Adaptive Harmonic Steady State Control for Disturbance Rejection
|
|
- Arnold Melton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Adaptive Harmonic Steady State Control for Disturbance Rejection J. Chandrasekar L. Liu D. Patt P. P. Friedmann and D. S. Bernstein I. INTRODUCTION The use of feedback control for disturbance rejection is of fundamental importance in a broad range of applications and the development of effective algorithms is an ongoing area of research. For well-modeled plants with broadband disturbance classical LQG theory can be applied with weighting filters introduced to shape controller effort in accordance with the disturbance spectrum and performance objectives 1. On the other hand if the disturbance is tonal or multi-tonal with known spectrum then a model of the exogenous signal can be embedded in the controller to produce high gain feedback at frequencies that comprise the spectrum of the disturbance 2. An alternative approach which is applicable in the case of tonal or multi-tonal disturbances with known spectrum allows the system to reach harmonic steady state and uses measurements of the steady state response amplitude and phase to determine the required control signal. This technique was developed independently within two research communities. For helicopter vibration reduction this technique is known as higher harmonic control 3 4. The same technique was developed independently for active rotor balancing in this case known as convergent control 5. We refer to this algorithm as HSS harmonic steady state control. Connections between higher harmonic control and internal model control are discussed in 6. When the plant and the disturbance are not well modeled then the problem can be significantly more challenging. Within the active noise control literature a host of adaptive algorithms have been developed inspired by digital signal processing techniques. These techniques are based on LMS updating of FIR filters 7. Another approach involves continuously adjusting the frequency magnitude and phase of the control input to cancel the disturbance 8. Alternative techniques which require limited modeling of the plant dynamics and disturbance spectrum have also been developed; see for example 9. This research was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under grant F and the Army Research Office under grant The authors are with Department of Aerospace Engineering The University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI FAX dsbaero@umich.edu Fig. 1. w u G G c Harmonic Steady State Control Architecture Implementation of HSS control requires knowledge of the frequency response of the transfer function between the control input and the measurements at the disturbance frequency. In practice this information is obtained through modeling or off-line identification. When this information is uncertain or when the plant is subject to change instability can occur. Consequently the robustness of HSS control is analyzed in 5 for both additive and multiplicative model uncertainty. Adaptive extensions of HSS control that remove the need to independently model the control-tomeasurement frequency response have been considered. Specifically in the least squares procedure was proposed for estimating this transfer function. Analysis of convergence of the estimates and performance of HSS with simultaneous estimation were not discussed in In the present paper we develop a unified framework for analyzing the properties and performance of adaptive harmonic steady state control thus extending and including most of the previous literature on harmonic steady state control. II. HARMONIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Assume for convenience that the disturbance w R d acting on the plant is a single harmonic with constant amplitude and phase. The HSS control algorithm waits until the output z R p reaches harmonic steady state and then measures the amplitude and phase of the output. With this information the control input u R m is determined to minimize the effect of disturbance. As shown in Fig. 1 the HSS control algorithm is a feedback controller and thus can potentially destabilize the plant although not in z
2 the usual LTI sense. As indicated in Fig. 1 we assume that the disturbance signal is unmeasured and thus is not available for feedback. The inputs uw and the output z are related by z w G zw G zu 2.1 u where G zw s and G zu s are multi-input multi-output continuous-time transfer functions and for all i 1...p j 1...d and l 1...m G ziw j s and G ziu l s are the SISO entries of G zw s and G zu s respectively. In HSS control the update of the control input u is not performed continuously but rather at specified times t k. The control input is harmonic with the same spectrum as the disturbance and the amplitude and phase of the control input are updated at t k. The time interval t k+1 t k between two successive updates need not be constant but must be sufficiently large to allow the output z to reach harmonic steady state. At steady state the amplitude and phase of the output z are completely determined by the amplitude and phase of the disturbance and control input. Assuming that the disturbance w is harmonic with frequency ω 1 and the output z has reached harmonic steady state within the time interval t k t k+1 wt zt and ut have components wt ŵ 1Ree jω 1 t+φ 1 ŵ d Ree jω 1 t+φ d T zt ẑ 1k Ree jω 1 