arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 26 May 1994

Transcription

1 ETH-TH/94-4 KLTE-DTP/94-3 May 5, 994 arxiv:hep-ph/ v 6 May 994 One-loop radiative corrections to the helicity amplitudes of QCD processes involving four quarks and one gluon Zoltan Kunszt a, Adrian Signer a and Zoltán Trócsányi a,b a Theoretical Physics, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland b Department of Theoretical Physics, KLTE, Debrecen, Hungary Abstract We present analytic results for the one-loop corrections of the helicity amplitudes of the QCD five-parton subprocesses involving four quarks and one gluon obtained with a standard Feynman diagram calculation using dimensional reduction. Work supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Hungarian National Science Foundation and the Universitas Foundation of the Hungarian Commercial Bank

2 The technical developments achieved recently in perturbative QCD calculations helicity method, 3,, 4, string theory based derivations 5, 6) made calculations of one-loop corrections to helicity amplitudes up to five-parton and perhaps also to six-parton processes feasible. As a first result, Bern, Dixon and Kosower published recently the one-loop corrections to the five-gluon amplitude in QCD and in N=,,4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories. They used string based technique and helicity method and obtained remarkably short analytic answer. In a previous paper 7 we presented simple analytic result for the singular parts of all helicity amplitudes of all five-parton processes in full agreement with the results of 6 in the case of the five gluon amplitudes). In this letter we present the complete one-loop corrections for processes involving four quarks equal or unequal flavors) and one gluon. We used conventional Feynman-diagram method, however, the use of the helicity technique was decisively important. Our method was tested previously by the diagrammatic evaluation of the one-loop corrections of the helicity amplitudes of all parton processes 8. A systematic description together with the non-trivial details of our calculation will be presented in a later publication. Here we mention only that the tensor integrals have been reduced to scalar integrals with a reduction method similar to 9. Calculating the integrals this way and the use of the helicity method allow us to eliminate all integrals which are more complicated than pentagon box) tensor-integrals with one two) integration momenta in the numerator. As a result, the gram determinants in the denominator which blow up the size of intermediate expressions were eliminated at the very beginning of the calculation. For the sake of simplicity we performed the calculation in the dimensional reduction scheme in D = 4 ε dimensions). Transition rules to different schemes such as conventional dimensional regularization, t Hooft Veltman have been derived in 8. It is convenient to give our result in a crossing symmetric form for the unphysical channel where all particles are outgoing 0 q qg. The momenta of the partons are labeled as 0 antiquark q) antiquark Q) quark Q) quark q) gluong). ) The color structure of the amplitudes is the same at one loop as at tree level: A i) q, h q ; Q, h Q; Q, h Q ; q, h q ; g, h g ) = ) ) g i g 3 T g ) q q 4π δ q q a i) q q q, h q ; Q, h Q; Q, h Q ; q, h q ; g, h g ) q q ) {q,q} T g ) q q N δ q q a i) q q q, h q ; Q, h Q; Q, h Q ; q, h q ; g, h g ), c q q ) {q,q} where i = 0 means tree level and i = means one-loop approximation. At a given order in perturbation theory, there are only two independent color subamplitudes because we have the symmetry properties a i) q Q q, h q; Q, h Q; Q, h Q ; q, h q ; g, h g ) = a i) Q q Q, h Q; q, h q ; q, h q ; Q, h Q ; g, h g ), 3) a i) q q q, h q ; Q, h Q; Q, h Q ; q, h q ; g, h g ) = a i) Q Q Q, h Q; q, h q ; q, h q ; Q, h Q ; g, h g ). 4)

