Higgs Physics from the Lattice Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound
|
|
- Marshall Clement McDowell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Higgs Physics from the Lattice Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound Julius Kuti University of California, San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007 Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 1/37
2 Outline of Lecture Series: Higgs Physics from the Lattice 1. Standard Model Higgs Physics Outlook for the Higgs Particle Standard Model Review Expectations from the Renormalization Group Nonperturbative Lattice Issues? 2. Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound Renormalization Group and Triviality in Lattice Higgs and Yukawa couplings Higgs Upper Bound in 1-component φ 4 Lattice Model Higgs Upper Bound in O(4) Lattice Model Strongly Interacting Higgs Sector? Higgs Resonance on the Lattice 3. Vacuum Instability and Higgs Mass Lower Bound Vacuum Instability and Triviality in Top-Higgs Yukawa Models Chiral Lattice Fermions Top-Higgs and Top-Higgs-QCD sectors with Chiral Lattice Fermions Higgs mass lower bound Running couplings in 2-loop continuum Renormalization Group Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 2/37
3 Standard Model Scales: Running Higgs coupling 1-loop Higgs couplings: 1-loop Feynman diagrams: Higgs boson self-couplings Running Higgs coupling λ(t) is defined as the Higgs 4-point function at scale t=log p µ Higgs beta function: β λ (t) = dλ(t) dt Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 3/37
4 Standard Model Scales: Running gauge and Yukawa couplings 1-loop gauge couplings: 1-loop Feynman diagrams: gauge boson couplings to fermions Running gauge couplings g(t), g (t), g 3 (t) can be defined as the gauge-fermion 3-point function at scale t=log p µ gauge beta functions: β g (t) = dg(t) dt 1-loop Yukawa couplings: 1-loop Feynman diagrams: Higgs boson Yukawa couplings to fermions Running Top coupling g Top (t) is defined as the Higgs fermion 3-point function at scale t=log p µ Top beta function: β gtop (t) = dg Top(t) dt Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 4/37
5 Standard Model Scales: RG Fixed Points and Triviality H = =g running of λ, g t, g t = gt 2 =g2 3 Top-Higgs sector (1-loop) with notation R = λ g 2 t dg 2 t dt = 9 16π 2 g 4 t g 2 dr t dg 2 t = 1 3 (8R2 + R 2) = m2 H 4m 2 t IR fixed line at R = 1 16 ( 65 1) = 0.44 Trivial fixed point only! Is the Landau pole the upper bound? Is λ(λ) = 0 the lower bound? Top-Higgs-QCD sector (1-loop) Pendleton-Ross fixed point: 2 m t = 9 g 3(µ = m t )v/ 2 95 GeV ( m H = 72 g 3 2v 53 GeV Weak gauge couplings and 2-loop destabilize the Pendleton-Ross fixed point Landau pole only in α 1 at µ = GeV with all couplings running? Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 5/37
6 Landau pole in perturbation theory: Higgs mass upper bound The RGE in the pure Higgs sector is known to three-loop order in the MS scheme β(λ) = d λ = 3 d t 2π 2 λ ζ(3) 32π 4 λ3 + (16π 2 ) 3 λ 4. The RGE exhibits an IR attractive fixed point λ=0 (perturbative triviality ) with general solution in one loop order 1 λ(µ) λ(µ) = 1 λ(λ) + 3 2π 2 ln Λ, λ(λ) = 1 µ 3 2π 2 λ(µ)ln Λ µ Increasing λ(µ) at fixed λ(λ), the Landau pole is hit at 3 2π 2 λ(µ)ln Λ µ = 1 bound λ(µ) < 2π2 3ln Λ µ which is related to the upper bound on the Higgs mass. with the naive upper λ = m2 H v 2. When we try to increase λ(µ) at fixed λ(λ) beyond the Landau pole limit, something else will happen which will reveal the intrinsic non-removable cutoff in the theory. This will be illustrated in the large N limit of the Higgs-Yukawa fermion model. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 6/37
7 Functional integral saddle point: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model The Lagrangian density of the continuum model after rescaling the coupling constants: L = 1 2 φ ( + m 2 )φ ) + ψ i γ µ µ ψ i y ψ i ψ i φ + 1 λ φ 4, i = 1, 2,...N F. NF 24 N F With rescaling of the scalar field φ N F and integrating out the fermion fields, the partition function is given by ( Z = Dφ exp [ N F Tr ln(γ µ µ yφ) + d 4 x[ 1 2 φ( + m2 )φ + 1 )] 24 λφ4 ]. The N F limit is a saddle point for the functional integral. The solution of the saddle point equations is equivalent to summing all Feyman diagrams with leading fermion bubbles which are proportional to N F. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 7/37
8 Renormalization: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model We first consider a Higgs-Yukawa model of a single real scalar field coupled to N F massless fermions in the exact N F limit Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 8/37
9 Renormalization: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model We first consider a Higgs-Yukawa model of a single real scalar field coupled to N F massless fermions in the exact N F limit This will allow us to demonstrate that the theory is trivial and the supposed vacuum instability is an artifact of ignoring the necessary cutoff in the model Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 8/37
10 Renormalization: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model We first consider a Higgs-Yukawa model of a single real scalar field coupled to N F massless fermions in the exact N F limit This will allow us to demonstrate that the theory is trivial and the supposed vacuum instability is an artifact of ignoring the necessary cutoff in the model Bare Lagrangian of the Higgs-Yukawa theory in Euclidean space-time is defined by L = 1 2 m2 0 φ λ 0φ ( µ φ 0 ) 2 + ψ a 0 ( γµ µ + y 0 φ 0 ) ψ a 0, where a = 1,..., N F sums over the degenerate fermion flavors and the subscript 0 denotes bare quantities. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 8/37
11 Renormalization: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model We first consider a Higgs-Yukawa model of a single real scalar field coupled to N F massless fermions in the exact N F limit This will allow us to demonstrate that the theory is trivial and the supposed vacuum instability is an artifact of ignoring the necessary cutoff in the model Bare Lagrangian of the Higgs-Yukawa theory in Euclidean space-time is defined by L = 1 2 m2 0 φ λ 0φ ( µ φ 0 ) 2 + ψ a 0 ( γµ µ + y 0 φ 0 ) ψ a 0, where a = 1,..., N F sums over the degenerate fermion flavors and the subscript 0 denotes bare quantities. We rewrite this as L = 1 2 m2 0 Z φφ λ 0Zφ 2 φ Z ( φ µ φ ) 2 + Zψ ψ ( a γ µ µ + y 0 Zφ φ ) ψ a = 1 2 (m2 + δm 2 )φ (λ + δλ)φ (1 + δz φ) ( µ φ ) 2 +(1 + δz ψ ) ψ a γ µ µ ψ a + ψ a (y + δy)φψ a, Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 8/37
12 Renormalization: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model We first consider a Higgs-Yukawa model of a single real scalar field coupled to N F massless fermions in the exact N F limit This will allow us to demonstrate that the theory is trivial and the supposed vacuum instability is an artifact of ignoring the necessary cutoff in the model Bare Lagrangian of the Higgs-Yukawa theory in Euclidean space-time is defined by L = 1 2 m2 0 φ λ 0φ ( µ φ 0 ) 2 + ψ a 0 ( γµ µ + y 0 φ 0 ) ψ a 0, where a = 1,..., N F sums over the degenerate fermion flavors and the subscript 0 denotes bare quantities. We rewrite this as L = 1 2 m2 0 Z φφ λ 0Zφ 2 φ Z ( φ µ φ ) 2 + Zψ ψ ( a γ µ µ + y 0 Zφ φ ) ψ a = 1 2 (m2 + δm 2 )φ (λ + δλ)φ (1 + δz φ) ( µ φ ) 2 +(1 + δz ψ ) ψ a γ µ µ ψ a + ψ a (y + δy)φψ a, with wavefunction renormalization factors, renormalized parameters, and counterterms Z φ = 1 + δz φ, Z ψ = 1 + δz ψ, m 2 0 Z φ = m 2 + δm 2, λ 0 Z 2 φ = λ + δλ, Z ψ Zφ y 0 = y + δy. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 8/37
