Washington University in St. Louis. W. Altmannshofer, BD and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 96, (2017) [arxiv: [hep-ph]] and in preparation.

Transcription

1 R D ( ) Anomaly: A Model-Independent Collider Signature and Possible Hint for R-parity Violating Supersymmetry BHUPAL DEV Washington University in St. Louis W. Altmannshofer, BD and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 96, (2017) [arxiv: [hep-ph]] and in preparation. SUSY 2017 TIFR, Mumbai December 12, 2017

2 R D ( ) Anomaly B(B Dτν) R D = B(B Dlν), R D = B(B D τν) R(D(*)): experiments B(B D (where l = e, µ). lν) vs theory R(D*) BaBar, PRL109,101802(2012) 0.5 Belle, PRD92,072014(2015) LHCb, PRL115,111803(2015) Belle, PRD94,072007(2016) Belle, PRL118,211801(2017) LHCb, FPCP2017 Average χ = 1.0 contours SM Predictions R(D)=0.300(8) HPQCD (2015) R(D)=0.299(11) FNAL/MILC (2015) R(D*)=0.252(3) S. Fajfer et al. (2012) σ 4σ 0.25 SM 0.2 [Talk by Giacomo Caria] HFLAV FPCP 2017 P(χ 2 ) = 71.6% R(D)

3 Outline A model-independent way to test the anomaly using ATLAS and CMS A possible correlation of the anomaly with the Higgs naturalness R-parity violating Supersymmetry with light 3rd generation

4 Model-independent Interest Collider Analysis of B D(*) τ τ+ R(D ( ) )= W coupling to leptons is universal i In a nut-shell, the anomalous behavior is in the basic process: b cτν. This necessarily implies by crossing symmetry an analogous anomaly in g + c bτν. A charged Higgs would couple mo lepton and produce an enhancem that involve a τ lepton Leads to a model-independent collider probe: pp bτ ν.

5 Model-independent Interest Collider Analysis of B D(*) τ τ+ R(D ( ) )= W coupling to leptons is universal i In a nut-shell, the anomalous behavior is in the basic process: b cτν. This necessarily implies by crossing symmetry an analogous anomaly in g + c bτν. A charged Higgs would couple mo lepton and produce an enhancem that involve a τ lepton Leads to a model-independent collider probe: pp bτ ν.

6 Effective Operators The effective 4-fermion Lagrangian for b cτν in the SM is given by L eff = 4G FV cb 2 ( cγ µ P L b) ( τγ µ P L ν τ ) + H.c. Same Lagrangian gives rise to pp bτν, but the rate is CKM-suppressed. Need not be the case in a generic NP scenario, which might be observable above the SM background at the LHC. Various dimension-6 four-fermion operators possible: [Freytsis, Ligeti, Ruderman (PRD 15)] O VR,L = ( cγ µ P R,L b) ( τγ µ P L ν) O SR,L = ( cp R,L b) ( τp L ν). O T = ( cσ µν P L b)( τσ µν P L ν).

7 Effective Operators The effective 4-fermion Lagrangian for b cτν in the SM is given by L eff = 4G FV cb 2 ( cγ µ P L b) ( τγ µ P L ν τ ) + H.c. Same Lagrangian gives rise to pp bτν, but the rate is CKM-suppressed. Need not be the case in a generic NP scenario, which might be observable above the SM background at the LHC. Various dimension-6 four-fermion operators possible: [Freytsis, Ligeti, Ruderman (PRD 15)] O VR,L = ( cγ µ P R,L b) ( τγ µ P L ν) O SR,L = ( cp R,L b) ( τp L ν). O T = ( cσ µν P L b)( τσ µν P L ν).

8 SM Backgrounds The direct pp bτν is suppressed by V cb 2. In a realistic hadron collider environment, however, there are other potentially dangerous backgrounds. pp jw jτν (j misidentified as b) pp W τν, with an ISR gluon b b and one b is lost pp tj bτνj and pp tw bτνjj, where the jet(s) are lost pp b bj, where one b is misidentified as a τ and the light jet is lost (i.e. misidentified as MET). The mis-id rates at the LHC typically are at the level of 1%. With basic trigger cuts p j,b,l T > 20 GeV, /E T > 20 GeV, η j,b,l < 2.5 and R lj,lb,jb > 0.4, we find the dominant contribution comes from pp Wj and pp b bj. σ SM (pp bτν bl + /E T ) 50 pb at s = 13 TeV LHC.

9 SM Backgrounds The direct pp bτν is suppressed by V cb 2. In a realistic hadron collider environment, however, there are other potentially dangerous backgrounds. pp jw jτν (j misidentified as b) pp W τν, with an ISR gluon b b and one b is lost pp tj bτνj and pp tw bτνjj, where the jet(s) are lost pp b bj, where one b is misidentified as a τ and the light jet is lost (i.e. misidentified as MET). The mis-id rates at the LHC typically are at the level of 1%. With basic trigger cuts p j,b,l T > 20 GeV, /E T > 20 GeV, η j,b,l < 2.5 and R lj,lb,jb > 0.4, we find the dominant contribution comes from pp Wj and pp b bj. σ SM (pp bτν bl + /E T ) 50 pb at s = 13 TeV LHC.

