Dynamics at infinity. of symmetric spaces. J. Porti, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 11th KAIST Geometric Topology Fair Jeonju, Korea, August 2013

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Dynamics at infinity. of symmetric spaces. J. Porti, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 11th KAIST Geometric Topology Fair Jeonju, Korea, August 2013"

Transcription

1 Dynamics at infinity of symmetric spaces J. Porti, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 11th KAIST Geometric Topology Fair Jeonju, Korea, August 2013

2 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact.

3 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact. Whan can one say for Γ Isom(X), when X is a symmetric space of rank 2?

4 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact. Whan can one say for Γ Isom(X), when X is a symmetric space of rank 2? The action of Isom(X) is not transtive on X. Hence look for domains in Isom(X)-orbits in X Eg: orbits on (SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1)) are P n, Flag(P n ), etc Understand geometrically Anosov groups à la Labourie and Guichard-Wienhard

5 Motivation Γ Isom(H n ) discrete subgroup H n = S n 1 ideal boundary and Λ = Γx H n limit set Γ acts properly discontinously on Ω = H n \Λ Γ convex cocompact if C H n Γ-inv. convex, C/Γ compact. If Γ is convex cocompact, then Ω/Γ is compact. Whan can one say for Γ Isom(X), when X is a symmetric space of rank 2? I Symmetric spaces of noncompact type II Ideal boundary III Dynamics at infinity (joint with M. Kapovich, B. Leeb),

6 I Symmetric spaces of noncompact type

7 Symmetric spaces: Definition X complete Riemannian manifold. An inversion at x X is an isometry σ x : X X s.t. σ x (x) = x and dσ x = Id Tx X (σ 2 x = Id) X is called a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion If γ : (ε,ε) X is a geodesic with γ(0) = x, then σ x γ(t) = γ( t)

8 Symmetric spaces: Definition X complete Riemannian manifold. An inversion at x X is an isometry σ x : X X s.t. σ x (x) = x and dσ x = Id Tx X (σ 2 x = Id) X is called a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion If γ : (ε,ε) X is a geodesic with γ(0) = x, then σ x γ(t) = γ( t) Proposition: A symmetric space is homogeneous: x 1,x 2 X g Isom(X) such that gx 1 = x 2 Proof: If y midpoint of x 1 and x 2, then σ y (x 1 ) = σ y σ x1 (x 1 ) = x 2 x 2 x y 1

9 Symmetric spaces: Definition X complete Riemannian manifold. An inversion at x X is an isometry σ x : X X s.t. σ x (x) = x and dσ x = Id Tx X (σ 2 x = Id) X is called a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion If γ : (ε,ε) X is a geodesic with γ(0) = x, then σ x γ(t) = γ( t) Proposition: A symmetric space is homogeneous: x 1,x 2 X g Isom(X) such that gx 1 = x 2 Proof: If y midpoint of x 1 and x 2, then σ y (x 1 ) = σ y σ x1 (x 1 ) = x 2 x 2 x y 1 By moving x 2, one can chose g = σ y σ x1 Isom 0 (X) Corollary: X = G/K, for G connected Lie group, K G compact G = Isom 0 (X) and K = G x.

10 Symmetric spaces as homogeneous spaces X is a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion Theorem:X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is a symmetric space (2) X = G/K, G connected Lie group, K G compact, σ : G G automorphism s.t. σ 2 = Id and (G σ ) 0 K G σ.

11 Symmetric spaces as homogeneous spaces X is a symmetric space if every x X has an inversion Theorem:X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is a symmetric space (2) X = G/K, G connected Lie group, K G compact, σ : G G automorphism s.t. σ 2 = Id and (G σ ) 0 K G σ. Classification (E. Cartan 1926) Examples H n = SO(n,1) 0 /SO(n) σ : SO(n,1) 0 SO(n,1) 0 A (A t ) 1 (SO(n,1) 0 ) σ = SO(n) CH n = SU(n,1) 0 /SU(n), S n = SO(n+1)/SO(n)

12 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor)

13 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor) Lemma: Y(t) vector field along a geodesic γ(t). Then γ Y = 0 iff dσ γ(t) Y(t+s) = Y(t s) (Use uniqueness of parallel transport)

14 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor) Lemma: Y(t) vector field along a geodesic γ(t). Then γ Y = 0 iff dσ γ(t) Y(t+s) = Y(t s) (Use uniqueness of parallel transport) (1) (2): γ geodesic p = γ(0), X, Y, Z parallel along γ. Then dσ p (R(X(t),Y(t))Z(t)) = R(dσ p X(t),dσ p Y(t))dσ p Z(t) = R( X(t), Y(t))( Z(t)) = R(X(t),Y(t))Z(t) Hence γ (t)( R(X(t),Y(t))Z(t) ) = 0 R = 0.

15 Locally symmetric spaces X is a locally symmetric space if every x X has an inversion defined in a neighborhood of x (eg H n /Γ). Theorem: X complete Riemannian manifold. The following are equiv: (1) X is locally symmetric (2) R = 0 (parallel curvature tensor) Lemma: Y(t) vector field along a geodesic γ(t). Then γ Y = 0 iff dσ γ(t) Y(t+s) = Y(t s) (Use uniqueness of parallel transport) (2) (1): Define a (local) map exp p (tv) exp p ( tv). This map preserves R by parallelism, hence it is an isometry by Cartan Ambrose Hicks theorem

16 Examples H n = SO(n,1) 0 /SO(n) σ(a) = (A t ) 1 R n = Isom 0 (R n )/SO(n) Isom 0 (R n ) SL(R,n+1) S n = SO(n+1)/SO(n) σ(a) = JAJ, J = H 2 H 2 SL(n,R)/SO(n) σ(a) = (A t ) SL(3,R)/SO(3) = {volume 1 ellipsoids in R 3 }/isometries

17 Decompostition X = G/K g = Lie(G) k = Lie(K) p = T x X, σ k = Id and σ p = Id g = k p, Lemma [k,k] k, [k,p] p, [p,p] k Proof: X,Y p, σ[x,y] = [σx,σy] = [ X, Y] = [X,Y] k. Lemma (R(X,Y)X,Y) = ([X,[Y,X]],Y) X,Y p

18 Decompostition X = G/K g = Lie(G) k = Lie(K) p = T x X, σ k = Id and σ p = Id g = k p, Lemma [k,k] k, [k,p] p, [p,p] k Proof: X,Y p, σ[x,y] = [σx,σy] = [ X, Y] = [X,Y] k. Lemma (R(X,Y)X,Y) = ([X,[Y,X]],Y) X,Y p Theorem X = R r X 1 X n, X i = G i /K i irr, G i semisimple Proof: Decompose p = p 0 p n Ad K -equiv

19 Decompostition X = G/K g = Lie(G) k = Lie(K) p = T x X, σ k = Id and σ p = Id g = k p, Lemma [k,k] k, [k,p] p, [p,p] k Proof: X,Y p, σ[x,y] = [σx,σy] = [ X, Y] = [X,Y] k. Lemma (R(X,Y)X,Y) = ([X,[Y,X]],Y) X,Y p Theorem X = R r X 1 X n, X i = G i /K i irr, G i semisimple Proof: Decompose p = p 0 p n Ad K -equiv Killing form: B : g g R ad G -invariant B(X,Y) = tr(adx ady) B gi 1 unique ad G -invariant B ki 0 negative definite B pi 1 positive definite iff G i noncompact

20 Symmetric spaces of noncompact type X = R r X 1 X n, Def: X of noncompact type if r = 0 and each X i noncompact

21 Symmetric spaces of noncompact type X = R r X 1 X n, Def: X of noncompact type if r = 0 and each X i noncompact X noncompact type X = G/K, K maximal compact subgroup g = k p, k = Lie(K), B k negative definite, B p positive definite

22 Symmetric spaces of noncompact type X = R r X 1 X n, Def: X of noncompact type if r = 0 and each X i noncompact X noncompact type X = G/K, K maximal compact subgroup g = k p, k = Lie(K), B k negative definite, B p positive definite Chose B as metric on p = T x X sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0, X,Y p. Corollary Xnoncompact type, then X is CAT(0). Examples: H n, H 2 H 2, SL(n,R)/SO(n).

