arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ds] 25 Feb 2006

Transcription

1 ON RATIONAL P-ADIC DYANAMICAL SYSTEMS arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ds] 25 Feb 2006 FARRUKH MUKHAMEDOV Abstract UTKIR ROZIKOV In the aer we investigate the behavior of trajectory of rational -adic dynamical system in comle -adic filed C. It is studied Siegel disks and attractors of such dynamical systems. We show that Siegel disks may either coincide or disjoin for different fied oints of the dynamical system. Besides, we find the basin of the attractor of the system. It is roved that such kind of dynamical system is not ergodic on a unit shere with resect to the Haar measure. Key words and hrases: Rational dynamics, attractors, Siegel disk, comle -adic field Mathematical Subject Classification: 46S10, 12J12, 11S99, 30D05, 54H20. 1 Introduction The -adic numbers were first introduced by the Germen mathematician K.Hensel. For about a century after the discovery of -adic numbers, they were mainly considered objects of ure mathematics. Beginning with 1980 s various models described in the language of -adic analysis have been actively studied. More recisely, models over the field of -adic numbers have been considered which is due to the assumtion that -adic numbers rovide a more eact and more adequate descrition of micro-world henomena. Numerous alications of these numbers to theoretical hysics have been roosed in aers [4], [12], [20], [26],[27] to quantum mechanics [15], to -adic - valued hysical observable [15] and many others [16],[25]. The study of -adic dynamical systems arises in Diohantine geometry in the constructions of canonical heights, used for counting rational oints on algebraic vertices over a number field, as in [7]. In [17],[24] -adic field have arisen in hysics in the theory of suerstrings, romoting questions about their dynamics. Also some alications of -adic dynamical systems to some biological, hysical systems has been roosed in [1],[2],[8],[17],[18]. Other studies of non-archimedean dynamics in the neighborhood of a eriodic and of the counting of eriodic oints over global fields using local fields aear in [13],[19],[21]. It is known that the analytic functions lay imortant role in comle analysis. In the -adic analysis the rational functions lay a similar role to the analytic functions in comle analysis [23]. Therefore, naturally one arises a question to study the dynamics of these functions in the -adic analysis. On the hand, such -adic dynamical systems aear while studying -adic Gibbs measures [9]. In [5],[6] dynamics on the Fatou set of a rational function defined over some finite etension of Q have been studied, besides, an analogue of Sullivan s no wandering domains theorem for -adic rational functions which have no wild recurrent Julia critical oints were roved. In [3] the behavior of a -adic dynamical system f() = n in the fields of 1

2 -adic numbers Q and comle -adic numbers C was investigated. Some ergodic roerties that dynamical system has been considered in [11]. The base of -adic analysis, -adic mathematical hysics are elained in [10],[14],[25]. In the aer we will investigate the behavior of trajectory of rational -adic dynamical systems in C. We will study Sigel disks and attractors of such dynamical systems. In the final section we show the considered dynamical system is not ergodic. 2 Preliminaries 2.1 -adic numbers Let Q be the field of rational numbers. The greatest common divisor of the ositive integers n and m is denotes by (n,m). Every rational number 0 can be reresented in the form = r n, where r,n Z, m is a ositive m integer, (,n) = 1, (,m) = 1 and is a fied rime number. The -adic norm of is given by { r for 0 = 0 for = 0. It has the following roerties: 1) 0 and = 0 if and only if = 0, 2) y = y, 3) the strong triangle inequality + y ma{, y }, 3.1) if y then y = ma{, y }, 3.2) if = y then y, this is a non-archimedean one. The comletion of Q with resect to -adic norm defines the -adic field which is denoted by Q. The well-known Ostrovsky s theorem asserts that norms = and, = 2,3,5... ehaust all nonequivalent norms on Q (see [?]). Any -adic number 0 can be uniquely reresented in the canonical series: = γ() ( ), (2.1) where γ = γ() Z and j are integers, 0 j 1, 0 > 0, j = 0,1,2,... (see more detail [10],[14]). Observe that in this case = γ(). The algebraic comletion of Q is denoted by C and it is called comle -adic numbers. For any a C and r > 0 denote U r (a) = { C : a r}, V r (a) = { C : a < r}, S r (a) = { C : a = r}. 2

