Physics 214 UCSD/225a UCSB Lecture 11 Finish Halzen & Martin Chapter 4

Transcription

1 Physics 24 UCSD/225a UCSB Lecture Finish Halzen Martin Chapter 4 origin of the propagator Halzen Martin Chapter 5 Continue Review of Dirac Equation Halzen Martin Chapter 6 start with it if time permits

2 Origin of propagator When we discussed perturbation theory a few lectures ago, we did what some call old fashioned perturbation theory. It was not covariant We required momentum conservation at vertex but not Energy conservation At second order, we need to consider time ordered products. When you do this more modern Fully covariant 4-momentum is conserved at each vertex However, propagating particles are off-shell This is what you ll learn in QFT!

3 Spinless massive propagator HM has a more detailed discussion for how to go from a time ordered 2nd order perturbation theory to get the propagator. Here, we simply state the result: p + p 2 =! m 2 p 2! m 2 A B For more details see Halzen Martin

4 HM Chapter 5 Review of Dirac Equation Dirac s Quandery Notation Reminder Dirac Equation for free particle Mostly an exercise in notation Define currents Make a complete list of all possible currents Aside on Helicity Operator Solutions to free particle Dirac equation are eigenstates of Helicity Operator Aside on handedness

5 Dirac s Quandery Can there be a formalism that allows wave functions that satisfy the linear and quadratic equations simultaneously: H! = "!" p!" + #m! H 2! = P 2 + m 2! If such a thing existed then the linear equation would provide us with energy eigenvalues that automatically satisfy the relativistic energy momentum relationship

6 Dirac s Quandery 2 Such a thing does indeed exist: Wave function is a 4 component object! i = # " i " i # = I *I α is thus a 3-vector of 4x4 matrices with special commutator relationships like the Pauli matrices. While β is a diagonal 4x4 matrix as shown. "! = " ;! # 2 = i " ;! # i 3 = " ; I = # #

7 The rest is history In the following I provide a very limited reminder of notation and a few facts. If these things don t sound familiar, then I encourage you to work through ch. 5 carefully.

8 Notation Reminder Sigma Matrices: "! = " ;! 2 = i " ;! 3 = " ; I = # # i # # Gamma Matrices: #! = I # ;! j =,2,3 j =,2,3 # = ;! 5 = I "I " j =,2,3 I State Vectors: "..! = ;!! T * =..... #.

9 Notation Reminder 2 Obvious statements about gamma matrices! j =,2,5T =! j =,2,5 ;! j =,3T = "! j =,3! j =,5T * =! j =,5 ;! j =,2,3T * = "! j =,2,3 Probability density!"! =! T *! =##! "! T * # Scalar product of gamma matrix and 4-vector A! " µ A µ = " A # " A # " 2 A 2 # " 3 A 3 Is again a 4-vector

10 Dirac Equation of free particle i! µ " # m = µ i" µ! µ + m = Ansatz:! = e "ipx u p Explore this in restframe of particle: # #! + 2 = 2me "imt ;! " 2 = 2me "imt ; Normalization chosen to describe 2E particles, as usual.

11 Particle vs antiparticle in restframe # #! + 2 = 2me "imt ;! " 2 = 2me "imt ; particle Recall, particle -> antiparticle means E,p -> -E,-p Let s take a look at Energy Eigenvalues: " # mi!mi u = Eu Hu =!!" p!" + "mu = Eu for p= we get this equation to satisfy by the energy eigenvectors It is thus obvious that 2 of the solutions have E <, and are the lower two components of the 4-component object u.

12 Particle Anti-particle! + 2 = 2me "imt # ;! " 2 = 2me "imt # ;! + 2 = 2me "imt # ;! " 2 = 2me "imt # ; Negative energy solution Positive energy solution

13 Not in restframe this becomes: Hu =!!"!" p + "mu = Eu Hu = m #!"!"!" p #!" * p m u = Eu The lower 2 components are thus coupled to the upper 2 via this matrix equation, leading to free particle and antiparticle solutions as follows.

14 Anti-Particle not in restframe! + 2 = Ne "ipx # p E + m ;! " 2 = Ne "ipx # p E + m! + 2 = Ne +ipx "# p E +m ;! " 2 = Ne +ipx "# p E +m I suggest you read up on this in HM chapter 5 if you re not completely comfortable with it.

15 What we learned so far: Dirac Equation has 4 solutions for the same p: Two with E> Two with E< The E< solutions describe anti-particles. The additional 2-fold ambiguity describes spin +-/2. You will show this explicitly in Exercise HM 5.4, which is part of HW next week. We thus have a formalism to describe all the fundamental spin /2 particles in nature.