23 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0)

24 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0) All maximal abelian algebras in p are conjugate. F 1,F 2 X maximal flats, then g G such that gf 1 = F 2 (if x 0 F 1 F 2 can chose g G x0 )

25 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0) All maximal abelian algebras in p are conjugate. F 1,F 2 X maximal flats, then g G such that gf 1 = F 2 (if x 0 F 1 F 2 can chose g G x0 ) Def: rank(x) = dim(maximal flat) rank(x) = 1 sec(x) < 0 Exs rankh n = 1, rankh n H m = 2, ranksl(n+1)/so(n+1) = n λ 0 λ1 h =... λ 0 + +λ n = 0 λ n

26 Flats and rank Def: a flat F X is a totally geodesic subespace F = R K Lemma abelian subalgebras ofp Flats throughx 0 h exp(h)x 0 (use sec(x,y) = [X,Y] 2 0) All maximal abelian algebras in p are conjugate. F 1,F 2 X maximal flats, then g G such that gf 1 = F 2 (if x 0 F 1 F 2 can chose g G x0 ) Def: rank(x) = dim(maximal flat) rank(x) = 1 sec(x) < 0 Exs rankh n = 1, rankh n H m = 2, ranksl(n+1)/so(n+1) = n λ 0 λ1 h =... λ 0 + +λ n = 0 λ n x,y F, σ y σ x transvection (it preserves F, σ y σ x F translation xy )

27 Regular directions Every geodesic γ : R X is contained in a maximal flat Def: γ is regular if contained in only one maximal flat, otherwise singular. Example: H 2 H 2 (s,t) (γ 1 (s),γ 2 (t)) is a flat (γ i : R H 2 geodesic,) γ 2 regular singular γ 1 singular directions s or t constant (horizontal or vertical)

28 Regular directions Every geodesic γ : R X is contained in a maximal flat Def: γ is regular if contained in only one maximal flat, otherwise singular. Example: {( SL(3)/SO(3) ) } λ0 h = λ1 λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 = R 2, exp(h)x 0 flat through x 0 λ 2 ) λ 0 = λ 1 can conjugate by : it is singular ( Regular directions through 0: λ 0 λ 1 λ 2 λ 0 λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 0 λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2

29 Regular directions Every geodesic γ : R X is contained in a maximal flat Def: γ is regular if contained in only one maximal flat, otherwise singular. Example: {( SL(3)/SO(3) ) } λ0 h = λ1 λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 = R 2, exp(h)x 0 flat through x 0 λ 2 ) λ 0 = λ 1 can conjugate by : it is singular ( Regular directions through 0: λ 0 λ 1 λ 2 λ 0 e λ 2 e λ 0 e λ 1

30 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α

31 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 1: set H α = kerα.

32 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 1: set H α = kerα. Proof of 2: α Λ, write g α = k g α p g α If k +p g α, k k, p p, then [h,p] = α(h)k, [h,k] = α(h)p. Claim If p = 1 then [k,p] = e α, [k,e α ] = e α 2 p, and [k,h α ] = 0 [ 1 e α k,p] = 1 e α e α, [ 1 e α k, 1 e α e α] = p, and [ 1 e α k,h α] = 0

33 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 2: α Λ, write g α = k g α p g α If k +p g α, k k, p p, then [h,p] = α(h)k, [h,k] = α(h)p. Claim If p = 1 then [k,p] = e α, [k,e α ] = e α 2 p, and [k,h α ] = 0 [ 1 e α k,p] = 1 e α e α, [ 1 e α k, 1 e α e α] = p, and [ 1 e α k,h α] = 0 Claim exp(t 1 e α k) rotation in plane e α,p. Take s α := exp( π e α k),

34 Roots Proposition: F maximal flat, x 0 F, then: 1. {γ F singular geodesic throughx 0 } = α Λ H α, withh α hyperplane,λfinite 2. α Λ, s α G s.t. s α (F) = F, s α F = reflection alongh α Proof: h p max abelian F = exp(h)x 0 v h is singular iff w p, w / h, [v,w] = ad v (w) = 0. ad v : g g is symmetric for (, ) = B(,σ ), which is positive definite {ad v,v h} diagonalize simultaneously: g = g 0 α Λg α α : h R is called a root, α( ) = (,e α ), e α h is the root element. Proof of 2: α Λ, write g α = k g α p g α If k +p g α, k k, p p, then [h,p] = α(h)k, [h,k] = α(h)p. Claim If p = 1 then [k,p] = e α, [k,e α ] = e α 2 p, and [k,h α ] = 0 proof: [h,[k,p]] = [k,[h,p]] [p,[k,h]] = 0 [k,p] h by maximality B([k,p],h) = B(p, [k,h]) = B(p,α(h)p) = α(h) = B(e α,h)

35 SL(3, R)/SO(3) h = {( λ0 λ1 λ 2 ) } λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 Singular directions: λ i = λ j λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 0 g = h λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2 0 g λ0 λ 1 g λ0 λ 2 g λ1 λ 0 0 g λ1 λ 2 s λ0 λ 1 = g λ2 λ 0 g λ2 λ 1 0 ( )

36 SL(3, R)/SO(3) h = {( λ0 λ1 λ 2 ) } λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 Singular directions: λ i = λ j λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 0 g = h λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2 0 g λ0 λ 1 g λ0 λ 2 g λ1 λ 0 0 g λ1 λ 2 s λ0 λ 1 = g λ2 λ 0 g λ2 λ 1 0 ( ) W = s λi λ j = Σ 3

37 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex

38 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex Def: A wall is fix(s α ) = exp(ker(α)) A chamber is the closure of a component of F \wall x, y lie in the same chamber iff α(x)α(y) 0 α Λ.

39 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex Def: A wall is fix(s α ) = exp(ker(α)) A chamber is the closure of a component of F \wall x, y lie in the same chamber iff α(x)α(y) 0 α Λ. Example: SL(3, R)/SO(3) λ 0 = λ 1 λ 1 λ 0 e 01 e 12 e 02 λ 1 = λ 2 e 02 e 01 e 12 λ 2 λ 0 = λ 2 Choice of positive chamber: {x R 2 (x,e 10 ) > 0, (x,e 12 ) > 0} {e 01,e 12 } primitive root system (type A 2 )

40 Weyl group Def: The Weyl group is W = {g K gf = F} = s α α Λ W = normalizer(h)/centralizer(h), F = exp(h)x 0 (F,W) is a (euclidean) Coxeter complex Def: A wall is fix(s α ) = exp(ker(α)) A chamber is the closure of a component of F \wall x, y lie in the same chamber iff α(x)α(y) 0 α Λ. Irreducible Dynkin diagrams

41 II Ideal boundary

42 Recall... X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 F = exp(h)x 0 X maximal flat (dimf = rankx) {singular geodesics inf troughx0 } = α Λ where wall α = kerα : h R, Λ (finite) set of roots. Weyl group = s α reflection through wall α G x0 = K (F,W) is a Euclidean Coxeter complex. wall α

43 Recall... X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 F = exp(h)x 0 X maximal flat (dimf = rankx) {singular geodesics inf troughx0 } = α Λ where wall α = kerα : h R, Λ (finite) set of roots. wall α Weyl group = s α reflection through wall α G x0 = K (F,W) is a Euclidean Coxeter complex. Ex: H 2 H 2 (s,t) (γ 1 (s),γ 2 (t)) is a flat (γ i : R H 2 geodesic,) t Singular directions: s = 0 or t = 0 Weyl group: Z/2Z Z/2Z s

44 Recall... X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 F = exp(h)x 0 X maximal flat (dimf = rankx) {singular geodesics inf troughx0 } = α Λ where wall α = kerα : h R, Λ (finite) set of roots. wall α Weyl group = s α reflection through wall α G x0 = K (F,W) is a Euclidean Coxeter {( complex. ) } λ0 Ex: SL(3,R)/SO(3): h = λ1 λ 0 +λ 1 +λ 2 = 0 λ 2 λ 1 λ 0 = λ 1 Singular directions: λ i = λ j Weyl group: Σ 3 = D 3 λ 1 = λ 2 λ 2 λ 0 λ 0 = λ 2

45 X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 Ideal boundary

46 Ideal boundary X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 X= {r : [0,+ ) X geodesic}/ = asymptote classes of geodesic rays r 1 r 2 if d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) C

47 Ideal boundary X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 X= {r : [0,+ ) X geodesic}/ = asymptote classes of geodesic rays r 1 r 2 if d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) C U(T x0 (X)) X = S dimx 1 v {exp x0 (tv) t 0} is a homeomorphism. G acts continuously on X X = ball.