t+θ 1k ẑ pk Ree jω 1 t+θ pk T ut û 1k Ree jω 1 t+ψ 1k û mk Ree jω 1 t+ψ mk T 2.2 where ŵ i R ẑ ik R û ik R are the amplitudes and φ i R θ ik R ψ ik R are the phase angles of the ith component of wt zt and ut respectively. Note that the amplitude ŵ i and phase φ i of the ith component of wt are independent of the time interval and furthermore φ i is determined by the choice of t 0. Next define w si R w ci R z sik R z cik R u sik R and u cik R by w si ŵ i sinφ i w ci ŵ i cosφ i z sik ẑ ik sinθ ik z cik ẑ ik cosθ ik u sik û ik sinψ ik u cik û ik cosψ ik. 2.3 Note that for all i 1...d w si and w ci are constants determined by the choice of t 0 and that u sik and u cik are determined by the control law. Define w R 2d z k R 2p and u k R 2m by w T Ț w s1 w c1 w sd w cd z k z s1k z c1k z spk z cpk u k u s1k u c1k u smk u cmk T. 2.4 It follows from that the system dynamics in terms of w z k and u k are given by z k Tu k + Ww 2.5 where for all i 1...p j 1...m and l 1...d the entries T ij R 2 2 and W il R 2 2 of T R 2p 2m and W R 2p 2d respectively are defined by ReGzi u T ij j jω 1 ImG zi u j jω 1 ImG zi u j jω 1 ReG zi u j jω 1 ReGzi w W il l jω 1 ImG zi w l jω 1 ImG zi w l jω 1 ReG zi w l jω Replacing k by k+1 in 2.5 and subtracting the resulting equation from 2.5 yields the disturbance-free update model z k+1 z k + Tu k+1 u k. 2.7 When the disturbance wt is a sum of sinusoids of multiple frequencies the above analysis carries through with minor modifications. III. THE HSS ALGORITHM Consider the cost function Jz k u k z T k Qz k + 2z T k Su k + u T k Ru k 3.1 where Q R 2p 2p S R 2p 2m and R R 2m 2m are weighting matrices such that R is positive definite and Q S is positive semidefinite. Substituting zk from S T R 2.5 into 3.1 yields Jz k u k u T k T T QT + T T S + S T T + R u k + 2u T k TT Q + S T Ww + w T W T QWw. Since 3.2 involves only u k and w we define 3.2 J wu k Jz k u k 3.3 and write J wu k as Jw u k Ww T u T Q QT + S Ww k T T Q + S T D u k 3.4 where the positive-semidefinite matrix D is defined by D T T QT + T T S + S T T + R. 3.5 To determine u k that minimizes J wu k we set J wu k u k 2Du k + 2T T Q + S T Ww Assuming D is positive definite the optimal control law is given by u opt u kopt D 1 T T Q + S T Ww 3.7 and the minimum cost is Jw u opt w T W T Q QT + SD 1 T T Q + S T Ww. 3.8 Since u opt depends on w whose measurement is not available we derive an equivalent control law that can be used for all k 1. Setting k 0 in 2.5 yields Ww z 0 Tu and hence substituting 3.9 into 2.5 yields z k z 0 + Tu k u
3 From 3.9 the optimal control law u opt in 3.7 can be expressed as u opt D 1 T T Q + S T z 0 Tu IV. CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS OF HSS ALGORITHM Note that u opt given by 3.11 is independent of k and hence remains constant for all k 1. Substituting 3.11 in 3.10 and 3.1 the optimal value of z k for all k 1 is given by z opt z kopt and thus I TD 1 T T Q + S T Jz opt u opt z 0 Tu 0 T Q QT + SD 1 z 0 Tu T T Q + S T z 0 Tu Using 3.10 the optimal control law can be expressed recursively as u k+1opt D 1 T T Q + S T z kopt Tu kopt. 4.3 The state-space representation of the system dynamics with the optimal control law is zk+1opt zkopt A 4.4 u k+1opt u kopt where A R 2p+m 2p+m is defined by I2p TM I A 2p TMT M MT 4.5 and M R 2m 2p is defined by M D 1 T T Q + S T. Note that A 2 A and hence A is an idempotent matrix and its eigenvalues are either 0 or 1. In fact A can be factored as I2p T I2p 0 I2p T A 0 I 2m M 0 2m 0 I 2m 4.6 which implies that speca speci 2p spec0 2m. 4.7 Since A is idempotent with the initial conditions z 0 and u implies that for all k zopt A k z0 A u opt u 0 z0 u 0 I TMz0 Tu 0 Mz 0 Tu Consequently the optimum values of u opt in 3.11 and z opt in 4.1 are attained after the first update. Note that if S 0 then z opt in 4.1 can be expressed as Hence z opt Q 1 Q 1 + TR 1 T T 1 z 0 Tu σ maxr z opt σ minqσ l TT T z0 Tu where l min2p2m. Note that if σmaxr is large minimum energy σ minq control it follows from 4.10 that z opt may be large indicating poor performance. Alternatively if σmaxr σ minq is small cheap control then 4.10 implies that the z opt is small and hence the performance is good. V. ROBUSTNESS OF HSS CONTROL Implementation of HSS requires knowledge of T. An erroneous model of T can result in degraded performance and possible instability. If an estimate ˆT of T is given the control law defined in 4.3 becomes where û k+1 ˆMz k ˆTû k 5.1 ˆM ˆD 1 ˆT T Q + S T R 2m 2p 5.2 assuming that ˆD ˆT T Q ˆT + S T ˆT + ˆT T S + R 5.3 is positive definite. The state-space representation of the system-dynamics with 5.1 is zk+1  zk 5.4 û k+1 where  is defined by I2p T  ˆM T ˆM ˆT I 2p ˆM ˆM ˆT and T ˆT T. û k It is useful to factor  as I2p T I2p 0  0 I 2m ˆM ˆM T which shows that 5.5 I2p T 0 I 2m 5.6 specâ speci 2p spec ˆM T. 5.7 Hence the HSS algorithm is stable if and only if Assuming S 0 it follows that sprad ˆM T sprad sprad ˆM T < ˆT T Q ˆT + R 1 ˆTT Q T σmaxt + σmax TσmaxQσmax T. σ minr Therefore it can be shown that if σ max T < σmaxt 2 then sprad ˆM T < 1. σ minr σ maxt σminr σ maxq 5.10 If is large minimum energy control σ maxq then according to 5.10 HSS control possesses a high degree of robustness and a sufficient condition for the stability of HSS algorithm is approximately given by σ max T < σ minr σ maxq However if σminr σ maxq is small cheap control then 5.10 implies that robustness is compromised.
