arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 3 Nov 2001

Transcription

1 arxv:physcs/ v1 [physcs.plasm-ph] 3 Nov 2001 Thermal nstablty of an optcally thn usty plasma Abstract Mahurjya P. Bora 1 Physcs Department, Gauhat Unversty, Guwahat , Ina. We nvestgate the role of thermal nstablty, arsng from raatve coolng of an optcally thn, usty plasma, by lnear stablty analyss. The corresponng sobarc stablty conton for conensaton moe s foun to be mofe sgnfcantly by the egree of onzaton an concentraton of fnte sze, relatvely heavy, an negatvely charge ust partcles. It has been shown that though the funamental wave moe s smlar n nature to the one n absence of ust partcles, a new ust-wave moe can propagate n such a plasma. It s conjecture that the presence of negatvely charge ust partcles may conserably affect the stablty of varous astrophyscal structures aganst thermal nstablty, whch can not be explane wth the help of gravtatonal nstablty. Key wors: thermal nstablty, usty plasma PACS: Ex, g, w The formaton an exstence of a large number of astrophyscal structures such as nterstellar clous, solar promnence, localze structures n planetary nebulae etc. can not be explane by means of conventonal gravtatonal nstablty [1]. However, t has been argue that thermal nstablty may be a reasonably goo canate, wth can accelerate conensaton, gvng rse to localze structures whch grow n ensty by loosng heat, manly through raaton [1,2]. The frst comprehensve analyss of thermal nstablty n a ffuse nterstellar gas s frst gven by Fel [2]. Subsequently, many authors consere the process of thermal nstablty n fferent crcumstances e.g. n hyrogen plasmas [3], to explan formaton of clumpy gas clous n two phase meum [4], an thermal nstabltes n photooze nterstellar gas [5]. Recently, Brk [7] has consere thermal conensatons n a weakly onze hyrogen plasma. 1 E-mal : mpb@guphys.cjb.net Preprnt submtte to Elsever Scence 22 October 2018

2 In recent years, however, t has been realze that heaver ust partcles consttutes an ubqutous an mportant component of many astrophyscal plasmas. [7 9] nclung nterstellar clous, stellar an planetary atmosphere, planetary nebulae etc. It s, thus of partcular nterest to see the effect of ust partcles on the role of thermal nstablty n astrophyscal stuatons. One of the obvous facts of ntroucng ust as a component of plasma s the propagaton of very low frequency compressonal moes [10]. We, n ths paper, nvestgate thermal nstabltes n a multcomponent plasma wth electrons, ons, an ust partcles, assumng that a λ D, where a s the average ust sze, s the average nter-ust stance, anλ D sthe Debye length. We conser the ust partcles to be negatvely charge an col, whereas the ons can loose energy through raaton by e-exctaton. We further assume that electrons are sothermal. We ntrouce a heat-loss functon [2] exclusve of thermal conucton, whch takes care of the raatve loss. For smplcty, we o not take nto account the ust-charge fluctuaton, whch usually has a stablzng effect [6]. The resultant equatons are two-flu magnetohyroynamcs MHD) equatons wth Boltzmann strbuton for the electrons. The ust acoustc DA) an ust-on acoustc DIA) moes [10] are rule out by vrtue of col ust assumpton. We show that the sobarc conton for thermal conensaton moe s sgnfcantly mofe by the ncluson of ust ynamcs. We also fn the exstence of a new wave moe, solely because of the presence of the ust partcles. We begn by wrtng out the equatons for a unboune, weakly collsonal usty plasma wth a heat-loss functon Lρ,T), whch represents the rate of net loss of energy per unt mass, through raaton. We conser the ust partcles to be negatvely charge an col an the electrons obey Boltzmann relaton. We assume here that that on-neutral collsonal cross-secton s of the same orer as that of the electron-neutral collsons, so that the electrons can be treate as Boltzmann strbuton f T /T e )v Te /v T ) 1, an n practce ths conton s satsfe n the cases we are gong to conser n ths work. The equatons are, n t + n )v =0, 1) v m t = ez E, 2) ) eφ n e =n e0 exp, 3) T e n t + n v )= ν R n +ν I n e, 4) m n v t =ez n E p, 5) 2

