arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ca] 19 May 2004
|
|
- Ariel Sullivan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Fractal Components of Wavelet Measures arxiv:math/040537v [math.ca] 9 May 004 Abstract Palle E.T. Jorgensen Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, 4 MacLean Hall, Iowa City, IA, 54-49, U.S.A. We compute the Coifman-Meyer-Wickerhauser measure µ for certain families of quadrature mirror filters (QMFs), and we establish that for a subclass of QMFs, µ contains a fractal scale. Key words: Hilbert space, Cuntz algebra, map, wavelet packets, pyramid algorithm, product measures, orthogonality relations, equivalence of measures, iterated function systems (IFS), scaling function, multiresolution, subdivision scheme, singular measures, absolutely continuous measures 000 MSC: 4C40; 4A6; 43A65; 4A65 Introduction Wavelets and wavelet packets are orthonormal bases, or Parseval frames, for the Hilbert space L (R) which are built from a small set of generating functions by applying only two operations to them, translation by the integers Z R, and by dyadic scaling t j t, j Z. The best known case is that of singly generated wavelets. Then there is a function ψ L (R) such that the family { j/ ψ ( j t k )} j,k Z (.) is an orthonormal basis for L (R). Wavelet packets (in the orthonormal case) are sequences (ϕ n ) n N0 and subsets J N 0 Z such that the two families { j/ ϕ n ( j t k ) (n, j) J, k Z } (.) address: jorgen@math.uiowa.edu (Palle E.T. Jorgensen). URL: jorgen (Palle E.T. Jorgensen. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMS (FRG). Preprint submitted to Elsevier Science February 008
2 and {ϕ n (t k) n N 0, k Z} (.3) are both both orthonormal bases. In the seminal paper [4], the authors Coifman, Meyer, and Wickerhauser proposed a selection of systems (.) from (.3); the idea being that (.3) may be constructed by an effective and relatively simple algorithm. The construction starts with a quadrature-mirror wavelet filter, i.e., a Fourier series m 0 (x) = k Za k e iπkx (.4) such that a k a k+l = δ 0,l (.5) k Z and a k =. (.6) k Z If the expansion in (.4) is a finite sum, then the functions ϕ 0, ϕ, ϕ, will be of compact support. The advantage with using (.) over (.) or (.3) is that the basis functions in (.) are better localized in time-frequency, as is spelled out in [4] and []. The authors of [4] propose a certain integral decomposition of L (R) which is based on a certain measure µ 0 on the unit-interval [0, ]. The idea is the following: The quadrature rules (.5) lead to a dyadic decomposition of the Hilbert space l (Z), repository for the wavelet coefficients: For each k N, and each dyadic interval [ ) ξ, ξ + k, ξ = i + + i k k, (.7) we assign a closed subspace H (ξ) l, such that the k distinct subspaces H (ξ) are mutually orthogonal, and H (ξ) = l (.8) ξ If e 0 denotes the vector e 0 (j):= δ 0,j in l, and P (ξ) the orthogonal projection onto H (ξ), then the measure µ 0 is determined by where ξ is the dyadic rational (.7). µ 0 ([ ξ, ξ + k )) = P (ξ)e 0 (.9) More generally, if f H, f =, we set µ f ( ) = P ( )f, and note that each µ f is a probability measure. These measures are shown in section 3 to dictate the wavepacket analysis in the Hilbert space L (R).
3 The expectation is that µ 0 is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure on [0, ]. We give a formula for µ 0 directly in terms of the coefficients (a j ) j Z in (.4), and we give a one-parameter family of coefficients a j (β) where β parameterizes the circle, and where for β < π/4, the measure µ 0 on small dyadic intervals J is governed by the formula where J denotes the length of J, and where µ 0 (dyadic interval J) J s, (.0) s = ln ( a 0 (β) ). (.) ln In the interval for β, the coefficients a j (β) are real-valued, and when β < π/4, a 0 (β) > /. Fourier Polynomials Let T = {z C z = }, and let D N. Consider the following two functions and m 0 (z) = D k=0 a k z k (.) We shall need several lemmas. m (z) = z D m 0 ( z) (.) = D k=0 ( ) k ā D k z k Lemma. The finite sequence a 0, a,, a D in (.) satisfies ā k a k+l = δ 0,l (.3) j Z if and only if anyone of the following equivalent conditions holds: (a) The matrix function U (z) = D k=0 A k z k, z T (.4) 3
4 is unitary, where the coefficient matrices are a k a k+ A k = for k = 0,,, D. (.5) a (D k) a (D k ) (b) The operators (S i f)(z) = m i (z) f ( z ), f L (T), i = 0,, (.6) and their adjoints Si satisfy Si S j = δ i,j I, i, j = 0,. (.7) S 0 S0 + S S = I (c) The following matrix function M (z) : = m 0 (z) m 0 ( z), z T, (.8) m (z) m ( z) is unitary, i.e., M (z) M (z) = I, for all z T. Remark. In the summation (.3), it is understood that the terms are zero if the summation index is not in the range which is specified for the sequence: If for example D =, then the conditions (.3) spell out as follows: a 0 + a + a + a 3 =. (.9) ā 0 a + ā a 3 = 0 The interpretation of (.4) is that the matrices A 0, A, A D are Fourier coefficients for a matrix function z U (z) defined on T. The requirements is that for each z T, the by matrix U (z) is unitary, i.e., that U(z) U (z) = I, z T. (.0) In general, for a function of the form (.4), the unitarity condition (.0) is equivalent to the following conditions on the constant matrices A 0, A, : A k+n A k = δ 0,n (.) or equivalently k A k A k+n = δ 0,n. (.) k 4
5 Again if D =, these conditions flesh out as follows: The two matrices A 0 = a 0 a a 3 a and A = a a 3 a a 0 (.3) satisfy A 0 A 0 + A A = I A A 0 = 0. (.4) PROOF. of Lemma.. The coefficients a 0, a,, a D are given and the two functions m 0 (z) and m (z) are defined as in (.) and (.). Even though they are defined for all z C, we shall use only the restrictions to T. It is convenient in some later calculations to introduce the substitution z:= e iπx ; and with this substitution we shall also view m 0 and m as oneperiodic functions on the real line R, and make the identification T = R/Z. We now turn to the implications: (.3)= (a). We already noted that the unitarity of the function U(z) in (.4) may be expressed by the conditions (.). When (.5) is substituted in (.), it is immediate that the two identities (.3) and (.) are equivalent. (a)= (b). Using the normalized Haar measure µ on T and the corresponding inner product f g : = f (z)g (z) dµ (z) (.5) of the Hilbert space L (T), we get the formula (S i f)(z) = w T,w =z As a result, we get the formula T m i (w)f (w), defined for f L (T), z T, and i = 0,. (S i S jf)(z) = w T,w =z (.6) m i (w)m j (w)f (z) ; (.7) which states that the four operators S i S j are multiplication operators. Hence the first part of (.7) reads: w T,w =z m i (w)m j (w) = δ i,j, z T. (.8) Substitution of (.) into (.8) shows that these conditions amount to the same sum rules (.3), or equivalently (.). 5
6 The second equation from (.7) may be restated as or equivalently S 0f + S f = f, for all f L (T) ; (.9) m i (w)f (w) dµ (z) = f (z) dµ (z). (.0) i=0 w =z T But the summation on the left-hand sides fleshes out as follows: and 4 i=0 w =ζ =z = = = T w =ζ =z w =ζ =z w =z w =z m i (w)m i (ζ)f (w)f(ζ) ( ) m i (w)m i (ζ) f (w)f(ζ) i=0 δ w,ζ f (w)f(ζ) f (w), f (w) dµ (z) = T f (z) dµ (z) (.) by an elementary property of the Haar measure. This proves (a)= (b); and in fact equivalence. (b)= (c). This implication also goes in both directions, and it is implicit in the previous step where we showed that the identities (.8) are equivalent to (.3). But an inspection of matrix entries shows that (.8) is a restatement of the unitary property for the matrix M (z) in (c). Corollary.3 Consider a Fourier polynomial m (z) = D k=0 a k z k (.) as in Lemma., and let S = S m be the operator on L (T) defined by Then the following conditions are equivalent: (i) S is an isometry; (ii) m (z) + m ( z) =, for z T; (Sf)(z) = m (z) f ( z ), z T. (.3) 6
7 and (iii) k a k a k+l = δ 0,l. PROOF. The equivalence (i) (ii) is immediate from an inspection of (.8) in the special case i = j = 0. To see (ii) (iii), it is simplest to write out the Fourier coefficients of the function z w T, w =z A substitution of (.) into (.4) yields a j a k w k j j k w =z = a j a k w n n j,k s.t. k j=n w =z = n j a j a j+n z n, m (w). (.4) and it follows that the sum in (.4) is the constant function if and only if (iii) is satisfied. Note that (iii) is a restatement of condition (.3) in Lemma.. In the following we consider operators S on the form (Sf)(z) = m (z) f (z ), z T, f L (T), and their adjoints. But we will need these operators realized explicitly in the sequence space l = L (T). Lemma.4. (a) The matrix representation for the operator S in Corollary.3 relative to the standard basis e n (z):= z n, n Z, for L (T), is (Sξ) n = k a n k ξ k ; (.5) and the adjoint S is (S ξ) n = k a k n ξ k. (.6) (b) The D-dimensional subspace L spanned by {e k D + k 0} is 7
8 invariant under S, and the corresponding D by D matrix is ā ā ā ā ā 3 ā. ā D ā D ā D.. ā (.7) ā ā ā ā 3 ā ā... ā D ā D ā D ā D ā D Specifically, the case D = is ā ā ā ā 0 0 ; (.8) 0 ā 3 ā ā ā 3 and the space L is then spanned by {, z, z, z 3 }. (c) For all n Z, there is a k N such that S k e n L. (.9) PROOF. The matrix representations (.5), and (.6), follow directly from the formulas (.3) and (.6). To prove (b), set so that We claim the following implication: J (D) : = {k Z D + k 0}, L = span {e k k J (D)}. ξ k = 0 for k Z\J (D) = k ā k n ξ k = 0 for n Z\J (D). (.30) 8
9 The invariance of L under S is immediate from this. Now suppose ξ k = 0 for k Z\J (D). Then one of the factors in ā k n ξ k vanishes if n Z\J (D); and the implication (.30) follows. To understand (c), iterate the matrix formula (.6). We get S k e n = p ā i ā i ā ik e p (.3) i,i,,i k where the summation on the right-hand side is over p Z, i, i, [0,,, D ], subject to i + i + + k i k + p k = n, so the range for the p-index is roughly divided by with each iteration of S on the basis vector e n (z) = z n. Remark.5 Conclusions (a) (b) in Lemma.4 hold for the smaller subspace M:= span {e k D k 0}. The matrix of the restricted operator S M is then obtained from (.7) by deletion of the last row and last column. For example, the reduced matrix corresponding to (.8) is ā F: = ā ā ā 0. 0 ā 3 ā However, property (c) in Lemma.4 is not satisfied for M. To see this, note that D =, and L = M Ce 3 in the example. As a result e 3 S k e 3 = (ā3 ) k for all k N. (.3) If a 3 0, it follows that S k e 3 is not in M, no matter how large k is. 3 Measures Induced by Representations of the Cuntz Relations The system of coefficients studied in section give rise to representations of the Cuntz relations. We recall the construction briefly; see [] for more details. When the coefficients a 0, a, are given, satisfying (.3), then the two operators S 0 and S from Lemma. (b) satisfy the relations (.7). We say that the two operators satisfy the Cuntz relations, or equivalently that they define a representation of the Cuntz algebra O on the Hilbert space H = L (T). 9
10 The norm-closed algebra of operators on H generated by S 0, S, S 0, and S is known, [5] to be a simple C -algebra; and it is unique up to isomorphism of C -algebras. We will also need to Hilbert space L (R). If in addition to (.3), the numbers (a k ) satisfy D k=0 a k =, (3.) then it is known [4] that the following system of three equations has solutions in L (R): ϕ n (x) = a k ϕ n (x k), (3.) k ϕ n+ (x) = k ( ) k a D k ϕ n (x k), (3.3) and R ϕ 0 (x) dx =. (3.4) Moreover, for every f L (R), the following Parseval identity holds: When a system, such as ϕ n ( k) f = f = f (x) dx. (3.5) n=0 k Z R {ϕ n ( k) n N 0, k Z}, (3.6) satisfies (3.5) we way it is a Parseval frame, or a normalized tight frame. There are simple further conditions on the coefficients (a k ) each of which guarantees that (3.6) is in fact an orthonormal basis (ONB) in L (R), i.e., that ϕ n ( k) ϕ m ( l) = δ n,m δ k,l. (3.7) To understand how to select subsets J N 0 Z such that the set of functions F (J): = { j ϕn ( j x k ) (n, j) J, k Z } (3.8) forms a Perseval frame, or an ONB, for L (R), the authors of [4] and [] suggested a family of measures associated with the operator systems (.7). We proved more generally, in [0] that these measures are associated with any representation of one of the Cuntz algebras O N, N =, 3,. The idea is simple: Let (S i ) i=0 be two operators in a Hilbert space H such that Si S j = δ i,j I and S i Si = I (3.9) i=0 0
11 hold. Then for every multi-index ξ:(i, i,, i k ), i j {0, } (3.0) the operator satisfies P (ξ): = S i S ik S i k S i (3.) P (ξ) = P (ξ) = P (ξ). Moreover P (ξ) = I (3.) ξ and P (ξ)p (η) = δ ξ,η P (ξ) (3.3) where the summation in (3.) is over all multi-indices of length k, and in (3.3) the multi-indices ξ and η have the same length. We say that, for each k N we have a dyadic partition of the Hilbert space H into orthogonal frequency bands. Theorem 3. Let m 0 :T C be a function which satisfies m 0 () = and m 0 (z) + m 0 ( z) = for z T. (3.4) Set m (z) = z m 0 ( z), for z T; (3.5) and let S i, i = 0,, be the operators (.6). Suppose the sequence ϕ 0, ϕ, ϕ, defined by ϕ n (x) = ( ) ( ) x x m 0 ϕ n (3.6) ϕ n+ (x) = ( ) ( ) x x m ϕ n (3.7) for n = 0,,, x R defines an orthonormal basis in L (R), where we set m j (x):= m j (e iπx ), j = 0,. Then p ϕn ( p t k) = ej Si p Si e k ϕ p n+i +i + +i p p (t j) i =0 i p=0 j Z (3.8) holds for all p, n N 0 and k Z. Moreover a subset J N 0 N 0 has the corresponding set { p ϕn ( p t k) (p, n) J, k Z } (3.9) define an orthonormal basis (ONB) in L (R) if and only if the sets [ p n, p (n + )) form a non-overlapping partition of N 0.
