arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 25 Jul 2015

Transcription

1 Spatial dispersion effects upon local excitation of extrinsic plasmons in a graphene micro-disk D. Mencarelli,2, S. Bellucci 2, A. Sindona 2,3, L. Pierantoni,2 Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy 2 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (LNF), Frascati, Roma, Italy 3 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università della Calabria, Via P. Bucci Cubo 3C, Rende (CS), Italy arxiv:57.79v [cond-mat.mes-hall] 25 Jul 25 Excitation of surface-waves at terahertz frequencies, on a suspended graphene sheet, is studied by a full-wave electromagnetic solver, in order to evaluate the effects of spatial dispersion when the infinite sheet is cut into various sizes and shapes at the microscopic scale. General considerations about the spatially dispersive anisotropic conductivity of graphene are used to select the conductivity response to be provided as input in a simulation of surface plasmons launched by the near field of a wire antenna, which is placed at sub-micrometric distances from a graphene micro-disk. The spatial dispersion of the graphene patch is shown to play a significant role not only in plasmon propagation free of external sources, but also in typical scanning probe microscopy configurations. In particular, it is analyzed how this spatial dispersion affects the excitation strength, or coupling, between the field sources and the surface plasmons. Keywords: Surface plasmon, spatially dispersive media, wire antenna, graphene conductivity, electromagnetic response at terahertz frequencies I. INTRODUCTION One of the main challenges for current device electronics is the full exploitation of the terahertz (THz) electromagnetic (EM) spectrum bridging the gap between the microwaves and optics. In this context, graphene and graphene-derived materials may constitute an effective vehicle for the realization of new THz devices 6, owing to their unique EM properties, namely, tunable conductivity and slow-wave features. This is why lowdimensional systems with honeycomb-like structure are undergoing continuous intensive investigation 7 as materials capable of supporting plasmon propagation in the THz frequency range. In this paper, we focus on numerical propagation and excitation of surface waves in spatially dispersive graphene, as seen from a macroscopic EM perspective, using the principle that a momentum matching between the field source and the surface plasmon has to be achieved. Such a condition is commonly obtained by grating coupling, prism coupling, spatial modulation of the graphene conductivity by an external gating, or periodic patterning. On the other hand, a THz beam impinging on a metal atomic force microscope tip has been recently used to generate guided THz waves on graphene 7. The nanometric curvature of the tip makes light scatter on a length scale of tens of nanometers 2, which provides the EM field together with the wave-number components required to excite short wavelength surface plasmons. A similar situation occurs, at lower frequencies, in scanning microwave microscopy (SMM) 8, where a metallic tip can act as a resonant antenna, whose tiptermination is directly coupled with the sample under test. In what follows, we present an EM scheme, which ideally recalls the above experimental set-up, i.e., we take a resonant wire antenna placed at sub-micrometric distances from a disk-shaped graphene patch. Our analysis suggests that, at least in excitation phenomena induced by a strong spatial gradient of the EM field on the graphene sample, the correction to the conductivity response, given by spatial dispersion, is strongly required. We therefore asses that spatial dispersion is an important limiting factor to the achievable coupling between surface-plasmons and the near-field of an SMM tip, as it produces a broadening of the system-response over a wide range of wave-vectors. The high impact of spatial dispersion in propagation and modal analysis of plasmons has been previously demonstrated 9, but a similar study has not been conducted so far in near field excitation problems, which are of fundamental importance in practical applications. In this paper, we provide such a characterization. From the numerical pont of view, we simulate surface plasmon excitation in an open computational domain, avoiding periodic boundary conditions and plane-wave excitations 5. The typical high charge mobility of carbon nanostructures leads to a huge increase of the macroscopic inductance, i.e., a high reactive energy stored per unit length, and, accordingly, a slow-wave propagation. Consequently, the plasmon velocity can be much smaller than the speed of light, with very small wavelengths as compared to that of the coupled feeding antenna. This also results in a high confinement of the EM field in the direction transverse to the propagation, which further increases the aspect ratio. We apply two different numerical methods, namely, the method of moments (MoM) and the method of finite elements (FEM), to validate the results, thus providing a further point of comparison of the full quantum approach to graphene conductivity with a semi-phenomenological construction, derived from the Kubo-formula 2.

