Chapter 1. Vector Measures. 1.1 Elementary properties
|
|
- Susanna Christina Day
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter Vector Measures In this chapter we present a survey of known results about vector measures. For the convenience of the readers some of the results are given with proofs, but neither results nor proofs pretend to be ours. The only exception is the material of Section.5 that covers the results of our joint paper with V. M. Kadets [8].. Elementary properties The results of this section may be found in [7]. Definition.. A function µ from a field F of subsets of a set Ω to a Banach space X is called a finitely additive vector measure, or simply a vector measure, if whenever A and A 2 are disjoint members of F then µ (A A 2 )=µ(a )+µ(a 2 ). ( ) If in addition µ A n = µ (A n ) in the norm topology of X n= n= for all sequences (A n ) of pairwise disjoint members of F such that A n F,thenµis termed a countably additive vector measure, or n= simply µ is countably additive. Example..2 Finitely additive and countably additive vector measures. Let Σ be a σ-field of subsets of a set Ω, λ be a nonnegative countably additive measure on Σ. Consider p. Define 3
2 4 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES µ p :Σ L p (Ω, Σ,λ)bytheruleµ p (A)=χ A for each set A Σ (χ A denotes the characteristic function of A). It is easy to see that µ p is a vector measure, which is countably additive in the case p< and fails to be countably additive in the case p =. Definition..3 A vector measure µ : F X is said to be nonatomic if for every set A F with µ (A) 0there exist A,A 2 F \ Ø such that A A 2 = A and µ (A i ) 0(,2). Definition..4 Let µ : F X be a vector measure. The variation of µ is the nonnegative function µ whose value on a set A F is given by µ (A) =sup µ(b), π B π where the supremum is taken over all partitions π of A into a finite number of pairwise disjoint members of F.If µ (Ω) <, then µ will be called a measure of bounded variation. The semivariation of µ is the extended nonnegative function µ whose value on a set A F is given by µ (A) =sup{ x µ (A) :x X, x }, where x µ is the variation of the real-valued measure x µ. Example..5 A measure of bounded variation. Let µ be the measure discussed in Example..2. Since µ (A) λ(a), it is plain that µ (A) λ (A), so that µ is of bounded variation. The next proposition presents two basic facts about the semivariation of a vector measure. Proposition..6 Let µ : F X be a vector measure. A F one has (a) µ (A) = sup {ε n},π B n π Then for ε n µ (B n ), where the supremum is taken over all partitions π of A into a finite number of pairwise disjoint members of F and over all finite collections {ε n } satisfying ε n ;
3 .. ELEMENTARY PROPERTIES 5 (b) sup{ µ(b) : A B F } µ (A) 2sup{ µ(b) : A B F }. Consequently a vector measure is of bounded semivariation on Ω if and only if its range is bounded in X. It is easy to define the integral of a bounded measurable function with respect to a bounded vector measure. To this end, let F be a field of subsets of a set Ω and µ : F X be a bounded vector measure. If f is a scalar-valued simple function, say f = n α i χ Ai,whereα i are nonzero scalars and A,..., A n are pairwise disjoint members of F, define T µ (f) = n α i µ (A i ). It is easy to show that this formula defines a linear operator T µ from the space of simple functions of the above form into X. Moreover,iffis as above and β =sup{ f (ω) : ω Ω}, then n n T µ (f) = α i µ (A i ) = β α i β µ (A i) β µ (Ω). by Proposition..6 (a). Thus T µ is a continuous linear operator, which acts on the space of simple functions on F, equipped with the supremum norm. Another look at the Proposition..6 (a) and the above calculations shows that T µ = µ (Ω) (.) Then T µ has a unique continuous linear extension, still denoted by T µ, to B (µ), the space of all scalar-valued functions on Ω that are uniform limits of simple functions modeled on F. (Note that in the case F is a σ-field, B (µ) is precisely the familiar space of bounded F -measurable scalar-valued functions defined on Ω). This discussion allows us to make Definition..7 Let F be a field of subsets of a set Ω and µ : F X be a bounded vector measure. For each f B (µ), the integral fdµ is defined by fdµ = T µ (f), where T µ is as above.
4 6 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES It is easy to see that this integral is linear in f (and also in µ) and satisfies fdµ f µ (Ω). Moreover, if x X,thenx fdµ = fdx µ; indeed, for simple functions this equality is trivial and density of simple functions in B (µ) proves the identity for all f B (µ). Definition..8 A family {µ τ : F X τ T } of countably additive vector measures is said to be uniformly countably additive whenever for any sequence (A n ) of pairwise disjoint members of F, the series µ τ (A n ) converges in norm uniformly in τ T. n= There are many alternative and useful formulations of countable additivity. We present two of them. Proposition..9 Any one of the following statements about a vector measure µ defined on a field F implies all the others. (i) µ is countably additive. (ii)theset{x µ:x X, x }is uniformly countably additive. (iii) Theset{ x µ : x X, x }is uniformly countably additive..2 Bartle-Dunford-Schwartz theorem The results of this section may be found in [7]. Definition.2. Let F be a field of subsets of a set Ω, µ : F X be a vector measure, and λ be a finite nonnegative real-valued measure on F. If µ (A) =0, then µ is called λ-continuous and this is lim λ(a) 0 denoted by µ λ. Sometimes we will say µ is absolutely continuous with respect to λ.
5 .2. BARTLE-DUNFORD-SCHWARTZ THEOREM 7 It should be noted that writing µ λ is not the same as saying µ vanishes on λ-null sets unless both λ and µ are countably additive and defined on a σ-field. Theorem.2.2 (Pettis) Let Σ be a σ-field of subsets of a set Ω, µ :Σ Xbe a countably additive vector measure, and λ be a finite nonnegative real-valued measure on Σ. Then µ is λ-continuous if and only if µ vanishes on sets of λ-measure zero. Proof. To prove the sufficiency, suppose µ vanishes on sets of λ- measure zero, but lim µ (A) > 0. Then there exist an ε>0anda λ(a) 0 sequence (A n ) in Σ, such that µ (A n ) εand λ (A n ) 2 n for all n. Foreachnselect an x n X such that x n and x nµ(a n ) ε 2. As µ is countably additive on Σ, then in accordance with Proposition..9 the set { x µ : x X, x }is uniformly countably additive. Now set B n = ( ) A i.evidentlyλ B n = 0. Consequently µ i=n n= vanishes on every set D Σ that is contained in B n = B. It follows n= that x µ (B) =0. Let C = Ω \ B and C n+ = B n \ B n+ for all n. Then (C n ) constitutes a sequence of pairwise disjoint members of Σ for which B n \ B = C i. i=n Also, since x n µ (B) = 0 for all n, one has ( ) lim x m n µ (B m) = lim x m n µ C i = lim x m n µ (C i)=0 i=m i=m uniformly in n, by the uniform countable additivity of the family { x n µ }. But now x n µ (B n ) x n µ (A n ) x n µ (A n ) ε 2.
6 8 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES This contradicts the last calculation and proves the sufficiency; the converse is transparent. The following theorem is central to the theory of vector measures. Theorem.2.3 (Bartle-Dunford-Schwartz) Let µ be a bounded countably additive vector measure defined on a σ-field Σ. Then there exists a nonnegative real-valued countably additive measure λ on Σ such that µ is absolutely continuous with respect to λ. Ifµis nonatomic, then λ can be chosen nonatomic. (λ can be chosen such that 0 λ(a) µ (A) for all A Σ.) Corollary.2.4 Let Σ be a σ-field, µ :Σ Xbe a bounded countably additive vector measure, λ be a measure from Theorem.2.3. Then there exist an operator T : L (λ) X, which is continuous for the weak topology on L (λ) and weak topology on X such that Tχ A = µ(a) for any A Σ. Proof. Define T : L (λ) X by Tf = fdµ. Then for each Ω x X, one has x Tf = fdx µ = f dx µ dλ dλ, where dx µ/dλ = g x L (λ) is the Radon-Nikodym derivative of x µ with respect to λ. If (f α )isanetinl (λ)convergingweak to f 0, then for each x X, lim α x Tf α = lim α f α g x dλ = f 0 g x dλ = x Tf 0, i.e., (Tf α ) converges weakly to Tf 0. Hence T is a weak to weak continuous linear operator. Corollary.2.5 (Bartle-Dunford-Schwartz) Let µ be a bounded countably additive vector measure on a σ-field Σ. Then µ has a relatively weakly compact range. Proof. Let T be the operator from Corollary.2.4. It follows that T maps the weak compact set {f L (λ) : f }ontoaweakly compact set R X. But now {µ (A) :A Σ}={T(x A ):A Σ} {T(f): f } R, and the proof is complete.
