arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 20 Jan 2013

Transcription

1 Summary of Violation in hh ecays at Belle arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] Jan 13 Eric White, for the Belle Collaboration 1 epartment of Physics University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH, US lthough violation is predicted to be small in the Standard Model, there exists a continuing theoretical interest within the charm sector due to enhancements of V through new physics processes. We present an overview of the measurements of direct violation in the charm sector at Belle. We give a brief review of the theory of violation in charm physics, then discuss recent measurements for the decay modes (s) φπ ; K S π,k S η( ) ; π η ( ) ; and K S π. PRESENTE T The 5 th International Workshop on Charm Physics Charm 1 Honolulu, Hawai i 968, US, May 14 17, 1 1

2 1 Introduction The violation of charge-parity() symmetry has been well-established in the neutral K and B systems [1 4], while a first measurement of violation (V) in the B s system has been reported by the LHCb collaboration [5]. long with the observation of mixing [6,7], there has been a renewal of interest in charm physics beyond the SM. V is described in the Standard Model (SM) by the Kobayashi-Maskawa phase in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) mixing matrix [8, 9]. However, since the expected size of V is not sufficient to account for the known matter-antimatter imbalance in our Universe, it is believed that additional sources of asymmetry could be generated by physics beyond the Standard Model [1]. lthough quark mixing has been measured to a level that is consistent with theory, recent evidence for V in singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays [5] has renewed theoretical interest in charm physics. Prior to the measurement by LHCb, asymmetries in decays to two-body final states were expected to be very small in the SM [11 14], of the order O(1 3 ). Thus, it is necessary to perform experimental searches in other charm decays such as K K, as well as other two-body final states hh. The precise theoretical determination of V in the charm sector is difficult to achieve, since the charm quark is too heavy for chiral perturbation theory and yet too light for the reliable application of heavy-quark effective theory. Thus, the determination of whether or not an observed effect is a clear sign of new physics beyond the SM is rather challenging [15 18]. In order to clarify this phenomenological picture, it is crucial to study V in other charm decays. In this paper. we present recent measurements by the Belle collaboration for the decay modes (s) φπ ; K S π,k S η( ) ; π η ( ) ; and K S π. The Belle etector The data sample was collected by the Belle detector [19] located at the KEKB asymmetric e e collider operating at or near theυ(4s) resonance. The Belle detector is a large-solid-angle magnetic spectrometer consisting of a silicon vertex detector (SV), a 5-layer central drift chamber (CC), an array of aerogel threshold Čerenkov counters (CC), a barrel-like arrangement of time-of-flight scintillation counters (TOF), and an electromagnetic calorimeter (ECL) based on CsI(Tl) crystals. These detector elements are all located inside a superconducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.5 T magnetic field. For charged hadron identification, a likelihood ratio is formed based on de/dx measured in the CC and the response of the CC and TOF. Charged kaons are identified using a likelihood requirement that is approximately 86% efficient for K ± and has a π ± misidentification rate of about 8%. more detailed description 1

3 of the detector can be found elsewhere []. 3 Formalism The time-integrated asymmetry for a meson decaying to some final state f is defined as f Γ( f) Γ( f) Γ( f)γ( f), (1) where Γ is the partial decay width for the process and, f are the charge-conjugate states. However, for any given mode the reconstructed asymmetry rec can include contributions from sources other than, such as kinematics and detector asymmetries. For an asymmetric detector such as Belle, the production of mesons through the decay e e cc will contain a forward-backward asymmetry FB due to interferences between electroweak (Z ) and electromagnetic (γ) processes, as well as higher-order QE effects. In final states containing a neutral kaon, SM mixing between K K can contribute a small asymmetry even in the absence of violation in the charm decay. dditional contributions to the reconstructed asymmetry can also arise from detection asymmetries. 4 (s) φπ The largest contributions to violation in the Standard Model occur through singly Cabibbo-suppressed (SCS) decays, such as φπ [15]. In order to cancel detection asymmetries and other systematic/experimental effects, the measured quantity is constructed as the difference in reconstruction asymmetries between the ± and s pm : rec = N( ) N( ) N( )N( ) N( s ) N( s ) () N( s )N( s ), where the second term corresponds to the Cabibbo-favored (CF) decay s φπ. Since this latter decay proceeds through the CKM matrix elements V cs Vud and thus is expected to have negligible contributions to the quantity rec directly probes in φπ decays [1]. The measurement is based on 955 fb 1 of data collected at the Υ(4S) resonance, with a fraction of the data recorded at the Υ(1S), Υ(S), Υ(3S), and Υ(5S) resonances. The φ meson is reconstructed through the φ K K decay mode. The reconstruction asymmetry for this decay can be expressed as the sum of several small contributions: rec = FB (cosθ star ) KK ǫ π ǫ (p π,cosθ π ). (3)