2 2 II. THEORY The dispersive conductivity of graphene on the THz regime is well defined in the literature (see for example Ref. ). Basically, the intra-band response of the valence (π) and conducting (π ) electrons of the material to a small applied electric field, harmonically oscillating in space and time, can be derived from the Boltzmann transport equation, under the relaxation-timeapproximation (RTA) or Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) model. In the RTA, the relaxation dynamics of each oneelectron state, corresponding to the linearly dispersing parts of the π and π bands, is modeled by a simple exponential decay, and the transport relaxation time is approximated with the lifetime of the state. Such a formalism provides an accurate description of spatial dispersion effects in doped graphene due do drift currents, which involve one-electron excitations within the π and π bands, at energies below a few THz relative the Dirac points, when the doping causes a Fermi energy shifts below.5 ev. The BGK model is more general that the RTA, because it allows for an extra degree of freedom, which enforces charge conservation, and accounts properly for electron diffusion,. We begin by specializing to the RTA conductivity, given by the dyadic tensor form σ rta (q) = σ rta(q) + + σrta(q), σ ± rta(q) = ie2 2π 2 st BZ d 2 k f ε ±k µ v ± (k)v ± (k) ω v ± (k) q () Here, the (two dimensional) frist Brilluoin Zone (BZ) integration is carried out on both the linearized band energies, denoted ε ±k = ± v f k, with v ± k = kε ±k representing the electron velocities, and v f = v ± (k) the Fermi velocity. f ε µ = + e ε µ kt is the Fermi Distribution (FD) of electrons at absolute temperature T, corresponding to the chemical potential µ (with the Dirac point energy of graphene set to zero energy), f ε µ = f ε µ ε = 4kT cosh 2 ( ) ε µ kt labels the first energy derivative of the FD, e represents electron charge, and ω = ω iγ is a complex frequency, which includes the THz frequency f, by the usual relation ω = 2πf, and a small shift along the imaginary axes, i.e., the electron damping rate γ, or scattering collision time τ (γ = 2π/τ). Another part of the graphene conductivity is related to inter-band processes between the π and π bands, and is included in the so called Kubo-Drude (KD) formulation 2, which stems from the same approximations as the RTA, though it does not contain the dispersive term v ± (k) q. Indeed, it has been shown that for surface waves supported by isolated graphene sheets, and working frequencies below a few THz, the spatial dispersion effects on inter-band transitions can be neglected,. Due to the absence of the dispersive term, the inter-band conductivity is a scalar, which can be expressed as a single energy integral σ inter = ie2 dε f ε µ f ε µ π ω ( ) 2ε 2. ω The total conductivity is then σ(q) = σ rta (q) + σ inter I, with I denoting the 2 2 identity matrix. Now, looking at the denominator in Eq. (), it is clear that when v ± (k) q and ω are comparable, the spatial dispersion cannot be neglected in surface plasmon excitation. This happens particularly in problems where a resonant behavior of the EM field is concerned, and is the case of some of the examples reported in this work, where the interaction between a radiating antenna and a graphene patch takes place via near-field coupling. To give an idea of the numbers involved, at a frequency f THz the spatial harmonics of the excitation field becomes significant, in the conductivity response, starting from wavevector values of q larger than µm. At the same frequency, the electric field wavelength is about 3µm, but the near field distribution between the tip of the antenna and the graphene sample varies on a sub-micrometric scale, depending on the tips radius and on the tip distance from the sample. Then, the slow-wave effect featured by plasmon propagation implies a wavelength reduction of more than one order of magnitude, and ensures matching and coupling with the exciting near field. Eq. () can be simplified and made more explicit by expressing the planar wave-vectors q and k in polar coordinates, say q = (q, θ q ), and k = (k, ϑ k ): σ ± rta(q) = ie2 v 2 f 2π 2 dkkf (2) ε ± k µ [ ] cos 2ϑk sin 2ϑ k sin 2ϑ k cos 2ϑ k dϑ k I + ω v f q cos(ϑ k θ q ) where the k-integral is performed over a circular area around the Dirac Point, and includes both positive and negative energies of the Dirac cone. After some manipulations 3, we find that the the tensor components of the intra-band conductivity take the compact form: [ ] σ rta(q) ± = σ rta(q)i ± + σ rta(q) ± cos 2θq sin 2θ q sin 2θ q cos 2θ q (3)