7 .3. LYAPUNOV S CONVEXITY THEOREM 9 Corollary.2.6 Let µ and λ be as in Corollary.2.4. Then co (µ (Σ)) = fdµ :0 f,f L (λ). Ω Proof. Let U = {f L (λ) :0 f } and V = Ω fdµ : f U. Note that U is weak compact and { A : A Σ} =exu(where ex U is the set of the extreme points of U). By the Krein-Milman theorem U = co w (ex U). Then a glance at Corollary.2.4 proves that V = co (µ (Σ)). The following theorem shows that the measure λ from the Bartle- Dunford-Schwartz theorem may be taken of the form x µ for a certain x X. Theorem.2.7 (Rybakov) Letµ:Σ Xbe a countably additive vector measure. Then there is x X such that µ x µ..3 Lyapunov s convexity theorem The results of this section may be found in [7]. One of the most important results in the theory of vector measures is the Lyapunov convexity theorem which states that the range of a nonatomic vector measures with values in a finite dimensional space is compact and convex. As it was mentioned above, this theorem fails in every infinite dimensional Banach space. Example.3. (Uhl) A nonatomic vector measure of bounded variation whose range is closed but nonconvex and noncompact. Let Σ be the Borel sets in [0, ] and λ be Lebesgue measure. Define µ :Σ L (λ)byµ(a)=χ A.IfΠ Σ is a partition of [0, ], it is evident that A Π µ (A) = A Π λ (A) =. Since every L -convergent sequence contains an almost everywhere convergent subsequence, µ (Σ)
8 0 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES is closed in L (λ). To see that µ (Σ) is not a convex set, note that χ 2 [0,] co µ (Σ) while if A Σ µ (A) 2 χ [0,] =[µ([0, ] \E)+µ(E)] /2 = 2. To see that µ (Σ) is not compact let A n = {t [0, ] : sin (2 n πt) > 0} for each positive integer n. A brief computation shows that µ (A n ) µ (A m ) = 2 for m n. Hence µ (Σ) is not compact. Example.3. suggests that nonatomicity may not be a very strong property of vector measures from the point of view of the Lyapunov theorem in the infinite dimensional context. Let us attempt to understand what nonatomicity means. Let µ :Σ R n have the form µ (A) =(λ (A),...,λ n (A)),A Σ, where each λ i is a countably additive finite signed scalar measure on Σ. Set λ (A) = n λ k (A). Then µ (A) 0 if and only if λ (A) 0. k= Now if µ is nonatomic, then λ is nonatomic. Consequently, if A Σandλ(A)>0 the mapping on the infinite dimensional subspace {fχ A : f L (λ)} that takes f into fdµis never one-to-one. We will A see that in the infinite dimensional case, this latter condition is precisely what is needed to make the Lyapunov theorem work. Throughout, Σ is a σ-field of subsets of Ω and X is a Banach space. Theorem.3.2 (Knowles; Lyapunov convexity theorem in the weak topology) Letµ:Σ Xbe a countably additive vector measure and λ be a finite nonnegative countably additive measure on Σ from Theorem.2.3. The following statements are equivalent. (i) If A Σ and λ (A) > 0, then the operator f fdµ on L (λ) is A not one-to-one on the subspace of functions in L (λ) vanishing off A.
9 .3. LYAPUNOV S CONVEXITY THEOREM (ii) For each A Σ, {µ (B A) :B Σ}is a weakly compact convex set in X. (iii) If 0 f L (λ), there exists a function g L (λ) such that fg > 0 but fgdµ =0. Ω Proof. Note that (iii) implies (i). To show that (i) implies (iii) let f L (λ), f > 0. Then there is an ε>0anda Σ such that fχ A >εand µ (A) > 0. According to (i), there is an h L (λ) such that hχ A > 0and Ahdµ =0. Setg=h/f on A and g =0offA. Then fg = h on A and so fgχ A > 0. Also fgdµ = hdµ =0. Ω A Hence (iii) holds. To check that (ii) implies (i), suppose (i) is false. Without loss of generality, we can assume that A = Ω, so that the operator f fdµ (f L (λ)) is one-to-one. It is not difficult to see that this A { } means that µ (Σ) = χ A dµ : A Σ is a proper subset of the set { Ω } V = fdµ : f L (λ),0 f. But by Corollary.2.6, V = Ω co (µ (Σ)); thus µ (Σ) cannot be both closed and convex. Hence (ii) is false. To complete the proof, we shall verify that (iii) implies (ii) again. It is enough to show that µ (Σ) is convex and weakly compact. Let f L (λ) be such that 0 f. Since by Corollary.2.4 the operator ( ) dµ is continuous for the weak topology on L (λ) and Ω the weak topology on X, theset H= g L (λ):0 g, fdµ = gdµ is a weak compact convex set in L (λ) and therefore has extreme points. If we can show that the extreme points of H, denoted by ext (H), are all in {χ A : A Σ} it will follow that there exists A Σ such that µ (A) = fdµ. Then an appeal to Corollary.2.6 will yield Ω Ω Ω
10 2 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES the equalities co (µ (Σ)) = Ω fdµ : f L (λ),0 f = µ(σ) and prove that µ (Σ) is weakly compact and convex. To this end, suppose f 0 ext (H) but f 0 χ A > 0 for each A Σ. A simple calculation shows that there exists f L (λ) with f > 0 such that 0 f 0 ± f. An appeal to (iii) gives us a g L (λ), that may be selected with g such that f g > 0 but f g dµ =0. Thenf 0 ±f g H;thusf 0 is not an Ω extreme point of H. This completes the proof. Note that in light of the remarks before Theorem.3.2 the classical Lyapunov theorem is contained in this theorem; in fact, the above proof of (iii) (ii) inthecasex=r n is Lindenstrauss s argument [23] to prove the Lyapunov theorem. Theorem.3.3 (Lyapunov) Let Σbe a σ-field of subsets of Ω, X be a finite dimensional Banach space and µ :Σ Xbe a countably additive vector measure. If µ is nonatomic, then the range of µ is a compact convex subset of X. Corollary.3.4 Let Σ be the σ-field of Borel subsets of [0, ]. IfXis an infinite dimensional Banach space, then there is a countably additive vector measure of bounded variation µ :Σ X and a set A Σ such that {µ (B A) :B Σ}is not a weakly compact convex set in X. Proof. Let λ be Lebesgue measure on Σ. Select a sequence (f n )in L (λ) such that f n = and the only g L (λ) with f n gdλ =0 for all n is g = 0. Choose a sequence of pairs (x n,x n) such that x n X, x n X, x m (x n ) = 0 if m n and x n (x n ) = for all n. Define T : L (λ) X by ( T (g) = x n 2 n x n ) f n gdλ. n= [0,] [0,]
11 .4. l p -VALUED MEASURES 3 If T (g) =0,thenx n T(g)=( 2 n x n ) [0,] f n gdλ = 0 for all n. Hence T is one-to-one on L (λ). To produce the advertised measure, define µ (A) =T(χ A ) for A Σ. It is not hard to see that µ is countably additive and T (.) = (.) dµ. Hence µ violates (i) of Theorem.3.2. [0,] By Theorem.3.2, µ is as advertised..4 l p -valued measures The main results of this section are contained in [7]. Another way of generalizing the Lyapunov convexity theorem is considering the closure of the range of the vector measure in the norm topology. Further by an X-valued vector measure we mean a countably additive vector measure µ defined on a σ-field Σ of subsets of a set Ω. Definition.4. A nonatomic X-valued vector measure µ is said to be Lyapunov if the closure of its range is convex. In 969 Uhl [7] proved the following theorem. Theorem.4.2 Let Σ be a σ-field of subsets of Ω and suppose X has the Radon-Nikodym property. If µ :Σ X is a nonatomic and countably additive measure of bounded variation, then µ is a Lyapunov measure. If we waive the requirement that the variation be bounded, then Uhl s theorem no longer holds, in particular there exists a nonatomic measure with values in a Hilbert space such that the closure of its range is not convex. (It is enough to consider the measure µ 2 from Example..2.) In 99 V. M. Kadets and M. M. Popov [6] obtained the following strengthening of this result. Theorem.4.3 The following conditions are equivalent for the space X:
12 4 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES. Each nonatomic X-valued measure of bounded variation is a Lyapunov measure; 2. There does not exist a sign-embedding of the space L [0, ] in X. Definition.4.4 A Banach space X is said to have the Lyapunov property if every nonatomic countably additive vector measure with values in X is a Lyapunov measure. As already mentioned above, an infinite dimensional Hilbert space does not have the Lyapunov property. Consequently, all spaces containing isomorphic copies of the space l 2 do not have the Lyapunov property; in particular, L p [0, ], C [0, ], l do not have the Lyapunov property. Nevertheless, spaces having the Lyapunov property exist. In 992 V. M. Kadets and G. Schechtman proved that l p ( p<, p 2)andc 0 have the Lyapunov property [7]. Before proving this result we need some lemmas. Lemma.4.5 If the measure µ is not a Lyapunov measure, then there exist a number ε>0and a set V Σ such that µ (U) µ (V 2 ) ε for any subset U Σ V (here and below, Σ V denotes the family of elements of the σ-algebra Σ that are subsets of the set V : the restriction of Σ to V ). Proof. Assume the contrary, i.e., assume that for any ε>0andany V Σ there exists a U V such that µ (U) µ (V ) 2 <ε. Let x and y be arbitrary elements of µ (Σ), x = µ (A), y = µ (B). We prove that (x + y) /2 µ (Σ). This means that µ is a Lyapunov measure, contrary to assumption. We choose U ε A \ B and U 2 ε B \ A such that 2 µ (A \ B) µ (U ) ε <ε, 2 µ(b\a) µ(uε 2) <ε. Then (x + y) µ (W ε ) 2ε for the set W ε = U ε 2 U2 ε (A B), i.e., (x + y) /2 can be approximated by values of the measure to any degree of accuracy. The lemma is proved.