3 Furthermore, we should consider only four helicity configurations. If we change the sign of all helicities, we obtain the corresponding amplitudes simply by replacing the spinor products......, where the angle bracket and squared bracket denote spinor products with minus-plus and plus-minus helicities, pq = ψ p)ψ q) and pq = ψ p)ψ q). Due to helicity conservation along a fermion line, we have h q = h q and h Q = h Q. We present our result for positive gluon helicity and label the remaining helicities with h q and h Q. In order to be able to write down the result for arbitrary values of h q and h Q, we introduce the helicity dependent momenta rh q ) = q if h q = and rh q ) = q if h q = ; 5) Rh Q ) = Q if h Q = and Rh Q ) = Q if h Q =. We shall suppress the helicity dependence of r and R. For the sake of completeness, we recall the tree-level amplitudes a 0) ij a 0) ij ij h q, h Q, ) = ip a h q, h Q, ) ig gj. 6) We absorbed the helicity dependence completely in the factor p a which is given by p a h q, h Q, ) = ) δ hqh Q rr, 7) q q Q Q where δ is the usual Kronecker δ. At one loop, the result can naturally be decomposed into soft contributions S ij h q, h Q, ) given in 7, ultraviolet renormalization terms R ij h q, h Q, ), terms coming from the expansion of collinear /ǫ singularities C ij h q, h Q, ) given by vertex and self energy integrals, finite terms composed from spinor products, dot products and single logarithms D ij h q, h Q, ), and finite terms E ij h q, h Q, ) containing factors of Li, ln and π coming from pentagon and box integrals. The labels i, j run over q, Q, q, Q similarly to the corresponding labels in the color subamplitudes a ) ij. The color subamplitude a ) ij has then the decomposition a ) ij q, h q ; Q, h Q ; Q, h Q ; q, h q ; g, ) = 8) S ij h q, h Q, ) R ij h q, h Q, ) C ij h q, h Q, ) D ij h q, h Q, ) E ij h q, h Q, ), where we suppressed the dependence on the momenta q, q, Q, Q, g. For completeness we recall the soft contributions S Q q h q, h Q, ) = c { Γ Nc a 0) ε Q qh q, h Q, ) P qg P Qq P Qg 9) N c a 0) Q qh q, h Q, ) P q Q P qq P P P Qq P Qq N c a 0) Q Q h q, h Q, ) P q Q P qg P Qq P qg N c a 0) q q h q, h Q, ) P Qq P Qg P Qq P Qg }

4 and S Q Qh q, h Q, ) = c Γ ε { Nc a 0) Q Q h q, h Q, ) P P Qg P Qg N c a 0) Q Q h q, h Q, ) P q Q P qq P P P Qq P Qq N c a 0) Q q h q, h Q, ) P q Q P P Qg P qg N c a 0) q Q h q, h Q, ) P P qg P Qq P Qg }, 0) where we introduced P ij = µ s ij ) ε c Γ = 4π) εγ ε)γ ε) Γ ε). We note that the helicity dependence of the soft contribution is given by the Born factors a 0) ij. This holds for the ultraviolet renormalization contributions and the collinear /ε) singularity as well. We record the result in such a form that the helicity dependence of the C terms is again completely factored into the Born terms. R ij h q, h Q, ) = 4π)ε εγ ε) N c N f ) a 0) ij h q, h Q, ) ) C Q Qh q, h Q, ) = c Γ ε a0) Q Q h q, h Q, ) 3 N c N f )P 3 ) P P ) ) N c a 0) 9 Q Q h q, h Q, ) 8 N c 3 0 ) N c 9 N f C Q q h q, h Q, ) = c Γ ε a0) Q q h q, h Q, ) 3 N c N f )P 3 ) P P ) 3) N c 9 a 0) Q q h q, h Q, ) 8 N c 3 0 ) N c 9 N f As expected, the next-to-leading order corrections destroy some of the symmetries of the Born terms. However, there are several symmetry relations which remain valid even at one loop: a ),, ) = a) Q Q Q Q,, ) q q, Q Q, 4) a ),, ) = a) Q Q Q Q,, ) q q, Q Q, 5) a ) Q q,, ) = a ) Q q,, ) q Q,q Q. 6) We find that S ij, R ij, E ij and C Q Q respect these symmetries separately. As a result the D Q Q terms must also satisfy the relations 4) and 5). In the case of C Q q, if we factor the Note that the C terms are not uniquely determined since we can always shift finite contributions between D and C terms. 3