3 3 2 n T t +p v )= χ T ) m n Ln,T ), 6) where χ stheonthermal conuctvty, ν I,R areonzatonanrecombnaton frequences, an the other symbols have ther usual meanngs. The subscrpts e,, respectvely refer to the electron, on, an ust populatons. Equatons 1) through 6) are the contnuty an momentum equatons for usts, Boltzmann relaton for the electrons, an contnuty, momentum, an energy equatons for the ons. The set of equatons s close by the quasneutralty conton, Z n = n e +Z n, 7) where Z, represents the on an ust charge numbers, respectvely. Note that we have taken nto account the possblty of multply onze ons. The on pressure s gven by p = n T T j are expresse n energy unts) an we have assume that Γ, the rato of specfc heats for the ons to be 5/3. The recombnaton loss term n the on-contnuty equaton represents the electrononrecombnaton on thesurface of theust partcles [11] anν R πr 2 n n c 2 s, where r s the ust raus an c s = T e /m ) 1/2 s the soun spee. We conser now a small perturbaton of the form exp ωt + k r). The lnearze expresson for electron, ust, an on enstes are gven by ñ e = φ, 8) ñ = ω2 ω φ, 9) 2 ñ = 1 ) δ e ω2 Z ω 2δ Z φ, 10) where we have use the lnearze form of the Boltzmann relaton for the electrons Eq.3), ust-contnuty equaton Eq.1), an the quasneutralty conton Eq.7). We have use ω = kc an c 2 = Z T e0 /n 0. The quanttes wth subscrpt 0 an 1 are equlbrum an perturbe quanttes, respectvely an represents normalze perturbe quanttes. We have normalze the perturbe enstes of the speces by ther respectve equlbrum values an perturbe electrostatc potental energy eφ 1 by equlbrum electron thermal energy, φ = eφ 1 /T e0. The quanttes δ j = n j0 /n 0 are the ratos of equlbrum electron an ust enstes to that of the ons for j = e,. The lnearze on-contnuty an momentum equatons are gven by ωñ +k v 1 )= ν R ñ +ñ )+ν I ñ e δ e, 11) ωk v 1 )=ω 2 τ φ+ p ), 12) 3

4 where ω = kc s the on-soun frequency, c = T 0 /m ) 1/2 s the on-thermal spee, τ = Z T e0 /T 0, an p = p 1 /p 0 s the normalze perturbe on pressure. Fnally we wrte own the lnearze energy equaton for the ons as 3 [ 1 2 ω T ω 2 ) ω 2 )] + φ δ e δ Z ω +ν Z ω 2 R ) ν I δ e +ν R =0 13) ω 2 1 ω 2 ) +ω ρ δ e δ Z φ+ω Z ω 2 T T, where we have efne T = T 1 /T e0, ω ρ = k ρ c, an ω T = k T + k 2 /k K )c. Followng Fel [2], we efne the wave numbers k ρ,t,k as k ρ = L ρ m n 0 c 3 T 0, k T = L T, an k c 3 K = c n 0. 14) χ The frst two are the wave numbers of sothermal an sochorc perturbatons, respectvely an the thr one s the recprocal of mean free path of the heatconuctng partcles. It has been assume throughout the ervaton that the perturbe on thermal conuctvty χ = 0 an the equlbrum heat-loss functon Lρ 0 = m n 0,T 0 ) = 0, where L ρ,t represents L/ T) ρ an L/ ρ) T, evaluate for the equlbrum state. Usng Eqs.8)-13), the sperson relaton for ths raatng usty plasma can now be wrtten as [ 1 Z 1+ 2 ) ω [ T ω 2 3 ω ω 2 τ 1 Z δ e δ Z ω 2 ω 2 1 Z δ e δ Z ω 2 ω 2 ) { ω ω ρ ν R ) 1 where we have use the relaton p = ñ + T. ω 2 ) δ e δ Z 1+ ν ) R =0 15) ω 2 ω ) )] ω ω 2 ν ω 2 I δ e +ν R ω 2 } + ω 2 )] ν I δ e +ν R, ω ω 2 Before numercally solvng the sperson relaton Eq.15), however, t s nstructve to analyze Eq.15) uner certan lmts. In the lmt of collsonless electron-on plasma wth no ust partcles an thermal raaton an zero heat-conuctvty, Eq.15) reuces to ω 2 = ω Z T e0 T 0 ), 16) whch s just the on-soun wave mofe by the on-charge number. We now 4

