arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 24 Jan 2017

Transcription

1 arxiv: v [hep-ph] 4 Jan 07 School of Physics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad , India suchismita@uohyd.ac.in Rukmani Mohanta School of Physics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad , India rmsp@uohyd.ernet.in Anjan K. Giri Physics Department, IIT Hyderabad, Kandi , India giria@iith.ac.in We study the impact of vector leptoquarks on the recent anomalies in semileptonic B meson decays such as R K and R D ( ) etc. We constrain the leptoquark couplings by using the existing data on the branching ratios of B s l + l and B X s l + l processes, where l = e, µ,τ. We estimate the branching ratios of B D ( ) l ν l processes using the constrained leptoquark parameter space. We also investigate the possibility of simultaneous explanation of R D ( ), R K anomalies in this model. 9th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle 8 November - December 06 Tata Institute for Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai, India Speaker. The authors would like to thank Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India for financial support through grant No. SB/S/HEP-07/0. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

2 . Introduction Recently both BaBar [] and Belle [] experiments have measured the ratio of branching fractions of B Dτ ν τ over B Dl ν l decays, where l = e, µ and the present average experimental result [] is R D = Br( B Dτ ν τ ) Br( B Dl ν l ) which has.9σ deviation from its standard model () prediction R D = 0.97 ± ± 0.08, (.) = 0.00 ± [4]. Besides, both the B factories and LHCb [5] have reported.σ discrepancy [] in the measurement of R D from its result R D R D = Br( B D τ ν τ ) Br( B D l ν l ) = ± 0.06 ± 0.00, (.) = 0.5 ± 0.00 [6]. Analogously another interesting observable is the lepton nonuniversality (LNU) parameter (R K ) in B + K + l + l process, which has recently been measured at LHCb, with value [7], R K = Br(B+ K + µ + µ ) Br(B + K + e + e ) = ± 0.06, (.) and corresponds to a.6σ deviation from its value R K =.000 ± [8] in the dilepton invariant mass squared bin ( q 6 ) GeV. In this paper, we would like to investigate the semileptonic B D ( ) l ν l decay processes, mediated by the FCNC transitions b cl ν l in the vector leptoquark (LQ) model. We compute the branching ratios of B D ( ) l ν l modes in this model. The simultaneous study of the lepton nonuniversality parameters R D ( ) and R K ( ) is the main objective of this work. LQs are color triplet hypothetical bosonic particles which allow quarks and leptons to interact simultaneously and carry both baryon and lepton numbers. LQs can have spin 0 (scalar) or spin (vector) and are encountered in various extensions of the, such as technicolor model, GUT theories, Pati-Salam models and the quark and lepton composite model. The outline of the paper is follows. In section, we discuss the effective Hamiltonians involving b cl ν l and b sll transitions in the. We also present the new physics contribution due to the vector LQ exchange. The constraint on LQ parameter space by using the experimental limit on the branching ratios of the B s l + l and B X s l + l decays and the numerical analysis for B D ( ) l ν l processes are presented in section. Section 4 contains the conclusion.. Effective Hamiltonian and the new physics contribution from vector leptoquark exchange In the, the effective Hamiltonian describing the processes mediated by the b cl ν l transition is given by [9] H e f f = 4G F V cb [( δ lτ +C l V )( c L γ µ b L ) ( τ L γ µ ν ll ) ], (.)

3 where G F is the Fermi constant, V cb is the CKM matrix element and q L(R) = L(R)q are the chiral quark fields with L(R) = ( γ 5 )/ as the projection operators. The Wilson coefficient C l V is zero in the and can only be generated by the new physics model. The effective Hamiltonian for b sl + l process in the is given by H e f f = 4G F V tb V 0 ts i= C i (µ)o i (µ), (.) where O i s are the six dimensional operators and C i s are the corresponding Wilson coefficients. Models with vector LQs can modify the effective Hamiltonian (.,.) due to the additional contributions arising from the LQs exchange and will give measurable deviations from the predictions of the in the beauty sector. Here we consider U (,,/) vector LQ multiplet which is invariant under the SU() c SU() L U() Y gauge group and does not allow proton decay. The interaction Lagrangian for U LQ with the fermions is given by [9] L LQ = h i j Q il σγ µ L jl U µ, (.) where Q(L) is the left handed quark (lepton) doublets, h i j are the LQ couplings and σ represents the Pauli matrices. After performing the Fierz transformation and comparing with (.), we obtain an additional Wilson coefficient as CV l = G F V cb k= V k h l hk M U /. (.4) Similarly the comparison of Eqn. (.) after Fierz transformation, with the effective Hamiltonian (.), one can obtain new Wilson coefficients C NP 9,0 C NP 9 = C NP 0 = π h ni GF V tb Vtsα hm j M U /. Constraint on leptoquark couplings and numerical analysis. (.5) After knowing the new physics contribution to the, we now proceed to constrain the new parameter space by using the experimental limit on the branching ratios of B s l + l and B X s l + l processes. Including LQ model, the branching ratio of B s l + l process is given by Br(B s l + l ) = G F 6π τ B s α f B s C 0 M Bs m l V tb V ts 4m l M B s + CNP 0. (.) C0 Now comparing the theoretical value of branching ratio with the σ range of the experimental data, the constraint on the real and imaginary part of the LQ couplings are given in Table. The branching ratio of B X s ll process in the LQ model is given by ( ) dbr ds LQ = B 0 [ 6 ( s ) ( + s )[Re(C e f f 9 C NP 9 + Re(C 0 C NP 0 ] + 8 ( s ) ( + s ) [ C NP 9 + C NP 0 ] + ( s ) Re(C 7 C NP 0 ) ], (.)