13 .4. l p -VALUED MEASURES 5 Lemma.4.6 Suppose that λ is a nonatomic positive numerical measure on Σ, and µ :Σ Xis a vector valued measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to λ but is not a Lyapunov measure. Then there exist a number a>0and a subset Ω Σ with λ (Ω ) > 0 having the following property : for any subsets A,A Σ Ω,A A, µ (A ) 2 µ (A) aλ (A). (.2) Proof. Suppose that ε>0andv Σ are as in the statement of Lemma.4.5. Take a = ε/λ (V ) as the required number a. A set A Σ V is said to be a narrow if there exists a subset A A such that the inequality converse to (.2) holds. By construction, V is not a narrow set. It suffices for us to prove the existence of a set Ω Σ V with λ (Ω ) > 0 that does not have narrow subsets. Assume the contrary, i.e., assume that the quantity narr (A) =sup{λ(a ):A Σ A, A is narrow} is positive for any A Σ V with λ (A) 0. We use induction to construct a chain V = V 0 V V 2... of sets such that at each step the set W n = V n \ V n+ is narrow and large : λ (W n ) 2 narr (V n). Then W = n=0 V n is a narrow set. Consequently, since V is not narrow, λ (Ω ) 0 holds for the set Ω = V \ W = n=0 V n. At the same time, the sets W n are disjoint and n= λ (W n )=λ(w)< ; therefore, λ (W n ) 0. We get that narr (Ω ) narr (V n ) 2λ (W n ) 0; i.e., narr (Ω ) = 0, although λ (Ω ) > 0. This contradiction proves the lemma. Lemma.4.7 The following two conditions are equivalent for a Banach space X: (i) X does not have the Lyapunov property. (ii) There exist a triple (Ω, Σ,λ) with a nonatomic numerical measure λ on Σ and an operator T : L (Ω, Σ,λ) X such that (a) T is continuous for the weak topology on L (Ω, Σ,λ) and the weak topology on X, and
14 6 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES (b) there exists an ε>0such that Tf ελ (supp f) for any sign f L (Ω, Σ,λ), i.e., any function taking only the values 0 and ±. Proof. We first show that (i) implies (ii). Let (Ω, Σ,λ) be a triple (Ω, Σ Ω,λ) as in Lemma.4.6, we get the existence of a measure µ :Σ Xand a number a>0 such that the inequality (.2) holds for any A A Σ. According to Corollary.2.4, there exists a weak - weak continuous operator T : L (Ω, Σ,λ) X connected with the measure µ by the relation T (χ A )=µ(a), A Σ. (.3) It remains to verify the condition (b). Suppose that f is a sign ; then f = χ A χ A2,whereA,A 2 ΣandA A 2 =Ø. LetA=A A 2 and ε =2a.Weget Tf = µ(a ) µ(a 2 ) =2µ(A ) µ(a) 2 2aλ (A) =ε λ(supp f). (ii) implies (i). Suppose that the operator T satisfies the conditions (a) and(b). The measure µ is given by (.3). It is easy to verify that µ is nonatomic and not a Lyapunov measure. The lemma is proved. Remark.4.8 Since µ : Σ X, µ (A) = Tχ A is absolutely continuous with respect to λ, the operator T will also have the following property: (c) for every ε>0there is δ>0such that Tf ε f for any f L (Ω, Σ,λ) with λ (suppf) δ. Let us introduce some additional symbols for the sequel. Let r i = r i (ω) be a sequence of independent random variables taking values + and with probability.fixanumbern Nand denote the 2 random variable T (ω) =inf j: j r i (ω) N.
15 .4. l p -VALUED MEASURES 7 Further define the stopped martingale k s i by the rule s i (ω) = { ri (ω) if i T (ω) 0 if i>t(ω) The constructed martingale is evidently symmetric and its absolute value is bounded by N +. Lemma.4.9 Let k beafunctionofn.ifn=o(k), then ( k lim P s N i < ) N =0. If k = o (N), then Proof. We have, ( k P s i < ) N lim P N ( k s i < ) N =. ( j = P max r j k i < ) N ( k P r i < ) ( N = P k k r i < N k By the central limit theorem, the last expression tends to zero if N = o (k). On the other hand, if k = o (N), then ( k P s i < ) k N = P( s i ) N e N/2k. N The lemma is proved. Lemma.4.0 Suppose that x, x n l p, p< and x n Then for any ε>0there exists an index n N such that x p + x n p ε< x+x n p < x p + x n p +ε. ). w 0. But if x, x n c 0, then under the same assumptions it is possible to ensure that max { x, x n } ε< x+x n <max { x, x n } + ε.
16 8 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES The method in the following theorem due to V. M. Kadets and G. Schechtman will often be used in the main results of the thesis. Theorem.4. The spaces l p with p 2, p<, and the space c 0 have the Lyapunov property. Proof. The case p<2. Fix N N for the present, and let k =[N/ ln N]. We assume that X = l p fails the Lyapunov property, and we use Lemma.4.7. Let Ω, Σ,λ,ε, and T : L X be as in that lemma, with λ (Ω) =. We prove by induction on j that there exist functions {t j } L (Ω, Σ,λ) such that for each j the functions {t i } j are jointly equidistributed with the {s i} j in Lemma.4.9 and p j T j t i > T (t i ) p. (.4) Indeed, everything is obvious for j =. Suppose that the assertion is already proved for j = m, and that {t i } m have been constructed { that satisfy (.4) with j = m. We consider the set A = ω Ω: m t i < } N and a sequence {z n } n= of functions independent on A, equal to zero off A, and taking the values ± with probabil- ity λ (A) /2. For any n the system {{t i } m,z n} is equidistributed with {s i } m+. The sequence z n tends to zero in the weak topology; hence w Tz n 0, and by Lemma.4.0 it is possible to choose n such that ( m ) T p m p t i + T (z n ) > T (t i ) + T (z n ) p δ, where δ is arbitrarily small. Choosing δ sufficiently small and letting t m+ = z n, we get the required inequality (.4) with j = m +. We now use the fact just proved. Suppose that {t i } k is equidistributed with {s i } k and subject to the condition (.4) with j = k. Then T p k p ( k ) t i T p k t i T (t i ) p. In view of the condition (ii) of Lemma.4.7, which T satisfies by construction, we have T (t i ) ε λ(supp t i ) ε λ (supp t k ) for i k.
