arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 12 May 2007
|
|
- Byron Gibbs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 On the exact formula for neutrino oscillation probability by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura Osamu Yasuda arxiv:74.5v [hep-ph] May 7 Department of Physics Tokyo Metropolitan University Minami-Osawa Hachioi Tokyo 9-97 Japan Abstract The exact formula for the neutrino oscillation probability in matter with constant density which was discovered by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura has been applied mostly to the standard case with three flavor neutrino so far. In this paper applications of their formula to more general cases are discussed. It is shown that this formalism can be generalized to various cases where the matter potential have off-diagonal components and the two non-trivial examples are given: the case with magnetic moments and a magnetic field and the case with non-standard interactions. It is pointed out that their formalism can be applied also to the case in the long baseline limit with matter whose density varies adiabatically as in the case of solar neutrino. PACS numbers: 4.6.Pq 4.6.St Electronic address: yasuda at phys.metro-u.ac.p Typeset by REVTEX
2 I. INTRODUCTION Neutrino oscillations in matter (See e.g. Ref. [] for review.) have been discussed by many people in the past because the oscillation probability has non-trivial behaviors in matter and due to the matter effect it may exhibit non-trivial enhancement which could be physically important. Unfortunately it is not easy to get an analytical formula for the oscillation probability in the three flavor neutrino scheme in matter and investigation of its behaviors has been a difficult but important problem in the phenomenology of neutrino oscillations. In Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura derived a nice compact formula [ ] for the neutrino oscillation probability in matter with constant density. Basically what they showed is that the quantity Ũ αũβ which is a factor crucial to express the oscillation probability analytically can be expressed as a linear combination of U α U β where Ũα and U α stand for the matrix element of the MNS matrix in matter and in vacuum respectively. However their formula is only applicable to the standard three flavor case. In this paper we show that their result can be generalized to various cases. We also show that their formalism can be applied also to the case with slowly varying matter density in the limit of the long neutrino path. In Sect. II we review briefly some aspects of the oscillation probabilities including a simple derivation for the formula by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura which was given in Ref. [4] because these are used in the following sections. Their formalism is generalized to the various cases where the matter potential has off-diagonal components and we will discuss the case with large magnetic moments and a magnetic field (Sect. III) and the case with non-standard interactions (Sect. IV). In Sect. V we summarize our conclusions. II. GENERALITIES ABOUT OSCILLATION PROBABILITIES A. The case of constant density It has been known [5] (See also earlier works [6 7 8].) that after eliminating the negative energy states by a Tani-Foldy-Wouthusen-type transformation the Dirac equation for neutrinos propagating in matter is reduced to the familiar form: where E diag(e E E ) i dψ dt = [ UEU +A(t) ] Ψ () A(t) G F diag(n e (t) N n (t)/ N n (t)/ N n (t)/) Ψ T (ν e ν µ ν τ ) is the flavor eigenstate U is the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (MNS) matrix E m + p ( = ) is the energy eigenvalue of each mass eigenstate and the matter effect A(t) at time (or position ) t is characterized by the density N e (t) of electrons and the one N n (t) of neutrons respectively. Throughout this paper we assume for simplicity that the density of matter is either constant or slowly varying so that its derivative is negligible. The matrix on the right hand side of Eq. () can be formally diagonalized as: UEU +A(t) = Ũ(t)Ẽ(t)Ũ (t) ()
3 where Ẽ(t) diag ( Ẽ (t)ẽ(t)ẽ(t) ) is a diagonal matrix with the energy eigenvalues Ẽ(t) in the presence of the matter effect. First of all let us assume that the matter density A(t) is constant. Then all the t dependence disappears and Eq. () can be easily solved resulting the flavor eigenstate at the distance L: Ψ(L) = Ũ exp( iẽl) Ũ Ψ(). () Thus the oscillation probability P(ν α ν β ) is given by P(ν α ν β ) = [Ũ exp( iel) Ũ ] βα = δ 4 Re ( ) ) k sin ( Ẽ k L <k + Im ( ) ( k sin Ẽ k L ) (4) <k where we have defined ŨαŨ β Ẽk Ẽ Ẽk and throughout this paper the indices αβ = (eµτ) and k = () stand for those of the flavor and mass eigenstates respectively. Once we know the eigenvalues Ẽ and the quantity the oscillation probability can be expressed analytically. B. The case of adiabatically varying density Secondly let us consider the case where the density of the matter varies adiabatically as in the case of the solar neutrino deficit phenomena. In this case instead of Eq. () we get ] Ψ(L) = Ũ(L)exp [ i L Ẽ(t) dt Ũ() Ψ() where Ũ() and Ũ(L) stand for the effective mixing matrices at the origin t = and at the end point t = L. The oscillation probability is given by [ { ] L P(ν α ν β ) = Ũ(L)exp i Ẽ(t) dt }Ũ() βα [ ] = Ũ(L) β Ũ(L) βkũ() αũ() αkexp k i L Ẽ(t) kdt. (5) InthestandardcasewiththreeflavorsofneutrinosinmattertheenergyeigenvaluesẼ canbeanalytically obtained by the root formula for a cubic equation [9]. So the only non-trivial problem in the standard case is to obtain the expression for and this was done by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura [ ]. In general cases however the analytic expression for Ẽ is very difficult or impossible to obtain and we will discuss below only examples in which the analytic expression for Ẽ is known.
