arxiv: v3 [cond-mat.str-el] 23 Mar 2011

Transcription

1 arxiv:92.363v3 [ond-mat.str-el] 23 Mar 211 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework: A systemati derivation o saling or thermodynamis near the uantum ritial point A Benlagra 1,3, K-S Kim 2 and C Pépin 1,4 1 Institut de Physiue Théoriue, CEA, IPhT, CNRS, URA 236, F Gi-sur-Yvette, Frane 2 Asia Paii Center or Theoretial Physis, Hogil Kim Memorial uilding 5th loor, POSTECH, Hyoja-dong, Namgu, Pohang , Korea 3 Institut ür Theoretishe Physik, Tehnishe Universität Dresden, 162 Dresden, Germany. 4 International Institute o Physis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal-RN, Brazil adel.enlagra@mailox.tu-dresden.de Astrat. Saling expressions or the ree energy are derived, using the Luttinger- Ward (LW) untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework, or two dierent models o uantum ritial point (QCP). First, we onsider the spin-density-wave (SDW) model or whih the eetive theory is the Hertz-Moriya-Millis (HMM) theory, desriing the interation etween itinerant eletrons and olletive spin lutuations. The dynami o the latter are desried y a dynamial exponent z depending on the nature o the transition. Seond, we onsider the Kondo reakdown model or QCP s, one possile senario or heavy-ermion uantum transitions, or whih the eetive theory is given y a gauge theory in terms o ondution eletrons, spinons or loalized spins, holons or hyridization lutuations, and gauge osons or olletive spin exitations. For oth models, we onstrut the thermodynami potential, in the whole phase diagram, inluding all kinds o sel-energy orretions in a sel-onsistent way, at the one loop level. We show how Eliasherg ramework emerges at this level and use the resulting Eliasherg euations to simpliy the LW expression or ree energy. it is ound that olletive oson exitations play a entral role. The saling expression or the singular part o the ree energy near the Kondo reakdown QCP is haraterized y two length sales : one is the orrelation length or hyridization lutuations, and the other is that or gauge lutuations, analogous to the penetration depth in superondutors. PACS numers: 71.1.H, h, w, 71.1.Fd

2 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 2 1. Introdution Flutuation orretions are an essential ingredient near uantum ritial points (QCPs). It may e relatively easy to inorporate uantum orretions in the weak oupling approah, the so alled Hertz-Moriya-Millis (HMM) theoretial ramework [1]. However, it eomes more ompliated to inlude uantum lutuations in the strong oupling approah suh as the gauge theoretial ramework sometimes proposed to desrie strongly orrelated eletrons like doped Mott insulators [2] and some heavy-ermion QCPs [3]. For these models, it is elieved that strong orrelations rationalize eletrons into some exoti elementary exitations arrying rational uantum numers o eletrons, and uantum lutuations o suh enhaned degrees o reedom appear to e ompliated. It is hallenging to develop a systemati approah to introdue, sel-onsistently, physially essential lutuations into the thermodynami potential near a QCP. Eets o uantum orretions on the thermodynami potential an e inorporated systematially using the Luttinger-Ward (LW) untional approah [4, 5, 6], where the grand potential is written in terms o dynami uantities, suh as the ully dressed Green s untion G[Σ] and the sel-energy Σ, through the relation[6] Ω[Σ] = T STr [ ln { G 1 [Σ] } + ΣG[Σ] ] + Y { G[Σ] }, (1) where STr[A]=Tr[A B ]-Tr[A F ] is the supertrae over Matsuara reuenies, internal uantum numers o the osoni (B) and ermioni (F) omponents o A. The uantity Y { G[Σ] } is the so-alled LW untional, determined purely y the interation potential and given y the sum o all losed-loop two-partile irreduile skeleton diagrams in the perturation theory approah. Variation o the LW untional Y with respet to G generates the sel-energy δy { G[Σ s ] } = Σ s G 1 G 1 [Σ s ] (2) δg[σ s ] where G is the non-interating Green s untion. The thermodynami potential is stationary with respet to hanges o the selenergy, i.e. it satisies the saddle-point ondition δω[σ] =. (3) δσ Σ=Σs An important issue in the perturation approah o the LW untional is to ind an expliit untional dependene or Y [7]. This is generally unknown and it is not always possile to sum the skeleton expansion into a losed orm or Y. The prolem with strongly orrelated systems is even worse eause the onvergene o the skeleton expansion is not guaranteed. It was demonstrated that the LW untional an e written as a losed orm in the Eliasherg ramework [9, 1], where the Eliasherg approximation allows to handle uantum orretions in a sel-onsistent way, at the one-loop level. The Eliasherg theory turns out to e justiied or z > 1 uantum ritiality, where z is the dynamial exponent, using a large-n expansion supporting the Migdal theorem

3 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 3 [11]. Here N is the numer o ermion lavors with spin symmetry SU(2). In partiular, the Eliasherg theory was argued to e a minimal ramework well working near a QCP [1]. In this study, we derive a LW expression o the ree energy or two models o itinerant QCPs : the spin-density-wave (SDW) model and the Kondo reakdown model. This will allow us to desrie thermodynamis near these QCPs starting rom a mirosopi model and inorporating sel-onsistently the eet o uantum lutuations. It is the irst time that this is done or the Kondo reakdown model. The plan is as ollows. In setion 2, we present the Spin-ermion (SF) model and derive in a systemati way the LW untional and show how Eliasherg euations or sel-energies are derived. The expression o the ree energy is simpliied using Eliasherg euations and the saling expression o its singular part is dedued. Setion 3 is devoted to the Kondo Breakdown (KB) model. A partiular are is taken to desrie the Higgs part o the phase diagram. The eet o ondensation is inorporated into a zero-order theory eore onsidering a umulant expansion in the lutuations interation. For this gauge theory, there are additional olletive exitations, whih results in the presene o two length sales in the saling expression o the ree energy. These two sales are related through the Anderson-Higgs mehanism. Setion 4 summarizes and disusses our main results. In partiular, theoretial struture dierenes etween the HMM theory and the gauge theory o the Kondo reakdown QCP are emphasized. Tehnial details are presented in the appendies. 2. Review o the Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework o the spin-ermion model The standard model o uantum ritiality in a metalli system is the HMM theory. In this model, a dynamial exponent z, relating the variation o the energy with the momentum ω z, haraterizes the dynamis o olletive exitations near the QCP. In partiular, z = 3 desries the erromagneti QCP while z = 2 desries the antierromagneti one. It is valuale to review the onstrution o the LW untional in the HMM theoretial ramework, disussed in the past[9], although several heavy ermion ompounds have een shown not to ollow the z = 2 HMM theory [16, 17, 18, 19, 2] Spin-ermion model We start rom the so alled spin-ermion model (SF) [1, 21, 22] or the SDW transition S SF = T ψ σk [ G 1 (k)]ψ σk + 1 k 2 T χ 1 () S S + gt 2 ψ σ k+ τ σσ ψ σ k S + O[{ S} n ; n 3], (4) k

