Dynamics at infinity. of symmetric spaces. J. Porti, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 11th KAIST Geometric Topology Fair Jeonju, Korea, August 2013
|
|
- Randolf Logan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dynamics at infinity of symmetric spaces J. Porti, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 11th KAIST Geometric Topology Fair Jeonju, Korea, August 2013
2 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact.
3 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact. Whan can one say for Γ Isom(X), when X is a symmetric space of rank 2?
4 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact. Whan can one say for Γ Isom(X), when X is a symmetric space of rank 2? The action of Isom(X) is not transtive on X. Hence look for domains in Isom(X)-orbits in X Eg: orbits on (SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1)) are P n, Flag(P n ), etc Understand geometrically Anosov groups à la Labourie and Guichard-Wienhard
5 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact. Whan can one say for Γ Isom(X), when X is a symmetric space of rank 2? I Symmetric spaces of noncompact type II Ideal boundary III Dynamics at infinity (joint with M. Kapovich, B. Leeb),
6 I Symmetric spaces of noncompact type
7 Symmetric spaces: Definition X complete Riemannian manifold. An inversion at x X is an isometry σ x : X X s.t. σ x (x) = x and dσ x = Id Tx X (σ 2 x = Id) X is called a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion If γ : (ε,ε) X is a geodesic with γ(0) = x, then σ x γ(t) = γ( t)
8 Symmetric spaces: Definition X complete Riemannian manifold. An inversion at x X is an isometry σ x : X X s.t. σ x (x) = x and dσ x = Id Tx X (σ 2 x = Id) X is called a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion If γ : (ε,ε) X is a geodesic with γ(0) = x, then σ x γ(t) = γ( t) Proposition: A symmetric space is homogeneous: x 1,x 2 X g Isom(X) such that gx 1 = x 2 Proof: If y midpoint of x 1 and x 2, then σ y (x 1 ) = σ y σ x1 (x 1 ) = x 2 x 2 x y 1
9 Symmetric spaces: Definition X complete Riemannian manifold. An inversion at x X is an isometry σ x : X X s.t. σ x (x) = x and dσ x = Id Tx X (σ 2 x = Id) X is called a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion If γ : (ε,ε) X is a geodesic with γ(0) = x, then σ x γ(t) = γ( t) Proposition: A symmetric space is homogeneous: x 1,x 2 X g Isom(X) such that gx 1 = x 2 Proof: If y midpoint of x 1 and x 2, then σ y (x 1 ) = σ y σ x1 (x 1 ) = x 2 x 2 x y 1 By moving x 2, one can chose g = σ y σ x1 Isom 0 (X) Corollary: X = G/K, for G connected Lie group, K G compact G = Isom 0 (X) and K = G x.
10 Symmetric spaces as homogeneous spaces X is a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion Theorem:X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is a symmetric space (2) X = G/K, G connected Lie group, K G compact, σ : G G automorphism s.t. σ 2 = Id and (G σ ) 0 K G σ.
11 Symmetric spaces as homogeneous spaces X is a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion Theorem:X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is a symmetric space (2) X = G/K, G connected Lie group, K G compact, σ : G G automorphism s.t. σ 2 = Id and (G σ ) 0 K G σ. Classification (E. Cartan 1926) Examples H n = SO(n,1) 0 /SO(n) σ : SO(n,1) 0 SO(n,1) 0 A (A t ) 1 (SO(n,1) 0 ) σ = SO(n) CH n = SU(n,1) 0 /SU(n), S n = SO(n+1)/SO(n)
12 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor)
13 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor) Lemma: Y(t) vector field along a geodesic γ(t). Then γ Y = 0 iff dσ γ(t) Y(t+s) = Y(t s) (Use uniqueness of parallel transport)
14 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor) Lemma: Y(t) vector field along a geodesic γ(t). Then γ Y = 0 iff dσ γ(t) Y(t+s) = Y(t s) (Use uniqueness of parallel transport) (1) (2): γ geodesic p = γ(0), X, Y, Z parallel along γ. Then dσ p (R(X(t),Y(t))Z(t)) = R(dσ p X(t),dσ p Y(t))dσ p Z(t) = R( X(t), Y(t))( Z(t)) = R(X(t),Y(t))Z(t) Hence γ (t)( R(X(t),Y(t))Z(t) ) = 0 R = 0.
15 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor) Lemma: Y(t) vector field along a geodesic γ(t). Then γ Y = 0 iff dσ γ(t) Y(t+s) = Y(t s) (Use uniqueness of parallel transport) (2) (1): Define a (local) map exp p (tv) exp p ( tv). This map preserves R by parallelism, hence it is an isometry by Cartan Ambrose Hicks theorem
16 Examples H n = SO(n,1) 0 /SO(n) σ(a) = (A t ) 1 R n = Isom 0 (R n )/SO(n) Isom 0 (R n ) SL(R,n+1) S n = SO(n+1)/SO(n) σ(a) = JAJ, J = H 2 H 2 SL(n,R)/SO(n) σ(a) = (A t ) SL(3,R)/SO(3) = {volume 1 ellipsoids in R 3 }/isometries
17 Decompostition X = G/K g = Lie(G) k = Lie(K) p = T x X, σ k = Id and σ p = Id g = k p, Lemma [k,k] k, [k,p] p, [p,p] k Proof: X,Y p, σ[x,y] = [σx,σy] = [ X, Y] = [X,Y] k. Lemma (R(X,Y)X,Y) = ([X,[Y,X]],Y) X,Y p
18 Decompostition X = G/K g = Lie(G) k = Lie(K) p = T x X, σ k = Id and σ p = Id g = k p, Lemma [k,k] k, [k,p] p, [p,p] k Proof: X,Y p, σ[x,y] = [σx,σy] = [ X, Y] = [X,Y] k. Lemma (R(X,Y)X,Y) = ([X,[Y,X]],Y) X,Y p Theorem X = R r X 1 X n, X i = G i /K i irr, G i semisimple Proof: Decompose p = p 0 p n Ad K -equiv
19 Decompostition X = G/K g = Lie(G) k = Lie(K) p = T x X, σ k = Id and σ p = Id g = k p, Lemma [k,k] k, [k,p] p, [p,p] k Proof: X,Y p, σ[x,y] = [σx,σy] = [ X, Y] = [X,Y] k. Lemma (R(X,Y)X,Y) = ([X,[Y,X]],Y) X,Y p Theorem X = R r X 1 X n, X i = G i /K i irr, G i semisimple Proof: Decompose p = p 0 p n Ad K -equiv Killing form: B : g g R ad G -invariant B(X,Y) = tr(adx ady) B gi 1 unique ad G -invariant B ki 0 negative definite B pi 1 positive definite iff G i noncompact
20 Symmetric spaces of noncompact type X = R r X 1 X n, Def: X of noncompact type if r = 0 and each X i noncompact
21 Symmetric spaces of noncompact type X = R r X 1 X n, Def: X of noncompact type if r = 0 and each X i noncompact X noncompact type X = G/K, K maximal compact subgroup g = k p, k = Lie(K), B k negative definite, B p positive definite
22 Symmetric spaces of noncompact type X = R r X 1 X n, Def: X of noncompact type if r = 0 and each X i noncompact X noncompact type X = G/K, K maximal compact subgroup g = k p, k = Lie(K), B k negative definite, B p positive definite Chose B as metric on p = T x X sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0, X,Y p. Corollary Xnoncompact type, then X is CAT(0). Examples: H n, H 2 H 2, SL(n,R)/SO(n).
