NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS. χ(n)n s, Re(s) > 1. Riemann proved that the completed basic zeta function,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS. χ(n)n s, Re(s) > 1. Riemann proved that the completed basic zeta function,"

Transcription

1 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS The basic zeta function is ζ(s) = n 1 n s, Re(s) > 1. Riemann proved that the completed basic zeta function, Z(s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2)ζ(s), Re(s) > 1, has an entire meromorphic continuation that satisfies the functional equation Z(1 s) = Z(s), s C. One of his proofs proceeds by arguing as follows. Poisson summation shows that the theta function, θ(t) = n Z e πin2t, t > 0, is a modular form, θ(1/t) = t 1/2 θ(t). Z is the Mellin transform (essentially a Fourier transform) of θ, Z(s) = 1 s/2 dt 2 (θ(t) 1)t, Re(s) > 1. t t>0 As t the integrand decays rapidly regardless of the value of s, posing no obstacle to the integral s convergence at its improper upper limit of integration. But as t 0 + the integrand is O(t (Re(s) 1)/2 dt/t), requiring Re(s) > 1 for the integral to converge at its improper lower limit. The transformation law for θ shows that in fact Z(s) = 1 2 (θ(t) 1)(t s/2 + t (1 s)/2 ) dt t 1 s 1 1 s. t>1 With the problematic lower limit of integration no longer present, the right side is now sensible as a meromorphic function for all s C, and it visibly satisfies the functional equation. Similar methods apply to any Dirichlet L-function, L(s, χ) = n 1 χ(n)n s, Re(s) > 1. The Dirichlet L-function has a suitable completion Λ(s, χ), Re(s) > 1, involving a factor similar to the factor π s/2 Γ(s/2) for the basic zeta function, but now taking into account the parity and the conductor of χ. Again the completion has a continuation and a functional equation. The calculation now involves a Gauss sum along with the other ingredients, and the functional equation includes a factor called a root number, W (χ)λ(1 s, χ) = Λ(s, χ). 1

2 2 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS If the Dirichlet character is quadratic then the root number W (χ) is 1. Both the basic zeta function and the Dirichlet L-function are defined over the basic number field Q. The technique of completion, continuation, and functional equation apply more generally to the Dedekind zeta function of a number field k, ζ k (s) = a Na s, and even for any L-function associated to a number field k and a so-called Hecke character of k, L k (s, χ) = a χ(a)na s. But the definition of a Hecke character is complicated, and the calculations and the root number become ever more elaborate as the environment grows. As Artin, Iwasawa, Tate, and perhaps others knew around 1950, working in the environment of the adeles simplifies the calculation decisively. In the adelic environment, the definition of a Hecke character is simple and natural, and the root number emerges naturally from local calculations. After defining the adelic zeta integral and looking at some of its local factors, these notes establish a global adelic version of its continuation and functional equation. Strikingly, the procedure is essentially identical to Riemann s original argument. The exposition of this material is based on a presentation and written materials by Paul Garrett. Then the notes continue to discuss the local factors of the zeta integral, following Kudla s lecture in the Introduction to the Langlands Program volume. Part 1. The Zeta Integral 1. Definition of the Zeta Integral Let k be a number field, and let A be its adele ring. Recall that k is discrete in A and the quotient A/k is compact. Let J be the idele group of k. Recall that k is discrete in the unit idele group J 1 and the quotient J 1 /k is compact. (The statement here is Fujisaki s Lemma, encompassing both the structure theorem for the units group of the integers of k and finiteness of the class number of k. The adelic repackaging of those results as Fujisaki s Lemma is optimal for our purposes here.) Let s be a complex parameter, let be a Hecke character of J, and let χ : J C ϕ : A C be an adelic Schwartz function. Let denote the idele norm, and let d denote Haar measure on J. Then the adelic zeta integral associated to χ and ϕ is Z(s, χ, ϕ) = α s χ(α)ϕ(α) d α. J

3 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 3 Here s and χ combine to encode the overall character χ s being integrated against the Schwartz function. Since χ need not be discretely parameterized, the parameters of the zeta integral thus incorporate some redundancy: Z(s + s, χ, ϕ) = Z(s, χ s, ϕ) for all s, s, χ. The integral converges for values of s in a right half-plane. 2. Local Zeta Integrals The Hecke character in the zeta integral decomposes as a product of local characters, χ = χ v : J C. v The assertion that the Schwartz function in the zeta integral decomposes similarly, ϕ = ϕ v, each ϕ v is Schwartz, v is not quite true, since in fact ϕ is a finite sum of such products, but we treat ϕ as a monomial from now on without further comment. For a nonarchimedean place v, the local Schwartz space consists of the compactly supported locally constant functions on k v, and for an archimedean place v the local Schwartz space consists of the smooth functions on k v all of whose derivatives are rapidly decreasing. In consequence of χ and ϕ factoring, the global zeta integral Z(s, χ, ϕ) = α s χ(α)ϕ(α) d α immediately takes the form of an Euler product of local zeta integrals, J Z(s, χ, ϕ) = v where for each place v, Z v (s, χ v, ϕ v ) = k v Z v (s, χ v, ϕ v ) α s vχ v (α)ϕ v (α) d v α. The Euler factorization will play no role in the global continuation and functional equation argument. However, we now examine some local Euler factors Unramified nonarchimedean places. Let v be a finite place of k, and let O v be the ring of integers of k v. With v fixed, freely drop it from the notation. Let the local character have no discretely-parameterized part, χ : k C, χ(α) = α so (for any global Hecke character, this holds at almost all the finite places), and let the local Schwartz function be the characteristic function of the local integers, ϕ : k C, ϕ(α) = 1 O (α). To compute the local integral Z(s) = α s χ(α)ϕ(α) d α, k take a uniformizer (valuation-1 element) ϖ. Thus ϖ = Np 1 where p is the prime ideal of O k corresponding to the place v. Normalize the multiplicative Haar

4 4 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS measure so that O has measure 1. Then the local integral is, allowing a slight abuse of notation at the last step, Z(s) = αη s+so ϕ(αη) d η d α = ϖ l s+so = (1 χ(p)np s ) 1. k /O O Thus the local zeta integral gives an Euler factor of the Hecke L-function at almost all places. And the local Schwartz function is its own Fourier transform, so that at such places there is no need to replace it by its Fourier transform in the local factor of the functional equation. The case of a ramified local character in the nonarchimedean case will be discussed later in the writeup Real archimedean places. Let k v = R. Consider the trivial character and the Gaussian Schwartz function l=0 χ : R C, χ(α) = 1, ϕ : R C, ϕ(α) = e πα2. The local integral is Z(s) = α s ϕ(α) d α = 2 R 0 t s e πt2 dt ( t = π s s ) 2 Γ. 2 This is the familiar archimedean factor from completing the basic zeta function or an even Dirichlet L-function. On the other hand, consider the sign character (which arises as the infinite part of an odd Dirichlet character viewed as a classical Hecke character, for example) and the simplest odd Schwartz function that incorporates the Gaussian, χ : R C, Then the local integral is Z(s) = α s χ(α)ϕ(α) d α = 2 R χ(α) = sgn(α), ϕ : R C, ϕ(α) = αe πα2. 0 t s+1 e πt2 dt t = s+1 π 2 Γ ( s This is the archimedean factor from completing an odd Dirichlet L-function Complex archimedean places. Let k v = C. The unitary characters are ( α ) m χ : C T, χ(α) = where m Z. α The Haar measure is d α = d+ α α 2 r dr dθ = r 2. Note that the change of variable ρ = r 2 gives 2r dr/r 2 = dρ/ρ. If m = 0 then let ϕ(α) = e π α 2. The local integral is Z(s) = α s Cχ(α)ϕ(α) d α = 2π r 2s e r dr πr2 C 0 r 2 = π π s Γ(s). ).