4 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 4 where we used the relativisti notation or energy-momentum k (k, iω), (, iω) and the sum expression is deined as... d d k k iω k k F <Λ (2π)...,... d d d iω Q <Λ (2π)... d In (4), ψ σk is the ermioni annihilation ield or an eletron with energy-momentum vetor k and spin σ, S is a osoni ield desriing spin-lutuations near a momentum Q and g is the oupling onstant measuring the strength o the interation etween ermioni and osoni exitations. The last term in (4) stands or higher order terms in S. These are shown to e irrelevant or d > 2 and marginal or d = 2 and an thereore e negleted [22]. In the asene o the interation, ermioni and osoni exitations are desried y the are eletron Green s untion G (k) and the are spin suseptiility χ () respetively z G (k) = iω v F k k F, χ χ () =. (5) ξ 2 + Q 2 + Ω 2 /v 2 s z is the uasipartile renormalization ator given y the Fermi liuid theory, and the eletron dispersion is linearized with a Fermi veloity v F and Fermi momentum k F. The eletron s hemial potential an inorporate eets o the ondensed part o the osoni ield. The are spin suseptiility is the usual Ornstein-Zernike orm where ξ is the are orrelation length o spins and χ ξ 2 is the stati suseptiility. v s is the are spin veloity. The spin-ermion model E.(4) is an eetive low-energy model that an e derived rom the Huard-like model in the weak oupling approximation [1, 21, 22]; high-energy ermions, with energy aove Λ, are integrated out to generate olletive osoni modes that mediate the interation etween ermions at energies smaller than Λ. Dynamis o the low-energy ermions and the olletive spin exitations are then desried y E. (5) Eliasherg theory The Eliasherg ramework allows the evaluation o the sel-energies Σ and Π, or eletrons and spin lutuations respetively, sel-onsistently assuming we an neglet the momentum dependene o the Σ and vertex orretions. An extensive review o this tehniue is given in [1]. We reall here the spirit o this tehniue and main results. The Eliasherg proedure relies on three steps: neglet oth the vertex orretions and the momentum dependene o the ermioni sel-energy : Use Dysons euations Σ(k, iω n ) = Σ(iω n ), g = G 1 (k, iω n ) = G 1 (k, iω n ) Σ(iΩ n ), χ 1 (, iω n ) = χ 1 (, iω n ) Π(, iω n ), (6)

5 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 5 to evaluate sel-onsistently the sel-energies represented diagrammatially in Fig.- 1(a) and (), where the propagators are ully dressed aording to (6). Chek a posteriori that the negleted momentum dependene o the ermioni selenergy and vertex orretions are indeed small. E. Sel-energies (a) k, σ () k +, σ () k, σ k +, σ Figure 1. (a) and () are the irst order ontriution to the ermioni sel-energy and () is the polarization ule, (d) where σ [1, N] is the spin index. The propagators o the ermion (straight line) and the spin lutuations oson (wavy line) are ully dressed. () is a stati and uniorm part in the sel-energy and an thus e onsidered as a renormalization o the eletron hemial potential. The osoni sel-energy is ound to e Π(, iω n ) = γ Ω n, (7) z 2 where γ = g 2 χ k F /(πv 2 F ) and z is the dynamial exponent. This result is ustomary or prolems where ermions interat with their own olletive modes. The latter are damped whenever they lie inside the partile-hole ontinuum o the Fermi liuid[1]. Suh a Landau-damped term is larger than the regular O(Ω 2 ) term in the are spin suseptiility E.(5) and ully determines the olletive spin dynamis. This auses eedak eets on the sel-energy orretion o eletrons, giving rise to non-fermi liuid physis near the QCP[1]. The model (4) an e extended y introduing N 1 idential ermioni speies with spin symmetry SU(2). A hannel index ν [1, N] is then added to the ermioni operators ψ in (4) and g g/ N to ensure a well-deined large N limit. A prolem in using the SU(N) representation arises or the deinition o the spin operator whih is only possile in the Sp(N) representation. This is a ruial aspet in partiular when onsidering the spin lutuations as ritial modes. Then either we use the Sp(N) representation or N opies o SU(2) ermions.

6 (a) () B k +, σ Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 6 G It has een shown that the Eliasherg approximation eomes exat in the limit N [9, 21]. Indeed, it is shown that oth vertex orretions and the momentumdependent orretions (a) to the ermioni sel-energy () turn out to sale as 1/N and vanish in the limit N. This limit shares some similarity with the Migdal limit or the eletron-phonon prolem : at large N, the damping introdued in (7) sales as N and G the olletive exitations eome slow. Then, the smallness in 1/N ompares to the smallness in m/m where mg is the eletron s mass and M is the ion s mass. In the ollowing, we will show how the Eliasherg ramework emerges rom the LW approah to the Spin-Fermion a model. a (a) () 2.3. Luttinger-Ward untional or the spin-ermion model As said in the introdution, the LW untional is, diagrammatially, the sum o all G losed-loop two-partile irreduile skeleton diagrams[4]. These an e ordered in a 1/N expansion as in Fig.-2 k, σ, ν k, σ Y [G, χ] = k +, σ, ν k +, σ O(N) O(1) Figure 2. Leading skeleton diagrams partiipating to the LW untional Y or the Spin-Fermion model with dependene on 1/N. Fermion (straight line) and oson (wavy line) propagators are ully dressed, σ [1, N] is the spin index and ν [1, N] is the hannel index. The irst diagram ontains one ermioni loop arrying spin and hannel uantum numers and one pair o verties, eah o order O(1/ N), so that it is o order O(N 2 /N) = O(N). The seond diagram involves one ermioni loop and two pairs o verties so that it is o order O(N 2 /N 2 ) = O(1). Braketed terms are dropped in the large N limit. Considering the general expression o the LW expression [E.(1)], and taking into aount only the leading O(N) ontriution to Y, shown in Fig.-2 and derived in Appendix A, one an write down the ree energy in terms o eletron and spin-lutuation Green s untions and sel-energies F LW [Σ, Π] = NT [ { ln G 1 (k) } + Σ(k)G(k) ] + T [ { ln χ 1 () } + Π()χ() ] k + 3Ng 2 T 2 G(k)χ()G(k + ), (8) k,