4  k I2p T 0 I 2m From 5.6 it follows that k 1 i1 I 0 ˆM T i ˆM k ˆM T I2p T 0 I 2m.5.12 Now assume that HSS control is stable that is 5.8 is satisfied. In this case lim ˆM T k 0 and let k 1 Γ lim ˆM T i I ˆM T 1. Hence the i1 limiting values of z k and û k are given by lim zk lim  k z0 ûk û 0 I TΓ ˆMz0 Tû 0 Γ ˆMz 0 Tû Now consider the case where the estimate ˆT of T involves a multiplicative error that is ˆT TI + T mul where T mul R 2m 2m. Then ˆT can be expressed equivalently by ˆT T + T where T T T mul. A sufficient condition for stability of HSS control is sprad ˆMT T mul < 1. Following a procedure similar to the one discussed in 5.9 and 5.10 for additive uncertainty it can be shown that the HSS algorithm is stable if σ max T mul < σ minr σmax 2 TσmaxQ VI. ADAPTIVE HSS CONTROL ALGORITHM Here we discuss online identification of the matrix T which will then be used as the basis for an adaptive extension of HSS control discussed in the previous sections. Define z k R 2p and u k R 2m by z k z k z k 1 u k u k u k and Z k R 2p k and U k R 2m k by Z k z 1 z k Uk u 1 u k. 6.2 The system dynamics equation 2.7 can be represented by Hence it follows from 6.1 that z k T u k. 6.3 Z k T U k. 6.4 Assuming U k Uk T is nonsingular we define P k U k Uk T and it follows from 6.4 that the least squares estimate ˆT LSk of T is given by ˆT LSk Z k U T k P k. The recursive least squares method is used to iteratively update ˆT LSk based on the past and current values of z k and u k. Since u k u T k is positive semidefinite for all k and k U k Uk T u i u T i 6.6 i1 it follows that if U k0 U T k 0 is nonsingular then U k Uk T is nonsingular for all k > k 0. Hence the recursive procedure for determining T LSk for all k > k 0 is given by where K k u T k+1p k u k+1 1 u T k+1p k 6.7 ˆT LSk+1 ˆT LSk + ε k+1 K k Note that P k+1 P k I u k+1 K k ε k+1 z k+1 ˆT LSk u k rank U k U T k rank U k mink 2m Since U k Uk T is 2m 2m it follows from 6.11 that U k Uk T is singular for all k < 2m. Hence the recursive procedure cannot be used for k < 2m. A suboptimal way to determine an estimate ˆT k of T is to replace P k in by ˆP k that is K k u T ˆP k+1 k u k+1 1 u T ˆP k+1 k 6.12 ˆT k+1 ˆT k + ε k+1 K k ˆP k+1 ˆP k I u k+1 K k where ˆP 0 is positive definite but otherwise arbitrary and ε k is defined by 6.10 with ˆT LSk replaced by ˆT k. It follows from that ˆP k is positive definite for all k 0 and is given by 1 ˆP k ˆP 0 + U k Uk T Furthermore ˆTk is given by ˆT k ˆT 1 0 ˆP 0 + Z k Uk T 1 ˆP 0 + U k Uk T Since ˆP 0 is positive definite the inverse in 6.16 always exists and hence the recursive procedure can be used for all k 0. The updated estimate ˆT k is used at each control update step to calculate the control law u k+1 which is given by where ˆM k is defined by u k+1 ˆM k z k ˆT k u k 6.17 ˆM k ˆT T k Q ˆT k + S T ˆTk + ˆT T k S + R 1 ˆT T k Q + ST VII. CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS OF THE ESTIMATE ˆT k Define T k R 2p 2m by T k ˆT k T 7.1 where ˆT k is updated using Next define the function V T ˆP by and V k by V T ˆP T ˆP 1 T T 7.2 V k V T k+1 ˆP k+1 V T k ˆP k 7.3
5 where ˆP k is updated using and ˆP 0 is the positive definite matrix used to initialize Subtracting T from both sides of 6.13 yields T k+1 T k + ε k+1 K k Using 6.3 and 7.1 ε k+1 can be expressed as ε k+1 T k u k Substituting and 7.5 into 7.3 yields ε k+1 ε T k+1 V k 1 + u T ˆP 7.6 k+1 k u k+1 and hence V T k ˆP k is non-increasing. Since V T k ˆP k 0 it follows that lim V T k ˆP k exists and is nonnegative. Hence lim ε k+1 ε T k u T ˆP lim k+1 k u V k k+1 Next we show that u k is bounded. Substituting 6.4 into 6.16 yields ˆT k ˆT 1 0 ˆP 0 + T U k U T 1 k ˆP 1 ˆP 0 + U k U T k Post-multiplying 7.8 by 0 + U k Uk T yields 1 1 T k T 0 ˆP 0 ˆP 0 + U k Uk T If U k0 Uk T 0 is nonsingular then for all k k implies that σ max T k σ max T 0 σ min ˆP 0 σ min U k0 U T k Hence if ˆP0 is chosen to be sufficiently large then σ max T k can be made sufficiently small and even made to satisfy condition 5.10 and in that case it follows from 5.9 that for all k k 0 σ max ˆM k T k < The state space representation of the system dynamics with the control law 6.17 is zk+1 zk 7.12 u k+1 Âk where Âk is defined by 5.5 with ˆT and ˆM replaced by ˆT k and ˆM k respectively. Hence for all k k 0 zk zk u k ik 0  i u k u k0 Note that  i can be factored as ik 0 I2p T I 0  i I2p 0 I 2m  k 21 ik ˆM T ik 0 i T i 0 I 2m where  21 ˆM k0 I + k 1 ik 0 i j0 T ˆM j j+1. From 7.11 it follows that σ max ˆM i T i ik 0 ik 0 σ max ˆM i T i < and hence it follows from that z k and u k are bounded. Hence for all k let γ > 0 satisfy u k < γ and thus u k u k+1 u k < 2γ From 6.5 and 6.6 it follows that ˆPk+1 ˆP k which implies that ˆP k ˆP Hence it follows from 7.17 and 7.16 that 1 + u T k ˆP k u k 1 + 4γ 2 λ max ˆP and thus 7.8 implies that lim ε k Taking the limit as k of 6.13 yields lim ˆTk+1 ˆT k lim ε k+1 u T k+1 ˆP k 1 + u T k+1 ˆP k u k From it follows that ˆTk+1 ˆT k lim Thus { ˆT k } is a Cauchy sequence and hence ˆT k converges. However there is no guarantee that ˆT k will converge to T. In fact it can be shown that there are certain choices of ˆP 0 and ˆT 0 such that ˆT k will not converge to T. Conditions on ˆT 0 and ˆP 0 that guarantee convergence of ˆT k to T are not available. However the steady state performance of the adaptive HSS control depends on the steady-state value of the estimate ˆT k. Note that using 6.16 the RLS estimate ˆT k can be expressed as ˆT k T + T 0 ˆP 1 0 ˆP k Consequently if ˆP k 0 as k then ˆT k T as k. It follows from the theory of RLS 12 that if u k is persistently exciting then ˆP k 0 as k. However since u k is given by the adaptive control law 6.17 u k may not be persistently exciting. Next define δ k R 2m by δ k 0 1 i 1 δ ki 0 1 2m i T 7.23 and δ ki R by δ ki δ sign u ki where u ki is the ith component of u k δ > 0 and i is the remainder when k is divided by 2m. Next define ũ k by ũ k u k + δ k. It can be shown that if δ is sufficiently large then ũ k is persistently exciting. The modified control law is given by u k+1 u k + ũ k. 7.24