12 PROOF. Since the functions in (3.6) (3.7) form an orthonormal basis for L (R), we have ϕ n (x + j) ϕ n (x + j) = δ n,n for n, n N 0, (3.0) j Z and (3.8) will follow if we check that ϕ m (t j) p ϕn ( p t k) dt = e j Si p Si e k R (3.) if m = p n + i + i + + i p p, and zero otherwise. But (3.) follows from Fourier duality, and a substitution of formulas (3.6) (3.7) and (3.0). We leave the computation to the reader. The second conclusion regarding the basis properties (ONB) of the functions in (3.9) follows from (3.8) when we note that m = p n + i + i + + i p p ranges over [ p n, p (n + )) as i,, i p vary over Z Z }{{. } p times Example 3. The best known special case of (3.9) is when J = {(0, ),(, ),(, ),(3, ), }, and the corresponding partition of N 0 is simply [ p, p+ ) for p = 0,,,. In this case, we only need the first two functions from the sequence ϕ n of (3.6) (3.7), i.e., ϕ 0 = ϕ, and ϕ = ψ. The other extreme is J = {(0, ), (0, ),(0, 3), }. In this case, each section in the corresponding partition of N 0 is a singleton, and all the functions {ϕ n n N 0 } from (3.6) (3.7) are needed in the (3.9) family. However, no dyadic scales are used. Between these two extremes there is a countable infinite family of non-overlapping partitions corresponding to the choice specified in (3.9); for example, the pairs (p, n) in some J from (3.9) may be specified as in the following table (Table ). Table. A set J consisting of points (p, n) as follows: p n In this case, we are using only the four functions ϕ 0, ϕ, ϕ, and ϕ 3 from (3.6) (3.7), and the segments from (3.9) are {0,,, 3} followed by [ k j, k (j + ) )
13 where k =,, 3,, and j {,, 3}. As a result, all the dyadic scaling numbers k are used. The resulting ONB in (3.9) consists of the following functions, ϕ 0 ( t l 0 ), k ϕ j ( k t l ), where l 0, l Z, k =,,, and j {,, 3}. Since {ϕ m ( j) m N 0, j Z} is an ONB for L (R), every f L (R), f =, defines a probability distribution P f on N 0 Z by P f (m, j) : = ϕ m ( j) f. (3.) Corollary 3.3 Let p, n N 0, k Z, and let P p (, ) be the corresponding probability distribution from (3.) ϕ n( p k) above. Then the marginal distribution in the first variable is ([ δ m, p n+i +i + +i p p µ i e k + + i p i p, + + i p + )). (3.3) p p PROOF. In view of (3.) and Theorem 3., the marginal distribution is j Z P p (m, j) ϕ n( p k) = δ m, p n+i +i + +i p p ej Si p Si e k j Z S = δ m, p n+i +i + +i p p ip Si e k ([ = δ m, p n+i +i + +i p p µ i e k + + i p i p, + + i p + )) p p which is the desired conclusion. The next result follows from [4], or from [0]. Lemma 3.4 There is a unique Borel measure E defined on the unit interval [0, ] such that E ([ i + + i k i k, + + i k + )) = P (i k k, i,, i k ) = S ξ Sξ. (3.4) Moreover the measure E = E P takes values in orthogonal projections in H, and E (dx) = I (3.5) 0 E (B ) E (B ) = 0 if B i are Borel sets with B B =. (3.6) 3
14 Remark 3.5 The expectation is that the measure class of E is that of the Lebesgue measure if E is derived from a wavelet representation. For the wavelet representations, the Hilbert space H is L (T); and for a generic set of wavelet representations e 0 is a cyclic vector; see [9]. Hence, to check if E is in the Lebesgue class, it is enough if we verify that the scalar valued, positive measure µ 0 ( ): = e 0 E ( )e 0 = E ( )e 0 (3.7) is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure on [0, ]. Using (3.4), we see that the measure µ 0 is given on dyadic intervals by the formula ([ i µ i k i k, + + i k + )) = S k ξe k 0. (3.8) Part of the reason for expecting that the measure µ 0 ( ) = E ( )e 0 should be absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure on [0, ] rests on the observation that λ = is always in the spectrum of the matrix (.7). If λ = is also a dominant eigenvalue, in a sense which we make precise below, then the asymptotic formula ([ i µ i k i k, )) k (3.9) k k would follow. From this the absolute continuity follows as well. But a closer examination of the matrices F i, i = 0,, shows that λ = is not always a dominant point in the spectrum of F 0 = S0 M. We now show that is in the spectrum. Lemma 3.6 Let the numbers a 0, a,, a D satisfy (.3) and (3.), and let S 0 and S 0 be the corresponding operators on l ; see (.5) and (.6). Then λ = is an eigenvalue for the finite-dimensional operator F 0 = S0 M. If F 0 is represented as a D by D matrix as in (.7), then the row-vector w = (,,, ) is a left-eigenvector for F 0, or equivalently w is }{{} D a right-eigenvector, with the same eigenvalue, for the adjoint matrix F0. PROOF. Substitution of m 0 () = into m 0 (z) + m 0 ( z) = from Corollary.3 yields m 0 ( ) = 0. Hence, z + divides the polynomial m 0 (z). 4
15 If m 0 (z) = (z + ) L (z), and L (z) = L () = D i=0 D i=0 l i z i, then it follows that l i = =. As a result we get a 0 = l 0 a i = l i + l i for i D a D = l D. (3.30) It follows from this that and D i=0 D i=0 a i = i a i+ = i l i = l i =. Working out the matrix product, this is a restatement of wf 0 = w, or equivalently F0 w = w. Theorem 3.7 Let a 0, a, a D be as stated in Lemma 3.6, suppose a 0 > max { λ λ spec (F 0 ) \ {a 0 }}, and set s = ln a 0 ln. Then every non-empty open subset V in [0, ] contains an infinite sequence of dyadic intervals J such that 0 < lim inf J V ( ) µ0 (J) J s lim sup J V ( ) µ0 (J) J s <. We say that the measure µ 0 contains s as a fractal scale. PROOF. The details follow by combining Lemma 3.6 with the technical lemma which we state and prove in Section 5 below. 5
16 Proposition 3.8 Let the numbers a 0,, a D satisfy the two conditions (.3) and (3.) and let S 0, S be the corresponding two operators; see (.6) (.7). Let µ 0 ( ):= E ( )e 0 be the measure (3.8). Then ([ i µ i k i k, + + i k + )) a k k 0 #(i=0) a D #(i=). (3.3) Remark 3.9 We will see later how this estimate yields information about a fractal component of µ 0 in the special case D =. PROOF. Let F i := Si, i = 0,. For k N, and i,, i k {0, }, set M ξ = i + + i k k and F ξ := F ik F i. Then F 0 e 0 = ā 0 e 0 and F e 0 = ā D e 0. To see this, recall that and m (z) = ā D ā D z + ā 0 z D, ([ µ )) 0 ξ, ξ + k = F ξ e 0 e 0 F ξ e 0 = F i Fi k e 0 e 0 = a 0 #(i=0) a D #(i=). Lemma 3.0 (The case D =.) (a) For the case D =, the real valued solutions a 0, a, a, a 3 to the three equations a 0 + a + a + a 3 = a 0 a + a a 3 = 0 (3.3) a 0 + a + a + a 3 = 6
17 are for β R. ( ) a 0 = + cosβ ( ) a = + sin β a = a 3 = ( cosβ ) ( sin β ) (3.33) (b) The spectrum of the matrix a F = a a a 0 0 a 3 a (3.34) obtained by restriction of S to M = span {e 0, e, e } is { a 0,, } sin β cosβ. (3.35) (c) The following two conditions are equivalent a 0 > max { λ λ spec (F) \ {a 0 }} (3.36) and β < π 4. (3.37) (d) The eigenspace for the point a 0 in the spectrum of F is spanned by the vector ( ) v where v R is the solution to v = a 0 I a a 0 a 3 a a. (3.38) 0 (e) For the case of Daubechies s wavelet, we have a 0 = a = a = a 3 = 3 4, (3.39) 7
18 and ( ) 3 β = arccos, (3.40) spec (F) = { a 0,, }. (3.4) In particular, a 0 < = max { λ λ spec (F)}. (3.4) PROOF. Part (a) follows directly from section 4 in []. To compute the spectrum of the matrix F, note that its characteristic polynomial is (λ a 0 ) ( λ (a + a )λ + a a a 0 a 3 ) ; (3.43) and when (3.33) are substituted, we see that the roots are as listed in (3.35). The conclusions listed in parts (c) and (d) are immediate consequences of (b). Finally (3.38) follows from the observation that F has the form F = a a G 0 (3.44) with G = a a 0 and the fact that a 0 is not in the spectrum of G. a 3 a The conclusions listed in (e) for Daubechies s wavelet follow by an application of (a) (d). To better appreciate the geometry of the formulas (3.33), the reader may find Fig. useful. 8