7 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 7 where G(k) and Σ(k) are the ully renormalized eletron Green s untion and selenergy, while χ() and Π() are the ully renormalized spin-lutuation Green s untion and sel-energy. The last term in (8) orresponds to the leading skeleton diagram o order O(N) shown in Fig Eliasherg euations One o the important aspets o the LW untional approah is that we an reover the sel-onsistent Eliasherg euations or sel-energies. Indeed, i we restrit ourselves to the leading O(N) term in Y and use the stationarity o the ree energy (8) with respet to sel-energies (3), we get the ollowing euations δg δσ δχ δπ ( ( Σ(k) + 3g 2 T Π() + 3Ng 2 T k G(k + )χ() G(k + )G(k) rom whih we dedue immediately the expressions o the eletroni sel-energy and the olletive spin polarization Σ(k) = 3g 2 T G(k + )χ(), ) ) =, =, Π() = 3Ng 2 T k G(k + )G(k). (9) gies δy [G,χ] δg = k, σ, ν = k, σ, ν 2 ) k +, σ, ν k, σ, ν k +, σ, ν k, σ δy [G,χ] δχ = = k +, σ, ν k +, σ σ Figure 3. Illustrating untional derivative o the LW untional with respet to Green s untions. The ross indiates the line that is ut y untional dierentiation. These expressions an e also otained y dierentiating the leading order O(N) ontriution to the LW untional Y with respet to G and χ respetively, aording to euation (2). Diagrammatially, this is euivalent to utting one o the internal lines o

8 (a) k, σ () k, σ, Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework δy 8 [G,χ] δχ = k +, σ the orresponding diagram, as shown in Fig.-3. k, σ Euations (9), with Dyson s euations, are nothing ut the sel-onsistent Eliasherg euations or sel-energies () (see Fig.1). Considering urther terms in the LW untional Y amounts to studying deviations rom the Eliasherg theory, in partiular introduing vertex orretions as shown in Fig.-4, in the 1/N expansion. k +, σ k +, (d) Figure 4. Spin-lutuations sel-energy generated rom the ontriution to the LW untional o order O(1), shown in Fig.2, y utting one internal osoni line. This an e otained rom The Eliasherg orm o the spin-lutuations polarization shown in Fig.-1() y inserting a osoni propagator to the vertex Simpliiation o the Luttinger-Ward expression One an simpliy urther the ull expression E.(8) o the ree energy [9]. Indeed, rom euations (9), one an notie that Y {G, χ} 3Ng 2 T 2 k, G(k)χ()G(k + ) = NT k = T Σ(k)G(k) (1) Π()χ(). (11) Thus, i we insert E. (11) into E.(8), the latter redues to F e = NT [ { ln G 1 (k) } + Σ(k)G(k) ] + T ln { χ 1 () }, (12) k while i we insert E. (1) we get the ollowing expression or E.(8) F e = NT k ln { G 1 (k) } + T [ ln { χ 1 () } + Π()χ() ]. (13) Considering euation (12), we an show (See Appendix B.1) that the ermioni part redues to a Fermi liuid orm F F L πnρ F T 2 so that the inal expression o the ree 6 energy or thermodynamis in the Eliasherg ramework writes F e = F F L + T ln { χ 1 () }. (14)

9 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework Thermodynamis Perorming the energy and momentum integrals in the Eliasherg euations E. (9), one inds [21, 22] Π(, iω) = γ Ω, (15) z 2 where γ = Ng 2 χ k F /(πvf 2 ). Considering only the linear-reueny Landau term in the spin suseptiility, this writes ( χ 1 (, iω) = χ 1 ξ 2 + Q 2 + Ω ). (16) z 2 In partiular, we have z = 2 or an antierromagneti QCP and z = 3 or a erromagneti one. Using this expression, the singular part o the ree energy (14) writes s (ξ 2, T ) = T ln { ξ γ Ω } iω, z 2 = 1 dν oth ( ν ) d d γν/ z 2 ) π 2T (2π) d tan 1(, ξ (17) where = Q is the shited momentum near the wave vetor Q. Perorming the reueny and momentum integrals in this euation, one inds the analyti expression o (17). Details o this evaluation or d = 3, z = 2 are given in appendix Appendix C. We would like to emphasize that the resulting eetive ree energy satisies the ollowing saling relation s (r, T ) = (d+z) r (r 1/ν, T z ), (18) where r (x, y) is an analyti regular untion. r ξ 2 measures the distane to the QCP, ν is the orrelation-length exponent, z is the dynamial exponent and d is the spae dimension. Inserting = ξ 2ν into the aove saling expression, we ind s (ξ 2, T ) = ξ 2ν(d+z) r (1, T ξ 2νz ). (19) Now, one an understand thermodynamis near the HMM theory QCP ased on this saling ree energy, derived rom the eetive ield theory in the Eliasherg ramework. As is already known, the naive saling (18) may e spoiled y the presene o at least one dangerously irrelevant variale [1] leading to a generalized saling orm (ξ 2, T, u) = (d+z) (ξ 2 1/ν, T z, u d+z 4 ), (2) where u is the onstant oeiient o an additional φ 4 term in the theory. Within the Eliasherg approximation, the orrelation length s ritial exponent value ν = 1/2, oming rom the Ornstein-Zernike orm or the stati oson propagator in Es. (5, 16) and valid at high energy, has no uantum orretions. This oinides with its mean-ield value in the Hertz theory aove the upper ritial dimension, i.e. when d + z > 4.

10 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 1 In pratie, or thermodynamis uantities, the results otained rom the naive saling hold up to logarithmi orretions where the argument o the logarithm is a power o T. We omment in Appendix E on how the eet o suh variales an e handled within our method and show that we an otain the same generalized expression (2). The purpose in this setion is only to show how one an get an analyti expression or ree energy inluding uantum orretions in a sel-onsistent way. 3. Luttinger-Ward untional in the Eliasherg ramework o the Kondo reakdown senario The HMM theoretial ramework has een regarded as the standard model or uantum ritiality in metals or a long time, although several heavy ermion ompounds have een shown not to ollow its preditions [16, 17, 18, 19, 2]. An interesting alternative theory suggests that heavy ermion uantum transitions are seletive Mott transitions o the nearly loalized ermions [13, 14, 15, 24] at whih the Kondo eet reaks down. This senario is supported y the presene o loalized magneti moments at the transition towards magnetism [17] and Fermi surae reonstrution at the QCP [18, 19]. This prolem has een takled using the U(1) slave-oson representation o the Anderson lattie model[14, 15], with the introdution o a small dispersion or the - eletrons. A remarkale aspet o the theory is that the resulting QCP, at whih an eetive hyridization vanishes, is multi-sale. Indeed, eause we have two kind o ermions in the model, i.e the ondution -ermions and the -spinons, there exist a Fermi surae mismath = k F kf etween Fermi momentum k F or spinons and kf or ondution eletrons sine illings o spinons and eletrons dier rom eah other. This mismath gives rise to an energy gap E or spinon-eletron lutuations that ontrols the dynamis o hyridization lutuations. Although it depends on the value o, this energy sale is shown to vary rom O(1 ) mk to O(1 2 ) mk. When E < E, holon lutuations are undamped, thus desried y z = 2 dynamial exponent. On the other hand, when E > E, holon lutuations are dissipative sine spinon-eletron exitations are Landau damped, thus desried y z = 3 ritial theory. Based on the z = 3 uantum ritiality, reent studies have ound uasi-linear eletrial transport and logarithmially divergent speii heat oeiient in d = 3 [15, 14, 25], and a divergent Grüneisen ratio with an anomalous exponent.7 [12], onsistent with experiments [16, 2] U(1) slave-oson representation o the Anderson lattie model We start rom the Anderson lattie model in the large-u limit L = i iσ (( τ µ)δ ij t ij ) jσ + i d iσ( τ + ɛ )d iσ + V i (d iσ iσ + H..) + J ij S i S j, (21)

