arxiv: v3 [gr-qc] 31 Aug 2011

Transcription

1 Gravo-Magnetic force in the MOND regime Qasem Exirifard School of Physics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran , Iran We derive the gravomagnetic field in the Λ-CDM and Modified Newtonian Dynamics MOND) paradigms before showing that the the gravomagnetic force at the edge of a galaxy can be in accord with only one of them. We further notice that MOND alters the Lens-Thirring precession of a gyroscope in the semi-lagrange point of the Sun-Jupiter system. Near future technology would enable us to measure this anomaly. PACS numbers: q,04.50.Kd, d arxiv: v3 gr-qc] 31 Aug 2011 The missing mass problem in galaxies can be resolved either by modifying the Newtonian Dynamics and gravity, or assuming the presence of dark matter. Perhaps it is interesting to search for some effects/predictions of MOND which can not be reproduced by the dark matter paradigm. In this line of thought, we show that MOND not only affects the fall of the gravitational potential but it also affects the fall of the gravomagnetic force. We report that the Lambda-CDM and MOND paradigms predict different fall of for the gravomagnetic force on and beyond the edge of a spinning galaxy. We notice that MOND also alters the gravomagnetic force near the semi-lagrange points of the solar system: at the points where the gravitational field vanishes. We argue that the MOND paradigm can be approved or discarded in the near future by measuring the gravomagnetic field in the semi-lagrange point of the Sun-Jupiter system. The note is organized as follows. First we review the gravomagnetic force before uplifting it into the MOND paradigm. We then estimate the size of the gravomagnetic force in the Semi-Lagrange point of the Sun-Jupiter system. This suggests that the gravomagnetic force in this semi-lagrange point can be measured in near future. This suggestion adds to the possibility of observing MOND in the solar system 1, 2]. I. GRAVOMAGNETIC FIELD IN MOND Classical gravity is governed by a single scalar field, the gravitational potential. The Newtonian gravitational potential satisfies: 2 Φ = 4πGρ, 1) where ρ is the density of matter. Albert Einstein attempting to uplift gravity to a relativistic regime, first replaced the space-time metric of Minkowski by ds 2 = cφ) 2 dt 2 +dx 2 +dy 2 +dz 2, 2) later with the Gromann s help, he introduced the Riemannian metric, ds 2 = g µν dx µ dx ν, 3) as the relativistic gravity 3]. The relativistic theory of gravity has a symmetric rank-two tensor: the metric. Metric has 10 components in four dimensions, 9 more than the degrees of the classical gravity 17]. To perceive the physical meaning of the degrees of the freedom of the relativistic theory, let the trajectory of a slow moving particle be considered in a static deviation from the Minkiowki metric. In so doing, the metric reads ds 2 = η µν dx µ dx ν +h µν dx µ dx ν, 4) Decomposing x µ to x µ = t,x i ), the line element follows ds 2 = dt 2 +dx i ) 2 +h 00 dt 2 5) +2h 0i dtdx i +h ij dx i dx j, where h µν h µν x i ). Note that h ij terms would affect orbits of massless probes or probes with large velocities. To see this consider a static spherical geometry ds 2 = g tt r)dt 2 +g rr r)dr 2 +r 2 dω 2, 6) where both g rr r) and g tt r) contribute to the trajectory of massless particle while the leading contribution to the orbit of a slow moving probe is due to g tt r) 18] 5]. Also note that due to the equations of motion of the metric, the off-diagonal components of h ij are comparable to its other components only for a relativistic mass distribution, mass distributions like geons 6]. Here we are considering the geometry around a non-relativistic mass distribution. We also study the orbits of massive particles: the paths that at the leading and sub-leading order can be derived from the first variation of S = dτ 1+h 00 )ṫ 2 +ẋ i ) 2 +2h 0i ṫẋ i ), 7) wherein the squared velocity terms have been ignored, and τ is an affine parameter. The Euler-Lagrange equation for t derived from 7) reads Electronic address: exir@theory.ipm.ac.ir ṫ 1+h 00 )+h 0i ẋ i = cte 8)