13 Renormalization: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model In the limit where N F becomes large, all Feynman diagrams with Higgs loops are suppressed relative to those with fermion loops. Hence, two of the counterterms vanish, Renormalization conditions (1,2) δy = 0, δz ψ = 0 as there are no radiative corrections to the fermion propagator or to the Higgs-fermion coupling. To maintain tree level relation m λv2 = 0 to all orders: Renormalization condition (3) δm δλv2 4N F y 2 k 1 k 2 + y 2 v 2 = 0 Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 9/37
14 Renormalization: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model In the large N F limit, the inverse propagator of the Higgs fluctuation ϕ = φ v is G 1 ϕϕ(p 2 ) = p 2 + m λv2 + p 2 δz φ + δm δλv2 Σ(p 2 ) Σ(p 2 ) = 4N F y 2 y 2 v 2 k.(k p) k (k 2 + y 2 v 2 )((k p) 2 + y 2 v 2 ) We impose the condition G 1 ϕϕ(p 2 0) = p 2 + m 2 H, which separates into two renormalization conditions: Renormalization condition (4) δm δλv2 Σ(p 2 = 0) = 0 Renormalization condition (5) δz φ dσ(p2 ) dp 2 p 2 =0 = 0 Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 10/37
15 Counterterms: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model Renormalization condition δm δλv2 Σ(p 2 = 0) = 0 maintains the tree-level relation m 2 H = m λv2 = 1 3 λv2 exactly. The counterterms precisely cancel all the finite and infinite radiative contributions. The Higgs mass defined as the zero-momentum piece of G 1 ϕϕ is identical to the curvature U eff (v). True physical mass given by the pole of the propagator and the renormalized masses m H and m can be related in perturbation theory. Renormalization conditions (3) and (4) yield δm 2 = 4N F y 2 k δλ = 24N F y 4 k 2 + 2y 2 v 2 (k 2 + y 2 v 2 ) 2, k 1 (k 2 + y 2 v 2 ) 2. The closed form for δz φ is more complicated and less illuminating. To demonstrate triviality, we use some finite cutoff in the momentum integrals and examine what occurs as this cutoff is removed. We will use a simple hard-momentum cutoff k Λ. Exactly the same conclusions would be reached using instead e.g. Pauli-Villars regularization. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 11/37
16 Counterterms: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model The non-zero counterterms are δm 2 N F y 2 [ 1 y 4 v 4 = 2π 2 2 Λ2 + 2(Λ 2 + y 2 v 2 ) 1 ] 2 y2 v 2 δλ = 3N Fy 4 [ y 2 v 2 π 2 2(Λ 2 + y 2 v 2 ) ( 2 ln y 2 v 2 )] Λ 2 + y 2 v 2 δz φ = N Fy 2 [ ( 1 y 2 2π 2 4 ln v 2 + Λ 2 ) y 2 v 2 + 5Λ4 3Λ 2 y 2 v 2 ] 12(Λ 2 + y 2 v 2 ) 2. In the large N F limit, the fermion inverse propagator receives no radiative correction, G 1 ψψ (p) = p µγ µ + yv, so we identify the fermion mass as m T = yv. Because both δy and δz ψ vanish, we can substitutey 2 = Z φ y 2 0 Z φ = 1 + N Fy 2 0 8π 2 ln Λ2 m T For any finite bare Yukawa coupling y 0, the Higgs wavefunction renormalization factor Z φ vanishes logarithmically as the cutoff is removed, m T /Λ 0. This same logarithmic behavior will appear in all of the renormalized couplings, for any choice of bare couplings. Triviality: a finite cutoff must be kept to maintain non-zero interactions. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 12/37
17 Triviality: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model Explicitly, the renormalized Yukawa coupling is y 2 = y 2 0 Z φ = y N Fy 2 0 8π 2 ln Λ2 m T N 1 F Λ2 ln 8π2 m 2, as m T Λ 0. T For the renormalized Higgs coupling, we have λ = λ 0 Zφ 2 δλ = λ 0Zφ 2 + 3N Fy 4 m 2 T π 2 2(Λ 2 + m 2 T ) ln m 2 T Λ 2 + m 2 T Zφ 2 λ 0 + 3N Fy 4 0 π ln m2 T Λ 2 12 N 1 F Λ2 ln 8π2 m 2, as m T Λ 0. T Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 13/37
18 Triviality: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model The slow logarithmic vanishing of y and λ enables a relatively large separation of cutoff and physical scales and still maintain significant interactions. Such a theory can in some limited sense be considered physical, if the cutoff effects are sufficiently small. The ratio of the Higgs and fermion masses in the large N F is m 2 H m 2 T = λv2 3y 2 v 2 = λ 3y 2 4, as m T Λ 0. Although completely unphysical, we can also consider the limit m T /Λ 1, where the cutoff is much below the physical scale. From Equation, we see this gives δλ = 0, δz φ = 0, and hence Z φ 1. In this limit, the connection between bare and renormalized parameters is simply λ = λ 0, y = y 0. This result is not surprising: deep in the cutoff regime, we simply have the bare theory, with no separation into renormalized parameters and their counterterms. This will be relevant when we discuss the Landau pole and the vacuum instability. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 14/37
19 Renormalization Group flow: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model The physical properties of the theory, at finite cutoff Λ are fixed by the choice of a complete set of bare parameters. Using the explicit cutoff dependence of y and λ, we can calculate the Callan-Symanzik flow of the renormalized couplings inn the m T /Λ 1 limit β y (y, λ) = Λ dy2 dλ = y 2 N F y 2 0 Z 2 0 φ 4π 2 = N Fy 4 4π 2 β λ (y, λ) = Λ dλ dλ = 1 16π 2 [ 8NF λy N F y 4] This is exactly the same RG flow one would calculate in the large N F limit using e.g. dimensional regularization, where the cutoff simply does not appear and the renormalized couplings flow with the arbitrary renormalization scale µ. The overall signs of the β functions would be opposite: increasing Λ corresponds to decreasing µ). We should expect this: when the cutoff is far above the physical scales, the finite cutoff effects are negligible and we must reproduce the unique cutoff-independent β functions. However, as the cutoff is reduced and m T /Λ increases, this cannot continue to hold indefinitely, as the renormalized couplings must eventually flow to the bare ones! Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 15/37
20 Renormalization Group flow: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model Let us demonstrate an explicit example of the Callan-Symanzik RG flow. In the large N F limit, m T = yv = y 0 v 0. The bare vev is determined by the minimum of the bare effective potential U eff,0 = 1 2 m2 0 φ λ 0φ 4 0 2N F ln [ 1 + y 2 0 φ2 0 /k2]. k Using a hard-momentum cutoff, this gives m λ 0v 2 0 N Fy 2 0 2π Λ y2 0 v2 0 ln y 2 0 v2 0 Λ 2 + y 2 = 0. 0 v2 0 We express all dimensionful quantities in units of the cutoff Λ. We pick some fixed values for λ 0 and y 0. Varying the value of m 2 0 /Λ2 changes the solution v 0 /Λ of Equation and hence the ratio m T /Λ. As we said, choosing the values of the bare parameters completely determines everything in the theory. For example, to attain a very small value of m T /Λ requires m 2 0 /Λ to be precisely fine tuned! This is the origin of the so-called fine-tuning problem. The critical surface, where v 0 /Λ = 0, is the transition line m 2 0 Λ 2 N Fy 2 0 4π 2 = 0, with all counterterms and renormalized parameters expressed in terms of λ 0, y 0, m 2 0 and v 0. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 16/37
21 Renormalization Group flow: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model All of the counterterms and renormalized parameters can be expressed in terms of λ 0, y 0, m 2 0 and v 0. We make an arbitrary choice λ 0 = 0.1, y 0 = 0.7 and vary the value of m 2 0 /Λ2 to explore the range < m T /Λ < When the cutoff is high, the exact RG flow is exactly the same as if the cutoff had been completely removed and follows precisely the continuum form of Equation. However, as the cutoff is reduced, the exact RG flow eventually breaks away from the continuum form and reaches a plateau at the value of the bare coupling. running Higgs coupling (Holland,JK) Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 17/37