11 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 11 where iσ and d iσ are ondution eletron with a hemial potential µ and loalized eletron with an energy level ɛ, respetively, t ij the hopping term o the ondution eletron and V the hyridization etween - and d-eletrons. The last spin-exhange term is generated y a perturative expansion to seond order in t/u and is in ompetition with the hyridization term. In the U limit o (21), the strong orrelations etween the d-eletrons show as a onstraint o no doule oupany or the d-eletron. This an e handled using the U(1) slave-oson representation d iσ = i iσ, (22) where i and iσ are holon and spinon, assoiated with hyridization and spin lutuations, respetively, oeying the loal onstraint i i + iσ iσ = SN, (23) σ where S = 1/2 is the value o spin and N is the numer o ermion lavors with σ = 1,..., N. One an then rewrite E. (21) into L = iσ (( τ µ)δ ij t ij ) jσ + ij i iσ( τ + ɛ ) iσ + i τ i + V i ( i iσ iσ + H..) + J ij ( iσχ ij jσ + H..) + NJ χ ij 2 + i ij i λ i ( i i + iσ iσ SN) (24) The spin-exhange term or the loalized orital has een deomposed, using a ield χ ij, resulting in exhange hopping proesses or the spinons. The loal onstraint (23) is taken into aount y the introdution o a Lagrange multiplier λ i. Perorming the saddle-point approximation o i, χ ij χ, and iλ i λ, one inds an orital seletive Mott transition as reakdown o Kondo eet at J T K, where a spin-liuid Mott insulator ( = ) arises in J > T K while a heavy-ermion Fermi liuid ( ) results in T K > J [13, 14, 15]. Here, T K = D exp ( ) ɛ Nρ V is the 2 Kondo temperature, where ρ (2D) 1 is the density o states or ondution eletrons with the hal andwidth D. Beyond the mean-ield approximation, gauge lutuations orresponding to phase lutuations o the hopping parameter χ ij = χe ia ij should e introdued to express olletive spin lutuations. It is more onvenient to represent the aove eetive Lagrangian as ollows, perorming the ontinuum approximation, L ALM = dr σ( τ µ ) σ + 1 i σ 2 + σ 2m σ( τ µ ia ) σ The ermioni and osoni ields here are all time and position dependent. A ull disussion o this Lagrangian an e ound in [15].

12 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework m ( i ia i ) σ 2 + ( τ µ ia ) + 1 2m ( i ia i ) 2 + u V ( σ σ + H..) + 1 4g 2 F µνf µν + SN(µ + ia ), (25) where a is the salar gauge ield, a i is the i omponent o the vetorial gauge ield a, g is an eetive oupling onstant etween matter and gauge ields, F µν µ a ν ν a µ is the ititious eletromagneti tensor assoiated with the our-potential (a, a). Furthermore, several uantities, suh as ermion and masses and hemial potentials, are redeined as ollows λ µ, (2m ) 1 = t, (2m ) 1 = Jχ, µ = µ + 2dt, µ = ɛ + λ 2Jdχ. (26) In here, ermion are ands ɛ k and ɛ k or ondution eletrons and spinons, respetively, are treated in the ontinuum approximation as ollows ɛ k = 2t(os k x + os k y + os k z ) 2dt + t(k 2 x + k 2 y + k 2 z), ɛ k = 2Jχ(os k x + os k y + os k z ) 2Jdχ + Jχ(k 2 x + k 2 y + k 2 z). (27) The and dispersion or hyridization an arise rom high energy lutuations o ondution eletrons and spinons. Atually, the and mass o holons is given y m 1 NV 2 ρ /2, where ρ is the density o states or ondution eletrons [14, 15]. Loal sel-interations denoted y u an e introdued via non-universal short-distanesale physis. One physial proess or suh interations is our-point eletron-spinon V polarization (see Fig.- 5), giving rise to u = u 4 with u D 3 O(1). Beause suh a loal A. φ interation term results rom non-universal 4 vertex or the holon physis, one may onsider that this term is introdued phenomenologially. B g F Figure 5. Four-point eletron-spinon polarization or the holons. Maxwell dynamis or gauge lutuations appears rom high energy lutuations o spinons and holons. B. Propagators and Verties G + We would like to develop the LW untional approah, inluding the Higgs or heavyermion phase. In this a i respet we write the holon ield with itsaondensation i part and lutuation ontriution (a) separately, () B +. G (28) + C. R

13 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 13 Then, the eetive ontinuum Lagrangian is written as ollows L ALM = dr σ( τ + 1 i 2 µ ) σ + σ 2m σ( τ µ ia ) σ + 1 ( i ia i ) σ 2 + [ τ (µ 2u B 2 ) ia ] + 1 ( i ia i ) 2 2m 2m + u V ( σ σ + H..) + V B( σ σ + H..) + 1 4g 2 µν µν + B2 2m a 2 i + u 2 B4 + ( SN B 2) (µ + ia ). We see that the hemial potential or holon exitations is modiied rom µ to µ 2u B 2. An important point is that gauge lutuations eome gapped when B, whih is due to the Anderson-Higgs mehanism Luttinger-Ward untional in the Kondo reakdown senario In the ollowing, we demonstrate how thermodynamis an e extrated rom the ompliated eetive ield theory desried y (29), where two kinds o ermion exitations and two kinds o oson lutuations are oupled with eah other. The point is how to introdue all sel-energy orretions sel-onsistently. As disussed eore, we onstrut the LW untional in the Eliasherg ramework, allowing us to take all kinds o sel-energy orretions sel-onsistently at least in the one-loop level. For simpliity, we start y ignoring gauge lutuations orretions, onsidering only holon lutuations. Gauge lutuations are ater that manipulated in the same way one their oupling with holons and spinons is known Construting a zero-order theory A sutle issue in deriving a LW expression or ree energy is how to handle a non-vanishing ondensation B to desrie the Higgs phase. A irst step towards this derivation is to onstrut a zero-order theory taking into aount, in a proper way, the eet o the ondensation part B. Going to Fourier spae, we an ast the ation orresponding to the Lagrangian (29) into a mean-ield part and holon lutuations part : (29) S MF = T k [ σk g 1 (k) σk + σk g 1 (k, iω) ] σk + V BT k S lu = T ( σk σk + H.. ) + ( SN B 2) B 4 µ + u 2 d 1 () + V T 2 k,σ ( k σk+ σk + H.. ), (3) The ontriution o the loal interation with strength u to the LW untional is su-leading with respet to the diagram o order O(N) used to derive the Eliasherg euations elow. The orresponding term is thus dropped rom S lu. Its inlusion may result in a generalized saling orm or the ree energy as shown in Appendix E.

