arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 22 Apr 2009

Transcription

1 arxiv: v [math.cv] 22 Apr 29 CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF CONVEX FUNCTIONS WITH POSITIVE AND MISSING COEFFICIENTS BY USING A FIXED POINT SH. NAJAFZADEH, M. ESHAGHI GORDJI AND A. EBADIAN Abstract. By considering a fixed point in unit disk, a new class of univalent convex functions is defined. Coefficient inequalities, integral operator and extreme points of this class are obtained.. Introduction Let w be fixed point in = {z : z < } and A(w) = {f H( ) : f(w) = f (w) = }. Let M w = {f A(w) : f is Univalent in }, and M w denoted the subclass of A(w) consist of the functions of the form (.) f(z) a n () n,a n,z w The function f(z) in M w is said to be Convex of order η( < η < ) if and only if Re{+ ()f (z) f } > η, (z ). (z) The similar definitions for uniformly convex and starlike functions are introduced by Goodman in [4]. For the function f(z) in M w, Ghanim and Darus have defined an operator as follows: I f(z) = f(z) I f(z) = ()f (z)+ 2 I 2 f(z) = ()(I f(z)) + 2 and for m,2,... (.2) I m f(z) = ()(I m f(z)) + 2 n m a n () n. We note that various other subclasses have been studied rather extensively by many authors. (see also [3] and [6]) 2 Mathematics Subject Classification. 3C45,3C5. Key words and phrases. Subordination; P-valent function; Coefficient estimate; Fixed point; Distortion bound and Radii of starlikeness and Convexity.

2 2 SH. NAJAFZADEH, M. ESHAGHI GORDJI AND A. EBADIAN Definition.. Afunctionf(z)belongingtotheclassM w isintheclassm w (A,B,m) if it satisfies the condition 2 (.3) [(z f(z)) w)(im (I m f(z)) +]+ 2 B 2 [(z f(z)) w)(im (I m f(z)) +]+ A+ 2 for some B < A <, A. 2. Main Results First we obtain coefficient inequalities for functions in M w (A,B,m). Then we prove the linear combination property. Theorem 2.. The function f(z) of the form (.) belongs t M w (A,B,m) if and only if (2.) Proof. Suppose (2.) holds and n m+ [n(b +)+A+2]a n +A B. (2.2) H = 2 ()(Im f(z)) +(I m f(z)) B 2 ()(Im f(z)) + B +A 2 Replacing(I m f(z)) and(i m f(z)) bytheirseriesexpansionfor < z w = r <, we have H = 2 nm+ (n+)a n (z w) n 2 (B A ) () 2+ n m+ [ 2 (Bn+A+)]a n(z w) n 2 nm+ (n+)a n r n 2 (+A B) r 2 + n m+ [ 2 (Bn+A+)]a nr n Since this inequality holds for all r ( < r < ), making r, we have by (2.) H 2 nm+ [n(b +)+A+2]a n 2 (+A B) H. So we have the required result. Conversely, let f(z) z w + a n() n and (.3) holds, so we have 2 nm+ (n+)a n () n 2 (B A ) (z w) + 2 nm+ [ 2 (Bn+A+)]a, n() n or 2 nm+ (n+)a n () n+ 2 (+A+B) 2 nm+ (Bn+A+)a n () n+ Since for all z,re(z) z, so Re{ 2 nm+ (n+)a n () n+ 2 (+A+B). 2 nm+ (Bn+A+)a n () n+}

