arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 8 Dec 1994

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 8 Dec 1994"

Mildred Peters
5 years ago
Views:

1 UTPT Field Equations and Conservation Laws in the Nonsymmetric Gravitational Theory J. Légaré and J. W. Moffat arxiv:gr-qc/941009v 8 Dec 1994 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A7 (December 7, 1994 Abstract The field equations in the nonsymmetric gravitational theory are derived from a Lagrangian density using a first-order formalism. Using the general covariance of the Lagrangian density, conservation laws and tensor identities are derived. Among these are the generalized Bianchi identities and the law of energy-momentum conservation. The Lagrangian density is expanded to second-order, and treated as an Einstein plus fields theory. From this, it is deduced that the energy is positive in the radiation zone. Typeset using REVTEX 1

2 I. INTRODUCTION Recently, a consistent version of the nonsymmetric gravitational theory (NGT has been proposed [1,]. This theory is free of ghosts, tachyons and higher-order poles in the propagator in the linear approximation [1]. In the following, we will present a detailed derivation of the field equations and compatibility conditions for the NGT, starting from a Lagrangian density. Using the general covariance of this Lagrangian density, we will deduce the conservation laws and tensor identities present in the theory. These will be seen to be direct generalizations of their general relativistic counterparts. Finally, by expanding the Lagrangian density to second-order about an arbitrary Einstein background, we will demonstrate that the energy contributions of the NGT vanish for large r, leaving only the contributions from general relativity (GR. Since these are known to be positive-definite, we will conclude that for large r, there are no negative energy modes in the NGT. II. STRUCTURE OF THE NONSYMMETRIC GRAVITATIONAL THEORY The NGT is a geometric theory of gravity based on a nonsymmetric field structure: g µν = g (µν +g [µν] ; in the NGT, g [µν] does not vanish. The affine connection coefficients, Γ λ µν, are also nonsymmetric. We define the inverse tensor g µν by the relation g µν g µα = g νµ g αµ = δ ν α. The Lagrangian density for the NGT can be written as the sum of four contributions: L NGT = L geom + L cosmo + L skew + L W. The geometric and cosmological terms, L geom and L cosmo, are defined by analogy with their counterparts in GR: L geom = g µν R µν (W and L cosmo = λ g. The remaining terms are defined by L skew = 1 4 µ g µν g [νµ],

3 and L W = 1 σg(µν W µ W ν. λ and µ are two cosmological constants, while σ is a coupling constant. In the linearized theory, it is found that σ = 1/3. The NGT Ricci curvature tensor R µν (W is given by R µν (W = W β µν,β 1 (Wβ µβ,ν +Wβ νβ,µ Wβ αν Wα µβ +Wβ αβ Wα µν, (1 where the W λ µν are the unconstrained nonsymmetric connection coefficients, defined in terms of the affine connection coefficients through the relation: W λ µν = Γλ µν 3 δλ µ W ν, ( where W µ = W[µα] α. It follows from ( that Γ µ = Γ λ [µλ] = 0. The NGT Ricci scalar is given by R(W = g µν R µν (W. III. DERIVATION OF THE FIELD EQUATIONS The action principle reads δs = δ (L NGT +L M d 4 x = 0, (3 where L M is a matter coupling term, for which δs M = δ L M d 4 x = 8π T µν δg µν d 4 x. (4 All variations are with respect to the g µν. Note that δ(l geom +L cosmo = δ(g µν R µν (W λ g = (G µν (W+λg µν δg µν, where G µν = R µν 1 g µνr 3

4 as in GR. Next, δl skew = 1 4 µ δ(g µν g [νµ] = 1 4 µ ( 1 g µνg [αβ] g [βα] +g [µν] +g [αβ] g µα g βν δg µν. The parenthesized quantity is defined as C µν, leaving δl skew = 1 4 µ δ(g µν g [νµ] = 1 4 µ C µν δg µν. Finally, δl W = 1 σδ(gµν W µ W ν = 1 σ g (W µ W ν 1 g µνg αβ W α W β δg µν. Defining P µν = W µ W ν and P = g µν P µν, we have that δl W = 1 σδ(gµν W µ W ν = 1 (P σ µν 1 g µνp δg µν = 1 σ P µν δg µν, where P µν = P µν 1 g µνp. Assembling these results and using (4, we find that δs = g (G µν (W+λg µν µ C µν + 1 σ P µν 8πT µν δg µν d 4 x = 0. This must hold for arbitrary δg µν, yielding the NGT field equations: G µν (W+λg µν µ C µν + 1 σ P µν = 8πT µν. (5 IV. COMPATIBILITY CONDITIONS Varying the action with respect to the W µ yields the compatibility conditions for the NGT. There are two contributions to consider: S geom = g µν R µν (Wd 4 x 4