14 A. φ 4 vertex or the holon Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 14 where g 1 (k) = iω + µ k2, 2m g 1 (k) = iω + µ k2, 2m g F C. Renorm d 1 () = iω + µ 2u B 2 2, (31) 2m The interation term gives raise to two kind o verties, shown in the ollowing B. Propagators and Verties igures G + G + B B D. Skeleton d G Figure 6. Verties due to the interation etween ermions and holons. Here, a line stands or the spinon propagator, the dashed line or the eletron propagator and the wavy line or the holon propagator. a i a i Whereas it is (a) justiied to ollow the same() strategy as or the HMM ramework (See Se.2.3), i.e. use the umulant expansion to the seond order, or the lutuations part o the interation term, it is not the ase or the ondensation part. However, the latter an e onsidered as a renormalization o the propagators g and g and is thus inluded in a new zero-order theory whose are ation is S MF. Indeed, we an write where S MF = T k ( σk σk )G 1 G 1 = ( σk σk ( g 1 V B ) V B g 1 + ( SN B 2) µ + u B 4 This gives the renormalized matrix Green s untion or the ermions ( G G = G ), where G = g 1 g 1 G = G = g 1 G (V B) 2, G = g 1 g 1 V B G ). g 1 g 1 g 1 (V B) 2 (a) 2, (32) (V B) 2 (33) G

15 ertex or the holon g F Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 15 The ondensation renormalizes thus the propagators or the, and hannels. In at, this euals summing the ininite series o the umulant expansion due C. Renormalized propagators the ondensation part o the interation term (see Fig.-7). gators and Verties G G B Figure 7. Propagators o the zero-order theory, where the eet o the ondensation D. Skeleton diagram at irst order B is totally taken into aount. G () Derivation o the (a) Luttinger-Ward() untional One we have properly handled the aondensation i part o the interation, we an ollow the strategy o Se The interation term due to hyridization lutuations writes G S = V T 2 ( σν k+ σν k + H.. ), (34) N k,σ,ν where we have extended the model to N idential speies o ermions y adding a hannel index ν [1, N] to the ermioni operators and the 1/ N ator ensures a well-deined large-n limit. Considering only the leading O(N) ontriution to the LW untional shown in Fig.-8, and aording to the general ormula E.(1), we get the ollowing expression or the ree energy with F e LW = F F + F + Y + ( SN B 2) µ + u B 4 2, (35) F F = T Tr [ ln ( G 1 + Σ ) + ΣG ] F = T Tr [ ln ( ) ] d 1 + Π + Π D (36) Y = 2NV 2 D ()G (k)g (k + ) k ( ) ( ) Σ Σ In (36), Σ = G G and G = are the sel-energy and ull Σ Σ Green s matries, respetively, o the ermions. They are related y the Dyson s euation G G 1 = G 1 Σ. (37) The same euation holds or holons D 1 G = d 1 Π. (38)

16 Y [G, χ] = B k +, σ, ν Luttinger-Ward untional approah O(N) in the Eliasherg O(1) ramework 16 G k, σ Y [G, χ] = G k +, σ O(N) O(1) B Figure Leading skeleton diagrams partiipating to the LW untional Y or the Kondo Breakdown model with dependene on 1/N. The ermioni propagators orrespond to G A. (straight φ 4 line) vertex and Gor (dashed the holon line) Green s untions o the zero order theory inluding the ondensation part o the interation. Both ermioni and osoni propagators are ully dressed. The irst diagram ontains one ermioni loop arrying spin and hannel uantum numers and one pair o verties, eah o order O(1/ N), so that it is o order O(N 2 /N) = O(N). The seond diagram ontains our loops and our pairs o verties, so it is o order O(N 4 /N 4 ) = O(1). One an manipulate gauge lutuations in the same way as the aove, where the gauge-oupling ation, whose verties are shown in Fig-9, is given y Sa = 1 m k ( a σk k, 2 σk + H.. ) + 1 a 2m a + σk+ σk, k,, Sa = 1 m ( a σ 2 σ + H.. ) + 1 a 2m a + σk+ σk,(39) (a), a i g F B. Propagators and Verties () k,, a i C. Ren G + G + () (d) D. Skele G Figure 9. Verties due to the interation o the gauge ields with holons and spinons. Gauge propagator is represented y a zigzag line. (a) G

17 G Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 17 es a i Introdution o gauge lutuations Following exatly the same proedure or hyridization lutuations, D. one Skeleton inds thediagram ollowing additional at irst order terms in E.(35) F a = T Tr [ ln ( ) ] d 1 a + Π a + Πa D a where Y a = NT 2 F (, k)g (k)d a ()G (k + ) 2 G (a) T 2 2 k, d 1 a (, Ω) = Ω g G 2 B(, )D ()D a ( )D ( + ), (4), + B2 2m, () D 1 a d 1 a Π a. G (a) a () a G Figure 1. First order skeleton diagrams orresponding to Y a. Fermioni and osoni propagators are ully dressed. F (k, ) and B(, ) are the urrent-gauge are verties or spinons and holons given respetively y F (k, ) 1 2 B(k, ) v i i,j=1 2 vi i,j=1 ( δij i j 2 ) v j, v i = k i + i /2 m, ( δij i j 2 ) v j, v i = k i + i /2 m, Y a orresponds to the ontriution o the leading skeleton diagrams, due to interations with the gauge ield, onstruted with the ully dressed propagators o the spinons, the holons and the gauge ields (see Fig-1) Eliasherg euations As or the HMM model, we an show that Eliasherg euations an e derived rom the LW untional approah. Indeed, restriting ourselves to the leading O(N) terms o Y = Y + Y a shown in Fig-8 and Fig-1, one an derive, in the same manner as in the HMM ase, the ollowing expressions or the sel-energies

18 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 18 Σ (k) = 2V 2 T D ()G (k + ) Σ (k) Σ a + Σ = T F (k, )G (k + )D a () + 2V 2 T G (k )D () Π () Π a + Π = T B(, )D a ( )D ( + ) + NV 2 T k G (k + )G (k) Π a () Π a + Π a = NT F (k, )G (k)g (k + ) + T 2 2 k B(, )D ()D ( + ) (41) We see that the gauge ield indues an additional part in the sel-energies o the spinons and the holons, whih we notie Σ a and Π a respetively (See Fig-11). δy a δg = G = G a 2 G G δy a δd = = a Figure 11. Illustrating untional derivative o the gauge part Y a o LW untional with respet to Green s untions. The ross indiates the line that is ut y untional dierentiation. Additional parts or the - hannel and the holon sel-energies are generated due to interations with the gauge ield. Euations (41) are nothing ut the Eliasherg euations or the KB model studied in [15]. It is ound that this approximation eomes exat in the limit N, provided we take into aount the Fermi surae urvature[1].

