w A g ḣ ga (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s ) ω (51) since k 1 > 0. From this result we see that With Equations 35, 38, and 51, we have (ȦtI t A T t + A t I t Ȧ T t + ȦsI sg A T s + A s I sg Ȧ T s )ω +k 2 δσ + k 1 δω V = k 1 δω T δω 0 (52) lim δω(t) = 0 (53) t I B δ ω = k 2 δσ k 1 δω (54) 6
7 Due to Equation 53 we have lim Jδ ω = lim k 2δσ (55) t t so that δσ 0. From Equation 39 we know that δ σ 0, so that the limit of δσ is a constant, therefore lim δσ = 0 (56) t 0 With LaSalle s Theorem [10], the attitude and angular velocity error due to tracking with this control law is globally asymptotically stable. Input-State Feedback Linearization Controller We now take a different approach to controlling this problem. For a certain class of nonlinear systems we can use a state feedback control and a change of variables that transforms the nonlinear system into an equivalent linear system [10]. We investigate input-state linearization of this nonlinear system. We begin with the state equations 39 and 40 which we transform with The transformed state equations are z 1 = δσ (57) z 2 = G(δσ)δω = δ σ (58) ż 1 = z 2 (59) ż 2 = Ġδω + Gδ ω (60) where Ġ = G(δ σ). Substitution of Equation 40 allows the state equations to be written as (61) ż 1 = z 2 (62) ż 2 = Ġδω + G(I 1 B (δḣ Ȧsh swa A s ḣ swa A g ḣ ga (63) (ȦtI t A T t + A t I t Ȧ T t + ȦsI sg A T s + A s I sg Ȧ T s )ω (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s ) ω C s g MW ) In this form we can choose C s g MW to cancel the nonlinear terms. We choose the momentum wheel control torques to be where (64) C s g MW = δḣ Ȧsh swa A s ḣ swa A g ḣ ga (65) (ȦtI t A T t + A t I t Ȧ T t + ȦsI sg A T s + A s I sg Ȧ T s )ω (A t I t A T t + A s I sg A T s ) ω + I B ν The constants k 5 and k 6 are positive. The system with control is ([ ] [ 0 1 k6 G 0 ż = + 0 Ġ 0 k 5 G ν = k 5 δω + k 6 δσ (66) ]) z (67) With the system represented linearly we can use linear stability analysis. From linear theory we can guarantee asymptotic stability if the coefficient matrix is Hurwitz [10]. 7
8 NUMERICAL SIMULATION We present the results of numerical simulations of the derived control laws for illustration. We first present the feed forward control inputs as calculated by the closed loop control moment gyro control law. Then we show how slight variations in initial conditions make the system diverge (as expected) from the desired reference conditions with only CMG feed forward inputs. Implementation of the closed loop momentum wheel control laws show that initial errors are rejected with minimal torques. We define the actuator orientations in F B which is aligned with the principal inertia reference frame. The principal inertia matrix is I B = diag(6, 5, 10) kg m 2. Three CMGs are used for the feed forward control aligned such that A s0 = A g = (68) (69) All three CMGs have the same inertia properties, I sw = 0.01 kg m 2, I sg = 0.01 kg m 2, I t = 0.01 kg m 2, and I g = 0.01 kg m 2. The nominal relative angular velocity of each CMG flywheel is 2000 rpm. Three momentum wheels are aligned with the principal axes with I sw = 0.04 kg m 2 for each momentum wheel. The transverse inertias of the momentum wheels along with inertias of the torque devices for the momentum wheels are included in the body inertia. The reference motion to be tracked is a 90 o slew about the 3 axis of the body. The reference motion is generated with bang-bang external torques to simulate the motion of a body with thrusters. The Modified Rodrigues Parameter representation of the reorientation of the reference body is shown in Figure 1. The gains for determining the control moment gyro maneuvering for the reorientation are k δ = 100, k 4 = 100, and k 3 = 2I ii k 4. Figure 2 shows the attitude and velocity error for the body with CMG feedback control. We now take the exact inputs to the CMGs that produced the previous result and implement them as feed forward inputs. Figure 3 shows the feed forward CMG control with an initial error of σ = [0.01, 0.02, 0.01]. Clearly without feedback control, any initial error or perturbation will result in errors in tracking and final orientation. We apply the Lyapunov momentum wheel feedback control laws. The gains are k 1 = 54 and k 2 = 47. Figure 4 shows that the momentum wheels correct for initial error while allowing the majority of the torque for the slew to come from the CMGs. Figure 5 shows the momentum wheel applied torques throughout the maneuver. Numerical simulations of the feedback linearization control law were performed. The linear gains were chosen to be k 5 = 5 and k 6 = 4 for this simulation. Figure 6 is the tracking error. The control torques that the momentum wheels apply to the system are shown in Figure 