5 and S W = 1 σ g µν W µ W ν d 4 x. We consider these separately. Consider first the variation of S W : δs W = σ g (µν W µ δw ν d 4 x. Now, δw ν = 1 ( δ α η δ ρ α δwη νρ δα η δρ α δwη ρν. Therefore, δs W = 1 σ (g (µρ W µ δ σ η g (µσ W µ δ ρ η δw η ρσ d 4 x. Consider now the variation of S geom : using (1, we have δs geom = g µν δr µν (Wd 4 x = [ g µν δw β µν,β 1 ( δw β µβ,ν +δwβ νβ,µ δw β ανw α µβ W β ανδw α µβ +δw β αβ Wα µν +W β αβ δwα µν ] d 4 x. Integrating the first three terms by parts and relabeling indices, we arrive at δs geom = [ g ρσ,η + 1 ( g ρν,ν +g µρ,µ δ σ η g µσ Wµη ρ gρν Wην σ ] +g µν Wµνδ ρ η σ +g ρσ W β ηβ δwρσd η 4 x, (6 where we have assumed that the δw η ρσ vanish on the boundary of integration. If we require that these variations vanish, we have that 0 = δs geom +δs W = [ g ρσ,η + 1 ( g ρν,ν +g µρ,µ δ σ η g µσ Wµη ρ gρν Wην σ +g µν W ρ µνδ σ η +g ρσ W β ηβ + 1 σ( g (µρ W µ δ σ η g (µσ W µ δ ρ η ] δw η ρσd 4 x. Since this must hold for arbitrary δwρσ η, we arrive at the compatibility conditions for the NGT: 5

6 g ρσ,η g (ρν,νδη σ +gµσ Wµη ρ +gρν Wην σ gµν Wµν ρ δσ η gρσ W β ηβ σg(µλ W µ δ ρ [λ δσ η] = 0. (7 Contracting this on ρ and η gives g [σρ],ρ = 3 σg(ρσ W ρ. (8 Contracting (7 on σ and η, and adding this to (8 gives This may be used to rewrite (7 as g (σρ,ρ +g µρ W σ µρ = 3 gσν W ρ [ρν] = 3 gσν W ν. g ρσ,η +g µσ W ρ µη +g ρν W σ ην g ρσ W β ηβ σg(µλ W µ δ ρ [λ δσ η] 3 gρµ W ν [νµ]δ σ η = 0. (9 Inserting the expression for Γ λ µν obtained from ( into (9 gives the compatibility condition for the Γ λ µν : g λξ,η g ρξ Γ ρ λη g λσγ σ ηξ + 1 σg(µρ ( g ρξ g λη g ηξ g λρ g λξ g [ρη] Wµ = 0. (10 V. CONSERVATION LAWS AND IDENTITIES We now proceed to derive the conservation laws and tensor identities present in the NGT (see for example [3]. Every term in the NGT Lagrangian density L NGT is a scalar density. It follows that each term in the NGT action, S NGT = L NGT d 4 x, must be invariant under a general coordinate transformation. In particular, we consider the infinitesimal coordinate transformation generated by x µ x µ = x µ + ǫξ µ, where ǫ 1. Since g µν is a tensor and W µ is a vector, we have that g µν xρ x σ (x = x µ x νg ρσ(x+g µν (x g µν (x W µ xρ (x = x µw ρ(x+w µ (x W µ (x. 6