3 A function f : U r (a) C is said to be analytic if it can be reresented by f() = f n ( a) n, f n C, n=0 which converges uniformly on the ball U r (a). 2.2 Dynamical systems in C In this section we recall some known facts concerning dynamical systems (f,u) in C, where f : U f() U is an analytic function and U = U r (a) or C. Now let f : U U be an analytic function. Denote n = f n ( 0 ), where 0 U and f n () = f... f(). }{{} n Recall some the standard terminology of the theory of dynamical systems (see for eamle [22]). If f( 0 ) = 0 then 0 is called a fied oint. A fied oint 0 is called an attractor if there eists a neighborhood V ( 0 ) of 0 such that for all oints y V ( 0 ) it holds lim y n = 0. If 0 is an attractor n then its basin of attraction is A( 0 ) = {y C : y n 0, n }. A fied oint 0 is called reeller if there eists a neighborhood V ( 0 ) of 0 such that f() 0 > 0 for V ( 0 ), 0. Let 0 be a fied oint of a function f(). The ball V r ( 0 ) (contained in U) is said to be a Siegel disk if each shere S ρ ( 0 ), ρ < r is an invariant shere of f(), i.e. if S ρ ( 0 ) then all iterated oints n S ρ ( 0 ) for all n = 1,2... The union of all Siegel desks with the center at 0 is said to a maimum Siegel disk and is denoted by SI( 0 ). Remark.[3] In comle geometry, the center of a disk is uniquely determined by the disk, and different fied oints cannot have the same Siegel disks. In non-archimedean geometry, a center of a disk is nothing but a oint which belongs to the disk. Therefore, in rincile, different fied oints may have the same Siegel desk. Let 0 be a fied oint of an analytic function f(). Put λ = d d f( 0). The oint 0 is called attractive if 0 λ < 1, indifferent if λ = 1, and reelling if λ > 1. Theorem 2.1.[3] Let 0 be a fied oint of an analytic function f : U U. The following assertions hold 1. if 0 is an attractive oint of f, then it is an attractor of the dynamical system (f,u). If r > 0 satisfies the inequality q = ma 1 d n f 1 n< n! d n ( 0) r n 1 < 1 (2.2) 3

4 and U r ( 0 ) U then U r ( 0 ) A( 0 ); 2. if 0 is an indifferent oint of f then it is the center of a Siegel disk. If r satisfies the inequality s = ma 1 d n f 2 n< n! d n ( 0) r n 1 < f ( 0 ) (2.3) and U r ( 0 ) U then U r ( 0 ) SI( 0 ); 3. if 0 is a reelling oint of f then 0 is a reeller of the dynamical system (f,u). 3 Rational -adic dynamical systems In this section we consider dynamical system associated with the function f : C C defined by where ˆ = c b. f() = + a b + c, b 0, c ab, a,b,c C (3.1) It is not difficult to check that fied oints of the function (3.1) are 1,2 = 1 c ± (c 1) 2 + 4ab. (3.2) 2b The following theorem is imortant in our investigation. Theorem 3.1. Let 1 and 2 be the fied oints of (3.1) (see (3.2)). Then 1. the oint 1 (res. 2 ) is attractive if and only if the oint 2 (res. 1 ) is reelling. 2. the oint 1 is indifferent if and only if the oint 2 is one. The roof immediately follows from the easily checking equality 3.1 Case: f ( 1 ) = 1 f ( 1 ) f ( 2 ) = 1. Let f ( 1 ) = 1, then according to Theorem 3.1 we have f ( 2 ) = 1. Observe that the considered case is equivalent to condition f ( i ) = (b 1 + c) 2 = 1, i = 1,2. (3.3) By Theorem 2.1 every fied oint i is a center of Siegel disk. We now verify the condition (2.3). First of all we comute 1 d n f n! d n ( i) nb n 1 = (b i + c) n+1 4