22 Renormalization Group flow: Large N F limit of Top-Higgs model All of the counterterms and renormalized parameters can be expressed in terms of λ 0, y 0, m 2 0 and v 0. We make an arbitrary choice λ 0 = 0.1, y 0 = 0.7 and vary the value of m 2 0 /Λ2 to explore the range < m T /Λ < When the cutoff is high, the exact RG flow is exactly the same as if the cutoff had been completely removed and follows precisely the continuum form of Equation. However, as the cutoff is reduced, the exact RG flow eventually breaks away from the continuum form and reaches a plateau at the value of the bare coupling. running Top coupling (Holland,JK) Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 18/37
23 Higgs Mass Upper Bound: 1-component Higgs field 1-component lattice φ 4 model is characterized by two bare parameters κ, λ with lattice action 4 S = 2κ φ(x)φ(x + ˆµ) + φ(x) 2 + λ(φ(x) 2 1) 2. x µ=1 There are two phases separated by a line of critical points κ = κ c (λ). For κ > κ c (λ) the symmetry is spontaneously broken and the bare field φ(x) has a non-vanishing expectation value v. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 19/37
24 Higgs Mass Upper Bound: 1-component Higgs field Study the vacuum expectation value and the connected two-point function G(x) = φ(x)φ(0) c = φ(x)φ(0) v 2. A renormalized mass m r and a field wave function renormalization constant Z r are defined through the behavior of Fourier transform of G(x) for small momenta: { G(k) 1 = Zr 1 m 2 r + k 2 + O(k 4 ) }. We also define the normalization constant associated with the canonical bare field through ˆ Z r = 2κZ r = 2κm 2 r χ. In the framework of perturbation theory correlation functions of the multiplicatively renormalized field φ r (x) = Zr 1/2 φ(x), have at all orders finite continuum limits after mass and coupling renormalization are taken into account. Correspondingly a renormalized vacuum expectation value is defined through v r = vzr 1/2. Finally a particular renormalized coupling is defined by g r 3m 2 r /v 2 r = 3m 4 r χ/v 2. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 20/37
25 Higgs Mass Upper Bound: 1-component Higgs field The renormalization group equations predict that the mass and vacuum expectation value go to zero according to m r τ 1/2 ln(τ) 1/6, v r τ 1/2 ln(τ) 1/3, for τ = κ/κ c 1 0, and correspondingly the renormalized coupling is predicted to go to zero logarithmically which is the expression of triviality. The critical behavior in the broken phase is conveniently expressed in terms of three integration constants C i, i = 1, 2, 3 appearing in the critical behaviors: m r = C 1 (β 1g r ) 17/27 e 1/β 1g r {1 + O(g r )}, β 1 = 3 16π 2, { Z r = C } g r 36 16π 2 + O(g2 r ), 1 κ κ c = 2 C 3 m2 r g 1/3 r {1 + O(g r )}. These constants were estimated by relating them to the corresponding constants C i in the symmetric phase. These in turn were computed by integrating the renormalization group equations with initial data on the line κ = 0.95κ c (λ) obtained from high temperature expansions. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 21/37
26 Higgs Mass Upper Bound: 1-component Higgs field One massive Higgs particle analytic results: Lüscher, Weisz lattice simulations: JK,Lin,Shen m R v 3.2 at am R = 0.5 How far can we lower the cutoff? Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 22/37
27 Higgs Mass Upper Bound: 4-component O(4) Higgs model One massive Higgs particle + 3 Goldstone particles analytic results: Lüscher, Weisz lattice simulations: JK,Lin,Shen m R v 2.6 at am R = 0.5 How far can we lower the cutoff? Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 23/37
28 Higgs Mass Upper Bound: 4-component O(4) Higgs model δ measures cutoff effects in Goldstone-Goldstone scattering Lüscher, Weisz Ad hoc and connected with lattice artifacts But threshold of new physics is in the continuum! What do we do when cutoff is low? Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 24/37
29 Higgs Physics and the Lattice Continuum Wilsonian RG UV Completion unknon new physics - Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 25/37
30 Higgs Physics and the Lattice Continuum Wilsonian RG UV Completion unknon new physics - Below new scale M integrated UV completion is represented by non-local L eff with all higher dimensional operators, 1 1 M 2 φ 2 φ, M 4 φ 3 φ, λ 6 M 2 φ6,... Propagator K(p2 /M 2 ) p 2 +M 2 with analytic K thins out UV completion with exponential damping - Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 25/37
31 Higgs Physics and the Lattice Continuum Wilsonian RG UV Completion unknon new physics - Below new scale M integrated UV completion is represented by non-local L eff with all higher dimensional operators, 1 1 M 2 φ 2 φ, M 4 φ 3 φ, λ 6 M 2 φ6,... Propagator K(p2 /M 2 ) p 2 +M 2 with analytic K thins out UV completion with exponential damping Āt the symmetry breaking scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 1 2 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Narrow definition of Standard Model: only relevant and marginal operators at scale M Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 25/37
32 Higgs Physics and the Lattice Continuum Wilsonian RG UV Completion unknon new physics - Below new scale M integrated UV completion is represented by non-local L eff with all higher dimensional operators, 1 1 M 2 φ 2 φ, M 4 φ 3 φ, λ 6 M 2 φ6,... Propagator K(p2 /M 2 ) p 2 +M 2 with analytic K thins out UV completion with exponential damping Āt the symmetry breaking scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 1 2 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Narrow definition of Standard Model: only relevant and marginal operators at scale M Lattice Wilsonian RG Regulate with lattice at scale Λ = π/a L lattice has all higher dimensional operators a 2 φ 2 φ, a 4 φ 4 φ, a 2 λ 6 φ 6,... Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 25/37
33 Higgs Physics and the Lattice Continuum Wilsonian RG UV Completion unknon new physics - Below new scale M integrated UV completion is represented by non-local L eff with all higher dimensional operators, 1 1 M 2 φ 2 φ, M 4 φ 3 φ, λ 6 M 2 φ6,... Propagator K(p2 /M 2 ) p 2 +M 2 with analytic K thins out UV completion with exponential damping Lattice Wilsonian RG Regulate with lattice at scale Λ = π/a L lattice has all higher dimensional operators a 2 φ 2 φ, a 4 φ 4 φ, a 2 λ 6 φ 6,... Āt the symmetry breaking scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 1 2 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Narrow definition of Standard Model: only relevant and marginal operators at scale M At the physical Higgs scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 1 2 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Choice of L lattice is irrelevant unless crossover phenomenon is required to insert intermidate M scale Two-scale problem for the lattice Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 25/37