48 Ideal boundary X = G/K symmetric space of nocompact type K < G maximal compact, sec 0 X= {r : [0,+ ) X geodesic}/ = asymptote classes of geodesic rays r 1 r 2 if d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) C U(T x0 (X)) X = S dimx 1 v {exp x0 (tv) t 0} is a homeomorphism. G acts continuously on X X = ball. The action of G on X is not transitive. For ξ X let G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ}. Lemma G ξ acts transitively on X.

49 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. p,q X p q r 1 r 2 X ξ t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i,

50 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. p,q X p q r 1 r 2 X ξ t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ

51 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. p,q X p q r 1 r 2 X ξ t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ φ (r 1 (t)) is a ray at ctnt distance from r 2 (t): they bound a flat strip φ r 1 φ (p) ξ q r 2

52 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ φ (r 1 (t)) is a ray at ctnt distance from r 2 (t): they bound a flat strip φ r 1 φ (p) ξ q φ r 1 and r 2 lie in a 2-flat F = R 2 τ transvection in F st τ(φ (p)) = q, hence τ(φ (ξ)) = τ(ξ) = ξ r 2

53 Proof that G ξ acts transitively on X. t d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) is convex and bounded, hence monotonic φ t i = σ r i (t)σ ri (0) G transvection along r i, φ t 1(p) = r 1 (t) at distance C from r 2 (t), φ t 2 φt 1(p) lies at distance C from r 2 (0) = q, at dist. 2C from p, Hence φ t k 2 φ t k 1 φ for some sequence t k, φ (ξ) = ξ φ (r 1 (t)) is a ray at ctnt distance from r 2 (t): they bound a flat strip φ r 1 φ (p) ξ q φ r 1 and r 2 lie in a 2-flat F = R 2 τ transvection in F st τ(φ (p)) = q, hence τ(φ (ξ)) = τ(ξ) = ξ Corollary For r 1 r 2, r 1 is regular iff r 2 is regular. Hence we talk about regular/singular ideal points (ideal chambers later) r 2

54 Example H 2 H 2. F = S 0 S 0 = S 1 (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 S 0 = R S 1 = H 2 S 1 chamber chamber (length π 2 ) vertex (ins 0 ) S 1

55 Example H 2 H 2. F = S 0 S 0 = S 1 (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 S 0 = R S 1 = H 2 S 1 chamber chamber (length π 2 ) vertex (ins 0 ) S 1 G = PSL(2,R) PSL(2,R) Regular orbits = S 1 S 1, singular orbits = S 1. Stabilizers of ideal points: G ξ = ( 0 ) ( 0 ) for ξ regular, G ξ = ( ) ( 0 ) for ξ singular. Orbits: G/G ξ

56 Example X = SL(3,R)/SO(3). F = S 1 : chamber (length π 3 ) vertex X = S 4 ξ X ( ξ regular, G ξ ) = 0, Gξ = G/G ξ 0 0 = flag manifold of P 2 ( ξ singular, G ξ ) = 0 0 or G ξ = ( 0 0, Gξ = G/G ξ = P 2 ), Gξ = G/G ξ = (P 2 ) {(p,l) P 2 (P 2 ) p l}

57 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0

58 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0 Proof (sketch): [g α,g β ] g α+β h α(h) 0 g α is a subalgebra. exph translates e th x 0 to a parallel line because [h,h] = 0.

59 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0 Proof (sketch): [g α,g β ] g α+β h α(h) 0 g α is a subalgebra. exph translates e th x 0 to a parallel line because [h,h] = 0. For v g α, [h,v] = α(h)v: d(e v e th x 0,e th x 0 ) = d(e th e v e th x 0,x 0 ) = d(e exp( tα(h))v x 0,x 0 ) which is bounded iff α(h) 0 (it converges to 0 iff α(h) > 0).

60 Stabilizer of ideal points ξ X. h h, ξ = lim t + exp(th)x 0 X, G ξ = {g G gξ = ξ} Lemma Lie(G ξ ) = h g α α(h) 0 Proof (sketch): [g α,g β ] g α+β h α(h) 0 g α is a subalgebra. exph translates e th x 0 to a parallel line because [h,h] = 0. For v g α, [h,v] = α(h)v: d(e v e th x 0,e th x 0 ) = d(e th e v e th x 0,x 0 ) = d(e exp( tα(h))v x 0,x 0 ) which is bounded iff α(h) 0 (it converges to 0 iff α(h) > 0). Remark: the distance converges to 0 for regular directions. Corollary: Define ideal chambers/simplices as G ξ being constant. P = G ξ parabolic subgroup B = G chamber = G ξ, ξ regular, Borel subgrup (max solvable/min parab)

61 Properties of flats in X. (1) x X, σ chamber in X,!F X flat s.t. x F, σ F (2) Given an ideal chamber σ X, X = {F flat σ F} (3) F 1, F 2 maximal flats asymptotic to σ, then ξ int(σ) there exist rays r i F i asymptotic to ξ, s.t. d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) 0 (4) σ,σ X chambers, F X flat such that σ,σ F

62 Properties of flats in X. (1) x X, σ chamber in X,!F X flat s.t. x F, σ F (2) Given an ideal chamber σ X, X = {F flat σ F} (3) F 1, F 2 maximal flats asymptotic to σ, then ξ int(σ) there exist rays r i F i asymptotic to ξ, s.t. d(r 1 (t),r 2 (t)) 0 (4) σ,σ X chambers, F X flat such that σ,σ F Existence (1) and (2): G ξ transitive on X. uniqueness of (1): uniqueness of a geodesic from x 0 to ξ int(σ) (3): estimate previous slide (4) Intersection Borel subalgebras contains a Cartan subalgebra (or open/close argument)

63 Ideal chambers G acts transitively on the set of ideal chambers (transitivity on flats + Weyl group) Def: The Fürstenberg boundary of X is F X = {ideal chambers} = G/G σ = {regulargorbit} F (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 S 1 chamber p S 1 zz F SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = Flag manifold ofp n

64 Tits building F = R r maximal flat, ( F,W) is a spherical Coxeter complex A chamber is a simplex of maximal dimension Theorem: X is a Tits building with apartments ( F,W) of dim r 1. Namely, X is a simplical complex with subcomplexes F s.t.: 1. It is thick: every simplex of dim < r 1 belongs to at least 3 chambers 2. Every apartment is thin (a wall belongs to only 2 chambers). 3. ξ 1,ξ 2 X there is an apartment A s.t. ξ 1,ξ 2 A 4. ξ 1,ξ 2 A A X then φ : A = A, φ(ξ i ) = ξ i

65 Examples of Tits buildings (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 S 1 chamber S 1 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) type A 1 A 1

66 Examples of Tits buildings (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flat η 1 η 1 η 2 η 2

67 Examples of Tits buildings (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flats γ 1 η 1 γ 1 γ 2 γ 2 η 1 η 2 η 2

68 Examples of Tits buildings SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = S n(n+3)/2 1, ( F,W) = (S n 1,Σ n ), type A n. A 2 A 3

69 Tits distance Def: The Tits distance between ξ 1,ξ 2 X is d T (ξ 1,ξ 2 ) = sup x X x (ξ 1,ξ 2 ) ξ 1 x X ξ 2 Flat case: F = R r = S r 1 with the standard metric. d T is realized by apartments If X is CAT( 1) then d T (ξ 1,ξ 2 ) = π.