7. CONCLUSIONS The objective of this research is to derive and validate mixed CMG and momentum wheel control laws. A control moment gyro gimbal rate feed forward control law provides output torques required for large rapid angular slew maneuvers. Lyapunov and feedback linearization techniques are used to develop momentum wheel control laws for initial condition and tracking error rejection. The controllers are derived from the nonlinear state equations for attitude and angular velocity error. Both control laws guarantee asymptotic convergence. Numerical simulations are preformed to verify convergence of the system with the derived control laws. Momentum wheel control torques for each controller are small in comparison to the torques required for the angular slew maneuver. (70) 8
9 Figure 1: MRP to be tracked Future work will include implementation of the mixed actuator attitude control laws on the Distributed Spacecraft Attitude Control System Simulator (DSACSS) at Virginia Tech. Exploration of momentum wheel feedback laws that do not have knowledge of the open loop CMG dynamics will be preformed. Power studies of mixed CMG and momentum wheel attitude control versus momentum wheel feedback control must be conducted to verify the advantage of the mixed actuator attitude control concept. References [1] J. R. Wertz and W. J. Larson, Space Mission Analysis and Design. New York, New York: Microcosm Press, [2] S. J. P. Robert H. Bishop and J. W. Sunkel, Adaptive control of space station with control moment gyros, IEEE Control Systems, vol. 12, pp , October [3] S. N. Singh and T. C. Bossart, Exact feedback linearization and contol of space station using CMG, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 38, pp , January [4] K. Ford and C. Hall, Singular direction avoidance steering for control-moment gyros, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 23, pp , July [5] H. Oh and S. Vadali, Feedback control and steering laws for spacecraft using single gimbal control moment gyros, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 38, pp , April [6] K. A. Ford, Reorientations of Flexible Spacecraft Using Momentum Exchange Devices. PhD thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology,
10 Figure 2: Tracking Reference Body with CMG feedback [7] H. Schaub, S. R. Vadali, and J. L. Junkins, Feedback control law for variable speed control moment gyros, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 46, pp , July [8] C. D. Hall, P. Tsiotras, and H. Shen, Tracking rigid body motion using thrusters and momentum wheels, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 50, no. 3, [9] M. D. Shuster, A survey of attitude representations, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 41, no. 4, pp , [10] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems. New York, New York: Macmillian,
11 Figure 3: Tracking Reference Body with CMG Feed Forward and Initial Error Figure 4: Tracking Reference Body with CMG Feed Forward,Initial Error, and MW Lyapunov feedback control 11
12 Figure 5: MW Lyapunov feedback control torques Figure 6: Tracking Reference Body with CMG Feed Forward, Initial Error, and MW feedback linearization 12
13 Figure 7: MW feedback linearization torques 13
Tracking Rigid Body Motion Using Thrusters and Momentum. Wheels
JAS 199 Tracking Rigid Body Motion Using Thrusters and Momentum Wheels Christopher D. Hall, Panagiotis Tsiotras, and Haijun Shen Abstract Tracking control laws are developed for a rigid spacecraft using
More informationMixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies
Mixed Control Moment Gyro and Momentum Wheel Attitude Control Strategies C. Eugene Skelton II Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment
More informationCOUPLED ORBITAL AND ATTITUDE CONTROL SIMULATION
COUPLED ORBITAL AND ATTITUDE CONTROL SIMULATION Scott E. Lennox AOE 5984: Advanced Attitude Spacecraft Dynamics and Control December 12, 23 INTRODUCTION In the last few years the space industry has started
More informationAdaptive Spacecraft Attitude Tracking Control with Actuator Uncertainties
Adaptive Spacecraft Attitude Tracking Control with Actuator Uncertainties Hyungjoo Yoon and Panagiotis Tsiotras Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 3332-15, USA An adaptive control algorithm
More informationLinear Feedback Control Using Quasi Velocities
Linear Feedback Control Using Quasi Velocities Andrew J Sinclair Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849 John E Hurtado and John L Junkins Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 A novel approach
More informationAttitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis
AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, & Dynamics Revised Submission, December, 22 Attitude Regulation About a Fixed Rotation Axis Jonathan Lawton Raytheon Systems Inc. Tucson, Arizona 85734 Randal W. Beard
More informationATTITUDE CONTROL INVESTIGATION USING SPACECRAFT HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATOR
ATTITUDE CONTROL INVESTIGATION USING SPACECRAFT HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATOR Scott A. Kowalchuk Advisor: Dr. Christopher D. Hall Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods in One Framework
Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 4, No. ists3, pp. Pd_5-Pd_, 6 Spacecraft Attitude Control with RWs via LPV Control Theory: Comparison of Two Different Methods in One Framework y Takahiro SASAKI,),
More informationCoupled Attitude And Orbital Control System Using Spacecraft Simulators
Coupled Attitude And Orbital Control System Using Spacecraft Simulators Scott Evan Lennox Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment
More informationSpacecraft Attitude and Power Control Using Variable Speed Control Moment Gyros. Hyungjoo Yoon
Spacecraft Attitude and Power Control Using Variable Speed Control Moment Gyros A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Hyungjoo Yoon In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor
More informationDesign of Sliding Mode Attitude Control for Communication Spacecraft
Design of Sliding Mode Attitude Control for Communication Spacecraft Erkan Abdulhamitbilal 1 and Elbrous M. Jafarov 1 ISTAVIA Engineering, Istanbul Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering, Istanbul Technical
More information*School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
NEW CONTROL LAWS FOR THE ATTITUDE STABILIZATION OF RIGID BODIES PANAGIOTIS TSIOTRAS *School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 7907. Abstract. This paper introduces
More informationQuaternion-Based Tracking Control Law Design For Tracking Mode
A. M. Elbeltagy Egyptian Armed forces Conference on small satellites. 2016 Logan, Utah, USA Paper objectives Introduction Presentation Agenda Spacecraft combined nonlinear model Proposed RW nonlinear attitude
More informationCommand shaping for a flexible satellite platform controlled by advanced fly-wheels systems. 1 Introduction
56th International Astronautical Congress, Paper IAC-5-C.1.3 Command shaping for a flexible satellite platform controlled by advanced fly-wheels systems Dario Izzo and Lorenzo Pettazzi ESA, Advanced Concepts
More informationRegenerative Power Optimal Reaction Wheel Attitude Control
University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Aerospace Engineering Sciences Graduate Theses & Dissertations Aerospace Engineering Sciences Spring 1-1-211 Regenerative Power Optimal Reaction Wheel Attitude
More informationAnalytical Mechanics. of Space Systems. tfa AA. Hanspeter Schaub. College Station, Texas. University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado.
Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems Third Edition Hanspeter Schaub University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado John L. Junkins Texas A&M University College Station, Texas AIM EDUCATION SERIES Joseph A.
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Control using CMGs: Singularities and Global Controllability
1 / 28 Spacecraft Attitude Control using CMGs: Singularities and Global Controllability Sanjay Bhat TCS Innovation Labs Hyderabad International Workshop on Perspectives in Dynamical Systems and Control
More informationKINEMATIC EQUATIONS OF NONNOMINAL EULER AXIS/ANGLE ROTATION
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS -14-10-01 KINEMATIC EQUATIONS OF NONNOMINAL EULER AXIS/ANGLE ROTATION Emanuele L. de Angelis and Fabrizio Giulietti INTRODUCTION Euler axis/angle is a useful representation in many attitude
More informationVisual Feedback Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Micro Satellite using Two Wheels
Visual Feedback Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Micro Satellite using Two Wheels Fuyuto Terui a, Nobutada Sako b, Keisuke Yoshihara c, Toru Yamamoto c, Shinichi Nakasuka b a National Aerospace Laboratory
More information3D Pendulum Experimental Setup for Earth-based Testing of the Attitude Dynamics of an Orbiting Spacecraft
3D Pendulum Experimental Setup for Earth-based Testing of the Attitude Dynamics of an Orbiting Spacecraft Mario A. Santillo, Nalin A. Chaturvedi, N. Harris McClamroch, Dennis S. Bernstein Department of
More informationAS3010: Introduction to Space Technology
AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology L E C T U R E 22 Part B, Lecture 22 19 April, 2017 C O N T E N T S Attitude stabilization passive and active. Actuators for three axis or active stabilization.