2 2 Notethat ṫ 1+h 00 ) standsforthegravitationalredshift while h 0i ẋ i represents a new relativistic term, a term yet to be experimentally observed.19] The Euler-Lagrange equation for x i derived from 7) then leads to d 2 x i dt c2 i h 00 +cδ ij k h 0j j h 0k ) dxk dt Now let it be defined 9) g Φ c 2 ) 10) g 0i A i c 11) using which the equation 9) can be rewritten as follows ẍ = Φ+v A) 12) This allows interpreting A as a gravo-magnetic field. Now consider a gyroscope in the space time. The similarity between the gravo-magnetic field and magnetic field beside the spin precession formula in electrodynamics Ṡ = µ B,µ = e 2mS) dictates that its spin precesses by 8] Ω LT = 1 A 13) 2 This is known as the Lens-Thirring precession 9]. The Lense-Thirring precession due to the rotation of the earth recently has been confirmed 10]. Ref. 11] provides a recent review on attempts to detect the Lense-Thirring effect. In the linearized Einstein-Hilbert gravity, the field equations for Φ and A read 2 Φ = 4πGρ 14) 2 A =.A) A) = 16πG c 2 j 15) where j ρ v where v is the velocity field of the matter distribution and ρ is the density 8]. Eq. 14) is the Newtonian potential s equation 1). We shall consider the gauge choice of.a = 0, so 15) will be simplified to A) = 16πG c 2 j 16) The effective field theory for A and φ thus follows: S = d 3 r 1 ] 8πG Φ 2 + A 2 )+ρφ 4j.A 17) where from this time foreword we use the natural unit c = 1. The Newtonian classical field theory for gravity is a part of this Lagrangian. In the Modified gravity realization of the MOND 12], one replaces the Newtonian classical field theory S = d 3 r 1 ] 8πG Φ 2 +ρφ 18) with a general field theory but retain the Newtonian dynamics F = ma): S MoG = d 3 r 1 ] 8πG LΦ, Φ, )+ρφ, 19) The AQUAL approach 13] assumes that the symmetries for the equations of motions derived from S and S MoG are the same. The symmetries for S are Φ Φ+ Λ, 20) where Λ represents a general vector field. Imposing 20) on 24) requires L to be a functional of the derivative of the Newtonian potential: L L Φ, 2 Φ, ). 21) AQUAL also requires the equations to be second order. So the Lagrangian is simplified to L L Φ) 22) We can construct only one scalar out of Φ. So the Lagrangian reads and the AQUAL action follows S AQUAL = d 3 r L F Φ. Φ) 23) 1 ] 8πG F Φ. Φ/a2 0 )+ρφ 24) The first variation of the AQUAL action with respect to Φ yields α µ Φ ) ) α Φ = 4πGρ, 25) where µx) = F x 2 ). The MOND terminology than requires 14]20] and µx) 1 : For x 1 26) µx) x : For x 1 27) 1.0±0.2) 10 10m s 2. 28) In the following we are going to apply the AQUAL assumptions, as reviewed above, on 17). In the MOND approach, perhaps we should change 17) with another action. We thus consider the following general action for 17) in MOND: S MGA = d 3 r 1 LΦ, Φ,,A, A, ) 8πG ] 4j.A+ρΦ 29)

3 3 Notice that we have considered the minimal coupling between the fields and their sources. This is also an assumption of the AQUAL model. We next assume that at the level of the equations of motion, S MGA respects the symmetries of 17). The symmetries of 17) follow Φ Φ+ Λ, 30) A A+ Λ, 31) A, j) A, j) 32) where Λ, Λ represent general scalar and vector fields. We also require that the equations of motion are second order differential equations. This beside 30) and 31) requires LΦ, Φ,,A, A, ) L Φ, A) 33) We are interested in the situations wherein the gravomagnetic field is small: A Φ 34) So we taylor expand 33) around A 0 and keep the first three terms: L Φ, A) L 2 Φ)+L 3 Φ) φ. A +L 1 Φ) A 2 35) Due to 32), L 3 vanishes and we get L Φ, A) L 2 Φ)+L 1 Φ) A 2 36) In the absence of the gravomagnetic field we should recover the AQUAL Lagrangian so L Φ, A) F Φ. Φ/a 2 0 )+L 1 Φ) A 2 37) This shows that the symmetry requirement beside a weak gravomagnetic force yields 37) as the action governing the static scalar and vector gravity. This action still has an unknown functional L 1 Φ). Now let the equations of motion for 37) be computed α µ Φ ) 4πGρ 38) ) α Φ L 1 Φ ) ) A a 0 = 16πG c 2 j 39) where in 38) we have ignored terms proportional to the gravomagtic potential squared due to34). We know that gravity is not a force. It is a manifestation of how matter deforms its surrounding space-time geometry. Perhaps the simplest modification to how matter deforms its surrounding is the one that does not distinguishes between various manifestation of the curved space-time: Φ and A. We name this simplest modification as the minimal AQUAL-gravomagnetic model wherein L 1 Φ ) µ Φ ) 40) inserting which in 39) states that the gravo-magnetic field strength in MOND A MOND ) holds A MOND = 1 µ Φ ) A Einstein-Hilebert 41) where A Einstein-Hilebert satisfies 15). In the MONDian regime 27), 41) simplifies to A MOND = Φ A Einstein-Hilebert 42) Since in the MOND regime Φ, we predict an enhancement of the gravomagnetic field. Note that we have provided the simplest modification to the gravomagnetic field. The TeVeS theory 16] based on the ordinary AQUAL model) introduces the primitive metric g αβ and the physical metric g αβ. In this theory, particles move on geodesics identified by the physical metric while the Einstein-Equation is derived from the primitive one. A non-trivial scaling factor between these two metrics changes the Newtonian potential to the MOND one. This scaling perhaps also changes the magnitude of the gravomagnetic field. Let it be hasten that calculating the gravomagneticforce in the TeVeS theory is not in the scope of this work. In the ΛCDM theory, the equation for the Newtonian potential and the gravomagnetic field read 2 Φ = 4πGρ+ρ Dark ) 43) 2 A 16πG = c 2 j + j Dark ) 44) where ρ Dark and j Dark are respectively the density and the velocity distribution of dark matter. There exists no direct information available about the velocity distribution of dark matter. The theoretical scenario considers dark matter halo as a cloud under a radial collapse. Such a collapse would not contribute to the gravomagnetic field. So dark matter paradigm does not enhance the gravomagnetic field. In the ΛCDM paradigm, therefore, the gravomagnetic field satisfies A ΛCDM = A Einstein-Hilebert 45) Letit be emphasizedthat A Einstein-Hilebert iscoupled only to the visible matter. 42) besides 45) state that measuring the gravo-magnetic force at edge/beyond the edge of a spiral galaxy refutes one of the minimal AQUALgravomagnetic model and dark paradigms and proves the other one, and provides strong constraint on a general AQUAL-gravomagnetic model. However the gravomagnetic force at the edge of a galaxy is too small and one may not hope to directly measure it. II. GRAVO-MAGNETIC FIELD IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM In some points in the solar system the gravitational field of the planets and the Sun and the galaxy cancel

4 4 each other. Let these points be called the semi-lagrange points. At a neighborhood around the semi-lagrange points MOND/MOG governs gravity. Let these neighborhoods be called the MOND windows. If we send/keep a satellite to/in MOND windows we then can manifestly search for the prediction of the MOND paradigm by performing on board experiments. The largest MOND window occurs at the semi- Lagrange point of the Sun-Jupiter system. In order to estimate the size of this window let us just consider the gravitational field of Sun and Jupiter 21]. Assume that the Jupiter s orbit is a circle around the sun. The magnitude of the Newtonian gravitational field of the Sun and Jupiter in the line connecting these two reads: gx) = GM Sun d x) 2 G x 2 46) where x is the distance from the Jupiter and d is the distance between Sun and Jupiter. The Newtonian gravitational acceleration vanishes at x SL = d 1+ MSun 47) x SL identifies the Semi-Lagrange point. Around this point the Newtonian gravitational acceleration can be approximated to or equivalently gx SL +δx) g x x=x SL δx 48) gx SL +δx) 2G d 3 M Sun ) 3/2 δx 49) where MSun 1 is assumed. This states that the MOND window in the semi-lagrange point of the Sun and