4 The forward-backward asymmetry is an odd function of the cosine of the meson s polar angle in the CM frame and could in principle differ between the and s due to fragmentation effects. There can be additional contributions to the asymmetry due to differences in the reconstruction efficiencies of oppositely charged kaons ( KK ǫ ) and pions ( π ǫ ). The total number of positively and negatively charged mesons can be calculated by integrating over the intrinsic laboratory phase-space distribution of the kaon pair convolved with the detection efficiency. ssuming the efficiencies are proportional to (1± K ǫ (x)) and neglecting higher-order terms in K ǫ, the kaon efficiency asymmetry can be written as KK ǫ = (P 1 (x) P (x)) K ǫ (x)dx, (4) where P 1 (x) and P (x) are the normalized distributions of detected same-sign and opposite-sign kaons, respectively. Here, the integration runs over the kaon phase space x (p,cosθ). The effiency asymmetry π ǫ depends on the pion momentum and polar angle in the laboratory frame. For the difference in reconstruction asymmetries rec measured in bins of three-dimensional (3) phase space (cosθ,p π,cosθ π ), the pion efficiency asymmetry π ǫ cancels. The 3 phase space is divided into bins of equal size with p π < 5 GeV/c. In each bin, the ± and s ± yields and asymmetry difference rec are measured using a binned likelihood fit to the M KKπ distributions. The sum of the mass distributions correspond contain 3755 ± 577 ± and 7871 ± 931 s ± decays. The asymmetry difference in each bin is then corrected with KK ǫ, so that cor rec = rec KK ǫ. (5) The corrections are then obtained by using Eq. 4 and the distributions for P 1 (x) and P (x) in data. The kaonasymmetry K ǫ, used in Eq. 4, is measured with the help of K π decays. The measured asymmetry for these decays can be written as rec = FB K ǫ π ǫ. By assuming negligible violation in CF decays and the same forward-backward asymmetry, and by neglecting the KK ǫ in Eq. 1, the measured asymmetry difference is equal to K ǫ []. The asymmetry of s φπ is measured using fitted yields in the aforementioned 3 bins. This asymmetry map is then used in conjuction with a sideband subtraction technique to weight K π events and determine the corrected yields for and in bins of kaon phase space. The following corrections are obtained for the total 3 phase space: KK ǫ for s, and KK ǫ = (.6±.13)%for, KK ǫ = (.51±.1)% = (.111 ±.5)%. The non-zero difference is due to momentum asymmetries in and s decays. The corrected asymmetry differences in 3 bins are used calculate the errorweighted averages in bins of cosθ using a least-squares fit. The quantities and 3

5 .4.3 a) FB.4.3 b) cos θ * cos θ * Figure 1: -violating asymmetry (left) and forward-backward asymmetry difference FB (right), in bins of cosθ. The horizontal line in the plot for represents the value of a constant fit to the data points. FB arethenextractedby adding/subtracting theasymmetry difference inopposite bins of cosθ using the following relations: = cor rec(cosθ ) cor rec( cosθ ), (6) FB = cor rec (cosθ ) cor rec ( cosθ ) (7) The fitted asymmetry is found to be = (.51±.8±.5)%, where the first error is statistical and the second systematic [5]. The result is consistent with no violation within 1.8 standard deviations and agrees with SM predictions, and corresponds to an improvement of five times the precision of previous measurements by CLEO [3] and BaBar [4]. Fig. 1 shows the measured difference in forwardbackward asymmetries, with the χ test of fitted values corresponding to a confidence level of 6%. This corresponds to a first measurement of the difference in forwardbackward asymmetries between the and s mesons; no significant deviation from zero was found. 5 K Sπ and K Sη ( ) Observed K S P final states are mixtures of CF K P and CS K P decays. Standard Model violation in these processes is generated from mixing and interference of decays with and without mixing, often parameterized by a ind. The 4