4 Eq. (5) requires in general the quantity like Ũ(t) βũ (t) βk which has the same flavor index β but different mass eigenstate indices k and it turns out that the analytical expression for Ũ(t) βũ (t) βk is hard to obtain. However if the length L of the neutrino path is very large and if L Ẽ(t) kdt is satisfied for k as in the case of the solar neutrino deficit phenomena after averaging over rapid oscillations Eq. (5) is reduced to P(ν α ν β ) = ββ (L) () where we have defined (t) Ũ(t) α. In the case of the solar neutrinos deficit process ν e ν e during the daylight ββ (L) at the end point t = L and () at the origin t = correspond to X ββ in vacuum and [ ] at the center of the Sun respectively where X [ ] U α U β [ Ũ α Ũ β are bilinear products of the elements of the mixing matrices in vacuum and at the center of the Sun respectively. Thus we obtain P(ν e ν e ) = X ee ] [ ] ee. Hence we see that evaluation of the quantity in the presence of the matter effect is important notonlyinthecase ofconstant matterdensity butalso inthecase ofadiabatically varying density. C. Another derivation of the formula by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura In this subsection a systematic derivation of their formula is given because such a derivation will be crucial for the generalizations in the following sections. The arguments are based on the trivial identities. From the unitarity condition of the matrix Ũ we have δ = [ ŨŨ ] = Ũ α Ũ β =. (6) Next we take the (αβ) component of the both hand sides in Eq. (): [ UEU +A ] = [ ŨẼŨ ] = Ũ α Ẽ Ũ β = Ẽ (7) The argument here is the same as that in Ref. [4]. Since this derivation does not seem to be widely known it is reviewed here. 4
5 Furthermore we take the (αβ) component of the square of Eq. (): [ (UEU +A ) ] = [ ŨẼ Ũ ] = Ũ α Ẽ Ũ β = Ẽ (8) Putting Eqs. (6) (8) together we have Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ = δ [UEU +A] [(UEU +A) ] which can be easily solved by inverting the Vandermonde matrix: = (ẼẼ (Ẽ +Ẽ) ) Ẽ Ẽ (ẼẼ (Ẽ +Ẽ) ) Ẽ Ẽ (ẼẼ (Ẽ +Ẽ) ) Ẽ Ẽ δ [UEU +A] [(UEU +A) ]. (9) [(UEU +A) ] ( = ) on the right hand side are given by the known quantities: [ UEU +A ] = [ (UEU +A ) ] = E X +Aδ αe δ βe E X +A ( E δαe X eβ ) +δ βe X αe +A δ αe δ βe. It can be shown that Eq. (9) coincides with the original results by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura [ ]. A remark is in order on Eq. (9). Addition of a matrix c to Eq. () where c is a constant and is the identity matrix or in other words the shift E E +c ( = ) () should give the same result for ( = ) since Eq. () only affects the overall phase of the oscillation amplitude and the phase has to disappear in the probability. It is easy to show that the shift () indeed gives the same result as Eq. (9). The proof is given in Appendix A. In practical calculations below we will always put c = E i.e. we will consider the mass matrix U(E E )U +A instead of the original one UEU +A since all the diagonal elements (E E ) = E = m /E are expressed in terms of the relevant variables m and therefore calculations become simpler. To save space however we will use the matrix UEU +A in most of the following discussions. D. The case with arbitrary number of neutrinos It is straightforward to generalize the discussions in sect. II C to the case with arbitrary number of neutrinos where the matter potential is diagonal in the flavor eigenstate. The 5
6 scheme with number of sterile neutrinos is one of the example of these cases [4 ]. The time evolution of such a scheme with N neutrino flavors is described by i dψ N dt = ( U N E N U N +A N) ΨN where Ψ T N (ν α ν α ν αn ) is the flavor eigenstate E N diag(e E E N ) () is the energy matrix of the mass eigenstate A N diag(a A A N ) is the potential matrix for the flavor eigenstate and U N is the N N MNS matrix. As in the previous sect. by taking the αβ components we get Ẽ m = [( U N E N UN +A ) m ] N for m = N which leads to the simultaneous equation. Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ N Ẽ N.. Ẽ N ẼN N. N = δ [UN EU N +A N ] [. (UN ) ] EUN N +A N. () Eq. () can be solved by inverting the N N Vandermonde matrix V N :. N = V N δ [UN E N U N +A N ] [. (UN E N UN +A N ) N ]. () The determinant of V N is the Vandermonde determinant <k Ẽk and therefore V can be analytically obtained as long as we know the value of Ẽ. The factors [(U N E N UN + A N ) ] ontherighthandsideofeq. ()canbeexpressed asfunctionsoftheenergye the quantityx invacuumandthematterpotentiala γ sincethematrix(u N E N UN +A N) isa sum of products of the matrices [(U N E N UN ) l ] γδ = kex l γδ k ( l ) and [(A N ) m ] ǫη = (A ǫ ) m δ ǫη ( m ). From Eq. () it is clear that enhancement of the oscillation probability due to the matter effect occurs only when some of Ẽk becomes small. 6
7 III. THE CASE WITH LARGE MAGNETIC MOMENTS AND A MAGNETIC FIELD So far we have assumed that the potential term is diagonal in the flavor basis. We can generalize the present result to the cases where we have off-diagonal potential terms. One of such examples is the case where there are only three active neutrinos with magnetic moments and the magnetic field (See e.g. Ref. [] for review.). The hermitian matrix with ( ) UEU B M B U E(U ) B Bµ is the mass matrix for neutrinos and anti-neutrinos without the matter effect where neutrinos have the magnetic moments µ in the magnetic field B. Here we assume the magnetic interaction of Maorana type (4) µ ν α F λκ σ λκ νβ c +h.c. (5) and in this case the magnetic moments µ are real and anti-symmetric in flavor indices: µ = µ βα. If the magnetic field is constant then the oscillation probability can be written as P(ν A ν B ) = δ AB 4 + J<K J<K Im ( AB J Re ( AB J AB K ) ) K AB sin ( Ẽ JK L ) ( sin Ẽ JK L ) (6) where AB run eµτē µ τ and JK run 6 respectively and U AJ UBJ. Ẽ J (J = 6) are the eigenvalues of the 6 6 matrix M. On the other hand if the magnetic field varies very slowly and if the length L of the baseline is so long that ẼJKL is satisfied for J K then the oscillation probability is given by AB J P(ν A ν B ) = 6 J= J BB AA (L) J (). (7) Following the same arguments as before the quantity Vandermonde matrix V 6 : AB AB. AB 6 = V 6 δ AB [M] AB [. (M) 5 ] AB AB J is given by inverting the 6 6. (8) See [5] for derivation of Eq. (4) from the Dirac Eq. 7
8 As in the previous sections [(M) J ] AB (J = 5) on the right hand side of Eq. (8) can be expressed in terms of the known quantities XK AB and B CD and Eqs. (6) and (8) are useful only when we know the eigenvalues ẼJ. To demonstrate the usefulness of these formulae let us consider the case where the magnetic field is large at origin but is zero at the end point and the magnetic field varies adiabatically. For simplicity we assume that θ and all the CP phases vanish. 