5 ( b n 1 = b i + c) = b n 1, here we have used the equality (3.3). Then the condition (2.3) is satisfied if the following inequality holds ma 2 n< b n 1 r n 1 < 1. (3.4) Let b < 1. (3.5) If r 1 then the condition (3.4) is satisfied, and hence U 1 ( i ) SI( i ). Theorem 3.2. Let the conditions (3.3) and (3.5) be satisfied. Then SI( i ) = V 1+εc ( i ), i = 1,2, where ε c = b 1. Proof. It suffices to rove that for any ε < ε c the equality f(s 1+ε ( i )) = S 1+ε ( i ) (3.6) is valid. Let y S 1+ε ( i ), i.e. y = i + γ, where γ = 1 + ε. Then from (3.1) we get 1 + ε f(y) i = (b i + c) 2 + γb. (3.7) b i + c The inequality ε < ε c imlies that γb b i + c < 1. It then follows from (3.7) and (3.3) that f(y) i = 1 + ε, which means that (3.6) is valid. Here we have used 3.1) roerty of the norm. If ε > ε c then γb b i + c > 1, consequently from (3.7) we infer f(y) i = 1 + ε c < 1 + ε. Hence (3.6) does not hold. One remains to consider the case ε = ε c. We choose γ as follows γ = γ = ( 1) b(b 1 + c). Then it easy to check that ỹ = i + γ belongs S 1+εc ( i ), but f(ỹ) i = (1 + ε c ) > 1 + ε c. Thus the equality (3.6) is valid only at ε < ε c. This comletes the roof. 5

6 Now we are interested the relation between Siegel disks SI( i ), i = 1,2. Theorem 3.3. Let the conditions (3.3) and (3.5) be satisfied. (i) If (c 1) 2 + 4ab b 1 + ε c, then SI( 1 ) SI( 2 ) = ; (ii) otherwise SI( 1 ) = SI( 2 ). Proof. (i) From (3.2) we find 1 2 = (c 1) 2 + 4ab b 1 + ε c. This means 1 / V 1+εc ( 2 ), hence by Theorem 3.2 we have SI( 1 ) SI( 2 ) =. (ii) In this case we have 1 2 < 1 + ε c. Let y SI( 1 ), then by Theorem 3.2 we can write y 1 < 1 + ε c. Whence y 2 = (y 1 ) + ( 1 2 ) < 1 + ε c. Consequently, we have SI( 1 ) SI( 2 ). So SI( 1 ) = SI( 2 ) since balls with the same radius ether coincide or disjoint in Non-Archimedean setting. 3.2 Case: f ( 1 ) 1 According to Theorem 3.1 without loss of generality we may assume that f ( 1 ) < 1.In this case we have f ( 2 ) > 1. From Theorem 2.1 we obtain the following Proosition 3.4. The fied oint 2 is a reelling oint of the dynamical system. Now one remains to investigate the fied oint 1. Observe that the condition f ( 1 ) < 1 is equivalent to (b 1 + c) 2 < 1. (3.8) Suose the following condition to be satisfied b b 1 + c = 2b 1 + c + (c 1) 2 + 4ab 1. (3.9) Lemma 3.5. Let the conditions (3.8) and (3.9) be satisfied. Then the inclusion V 1 ( 1 ) A( 1 ) is valid. Proof. We check the condition (2.2) of Theorem 2.1. q = ma n()b n 1 1 n< (b 1 + c) n+1 r n 1 < ma 1 n< b b 1 + c n 1 r n 1 < 1. 6

