Rethinking Gauge Theory through Connes Noncommutative Geometry
|
|
- Magdalene Gilmore
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Rethinking Gauge Theory through Connes Noncommutative Geometry Chen Sun Virginia Tech October 24, 2015 Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
2 Work with Ufuk Aydemir, Djordje Minic, Tatsu Takeuchi: Phys. Rev. D 91, (2015) [arxiv: ], Pati-Salam Unification from Non-commutative Geometry and the TeV-scale W R boson [arxiv: ], Review of NCG in preparation. For background of NCG, c.f. Chamseddine, Connes, et. al.: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 18B, 29 (1991) Commun. Math. Phys. 182, 155 (1996) [hep-th/ ], Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11, 991 (2007) [hep-th/ ], and for superconnection, c.f. Neeman, Fairlie, et. al.: Phys. Lett. B 81, 190 (1979), J. Phys. G 5, L55 (1979), Phys. Lett. B 82, 97 (1979). Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
3 The quickest review of gauge theory Given ψ Ô element in rep space H, e.g. Dirac spinors, operator on H, e.g. /, we say the operator is covariant if under the transformation ψ uψ, the operator trasforms as Ô uôu 1, since that gives us Ôψ uôψ. At the end, a theory built with L ψ Ôψ is invariant under the transformation. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
4 The quickest review of gauge theory -Cont d When we localize the transformation u, things sometimes change Ô uôu 1 + local terms. Therefore, we need to come up with another operator that transforms as  uâu 1 local terms, so that the combination of the two gives Ô +  u(ô + Â)u 1. Then we have made the combo operator Ô +  a covariant operator, denoted Ô A. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
5 Example: U(1) from global to local We have L = ψi / ψ. Invariant under global U(1): ψ e iθ ψ, L L = L. When we localize the U(1) symmetry, i.e. θ = θ(x), ψ e iθ(x) ψ, L L = L θψψ. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
6 Example: U(1) from global to local -Cont d Therefore we come up with a U(1) gauge field A, which transforms as A uau 1 + θ. and modify the Lagrangian as L = ψ(i / + /A)ψ. All together, we acquire an invariant theory. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
7 Description in spectral triple Suppose we have The unitary transformations are Under transformations u, we have A =C (M), H =Γ(M, S), D =i /. {u A u u = uu = 1}. ψ uψ, Dψ Duψ = udψ + [D, u]ψ. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
8 Under transformations u, we have ψ uψ, Dψ Duψ = udψ + [D, u]ψ, The theory built with ψdψ is invariant ψdψ ψu Duψ = ψdψ + ψu [D, u]ψ. [D, u] = 0, (u) = 0, u is a global symmetry. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
9 Under transformations u, we have ψ uψ, Dψ Duψ = udψ + [D, u]ψ, The theory built with ψdψ is invariant What if [D, u] 0? ψdψ ψu Duψ = ψdψ + ψu [D, u]ψ. [D, u] = 0, (u) = 0, u is a global symmetry. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
10 Under transformations u, we have ψ uψ, Dψ Duψ = udψ + [D, u]ψ, The theory built with ψdψ is invariant What if [D, u] 0? ψdψ ψu Duψ = ψdψ + ψu [D, u]ψ. [D, u] = 0, (u) = 0, u is a global symmetry. Old trick: use a gauge field to absorb the extra term. What should the gauge look like? Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
11 [D, u] 0 In this case, D transforms as D u(d + u [D, u])u. Apparently it is not covariant. It is perturbed during the transformation, with the extra term is of the form u [D, u]. We want to absorb the extra term into D, with the hope the overall operator is recovered covariant. Therefore we define another operator as A = a i [D, b i ], where a i, b i A. We can immediately tell the extra term is nothing but of the form of A, thus can be absorbed. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
12 D u(d + u [D, u])u = u(d + A 0 )u. With transformation u: D D + A 0. Need A A A 0. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
13 Using the language we are familiar with, we have (up to order one condition) ψ uψ, D u(d + u [D, u])u, A u(a u [D, u])u, D + A u(d + A)u. Formally, D works similarly to a differential operator as in W = W µ dx µ, and A works like the gauge field. In this way, we can define the new differential one forms as elements in { } Ω 1 = ai [D, b i ] a i, b i A. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
14 Using the language we are familiar with, we have (up to order one condition) ψ uψ, D u(d + u [D, u])u, A u(a u [D, u])u, D + A u(d + A)u. Formally, D works similarly to a differential operator as in W = W µ dx µ, and A works like the gauge field. In this way, we can define the new differential one forms as elements in { } Ω 1 = ai [D, b i ] a i, b i A. Define the perturbed D A to be the combination of the two D A = D + A. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
15 Generalization As it is shown above, (A, H, D) = (C (M), Γ(M, S), i / ) gives us a U(1) gauge theory. But, what for? With a few modifications, we can build a generalized gauge theory. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
16 A = C C According to Gelfand-Naimark, if we study all the algebra in C (M), we can get all the information of the geometry M. where f C (M). f : M C, p f (p), By analogy: Consider changing A = C (M) to A = C C, a A, we denote a = (λ, λ ). This is the map, a : {p 1, p 2 } C, p 1 a(p 1 ) = λ, p 2 a(p 2 ) = λ. Similar to C (M) M, roughly, we have C C {p 1, p 2 }, a two point space. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
17 A = C C At this point, there is no relation for the two points space. In A = C (M), the distance is d(x, y) = inf ds, γ d 2 s = g µν dx µ dx ν. How to extract this information from the algebra, if Gelfand-Naimark is correct? Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
18 A = C C At this point, there is no relation for the two points space. In A = C (M), the distance is d(x, y) = inf ds, γ d 2 s = g µν dx µ dx ν. How to extract this information from the algebra, if Gelfand-Naimark is correct? d(x, y) = sup{ f (x) f (y) : f C (M), f (x) 1}. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
19 d(x, y) = sup{ f (x) f (y) : f C (M), f (x) 1}. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
20 Distance formula: d(x, y) = sup{ f (x) f (y) : f C (M), f (x) 1}. Translate: f x x 1 x 2 x Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
21 Distance formula: d(x, y) = sup{ f (x) f (y) : f C (M), f (x) 1}. Translate: f x x 1 x 2 x Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
22 Distance formula: d(x, y) = sup{ f (x) f (y) : f C (M), f (x) 1}. Translate: f x x 1 x 2 x Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
23 Distance formula: d(x, y) = sup{ f (x) f (y) : f C (M), f (x) 1}. Translate: f x x 1 x 2 x Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
24 Distance formula: d(x, y) = sup{ f (x) f (y) : f C (M), f (x) 1}. Translate: f x x 1 x 2 x Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