10 SM Backgrounds The direct pp bτν is suppressed by V cb 2. In a realistic hadron collider environment, however, there are other potentially dangerous backgrounds. pp jw jτν (j misidentified as b) pp W τν, with an ISR gluon b b and one b is lost pp tj bτνj and pp tw bτνjj, where the jet(s) are lost pp b bj, where one b is misidentified as a τ and the light jet is lost (i.e. misidentified as MET). The mis-id rates at the LHC typically are at the level of 1%. With basic trigger cuts p j,b,l T > 20 GeV, /E T > 20 GeV, η j,b,l < 2.5 and R lj,lb,jb > 0.4, we find the dominant contribution comes from pp Wj and pp b bj. σ SM (pp bτν bl + /E T ) 50 pb at s = 13 TeV LHC.

11 Signal Rate We consider the dimension-6 NP operators O VR,L and O SR,L. For a typical choice g NP /Λ 2 = (1 TeV) 2, the signal cross section for pp bτν bl + /E T of σ V 1.1 pb (vector case) and σ S 1.8 pb (scalar case), both at s = 13 TeV LHC. Can directly probe mediator masses up to around 2.4 (2.6) TeV at 3σ CL in the vector (scalar) operator case with O(1) couplings at s = 13 TeV LHC with L = 300 fb 1. The signal-to-background ratio can be significantly improved by using specialized selection cuts, e.g. p b T > 100 GeV, M bl > 100 GeV and /E T > 100 GeV.

12 Signal Rate We consider the dimension-6 NP operators O VR,L and O SR,L. For a typical choice g NP /Λ 2 = (1 TeV) 2, the signal cross section for pp bτν bl + /E T of σ V 1.1 pb (vector case) and σ S 1.8 pb (scalar case), both at s = 13 TeV LHC. Can directly probe mediator masses up to around 2.4 (2.6) TeV at 3σ CL in the vector (scalar) operator case with O(1) couplings at s = 13 TeV LHC with L = 300 fb 1. The signal-to-background ratio can be significantly improved by using specialized selection cuts, e.g. p b T > 100 GeV, M bl > 100 GeV and /E T > 100 GeV.

13 Kinematic Distributions 3 SM Vector Scalar SM Vector Scalar Normalized Evenets Normalized Evenets p T l (GeV) p T b (GeV) SM Vector Scalar SM Vector Scalar Normalized Evenets Normalized Evenets M bl (GeV) MET (GeV) FIG. 1. Normalized kinematic distributions for the pp! b! b` + /E T signal and background.

14 Cut Efficiency Cut Efficiency Observable value SM Signal Signal (GeV) background (Vector case) (Scalar case) p l T p b T M bl /E T

15 Possible Hint for Natural SUSY with RPV Anomaly involved 3rd generation of the SM. Speculation: May be related to Higgs naturalness? An obvious UV-complete candidate: Natural SUSY with light 3rd generation. [Brust, Katz, Lawrence, Sundrum (JHEP 12); Papucci, Ruderman, Weiler (JHEP 12)] 4 Coupling unification still preserved, even with RPV. Signal calar case) êai SM RPV 3 MSSM

16 Explaining the R D ( ) Anomaly Consider a minimal RPV SUSY setup with the λ -couplings. L = λ ijk[ νil d kr d jl + d jl d kr ν il + d kr ν c ild jl ẽ il d kr u jl ũ jl d kr e il d krēc ilu jl ] + H.c. Leads to the effective 4-fermion interactions: [Deshpande, He (EPJC 17)] [ L eff λ ijk λ mnk 2m 2 d ν ml γ µ ν il d nl γ µ d jl kr ) + ē ml γ µ e il (ū L V CKM ) n γ µ (V CKM u L j ) ] ν ml γ µ e il d nl γ µ (V CKM u L + h.c. λ ijk λ mjn 2m 2 ũ jl ē ml γ µ e il d kr γ µ d nr, Contributes to R D ( ) at tree-level: b bν cτν. j

17 6 BÆKnn BÆpnn R +R Allowed Parameter Space direct search es t decays Z cou plin gs l'313 = l'323 = BÆtn D* D l'313 = -0.05, l'323 = RD RD v2 10 = SM = 1 + Xc SM 2m2b 10 RD RD 105, R l333 Xc = λ λ0333 λ Vcs Vcd 10 + λ0333 λ0313 Vcb Vcb BÆKnn RD + RD * BÆpnn l'313 = l'323 = R l'333 = 0.9, l'313 = m bé HGeVL R l'333 = 0.9, l'323 = l'333 direct search es l'313 = -0.05, l'323 = m bé HGeVL 600 BÆtn l' t decays Z cou plin gs l'

18 Explaining the R D ( ) Anomaly FIG. 4. The SM predictions (red), experimental world aver-

19 Conclusion and Outlook If the R D ( ) anomaly is true, we should find an anomaly in the high-energy signal of pp bτν. Provides a model-independent high-p T test of the R D ( ) anomaly at the LHC. Since it involves the 3rd generation, the origin of the anomaly might be related to the Higgs naturalness problem. A specific scenario that addresses this issue: Natural SUSY with RPV. Common explanation of R D ( ) and R K ( )?