More informationIAC-11-C1.5.9 INERTIA-FREE ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WITH UNKNOWN TIME-VARYING MASS DISTRIBUTION
6nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, SA. Copyright by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved IAC--C.5.9 INERTIA-FREE ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WITH UNKNOWN
More informationIAA-CU A Simulator for Robust Attitude Control of Cubesat Deploying Satellites
A Simulator for Robust Attitude Control of Cubesat Deploying Satellites Giovanni Mattei, George Georgiou, Angelo Pignatelli, Salvatore Monaco Abstract The paper deals with the development and testing of
More informationWEIGHTING MATRICES DETERMINATION USING POLE PLACEMENT FOR TRACKING MANEUVERS
U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series D, Vol. 75, Iss. 2, 2013 ISSN 1454-2358 WEIGHTING MATRICES DETERMINATION USING POLE PLACEMENT FOR TRACKING MANEUVERS Raluca M. STEFANESCU 1, Claudiu L. PRIOROC 2, Adrian M. STOICA
More informationAttitude Control of a Bias Momentum Satellite Using Moment of Inertia
I. INTRODUCTION Attitude Control of a Bias Momentum Satellite Using Moment of Inertia HYOCHOONG BANG Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology HYUNG DON CHOI Korea Aerospace Research Institute
More informationUnit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft without velocity measurement
Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel San Diego, CA, USA, December 3-5, 6 Unit quaternion observer based attitude stabilization of a rigid spacecraft
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Control Using Control Moment Gyro Reconfiguration
Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Control Moment Gyro Reconfiguration Kanthalakshmi SRINIVASAN 1, Deepana GANDHI 1, Manikandan VENUGOPAL 2 1 Department of Instrumentation and Control Systems Engineering,
More informationAttitude Determination for NPS Three-Axis Spacecraft Simulator
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit 6-9 August 4, Providence, Rhode Island AIAA 4-5386 Attitude Determination for NPS Three-Axis Spacecraft Simulator Jong-Woo Kim, Roberto Cristi and
More informationInternal Torques and Forces in Gyrostats with Magnetically Suspended Rotors
Internal Torques and Forces in Gyrostats with Magnetically Suspended Rotors by Marcus Carl Pressl Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment
More informationIAC-04-A.P.12 NONLINEAR ATTITUDE CONTROL OF THE MICRO-SATELLITE ESEO
IAC-04-A.P.12 NONLINEAR ATTITUDE CONTROL OF THE MICRO-SATELLITE ESEO Morten Pedersen Topland and Jan Tommy Gravdahl Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology
More informationNew Results for Time-Optimal Three-Axis. Reorientation of a Rigid Spacecraft
New Results for Time-Optimal Three-Axis Reorientation of a Rigid Spacecraft Xiaoli Bai, John L. Junkins Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 Abstract Some new results for a classical minimum,
More informationResearch Article Shorter Path Design and Control for an Underactuated Satellite
Hindawi International Journal of Aerospace Engineering Volume 27 Article ID 8536732 9 pages https://doi.org/.55/27/8536732 Research Article Shorter Path Design and Control for an Underactuated Satellite
More informationSATELLITE ATTITUDE TRACKING BY QUATERNION-BASED BACKSTEPPING. Raymond Kristiansen,1 Per Johan Nicklasson,2 Jan Tommy Gravdahl,3
SATELLITE ATTITUDE TRACKING BY QUATERNION-BASED BACKSTEPPING Raymond Kristiansen,1 Per Johan Nicklasson,2 Jan Tommy Gravdahl,3 Department of Space Technology Narvik University College, Norway Department
More informationSliding Mode Control Strategies for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers
Osaka University March 15, 2018 Sliding Mode Control Strategies for Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers Elisabetta Punta CNR-IEIIT, Italy Problem Statement First Case Spacecraft Model Position Dynamics Attitude
More informationPartial Attitude Consensus for Underactuated Satellite Clusters
6 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) ARIA Resort & Casino December -4, 6, Las Vegas, USA Partial Attitude Consensus for Underactuated Satellite Clusters John Matthew Brewer and Panagiotis
More information9 th AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Breckenridge, CO February 7 10, 1999