3 3 Choosing = r with < r <, we get 2 (2.3) nm+ (n+)a n r n+ 2 (+A B). 2 nm+ (Bn+A+)a n rn+ Upon clearing the denominator in (2.3) and letting r, we get or 2 nm+ (n+)a n 2 (+A B) 2 nm+ (Bn+A+)a n, Hence the proof is complete. Theorem 2.2. Let f j (z) defined by 2 nm+ [n(b +)+A+2]a n 2 (+A B). (2.4) f j (z) a n,j () n,j,2,... be in the class M w (A,B,m), then the function F(z) = d j f j (z), d j j= is also in M w (A,B,m), where t j= d j. Proof. Since f j (z) M w (A,B,m), by (2.) we have, (2.5) also But by (2.5) n m+ [n(b +)+A+2]a n,j +A B,j,2,... F(z) = d j ( + a n,j () n ) j= d j + j= ( j= d j a n,j )() n s n () n where s n = n m+ [n(b +)+A+2]s n = = j= Now the proof is complete. d j { d j a n,j j= n m+ [n(b +)+A+2][ n m+ [n(b +)+A+2]a n,j } d j (+A B) +A B. j= d j a n,j ] j=

4 4 SH. NAJAFZADEH, M. ESHAGHI GORDJI AND A. EBADIAN 3. Extreme points and Integral operators Inthe lastsectionweinvestigateaboutextremepointsofm w (A,B,m) andverify the effect of two operators on functions in the class M w (A,B,m). Theorem 3.. Let f (z) and (3.) f n (z) + +A B n m+ [n(b +)+A+2] ()n, n k then f(z) M w (A,B,m) if and only if it can be expressed in the form f(z) = n= C nf n (z) where C n, C i = (i,2,...,k ), C n Proof. Let f(z) = C n f n (z), so, Since f(z) = C k + C n [ + +A B n m+ [n(b +)+A+2] ()n ]+ n= C n [ + +A B n m+ [n(b +)+A+2] ()n ] +A B n m+ [n(b +)+A+2] C n() n. +A B n m+ [n(b +)+A+2] = C n = n= n m+ [n(b +)+A+2] C n +A B C n C, so f(z) M w (A,B,m). Conversely, suppose that f(z) M w (A,B,m). Then by (2.) we have By setting a n +A B n m+ [n(b +)+A+2]. C n = nm+ [n(b +)+A+2] a n, n +A B C i = (i,2,...,k ), C n= C n, we obtain the required result. Theorem 3.2. Let γ be a real number such that γ >. If f(z) M w (A,B,m), then the functions H (z) = γ () γ H 2 (z) = C are also in the same class. z w (t w) γ f(t)dt and ν C f(ν()+w)dν, C

5 5 Proof. Let f(z) M w (A,B,m), then a simple calculation shows that, Since and C C+n+ < and γ+n H (z) γ +n a n() n H 2 (z) C C +n+ a n() n <, by using Theorem 2., we get, n m+ [n(b +)+A+2]a n γ +n < n m+ [n(b+)+a+2]a n < +A B n m+ C [n(b+)+a+2]a n C +n+ < n m+ [n(b+)+a+2]a n < +A B HencebyTheorem(2.)weconcludethatH (z)andh 2 (z)areintheclassm w (A,B,m). So the proof is complete. References [] F. Ghanim and M. Darus, On new subclass of analytic univalent function with negative coefficient I, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, vol. 3. No27, (28), [2], Some subordination results associated with certain subclass of analytic meromorphic function, J. Math. and statistics, 4(2), (28), 2 6. [3] F. Ghanim, M. Darus and S. Sivasubramanian, On subclass of analytic univalent function, Int. J. pure Appl., 4, (27), [4] A.W. Goodman, On uniformly starlike functions, J. Math. Anal. Appl, 55, (99), [5], On uniformaly convex functions, Ann. polon. Math, 56(), (99), [6] Sh. Najafzadeh, A. Tehranchi and S. R. Kulkarni, Application of differential operator on p-valent meromorphic functions, Anal. Univ. oradea, Fasc. Math. Tom XII, (25), Sh. Najafzadeh Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran E.mail: najafzadeh234@yahoo.ie M. Eshaghi Gordji Department of Mathematics, Semnan University, P. O. Box , Semnan, Iran E.Mail: madjid.eshaghi@gmail.com A. Ebadian Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran E.mail: aebadian@yahoo.com