p fluctuations Piotr Bożek with: W. Broniowski, arxiv: and S. Chatterjee in progress AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków

Transcription

1 p fluctuations AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków with: W. Broniowski, arxiv: and S. Chatterjee in progress

2 Size fluctuations p fluctuations 6 N w 00 r fm p 563MeV 6 N w 00 r fm p 622MeV y fm 3 0 y fm a 3 b x fm x fm proposed by Broniowski et al. Phys.Rev. C80 (2009) : two-shots calculation

3 > (GeV) <p T Nw=00 w <r> (fm) C p = N(N ) i j (p i p )(p j p ) p 2

4 PHENIX data vs. hydro. p Ti p Tj 2 pt c p Ti p Tj 2 pt p max T GeV

5 >> (GeV) <<p T Viscosity effects on hydro response N w =00 η/s=0.08, ζ/s=0.04, T =50MeV, w=0.4fm f η/s=0.6 T f =40MeV ζ/s=0.08 w=0.6fm /2 <r 2 > (fm) p p 0.4 r r

6 size fl. p fluctuations hydro. response not modified by viscosity TF smearing core-corona Ptot conservation centrality def. too much fluctuations?

7 Wounded quark model in AA dn ch /dη / Q W UA5, p p, s = 9.6 GeV UA5, p p, s = 200 GeV ALICE, p p, s = 2760 GeV PHENIX, d Au, snn = 200 GeV PHENIX, 3 He Au, snn = 200 GeV PHENIX, Cu Au, snn = 200 GeV PHENIX, Au Au, snn = 9.6 GeV PHENIX, Au Au, snn = 200 GeV PHENIX, U U, snn = 93 GeV ALICE, P b P b, snn = 2760 GeV - very good (full) scaling at LHC - approximate scaling at RHIC LHC - 3 partons, RHIC - 2 partons? PB, W. Broniowski, M. Rybczyński, PRC N W

8 p fluctuation quark Glauber model initial conditions <ΔpTΔpT> /2 /<<pt>> quarks nucleons ALICE quarks nucleons dn ch /dη Quark Glauber model gives better description of initial volume fluctuations

9 Same in log scale <ΔpTΔpT> /2 /<<pt>> (a) quarks nucleons ALICE quarks nucleons dn ch /dη more than simple N /2 scaling both experiment and theory not minijets

10 Size - p correlation PbPb 0-20% (a) quarks nucleons <Δr>/<<r>> <ΔpT>/<<pT>> PbPb 0-20% (b) quarks nucleons Δ(<r>/N /3 )/<<r>/n /3 > <ΔpT>/<<pT>> N α q <r> - predictor of the final p

11 Best correlation.0 PbPb 0-20% 0.8 -ρ(<r>/n α,pt) <r>/n α _ R/N α <r>/n α quarks quarks nucleons α N /3 <r>

12 p predictor (a) (b) -ρ 0.6 PbPb quark Glauber model hydro ρ(<r>/n α,p T ) ρ(βϵ 0,0 ϵ 0,2,p T ) ρ(βϵ 0,0 ϵ 0,2 γϵ 2,2,p T ) centrality [%] -ρ PbPb nucleon Glauber model hydro ρ(<r>/n α,p T ) ρ(βϵ 0,0 ϵ 0,2,p T ) ρ(βϵ 0,0 ϵ 0,2 γϵ 2,2,p T ) centrality [%] consistent with predcitor of Mazellauskas-Teaney, PRC 206

13 Caution - additional fluctuation may change the results GLISSANDO, PbPb@2.76TeV < r r> /2 /<<r>> 0 quarks quarksγ (κ=) quarksγ (κ=0.5) nucleons c [%]