6 asymmetry from K K mixing is measured to be K = (.33 ±.6)% [4] and arises in the value of for KSP, when contributions from CS decays are ignored. It is estimated that for new physics processes containing additional weak phases other that of the Kobayashi-Maskawa phase, interferences between CF and CS channels could generate direct asymmetries on the order of 1% for KS P decays [6]. Thus, an observation of that is inconsistent with K would provide strong evidence for physics processes beyond the SM [7]. The flavor of the neutral meson is identified using the charge of the lowmomentum ( soft ) pion π s in the decay π s. The asymmetry is then measured from the reconstruction asymmetry, defined as s π rec = N rec N π s rec N π s rec N π s rec, (8) where N rec is the number of reconstructed decays for each flavor. Other than a forward-backward asymmetry FB, the measured asymmetry includes an additional contribution from the detection efficiency asymmetry πs ǫ between positively and negatively charged soft pions. Since neutral kaons are reconstructed with π π combinations and P with either γγ or γγπ π final states, asymmetries in the detection of KS and P cancel. The reconstruction asymmetry can than be written as rec = FB (cosθ ) πs ǫ (pt π s,cosθ πs ), (9) where FB is an odd function of the cosine of the polar angle of in the CMS frame, πs ǫ depends on the transverse momentum and polar angle of the slow pion in the laboratory frame, and is independent of all kinematic variables. By assuming the same FB for and mesons, the decays π s K π π s (tagged) and K π (untagged) can be used to correct for πs ǫ. This is accomplished by subtracting the measured asymmetries in these two decay modes, untagged rec and tagged rec. enoting the reconstruction efficiency corrected for πs ǫ as π s rec,corr, the quantities and FB can then extracted by adding/subtracting the corrected asymmetries using the following relations: π = s rec,corr (cosθ π ) s rec,corr ( cosθ ) (1) π FB = s rec,corr (cosθ π ) s rec,corr ( cosθ ). (11) The measurement is based on 791 fb 1 of data collected at or near the Υ(4S) resonance. The mass difference M( ) M() is reconstructed for each mode and parameterized as a sum of Gaussian and bifurcated Gaussians with common mean. The asymmetry of the negatively and positively charged yields, as well as their 5

7 N S rec (%) π s K S π π s 3633±679.19±.19 π s KSηπ s 45831±83 1.±.51 π s K S η π s 6899± ±.67 Table 1: The sum N S and asymmetry rec for and yields from the fits. Uncertainties are statistical only. Systematic uncertainties for final results are listed at the end of this section. sum, is obtained directly from simultaneous fit to the distribution of each candidate. Table 1 lists the results of these fits. The values of πs ǫ are extracted from simultaneous fits to the M() distributions, with similar parameterization. n untagged sample of K π is used to evaluate rec in bins of transverse momentum (p T ) and polar angle (cosθ ). Factors of (1 rec ) are used to weight tagged π s K π π s events for each ± candidate, and the values of πs ǫ are then extracted. fter dividing the data samples into bins of momentum and polar angle for the slow pion in the CM frame and correcting each event by the corresponding factor of πs ǫ, the values of FB and are then fitted. Fig. shows and FB as a function of cosθ. The values obtained for the asymmetry are K S π K S η = (.54 ±.51 ±.16)%, and K S η = (.8±.19±.1)%, = (.98 ±.67 ±.14)% [8], where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. No evidence for violation is observed. The results are consistent with SM predictions and currently serve as the most stringent constraint for new physics models arising from violation in the charm sector. The measurement of the decay KSπ is one of the most precise measurements of any asymmetry in the charm sector. For KSη and KSη, the results presented represent the first measurement of violation in these modes. 6 K η ( ) and π η ( ) ecays of charged mesons are important to understanding sources of SU(3) flavor symmetry breaking, as well as the nature of violation that arises in the CKM flavor-mixing matrix in the Standard Model [9,3]. The two-body decays containing an η ( ) are either doubly Cabibbo-suppressed (K η ( ) ) or singly Cabibbo-suppressed (π η ( ) ). With current experimental sensitivity, observation of violation in twobody decays of a charged meson containing an η ( ) would represent strong evidence of new physics processes beyond the Standard Model. The data used for this measurement corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 6