19 The coefficients a 0 (β), a (β), a (β), a 3 (β) of (3.3) a 3 (β) a (β) β = 3π 4 β = π 4 β = π β = 3π 4 β = 0 β < π 4 β = π 4 a 0 (β) β = cos ( ) 3 Daubechies a (β) Figure. The four coefficients a 0, a, a, a 3 are described by the two circles in Fig., viz., by ( a 0 ) +( a 3 ) =, and by 4 ( a ) +( a ) = 4. (3.45) This representation also makes it clear that, if one of the four coefficients vanishes, then so does a second from the remaining coefficients. The resulting four degenerate cases are as sketched in Table. Table. The degenerate cases when one (and therefore two) of the coefficients a 0, a, a, a 3 vanish: m 0 +z +z 3 z+z z +z 3 m z z 3 z 3 z+z z β π 4 π 4 3π 4 3π 4 There are four distinct configurations, and all four are variations of the Haar wavelet, see Fig.. The second column in Table is called the stretched Haar wavelet; see []. For all three, we have the formula ([ i µ i k i k, + + i k + )) = k (3.46) k k 9
20 which proves that µ 0 is the Lebesgue measure on the unit-interval [0, ] for all four variations of the Haar wavelet. The two matrices F 0 and F corresponding to the four variants of the Haar wavelet filters in Table are as follows: F 0 : F : The father function ϕ and the mother function ψ for the Haar Wavelet Figure. 0
21 Remark 3. We shall need Lemma 3.6 for the two matrices a a F 0 = a a a 0 and F = a a a 3 0 a 3 a 0 a 0 a 3 (3.47) For the range β < π 4, we have (3.36) satisfied by spec (F 0). But then the point a 3 = a 3 (β) satisfies a 3 <, and = max { λ λ spec (F )}. (3.48) Theorem 3. Let β R, β < π, be given. Let a 4 0, a, a, a 3, be the corresponding numbers in (3.33). Let (S i ) i=0 be the operators in (.6), and F i : = S i (3.49) M the matrices (3.47). Let be a dyadic fraction. ξ = i + + i k k (3.50) Then lim n a n 0 F 0 n F i k F i e 0 = a #(i=0) 0 a #(i=) 3 (e 0 + v) (3.5) where v is the vector in (3.38). Moreover, if ε > 0 is given, there is an n 0 N such that ([ µ 0 ξ, ξ + )) a n a #(i=0) n+k 0 0 a #(i=) ( 3 + v ε ). (3.5) for all n n 0. More generally, given ε, 0 < ε <, there is n 0 N such that ([ )) ( + v ε ) ( a #(i=0) 0 a #(i=) ) µ 0 ξ, ξ + 3 n+k a n 0 ( a #(i=0) 0 a #(i=) 3 ) ( + v + ε ) for all n n 0. PROOF. Recall that e 0 + v is the eigenvector satisfying F 0 (e 0 + v) = a 0 (e 0 + v), and e 0 e 0 + v =. (3.53)
22 Moreover, we have Using (3.36) for F 0, we get F 0 e 0 = a 0 e 0 and F e 0 = a 3 e 0. (3.54) lim n a n 0 F n 0 w = e 0 w (e 0 + v) (3.55) for all w M. Applying this, and (3.54), to w:= F ik F i e 0, the conclusion (3.5) follows. Since ([ µ 0 ξ, ξ + )) = S n n+k 0 S ξ e 0 = F n 0 F i k F i e 0, (3.56) the second conclusion (3.5) follows from the first. Corollary 3.3 Let β < π 4, and let a 0, a, a, a 3 be the corresponding numbers in (3.33). If the measure µ 0 ( ) = E ( )e 0 is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure dx on [0, ]. Then the Radon-Nikodym derivative dµ 0 /dx = f is unbounded in every open (non-empty) subset of [0, ]. PROOF. Let V [0, ] be a non-empty open subset. Then pick ξ as in (3.50), and n N such that [ ξ, ξ + ) V. (3.57) n Then pick ε, 0 < ε <, and n 0 n such that (3.5) holds for all n n 0. If f were bounded in V with upper bound C; then (3.5) implies the estimate C n a n 0 a #(i=0) 0 a #(i=) ( 3 + v ε ) (3.58) for all n n 0. Since a 0 >, lim n n a n 0 =, which contradicts (3.58). Example 3.4 We introduced the constants a 0, a, a, a 3 for Daubechies s wavelet in part (e) of Lemma 3.6. An inspection of (3.33) and (3.39) shows that β = arccos ( ) 3. Hence sin β cosβ =, and the three numbers in the spectrum of F 0 are as follows: < a 0 <. (3.59)
23 One checks that the vector v : = ( + 3 ) e + ( 3 ) e (3.60) spans the -eigenspace for F 0. Since a 0 <, the eigenspace { w M F 0 w = } w (3.6) is orthogonal to e 0. Corollary 3.5 Let β = arccos ( ) 3, so that the numbers a0, a, a, a 3 define the Daubechies wavelet. Let v be the eigenvector in (3.60), and pick w M such that F 0 w = w, and w v = 8. (3.6) Let ξ be a dyadic rational given as in (3.50). Then, for every ε, 0 < ε <, there is n 0 N such that w F ik F i e 0 ε µ ([ )) 0 ξ, ξ + n+k (3.63) n w F ik F i e 0 + ε for all n n 0. PROOF. The argument follows the proof of Theorem 3.. The vector w is w = (e 0 + e + e ). The main difference is that now is the top eigenvalue of F 0 with eigenvector v. If w is chosen as in (3.6), then lim n n F n 0 s = 8 w s v (3.64) for all s M. The desired result (3.63) follows when this is applied to s = F ik F i e 0. 4 Wavelets on Fractals In section we proved some lemmas for representations of the Cuntz algebra O, and we used them in section 3 above in our analysis of dyadic wavelets in the Hilbert space L (R). But there are other Hilbert spaces H which admit wavelet algorithms. In a recent paper [6], we constructed wavelets in separable Hilbert spaces H (s) built on Hausdorff measure (dx) s where s denotes the 3
24 corresponding fractal dimension. For the middle third Cantor set, for example, the scaling number N is 3; and the fractal dimension is s = ln ln 3 = log 3(). In this section, we show how our Cantor subdivision construction is built on a representation of the O 3 -Cuntz relations on L (T) which are analogous to the representations of O which we used in our analysis of dyadic L (R)-wavelets. Lemma 4. Let N N, N, be given, and let m 0, m,, m N be bounded measurable functions on T. Then the operators (S i f)(z) = m i (z) f ( z N), f L (T), i = 0,,, N, z T (4.) satisfy the Cuntz relations Si S j = S i,j I N S i Si = I i=0 (4.) if and only if the associated N by N matrix function M N (z) = ( ( )) mj ze i kπ N N j,k (4.3) takes values in the unitary matrices for a.e. z T. PROOF. Rather than sketching the details, we will instead refer the reader to section above where the argument is done in full for N = ; see also [6] or []. For each of the representations (S i ) N i=0, we get a measure µ 0 on the unitinterval [0, ], as outlined in section 3 (for the special case N =.) In the general case, the measure µ 0 is determined uniquely on the N-adic subintervals as follows, ([ i µ 0 N + + i k N, i k N + + i k N + )) = S k N k i k Si Si e 0 where i, i, {0,,, N }. (4.4) We state the next result just for the middle-third Cantor set; but, following the discussion in [6], the reader will convince him/herself that it carries over to any fractal constructed by iteration of finite families of (contractive) affine maps in R d ; so called iterated function systems (IFS). 4
25 Proposition 4. Let m 0 (z) = +z m (z) = z (4.5) m (z) = z Then the unitarity condition (4.3) from Lemma 4. is satisfied, and the operators (S i f)(z) = m i (z) f ( z 3), f L (T), i = 0,,, z T, (4.6) define a representation of O 3 on L (T); and the corresponding measure µ 0 from (4.4) is the Hausdorff measure µ (s) of Hausdorff dimension s = ln = ln 3 log 3 () restricted to the middle-third Cantor set X 3 [0, ]. Remark 4.3 A classical theorem of Hutchinson [8], see also [7], implies that the Cantor measure, supported on X 3, is the unique Borel probability measure µ which solves f (x) dx (x) = ( ( ) ( ) ) x x + f dx (x) + f dµ (x) 3 3 for all continuous bounded functions f. (4.7) As a result, we need to verify that our measure µ 0 from (4.4), and from the O 3 -representation, satisfies identity (4.7). To compute the terms on the right-hand side in (4.4) is a finite matrix problem. We need only to calculate the operators Si, i = 0,,, on the threedimensional subspace M:= span {e 0, e, e }. But the argument from section 3 shows that the three restricted operators F i : = Si, i = 0,, (4.8) M have the following matrix representation F 0 = 0 0, F = 0 0, F = (4.9) A substitution of (4.8) (4.9) into (4.4) yields ([ i µ 0 N + + i k i N k, N + + i k N + )) k N k = F ik F i F i e 0 0 if one or more of the i j s is = k otherwise. (4.0) 5