23 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0)
24 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0) All maximal abelian algebras in p are conjugate. F 1,F 2 X maximal flats, then g G such that gf 1 = F 2 (if x 0 F 1 F 2 can chose g G x0 )
25 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0) All maximal abelian algebras in p are conjugate. F 1,F 2 X maximal flats, then g G such that gf 1 = F 2 (if x 0 F 1 F 2 can chose g G x0 ) Def: rank(x) = dim(maximal flat) rank(x) = 1 sec(x) < 0 Exs rankh n = 1, rankh n H m = 2, ranksl(n+1)/so(n+1) = n λ 0 λ1 h =... λ 0 + +λ n = 0 λ n
26 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0) All maximal abelian algebras in p are conjugate. F 1,F 2 X maximal flats, then g G such that gf 1 = F 2 (if x 0 F 1 F 2 can chose g G x0 ) Def: rank(x) = dim(maximal flat) rank(x) = 1 sec(x) < 0 Exs rankh n = 1, rankh n H m = 2, ranksl(n+1)/so(n+1) = n λ 0 λ1 h =... λ 0 + +λ n = 0 λ n x,y F, σ y σ x transvection (it preserves F, σ y σ x F translation xy )
27 Regular directions Every geodesic γ : R X is contained in a maximal flat Def: γ is regular if contained in only one maximal flat, otherwise singular. Example: H 2 H 2 (s,t) (γ 1 (s),γ 2 (t)) is a flat (γ i : R H 2 geodesic,) γ 2 regular singular γ 1 singular directions s or t constant (horizontal or vertical)
28 Regular directions Every geodesic γ : R X is contained in a maximal flat Def: γ is regular if contained in only one maximal flat, otherwise singular. Example: {( SL(3)/SO(3) ) } λ0 h = λ1 λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 = R 2, exp(h)x 0 flat through x 0 λ 2 ) λ 0 = λ 1 can conjugate by : it is singular ( Regular directions through 0: λ 0 λ 1 λ 2 λ 0 λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 0 λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2
29 Regular directions Every geodesic γ : R X is contained in a maximal flat Def: γ is regular if contained in only one maximal flat, otherwise singular. Example: {( SL(3)/SO(3) ) } λ0 h = λ1 λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 = R 2, exp(h)x 0 flat through x 0 λ 2 ) λ 0 = λ 1 can conjugate by : it is singular ( Regular directions through 0: λ 0 λ 1 λ 2 λ 0 e λ 2 e λ 0 e λ 1
30 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α
31 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 1: set H α = kerα.
32 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 1: set H α = kerα. Proof of 2: α Λ, write g α = k g α p g α If k +p g α, k k, p p, then [h,p] = α(h)k, [h,k] = α(h)p. Claim If p = 1 then [k,p] = e α, [k,e α ] = e α 2 p, and [k,h α ] = 0 [ 1 e α k,p] = 1 e α e α, [ 1 e α k, 1 e α e α] = p, and [ 1 e α k,h α] = 0
33 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 2: α Λ, write g α = k g α p g α If k +p g α, k k, p p, then [h,p] = α(h)k, [h,k] = α(h)p. Claim If p = 1 then [k,p] = e α, [k,e α ] = e α 2 p, and [k,h α ] = 0 [ 1 e α k,p] = 1 e α e α, [ 1 e α k, 1 e α e α] = p, and [ 1 e α k,h α] = 0 Claim exp(t 1 e α k) rotation in plane e α,p. Take s α := exp( π e α k),
34 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 2: α Λ, write g α = k g α p g α If k +p g α, k k, p p, then [h,p] = α(h)k, [h,k] = α(h)p. Claim If p = 1 then [k,p] = e α, [k,e α ] = e α 2 p, and [k,h α ] = 0 proof: [h,[k,p]] = [k,[h,p]] [p,[k,h]] = 0 [k,p] h by maximality B([k,p],h) = B(p, [k,h]) = B(p,α(h)p) = α(h) = B(e α,h)
35 SL(3, R)/SO(3) h = {( λ0 λ1 λ 2 ) } λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 Singular directions: λ i = λ j λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 0 g = h λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2 0 g λ0 λ 1 g λ0 λ 2 g λ1 λ 0 0 g λ1 λ 2 s λ0 λ 1 = g λ2 λ 0 g λ2 λ 1 0 ( )
36 SL(3, R)/SO(3) h = {( λ0 λ1 λ 2 ) } λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 Singular directions: λ i = λ j λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 0 g = h λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2 0 g λ0 λ 1 g λ0 λ 2 g λ1 λ 0 0 g λ1 λ 2 s λ0 λ 1 = g λ2 λ 0 g λ2 λ 1 0 ( ) W = s λi λ j = Σ 3
37 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex
38 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex Def: A wall is fix(s α ) = exp(ker(α)) A chamber is the closure of a component of F \wall x, y lie in the same chamber iff α(x)α(y) 0 α Λ.
39 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex Def: A wall is fix(s α ) = exp(ker(α)) A chamber is the closure of a component of F \wall x, y lie in the same chamber iff α(x)α(y) 0 α Λ. Example: SL(3, R)/SO(3) λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 λ 0 e 01 e 12 e 02 λ 1 = λ 2 e 02 e 01 e 12 λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2 Choice of positive chamber: {x R 2 (x,e 10 ) > 0, (x,e 12 ) > 0} {e 01,e 12 } primitive root system (type A 2 )
40 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex Def: A wall is fix(s α ) = exp(ker(α)) A chamber is the closure of a component of F \wall x, y lie in the same chamber iff α(x)α(y) 0 α Λ. Irreducible Dynkin diagrams
41 II Ideal boundary
42 Recall... X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 F = exp(h)x 0 X maximal flat (dimf = rankx) {singular geodesics inf troughx0 } = α Λ where wall α = kerα : h R, Λ (finite) set of roots. Weyl group = s α reflection through wall α G x0 = K (F,W) is a Euclidean Coxeter complex. wall α
43 Recall... X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 F = exp(h)x 0 X maximal flat (dimf = rankx) {singular geodesics inf troughx0 } = α Λ where wall α = kerα : h R, Λ (finite) set of roots. wall α Weyl group = s α reflection through wall α G x0 = K (F,W) is a Euclidean Coxeter complex. Ex: H 2 H 2 (s,t) (γ 1 (s),γ 2 (t)) is a flat (γ i : R H 2 geodesic,) t Singular directions: s = 0 or t = 0 Weyl group: Z/2Z Z/2Z s
44 Recall... X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 F = exp(h)x 0 X maximal flat (dimf = rankx) {singular geodesics inf troughx0 } = α Λ where wall α = kerα : h R, Λ (finite) set of roots. wall α Weyl group = s α reflection through wall α G x0 = K (F,W) is a Euclidean Coxeter {( complex. ) } λ0 Ex: SL(3,R)/SO(3): h = λ1 λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 λ 2 λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 Singular directions: λ i = λ j Weyl group: Σ 3 = D 3 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 2 λ 0 λ 0 = λ 2
45 X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 Ideal boundary
46 Ideal boundary X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 X= {r : [0,+ ) X geodesic}/ = asymptote classes of geodesic rays r 1 r 2 if d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) C
47 Ideal boundary X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 X= {r : [0,+ ) X geodesic}/ = asymptote classes of geodesic rays r 1 r 2 if d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) C U(T x0 (X)) X = S dimx 1 v {exp x0 (tv) t 0} is a homeomorphism. G acts continuously on X X = ball.