7 It follows that δg µν = g µβ g αν (g αβ(x g αβ (x = ǫ ( g µρ ξ ν,ρ +g ρν ξ µ,ρ g µν,λξ λ δw µ = W µ(x W µ (x = ǫ ( W λ ξ λ,µ +W µ,λ ξ λ, (11a (11b to first order in ǫ. Here, we have used the fact that g ρν g µσ g ρσ,λ = g µν,λ. Consider first the term L geom = g µν R µν (W appearing in the NGT Lagrangian density. Since this is a scalar density, we must necessarily have ( δl geom δs geom = 0 = δg µν δgµν + δl geom δwρσ η δw η ρσ d 4 x, (1 where δ/δg µν denotes functional differentiation. The second term was evaluated in (6; using the compatibility condition, this can be reduced to δl geom δwρσ η δwρσ η = σg (µλ W µ δ[λδ σ ρ η] δwη ρσ = σg (µλ W µ δw λ, where we have used the fact that δw η [ηλ] = δw λ. This can be further simplified through the use of (8, yielding δl geom δwρσ η δwρσ η = 3 g[λµ],µδw λ. As was found in the derivation of the field equations, the first term in (1 is given by δl geom δg µν δgµν = G µν (Wδg µν. Combining these results and using (11, we have that δs geom = ǫ G µν (W ( g µρ ξ ν,ρ +g ρν ξ µ,ρ g µν,ρξ ρ d 4 x+ 3 ǫ g,µ( [λµ] Wρ ξ ρ,λ +W λ,ρ ξ ρ d 4 x = ǫ ([g µρ G µσ (W+g ρν G σν (W],ρ +g µν,σg µν (W 4 3 g[ρµ],µw [ρ,σ] ξ σ d 4 x +ǫ [(g µρ G µσ (W+g ρν G σν (W+ ] 3 g[ρµ],µw σ ξ σ d 4 x. (13,ρ Suppose first that the ξ σ vanish on the boundary of integration, but are otherwise arbitrary. The second term of (13 must vanish, since it is strictly a surface term. The first term yields 7

8 [g µρ G µσ (W+g ρµ G σµ (W],ρ +g µρ,σg µρ (W 4 3 g[ρµ],µw [ρ,σ] = 0. (14 These are known as the generalized Bianchi identities of the NGT. They can be written in terms of the G µν (Γ by first noting that G µν (W = G µν (Γ+ 3 (W [µ,ν] 1 g µνg [αβ] W [α,β]. By direct substitution into (14, it is seen that [g µρ G µσ (Γ+g ρµ G σµ (Γ],ρ +g µν,σg µν (Γ = 3 g[µν] W [µ,ν],σ 4 3 g[µν] W [µ,σ],ν. However, g [µν] W [µ,σ],ν = 1 g[µν] W [µ,ν],σ. Therefore, in terms of the G µν (Γ, the Bianchi identities are written [g µρ G µσ (Γ+g ρµ G σµ (Γ],ρ +g µν,σg µν (Γ = 0. (15 Inserting (14 into (13 leaves ǫ [(g µρ G µσ (W+g ρµ G σµ (W+ ] 3 g[ρµ],µw σ ξ σ d 4 x = 0.,ρ Suppose ξ ρ is taken as an arbitrary constant vector; we then have ǫ [g µρ G µσ (W+g ρµ G σµ (W+ ] 3 g[ρµ],µw σ ξ σ d 4 x = 0.,ρ We can use (14 to simplify this, leaving ǫ (g µρ,σg µρ (W 3 g[ρµ],µw ρ,σ ξ σ d 4 x = 0. Therefore, g µρ,σg µρ (W = 3 g[ρµ],µw ρ,σ. (16 The identities (14 and (16 are all the relations that may be derived from the general covariance of L geom. 8

9 Inserting the field equations into (15 gives g µλ T µρ,ρ +g λµ T ρµ,ρ +(g µλ,ν +g λν,µ g µν,λ T µν 1 4π σg(µν W ν W [µ,λ] = 0, (17 where we have introduced for brevity. Consider now the two terms T µν = T µν 1 3π µ C µν 1 16π σ P µν and L skew = 1 4 µ g µν g [νµ] L W = 1 σg(µν W µ W ν that appear in the NGT Lagrangian density. Both these terms are scalar densities, and hence their corresponding contributions to the action must also be invariant under the transformation, x µ x µ = x µ +ǫξ µ, considered above. Proceeding in the same manner as for the curvature term, these two contributions lead to the identities g µλ C µρ,ρ +g λµ C ρµ,ρ +(g µλ,ν +g λν,µ g µν,λ C µν = 0 (18a and g µλ Pµρ,ρ +g λµ Pρµ,ρ +(g µλ,ν +g λν,µ g µν,λ P µν +4g (µν W µ W [ν,λ] = 0. (18b However, the identities appearing in(18 are two of the terms that appear in(17. Cancelling these terms, we arrive at g µλ T µρ,ρ +g λµ T ρµ,ρ +(g µλ,ν +g λν,µ g µν,λ T µν = 0. (19 This is known as the generalized law of energy-momentum conservation in NGT. This is a direct generalization of the identity ν T µν = 0 of GR, where ν denotes covariant differentiation with respect to the GR connection. As a matter of fact, if g µν is taken as symmetric, this reduces to ν T (µν = 0. 9