4 In this case the 6 6 matrix M in Eq. (4) becomes real and we obtain the following oscillation probabilities: P(ν α ν β ) = P( ν α ν β ) = (U β ) [ReŨ() α] = P(ν α ν β ) = P( ν α ν β ) = (U β ) [ImŨ() α] (9) = where Ũ() the unitary matrix which diagonalizes the matrix UEU +ib() at the origin: UEU +ib() = Ũ()Ẽ()Ũ (). In this example the energy eigenvalues are degenerate i.e. the 6 6 energy matrix becomes diag(ẽẽ) and the oscillation probability differs from Eq. (7) because the condition ẼJKL (J K) is not satisfied (e.g. ẼJK = not only for J = K = but also for J = K = 4). Each probability in Eqs. (9) itself is not expressed in terms of () but we find that the following relation holds: P(ν α ν β )+P( ν α ν β ) = (U β ) Ũ() α = = = X ββ (). () Eq. () is a new result and without the present formalism it would be hard to derive it. The details of derivation of Eq. (9) and explicit forms of () are given in Appendix B. Eq. () may be applicable to the case where high energy astrophysical neutrinos which are produced in a relatively large magnetic field are observed on the Earth on the assumption that the fluxes of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos are almost equal. IV. THE CASE WITH NON-STANDARD INTERACTIONS Another interesting application is the oscillation probability in the presence of new physics in propagation [ ]. In this case the mass matrix is given by UEU +A NP () 4 In the presence of the magnetic interaction(5) ofmaoranatype the twocp phases which are absorbed by redefinition of the charged lepton fields in the standard case cannot be absorbed and therefore become physical. Here however we will assume for simplicity that these CP phases vanish. 8
9 where A NP G F N e +ǫ ee ǫ eµ ǫ eτ ǫ eµ ǫ µµ ǫ µτ ǫ eτ ǫ µτ ǫ ττ. Thedimensionless quantitiesǫ standforpossibledeviationfromthestandardmattereffect. Also in this case the oscillation probability is given by Eqs. (4) and (9) where the standard potential matrix A has to be replaced by A NP. The extra complication compared to the standard case is calculations of the eigenvalues Ẽ and the elements [(UEU +A NP ) m ] (m = ). Again to demonstrate the usefulness of the formalism here we will discuss for simplicity the case in which the eigenvalues are the roots of a quadratic equation. It is known [] that the constraints on the three parameters ǫ ee ǫ eτ ǫ ττ from various experimental data are weak and they could be as large as O(). In Ref. [4] it was found that large values ( O()) of the parameters ǫ ee ǫ eτ ǫ ττ are consistent with all the experimental data including those of the atmospheric neutrino data provided that one of the eigenvalues of the matrix () at high energy limit i.e. A NP becomes zero. Simplifying even further here we will neglect the parameters ǫ eµ ǫ µµ ǫ µτ which are smaller than O( ) and we will consider the potential matrix +ǫ ee ǫ eτ A NP = A ǫ eτ ǫ ττ () where A G F N e the three parameters ǫ ee ǫ eτ ǫ ττ are constrained in such a way that two of the three eigenvalues become zero. We will assume that N e is constant and we will take the limit m. The oscillation probability P(ν µ ν e ) in this case can be analytically expressed and is given by P(ν µ ν e ) = 4Re ( µe 4Re ( µe µe µe ) ) sin ( Λ L 4Re ( µe ] ) sin [ (Λ+ Λ L)L µe ) ) sin ( Λ+ L + 8A( E ) Λ + Λ (Λ + Λ ) ǫ eτx eµ X µτ sin(arg(ǫ eµ )+δ) ( ) ( ) [ ] Λ L Λ+ L (Λ+ Λ )L sin sin sin. () Eq. () is another new result and it would be difficult to obtain it without using the present formalism. The details of derivation of Eq. () explanation of the notations and the explicit forms of all the variables in Eq. () are described in Appendix C. V. CONCLUSIONS The essence of the exact formula for the neutrino oscillation probability in constant matter which was discovered by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura lies in the fact that the combination Ũα Ũ β of the mixing matrix elements in matter can be expressed 9
10 as polynomials in the same quantity X U α U β in vacuum. In this paper we have discussed applications of their formalism to more general cases. We have pointed out that their formalism can be useful for the cases in matter not only with constant density but also with density which varies adiabatically as in the case of the solar neutrino problem after taking the limit of the long neutrino path. We have shown that their formalism can be generalized to the cases where the matter potential has off-diagonal components. As concrete non-trivial examples we discussed the case with magnetic moments and a magnetic field and the case with non-standard interactions. The application of the present formalism to the case with unitarity violation has been discussed elsewhere [5]. The formalism by Kimura Takamura and Yokomakura is quite general and can be applicable to many problems in neutrino oscillation phenomenology. APPENDIX A: PROOF THAT EQ. () GIVES THE SAME (9) In this appendix we show that Eq. () gives the same result for value of ( = ) for Ũ ( Ẽ +c ) Ũ = UEU +A+c ( = ). The becomes at most quadratic 5 in c and all one has to do is to show that the coefficients of the terms linear and quadratic in c vanish. Let us introduce the notation Ẽ +c Ẽ +c Ẽ +c (Ẽ +c) (Ẽ +c) (Ẽ +c) δ [UEU +A+c] [(UEU +A+c) ] (V ) () +c(v ) () +c (V ) () B () +c B () +c B () where V (k) is the coefficient of the inverted Vandermonde matrix which is k-th order in c and B (k) is the coefficient of the vector (UEU +A+c) which is k-th order in c. Then the terms linear in c are given by = (V ) () B () +(V ) () B () (Ẽ +Ẽ ) Ẽ Ẽ ( (Ẽ +Ẽ) + ) Ẽ Ẽ (Ẽ +Ẽ ) Ẽ Ẽ δ [UEU +A] [(UEU +A) ] 5 Notice that all the factors Ẽk are invariant under the shift () and the only change by this shift comes either from the terms ẼẼk or from Ẽ +Ẽk in the inverse of the Vandermonde matrix (cf. Eq. (9)). Hence the difference by Eq. () is at most quadratic in c.
11 + Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ Ẽ and the terms quadratic in c are given by (+ẼẼ (Ẽ +Ẽ) +) ( ẼẼ +(Ẽ +Ẽ) ) δ = [UEU +A] (+ẼẼ (Ẽ +Ẽ) +) = (V ) () B () +(V ) () B () +(V ) () B () (+ ) Ẽ Ẽ δ ( ) [UEU [(UEU +A] Ẽ Ẽ +A) ] (+ ) Ẽ Ẽ (Ẽ +Ẽ ) Ẽ Ẽ + ( (Ẽ +Ẽ) + ) δ Ẽ Ẽ [UEU +A] (Ẽ +Ẽ ) Ẽ Ẽ (+ẼẼ (Ẽ +Ẽ) +) Ẽ Ẽ + ( ẼẼ +(Ẽ +Ẽ) ) =. Ẽ Ẽ δ (+ẼẼ (Ẽ +Ẽ) +) Ẽ Ẽ Thus ( = ) is independent of c as is claimed. APPENDIX B: DERIVATION OF EQ. (9) The matrix (4) can be rewritten as M = ( )( i UEU +ib i UEU ib )( ) i i so the problem of diagonalizing the 6 6 matrix (4) is reduced to diagonalizing the matrices UEU ± ib. Since we are assuming that θ and all the CP phases vanish all the matrix elements U α and B = B βα are real UEU ±ib can be diagonalized by a unitary matrix and its complex conugate: UEU +ib = ŨẼŨ UEU ib = Ũ Ẽ(Ũ ). Therefore we can diagonalize M by a 6 6 unitary matrix Ũ as (Ẽ ) M = Ũ Ẽ Ũ