48 Ideal boundary X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 X= {r : [0,+ ) X geodesic}/ = asymptote classes of geodesic rays r 1 r 2 if d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) C U(T x0 (X)) X = S dimx 1 v {exp x0 (tv) t 0} is a homeomorphism. G acts continuously on X X = ball. The action of G on X is not transitive. For ξ X let G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ}. Lemma G ξ acts transitively on X.
49 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. p,q X p q r 1 r 2 X ξ t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i,
50 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. p,q X p q r 1 r 2 X ξ t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ
51 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. p,q X p q r 1 r 2 X ξ t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ φ (r 1 (t)) is a ray at ctnt distance from r 2 (t): they bound a flat strip φ r 1 φ (p) ξ q r 2
52 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ φ (r 1 (t)) is a ray at ctnt distance from r 2 (t): they bound a flat strip φ r 1 φ (p) ξ q φ r 1 and r 2 lie in a 2-flat F = R 2 τ transvection in F st τ(φ (p)) = q, hence τ(φ (ξ)) = τ(ξ) = ξ r 2
53 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ φ (r 1 (t)) is a ray at ctnt distance from r 2 (t): they bound a flat strip φ r 1 φ (p) ξ q φ r 1 and r 2 lie in a 2-flat F = R 2 τ transvection in F st τ(φ (p)) = q, hence τ(φ (ξ)) = τ(ξ) = ξ Corollary For r 1 r 2, r 1 is regular iff r 2 is regular. Hence we talk about regular/singular ideal points (ideal chambers later) r 2
54 Example H 2 H 2. F = S 0 S 0 = S 1 (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 S 0 = R S 1 = H 2 S 1 chamber chamber (length π 2 ) vertex (ins 0 ) S 1
55 Example H 2 H 2. F = S 0 S 0 = S 1 (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 S 0 = R S 1 = H 2 S 1 chamber chamber (length π 2 ) vertex (ins 0 ) S 1 G = PSL(2,R) PSL(2,R) Regular orbits = S 1 S 1, singular orbits = S 1. Stabilizers of ideal points: G ξ = ( 0 ) ( 0 ) for ξ regular, G ξ = ( ) ( 0 ) for ξ singular. Orbits: G/G ξ
56 Example X = SL(3,R)/SO(3). F = S 1 : chamber (length π 3 ) vertex X = S 4 ξ X ( ξ regular, G ξ ) = 0, Gξ = G/G ξ 0 0 = flag manifold of P 2 ( ξ singular, G ξ ) = 0 0 or G ξ = ( 0 0, Gξ = G/G ξ = P 2 ), Gξ = G/G ξ = (P 2 ) {(p,l) P 2 (P 2 ) p l}
57 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0
58 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0 Proof (sketch): [g α,g β ] g α+β h α(h) 0 g α is a subalgebra. exph translates e th x 0 to a parallel line because [h,h] = 0.
59 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0 Proof (sketch): [g α,g β ] g α+β h α(h) 0 g α is a subalgebra. exph translates e th x 0 to a parallel line because [h,h] = 0. For v g α, [h,v] = α(h)v: d(e v e th x 0,e th x 0 ) = d(e th e v e th x 0,x 0 ) = d(e exp( tα(h))v x 0,x 0 ) which is bounded iff α(h) 0 (it converges to 0 iff α(h) > 0).
60 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0 Proof (sketch): [g α,g β ] g α+β h α(h) 0 g α is a subalgebra. exph translates e th x 0 to a parallel line because [h,h] = 0. For v g α, [h,v] = α(h)v: d(e v e th x 0,e th x 0 ) = d(e th e v e th x 0,x 0 ) = d(e exp( tα(h))v x 0,x 0 ) which is bounded iff α(h) 0 (it converges to 0 iff α(h) > 0). Remark: the distance converges to 0 for regular directions. Corollary: Define ideal chambers/simplices as G ξ being constant. P = G ξ parabolic subgroup B = G chamber = G ξ, ξ regular, Borel subgrup (max solvable/min parab)
61 Properties of flats in X. (1) x X, σ chamber in X,!F X flat s.t. x F, σ F (2) Given an ideal chamber σ X, X = {F flat σ F} (3) F 1, F 2 maximal flats asymptotic to σ, then ξ int(σ) there exist rays r i F i asymptotic to ξ, s.t. d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) 0 (4) σ,σ X chambers, F X flat such that σ,σ F
62 Properties of flats in X. (1) x X, σ chamber in X,!F X flat s.t. x F, σ F (2) Given an ideal chamber σ X, X = {F flat σ F} (3) F 1, F 2 maximal flats asymptotic to σ, then ξ int(σ) there exist rays r i F i asymptotic to ξ, s.t. d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) 0 (4) σ,σ X chambers, F X flat such that σ,σ F Existence (1) and (2): G ξ transitive on X. uniqueness of (1): uniqueness of a geodesic from x 0 to ξ int(σ) (3): estimate previous slide (4) Intersection Borel subalgebras contains a Cartan subalgebra (or open/close argument)
63 Ideal chambers G acts transitively on the set of ideal chambers (transitivity on flats + Weyl group) Def: The Fürstenberg boundary of X is F X = {ideal chambers} = G/G σ = {regulargorbit} F (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 S 1 chamber p S 1 zz F SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = Flag manifold ofp n
64 Tits building F = R r maximal flat, ( F,W) is a spherical Coxeter complex A chamber is a simplex of maximal dimension Theorem: X is a Tits building with apartments ( F,W) of dim r 1. Namely, X is a simplical complex with subcomplexes F s.t.: 1. It is thick: every simplex of dim < r 1 belongs to at least 3 chambers 2. Every apartment is thin (a wall belongs to only 2 chambers). 3. ξ 1,ξ 2 X there is an apartment A s.t. ξ 1,ξ 2 A 4. ξ 1,ξ 2 A A X then φ : A = A, φ(ξ i ) = ξ i
65 Examples of Tits buildings (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 S 1 chamber S 1 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) type A 1 A 1
66 Examples of Tits buildings (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flat η 1 η 1 η 2 η 2
67 Examples of Tits buildings (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flats γ 1 η 1 γ 1 γ 2 γ 2 η 1 η 2 η 2
68 Examples of Tits buildings SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = S n(n+3)/2 1, ( F,W) = (S n 1,Σ n ), type A n. A 2 A 3
69 Tits distance Def: The Tits distance between ξ 1,ξ 2 X is d T (ξ 1,ξ 2 ) = sup x X x (ξ 1,ξ 2 ) ξ 1 x X ξ 2 Flat case: F = R r = S r 1 with the standard metric. d T is realized by apartments If X is CAT( 1) then d T (ξ 1,ξ 2 ) = π.