26 Using this, it is immediate to see that µ 0 satisfies Hutchinson s identity (4.7), and therefore µ 0 is the Hausdorff measure µ (s), s = log 3 (), restricted to X 3. 5 A Technical Lemma In the proof of Lemma 3.6, Theorem 3. and Corollary 3.3 above, we relied on the following lemma regarding operators in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space. While it is analogous to the classical Perron-Frobenius theorem, our present result makes no mention of positivity. In fact, our matrix entries will typically be complex. Notation 5. If M is a complex Hilbert space, we denote by L (M) the algebra of all bounded linear operators on M If M is also finite-dimensional, we will pick suitable matrix representations for operators F:M M If M contains subspaces, M i, i =, such that M M and M = M M, then we get a block-matrix representation F = A B (5.) C D where the entries are linear operators specified as follows. A:M M, B:M M ; and C:M M, D:M M. If dim M =, and M = Cw for some w M, then we will identify the operators M M with M via where η M. The adjoint operator is T η :C z zη, Tη x = η x w, for x M. Lemma 5. Let M be a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, with d = dim M. Let F L (M), and let a C satisfy the following four conditions: (i) a spec (F); 6
27 (ii) a > max { λ λ spec (F) \ {a}}; (iii) the algebraic multiplicity of a is one; and (iv) there is a w M, w =, such that F w = āw. Then there is a unique ξ M such that w ξ = and Fξ = aξ. (5.) Moreover, lim n a n F n x = w x ξ for all x M. (5.3) Lemma 5.3 There is a constant C independent of d = dim M and of x, such that { a n F n x w x ξ Cn d s n } max s spec (F) \ {a}. (5.4) a PROOF. [Lemma 5.] Set Then M : = M Cw = {x M w x = 0}. M = Cw M, (5.5) and we get the resulting block-matrix representaton of F, a 00 0 F = (5.6) η G where a is the number in (i), the vector η M, and operator G L (M ), are uniquely determined. As a result, we get the factorization det (λ F) = (λ a) det (λ G) (5.7) for the characteristic polynomial. Assumptions (ii) and (iii) imply spec (F) \ {a} = spec (G) ; (5.8) and in particular, we note that a is not in the spectrum of G. Hence the inverse (a G) is well defined, and (a G) L (M ). 7
28 We claim that the vector satisfies the conditions in (5.). ξ = w + (a G) η (5.9) First note that (a G) η M, so w ξ = w w = w =. Moreover, Fξ = aw + η + G (a G) η = aw + a (a G) η = aξ, which proves the second condition in (5.). Uniqueness of the vector ξ in (5.) follows from (5.8). Using the matrix representation (5.6), we get and by induction, F a 00 0 = aη + Gη G F n a n 00 0 = (5.0) a n η + a n Gη + + G n η G n a n = (a n G n )(a G) η G n Hence, if we show that lim n a n G n = 0, (5.) then the desired conclusion (5.3) will follow. Using the matrix form (5.0), the conclusion (5.3) reads lim n a n F n = (5.) (a G) η 0 In proving (5.), we will make use of the Jordan-form representation for G. Jordan s theorem applied to G yields three operators D, V, N L (M ) with the following properties: () D is a diagonal matrix with the numbers spec (F) \ {a} down the diagonal; () V is invertible; (3) N is nilpotent: If d = dim (M ) then N d = 0; 8
29 (4) [N, D] = ND DN = 0; (5) G = V (D + N) V. Let x M, and let n d. Using () (5), we get a n G n x = V a n (D + N) n V x ( ) d n = V a n D n i N i V x. i i=0 But the matrix a n D n i is diagonal with entries { a n s n i s spec (F) \ {a} }, 0 i d. Using finally assumption (ii), we conclude that lim n ( ) n a n s n i = 0, (5.3) i and the proof of (5.) is completed. PROOF. [Lemma 5.3] Let the conditions be as stated in the Remark. From the arguments in the proof of Lemma 5., we see that the two vectors on the left-hand side in (5.4) may be decomposed as follows: and a n F n x = w x w + ( a n G n) (a G) η + a n G n P M x; (5.4) Hence, the difference is in M, and a n F n x w x ξ w x ξ = w x w + (a G) η. (5.5) = a n G ( n P M x (a G) η ) { Cn d s n } max s spec (F) \ {a} a which is the desired conclusion (5.4). References [] O. Bratteli, D. E. Evans, P. E. T. Jorgensen, Compactly Supported Wavelets and Representations of the Cuntz Relations, Appl. Comp. Harm. Anal., 00, (000) 3. 9
30 [] O. Bratteli, P. E. T. Jorgensen, Wavelets through a Looking Glass: The World of the Spectrum, Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis, Birkhäuser, Boston, 00. [3] O. Bratteli, P. E. T. Jorgensen, Iterated function systems and permutation representations of the Cuntz algebra, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 39 (999) no [4] R. Coifman, Y. Meyer, V. Wickerhauser, Size properties of wavelet-packets, in: M. Ruskai, G. Beylkin, R. Coifman, I. Daubechies, S. Mallat, Y. Meyer, L. Raphael (Eds.), Wavelets and Their Applications, Jones and Bartlett, Boston, 99, pp [5] J. Cuntz, Simple C -algebras generated by isometries, Comm. Math. Phys. 57 (977) [6] D. Dutkay, P. Jorgensen, Wavelets on Fractals, preprint, University of Iowa, 004, arxiv:math.ca/ , accepted: Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana. [7] K. J. Falconer, The Geometry of Fractal Sets, Cambridge, Tracts on Mathematics, 85. [8] J. E. Hutchinson, Fractals and self-similarity, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (98) [9] P.E.T. Jorgensen, Minimality of the Data in Wavelet Filters, Advances in Mathematics 59, 00, pp [0] P.E.T. Jorgensen, Measures in wavelet decompositions, preprint, University of Iowa, 004, arxiv:math.ca/04004, submitted to Elsevier Science. [] M. V. Wickerhauser, Best-adapted wavelet packet bases, in: I. Daubechies (Ed.), Different Perspectives on Wavelets (San Antonio, TX, 993), Vol. 47 of Proc. Sympos. Appl. Math., American Mathematical Society, Providence, 993, pp [] M. V. Wickerhauser, Adapted Wavelet Analysis from Theory to Software, IEEE Press, New York, A.K. Peters, Wellesley, MA,
Analysis of Fractals, Image Compression and Entropy Encoding
Analysis of Fractals, Image Compression and Entropy Encoding Myung-Sin Song Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Jul 10, 2009 Joint work with Palle Jorgensen. Outline 1. Signal and Image processing,
More informationFourier Bases on the Skewed Sierpinski Gasket
Fourier Bases on the Skewed Sierpinski Gasket Calvin Hotchkiss University Nebraska-Iowa Functional Analysis Seminar November 5, 2016 Part 1: A Fast Fourier Transform for Fractal Approximations The Fractal
More informationDecomposition of Riesz frames and wavelets into a finite union of linearly independent sets
Decomposition of Riesz frames and wavelets into a finite union of linearly independent sets Ole Christensen, Alexander M. Lindner Abstract We characterize Riesz frames and prove that every Riesz frame
More informationSpectral Properties of an Operator-Fractal
Spectral Properties of an Operator-Fractal Keri Kornelson University of Oklahoma - Norman NSA Texas A&M University July 18, 2012 K. Kornelson (U. Oklahoma) Operator-Fractal TAMU 07/18/2012 1 / 25 Acknowledgements
More informationFourier Bases on Fractals
Fourier Bases on Fractals Keri Kornelson University of Oklahoma - Norman February Fourier Talks February 21, 2013 K. Kornelson (U. Oklahoma) Fractal Fourier Bases FFT 02/21/2013 1 / 21 Coauthors This is
More informationFinite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product
Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.fa] 27 Sep 2016
Decomposition of Integral Self-Affine Multi-Tiles Xiaoye Fu and Jean-Pierre Gabardo arxiv:43.335v2 [math.fa] 27 Sep 26 Abstract. In this paper we propose a method to decompose an integral self-affine Z
More informationDORIN ERVIN DUTKAY AND PALLE JORGENSEN. (Communicated by )
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 OVERSAMPLING GENERATES SUPER-WAVELETS arxiv:math/0511399v1 [math.fa] 16 Nov 2005 DORIN ERVIN DUTKAY
More informationSize properties of wavelet packets generated using finite filters
Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 18 (2002, 249 265 Size properties of wavelet packets generated using finite filters Morten Nielsen Abstract We show that asymptotic estimates for the growth in L p (R- norm of
More informationCuntz algebras, generalized Walsh bases and applications
Cuntz algebras, generalized Walsh bases and applications Gabriel Picioroaga November 9, 2013 INFAS 1 / 91 Basics H, separable Hilbert space, (e n ) n N ONB in H: e n, e m = δ n,m span{e n } = H v = k=1
More informationKaczmarz algorithm in Hilbert space
STUDIA MATHEMATICA 169 (2) (2005) Kaczmarz algorithm in Hilbert space by Rainis Haller (Tartu) and Ryszard Szwarc (Wrocław) Abstract The aim of the Kaczmarz algorithm is to reconstruct an element in a