25 A = C C By analogy, can calculate the distance between the two points in A = C C. Introduce the third element, the generalization of Dirac operator, The distance formula is D = [ 0 m m 0 ]. d(x, y) = sup{ a(x) a(y) : a A, [D, a] 1}. Distance between the two points d(p 1, p 2 ) = sup a A, [D,a] 1 { a(p 1 ) a(p 2 ) } = sup (λ,λ ) A, [D,a] 1 λ λ = 1 m. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
26 A = C C By analogy, can calculate the distance between the two points in A = C C. Introduce the third element, the generalization of Dirac operator, The distance formula is D = [ 0 m m 0 ]. d(x, y) = sup{ a(x) a(y) : a A, [D, a] 1}. Distance between the two points d(p 1, p 2 ) = sup a A, [D,a] 1 { a(p 1 ) a(p 2 ) } = sup (λ,λ ) A, [D,a] 1 λ λ = 1 m. The generalized Dirac operator encodes the distance information! Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
27 A = C C A = C C, H = C N C N, [ ] 0 M D =. M 0 For a A = (λ, λ ), the differential is (λ λ ): By analogy with [ ] [D, a] = (λ λ 0 M ), M 0 df = µ f dx µ = lim ɛ 0 (f (x + ɛ) f (x)) dx µ ɛ. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
28 A = C C A = C C, H = C N C N, [ ] 0 M D =. M 0 For a A = (λ, λ ), the differential is (λ λ ): [ ] [D, a] = (λ λ 0 M ), M 0 By analogy with df = µ f dx µ = lim ɛ 0 (f (x + ɛ) f (x)) dx µ ɛ. The integral is (λ + λ ): By analogy with Tr(a) = λ + λ. f (x)dx. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
29 Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 A 2. e.g. the model with U(1) Y SU(2) L, or SU(2) R SU(2) L, etc. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
30 Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 A 2. e.g. the model with U(1) Y SU(2) L, or SU(2) R SU(2) L, etc. They correspond to a representation space H L H R, or H f H f. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
31 Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 A 2. e.g. the model with U(1) Y SU(2) L, or SU(2) R SU(2) L, etc. They correspond to a representation space H L H R, or H f H f. It is natural to equip the spectral triple (A, H, D) with another object, γ, the grading operator. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
32 Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 A 2. e.g. the model with U(1) Y SU(2) L, or SU(2) R SU(2) L, etc. They correspond to a representation space H L H R, or H f H f. It is natural to equip the spectral triple (A, H, D) with another object, γ, the grading operator. For example, In the case of (A, H, D) = (C (M), Γ(M, S), i / ), γ = γ 5. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
33 Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 A 2. e.g. the model with U(1) Y SU(2) L, or SU(2) R SU(2) L, etc. They correspond to a representation space H L H R, or H f H f. It is natural to equip the spectral triple (A, H, D) with another object, γ, the grading operator. For example, In the case of (A, H, D) = (C (M), Γ(M, S), i / ), γ = γ 5. [ ] In the case of (A, H, D) = (C C, C N C N 0 M, ), we can choose M 0 the grading operator to be γ = diag(1,..., 1, 1,..., 1) }{{}}{{} N copies N copies Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
34 Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 A 2. e.g. the model with U(1) Y SU(2) L, or SU(2) R SU(2) L, etc. They correspond to a representation space H L H R, or H f H f. It is natural to equip the spectral triple (A, H, D) with another object, γ, the grading operator. For example, In the case of (A, H, D) = (C (M), Γ(M, S), i / ), γ = γ 5. [ ] In the case of (A, H, D) = (C C, C N C N 0 M, ), we can choose M 0 the grading operator to be γ = diag(1,..., 1, 1,..., 1) }{{}}{{} N copies N copies A device that helps us distinguish one part from the other. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
35 Grading Physically, we are specifically interested in the type of algebra A = A 1 A 2. e.g. the model with U(1) Y SU(2) L, or SU(2) R SU(2) L, etc. They correspond to a representation space H L H R, or H f H f. It is natural to equip the spectral triple (A, H, D) with another object, γ, the grading operator. For example, In the case of (A, H, D) = (C (M), Γ(M, S), i / ), γ = γ 5. [ ] In the case of (A, H, D) = (C C, C N C N 0 M, ), we can choose M 0 the grading operator to be γ = diag(1,..., 1, 1,..., 1) }{{}}{{} N copies N copies A device that helps us distinguish one part from the other. D, A = A 1 A 2 two sheets structure. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
36 A = C H A toy model A = C H, H = C 2 C 2, [ ] 0 M D =. M 0 Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
37 A = C H A toy model A = C H, H = C 2 C 2, [ ] 0 M D =. M 0 How do we fit this with our particle spectrum? Flavor space: ν R = 0, e R = 0, ν L = 1, e L = λ For any a A, a = To give mass terms out of ψ Dψ, let M = λ α β [ ] mν 0. 0 m e β. α Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
38 The unitary transformations are {u A u u = uu = 1}. This implies u = e iθ e iθ α β β s.t. α 2 + β 2 = 1. α which automatically fulfills det u = 1. This is the symmetry U(1) R SU(2) L. The U(1) R charge is 2 R L 0 0 Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
39 When we make the U(1) R SU(2) L transformation, L =Ψ DΨ Ψ u DuΨ = Ψ DΨ + Ψ u [D, u]ψ. }{{} the local twist In general [D, u] 0, therefore, this demands for a gauge field to absorb the local twist, in the discrete direction. According to our recipe, we do have a gauge field between the two sheets, A = i a i [D, b i ]. L =Ψ (D + A)Ψ Ψ DΨ + Ψ u [D, u]ψ + Ψ AΨ Ψ u [D, u]ψ =Ψ (D + A)Ψ Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
40 Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is [ ] M A = Φ, ΦM [ ] φ1 φ Φ = [φ 1 φ 2 ] = 2 φ 2 φ 1 Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
41 Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is [ ] M A = Φ, ΦM [ ] M D + A = (Φ + 1). (Φ + 1)M Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
42 Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is [ ] M A = Φ, ΦM [ ] M D + A = (Φ + 1). (Φ + 1)M The perturbation of D 2 derived from the (spectral) action: Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) Tr ( (MM ) 2) ( Φ ) 2. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
43 Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is [ ] M A = Φ, ΦM [ ] M D + A = (Φ + 1). (Φ + 1)M The perturbation of D 2 derived from the (spectral) action: Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) Tr ( (MM ) 2) ( Φ ) 2. This gives us a Mexican-hat-shaped potential. A field expanded at the minimum 0. By counting d.o.f, we have = 4 real degrees, i.e. Φ is a pair of complex numbers. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
44 Demanded to be Hermitian, this gauge field is [ ] M A = Φ, ΦM [ ] M D + A = (Φ + 1). (Φ + 1)M The perturbation of D 2 derived from the (spectral) action: Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) Tr ( (MM ) 2) ( Φ ) 2. This gives us a Mexican-hat-shaped potential. A field expanded at the minimum 0. By counting d.o.f, we have = 4 real degrees, i.e. Φ is a pair of complex numbers. SSB now has a reason: D + A gives a VEV shift. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