19 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework Simpliiation o the Luttinger-Ward expression We an notie that Y 2NV 2 D ()G (k)g (k + ) k = NT Σ (k)g + Σ (k)g (42) k = T Π ()D (), (43) and that Y a NT 2 2 T 2 2 = NT k k, F (, k)g (k)d a ()G (k + ), B(, )D ()D a ( )D ( + ) Σ a (k)g (k) Π a ()D () (44) = NT k Σ a (k)g (k) Π a()d a () (45) Hene, we an simpliy the expression o ree energy or the KB model y introduing either euations (42-45) into the expression o the ree energy. As an example, i we use E. (43) and (45) we get the ollowing expression or ree energy with F e LW = F F + F + F a + ( SN B 2) (µ + ia ) + u B 4 2, F F = T Tr [ ln ( G 1) + Σ G ] F = T Tr [ ln ( D 1 F a = T Tr [ ln ( D 1 a ) + Π a D ] )] In this expression, the ermioni ontriution redues to a Fermi liuid orm (see Appendix B.2) FLW F πnρ + T 2 πnρ T 2, 6 6 where ρ ± is the density o states o the upper(lower) hyridized and. The singular part o the ree energy is given solely y the osoni setor : F s = F a + F. We an make a urther simpliiation onsidering that Π Π a +, in whih ase the holon part is given y (46) F = T ln ( d 1 () + Π () ). + In the non-ondensed phase, B =, the ontriution o the gauge ields to the oson propagator has een shown [15] to e dominant only or T E as it is then the only soure o damping or the osons. In the ondensed phase with B =, Π gets an additional term proportional to B 2. (See E. (31)) and is thus leading.

20 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework Thermodynamis Perorming the energy and momentum integrals in the Eliasherg euations [Es. (41)], we ind Landau damping expressions or the holon and the gauge polarizations where Π (, iω) = γ Ω 2m, Π a(, iω) + Π a(, iω) = γ = 2π v F with m = 2 NV 2 ρ and d = d (d 1) 2 (2π) ( d 1) d γ a 2m a Ω, (47) γ a m a = Nπ m v F + π d m with a UV ut-o [15]. The singular ontriution or the ree energy is s (µ, T ) = (µ, T ) + T + T ln ( 2 + γ Ω + (µ, T ) ) ln ( 2 + γ a Ω + a(µ, T ) ), (48) where the ondensation part (µ, T ), holon mass (µ, T ), and gauge-oson mass a (µ, T ) are given y (µ, T ) = µ B 2 + u 2 B4, (µ, T ) = 2m (µ )[µ 2u B 2 (µ, T )], a (µ, T ) = m a m (µ ) B2 (µ, T ), (49) respetively. Note that the holon and mass depends on the eetive hemial potential sine it is given y the eletron density o states. The oeiient in the gauge-oson m mass is given y a ) m (µ >) O(1)( V 2, D approximately. An important remark is that we an determine sel-onsistently the ondensation e FLW value B y the ondition = (See Appendix F). Beside the part otained B at the mean-ield level, there are ontriutions due to hyridization and gauge lutuation orretions. The Eliasherg ramework allows then to reine the value o the ondensation B. An expliit analyti expression or the singular part o the ree energy is otained ater integration on reuenies and momenta in E.(48). The details o this evaluation or d = 3, z = 3 and its results are given in Appendix D Saling o the ree energy near the Kondo reakdown uantum ritial point One we have the analyti expression or the singular part o the ree energy, ater integration o reuenies and momenta in E.(48), we an dedue its saling expressions.

21 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 21 As shown previously, this part o the ree energy results rom olletive oson exitations assoiated with hyridization and gauge lutuations. For eah o these osoni exitations, we assoiate a length sale or suh oson exitations, and the saling orm o the ree energy near the Kondo Breakdown QCP reads s (ξ 2, λ 2 a, T ) = (d+z ) (ξ 2 1/ν, T z ) + (d+za) a a (λ 2 a 1/νa a, T za a ). (5) (a) (x, y) is an analyti regular untion or hyridization (gauge) lutuations and d is the spae dimension. ξ = 1/2 is the orrelation length or holons, and λ a = a 1/2 is the one or gauge osons. In partiular, λ a may e onsidered as the penetration depth in the superondutor. and a are saling parameters or hyridization and gauge lutuations, respetively. ν (a) is the orrelation-length exponent o holons (gauge osons), and z (a) is the dynamial exponent o holons (gauge osons). Here we have z = z a as shown in E. (47). Furthermore, ν = ν a = 1/2 as there are no uantum orretions to the usual Ornstein-Zernike orm o a stati oson propagator within the Eliasherg treatment. These values or ν a, oinide with the mean-ield value o the orrelation length ritial exponent in Hertz theory aove its upper ritial dimension. Although two kinds o length sales are introdued, oth sales diverge at the same parameter point, V = V eause they are related with eah other via Anderson-Higgs mehanism. In addition, we note that this expression is appliale near the Kondo reakdown QCP, approahing rom the heavy-ermion side eause we have onsidered properly and in a sel-onsistent way the eet o a inite ondensation. Inserting = ξ 2ν and a = λ 2ν a into the aove saling expression, we ind s (ξ 2, λ 2 a, T ) = ξ 2ν(d+z) (1, T ξ 2νz ) + λ 2ν(d+z) a a (1, T λ 2νz a ). (51) This is our main result, derived rom the mirosopi model ased on the LW untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework. Now, one an understand thermodynamis near the Kondo reakdown QCP ased on this saling ree energy. 4. Disussion and summary In this study we derived the saling o ree energy rom a mirosopi model or two models o uantum ritiality : the standard theoretial ramework alled the Hertz- Moriya-Millis (HMM) theory and the strong oupling approah orresponding to the gauge theory. Flutuation orretions are taken into aount systematially in the Luttinger-Ward untional approah. The Eliasherg ramework allows to use the proper level o approximation to get, sel-onsistently, the orret saling or thermodynamis near the uantum ritial point (QCP). We have shown that the singular part o the ree energy or oth models is due to the olletive osoni exitations, whereas the ermioni exitations give a Fermi Liuid ontriution. These saling ators are in at the same ut may e assoiated with dierent dynamial exponents or dierent parts o the osoni setor. Thus, we introdue susripts or holons and gauge osons to keep in mind this at.