More informationFrame Diagonalization of Matrices
Frame Diagonalization of Matrices Fumiko Futamura Mathematics and Computer Science Department Southwestern University 00 E University Ave Georgetown, Texas 78626 U.S.A. Phone: + (52) 863-98 Fax: + (52)
More informationLebesgue Measure on R n
8 CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets
More informationBoolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices
Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver CO 80208 Frédéric Latrémolière Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable
More informationShannon-Like Wavelet Frames on a Class of Nilpotent Lie Groups
Bridgewater State University From the SelectedWorks of Vignon Oussa Winter April 15, 2013 Shannon-Like Wavelet Frames on a Class of Nilpotent Lie Groups Vignon Oussa Available at: https://works.bepress.com/vignon_oussa/1/
More informationCOMPACTLY SUPPORTED ORTHONORMAL COMPLEX WAVELETS WITH DILATION 4 AND SYMMETRY
COMPACTLY SUPPORTED ORTHONORMAL COMPLEX WAVELETS WITH DILATION 4 AND SYMMETRY BIN HAN AND HUI JI Abstract. In this paper, we provide a family of compactly supported orthonormal complex wavelets with dilation
More informationA DECOMPOSITION THEOREM FOR FRAMES AND THE FEICHTINGER CONJECTURE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 A DECOMPOSITION THEOREM FOR FRAMES AND THE FEICHTINGER CONJECTURE PETER G. CASAZZA, GITTA KUTYNIOK,
More informationBand-limited Wavelets and Framelets in Low Dimensions
Band-limited Wavelets and Framelets in Low Dimensions Likun Hou a, Hui Ji a, a Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, 10 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119076 Abstract In this paper,
More informationLebesgue Measure on R n
CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets
More informationBiorthogonal Spline Type Wavelets
PERGAMON Computers and Mathematics with Applications 0 (00 1 0 www.elsevier.com/locate/camwa Biorthogonal Spline Type Wavelets Tian-Xiao He Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Illinois Wesleyan
More informationMRA Frame Wavelets with Certain Regularities Associated with the Refinable Generators of Shift Invariant Spaces
Chapter 6 MRA Frame Wavelets with Certain Regularities Associated with the Refinable Generators of Shift Invariant Spaces Tian-Xiao He Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Illinois Wesleyan University,
More information1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016
1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 W2016 1.1 Homework 1. Due Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Notation 1.1 Let U be any set, g be a positive function on U, Y be a normed space. For any f : U Y let
More informationOn Riesz-Fischer sequences and lower frame bounds
On Riesz-Fischer sequences and lower frame bounds P. Casazza, O. Christensen, S. Li, A. Lindner Abstract We investigate the consequences of the lower frame condition and the lower Riesz basis condition
More informationAffine and Quasi-Affine Frames on Positive Half Line
Journal of Mathematical Extension Vol. 10, No. 3, (2016), 47-61 ISSN: 1735-8299 URL: http://www.ijmex.com Affine and Quasi-Affine Frames on Positive Half Line Abdullah Zakir Husain Delhi College-Delhi
More informationSpectral Theorem for Self-adjoint Linear Operators
Notes for the undergraduate lecture by David Adams. (These are the notes I would write if I was teaching a course on this topic. I have included more material than I will cover in the 45 minute lecture;
More informationFRAME DUALITY PROPERTIES FOR PROJECTIVE UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS
FRAME DUALITY PROPERTIES FOR PROJECTIVE UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS DEGUANG HAN AND DAVID LARSON Abstract. Let π be a projective unitary representation of a countable group G on a separable Hilbert space H.
More informationCHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups
CHAPTER 6 Representations of compact groups Throughout this chapter, denotes a compact group. 6.1. Examples of compact groups A standard theorem in elementary analysis says that a subset of C m (m a positive
More informationSince G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =
Problem 1 Show that if π is an irreducible representation of a compact lie group G then π is also irreducible. Give an example of a G and π such that π = π, and another for which π π. Is this true for
More informationShift Invariant Spaces and Shift Generated Dual Frames for Local Fields
Communications in Mathematics and Applications Volume 3 (2012), Number 3, pp. 205 214 RGN Publications http://www.rgnpublications.com Shift Invariant Spaces and Shift Generated Dual Frames for Local Fields
More informationTopics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem
Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem 1 Fourier Analysis, a review We ll begin with a short review of simple facts about Fourier analysis, before going on to interpret
More informationContents. Preface for the Instructor. Preface for the Student. xvii. Acknowledgments. 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.A R n and C n 2
Contents Preface for the Instructor xi Preface for the Student xv Acknowledgments xvii 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.A R n and C n 2 Complex Numbers 2 Lists 5 F n 6 Digression on Fields 10 Exercises 1.A 11 1.B Definition
More informationSubsequences of frames
Subsequences of frames R. Vershynin February 13, 1999 Abstract Every frame in Hilbert space contains a subsequence equivalent to an orthogonal basis. If a frame is n-dimensional then this subsequence has
More informationON SPECTRAL CANTOR MEASURES. 1. Introduction
ON SPECTRAL CANTOR MEASURES IZABELLA LABA AND YANG WANG Abstract. A probability measure in R d is called a spectral measure if it has an orthonormal basis consisting of exponentials. In this paper we study
More informationCONSTRUCTIVE PROOF OF THE CARPENTER S THEOREM
CONSTRUCTIVE PROOF OF THE CARPENTER S THEOREM MARCIN BOWNIK AND JOHN JASPER Abstract. We give a constructive proof of Carpenter s Theorem due to Kadison [14, 15]. Unlike the original proof our approach
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More informationFunctional Analysis Review
Outline 9.520: Statistical Learning Theory and Applications February 8, 2010 Outline 1 2 3 4 Vector Space Outline A vector space is a set V with binary operations +: V V V and : R V V such that for all
More informationG-frames in Hilbert Modules Over Pro-C*-algebras
Available online at http://ijim.srbiau.ac.ir/ Int. J. Industrial Mathematics (ISSN 2008-5621) Vol. 9, No. 4, 2017 Article ID IJIM-00744, 9 pages Research Article G-frames in Hilbert Modules Over Pro-C*-algebras
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 14 Sep 2003
arxiv:math/0309236v [math.fa] 4 Sep 2003 RANK-ONE DECOMPOSITION OF OPERATORS AND CONSTRUCTION OF FRAMES KERI A. KORNELSON AND DAVID R. LARSON Abstract. The construction of frames for a Hilbert space H
More informationimplies that if we fix a basis v of V and let M and M be the associated invertible symmetric matrices computing, and, then M = (L L)M and the
Math 395. Geometric approach to signature For the amusement of the reader who knows a tiny bit about groups (enough to know the meaning of a transitive group action on a set), we now provide an alternative
More informationOperators with Closed Range, Pseudo-Inverses, and Perturbation of Frames for a Subspace
Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 42 (1), 1999 pp. 37 45 Operators with Closed Range, Pseudo-Inverses, and Perturbation of Frames for a Subspace Ole Christensen Abstract. Recent work of Ding and Huang shows that
More informationNOTES ON FRAMES. Damir Bakić University of Zagreb. June 6, 2017
NOTES ON FRAMES Damir Bakić University of Zagreb June 6, 017 Contents 1 Unconditional convergence, Riesz bases, and Bessel sequences 1 1.1 Unconditional convergence of series in Banach spaces...............