7 According to (3.9) this condition is fulfilled if r < 1. By Theorem 2.1 we infer the required assertion. Denote δ 1 = (b 1 + c) 2 1, δ 2 = b 1 + c b 1. Lemma 3.6. Let the conditions (3.8) and (3.9) be satisfied. Then ˆ, 2 S 1+δ2 ( 1 ), here Proof. Consider ˆ = c b, 2 = 1 c (c 1) 2 + 4ab. 2b ˆ 1 = 1 + c + (c 1) 2 + 4ab 2b = = b 1 + c b = 1 + δ 2, hence ˆ S 1+δ2 ( 1 ). It easy to check that ˆ 2 = b(b 1 + c) = since δ 1 > 0. So we have = 1 + δ 2 < 1 + δ 2, 1 2 = ( 1 ˆ) + (ˆ 2 ) = 1 + δ 2, here we have used 3.1) roerty of the norm. Lemma is roved. Theorem 3.7. Let the conditions (3.8) and b b 1 + c < 1 (3.10) be satisfied. Then δ:0 δ 1+δ 2 S δ ( 1 ) A( 1 ). Proof. It suffices to rove that S 1+δ ( 1 ) A( 1 ) at δ 1 + δ 2. Indeed, from the roof of Lemma 3.5 one easily sees that the condition (3.10) rovides U 1 ( 1 ) A( 1 ). Let S 1+δ ( 1 ), i.e. = 1 + γ, γ = 1 + δ. From (3.1) and (3.2) we get f() 1 = ()γ (b 1 + c) 2 + γb(b 1 + c) = 7

8 (1 + δ) = ( ) b1 b 2 + c 2 ( ). (3.11) b1 + c + γ b b Case 1. Let us assume that b 1 + c b 2 > γ b 1 + c b this imlies that δ < δ 2. Then from (3.11) we infer f() 1 = (b 1 + c) 2 (1 + δ). (3.12) If δ δ 1 then the right side of (3.11) is not greeter than 1. Hence, f() U 1 ( 1 ). This yields that S 1+δ ( 1 ) A( 1 ). If δ > δ 1, then the right side of (3.12) is greeter than 1, denote it by 1 + λ, i.e. 1 + λ = (b 1 + c) 2 (1 + δ), λ > 0. From (3.8) and δ < δ 2 we obtain λ < δ 2, since in this case f() S 1+λ ( 1 ), so we can ut f() instead of in (3.12), namely f 2 () 1 = (b 1 + c) 2 f() 1 = 2 (b 1 + c) 2 (1 + δ). If the right side of the last equality is not greeter than 1, then f 2 () U 1 ( 1 ), and hence S 1+δ ( 1 ) A( 1 ). Otherwise reeating the above argument we can rove the following equality f n () 1 = n (b 1 + c) 2 (1 + δ), n 1. (3.13) The condition (3.8) imlies that there is a ositive integer n 0 such that f n () U 1 ( 1 ) for all n > n 0. This yields S 1+δ ( 1 ) A( 1 ). Case 2. Now suose that b 1 + c b 2 < γ b 1 + c b this imlies that δ > δ 2. It then follows from (3.11) that f() 1 = b(b 1 + c). (3.14),, Observe that b(b 1 + c) = 1 + δ 2. (3.15) 8

9 If δ 2 δ 1 then the equalities (3.14) and (3.15) rovide that f() U 1 ( 1 ), and in this case we obtain the assertion of theorem. If δ 2 > δ 1, then from (3.15) we infer that the right side of (3.14) is greeter than 1, and which is denoted by 1 + µ, µ > 0. So f() S 1+µ ( 1 ). Show that µ < δ 2. Indeed, 1 + µ = 1 + δ 2 < 1 + δ 2 this imlies µ < δ 2. Thus, we have reduced our consideration to the case 1. This comletes the roof. Lemma 3.8. Let 2 > 1 + δ 2, then f() S 1+δ2 ( 2 ). Proof. Denote γ = 2, then the condition of lemma means that γb b 2 + c > 1. we then have 2 f() 2 = (b 2 + c) 2 = + γb(b 2 + c) = 2 (b 2 + c) γb = b 2 + c = 2 (b 2 + c) 2 γb = b 2 + c = b(b 2 + c) = = b 1 + c b = 1 + δ 2 Lemma is roved. From this lemma we obtain the following Corollary 3.9. Let the condition of Lemma 3.8 be satisfied, then f(s 1+δ2 ( 2 )) = S 1+δ2 ( 2 ). Corollary Let δ 2, then f() 2 f ( 2 ) 2 The roof is similar to the roof of Lemma 3.8. Theorem Let the conditions of Theorem 3.7 be satisfied. Then A( 1 ) = C \ {ˆ, 2 }. 9