6 Microphone output in volts At about 4 s the microphone is moved to a new location At about 22 s adaptive HSS control begins time in seconds Fig. 2. Top view of the acoustic drum with two end-mounted speakers and one internal microphone. The microphone is initially at Location A and is moved to Location B while the HSS control algorithm is operational. Fig. 3. Disturbance rejection using fixed-model and adaptive HSS control. The microphone is moved at t 4sand the output diverges. Adaptive HSS control begins at t 22 s and convergence is achieved. VIII. EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLE: NOISE CANCELLATION IN AN ACOUSTIC DRUM The acoustic drum see Fig. 2 has two endmounted speakers and up to six microphones suspended inside the drum through holes drilled along the top. Though the equations of motion of the acoustic drum is not similar to that of the duct 1 the input-output response is linear and hence HSS control can be used to reject a disturbance with a known harmonic spectrum. A constant-amplitude single-tone disturbance signal wt with frequency 10 Hz ω 20π rad/s is produced by the disturbance speaker. The actuation speaker produces the control ut for cancelling the disturbance. The control objective is to reduce the output zt measured by microphone 1 at Location A. To estimate T a sinusoidal input with frequency 10 Hz amplitude û 1 and phase angle ψ 1 is applied to the system in N separate trials. The amplitude and phase of the output ẑ 1 and θ 1 are used to determine an initial estimate T LS of T using the batch least squares procedure. A dspace 1003 system is used to determine the vector z k from measurements of zt and the update u k is computed by a Simulink implementation of the HSS control algorithm. Fig. 3 shows the performance of HSS control with T T LS. Next we consider the case in which T is uncertain. At t 4 s the microphone is moved from its original location Location A to a new location Location B resulting in a change in the system dynamics. Since conventional HSS control is unaware of this change the modified system is unstable and the output diverges. At t 22 s adaptive HSS control begins and stability is recovered providing disturbance rejection at the new location. IX. CONCLUSION In this paper we developed adaptive harmonic steady state control for disturbance rejection. HSS control extends higher harmonic control and convergent control developed for helicopter vibration reduction and rotor imbalance control. HSS control is applicable to stable systems with tonal or multi-tonal disturbances. The adaptive HSS algorithm is easy to implement and robust in the sense that no modeling information is required aside from the number of disturbance harmonics. REFERENCES 1 J. Hong and D. S. Bernstein Bode Integral Constraints Colocation and Spillover in Active Noise and Vibration Control IEEE Trans. Contr. Sys. Tech. vol. 6 pp W. Messner and M. Bodson Design of Adaptive Feedforward Algorithms using Internal Model Equivalence Int. J. Adap. Contr. Sig. Proc. vol. 9 pp P. P. Friedmann and T. A. Millott Vibration Reduction in Rotorcraft Using Active Control: A Comparison of Various Approaches J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. vol. 18 pp K. P. Nygren and D. P. Schrage Fixed-Gain Versus Adaptive Higher Harmonic Control Simulation J. Amer. Helicopter Soc. vol. 34 pp C. R. Knospe R. W. Hope S. M. Tamer and S. J. Fedigan Robustness of Adaptive Unbalance Control of Rotors with Magnetic Bearings J. Vibr. Contr. vol. 2 pp S. R. Hall and N. M. Werely Performance of Higher Harmonic Control Algorithms for Helicopter Vibration Reduction J. Guid. Contr. Dyn. vol. 16 pp S. M. Kuo and D. R. Morgan Active Noise Control Systems. Wiley- Interscience M. Bodson and S. C. Scott Adaptive Algorithms for the Rejection of Sinusoidal Disturbances with Unknown Frequency Automatica vol. 33 pp R. Venugopal and D. S. Bernstein Adaptive Disturbance Rejection Using ARMARKOV/Toeplitz Models IEEE Trans. Contr. Sys. Tech. vol. 8 pp C. R. Knospe R. W. Hope S. J. Fedigan and R. D. Williams Experiments in the Control of Unbalance Response using Magnetic Bearings Mechatronics vol. 5 pp W. Johnson Self-Tuning Regulators for Multicyclic Control of Helicopter Vibration NASA Tech. Paper no K. J. Astrom and B. Wittenmark Adaptive Control. Addison Wesley 1995.
The HHC Algorithm for Helicopter Vibration Reduction Revisited
45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference 19-22 April 2004, Palm Springs, California AIAA 2004-1948 The HHC Algorithm for Helicopter Vibration Reduction Revisited
More informationCumulative Retrospective Cost Adaptive Control with RLS-Based Optimization
21 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July 2, 21 ThC3.3 Cumulative Retrospective Cost Adaptive Control with RLS-Based Optimization Jesse B. Hoagg 1 and Dennis S.