34 Higgs Physics and the Lattice Continuum Wilsonian RG UV Completion unknon new physics - Below new scale M integrated UV completion is represented by non-local L eff with all higher dimensional operators, 1 1 M 2 φ 2 φ, M 4 φ 3 φ, λ 6 M 2 φ6,... Propagator K(p2 /M 2 ) p 2 +M 2 with analytic K thins out UV completion with exponential damping - At the symmetry breaking scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 2 1 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Narrow definition of Standard Model: only relevant and marginal operators at scale M Lattice Wilsonian RG Regulate with lattice at scale Λ = π/a L lattice has all higher dimensional operators a 2 φ 2 φ, a 4 φ 4 φ, a 2 λ 6 φ 6,... Scale M missing? At the physical Higgs scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 1 2 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Choice of L lattice is irrelevant unless crossover phenomenon is required to insert intermidate M scale Two-scale problem for the lattice Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 25/37
35 Higgs Physics and the Lattice Continuum Wilsonian RG UV Completion unknon new physics - Below new scale M integrated UV completion is represented by non-local L eff with all higher dimensional operators, 1 1 M 2 φ 2 φ, M 4 φ 3 φ, λ 6 M 2 φ6,... Propagator K(p2 /M 2 ) p 2 +M 2 with analytic K thins out UV completion with exponential damping - At the symmetry breaking scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 2 1 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Narrow definition of Standard Model: only relevant and marginal operators at scale M Lattice Wilsonian RG Regulate with lattice at scale Λ = π/a L lattice has all higher dimensional operators a 2 φ 2 φ, a 4 φ 4 φ, a 2 λ 6 φ 6,... Scale M missing? Possible to insert intermediate continuum scale M with L eff to include 1 1 M 2 φ 2 φ, M 4 φ 3 φ, λ 6 M 2 φ6,... to represent new degreese of freedom above M or, Lee-Wick and other UV completions which exist above scale M (not effective theories!) At the physical Higgs scale v = 250 GeV only relevant and marginal operators survive Only 1 2 m2 H φ2 and λφ 4 terms in V Higgs (φ), in addition to ( φ) 2 operator Choice of L lattice is irrelevant unless crossover phenomenon is required to insert intermidate M scale Two-scale problem for the lattice Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 25/37
36 Example for UV Completion: Higer derivative (Lee-Wick) Higgs sector Jansen,JK,Liu, Phys. Lett. B309 (1993) p.119 and p.127 (Model was recently reintroduced by Grinstein, O Connell, Wise in arxiv: ) Represent the Higgs doublet with four real components φ a which transform in the vector representation of O(4) and include new higher derivative terms in the kinetic part of the O(4) Higgs Lagrangian, L H = 1 2 µφ a µ φ a cos(2θ) M 2 φ a φ a + 1 2M 4 µφ a µ φ a V(φ a φ a ) The Higgs potential is V(φ a φ a ) = 1 2 µ2 φ a φ a + λ(φ a φ a ) 2. The higher derivative terms of the Lagrangian lead to complex conjugate ghost pairs in the spectrum of the Hamilton operator Complex conjugate pairs of energy eigenvalues and the related complex pole pairs in the propagator are parametrized by M = Me ±iθ. Choice Θ = π/4 simplifies. The absolute value M of the complex ghost mass M will be set on the TeV scale Unitary S-matrix, macroscopic causality, Lorent invariance? λ > 0 asymptotically! Vacuum instability? Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 26/37
37 Example for UV Completion: Gauged Lee-Wick extension Higher derivative Yang-Mills gauge Lagrangian for the SU(2) L U(1) weak gauge fields W µ, B µ follows similar construction with covariant derivative D ab µ = δ ab µ + gf abc W c µ, L W = 1 4 Ga µνg aµν 1 4M 4 D2 G a µνd 2 G aµν, L W is superrenormalizable but not finite. Full gauged Higgs sector is described by the Lagrangian L = L W + L B + L Higgs, L Higgs = (D µ Φ) D µ Φ + 1 2M 4 (D µd DΦ) (D µ D DΦ) V(Φ Φ) Gauge-covariant derivative is D µ Φ = ( µ + i g 2 σ W µ + i g 2 B µ) Φ. Similar fermion construction: L fermion = iψ D Ψ + SM particle content is doubled Logarithmic divergences only i 2M 4 Ψ D 2 D D 2 Ψ. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 27/37
38 Higher derivative β-function and RG: Liu s Thesis (1994) β function: Lee-Wick UV Completion Higher derivative Higgs sector is finite field theory Mass dependent β(t)-function vanishes asymptotically Grows logarithmically in gauged Higgs sector running Higgs coupling: Running Higgs coupling λ(t) freezes asymptotically The fixed line of allowed Higgs couplings must be positive! Vacuum instability? Higgs mass lower bound from λ( ) > 0 Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 28/37
39 S-matrix, Unitarity, and Causality: Lee-Wick UV Completion Liu,Jansen,JK Nucl.Phys. B34 (1994) p.635 cross section phase shift Equivalence theorem, Goldstone scattering Higgs mass upper bound relaxed m H =1 TeV, or higher, but ρ-parameter and other Electroweak precision? Phase shift reveals ghost, microscopic time advancement, only π/2 jump in phase shift m H =1 TeV, M = 3.6 TeV v/m=0.07, m H /M = 0.28 What about the ρ-parameter? Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 29/37
40 The ρ-parameter ρ = m 2 W m 2 Z cos2 θ W = 1 + Z(+) Z ( 0) cosθ W is determined independently in high precision lepton processes. The 1-loop vacuum polarization operator will shift the physical pole locations for the weak gauge bosons: Π H W ρ 1 Higgs = MW,tree 2 ΠH Z MZ,tree 2 = 3 d 4 k Σ H (k 2 ) 4 g 2 k 2 <Λ 2 (2π) 4 (k 2 + MW,tree 2 )(k2 + MZ,tree 2 )(k2 + Σ 2 H (k2 )) Heavy Higgs with acceptable ρ-parameter would be a broad resonace How to calculate Higgs resonance on the lattice? Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 30/37
41 Higgs resonance: Finite width in finite volume? Energy spectrum of two-particle states in a finite box with periodic boundary conditions = elastic scattering phase shifts in infinite volume Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 31/37
42 Higgs resonance: Finite width in finite volume? Energy spectrum of two-particle states in a finite box with periodic boundary conditions = elastic scattering phase shifts in infinite volume Two-particle energy levels are calculable by Monte Carlo techniques = extract phase shifts from numerical simulations on finite lattices Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 31/37
43 Higgs resonance: Finite width in finite volume? Energy spectrum of two-particle states in a finite box with periodic boundary conditions = elastic scattering phase shifts in infinite volume Two-particle energy levels are calculable by Monte Carlo techniques = extract phase shifts from numerical simulations on finite lattices Infinite bare λ limit = 4-dimensional O(4) non-linear σ-model in broken phase with unstable Higgs particle Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 31/37
44 Higgs resonance: Finite width in finite volume? Energy spectrum of two-particle states in a finite box with periodic boundary conditions = elastic scattering phase shifts in infinite volume Two-particle energy levels are calculable by Monte Carlo techniques = extract phase shifts from numerical simulations on finite lattices Infinite bare λ limit = 4-dimensional O(4) non-linear σ-model in broken phase with unstable Higgs particle Small Goldstone mass is required by the method = add external source term to the lattice action of the 4-dimensional O(4) non-linear σ-model: 4 S = 2κ φ α x φ α x+ˆµ + J φ 4 x x µ=1 x The scalar field is represented as a four component vector φ α x of unit length: φ α x φ α x = 1 Two Goldstone bosons ( pions ) of mass m π with zero total momentum in a cubic box of size L 3 in the elastic region are characterised by centre-of-mass energies W or momenta k defined through W = 2 m 2 π + k 2, k = k with W and k in the ranges: 2m π < W < 4m π 0 < k/m π < 3 They are classified according to irreducible representations of the cubic group. Their discrete energy spectrum W j, j = 0, 1, 2,..., is related to the scattering phase shifts δ l with angular momenta l which are allowed by the cubic symmetry of the states Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 31/37