AAS 99-139 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics MATLAB TOOLBOX FOR RIGID BODY KINEMATICS Hanspeter Schaub and John L. Junkins 9 th AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference Breckenridge,
More informationOptimal Fault-Tolerant Configurations of Thrusters
Optimal Fault-Tolerant Configurations of Thrusters By Yasuhiro YOSHIMURA ) and Hirohisa KOJIMA, ) ) Aerospace Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hino, Japan (Received June st, 7) Fault tolerance
More informationStabilization of Angular Velocity of Asymmetrical Rigid Body. Using Two Constant Torques
Stabilization of Angular Velocity of Asymmetrical Rigid Body Using Two Constant Torques Hirohisa Kojima Associate Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Tokyo Metropolitan University 6-6, Asahigaoka,
More informationAttitude Tracking Control of a Small Satellite in Low Earth Orbit
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 10-13 August 2009, Chicago, Illinois AIAA 2009-5902 Attitude Tracking Control of a Small Satellite in Low Earth Orbit Amit K. Sanyal Zachary Lee-Ho In
More informationAdaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy
Adaptive Backstepping Control for Optimal Descent with Embedded Autonomy Maodeng Li, Wuxing Jing Department of Aerospace Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150001, China
More informationCoordinated Attitude Control of Spacecraft Formation without Angular Velocity Feedback: A Decentralized Approach
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference - 3 August 29, Chicago, Illinois AIAA 29-6289 Coordinated Attitude Control of Spacecraft Formation without Angular Velocity Feedback: A Decentralized Approach
More informationPerturbed Feedback Linearization of Attitude Dynamics
008 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 008 FrC6.5 Perturbed Feedback Linearization of Attitude Dynamics Abdulrahman H. Bajodah* Abstract The paper introduces
More informationInertia-Free Spacecraft Attitude Control Using. Reaction Wheels
Inertia-Free Spacecraft Attitude Control Using Reaction Wheels Avishai Weiss, Ilya Kolmanovsky, Dennis S. Bernstein, Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 489-4
More informationAlmost Global Robust Attitude Tracking Control of Spacecraft in Gravity
Almost Global Robust Attitude Tracking Control of Spacecraft in Gravity Amit K. Sanyal Nalin A. Chaturvedi In this paper, we treat the practical problem of tracking the attitude and angular velocity of
More informationATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS
IAA-AAS-DyCoSS2-14-07-02 ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS Ozan Tekinalp, * Omer Atas INTRODUCTION Utilization of solar sails for the de-orbiting of satellites is
More informationSpacecraft Attitude Dynamics for Undergraduates
Session 1123 Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics for Undergraduates Dr. Rachel Shinn Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ Abstract Teaching spacecraft attitude dynamics to undergraduate students
More information3 Rigid Spacecraft Attitude Control
1 3 Rigid Spacecraft Attitude Control Consider a rigid spacecraft with body-fixed frame F b with origin O at the mass centre. Let ω denote the angular velocity of F b with respect to an inertial frame
More informationAAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference
Paper AAS 99-7 Satellite Attitude Control and Power Tracking with Momentum Wheels Panagiotis Tsiotras and Haijun Shen Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA -5, USA Chris Hall Virginia Polyutechnic
More informationSatellite Attitude Control by Quaternion-Based Backstepping
25 American Control Conference June 8-1, 25. Portland, OR, USA WeB11.4 Satellite Attitude Control by Quaternion-Based Backstepping Raymond Kristiansen* and Per J. Nicklasson** Department of Computer Science,
More informationKeywords: Kinematics; Principal planes; Special orthogonal matrices; Trajectory optimization
Editorial Manager(tm) for Nonlinear Dynamics Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: Title: Minimum Distance and Optimal Transformations on SO(N) Article Type: Original research Section/Category: Keywords:
More informationMAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009
MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009 Please read through the entire homework set before beginning. Also, please label clearly your answers and summarize your findings as concisely as possible.