4 where s = q /m b and B 0 can be found in [0]. The allowed region of corresponding LQ couplings which are compatible with the σ range of the experimental result in low q are given in Table. Now using the constrained LQ couplings from Table and Eqns. (.4,.5), we compute the bound on new Wilson coefficients CV l, C9,0 NP. In Table II, we present the predicted values of branching ratios of B D ( ) lν l processes in both the and U LQ model. In Fig., we show the q variation of LNU parameters, R D (q ) (left panel) and R D (q ) (right panel). The plots for R K (q ) (left panel) and R K (q ) (right panel) parameters in low q region are shown in Fig.. The corresponding numerical values of LNU parameters are given in Table. Table : Constraints on the real and imaginary parts of the leptoquark couplings (for M LQ = TeV) from B s l + l and B X s ll processes [0] Deacy process Leptoquark Couplings Real part Imaginary Part h h.0.0 B s l + l h h h h B X s l + l h h h h R D (q ) 6 4 R D * (q ) q [GeV ] q [GeV ] Figure : The q variation of R D (q ) (left panel) and R D (q ) (right panel) parameters in LQ model. 4. Conclusion In this work we have studied the rare semileptonic B D ( ) l ν l decays and the lepton nonuniversalty parameters such as R D ( ) and R K ( ) in the U (,,/) vector LQ model. The LQ parameter space is constrained by using the branching ratios of rare B s l + l and B X s l + l decay processes. We computed the branching ratios and lepton nonuniversality in B D ( ) l ν l processes in the U vector LQ model. The anomaly in R K observable is also studied. We found that the observed anomalies can be accommodated in this model. References [] BaBar Collaboration, J. Lees et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 09, 080 (0); BaBar Collaboration, J. Lees et al., Phys. Rev. D 88, 070 (0).

5 Table : The predicted values of branching ratios of B D ( ) l ν l processes and the R D ( ), R K ( ) anomalies in vector leptoquark model [0, ] Observables Predictions Values in Br( B Dl ν l ) (.8 ± 0.) 0 (..5) 0 Br( B Dτ ν l ) (6.75 ± 0.08) 0 (.48 8.) 0 Br( B D l ν l ) (5.8 ± 0.) 0 ( ) 0 Br( B D τ ν l ) (. ± ) 0 (..6) 0 R D R D 0. R Kq [,6] R K q [,6] R K (q ) R K * (q ) q [GeV ] q [GeV ] Figure : The plot for R K (q ) (left panel) and R K (q ) (right panel) in the low q region in LQ model. [] Belle Collaboration, M. Huschle et al., Phys. Rev. D 9, 0704 (05); Belle Collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., [arxiv:60.067]. [] Heavy Flavour Averaging Group, winter6_dtaunu.html. [4] H. Na et al., Phys. Rev. D 9, (05). [5] R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 80 (05) Addendum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 5990 (05). [6] S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and I. Nisandzic, Phys. Rev. D 85, (0). [7] R. Aaij et al., [LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett., 560 (04). [8] C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, G. Piranishvili, JHEP, 040 (007). [9] Y. Sakaki, R. Watanabe, M. Tanaka and A. Tayduganov, Phys. Rev. D 88, 0940 (0). [0] S. Sahoo, R. Mohanta and A. Giri, [arxiv: ]. [] A. Giri, R. Mohanta and S. Sahoo, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 770, 00 (06). 4