8 S η K.5 * FB CMS cosθ * CMS cosθ * 1 S η K.5 * FB cosθ CMS * cosθ CMS * π S K.5 * FB CMS cosθ * CMS cosθ * 1 Figure : Measured (left) and FB (right) values as a function of cosθ. Top plots are for K S π, middle plots for K S η, and bottom plots for K S η final states. The dashed curves show the leading-order prediction for FB. 7

9 ) Events/(4 MeV/c ) Events/(4 MeV/c M(π η) (GeV/c ) M(π η ) (GeV/c ) Figure 3: The invariant mass distributions used for the branch- ing fraction measurements, corresponding to π η (left) and π η (right) final states. Points with error bars and histograms correspond to the data and the fit, respectively. 791 fb 1, collected at or near the Υ(4S) resonance. The η is reconstructed through the η ( ) π π π decay mode, while η is reconstructed through the π π η γγ decay. Fig. 3 shows the invariant mass distributions for π η and π η after event selection. The reconstruction asymmetry for this decay can be expressed as: rec = π η FB π ǫ, (1) where the total reconstruction asymmetry includes additional contributions from the forward-backward asymmetry of the charged, as well as the detection effiiciency asymmetry between positively and negatively charged pions. These additional asymmetries are corrected using a sample of Cabibbo-favored s φπ decays, in which the asymmetry predicted by the SM is expected to be negligible. ssuming that FB is the same for charged and s mesons, the asymmetry can be extracted by taking the difference between the reconstruction asymmetries of π η ( ) and s φπ decays. The measurement is performed in 3 bins of p Tπ and cosθ π in the laboratory frame and polar angle cosθ (s) in the CM frame. fter subtracting the reconstruction asymmetry for s φπ, weighted averages of the asymmetry are summed over each bin to give = (1.74±1.13±.19)% for π η and (.1±1.1±.17)% for π η ( ) [33]. To date, these measurements correspond to the most precise determinations of in π η ( ) decays. lso measured were the ratios of branching fractions of CSandSCSmodes, forwhichb( K η)/b( π η) = (3.6±.43±.14)% 8

10 and B( K η )/B( π η ) = (3.77±.39±.1)%. From these branching fraction ratios, along with that of K π [3] and the tree and annihilation amplitude relations given in Ref. [31], the relative final-state phase difference between tree and annihilation amplitudes in decays is measured to be δ T = (7±9) or (88±9). 7 K S π To date, the the world average of the asymmetry in the decay K S π is (.54 ±.14)% [4], consistent with the expected asymmetry due to the neutral kaon in the final state. The asymmetry in this decay is defined as Γ( K S π ) Γ( K S π ) Γ( K Sπ )Γ( K Sπ ). (13) Since K S candidates are reconstructed from π π decays, the detection asymmetry associated with these charged pions cancels. The remaining reconstruction asymmetry can be written as rec = FB π ǫ, (14) where FB is an odd function of the cosine of the polar angle of the momentum in the CM frame, and ǫ depends on the transverse momentum and polar angle of the π in the laboratory frame. ssuming the same forward-backward asymmetry for and mesons, samples of K π π and K π π can be used to correct for π ǫ. Once rec has been corrected, the quantities and FB can be extracted by adding/subtracting the asymmetry difference in opposite bins of cosθ using the following relations: = cor rec (cosθ )cor rec ( cosθ ), (15) FB = cor rec (cosθ ) cor rec ( cosθ ). (16) This measurement is based on 977 fb 1 of data collected at or near the Υ(4S) resonance, along with data recorded at the Υ(1S), Υ(S), Υ(3S), and Υ(5S) resonances, corresponding to 1.74 million reconstructed decays. The ± K Sπ ± signals are parameterized as a sum of Gaussian and bifurcated Gaussian with common mean. The asymmetry of the negatively and positively charged yields, as well as their sum, is obtained directly from a simultaneous fit to the distribution of each candidate. The asymmetry and sum of each yield from the fit are (.146±.94)% and (1738 ± %), respectively, where the errors are statistical only. The correction to π ǫ is first extracted using rec from the K π π sample. This value is then used to weight each ± K π ± π ± candidate with a factor of 9