12 where Ũ = ( )(Ũ ) i = ( i Ũ ) Ũ iũ iũ Ũ. We note in passing that the reason why diagonalization of the 6 6 matrix is reduced to that of the matrix is because the two matrices UEU and B are real. On the other hand without a magnetic field the 6 6 unitary matrix U is given by U = ( U U ) = ( U U where the CP phase δ has dropped out because θ =. From these we can integrate the equation of motion and we get the fields at the end point: ( ) ( ) ( ) Ψ(L) e Ψ c = (L) Ũ(L) iφ Ψ() e iφ Ũ() Ψ c () = ( )( ) Ue iφ Ũ +U e iφ (Ũ ) i(ue iφ Ũ U e iφ (Ũ ) ) Ψ() i(ue iφ Ũ U e iφ (Ũ ) ) Ue iφ Ũ +U e iφ (Ũ ) Ψ c () where Φ L Ẽ(t) dt and we have assumed that a large magnetic field exists at the origin whereas there is no magnetic field at the end point. Thus the oscillation probabilities for the adiabatic transition are give by: [ P(ν α ν β ) = P( ν α ν β ) = lim L Ue iφ Ũ +U e iφ (Ũ ) ] = U β [ Re(Ũα) ] = L P( ν α ν β ) = P(ν α ν β ) = lim Hence we obtain the following relation: = = ) [ Ue iφ Ũ U e iφ (Ũ ) ] U β [ Im(Ũα) ]. P(ν α ν β )+P( ν α ν β ) = P(ν α ν β )+P(ν α ν β ) = U β Ũα. = To get Ũα we need the explicit expression for the eigenvalues and the quantity in the presence of a magnetic field. In the following we will subtract E from the energy matrix E because it will only change the phase of the oscillation amplitude. For simplicity we will put θ = θ = π/4 and we will consider the limit m. Defining E k m k /E and B = Bµ p q p r q r
13 we have the eigenvalue equation = λ U(E E )U ib = λ E λ (p +q +r )λ+ E (p q). The three roots of the cubic equation (B) are given by (B) λ = Rcosϕ+ E where λ = Rcos(ϕ+ π)+ E R [( E /) +(p +q +r )/] / λ = Rcos(ϕ π)+ E ϕ (/)cos [ {( E /) + E (p +q +r )/6 E (p q) /4}/R ]. The quantity in the presence of a magnetic field is given by = λ λ (λ λ (λ +λ ) ) λ λ (λ λ (λ +λ ) ) λ λ (λ λ (λ +λ ) ) Y Y (B) where Y = [ U(E E )U +ib ] = E X { (α = e) = E / (α = µτ) [ {U(E Y = E )U +ib } ] = q +r (α = e) r +p +( E ) / (α = µ) p +q +( E ) / (α = τ) = ( E ) X (B ) (B). (B4) In evaluating Y we have used the facts θ = θ = π/4 E = B = B βα and that U(E E )U is a symmetric matrix. Using all these results it is straightforward to obtain the explicit form for P(ν α ν β )+P( ν α ν β ) by plugging the results of Eqs. (B) (B) (B4) into the following (although calculations are tedious): P(ν α ν e )+P( ν α ν e ) = c P(ν α ν β )+P( ν α ν β ) = c where s sinθ c cosθ. +s + s + (β = µτ)
14 APPENDIX C: DERIVATION OF EQ. () The oscillation probability () is obtained in two steps. First we will obtain the eigenvalues of thematrix() witheq. () andthenwe will plug the expressions for theeigenvalues into Eq. (9) with A replaced by A NP given in Eq. (). Let us introduce notations for hermitian matrices: λ λ i i λ 5 λ 9 i i λ 7 i i whereλ λ 5 andλ 7 arethestandardgell-mannmatriceswhereasλ andλ 9 arethenotations which are defined only in this paper. Simple calculations show that the matrix A NP in Eq. () can be rewritten as where A NP = Ae iγλ 9 e iβλ 5 λ +ǫ ee +ǫ ττ (+ǫee ) ǫ ττ +λ 9 + ǫ µτ e iβλ 5 e iγλ 9 (C) β tan ǫ eτ +ǫ ee ǫ ττ γ arg(ǫ eµ). From Eq. (C) we see that the two potentially non-zero eigenvalues λ e and λ τ of the matrix () are given by ( λe λ τ ) = A +ǫ ee +ǫ ττ (+ǫee ) ǫ ττ ± + ǫ µτ. In order for this scheme to be consistent with the atmospheric neutrino data particularly at high energy which are perfectly described by vacuum oscillations λ τ has to vanish [4]. In this case we have Thus we have tanβ = ǫ eτ +ǫ ee ǫ ττ = ǫ eτ +ǫ ee λ e = A(+ǫ ee ) [ + ǫ eτ ] (+ǫ ee ) = A(+ǫ ee) cos β. A NP = Ae iγλ 9 e iβλ 5 diag(λ e )e iβλ 5 e iγλ 9. (C) 4
15 If we did not have β and γ Eq. (C) would be the same as the standard three flavor scheme in matter which was analytically worked out in Ref. [6] in the limit of m. It turns out that by redefining the parametrization of the MNS matrix Eq. (C) can be also treated analytically in the limit of m as was done in Ref. [6]. The mass matrix can be written as [ UEU +A NP = e iγλ 9 e iβλ 5 e iβλ 5 e iγλ 9 UEU e iγλ 9 e iβλ 5 +diag(λ e ) ] e iβλ 5 e iγλ 9. Here we introduce the following two unitary matrices: U e iβλ 5 e iγλ 9 U diag(e iargu τ )U diag(e iargu e e iargu e ) where U is the MNS matrix in the standard parametrization [7] and U was defined in the second line in such a way that the elements U e U e U τ be real to be consistent with the standard parametrization in Ref. [7] 6. Then we have [ UEU +A NP = e iγλ 9 e iβλ 5 diag(e iargu τ ) U EU +diag(λ e ) ] diag(e iargu τ )e iβλ 5 e iγλ 9. Before proceeding further let us obtain the expression for the three mixing angles θ k and the Dirac phase δ in U. Since U = c β e iγ U e +s β e iγ U τ c β e iγ U e +s β e iγ U τ c β e iγ U e +s β e iγ U τ U µ U µ U µ c β e iγ U τ s β e iγ U e c β e iγ U τ s β e iγ U e c β e iγ U τ s β e iγ U e where c β cosβ s β sinβ we get θ = sin U e = sin c β e iγ U e +s β e iγ U τ θ = tan (U e/u e) = tan ( c β e iγ U e +s β e iγ U τ / c β e iγ U e +s β e iγ U τ ) θ = tan (U µ /U τ ) = tan ( U µ / c β e iγ U τ s β e iγ U e ) δ = argu e = arg(c βe iγ U e +s β e iγ U τ ). As was shown in Ref. [6] in the limit m the matrix on the right hand side of Eq. (C) can be diagonalized as follows: U EU +diag(λ e ) E = e iθ λ 7 Γ δ e iθ [ e iθ = e iθ λ 7 Γ δ λ 5 Γ δ eiθ λ diag( E )e iθ λ Γ δ e iθ λ 5 Γ δ e iθ λ 5 diag( E )+diag(λ e ) ] Γ δ e iθ λ 7 = e iθ λ 7 i θ Γ δ e λ 5 i θ diag(λ Λ + )e λ 5 Γ δ eiθ λ (C) λ 7 +diag(λ e ) where Γ δ diag(e iδ ) E m /E we have used the standard parametrization [7] U e iθ λ 7 Γ δ e iθ λ 5 Γ eiθ λ and the eigenvalues Λ ± are defined by Λ ± = ( E +λ e )± δ ( E cosθ λ e ) +( E sinθ ). 6 The element U τ has to be also real but it is already satisfied because U τ = U τ. 5
16 Having obtained the eigenvalues by plugging these into Eq. (9) with A A NP Ẽ Λ Ẽ Ẽ Λ + we obtain µe : µe µe µe = Λ (Λ + Λ ) ( Λ + ) Λ + Λ ( Λ + Λ (Λ + +Λ ) ) Λ + (Λ + Λ ) ( Λ ) Y µe Y µe = Y µe +Λ + Y µe Λ (Λ + Λ ) Y µe (Λ + +Λ )Y µe Λ + Λ Y µe Λ Y µe Λ + (Λ + Λ ) where Y µe are defined by [ (UEU ] Y µe +A NP) µe and are given by Y µe = E X µe Y µe = [( E ) +A(+ǫ ee ) E ]X µe +A E ǫ eτ Xµτ. Furthermore by introducing the notations ξ [( E ) +A(+ǫ ee ) E ]U µ U e η A E ǫ eτ U µ U τ ζ E U µ U e we can rewrite Y µe = ζe iδ and Y µe = ξe iδ + ηe iγ where δ is the Dirac CP phase of the MNS matrix U so we have µe = e iδ Λ (Λ + Λ ) [ξ +ηe i(γ+δ) Λ + ζ] µe = eiδ Λ + Λ [ξ +ηe i(γ+δ) (Λ + +Λ )ζ] µe = e iδ Λ + (Λ + Λ ) [ξ +ηe i(γ+δ) Λ ζ]. Notice that the phase factor e iδ in front of each drops out in the oscillation probability P(ν µ ν e ) because P(ν µ ν e ) is expressed in terms of µe µe k and the oscillation probability () depends only on the combination γ +δ = arg(ǫ eµ )+δ. In the present case the matrix Ũ is unitary and because of this three flavor unitarity all the T violating terms are proportional to one factor: Im ( µe <k = Im ( µe = 8Im ( µe µe ) ( k sin Ẽ k L ) µe µe ) ( [sin Ẽ L ) sin ( ẼL ) +sin ( ẼL ) ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ) Ẽ L Ẽ L Ẽ L sin µe 6 sin sin.