More informationSystem Identification Using a Retrospective Correction Filter for Adaptive Feedback Model Updating
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St Louis, MO, USA June 1-1, 9 FrA13 System Identification Using a Retrospective Correction Filter for Adaptive Feedback Model Updating M A Santillo
More informationHigher-Harmonic-Control Algorithm for Helicopter Vibration Reduction Revisited
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE, CONROL, AND DYNAMICS Vol. 28, No. 5, September October 25 Higher-Harmonic-Control Algorithm for Helicopter Vibration Reduction Revisited Dan Patt, Li Liu, Jaganath Chandrasear, Dennis
More informationA METHOD OF ADAPTATION BETWEEN STEEPEST- DESCENT AND NEWTON S ALGORITHM FOR MULTI- CHANNEL ACTIVE CONTROL OF TONAL NOISE AND VIBRATION
A METHOD OF ADAPTATION BETWEEN STEEPEST- DESCENT AND NEWTON S ALGORITHM FOR MULTI- CHANNEL ACTIVE CONTROL OF TONAL NOISE AND VIBRATION Jordan Cheer and Stephen Daley Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,
More informationAdaptive Control of an Aircraft with Uncertain Nonminimum-Phase Dynamics
1 American Control Conference Palmer House Hilton July 1-3, 1. Chicago, IL, USA Adaptive Control of an Aircraft with Uncertain Nonminimum-Phase Dynamics Ahmad Ansari and Dennis S. Bernstein Abstract This
More informationSliding Window Recursive Quadratic Optimization with Variable Regularization
11 American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 29 - July 1, 11 Sliding Window Recursive Quadratic Optimization with Variable Regularization Jesse B. Hoagg, Asad A. Ali,
More information+ 1) = Az(k.) + Bu(k) + Diw(k1, (1) z(k) = E&) + Ezu(k) + Eow(k), (2) y(k) = CZ(k) + h (k) + Dzw(k), (3) Rejection Using ARMARKQV Representations
Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Decision & Control San Diego, Califomla USA December.1997 Adaptive Disturbance System TA06 10:20 Rejection Using ARMARKQV Representations Ravinder Venugopal and Dennis
More informationIMPROVEMENTS IN ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL OF HELICOPTER NOISE IN A MOCK CABIN ABSTRACT
IMPROVEMENTS IN ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL OF HELICOPTER NOISE IN A MOCK CABIN Jared K. Thomas Brigham Young University Department of Mechanical Engineering ABSTRACT The application of active noise control (ANC)
More informationADAPTIVE PERIODIC NOISE CANCELATION FOR COOLING FANS WITH VARYING ROTATIONAL SPEED
Proceedings of IDETC/VIB 27 ASME 27 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise (VIB) September 4-7, 27, Las Vegas, USA DRAFT ADAPTIVE
More informationRetrospective Cost Adaptive Control for Nonminimum-Phase Systems with Uncertain Nonminimum-Phase Zeros Using Convex Optimization
American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 9 - July, Retrospective Cost Adaptive Control for Nonminimum-Phase Systems with Uncertain Nonminimum-Phase Zeros Using Convex
More informationAdaptive Control Using Retrospective Cost Optimization with RLS-Based Estimation for Concurrent Markov-Parameter Updating
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 8th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, PR China, December 6-8, 9 ThA Adaptive Control Using Retrospective Cost Optimization with RLS-Based Estimation
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 24: H2 Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 4, 2011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 24: H 2 Synthesis May
More informationNew Recursive-Least-Squares Algorithms for Nonlinear Active Control of Sound and Vibration Using Neural Networks
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL. 12, NO. 1, JANUARY 2001 135 New Recursive-Least-Squares Algorithms for Nonlinear Active Control of Sound and Vibration Using Neural Networks Martin Bouchard,
More informationRetrospective Cost Adaptive Control for Feedback and Feedforward Noise Control
Retrospective Cost Adaptive Control for Feedback and Feedforward Noise Control by Antai Xie A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Aerospace
More informationPerformance of an Adaptive Algorithm for Sinusoidal Disturbance Rejection in High Noise
Performance of an Adaptive Algorithm for Sinusoidal Disturbance Rejection in High Noise MarcBodson Department of Electrical Engineering University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 842, U.S.A. (8) 58 859 bodson@ee.utah.edu
More informationAdaptive Rejection of Periodic Disturbances Acting on Linear Systems with Unknown Dynamics
206 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) ARIA Resort & Casino December 2-4, 206, Las Vegas, USA Adaptive Rejection of Periodic Disturbances Acting on Linear Systems with Unknown Dynamics
More informationI. D. Landau, A. Karimi: A Course on Adaptive Control Adaptive Control. Part 9: Adaptive Control with Multiple Models and Switching
I. D. Landau, A. Karimi: A Course on Adaptive Control - 5 1 Adaptive Control Part 9: Adaptive Control with Multiple Models and Switching I. D. Landau, A. Karimi: A Course on Adaptive Control - 5 2 Outline
More informationOptimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems
1 Optimal Polynomial Control for Discrete-Time Systems Prof Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning this paper should
More informationIterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I
Iterative Learning Control Analysis and Design I Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK etar@ecs.soton.ac.uk http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ Contents Basics Representations
More informationA Numerical Study on Controlling a Nonlinear Multilink Arm Using A Retrospective Cost Model Reference Adaptive Controller
5th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC) Orlando, FL, USA, December -5, A Numerical Study on Controlling a Nonlinear Multilink Arm Using A Retrospective Cost
More informationKalman-Filter-Based Time-Varying Parameter Estimation via Retrospective Optimization of the Process Noise Covariance
2016 American Control Conference (ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 2016. Boston, MA, USA Kalman-Filter-Based Time-Varying Parameter Estimation via Retrospective Optimization of the Process Noise
More informationGrowing Window Recursive Quadratic Optimization with Variable Regularization
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA Growing Window Recursive Quadratic Optimization with Variable Regularization Asad A. Ali 1, Jesse B.