More informationSATELLITE ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN WITH NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND KINEMTICS OF QUATERNION USING REACTION WHEELS
SATELLITE ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN WITH NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND KINEMTICS OF QUATERNION USING REACTION WHEELS Breno Braga Galvao Maria Cristina Mendes Faustino Luiz Carlos Gadelha de Souza breno.braga.galvao@gmail.com
More informationAttitude Control Strategy for HAUSAT-2 with Pitch Bias Momentum System
SSC06-VII-5 Attitude Control Strategy for HAUSAT-2 with Pitch Bias Momentum System Young-Keun Chang, Seok-Jin Kang, Byung-Hoon Lee, Jung-on Choi, Mi-Yeon Yun and Byoung-Young Moon School of Aerospace and
More informationExperiments in Control of Rotational Mechanics
International Journal of Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems Vol. 2, No. 1, 2016, pp. 9-22 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ijacis ISSN: 2381-7526 (Print); ISSN: 2381-7534 (Online) Experiments
More informationExperimental Results for Almost Global Asymptotic and Locally Exponential Stabilization of the Natural Equilibria of a 3D Pendulum
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 4-6, 26 WeC2. Experimental Results for Almost Global Asymptotic and Locally Exponential Stabilization of the Natural
More informationStabilization of a Specified Equilibrium in the Inverted Equilibrium Manifold of the 3D Pendulum
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 27 ThA11.6 Stabilization of a Specified Equilibrium in the Inverted Equilibrium
More informationKinematic Steering Law for Conically-Constrained Torque-Limited Spacecraft Attitude Control
University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Aerospace Engineering Sciences Graduate Theses & Dissertations Aerospace Engineering Sciences Spring 1-1-217 Kinematic Steering Law for Conically-Constrained
More informationRigid-Body Attitude Control USING ROTATION MATRICES FOR CONTINUOUS, SINGULARITY-FREE CONTROL LAWS
Rigid-Body Attitude Control USING ROTATION MATRICES FOR CONTINUOUS, SINGULARITY-FREE CONTROL LAWS 3 IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE» JUNE -33X//$. IEEE SHANNON MASH Rigid-body attitude control is motivated
More informationOPTIMAL SPACECRAF1 ROTATIONAL MANEUVERS
STUDIES IN ASTRONAUTICS 3 OPTIMAL SPACECRAF1 ROTATIONAL MANEUVERS JOHNL.JUNKINS Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A. and JAMES D.TURNER Cambridge Research, Division of PRA, Inc., Cambridge,
More informationGlobal Trajectory Design for Position and Attitude Control of an Underactuated Satellite *
Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci. Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 7 4, 26 Global Trajectory Design for Position and Attitude Control of an Underactuated Satellite * Yasuhiro YOSHIMURA, ) Takashi MATSUNO, 2) and Shinji
More informationSpacecraft Angular Velocity Stabilization Using A Single-Gimbal Variable Speed Control Moment Gyro
Spacecraft Angular Velocity Stabilization Using A Single-Gimbal Variable Speed Control Moment Gyro Ancil Marsall and Panagiotis Tsiotras Georgia Institute of Tecnology, Atlanta, GA 3332-15 Feedback controllers
More informationFully-Coupled Dynamical Jitter Modeling of a Rigid Spacecraft with Imbalanced Reaction Wheels. John Alcorn, Cody Allard and Hanspeter Schaub
AIAA xxx Fully-Coupled Dynamical Jitter Modeling of a Rigid Spacecraft with Imbalanced Reaction Wheels John Alcorn, Cody Allard and Hanspeter Schaub University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 839, US AIAA/AAS
More informationMuch work went into ensuring that prolate dual-spin satellites can be stable even in the presence of energy dissipation. Approximate energy-sink metho
AAS -47 RELATIVE EQUILIBRIA OF A GYROSTAT WITH A DISCRETE DAMPER Λ Ralph A. Sandfry y and Christopher D. Hall z We investigate the possible equilibria for a torque-free gyrostat with an attached spring-mass
More informationOptimal Variable-Structure Control Tracking of Spacecraft Maneuvers
Optimal Variable-Structure Control racking of Spacecraft Maneuvers John L. Crassiis 1 Srinivas R. Vaali F. Lanis Markley 3 Introuction In recent years, much effort has been evote to the close-loop esign
More informationStabilization of a 3D Rigid Pendulum
25 American Control Conference June 8-, 25. Portland, OR, USA ThC5.6 Stabilization of a 3D Rigid Pendulum Nalin A. Chaturvedi, Fabio Bacconi, Amit K. Sanyal, Dennis Bernstein, N. Harris McClamroch Department
More informationConstant Orbital Momentum Equilibrium Trajectories of a Gyrostat-Satellite
Constant Orbital Momentum Equilibrium Trajectories of a Gyrostat-Satellite Matthew Clark VanDyke Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial
More informationSatellite Attitude Control System Design Using Reaction Wheels Bhanu Gouda Brian Fast Dan Simon
Satellite Attitude Control System Design Using Reaction Wheels Bhanu Gouda Brian Fast Dan Simon Outline 1. Overview of Attitude Determination and Control system. Problem formulation 3. Control schemes
More informationA Spherical Magnetic Dipole Actuator for Spacecraft Attitude Control
University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Aerospace Engineering Sciences Graduate Theses & Dissertations Aerospace Engineering Sciences Spring 1-1-2015 A Spherical Magnetic Dipole Actuator for Spacecraft
More informationFormation Dynamics of Coulomb Satellites
Formation Dynamics of Coulomb Satellites Hyunsik Joe a, Hanspeter Schaub a and Gordon G. Parker b a Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, USA b Michigan Technological University, Houghton, USA Abstract
More informationNonlinear Control of a Spacecraft with Multiple Fuel Slosh Modes
11 5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December 1-15, 11 onlinear Control of a Spacecraft with Multiple Fuel Slosh Modes Mahmut Reyhanoglu
More informationNONLINEAR ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WITH A CAPTURED ASTEROID
WSCFF-15 35483 NONLNEAR ATTTUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WTH A CAPTURED ASTEROD Saptarshi Bandyopadhyay * and Soon-Jo Chung One of the main control challenges of National Aeronautics and Space Administration
More informationAN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT
AAS 16-366 AN ANALYTICAL SOLUTION TO QUICK-RESPONSE COLLISION AVOIDANCE MANEUVERS IN LOW EARTH ORBIT Jason A. Reiter * and David B. Spencer INTRODUCTION Collision avoidance maneuvers to prevent orbital
More informationDynamics. Basilio Bona. Semester 1, DAUIN Politecnico di Torino. B. Bona (DAUIN) Dynamics Semester 1, / 18
Dynamics Basilio Bona DAUIN Politecnico di Torino Semester 1, 2016-17 B. Bona (DAUIN) Dynamics Semester 1, 2016-17 1 / 18 Dynamics Dynamics studies the relations between the 3D space generalized forces
More informationLow-Thrust Attitude Control for Nano-Satellite with Micro-Cathode Thrusters
Low-Thrust Attitude Control for Nano-Satellite with Micro-Cathode Thrusters IEPC-3-366 Presented at the 33 rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, The George Washington University, Washington,
More informationFeedback Control of Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers using Differential Drag
Feedback Control of Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers using Differential Drag D. Pérez 1 and R. Bevilacqua Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, 1180 This work presents a feedback control strategy
More informationAgile Maneuvers for Near Earth Object (NEO) Fly-by Missions
Agile Maneuvers for Near Earth Object (NEO) Fly-by Missions Vaios Lappas 1, Bong Wie 2 and Jozef van der Ha 3 1 Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom, E-mail: v.lappas@surrey.ac.uk
More informationSpacecraft Rate Damping with Predictive Control Using Magnetic Actuators Only
C. Böhm a M. Merk a W. Fichter b F. Allgöwer a Spacecraft Rate Damping with Predictive Control Using Magnetic Actuators Only Stuttgart, March 2009 a Institute of Systems Theory and Automatic Control, University
More informationControl of the Inertia Wheel Pendulum by Bounded Torques
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 5 Seville, Spain, December -5, 5 ThC6.5 Control of the Inertia Wheel Pendulum by Bounded Torques Victor
More informationNomenclature. = the local vertical and local horizontal reference frame. = angular velocity vector of spacecraft (rad/s)
Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control of Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics with Actuator Failures Yu Han 1 Harbin Institude of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 151 James D. Biggs 2 University of Strathclyde,
More information6. 3D Kinematics DE2-EA 2.1: M4DE. Dr Connor Myant
DE2-EA 2.1: M4DE Dr Connor Myant 6. 3D Kinematics Comments and corrections to connor.myant@imperial.ac.uk Lecture resources may be found on Blackboard and at http://connormyant.com Contents Three-Dimensional
More informationTTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2
TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1
More informationLab #4 - Gyroscopic Motion of a Rigid Body
Lab #4 - Gyroscopic Motion of a Rigid Body Last Updated: April 6, 2007 INTRODUCTION Gyroscope is a word used to describe a rigid body, usually with symmetry about an axis, that has a comparatively large
More informationRobust LQR Control Design of Gyroscope
Robust LQR Control Design of Gyroscope Ashok S. Chandak 1, Anil J. Patil 2 Abstract The basic problem in designing control systems is the ability to achieve good performance in the presence of uncertainties