3 3 where we have introduced the scalar conductivities: σ rta(q) ± = ie2 vf 2 2π 2 dkkf dθ k ε ± k µ ω v f q cos θ k = ie2 vf 2 kf ε dk ± k µ π ω2 vfq = σ intra 2 2 v 2 f q 2 / ω 2 and σ rta(q) ± = ie2 vf 2 2π 2 dkkf dθ k cos 2θ k ε ± k µ ω v f q cos θ k ( 2 v 2 f q 2 / ω 2 ) ω 2 σ = intra v 2 f q 2 / ω 2 q 2 These turn out to be both proportional to the standard, i.e. non-dispersive, intra-band scalar conductivity σ intra of the KD model 2. The latter may be calculated from the energy integral σ intra = ie2 π 2 ω dεε(f ε µ f ε µ), and evaluates exactly to σ intra = iξ / ω, with ξ = e2 µ [µ + 2kT ln(e kt π 2 + )]. Incidentally, we notice that the conductivity σ rta, ± being markedly anisotropic, is proportional to ω 2 σ intra, which makes its imaginary part change sign with increasing the frequency, in contrast to the purely inductive nature of σ rta, ± whose imaginary part keeps a negative sign in the sampled frequency range. Such a behavior is illustrated by the plots of Fig. (A) and. Now, by definition, surface waves are sustained at the interface between materials having different permittivities so that, in a transverse resonance circuit, their associated reactances cancel out. As a consequence, the contribution of the anisotropic term σ rta ± may strongly affect the polarization of surface plasmons 4 of high rate of spatial variation. (A) 4 2 qv F σ rta ξ Im Re 3-2 γ - γ qv =.25 =.25 F Im qv F ω ω.5 2. qv F qv F FIG.. Real and imaginary parts of the scalar conductivities σ rta ± (A) and σ rta ± calculated from the RTA model (3), and reported vs the dimensionless frequency ω/qv f. The two quantities are normalized to ξ /qv f, and v fξ /q, respectively. 2 qσ rta v F ξ Re To include the diffusion currents, we introduce the following tensor quantity where D ± (q) = iγ ω f ε ±k µ = st BZ st BZ d 2 k f ε ±k µ f ε ±k µ v ± (k)q ω v ± (k) q, (4) d 2 kf ε. ±k µ The BGK correction to the RTA conductivity can be put in the form: σ ± bgk(q) = [I + D ± (q)] σ ± rta(q). (5) which is equivalent to the result presented in Ref., and leads to correct the total conductivity as σ(q) = σ bgk (q) + σ inter I. The numerical results reported in the following are obtained by both a full-wave solver and a semianalytical approach, as implemented respectively by the finite element method (FEM) and the method of moments (MoM). The latter employs, in cylindrical coordinates r = (r, ϕ), z, the usual free-space Green s tensor G 2 as the kernel of an integral operator relating the electric current density and field: E(r, z) = d 2 r dz G(r r, z z ) J(r, z ). Here, the solution for the resulting Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) is generalized to the case of spatially dispersive material 2, by using the proper constitutive relation in the spatial domain, i.e., J s (r) = d 2 r σ(r r ) E s (r ) (6) where the planar current J s, and the tangent electric field E s, are sampled over the graphene surface. The non-local behavior of the current-filed relation becomes important when rapid field variations are involved. Transforming the conductivity in real space, the input spatial response of dispersive graphene is obtained: σ(r) = I dq 2π q σ(q)j (qr) + Iσ inter (7) ( ) cos 2φ sin 2φ dq sin 2φ cos 2φ 2π q σ(q)j 2 (qr), where the scalar conductivities σ and σ include both the ±-contributions from Eq. (3)- or Eq. (5). In Eq. (7) the first and second terms contributing to the conductance, are weighted by the zero-order and second-order Bessel functions, respectively. This means that the first addend of the conductivity is more sensitive to slow varying fields with respect to the second addend. Equally importantly, the second term of the conductivity, containing