5 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 5 If m > 0 then let ϕ(α) = ᾱ m e π α 2. The local integral is Z(s) = α s Cχ(α)ϕ(α) d α = 2π r 2s+m e πr2 C 0 ( = π π s m 2 Γ s + m ). 2 If m < 0 then let ϕ(α) = α m e π α 2. The local integral is Z(s) = α s Cχ(α)ϕ(α) d α = 2π r 2s m e πr2 C 0 ( = π π s+ m 2 Γ s m ). 2 Thus in all cases, ( m s Z(s) = π π 2 Γ s + m ). 2 A more classical normalization is to multiply the measure by 2/π and to replace e π α 2 by e 2π α 2 in the Schwartz functions. Then in particular when m = 0, the local integral is 2 (2π) s Γ(s), and by Legendre s duplication formula Γ(z)Γ(z + 1/2) = 2 1 2z π 1/2 Γ(2z) this is the product of the even and odd real archimedean factors from a moment ago. The classical normalization fits tidily with the factorization of the Dedekind zeta function of a CM-extension. Part 2. Global Theory This part of the writeup establishes the global continuation and functional equation for the adelic zeta integral. The method is laid out to look similar to Riemann s original argument. 3. Convergence This section shows that the half-zeta integral α s χ(α)ϕ(α) d α α 1 converges for all s C. We may take the Schwartz function to be monomial, ϕ = v ϕ v, since any Schwartz function is a finite sum of such. The Schwartz function decays rapidly, ϕ(α) C ϕ,n sup{ α v v, 1} n, α A, n Z +. v (The product is nontrivial at only finitely many terms, and similarly for products to come in this section except the last one.) Since sup{r, 1} = r 1/2 sup{r 1/2, r 1/2 } for any r > 0, the bounds become (omitting constants from now on) ϕ(α) α n/2 v sup{ α v 1/2 v, α v 1/2 v } n r dr r 2 r dr r 2 = α n/2 v inf{ α v n/2 v, α v n/2 v }, α J, n Z +,

6 6 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS and so furthermore ϕ(α) v inf{ α v n/2 v, α v n/2 v }, α 1, n Z +. We may assume that χ is discretely-parameterized by absorbing its continuous parameter into s. Thus, letting σ = Re(s), α s χ(α)ϕ(α) d α α 1 α σ inf{ α v n/2 v, α v n/2 v } α 1 v α v σ inf{ α v n/2 v, α v n/2 v } d α, n Z +. v k v Each nonarchimedean integral is a sum over Z that converges absolutely in both directions for n > 2 σ. Specifically, it is e 0 qv e(σ+n/2) + qv e(σ n/2) = e>0 1 q n v (1 qv σ n/2 )(1 qv σ n/2 ). The archimedean integrals are similar. Thus for any s the product is dominated by the convergent product for ζ k (σ + n/2)ζ k ( σ + n/2)/ζ k (n) for all sufficiently large n. 4. Elements of Adelic Harmonic Analysis Let T denote the circle group of complex numbers of absolute value 1. Take an adelic additive unitary character that is trivial on k, ψ : A T ψ(k) = 1. The adelic Fourier transform of a Schwartz function ϕ : A C is Fϕ : A C, (Fϕ)(x) = ϕ(y)ψ( xy) dy. Here the Haar measure on A is normalized so that (FFϕ)(x) = ϕ( x). We construct such a character, if only to show that one exists and perhaps to give the reader some grounding. First define an additive unitary character for each rational prime. For a finite prime p of Q the character is e p (x) = exp( 2πix), x Q p, whose meaning and continuity are clear on the dense subset Z[1/p] of Q p and therefore on all of Q p. For the infinite prime of Q the character is e (x) = exp(2πix), x R. Thus p e p(q) = 1, the product including the infinite prime. Now return to the general number field k, and take each local character ψ v to be the trace followed by the corresponding character, ψ v = e p tr kv/q p, v p. A

7 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 7 (Thus the kernel of ψ v is the local inverse different, simply the local integers away from ramification.) The product of the local characters, ψ = v ψ v : A T, is an adelic additive unitary character. Not only does the general adelic additive unitary character decompose as a product of local characters in this fashion, but in fact we will later see that the general adelic additive unitary character can be normalized to this particular ψ. For any Schwartz function ϕ and any idele α, define the dilation ϕ α : A C, ϕ α (x) = ϕ(αx). The relation between the Fourier transforms of the dilation and of the original function is F(ϕ α ) = α 1 A (Fϕ) α 1. To see this, compute (F(ϕ α ))(x) = ϕ α (y)ψ( xy) dy = ϕ(αy)ψ( α 1 xαy) d(αy)/ α A A = α 1 A (Fϕ)(α 1 x). The adelic Poisson summation formula is derived as follows. Given a Schwartz function f : A C, symmetrize to obtain a k-periodic function F : A C, F (x) = k k f(x + k). A The symmetrized function is equal to its Fourier series, F (x) = k k c k (F )ψ(kx), where the kth Fourier coefficient is c k (F ) = F (y)ψ( ky) dy = = A/k f(y + κ)ψ( k(y + κ)) dy A/k κ k A f(y)ψ( ky) dy since ψ is additive and ψ(k) = 1 = (Ff)(k). This gives the Poisson summation formula, (Ff)(k)ψ(kx), k k f(x + k) = k k and especially when x = 0 we have k k f(k) = k k (Ff)(k).

8 8 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS Let A be a topological group (locally compact and countably-based) and B a closed subgroup. The mock-fubini formula is f(α) dα = F (α) dα where F (α) = f(αβ) dβ. A A/B B 5. Continuation and Functional Equation Again, for a Hecke character χ : J C and a Schwartz function ϕ : A C, the associated adelic zeta integral is Z(s, χ, ϕ) = α s χ(α)ϕ(α) d α, J convergent for s in a right half-plane. To establish its analytic continuation and functional equation, begin by defining an adelic theta function, θ ϕ (α) = k k ϕ(αk), α J. The adelic Poisson summation formula and then the formula for the Fourier transform of a dilation give the transformation law for the theta function, θ ϕ (α) = k k ϕ α (k) = k k (F(ϕ α ))(k) = α 1 k k(fϕ) α 1(k) = α 1 θ Fϕ ( α 1 ). A calculation that uses the mock-fubini formula at the first step shows that the theta function contributes to the zeta integral, Z(s, χ, ϕ) = αk s χ(αk)ϕ(αk) d α J/k k k ( ) = α s χ(α) ϕ(αk) ϕ(0) d α J/k k k = α s χ(α) ( θ ϕ (α) ϕ(0) ) d α. J/k The zeta integral splits into two terms. Let S = {α J : α 1}/k, T = {α J : α 1}/k. Then S T = J/k and S T has measure 0, so that Z(s, χ, ϕ) = α s χ(α) ( θ ϕ (α) ϕ(0) ) d α + α s χ(α) ( θ ϕ (α) ϕ(0) ) d α. S T

9 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 9 The transformation law for the theta function shows that the first term of the right side of the previous display is α s χ(α) ( θ ϕ (α) ϕ(0) ) d α (1) S = S α s 1 χ(α) ( θ Fϕ (α 1 ) (Fϕ)(0) ) d α ϕ(0) α s χ(α) d α S + (Fϕ)(0) α s 1 χ(α) d α. And substituting α 1 for α shows that the main term of the right side of (1) is α s 1 χ(α) ( θ Fϕ (α 1 ) (Fϕ)(0) ) d α S = α 1 s χ 1 (α) ( θ Fϕ (α) (Fϕ)(0) ) d α. To study the other two terms of the right side of (1), again use the mock-fubini formula f(α) dα = F (α) dα where F (α) = f(αβ) dβ. A A/B Let A = S, B = J 1 /k, and f(α) = α s χ(α). Then the inner integral is F (α) = αβ s χ(αβ) d β = α s χ(α) χ(β) d β J 1 /k J 1 /k { α s vol(j 1 /k ) if χ = 1, = 0 if χ 1. Here we are using the fact that B is a compact group, although A isn t a group at all. And since A/B = (0, 1], where the map is α α, the nontrivial case of the outer integral is (omitting constants for the moment) S/(J 1 /k ) T α s d α = 1 0 S t s dt t = 1 s. Thus the second term of the right side of (1) is ϕ(0) α s χ(α) d vol(j 1 /k ) ϕ(0) if χ = 1, α = s S 0 if χ 1. Similarly the third term of the right side of (1) is (Fϕ)(0) α s 1 χ(α) d vol(j 1 /k ) (Fϕ)(0) if χ = 1, α = 1 s S 0 if χ 1. B

10 10 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS This analysis gives the desired properties of the zeta integral. If χ = 1 then ( Z(s, 1, ϕ) = α s( θ ϕ (α) ϕ(0) ) + α 1 s( θ Fϕ (α) (Fϕ)(0) )) d α T ( ϕ(0) vol(j 1 /k ) + (Fϕ)(0) ), s 1 s while if χ 1 then the two terms that contribute poles vanish, and so ( Z(s, χ, ϕ) = α s χ(α) ( θ ϕ (α) ϕ(0) ) + α 1 s χ 1 (α) ( θ Fϕ (α) (Fϕ)(0) )) d α. T In both cases, the integral is an entire function of s, as discussed earlier. In either case, the zeta integral Z(s, χ, ϕ) is visibly invariant under the substitution (s, χ, ϕ) (1 s, χ 1, Fϕ). When χ = 1, it is meromorphic with simple poles at s = 0 and s = 1, and when χ 1, it is entire. That is, we have established that Z(s, χ, ϕ) has a continuation to the complex plane, and the continuation satisfies the functional equation Z(s, χ, ϕ) = Z(1 s, χ 1, Fϕ). The continuation of Z(s, χ, ϕ) is analytic when χ 1, and it is meromorphic with simple poles at s = 0 and s = 1 when χ = 1. Later in this writeup we will view the zeta integral as an (s, χ)-parameterized function Z(s, χ) of Schwartz functions ϕ, i.e., as a distribution. From this point of view, the functional equation is Z(s, χ) = FZ(1 s, χ 1 ). This is the version of the functional equation that will be quoted at the very end of the writeup. Part 3. Local Theory Each local factor of the zeta integral can be continued as well. Doing so leads naturally to an L-function and an ε-factor associated to the Hecke character χ. Eventually, combining the local results with the global work produces a continuation and a function equation for the L-function. 6. The Local Zeta Integral We work over a local field F. Thus F is nonarchimedean, or F = R, or F = C. Let S(F ) denote the space of Schwartz functions on F. With F clear in our minds we freely suppress it from the notation, for example writing S rather than S(F ). Let χ : F C be a character, not necessarily unitary. For any Schwartz function ϕ S and for a complex parameter s C, the local zeta integral is formally (not yet discussing convergence) Z(s, χ, ϕ) = ϕ(x)χ(x) x s d x. F