45 By analogy, local twist e iθ µ e iθ = µ θ u [D, u] ω A µ d µ x ai [D, b i ] = ΦM basis d µ x M comp A µ Φ M θ (d + A) (d + A) Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) F µν µ A ν + [A µ, A ν ] DA + A 2 S F µν F µν d 4 x (Tr ( (D + A) 2 D 2) ) 2 M Φ Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
46 Product geometry Consider the algebra: This corresponds to a geometry A =C (M) C (M) C (M) (C C). F =M M, M {p 1, p 2 }. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
47 Product geometry Consider the algebra: This corresponds to a geometry A =C (M) C (M) C (M) (C C). F =M M, M {p 1, p 2 }. Combining continuous part with C H, a double-layer structure. A = C (M) (C H). Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
48 The Dirac operator of the product geometry: The gauge field: D x = i / + γ 5 D. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
49 The Dirac operator of the product geometry: The gauge field: D x = i / + γ 5 D. A x f i [/, g i ] + a i [D, b i ] } {{ } } {{ } A [1,0] A [0,1] Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
50 The Dirac operator of the product geometry: The gauge field: D x = i / + γ 5 D. A x f i [/, g i ] }{{} A [1,0] [ B Φ Φ W ]. + a i [D, b i ] } {{ } A [0,1] Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
51 Highlights: A two sheet structure. A gauge field in between. SSB feature out of box. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
52 Highlights: A two sheet structure. A gauge field in between. SSB feature out of box. Implies a Higgs as the discrete gauge, generated similarly as the continous gauge fields. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
53 Color sector In order to reproduce SM, color sector must be involved. Introduce the color space. H = C C 3, with basis l = 0, r = 0, g = 1, b = A = C M 3 (C), with a A, λ a = Symmetry group is m 11 m 21 m 12 m 22 m 13 m. 23 m 31 m 32 m 33 {u A u u = uu = 1}, together with the unimodularity condition, det u = 1. a = e iθ e iθ/3 m, m SU(3). Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
54 a = e iθ e iθ/3 m, m SU(3). This gives the U(1) charge l r g b We recognize them as B L charge, and this gives us the symmetry U(1) B L SU(3) C. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
55 A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)). Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
56 A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)). Introduce the bimodule representation: R l R r L g. L b Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
57 A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)). Introduce the bimodule representation: Denote the space as R l R r L g. L b (2 R 2 L ) (1 l 3 C ). Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
58 A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)). Introduce the bimodule representation: Denote the space as R l R r L g. L b (2 R 2 L ) (1 l 3 C ). Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
59 A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)). Introduce the bimodule representation: Denote the space as R l R r L g. L b (2 R 2 L ) (1 l 3 C ). Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example ν L = L l 2 L 1 l, Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
60 A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)). Introduce the bimodule representation: Denote the space as R l R r L g. L b (2 R 2 L ) (1 l 3 C ). Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example d R,g = R g Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
61 A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)) To combine the flavor sector with the color sector, let A = C (M) (C H M 3 (C)). Introduce the bimodule representation: Denote the space as R l R r L g. L b (2 R 2 L ) (1 l 3 C ). Can identify the basis with SM particle spectrum, for example d R = R [ r g b ] 2 R 3 C, Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
62 Introduce J, charge conjugate, R l l R J R r r L g g R, L L b b L a A with left action on flavor space as before, JaJ 1 is the right action on color space. Ready to combine the previous result on flavor space and color space. 2 R L 0 0 l r g b Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
63 U(1) R : L R U(1) B L : L R Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
64 L R Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
65 Spectral Action According to Chamseddine et. al. (hep-th/ ), one builds the action based on spectral action principle: The physical (bosonic) action only depends upon the spectrum of D. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
66 Spectral Action According to Chamseddine et. al. (hep-th/ ), one builds the action based on spectral action principle: The physical (bosonic) action only depends upon the spectrum of D. S spec = Tr(f (D A /Λ)). We can expand it as Tr(f (D A /Λ)) L(g µν, A) g d 4 x. M Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
67 The bosonic action, S Bosonic =S Higgs + S YM + S Cosmology + S Riemann, S Higgs = f 0a 2π 2 D µ φ 2 g d 4 x + 2af 2Λ 2 + ef 0 π 2 φ 2 g d 4 x + f 0b 2π 2 φ 4 g d 4 x, S YM = f 0 16π 2 Tr(F µνf µν ) = f 0 2π 2 (g3 2 GµνG i µν i + g2 2 WµνW i µν i g 1 2 B µν B µν ) g d 4 x where the parameters are a =Tr(M ν M ν + M e M e + 3(M u M u + M d M d )) b =Tr((M ν M ν ) 2 + (M e M e ) 2 + 3(M u M u ) 2 + 3(M d M d ) 2 ) c =Tr(M RM R ) d =Tr((M RM R ) 2 ) e =Tr(M RM R M ν M ν ), f n is the (n 1)th momentum of f. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
68 Output: Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
69 Output: g 2 3 = g 2 2 = 5 3 g 2 1, Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
70 Output: g 2 3 = g 2 2 = 5 3 g 2 1, φ 0, Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
71 Output: g 2 3 = g 2 2 = 5 3 g 2 1, φ 0, M 2 W = 1 8 i (mi 2 ν + m i 2 e + 3m i 2 u + 3m i 2 d ), Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
72 Output: g 2 3 = g 2 2 = 5 3 g 2 1, φ 0, MW 2 = 1 i 8 (mi 2 ν + m i 2 e + 3m i 2 u + 3m i 2 d ), Can be calculated from spectral action. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
73 Output: g 2 3 = g 2 2 = 5 3 g 2 1, φ 0, MW 2 = 1 i 8 (mi 2 ν + m i 2 e + 3m i 2 u + 3m i 2 d ), Can be calculated from spectral action. Intuitively, Cont Disc Fermion ψ / ψ Ψ DΨ Boson µ W µ W D 2 W 2 Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
74 Output: g 2 3 = g 2 2 = 5 3 g 2 1, φ 0, M 2 W = 1 8 m H 170 GeV, i (mi 2 ν + m i 2 e + 3m i 2 u + 3m i 2 d ), Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
75 Output: g 2 3 = g 2 2 = 5 3 g 2 1, φ 0, M 2 W = 1 8 i (mi 2 ν + m i 2 e + 3m i 2 u + 3m i 2 d ), m H 170 GeV, problematic, which is naturally saved by the left-right completion we propose. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
76 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ φ + δφ, with δφ = ɛ i σ i φ = ɛ i Φ i, Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
77 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ φ + δφ, with δφ = ɛ i σ i φ = ɛ i Φ i, δl δl δs = δφ + δφ δ φ δ φ ( ) ( ) δl δl δl = δφ δφ + δ φ δφ δφ δ φ ( ) EOM δl = δ φ δφ ( = ɛ δl ) δ φ Φ = (ɛj) = µ (ɛ)j µ + ɛ µ j µ. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