4 4 off-diagonal matrix elements, is characterized by an angular dependence related to a current response, which is locally weighted by a quadrupole spatial distribution of the EM field. As a consequence, unless very high angular and radial variations of the EM fields are concerned, the second term can be neglected. Let us now turn to the main application of the present work (Fig. 2), i.e, a circular graphene disk of diameter D, with a wire antenna of length L, placed just above its center, for which we can safely assume cylindrical symmetry. The gap between the antenna and the disk is L/2. In absence of angular variation of the EM excitation, the off diagonal terms vanish and no angular current arises. In addition, with a not too small tip-sample distance, and, thus, a not too strong EM field variation, the σ-term in Eq. (7) is expected to be dominant. a real constant without spatial ripples. In presence of dispersion, the actual response is more complex, and some spatial ripples appear. These oscillations extend just to a fraction of the free-space wavelength λ, which is typically comparable with plasmon the wavelength, and increases with increasing the charge lifetime. We expect that the above behavior of the system will reflect, numerically, on the solution of the EM field distribution. C/σintra..5. Re Im τ=2ps τ=ps τ=2ps τ=ps L graphene plasmon r/λ FIG. 3. Cumulative integral of the impulsive response C/σ intra as a function of radial position r, normalized to the free-space wavelength λ; two different scattering times (τ =, 2 ps) are tested. D=2R FIG. 2. Wire antenna placed at sub-micrometric distance (L/2) from a graphene patch Under these limiting conditions, Eq. (6) can be approximated by J r = d 2 r σ( r r ) E s (r ) (8) where J r is the radial component of the surface current, and σ(r) is the real space representation of σ(q), which gives the (spatial) impulsive response of the current after the EM excitation. Note that usual assumption of a thin hollow cylinder to approximate the wire antenna may affect the near field distribution between the tip and graphene, but does not limit the generality of the present analysis. For a fixed frequency, the effect of spatial dispersion increases with increasing the charge scattering-time, which is practically related to the the quality of the graphene samples, i.e. absence of defects, grain boundaries, and multilayer regions. As a practical example, we take the cumulative integral of the impulsive response C(r) = d 2 r σ(r r ) = 2π dr r σ(r ), r <r i.e., the current density response to a uniform unit electric field within a circular area of radius r < R. Its profile, normalized to σ intra, is shown in Fig. 3 for two different scattering times (τ =, 2 ps), at f = THz. In absence of dispersion, the response of Fig. 3 would be III. NUMERICAL RESULTS In the following, we present the solution for the EFIE directly in real space, not in the reciprocal one, so we will focus on both the full tensor form (7) and the scalar form (8) of the surface conductivity. A. Non-dispersive analysis of surface plasmons We begin by considering an example of plasmon excitation neglecting spatial dispersion effects. TIP Normalized electric field R Increasing Losses R/2.5. R/2 R.5 FIG. 4. Plasmon distribution (in response to a normalized electric field) from a linear antenna coupled to a graphene disk (see Fig. 2) as a function of Re(Z s)/im(z s). The surface reactance has been fixed to Im(Z s) = 5 kω Radial position ReZs/ImZs

5 5 The radial plasmon distribution, for D = 2R = L c/2f, is reported Fig. 4, as a function of the inverse plasmon quality factor. We define the latter as the ratio between imaginary and real parts of the surface graphene impedance, i.e., Im(Z s )/Re(Z s ), calculated by the nondispersive Kubo-Drude formula, i.e. the q -limit of Eq. (). In Fig. 4, both the operation frequency and the graphene chemical potential follow from the choice of the surface reactance and plasmon quality-factor: for example, a value of Im(Z s ) = 5 kω and a quality factor of are associated to a chemical potential of.8 ev and a frequency of about 7.4 THz. We see that as Re(Z s )/Im(Z s ) increases from to.5, the spatial oscillations and propagation of the plasmon expire at a progressively smaller radial distance from the feeding tip. (A) Strongly Perturbed Radiation and the higher the reflection coefficient at the input port of the antenna (indicated by arrows). Fig. 5 shows in more details what is happening to the antenna near (right picture) and far from (left picture) the detuning points, i.e., the arrows of Fig. 5(A). In particular, we take surface reactances of 2 and.7 kω, corresponding respectively to input matching of about 4 and 3dB: in the former case, the radiation is drastically reduced by the plasmon coupling and a large amount of power is reflected back to the input port of the antenna. The results reported in Fig. 5(A) are derived from our MoM