14 Observable and data analysis duc<on in pp collisions at high r strings stretched between the strings produces the observed mber of strings grows with the ding nuclei, and one has to take he form of their fusion and/or <on of the string interac<on ng to the QGP forma<on, is la<ons between mean pt in two as the main tool to study this freeze out FB correla<ons are usually measured between observables obtained in an event-by-event analysis in two separated η-intervals. The conven<onal observable for the FB correla<ons analysis is the charged par<cle mul'plicity (n-n correla=ons). In the present study, instead of the mul<plicity, we took an intensive observable, namely the event-averaged transverse momentum of par<cles measured in each of the two pseudorapidity intervals, and call it mean-pt correla=ons. The strength of the correla<on (bcorr) between observables F and B is determined by expression below: latest correlation p p correlation in rapidity - ALICE preliminary detection freeze out latest correlation z [2] η nb-nf between particle multiplicities in F and B intervals ptb-ptf between event-mean transverse momenta in F and B intervals Evolu<on with centrality Backward Forward FB correla<ons are measured in Pb-Pb collisions at snn=2.76 and 5.02 TeV with the ALICE detector. Par<cle reconstruc<on was performed using Inner Tracker System (ITS) and Time Projec<on Chamber (TPC). Kinema<c range is η <0.8, pt range GeV/c. Systema<c uncertain<es for bcorr are about 3-5%. Centrality es<mators used in the analysis are V0 detector (which consists of two arrays of scin<llators V0C 3.7 < η <.7 and V0A 2.8 < η < 5.) and zero-degree calorimeter ZDC. Nota'ons: ηgap distance between FB intervals, δη interval width (taken as 0.4 for this analysis). ² The magnitude of the F drops towards central c ² Monte-Carlo event ge ty ² The magnitude of the FB mean-pt correla<on strength rises from peripheral to mid-central and Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV drops towards central collisions (Figure ). ² Monte-Carlo event generators generally do not describe this centrality evolu<on: HIJING provides too weak correla<ons with no dependence on centrality, while AMPT shows significant correla<ons but does not quan<ta<vely or qualita<vely agree with the data. It can be seen that only the string fusion model [3] qualita<vely describes the behavior of bcorr observed in data. ² Calcula<ons in other MC generators are shown in Figure 2 (with different kinema<c cuts). One of the possible explana<ons of the decline of the mean-pt correla<on coefficient for most central collisions was obtained in the model with quark-gluon string fusion on the transverse lauce [4]. It was shown that this decline can be explained by the ahenua<on of color field fluctua<ons due to the string fusion processes at large string density, which can be gained only at LHC energy (at energies above RHIC). Note that in this simple model there is no azimuthal flow. This qualita<ve explana<on is confirmed by the results [5, 6], obtained in a more realis<c dipole-based Monte Carlo string fusion model [7, 8]. Fig.2 FB mean-pt correla<ons in different monte-carlo models [5]. Kinema<c cuts are different than in Fig.. ALI-PREL-9353 Fig. FB mean-pt correla<on strength as a QM poster I. Altsybeev for ALICE func<on of centrality in comparison with calcula<ons from AMPT and HIJING. Event-mean transverse momenta correla<ons are robust against volume fluctua<ons and thus the centrality determina<on methods (see Figure 3), which provides higher sensi<vity of this quan<ty to the proper<es of the ini<al state and evolu<on of the medium created in AA collisions. In contrast, FB mul'plicity correla<ons strongly depend on the size of centrality class and type of centrality es<mator bn-n corr city correla<ons z ALICE Preliminary centrality by V0M 0% 2% Pb-Pb s NN = 2.76 TeV 5% % 0.5% Piotr Boz ek 0.2<p <2.0 GeV/c provides too weak c significant correla<ons ² Calcula<ons in other M can be seen that only observed in data. One of the possible exp central collisions was o lauce [4]. It was show fluctua<ons due to the at LHC energy (at ener flow. This qualita<ve ex dipole-based Monte Ca

15 Forward and backward going participants Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci. 57 (2007) Glauber Monte Carlo model different distributions for forward and backward going participants - different fireball shape at forward and backward rapidities

16 FAu Fd FAu-Fd F AuFd Asymmetric emission (Bia las, Czyż, Acta Phys.Polon.B36, 905 (2005) ρ(η, x, y) f (η)n (x, y) f (η)n (x, y) dndηd 2 x T fη f Η f Η fη f Η f Η Η x T bremsstrahlung Adil Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. C72, (2005) Η

17 ,η 2 ) p p correlation in rapidity - hydro ALICE 0.8<η < 0.6, 0.6<η < <η < 0.3, 0.3<η < <η <0, 0<η <0.2 2 Model C(η 0.05 PbPb, s = 2.76 TeV NN Centrality % reasonable description of the data

18 ,η 2 ) p p correlation coefficient - ill defined PbPb, s NN Model: Default Model: acc = 0.8 Model: only primordial Model: charge balanced Default: acc=, primordial decay, charge unbalanced = 2.76 TeV ALICE 0.8<η < <η <0.8 2 C(η Centrality % b = < [p ] A [p ] B > < [p ] A >< [p ] B > (< p 2 A > < p A > 2 )(< pb 2 > < p B > 2 ) =... ij pa i pj A... sensitive to accepteance, particle multiplicity dominated by statistical fluctuations! n 2 A

19 [p ] [p ] correlation coefficient < [p ] A [p ] B > < [p ] A >< [p ] B > C A p C B p = n A (n A )... i j pa i pj A....2 PbPb, s NN = 2.76 TeV C( η,η) % 0 20 % % % % Initial: quark Glauber η insensitive to acceptnace, mulitplicity true measure of flow-flow correlations in the current model - strong correlations

20 Summary size fluctuations p fluctuations Glauberhydro qualitatively consistent suggest scenarios with less fluctuations (quark Glauber model) p correlations in η interesting strong [p ] [p ] correlations? - should be measured