11 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 11 In the archimedean case, the multiplicative Haar measure in the definition is { d dx is Lebesgue measure and x = x x = dx/ x where 2 if F = R, dx is twice Lebesgue measure and x = xx if F = C. In the nonarchimedean case the multiplicative Haar measure is determined up to constant multiple, and soon we will normalize it. 7. Spaces of Distributions Introduce two spaces: The Schwartz functions that vanish to all orders at 0, S 0 = {ϕ S : ϕ (n) (0) = 0 for all n 0}. The Taylor expansions of Schwartz functions at 0, T = { n 0(ϕ (n) (0)/n!)x n : ϕ S}. (If F is nonarchimedean then S 0 is simply the Schwartz functions that vanish at 0, and T = {ϕ(0) : ϕ S} is simply a copy of C.) Then we have a short exact sequence inc 0 S 0 S T 0. Introduce two more spaces: The tempered distributions that are supported at 0, S {0} = {u S : supp(u) {0}}. These are the finite linear combinations δ-derivatives, counting δ as its own zeroth derivative. Note that S {0} = T. The restrictions of tempered distributions to S 0, S = {u : u S }. By the Hahn Banach Theorem, S is all of S 0. The previous short exact sequence dualizes to another, 0 S {0} S res S 0. For any a F, the right-translation operator R a on Schwartz functions ϕ S is defined by the condition (R a ϕ)(x) = ϕ(xa). (Since F is a field, right-translation and left-translation are the same, but the rule R ab = R a R b holds with no reference to commutativity, whereas the general rule for left-translation is L ab = L b L a.) The right-translation operator R a on tempered distributions u S is defined as an adjoint, R a u, ϕ = u, R a 1ϕ. (The inverse ensures that again the rule R ab = R a R b holds with no reference to commutativity.) A tempered distribution u S is an eigendistribution if for some character χ : F C, not necessarily unitary, R a u = χ(a)u for all a F. The eigendistributions having one particular character χ form the eigenspace S (χ).

12 12 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS Let χ : F C be a character, not necessarily unitary. The previous short exact sequence of distributions restricts to eigenspaces, 0 S {0} (χ) S (χ) res S (χ), where now the restriction map need not surject: a χ-eigendistribution on S 0 lifts to a distribution on S, but the lift need not again be a χ-eigendistribution. The first object of the previous sequence is at most one-dimensional. Specifically (letting na stand for nonarchimedean), Cδ = S {0} (χ 0) if F = na, CD k δ = S S {0} = {0} (χ k) where χ k (x) = x k if F = R, k 0 k 0 CD k,l δ = S {0} (χ k,l) where χ k,l (x) = x k x l if F = C. k,l 0 k,l 0 We quote that the third object of the previous sequence is exactly one-dimensional. Specifically, if we let λ χ denote the distribution that integrates against χ over F, λ χ : ϕ ϕ(x)χ(x) d x, F then S (χ) = Cλ χ. Thus the sequence takes various possible forms: F = na, χ χ o : 0 0 S (χ) Cλ χ, F = R, χ χ k : 0 0 S (χ) Cλ χ, F = C, χ χ k,l : 0 0 S (χ) Cλ χ, F = na, χ = χ o : 0 Cδ S (χ o ) Cλ λχo, F = R, χ = χ k : 0 CD k δ S (χ k ) Cλ χk, F = C, χ = χ k,l : 0 CD k,l δ S (χ k,l ) Cλ χk,l. In the first three cases dim(s (χ)) 1, and in the last three dim(s (χ)) 2. The result that we want is: That is: In all cases, dim(s (χ)) = 1. In the first three cases, where S (χ) injects into S (χ), we need to show that it surjects by showing that a lift of λ χ from S (χ) to S lies in S (χ). In the last three cases, where the map from S (χ) to S (χ) has a onedimensional kernel, we need to show that its image is trivial by showing that no lift of λ χ from S (χ) to S lies in S (χ). In sections we will establish the result in the nonarchimedean case modulo the invocation that the right-hand link of the sequence is one-dimensional, meeting some fruitful ideas in the process. Then, introducing Fourier analysis in section 8.1 will give two nonzero basis elements of S (χ) in section 8.2, so that the two must be proportional. The constant of proportionality is the local ε-factor, and we will compute it in sections

13 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS The nonarchimedean unramified case. Now assume that F is nonarchimedean. Let O = the ring of integers of F, P = the maximal ideal of O, ϖ = a generator of P, q = O/P, uϖ e = q e for u O and e Z, d x = multiplicative Haar measure, normalized so that d x = 1. O Consider a complex parameter s C and a character χ : F C. As explained above, the distribution λ, ϕ 0 = Z(s, χ, ϕ 0 ) spans the one-dimensional eigenspace S (χ s ). Since each Schwartz function ϕ 0 S 0 vanishes to all orders at 0, the integral is an entire function of s. However, now consider instead a Schwartz function ϕ from the larger space S rather than from S 0. The local zeta integral remains analytic in s for Re(s) > 0, but for general s we can not immediately take the alleged distribution λ, ϕ = Z(s, χ, ϕ) as a basis element of S (χ s ), or even as an element of S at all. To work around the problem, note that by the nature of nonarchimedean Schwartz functions, ϕ is constant on some neighborhood P e 1 of 0. Thus the related function ϕ 0 = (1 R ϖ 1)ϕ, ϕ 0 (x) = ϕ(x) ϕ(xϖ 1 ) is identically 0 on P e, i.e., ϕ 0 S 0. Consequently, the local zeta integral of the related function, Z(s, χ, ϕ 0 ) = ϕ 0 (x)χ(x) x s d x = λ, ϕ 0 F is entire in s. The distribution µ whose output is this related local zeta integral, µ, ϕ = λ, ϕ 0 = Z(s, χ, ϕ 0 ), lies in S (χ s ), because the preliminary calculation that for a F and ϕ S, (R a 1ϕ) 0 = (1 R ϖ 1)(R a 1ϕ) = R a 1(1 R ϖ 1)ϕ = R a 1(ϕ 0 ), justifies the third equality in the calculation R a µ, ϕ = µ, R a 1ϕ = λ, (R a 1ϕ) 0 = λ, R a 1(ϕ 0 ) = R a λ, ϕ 0 = χ(a) a s λ, ϕ 0 = χ(a) a s µ, ϕ. So we have proved that dim(s (χ s )) 1, provided that µ is not the zero distribution. To show that indeed µ is not the zero distribution, let ϕ o = 1 O be the characteristic function of O, and compute µ, ϕ o = (1 O (x) 1 O (xϖ 1 )χ(x) x s d x = χ(x) d x. F O We are assuming that χ is unramified, and so (recalling that the multiplicative Haar measure of O has been normalized to 1) the result is 1.