simulator 5, whereas the plots of Fig. 5 are calculated by an independent full-wave EM solver (HFSS by Ansoft), which provides an independent validation of our implementation. Reflection Coefficient (db) Im(Z S ) kω Low Detuning High Detuning Im(Z S )=.7 kω Im(Z S )=2. kω FIG. 5. (A) Input matching of the antenna vs surface reactance; iso-surface plot of the electric field (magnitude) radiated by the wire antenna, and plasmon excitation on the underlying graphene patch. Another interesting effect is pointed out in Fig. 5: the overlap of the plasmon distribution with the near field under the tip determines the strength of the coupling, and the amount of power transferred by the antenna to the plasmon. In order to emphasize this concept, and make the effect more evident, the losses are just neglected for the moment. Fig. 5(A) shows that the antenna, that would work precisely at its resonance frequency in absence of graphene, can be more or less detuned by the graphene patch, depending on the above coupling: the higher the coupling strength, the higher the coupled reactive power, B. Dispersive characterization of surface plasmon excitation In order to discuss the effect of dispersion on the strength of plasmon excitation, we focus on the two examples reported in Fig. 6. (A) No Disp τ=2. ps τ=. ps τ=.5 ps μ (ev) D=L λ/2.5 τ=2. ps τ=. ps τ=.5 ps D=L λ/2. τ=2. ps τ=. ps τ=.5 ps No Disp τ=2. ps τ=. ps τ=.5 ps μ (ev) FIG. 6. Reflection coefficient at the input terminal of the antenna with (solid lines) and without (dashed lines) spatial dispersion, for different scattering times. The frequency is set to THz, while two different disk diameters are tested, namely D = L λ/2. (A), D = L λ/2.5. S (db) S (db)

6 6 Differently from the results shown in Fig. 5, here we take into account ohmic losses using the approximate complex conductivity of Eq. (8), within the RTA limit, and assuming a nominal frequency of THz. We show the effect of spatial dispersion on the input matching (S) of the antenna, respectively in resonant (L λ/2., Fig. 6(A)) and non-resonant (L λ/2.5, Fig. 6) conditions. The antenna is fed by a voltage source with an impedance equal to the real part of the input impedance of the antenna, which is about 7 Ω and 2222 Ω for the resonant and non-resonant cases, respectively. Clearly, the minima of reflection, corresponding to surface field resonances, have lower matching levels in the non-resonant case. In either cases, the resonances are less pronounced as a consequence of dispersion, and the effect is more and more evident as the scattering time becomes larger, or, the quality of graphene gets better. Three different values of typical scattering times are tested, i.e., τ =.5,., 2. ps. All curves are plotted as a function of the chemical potential of graphene, corresponding to a Fermi energy shift associated to the local doping level. In SMM, the local doping can be provided, in near field applications, by electrostatic tuning of the charge density by a DC voltage applied to the microscope tip 7..2 non dispersive (A) dispersive.2 wave (for a normalized electric field) on the graphene disk, as function of the radial position and the doping levels (values corresponding to those of Fig. 6), with and without spatial dispersion. Here, a scattering time of 2 ps is assumed. Differences in the spatial field distributions are clearly observable, particularly in correspondence of the resonance peaks. Looking at the plots of Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, we see that the absolute effect of spatial dispersion is higher in the non-resonant case, where the size of the graphene disk is much smaller than the free-space wavelength λ. To go beyond the diagonal conductivity approximation (8), within the RTA, we explicitly account for the angular variations of the EM field, and at the same level of the effect of diffusion currents, by considering the full conductivity response (7), within both the RTA and BGK approaches Non disp. Eq. (8) Eq. (7)-BGK Eq. (7)-RTA S (db) µ (ev)..5 r/r. non dispersive.5 (C) µ (ev) D=L λ/2. D=L λ/2.5 E S E S D=L λ/2...5 r/r. dispersive.5 (D) D=L λ/ r/r...5 r/r. FIG. 7. Spatial distribution of the surface electric field E s (normalized to ) as a function of relative position (r/r) and chemical potential µ, with (B,D) and without (A,C) spatial dispersion effects, for f= THz, and D = L λ/2. (A,B), D = L λ/2.5 (C,D) Fig. 7 shows the spatial