5 look at the expanson of Eq.15) [2], n the lmt of weak collsons ν I,R ω) an vanshng thermal perturbaton.e. ω ρ,t 0, whch, for the conensaton moe, s gven by n con [ 2δ e ω ρ 1+ Z ) ] τ ω T ν R Z ν I ) 5δ e +3Z τ) δ e 8δe 4 + ω5δ 2 e +3Z τ) 4 ) 3ω ρ +2ω T ) +Oωρ,T 5 ), [ω ρ ω T 1+ Z )] 2 τ δ e 17) wherewehavesubsttuteω = nanneglecteω.thecharacterstcvelocty of the moes, we are ntereste, s c an n a plasma wth col usts T T,e ), as ths one, c /c 1. For example, n nterstellar clous, n 10 3, n 10 7, T e T 10 K an wth Z 10 2 an m 10 8 m, c /c 10 3, so that we can safely assume ω ω. To the leang orer, we have the raaton conensaton moe f, ω ρ +Z ν I > ν R + 1+ Z ) τ ω T, 18) δ e whch reuces, n the collsonless lmt to ω ρ > 1+ Z ) τ ω T. 19) δ e Note that for zero thermal-conuctvty, ω T = k T c an the above contons are nepenent of k. The contons gven by nequaltes 18) an 19) are smlar to the sobarc nstablty conton gven by Fel [2], mofe by collsons an ust partcles. We observe that the presence of a sgnfcant ust populaton smaller δ e ) conserably mofes the nstablty crtera for the conensaton moe an has a stablzng effect. It s nterestng to note that the egree of onzaton has also a smlar effect on the stablty of the conensaton moe whch becomes mportant n certan stuatons. For example, n conensatons observe n planetary nebulae, the thermal nstablty s strongly assocate wth collsons of electrons wth N + an N ++ ons [2]. It shoul, however, be note that the contons 18) an 19) o not reuce to one gven by Fel even n absence of ust partcles, whch s because our conseraton of two-flu approxmaton. The nequalty 18) also mples that the growth rate of the conensaton moe s nepenent of the wave number n the short wavelength lmt, when the thermal-conuctvty s zero n opposte to a thermally conuctng plasma fnte k K ), where there s no conensaton for suffcently larger k. Plots of the normalze growth rate ˆω = ω/ω ρ ) versus normalze wave number ˆk = 5

6 º½ º½¾ º º ½ ¾ Fg. 1. Normalze growth rate of the collsonless conensaton moe vs. wave number. The sol curves are wth ust partcles whereas the ashe ones are wthout 1 anyust.thetopmostcurvesarefor ˆk K = k 1 ρ/k K = 0antheothersfor ˆk K = 0.01 an 0.1, respectvely. k/k ρ ) for the conensaton moe are shown n Fg.1, n absence of collsons. The growth rate of the moe s efntely smaller n presence of ust partcles, as we have guesse, but note the lengthenng of the cut-off wave number. In fact, the knees of the lower curves wth fnte k K prove to a bfurcaton pont n a collsonal plasma, as we shall see shortly. The parameters for Fg.1 are ˆk T = k T /k ρ = 0.2, Z = 1, Z = 100, T e0 = T 0 = 10 K, m /m = 10 8, n 0 = 10 3 cm 3, ann 0 = 10 6 cm 3. These values are typcal for nterstellar clous [12]. An approxmaton smlar to Eq.17) for collsonless wave moes s gven by δ e n wave = 5δ e +3Z τ) +Oω 2 ρ,t ). ω ρ + 2 ) ) 1/2 3 ω 5δe +3Z τ T ±ω 20) 3δ e The nstablty crtera for a growng wave moe s thus ω ρ + 2/3ω T ) < 0, whch s just the sentropc nstablty crtera, gven by Fel [2]. We can thus argue that the prncpal wave moe s unaffecte by the presence of ust partcles,butforaecreasenmagntue,ctatebytheterm5+3z τ/δ e ) 1, whch proportonal to δ e /Z. 2 However, there s one more wave moe whch s not apparent from the above analyss. We can etect the latter only by approprately solvng Eq.15), numercally. In Fg.2, we show the the growngwave moes n a collsonless plasma wth conserable ust presence as n case of a planetary nebula [13]. There s a purely ust-wave moe secon fgure n Fg.2) whch s otherwse absent n a pure electron-on plasma. The growth rate of the moe s, however, much smaller. Notce the cut-offs n all these curves. These fgures are wth ˆk 1 T = 2, ˆk K = 0.01, Z = 2, Z = 100 an n 0 = 10 5 cm 3, all other parameters beng same as n Fg.1. The value of ˆk K s typcal n planetary nebulae. We have chosen a large negatve value for ˆk T so as to rve the wave moe unstable see Eq.20)). Note that a conensaton moe wll always accompany these wave moes not shown) as the conton 6