14 14 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS No claim is made that the basis element µ lifts the local zeta integral distribution λ from S (χ s )) to S (χ s )). It does not, because in general ϕ 0 ϕ for ϕ S 0. We will see that no such lift is possible for the trivial character, and so in that case µ must be a multiple of the δ distribution. To see that in fact µ is exactly δ, compute that since any given ϕ S is constant on some P e 1 we have µ, ϕ = (ϕ(x) ϕ(xϖ 1 )) d x = (ϕ(x) ϕ(xϖ 1 )) d x F F P e = ϕ(x) d x ϕ(xϖ 1 ) d x = ϕ(ϖ e 1 x) d x F P e F P e O = ϕ(0). That is, µ = δ in the trivial character case as claimed. We will continue the local zeta integral meromorphically to all s C, obtaining a second basis element of S (χ s ) away from the poles of the continuation. The idea is to break the related integral Z(s, χ, ϕ 0 ) into two pieces and recover the original Z(x, χ, ϕ) times a factor. Compute that for Re(s) > 0, ϕ 0 (x)χ(x) x s d x = F ϕ(x)χ(x) x s d x F ϕ(xϖ 1 )χ(x) x s d x F = (1 χ(ϖ)q s )Z(s, χ, ϕ) = L(s, χ) 1 Z(s, χ, ϕ). In terms of distributions, slightly rearranging the previous display gives λ χ s, ϕ = L(s, χ) µ χ s, ϕ, Re(s) > 0. However, the right side of the previous display is the product of an L-factor that is meromorphic in s, and a local zeta integral that is entire in s. Thus we use the right side to continue the left side meromorphically in s, λ χ s, ϕ = L(s, χ) µ χ s, ϕ, s C. And so L(s, χ) is naturally a ratio of two basis-elements of a one-dimensional distribution space, away from poles The nonarchimedean ramified case. If χ is ramified then for any integers m and n with m n, P n P m χ(x) x s d x = m 1 e=n χ(ϖ) e q es O χ(x) d x = 0. It follows that for any ϕ S (which is constant on some neighborhood of 0), the integral ϕ(x)χ(x) x s d x, n 0 F P n is independent of n once n is large enough. That is, the improper integral Z(s, χ, ϕ) = ϕ(x)χ(x) x s d x F

15 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 15 converges. Also, if we specify ϕ o = 1 O χ 1 then Z(s, χ, ϕ o ) = d x = 1, O Thus the distribution λ S, λ, ϕ = Z(s, χ, ϕ) is nonzero and immediately extends from S (χ s ) to S (χ s ). The natural definition of the local L-factor in the ramified case is therefore L(s, χ) = 1. We have now shown that dim(s (χ)) 1 for all χ in the nonarchimedean case, unramified or ramified, and so dim(s (χ)) = 1 for all nontrivial χ in the nonarchimedean case The nonarchimedean trivial case. In the nonarchimedean case, we still need to prove that S (χ o ) is only one-dimensional. Let ϕ denote a generic Schwartz function. Recall the first short exact sequence from earlier, now augmented by a left inverse of its inclusion map, inc 0 S 0 S T 0. 1 (0)1 O Here 1 (0)1 O denotes the map from S to S 0 that takes any ϕ to ϕ ϕ(0)1 O, and so (1 (0)1 O ) inc = 1 on S 0. As before, dualize and quote the Hahn Banach Theorem to get a second short exact sequence, now augmented by a right inverse of its restriction map, 0 S {0} S res S S 0 (1 (0)1O ) where res (1 (0)1 O ) = 1 on S. Let λ = λ χo S (χ o ) be the basic integration distribution on S 0, λ, ϕ 0 = ϕ 0 (x) d x, ϕ 0 S 0, F and let λ S denote the corresponding lift from the sequence, That is to say, λ = (1 (0)1 O ) λ S. λ, ϕ = λ, ϕ ϕ(0)1 O, ϕ S. The general lift of λ to S is λ + cδ where c C. We want to show that: No lift of λ to S is F -invariant. But δ is F -invariant, and so it suffices to show that the particular lift λ is not F -invariant. Compute that for any a F and any ϕ S, R a λ, ϕ = λ, Ra 1ϕ = λ, R a 1ϕ (R a 1ϕ)(0)1 O = λ, R a 1ϕ ϕ(0)1 O (showing by a small exercise that R a λ is again a lift of λ), and in particular for a = 1, λ, ϕ = λ, ϕ ϕ(0)1 O ). 0

16 16 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS Thus (noting that if ϕ S then (1 R a 1)ϕ S 0 ) ( (1 R a ) λ, ϕ = λ, (1 R a 1)ϕ = ϕ(x) ϕ(xa 1 ) ) d x. F The integral is in general nonzero. For example, choose ϕ = 1 O to get (the last equality in the display to follow is an exercise) ( (1 R a ) λ, 1 O = 1O (x) 1 O (xa 1 ) ) d x = ord(a). F The calculation has shown that R a λ = λ ord(a)δ. That is, { λ, δ} is the basis of a two-dimensional F -representation with the action given by ] [ ] ] [ λ 1 ord(a) [ λ R a =. δ 0 1 δ Unlike finite-group representations, this representation is not semisimple: the subrepresentation spanned by δ does not have a complement. The proof that dim(s (χ)) = 1 for all χ in the nonarchimedean case is complete. 8. The Local Functional Equation 8.1. Additive characters. Consider a particular nontrivial unitary character ψ : F T. That is, ψ(x + x ) = ψ(x)ψ(x ), x, x F, and the outputs of ψ are complex values of absolute value 1. We refer to such a character simply as additive. One choice of the particular character is ψ = exp 2πi Tr F/Qp, but this choice is not necessarily the optimal normalization; for our purposes its role is to show that there are any additive characters at all. From now on, let ψ denote some fixed additive character of F, but it need not yet be normalized in any particular way. With ψ in place, define the Fourier transform on Schwartz functions, F : S S, (Fϕ)(ξ) = ϕ(t)ψ(ξt) dt. We understand the measure to be normalized so that it is self-dual, meaning that FF = R 1, i.e., (FFϕ)(x) = ϕ( x) for all ϕ S and x F. The question of how to normalize the measure to produce the desired self-duality will be discussed soon. We remark for future reference that for any a F (exercise), FR a 1 = a R a F (equality of operators on S), so that consequently (exercise the next display is not a trivial rewrite of the previous one) R a F = a FR a 1 (equality of operators on S ). We invoke that any nontrivial additive character ψ of F is a dilation of the given one. That is, for some a F, ψ = ψ a where ψ a = ψ a. F

17 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 17 We want to choose c R + such that the scaled measure d = c d is self dual with respect to ψ, granting that d is self-dual with respect to ψ. Compute first that (exercise) F1 O = cr a 1 O, and then second that consequently (check the steps) F F1 O = c FR a 1 O = c a 1 R a 1 F1O = c 2 a 1 R a 1R a 1 O = c 2 a 1 1 O, so that the right choice is c = a 1/2. The conductor ν(ψ) of ψ is the negative of the exponent of the largest (as a set) P-power where ψ is trivial, ψ = 1 on P ν(ψ) but not on P (ν(ψ)+1). That is, the characterizing description of the conductor is ψ = 1 on P e if and only if e ν(ψ). (The P-powers form a basis of open neighborhoods of 0 in F along with being subgroups.) It is an exercise to show that if the Schwartz function ϕ is a function on P n /P m then its Fourier transform Fϕ is a function on P m ν /P n ν where ν = ν(ψ). Given the conductor of ψ, we use the characterizing condition to determine the conductor of ψ a for any a F. For any e Z, ψ a (P e ) = ψ(p (e ord(a)) ), so that ψ a = 1 on P e if and only if ψ = 1 on P (e ord(a)) ), which in turn holds if and only if e ord(a) ν(ψ), i.e., if and only if e ν(ψ) + ord(a). That is, by the characterizing condition, ν(ψ a ) = ν(ψ) + ord(a). By choosing a suitably, we may replace our basic character by a dilation and then assume that the basic additive character has conductor 0, i.e., it is trivial on O but not on P 1. Granting that the basic additive character has conductor 0, the Fourier transform of the characteristic function of the integers is { µ(o) if ψ is trivial on ξo, (F1 O )(ξ) = 1 O (t)ψ ξ (t) dt = ψ ξ (t) dt = 0 otherwise. F O Since ψ has conductor 0, the calculation shows that F1 O = µ(o)1 O, and so we normalize the additive measure by specifying µ(o) = 1. Now F1 O = 1 O, and consequently FF1 O = 1 O = R 1 O. For any ψ, the Fourier inversion condition that FF = R 1 holds for exactly one normalization of the Haar measure. So in particular, when ψ has conductor 0, the relevant Haar measure is our normalization µ(o) = 1. And more generally, when ψ has conductor ν (so that ψ = ψϖ o where ν ψo is an additive character of conductor 0), the Haar measure is normalized by the condition µ(o) = ϖ ν 1/2 = q ν/2.