distribution of the plasmonic µ (ev) µ (ev) µ (ev) FIG. 8. Reflection coefficient (S) at input terminal of the antenna with different approaches to dispersion; f = THz, τ = ps, and D = L λ/2. are assumed. In Fig 8, we report the details of the input matching of the antenna, in the resonant case D L = λ/2.2, and compare the results obtained from the different levels of approximations discussed in the present work. We find confirmation that RTA conductivity of the graphene disk represent a significant improvement with respect to the non-dispersive conductivity of an infinite graphene sheet. In addition we see that contribution of the off diagonal tensor σ leads to non-negligible small corrections to the diagonal tensor σ, within the RTA. More importantly we notice that the effect of electron diffusion, included in the BGK, plays a significant role. Indeed the RTA and BGK expressions of σ and σ lead to remarkably differenit results. In particular, the contribution of dispersion appears to be under-estimated by the RTA conductivity (or by even more simplified expressions, like Eq. (8)), with respect to the BGK form. IV. CONCLUSIONS We have used a semiclassical model derived from the Boltzmann transport equation to investigate the effect of

7 7 spatial dispersion on the linear THz response of graphene, by excitation of surface plasmons. The excitation source has been provided by the near field of an antenna radiating in proximity of a graphene micro-disk. We have characterized the role of spatial dispersion, with respect to a cylindrical system, within both the RTA and the BGK approach, obtaining meaningful and compact expressions of the full-tensor representing the constitutive relation of the graphene patch in real space. We have shown that the surface distribution of the field on the disk, and the macroscopic response of the antenna, is significantly affected by spatial dispersion in two distinct noteworthy examples, where the antenna has been set in resonant and non-resonant conditions. Although the role played by spatial dispersion was previously clarified in propagation and modal analysis of plasmons,, here we have provided a focus on near field excitation problems, with potential fallout in important practical applications, concerning near field imaging. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work has been supported by the European Project Carbon Based Smart Systems for Wireless Applications, (NANO-RF, n ). We also thank NOW Srl ( for providing HFSS simulations. Koppens F H L, Chang D E, García de Abajo F J, Nano Letters (8), , 2, Epub 8-7-2, DOI:.2/nl277h. 2 Ju L, Geng B, Horng J, Girit C, Martin M, Hao Z, Bechtel H A, Liang X, Zettl A, Ron Shen Y, Wang F, Nature Nanotechnology 6, pp.: , 2, Epub 4--2, doi:.38/nnano Echtermeyer T J, Britnell L, Jasnos P K, Lombardo A, Gorbachev R V, Grigorenko A N, Geim A K, Ferrari A C, Novoselov K S, Nature Communications 2, 458, 2, Epub 3-9-2, doi:.38/ncomms464 4 Christensen J, Manjavacas A, Thongrattanasiri S, Koppens F H L, García de Abajo F J, ACS Nano 6 (), pp.: (22), Epub 6-2-2, doi:.2/nn Diaconescu B, Pohl K, Vattuone L, Savio L, Hofmann P, Silkin V M, Pitarke J M, Chulkov E V, Echenique P M, Faras D, Rocca M, Nature 448, 57-59, doi:.38/nature5975; 6 Hartmann R R, Kono J, Portnoi M E, Nanotechnology 25, 322, doi:.88/ /25/32/322 7 Low T, Avouris P, ACS Nano 8 (2), pp.: 86-, 24 8 Farina, M., Ye, T., Lanzani, G., Di Donato, A., Venanzoni, G., Mencarelli, D., Pietrangelo, T., Morini, A., Keivanidis, P.E., Nature Communications 4, 2668, 23 9 D. Correas-Serrano, J. S. Gomez-Diaz, and A Alvarez- Melcon, IEEE Antennas and wireless propagation letters, Vol. 3, 345, 24 G. Lovat, G. W. Hanson, R. Araneo, and P. Burghignoli Phys. Rev. B 87, 5429 (23) D. Correas-Serrano, J. S. Gómez-Díaz, J. Perruisseau- Carrier, and A. Alvarez-Melcon, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 6, no. 2, pp , Dec G. W. Hanson, Journal of Applied Physics (28); G. W. Hanson, IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation 56 (3), , 28 3 I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhic, Tables of integral, series and products, 7 Ed., Elsevier Academic Press, USA, 27 4 D. Mencarelli, L. Pierantoni, A. Di Donato, M. Farina, Journal of Computational Electronics, Volume 4, Issue, pp 24-22, March 25, (DOI).7/S Xiao Yong He and Rui Li, IEEE Journal of selected topics in quantum electronics, Vol. 2, n., Jan. 24