17 .4. l p -VALUED MEASURES 9 Since {t i } k and {s i} k are equidistributed, this gives us by the choice of k that ( ) p T N + p + k T (t i ) p kε p (P (s k 0)) p (N/ ln N ) ε p ( P ( k )) p s i < N. By Lemma.4.9, the last factor tends to ; hence this inequality cannot hold for large N. This contradiction completes the analysis of the first case. Thecase2<p<. Assume that X = l p fails the Lyapunov property. By analogy with the first case, we fix an N N, let k = [N ln N], and construct functions {t i } k equidistributed with {s i} k and satisfying the requirement ( k ) T p k t i < T (t i ) p + T p k+. (.5) We define the auxiliary function f N by k if t i N f N = k if t i. N 0 for the rest k and denote supp f N by A. Since t i < N +, f N k t i on A. N N Consequently, ( χ A f N ) k t i 0. (.6) N N Further, according to Lemma.4.9, λ (Ω\A) 0, and by Remark.4.8 ( T χ Ω/A N k t i ) N 0. (.7)
18 20 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES Comparing (.6) and (.7), we get that ( ) k T t i T(f N ) +o(). (.8) N By (.5) and the property (.8) of T, [ε λ(a)] p T p k ( N ) p +o() = o (). This contradicts Lemma.4.9, which asserts that lim λ (A) =. N The case X = c 0 is analysed just like the preceding case. The theorem is proved. There are simpler proofs for c 0 and l, due to V. Kadets, which were never published before. We use the chance to present (with the kind permission of V. Kadets) these proofs too. Proposition.4.2 c 0 has the Lyapunov property. Proof. Let µ : Σ c 0 be a nonatomic countably additive vector measure. According to Corollary.2.4 there is an operator T : L (Ω, Σ,λ) c 0 such that µ (A) =Tχ A for all A Σandwhichis continuous for the weak topology on L (Ω, Σ,λ) and the weak topology on c 0,whereλis a nonnegative nonatomic real-valued countably additive measure on Σ such that µ is absolutely continuous with respect to λ. By Lemma.4.5, it is sufficient to show that for every A and every ε>0 there exists a set B Σ A such that µ (B) 2 µ (A) ε. (.9) Let {e i } be the unit vector basis of c 0 and {f i } be the coordinate functionals on c 0. Then Tx = f i (Tx)e i. Denote T i x = f i (Tx). Take an arbitrary A Σandanε>0. Fix N N for the present. As µ is a nonatomic measure we can decompose A into the union of mutually disjoint sets A k Σ A (k =,...,N)withµ(A k ) 0 for all k, λ (A k )=λ(ω) /N. Let rbe a Rademacher function on A. Put n =andm 0 = 0. Select m N such that Tr m T i r
19 .4. l p -VALUED MEASURES 2. Consider a sequence {r 2 2 N+ n } n= of Rademacher functions on A 2.By Corollary.2.5, Trn 2 n 0 in the weak topology. Hence there are a m number n 2 such that T i rn 2 2 and a number m 2 N+3 2 such that T i rn 2 2. Consequently 2 N+3 i=m 2 + m 2 Tr2 n 2 T i r 2 n 2 i=m + 2. N+2 Continuing this process we obtain the sequences of numbers {n k } N k= and {m k } N k=0 and the set of functions { } N rn k such that k k= rk n k is a Rademacher function on A k and m k Trk n k T i r k n k i=m k + 2 N+k for k =,...,N. Consequently ( N ) T rn k N m k k T i rn k k + 2 = max N k= k= i=m k + m k k N i=m k + T i rn k k + 2. N If the maximum is reached at k 0 then applying the equation (.) we have ( N ) T m rn k k0 k T i r k 0 n k0 + 2 T N Ak0 + 2 µ (A N k 0 )+ 2. N k= i=m k0 + As µ is absolutely continuous with respect to λ and λ (A k )=λ(ω) /N for k =,..., N and by Proposition..6, the last sum tends to zero as N. Thus choosing N sufficiently large and taking B = { Nk= ω Ω:r k nk = } we obtain the required inequality (.9). The proposition is proved. Before we prove that l has the Lyapunov property, let us recall that Schur has proved that in l the norm-convergence and the weakconvergence coincide. We will show that all Banach spaces, which have this property, have the Lyapunov property.
20 22 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES Definition.4.3 A Banach space X is said to have the Schur property if a sequence (x n ) of elements of X converges in the weak topology if and only if it converges in the norm topology. Proposition.4.4 If a Banach space X has the Schur property, then it has the Lyapunov property. Proof. Let µ be a nonatomic countably additive vector measure on a σ-field Σ and T : L (λ) X be the operator from Corollary.2.4. Take an arbitrary A Σ and consider on A the sequence of functions f n = +rn,where(r 2 n ) are Rademacher functions on A. Asf n χ n 2 A in the weak topology, then by Corollary.2.5 we have Tf n µ (A) 2 in the weak topology. It follows that Tf n µ(a) 2 f n = χ An,whereA n Σ. Thus we have µ (A n) 2 µ (A) 0. n By Lemma.4.5, the proposition is proved. n n 0. But.5 The three-space problem The results of this section have been published in [8], [5]. The three-space problem arises for every Banach space property. Namely, do a subspace Y and the quotient space X/Y have the property if X does and does X have the property if Y and X/Y do? Some of these problems can be solved easily in the case of the Lyapunov property. Indeed, if X has the Lyapunov property and Y X,then Y has the Lyapunov property, but X/Y needs not have the Lyapunov property (for instance, X = l because the set of its quotient spaces contains all separable Banach spaces [24, p.08]). At the same time the answer to the last problem runs into difficulties. The purpose of this section is the positive solution of the above mentioned problem : let Y be a subspace of a Banach space X. If Y and X/Y have the Lyapunov property, then X has the Lyapunov property. The following three lemmas are of technical nature.