22 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 22 For the HMM theory, there exists one length sale assoiated with the orresponding symmetry reaking, here spin-density-wave (SDW) instaility. This at allows us to onstrut the saling ree energy as a untion o the spin-spin orrelation length and temperature or the SDW uantum transition. We derived the orret saling expression using the Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework. For the gauge theory, there are additional olletive exitations. These have nothing to do with the phase transition diretly although they are aeted y it. Suh olletive modes turn out to e gauge lutuations orresponding to olletive spin lutuations in our ontext. An additional length sale, assoiated with gauge lutuations, an appear. Indeed, onsidering that the Kondo reakdown transition is driven y ondensation o holons, orresponding to the ormation o an eetive hyridization, the struture o the theory gives rise to massive gauge lutuations via the Anderson-Higgs mehanism. This is the physial reason why the seond length sale appears in the gauge theory. Beause the two kinds o length sales, orrelation length o hyridization lutuations and penetration depth o gauge lutuations, are deeply related via the Anderson-Higgs mehanism, they diverge at the Kondo reakdown QCP simultaneously. However, the presene o the additional length sale leads to a dierent saling expression or the thermodynami potential, ompared with the HMM theory. We derived suh a saling expression using the Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework. In the Eliasherg approximation, we showed that the saling expression o the ree energy has two ontriutions orresponding to eah length sale, where eah part ontains only one length sale. In this paper we ignored vertex orretions, sometimes justiied ut not always [1]. Our path integral derivation o the Luttinger-Ward untional gives a hane to extend the Eliasherg ramework, allowing vertex orretions. This an e ahieved y going to higher orders o the umulant expansion. In partiular, i we do the same jo up to the ourth order, we expet that vertex orretions will appear, satisying the Bethe-Salpeter euation or verties [23]. It is an important uture diretion to see how introdution o vertex orretions hanges the saling expression o the Eliasherg approximation. This work is supported y the Frenh National Grant ANR26ECCEZZZ.

23 or the holon Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 23 Appendix A. Derivation o the Luttinger-Ward untional up to seond order in the interation The LW untional an e derived thoroughly using a umulant expansion to the seond order in the interation term. Indeed, this term indues the ollowing orretions to the are ation δs g 2 T 4 [ ψ ψβk ψ α k + τ αβs n τ n α m β Sm k,k, αk ψ β k + ψ βk ψ α k + τ αβs n τ n α m β Sm ψ αk+ ψ β k + ψ αk ψα k + ψ β k τ αβs n τ n α m β Sm + ] ψ α k + ψ β k τ αβs n τ n α m β Sm ψ αk+ ψ βk g2 2 T 4 [ S n ψ αk+ τ αβψ n βk ψ α k + τ α m β ψ β k Sm k,k, + ψ αk+ τ αβψ n βk ψ ] α k + τ α m β ψ β k S n S m g2 2 T 4 [ ψ αk+ ψ β k τ n k,k, αβτα m β S n S m ψβk ψ α k + + ψ αk+ ψ βk τ ] αβτ n α m β S n S m ψ α k + ψ β k, 1 C. Renormalized propagators The ermioni and osoni propagators are introdued as G(k)δ kk δ σσ ψ σk ψ σ k, χ()δ S n S n G while the orresponding sel-energies are Σ(k)δ kk δ δ βα g 2 ψ βk ψ α k + τ αβs n τ n α m β Sm G g 2 ψ α k + ψ β k τ αβs n τ n α m β Sm + + +,... Π()δ g 2 ψ αk+ τ n αβψ βk ψ α k + τ m α β ψ β k. The two last sums in (A.1) orresponds to the two diagrams shown in Fig-A1 where the ermioni and osoni propagators are are. D. Skeleton diagram at irst order k, σ ψ βk (A.1) rs and Verties (a) () () d) a i k +, σ G Figure A1. The one loop losed diagrams or ree energy in the SF model. The ermioni and osoni propagators are are (a) () The presription to get the LW untional at this order is to dress these propagators[4] in the orresponding G skeleton diagram, resulting in the ollowing G a a

24 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 24 expression or the LW untional Y = N 3g2 2 T 2 G(k)χ()G(k + ) + N 2 3g2 k, 2 T 2 χ() k G(k) k G(k ). (A.2) In Fig-A1, the diagram () will generate a stati and uniorm part in the sel-energy and an thus e onsidered as a renormalization o the eletron hemial potential. Appendix B. Fermioni ontriution to ree energy Appendix B.1. Spin-ermion model The momentum dependene o the eletron sel-energy is shown to e regular [1], we then replae the momentum with the Fermi momentum k F : Σ(iω) Σ(k F, iω). Then, the eletron ontriution to the ree energy o the SF model is given y F el NT [ { ln G 1 (k, iω) + Σ(iω) } + Σ(iω)G(k, iω) ] iω,k [ 1 du u ln { G 1 (k, iω) + uσ(iω) } = NT iω,k Σ(iω) + G 1 (k, iω) Σ(iω) ] NT iω,k ln { G 1 (k, iω) } (B.1) Here, the last term orresponds to the ree ermion part giving raise to the Fermi liuid orm o the ree energy or eletrons NT ln { G 1 (k, iω) } = N πρ F iω,k 6 T 2, (B.2) where ρ F is the density o states at the Fermi level. The irst two terms o (B.1) are shown to e vanishingly small in the low energy limit. Indeed, we have δf el NT [ 1 du u ln { G 1 (k, iω) + uσ(iω) } Σ(iω) ] + iω,k G 1 (k, iω) Σ(iω) = NT 1 du [ Σ(iω) iω,k G 1 (k, iω) uσ(iω) + Σ(iω) ] G 1 (k, iω) Σ(iω) = NT Σ(iω) 2 1 (1 u) iω,k G 1 du (k, iω) Σ(iω) G 1 uσ. (B.3) Now, we an swith rom the integration over momentum to that over energy as ollows where Λ is an energy ut-o. Integrating over ɛ, we ind that 1 δf el = NT ρ F du iω Λ... ρ F dɛ... k Λ Σ(iω) [ ln ( iω Σ(iω) Λ) ( iω uσ(iω) Λ)] ln iω Σ(iω) + Λ iω uσ(iω) + Λ