70 III Dynamics at infinity (joint with M. Kapovich and B. Leeb)

71 Examples of Tits building structures at X (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flat η 1 η 1 η 2 η 2

72 Examples of Tits building structures at X (H 2 H 2 ) = S 1 S 1 = S 3 ( F,W) = (S 1,Z/2Z Z/2Z) A 1 A 1 S 1 chamber S 1 H 2 H 2 flats γ 1 η 1 γ 1 γ 2 γ 2 η 1 η 2 η 2

73 Examples of Tits building structures at X SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = S n(n+3)/2 1, ( F,W) = (S n 1,Σ n )

74 Examples of Tits building structures at X SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) = S n(n+3)/2 1, ( F,W) = (S n 1,Σ n ) ( SL(3,R)/SO(3) ) = S 4, W = Σ 3 = D 3 F X = regular orbit = Flag(P 2 ) = {(p,l) p l} P 2 (P 2 ) Two singular SL(3,R)-orbits: P 2 and (P 2 ) ( SL(3,R)/SO(3) ) = Flag(P 2 ) (0,1) P 2 (P 2 )

75 Regular subgroups X = G/K symmetric space of noncompact type. Γ < G discrete subgroup, γ n Γ sequence. Assume xγ n x regular x V(x,σ n ) γ n x σ n X chamber V(x,σ n ) = {rays fromxtoσ n }. (σ n depends on γ n and x) Def: Γ regular if γ n Γ, γ n, then d(γ n x, V(x,σ n ))

76 Regular subgroups X = G/K symmetric space of noncompact type. Γ < G discrete subgroup, γ n Γ sequence. Assume xγ n x regular x V(x,σ n ) γ n x σ n X chamber V(x,σ n ) = {rays fromxtoσ n }. (σ n depends on γ n and x) Def: Γ regular if γ n Γ, γ n, then d(γ n x, V(x,σ n )) If Λ Γ = X Γx is regular Γ regular, but. There is a well defined notion of limit chamber σ n σ and chamber limit set: Λ Ch (Γ) F X Aim: find disc. domains in G-orbits in X depending on Λ Ch (Γ)

77 Relative position (a mod,σ mod ) = reference model apartment and chamber Chart α : (a mod,σ mod ) = ( F,σ) Def: For fixed σ X, the position relative σ is: pos(,σ) : X a mod ξ pos(ξ,σ) = α 1 (ξ)

78 Relative position (a mod,σ mod ) = reference model apartment and chamber Chart α : (a mod,σ mod ) = ( F,σ) Def: For fixed σ X, the position relative σ is: pos(,σ) : X a mod ξ pos(ξ,σ) = α 1 (ξ) G orbit W orbit

79 Relative position (a mod,σ mod ) = reference model apartment and chamber Chart α : (a mod,σ mod ) = ( F,σ) Def: For fixed σ X, the position relative σ is: pos(,σ) : X a mod G orbit ξ pos(ξ,σ) = α 1 (ξ) W orbit Example: (SL(3,R)/SO(3)) F = S 1 A reference chamber is equiv. to a flag (p,l) P 2 (P 2 ), p l l ref. chamber p

80 Example of relative position Example: (SL(3,R)/SO(3)) F = S 1 A reference chamber is equiv. to a flag (p,l) P 2 (P 2 ), p l There are two W -orbits of singular points (corresponding to pts /lines) {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l}

81 Example of relative position Example: (SL(3,R)/SO(3)) F = S 1 A reference chamber is equiv. to a flag (p,l) P 2 (P 2 ), p l There are two W -orbits of singular points (corresponding to pts /lines) {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l} {ξ G orbit pos(ξ,σ) = ctnt} Schubert cell (maybe not closed) {ξ G orbit pos(ξ,σ) = ctnt} Schubert cycle Want to remove certain Schubert cycles relative to chambers in Λ Ch (Γ)

82 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 }

83 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 } Example: {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l}

84 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 } Example: {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l} If η 0 is regular, then Wη 0 = W and is the Bruhat ordering on W Longest element w 0 W : σ mod and w 0 σ mod are antipodal (opposite)

85 Partial ordering in Weyl orbits Wη 0 a mod Weyl orbit, η 1,η 2 Wη 0 Def: η 1 η 2 if {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 1 } {ξ pos(ξ,σ) = η 2 } Example: {p p l, p p} l ref. chamber {l p l } p {p p l} {l p l, l l} If η 0 is regular, then Wη 0 = W and is the Bruhat ordering on W Longest element w 0 W : σ mod and w 0 σ mod are antipodal (opposite) Def: S Wη 0 closed if η 1 S and η 2 η 1 imply η 2 S {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} is closed if S is closed

86 Thickenings of limit set Γ G discrete and regular. S Wη 0 a mod closed (for ) Λ Ch (Γ) F X Def: S-Thickening of Λ Ch (Γ): Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S}

87 Thickenings of limit set Γ G discrete and regular. S Wη 0 a mod closed (for ) Λ Ch (Γ) F X Def: S-Thickening of Λ Ch (Γ): Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ S fat: Wη 0 = S w 0 S, where w 0 W is the longest element in W (we need to remove a sufficiently large set to have proper discontinuity)

88 Chamber conical and antipodal Def: A chamber σ Λ Ch (Γ) is conical if N R (V(x,σ)) Γx is infinite, for some R > 0, some (any) x X. x V(x,σ) γx σ X Def: Γ is antipodal if σ 1 σ 2 Λ Ch (Γ) are antipodal/opposite (pos(σ 1,σ 2 ) = w 0 σ mod, w 0 σ mod and σ mod antipodal in a mod ). σ mod w 0 σ mod Def: Γ < G discrete is RCA if regular, chamber conical and antipodal

89 Chamber conical and antipodal Def: A chamber σ Λ Ch (Γ) is conical if N R (V(x,σ)) Γx is infinite, for some R > 0, some (any) x X. x V(x,σ) γx σ X Def: Γ is antipodal if σ 1 σ 2 Λ Ch (Γ) are antipodal/opposite (pos(σ 1,σ 2 ) = w 0 σ mod, w 0 σ mod and σ mod antipodal in a mod ). Def: Γ < G discrete is RCA if regular, chamber conical and antipodal Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact S slim: S w 0 S =.

90 Chamber conical and antipodal Def: A chamber σ Λ Ch (Γ) is conical if N R (V(x,σ)) Γx is infinite, for some R > 0, some (any) x X. x V(x,σ) γx σ X Def: Γ is antipodal if σ 1 σ 2 Λ Ch (Γ) are antipodal/opposite (pos(σ 1,σ 2 ) = w 0 σ mod, w 0 σ mod and σ mod antipodal in a mod ). Def: Γ < G discrete is RCA if regular, chamber conical and antipodal Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact S slim: S w 0 S =. fat: S w 0 S = Wη 0. balanced = slim + fat Corollary: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and balanced, then Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a cocompact domain of discont.

91 Examples of thickenings X = SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) Wη 0 a mod rel positions of points in P n e.g. G ξ = σ mod = {F 0 F 1 F n 1 } reference chamber S k : points in F k fat ifk (n 1)/2 S k = slim ifk (n 1)/2 {( )} 0 0 0

92 Examples of thickenings X = SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) Wη 0 a mod rel positions of points in P n e.g. G ξ = σ mod = {F 0 F 1 F n 1 } reference chamber S k : points in F k fat ifk (n 1)/2 S k = slim ifk (n 1)/2 {( )} Wη 0 a mod orbit of rel )} positions of {(p,h) P n (P n ) p H} e.g. G ξ = {( S = {(p,h) p F i H for somei} is balanced

93 Examples of thickenings X = SL(n+1,R)/SO(n+1) Wη 0 a mod rel positions of points in P n e.g. G ξ = σ mod = {F 0 F 1 F n 1 } reference chamber S k : points in F k fat ifk (n 1)/2 S k = slim ifk (n 1)/2 {( )} Wη 0 a mod orbit of rel )} positions of {(p,h) P n (P n ) p H} e.g. G ξ = {( S = {(p,h) p F i H for somei} is balanced Also for X = SL(n+1,C)/SU(n+1)

94 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), H 2

95 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), Λ 0 = Γx H 2 H 2 Λ 0

96 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), Λ 0 = Γx H 2 H 2 Γ Isom + (H 2 ) = SO(2,1) SL(3,R) Q = H 2 = {[x 0 : x 1 : x 2 ] P 2 x 2 0 = x 2 1 +x 2 2} conic Γ is regular: Λ Ch = {(p,l) p Λ 0,l = T p Q} Ω = P 2 \{x x line tangent toqatλ 0 } is a domain of discontinuity for Γ

97 Example: Fuchsian subgroups Γ Isom + (H 2 ), Λ 0 = Γx H 2 H 2 Γ Isom + (H 2 ) = SO(2,1) SL(3,R) Q = H 2 = {[x 0 : x 1 : x 2 ] P 2 x 2 0 = x 2 1 +x 2 2} conic Γ is regular: Λ Ch = {(p,l) p Λ 0,l = T p Q} Ω = P 2 \{x x line tangent toqatλ 0 } is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Ω = Flag(P 2 )\{(p,l) p l, p Λ 0 orltangent toqatλ 0 } is a domain of disc. for Γ, cocompact when Γ cvx cocompact in H 2

98 Example of RCA: Veronese embedding Γ 0 < SL(2,C) discrete, H 3 /Γ 0 hyp. orbifold, Λ 0 P 1 (C) limit set Γ = Sym N (Γ 0 ) SL(N +1,C), Γ X = SL(N +1,C)/SU(N +1) Sym N : SL(2,C) SL(N +1,C) irreducible C N+1 = {p(x,y) C[x,y] homogeneous & deg(p(x,y)) = N} If C 2 = v 1,v 2, then Sym N (C 2 ) = v N 1,v N 1 1 v 2,,v N 2. Γ is regular, and it is RCA if Γ 0 convex cocompact.