More informationDSCC2012-MOVIC
ASME 2 th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference joint with the JSME 2 th Motion and Vibration Conference DSCC2-MOVIC2 October 7-9, 2, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA DSCC2-MOVIC2-88 BROADBAND DISTURBANCE
More informationDESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SENSORLESS SPEED CONTROL FOR INDUCTION MOTOR DRIVE USING AN OPTIMIZED EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJECET) International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering & Technology (IJECET), ISSN 0976 ISSN 0976 6464(Print)
More informationPosition Control Using Acceleration- Based Identification and Feedback With Unknown Measurement Bias
Position Control Using Acceleration- Based Identification and Feedback With Unknown Measurement Bias Jaganath Chandrasekar e-mail: jchandra@umich.edu Dennis S. Bernstein e-mail: dsbaero@umich.edu Department
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (2-3 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30 Today: Recap
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationLinear Quadratic Gausssian Control Design with Loop Transfer Recovery
Linear Quadratic Gausssian Control Design with Loop Transfer Recovery Leonid Freidovich Department of Mathematics Michigan State University MI 48824, USA e-mail:leonid@math.msu.edu http://www.math.msu.edu/
More informationActive Minimization of Acoustic Energy Density to Attenuate Radiated Noise from Enclosures
Active Minimization of Acoustic Energy Density to Attenuate Radiated Noise from Enclosures Andrew J. Boone Department of Mechanical Engineering Brigham Young University 435 CTB Provo, UT 8460 Abstract
More informationEnhancing Transient Response of Asymptotic Regulation with Disturbance Onset
211 American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 29 - July 1, 211 Enhancing Transient Response of Asymptotic Regulation with Disturbance Onset Kevin C. Chu and Tsu-Chin
More informationRobust harmonic control for helicopter vibration attenuation
214 American Control Conference (ACC) June 4-6, 214. Portland, Oregon, USA Robust harmonic control for helicopter vibration attenuation Roberto Mura, Amir Masoud Ghalamzan Esfahani, Marco Lovera Abstract
More informationThM06-2. Coprime Factor Based Closed-Loop Model Validation Applied to a Flexible Structure
Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Maui, Hawaii USA, December 2003 ThM06-2 Coprime Factor Based Closed-Loop Model Validation Applied to a Flexible Structure Marianne Crowder
More informationIntroduction to System Identification and Adaptive Control
Introduction to System Identification and Adaptive Control A. Khaki Sedigh Control Systems Group Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering K. N. Toosi University of Technology May 2009 Introduction
More informationADAPTIVE CONTROL WITH CONVEX SATURATION CONSTRAINTS
Proceedings of the ASME 3 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference DSCC3 October -3, 3, Palo Alto, California, USA DSCC3-3877 ADAPTIVE CONTROL WITH CONVEX SATURATION CONSTRAINTS Jin Yan Dept of Aerospace
More informationApplication of Neuro Fuzzy Reduced Order Observer in Magnetic Bearing Systems
Application of Neuro Fuzzy Reduced Order Observer in Magnetic Bearing Systems M. A., Eltantawie, Member, IAENG Abstract Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is used to design fuzzy reduced order
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin Discrete-Time
More informationChapter 3. LQ, LQG and Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 3 LQ, LQG and Control System H 2 Design Overview LQ optimization state feedback LQG optimization output feedback H 2 optimization non-stochastic version of LQG Application to feedback system design
More informationRobust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming
Robust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming Gorka Galdos, Alireza Karimi and Roland Longchamp Abstract A quadratic programming approach is proposed to tune fixed-order
More informationADAPTIVE CONTROL OF A FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE USING ACOUSTIC EXCITATION AND OPTICAL SENSING
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit 11-14 August 23, Austin, Texas AIAA 23-543 ADAPTIVE CONTROL OF A FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE USING ACOUSTIC EXCITATION AND OPTICAL SENSING Jesse Hoagg
More informationMANY adaptive control methods rely on parameter estimation
610 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 52, NO 4, APRIL 2007 Direct Adaptive Dynamic Compensation for Minimum Phase Systems With Unknown Relative Degree Jesse B Hoagg and Dennis S Bernstein Abstract
More informationSemiparametric Identification of Wiener Systems Using a Single Harmonic Input and Retrospective Cost Optimization
American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, ThC7. Semiparametric Identification of Wiener Systems Using a Single Harmonic Input and Retrospective Cost Optimization
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationHELICOPTERS radiate noise over a large frequency
596 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 7, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 1999 Feedback Attenuation and Adaptive Cancellation of Blade Vortex Interaction on a Helicopter Blade Element Kartik B. Ariyur
More informationAdaptive Output Feedback Control of the NASA GTM Model with Unknown Nonminimum-Phase Zeros
AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 8 - August, Portland, Oregon AIAA -64 Adaptive Output Feedback Control of the NASA GTM Model with Unknown Nonminimum-Phase Zeros Anthony M. D Amato, E.