45 Higgs resonance: Finite width in finite volume? In the subspace of cubically invariant states only angular momenta l = 0, 4, 6,... contribute. Due to the short-range interaction it seems reasonable to neglect all l 0. Then an energy value W j belongs to the two-particle spectrum, if the corresponding momentum k j = (W j /2) 2 m 2 π is a solution of ( ) kj L δ 0 (k j ) = φ + jπ 2π The continuous function φ(q) is given by qπ 3/2 tan ( φ(q)) = Z 00 (1, q 2 ), φ(0) = 0 with Z 00 (1, q 2 ) defined by analytic continuation of Z 00 (s, q 2 ) = 1 4π n Z 3 ( n 2 q 2) s. This result holds only for 0<q 2 <9, which is fulfilled in our simulations, and provided finite volume polarisation effects and scaling violations are negligible In our Monte-Carlo investigation we calculate the momenta k j corresponding to the two-particle energy spectrum W j for a given size L, and can then read off the scattering phaseshift δ 0 (k j ) from its defining equation In order to scan the momentum dependence of the phase shift we have to vary the spatial extent L of the lattice Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 32/37
46 Higgs resonance: Finite width in finite volume? The two-particle states in our model are also classified according to the remaining O(3)-symmetry: They have isospin 0, 1, 2. Since we expect the σ-resonance to be in the isospin-0 channel, we restrict ourselves to that case. Operator O 0 (t) = Φ 4 0 =,t L 3 x Φ 4 for σ-field at zero momentum is included x,t Two-particle correlation matrix function C ij (t) = ( O i (t) O i (t + 1) ) O j (0) i, j = 0, 1, 2,... Eigenvalues decaying as exp( W i t) The set of states is truncated at finite i=r to keep W r below inelastic threshold J m =2m =3m =4m Lines of constant ratios m σ /m π and m π L (dotted line) Reflection multi-cluster algorithm for finite external source J Set of 3 κ, J configurations with middle point κ = 0.315, J = 0.01 tuned to keep σ-mass in elastic region Cylindrical lattices L 3 T up to sizes of , c Figure 3: Lines of constant mass ratios m=m and ml in the -J plane derived with the Julius help of Kuti, theuniversity scaling laws of California of ref. at [22]. San The Diegosolid lineint represents Summer School the ratio on Lattice m=m QCD = 3. andour its applications choice Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 33/37
47 Higgs resonance: Finite width in finite volume? The pion mass m π can be measured by a fit to the inverse propagator in four-dimensional momentum space: G 1 aa (p, p) = Zπ 1 {m 2 π + ˆp 2 }, a = 1, 2, 3 For perturbation theory checks we also want m σ and λ R, λ R = 3Z π m 2 σ m 2 π Σ 2 where Σ is the infinite volume σ field expectation value Two-parameter fit to the inverse σ and π propagators in momentum space lattice at κ = 0.315, J = 0.01 [G 44(p;?p)]?1 and [G aa(p;?p)]?1 The negative intercept and slope of the inverse Goldstone propagator G 1 aa (p, p) determine the propagator mass m π The negative intercept and slope of the inverse σ propagator G 1 44 (p, p) determine the propagator mass m σ for the Higgs particle bp 2 Figure Julius Kuti, University 5: of California The upper at San (lower) Diego curve INT shows Summer a two-parameter School on Lattice t QCD to and the its inverse applications () Seattle, propagator August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 34/37
48 Higgs resonance: Two-particle states W m Comparison of simulation results (crosses) with perturbative prediction in isospin 0 channel at κ = 0.315, J = 0.01 Solid lines depict perturbative prediction (dashed lines perturbative estimates based on propagator masses) Dotted lines represent free pion pairs The location of the resonance energy m σ is indicated by dotted horizontal line at W 3m π m L Figure 8: Comparison of the Monte Carlo results (crosses) with the perturbatively predicted two-particle energy spectrum in the isospin-0 channel for the simulation point ( = 0:315, J =0:01). The data are in excellent agreement with the perturbative predictions (solid lines) based on the results of table 11. Dotted lines refer to the free energy spectrum, while the dashed lines show the perturbative spectrum based on the estimates of table 4. The location of the resonance energy m is symbolized by the dotted horizontal line at W 3m. { Errors are smaller than the symbols. Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 35/37
49 Higgs resonance: Phase shift in perturbation theory 1. We will use the linear model for the phase shift calculation S[φ; j, m 2 ] = d 4 x [ 1 2 µφ α µ φ α m2 φ α φ α + λ 4! (φα φ α ) 2 jφ N] with α = 1,..., N and N = 4 in our case. The mass parameter m 2 is negative in broken phase 2. Pions have isospin index a=1,...n-1 (single pion state isospin is I=1 for N=4) Two-particle state decomposes into I=0,1,2 irreducible representations Partial wave decomposition T I = 16πW k (2l + 1)P l (cosϑ)tl I l=0 Bose symmetry requires tl I = 0 if I+l is odd ( ) tl I = 1 2i e 2iδI l 1 with real phase shifts δ I l in elastic region 2m π < W < 4m π 3. Leading perturbative result: δ 0 0 = λ R N 1 48π δ 2 0 = k W λ R m 2 σ m 2 π 96π kw ( 1 m2 σ m 2 π m 2 σ W ( 1 + m2 σ 2k 2 ) ln ) + δ 2 0 ( 4k 2 + m 2 σ m 2 σ ) λ R m 2 σ m 2 π 48π kw Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 36/37
50 Higgs resonance: Phase shift Göckeler et al. 0 0 am σ = 0.72 m σ = 3.07 m π Γ σ = 0.18 m σ k=m Agreement with perturbation theory igure 15: Comparison of the t with respect to the perturbative ansatz (3.6) (solid curve) nd the perturbative prediction based on the estimates ~m and ~g R of table 4 (dashed curve) n the isospin-0 channel for (=0:315, J =0:01). Julius Kuti, University of California at San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007, Lecture 2: Triviality and Higgs Mass Upper Bound 37/37
Higgs Physics from the Lattice Lecture 1: Standard Model Higgs Physics
Higgs Physics from the Lattice Lecture 1: Standard Model Higgs Physics Julius Kuti University of California, San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August 8-28, 2007 Julius
More informationHiggs Physics from the Lattice Lecture 3: Vacuum Instability and Higgs Mass Lower Bound
Higgs Physics from the Lattice Lecture 3: Vacuum Instability and Higgs Mass Lower Bound Julius Kuti University of California, San Diego INT Summer School on Lattice QCD and its applications Seattle, August
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory I Contact: Michael Kachelrieß, tel. 99890701 Allowed tools: mathematical tables Some formulas can be found on p.2. 1. Concepts.
More informationTheory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)
Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII June 4) At the head of your report, please write your name, student ID number and a list of problems that you worked on in a report like II-1, II-3, IV- ).
More informationA Renormalization Group Primer
A Renormalization Group Primer Physics 295 2010. Independent Study. Topics in Quantum Field Theory Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz May 2010 Introduction: Some Simple
More informationRegularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Regularization Physics 3A, Spring 7, Hitoshi Murayama Introduction In quantum field theories, we encounter many apparent divergences. Of course all physical quantities are finite, and therefore divergences
More informationRG flow of the Higgs potential. Holger Gies
RG flow of the Higgs potential Holger Gies Helmholtz Institute Jena & Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena & C. Gneiting, R. Sondenheimer, PRD 89 (2014) 045012, [arxiv:1308.5075], & S. Rechenberger, M.M.
More informationNTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk
FY3464 Quantum Field Theory II Final exam 0..0 NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk Examination for FY3464 Quantum Field Theory II Contact: Kåre Olaussen, tel. 735 9365/4543770 Allowed tools: mathematical
More informationVacuum Energy and Effective Potentials
Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials Quantum field theories have badly divergent vacuum energies. In perturbation theory, the leading term is the net zero-point energy E zeropoint = particle species
More informationNon-perturbative Study of Chiral Phase Transition
Non-perturbative Study of Chiral Phase Transition Ana Juričić Advisor: Bernd-Jochen Schaefer University of Graz Graz, January 9, 2013 Table of Contents Chiral Phase Transition in Low Energy QCD Renormalization
More informationRG flow of the Higgs potential. Holger Gies
RG flow of the Higgs potential Holger Gies Helmholtz Institute Jena & Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena & C. Gneiting, R. Sondenheimer, PRD 89 (2014) 045012, [arxiv:1308.5075], & S. Rechenberger, M.M.
More informationSolutions to gauge hierarchy problem. SS 10, Uli Haisch
Solutions to gauge hierarchy problem SS 10, Uli Haisch 1 Quantum instability of Higgs mass So far we considered only at RGE of Higgs quartic coupling (dimensionless parameter). Higgs mass has a totally
More informationEffective Field Theory
Effective Field Theory Iain Stewart MIT The 19 th Taiwan Spring School on Particles and Fields April, 2006 Physics compartmentalized Quantum Field Theory String Theory? General Relativity short distance
More informationA model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:
I. THE STANDARD MODEL A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:. The symmetries of the Lagrangian; 2. The representations of fermions
More information10 Thermal field theory
0 Thermal field theory 0. Overview Introduction The Green functions we have considered so far were all defined as expectation value of products of fields in a pure state, the vacuum in the absence of real
More informationRG flow of the Higgs potential. Holger Gies
RG flow of the Higgs potential Holger Gies Helmholtz Institute Jena & TPI, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena & C. Gneiting, R. Sondenheimer, PRD 89 (2014) 045012, [arxiv:1308.5075], & S. Rechenberger,
More information8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II
8.3 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 010 Lecture Firstly, we will summarize our previous results. We start with a bare Lagrangian, L [ 0, ϕ] = g (0)
More informationInverse square potential, scale anomaly, and complex extension
Inverse square potential, scale anomaly, and complex extension Sergej Moroz Seattle, February 2010 Work in collaboration with Richard Schmidt ITP, Heidelberg Outline Introduction and motivation Functional
More informationTextbook Problem 4.2: We begin by developing Feynman rules for the theory at hand. The Hamiltonian clearly decomposes into Ĥ = Ĥ0 + ˆV where
PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #11. Textbook Problem 4.2: We begin by developing Feynman rules for the theory at hand. The Hamiltonian clearly decomposes into Ĥ = Ĥ0 + ˆV where Ĥ 0 = Ĥfree Φ + Ĥfree
More informationPrecision (B)SM Higgs future colliders
Flavor and top physics @ 100 TeV Workshop, IHEP/CAS, MARCH 5, 2015 Seung J. Lee (KAIST) Precision (B)SM Higgs Studies @ future colliders 1. Study of SM Higgs boson partial widths and branching fractions
More informationQuantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University
Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model MATTHEW D. Harvard University SCHWARTZ!H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS t Contents v Preface page xv Part I Field theory 1 1 Microscopic theory of radiation 3 1.1
More informationHiggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I
iggs Boson Phenomenology Lecture I Laura Reina TASI 2011, CU-Boulder, June 2011 Outline of Lecture I Understanding the Electroweak Symmetry Breaking as a first step towards a more fundamental theory of
More informationParticle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet
Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet Five out of these 16 questions will be given to you at the beginning of the exam. (1) (a) Which are the different fundamental interactions that exist in Nature?
More informationFinite Temperature Field Theory
Finite Temperature Field Theory Dietrich Bödeker, Universität Bielefeld 1. Thermodynamics (better: thermo-statics) (a) Imaginary time formalism (b) free energy: scalar particles, resummation i. pedestrian
More informationIntroduction to Renormalization Group
Introduction to Renormalization Group Alex Kovner University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT Valparaiso, December 12-14, 2013 Alex Kovner (UConn) Introduction to Renormalization Group December 12-14, 2013 1
More informationThe Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle
The Higgs Mechanism and the Higgs Particle Heavy-Ion Seminar... or the Anderson-Higgs-Brout-Englert-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble Mechanism Philip W. Anderson Peter W. Higgs Tom W. B. Gerald Carl R. François Robert
More informationDonoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6
1 Week 7: Non linear sigma models and pion lagrangians Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter 9.3 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6 Weinberg, Chap. 19 1 Goldstone boson lagrangians
More informationStandard Model & Beyond
XI SERC School on Experimental High-Energy Physics National Institute of Science Education and Research 13 th November 2017 Standard Model & Beyond Lecture III Sreerup Raychaudhuri TIFR, Mumbai 2 Fermions
More informationMonte Carlo Calculation of Phase Shift in Four Dimensional O(4) φ 4 Theory
arxiv:hep-lat/9207028v1 26 Jul 1992 Monte Carlo Calculation of Phase Shift in Four Dimensional O(4) φ 4 Theory Jun Nishimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan 26 July
More informationAnalytical study of Yang-Mills theory from first principles by a massive expansion
Analytical study of Yang-Mills theory from first principles by a massive expansion Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Catania, Italy Infrared QCD APC, Paris Diderot University, 8-10 November
More informationREVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,
More informationQuantum Field Theory II
Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,
More informationIntroduction to particle physics Lecture 6
Introduction to particle physics Lecture 6 Frank Krauss IPPP Durham U Durham, Epiphany term 2009 Outline 1 Fermi s theory, once more 2 From effective to full theory: Weak gauge bosons 3 Massive gauge bosons:
More informationLecture 12 Holomorphy: Gauge Theory
Lecture 12 Holomorphy: Gauge Theory Outline SUSY Yang-Mills theory as a chiral theory: the holomorphic coupling and the holomorphic scale. Nonrenormalization theorem for SUSY YM: the gauge coupling runs
More informationQFT Dimensional Analysis
QFT Dimensional Analysis In h = c = 1 units, all quantities are measured in units of energy to some power. For example m = p µ = E +1 while x µ = E 1 where m stands for the dimensionality of the mass rather
More informationPhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 2017/2018
July 10, 017 SISSA Entrance Examination PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 017/018 S olve two among the four problems presented. Problem I Consider a quantum harmonic oscillator in one spatial
More informationAn introduction to lattice field theory
An introduction to lattice field theory, TIFR, Mumbai, India CBM School, Darjeeling 21 23 January, 2014 1 The path integral formulation 2 Field theory, divergences, renormalization 3 Example 1: the central
More informationThe Physics Of Yang-Mills-Higgs Systems
The Physics Of Yang-Mills-Higgs Systems Beyond Perturbation Theory Axel Maas 9 th of January 2014 University of Heidelberg Germany Overview Yang-Mills-Higgs theory Overview Yang-Mills-Higgs theory Physical
More informationRenormalization Group Study of the Chiral Phase Transition
Renormalization Group Study of the Chiral Phase Transition Ana Juričić, Bernd-Jochen Schaefer University of Graz Graz, May 23, 2013 Table of Contents 1 Proper Time Renormalization Group 2 Quark-Meson Model
More informationThe Minimal Lee-Wick Standard Model
The Minimal Lee-Wick Standard Model Richard Lebed West Coast LHC Theory Meeting UCLA, November 2008 Work performed with Chris Carone, College of William & Mary Physics Letters B668, 221 (2008) Outline
More informationReφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f
I. THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM A. Quadratic divergence We illustrate the problem of the quadratic divergence in the Higgs sector of the SM through an explicit calculation. The example studied is that of the
More information+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2
I. THE HIGGS POTENTIAL AND THE LIGHT HIGGS BOSON In the previous chapter, it was demonstrated that a negative mass squared in the Higgs potential is generated radiatively for a large range of boundary
More informationStrongly coupled gauge theories: What can lattice calculations teach us?