More informationWAVELETS WITH COMPOSITE DILATIONS
ELECTRONIC RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENTS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Pages 000 000 (Xxxx XX, XXXX S 1079-6762(XX0000-0 WAVELETS WITH COMPOSITE DILATIONS KANGHUI GUO, DEMETRIO LABATE, WANG-Q
More information(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define
Homework, Real Analysis I, Fall, 2010. (1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define ρ(f, g) = 1 0 f(x) g(x) dx. Show that
More informationThe University of Texas at Austin Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. EE381V: Large Scale Learning Spring 2013.
The University of Texas at Austin Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering EE381V: Large Scale Learning Spring 2013 Assignment Two Caramanis/Sanghavi Due: Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013. Computational
More informationCONTINUITY OF SUBADDITIVE PRESSURE FOR SELF-AFFINE SETS
RESEARCH Real Analysis Exchange Vol. 34(2), 2008/2009, pp. 1 16 Kenneth Falconer, Mathematical Institute, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, Scotland. email: kjf@st-and.ac.uk Arron
More informationON THE SIMILARITY OF CENTERED OPERATORS TO CONTRACTIONS. Srdjan Petrović
ON THE SIMILARITY OF CENTERED OPERATORS TO CONTRACTIONS Srdjan Petrović Abstract. In this paper we show that every power bounded operator weighted shift with commuting normal weights is similar to a contraction.
More informationFrame Wavelet Sets in R d
Frame Wavelet Sets in R d X. DAI, Y. DIAO Department of Mathematics University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223 xdai@uncc.edu Q. GU Department of Mathematics Each China Normal University
More informationA DECOMPOSITION OF E 0 -SEMIGROUPS
A DECOMPOSITION OF E 0 -SEMIGROUPS Remus Floricel Abstract. Any E 0 -semigroup of a von Neumann algebra can be uniquely decomposed as the direct sum of an inner E 0 -semigroup and a properly outer E 0
More informationarxiv:math/ v4 [math.oa] 28 Dec 2005
arxiv:math/0506151v4 [math.oa] 28 Dec 2005 TENSOR ALGEBRAS OF C -CORRESPONDENCES AND THEIR C -ENVELOPES. ELIAS G. KATSOULIS AND DAVID W. KRIBS Abstract. We show that the C -envelope of the tensor algebra
More informationReview problems for MA 54, Fall 2004.
Review problems for MA 54, Fall 2004. Below are the review problems for the final. They are mostly homework problems, or very similar. If you are comfortable doing these problems, you should be fine on
More informationConstructive Proof of the Carpenter s Theorem
Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 57 (3), 2014 pp. 463 476 http://dx.doi.org/10.4153/cmb-2013-037-x c Canadian Mathematical Society 2013 Constructive Proof of the Carpenter s Theorem Marcin Bownik and John Jasper
More informationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON CENTER FOR THE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES. Tight compactly supported wavelet frames of arbitrarily high smoothness
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON CENTER FOR THE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES Tight compactly supported wavelet frames of arbitrarily high smoothness Karlheinz Gröchenig Amos Ron Department of Mathematics U-9 University
More informationReal Analysis Problems
Real Analysis Problems Cristian E. Gutiérrez September 14, 29 1 1 CONTINUITY 1 Continuity Problem 1.1 Let r n be the sequence of rational numbers and Prove that f(x) = 1. f is continuous on the irrationals.
More informationSampling and Interpolation on Some Nilpotent Lie Groups
Sampling and Interpolation on Some Nilpotent Lie Groups SEAM 013 Vignon Oussa Bridgewater State University March 013 ignon Oussa (Bridgewater State University)Sampling and Interpolation on Some Nilpotent
More informationWavelets and multiresolution representations. Time meets frequency
Wavelets and multiresolution representations Time meets frequency Time-Frequency resolution Depends on the time-frequency spread of the wavelet atoms Assuming that ψ is centred in t=0 Signal domain + t
More information2 PETER G. CASAZZA, MANUEL T. LEON In this paper we generalize these results to the case where I is replaced by any positive selfadjoint invertible op
FRAMES WITH A GIVEN FRAME OPERATOR PETER G. CASAZZA, MANUEL T. LEON Abstract. Let S be a positive self-adjoint invertible operator on an N-dimensional Hilbert space H N and let M N. We give necessary and
More informationMeans of unitaries, conjugations, and the Friedrichs operator
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 335 (2007) 941 947 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Means of unitaries, conjugations, and the Friedrichs operator Stephan Ramon Garcia Department of Mathematics, Pomona College, Claremont,
More informationMATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES SPECTRAL THEOREM
MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES SPECTRAL THEOREM We present the material in a slightly different order than it is usually done (such as e.g. in the course book). Here we prefer to start out with
More informationCHEBYSHEV INEQUALITIES AND SELF-DUAL CONES
CHEBYSHEV INEQUALITIES AND SELF-DUAL CONES ZDZISŁAW OTACHEL Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science University of Life Sciences in Lublin Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland EMail: zdzislaw.otachel@up.lublin.pl
More informationLecture 7 Multiresolution Analysis
David Walnut Department of Mathematical Sciences George Mason University Fairfax, VA USA Chapman Lectures, Chapman University, Orange, CA Outline Definition of MRA in one dimension Finding the wavelet
More informationSPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS
SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS G. RAMESH Contents Introduction 1 1. Bounded Operators 1 1.3. Examples 3 2. Compact Operators 5 2.1. Properties 6 3. The Spectral Theorem 9 3.3. Self-adjoint
More information9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning
Tel Aviv University, 2015 Functions of real variables 93 9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning 9a Borel-Kolmogorov paradox............. 93 9b Radon-Nikodym theorem.............. 94 9c Conditioning.....................
More informationDISCRETE CDF 9/7 WAVELET TRANSFORM FOR FINITE-LENGTH SIGNALS
DISCRETE CDF 9/7 WAVELET TRANSFORM FOR FINITE-LENGTH SIGNALS D. Černá, V. Finěk Department of Mathematics and Didactics of Mathematics, Technical University in Liberec Abstract Wavelets and a discrete
More informationIn particular, if A is a square matrix and λ is one of its eigenvalues, then we can find a non-zero column vector X with
Appendix: Matrix Estimates and the Perron-Frobenius Theorem. This Appendix will first present some well known estimates. For any m n matrix A = [a ij ] over the real or complex numbers, it will be convenient
More informationUniversity of Missouri Columbia, MO USA
EXISTENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF FINITE FRAMES WITH A GIVEN FRAME OPERATOR PETER G. CASAZZA 1 AND MANUEL T. LEON 2 1 Department of Mathematics University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211 USA e-mail: casazzap@missouri.edu
More informationProblem set 2. Math 212b February 8, 2001 due Feb. 27
Problem set 2 Math 212b February 8, 2001 due Feb. 27 Contents 1 The L 2 Euler operator 1 2 Symplectic vector spaces. 2 2.1 Special kinds of subspaces....................... 3 2.2 Normal forms..............................