11 (1 rec ). The weighted M(K π ± π ± ) sample is then used to measure π ǫ in 1 1 bins of the phase space (p Tπ,cosθ π ). The data samples are then divided into equivalent bins of phase space, whereby each KS π candidate is weighted by a factor of (1 π ǫ ). The corrected asymmetry is measured using a simultaneous fit of M(KS π ) in bins of cosθ. Fig. 4 shows and FB as a function of cosθ. The final asymmetry measured in the decay is (.363±.94±.67)%, where the first error is statistical and the seccond is systematic..5 π S K FB CMS cosθ Figure 4: Measured (top) and FB (bottom) values as a function of cosθ. In the top plot, the dashed line is the mean value of while the hatched band is the ±1σ total interval, where σ total is the total uncertainty. By subtracting the contribution from neutral kaons, the asymmetry from the charm decay is (.18 ±.94 ±.68)% [34]. This value, consistent with zero, represents the most precise measurement of in charm decays to date. The new world average for this decay mode is listed in Table. 1

12 KS π FOCUS 1.6±1.5±.9 CLEO 1.3±.7±.3 BaBar.44±.13±.1 Belle.363 ±.94 ±.67 verage [34].41 ±.9 Table : Summary of measured values and world average for in K S π decays. The final average is 4.6 standard deviations from zero and consistent with expected violation in the neutral kaon system. 8 Conclusion In summary, we have reported some of the latest results for the measurement of asymmetries in two-body charm decays at Belle. ebate continues within the theoretical community as to whether violation in the charm sector would indicate new physics, or whether it can be explained within the framework of the Standard Model. lthough precise theoretical predictions in this sector are very difficult to achieve, the ongoing search for violation in other charm decays remains an exciting one. CKNOWLEGEMENTS Theauthorwishes tothanktheorganizersandstaffofthe5 th InternationalWorkshop on Charm Physics for both a stimulating scientific program and excellent hospitality. References [1] J. H. Christenson, J. W. Cronin, V. L. Fitch, and R. Turlay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 138. [] BaBar collaboration, B. ubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (1) [3] Belle collaboration, K. be et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (1) 918. [4] Particle ata Group, K. Nakamura et al., J. Phys. G37 (1) 751. [5] LHCb collaboration, R. aij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1) 161. [6] BaBar collaboration, B. ubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (7)

13 [7] Belle collaboration, M. Staric et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (7) [8] N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1 (1963) 531. [9] M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 65. [1] W.-S. Hou, Chin. J. Phys. 47 (9) 134. [11] S. Bianco, F. L. Fabbri,. Benson, and I. Bigi, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 6N7 (3) 1. [1] M. Bobrowski,. Lenz, J. Riedl, and J. Rohrwild, JHEP 13 (1) 9. [13] 16 Y. Grossman,. L. Kagan, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rev. 75 (7) 368. [14] 17.. Petrov, PoS BEUTY9 (9) 4. [15] E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, JHEP 15 (1) 14. [16] 19 G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and P. Paradisi, JHEP 14 (1) 6. [17] Y. Grossman,. L. Kagan and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. 85 (1) [18] 1 B. Bhattacharya, M. Gronau and J. L. Rosner, arxiv: [hep-ph]. [19] S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 499, 1 (3), and other papers included in this volume. [] S. bashian et al. (Belle Collab.), Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 479, 117 (). [1] S. Bergmann, Y. Nir, JHEP 9, 31 (1999). [] Corrections for a non-zero KK ǫ can be applied iteratively, using K ǫ from the previous iteration and Eq. 4. However, negligible changes are found in the asymmetry map after convergence. [3] CLEO collaboration, P. Rubin et al., Phys. Rev. 78 (8) 73. [4] BaBar collaboration, B. ubert et al., Phys. Rev. 71 (5) [5] Belle collaboration, M. Staric et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1) [6] Y. Grossman,. L. Kagan, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rev. 75, 368 (7). [7] I. I. Bigi and H. Yamamoto, Phys. Lett. B 349, 363 (1995). [8] Belle collaboration, E. Won et al., PRL 17, 181 (11). 1

14 [9] B. Bhattacharya and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. 81, 146 (1). [3] H-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Phys. Rev. 81, 741 (1). [31] C.-W. Chiang and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. 65, 547 () [3] CLEO Collaboration, H. Mendez et al., Phys. Rev. 81, 513 (1). [33] Belle collaboration, E. Won et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 181 (11). [34] Belle collaboration, B. R. Ko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett (1). 13