5 helicity dependence into the Born terms as in eq. 3), then the symmetry relation 6) is slightly violated which is compensated by a corresponding change in D Q q : D Q q,, ) = D Q q,, ) q Q,q Q ) s 3 N c N f )a 0) Q q,, ) ln. 7) s In order to give the results in a more compact form, we introduce the following notation : ) ) { } ij sij s { = ln ln, ij 0 µ µ } = { } ij s s, 8) ij 0 { } ij = s s ij ) { ij Now the D terms take the form s s s ij ), { ij }3 = { ij s s ij ) 3 s ij s ) s ij s s s ij ). id Q Q,, ) = 9) qq N Qg Qg ) 3 q Q qq Qg { } c Qg Qg Qg N c q Q qq q Q qg qq qqqg { } Qg N c Qg Qg s Qg s Qg q Q qq { } qq Qg qg Qg 0 Qg { } qg qgqg Qg q Q { Qg q Q qq { qq Qg N c qg Qg Qg 3 q Q Qg Qg qq qg ) qq q Q qq { } qq Qg Qg Qg Qg Qg qg q Q qg { q Q qq qg Qg } qq q Q qq { } Qg qq qg Qg qq, { } Qg 0 { } id Q Q,, ) = 0) 3 q N Q { Qg 3 q Q qq { } c Qg Qg Qg Qg Qg 3 q Q { } N c Qg Qg Qg 0 N c q Q qg q Q { qq q Q qq { } N c Qg s qg Qg Qg Qg Qg 0 q Q qg qg { qq qq Qg qg { } q qg Qg } Q Qg qg qq { } Qg Qg Qg qg qq qq qq Qg Qg qg qgqg Qg Note that the function introduced in ref. 6. { ij } n { Qg } q Q qq qq qq qg Qg { } qq Qg Qg { } Qg qq { } Qg has n mass dimensions. These functions are related to similar ones 4,

6 id Q q,, ) = ) N c N f ) q Q Qg { } q Q qgqg { } 3 Qg qg qgqg { }3 N c q Q qq q Q qg Qg q Q { N c qg Qg Qg s qg qg qg qq Qq Qg qg ) { } qg qq qg qq q Q qq { q Q qg qg qq Qg qg } ) 3 q Q qg qg q Q Qg qq Qg Qg { } Qg qg qg Qg qg qgqg { } Qg qg Qg qg {} qq ) } { qg qg qg q Q qq Qg { } N qg q c qg qg Qg q Q Q 0 qg q Q ) q Q qq { qg Qg 3 q Q ) { q qg qg qg Q Qg q qg Q qq { q Q qg qq Qg qg ) Qg { } 3 qq q Q qg q Q Qg { } qq Qg qg q Q qq { qg Qg qg qq qg qg } q Q Qg { } N c qg qg q Q } { qg q Q { qg 0 qg qg 0 qg Qg, id Q q,, ) = ) Nc qq q Q q Q qg qg Qg N c qg Qg Qg s qg s q Q Qg { } qg qg Qgs Qg s qg ) { qg Qg } N f 3 q Q qq qg Qg } { q Q qgqg q Q N c qg Qg 3 Qq { q Q Qg qg 3 q N c Q q Q qg Qg q Q Qg 3 Qg { } q Q qg 0 qg { } Qg qg Qg { }3 qq Qg Qg qg Qg ) Qg qg Qg { { } { } qq q Q 3 q Q qg Qg qq Qg q Q Qg ) qg Qg Qg ) { q Q qgqg { } qg qgqg } {, }3