10 VI. POSITIVITY OF THE ASYMPTOTIC VALUE OF THE ENERGY We now consider a second-order expansion of the NGT Lagrangian density about an arbitrary Einstein background. To this end, we write g µν = (E g µν + (1 g µν + ( g µν +... Γ λ µν = (E Γ λ µν + (1 Γ λ µν + ( Γ λ µν +... W µ = (1 W µ + ( W µ +... Here and throughout, we use the convention that a quantity preceded by a (E is to be evaluated in the Einstein background. Since W µ has no equivalent in GR, there is no (E W µ term. The inverse metric g µν is given by g µν = (E g µν + (1 g µν + ( g µν +..., where (E g µν is the usual inverse metric from GR, and (1 g βν = (E g βα(e g µν(1 g µα ( g βν = (E g βα(e g µν( g µα (E g βα(1 g µν(1 g µα. To second-order, the determinant of the metric is g = (E g + (E g (1 g + (E g ( g +..., where (1 g = (E g αµ (1 g αµ ( g = 3 8 ( (E g αµ (1 g αµ + (E g αµ ( g αµ. It therefore follows that, to the same order of approximation, [ g = (E g 1+ 1(E g (1 µν g µν 1 16 ( (E g (1 µν g µν ] 1 + (E g ( µν g µν. If we expand the compatibility condition (10 to lowest-order, we obtain (E g λξ,η (E g ρξ (E Γ ρ λη (E g λρ (E Γ ρ ηξ = 0. This is recognized as the compatibility condition familiar from GR. Its solution is well-known: 10

11 (E Γ σ λη = 1(E g ( σξ (E g λξ,η + (E g ξη,λ (E g ηλ,ξ. The first- and second-order corrections are obtained by a process of iteration. The results are (1 Γ σ λη = 1(E g ( σξ (1 η g λξ + (1 λ g ξη (1 ξ g ηλ +σδ σ [λ δ µ (1 η] W µ (0a ( Γ σ λη = 1(E g ( σξ ( η g λξ + ( λ g ξη ( ξ g ηλ +σδ σ [λ δ µ ( η] W µ (E g σξ(1 g ρξ (1 Γ ρ λη + 1 σ [(E g σξ ( (1 g ξλ δ µ η (1 g ηξ δ µ λ (1 W µ 1(E g ( ] µρ δλ σ(1 g [ρη] +δη σ(1 g [ρλ] (E g σξ(e g (1 ηλ g (1 [ρξ] W µ. (0b Here, µ denotes covariant differentiation with respect to the background metric (E g µν. The NGT Ricci curvature tensor R µν (Γ may be expanded in a similar fashion. Writing R µν (Γ = (E R µν (Γ+ (1 R µν (Γ+ ( R µν (Γ+..., it is found that (E R µν (Γ = (E Γ β µν,β (E Γ β µβ,ν (E Γ β αν (E Γ α µβ + (E Γ β αβ (E Γ α µν (1 R µν (Γ = β (1 Γ β µν δσ (ν δρ µ σ (1 Γ β (ρβ (1a ( R µν (Γ = ( β Γ β µν δσ (ν δρ µ σ ( Γ β (ρβ (1 Γ β αν (1 Γ α µβ + (1 Γ β (1 (αβ Γ α µν. (1b Note that (E R µν (Γ is the usual Ricci curvature tensor of GR, as expected. In a second-order expansion, the NGT Lagrangian density is found to be L NGT = (E L+ (1 L+ ( L+..., where (E L = (E g (E g µν(e R µν (Γ λ (E g is the usual Lagrangian density of GR, and 11