21 .5. THE THREE-SPACE PROBLEM 23 Lemma.5. Let X have the Lyapunov property and µ :Σ Xbe a nonatomic measure. Then there is a nonatomic nonnegative measure λ :Σ Rsuch that for every A Σ and n N there exists B n Σ A satisfying the following inequalities: µ (B n) 2 µ (A) 2 and λ (B n n ) 2 λ (A) 2. (.0) n Proof. By Theorem.2.7 there is a functional x X with x = for which µ x µ. Put λ = x µ. Let A Σ. In accordance with the Hahn decomposition theorem let us denote by Ω + and Ω the positivity and negativity sets for x µ respectively. Then λ (C) = x µ(c Ω + ) x µ(c Ω ) for any C Σ. Put A + = A Ω + and A = A Ω. Since X has the Lyapunov property, we can choose B n + Σ A + and B n Σ A such that µ ( B n + Then x µ ( B n + Define B n = B n + (.0) are true. ) 2 µ ( A +) 2 and µ ( ) B n+ n 2 µ ( A ) 2. n+ ) 2 x µ ( A +) 2 and x µ ( ) B n+ n 2 x µ ( A ) 2. n+ B n. It is easy to check that for B n the inequalities Lemma.5.2 Let X have the Lyapunov property, µ :Σ X be a nonatomic measure, λ be the measure from Lemma.5.. Then for every A Σ with λ (A) 0and ε>0there exist G Σ A,G = A\G such that (i) λ ( G ) = λ ( G ) = λ (A) /2, (ii) µ ( G ) 2 µ (A) <ε. Proof. Let us choose B n as in Lemma.5.. We can select C n Σ Bn if λ (B n ) λ (A) orc 2 n Σ A\Bn if λ (B n ) < λ (A) for which 2 λ (C n )= λ(a) λ(b 2 n) (because λ is a nonatomic real-valued measure). By (.0), λ (C n ) n 0. PutG n =B n C n,g n = A\G n.then
22 24 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES we obtain λ ( ) ( ) G n = λ G n = λ (A), and λ ( G 2 n \B ) n 0, and n λ ( B n \G n) 0. Since µ is absolutely continuous with respect to n λ the last condition implies that µ ( B n \G n) 0andµ ( G n n \B ) n n 0. Together with inequality (.0) this gives us µ ( ) G n 2 µ (A) 0. n So for sufficiently large n the sets G = G n and G = G n the conditions (i) and(ii). will satisfy Lemma.5.3 Under the conditions of Lemma.5.2 for every A Σ with λ (A) 0and ε>0there exists a σ-algebra Σ Σ A such that for every B Σ we have µ (A) µ (B) λ (B) ελ (B) (.) λ (A) and the measure λ is nonatomic on Σ. Proof. Take A Σandε > 0. Employing Lemma.5.2, we choose sets A Σ A, A 2 = A\A with λ (A ) = λ(a 2 ) = λ(a) and 2 µ(a ) µ(a) ε (note that 2 4 µ (A ) 2 µ (A) = 2 µ (A ) µ (A 2 ) = µ (A 2) 2 µ (A) 4 ε). Employing Lemma.5.2 twice (for A = A and A = A 2 )weobtain A, Σ A,A,2 =A \A, ;A 2, Σ A2,A 2,2 =A 2 \A 2, with λ (A, )= λ(a,2 )=λ(a 2, )=λ(a 2,2 )= 4 λ(a)and µ(a,) 2 µ(a ) ɛ 6, µ (A 2, ) 2 µ (A 2) ɛ 6. When we continue this process, we obtain a tree of sets A i,i 2,...,i n,i k {,2},n Nwith A i,i 2,...,i n+ A i,i 2,...,i n,a i,i 2,...,i n,2 = A i,i 2,...,i n \A i,i 2,...,i n,, µ (A i,i 2,...,i n ) µ ( ) A 2 i,i 2,...,i n ε, λ (A 4 n i,i 2,...,i n )= λ(a) 2 n
23 .5. THE THREE-SPACE PROBLEM 25 Let Σ be a σ-algebra generated by the sets A i,i 2,...,i n. We are going to show that the algebra Σ has the required property. Let B = A i,i 2,...,i n.then µ(b) λ(b) λ(a) µ(a) µ(ai =,i 2,...,i n ) µ (A) 2 n µ (A i,i 2,...,i n ) µ ( ) A 2 i,i 2,...,i n + µ ( ) A 2 i,i 2,...,i n µ ( ) A 2 i,i 2,...,i n µ 2 n (Ai ) µ (A) 2 ε + ε ε 4 n 2 4 n 2 n 4 = ε ( ) n 2 2(n ) 2 ε n+ 2 n = ελ (A i,i 2,...,i n ). Hence by the triangle inequality and the σ-additivity of µ and λ we get (.) for B = B n, where the B n are disjoint sets of the form n= A i,i 2,...,i k. Then we obtain (.) for every B Σ using approximation of λ (B) by bigger sets of the form B = B n. Lemma.5.4 The statements of Lemmas.5.2 and.5.3 are valid for an arbitrary nonatomic measure λ. Proof. Let µ :Σ X, λ :Σ R + be nonatomic measures. Let ν be the measure which played the role of λ in Lemma.5.. Consider two cases. Case : λ ν.take A Σ, n N. In view of Lemma.5.3, there is Σ Σ A such that for any B Σ n= ν (B) µ (B) ν (A) µ (A) ν (B), (.2) 2n ν is a nonatomic measure with respect to Σ. Applying the Lyapunov theorem to the measure σ : Σ R 2 : σ(a) = (ν(a),λ(a)), we obtain sets G,G Σ such that λ ( G ) = λ ( G ) = λ (A) and 2 ν ( G ) =ν ( G ) = ν (A). Then (.2) implies inequality (ii) which 2 we need.
24 26 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES Case 2: λ ν. We decompose λ into the sum of absolutely continuous and strictly singular measures with respect to ν : λ = λ + λ 2. Then λ 2 is concentrated on a ν-negligible set S. Now we consider A\S and S A separately. By the case chose G ( ) A\S so that λ G = λ 2 (A), µ ( ) G µ 2 (A) and G 2 n 2 S A with ( ) λ 2 G 2 = λ (S ( ) ( A). Because λ 2 G 2 = 0, µ G 2) = 0 and ( ) λ 2 G = 0 it is clear that G = G G 2 satisfies (ii). The proof of the Lemma.5.3 shows that if Lemma.5.2 is valid for an arbitrary λ then Lemma.5.3 is valid too for an arbitrary nonatomic measure λ. The following statement is evident. Lemma.5.5 If X is a Banach space, Y isasubspaceofx, µ :Σ X is a nonatomic measure, then µ :Σ X/Y ( µ (A)-the equivalence class of µ (A)) is a nonatomic measure too. Theorem.5.6 Let Y be a subspace of a Banach space X. If Y and X/Y have the Lyapunov property, then X has the Lyapunov property too. Proof. Let µ :Σ X, λ :Σ R + be nonatomic measures, λ (Ω) =. Fix A Σ, λ(a) 0,andε>0. By Lemmas.5.4 and.5.5 there is a σ-algebra Σ Σ A such that µ (B) λ (B) µ (A) λ (A) < ελ (B) (.3) 2 for all B Σ and λ is nonatomic on Σ. Define σ :Σ Xby the rule σ (B) =µ(b) λ(b) µ(a).now we show that there exist a σ-algebra λ(a) Σ Σ and a nonatomic measure β : Σ Y such that σ (B) β (B) < 2ε for all B Σ. Indeed, by inequality (.3) and nonatomicity of λ we can choose sets A, A 2 Σ such that A = A A2,λ(A )=λ(a 2 )= 2 λ(a),and σ (A ) <ε 2 λ(a). Clearly, there is x σ (A ) such that x ε 2 λ(a).denote α (A) =x, α (A2) = x,
25 .5. THE THREE-SPACE PROBLEM 27 Applying step by step Lemma.5.2 and Lemma.5.4, we get sets A i,...,i k Σ, k = 2,3,...; i,..., i k =,2, such that A i,...,i k = ) A i,...,i k, Ai,...,i k,2, λ(a i,...,i k ) = 2 λ( A i,...,i k = λ (A), and 2 k σ ( ) A i,...,i k, σ ( ) A 2 i,...,i k <ε λ(a).it is readily seen that 2 2k in every equivalence class σ ( ) A i,...,i k, σ ( ) A 2 i,...,i k X there exists an element x i,...,i k such that xi,...,i k ε λ (A). Put 2 2k α ( ) A i,...,i k, = α ( ) A 2 i,...,i k + xi,...,i k, α ( ) A i,...,i k,2 = α ( ) A 2 i,...,i k xi,...,i k. Evidently, α ( ( ( A i,...,i k,) σ Ai,...,i k,) and α Ai,...,i k,2) σ ( A i,...,i k,2). By Σ denoteσ-algebra generated by the sets A i,...,i k. Iterating the inequality α (A i,...,i k ) α ( ) A 2 i,...,i k + ε λ (A), 2 2k we obtain α (A i,...,i k ) ε λ(a)=2ελ (A 2 k i,...,i k ). Let us extend α to Σ andshowthat α(b) 2ελ (B) (.4) for any B Σ. For this purpose we take B = A i,...,i k,wherei I is a finite set of indices and A i,...,i k are mutually disjoint sets. Put α (B) = α(a i,...,i k ). Clearly, I α (B) I α(a i,...,i k ) 2ε I λ(a i,...,i k )=2ελ (B). This proves that inequality (.4) is valid for elements of the algebra S, generated by the sets A i,...,i k. Now applying the Kluvanek-Uhl extension theorem [6, Chapter 6, Section 8, Addition 4] we obtain an extension of α to Σ. Thus, we have constructed a measure α : Σ X such that α (B) σ (B) for any B Σ and α(b) 2ελ (B).αis a nonatomic measure because λ is nonatomic by construction. It is clear that β = α σ has the required property. The statement is proved. Let us complete the proof of the theorem. Since β : Σ Y is a nonatomic measure and Y has the Lyapunov property, we see that by Lemma.5.2 there is B Σ such that λ (B) = λ(a)and 2 β(b) 2 β(a) ε.