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationMITIGATING UNCORRELATED PERIODIC DISTURBANCE IN NARROWBAND ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL SYSTEMS
17th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 29) Glasgow, Scotland, August 24-28, 29 MITIGATING UNCORRELATED PERIODIC DISTURBANCE IN NARROWBAND ACTIVE NOISE CONTROL SYSTEMS Muhammad Tahir AKHTAR
More informationAlgorithm for Multiple Model Adaptive Control Based on Input-Output Plant Model
BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNEICS AND INFORMAION ECHNOLOGIES Volume No Sofia Algorithm for Multiple Model Adaptive Control Based on Input-Output Plant Model sonyo Slavov Department of Automatics
More informationPID controllers, part I
Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering Dr inŝ. JANUSZ LICHOTA CONTROL SYSTEMS PID controllers, part I Wrocław 2007 CONTENTS Controller s classification PID controller what is it? Typical controller
More informationCCA BASED ALGORITHMS FOR BLIND EQUALIZATION OF FIR MIMO SYSTEMS
CCA BASED ALGORITHMS FOR BLID EQUALIZATIO OF FIR MIMO SYSTEMS Javier Vía and Ignacio Santamaría Dept of Communications Engineering University of Cantabria 395 Santander, Cantabria, Spain E-mail: {jvia,nacho}@gtasdicomunicanes
More informationAN ALTERNATIVE FEEDBACK STRUCTURE FOR THE ADAPTIVE ACTIVE CONTROL OF PERIODIC AND TIME-VARYING PERIODIC DISTURBANCES
Journal of Sound and Vibration (1998) 21(4), 517527 AN ALTERNATIVE FEEDBACK STRUCTURE FOR THE ADAPTIVE ACTIVE CONTROL OF PERIODIC AND TIME-VARYING PERIODIC DISTURBANCES M. BOUCHARD Mechanical Engineering
More informationFiltered-X LMS vs repetitive control for active structural acoustic control of periodic disturbances
Filtered-X LMS vs repetitive control for active structural acoustic control of periodic disturbances B. Stallaert 1, G. Pinte 2, S. Devos 2, W. Symens 2, J. Swevers 1, P. Sas 1 1 K.U.Leuven, Department
More informationAutonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective
Autonomous Helicopter Landing A Nonlinear Output Regulation Perspective Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio State University
More informationRetrospective Cost Adaptive Thrust Control of a 1D scramjet with Mach Number Disturbance
2015 American Control Conference Palmer House Hilton July 1-3, 2015. Chicago, IL, USA Retrospective Cost Adaptive Thrust Control of a 1D scramjet with Mach Number Disturbance Ankit Goel 1, Antai Xie 2,
More informationDSCC2012-MOVIC
ASME 22 5th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference joint with the JSME 22 th Motion and Vibration Conference DSCC22-MOVIC22 October 7-9, 22, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA DSCC22-MOVIC22-8752 ADAPTIVE
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian. NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More informationOnline monitoring of MPC disturbance models using closed-loop data
Online monitoring of MPC disturbance models using closed-loop data Brian J. Odelson and James B. Rawlings Department of Chemical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Online Optimization Based Identification
More informationA Class of Strongly Stabilizing Bandpass Controllers for Flexible Structures
Milano Italy August 28 - September 2, 211 A Class of Strongly Stabilizing Bandpass Controllers for Flexible Structures Alberto Cavallo, Giuseppe De Maria, Ciro Natale and Salvatore Pirozzi Dipartimento
More informationCOMBINED ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER FOR UAV GUIDANCE
COMBINED ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER FOR UAV GUIDANCE B.R. Andrievsky, A.L. Fradkov Institute for Problems of Mechanical Engineering of Russian Academy of Sciences 61, Bolshoy av., V.O., 199178 Saint Petersburg,
More informationDisturbance Rejection in Parameter-varying Web-winding Systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Disturbance Rejection in Parameter-varying Web-winding Systems Hua Zhong Lucy Y. Pao Electrical and Computer Engineering
More informationRobust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States
obust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States John A Akpobi, Member, IAENG and Aloagbaye I Momodu Abstract Compressors for jet engines in operation experience
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 2 Stability Definitions We define stability first with respect to changes in the initial conditions Analysis of Discrete-Time
More informationExperimental Evaluation on H DIA Control of Magnetic Bearings with Rotor Unbalance
Experimental Evaluation on H DIA Control of Magnetic Bearings with Rotor Unbalance Hiroki Seto and Toru Namerikawa Division of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Kanazawa University Kakuma-cho,
More informationDISCRETE TIME H CONTROL OF TIP-TILT MODES WITH SATURATING ACTUATORS
Florence, Italy. May 2013 ISBN: 978-88-908876-0-4 DOI: 10.12839/AO4ELT3.13438 DISCRETE TIME H CONTROL OF TIP-TILT MODES WITH SATURATING ACTUATORS Jean-Pierre Folcher a UMR 7293 Lagrange - Université de
More informationControl of Chatter using Active Magnetic Bearings
Control of Chatter using Active Magnetic Bearings Carl R. Knospe University of Virginia Opportunity Chatter is a machining process instability that inhibits higher metal removal rates (MRR) and accelerates
More informationFundamental Design Limitations of the General Control Configuration
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 48, NO 8, AUGUST 2003 1355 Fundamental Design Limitations of the General Control Configuration Jim S Freudenberg, Fellow, IEEE, C V Hollot, Senior Member, IEEE,
More informationMultipredictive Adaptive Control of Arc Welding Trailing Centerline Temperature
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 8, NO. 1, JANUARY 2000 159 Multipredictive Adaptive Control of Arc Welding Trailing Centerline Temperature T. O. Santos, R. B. Caetano, J. M. Lemos,
More informationRecursive Deadbeat Controller Design
NASA Technical Memorandum 112863 Recursive Deadbeat Controller Design Jer-Nan Juang Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia Minh Q Phan Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey May 1997 National
More informationAdaptive Stabilization of a Class of Nonlinear Systems With Nonparametric Uncertainty
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 46, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2001 1821 Adaptive Stabilization of a Class of Nonlinear Systes With Nonparaetric Uncertainty Aleander V. Roup and Dennis S. Bernstein
More informationChapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs
Chapter 2 Review of Linear and Nonlinear Controller Designs This Chapter reviews several flight controller designs for unmanned rotorcraft. 1 Flight control systems have been proposed and tested on a wide
More informationAdaptive Robust Control
Adaptive Robust Control Adaptive control: modifies the control law to cope with the fact that the system and environment are uncertain. Robust control: sacrifices performance by guaranteeing stability
More informationSystems. Active Vibration Isolation of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom
Active Vibration Isolation of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems WASSIM M. HADDAD School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0150 USA ALI RAZAVI George W Woodruff