16 Helicity Operator The helicity operator commutes with both H and P. Helicity is thus conserved for the free spin /2 particle. 2 "!"! # p #!"! # p The unit vector here is the axis with regard to which we define the helicity. For,,, i.e. the Z-axis, we get the desired +-/2 eigenvalues. #! 3 = "

17 Dirac Equation for particle and anti-particle spinors It s sometimes notationally convenient to write the antiparticle spinor solution i.e. the -p,-e as an explicit Antiparticle spinor that satisfies a modified dirac equation:! µ p µ " mu =! µ p µ + mv = particle antiparticle The v-spinor then has positive energy. We won t be using v-spinors in this course. HM Equation 5.33 and 5.34

18 Antiparticles We will stick to the antiparticle description we introduced in chapter 4: e - e - p,e -p,-e Initial state e + e - is an initial state e - e - with the positron being an electron going in the wrong direction, i.e. backwards in time.

19 Some more reflections on γ µ There are exactly 5 distinct γ matrices: #! = I # ;! j =,2,3 j =,2,3 # = ;! 5 = I "I " j =,2,3 I! 5 " i!!! 2! 3 Where Every one of them multiplied with itself gives the unit matrix. As a result, any product of 5 of them can be expressed as a product of 3 of them.

20 Currents Any bi-linear quantity can be a current as long as it has the most general form:! 4x4! By finding all possible forms of this type, using the gamma-matrices as a guide, we can form all possible currents that can be within this formalism.

21 The possible currents!!!" 5!!" µ!!" 5 " µ! scalar pseudo-scalar vector pseudo-vector or axial-vector! i 2 " µ " # " # " µ! tensor

22 Chapter 6 Electrodynamics of Spin-/2 particles.

23 Spinless vs Spin /2! t, x = Ne "ip µ x µ! t, x = u pe "ip µ x µ J µ =!ie" # µ "! µ " # " T fi =!i J µ fi A µ d 4 x + Oe 2 J µ =!e"# µ " T fi =!i J µ fi A µ d 4 x + Oe 2 We basically make a substitution of the vertex factor: p + p! u f i f " u µ µ i And all else in calculating M 2 remains the same.

24 Example: e - e - scattering For Spinless i.e. bosons we showed: " M =!e p 2 A + p C µ p B + p D µ # p A! p C µ p B + p C µ p A! p D + p A + p D 2 2 For Spin /2 we thus get: # M =!e u c" µ u 2 A u D " µ u B p A! p C µ u A u C " µ u B p A! p D! u D" 2 2 Minus sign comes from fermion exchange!!!

25 Spin Averaging The M from previous page includes spinors in initial and final state. In many experimental situations, in particular in hadron collissions, you neither fix initial nor final state spins. We thus need to form a spin averaged amplitude squared before we can compare with experiment: M 2 = 2s A + 2s B +! M 2 = 4 spin! spin M 2 A B C D

26 Spin Averaging in non-relativistic limit Incoming e - : Outgoing e - :! # s= +/ 2 u = 2m# # # " u s=/ 2 = 2m Reminder: #! = I "I #! j =,2,3 j =,2,3 = " j =,2,3 # u! u = 2m if µ = " s i = s f f µ i otherwise

27 Invariant variables s,t,u Example: e- e- -> e- e- s = p A + p B 2 = 4 k 2 + m 2 A C t = p A - p C 2 = -2 k 2 - cosθ B D u = p A - p D 2 = -2 k 2 + cosθ k = k i = k f m = m e θ = scattering angle, all in com frame.

28 Invariant variables s,t,u s = p A + p B 2 = 4 k 2 + m 2 A C B D B,D are antiparticles! p B thus negative, leading to the + in p A +p B. k = k i = k f m = m e θ = scattering angle, all in com frame.

29 M for Different spin combos # M =!e u c" µ u 2 A u D " µ u B t! u D" µ u A u C " µ u B u [u c " µ u A u D " µ u B ] *+* = 4m 2 [u D " µ u A u C " µ u B ] = 4m 2 *+* [u c " µ u A u D " µ u B ] *+* = etc. M 2 = 4 4m2 e 2 " 2 2 * t! # u 2 + t u 2,

30 M for Different spin combos # u M =!e 2 c " µ u A u D " µ u B t! u D" µ u A u C " µ u B u A B C D A B C D t 2 And alike for the other permutations. u 2 A B C D " # t! u 2

31

32

33