99 Example of RCA: Veronese embedding Γ 0 < SL(2,C) discrete, H 3 /Γ 0 hyp. orbifold, Λ 0 P 1 (C) limit set Γ = Sym N (Γ 0 ) SL(N +1,C), Γ X = SL(N +1,C)/SU(N +1) Sym N : SL(2,C) SL(N +1,C) irreducible C N+1 = {p(x,y) C[x,y] homogeneous & deg(p(x,y)) = N} If C 2 = v 1,v 2, then Sym N (C 2 ) = v N 1,v N 1 1 v 2,,v N 2. Γ is regular, and it is RCA if Γ 0 convex cocompact. Veronese embedding φ : P 1 P N = P({p C[X,Y]homogeneous & degp = N}) [a : b] [(ax +by) N ] Λ ch (Γ) = { flags osculating toφ(λ 0 ) φ(p 1 )}

100 Example of RCA: Veronese embedding Γ 0 < SL(2,C) discrete, H 3 /Γ 0 hyp. orbifold, Λ 0 P 1 (C) limit set Γ = Sym N (Γ 0 ) SL(N +1,C), Γ X = SL(N +1,C)/SU(N +1) Γ is regular, and it is RCA if Γ 0 convex cocompact. Λ ch (Γ) = { flags osculating toφ(λ 0 ) φ(p 1 )} Theorem: For N > 2, Γ acts properly on P N \Osc [N/2] φ(λ 0 ) and cocompactly on P N \Osc [(N 1)/2] φ(λ 0 ) if Γ 0 convex cocompact Osc k = k-th osculating manifold (k = 1 is the tangent bundle, k = 2 planes approaching second order, etc) For N 1, Γ acts properly (cocompactly when Γ 0 cvx cocompact) on {(p,h) P N (P N ) p H, F i osc toφ(γ 0 ), p F i H}

101 Weak RCA subgroups One can weaken the regularity assumption working with simplices instead of chambers. eg limit sets are not full flags but only partial flags Can talk about weak-rca subgroups Theorem: Γ is weak-rca iff it is anosov (Anosov in the sense of Labourie and Guichard-Wienhard) Benoist: strictly convex projective groups are weak-rca Ω P n limit set in {(p,h) P n (P n ) p H}: Λ = {(p,h) p Ω,H tangent to Ω}

102 Sketch of proof of discontinuity Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Ω = Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S}

103 Sketch of proof of discontinuity Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Ω = Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Take ξ n Gξ 0, ξ n ξ, γ n Γ, γ n, and γ n ξ n ξ. Want to see that if ξ lies in Ω, then ξ doesn t

104 Sketch of proof of discontinuity Theorem: Γ G discrete and regular. If S is fat then Ω = Gξ 0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) is a domain of discontinuity for Γ Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Take ξ n Gξ 0, ξ n ξ, γ n Γ, γ n, and γ n ξ n ξ. Want to see that if ξ lies in Ω, then ξ doesn t Step 1: γ ±1 n σ ± Λ Ch (Γ) Step 2: If ˆσ F X is opposite to σ, then γ nˆσ σ + Assume ξ Ω, hence pos(ξ,σ ) / S pos(ξ n,σ ) / S pos(ξ n,ˆσ) S (S fat) pos(γ n ξ n,γ nˆσ) S pos(ξ,σ + ) S (S closed) Thus ξ / Ω.

105 Sketch of proof of cocompactness Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S}

106 Sketch of proof of cocompactness Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Step 1. Γ is expansive (à la Sullivan) on Λ Ch (Γ) F X by conicallity: For all σ Λ Ch (Γ) there are γ Γ, σ U F X, C > 1 st: d(γσ 1,γσ 2 ) > Cd(σ 1,σ 2 ) σ 1,σ 2 U Step 2. There is a fibration π : Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) Λ Ch (Γ) (that extends in a neighbhood in Gξ 0 ) by slimness and antipodality

107 Sketch of proof of cocompactness Theorem: Γ G RCA. If S Wη 0 closed and slim, then ( Gξ0 \Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) ) /Γ is compact Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) = σ Λ Ch (Γ) {ξ Gξ 0 pos(ξ,σ) S} Sketch of proof: Step 1. Γ is expansive (à la Sullivan) on Λ Ch (Γ) F X by conicallity: For all σ Λ Ch (Γ) there are γ Γ, σ U F X, C > 1 st: d(γσ 1,γσ 2 ) > Cd(σ 1,σ 2 ) σ 1,σ 2 U Step 2. There is a fibration π : Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)) Λ Ch (Γ) (that extends in a neighbhood in Gξ 0 ) by slimness and antipodality Then d(γπ 1 (σ 1 ),γπ 1 (σ 2 )) > Cd(π 1 (σ 1 ),π 1 (σ 2 )) σ 1,σ 2 U Which implies cocompactness (find a fundamental domain uniformly away from Th S (Λ Ch (Γ)))

108 Thank you for your attention

Coarse geometry of isometry groups of symmetric spaces

Coarse geometry of isometry groups of symmetric spaces Coarse geometry of isometry groups of symmetric spaces Joan Porti (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) August 12, 24 joint with Misha Kapovich and Bernhard Leeb, arxiv:1403.7671 Geometry on Groups and Spaces,

More information

Dynamics on flag manifolds: domains of proper discontinuity and cocompactness

Dynamics on flag manifolds: domains of proper discontinuity and cocompactness msp Geometry & Topology 22 (2018) 157 234 Dynamics on flag manifolds: domains of proper discontinuity and cocompactness MICHAEL KAPOVICH BERNHARD LEEB JOAN PORTI For noncompact semisimple Lie groups G

More information

An introduction to Higher Teichmüller theory: Anosov representations for rank one people

An introduction to Higher Teichmüller theory: Anosov representations for rank one people An introduction to Higher Teichmüller theory: Anosov representations for rank one people August 27, 2015 Overview Classical Teichmüller theory studies the space of discrete, faithful representations of

More information

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces Geometry of symmetric R-spaces Makiko Sumi Tanaka Geometry and Analysis on Manifolds A Memorial Symposium for Professor Shoshichi Kobayashi The University of Tokyo May 22 25, 2013 1 Contents 1. Introduction

More information

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI 1. Maximal Tori By a torus we mean a compact connected abelian Lie group, so a torus is a Lie group that is isomorphic to T n = R n /Z n. Definition 1.1.