25 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 25 For uσ(iω) Λ, the two last terms anels and δf el vanishes. The eletroni part o the ree energy (12) o the SF model redues then to the Fermi liuid ontriution F el = N πρ F 6 T 2. (B.4) Appendix B.2. Kondo reakdown theory The ermioni setor in the KB model atorizes into an upper (+) and a lower (-) and whose dispersions are given y E k± = 1 [ ] ɛ k + ɛ k ± (ɛ k ɛ k 2 )2 + 4V 2 B 2 The ree energy or eah and has a similar expression to E. (B.4) and redues to a Fermi liuid orm F ± = πnρ ± T 2, 6 where ρ ± is the density o states o the upper (lower) and at the Fermi level given y ( ) 1 Ek± ρ ± = ρ ɛ k E ± = Appendix C. Momentum and reueny integral or the ree energy o the Spin-ermion model Introduing (x) = tan 1 x, we have the ollowing limits (x 1) x, (x 1) π 2. (C.1) Then, the ree energy expression o E. (17) an e ast aording to s (ξ, T ) 1 dν oth ( ν ) [ ν 2 d 2π 3 2T ξ π 2 2 where r = ν Ω s ξ 2. Then s (ξ, T ) = 1 2π 3 ξ 1( π 2 tan 1 dν oth ( ν 2T Ω s r )[ ν { ν Λ ξ Ω s Ω 2 s ξ2 ν Ω s 1 )} + π 6 ( ν Ω s ξ 2) 3/2 ] r ] d 2, (C.2) 1 (2T ) 2 Λ 2π 3 + ξ 5 r (T ξ 2 ), (C.3) Ω s where Λ is a momentum uto and r (T ξ 2 ) = 1 [ [2T ξ 2 ] 2 { 2T ξ ( π 2T ξ 2π 3 Ω s 2 2 tan 1 1 )} Ω s Ω s π 6 [2T ξ2 ] + ( [2T ξ 2 ] 1 ) 3 ] 2. Ω s We see that the singular part o the ree energy ollows the saling relation shown in Es. (18) and (19).

26 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 26 Appendix D. Momentum and reueny integral or the ree energy in the Kondo reakdown senario Let s onsider the spetral representation o E. (48) s (µ r, T ) = (µ r, T ) 1 dν oth ( ν ) d 2 2π 3 2T { ( tan 1 ν ) γ ( + tan 1 ν )} γ [ 2 a. (D.1) + ] [ 2 + a ] Considering the approximation or tan 1 x, the holon part is ast, as previously, into two parts in the momentum integral (µ, T ) = 1 dν oth ( ν ) d 2 tan 1( ν ) γ 2π 3 2T [ 2 + ] 1 dν oth ( ν ) d 2 γ ν 2π 3 2T r [ 2 + ] 1 dν oth ( ν ) r d 2 π 2π 3 2T 2, where r is a harateristi momentum determined y the euation γ ν r [r 2 + ] = 1 3 r + r γ ν =. The solution o the latter is given y (2/3) 1/3 r = ( 9γ ν (γ ) 1/3 + ν) 2 whih is deinitely positive. Then (µ, T ) = 1 4π 3 1 4π 3 dν oth ( ν ) Λ 2 2T r 2 dν oth ( ν 2T ) γ ν ln ( Λ 2 r γ ν ( 9γ ν (γ ν) 2 ) 1/3 dx γ ν 1 x + 12π 2 ) 1 12π 2 2 1/3 3 2/3,(D.2) dν oth ( ν ) 3 2T r dν oth ( ν )( r + γ ν ), 2T where the momentum uto Λ is taken muh larger than the holon mass, i.e., Λ 2. The reueny integral an e perormed approximately, given y (µ r, T ) = 1 4π 3 dν oth ( ν 2T 1 { 2T dν 2T 4π 3 ν + Λν 2T 1 { 2T 12π 2 1 4π 3 2T dν 2T ν + Λν ) γ ν ln ( Λ 2 r ) 1 γ ν 12π 2 2T ) dν } γ ν ln ( Λ 2 r [, ν] γ ν dν }( r + γ ν ) dν 2T ν γ ν ln ( Λ 2 r [, ν] ) 1 γ ν 12π 2 2T (D.3) dν oth ( ν )( r + γ ν ) 2T dν 2T ν ( r + γ ν ) 1 (2γ 4π 3 T ) 2 ln ( Λ 2 r [, 2T ]) 1 (2γ γ 2γ T 12π 2 T ) ( r [, 2T ] + 2γ T ), γ

27 Luttinger-Ward untional approah in the Eliasherg ramework 27 where r [, 2T ] = (2/3) 1/3 ( 9[2γ T ] (2γ T ) 2 ) 1/3 + ( 9[2γ T ] (2γ T ) 2 ) 1/3 2 1/3 3 2/3. For the gauge-lutuation part, exatly the same proedure is perormed, and the result holds provided that the susript is replaed with a. (D.4) Appendix E. Introdution o dangerously irrelevant variales In this appendix, we show how the presene o a dangerously irrelevant variale an aet the naive saling relations otained in (18) and (51) We reall that Millis [1] showed in this ase, using perturative RG, that the ontrol parameter δ = ξ 2 is renormalized aording to C δ r = δ + u z + d 2, (E.1) where C is a onstant, and the orrelation length ξ gets a temperature dependene ξ 2 = δ r + g(d, z)ut d+z 2 z, (E.2) where g is a untion depending on the dimension d and the dynamial exponent z. Aordingly, the naive saling shown in E.(18) is invalidated and the eet o the dangerously irrelevant parameter u must e inorporated into a generalized saling orm (ξ 2, T, u) = (d+z) (ξ 2 1/ν, T z, u d+z 4 ). (E.3) Let s onsider then a φ 4 term with a onstant oeiient u in the SF model (4), as in the Hertz-Millis theory, within our method. The orresponding vertex is shown in Fig.- E1-(a) elow. At the irst loop level, this uarti term generates the diagrams shown in Fig.- E1-() and (), where the osoni propagators are ull. These are o order O(1) and are thus su-leading with respet to the diagram o order O(N) irst onsidered in the LW untional shown in Fig.- 2. I these are inluded in the LW untional, the osoni sel-energy, generated y variation o the ree energy with respet to the osoni Green s untion as explained in setion 2.4, gets a onstant ontriution rom the diagram (a). This is a renormalization o the osoni hemial potential as in E.(E.1). The diagram () is easily shown to give orretions to saling to the orrelation length ξ as ξ 2 (T ) ξ 2 () T d+z 2 z, onsistent with (E.2) We see that our method allows to aount sel-onsistently or the eet o the parameter u. Rigorously, this should e onsidered in the expression o the ree energy.