18 18 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 8.2. The local functional equation. Lemma 3.6 in Kudla states that For the proof, recall that µ S (χ) = Fµ S (χ 1 ). FR a 1 = a R a F (equality of operators on S), R a F = a FR a 1 (equality of operators on S ). The lemma follows from computing that for any a F and ϕ S, R a Fµ, ϕ = a FR a 1µ, ϕ = a R a 1µ, Fϕ = χ 1 (a) a µ, Fϕ = χ 1 (a) a Fµ, ϕ. Recall that for any χ and s, the space S (χ s ) is spanned by µ χ s, where µ χ s, ϕ = ((1 R ϖ 1)ϕ)(x)χ(x) x s d x, F For any χ and s, replace χ by χ 1 1 s in the lemma to get that Fµ χ 1 1 s S (χ s ) = Cµ χ s. That is, since the Fourier transform is an isometry and hence doesn t kill µ χ 1 1 s, Fµ χ 1 1 s = ε(s, χ, ψ)µ χ s for some ε(s, χ, ψ) C Pre-normalizing the ε-factor calculation. For any s C, χ s is ramified if and only if χ is ramified, because s = 1 on O. Consequently the basic function ϕ o from earlier, taken to 1 by µ, is the same for µ χ s as it is for µ χ. Specifically, it is { ϕ o 1 O if χ is unramified, = 1 O χ 1 if χ is ramified. Apply the relation from the end of the previous section, ε(s, χ, ψ)µ χ s = Fµ χ 1 1 s, to the basic function, giving a formula for the local ε-factor, (2) ε(s, χ, ψ) = µ χ 1 1 s, Fϕo. We will show that: To compute ε(s, χ, ψ) we may assume that χ is unitary. To see this, apply (2) twice to get ε(s, χ t, ψ) = µ χ 1 t 1 s, Fϕo = µ χ 1 1 s t, χ, Fϕo = ε(s + t, χ, ψ). Thus we may assume that χ is unitary, as desired. Next we show that: To compute ε(s, χ, ψ) we may assume that ψ is normalized.

19 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 19 Fix any a F, and let ψ = ψ a. Recall that if the measure dx is self-dual with respect to ψ then a 1/2 dx is self dual with respect to ψ. Use (2) with ψ in place of ψ, and then at the end of the calculation use (2) again with the original ψ, ε(s, χ, ψ a ) = µ χ 1 1 s, Fϕ o = a 1/2 µ χ 1 1 s, R afϕ o = a 1/2 R a 1µ χ 1 1 s, Fϕo = a 1/2 a s 1 χ(a) µ χ 1 1 s, Fϕo = a s 1/2 χ(a)ε(s, χ, ψ). Thus we may assume that ψ is normalized, as desired The ε-factor calculation. From the previous section, we have the formula for ε(s, χ, ψ) (3) ε(s, χ, ψ) = µ χ 1 1 s, Fϕo and the reduction identity ε(s, χ, ψ a ) = a s 1/2 χ(a)ε(s, χ, ψ). If χ is unramified then first take ψ normalized to have conductor 0. As discussed, we then have F1 O = 1 O, and so (3) becomes ε(s, χ, ψ) = µ χ 1 1 s, 1 O = 1. Combine the reduction identity with the previous display to obtain for any a F, ε(s, χ, ψ a ) = a s 1/2 χ(a). The additive character ψ a has conductor ν = ord(a), so rewrite the previous display, now letting ψ denote a general additive character of conductor ν, ε(s, χ, ψ) = q (1/2 s)ν χ(ϖ ν ), F = na, χ unramified. If χ is ramified then its conductor c = c(χ) Z + is defined as the exponent of the largest (as a set) P-power such that χ is trivial on that P-power translate about 1, χ = 1 on 1 + P c(χ) but not on 1 + P c(χ) 1. (The P-power translates about 1 form a basis of open neighborhoods of 1 in F along with being subgroups.) Let c Z + denote the conductor of χ, and assume first that ψ has conductor 0. The basic function ϕ o = 1 O χ 1 is a function on O/P c, and so its Fourier transform Fϕ o is a function on P c /O. In particular, (Fϕ o )(ξ) = 0 if ord(ξ) < c. Next we show that also (Fϕ o )(ξ) = 0 if ord(ξ) > c. The Fourier transform is (Fϕ o )(ξ) = χ 1 (t)ψ ξ (t) dt. O If c = 1 then ord(ξ) 0 and so ψ ξ is trivial on O ; but χ 1 is nontrivial on O, and so the previous display shows that (Fϕ o )(ξ) = 0. (Since χ 1 is a multiplicative character but the integral involves additive Haar measure, we can not merely quote the result that the integral of a nontrivial character over a compact group vanishes until we realize that the additive Haar measure is also multiplicative Haar measure on the unit group.) If c > 1 then we have a natural isomorphism between a

20 20 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS multiplicative group of additive cosets and a multiplicative group of multiplicative cosets, Consequently (O/P c 1 ) (Fϕ o )(ξ) = = O /(1 + P c 1 ), u + P c 1 u(1 + O c 1 ). u (O/P c 1 ) u (O/P c 1 ) χ 1 (u(1 + t))ψ ξ (u + t) dt P c 1 χ 1 (u)ψ ξ (u) χ 1 (1 + t)ψ ξ (t) dt. P c 1 But ψ ξ is trivial on P c 1 and χ 1 is nontrivial on 1 + P c 1, and so the integral is 0, again because we are integrating over a compact subgroup of the unit group, so that the additive Haar measure is also multiplicative. The remaining case is ξ = uϖ c where u O. The Fourier transform is (Fϕ o )(ξ) = χ 1 (t)ψ uϖ c(t) dt O = χ(u) χ 1 (ut)ψ ϖ c(ut) d(ut) O = χ(ϖ c ξ) χ 1 (t)ψ(ϖ c t) dt. O Rewrite the previous display as (Fϕ o )(ξ) = χ(ϖ c ξ)q c/2 τ(χ, ψ), where τ(χ, ψ) is the normalized Gauss sum, τ(χ, ψ) = q c/2 O χ 1 (t)ψ(ϖ c t) dt. (To see that the normalization is correct, compute that the square of the modulus of the integral is χ 1 (t)χ 1 (t )ψ(ϖ c (t t )) dt dt O O = χ 1 (t)χ 1 (tt )ψ(ϖ c (1 t )t) dt dt O O = χ 1 (t ) ψ(ϖ c (1 t )t) dt dt O O = χ 1 (t ) ψ(ϖ c (1 t )t) dt dt O O χ 1 (t ) ψ(ϖ c (1 t )t) dt dt. O P The first inner integral vanishes unless 1 t P c, in which case it is µ(o) = 1, and then the outer integral is µ(1 + P c ) = µ(p c ) = q c. So overall the first double integral is q c. The second double integral is similar except that now the inner integral vanishes unless 1 t P c 1, in which case the outer integral vanishes. Thus the modulus of the integral is q c/2 as desired.) Now we have (Fϕ o )(ξ) = q c/2 τ(χ, ψ)ϕ o (ϖ c ξ).

21 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS 21 And ϕ o is the basic function for χ 1. Consequently the formula (3) for ε gives ε(s, χ, ψ) = q c/2 τ(χ, ψ) µ χ 1 1 s, R ϖ cϕo = q c/2 τ(χ, ψ) R ϖ cµ χ 1 1 s, ϕo = q c/2 τ(χ, ψ)χ 1 (ϖ c ) ϖ c 1 s µ χ 1 1 s, ϕo = q c/2 τ(χ, ψ)χ(ϖ c )q (1 s)c = q (1/2 s)c τ(χ, ψ)χ(ϖ c ). So far the calculation has assumed that ψ has conductor 0. The general case is ψ = ψϖ o where ν ψo has conductor 0. By the second reduction identity, ε(s, χ, ψ) = q (1/2 s)ν χ(ϖ ν )q (1/2 s)c τ(χ, ψ o )χ(ϖ c ) = q (1/2 s)(c+ν) χ(ϖ c+ν )τ(χ, ψ o ). To express the Gauss sum in terms of ψ rather than ψ o, compute τ(χ, ψ o ) = q c/2 O χ 1 (t)ψ o (ϖ c t) d o t = q 1/2(c+ν) O χ 1 (t)ψ ϖ ν (ϖ c t) dt = q 1/2(c+ν) O χ 1 (t)ψ(ϖ c ν t) dt, and so the more general definition of the normalized Gauss sum is In sum, τ(χ, ψ) = q 1/2(c+ν) O χ 1 (t)ψ(ϖ c ν t) dt. ε(s, χ, ψ) = q (1/2 s)(c+ν) τ(χ, ψ)χ(ϖ c+ν ), F = na, χ ramified. 9. The Global ε-factor Fix an archimedean place v. We have shown that the local ε-factor is where τ v (χ v, ψ v ) = ε v (s, χ v, ψ v ) = q v (1/2 s)(cv+νv) τ v (χ v, ψ v )χ v (ϖv cv+νv ), q v = O/P, ϖ v = a generator of P F v, c v = the conductor of χ v, ν v = the conductor of ψ v, { 1 χv unramified, q 1/2(cv+νv) v q 1/2(c+ν) O v χ 1 v (t)ψ v (ϖv cv νv t) dt χ v ramified. Replace ψ by ψ a where a k. At each nonarchimedean place we have from before, ε v (s, χ v, ψ v,a ) = a s 1/2 v χ v (a v )ε v (s, χ v, ψ v ).