70 III Dynamics at infinity (joint with M. Kapovich and B. Leeb)
71 Examples of Tits building structures at X (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flat η 1 η 1 η 2 η 2
72 Examples of Tits building structures at X (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flats γ 1 η 1 γ 1 γ 2 γ 2 η 1 η 2 η 2
73 Examples of Tits building structures at X SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = S n(n+3)/2 1, ( F,W) = (S n 1,Σ n )
74 Examples of Tits building structures at X SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = S n(n+3)/2 1, ( F,W) = (S n 1,Σ n ) ( SL(3,R)/SO(3) ) = S 4, W = Σ 3 = D 3 F X = regular orbit = Flag(P 2 ) = {(p,l) p l} P 2 (P 2 ) Two singular SL(3,R)-orbits: P 2 and (P 2 ) ( SL(3,R)/SO(3) ) = Flag(P 2 ) (0,1) P 2 (P 2 )
75 Regular subgroups X = G/K symmetric space of noncompact type. Γ < G discrete subgroup, γ n Γ sequence. Assume xγ n x regular x V(x,σ n ) γ n x σ n X chamber V(x,σ n ) = {rays fromxtoσ n }. (σ n depends on γ n and x) Def: Γ regular if γ n Γ, γ n, then d(γ n x, V(x,σ n ))
76 Regular subgroups X = G/K symmetric space of noncompact type. Γ < G discrete subgroup, γ n Γ sequence. Assume xγ n x regular x V(x,σ n ) γ n x σ n X chamber V(x,σ n ) = {rays fromxtoσ n }. (σ n depends on γ n and x) Def: Γ regular if γ n Γ, γ n, then d(γ n x, V(x,σ n )) If Λ Γ = X Γx is regular Γ regular, but. There is a well defined notion of limit chamber σ n σ and chamber limit set: Λ Ch (Γ) F X Aim: find disc. domains in G-orbits in X depending on Λ Ch (Γ)
77 Relative position (a mod,σ mod ) = reference model apartment and chamber Chart α : (a mod,σ mod ) = ( F,σ) Def: For fixed σ X, the position relative σ is: pos(,σ) : X a mod ξ pos(ξ,σ) = α 1 (ξ)
78 Relative position (a mod,σ mod ) = reference model apartment and chamber Chart α : (a mod,σ mod ) = ( F,σ) Def: For fixed σ X, the position relative σ is: pos(,σ) : X a mod ξ pos(ξ,σ) = α 1 (ξ) G orbit W orbit
79 Relative position (a mod,σ mod ) = reference model apartment and chamber Chart α : (a mod,σ mod ) = ( F,σ) Def: For fixed σ X, the position relative σ is: pos(,σ) : X a mod G orbit ξ pos(ξ,σ) = α 1 (ξ) W orbit Example: (SL(3,R)/SO(3)) F = S 1 A reference chamber is equiv. to a flag (p,l) P 2 (P 2 ), p l l ref. chamber p
80 Example of relative position Example: (SL(3,R)/SO(3)) F = S 1 A reference chamber is equiv. to a flag (p,l) P 2 (P 2 ), p l There are two W -orbits of singular points (corresponding to pts /lines) {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l}
81 Example of relative position Example: (SL(3,R)/SO(3)) F = S 1 A reference chamber is equiv. to a flag (p,l) P 2 (P 2 ), p l There are two W -orbits of singular points (corresponding to pts /lines) {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l} {ξ G orbit pos(ξ,σ) = ctnt} Schubert cell (maybe not closed) {ξ G orbit pos(ξ,σ) = ctnt} Schubert cycle Want to remove certain Schubert cycles relative to chambers in Λ Ch (Γ)
82 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 }
83 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 } Example: {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l}
84 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 } Example: {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l} If η 0 is regular, then Wη 0 = W and is the Bruhat ordering on W Longest element w 0 W : σ mod and w 0 σ mod are antipodal (opposite)
85 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 } Example: {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l} If η 0 is regular, then Wη 0 = W and is the Bruhat ordering on W Longest element w 0 W : σ mod and w 0 σ mod are antipodal (opposite) Def: S Wη 0 closed if η 1 S and η 2 η 1 imply η 2 S {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} is closed if S is closed
86 Thickenings of limit set Γ G discrete and regular. S Wη 0 a mod closed (for ) Λ Ch (Γ) F X Def: S-Thickening of Λ Ch (Γ): Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S}
87 Thickenings of limit set Γ G discrete and regular. S Wη 0 a mod closed (for ) Λ Ch (Γ) F X Def: S-Thickening of Λ Ch (Γ): Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ S fat: Wη 0 = S w 0 S, where w 0 W is the longest element in W (we need to remove a sufficiently large set to have proper discontinuity)
88 Chamber conical and antipodal Def: A chamber σ Λ Ch (Γ) is conical if N R (V(x,σ)) Γx is infinite, for some R > 0, some (any) x X. x V(x,σ) γx σ X Def: Γ is antipodal if σ 1 σ 2 Λ Ch (Γ) are antipodal/opposite (pos(σ 1,σ 2 ) = w 0 σ mod, w 0 σ mod and σ mod antipodal in a mod ). σ mod w 0 σ mod Def: Γ < G discrete is RCA if regular, chamber conical and antipodal
89 Chamber conical and antipodal Def: A chamber σ Λ Ch (Γ) is conical if N R (V(x,σ)) Γx is infinite, for some R > 0, some (any) x X. x V(x,σ) γx σ X Def: Γ is antipodal if σ 1 σ 2 Λ Ch (Γ) are antipodal/opposite (pos(σ 1,σ 2 ) = w 0 σ mod, w 0 σ mod and σ mod antipodal in a mod ). Def: Γ < G discrete is RCA if regular, chamber conical and antipodal Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact S slim: S w 0 S =.
90 Chamber conical and antipodal Def: A chamber σ Λ Ch (Γ) is conical if N R (V(x,σ)) Γx is infinite, for some R > 0, some (any) x X. x V(x,σ) γx σ X Def: Γ is antipodal if σ 1 σ 2 Λ Ch (Γ) are antipodal/opposite (pos(σ 1,σ 2 ) = w 0 σ mod, w 0 σ mod and σ mod antipodal in a mod ). Def: Γ < G discrete is RCA if regular, chamber conical and antipodal Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact S slim: S w 0 S =. fat: S w 0 S = Wη 0. balanced = slim + fat Corollary: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and balanced, then Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a cocompact domain of discont.
91 Examples of thickenings X = SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) Wη 0 a mod rel positions of points in P n e.g. G ξ = σ mod = {F 0 F 1 F n 1 } reference chamber S k : points in F k fat ifk (n 1)/2 S k = slim ifk (n 1)/2 {( )} 0 0 0
92 Examples of thickenings X = SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) Wη 0 a mod rel positions of points in P n e.g. G ξ = σ mod = {F 0 F 1 F n 1 } reference chamber S k : points in F k fat ifk (n 1)/2 S k = slim ifk (n 1)/2 {( )} Wη 0 a mod orbit of rel )} positions of {(p,h) P n (P n ) p H} e.g. G ξ = {( S = {(p,h) p F i H for somei} is balanced
93 Examples of thickenings X = SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) Wη 0 a mod rel positions of points in P n e.g. G ξ = σ mod = {F 0 F 1 F n 1 } reference chamber S k : points in F k fat ifk (n 1)/2 S k = slim ifk (n 1)/2 {( )} Wη 0 a mod orbit of rel )} positions of {(p,h) P n (P n ) p H} e.g. G ξ = {( S = {(p,h) p F i H for somei} is balanced Also for X = SL(n+1,C)/SU(n+1)
94 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), H 2
95 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), Λ 0 = Γx H 2 H 2 Λ 0
96 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), Λ 0 = Γx H 2 H 2 Γ Isom + (H 2 ) = SO(2,1) SL(3,R) Q = H 2 = {[x 0 : x 1 : x 2 ] P 2 x 2 0 = x 2 1 +x 2 2} conic Γ is regular: Λ Ch = {(p,l) p Λ 0,l = T p Q} Ω = P 2 \{x x line tangent toqatλ 0 } is a domain of discontinuity for Γ
97 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), Λ 0 = Γx H 2 H 2 Γ Isom + (H 2 ) = SO(2,1) SL(3,R) Q = H 2 = {[x 0 : x 1 : x 2 ] P 2 x 2 0 = x 2 1 +x 2 2} conic Γ is regular: Λ Ch = {(p,l) p Λ 0,l = T p Q} Ω = P 2 \{x x line tangent toqatλ 0 } is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Ω = Flag(P 2 )\{(p,l) p l, p Λ 0 orltangent toqatλ 0 } is a domain of disc. for Γ, cocompact when Γ cvx cocompact in H 2
98 Example of RCA: Veronese embedding Γ 0 < SL(2,C) discrete, H 3 /Γ 0 hyp. orbifold, Λ 0 P 1 (C) limit set Γ = Sym N (Γ 0 ) SL(N +1,C), Γ X = SL(N +1,C)/SU(N +1) Sym N : SL(2,C) SL(N +1,C) irreducible C N+1 = {p(x,y) C[x,y] homogeneous & deg(p(x,y)) = N} If C 2 = v 1,v 2, then Sym N (C 2 ) = v N 1,v N 1 1 v 2,,v N 2. Γ is regular, and it is RCA if Γ 0 convex cocompact.