78 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ φ + δφ, with δφ = ɛ i σ i φ = ɛ i Φ i, δs = (ɛj) = µ (ɛ)j µ + ɛ µ j µ. µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) 0, a local symmetry with a gauge. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
79 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ φ + δφ, with δφ = ɛ i σ i φ = ɛ i Φ i, δs = (ɛj) = µ (ɛ)j µ + ɛ µ j µ. µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) 0, a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ DΨ Ψ DΨ + Ψ [D, ɛ i σ i ]Ψ. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
80 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ φ + δφ, with δφ = ɛ i σ i φ = ɛ i Φ i, δs = (ɛj) = µ (ɛ)j µ + ɛ µ j µ. µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) 0, a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ DΨ Ψ DΨ + Ψ [D, ɛ i σ i ]Ψ. Ψ [D, ɛ i σ i ]Ψ by analogy with µ (ɛj µ ). Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
81 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ φ + δφ, with δφ = ɛ i σ i φ = ɛ i Φ i, δs = (ɛj) = µ (ɛ)j µ + ɛ µ j µ. µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) 0, a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ DΨ Ψ DΨ + Ψ [D, ɛ i σ i ]Ψ. Ψ [D, ɛ i σ i ]Ψ by analogy with µ (ɛj µ ). [D, ɛ i σ i ] = 0 a global symmetry in the discrete direction. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
82 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] is insensitive to local/global transformation w.r.t. M. φ φ + δφ, with δφ = ɛ i σ i φ = ɛ i Φ i, δs = (ɛj) = µ (ɛ)j µ + ɛ µ j µ. µ j µ = 0 a symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) = 0 a global symmetry. µ (ɛ j µ ) 0, a local symmetry with a gauge. Ψ DΨ Ψ DΨ + Ψ [D, ɛ i σ i ]Ψ. Ψ [D, ɛ i σ i ]Ψ by analogy with µ (ɛj µ ). [D, ɛ i σ i ] = 0 a global symmetry in the discrete direction. [D, ɛ i σ i ] 0 a local symmetry in the discrete direction, with a gauge. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
83 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] = 0 refers to Du = ud, D = udu. In SM, this refers to the VEV shift is invariant under the transformation u. This describes the transformation of VEV shift, or the symmetry under which vacuum is invariant. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
84 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] = 0 refers to Du = ud, D = udu. In SM, this refers to the VEV shift is invariant under the transformation u. This describes the transformation of VEV shift, or the symmetry under which vacuum is invariant. Remaining symmetry, Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
85 Other Fun Facts local twist [D, u] = 0 refers to Du = ud, D = udu. In SM, this refers to the VEV shift is invariant under the transformation u. This describes the transformation of VEV shift, or the symmetry under which vacuum is invariant. Remaining symmetry, Breaking chain. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
86 Other Fun Facts local twist [ ] 0 M In the simplest case, A = H H, D = and M = M 0 Pictorially, the twist between left sheet and right sheet. [ ] 0 mu. m d 0 Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
87 Other Fun Facts local twist [ ] 0 M In the simplest case, A = H H, D = and M = M 0 [ ] 0 mu. m d 0 Pictorially, the twist between left sheet and right sheet. But even we make same twists for left and right, we still have a local twist term, unless m u = m d, isospin-like. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
88 Other Fun Facts The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
89 Other Fun Facts The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Extra dimension but discrete. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
90 Other Fun Facts The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Extra dimension but discrete. The separation introduces a second scale EW, from a i [D, b i ], different from the GUT scale which is led by the fluctuation in the continuous direction f i [/, g i ]. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
91 Other Fun Facts The seperation Totally independent of the base manifold M. Extra dimension but discrete. The separation introduces a second scale EW, from a i [D, b i ], different from the GUT scale which is led by the fluctuation in the continuous direction f i [/, g i ]. When the separation goes to, m f 0. This corresponds to the decouple of Higgs sector: left and right stop talking to each other, physically and geometrically. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
92 Back to the Left-Right Completion Different realizations. For example. NCG/ spectral triple is built using lattice, supersymmetric quantum mechanics operators, Moyal deformed space, etc. We have tried a specific realization using superconnection, su(2 1), and the left-right completion of su(2 2). Low energy emergent left-right completion, 4 TeV. (Ufuk Aydemir, Djordje Minic, C.S., Tatsu Takeuchi: Phys. Rev. D 91, (2015) [arxiv: ]) Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
93 More About the Left-Right Completion Hints for left-right symmetry behind the scene. (Pati-Salam Unification from NCG and the TeV-scale WR boson, [arxiv: ], Ufuk Aydemir, Djordje Minic, C.S., Tatsu Takeuchi ) Changing the algebra to (H R H L ) (C M 3 (C)) does not change the scale. 2 3 g 2 BL = g 2 2L = g 2 2R = g 2 3. Through the mixing of SU(2) R U(1) B L into U(1) Y, we get LR symmetry breaking at GUT. 1 g 2 = 1 g gbl 2 = g 2. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
94 Myths and Outlooks So far it is a classical theory only classical L is given. But it has a GUT feature! Without adding new d.o.f. If it just happens at one scale, how to accommodate Wilson picture. Quantization of the theory? Loops? Relation to the D-brane structure? Measure of the Dirac operator?... Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
95 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
96 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
97 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
98 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
99 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
100 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
101 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. SSB has a reason. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
102 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. SSB has a reason. Fit in all SM fermions and bosons. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
103 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. SSB has a reason. Fit in all SM fermions and bosons. GUT without new degrees of freedom. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
104 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. SSB has a reason. Fit in all SM fermions and bosons. GUT without new degrees of freedom. Mass relation. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