More information

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction. 1. Riemannian symmetric spaces Definition 1.1. A (globally, Riemannian) symmetric space is a Riemannian manifold (X, g) such that for all x X, there exists an isometry s x Iso(X, g) such that s x (x) =

More information

Mostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and

Mostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and Mostow Rigidity W. Dison June 17, 2005 0 Introduction Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces We will be concerned with (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and (b) simply connected,

More information

BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP

BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 4, Number 1, June 2001, Pages 71 75 BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP HI-JOON CHAE Abstract. A Bruhat-Tits building

More information

Groups up to quasi-isometry

Groups up to quasi-isometry OSU November 29, 2007 1 Introduction 2 3 Topological methods in group theory via the fundamental group. group theory topology group Γ, a topological space X with π 1 (X) = Γ. Γ acts on the universal cover

More information

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT 1. The parallel transport We shall start with the geometric meaning of linear connections. Suppose M is a smooth manifold with a linear connection. Let γ : [a, b] M be

More information

SOME RECENT RESULTS ON ANOSOV REPRESENTATIONS

SOME RECENT RESULTS ON ANOSOV REPRESENTATIONS SOME RECENT RESULTS ON ANOSOV REPRESENTATIONS MICHAEL KAPOVICH, BERNHARD LEEB, JOAN PORTI Abstract. In this note we give an overview of some of our recent work on Anosov representations of discrete groups

More information

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras Lie Groups and Bundles 2014/15 BGSMath 1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras 1. Prove that O(n) is Lie group and that its tangent space at I O(n) is isomorphic to the space so(n) of skew-symmetric matrices

More information

CONVEX COCOMPACT GROUPS IN REAL RANK ONE AND HIGHER

CONVEX COCOMPACT GROUPS IN REAL RANK ONE AND HIGHER CONVEX COCOMPACT GROUPS IN REAL RANK ONE AND HIGHER FANNY KASSEL Notes for a talk at the GEAR workshop on Higher Teichmüller Thurston Theory, Northport, Maine, 23 30 June 2013 Let G be a real, connected,

More information

Bredon finiteness properties of groups acting on CAT(0)-spaces

Bredon finiteness properties of groups acting on CAT(0)-spaces Bredon finiteness properties of groups acting on CAT(0)-spaces Nansen Petrosyan KU Leuven Durham 2013 1 Goal: Discuss finiteness properties for E FIN G and E VC G when G acts isometrically and discretely

More information

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES ANDREAS ČAP AND KARIN MELNICK Abstract. We use the general theory developed in our article [1] in the setting of parabolic

More information

A strong Schottky Lemma for nonpositively curved singular spaces

A strong Schottky Lemma for nonpositively curved singular spaces A strong Schottky Lemma for nonpositively curved singular spaces To John Stallings on his sixty-fifth birthday Roger C. Alperin, Benson Farb and Guennadi A. Noskov January 22, 2001 1 Introduction The classical

More information

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 An introduction to arithmetic groups Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027, China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 June 27, 2006 Plan. 1. Examples of arithmetic groups

More information

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) March 14, 2011 Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) ()Intersection of stable and

More information

Kleinian groups Background

Kleinian groups Background Kleinian groups Background Frederic Palesi Abstract We introduce basic notions about convex-cocompact actions on real rank one symmetric spaces. We focus mainly on the geometric interpretation as isometries

More information

RIGIDITY OF INVARIANT CONVEX SETS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES

RIGIDITY OF INVARIANT CONVEX SETS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES RIGIDITY OF INVARIANT CONVEX SETS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES BRUCE KLEINER AND BERNHARD LEEB Abstract. The main result implies that a proper convex subset of an irreducible higher rank symmetric space cannot

More information

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces Sigurdur Helgason Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume 34 nsffvjl American Mathematical Society l Providence, Rhode Island PREFACE PREFACE TO THE

More information

1.3 Group Actions. Exercise Prove that a CAT(1) piecewise spherical simplicial complex is metrically flag.

1.3 Group Actions. Exercise Prove that a CAT(1) piecewise spherical simplicial complex is metrically flag. Exercise 1.2.6. Prove that a CAT(1) piecewise spherical simplicial complex is metrically flag. 1.3 Group Actions Definition 1.3.1. Let X be a metric space, and let λ : X X be an isometry. The displacement

More information

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries Comparison techniques for infinitesimal automorphisms of parabolic geometries University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Srni, January 2012 This talk reports on joint work in progress with Karin Melnick

More information

ASYMPTOTIC INVARIANTS OF HADAMARD MANIFOLDS. Mohamad A. Hindawi. A Dissertation. Mathematics

ASYMPTOTIC INVARIANTS OF HADAMARD MANIFOLDS. Mohamad A. Hindawi. A Dissertation. Mathematics ASYMPTOTIC INVARIANTS OF HADAMARD MANIFOLDS Mohamad A. Hindawi A Dissertation in Mathematics Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for

More information

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY 1. The Hopf-Rinow Theorem Recall that a Riemannian manifold (M, g) is called geodesically complete if the maximal defining interval of any geodesic is R. On the other

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 19 Nov 2009

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 19 Nov 2009 GLOBAL BEHAVIOR OF THE RICCI FLOW ON HOMOGENEOUS MANIFOLDS WITH TWO ISOTROPY SUMMANDS. arxiv:09.378v [math.dg] 9 Nov 009 LINO GRAMA AND RICARDO MIRANDA MARTINS Abstract. In this paper we study the global

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 4 Feb 2013

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 4 Feb 2013 BULGING DEFORMATIONS OF CONVEX RP 2 -MANIFOLDS arxiv:1302.0777v1 [math.dg] 4 Feb 2013 WILLIAM M. GOLDMAN Abstract. We define deformations of convex RP 2 -surfaces. A convex RP 2 -manifold is a representation

More information

Genericity of contracting elements in groups

Genericity of contracting elements in groups Genericity of contracting elements in groups Wenyuan Yang (Peking University) 2018 workshop on Algebraic and Geometric Topology July 29, 2018 Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Wenyuan Yang Genericity

More information

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding On the Harish-Chandra Embedding The purpose of this note is to link the Cartan and the root decompositions. In addition, it explains how we can view a Hermitian symmetric domain as G C /P where P is a

More information

ISOMETRY GROUPS OF CAT(0) CUBE COMPLEXES. 1. Introduction

ISOMETRY GROUPS OF CAT(0) CUBE COMPLEXES. 1. Introduction ISOMETRY GROUPS OF CAT(0) CUBE COMPLEXES COREY BREGMAN Abstract. Given a CAT(0) cube complex X, we show that if Aut(X) Isom(X) then there exists a full subcomplex of X which decomposes as a product with

More information

Moduli spaces and locally symmetric spaces

Moduli spaces and locally symmetric spaces p. 1/4 Moduli spaces and locally symmetric spaces Benson Farb University of Chicago Once it is possible to translate any particular proof from one theory to another, then the analogy has ceased to be productive

More information

Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University

Symmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University McGill University Sept 2010 What are Hermitian? A Riemannian manifold M is called a Riemannian symmetric space if for each point x M there exists an involution s x which is an isometry of M and a neighbourhood

More information

Random Walks on Hyperbolic Groups III

Random Walks on Hyperbolic Groups III Random Walks on Hyperbolic Groups III Steve Lalley University of Chicago January 2014 Hyperbolic Groups Definition, Examples Geometric Boundary Ledrappier-Kaimanovich Formula Martin Boundary of FRRW on

More information

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES ASIAN J. MATH. c 2008 International Press Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 289 298, September 2008 002 ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES RAUL QUIROGA-BARRANCO Abstract.

More information

An introduction to orbifolds

An introduction to orbifolds An introduction to orbifolds Joan Porti UAB Subdivide and Tile: Triangulating spaces for understanding the world Lorentz Center November 009 An introduction to orbifolds p.1/0 Motivation Γ < Isom(R n )

More information

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 4 Jun 2012

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 4 Jun 2012 The Higher Rank Rigidity Theorem for Manifolds With No Focal Points Jordan Watkins University of Michigan arxiv:1111.5428v2 [math.dg] 4 Jun 2012 October 27, 2018 Abstract. We say that a Riemannian manifold

More information

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS BRIAN COLLIER 1. Outiline The goal is to talk about semisimple Lie groups, mainly noncompact real semisimple Lie groups. This is a very broad subject so we will do our best to be

More information

CONVEX FUNCTIONS ON SYMMETRIC SPACES, SIDE LENGTHS OF POLYGONS AND THE STABILITY INEQUALITIES FOR WEIGHTED CONFIGURATIONS AT INFINITY

CONVEX FUNCTIONS ON SYMMETRIC SPACES, SIDE LENGTHS OF POLYGONS AND THE STABILITY INEQUALITIES FOR WEIGHTED CONFIGURATIONS AT INFINITY j. differential geometry 81 (2009) 297-354 CONVEX FUNCTIONS ON SYMMETRIC SPACES, SIDE LENGTHS OF POLYGONS AND THE STABILITY INEQUALITIES FOR WEIGHTED CONFIGURATIONS AT INFINITY Michael Kapovich, Bernhard

More information

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications

EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications EKT of Some Wonderful Compactifications and recent results on Complete Quadrics. (Based on joint works with Soumya Banerjee and Michael Joyce) Mahir Bilen Can April 16, 2016 Mahir Bilen Can EKT of Some