Jupiter system is about 5km. This is large enough to accommodate a satellite. In the following we would like to estimate if we can measure the gravomagnetic force produced at the Sun- Jupiter MOND window. We calculate this in the rest frame of the MOND window. The gravomagnetic field receives contribution from the angular spins of the Jupiter and Sun, and also the motion of the Sun and Jupiter. In the rest frame of the MOND window the leading contributions to the gravomagnetric field are due to the orbital motion of the Sun and Jupiter : A Sun G c 2 M Sun d A Jupiter G c 2 x SL 2π T 50) 2π T 51) where T is the orbital period of the Jupiter around the Sun: T = days 52) Let us compare these contributions with the gravomagnetic field measured by the gravity probe B. The gravity probe B measures the gravomagnetic field around the earth through the Lense-Thirring effect. It has recently measured the gravomagnetic field around the earth: A Probe B G c 2 L r 3 pb where L represents the spin of the earth 53) L kg m 2 /s 54) and r pb is the radius of the orbit of the gravity probe B: r pb )km = km 55) So the leading contributions to the magnitude of the gravomagnetic force at this MOND window yield A Sun A Probe B 56) A Jupiter A Probe B 57) This indicates that utilizing the today technology we can not detect the gravomagnetic field in the MOND window, even if we manage to place a satellite in its deep MON- Dian regime and enlarge the magnitude of the gravomagnetic field by some factors. The factor of 10 3, however, is not very tiny. We might reach such a precision in ten years provided that we annually improve the precision by a factor of two. When this precision is achieved then placing a gyroscope inside the deep MONDian regime of the semi-lagrange point of the Sun-Jupiter and measuring the Lense-Thiring effect will prove or refute the minimal AQUAL-gravomagnetic model and strongly constraint non-minimal models. Acknowledgements I thank ICTP for the nice hospitality during which this work was accomplished. I thank Jacob Bekenstein and Lorenzo Iorio for correspondence. 1] Jacob Bekenstein and Joo Magueijo, Phys. Rev. D ) ; M. Milgrom, arxiv: astro-ph.co]. 2] L. Iorio, Open Astron. J ) 156 arxiv:

5 5 gr-qc]]. 3] H. F. M. Goenner, arxiv: gr-qc]. 4] T. Jacobson, Class. Quant. Grav ) 5717 arxiv: gr-qc]]. 5] M. Blau, Lecture notes on general relativity, 6] John Archibald Wheeler, Phys. Rev ) ] R. Penrose, Rev. Nuovo Cimento, ) Special Number), ] T. Padmanabhan, Gravitation: Foundations and Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, 9] J. Lense and H. Thirring, Phys. Zeits. 19, ). 10] C. W. F. Everitt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett ) , arxiv: gr-qc]. 11] L. Iorio, H. I. M. Lichtenegger, M. L. Ruggiero and C. Corda, Astrophys. Space Sci ) 351 arxiv: gr-qc]]. 12] M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J ) 365; M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J ) ] J. Bekenstein, M. Milgrom, Astrophysical J. 286, 1984) 7. 14] J. D. Bekenstein, arxiv:astro-ph/ ; K. G. Begeman, A. H. Broeils and R. H. Sanders, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc ) ] B. Famaey and J. Binney, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc ) 603 arxiv:astro-ph/ ]: 16] J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D ) Erratum-ibid. D ) ] arxiv:astro-ph/ ]. 17] Due to the conservation of the energy-momentum tensor, and the equation of motion for the metric, only 6 components of the metric are dynamical fields. 18] In most cases it holds that g ttg rr = 1 4]. This relation constraints the equation of state of the matter or how gravity should be modified. 19] This is the kind of the modification of the effective energy of a particle that lets the extraction of energy from a black hole the Penrose mechanism) 7]. 20] The most widely used from µ are 13, 15]: µx) = x x+1 and µx) = 1+x x 2. 21] Including other gravitational field would alter the position of the window but it is very unlikely to significantly change the size of the window.