Strongly coupled gauge theories: What can lattice calculations teach us? Anna Hasenfratz University of Colorado Boulder Rencontres de Moriond, March 21 216 Higgs era of particle physics The 212 discovery
More informationLight-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics
Light-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics David G. Robertson Department of Physics, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 Abstract Light-cone quantization of (3+1)-dimensional electrodynamics is
More informationWilsonian and large N theories of quantum critical metals. Srinivas Raghu (Stanford)
Wilsonian and large N theories of quantum critical metals Srinivas Raghu (Stanford) Collaborators and References R. Mahajan, D. Ramirez, S. Kachru, and SR, PRB 88, 115116 (2013). A. Liam Fitzpatrick, S.
More informationQFT Dimensional Analysis
QFT Dimensional Analysis In the h = c = 1 units, all quantities are measured in units of energy to some power. For example m = p µ = E +1 while x µ = E 1 where m stands for the dimensionality of the mass
More informationReview of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10
Review of scalar field theory Srednicki 5, 9, 10 2 The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate
More informationThe mass of the Higgs boson
The mass of the Higgs boson LHC : Higgs particle observation CMS 2011/12 ATLAS 2011/12 a prediction Higgs boson found standard model Higgs boson T.Plehn, M.Rauch Spontaneous symmetry breaking confirmed
More informationSimplified models in collider searches for dark matter. Stefan Vogl
Simplified models in collider searches for dark matter Stefan Vogl Outline Introduction/Motivation Simplified Models for the LHC A word of caution Conclusion How to look for dark matter at the LHC? experimentally
More informationHigher dimensional operators. in supersymmetry
I. Antoniadis CERN Higher dimensional operators in supersymmetry with E. Dudas, D. Ghilencea, P. Tziveloglou Planck 2008, Barcelona Outline Effective operators from new physics integrating out heavy states
More informationAnomaly and gaugino mediation
Anomaly and gaugino mediation Supergravity mediation X is in the hidden sector, P l suppressed couplings SUSY breaking VEV W = ( W hid (X) + W vis ) (ψ) f = δj i ci j X X ψ j e V ψ 2 i +... Pl τ = θ Y
More informationLectures on Chiral Perturbation Theory
Lectures on Chiral Perturbation Theory I. Foundations II. Lattice Applications III. Baryons IV. Convergence Brian Tiburzi RIKEN BNL Research Center Chiral Perturbation Theory I. Foundations Low-energy
More informationThe Affleck Dine Seiberg superpotential
The Affleck Dine Seiberg superpotential SUSY QCD Symmetry SUN) with F flavors where F < N SUN) SUF ) SUF ) U1) U1) R Φ, Q 1 1 F N F Φ, Q 1-1 F N F Recall that the auxiliary D a fields: D a = gφ jn T a
More informationTheory toolbox. Chapter Chiral effective field theories
Chapter 3 Theory toolbox 3.1 Chiral effective field theories The near chiral symmetry of the QCD Lagrangian and its spontaneous breaking can be exploited to construct low-energy effective theories of QCD
More informationSTANDARD MODEL and BEYOND: SUCCESSES and FAILURES of QFT. (Two lectures)
STANDARD MODEL and BEYOND: SUCCESSES and FAILURES of QFT (Two lectures) Lecture 1: Mass scales in particle physics - naturalness in QFT Lecture 2: Renormalisable or non-renormalisable effective electroweak
More informationThe 1/N expansion method in quantum field theory
III d International School Symmetry in Integrable Systems and Nuclear Physics Tsakhkadzor, Armenia, 3-13 July 2013 The 1/N expansion method in quantum field theory Hagop Sazdjian IPN, Université Paris-Sud,
More informationDefining Chiral Gauge Theories Beyond Perturbation Theory
Defining Chiral Gauge Theories Beyond Perturbation Theory Lattice Regulating Chiral Gauge Theories Dorota M Grabowska UC Berkeley Work done with David B. Kaplan: Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016), no. 21 211602
More informationTriplet Higgs Scenarios
Triplet Higgs Scenarios Jack Gunion U.C. Davis Grenoble Higgs Workshop, March 2, 203 Higgs-like LHC Signal Fits with MVA CMS suggest we are heading towards the SM, but it could simply be a decoupling limit
More informationLandau s Fermi Liquid Theory
Thors Hans Hansson Stockholm University Outline 1 Fermi Liquids Why, What, and How? Why Fermi liquids? What is a Fermi liquids? Fermi Liquids How? 2 Landau s Phenomenological Approach The free Fermi gas
More informationLoop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51
Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51 Similarly, the exact Dirac propagator can be written as: Let s consider the theory of a pseudoscalar field and a Dirac field: the only couplings allowed
More informationJuly 2, SISSA Entrance Examination. PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 2018/2019. olve two among the three problems presented.