7 id Q q,, ) = 3) N f N c ) qq Qg { } qq qg Qg { } 3 Qg qg qg Qg { }3 qq 3 qg qq N c qg Qg qg qg 3 qq qq qg ) { } qg qg qg qq qg qq q Q Qg qg qg qg Qg qq Qg Qg q Q Qg Qg ) { } Qg 3 q Q qq Qg Qg q Q Qg Qg ) {Qg q Q q Q Qg { } Qg Qg } Qg qg qg Qg { } Qg qg Qg { qq q Qqg } { qg Qg qg } qg qq qq qq q Q qg Qg qg Qg N c qg Qg Qg Qg s qg Qg s qg s qq qq } { q Q q Q qg Qg qq } { qg 0 qg qg qq { qq 0 qg q Q qg qg qg qq Qg Qg qq Qg ) { Qg Qg { qg qg qg s qg qq qg qg qq ) {Qg } q Q Qg Qg Qg s Qg Qg 0 qg qg Qg qq Qg qg ) Qg qg Qg qg qq Qg qg Qg Qg ) { q Q Qg Qg { qq q Q Qg { } qg Qg q } Q qq q Q Qg qg } qg qq Qg qg q Q qg q Q qg Qg qgq Q qg s q Q q Q Qg Qg qg q g Qg s qg Qgs qq s q Q) qg Qg ) { qg ) {Qg { } q Q Qg Qg } qq qg q Q qg } q Q qg qg { } Qg. { } Qg q Q { qg } The E contributions can conveniently be given in terms of some auxiliary functions defined as follows. Fi, j, k) = Li s ) mn Li s ) mn ) sij s ij s jk ln π s jk 6, 4) where Li is the dilogarithm and m, n denote the complementary labels to i, j, k) in the set of labels q, Q, Q, q, g) {m, n} = { q, Q, Q, q, g}\{i, j, k}. 5) 6

8 We also use the functions and hi, j, k, l) = ik jl il jk, 6) hi, j, k, l) = hi, j, k, l) δ ik)δ jl )) 7) Gr, a, A, g, R) = hr, a, g, R) δ RA Fa, A, g), 8) Gr, g, a, A, R) = hr, g, A, R) δra Fg, a, A), where a {q, q} and A {Q, Q} respectively. Then the E Q q h q, h Q ) term for arbitrary h q, h Q quark helicity configuration is given as E Q q h q, h Q, ) = 9) a 0) Q q h q, h Q, ) { N c F q, g, Q) hr, q, Q, R)F q, q, Q) hr, q, g, R)Fq, q, g) hr, g, Q, R)Fg, Q, Q) hr, q, Q, R)Fq, Q, Q) N c hr, q, Q, R) Fq, Q, Q) Fq, q, Q) ) Fq, g, Q) hr, q, Q, R) F q, Q, Q) F q, q, Q) ) F q, g, Q) hr, q, Q, R) F q, Q, Q) F q, q, Q) ) F q, g, Q) hr, q, Q, R) Fq, q, Q) Fq, Q, Q) ) Fq, g, Q) } a 0) Q Q h q, h Q, ) { N c hr, g, Q, R)Fg, Q, Q) N c F q, g, Q) hr, q, g, R)F q, q, g) F Q, g, q) hr, q, g, R)Fq, q, g) hr, Q, g, R)F Q, Q, g) hr, q, Q, R) Fq, Q, Q) Fq, q, Q) ) hr, q, Q, R) F q, Q, Q) F q, q, Q) ) Gr, q, Q, g, R) Gr, q, Q, g, R) Gr, q, Q, g, R) Gr, q, Q, g, R) } a 0) q q h q, h Q, ){N c hr, q, g, R)Fq, q, g) N c F Q, g, q) hr, g, Q, R)Fg, Q, Q) FQ, g, q) hr, g, Q, R)Fg, Q, Q) hr, g, q, R)Fg, q, q) hr, q, Q, R) Fq, q, Q) Fq, Q, Q) ) hr, q, Q, R) Fq, q, Q) Fq, Q, Q) ) Gr, g, q, Q, R) Gr, g, q, Q, R) Gr, g, q, Q, R) Gr, g, q, Q, R)}. 7