More information

Proper SL(2,R)-actions on homogeneous spaces

Proper SL(2,R)-actions on homogeneous spaces Proper SL(2,R)-actions on homogeneous spaces arxiv:1405.4167v3 [math.gr] 27 Oct 2016 Maciej Bocheński, Piotr Jastrzębski, Takayuki Okuda and Aleksy Tralle October 28, 2016 Abstract We study the existence

More information

COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II

COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II LECTURES BY JOACHIM SCHWERMER, NOTES BY TONY FENG Contents 1. Review 1 2. Lifting differential forms from the boundary 2 3. Eisenstein

More information

Fuchsian groups. 2.1 Definitions and discreteness

Fuchsian groups. 2.1 Definitions and discreteness 2 Fuchsian groups In the previous chapter we introduced and studied the elements of Mob(H), which are the real Moebius transformations. In this chapter we focus the attention of special subgroups of this

More information

arxiv: v2 [math.mg] 25 Oct 2015

arxiv: v2 [math.mg] 25 Oct 2015 Strongly transitive actions on Euclidean buildings arxiv:1506.03594v2 [math.mg] 25 Oct 2015 Linus Kramer and Jeroen Schillewaert Abstract We prove a decomposition result for a group G acting strongly transitively

More information

The Geometrization Theorem

The Geometrization Theorem The Geometrization Theorem Matthew D. Brown Wednesday, December 19, 2012 In this paper, we discuss the Geometrization Theorem, formerly Thurston s Geometrization Conjecture, which is essentially the statement

More information

GEODESIC PLANES IN GEOMETRICALLY FINITE MANIFOLDS OSAMA KHALIL

GEODESIC PLANES IN GEOMETRICALLY FINITE MANIFOLDS OSAMA KHALIL GEODESIC PLANES IN GEOMETRICALLY FINITE MANIFOLDS OSAMA KHALIL Abstract. We study the problem of rigidity of closures of totally geodesic plane immersions in geometrically finite manifolds containing rank

More information

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Hamburg,14-18 July 2008 1 The talk is based on a joint work with C.Medori and A.Tomassini (Parma) See ArXiv 0806.2272, where also a survey

More information

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms. Basic Notions: Jerusalem, March 2010 Birgit Speh Cornell University 1 Let G be a group and V a vector space.

More information

Hermitian Symmetric Spaces

Hermitian Symmetric Spaces Hermitian Symmetric Spaces Maria Beatrice Pozzetti Notes by Serena Yuan 1. Symmetric Spaces Definition 1.1. A Riemannian manifold X is a symmetric space if each point p X is the fixed point set of an involutive

More information

OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES

OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES KRISTOPHER TAPP Abstract. Examples of almost-positively and quasi-positively curved spaces of the form M = H\((G, h) F ) were discovered recently

More information

COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. Nigel Higson. Unpublished Note, 1999

COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. Nigel Higson. Unpublished Note, 1999 COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE Nigel Higson Unpublished Note, 1999 1. Introduction Let X be a discrete, bounded geometry metric space. 1 Associated to X is a C -algebra C (X) which

More information

INFINITE REDUCED WORDS AND THE TITS BOUNDARY OF A COXETER GROUP

INFINITE REDUCED WORDS AND THE TITS BOUNDARY OF A COXETER GROUP INFINITE REDUCED WORDS AND THE TITS BOUNDARY OF A COXETER GROUP THOMAS LAM AND ANNE THOMAS Abstract. Let (W, S) be a finite rank Coxeter system with W infinite. We prove that the limit weak order on the

More information

On lengths on semisimple groups

On lengths on semisimple groups On lengths on semisimple groups Yves de Cornulier May 21, 2009 Abstract We prove that every length on a simple group over a locally compact field, is either bounded or proper. 1 Introduction Let G be a

More information

arxiv: v4 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2015

arxiv: v4 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2015 SMOOTHING 3-DIMENSIONAL POLYHEDRAL SPACES NINA LEBEDEVA, VLADIMIR MATVEEV, ANTON PETRUNIN, AND VSEVOLOD SHEVCHISHIN arxiv:1411.0307v4 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2015 Abstract. We show that 3-dimensional polyhedral

More information

Lecture 4 - The Basic Examples of Collapse

Lecture 4 - The Basic Examples of Collapse Lecture 4 - The Basic Examples of Collapse July 29, 2009 1 Berger Spheres Let X, Y, and Z be the left-invariant vector fields on S 3 that restrict to i, j, and k at the identity. This is a global frame

More information

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy 1/13 Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy Thomas Leistner International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Évora, September 2 5, 2013 Outline 2/13 1 Lorentzian holonomy Holonomy

More information

Infinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings

Infinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings Infinite generation of non-cocompact lattices on right-angled buildings ANNE THOMAS KEVIN WORTMAN Let Γ be a non-cocompact lattice on a locally finite regular right-angled building X. We prove that if

More information

The Symmetric Space for SL n (R)

The Symmetric Space for SL n (R) The Symmetric Space for SL n (R) Rich Schwartz November 27, 2013 The purpose of these notes is to discuss the symmetric space X on which SL n (R) acts. Here, as usual, SL n (R) denotes the group of n n

More information

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009. Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009. Solutions (1) Let Γ be a discrete group acting on a manifold M. (a) Define what it means for Γ to act freely. Solution: Γ acts

More information

Euclidean Buildings. Guyan Robertson. Newcastle University

Euclidean Buildings. Guyan Robertson. Newcastle University Euclidean Buildings Guyan Robertson Newcastle University Contents 1 Overview of Buildings 2 Lattices, Coset Spaces, Normal Form 3 The Ãn 1 building of PGL n (F) 4 The Boundary 5 Ã 2 groups Part I Overview

More information

Compactifications of Margulis space-times

Compactifications of Margulis space-times 1/29 Compactifications of Margulis space-times Suhyoung Choi Department of Mathematical Science KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/ schoi email: schoi@math.kaist.ac.kr Geometry of Moduli Spaces

More information

Free Loop Cohomology of Complete Flag Manifolds

Free Loop Cohomology of Complete Flag Manifolds June 12, 2015 Lie Groups Recall that a Lie group is a space with a group structure where inversion and group multiplication are smooth. Lie Groups Recall that a Lie group is a space with a group structure

More information

Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups

Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups Bruhat Tits buildings and representations of reductive p-adic groups Maarten Solleveld Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen joint work with Ralf Meyer 26 November 2013 Starting point Let G be a reductive p-adic

More information

THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP AND A THEOREM OF MASUR-WOLF

THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP AND A THEOREM OF MASUR-WOLF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP AND A THEOREM OF MASUR-WOLF JOHN D. MCCARTHY AND ATHANASE PAPADOPOULOS Abstract. In [M-W], Masur and Wolf proved that the Teichmüller space of genus g > 1 surfaces with the Teichmüller

More information

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups An undergraduate approach to Lie theory Slide 1 Andrew Baker, Glasgow Glasgow, 12/11/1999 1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups A continuous g : V 1 V 2 with V k R m k open is called smooth if it is infinitely

More information

Killing fields of constant length on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds

Killing fields of constant length on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds Killing fields of constant length on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds Southern Mathematical Institute VSC RAS Poland, Bedlewo, 21 October 2015 1 Introduction 2 3 4 Introduction Killing vector fields (simply

More information

H-projective structures and their applications

H-projective structures and their applications 1 H-projective structures and their applications David M. J. Calderbank University of Bath Based largely on: Marburg, July 2012 hamiltonian 2-forms papers with Vestislav Apostolov (UQAM), Paul Gauduchon

More information

THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF THE DOUBLE OF THE FIGURE-EIGHT KNOT EXTERIOR IS GFERF

THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF THE DOUBLE OF THE FIGURE-EIGHT KNOT EXTERIOR IS GFERF THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF THE DOUBLE OF THE FIGURE-EIGHT KNOT EXTERIOR IS GFERF D. D. LONG and A. W. REID Abstract We prove that the fundamental group of the double of the figure-eight knot exterior admits

More information

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 21 Dec 2018

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 21 Dec 2018 Geometry of compact complex manifolds associated to generalized quasi-fuchsian representations arxiv:1704.01091v2 [math.gt] 21 Dec 2018 1 Introduction David Dumas and Andrew Sanders This paper is concerned

More information

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. LIE GROUPS, LIE ALGEBRAS, AND REPRESENTATIONS SPRING SEMESTER 2008 RICHARD A. WENTWORTH Contents 1. Lie groups and Lie algebras 2 1.1. Definition