105 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. SSB has a reason. Fit in all SM fermions and bosons. GUT without new degrees of freedom. Mass relation. Predicts Higgs mass. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
106 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. SSB has a reason. Fit in all SM fermions and bosons. GUT without new degrees of freedom. Mass relation. Predicts Higgs mass. Local twist with different setting of D. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
107 Summary (of Fun Facts) Recipe to cook up a (generalized) gauge theory: (A, H, D), the spectral triple. Take mass matrix as a derivative, trace as the integral. Generate the gauge field A = a[d, b]. Spectral action, Tr(f (D/Λ)) DA + A 2, as the gauge strength Generalized free fermion action, Ψ D A Ψ, for the fermionic part. The dish: Two sheets structure. An extra discrete direction. Separation of the sheets (m f 0, second scale, etc.) Higgs is a gauge in that direction. SSB has a reason. Fit in all SM fermions and bosons. GUT without new degrees of freedom. Mass relation. Predicts Higgs mass. Local twist with different setting of D. Minimally coupled gravity sector.... Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
108 Reference Chamseddine, Connes, et. al.: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 18B, 29 (1991) Commun. Math. Phys. 182, 155 (1996) [hep-th/ ], Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11, 991 (2007) [hep-th/ ], JHEP 0611, 081 (2006) [hep-th/ ], Commun. Math. Phys. 186, 731 (1997) [hep-th/ ]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, (2007) [arxiv: [hep-th]], J. Geom. Phys. 58, 38 (2008) [arxiv: [hep-th]], Fortsch. Phys. 58, 553 (2010), [arxiv: [hep-th]]. Neeman, Fairlie, et. al.: Phys. Lett. B 81, 190 (1979), J. Phys. G 5, L55 (1979), Phys. Lett. B 82, 97 (1979). Ufuk Aydemir, Djordje Minic, C.S., Tatsu Takeuchi: Phys. Rev. D 91, (2015) [arxiv: ], Pati-Salam Unification from Non-commutative Geometry and the TeV-scale W R boson [arxiv: ]. Chen Duke Gauge Theory through NCG October 24, / 44
Pati-Salam unification from noncommutative geometry and the TeV-scale WR boson
Pati-Salam unification from noncommutative geometry and the TeV-scale WR boson Ufuk Aydemir Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University Collaborators: Djordje Minic, Tatsu Takeuchi, Chen Sun
More informationSpectral Triples and Pati Salam GUT
Ma148b Spring 2016 Topics in Mathematical Physics References A.H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, W. van Suijlekom, Beyond the Spectral Standard Model: Emergence of Pati-Salam Unification, JHEP 1311 (2013) 132
More informationThe Standard Model in Noncommutative Geometry: fermions as internal Dirac spinors
1/21 The Standard Model in Noncommutative Geometry: fermions as internal Dirac spinors Ludwik Dabrowski SISSA, Trieste (I) (based on JNCG in print with F. D Andrea) Corfu, 22 September 2015 Goal Establish
More informationand the seeds of quantisation
noncommutative spectral geometry algebra doubling and the seeds of quantisation m.s.,.,, stabile, vitiello, PRD 84 (2011) 045026 mairi sakellariadou king s college london noncommutative spectral geometry
More informationGrand Unification in the Spectral Pati Salam Model
Grand Unification in the Spectral Pati Salam Model Ali H Chamseddine 1,3, Alain Connes 2,3,4 and Walter D van Suijlekom 5 1 Physics Department, American University of Beirut, Lebanon 2 College de France,
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 7 May 2009
arxiv:0905.0997v1 [hep-ph] 7 May 9 BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL: A NONCOMMUTATIVE APPROACH C.A. STEPHAN Institut für Mathematik, Universität Potsdam 14469 Potsdam, Germany During the last two decades Alain
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationThe Spectral Geometry of the Standard Model
Ma148b Spring 2016 Topics in Mathematical Physics References A.H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, M. Marcolli, Gravity and the Standard Model with Neutrino Mixing, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., Vol.11 (2007) 991 1090
More informationAn extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model
An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model Jochen Zahn Universität Wien based on arxiv:1401.2020 joint work with Harold Steinacker Bayrischzell, May 2014 Motivation The IKKT
More informationSummary. Talk based on: Keywords Standard Model, Morita equivalence, spectral triples. Summary of the talk: 1 Spectral action / Spectral triples.
Summary The Standard Model in Noncommutative Geometry and Morita equivalence Francesco D Andrea 27/02/2017 Talk based on: FD & L. Dabrowski, J. Noncommut. Geom. 10 (2016) 551 578. L. Dabrowski, FD & A.
More informationTHE STANDARD MODEL AND THE GENERALIZED COVARIANT DERIVATIVE
THE STANDAD MODEL AND THE GENEALIZED COVAIANT DEIVATIVE arxiv:hep-ph/9907480v Jul 999 M. Chaves and H. Morales Escuela de Física, Universidad de Costa ica San José, Costa ica E-mails: mchaves@cariari.ucr.ac.cr,
More informationThe Spectral Action and the Standard Model
Ma148b Spring 2016 Topics in Mathematical Physics References A.H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, M. Marcolli, Gravity and the Standard Model with Neutrino Mixing, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., Vol.11 (2007) 991 1090
More informationEmergent space-time and gravity in the IIB matrix model
Emergent space-time and gravity in the IIB matrix model Harold Steinacker Department of physics Veli Losinj, may 2013 Geometry and physics without space-time continuum aim: (toy-?) model for quantum theory
More informationSpectral action, scale anomaly. and the Higgs-Dilaton potential
Spectral action, scale anomaly and the Higgs-Dilaton potential Fedele Lizzi Università di Napoli Federico II Work in collaboration with A.A. Andrianov (St. Petersburg) and M.A. Kurkov (Napoli) JHEP 1005:057,2010
More informationNew Model of massive spin-2 particle
New Model of massive spin-2 particle Based on Phys.Rev. D90 (2014) 043006, Y.O, S. Akagi, S. Nojiri Phys.Rev. D90 (2014) 123013, S. Akagi, Y.O, S. Nojiri Yuichi Ohara QG lab. Nagoya univ. Introduction
More informationCoordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates
Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates Amir H. Fatollahi Department of Physics, Alzahra University, P. O. Box 19938, Tehran 91167, Iran fath@alzahra.ac.ir Abstract
More informationSpectral Action from Anomalies
Spectral Action from Anomalies Fedele Lizzi Università di Napoli Federico II and Insitut de Ciencies del Cosmo, Universitat de Barcelona Work in collaboration with A.A. Andrianov & M. Kurkov (St. Petersburg)
More informationLecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism
Lecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism Introduction: moduli space. Outline Explicit computation of moduli space for SUSY QCD with F < N and F N. The Higgs mechanism. The super-higgs mechanism. Reading: Terning
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14.