99 Example of RCA: Veronese embedding Γ 0 < SL(2,C) discrete, H 3 /Γ 0 hyp. orbifold, Λ 0 P 1 (C) limit set Γ = Sym N (Γ 0 ) SL(N +1,C), Γ X = SL(N +1,C)/SU(N +1) Sym N : SL(2,C) SL(N +1,C) irreducible C N+1 = {p(x,y) C[x,y] homogeneous & deg(p(x,y)) = N} If C 2 = v 1,v 2, then Sym N (C 2 ) = v N 1,v N 1 1 v 2,,v N 2. Γ is regular, and it is RCA if Γ 0 convex cocompact. Veronese embedding φ : P 1 P N = P({p C[X,Y]homogeneous & degp = N}) [a : b] [(ax +by) N ] Λ ch (Γ) = { flags osculating toφ(λ 0 ) φ(p 1 )}
100 Example of RCA: Veronese embedding Γ 0 < SL(2,C) discrete, H 3 /Γ 0 hyp. orbifold, Λ 0 P 1 (C) limit set Γ = Sym N (Γ 0 ) SL(N +1,C), Γ X = SL(N +1,C)/SU(N +1) Γ is regular, and it is RCA if Γ 0 convex cocompact. Λ ch (Γ) = { flags osculating toφ(λ 0 ) φ(p 1 )} Theorem: For N > 2, Γ acts properly on P N \Osc [N/2] φ(λ 0 ) and cocompactly on P N \Osc [(N 1)/2] φ(λ 0 ) if Γ 0 convex cocompact Osc k = k-th osculating manifold (k = 1 is the tangent bundle, k = 2 planes approaching second order, etc) For N 1, Γ acts properly (cocompactly when Γ 0 cvx cocompact) on {(p,h) P N (P N ) p H, F i osc toφ(γ 0 ), p F i H}
101 Weak RCA subgroups One can weaken the regularity assumption working with simplices instead of chambers. eg limit sets are not full flags but only partial flags Can talk about weak-rca subgroups Theorem: Γ is weak-rca iff it is anosov (Anosov in the sense of Labourie and Guichard-Wienhard) Benoist: strictly convex projective groups are weak-rca Ω P n limit set in {(p,h) P n (P n ) p H}: Λ = {(p,h) p Ω,H tangent to Ω}
102 Sketch of proof of discontinuity Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Ω = Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S}
103 Sketch of proof of discontinuity Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Ω = Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Take ξ n Gξ 0, ξ n ξ, γ n Γ, γ n, and γ n ξ n ξ. Want to see that if ξ lies in Ω, then ξ doesn t
104 Sketch of proof of discontinuity Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Ω = Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Take ξ n Gξ 0, ξ n ξ, γ n Γ, γ n, and γ n ξ n ξ. Want to see that if ξ lies in Ω, then ξ doesn t Step 1: γ ±1 n σ ± Λ Ch (Γ) Step 2: If ˆσ F X is opposite to σ, then γ nˆσ σ + Assume ξ Ω, hence pos(ξ,σ ) / S pos(ξ n,σ ) / S pos(ξ n,ˆσ) S (S fat) pos(γ n ξ n,γ nˆσ) S pos(ξ,σ + ) S (S closed) Thus ξ / Ω.
105 Sketch of proof of cocompactness Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S}
106 Sketch of proof of cocompactness Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Step 1. Γ is expansive (à la Sullivan) on Λ Ch (Γ) F X by conicallity: For all σ Λ Ch (Γ) there are γ Γ, σ U F X, C > 1 st: d(γσ 1,γσ 2 ) > Cd(σ 1,σ 2 ) σ 1,σ 2 U Step 2. There is a fibration π : Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) Λ Ch (Γ) (that extends in a neighbhood in Gξ 0 ) by slimness and antipodality
107 Sketch of proof of cocompactness Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Step 1. Γ is expansive (à la Sullivan) on Λ Ch (Γ) F X by conicallity: For all σ Λ Ch (Γ) there are γ Γ, σ U F X, C > 1 st: d(γσ 1,γσ 2 ) > Cd(σ 1,σ 2 ) σ 1,σ 2 U Step 2. There is a fibration π : Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) Λ Ch (Γ) (that extends in a neighbhood in Gξ 0 ) by slimness and antipodality Then d(γπ 1 (σ 1 ),γπ 1 (σ 2 )) > Cd(π 1 (σ 1 ),π 1 (σ 2 )) σ 1,σ 2 U Which implies cocompactness (find a fundamental domain uniformly away from Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)))
108 Thank you for your attention
Coarse geometry of isometry groups of symmetric spaces
Coarse geometry of isometry groups of symmetric spaces Joan Porti (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) August 12, 24 joint with Misha Kapovich and Bernhard Leeb, arxiv:1403.7671 Geometry on Groups and Spaces,
More informationDynamics on flag manifolds: domains of proper discontinuity and cocompactness
msp Geometry & Topology 22 (2018) 157 234 Dynamics on flag manifolds: domains of proper discontinuity and cocompactness MICHAEL KAPOVICH BERNHARD LEEB JOAN PORTI For noncompact semisimple Lie groups G
More informationAn introduction to Higher Teichmüller theory: Anosov representations for rank one people
An introduction to Higher Teichmüller theory: Anosov representations for rank one people August 27, 2015 Overview Classical Teichmüller theory studies the space of discrete, faithful representations of
More informationGeometry of symmetric R-spaces
Geometry of symmetric R-spaces Makiko Sumi Tanaka Geometry and Analysis on Manifolds A Memorial Symposium for Professor Shoshichi Kobayashi The University of Tokyo May 22 25, 2013 1 Contents 1. Introduction
More informationLECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori
LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI 1. Maximal Tori By a torus we mean a compact connected abelian Lie group, so a torus is a Lie group that is isomorphic to T n = R n /Z n. Definition 1.1.
More information1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.