More information

EXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS

EXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS EXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS These are the notes of a talk given by the author in Asheville at the workshop Higgs bundles and Harmonic maps in January 2015. It aims to sketch the proof of the

More information

Finsler bordifications of symmetric and certain locally symmetric spaces

Finsler bordifications of symmetric and certain locally symmetric spaces Finsler bordifications of symmetric and certain locally symmetric spaces Michael Kapovich, Bernhard Leeb July 5, 2017 Abstract We give a geometric interpretation of the maximal Satake compactification

More information

Math 249B. Tits systems

Math 249B. Tits systems Math 249B. Tits systems 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ + Φ, and let B be the unique Borel k-subgroup

More information

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications 1 University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Berlin, November 11, 2016 1 supported by project P27072 N25 of the Austrian Science

More information

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups Shrawan Kumar Talk given at AMS Sectional meeting held at Davidson College, March 2007 1 Hermitian eigenvalue

More information

REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES

REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES MAKIKO SUMI TANAKA 1. Introduction This article is based on the collaboration with Tadashi Nagano. In the first part of this article we briefly review basic

More information

VOLUME GROWTH AND HOLONOMY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE

VOLUME GROWTH AND HOLONOMY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE VOLUME GROWTH AND HOLONOMY IN NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE KRISTOPHER TAPP Abstract. The volume growth of an open manifold of nonnegative sectional curvature is proven to be bounded above by the difference between

More information

Definably amenable groups in NIP

Definably amenable groups in NIP Definably amenable groups in NIP Artem Chernikov (Paris 7) Lyon, 21 Nov 2013 Joint work with Pierre Simon. Setting T is a complete first-order theory in a language L, countable for simplicity. M = T a

More information

Dynamics of Group Actions and Minimal Sets

Dynamics of Group Actions and Minimal Sets University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder First Joint Meeting of the Sociedad de Matemática de Chile American Mathematical Society Special Session on Group Actions: Probability and Dynamics

More information

Tame definable topological dynamics

Tame definable topological dynamics Tame definable topological dynamics Artem Chernikov (Paris 7) Géométrie et Théorie des Modèles, 4 Oct 2013, ENS, Paris Joint work with Pierre Simon, continues previous work with Anand Pillay and Pierre

More information

DIAMETERS OF SPHERICAL ALEXANDROV SPACES AND CURVATURE ONE ORBIFOLDS

DIAMETERS OF SPHERICAL ALEXANDROV SPACES AND CURVATURE ONE ORBIFOLDS DIAMETERS OF SPHERICAL ALEXANDROV SPACES AND CURVATURE ONE ORBIFOLDS SARAH J. GREENWALD Abstract. Let G be a closed, non-transitive subgroup of O(n + 1), where n, and let Q n = S n /G. We will show that

More information

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP JAY TAYLOR 1 Examples of Lie Groups The following is adapted from [2] We begin with the basic definition and some core examples Definition A Lie group is a smooth

More information

INDUCED QUASI-ACTIONS: A REMARK. 1. Introduction

INDUCED QUASI-ACTIONS: A REMARK. 1. Introduction INDUCED QUASI-ACTIONS: A REMARK BRUCE KLEINER AND BERNHARD LEEB 1. Introduction In this note we observe that the notion of an induced representation has an analog for quasi-actions, and give some applications.

More information

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

Left-invariant Einstein metrics on Lie groups August 28, 2012 Differential Geometry seminar Department of Mathematics The Ohio State University these notes are posted at http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/ derdzinski.1/beamer/linv.pdf LEFT-INVARIANT

More information

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document. Exercises in Geometry I University of Bonn, Winter semester 2014/15 Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Néstor León Delgado The collection of exercises here presented corresponds to the exercises for the

More information

Naturally reductive homogeneous spaces classification and special geometries

Naturally reductive homogeneous spaces classification and special geometries Naturally reductive homogeneous spaces classification and special geometries Ana Cristina Ferreira CMAT - Universidade do Minho anaferreira@math.uminho.pt Symmetries in Geometry, Analysis and Spectral

More information

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 29 Aug 2005

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 29 Aug 2005 arxiv:math/0508562v1 [math.dg] 29 Aug 2005 Geometry and Dynamics of Discrete Isometry Groups of Higher Rank Symmetric Spaces Gabriele Link 25/08/2005 Abstract For real hyperbolic spaces, the dynamics of

More information

CONVEX COCOMPACTNESS IN PSEUDO-RIEMANNIAN HYPERBOLIC SPACES

CONVEX COCOMPACTNESS IN PSEUDO-RIEMANNIAN HYPERBOLIC SPACES CONVEX COCOMPACTNESS IN PSEUDO-RIEMANNIAN HYPERBOLIC SPACES JEFFREY DANCIGER, FRANÇOIS GUÉRITAUD, AND FANNY KASSEL To Bill Goldman on his 60th birthday Abstract. Anosov representations of word hyperbolic

More information

Ricci-flat metrics on complex cones

Ricci-flat metrics on complex cones Ricci-flat metrics on complex cones Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow & Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (AEI), Potsdam-Golm, Germany Quarks 2014, Suzdal, 3 June 2014 arxiv:1405.2319 1/20

More information

A genus 2 characterisation of translation surfaces with the lattice property

A genus 2 characterisation of translation surfaces with the lattice property A genus 2 characterisation of translation surfaces with the lattice property (joint work with Howard Masur) 0-1 Outline 1. Translation surface 2. Translation flows 3. SL(2,R) action 4. Veech surfaces 5.

More information

We will outline two proofs of the main theorem:

We will outline two proofs of the main theorem: Chapter 4 Higher Genus Surfaces 4.1 The Main Result We will outline two proofs of the main theorem: Theorem 4.1.1. Let Σ be a closed oriented surface of genus g > 1. Then every homotopy class of homeomorphisms

More information

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies Misha Verbitsky Géométrie des variétés complexes IV CIRM, Luminy, Oct 26, 2010 1 Hyperkähler manifolds DEFINITION: A hyperkähler structure on a manifold M

More information

An introduction to the geometry of homogeneous spaces

An introduction to the geometry of homogeneous spaces Proceedings of The Thirteenth International Workshop on Diff. Geom. 13(2009) 121-144 An introduction to the geometry of homogeneous spaces Takashi Koda Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University

More information

Z n -free groups are CAT(0)

Z n -free groups are CAT(0) Z n -free groups are CAT(0) Inna Bumagin joint work with Olga Kharlampovich to appear in the Journal of the LMS February 6, 2014 Introduction Lyndon Length Function Let G be a group and let Λ be a totally

More information

(2012) arxiv joint: Darren Long, Stephan Tillmann

(2012) arxiv joint: Darren Long, Stephan Tillmann Projective Structures on Manifolds Daryl Cooper U.C.S.B September 19, 2013 (2012) arxiv 1109.0585 joint: Darren Long, Stephan Tillmann M n (G,X) = geometric structure X φ ψ ψ φ 1 G dev : M X hol : π 1

More information

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 1. Conformal change of Riemannian metrics [3 points] Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. A conformal change is a nonnegative function λ : M (0, ). Such a function defines

More information

Uncertainty principles for the Schrödinger equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type

Uncertainty principles for the Schrödinger equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type Uncertainty principles for the Schrödinger equation on Riemannian symmetric spaces of the noncompact type Angela Pasquale Université de Lorraine Joint work with Maddala Sundari Geometric Analysis on Euclidean

More information

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Ivan C.H. Ip Update: May 16, 2017 5 Review of Root Systems In this section, let us have a brief introduction to root system and finite Lie type classification

More information

Left-invariant metrics and submanifold geometry

Left-invariant metrics and submanifold geometry Left-invariant metrics and submanifold geometry TAMARU, Hiroshi ( ) Hiroshima University The 7th International Workshop on Differential Geometry Dedicated to Professor Tian Gang for his 60th birthday Karatsu,

More information

ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM. Hee Oh

ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM. Hee Oh ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM Hee Oh Abstract. In this paper, we generalize Margulis s S-arithmeticity theorem to the case when S can be taken as an infinite set of primes. Let R be

More information

A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds

A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds arxiv:math/0312251v1 [math.dg] 12 Dec 2003 A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds Haibao Duan Institute of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, dhb@math.ac.cn

More information