22 22 NUMBER FIELD ZETA INTEGRALS AND L-FUNCTIONS Assuming that the same formula holds for archimedean places, the global product of the local ε-factors is independent of ψ, and so it is written ε(s, χ) = v ε v (s, χ v, ψ v ). Part 4. The Final Calculation To set up the final calculation, define Λ(s, χ) = v L v (s, χ v ), Z o (s, χ) = v Z o,v (s, χ v ), Z(s, χ) = v Z v (s, χ v ). Then Λ(s, χ)z o (s, χ) = Z(s, χ) multiplying together each Z v = (FZ)(1 s, χ 1 ) by the global functional equation = v = v = v (FZ v )(1 s, χ 1 v ) decomposing FZ L v (1 s, χ 1 v )(FZ o,v )(1 s, χ 1 v ) factoring each FZ v L v (1 s, χ 1 v )ε v (s, χ v, ψ v )Z o,v (s, χ v ) by the local functional equations = Λ(1 s, χ 1 )ε(s, χ)z o (s, χ) assembling Λ, ε, and Z o. Therefore Λ(s, χ) = ε(s, χ)λ(1 s, χ 1 ). Part 5. Application: Quadratic ε-factors are Trivial Let k be a quadratic number field, and let χ be its character. Note that χ 1 = χ. Compute that Z k (1 s) = Z k (s) = Z Q (s)λ Q (s, χ) = Z Q (1 s)ε(s, χ)λ Q (1 s, χ) = ε(s, χ)z k (1 s). Thus ε(s, χ) = 1. This result encompasses the value of the quadratic Gauss sum.

Lecture Notes: Tate s thesis

Lecture Notes: Tate s thesis Lecture Notes: Tate s thesis September 9, 2 Motivation To prove the analytic continuation of the Riemann zeta function (85), we start with the Gamma function: Γ(s) Substitute: Γ(s/2) And now put πn 2 x

More information

Introduction to L-functions I: Tate s Thesis

Introduction to L-functions I: Tate s Thesis Introduction to L-functions I: Tate s Thesis References: - J. Tate, Fourier analysis in number fields and Hecke s zeta functions, in Algebraic Number Theory, edited by Cassels and Frohlich. - S. Kudla,

More information

Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation

Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation (December 19, 010 Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ I show that over global fields k (characteristic not the quadratic norm residue symbol

More information

Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation

Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation (September 17, 010) Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ I show that over global fields (characteristic not ) the quadratic norm residue

More information

FOURIER INVERSION. an additive character in each of its arguments. The Fourier transform of f is

FOURIER INVERSION. an additive character in each of its arguments. The Fourier transform of f is FOURIER INVERSION 1. The Fourier Transform and the Inverse Fourier Transform Consider functions f, g : R n C, and consider the bilinear, symmetric function ψ : R n R n C, ψ(, ) = ep(2πi ), an additive

More information

Hecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands

Hecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands Hecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands S. M.-C. 18 October 2016 Today we re going to be associating L-functions to automorphic things and discussing their L-function-y properties, i.e. analytic continuation

More information

NOTES ON TATE S THESIS

NOTES ON TATE S THESIS NOTES ON TATE S THESIS YICHAO TIAN The aim of this short note is to explain Tate s thesis [Ta50] on the harmonic analysis on Adèles and Idèles, the functional equations of Dedekind Zeta functions and Hecke

More information

17 The functional equation

17 The functional equation 18.785 Number theory I Fall 16 Lecture #17 11/8/16 17 The functional equation In the previous lecture we proved that the iemann zeta function ζ(s) has an Euler product and an analytic continuation to the

More information

Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group. and by the product formula it lies in the kernel (A K )1 of the continuous idelic norm

Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group. and by the product formula it lies in the kernel (A K )1 of the continuous idelic norm Math 676. A compactness theorem for the idele group 1. Introduction Let K be a global field, so K is naturally a discrete subgroup of the idele group A K and by the product formula it lies in the kernel

More information

Factorization of zeta-functions, reciprocity laws, non-vanishing

Factorization of zeta-functions, reciprocity laws, non-vanishing (January, 0 Factorization of zeta-functions, reciprocity laws, non-vanishing Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/. Gaussian integers o Z[i]. Eisenstein integers o Z[ω] 3.

More information

18 The analytic class number formula

18 The analytic class number formula 18.785 Number theory I Lecture #18 Fall 2015 11/12/2015 18 The analytic class number formula The following theorem is usually attributed to Dirichlet, although he originally proved it only for quadratic

More information

Galois Representations

Galois Representations 9 Galois Representations This book has explained the idea that all elliptic curves over Q arise from modular forms. Chapters 1 and introduced elliptic curves and modular curves as Riemann surfaces, and

More information

AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations.

AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations. AHAHA: Preliminary results on p-adic groups and their representations. Nate Harman September 16, 2014 1 Introduction and motivation Let k be a locally compact non-discrete field with non-archimedean valuation

More information

Tate s thesis and arithmetic zeta functions

Tate s thesis and arithmetic zeta functions Tate s thesis and arithmetic zeta functions UROP+ Final Paper, Summer 208 Avi Zeff Mentor: Chun Hong Lo August 3, 208 Abstract This paper is a mostly expository account of zeta functions in number theory.

More information

OVERVIEW OF TATE S THESIS

OVERVIEW OF TATE S THESIS OVERVIEW O TATE S THESIS ALEX MINE Abstract. This paper gies an oeriew of the main idea of John Tate s 1950 PhD thesis. I will explain the methods he used without going into too much technical detail.

More information

then it is called a non-archimedean absolute value. If condition (1.1.2) fails for some x, y F, then is called an archimedean absolute value.

then it is called a non-archimedean absolute value. If condition (1.1.2) fails for some x, y F, then is called an archimedean absolute value. CHAPTER I ADELES OVER Q 1.1 Absolute values Definition 1.1.1 (Absolute value) An absolute value on a field F is a nonnegative real valued function on F which satisfies the conditions: (i) x = 0 if and

More information

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms (February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops

More information

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring

Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring Qualifying Exams I, 2014 Spring 1. (Algebra) Let k = F q be a finite field with q elements. Count the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree 12 over k. 2. (Algebraic Geometry) (a) Show that

More information

Abelian topological groups and (A/k) k. 1. Compact-discrete duality

Abelian topological groups and (A/k) k. 1. Compact-discrete duality (December 21, 2010) Abelian topological groups and (A/k) k Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ 1. Compact-discrete duality 2. (A/k) k 3. Appendix: compact-open topology

More information

8 Complete fields and valuation rings

8 Complete fields and valuation rings 18.785 Number theory I Fall 2017 Lecture #8 10/02/2017 8 Complete fields and valuation rings In order to make further progress in our investigation of finite extensions L/K of the fraction field K of a

More information

We start with a simple result from Fourier analysis. Given a function f : [0, 1] C, we define the Fourier coefficients of f by

We start with a simple result from Fourier analysis. Given a function f : [0, 1] C, we define the Fourier coefficients of f by Chapter 9 The functional equation for the Riemann zeta function We will eventually deduce a functional equation, relating ζ(s to ζ( s. There are various methods to derive this functional equation, see

More information

CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK Motivation

CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK Motivation CLASS FIELD THEORY WEEK 1 JAVIER FRESÁN 1. Motivation In a 1640 letter to Mersenne, Fermat proved the following: Theorem 1.1 (Fermat). A prime number p distinct from 2 is a sum of two squares if and only

More information

1 The functional equation for ζ

1 The functional equation for ζ 18.785: Analytic Number Theory, MIT, spring 27 (K.S. Kedlaya) The functional equation for the Riemann zeta function In this unit, we establish the functional equation property for the Riemann zeta function,

More information

Here we used the multiindex notation:

Here we used the multiindex notation: Mathematics Department Stanford University Math 51H Distributions Distributions first arose in solving partial differential equations by duality arguments; a later related benefit was that one could always

More information

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016 1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 W2016 1.1 Homework 1. Due Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Notation 1.1 Let U be any set, g be a positive function on U, Y be a normed space. For any f : U Y let

More information

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory How small can disc(k) be for a number field K of degree n = r 1 + 2r 2?