12 (1 L = ( L = (E g {[ 1 (E g [ ] 1 (1 g (E g µν(e R µν (Γ+ (1 g µν(e R µν (Γ+ (E g µν(1 R µν (Γ λ (1 g ( g 1 4 ( (1 g ] (E g µν(e R µν (Γ+ 1(1 g (1 g µν(e R µν (Γ (a + 1 (1 g (E g µν(1 R µν (Γ+ (1 g µν(1 R µν (Γ+ ( g µν(e R µν (Γ+ (E g µν( R µν (Γ λ [ ( g 1 ( (1 g ] 1 4 µ(1 g [µν](1 g [νµ] + 1 σ(e g µν(1 W (1 µ W ν + } (1 g [µν](1 W [µ,ν]. (b 3 We are now in a position to treat this problem as a special case of GR. Let us consider L NGT = (E L+L field, where L field = (1 L + ( L. We can then define a stress-energy tensor (see [5] by t αβ = (1 t αβ + ( t αβ, where (i t αβ δ (i L = (E g αβ(i L δ (E g (E g δ (i L. αβ δ (E g αβ The second term in (i t αβ is given by (. The functional derivatives are found to be δ (1 L = 1 ( (1 g αβ(e g µν(e R δ (E µν (Γ (1 g (E g µβ(e g αν(e R µν (Γ+ (1 g (E g µνδ (E R µν (Γ g αβ δ (E g αβ ( (E g µβ(1 g αν + (E g αν(1 g µβ (E R µν (Γ+ (1 g µνδ(e R µν (Γ (E g µβ(e g αν(1 R δ (E µν (Γ g αβ + (E g µνδ (1 R µν (Γ +λ (1 g αβ δ (E g αβ δ ( L = 1 { δ ( g (E g µν(e R δ (E g αβ δ (E µν (Γ ( g (E g µβ(e g αν(e R µν (Γ+ ( g (E g µνδ(e R µν (Γ g αβ δ (E g αβ + (1 g (1 g αβ(e g µν(e R µν (Γ+ 1 ( (1 g (E g µβ(e g αν( R µν (Γ 1 ( (1 g (E g µνδ (E R µν (Γ (1 g αβ(1 g µν(e R δ (E µν (Γ g αβ ( (E g µβ(1 g αν + (E g αν(1 g µβ (1 g (E R µν (Γ+ (1 g (1 g µνδ(e R µν (Γ δ (E g αβ (1 g αβ(e g µν(1 R µν (Γ (1 g (E g µβ(e g αν(1 R µν (Γ+ (1 g (E g µνδ(1 R µν (Γ δ (E g αβ ( (E g µβ(1 g αν + (E g αν(1 g µβ (1 R µν (Γ+ (1 g µνδ (1 R µν (Γ δ (E g αβ 1 } + ( g µνδ(e R µν (Γ δ (E g αβ

13 ( (E g µβ( g αν + (E g αν( g µβ + (1 g µβ(1 g αν (E R µν (Γ (E g µβ(e g να( R µν (Γ + (E g µνδ ( R µν (Γ δ (E g αβ λ ( δ ( g + (1 g (1 g αβ 1 δ (E g αβ σ(e g µβ(e g αν(1 W (1 µ W ν + ( (E g µβ(1 g [αν] + (E g αν(1 g [µβ]( 1 4 µ(1 g [νµ] (1 W [µ,ν] 3 The various terms in these expressions are given in Appendix A. Consider now the flux of stress-energy at infinity as given by the previous two tensors. For large r, it can be shown that (i g αβ (where i = 1, is damped out; it follows that, even in the worst possible case, (i Γ λ µν and (i R µν (Γ will decay at least as fast as (i g αβ. It has been shown (see [6] that for large r, (i g [3] Csinθ e µr (1+µr (µr µm, where C is a constant and M is the mass of the gravitating body. In [], it was shown that in the expansion to linear order about an arbitrary Einstein background (with σ = 1/3: (1 W µ = 1 µ ν ( 4 (E g λσ(e g αβ(e R ανλµ (1 g [σβ] ( (E R(Γ (1 g [] µν, so that (1 W µ decays at least as fast as (1 g [σβ]. Here, ( (E R(Γ (1 g [] µν denotes terms involving the products of the background Riemann tensor with (1 g [µν]. Taking (E R µν (Γ = 0 and setting λ = 0, we find that for large r, (1 t αβ 0 and ( t αβ 0. More importantly, because the (i t αβ (i = 1, go to zero so rapidly, the energy-momentum fluxes (see [3] (i R µ = t dt t 1 S (i t µj n j ds (i = 1, vanish as the radius of the surface S becomes large. Here, the integration is carried out over a region bounded by the hypersurfaces t = t 1, Σ, and t = t. An element of the hypersurface Σ is written dσ j = n j dsdt, where ds is an element of a two-dimensional sphere whose radius is r, where r and n j is the normal to this sphere. We have therefore demonstrated that, for large r, the flux of energy at infinity is given strictly by its general relativistic contributions, which are known to be positive-definite. 13