1. Riemannian symmetric spaces Definition 1.1. A (globally, Riemannian) symmetric space is a Riemannian manifold (X, g) such that for all x X, there exists an isometry s x Iso(X, g) such that s x (x) =
More informationMostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and
Mostow Rigidity W. Dison June 17, 2005 0 Introduction Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces We will be concerned with (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and (b) simply connected,
More informationBRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 4, Number 1, June 2001, Pages 71 75 BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP HI-JOON CHAE Abstract. A Bruhat-Tits building
More informationGroups up to quasi-isometry
OSU November 29, 2007 1 Introduction 2 3 Topological methods in group theory via the fundamental group. group theory topology group Γ, a topological space X with π 1 (X) = Γ. Γ acts on the universal cover
More informationLECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT
LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT 1. The parallel transport We shall start with the geometric meaning of linear connections. Suppose M is a smooth manifold with a linear connection. Let γ : [a, b] M be
More informationSOME RECENT RESULTS ON ANOSOV REPRESENTATIONS
SOME RECENT RESULTS ON ANOSOV REPRESENTATIONS MICHAEL KAPOVICH, BERNHARD LEEB, JOAN PORTI Abstract. In this note we give an overview of some of our recent work on Anosov representations of discrete groups
More information1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras
Lie Groups and Bundles 2014/15 BGSMath 1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras 1. Prove that O(n) is Lie group and that its tangent space at I O(n) is isomorphic to the space so(n) of skew-symmetric matrices
More informationCONVEX COCOMPACT GROUPS IN REAL RANK ONE AND HIGHER
CONVEX COCOMPACT GROUPS IN REAL RANK ONE AND HIGHER FANNY KASSEL Notes for a talk at the GEAR workshop on Higher Teichmüller Thurston Theory, Northport, Maine, 23 30 June 2013 Let G be a real, connected,
More informationBredon finiteness properties of groups acting on CAT(0)-spaces
Bredon finiteness properties of groups acting on CAT(0)-spaces Nansen Petrosyan KU Leuven Durham 2013 1 Goal: Discuss finiteness properties for E FIN G and E VC G when G acts isometrically and discretely
More informationESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction
ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES ANDREAS ČAP AND KARIN MELNICK Abstract. We use the general theory developed in our article [1] in the setting of parabolic
More informationA strong Schottky Lemma for nonpositively curved singular spaces
A strong Schottky Lemma for nonpositively curved singular spaces To John Stallings on his sixty-fifth birthday Roger C. Alperin, Benson Farb and Guennadi A. Noskov January 22, 2001 1 Introduction The classical
More informationAn introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109
An introduction to arithmetic groups Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027, China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 June 27, 2006 Plan. 1. Examples of arithmetic groups
More informationIntersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions
Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) March 14, 2011 Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) ()Intersection of stable and
More informationKleinian groups Background
Kleinian groups Background Frederic Palesi Abstract We introduce basic notions about convex-cocompact actions on real rank one symmetric spaces. We focus mainly on the geometric interpretation as isometries
More informationRIGIDITY OF INVARIANT CONVEX SETS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES
RIGIDITY OF INVARIANT CONVEX SETS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES BRUCE KLEINER AND BERNHARD LEEB Abstract. The main result implies that a proper convex subset of an irreducible higher rank symmetric space cannot
More informationDifferential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces
Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces Sigurdur Helgason Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume 34 nsffvjl American Mathematical Society l Providence, Rhode Island PREFACE PREFACE TO THE
More information1.3 Group Actions. Exercise Prove that a CAT(1) piecewise spherical simplicial complex is metrically flag.
Exercise 1.2.6. Prove that a CAT(1) piecewise spherical simplicial complex is metrically flag. 1.3 Group Actions Definition 1.3.1. Let X be a metric space, and let λ : X X be an isometry. The displacement
More informationComparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries
Comparison techniques for infinitesimal automorphisms of parabolic geometries University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Srni, January 2012 This talk reports on joint work in progress with Karin Melnick
More informationASYMPTOTIC INVARIANTS OF HADAMARD MANIFOLDS. Mohamad A. Hindawi. A Dissertation. Mathematics
ASYMPTOTIC INVARIANTS OF HADAMARD MANIFOLDS Mohamad A. Hindawi A Dissertation in Mathematics Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
More informationLECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY
LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem Recall that a Riemannian manifold (M, g) is called geodesically complete if the maximal defining interval of any geodesic is R. On the other
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.dg] 19 Nov 2009
GLOBAL BEHAVIOR OF THE RICCI FLOW ON HOMOGENEOUS MANIFOLDS WITH TWO ISOTROPY SUMMANDS. arxiv:09.378v [math.dg] 9 Nov 009 LINO GRAMA AND RICARDO MIRANDA MARTINS Abstract. In this paper we study the global
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.dg] 4 Feb 2013
BULGING DEFORMATIONS OF CONVEX RP 2 -MANIFOLDS arxiv:1302.0777v1 [math.dg] 4 Feb 2013 WILLIAM M. GOLDMAN Abstract. We define deformations of convex RP 2 -surfaces. A convex RP 2 -manifold is a representation
More informationGenericity of contracting elements in groups
Genericity of contracting elements in groups Wenyuan Yang (Peking University) 2018 workshop on Algebraic and Geometric Topology July 29, 2018 Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Wenyuan Yang Genericity
More informationOn the Harish-Chandra Embedding
On the Harish-Chandra Embedding The purpose of this note is to link the Cartan and the root decompositions. In addition, it explains how we can view a Hermitian symmetric domain as G C /P where P is a
More informationISOMETRY GROUPS OF CAT(0) CUBE COMPLEXES. 1. Introduction
ISOMETRY GROUPS OF CAT(0) CUBE COMPLEXES COREY BREGMAN Abstract. Given a CAT(0) cube complex X, we show that if Aut(X) Isom(X) then there exists a full subcomplex of X which decomposes as a product with
More informationModuli spaces and locally symmetric spaces
p. 1/4 Moduli spaces and locally symmetric spaces Benson Farb University of Chicago Once it is possible to translate any particular proof from one theory to another, then the analogy has ceased to be productive
More informationSymmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University
McGill University Sept 2010 What are Hermitian? A Riemannian manifold M is called a Riemannian symmetric space if for each point x M there exists an involution s x which is an isometry of M and a neighbourhood
More informationRandom Walks on Hyperbolic Groups III
Random Walks on Hyperbolic Groups III Steve Lalley University of Chicago January 2014 Hyperbolic Groups Definition, Examples Geometric Boundary Ledrappier-Kaimanovich Formula Martin Boundary of FRRW on
More informationARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES
ASIAN J. MATH. c 2008 International Press Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 289 298, September 2008 002 ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES RAUL QUIROGA-BARRANCO Abstract.