10 Proof. Since ˆ does not belong the domain of f and 2 is a fied oint of one, therefore ˆ, 2 / A( 1 ). According to Theorem 3.7 it suffices to rove that S 1+δ2 ( 1 ) \ {ˆ, 2 } A( 1 ). Keeing in mind (3.15), 1 ˆ = b 1 + c b and γ = 1 the equality (3.11) yields From 1 = 1 + δ 2 we get f() 1 = 1 + δ 2 1 ˆ. (3.16) f() 1 = (1 + δ 2 ) 2 ( ) ˆ. (3.17) If the right side of (3.17) non equal to 1+δ 2 then according to Theorem 3.7 we infer that f() A( 1 ), hence A( 1 ). One remains to consider a case when the right side of (3.17) is equal to 1+δ 2, i.e f() 1 = 1+δ 2. In this case we find ˆ = 1 + δ 2. (3.18) From this we get 2 = ( ˆ) + (ˆ δ 2, (3.19) here it has been used the equality ˆ 2 = 1 + δ 2. (see the roof of Lemma 3.6). According to Corollary 3.10 there eists a ositive integer n 0 such that f n 0 () 2 > 1 + δ 2, whence f n 0 () ˆ = (f n 0 () 2 ) + ( 2 ˆ) > 1 + δ 2, (3.20) here we have used 3.1) roerty of the norm. From (3.16) we obtain f 2 () 1 = 1 + δ 2 f() 1 = (1 + δ 2) 2 1. (3.21) f() ˆ f() ˆ Now we estimate f() ˆ : f() ˆ = (f() 1 ) + ( 1 ˆ) 1 + δ 2. Hence the equality (3.21) imlies f 2 () δ 2. (3.22) 10

11 If the left side of (3.22) is not equal to 1 + δ 2, then f 2 () A( 1 ), so A( 1 ). If f 2 () 1 = 1 + δ 2, then reeating this argument till a number k such that f k () δ 2, (3.23) we conclude that A( 1 ). Now we show that such number k does eist. Let us assume that for all m n 0 the following equality f m () 1 = 1 + δ 2, (3.24) is valid. Otherwise nothing to rove. Put k = n According to (3.16),(3.20) and (3.24) we have f n 0+1 () 1 = 1 + δ 2 fn0 () 1 f n 0 () ˆ < 1 + δ 2, i.e. (3.23) is valid. This comletes the roof. 4 Dynamical system f() = b + c in Q is not ergodic In this section we consider a dynamical system f() = b + c, c 0, b,c Q (4.1) in Q. It is easy to that = 0 is a fied oint for (4.1). A question about ergodicity of the considered system arises when the fied oint = 0 is indifferent. This lead us to the condition c = 1. From condition (3.5) we find that b < c. Then it is not difficult to check that f(s 1 (0)) = S 1 (0). From now we consider the dynamical system (4.1) on the shere S 1 (0). Lemma 4.1.For every ball U l(a) S 1 (0) then the following equality holds f(u l(a)) = U l(f(a)) Proof. From inclusion U l(a) S 1 (0) we have a = 1. Let a l, then f() f(a) = c a b + c ba + c = a l, here we have used the equality b + c = 1, which follows from b < 1. Lemma is roved. Consider a measurable sace (S 1 (0), B), here B is the algebra of generated by cloen subsets of S 1 (0). Every element of B is a union of some balls U l(a). A measure µ : B R is said to be Haar measure if it is defined by µ(u l(a)) = 1 q l, 11