More informationDecentralized Disturbance Attenuation for Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Delayed State Interconnections
Decentralized Disturbance Attenuation for Large-Scale Nonlinear Systems with Delayed State Interconnections Yi Guo Abstract The problem of decentralized disturbance attenuation is considered for a new
More informationRecent Advances in Positive Systems: The Servomechanism Problem
Recent Advances in Positive Systems: The Servomechanism Problem 47 th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 28. Bartek Roszak and Edward J. Davison Systems Control Group, University of Toronto
More informationMIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time
MIMO robustness MIMO analysis: loop-at-a-time y 1 y 2 P (s) + + K 2 (s) r 1 r 2 K 1 (s) Plant: P (s) = 1 s 2 + α 2 s α 2 α(s + 1) α(s + 1) s α 2. (take α = 10 in the following numerical analysis) Controller:
More informationTitle algorithm for active control of mul IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH A LANGUAGE PROCESSING (2006), 14(1):
Title Analysis of the filtered-x LMS algo algorithm for active control of mul Author(s) Hinamoto, Y; Sakai, H Citation IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH A LANGUAGE PROCESSING (2006), 14(1): Issue Date
More informationH -Control of Acoustic Noise in a Duct with a Feedforward Configuration
H -Control of Acoustic Noise in a Duct with a Feedforward Configuration K.A. Morris Department of Applied Mathematics University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 CANADA Abstract A mathematical model
More informationTitle without the persistently exciting c. works must be obtained from the IEE
Title Exact convergence analysis of adapt without the persistently exciting c Author(s) Sakai, H; Yang, JM; Oka, T Citation IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL 55(5): 2077-2083 PROCESS Issue Date 2007-05 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/50544
More informationACTIVE NOISE CONTROL OF A COOLING FAN IN A SHORT DUCT
Proceedings of CAD28 oisecon28-asme CAD July 28-3, 28, Dearborn, Michigan, USA CAD28-7386 ACTIVE OISE COTROL OF A COOLIG FA I A SHORT DUCT Charles E. Kinney System Identification and Control Lab. Dep.
More informationRegulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii
Regulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii Hua Zhong and Lucy Y. Pao Abstract A tape system is time-varying as tape winds from one reel to the other. The variations in reel radii consist
More informationEFFICIENT LINEAR MIMO ADAPTIVE INVERSE CONTROL
EFFICIENT LINEAR MIMO ADAPTIVE INVERSE CONTROL Dr. Gregory L. Plett Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of Colorado at Colorado Springs P.O. Box 715, Colorado Springs, CO 8933 715
More informationRobust LQR Control Design of Gyroscope
Robust LQR Control Design of Gyroscope Ashok S. Chandak 1, Anil J. Patil 2 Abstract The basic problem in designing control systems is the ability to achieve good performance in the presence of uncertainties
More informationObserver design for rotating shafts excited by unbalances
Observer design for rotating shafts excited by unbalances R. S. Schittenhelm, Z. Wang, S. Rinderknecht Institute for Mechatronic Systems in Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
More informationMTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan
MTNS 06, Kyoto (July, 2006) Shinji Hara The University of Tokyo, Japan Outline Motivation & Background: H2 Tracking Performance Limits: new paradigm Explicit analytical solutions with examples H2 Regulation
More informationA sub-optimal second order sliding mode controller for systems with saturating actuators
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 28 FrB2.5 A sub-optimal second order sliding mode for systems with saturating actuators Antonella Ferrara and Matteo
More informationMAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions
MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions Question 1. SIGNALS: Design of a noise-cancelling headphone system. 1a. Based on the low-pass filter given, design a high-pass filter,
More informationAdaptive Control of Mass-Spring Systems with Unknown Hysteretic Contact Friction
26 American Control Conference (ACC) Boston arriott Copley Place July 6-8, 26. Boston, A, USA Adaptive Control of ass-spring Systems with Unknown Hysteretic Contact Friction ohammad Al Janaideh and Dennis
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Basic Feedback Analysis & Design
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Basic Feedback Analysis & Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Routh s Stability
More informationTrack-Following Control Design and Implementation for Hard Disk Drives with Missing Samples
Track-Following Control Design and Implementation for Hard Disk Drives with Missing Samples Jianbin Nie Edgar Sheh Roberto Horowitz Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley,
More informationRegulation of Linear Systems with Unknown Additive Sinusoidal Sensor Disturbances
Proceedings of the 7th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-, 8 Regulation of Linear Systems with Unknown Additive Sinusoidal Sensor Disturbances Riccardo
More informationRobust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method
International Journal of Electrical Engineering. ISSN 0974-2158 Volume 7, Number 2 (2014), pp. 257-270 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationH 2 Suboptimal Estimation and Control for Nonnegative
Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July 11-13, 2007 FrC20.3 H 2 Suboptimal Estimation and Control for Nonnegative Dynamical Systems
More informationIDENTIFICATION FOR CONTROL
IDENTIFICATION FOR CONTROL Raymond A. de Callafon, University of California San Diego, USA Paul M.J. Van den Hof, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands Keywords: Controller, Closed loop model,
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationChapter Robust Performance and Introduction to the Structured Singular Value Function Introduction As discussed in Lecture 0, a process is better desc
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter Robust
More informationControl For Hard Disk Drives With An Irregular Sampling Rate
211 American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 29 - July 1, 211 Optimal H Control For Hard Disk Drives With An Irregular Sampling Rate Jianbin Nie, Edgar Sheh, and Roberto
More informationLecture 8. Applications
Lecture 8. Applications Ivan Papusha CDS270 2: Mathematical Methods in Control and System Engineering May 8, 205 / 3 Logistics hw7 due this Wed, May 20 do an easy problem or CYOA hw8 (design problem) will
More informationCBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using State-space Methods. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using State-space Methods Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University Korea University III -1 Overview States What
More informationIAC-11-C1.5.9 INERTIA-FREE ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WITH UNKNOWN TIME-VARYING MASS DISTRIBUTION
6nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, SA. Copyright by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved IAC--C.5.9 INERTIA-FREE ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SPACECRAFT WITH UNKNOWN
More information