14 VII. CONCLUSIONS The general covariance of the NGT Lagrangian density leads to a law of energymomentum conservation which is an immediate generalization of the identity ν T µν = 0 of GR. The Bianchi identities also have simple generalizations in the NGT. The nonsymmetric tensors C µν and P µν are also found to obey identities. However, at this time, no physical meaning is attached to these identities. An expansion of the NGT Lagrangian density to second-order allows it to be reinterpreted as an Einstein plus fields theory. In this framework, the stress-energy tensor is found to be positive-definite for large r. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank M. Clayton and N.J. Cornish for their help and for many stimulating discussions. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. J. Légaré would like to thank the Government of Ontario for their support of this work. APPENDIX A: We give below the expressions appearing in the calculation of the stress-energy tensor. δ ( g = 3 4(1 g ρσ(e g βν(1 g βν δ (E g ρσ ( g ρσ δ (E g ρσ + (1 g νσ(e g ρβ(1 g νβ δ (E g ρσ δ (E Γ σ λη = 1(E g ( σξ η δ (E g λξ + λ δ (E g ξη ξ δ (E g ηλ δ (1 Γ σ λη = 1 (E g σα(e g ( βξ (1 η g λξ + (1 λ g ξη (1 ξ g ηλ δ (E g βα 1 ( (E g σξ (1 g αξ δ β λ δγ η + (1 g λα δ β ξ δγ η + (1 g αη δ β ξ δγ λ + (1 g ξα δη β δγ λ (1 g αλ δηδ β γ ξ (1 g ηα δ β λ δγ ξ δ (E Γ α βγ δ ( Γ σ λη = 1 (E g σα(e g βξ ( η ( g λξ + λ ( g ξη ξ ( g ηλ δ (E g βα 14

15 1 ( (E g σξ ( g αξ δ β λ δγ η + ( g λα δ β ξ δγ η + ( g αη δ β ξ δγ λ + ( g ξα δηδ β γ λ ( g αλ δη β δγ ξ ( g ηα δ β λ δγ ξ δ (E Γ α βγ (E g σξ(1 g ρξ δ (1 Γ ρ λη + (E g σα(e g ξβ(1 g ρξ (1 Γ ρ λη δ(e g βα 1 σ {(E g σα(e g βξ ( (1 g ξλ δ µ η (1 g ηξ δ µ λ (1 W µ δ (E g βα + 1 (E g µα(e g βρ( δ σ λ (1 g [ρη] +δ σ η (1 g [ρλ] (1 W µ δ (E g βα 1 (E g µα(e g βρ(e g σξ(e g ηλ (1 g [ρξ] (1W µ δ (E g βα 1(E g µρ(e g σα(e g βξ(e g (1 ηλ g [ρξ] (1W µ δ (E g βα + 1 } (E g µρ(e g σξ(1 g (1 [ρξ] W µ δ (E g ηλ δ (E R µν (Γ = β δ (E Γ β µν νδ (E Γ β µβ δ (1 R µν (Γ = β δ (1 Γ β µν δ(νδ σ ρ µ σδ (1 Γ β (ρβ +δσ (νδ µ(1 ρ Γ β (αβ δ(e Γ α ρσ ( (1 Γ β ανδ (E Γ α µβ + (1 Γ β µαδ (E Γ α νβ (1 Γ α µνδ (E Γ β αβ δ ( R µν (Γ = β δ ( Γ β µν δ(νδ σ ρ µ σδ ( Γ β (ρβ +δσ (νδ µ( ρ Γ β (αβ δ(e Γ α ρσ ( ( Γ β αν δ(e Γ α µβ + (1 Γ β µα δ(e Γ α νβ (1 Γ α µν δ(e Γ β αβ (1 Γ β αν δ(1 Γ α µβ δ(1 Γ β αν (1 Γ α µβ + (1 Γ β (αβ δ(1 Γ α µν +δ(1 Γ β (αβ(1 Γ α µν. 15

16 REFERENCES [1] J.W. Moffat, University of Toronto Preprint UTPT-94-8, gr-qc/ , [] J.W. Moffat, University of Toronto Preprint UTPT-94-30, gr-qc/941107, [3] A. Papapetrou, Lectures on General Relativity (Reidel, Dordrecht, [4] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (Wiley, New York, 197, p. 36. [5] C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1973, p [6] N.J. Cornish, in preparation. 16

arxiv:gr-qc/ v3 10 Nov 1994

arxiv:gr-qc/ v3 10 Nov 1994 1 Nonsymmetric Gravitational Theory J. W. Moffat Department of Physics University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A7 Canada arxiv:gr-qc/9411006v3 10 Nov 1994 Abstract A new version of nonsymmetric gravitational