12 here q is a rime number. From lemma 4.1 we conclude that f reserves the measure µ, i.e. µ(f(u l(a))) = µ(u l(a)) (4.2). Recall a dynamical system (X,T,λ), where T : X X is a measure reserving transformation, is called ergodic if for every invariant set A, i.e. T(A) = A the equalities λ(a) = 0 or λ(a) = 1 are valid. (see, [28]) Proosition 4.2. If there is some number N N such that f N (a) a < 1 for some a S 1 (0) then the dynamical system (4.1) is not ergodic on S 1 (0) with resect to the Haar measure. Proof. Denote N = min{n N : f n (a) a < 1 for some a S 1 (0)}. Because of the discreteness of the -adic metric we can assume that f N (a) a l for some ositive integer l N. Put A = N 1 k=0 U l(f k (a)). Then from Lemma 4.1 we find that f(a) = A. It is clear that µ(a) 0 and µ(s 1 (0) \ A) 0, hence f is not ergodic. This comletes the roof. Corollary 4.3. If = 2 then the dynamical system (4.1) is not ergodic on S 1 (0) with resect to the Haar measure. Proof. Form the condition c 2 = 1 using the roerty 3.2) of the norm we get 1 c 2 1. Then we have 2 f(a) a 2 = 1 c ba 2 1 2, since ba Hence the set A = U 2 1(a) is invariant with resect to f. On the other hand µ(a) = 1/2, that means f is not ergodic. The corollary is roved. Lemma 4.4.For every N N the following equalities hold f 2 () = where S N = N 3 b(1 + c) + c 2, f3 () = m=0 c 2m (2 N 2 1). b(1 + c 2 + c 3 ) + c 4, fn () = The roof immediately follows from induction method. From this Lemma we can rove the following Corollary 4.5.For every integer N N the following equalities hold f 3 () = f 1 () = b/c + 1/c, f 2 () = b/c(1 + 1/c 2 + 1/c 3 ) + 1/c 4,f N () = 12 b/c(1 + 1/c) + 1/c 2, b(1 + S N ) + c 2N 1, b/c(1 + Z N ) + 1/c 2N 1,

13 where Z N = N 3 1/c 2m (2 N 2 1). m=0 Using Lemma 4.4 consider the difference f N () = 1 b(1 + S N ) c 2N 1 form this we conclude that the condition f N () = 1 for all N N and S 1 (0) is equivalent to the equality 1 c 2N 1 = 1, N N. (4.3) Using Corollary 4.5 and analogous argument as above we can obtain that the condition f N () = 1 for all N N and S 1 (0) is also equivalent to the equality (4.3). From (2.1) we have that every element c S 1 (0) is reresented in the form c = a 0 + a 1 + a , where a 0 0, a k {0,1,..., 1}, k N. Then it is easy to see the condition (4.3) is equivalent to the following one a 2N 1 0 / 1(mod ), N N This condition is satisfied for eamle on = 7 with a 0 = 2. Let us assume that the condition (4.2) is satisfied. Then for all n N, we get U l(f n (a)) U l(a) = for all a S 1 (0), l N. Then according to Theorem 1.5[28] we conclude that the set the dynamical system (4.1) is not ergodic. So we have roved the following Theorem 4.6. The dynamical system (4.1) is not ergodic on S 1 (0) with resect to the Haar measure. Acknowledgement This work was done in the scheme of Mathematical Fellowshi at the Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), and the authors thank ICTP for roviding financial suort and all facilities. The first author also thanks IMU/CDE- rogram for financial suort. The authors also acknowledge with gratitude to Professor A.Yu.Khrennikov for the helful comments. References [1] V.A.Avetisov, A.H. Bikulov, S.V.Kozyrev and V.A.Osiov, -adic modls of ultrametric diffusion constrained by hierarchical energy landscaes, J. Phys. A: Math.Gen. 35(2002), [2] S.Albeverio, A.Khrennikov, and P.E.Koloeden, Memory retrieval as a -adic dynamical system, BioSys. 49(1999),