More informationFast Seek Control for Flexible Disk Drive Systems
Fast Seek Control for Flexible Disk Drive Systems with Back EMF and Inductance Chanat La-orpacharapan and Lucy Y. Pao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering niversity of Colorado, Boulder, CO
More informationFAULT DETECTION for SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM. M. Amin Vahid D. Mechanical Engineering Department Concordia University December 19 th, 2010
FAULT DETECTION for SPACECRAFT ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM M. Amin Vahid D. Mechanical Engineering Department Concordia University December 19 th, 2010 Attitude control : the exercise of control over the orientation
More informationAttitude control of a hopping robot: a feasibility study
Attitude control of a hopping robot: a feasibility study Tammepõld, R. and Kruusmaa, M. Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia Fiorini, P. University of Verona, Italy Summary Motivation Small mobile
More informationControl of a Car-Like Vehicle with a Reference Model and Particularization
Control of a Car-Like Vehicle with a Reference Model and Particularization Luis Gracia Josep Tornero Department of Systems and Control Engineering Polytechnic University of Valencia Camino de Vera s/n,
More informationRobust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft
Robust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft AER1503 Spacecraft Dynamics and Controls II April 24, 2015 Christopher Au Agenda Introduction Model Formulation Controller Designs Simulation Results 2
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationApplication of the Cayley Form to General Spacecraft Motion
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE, CONTROL, AND DYNAMICS Vol. 29, No. 2, March April 2006 Application of the Cayley Form to General Spacecraft Motion Andrew J. Sinclair, John E. Hurtado, and John L. Junkins Texas A&M
More informationLyapunov-based Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers using Differential Drag
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 08-11 August 2011, Portland, Oregon AIAA 2011-6630 Lyapunov-based Spacecraft Rendezvous Maneuvers using Differential Drag D. Pérez 1 and R. Bevilacqua
More informationZEROS OF MODAL MODELS OF FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES
ZEROS OF MODAL MODELS OF FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES by Douglas K. Lindner Bradley Department of Electrical Engineering Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 461 (73) 31-458 email:lindner@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu Corresponding
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationAttitude Control Simulator for the Small Satellite and Its Validation by On-orbit Data of QSAT-EOS
SSC17-P1-17 Attitude Control Simulator for the Small Satellite and Its Validation by On-orbit Data of QSAT-EOS Masayuki Katayama, Yuta Suzaki Mitsubishi Precision Company Limited 345 Kamikmachiya, Kamakura
More informationAttitude Determination and. Attitude Control
Attitude Determination and Placing the telescope in orbit is not the end of the story. It is necessary to point the telescope towards the selected targets, or to scan the selected sky area with the telescope.
More informationGeneration X. Attitude Control Systems (ACS) Aprille Ericsson Dave Olney Josephine San. July 27, 2000
Generation X Attitude Control Systems (ACS) Aprille Ericsson Dave Olney Josephine San July 27, 2000 ACS Overview Requirements Assumptions Disturbance Torque Assessment Component and Control Mode Recommendations
More informationCHAPTER 4 CONVENTIONAL CONTROL FOR SATELLITE ATTITUDE
93 CHAPTER 4 CONVENTIONAL CONTROL FOR SATELLITE ATTITUDE 4.1 INTRODUCTION Attitude control is the process of achieving and maintaining an orientation in space. The orientation control of a rigid body has
More informationRobot Control Basics CS 685
Robot Control Basics CS 685 Control basics Use some concepts from control theory to understand and learn how to control robots Control Theory general field studies control and understanding of behavior
More informationVibration Suppression Control of a Space Robot with Flexible Appendage based on Simple Dynamic Model*
213 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) November 3-7, 213 Tokyo, Japan Vibration Suppression Control of a Space Robot with Flexible Appendage based on Simple Dynamic
More informationModel Reference Adaptive Control of Underwater Robotic Vehicle in Plane Motion
Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on SSTEMS Agios ikolaos Crete Island Greece July 23-25 27 38 Model Reference Adaptive Control of Underwater Robotic Vehicle in Plane Motion j.garus@amw.gdynia.pl
More information