More information08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms
(February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops
More information1. General Vector Spaces
1.1. Vector space axioms. 1. General Vector Spaces Definition 1.1. Let V be a nonempty set of objects on which the operations of addition and scalar multiplication are defined. By addition we mean a rule
More informationSpectral theorems for bounded self-adjoint operators on a Hilbert space
Chapter 10 Spectral theorems for bounded self-adjoint operators on a Hilbert space Let H be a Hilbert space. For a bounded operator A : H H its Hilbert space adjoint is an operator A : H H such that Ax,
More informationNORMS ON SPACE OF MATRICES
NORMS ON SPACE OF MATRICES. Operator Norms on Space of linear maps Let A be an n n real matrix and x 0 be a vector in R n. We would like to use the Picard iteration method to solve for the following system
More informationInvariant measures for iterated function systems
ANNALES POLONICI MATHEMATICI LXXV.1(2000) Invariant measures for iterated function systems by Tomasz Szarek (Katowice and Rzeszów) Abstract. A new criterion for the existence of an invariant distribution
More information4 Hilbert spaces. The proof of the Hilbert basis theorem is not mathematics, it is theology. Camille Jordan
The proof of the Hilbert basis theorem is not mathematics, it is theology. Camille Jordan Wir müssen wissen, wir werden wissen. David Hilbert We now continue to study a special class of Banach spaces,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.fa] 28 Dec 2018
DECOMPOSITION OF GAUSSIAN PROCESSES, AND FACTORIZATION OF POSITIVE DEFINITE KERNELS arxiv:1812.10850v1 [math.fa] 28 Dec 2018 PALLE JORGENSEN AND FENG TIAN Abstract. We establish a duality for two factorization
More informationKernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels
Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels 2. Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Kenji Fukumizu The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. Graduate University
More informationFinding eigenvalues for matrices acting on subspaces
Finding eigenvalues for matrices acting on subspaces Jakeniah Christiansen Department of Mathematics and Statistics Calvin College Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Faculty advisor: Prof Todd Kapitula Department
More informationConstruction of Multivariate Compactly Supported Orthonormal Wavelets
Construction of Multivariate Compactly Supported Orthonormal Wavelets Ming-Jun Lai Department of Mathematics The University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602 April 30, 2004 Dedicated to Professor Charles A.
More information1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability Let E R N, let f : E R and let x 0 E. Given a direction v R N, let L be the line through x 0 in the direction v, that is, L :=
More informationA BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO HILBERT SPACE FRAME THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS AMS SHORT COURSE: JOINT MATHEMATICS MEETINGS SAN ANTONIO, 2015 PETER G. CASAZZA Abstract. This is a short introduction to Hilbert
More informationIf Y and Y 0 satisfy (1-2), then Y = Y 0 a.s.
20 6. CONDITIONAL EXPECTATION Having discussed at length the limit theory for sums of independent random variables we will now move on to deal with dependent random variables. An important tool in this
More informationMAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY
MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations
More informationThe Cayley-Hamilton Theorem and the Jordan Decomposition
LECTURE 19 The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem and the Jordan Decomposition Let me begin by summarizing the main results of the last lecture Suppose T is a endomorphism of a vector space V Then T has a minimal
More informationERGODIC AVERAGES FOR INDEPENDENT POLYNOMIALS AND APPLICATIONS
ERGODIC AVERAGES FOR INDEPENDENT POLYNOMIALS AND APPLICATIONS NIKOS FRANTZIKINAKIS AND BRYNA KRA Abstract. Szemerédi s Theorem states that a set of integers with positive upper density contains arbitrarily
More informationReal Variables # 10 : Hilbert Spaces II
randon ehring Real Variables # 0 : Hilbert Spaces II Exercise 20 For any sequence {f n } in H with f n = for all n, there exists f H and a subsequence {f nk } such that for all g H, one has lim (f n k,
More informationTrace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem
Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem Tom Phelan Semester 2 2009 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a self-contained derivation of the celebrated Lidskii Trace
More informationFractal wavelets of Dutkay-Jorgensen type for the Sierpinski gasket space
Fractal wavelets of Dutkay-Jorgensen type for the Sierpinski gasket space Jonas D Andrea, Kathy D. Merrill, and Judith Packer Abstract. Several years ago, D. Dutkay and P. Jorgensen developed the concept
More information4. Ergodicity and mixing
4. Ergodicity and mixing 4. Introduction In the previous lecture we defined what is meant by an invariant measure. In this lecture, we define what is meant by an ergodic measure. The primary motivation
More informationHilbert Spaces. Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space.
Hilbert Spaces Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space. Vector Space. Vector space, ν, over the field of complex numbers,
More informationWAVELET EXPANSIONS OF DISTRIBUTIONS
WAVELET EXPANSIONS OF DISTRIBUTIONS JASSON VINDAS Abstract. These are lecture notes of a talk at the School of Mathematics of the National University of Costa Rica. The aim is to present a wavelet expansion
More informationSemi-orthogonal wavelet frames on positive half-line using the Walsh Fourier transform
NTMSCI 6, No., 175-183 018) 175 New Trends in Mathematical Sciences http://dx.doi.org/10.085/ntmsci.018.83 Semi-orthogonal wavelet frames on positive half-line using the Walsh Fourier transform Abdullah
More information4.2. ORTHOGONALITY 161
4.2. ORTHOGONALITY 161 Definition 4.2.9 An affine space (E, E ) is a Euclidean affine space iff its underlying vector space E is a Euclidean vector space. Given any two points a, b E, we define the distance
More informationWavelets, Multiresolution Analysis and Fast Numerical Algorithms. G. Beylkin 1
A draft of INRIA lectures, May 1991 Wavelets, Multiresolution Analysis Fast Numerical Algorithms G. Beylkin 1 I Introduction These lectures are devoted to fast numerical algorithms their relation to a
More informationFunction spaces on the Koch curve
Function spaces on the Koch curve Maryia Kabanava Mathematical Institute Friedrich Schiller University Jena D-07737 Jena, Germany Abstract We consider two types of Besov spaces on the Koch curve, defined
More informationReal Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Elements of Functional Analysis
Real Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Chapter 5 Elements of Functional Analysis Yung-Hsiang Huang 5.1 Normed Vector Spaces 1. Note for any x, y X and a, b K, x+y x + y and by ax b y x + b a x. 2. It
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ca] 4 Jun 2017
EXCURSIONS ON CANTOR-LIKE SETS ROBERT DIMARTINO AND WILFREDO O. URBINA arxiv:4.70v [math.ca] 4 Jun 07 ABSTRACT. The ternary Cantor set C, constructed by George Cantor in 883, is probably the best known
More informationTHEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515
THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515 Proposition 1 (=comment on page 17). If A is an algebra, then any finite union or finite intersection of sets in A is also in A. Proposition 2 (=Proposition 1.1). For every
More informationTHE KADISON-SINGER PROBLEM AND THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 THE KADISON-SINGER PROBLEM AND THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE PETER G. CASAZZA AND ERIC WEBER Abstract.
More informationThe following definition is fundamental.
1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic
More informationSo reconstruction requires inverting the frame operator which is often difficult or impossible in practice. It follows that for all ϕ H we have
CONSTRUCTING INFINITE TIGHT FRAMES PETER G. CASAZZA, MATT FICKUS, MANUEL LEON AND JANET C. TREMAIN Abstract. For finite and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces H we classify the sequences of positive real
More informationTwo-channel sampling in wavelet subspaces
DOI: 10.1515/auom-2015-0009 An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 23(1),2015, 115 125 Two-channel sampling in wavelet subspaces J.M. Kim and K.H. Kwon Abstract We develop two-channel sampling theory in
More information