9 As noted before, the E Q Q terms satisfy the symmetry relations 4) and 5), therefore it is sufficient to present the E Q Q type contributions for h q = and arbitrary h Q : E Q Q, h Q, ) = a 0) Q Q, h Q, ) H h Q Q Q q, Q, Q, q, g) 30) a 0) Q q, h Q, ) H h Q Q q q, Q, Q, q, g) a 0) q Q, h Q, ) H h Q q Q q, Q, Q, q, g), where the auxiliary functions, H h Q ij have the form H Q Q q, Q, Q, q, g) = 3) N c F q, g, q) FQ, q, g) F Q, g, q) FQ, g, q) FQ, q, q) Fg, q, q) h q, g, Q, Q)Fg, q, Q) h q, q, Q, Q)Fq, q, Q) h q, g, q, Q)Fg, q, q) N c F q, q, Q) F q, q, Q) FQ, q, q) F q, Q, g) FQ, Q, g) F q, Q, g) Fq, Q, g) h q, q, Q, Q)Fq, q, Q) h q, q, g, Q)Fq, Q, g) h q, Q, g, Q)F Q, Q, g), H Q Q q, Q, Q, q, g) = 3) N c F q, g, q) FQ, q, g) F Q, g, q) FQ, g, q) FQ, q, q) Fg, q, q) Fg, q, Q) Fq, q, Q) h q, g, q, Q)Fg, q, q) N c F q, q, Q) F q, q, Q) F Q, q, q) F q, Q, g) Fq, Q, g) F q, Q, g) F Q, Q, g) h q, q, Q, Q)FQ, q, q) h q, q, g, Q)Fq, Q, g) h q, Q, g, Q)FQ, Q, g), H h Q Q q q, Q, Q, q, g) = 33) N c F q, g, Q) F q, g, q) FQ, q, q) FQ, q, g) FQ, Q, q) h q, g, Q, R)Fg, q, Q) h q, g, q, R)Fg, q, q) h q, g, Q, R)Fg, Q, Q), H h Q q Q q, Q, Q, q, g) = 34) N c Fq, g, Q) Fq, g, q) FQ, q, g) F q, q, g) h q, q, Q, R)Fq, q, Q) h q, g, Q, R)Fg, q, Q) h q, g, Q, R)Fg, Q, Q) h q, q, Q, R)Fq, Q, Q) h q, g, q, R)Fg, q, q) h q, q, g, R)Fq, q, g). The above results are valid in the unphysical region, where the dot products are negative, therefore the arguments of the logarithms and dilogarithms is away from the branch cuts. To obtain the amplitudes in any physical channel, one has to continue analytically to the corresponding physical region and make the usual substitution This defines all functions in a unique way. s ij s ij iη. 35) 8

10 References Z. Xu, D. Zhang and L. Chang, Nucl. Phys. B9 987) 39. R. Kleiss and W. J. Stirling, Nucl. Phys. B6 985) J. Gunion and Z. Kunszt, Phys. Lett. B6 985) For reviews see: M. L. Mangano and S. J. Parke, Phys. Rep ) 30; R. Gastmans and T. T. Wu, International Series of Monographs on Physics, Vol. 80 Clarendon Press, Oxford, 990) xvi 648 pages. 5 Z. Bern and D. A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B379 99) Z. Bern L. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. Lett ) Z.Kunszt, A. Signer and Z. Trócsányi, ETH-TH/ Z. Kunszt, A. Signer and Z. Trócsányi, Nucl. Phys. B4 994) G. van Oldenborgh and J.A.M. Vermaseren, Z.P. C46 990) 45. 9