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory How small can disc(k) be for a number field K of degree n = r 1 + 2r 2? Math 59: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory How small can disck be for a number field K of degree n = r + r? Let K be a number field of degree n = r + r, where as usual r and r are respectively the

More information

CHARACTERS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS (SHORT VERSION)

CHARACTERS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS (SHORT VERSION) CHARACTERS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS (SHORT VERSION) KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The theme we will study is an analogue on finite abelian groups of Fourier analysis on R. A Fourier series on the real line

More information

AUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I

AUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I AUTOMORPHIC FORMS NOTES, PART I DANIEL LITT The goal of these notes are to take the classical theory of modular/automorphic forms on the upper half plane and reinterpret them, first in terms L 2 (Γ \ SL(2,

More information

Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett garrett/

Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett   garrett/ (February 19, 2005) Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ The result sketched here is of fundamental importance in

More information

COUNTING MOD l SOLUTIONS VIA MODULAR FORMS

COUNTING MOD l SOLUTIONS VIA MODULAR FORMS COUNTING MOD l SOLUTIONS VIA MODULAR FORMS EDRAY GOINS AND L. J. P. KILFORD Abstract. [Something here] Contents 1. Introduction 1. Galois Representations as Generating Functions 1.1. Permutation Representation

More information

Local Compactness and Number Theory. Sam Mundy

Local Compactness and Number Theory. Sam Mundy Local Compactness and Number Theory Sam Mundy May 1, 2015 i Introduction The present document is a slightly expanded version of a series of lectures I gave at the University of New Mexico in the spring

More information

Representations of moderate growth Paul Garrett 1. Constructing norms on groups

Representations of moderate growth Paul Garrett 1. Constructing norms on groups (December 31, 2004) Representations of moderate growth Paul Garrett Representations of reductive real Lie groups on Banach spaces, and on the smooth vectors in Banach space representations,

More information

On Artin s L-Functions*

On Artin s L-Functions* On Artin s L-Functions* by R.P. Langlands The nonabelian Artin L-functions and their generalizations by Weil are known to be meromorphic in the whole complex plane and to satisfy a functional equation

More information

15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem

15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem 15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem Let q > 3 be a prime (and later p will be a prime which has no relation which q). Suppose that there exists a non-trivial integral solution to the Diophantine

More information

The Langlands Program: Beyond Endoscopy

The Langlands Program: Beyond Endoscopy The Langlands Program: Beyond Endoscopy Oscar E. González 1, oscar.gonzalez3@upr.edu Kevin Kwan 2, kevinkwanch@gmail.com 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras. 2 Department

More information

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2. Sep. 1 0, 008 Distributions Distributions are generalized functions. Some familiarity with the theory of distributions helps understanding of various function spaces which play important roles in the study

More information

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations

More information

arxiv: v2 [math.nt] 1 May 2015

arxiv: v2 [math.nt] 1 May 2015 TWISTING ORMULA O EPSILON ACTORS SAZZAD ALI BISWAS Abstract. or characters of a nonarchimedean local field we have explicit formula for epsilon factor. But in general we do not have any generalized twisting

More information

Algebraic Number Theory Notes: Local Fields

Algebraic Number Theory Notes: Local Fields Algebraic Number Theory Notes: Local Fields Sam Mundy These notes are meant to serve as quick introduction to local fields, in a way which does not pass through general global fields. Here all topological

More information

TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY - EXERCISE SHEET I. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY - EXERCISE SHEET I. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY - EXERCISE SHEET I École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Exercise Non-vanishing of Dirichlet L-functions on the line Rs) = ) Let q and let χ be a Dirichlet character modulo q.

More information

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS Sairaiji, F. Osaka J. Math. 39 (00), 3 43 FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS FUMIO SAIRAIJI (Received March 4, 000) 1. Introduction Let be an elliptic curve over Q. We denote by ˆ

More information

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract Smith theory Andrew Putman Abstract We discuss theorems of P. Smith and Floyd connecting the cohomology of a simplicial complex equipped with an action of a finite p-group to the cohomology of its fixed

More information

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS JOHN VOIGHT Below are some questions that I have asked on oral qualifying exams (starting in fall 2015). 1.1. Core questions. 1. Algebra (1) Let R be a noetherian (commutative)

More information

2. Function spaces and approximation

2. Function spaces and approximation 2.1 2. Function spaces and approximation 2.1. The space of test functions. Notation and prerequisites are collected in Appendix A. Let Ω be an open subset of R n. The space C0 (Ω), consisting of the C

More information

1, for s = σ + it where σ, t R and σ > 1

1, for s = σ + it where σ, t R and σ > 1 DIRICHLET L-FUNCTIONS AND DEDEKIND ζ-functions FRIMPONG A. BAIDOO Abstract. We begin by introducing Dirichlet L-functions which we use to prove Dirichlet s theorem on arithmetic progressions. From there,

More information

1. Pseudo-Eisenstein series

1. Pseudo-Eisenstein series (January 4, 202) Spectral Theory for SL 2 (Z)\SL 2 (R)/SO 2 (R) Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Pseudo-Eisenstein series Fourier-Laplace-Mellin transforms Recollection

More information

Traces, Cauchy identity, Schur polynomials

Traces, Cauchy identity, Schur polynomials June 28, 20 Traces, Cauchy identity, Schur polynomials Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/. Example: GL 2 2. GL n C and Un 3. Decomposing holomorphic polynomials over GL

More information

WHITTAKER NEWFORMS FOR LOCAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2)

WHITTAKER NEWFORMS FOR LOCAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2) WHITTAKER NEWFORMS FOR LOCAL REPRESENTATIONS OF GL(2 ALEXANDRU A. POPA Abstract. In this note, we present a complete theory of Whittaker newforms for local representations π of GL(2, which are functions

More information

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Primes in arithmetic progressions: Dirichlet characters and L-functions

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Primes in arithmetic progressions: Dirichlet characters and L-functions Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Primes in arithmetic progressions: Dirichlet characters and L-functions Dirichlet extended Euler s analysis from π(x) to π(x, a mod q) := #{p x : p is a

More information

SPRING 2006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS

SPRING 2006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS SPRING 006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS 1A. Let G be the subgroup of the free abelian group Z 4 consisting of all integer vectors (x, y, z, w) such that x + 3y + 5z + 7w = 0. (a) Determine a linearly

More information

p-adic fields Chapter 7

p-adic fields Chapter 7 Chapter 7 p-adic fields In this chapter, we study completions of number fields, and their ramification (in particular in the Galois case). We then look at extensions of the p-adic numbers Q p and classify

More information

Bernstein s analytic continuation of complex powers

Bernstein s analytic continuation of complex powers (April 3, 20) Bernstein s analytic continuation of complex powers Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/. Analytic continuation of distributions 2. Statement of the theorems

More information

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X. Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2

More information

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems 12.1.2. Let M be a module over the integral domain R. (a) Assume that M has rank n and that x 1,..., x n is any maximal set of linearly independent elements

More information

MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA

MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA For ω, consider an integral of the form I(ω) = e iωf(x) u(x) dx, where u Cc (R n ) complex valued, with support in a compact set K, and f C (R n ) real valued. Thus, I(ω)

More information

Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #6

Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #6 18.785 Number Theory Fall 2016 Problem Set #6 Description These problems are related to the material covered in Lectures 10-12. Your solutions are to be written up in latex (you can use the latex source

More information

Math 210C. The representation ring

Math 210C. The representation ring Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let

More information

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2.

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2. ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 27: SOLUTIONS Problem. Determine, with justification, the it cos(nx) n 2 x 2 dx. Solution. For an integer n >, define g n : (, ) R by Also define g : (, ) R by g(x) = g n

More information

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C :

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C : TOEPLITZ OPERATORS EFTON PARK 1. Introduction to Toeplitz Operators Otto Toeplitz lived from 1881-1940 in Goettingen, and it was pretty rough there, so he eventually went to Palestine and eventually contracted

More information

Transition: Eisenstein series on adele groups. 1. Moving automorphic forms from domains to groups

Transition: Eisenstein series on adele groups. 1. Moving automorphic forms from domains to groups May 8, 26 Transition: Eisenstein series on adele groups Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/mfms/notes 23-4/2 2 transition

More information

Theorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.

Theorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u. 5. Fields 5.1. Field extensions. Let F E be a subfield of the field E. We also describe this situation by saying that E is an extension field of F, and we write E/F to express this fact. If E/F is a field

More information

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative This chapter is another review of standard material in complex analysis. See for instance

More information

A correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire

A correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire A correction to Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire Hervé Jacquet December 5, 2011 Nadir Matringe has indicated to me that the paper Conducteur des Représentations du groupe linéaire ([JPSS81a],

More information

MA257: INTRODUCTION TO NUMBER THEORY LECTURE NOTES

MA257: INTRODUCTION TO NUMBER THEORY LECTURE NOTES MA257: INTRODUCTION TO NUMBER THEORY LECTURE NOTES 2018 57 5. p-adic Numbers 5.1. Motivating examples. We all know that 2 is irrational, so that 2 is not a square in the rational field Q, but that we can

More information

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients. EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) EYAL GOREN, MCGILL UNIVERSITY, FALL 2007 (1) We define a (full) lattice L in R n to be a discrete subgroup of R n that contains a basis for R n. Prove that L is

More information

The Casselman-Shalika Formula for a Distinguished Model

The Casselman-Shalika Formula for a Distinguished Model The Casselman-Shalika ormula for a Distinguished Model by William D. Banks Abstract. Unramified Whittaker functions and their analogues occur naturally in number theory as terms in the ourier expansions

More information

Class field theory viewed as a Langlands correspondence

Class field theory viewed as a Langlands correspondence Class field theory viewed as a Langlands correspondence Milo Bogaard June 30, 2010 Bachelorscriptie wiskunde Begeleiding: dr. Ben Moonen KdV Instituut voor wiskunde Faculteit der Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde

More information

Automorphic forms, L-functions and number theory (March 12 16) Three Introductory lectures. E. Kowalski

Automorphic forms, L-functions and number theory (March 12 16) Three Introductory lectures. E. Kowalski Automorphic forms, L-functions and number theory (March 12 16) Three Introductory lectures E. Kowalski Université Bordeaux I - A2X, 351, cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence Cedex, France E-mail address:

More information

Local Fields. Chapter Absolute Values and Discrete Valuations Definitions and Comments

Local Fields. Chapter Absolute Values and Discrete Valuations Definitions and Comments Chapter 9 Local Fields The definition of global field varies in the literature, but all definitions include our primary source of examples, number fields. The other fields that are of interest in algebraic

More information

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative This chapter is another review of standard material in complex analysis. See for instance

More information

Topological vectorspaces

Topological vectorspaces (July 25, 2011) Topological vectorspaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ Natural non-fréchet spaces Topological vector spaces Quotients and linear maps More topological

More information

LECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE

LECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE LECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE Some notions.. A crash course on Fourier transform For j =,, n, j = x j. D j = i j. For any multi-index α = (α,, α n ) N n. α = α + + α n. α! = α! α n!. x α =

More information

Tr (Q(E)P (F )) = µ(e)µ(f ) (1)

Tr (Q(E)P (F )) = µ(e)µ(f ) (1) Some remarks on a problem of Accardi G. CASSINELLI and V. S. VARADARAJAN 1. Introduction Let Q, P be the projection valued measures on the real line R that are associated to the position and momentum observables

More information

Why is the Riemann Hypothesis Important?

Why is the Riemann Hypothesis Important? Why is the Riemann Hypothesis Important? Keith Conrad University of Connecticut August 11, 2016 1859: Riemann s Address to the Berlin Academy of Sciences The Zeta-function For s C with Re(s) > 1, set ζ(s)

More information

Proof of a simple case of the Siegel-Weil formula. 1. Weil/oscillator representations

Proof of a simple case of the Siegel-Weil formula. 1. Weil/oscillator representations (March 6, 2014) Proof of a simple case of the Siegel-Weil formula Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ First, I confess I never understood Siegel s arguments for his mass

More information

9 Artin representations

9 Artin representations 9 Artin representations Let K be a global field. We have enough for G ab K. Now we fix a separable closure Ksep and G K := Gal(K sep /K), which can have many nonabelian simple quotients. An Artin representation

More information

Generalizations of the Lerch zeta function

Generalizations of the Lerch zeta function Generalizations of the Lerch zeta function by Trung Hieu Ngo A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics) in the University of

More information

1. Statement of the theorem

1. Statement of the theorem [Draft] (August 9, 2005) The Siegel-Weil formula in the convergent range Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ We give a very simple, mostly local, argument for the equality

More information

Lemma 1.1. The field K embeds as a subfield of Q(ζ D ).

Lemma 1.1. The field K embeds as a subfield of Q(ζ D ). Math 248A. Quadratic characters associated to quadratic fields The aim of this handout is to describe the quadratic Dirichlet character naturally associated to a quadratic field, and to express it in terms

More information

18. Cyclotomic polynomials II

18. Cyclotomic polynomials II 18. Cyclotomic polynomials II 18.1 Cyclotomic polynomials over Z 18.2 Worked examples Now that we have Gauss lemma in hand we can look at cyclotomic polynomials again, not as polynomials with coefficients

More information

1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω)

1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω) 0.1 Norms 0.1 Norms A norm on a linear space X is a function : X R with the properties: Positive Definite: x 0 x X (nonnegative) x = 0 x = 0 (strictly positive) λx = λ x x X, λ C(homogeneous) x + y x +

More information

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations 14 From modular forms to automorphic representations We fix an even integer k and N > 0 as before. Let f M k (N) be a modular form. We would like to product a function on GL 2 (A Q ) out of it. Recall

More information

1 Absolute values and discrete valuations

1 Absolute values and discrete valuations 18.785 Number theory I Lecture #1 Fall 2015 09/10/2015 1 Absolute values and discrete valuations 1.1 Introduction At its core, number theory is the study of the ring Z and its fraction field Q. Many questions

More information

Continuing the pre/review of the simple (!?) case...

Continuing the pre/review of the simple (!?) case... Continuing the pre/review of the simple (!?) case... Garrett 09-16-011 1 So far, we have sketched the connection between prime numbers, and zeros of the zeta function, given by Riemann s formula p m

More information

Absolute Values and Completions

Absolute Values and Completions Absolute Values and Completions B.Sury This article is in the nature of a survey of the theory of complete fields. It is not exhaustive but serves the purpose of familiarising the readers with the basic

More information

Congruent Number Problem and Elliptic curves

Congruent Number Problem and Elliptic curves Congruent Number Problem and Elliptic curves December 12, 2010 Contents 1 Congruent Number problem 2 1.1 1 is not a congruent number.................................. 2 2 Certain Elliptic Curves 4 3 Using

More information

gφ(m) = ω l (g)φ(g 1 m)) where ω l : Γ F l

gφ(m) = ω l (g)φ(g 1 m)) where ω l : Γ F l Global Riemann-Roch formulas Let K be a number field, Γ = Gal( K/K), M a finite Γ-module of exponent m; ie mm = (0) If S is a finite set of places of K we let Γ S = Gal(K S /K), where K S is the union

More information

The Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2

The Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2 The Local Langlands Conjectures for n = 1, 2 Chris Nicholls December 12, 2014 1 Introduction These notes are based heavily on Kevin Buzzard s excellent notes on the Langlands Correspondence. The aim is

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 15 Mar 2012

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 15 Mar 2012 ON ZAGIER S CONJECTURE FOR L(E, 2): A NUMBER FIELD EXAMPLE arxiv:1203.3429v1 [math.nt] 15 Mar 2012 JEFFREY STOPPLE ABSTRACT. We work out an example, for a CM elliptic curve E defined over a real quadratic

More information

Math 229: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory The product formula for ξ(s) and ζ(s); vertical distribution of zeros

Math 229: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory The product formula for ξ(s) and ζ(s); vertical distribution of zeros Math 9: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory The product formula for ξs) and ζs); vertical distribution of zeros Behavior on vertical lines. We next show that s s)ξs) is an entire function of order ;

More information

Topics in Harmonic Analysis Lecture 1: The Fourier transform

Topics in Harmonic Analysis Lecture 1: The Fourier transform Topics in Harmonic Analysis Lecture 1: The Fourier transform Po-Lam Yung The Chinese University of Hong Kong Outline Fourier series on T: L 2 theory Convolutions The Dirichlet and Fejer kernels Pointwise

More information

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg = Problem 1 Show that if π is an irreducible representation of a compact lie group G then π is also irreducible. Give an example of a G and π such that π = π, and another for which π π. Is this true for

More information

Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem

Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem Tom Phelan Semester 2 2009 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a self-contained derivation of the celebrated Lidskii Trace

More information

Dirichlet s Theorem. Calvin Lin Zhiwei. August 18, 2007

Dirichlet s Theorem. Calvin Lin Zhiwei. August 18, 2007 Dirichlet s Theorem Calvin Lin Zhiwei August 8, 2007 Abstract This paper provides a proof of Dirichlet s theorem, which states that when (m, a) =, there are infinitely many primes uch that p a (mod m).

More information

Microlocal Methods in X-ray Tomography

Microlocal Methods in X-ray Tomography Microlocal Methods in X-ray Tomography Plamen Stefanov Purdue University Lecture I: Euclidean X-ray tomography Mini Course, Fields Institute, 2012 Plamen Stefanov (Purdue University ) Microlocal Methods

More information

On the Notion of an Automorphic Representation *

On the Notion of an Automorphic Representation * On the Notion of an Automorphic Representation * The irreducible representations of a reductive group over a local field can be obtained from the square-integrable representations of Levi factors of parabolic

More information

MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY ELEVENTH LECTURE

MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY ELEVENTH LECTURE MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY ELEVENTH LECTURE The subjects of this lecture are characters, Gauss sums, Jacobi sums, and counting formulas for olynomial equations over finite fields. 1. Definitions, Basic Proerties

More information

6 Lecture 6: More constructions with Huber rings

6 Lecture 6: More constructions with Huber rings 6 Lecture 6: More constructions with Huber rings 6.1 Introduction Recall from Definition 5.2.4 that a Huber ring is a commutative topological ring A equipped with an open subring A 0, such that the subspace

More information

Isogeny invariance of the BSD formula

Isogeny invariance of the BSD formula Isogeny invariance of the BSD formula Bryden Cais August 1, 24 1 Introduction In these notes we prove that if f : A B is an isogeny of abelian varieties whose degree is relatively prime to the characteristic

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable

More information