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14 Majorana spinors March 15, 2012 So far, we have only considered massless, two-component
More informationThe Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local Gauge Transformations Dynamics of Field Ten
Lecture 4 QCD as a Gauge Theory Adnan Bashir, IFM, UMSNH, Mexico August 2013 Hermosillo Sonora The Gauge Principle Contents Quantum Electrodynamics SU(N) Gauge Theory Global Gauge Transformations Local
More informationSolutions to gauge hierarchy problem. SS 10, Uli Haisch
Solutions to gauge hierarchy problem SS 10, Uli Haisch 1 Quantum instability of Higgs mass So far we considered only at RGE of Higgs quartic coupling (dimensionless parameter). Higgs mass has a totally
More informationNoncommutative geometry, Grand Symmetry and twisted spectral triple
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Noncommutative geometry, Grand Symmetry and twisted spectral triple To cite this article: Agostino Devastato 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 634 012008
More informationGauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised
Outline Gauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised Giuliano Panico ISAS-SISSA Trieste, Italy The 14th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions Irvine,
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 15 Aug 2000
hep-th/0008120 IPM/P2000/026 Gauged Noncommutative Wess-Zumino-Witten Models arxiv:hep-th/0008120v1 15 Aug 2000 Amir Masoud Ghezelbash,,1, Shahrokh Parvizi,2 Department of Physics, Az-zahra University,
More informationAxions. Kerstin Helfrich. Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics, / 31
1 / 31 Axions Kerstin Helfrich Seminar on Theoretical Particle Physics, 06.07.06 2 / 31 Structure 1 Introduction 2 Repetition: Instantons Formulae The θ-vacuum 3 The U(1) and the strong CP problem The
More informationTowards particle physics models from fuzzy extra dimensions
Towards particle physics models from fuzzy extra dimensions Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis National Technical University and NCSR Demokritos, Athens Joint work with H.Steinacker and G.Zoupanos Particles
More informationSymmetry Groups conservation law quantum numbers Gauge symmetries local bosons mediate the interaction Group Abelian Product of Groups simple
Symmetry Groups Symmetry plays an essential role in particle theory. If a theory is invariant under transformations by a symmetry group one obtains a conservation law and quantum numbers. For example,
More informationIntroduction to Lattice Supersymmetry
Introduction to Lattice Supersymmetry Simon Catterall Syracuse University Introduction to Lattice Supersymmetry p. 1 Motivation Motivation: SUSY theories - cancellations between fermions/bosons soft U.V
More informationFuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models
Fuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Joint work with H.Steinacker and G.Zoupanos arxiv:1002.2606 [hep-th] Corfu, September 2010 Overview Motivation N = 4 SYM
More informationLectures on Standard Model Effective Field Theory
Lectures on Standard Model Effective Field Theory Yi Liao Nankai Univ SYS Univ, July 24-28, 2017 Page 1 Outline 1 Lecture 4: Standard Model EFT: Dimension-six Operators SYS Univ, July 24-28, 2017 Page
More informationAs usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16
As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 8: Lectures 15, 16 Masses for Vectors: the Higgs mechanism April 6, 2012 The momentum-space propagator
More informationThe spectral action for Dirac operators with torsion
The spectral action for Dirac operators with torsion Christoph A. Stephan joint work with Florian Hanisch & Frank Pfäffle Institut für athematik Universität Potsdam Tours, ai 2011 1 Torsion Geometry, Einstein-Cartan-Theory
More informationHIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY
HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY I.L. Buchbinder Tomsk I.L. Buchbinder (Tomsk) HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY Wroclaw, April, 2011 1 / 27 Aims Brief non-expert non-technical review of some old
More informationInter-brane distance stabilization by bulk Higgs field in RS model
EPJ Web of Conferences 58, 0500 07 QFTHEP 07 DOI: 0.05/epjconf/07580500 Inter-brane distance stabilization by bulk Higgs field in RS model Vadim Egorov,, and Igor Volobuev, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear
More informationReφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f
I. THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM A. Quadratic divergence We illustrate the problem of the quadratic divergence in the Higgs sector of the SM through an explicit calculation. The example studied is that of the
More informationManifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group
Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group Anthony W. H. Preston University of Southampton Supervised by Prof. Tim R. Morris Talk prepared for Asymptotic Safety seminar,
More informationDimensional reduction near the deconfinement transition
Dimensional reduction near the deconfinement transition Aleksi Kurkela ETH Zürich Wien 27.11.2009 Outline Introduction Dimensional reduction Center symmetry The deconfinement transition: QCD has two remarkable
More informationA String Model for Preons and the Standard Model Particles. Abstract
March 5, 013 A String Model for Preons and the Standard Model Particles Risto Raitio 1 030 Espoo, Finland Abstract A preon model for standard model particles is proposed based on spin 1 fermion and spin
More informationThe Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle
The Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle Heavy-Ion Seminar... or the Anderson-Higgs-Brout-Englert-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble Mechanism Philip W. Anderson Peter W. Higgs Tom W. B. Gerald Carl R. François Robert
More informationChiral Symmetry Breaking from Monopoles and Duality
Chiral Symmetry Breaking from Monopoles and Duality Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University with A. Cherman and M. Unsal, PRL 117 (2016) 081601 Motivation Confinement and chiral symmetry breaking
More informationDonoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6
1 Week 7: Non linear sigma models and pion lagrangians Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter 9.3 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6 Weinberg, Chap. 19 1 Goldstone boson lagrangians
More informationHolographic Wilsonian Renormalization Group
Holographic Wilsonian Renormalization Group JiYoung Kim May 0, 207 Abstract Strongly coupled systems are difficult to study because the perturbation of the systems does not work with strong couplings.
More informationNONCOMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY IN THE LHC-ERA
NONCOMMUTATIVE GEOMETRY IN THE LHC-ERA C.A. STEPHAN Institut für Mathematik, Universität Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 0, 4469 Potsdam, Germany Noncommutative geometry allows to unify the basic building blocks
More informationStar operation in Quantum Mechanics. Abstract
July 000 UMTG - 33 Star operation in Quantum Mechanics L. Mezincescu Department of Physics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 3314 Abstract We outline the description of Quantum Mechanics with noncommuting
More informationCHAPTER II: The QCD Lagrangian
CHAPTER II: The QCD Lagrangian.. Preparation: Gauge invariance for QED - 8 - Ã µ UA µ U i µ U U e U A µ i.5 e U µ U U Consider electrons represented by Dirac field ψx. Gauge transformation: Gauge field
More informationThe Standard Model Part. II
Our Story Thus Far The Standard Model Part. II!!We started with QED (and!)!!we extended this to the Fermi theory of weak interactions! Adding G F!!Today we will extended this to Glashow-Weinberg-Salam
More informationYet Another Alternative to Compactification
Okayama Institute for Quantum Physics: June 26, 2009 Yet Another Alternative to Compactification Heterotic five-branes explain why three generations in Nature arxiv: 0905.2185 [hep-th] Tetsuji KIMURA (KEK)
More informationThe Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology
The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology Juan Rojo STFC Rutherford Fellow University of Oxford Theoretical Physics Graduate School course Lecture 2: The QCD Lagrangian, Symmetries and Feynman Rules
More informationGrand Unification. Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Gravity not included
Pati-Salam, 73; Georgi-Glashow, 74 Grand Unification Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group G M X SU(3) SU() U(1) Gravity not included (perhaps not ambitious enough) α(q ) α 3
More informationIntroduction to Instantons. T. Daniel Brennan. Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Field Theory. Effects of Instanton- Matter Interactions.