More informationAn introduction to orbifolds
An introduction to orbifolds Joan Porti UAB Subdivide and Tile: Triangulating spaces for understanding the world Lorentz Center November 009 An introduction to orbifolds p.1/0 Motivation Γ < Isom(R n )
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.dg] 4 Jun 2012
The Higher Rank Rigidity Theorem for Manifolds With No Focal Points Jordan Watkins University of Michigan arxiv:1111.5428v2 [math.dg] 4 Jun 2012 October 27, 2018 Abstract. We say that a Riemannian manifold
More informationSEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS
SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS BRIAN COLLIER 1. Outiline The goal is to talk about semisimple Lie groups, mainly noncompact real semisimple Lie groups. This is a very broad subject so we will do our best to be
More informationCONVEX FUNCTIONS ON SYMMETRIC SPACES, SIDE LENGTHS OF POLYGONS AND THE STABILITY INEQUALITIES FOR WEIGHTED CONFIGURATIONS AT INFINITY
j. differential geometry 81 (2009) 297-354 CONVEX FUNCTIONS ON SYMMETRIC SPACES, SIDE LENGTHS OF POLYGONS AND THE STABILITY INEQUALITIES FOR WEIGHTED CONFIGURATIONS AT INFINITY Michael Kapovich, Bernhard
More informationEKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications
EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications and recent results on Complete Quadrics. (Based on joint works with Soumya Banerjee and Michael Joyce) Mahir Bilen Can April 16, 2016 Mahir Bilen Can EKT of Some
More informationProper SL(2,R)-actions on homogeneous spaces
Proper SL(2,R)-actions on homogeneous spaces arxiv:1405.4167v3 [math.gr] 27 Oct 2016 Maciej Bocheński, Piotr Jastrzębski, Takayuki Okuda and Aleksy Tralle October 28, 2016 Abstract We study the existence
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II
COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II LECTURES BY JOACHIM SCHWERMER, NOTES BY TONY FENG Contents 1. Review 1 2. Lifting differential forms from the boundary 2 3. Eisenstein
More informationFuchsian groups. 2.1 Definitions and discreteness
2 Fuchsian groups In the previous chapter we introduced and studied the elements of Mob(H), which are the real Moebius transformations. In this chapter we focus the attention of special subgroups of this
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.mg] 25 Oct 2015
Strongly transitive actions on Euclidean buildings arxiv:1506.03594v2 [math.mg] 25 Oct 2015 Linus Kramer and Jeroen Schillewaert Abstract We prove a decomposition result for a group G acting strongly transitively
More informationThe Geometrization Theorem
The Geometrization Theorem Matthew D. Brown Wednesday, December 19, 2012 In this paper, we discuss the Geometrization Theorem, formerly Thurston s Geometrization Conjecture, which is essentially the statement
More informationGEODESIC PLANES IN GEOMETRICALLY FINITE MANIFOLDS OSAMA KHALIL
GEODESIC PLANES IN GEOMETRICALLY FINITE MANIFOLDS OSAMA KHALIL Abstract. We study the problem of rigidity of closures of totally geodesic plane immersions in geometrically finite manifolds containing rank
More informationHomogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky
Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Hamburg,14-18 July 2008 1 The talk is based on a joint work with C.Medori and A.Tomassini (Parma) See ArXiv 0806.2272, where also a survey
More informationBranching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.
Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Basic Notions: Jerusalem, March 2010 Birgit Speh Cornell University 1 Let G be a group and V a vector space.
More informationHermitian Symmetric Spaces
Hermitian Symmetric Spaces Maria Beatrice Pozzetti Notes by Serena Yuan 1. Symmetric Spaces Definition 1.1. A Riemannian manifold X is a symmetric space if each point p X is the fixed point set of an involutive
More informationOBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES
OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES KRISTOPHER TAPP Abstract. Examples of almost-positively and quasi-positively curved spaces of the form M = H\((G, h) F ) were discovered recently
More informationCOUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. Nigel Higson. Unpublished Note, 1999
COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE Nigel Higson Unpublished Note, 1999 1. Introduction Let X be a discrete, bounded geometry metric space. 1 Associated to X is a C -algebra C (X) which
More informationINFINITE REDUCED WORDS AND THE TITS BOUNDARY OF A COXETER GROUP
INFINITE REDUCED WORDS AND THE TITS BOUNDARY OF A COXETER GROUP THOMAS LAM AND ANNE THOMAS Abstract. Let (W, S) be a finite rank Coxeter system with W infinite. We prove that the limit weak order on the
More informationOn lengths on semisimple groups
On lengths on semisimple groups Yves de Cornulier May 21, 2009 Abstract We prove that every length on a simple group over a locally compact field, is either bounded or proper. 1 Introduction Let G be a
More informationarxiv: v4 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2015
SMOOTHING 3-DIMENSIONAL POLYHEDRAL SPACES NINA LEBEDEVA, VLADIMIR MATVEEV, ANTON PETRUNIN, AND VSEVOLOD SHEVCHISHIN arxiv:1411.0307v4 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2015 Abstract. We show that 3-dimensional polyhedral
More informationLecture 4 - The Basic Examples of Collapse
Lecture 4 - The Basic Examples of Collapse July 29, 2009 1 Berger Spheres Let X, Y, and Z be the left-invariant vector fields on S 3 that restrict to i, j, and k at the identity. This is a global frame
More informationGlobal aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy
1/13 Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy Thomas Leistner International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Évora, September 2 5, 2013 Outline 2/13 1 Lorentzian holonomy Holonomy
More informationInfinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings
Infinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings ANNE THOMAS KEVIN WORTMAN Let Γ be a non-cocompact lattice on a locally finite regular right-angled building X. We prove that if
More informationThe Symmetric Space for SL n (R)
The Symmetric Space for SL n (R) Rich Schwartz November 27, 2013 The purpose of these notes is to discuss the symmetric space X on which SL n (R) acts. Here, as usual, SL n (R) denotes the group of n n
More informationPractice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.
Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009. Solutions (1) Let Γ be a discrete group acting on a manifold M. (a) Define what it means for Γ to act freely. Solution: Γ acts
More informationEuclidean Buildings. Guyan Robertson. Newcastle University
Euclidean Buildings Guyan Robertson Newcastle University Contents 1 Overview of Buildings 2 Lattices, Coset Spaces, Normal Form 3 The Ãn 1 building of PGL n (F) 4 The Boundary 5 Ã 2 groups Part I Overview
More informationCompactifications of Margulis space-times
1/29 Compactifications of Margulis space-times Suhyoung Choi Department of Mathematical Science KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/ schoi email: schoi@math.kaist.ac.kr Geometry of Moduli Spaces
More informationFree Loop Cohomology of Complete Flag Manifolds
June 12, 2015 Lie Groups Recall that a Lie group is a space with a group structure where inversion and group multiplication are smooth. Lie Groups Recall that a Lie group is a space with a group structure
More informationBruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups
Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups Maarten Solleveld Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen joint work with Ralf Meyer 26 November 2013 Starting point Let G be a reductive p-adic
More informationTHE MAPPING CLASS GROUP AND A THEOREM OF MASUR-WOLF
THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP AND A THEOREM OF MASUR-WOLF JOHN D. MCCARTHY AND ATHANASE PAPADOPOULOS Abstract. In [M-W], Masur and Wolf proved that the Teichmüller space of genus g > 1 surfaces with the Teichmüller
More information1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups
An undergraduate approach to Lie theory Slide 1 Andrew Baker, Glasgow Glasgow, 12/11/1999 1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups A continuous g : V 1 V 2 with V k R m k open is called smooth if it is infinitely
More informationKilling fields of constant length on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds
Killing fields of constant length on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds Southern Mathematical Institute VSC RAS Poland, Bedlewo, 21 October 2015 1 Introduction 2 3 4 Introduction Killing vector fields (simply
More informationH-projective structures and their applications
1 H-projective structures and their applications David M. J. Calderbank University of Bath Based largely on: Marburg, July 2012 hamiltonian 2-forms papers with Vestislav Apostolov (UQAM), Paul Gauduchon
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF THE DOUBLE OF THE FIGURE-EIGHT KNOT EXTERIOR IS GFERF
THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF THE DOUBLE OF THE FIGURE-EIGHT KNOT EXTERIOR IS GFERF D. D. LONG and A. W. REID Abstract We prove that the fundamental group of the double of the figure-eight knot exterior admits
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.gt] 21 Dec 2018
Geometry of compact complex manifolds associated to generalized quasi-fuchsian representations arxiv:1704.01091v2 [math.gt] 21 Dec 2018 1 Introduction David Dumas and Andrew Sanders This paper is concerned
More informationThese notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.