7 º ½º¹ ½º¾¹ º¾ ¹ º½ ¹ ¹ ¾ ¾ Fg. 2. Normalze growth rates vs. wave number for the conensaton moes n absence of collsons. The frst fgure shows the usual wave moe present rrespectve of the ust partcles. However, the growth rate n presence of ust partcles s conserably smaller sol curve). The secon fgure shows the ust-wave moe whch s absent n a pure electron-on plasma. º º º ½ ¾ 1 Fg.3.Growthratesnpresenceofcollsons wthˆk T = 0.2, ˆk K = 0.01,ν R/ω ρ = 0.2, ν I /ω ρ = 0, an n 0 = 10 6 cm 3. Other parameters are same as n Fgs.1 an 2. for conensaton nstablty s realy satsfe n ths case ˆk T < 0). In Fg.3, we show the growth rates of moes wth collsonal effects. The sol curves represent conensaton moes an the ashe one represents the wave moe. We see a merger of the conensaton moes to a growng wave moe at a bfurcaton pont near ˆk 4.0. We shoul emphasze that we o not have an explct expresson for the nterstellar heat-loss functon Lρ,T) n general, because of an we varety of compostons of materal n fferent nterstellar regons. Beses, several heatng an coolng mechansms may be operatve smultaneously an ther epenence on local ensty an temperature may not be known exactly. Delgarno an McCray [14], n ther classc revew, have mentone about fferent coolng processes n HI regons. A relatvely concse expresson for the heat-loss functon n photo-onze nterstellar gases wth hgh metallcty s gven by Corbell an Ferrara [5]. In the smplest case, for raatve coolng, the heat-loss functon can be assume to be proportonal to ρ n p m, where n = 5/2,m = 1/2 for free-boun transtons an n = 3/2,m = +1/2 for free-free transtons [3,14,15]. However, the exact form the heat-loss functon s not mportant at ths pont. As a prototype example, we assume the heat- 7

8 ½ º º Æ º º º ½º¾ ½º ½º ¾º½ ÌÌ Æ ¾º ¾º Fg. 4. Range of nstablty n terms of temperature wth δ e. The value of T = 4.0,4.5, an 5.0, respectvely for the upper, mle, an lower curves. loss functon use by Fel [2] for thermal conensatons n planetary nebulae, whch s represente by T 0 L T ρ 0 L ρ = K T 1 T +ˆk 1 2 K )+ T/T 3 2ˆk 1 T ˆk 1 K T 21) where T s the mean excess onzaton temperature of N + ons. The temperatures are gven n the unts of T N + = K, the mean exctaton temperature of the N + level. Applyng the nstablty conton 19) n the collsonless case, we have, thermal conensaton f, T T,ζ) < T < T + T,ζ), 22) where ζ = 1+1/δ e ) an T ± T,ζ)=[2ζ + ˆk K T2+ζ)±{[2ζ + ˆkK T2+ζ)] 2 8ˆk K Tζ2+3ζ)} 1/2 ]4+6ζ) 1. 23) For smplcty, we have assume T e0 = T 0 an Z = 1. The above expresson of T ± reuces to usual one when ζ = 1 sngle-flu approxmaton). For ˆk K = 3/2, Z = 100, n 0 = 10 3 cm 3, n 0 = 10 7 cm 3, an T = 4.5, we have T ± = , whch n absence of ust becomes [2]. So, the presence of ust proves a stablzng effect aganst raatve conensatons. However, the range of nstablty shrnks to zero at T = 3.902, much hgher than 1.974, whch s for the ust-less case. Ths mples that for a planetary nebula wth a conserable amount of ust partcles, to be stable aganst the raatve conensaton moe, t has to be at a much hgher temperature. In Fg.4, we show the range of unstable temperature wth δ e. Note that a lower value of δ e correspons to hgher ust concentraton. To conclue, we have foun that the nstablty crteron for the thermal conensaton moe s sgnfcantly affecte by the presence of ust partcles, whch 8

9 can severely alter the stablty regmes of many astrophyscal conensatons where a sgnfcant number of ust partcles are present. The funamental wave moe s smlar n both cases wth an wthout ust partcles, though we now have another wave moe, whch s ue to the presence of ust partcles. Fnally, we have shown that the conventonal stablty regmes of many astrophyscal conensatons may be conserably change. Acknowlegement I woul lke to acknowlege the hosptalty urng my stay at The Abus Salam ICTP, Treste, Italy, where a part of ths work has been carre out. References [1] E.N. Parker, Ap. J ) 431. [2] G.B. Fel, Ap. J ) 531. [3] R.J. Defouw, Ap. J ) 55. [4] A. Burkert, D.N.C. Ln, Ap. J. 5371) 2000) 270. [5] E. Corbell, A. Ferrara, Ap. J ) 708. [6] R. Sngh. M.P. Bora, Phys. Plasmas 76) 2000) [7] G.T. Brk, Phys. Plasmas 79) 2000) [8] P.K. Shukla, G.T. Brk, G.E. Morfll, Phys. Scr ) 299. [9] A. Copp, G.T. Brk, P.K. Shukla, Phys. Plasmas ) [10] N.N. Rao, P.K. Shukla, M.Y. Yu, Planet. Space Sc ) 543. [11] P.K. Kaw, R. Sngh, Phys. Rev. Lett ) 3. [12] D.A. Mens, M. Rosenberg, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys ) 419. [13] A.A. Mamun, P.K. Shukla, Phys. Plasmas 79) 2000) [14] A. Delgarno, R.A. McCray, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys ) 375. [15] S.P. Talwar, M.P. Bora, J. Plasma Phys. 542) 1995)