26 28 CHAPTER. VECTOR MEASURES Thus we have σ (B) σ (A) 2 σ(b) β(b) + 2 σ(a) β(a) 2 + β(b) 2 β(a) 3ε. Since σ (B) σ (A) 2 =µ(b) µ(a),the proof is completed. 2 Let us stress an important particular case of this theorem. Corollary.5.7 Let X = X X 2 where X,X 2 have the Lyapunov property. Then X has the Lyapunov property too. It is clear that by induction we can extend this property to any finite sum of Banach spaces. Corollary.5.8 The spaces X p from the work [9] ( twisted sums of l p spaces) have the Lyapunov property for p 2.
THREE SPACES PROBLEM FOR LYAPUNOV THEOREM ON VECTOR MEASURE. V. M. Kadets, O. I. Vladimirskaya
Serdica Math. J. 24 (998), 45-52 THREE SPACES PROBLEM FOR LYAPUNOV THEOREM ON VECTOR MEASURE V. M. Kadets, O. I. Vladimirskaya Communicated by G. Godefroy Abstract. It is proved that a Banach space X has
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More informationChapter 8. General Countably Additive Set Functions. 8.1 Hahn Decomposition Theorem
Chapter 8 General Countably dditive Set Functions In Theorem 5.2.2 the reader saw that if f : X R is integrable on the measure space (X,, µ) then we can define a countably additive set function ν on by
More informationExamples of Dual Spaces from Measure Theory
Chapter 9 Examples of Dual Spaces from Measure Theory We have seen that L (, A, µ) is a Banach space for any measure space (, A, µ). We will extend that concept in the following section to identify an
More information3 Integration and Expectation
3 Integration and Expectation 3.1 Construction of the Lebesgue Integral Let (, F, µ) be a measure space (not necessarily a probability space). Our objective will be to define the Lebesgue integral R fdµ
More informationMATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, 2014 1 Introduction Definition. If A, B are sets and there exists a bijection A B, they have the same cardinality, which we write as A, #A. If there exists
More informationHILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM. where the bar in the first equation denotes complex conjugation. In either case, for any x V define
HILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM STEVEN P. LALLEY 1. DEFINITIONS Definition 1. A real inner product space is a real vector space V together with a symmetric, bilinear, positive-definite mapping,
More informationCombinatorics in Banach space theory Lecture 12
Combinatorics in Banach space theory Lecture The next lemma considerably strengthens the assertion of Lemma.6(b). Lemma.9. For every Banach space X and any n N, either all the numbers n b n (X), c n (X)
More information212a1214Daniell s integration theory.
212a1214 Daniell s integration theory. October 30, 2014 Daniell s idea was to take the axiomatic properties of the integral as the starting point and develop integration for broader and broader classes
More informationl(y j ) = 0 for all y j (1)
Problem 1. The closed linear span of a subset {y j } of a normed vector space is defined as the intersection of all closed subspaces containing all y j and thus the smallest such subspace. 1 Show that
More informationMAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9
MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF REAL ANALYSIS by. IV.1. Differentiation of Monotonic Functions
FUNDAMNTALS OF RAL ANALYSIS by Doğan Çömez IV. DIFFRNTIATION AND SIGND MASURS IV.1. Differentiation of Monotonic Functions Question: Can we calculate f easily? More eplicitly, can we hope for a result
More informationMATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents
MATH 3969 - MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Measure Theory 2 1.1. Properties of Measures 3 1.2. Constructing σ-algebras and measures 3 1.3. Properties of the Lebesgue measure
More informationChapter 4. Measure Theory. 1. Measure Spaces
Chapter 4. Measure Theory 1. Measure Spaces Let X be a nonempty set. A collection S of subsets of X is said to be an algebra on X if S has the following properties: 1. X S; 2. if A S, then A c S; 3. if
More informationMeasure Theory on Topological Spaces. Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond
Measure Theory on Topological Spaces Course: Prof. Tony Dorlas 2010 Typset: Cathal Ormond May 22, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 The Riemann Integral........................................ 2 1.2 Measurable..............................................
More informationLebesgue-Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym Theorem Matt Rosenzweig 1 Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym Theorem In what follows, (, A) will denote a measurable space. We begin with a review of signed measures. 1.1 Signed Measures Definition
More informationII - REAL ANALYSIS. This property gives us a way to extend the notion of content to finite unions of rectangles: we define
1 Measures 1.1 Jordan content in R N II - REAL ANALYSIS Let I be an interval in R. Then its 1-content is defined as c 1 (I) := b a if I is bounded with endpoints a, b. If I is unbounded, we define c 1
More informationON SUBSPACES OF NON-REFLEXIVE ORLICZ SPACES
ON SUBSPACES OF NON-REFLEXIVE ORLICZ SPACES J. ALEXOPOULOS May 28, 997 ABSTRACT. Kadec and Pelczýnski have shown that every non-reflexive subspace of L (µ) contains a copy of l complemented in L (µ). On
More informationChapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries
Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.
More information( f ^ M _ M 0 )dµ (5.1)
47 5. LEBESGUE INTEGRAL: GENERAL CASE Although the Lebesgue integral defined in the previous chapter is in many ways much better behaved than the Riemann integral, it shares its restriction to bounded
More informationCHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM
CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM We begin our study by identifying certain special kinds of linear functionals on certain special vector spaces of functions. We describe these linear functionals
More informationSigned Measures. Chapter Basic Properties of Signed Measures. 4.2 Jordan and Hahn Decompositions
Chapter 4 Signed Measures Up until now our measures have always assumed values that were greater than or equal to 0. In this chapter we will extend our definition to allow for both positive negative values.
More informationPROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space
1 Professor Carl Cowen Math 54600 Fall 09 PROBLEMS 1. (Geometry in Inner Product Spaces) (a) (Parallelogram Law) Show that in any inner product space x + y 2 + x y 2 = 2( x 2 + y 2 ). (b) (Polarization
More informationQUANTUM MEASURE THEORY. Stanley Gudder. Department of Mathematics. University of Denver. Denver Colorado
QUANTUM MEASURE THEORY Stanley Gudder Department of Mathematics University of Denver Denver Colorado 828 sgudder@math.du.edu 1. Introduction A measurable space is a pair (X, A) where X is a nonempty set
More informationTHEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 516
THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 516 Results labeled Theorem Ea.b.c (or Proposition Ea.b.c, etc.) refer to Theorem c from section a.b of Evans book (Partial Differential Equations). Proposition 1 (=Proposition
More informationThe small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results)
The small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results) Ehrhard Behrends Abstract A metric space (M, d) is said to have the small ball property (sbp) if for every ε 0 > 0 there exists a sequence
More informationAn introduction to some aspects of functional analysis
An introduction to some aspects of functional analysis Stephen Semmes Rice University Abstract These informal notes deal with some very basic objects in functional analysis, including norms and seminorms
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More informationMTH 404: Measure and Integration
MTH 404: Measure and Integration Semester 2, 2012-2013 Dr. Prahlad Vaidyanathan Contents I. Introduction....................................... 3 1. Motivation................................... 3 2. The
More informationMATH & MATH FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE EXERCISES FALL 2015 & SPRING Scientia Imperii Decus et Tutamen 1
MATH 5310.001 & MATH 5320.001 FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE EXERCISES FALL 2015 & SPRING 2016 Scientia Imperii Decus et Tutamen 1 Robert R. Kallman University of North Texas Department of Mathematics 1155
More informationRecall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm
Chapter 13 Radon Measures Recall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm (13.1) f = sup x X f(x). We want to identify
More informationLecture 3: Probability Measures - 2
Lecture 3: Probability Measures - 2 1. Continuation of measures 1.1 Problem of continuation of a probability measure 1.2 Outer measure 1.3 Lebesgue outer measure 1.4 Lebesgue continuation of an elementary
More information1 Inner Product Space
Ch - Hilbert Space 1 4 Hilbert Space 1 Inner Product Space Let E be a complex vector space, a mapping (, ) : E E C is called an inner product on E if i) (x, x) 0 x E and (x, x) = 0 if and only if x = 0;
More informationUNCONDITIONALLY CONVERGENT SERIES OF OPERATORS AND NARROW OPERATORS ON L 1
UNCONDITIONALLY CONVERGENT SERIES OF OPERATORS AND NARROW OPERATORS ON L 1 VLADIMIR KADETS, NIGEL KALTON AND DIRK WERNER Abstract. We introduce a class of operators on L 1 that is stable under taking sums
More informationn [ F (b j ) F (a j ) ], n j=1(a j, b j ] E (4.1)
1.4. CONSTRUCTION OF LEBESGUE-STIELTJES MEASURES In this section we shall put to use the Carathéodory-Hahn theory, in order to construct measures with certain desirable properties first on the real line
More informationDynkin (λ-) and π-systems; monotone classes of sets, and of functions with some examples of application (mainly of a probabilistic flavor)
Dynkin (λ-) and π-systems; monotone classes of sets, and of functions with some examples of application (mainly of a probabilistic flavor) Matija Vidmar February 7, 2018 1 Dynkin and π-systems Some basic
More informationTHEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515
THEOREMS, ETC., FOR MATH 515 Proposition 1 (=comment on page 17). If A is an algebra, then any finite union or finite intersection of sets in A is also in A. Proposition 2 (=Proposition 1.1). For every
More informationOverview of normed linear spaces
20 Chapter 2 Overview of normed linear spaces Starting from this chapter, we begin examining linear spaces with at least one extra structure (topology or geometry). We assume linearity; this is a natural
More informationA VERY BRIEF REVIEW OF MEASURE THEORY
A VERY BRIEF REVIEW OF MEASURE THEORY A brief philosophical discussion. Measure theory, as much as any branch of mathematics, is an area where it is important to be acquainted with the basic notions and
More information3. (a) What is a simple function? What is an integrable function? How is f dµ defined? Define it first
Math 632/6321: Theory of Functions of a Real Variable Sample Preinary Exam Questions 1. Let (, M, µ) be a measure space. (a) Prove that if µ() < and if 1 p < q
More informationCHAPTER 6. Differentiation
CHPTER 6 Differentiation The generalization from elementary calculus of differentiation in measure theory is less obvious than that of integration, and the methods of treating it are somewhat involved.