These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. LIE GROUPS, LIE ALGEBRAS, AND REPRESENTATIONS SPRING SEMESTER 2008 RICHARD A. WENTWORTH Contents 1. Lie groups and Lie algebras 2 1.1. Definition
More informationEXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS
EXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS These are the notes of a talk given by the author in Asheville at the workshop Higgs bundles and Harmonic maps in January 2015. It aims to sketch the proof of the
More informationFinsler bordifications of symmetric and certain locally symmetric spaces
Finsler bordifications of symmetric and certain locally symmetric spaces Michael Kapovich, Bernhard Leeb July 5, 2017 Abstract We give a geometric interpretation of the maximal Satake compactification
More informationMath 249B. Tits systems
Math 249B. Tits systems 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ + Φ, and let B be the unique Borel k-subgroup
More informationFrom holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications
From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications 1 University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Berlin, November 11, 2016 1 supported by project P27072 N25 of the Austrian Science
More informationEigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups
Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups Shrawan Kumar Talk given at AMS Sectional meeting held at Davidson College, March 2007 1 Hermitian eigenvalue
More informationREGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES
REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES MAKIKO SUMI TANAKA 1. Introduction This article is based on the collaboration with Tadashi Nagano. In the first part of this article we briefly review basic
More informationVOLUME GROWTH AND HOLONOMY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE
VOLUME GROWTH AND HOLONOMY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE KRISTOPHER TAPP Abstract. The volume growth of an open manifold of nonnegative sectional curvature is proven to be bounded above by the difference between
More informationDefinably amenable groups in NIP
Definably amenable groups in NIP Artem Chernikov (Paris 7) Lyon, 21 Nov 2013 Joint work with Pierre Simon. Setting T is a complete first-order theory in a language L, countable for simplicity. M = T a
More informationDynamics of Group Actions and Minimal Sets
University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder First Joint Meeting of the Sociedad de Matemática de Chile American Mathematical Society Special Session on Group Actions: Probability and Dynamics
More informationTame definable topological dynamics
Tame definable topological dynamics Artem Chernikov (Paris 7) Géométrie et Théorie des Modèles, 4 Oct 2013, ENS, Paris Joint work with Pierre Simon, continues previous work with Anand Pillay and Pierre
More informationDIAMETERS OF SPHERICAL ALEXANDROV SPACES AND CURVATURE ONE ORBIFOLDS
DIAMETERS OF SPHERICAL ALEXANDROV SPACES AND CURVATURE ONE ORBIFOLDS SARAH J. GREENWALD Abstract. Let G be a closed, non-transitive subgroup of O(n + 1), where n, and let Q n = S n /G. We will show that
More informationTHE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP
THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP JAY TAYLOR 1 Examples of Lie Groups The following is adapted from [2] We begin with the basic definition and some core examples Definition A Lie group is a smooth
More informationINDUCED QUASI-ACTIONS: A REMARK. 1. Introduction
INDUCED QUASI-ACTIONS: A REMARK BRUCE KLEINER AND BERNHARD LEEB 1. Introduction In this note we observe that the notion of an induced representation has an analog for quasi-actions, and give some applications.
More informationLeft-invariant Einstein metrics
on Lie groups August 28, 2012 Differential Geometry seminar Department of Mathematics The Ohio State University these notes are posted at http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/ derdzinski.1/beamer/linv.pdf LEFT-INVARIANT
More informationMany of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.
Exercises in Geometry I University of Bonn, Winter semester 2014/15 Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Néstor León Delgado The collection of exercises here presented corresponds to the exercises for the
More informationNaturally reductive homogeneous spaces classification and special geometries
Naturally reductive homogeneous spaces classification and special geometries Ana Cristina Ferreira CMAT - Universidade do Minho anaferreira@math.uminho.pt Symmetries in Geometry, Analysis and Spectral
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 29 Aug 2005
arxiv:math/0508562v1 [math.dg] 29 Aug 2005 Geometry and Dynamics of Discrete Isometry Groups of Higher Rank Symmetric Spaces Gabriele Link 25/08/2005 Abstract For real hyperbolic spaces, the dynamics of
More informationCONVEX COCOMPACTNESS IN PSEUDO-RIEMANNIAN HYPERBOLIC SPACES
CONVEX COCOMPACTNESS IN PSEUDO-RIEMANNIAN HYPERBOLIC SPACES JEFFREY DANCIGER, FRANÇOIS GUÉRITAUD, AND FANNY KASSEL To Bill Goldman on his 60th birthday Abstract. Anosov representations of word hyperbolic
More informationRicci-flat metrics on complex cones
Ricci-flat metrics on complex cones Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow & Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (AEI), Potsdam-Golm, Germany Quarks 2014, Suzdal, 3 June 2014 arxiv:1405.2319 1/20
More informationA genus 2 characterisation of translation surfaces with the lattice property
A genus 2 characterisation of translation surfaces with the lattice property (joint work with Howard Masur) 0-1 Outline 1. Translation surface 2. Translation flows 3. SL(2,R) action 4. Veech surfaces 5.
More informationWe will outline two proofs of the main theorem:
Chapter 4 Higher Genus Surfaces 4.1 The Main Result We will outline two proofs of the main theorem: Theorem 4.1.1. Let Σ be a closed oriented surface of genus g > 1. Then every homotopy class of homeomorphisms
More informationStable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies
Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies Misha Verbitsky Géométrie des variétés complexes IV CIRM, Luminy, Oct 26, 2010 1 Hyperkähler manifolds DEFINITION: A hyperkähler structure on a manifold M
More informationAn introduction to the geometry of homogeneous spaces
Proceedings of The Thirteenth International Workshop on Diff. Geom. 13(2009) 121-144 An introduction to the geometry of homogeneous spaces Takashi Koda Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University
More informationZ n -free groups are CAT(0)
Z n -free groups are CAT(0) Inna Bumagin joint work with Olga Kharlampovich to appear in the Journal of the LMS February 6, 2014 Introduction Lyndon Length Function Let G be a group and let Λ be a totally
More information(2012) arxiv joint: Darren Long, Stephan Tillmann
Projective Structures on Manifolds Daryl Cooper U.C.S.B September 19, 2013 (2012) arxiv 1109.0585 joint: Darren Long, Stephan Tillmann M n (G,X) = geometric structure X φ ψ ψ φ 1 G dev : M X hol : π 1
More informationExercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1
Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 1. Conformal change of Riemannian metrics [3 points] Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. A conformal change is a nonnegative function λ : M (0, ). Such a function defines
More informationUncertainty principles for the Schrödinger equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type
Uncertainty principles for the Schrödinger equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type Angela Pasquale Université de Lorraine Joint work with Maddala Sundari Geometric Analysis on Euclidean
More informationLecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra
Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Ivan C.H. Ip Update: May 16, 2017 5 Review of Root Systems In this section, let us have a brief introduction to root system and finite Lie type classification
More informationLeft-invariant metrics and submanifold geometry
Left-invariant metrics and submanifold geometry TAMARU, Hiroshi ( ) Hiroshima University The 7th International Workshop on Differential Geometry Dedicated to Professor Tian Gang for his 60th birthday Karatsu,
More informationADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM. Hee Oh
ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM Hee Oh Abstract. In this paper, we generalize Margulis s S-arithmeticity theorem to the case when S can be taken as an infinite set of primes. Let R be
More informationA Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds
arxiv:math/0312251v1 [math.dg] 12 Dec 2003 A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds Haibao Duan Institute of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, dhb@math.ac.cn
More information