14 [3] S.Albeverio, A.Khrennikov, B.Tirozzi and S.De.Smedt, -adic dynamical systems, Theor.Math. Phys. 114(1998), [4] I.Ya.Araf eva, B.Dragovich, P.H.Framton and I.V.Volovich, Wave function of the universe and -adic gravity, Int. J. Mod.Phys. A. 6(1991) [5] R.Benedetto, Hyerbolic mas in -adic dynamics, Ergod. Th.& Dynam.Sys. 21(2001), [6] R.Benedetto, -Adic dynamics and Sullivan s no wandering domains thoerem, Comosito Math. 122(2000), [7] G.Call and J.Silverman,Canonical height on varieties with morhisms, Comosito Math. 89(1993), [8] D.Dubischer, V.M.Gundlach, A.Khrennikov and O.Steinkam, Attractors of random dynamical system over -adic numbers and a model of noisy cognitive rocess, Physica D. 130(1999), [9] N.N.Ganikhodjaev, F.M.Mukhamedov and U.A.Rozikov, Eistence of hase transition for the Potts -adic model on the set Z, Theor.Math. Phys. 130(2002), [10] F.Q.Gouvea, -adic numbers, Sringer, Berlin [11] V.M.Gundlach, A.Khrennikov and K.O.Lindahl, On ergodic behavior of -adic dynamical systems., Infin. Dimen. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. To. 4(2001), [12] P.G.O.Freund, and E.Witten, Adelic string amletudes, Phys. Lett. B199(1987) [13] M.Herman and J.-C.Yoccoz, Generalizations of some theorems of small divisors t non-archimedean fields, In: Geometric Dynamics (Rio de Janeiro, 1981), Lec. Notes in Math. 1007, Sringer, Berlin, 1983, [14] N.Koblitz, -adic numbers, -adic analysis and zeta-function Sringer, Berlin, [15] A.Yu.Khrennikov, -adic quantum mechanics with -adic valued functions, J.Math.Phys. 32(1991), [16] A.Yu.Khrennikov, -adic Valued Distributions in Mathematical Physics Kluwer, Netherlands, [17] A.Yu.Khrennikov, Non-Archimedean analysis: quantum aradoes, dynamical systems and biological models, Kluwer, Netherlands, [18] A.Yu.Khrennikov, The descrition of Grain s functioning by the -adic dynamical system, Prerint Ruhr Univ.Bochum, SFB-237,N

15 [19] J.Lubin,Nonarchimedean dynamical systems, Comosito Math. 94(3)(1994), [20] E.Marinary and G.Parisi, On the -adic five oint function, Phys.Lett. 203B(1988) [21] T.Pezda, Polynomial cycles in certain local domains, Acta Arith. 66 (1994), [22] H.-O.Peitgen, H.Jungers and D.Saue, Chaos Fractals, Sringer, Heidelberg-New York, [23] A.M.Robert, A course of -adic analysis, Sringer, New York, [24] E.Thiran, D.Verstegen and J.Weters, -adic dynamics, J.Stat. Phys. 54(3/4)(1989), [25] V.S.Vladimirov and I.V.Volovich and E.I.Zelenov, -adic Analysis and Mathematical Physics, World Scientific, Singaour, [26] I.V.Volovich, Number theory as the ultimate hysical theory, Prerint, TH, 4781/87. [27] I.V.Volovich, -adic strings, Class. Quantum Grav. 4(1987) L83-L87. [28] P.Walters, An introduction to ergodic theory, Sringer, Berlin- Heidelberg-New York, Mechanical and Mathematical Deatrment National University of Uzbekistan Vuzgorodok, Tashkent, , Uzbekistan, e-amil: far75m@yande.ru Institute of Mathematics, 29, F.Hodjaev str., Tashkent, , Uzbekistan, root@im.tashkent.su 15