17 µe This modified Jarlskog factor Im( µe ) in matter can be rewritten as Im( µe µe ) = This completes derivation of Eq. (). µe Im(Y Y µe ) = Λ + Λ (Λ + Λ ) ηζsin(γ +δ) Λ + Λ (Λ + Λ ) = A( E ) Λ + Λ (Λ + Λ ) ǫ eτx eµ X µτ sin(arg(ǫ eµ )+δ). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank Alexei Smirnov for bringing my attention to Refs. [ ]. He would also like to thank He Zhang for calling my attention to Refs. [4 ] which were missed in the first version of this paper. This research was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of the Ministry of Education Science and Culture #946. [] J. N. Bahcall R. Davis P. Parker A. Smirnov and R. Ulrich Reading USA: Addison-Wesley (995) 44 p. (Frontiers in physics. 9) [] K. Kimura A. Takamura and H. Yokomakura Phys. Lett. B () [arxiv:hep-ph/99]. [] K. Kimura A. Takamura and H. Yokomakura Phys. Rev. D () [arxiv:hep-ph/595]. [4] Z. z. Xing and H. Zhang Phys. Lett. B 68 (5) [arxiv:hep-ph/58]. [5] W. Grimus and T. Scharnagl Mod. Phys. Lett. A 8 94 (99). [6] A. Halprin Phys. Rev. D 4 46 (986). [7] P. D. Mannheim Phys. Rev. D 7 95 (988). [8] R. F. Sawyer Phys. Rev. D 4 98 (99). [9] V. D. Barger K. Whisnant S. Pakvasa and R. J. N. Phillips Phys. Rev. D 78 (98). [] H. Zhang arxiv:hep-ph/664. [] M. M. Guzzo A. Masiero and S. T. Petcov Phys. Lett. B 6 54 (99); [] E. Roulet Phys. Rev. D (99). [] S. Davidson C. Pena-Garay N. Rius and A. Santamaria JHEP () [arxiv:hep-ph/9]. [4] A. Friedland and C. Lunardini Phys. Rev. D 7 59 (5) [arxiv:hep-ph/564]. [5] E. Fernandez-Martinez M. B. Gavela J. Lopez-Pavon and O. Yasuda arxiv:hep-ph/798. [6] O. Yasuda Proceedings of Symposium on New Era in Neutrino Physics (Universal Academy Press Inc. Tokyo eds. H. Minakata and O. Yasuda) p (999) [arxiv:hep-ph/9895]. [7] S. Eidelman et al. [Particle Data Group] Phys. Lett. B 59 (4). 7
Non oscillation flavor physics at future neutrino oscillation facilities
Non oscillation flavor physics at future neutrino oscillation facilities Tokyo Metropolitan University Osamu Yasuda 2 July 2008 @nufact08 (SM+m ν ) + (correction due to New physics) which can be probed
More informationThe KTY formalism and the neutrino oscillation probability including nonadiabatic contributions. Tokyo Metropolitan University.
The KTY formalism and the neutrino oscillation probability including nonadiabatic contributions Tokyo Metropolitan niversity Osamu Yasuda Based on Phys.Rev. D89 (2014) 093023 21 December 2014@Miami2014
More informationNew index of CP phase effect and θ 13 screening in long baseline neutrino experiments
Physics Letters B 640 (006) 3 36 www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb New index of CP phase effect and θ 13 screening in long baseline neutrino experiments Keiichi Kimura a,, Akira Takamura a,b, Tadashi Yoshikawa
More informationNeutrinos: Three-Flavor Effects in Sparse and Dense Matter
Neutrinos: Three-Flavor Effects in Sparse and Dense Matter Tommy Ohlsson tommy@theophys.kth.se Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) & Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA) Stockholm, Sweden Neutrinos
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 24 Feb 1996
TMUP-HEL-9604 February 1996 arxiv:hep-ph/9602386v1 24 Feb 1996 THREE FLAVOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION CONSTRAINTS FROM ACCELERATOR, REACTOR, ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS Osamu Yasuda 1 and Hisakazu
More informationIs nonstandard interaction a solution to the three neutrino tensions?
1/28 Is nonstandard interaction a solution to the three neutrino tensions? Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University Dec. 18 @Miami 2016 Based on arxiv:1609.04204 [hep-ph] Shinya Fukasawa, Monojit Ghosh,OY
More informationSearching for non-standard interactions at the future long baseline experiments
Searching for non-standard interactions at the future long baseline experiments Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University Dec. 18 @Miami 015 1/34 1. Introduction. New Physics in propagation 3. Sensitivity
More informationPuzzles of Neutrinos and Anti-Matter: Hidden Symmetries and Symmetry Breaking. Hong-Jian He
Puzzles of Neutrinos and Anti-Matter: Hidden Symmetries and Symmetry Breaking Tsinghua University 2009-1-13 Collaborators: Shao-Feng Ge & Fu-Rong Yin Based on arxiv:1001.0940 (and works in preparation)
More informationExact Formula of Probability and CP Violation for Neutrino Oscillations in Matter
Exact Formula of Probability and CP Violation for Neutrino Oscillations in Matter K. Kimura,A.Takamura,,andH.Yokomakura Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 6-86, Japan Department of Mathematics,
More informationNew Jarlskog Determinant from Physics above the GUT Scale
EJTP 6, No. 2 (29) 229 234 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics New Jarlskog Determinant from Physics above the GUT Scale Bipin Singh Koranga and S. Uma Sankar Department of Physics, Indian Institute
More informationPuzzles of Neutrino Mixing and Anti-Matter: Hidden Symmetries and Symmetry Breaking. Shao-Feng Ge
Puzzles of Neutrino Mixing and Anti-Matter: Hidden Symmetries and Symmetry Breaking Shao-Feng Ge (gesf02@mails.thu.edu.cn) Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua Univeristy 200-4-8 Collaborators: Hong-Jian
More informationNeutrino oscillation phenomenology
Neutrino oscillation phenomenology Tokyo Metropolitan University Osamu Yasuda INO-KEK meeting 7 November 007@KEK Contents 1. Introduction. Future long baseline experiments 3. Deviation from the standard
More informationQuarks and Leptons. Subhaditya Bhattacharya, Ernest Ma, Alexander Natale, and Daniel Wegman
UCRHEP-T54 October 01 Heptagonic Symmetry for arxiv:110.6936v1 [hep-ph] 5 Oct 01 Quarks and Leptons Subhaditya Bhattacharya, Ernest Ma, Alexander Natale, and Daniel Wegman Department of Physics and Astronomy,
More informationThe Physics of Neutrino Oscillation. Boris Kayser INSS August, 2013
The Physics of Neutrino Oscillation Boris Kayser INSS August, 2013 1 Neutrino Flavor Change (Oscillation) in + l α (e.g. µ) Vacuum ( Approach of ) B.K. & Stodolsky - l β (e.g. τ) Amp ν W (ν α ) (ν β )
More informationNeutrinos and CP Violation. Silvia Pascoli
0 Neutrinos and CP Violation XI Internat.Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes Venezia - 23 February 2005 Silvia Pascoli CERN Outline Outline Theoretical aspects of Dirac and Majorana CPV phases Determining
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v4 1 Sep 2002
DPNU-02-4 Exact Formulas and Simple CP dependence of Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter with Constant Density Keiichi Kimura,, Akira Takamura,,2, and Hidekazu Yokomakura, Department of Physics,
More informationThe Daya Bay and T2K results on sin 2 2θ 13 and Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions (NSI)
The Daya Bay and TK results on sin θ 13 and Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions (NSI) Ivan Girardi SISSA / INFN, Trieste, Italy Based on: I. G., D. Meloni and S.T. Petcov Nucl. Phys. B 886, 31 (014) 8th
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 12 Jun 1996
SNUTP 96-059 KAIST-TP 96/10 hep-ph/yymmdd arxiv:hep-ph/9606304v1 1 Jun 1996 Medium Effects on the CP phases and Dynamical Mixing Angles in the Neutrino Mixing Matrix J. D. Kim a, C. W. Kim b,c, Jewan Kim
More informationProspects of Reactor ν Oscillation Experiments
Prospects of Reactor ν Oscillation Experiments F.Suekane RCNS, Tohoku Univ. Erice School 3/09/009 1 Contents * Motivation * Physics of Neutrino Oscillation * Accessible Parameters of Reactor Neutrinos
More informationScaling in the Neutrino Mass Matrix and the See-Saw Mechanism. Werner Rodejohann (MPIK, Heidelberg) Erice, 20/09/09
Scaling in the Neutrino Mass Matrix and the See-Saw Mechanism Werner Rodejohann (MPIK, Heidelberg) Erice, 20/09/09 1 A. S. Joshipura, W.R., Phys. Lett. B 678, 276 (2009) [arxiv:0905.2126 [hep-ph]] A. Blum,