February 18, 2015 1 2 3 Instantons in Path Integral Formulation of mechanics is based around the propagator: x f e iht / x i In path integral formulation of quantum mechanics we relate the propagator to
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationSymmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics
Symmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari Symmetries have been the cornerstone of modern physics in the last century. Symmetries are used to classify solutions to physical
More informationNoncommutative Geometry for Quantum Spacetime
Noncommutative Geometry for Quantum Spacetime The view from below Fedele Lizzi Università di Napoli Federico II Institut de Ciencies del Cosmo, Barcelona SIGrav, Alessandria 2014 I think we would all agree
More information125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification
125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification Nobuchika Okada The University of Alabama Miami 2013, Fort Lauderdale, Dec. 12 18, 2013 Discovery of Higgs boson at LHC! 7/04/2012 Standard Model Higgs boson
More informationThe boundary state from open string fields. Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba. March 9, 2009 at Nagoya
The boundary state from open string fields Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba March 9, 2009 at Nagoya Based on arxiv:0810.1737 in collaboration with Kiermaier and Zwiebach (MIT) 1 1. Introduction Quantum
More informationTheory toolbox. Chapter Chiral effective field theories
Chapter 3 Theory toolbox 3.1 Chiral effective field theories The near chiral symmetry of the QCD Lagrangian and its spontaneous breaking can be exploited to construct low-energy effective theories of QCD
More informationHeterotic Brane World
Heterotic Brane World Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Germany Based on work with S. Förste, P. Vaudrevange and A. Wingerter hep-th/0406208, to appear in Physical Review D Heterotic
More information12.2 Problem Set 2 Solutions
78 CHAPTER. PROBLEM SET SOLUTIONS. Problem Set Solutions. I will use a basis m, which ψ C = iγ ψ = Cγ ψ (.47) We can define left (light) handed Majorana fields as, so that ω = ψ L + (ψ L ) C (.48) χ =
More informationLocal RG, Quantum RG, and Holographic RG. Yu Nakayama Special thanks to Sung-Sik Lee and Elias Kiritsis
Local RG, Quantum RG, and Holographic RG Yu Nakayama Special thanks to Sung-Sik Lee and Elias Kiritsis Local renormalization group The main idea dates back to Osborn NPB 363 (1991) See also my recent review
More informationElectroweak physics and the LHC an introduction to the Standard Model
Electroweak physics and the LHC an introduction to the Standard Model Paolo Gambino INFN Torino LHC School Martignano 12-18 June 2006 Outline Prologue on weak interactions Express review of gauge theories
More informationE 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale
E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale Instituts-Seminar Kerne und Teilchen, TU Dresden Alexander Knochel Uni Freiburg 24.06.2010 Based on: F. Braam, AK, J. Reuter, arxiv:1001.4074 [hep-ph], JHEP06(2010)013 Outline
More informationMay 7, Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Francesco Fucito. Introduction. Standard. Model- Boson Sector. Standard. Model- Fermion Sector
- Boson - May 7, 2017 - Boson - The standard model of particle physics is the state of the art in quantum field theory All the knowledge we have developed so far in this field enters in its definition:
More informationStrongly coupled gauge theories: What can lattice calculations teach us?
Strongly coupled gauge theories: What can lattice calculations teach us? Anna Hasenfratz University of Colorado Boulder Rencontres de Moriond, March 21 216 Higgs era of particle physics The 212 discovery
More informationTeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw mechanism and its collider signatures at the LHC
TeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw mechanism and its collider signatures at the LHC Wei Chao (IHEP) Outline Brief overview of neutrino mass models. Introduction to a TeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw model. EW precision
More informationIntroduction to Noncommutative geometry
Introduction to Noncommutative geometry Apimook Watcharangool March 19, 2014 1 Abstract The objective of non-commutative geometry(ncg) is to find the link between the spectrum of operator algebra and the
More informationarxiv:hep-lat/ v6 11 Dec 2003
ITEP-LAT/2003-32 A hidden symmetry in the Standard Model B.L.G. Bakker a, A.I. Veselov b, M.A. Zubkov b arxiv:hep-lat/0301011v6 11 Dec 2003 a Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam,
More informationNeutrino Masses and Dark Matter in Gauge Theories for Baryon and Lepton Numbers
Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter in Gauge Theories for Baryon and Lepton Numbers DPG Frühjahrstagung 014 in Mainz Based on Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 31801 (013), Phys. Rev. D 88, 051701(R) (013), arxiv:1309.3970
More informationModification of Higgs Couplings in Minimal Composite Models
Modification of Higgs Couplings in Minimal Composite Models Da Liu Argonne National Laboratory With Ian Low, Carlos E. M. Wagner, arxiv:173.xxxx Motivation LHC data prefer κ t > κ g! Composite Higgs model
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 1 Dec 1998
SOGANG-HEP 235/98 Lagrangian Approach of the First Class Constrained Systems Yong-Wan Kim, Seung-Kook Kim and Young-Jai Park arxiv:hep-th/9812001v1 1 Dec 1998 Department of Physics and Basic Science Research
More informationHolographic study of magnetically induced ρ meson condensation
Holographic study of magnetically induced ρ meson condensation Nele Callebaut Ghent University November 13, 2012 QCD in strong magnetic fields, Trento Overview 1 Introduction 2 Holographic set-up The Sakai-Sugimoto
More informationTopological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons
8 November 00 Physics Letters B 50 00) 70 7 www.elsevier.com/locate/npe Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons A. Imaanpur Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University,
More informationQED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014
QED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014 Joel Goldstein University of Bristol Joel.Goldstein@bristol.ac.uk These lectures are designed to give an introduction to the gauge theories of the standard model
More informationGeometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010
March 4, 2010 Many uses of Mathematics in Physics The language of the physical world is mathematics. Quantitative understanding of the world around us requires the precise language of mathematics. Symmetries
More informationHIGGS-GRAVITATIONAL INTERATIONS! IN PARTICLE PHYSICS & COSMOLOGY
HIGGS-GRAVITATIONAL INTERATIONS! IN PARTICLE PHYSICS & COSMOLOGY beyond standard model ZHONG-ZHI XIANYU Tsinghua University June 9, 015 Why Higgs? Why gravity? An argument from equivalence principle Higgs:
More information2T-physics and the Standard Model of Particles and Forces Itzhak Bars (USC)
2T-physics and the Standard Model of Particles and Forces Itzhak Bars (USC) hep-th/0606045 Success of 2T-physics for particles on worldlines. Field theory version of 2T-physics. Standard Model in 4+2 dimensions.