More informationMAT 571 REAL ANALYSIS II LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 2. Product measures Iterated integrals Complete products Differentiation 17
MAT 57 REAL ANALSIS II LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: SPRING 205 Contents. Convergence in measure 2. Product measures 3 3. Iterated integrals 4 4. Complete products 9 5. Signed measures
More informationReminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces
Reminder Notes for the Course on Measures on Topological Spaces T. C. Dorlas Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies School of Theoretical Physics 10 Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Email: dorlas@stp.dias.ie
More informationChapter 5. Measurable Functions
Chapter 5. Measurable Functions 1. Measurable Functions Let X be a nonempty set, and let S be a σ-algebra of subsets of X. Then (X, S) is a measurable space. A subset E of X is said to be measurable if
More informationStone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces
The Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto June 27, 2014 1 Completely regular spaces and Tychonoff spaces A topological
More informationIntegration on Measure Spaces
Chapter 3 Integration on Measure Spaces In this chapter we introduce the general notion of a measure on a space X, define the class of measurable functions, and define the integral, first on a class of
More informationReview of measure theory
209: Honors nalysis in R n Review of measure theory 1 Outer measure, measure, measurable sets Definition 1 Let X be a set. nonempty family R of subsets of X is a ring if, B R B R and, B R B R hold. bove,
More informationIntegral Jensen inequality
Integral Jensen inequality Let us consider a convex set R d, and a convex function f : (, + ]. For any x,..., x n and λ,..., λ n with n λ i =, we have () f( n λ ix i ) n λ if(x i ). For a R d, let δ a
More information4 Integration 4.1 Integration of non-negative simple functions
4 Integration 4.1 Integration of non-negative simple functions Throughout we are in a measure space (X, F, µ). Definition Let s be a non-negative F-measurable simple function so that s a i χ Ai, with disjoint
More informationPart V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory
Part V 7 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets Lebesgue Integration Theory Definition 7. (Preliminary). A measure on a set is a function :2 [ ] such that. () = 2. If { } = is a finite
More information(1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define
Homework, Real Analysis I, Fall, 2010. (1) Consider the space S consisting of all continuous real-valued functions on the closed interval [0, 1]. For f, g S, define ρ(f, g) = 1 0 f(x) g(x) dx. Show that
More informationProblem Set. Problem Set #1. Math 5322, Fall March 4, 2002 ANSWERS
Problem Set Problem Set #1 Math 5322, Fall 2001 March 4, 2002 ANSWRS i All of the problems are from Chapter 3 of the text. Problem 1. [Problem 2, page 88] If ν is a signed measure, is ν-null iff ν () 0.
More information+ 2x sin x. f(b i ) f(a i ) < ɛ. i=1. i=1
Appendix To understand weak derivatives and distributional derivatives in the simplest context of functions of a single variable, we describe without proof some results from real analysis (see [7] and
More information1 Measurable Functions
36-752 Advanced Probability Overview Spring 2018 2. Measurable Functions, Random Variables, and Integration Instructor: Alessandro Rinaldo Associated reading: Sec 1.5 of Ash and Doléans-Dade; Sec 1.3 and
More informationMeasurable functions are approximately nice, even if look terrible.
Tel Aviv University, 2015 Functions of real variables 74 7 Approximation 7a A terrible integrable function........... 74 7b Approximation of sets................ 76 7c Approximation of functions............
More informationSigned Measures and Complex Measures
Chapter 8 Signed Measures Complex Measures As opposed to the measures we have considered so far, a signed measure is allowed to take on both positive negative values. To be precise, if M is a σ-algebra
More information(U) =, if 0 U, 1 U, (U) = X, if 0 U, and 1 U. (U) = E, if 0 U, but 1 U. (U) = X \ E if 0 U, but 1 U. n=1 A n, then A M.
1. Abstract Integration The main reference for this section is Rudin s Real and Complex Analysis. The purpose of developing an abstract theory of integration is to emphasize the difference between the
More informationReal Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Signed Measures and Differentiation
Real Analysis, 2nd dition, G.B.Folland Chapter 3 Signed Measures and Differentiation Yung-Hsiang Huang 3. Signed Measures. Proof. The first part is proved by using addivitiy and consider F j = j j, 0 =.
More informationReal Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Elements of Functional Analysis
Real Analysis, 2nd Edition, G.B.Folland Chapter 5 Elements of Functional Analysis Yung-Hsiang Huang 5.1 Normed Vector Spaces 1. Note for any x, y X and a, b K, x+y x + y and by ax b y x + b a x. 2. It
More informationConvergence of Banach valued stochastic processes of Pettis and McShane integrable functions
Convergence of Banach valued stochastic processes of Pettis and McShane integrable functions V. Marraffa Department of Mathematics, Via rchirafi 34, 90123 Palermo, Italy bstract It is shown that if (X
More informationMeasure and integration
Chapter 5 Measure and integration In calculus you have learned how to calculate the size of different kinds of sets: the length of a curve, the area of a region or a surface, the volume or mass of a solid.
More informationCHAPTER V DUAL SPACES
CHAPTER V DUAL SPACES DEFINITION Let (X, T ) be a (real) locally convex topological vector space. By the dual space X, or (X, T ), of X we mean the set of all continuous linear functionals on X. By the
More informationMATH 426, TOPOLOGY. p 1.
MATH 426, TOPOLOGY THE p-norms In this document we assume an extended real line, where is an element greater than all real numbers; the interval notation [1, ] will be used to mean [1, ) { }. 1. THE p
More informationFragmentability and σ-fragmentability
F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 143 (1993) Fragmentability and σ-fragmentability by J. E. J a y n e (London), I. N a m i o k a (Seattle) and C. A. R o g e r s (London) Abstract. Recent work has studied
More informationL p Spaces and Convexity
L p Spaces and Convexity These notes largely follow the treatments in Royden, Real Analysis, and Rudin, Real & Complex Analysis. 1. Convex functions Let I R be an interval. For I open, we say a function
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRIC MEASURE THEORY AND AN APPLICATION TO MINIMAL SURFACES ( DRAFT DOCUMENT) Academic Year 2016/17 Francesco Serra Cassano
AN INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRIC MEASURE THEORY AND AN APPLICATION TO MINIMAL SURFACES ( DRAFT DOCUMENT) Academic Year 2016/17 Francesco Serra Cassano Contents I. Recalls and complements of measure theory.