More informationNeutrino Masses SU(3) C U(1) EM, (1.2) φ(1, 2) +1/2. (1.3)
Neutrino Masses Contents I. The renormalizable Standard Model 1 II. The non-renormalizable Standard Model III. The See-Saw Mechanism 4 IV. Vacuum Oscillations 5 V. The MSW effect 7 VI. Experimental results
More informationThe Physics of Neutrino Oscillation
The Physics of Neutrino Oscillation Boris Kayser PASI March, 2012 1 Neutrino Flavor Change (Oscillation) in Vacuum + l α (e.g. µ) ( ) Approach of B.K. & Stodolsky - l β (e.g. τ) Amp W (ν α ) (ν β ) ν W
More informationNeutrino Phenomenology. Boris Kayser ISAPP July, 2011 Part 1
Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser ISAPP July, 2011 Part 1 1 What Are Neutrinos Good For? Energy generation in the sun starts with the reaction Spin: p + p "d + e + +# 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Without the neutrino,
More informationProblems for SM/Higgs (I)
Problems for SM/Higgs (I) 1 Draw all possible Feynman diagrams (at the lowest level in perturbation theory) for the processes e + e µ + µ, ν e ν e, γγ, ZZ, W + W. Likewise, draw all possible Feynman diagrams
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 8 Feb 2000
Neutrino Tests of General and Special Relativity C. N. Leung 1 arxiv:hep-ph/0002073v2 8 Feb 2000 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716, U.S.A. Abstract We review
More informationBimaximal Neutrino Mixing in a Zee-type Model with Badly Broken Flavor Symmetry
University of Shizuoka US-00-08 August 000 hep-ph/000xxx Bimaximal Neutrino Mixing in a Zee-type Model with Badly Broken Flavor Symmetry Yoshio Koide and Ambar Ghosal Department of Physics, University
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 19 Jun 2004
Democratic Neutrino Mixing Reexamined Harald Fritzsch Sektion Physik, Universität München, Theresienstrasse 7A, 80 Munich, Germany arxiv:hep-ph/0400 v1 19 Jun 004 Zhi-zhong Xing Institute of High Energy
More informationarxiv: v4 [hep-ph] 17 May 2018
Non-standard interactions and the CP phase measurements in neutrino oscillations at low energies Shao-Feng Ge and Alexei Yu. Smirnov arxiv:167.8513v4 [hep-ph] 17 May 18 Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik,
More informationNeutrino Phenomenology. Boris Kayser INSS August, 2013 Part 1
Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser INSS August, 2013 Part 1 1 What Are Neutrinos Good For? Energy generation in the sun starts with the reaction Spin: p + p "d + e + +# 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Without the neutrino,
More informationUniversity of Wisconsin - Madison. Abstract. AMES-HET ASITP MADPH January 1999
University of Wisconsin - Madison AMES-HET-99-01 ASITP-99-04 MADPH-99-1096 January 1999 NEUTRINO MIXING, CP/T VIOLATION AND TEXTURES IN FOUR-NEUTRINO MODELS V. Barger 1, Yuan-Ben Dai,K.Whisnant 3, and
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 16 Feb 2003
CERN-TH/2003-027 Natural relations among physical observables in the neutrino mass matrix arxiv:hep-ph/03028v2 6 Feb 2003 Riccardo Barbieri a, Thomas Hambye a and Andrea Romanino b a Scuola Normale Superiore
More informationNeutrino Anomalies & CEνNS
Neutrino Anomalies & CEνNS André de Gouvêa University PIRE Workshop, COFI February 6 7, 2017 Something Funny Happened on the Way to the 21st Century ν Flavor Oscillations Neutrino oscillation experiments
More informationAn Underlying Symmetry Determines all Elements of CKM and PMNS up to a Universal Constant?
Commun. Theor. Phys. 64 (2015) 519 524 Vol. 64 No. 5 November 1 2015 An Underlying Symmetry Determines all Elements of CKM and PMNS up to a Universal Constant? KE Hong-Wei ( ) 1 and LI Xue-Qian (Ó 1 School
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 8 Apr 2012
Non-standard interactions and bimagic baseline for neutrino oscillations Rathin Adhikari, 1, Arnab Dasgupta, 1, and Zini Rahman 1, 1 Centre for Theoretical Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia Central University),
More informationSolar and atmospheric ν s
Solar and atmospheric ν s Masato SHIOZAWA Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, U of Tokyo, and Kamioka Satellite, Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI),
More informationFlavor Symmetry L e L µ L τ, Atmospheric Neutrino Mixing and CP Violation in the Lepton Sector
SISSA 63/004/EP hep-ph/0409135 Flavor Symmetry L e L µ L τ, Atmospheric Neutrino Mixing and CP Violation in the Lepton Sector arxiv:hep-ph/0409135v3 9 Mar 005 S.T. Petcov and W. Rodejohann Scuola Internazionale
More informationImpact of light sterile!s in LBL experiments "
Xmas Theory Workshop Bari, 22/12/14 Impact of light sterile!s in LBL experiments " Work done in collaboration with L. Klop (Master Thesis at MPI) (now PhD student @ GRAPPA Institute, Amsterdam) Antonio
More informationEffect of systematics in T2HK, T2HKK, DUNE
1/22 Effect of systematics in T2HK, T2HKK, DUNE Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University September 14, 2018 NOW2018@ Ostuni Rosa Marina Based on PRD 96 ( 17) 013001, Monojit Ghosh & OY PTEP 2018 ( 18)
More informationDepartment of Applied Physics, Chubu University. Kasugai, Aichi 487, Japan. April 1997
CU/TP-97-3 April 1997 Neutrino Mass and Mixing in the Universal Yukawa Coupling Framework arxiv:hep-ph/97466v1 9 Apr 1997 Tadayuki Teshima, Toyokazu Sakai and Osamu Inagaki Department of Applied Physics,
More informationDamping signatures in future neutrino oscillation experiments
Damping signatures in future neutrino oscillation experiments Based on JHEP 06(2005)049 In collaboration with Tommy Ohlsson and Walter Winter Mattias Blennow Division of Mathematical Physics Department
More informationSterile neutrinos. Stéphane Lavignac (IPhT Saclay)
Sterile neutrinos Stéphane Lavignac (IPhT Saclay) introduction active-sterile mixing and oscillations cosmological constraints experimental situation and fits implications for beta and double beta decays
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 19 Jan 2018
Prepared for submission to JHEP FERMILAB-PUB-18-014-T Compact Perturbative Expressions for Neutrino Oscillations in Matter: II arxiv:1801.06514v1 [hep-ph] 19 Jan 018 Peter B. Denton, a Hisakazu Minakata,
More informationNeutrinos as a Unique Probe: cm
Neutrinos as a Unique Probe: 10 33 10 +28 cm Particle Physics νn, µn, en scattering: existence/properties of quarks, QCD Weak decays (n pe ν e, µ e ν µ ν e ): Fermi theory, parity violation, quark mixing
More informationParticle Physics WS 2012/13 ( )
Particle Physics WS 2012/13 (22.1.2013) Stephanie Hansmann-Menzemer Physikalisches Institut, INF 226, 3.101 Reminder: No lecture this Friday 25.01.2012 2 Neutrino Types and Sources Neutrinos are only detected
More informationNeutrino Masses & Flavor Mixing 邢志忠. Zhi-zhong Xing. (IHEP, Winter School 2010, Styria, Austria. Lecture B
Neutrino Masses & Flavor Mixing Zhi-zhong Xing 邢志忠 (IHEP, Beijing) @Schladming Winter School 2010, Styria, Austria Lecture B Lepton Flavors & Nobel Prize 2 1975 1936 = 1936 1897 = 39 Positron: Predicted
More informationSOME COMMENTS ON HIGH-PRECISION STUDY OF NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS
Ó³ Ÿ. 2015.. 12, º 4(195).. 720Ä732 ˆ ˆŠ Œ ˆ ˆ Œ ƒ Ÿ. ˆŸ SOME COMMENTS ON HIGH-PRECISION STUDY OF NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS S. M. Bilenky 1 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna Some problems connected
More informationConstraining long-range leptonic forces using iron calorimeter detectors
Constraining long-range leptonic forces using iron calorimeter detectors Anjan S. Joshipur and Subhendra Mohany Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad 380 009 India Abstract The leptonic long range forces
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 5 Jan 2012