More informationA construction of the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam model on the lattice with exact gauge invariance
A construction of the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam model on the lattice with exact gauge invariance Y. Kikukawa Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo based on : D. Kadoh and Y.K., JHEP 0805:095 (2008), 0802:063
More informationGauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov
Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov March 9, 2017 Work with Georgios Karananas, 1703.02964 Heidelberg, March 9, 2017 p. 1 Outline Motivation Gauge coupling unification without
More informationThe Standard Model and beyond
The Standard Model and beyond In this chapter we overview the structure of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, its shortcomings, and different ideas for physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM)
More informationMesons beyond the quark-antiquark picture: glueballs, hybrids, tetraquarks - part 1 - Francesco Giacosa
Mesons beyond the quark-antiquark picture: glueballs, hybrids, tetraquarks - part 1-55 Cracow School of Theoretical Physics 20 28/6/2015, Zakopane, Poland Outline The Lagrangian of QCD and its symmetries
More informationSolution Set 8 Worldsheet perspective on CY compactification
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Physics String Theory (8.821) Prof. J. McGreevy Fall 2007 Solution Set 8 Worldsheet perspective on CY compactification Due: Monday, December 18, 2007
More informationON ULTRAVIOLET STRUCTURE OF 6D SUPERSYMMETRIC GAUGE THEORIES. Ft. Lauderdale, December 18, 2015 PLAN
ON ULTRAVIOLET STRUCTURE OF 6D SUPERSYMMETRIC GAUGE THEORIES Ft. Lauderdale, December 18, 2015 PLAN Philosophical introduction Technical interlude Something completely different (if I have time) 0-0 PHILOSOPHICAL
More informationEffective Field Theory
Effective Field Theory Iain Stewart MIT The 19 th Taiwan Spring School on Particles and Fields April, 2006 Physics compartmentalized Quantum Field Theory String Theory? General Relativity short distance
More informationGeography on Heterotic Orbifolds
Geography on Heterotic Orbifolds Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn and CERN, Geneva Based on work with S. Förste, P. Vaudrevange and A. Wingerter hep-th/0406208, hep-th/0504117
More informationBoundary Conditions in AdS Life Without a Higgs
Boundary Conditions in AdS Life Without a Higgs Csáki, Grojean, Murayama, Pilo, JT hep-ph/0305237 Csáki, Grojean, Pilo, JT hep-ph/0308038 Csáki, Grojean, Hubisz, Shirman, JT hep-ph/0310355 Cacciapaglia,
More informationThe Phases of QCD. Thomas Schaefer. North Carolina State University
The Phases of QCD Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University 1 Motivation Different phases of QCD occur in the universe Neutron Stars, Big Bang Exploring the phase diagram is important to understanding
More informationYet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes
The University of Tokyo, Hongo: October 26, 2009 Yet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes arxiv: 0905.285 [hep-th] Tetsuji KIMURA (KEK) Shun ya Mizoguchi (KEK, SOKENDAI) Introduction
More informationThe θ term. In particle physics and condensed matter physics. Anna Hallin. 601:SSP, Rutgers Anna Hallin The θ term 601:SSP, Rutgers / 18
The θ term In particle physics and condensed matter physics Anna Hallin 601:SSP, Rutgers 2017 Anna Hallin The θ term 601:SSP, Rutgers 2017 1 / 18 1 Preliminaries 2 The θ term in general 3 The θ term in
More informationFlavor, Minimality and Naturalness in Composite Higgs Models
eth zurich Flavor, Minimality and Naturalness in Composite Higgs Models Adrián Carmona Bermúdez Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich In collaboration with F. Goertz A naturally light Higgs without
More informationPhysical consequences of the QED theta angle
Physical consequences of the QED theta angle Steve Hsu Academia Sinica / University of Oregon ITP, Beijing, December 2010 Outline 1. Quantum phases from the QED theta angle 2. Path integral 3. Functional
More informationThe Standard Model in Noncommutative Geometry and Morita equivalence
The Standard Model in Noncommutative Geometry and Morita equivalence Francesco D Andrea e + u u W + ν g d Geometry, Symmetry and Quantum Field Theory Vietri, 30-31 March 2015 The spectral action approach
More informationSM predicts massless neutrinos
MASSIVE NEUTRINOS SM predicts massless neutrinos What is the motivation for considering neutrino masses? Is the question of the existence of neutrino masses an isolated one, or is connected to other outstanding
More informationMass Components of Mesons from Lattice QCD
Mass Components of Mesons from Lattice QCD Ying Chen In collaborating with: Y.-B. Yang, M. Gong, K.-F. Liu, T. Draper, Z. Liu, J.-P. Ma, etc. Peking University, Nov. 28, 2013 Outline I. Motivation II.
More informationA Brief Introduction to AdS/CFT Correspondence
Department of Physics Universidad de los Andes Bogota, Colombia 2011 Outline of the Talk Outline of the Talk Introduction Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation Outline of the Talk Introduction Motivation
More informationLittle Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology
Little Higgs Models Theory Phenomenology Wolfgang Kilian (Karlsruhe) Karlsruhe January 2003 How to make a light Higgs (without SUSY) Minimal models The Littlest Higgs and the Minimal Moose Phenomenology
More informationAnomalies and discrete chiral symmetries
Anomalies and discrete chiral symmetries Michael Creutz BNL & U. Mainz Three sources of chiral symmetry breaking in QCD spontaneous breaking ψψ 0 explains lightness of pions implicit breaking of U(1) by
More informationIntroduction to Supersymmetry
Introduction to Supersymmetry 1: Formalism of SUSY M. E. Peskin Maria Laach Herbstschule September, 2004 Among models of electroweak symmetry breaking and physics beyond the Standard Model Supersymmetry
More informationGroup Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories
Group Structure of SpontaneouslyBroken Gauge Theories p. 1/25 Group Structure of Spontaneously Broken Gauge Theories Laura Daniel ldaniel@ucsc.edu Physics Department University of California, Santa Cruz
More informationJuly 2, SISSA Entrance Examination. PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 2018/2019. olve two among the three problems presented.
July, 018 SISSA Entrance Examination PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 018/019 S olve two among the three problems presented. Problem I Consider a theory described by the Lagrangian density
More informationAdS/CFT Beyond the Planar Limit
AdS/CFT Beyond the Planar Limit T.W. Brown Queen Mary, University of London Durham, October 2008 Diagonal multi-matrix correlators and BPS operators in N=4 SYM (0711.0176 [hep-th]) TWB, Paul Heslop and
More information