More informationLocally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem
56 Chapter 7 Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem Recall that C(X) is not a normed linear space when X is not compact. On the other hand we could use semi
More informationExercise 1. Show that the Radon-Nikodym theorem for a finite measure implies the theorem for a σ-finite measure.
Real Variables, Fall 2014 Problem set 8 Solution suggestions xercise 1. Show that the Radon-Nikodym theorem for a finite measure implies the theorem for a σ-finite measure. nswer: ssume that the Radon-Nikodym
More informationFinal Exam Practice Problems Math 428, Spring 2017
Final xam Practice Problems Math 428, Spring 2017 Name: Directions: Throughout, (X,M,µ) is a measure space, unless stated otherwise. Since this is not to be turned in, I highly recommend that you work
More informationReal Analysis Chapter 3 Solutions Jonathan Conder. ν(f n ) = lim
. Suppose ( n ) n is an increasing sequence in M. For each n N define F n : n \ n (with 0 : ). Clearly ν( n n ) ν( nf n ) ν(f n ) lim n If ( n ) n is a decreasing sequence in M and ν( )
More informationDual Space of L 1. C = {E P(I) : one of E or I \ E is countable}.
Dual Space of L 1 Note. The main theorem of this note is on page 5. The secondary theorem, describing the dual of L (µ) is on page 8. Let (X, M, µ) be a measure space. We consider the subsets of X which
More information1 Functional Analysis
1 Functional Analysis 1 1.1 Banach spaces Remark 1.1. In classical mechanics, the state of some physical system is characterized as a point x in phase space (generalized position and momentum coordinates).
More information2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due 9/5). Prove that every countable set A is measurable and µ(a) = 0. 2 (Bonus). Let A consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is
More informationReal Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller
Real Analysis Notes Thomas Goller September 4, 2011 Contents 1 Abstract Measure Spaces 2 1.1 Basic Definitions........................... 2 1.2 Measurable Functions........................ 2 1.3 Integration..............................
More informationTHE RANGE OF A VECTOR-VALUED MEASURE
THE RANGE OF A VECTOR-VALUED MEASURE J. J. UHL, JR. Liapounoff, in 1940, proved that the range of a countably additive bounded measure with values in a finite dimensional vector space is compact and, in
More informationA note on some approximation theorems in measure theory
A note on some approximation theorems in measure theory S. Kesavan and M. T. Nair Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai - 600 06 email: kesh@iitm.ac.in and mtnair@iitm.ac.in
More informationReal Analysis Qualifying Exam May 14th 2016
Real Analysis Qualifying Exam May 4th 26 Solve 8 out of 2 problems. () Prove the Banach contraction principle: Let T be a mapping from a complete metric space X into itself such that d(tx,ty) apple qd(x,
More informationPart III. 10 Topological Space Basics. Topological Spaces
Part III 10 Topological Space Basics Topological Spaces Using the metric space results above as motivation we will axiomatize the notion of being an open set to more general settings. Definition 10.1.
More informationIntroduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1
Christopher Heil Introduction to Real Analysis Alternative Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces Last Updated: March 10, 2018 c 2018 by Christopher Heil Chapter 1 A Primer on Norms and Banach Spaces
More informationMath212a1413 The Lebesgue integral.
Math212a1413 The Lebesgue integral. October 28, 2014 Simple functions. In what follows, (X, F, m) is a space with a σ-field of sets, and m a measure on F. The purpose of today s lecture is to develop the
More informationProbability and Random Processes
Probability and Random Processes Lecture 7 Conditional probability and expectation Decomposition of measures Mikael Skoglund, Probability and random processes 1/13 Conditional Probability A probability
More informationMath 118B Solutions. Charles Martin. March 6, d i (x i, y i ) + d i (y i, z i ) = d(x, y) + d(y, z). i=1
Math 8B Solutions Charles Martin March 6, Homework Problems. Let (X i, d i ), i n, be finitely many metric spaces. Construct a metric on the product space X = X X n. Proof. Denote points in X as x = (x,
More informationNOTES ON VECTOR-VALUED INTEGRATION MATH 581, SPRING 2017
NOTES ON VECTOR-VALUED INTEGRATION MATH 58, SPRING 207 Throughout, X will denote a Banach space. Definition 0.. Let ϕ(s) : X be a continuous function from a compact Jordan region R n to a Banach space
More informationChapter IV Integration Theory
Chapter IV Integration Theory This chapter is devoted to the developement of integration theory. The main motivation is to extend the Riemann integral calculus to larger types of functions, thus leading
More informationExtreme points of compact convex sets
Extreme points of compact convex sets In this chapter, we are going to show that compact convex sets are determined by a proper subset, the set of its extreme points. Let us start with the main definition.
More informationTHE CARATHÉODORY EXTENSION THEOREM FOR VECTOR VALUED MEASURES
PROCEEDINGS of the AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 72, Number 1, October 1978 THE CARATHÉODORY EXTENSION THEOREM FOR VECTOR VALUED MEASURES JOSEPH KUPKA Abstract. This paper comprises three advertisements
More informationLebesgue measure and integration
Chapter 4 Lebesgue measure and integration If you look back at what you have learned in your earlier mathematics courses, you will definitely recall a lot about area and volume from the simple formulas
More informationDecreasing Rearrangement and Lorentz L(p, q) Spaces
Decreasing Rearrangement and Lorentz L(p, q) Spaces Erik Kristiansson December 22 Master Thesis Supervisor: Lech Maligranda Department of Mathematics Abstract We consider the decreasing rearrangement of
More information1.1. MEASURES AND INTEGRALS
CHAPTER 1: MEASURE THEORY In this chapter we define the notion of measure µ on a space, construct integrals on this space, and establish their basic properties under limits. The measure µ(e) will be defined
More informationStanford Mathematics Department Math 205A Lecture Supplement #4 Borel Regular & Radon Measures
2 1 Borel Regular Measures We now state and prove an important regularity property of Borel regular outer measures: Stanford Mathematics Department Math 205A Lecture Supplement #4 Borel Regular & Radon
More informationFolland: Real Analysis, Chapter 7 Sébastien Picard
Folland: Real Analysis, Chapter 7 Sébastien Picard Problem 7.2 Let µ be a Radon measure on X. a. Let N be the union of all open U X such that µ(u) =. Then N is open and µ(n) =. The complement of N is called
More informationProbability and Measure
Part II Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2018 84 Paper 4, Section II 26J Let (X, A) be a measurable space. Let T : X X be a measurable map, and µ a probability
More informationAnalysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2008
Analysis Comprehensive xam Questions Fall 28. (a) Let R be measurable with finite Lebesgue measure. Suppose that {f n } n N is a bounded sequence in L 2 () and there exists a function f such that f n (x)
More information2 Probability, random elements, random sets
Tel Aviv University, 2012 Measurability and continuity 25 2 Probability, random elements, random sets 2a Probability space, measure algebra........ 25 2b Standard models................... 30 2c Random
More informationLEBESGUE MEASURE AND L2 SPACE. Contents 1. Measure Spaces 1 2. Lebesgue Integration 2 3. L 2 Space 4 Acknowledgments 9 References 9
LBSGU MASUR AND L2 SPAC. ANNI WANG Abstract. This paper begins with an introduction to measure spaces and the Lebesgue theory of measure and integration. Several important theorems regarding the Lebesgue
More informationREAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS
REAL AND COMPLE ANALYSIS Third Edition Walter Rudin Professor of Mathematics University of Wisconsin, Madison Version 1.1 No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any
More information02. Measure and integral. 1. Borel-measurable functions and pointwise limits
(October 3, 2017) 02. Measure and integral Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2017-18/02 measure and integral.pdf]
More informationCompendium and Solutions to exercises TMA4225 Foundation of analysis
Compendium and Solutions to exercises TMA4225 Foundation of analysis Ruben Spaans December 6, 2010 1 Introduction This compendium contains a lexicon over definitions and exercises with solutions. Throughout
More informationMATH 650. THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM
MATH 650. THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM This note presents two important theorems in Measure Theory, the Lebesgue Decomposition and Radon-Nikodym Theorem. They are not treated in the textbook. 1. Closed subspaces
More informationRandom and Vector Measures: From Toy Measurable Systems to Quantum Probability. Kristin Courtney
Random and Vector Measures: From Toy Measurable Systems to Quantum Probability by Kristin Courtney A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More information