NEUTRINO MASSES FROM R-PARITY NON-CONSERVING LOOPS arxiv:1201.1231v1 [hep-ph] 5 Jan 2012 Marek Góźdź, Wies law A. Kamiński Department of Informatics, Maria Curie-Sk lodowska University, pl. Marii Curie
More informationOverview of Reactor Neutrino
Overview of Reactor Neutrino Chan-Fai (Steven) Wong, Wei Wang Sun Yat-Sen University 22 September 2016 The 14th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics Many thanks to Jia Jie Ling, Liang Jian Wen
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Mar 2017
Flavon-induced lepton flavour violation arxiv:1703.05579v1 hep-ph] 16 Mar 017 Venus Keus Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki,
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 20 Oct 2005
hep-ph/0510272 Neutrino Mass Matrices with Vanishing Determinant and θ 13 arxiv:hep-ph/0510272v1 20 Oct 2005 Bhag C. Chauhan, João Pulido Centro de Física Teórica das Partículas (CFTP) Departamento de
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 10 Sep 2003
Complete Parameter Space of Quark Mass Matrices with Four Texture Zeros Zhi-zhong Xing and He Zhang Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 918 (4), Beijing 100039, China
More informationNeutrino Basics. m 2 [ev 2 ] tan 2 θ. Reference: The Standard Model and Beyond, CRC Press. Paul Langacker (IAS) LSND 90/99% SuperK 90/99% MINOS K2K
Neutrino Basics CDHSW m 2 [ev 2 ] 10 0 10 3 10 6 10 9 KARMEN2 Cl 95% NOMAD MiniBooNE Ga 95% Bugey CHOOZ ν X ν µ ν τ ν τ NOMAD all solar 95% SNO 95% CHORUS NOMAD CHORUS LSND 90/99% SuperK 90/99% MINOS K2K
More informationHiggs Bosons Phenomenology in the Higgs Triplet Model
Higgs Bosons Phenomenology in the Higgs Triplet Model Andrew Akeroyd National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan TeV scale mechanisms ( testable ) for neutrino mass generation Higgs Triplet Model Production
More informationCOMMENTS UPON THE MASS OSCILLATION FORMULAS. Abstract
COMMENTS UPON THE MASS OSCILLATION FORMULAS S. De Leo (a,b), G. Ducati (b) and P. Rotelli (a) (a) Dipartimento di Fisica, INFN, Sezione di Lecce, via Arnesano, CP 193, 73100 Lecce, Italia. (b) Departamento
More informationStatus of Light Sterile Neutrinos Carlo Giunti
C. Giunti Status of Light Sterile Neutrinos EPS-HEP 05 3 July 05 /5 Status of Light Sterile Neutrinos Carlo Giunti INFN, Sezione di Torino and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Torino giunti@to.infn.it
More informationNeutrino mixing. Outline: description/review of mixing phenomenology possible experimental signatures short review of existing experimental results
Neutrino mixing Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens: neutrinos have mass physics beyond the (perturbative) Standard Model participates Outline: description/review of mixing phenomenology possible experimental
More informationPhenomenology at neutrino oscillation experiments
Phenomenology at neutrino oscillation experiments Tracey Li IPPP, Durham University Supervisor: Dr. Silvia Pascoli LEPP particle theory seminar Cornell University 2nd April 2010 Talk overview Neutrino
More informationNeutrino Physics After the Revolution. Boris Kayser PASI 2006 October 26, 2006
Neutrino Physics After the Revolution Boris Kayser PASI 2006 October 26, 2006 1 What We Have Learned 2 The (Mass) 2 Spectrum ν 3 ν 2 ν 1 } Δm 2 sol (Mass) 2 Δm 2 atm or Δm 2 atm ν ν 2 } Δm 2 sol 1 ν 3
More informationNeutrino Oscillation Probability from Tri-Bimaximality due to Planck Scale Effects
EJTP 6, No. 21 (2009) 149 156 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Neutrino Oscillation Probability from Tri-Bimaximality due to Planck Scale Effects Bipin Singh Koranga Department of Physics, Kirori
More informationNeutrino Physics. NASA Hubble Photo. Boris Kayser PASI March 14-15, 2012 Part 1
Neutrino Physics NASA Hubble Photo Boris Kayser PASI March 14-15, 2012 Part 1 1 What Are Neutrinos Good For? Energy generation in the sun starts with the reaction Spin: p + p "d + e + +# 1 2 1 2 1 1 2
More informationCosmological Family Asymmetry and CP violation
Cosmological Family Asymmetry and CP violation Satoru Kaneko (Ochanomizu Univ.) 2005. 9. 21 at Tohoku Univ. T. Endoh, S. K., S.K. Kang, T. Morozumi, M. Tanimoto, PRL ( 02) T. Endoh, T. Morozumi, Z. Xiong,
More informationIntroduction to Neutrino Physics. TRAN Minh Tâm
Introduction to Neutrino Physics TRAN Minh Tâm LPHE/IPEP/SB/EPFL This first lecture is a phenomenological introduction to the following lessons which will go into details of the most recent experimental
More informationSolar neutrinos and the MSW effect
Chapter 12 Solar neutrinos and the MSW effect The vacuum neutrino oscillations described in the previous section could in principle account for the depressed flux of solar neutrinos detected on Earth.
More informationJuly 19, SISSA Entrance Examination. Elementary Particle Theory Sector. olve two out of the four problems below
July 19, 2006 SISSA Entrance Examination Elementary Particle Theory Sector S olve two out of the four problems below Problem 1 T he most general form of the matrix element of the electromagnetic current
More informationSensitivity to sterile ν mixings at a ν Factory --Side business of a ν Factory --
Sensitivity to sterile ν mixings at a ν Factory --Side business of a ν Factory -- Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University 009-1-18 @ Miami009 1 1. Introduction. Light sterile neutrinos 3. Summary 1.
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 21 Jul 2017
Analytical solution for the Zee mechanism A. C. B. Machado, 1, J. Montaño,, Pedro Pasquini, 3, and V. Pleitez 4, 1 Laboratorio de Física Teórica e Computacional Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul Rua Galvão
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationPhenomenology of neutrino mixing in vacuum and matter
Phenomenology of neutrino mixing in vacuum and matter A Upadhyay 1 and M Batra 1 School of Physics and Material Science Thapar University, Patiala-147004. E-mail:mbatra310@gmail.com Abstract: During last
More informationNeutrino Oscillation and CP violation
Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation Contents. Neutrino Oscillation Experiments and CPV. Possible CP measurements in TK 3. Summary Nov.4, 4 @Nikko K. Nishikawa Kyoto niversity CP Violation Asymmetry between
More informationNEUTRINO PHYSICS. Neutrino Oscilla,on Theory. Fabio Bellini. Fisica delle Par,celle Elementari, Anno Accademico Lecture november 2013
NEUTRINO PHYSICS Neutrino Oscilla,on Theory Lecture 16 11 november 2013 Fabio Bellini Fisica delle Par,celle Elementari, Anno Accademico 2013-2014 http://www.roma1.infn.it/people/rahatlou/particelle 2
More informationSolar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV
SOLAR NEUTRINOS Solar spectrum Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV Beryllium neutrinos 0.86 MeV Monochromatic since 2 body decay 2 kev width due to
More informationFlavor oscillations of solar neutrinos
Chapter 11 Flavor oscillations of solar neutrinos In the preceding chapter we discussed the internal structure of the Sun and suggested that neutrinos emitted by thermonuclear processes in the central
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 26 Jul 2006
Neutrino mass and baryogenesis arxiv:hep-ph/0607287v1 26 Jul 2006 D. Falcone Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, Università di Napoli, Via Cintia, Napoli, Italy A brief overview of the phenomenology related
More informationNo Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein Effect in Maximal Mixing arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 26 Jan 1996
RAL-TR-95-078 20 December 1995 No Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein Effect in Maximal Mixing arxiv:hep-ph/9601346v1 26 Jan 1996 P. F. Harrison Physics Department, Queen Mary and Westfield College Mile End Rd.