July, 018 SISSA Entrance Examination PhD in Theoretical Particle Physics Academic Year 018/019 S olve two among the three problems presented. Problem I Consider a theory described by the Lagrangian density
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 10 Oct 1995
UCL-IPT-95-16 Symmetry breaking induced by top quark loops from a model without scalar mass. arxiv:hep-ph/9510266v1 10 Oct 1995 T. Hambye Institut de Physique Théorique UCL B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
More informationStandard Model with Four Generations and Multiple Higgs Doublets
RGE,SDE,SM4 p. 1/2 Standard Model with Four Generations and Multiple Higgs Doublets 1st IAS-CERN School Jan 26th, 2012, Singapore Chi Xiong Institute of Advanced Studies Nanyang Technological University
More informationUniversal behaviour of four-boson systems from a functional renormalisation group
Universal behaviour of four-boson systems from a functional renormalisation group Michael C Birse The University of Manchester Results from: Jaramillo Avila and Birse, arxiv:1304.5454 Schmidt and Moroz,
More informationQCD in the light quark (up & down) sector (QCD-light) has two mass scales M(GeV)
QCD in the light quark (up & down) sector (QCD-light) has two mass scales M(GeV) 1 m N m ρ Λ QCD 0 m π m u,d In a generic physical system, there are often many scales involved. However, for a specific
More informationGoldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD
Goldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz May 2011 Before reading this handout, carefully read Peskin and Schroeder s
More informationLecture III: Higgs Mechanism
ecture III: Higgs Mechanism Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking The Higgs Mechanism Mass Generation for eptons Quark Masses & Mixing III.1 Symmetry Breaking One example is the infinite ferromagnet the nearest
More informationSymmetries in Effective Field Theory
Symmetries in Effective Field Theory Sourendu Gupta SERC Main School 2014, BITS Pilani Goa, India Effective Field Theories December, 2014 Outline Outline Symmetries in EFTs Softly broken symmetries in
More information21 Renormalization group
Renormalization group. Renormalization and interpolation Probably because they describe point particles, quantum field theories are divergent. Unknown physics at very short distance scales, removes these
More informationSM, EWSB & Higgs. MITP Summer School 2017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders. Homework & Exercises
SM, EWSB & Higgs MITP Summer School 017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders Homework & Exercises Ch!"ophe Grojean Ch!"ophe Grojean DESY (Hamburg) Humboldt University (Berlin) ( christophe.grojean@desy.de
More informationRenormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems
Renormalization group methods in nuclear few- and many-body problems Lecture 2 S.K. Bogner (NSCL/MSU) 2011 National Nuclear Physics Summer School University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lecture 2 outline
More informationWeek 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books
Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books Burgess-Moore, Chapter Weiberg, Chapter 5 Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 1, 1 Free field Lagrangians
More informationHunting New Physics in the Higgs Sector
HS Hunting New Physics in the Higgs Sector SM Higgs Sector - Test of the Higgs Mechanism Oleg Kaikov KIT, Seminar WS 2015/16 Prof. Dr. M. Margarete Mühlleitner, Dr. Roger Wolf, Dr. Hendrik Mantler Advisor:
More informationVacuum stability and the mass of the Higgs boson. Holger Gies
Vacuum stability and the mass of the Higgs boson Holger Gies Helmholtz Institute Jena & TPI, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena & C. Gneiting, R. Sondenheimer, PRD 89 (2014) 045012, [arxiv:1308.5075],
More informationCritical exponents in quantum Einstein gravity
Critical exponents in quantum Einstein gravity Sándor Nagy Department of Theoretical physics, University of Debrecen MTA-DE Particle Physics Research Group, Debrecen Leibnitz, 28 June Critical exponents
More informationElectroweak physics and the LHC an introduction to the Standard Model
Electroweak physics and the LHC an introduction to the Standard Model Paolo Gambino INFN Torino LHC School Martignano 12-18 June 2006 Outline Prologue on weak interactions Express review of gauge theories
More informationDR.RUPNATHJI( DR.RUPAK NATH )
11 Perturbation Theory and Feynman Diagrams We now turn our attention to interacting quantum field theories. All of the results that we will derive in this section apply equally to both relativistic and
More informationFinite-temperature Field Theory
Finite-temperature Field Theory Aleksi Vuorinen CERN Initial Conditions in Heavy Ion Collisions Goa, India, September 2008 Outline Further tools for equilibrium thermodynamics Gauge symmetry Faddeev-Popov
More informationGauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised
Outline Gauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised Giuliano Panico ISAS-SISSA Trieste, Italy The 14th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions Irvine,
More informationQED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014
QED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014 Joel Goldstein University of Bristol Joel.Goldstein@bristol.ac.uk These lectures are designed to give an introduction to the gauge theories of the standard model
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Mar 2017
Flavon-induced lepton flavour violation arxiv:1703.05579v1 hep-ph] 16 Mar 017 Venus Keus Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki,
More informationHiggs Signals and Implications for MSSM
Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM Shaaban Khalil Center for Theoretical Physics Zewail City of Science and Technology SM Higgs at the LHC In the SM there is a single neutral Higgs boson, a weak isospin
More informationLecture II: Owe Philipsen. The ideal gas on the lattice. QCD in the static and chiral limit. The strong coupling expansion at finite temperature
Lattice QCD, Hadron Structure and Hadronic Matter Dubna, August/September 2014 Lecture II: Owe Philipsen The ideal gas on the lattice QCD in the static and chiral limit The strong coupling expansion at
More informationThe Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology
The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology Juan Rojo STFC Rutherford Fellow University of Oxford Theoretical Physics Graduate School course Lecture 2: The QCD Lagrangian, Symmetries and Feynman Rules
More informationTwin Higgs Theories. Z. Chacko, University of Arizona. H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez
Twin Higgs Theories Z. Chacko, University of Arizona H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez Precision electroweak data are in excellent agreement with the Standard Model with a Higgs mass
More informationDynamic Instability of the Standard Model and the Fine-Tuning Problem. Ervin Goldfain
Dynamic Instability of the Standard Model and the Fine-Tuning Problem Ervin Goldfain Photonics CoE, Welch Allyn Inc., Skaneateles Falls, NY 13153, USA Email: ervingoldfain@gmail.com Abstract The Standard
More informationFinite Size Scaling of the Higgs-Yukawa Model near the Gaussian Fixed Point
DESY 16-07 Finite Size Scaling of the Higgs-Yukawa Model near the Gaussian Fixed oint National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan E-mail: ren107.ep99@g.nctu.edu.tw Karl Jansen NIC, DESY Zeuthen, Germany
More informationLecture 7 SUSY breaking
Lecture 7 SUSY breaking Outline Spontaneous SUSY breaking in the WZ-model. The goldstino. Goldstino couplings. The goldstino theorem. Reading: Terning 5.1, 5.3-5.4. Spontaneous SUSY Breaking Reminder:
More informationWho is afraid of quadratic divergences? (Hierarchy problem) & Why is the Higgs mass 125 GeV? (Stability of Higgs potential)
Who is afraid of quadratic divergences? (Hierarchy problem) & Why is the Higgs mass 125 GeV? (Stability of Higgs potential) Satoshi Iso (KEK, Sokendai) Based on collaborations with H.Aoki (Saga) arxiv:1201.0857
More informationTowards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group
Towards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group Anthony W. H. Preston University of Southampton Supervised by Prof. Tim R. Morris Talk prepared for UK QFT-V, University of Nottingham,
More informationIntroduction to the Standard Model New Horizons in Lattice Field Theory IIP Natal, March 2013
Introduction to the Standard Model New Horizons in Lattice Field Theory IIP Natal, March 2013 Rogerio Rosenfeld IFT-UNESP Lecture 1: Motivation/QFT/Gauge Symmetries/QED/QCD Lecture 2: QCD tests/electroweak
More informationMesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects at finite baryon density
Mesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects at finite baryon density Research Center for Nuclear Physics Osaka University Workshop on Strangeness and charm in hadrons and dense matter Yukawa Institute for
More informationAnalytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations
Analytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations Stefan Flörchinger (CERN) Aachen, 07.03.2012 Short outline Quantum effective action and its analytic continuation Functional renormalization
More informationSymmetries in Effective Field Theory
Symmetries in Effective Field Theory Sourendu Gupta Mini School 2016, IACS Kolkata, India Effective Field Theories 29 February 4 March, 2016 Outline Outline Symmetries in EFTs Softly broken symmetries
More informationAnomaly. Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa. College de France, 14 February 2006
Anomaly Kenichi KONISHI University of Pisa College de France, 14 February 2006 Abstract Symmetry and quantization U A (1) anomaly and π 0 decay Origin of anomalies Chiral and nonabelian anomaly Anomally
More informationGauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov
Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov March 9, 2017 Work with Georgios Karananas, 1703.02964 Heidelberg, March 9, 2017 p. 1 Outline Motivation Gauge coupling unification without
More informationΦ 4 theory on the lattice
Φ 4 theory on the lattice Max Jansen, Kilian Nickel March 2011 Contents 1 Motivation 1 2 Theory 1 2.1 Path integral........................................ 1 2.2 Renormalization......................................
More information752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian
752 Final April 16, 2010 Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The standard model Lagrangian L SM = L Y M + L W D + L Y u + L H The rst term, the Yang Mills
More informationMichael CREUTZ Physics Department 510A, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
with η condensation Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 66-85, Japan E-mail: saoki@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp Michael CREUTZ Physics Department
More informationBasics of Higgs Physics
Basics of iggs Physics Sven einemeyer, IFCA (Santander) Karlsruhe, 07/2007 1. The iggs Boson in the SM 2. The iggs Boson in the MSSM Sven einemeyer Basics of iggs Physics presusy07 (Karlsruhe) 23.07.2007
More information