More informationFermion Mixing Angles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries
Fermion Mixing ngles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries C. Hagedorn hagedorn@mpi-hd.mpg.de Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany. Blum, CH, M. Lindner numerics:.
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 12 Apr 2000 K.S. Babu 1 and S.M. Barr 2
OSU-HEP-00-02 BA-00-19 A Mass Relation for Neutrinos arxiv:hep-ph/0004118v1 12 Apr 2000 K.S. Babu 1 and S.M. Barr 2 1 Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078, USA 2 Bartol
More informationChart of Elementary Particles
Chart of Elementary Particles Chart of Elementary Particles Better Chart! Better Chart! As of today: Oscillation of 3 massive active neutrinos is clearly the dominant effect: If neutrinos have mass: For
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 18 Apr 2001
Resonance in the seesaw mechanism Haijun Pan and G. Cheng 2,3 Lab of Quantum Communication and Quantum Computation, and Center of Nonlinear Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Heifei,
More informationQUANTUM MECHANICS I PHYS 516. Solutions to Problem Set # 5
QUANTUM MECHANICS I PHYS 56 Solutions to Problem Set # 5. Crossed E and B fields: A hydrogen atom in the N 2 level is subject to crossed electric and magnetic fields. Choose your coordinate axes to make
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v6 3 Apr 2001
CP Violation in Seesaw Model T. Endoh, T. Morozumi, T. Onogi and A. Purwanto arxiv:hep-ph/00345v6 3 Apr 00 Department of Physics, Hiroshima University -3- Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima - 739-856, Japan
More informationLecture 4: Entropy. Chapter I. Basic Principles of Stat Mechanics. A.G. Petukhov, PHYS 743. September 7, 2017
Lecture 4: Entropy Chapter I. Basic Principles of Stat Mechanics A.G. Petukhov, PHYS 743 September 7, 2017 Chapter I. Basic Principles of Stat Mechanics A.G. Petukhov, Lecture PHYS4: 743 Entropy September
More informationSterile neutrinos at future long-baseline experiments
Davide Meloni, Dip. Fisica Roma Tre & INFN sez. Roma Tre, Friday 12, NOW 2008 1 Introduction Sterile neutrinos today 2 Current limits on new mixing angles The question of the parameterization Current allowed
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 16 Apr 2001
NEUTRINO MASS, MIXING, AND OSCILLATION a arxiv:hep-ph/0104147v1 16 Apr 2001 Boris Kayser National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230, USA E-mail: bkayser@nsf.gov Do neutrinos have
More informationNeutrino Mixing and Cosmological Constant above GUT Scale
EJTP 6, No. 22 (2009) 197 202 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Neutrino Mixing and Cosmological Constant above GUT Scale Bipin Singh Koranga Department of Physics, Kirori Mal college (University
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v2 16 May 2002
UMD-PP-0-50 May 00 Testing Neutrino Mass Matrices with Approximate L e L µ L τ Symmetry arxiv:hep-ph/005131v 16 May 00 H. S. Goh, R.N. Mohapatra, and S.- P. Ng Department of Physics, University of Maryland
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 5 Jun 2014
Impact of approximate oscillation probabilities in the analysis of three neutrino experiments B. K. Cogswell 1, D. C. Latimer 2 and D. J. Ernst 1 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University,
More information- Future Prospects in Oscillation Physics -
Measuring θ 13 and the Search for Leptonic CP Violation - Future Prospects in Oscillation Physics - Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ν e flux θ 13 =? P ee, (4 MeV) 1/r 2 Evidence
More informationSemi-Empirical Neutrino and Quark Mixing Angle Broken 4-Color Geometric Symmetry
1 Semi-Empirical Neutrino and Quark Mixing Angle Broken 4-Color Geometric Symmetry E. M. Lipmanov 40 Wallingford Road # 272, Brighton MA 02135, USA Abstract Two semi-empirical ideas are guiding the present
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 1 Aug 1997
Diagonalization of Quark Mass Matrices and the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix. Andrija Rašin International Center for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera, 3400 Trieste, Italy I discuss some general
More informationElectric Dipole Moment and Neutrino Mixing due to Planck Scale Effects
EJTP 7, No. 23 (2010) 35 40 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics Electric Dipole Moment and Neutrino Mixing due to Planck Scale Effects Bipin Singh Koranga Kirori Mal College (University of Delhi,)
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 11 Jan 2001
IFT/00-36 hep-ph/0101111 Phenomenology of the Chargino and Neutralino Systems arxiv:hep-ph/0101111v1 11 Jan 2001 J. Kalinowski Instytut Fizyki Teoretycznej, Uniwersytet arszawski Hoża 69, 00681 arsaw,
More informationPolygonal Derivation of the Neutrino Mass Matrix
UCRHEP-T38 September 4 arxiv:hep-ph/4988 v 9 Sep 4 Polygonal Derivation of the Neutrino Mass Matrix Ernest Ma Physics Department, University of California, Riverside, California 951, USA Abstract Representations
More information12.2 Problem Set 2 Solutions
78 CHAPTER. PROBLEM SET SOLUTIONS. Problem Set Solutions. I will use a basis m, which ψ C = iγ ψ = Cγ ψ (.47) We can define left (light) handed Majorana fields as, so that ω = ψ L + (ψ L ) C (.48) χ =
More informationParity violation. no left-handed ν$ are produced
Parity violation Wu experiment: b decay of polarized nuclei of Cobalt: Co (spin 5) decays to Ni (spin 4), electron and anti-neutrino (spin ½) Parity changes the helicity (H). Ø P-conservation assumes a
More informationHeavy Sterile Neutrinos at CEPC
Wei Liao East China University of Science and Technology Based on arxiv:17.09266, in collaboration with X.H. Wu INPAC SJTU, Nov. 17 2017 Outline Review of neutrino mass low energy seesaw model constraint
More informationNeutrino mass matrix: inverted hierarchy and CP violation
Neutrino mass matrix: inverted hierarchy and CP violation Michele Frigerio INFN, Section of Trieste and International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Via Beirut, I-301 Trieste, Italy. Alexei Yu. Smirnov
More informationNeutrino Physics II. Neutrino Phenomenology. Arcadi Santamaria. TAE 2014, Benasque, September 19, IFIC/Univ. València
Neutrino Physics II Neutrino Phenomenology Arcadi Santamaria IFIC/Univ. València TAE 2014, Benasque, September 19, 2014 Neutrino Physics II Outline 1 Neutrino oscillations phenomenology Solar neutrinos
More informationWhat If U e3 2 < 10 4? Neutrino Factories and Other Matters
What If U e3 < 0 4? Neutrino Factories and Other Matters André de Gouvêa University DUSEL Theory Workshop Ohio State University, April 4 6, 008 April 5, 008 tiny U e3 : now what? Outline. What are We Aiming
More informationNonunitary mixing: current constraints and new ambiguity
Nonunitary mixing: current constraints and new ambiguity Omar Miranda Cinvestav September 7, 2016 Omar Miranda (Cinvestav ) Non unitary neutrino mixing September 7, 2016 1 / 27 Outline 1 Theoretical motivation
More information